Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
M2011-0023
HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-3044 / Fax (949) 723-0589 HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Remove existing dock and replace with new wood framed dock structure using wood decking. Install new wood gangways. Existing gangway latform to remain in place. No seawall or landside work to be performed. Address number must be stenciled on at least 1 bayward facing pile. Pier conditions must be signed by applicant prior to final approval. Property Address: 1801 West Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA Legal Description: Harbor Permit Number: 129-1801 Plan Check Number: N/A Applicant: Orange Coast College Applicant's Mailing Address: 1801 West Coast Hwy. , Newport Beach, CA 92663 Phone Number: 949-581-2888- CAA Planning I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including: 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. page 1 of 2 And find p They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Municipal Code, Title 17 and any applicable specific or precise plans or, ❑ That a variance of exception has been approved and final. A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated. Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Municipal Code or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or the design of a project located thereon, this Approval In Concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of this said ordinance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development: 'X Has been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt. ❑ Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy attached). ❑ Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached). All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a harbor permit and a building permit have been given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed. This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport Beach. See attached Special Conditions. Lisa Walters, Harbor Resou December 12, 2014 Attachments: Worksheet for Building Permit Application Drawing Page 2 of 2 Check Appropriate Box for Applicant/Notification Information [' 3. Owner's Name Last Orange Coast College First Owner's Address Owner's E-mail Address C'q ub .0 1801 W. Coast Highway brad@occsailing.com City Newport Beach State CA Zip 92663 Telephone 949/631-3121 4. Architect/Designer's Name Last Next Step Design, Inc. First Lic. No. Architect/Designer's Address Architect/Designer's E-mail Address 26170 Enterprise Way, Suite 400 City State CA Zip 92630 Telephone 949/215-3339 11 Lake Forest 5. Engineer's Name Last Schaffner FirstShawna Lic. No. Engineer's Address Engineer's E-mail Address CAA Planning, Inc., 65 Enterprise, Suite 130 sschaffner@caaplanning.com City State CA Zip 192656 Telephone 949/581-2888 Aliso Viejo j- 6. Contractor's Name Last First Lic. No.F777 Class Contractor's Address Contractor's E-mail Address City StateF777 Zip Telephone OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT NO. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK NO. PLAN CHECK FEE $ OCCUPANCY- GROUP PLAN CHECK ENG.¢J _kt Aats —?6t LO V—L IV -1 VVI—L 1801 W. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 PARCEL: PM 1002-29 AS THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, 1 HAVE SELECTED APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) TO EFFECTIVELY MINIMIZE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS OF THIS PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON STORM WATER QUALITY. THE PROJECT OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE AWARE THAT SELECTED BMPS MUST BE INSTALLED. MONITORED, AND MAINTAINED TO ENSURE THEIR EFFECTIVENESS. THE BMPS NOT SELECTED FOR IMPLEMENTATION ARE REDUNDANT OR DEEMED NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED COSTRUCTION ACTMTIES. PRESIDENT 05/25/2013 NAME POSTITION DATE ,i I THE SCHOOL OF SAILING & SEAMANSHIP ORANGE COAST COLLEGE 1801 W. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY NEWPORT BEACH CA, 92663 EEL GRASS WSPECTION El Eelgrass within 15' of project ® Eelgrass within 15 - 30' of project ® No EglgTss jD projectarea Signature rre Inspection Date & TIrne JOB DESCRIPTION REMOVE EXISTING DOCK AND REPLACE WITH. NEW WOOD FRAMED DOCK STRUCTURE USING WOOD DECKING. INSTALL NEW WOOD GANGWAYS. EXISTING GANGWAY PLATFORM TO REMAIN IN PLACE NO SEAWALL OR LANDSIDE WDRK TO BE PERFORMED. EXISTING PILE QUANTITY - 16",S.F.) PILES TO BE REMOVED - 13 (8.61 S.F.) REPLACEMENT PILES - 20 (35.3 S.F.) TOTAL PILE COUNT - 23 (36.4 S.F.) EXISTING DOCK AREA - 8833 SO. FT. DOCK AREA TO BE REMOVED - 6775 SO. FT. NEW DOCK AREA - 6209 S0. Fi. TOTAL DOCK AREA - 8267 S0. FT. DRAWING LIST SHEET \S� DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 CONSTRUCTION NOTES 3 DEMOLITION PLAN 4 DOCK DIMENSIONAL PLAN 5 DOCK OVERALL FRAMING PLAN 6 UTILITY AND FIRE PROTECTION PLAN 7 FINGER FRAMING PIANS 8 FINGER AND PARTIAL DOCK FRAMING PLANS 9 CREW DOCK FRAMING PLANS 10 GANGWAY PLANS AND ELEVATIONS 11 CONSTRUCTIONDETAILS 12 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 13 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 14 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 15 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 16 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS E-1 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS E-2 ELECTRICAL SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM E-3 ELECTRICAL DOCK PLAN NEWPpRT CHANNEL VICINITY MAP .� SCALE NTS PACIFIC COAST HWY —ono PLOT PLAN SCALE 1/64• = 1'-0- Exhibit 6 - Plan Sheets PROPRIETARY INFORMATION DDcuIENE xm na xEaaunon can.xED xE� ua Ta PFOMNIY tF raxr 51EP DESA r+lD ua rD e= usn nr rxE wsrouEn .r ra mx vlD.x orar. xm DnaR usE a nasi nDLill@115 6 rtNrBDED. QI OFESS/q�,� BETg4,'Yfc h yV S.E. 4296 �s TRU k Q P ATE. Q'CG1U.tF&@ DATE 03/31/14 DPN x H ARC Hanan er: SB AS NOTED �. D1-532 SHEET 1 r\/IC`TIAIn rl!\nI/ I VLYY V\./\.JI\ L/\IJI II VV u\J\./1\ PROFILE PROFILE next + sCep DESIGN, INC EXISTING DOCK TO BE REMOVED (6775 S.F.) -} ¢` EXISTING DOCK TO -�-` - REMAIN (2058 S.F.) NEW DOCK (6209 S.F.) Project: OCC DOCK REMODEL Date: 09/18/2014 Sheet: 1 OF 1 E i it 4 - Docver ay > Exhibit 10 - Eelgrass Impact/Mitigation Area PLAN / POTENTIAL EELGRASS IMPACT AND MITIGATION AREA LEGEND: EXISTING EELGRASS — 2.400 SO. FT. 19 ` r: EELGRASS MIRGARON AREA - 2.000 SO. FT. LoEXISTING EELGRASS PATCH IN WEST BASIN ECO STEEL DECK COVERING - 4723 S0. FT. ECO STEEL GANGWAY COVERING PROPRIETARY INFORMATION 1xs oocuumr un ME xsoxwna+ roxomn �i irx 1xc rxovmY a xm srtv oEvw um�ro�usm erg cusum •* rff wuiwx sw,nu um ourzx us= or oow�mis 6 PRtii®TFD. QpOTESS/qI,� ' N BETg4,`Y fc h h� _ oyy S.E. 4296 9TlRU TU0.P 3' E Q CA DATE 06/28/14 ox wx ar ARC SB scut AS NOTED oe xo. 01-532 SHEET EG 1 Notice of Exemption To: County Clerk Recorder From: Coast Community College District County of Orange 1370 Adams Ave Public Services Division Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 438-4600 Project Title: Orange Coast College Dock Renovation Project Project Applicant: Coast Community College District, The School of Sailing & Seamanship, Attention: Brad Averv. Director, Orange Coast College Marine Programs, 1801 W. Coast Highway. Newport Beach. CA 92663 949-645-9412 Project Location — Specific: The proposed project is located at 1801 W. Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA. Work will be conducted in in waters of Newport Harbor, Newport Beach, County of Orange. Project Location — City: Newport Beach Project Location —County: Orange Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: The proposed dock renovation project will reconfigure and reconstruct the existing marina dock system to provide more docking flexibility for a greater variety of vessels used for student training programs and to provide the public with more access to vessels and the harbor for the purpose of building nautical skills. The existing dock was constructed in the early 1970's and has reached the end of its useful life. The existing dock structure is 8,833 sq. ft. and the reconfigured dock system will be 8,267 sq. ft., which will result in a decrease of water surface coverage of 566 sq. ft. The project will include the removal of 8" to 14" guide piles, to be replaced with new 18" guide piles. This pile upsizing is necessary because existing pile supports are inadequate and many can be shifted and moved up to a foot, simply by applying pressure by hand. The goal of the new dock plan is to provide more docking flexibility for a greater variety of vessels used for student training. The berthing of these vessels, and their impacts to adjacent existing vessels, required a comprehensive review of vessel use cycles at the facility. This has resulted in the new design, which will provide the public with more efficient access to vessels and the harbor for the purpose of building nautical skills. A safety consideration is the relocation of the College's flagship, the Nordic Star, so it does not impede the safe passage of the school's smaller vessels in and out of the marina. The 92 -foot Nordic Star was donated to the College three years ago as a school ship for students, and special charter events. For the past two years, this vessel has been undergoing an extensive refit for these uses, per US Coast Guard regulations. The length and height of Nordic Star requires that the vessel be relocated at the east end of the marina, to allow smaller school vessels better cross traffic visibility when maneuvering in and out of the Marina. The reconfiguration will include the relocation of a small boat lagoon, and replacement of existing crew docks, gangways and ramps. The reconfiguration calls for replacing or upgrading the marina infrastructure including electrical, water, a new pump out connection for the Nordic Star, firefighting systems, and bring the entire marina into conformance with state and city building and safety codes and in compliance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (SCEMP). The project will include planting of Eelgrass in the location of the relocated small boat lagoon, which offers significant open water suitable for Eelgrass growth. Existing Eelgrass and the new Eelgrass planting area will be monitored for a five year time period consistent with the SCEMP. No dredging is proposed. Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Coast Community College District Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project: Coast Community College District, The School of Sailing & Seamanship. Orange Coast College, Brad Avery, Director 949-645-9412. POST -ED Recorded in Official Records, Orange County _ Hugh Nguyen, Clerk -Recorder C C ILIII� IIIII II �IIII� IIII IIII II I II IIIII�IIII�� IIII I IIII ILD N0 FEE (T I.� NOV 14 2014 *$ R 0 0 0 7 0 9 7 5 2 1$* — NOV 1 4 2014 HUGH NGUYEN, CLERK-RECORD>*R 201485001061 1:35 pm 11/14/14 7 SC4 Z01 HUGH NGUYEN, CLERK -RECORDER DEPUTY BY: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _e..e Exempt Status: (check one): ❑ Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)); ® Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: 15301, 15302, 15314, 15333(d)(1) ❑ Statutory Exemptions. State code number: N/A Reasons why project is exempt: Section 15301 consists of the operation, repair, maintenance, etc. of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond the existing use. The existing dock structure is 8,833 sq. ft., and the proposed dock structure is 8,267 sq. ft., which results in a reduction of water surface coverage of 566 sq. ft. The project will not expand the existing use, but will allow for the more efficient use and operation of the docks. In addition, repair and maintenance is necessary for the existing piles, many of which can be moved by hand. Section 15302 exempts the replacement or reconstruction of structures where the new structure will be located on the same site and with the same purpose and capacity as the existing structure. The proposed project is the replacement of an existing docks at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship facility. The new docks will be placed substantially in the same location and will serve to moor boats in the same capacity as the existing docks, but in a more effective configuration. The purpose and capacity of the docks will be unchanged. Section 15314 exempts minor additions to schools within existing grounds where the addition does not increase the original student capacity by more than 25%. The existing docks serve Orange Coast College's School of Sailing and Seamanship and the proposed dock replacement project will enhance operations and safety for the existing student population. The proposed dock repalcement will not increase the student capacity by more than 25% but will provide more docking flexibility for a greater variety of vessels used for student training. Section 15333(d)(1) exempts small habitat restoration projects not to exceed five acres. The project will result in the relocation of a "lagoon" area suitable for the planting of Eelgrass. No dredging is proposed and existing Eelgrass will not be disturbed. The creation of a new Eelgrass area is appropriate given the water depth and overall reduction in water surface coverage by approximately 566 sq. ft. Approximately 2,000 sq. ft. of Eelgrass will be planted, which is within the five acre limit established in Section 15333. The onsite Eelgrass planting will be consistent with the SCEMP. Lead Agency i Contact Person: Area Code/Telephone/Extension: S9 �'�t, - I q i - If filed by applicant: 1. Attach certified document of exemption finding. 2. Has a Notice o xemption been filed by the public agency approving the project?- ❑]Yes ® No Signature: Date: t Z ' �'' Title: 0-460" ❑ by Lead Agency ® Signed by Applicant Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21110, Public Resources Code. Reference: Sections 21108, 21152, and 21152.1, Public Resources Code. ' t FILED POSTED NOV 142014 NOV 14 2014 HUGH NGUYEN, CLERK -RECORDER BY: DEPUTY HUGH NGUYEN, CLERK -RECORDER BY: DEPUTY The School of SAILING SEAMANSHIP \ Orange Coast College September 10, 2014 Mr. Chris Miller Harbor Resources Manager City of Newport Beach 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: Letter of Authorization Coast Community College District Dock Renovation Project Dear Mr. Miller: This is to confirm that CAA Planning, Inc. (CAA) is authorized to represent Coast Community College District in securing the Approval -In -Concept for the planned dock renovation project at 1801 W. Coast Highway. CAA is authorized to execute, take delivery, request and take necessary action on behalf of the Coast Community College District to obtain said Approval -In -Concept from the City of Newport Beach. Sincerely, very erector, Orange Coast College Marine Programs Coast Community College District c: Shawna Schaffner 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA 92663 949-645-9412 Fax 949-645-1859 CAA. PLANNING November 19, 2014 Mr. Chris Miller Harbor Resources Manager City of Newport Beach 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: Orange Coast College Dock Renovation Project 1801 W. Coast Highway, Newport Beach Dear Mr. Miller: On behalf of Orange Coast College (OCC), CAA Planning, Inc. (CAA) is pleased to submit the attached application for an Approval -In -Concept (AIC) for the reconfiguration and reconstruction of the Orange Coast College marina docks and gangways and an update to dock related infrastructure including electrical, water and firefighting systems. Please find included herein a letter from Brad Avery, Director, Orange Coast College, authorizing CAA to file and process this AIC application. The regional location of the project site is depicted on Exhibit 1 and the more specific vicinity of the site is depicted on Exhibit 2 attached hereto. Exhibit 3 provides an aerial view of the OCC docks with the project area boundaries shown in red and ground level photographs of the docks. Existing Marina Orange Coast College has, since 1956, offered public rowing, sailing and seamanship programs at the marina, which is located on land leased from the County of Orange. The current docks were built in the early 1970's when the program was much smaller and served only OCC students. The marina currently serves more than 2,000 people a year with a community program available to adults, college students and youth. To accommodate the curriculum, the program uses more than five dozen vessels which have been donated to the school by local residents. The vessels include rowing shells, sailing dinghies, keelboats and larger sail and power boats. The marina is also home to the college's flagship, the Nordic Star. The 92 - foot Nordic Star was donated to OCC three years ago as a school ship for students. For the past two years, this vessel has been undergoing an extensive refit for this use per U.S. Coast Guard regulations and is now located at the OCC docks. The OCC facility currently operates seven days a week. The Professional Mariner program, which is funded by the State of California, was created by OCC approximately five years ago and continues as part of the curriculum. This entry-level maritime career education program is designed to assist students become employable in the local maritime industry or transfer to four-year maritime academies. The program focuses on building basic maritime and safety skills for college students, veterans and older adults re-entering the job market. A key component of the program is "real world" hands-on education aboard a variety of watercraft. The increase in students, offerings and vessels for the program requires a new marina layout to enhance efficiency and safe access to program vessels. 65 Enterprise, Suite 130 • Aliso Viejo, California 92656 • (949) 581-2888 • Fax (949) 581-3599 Lim Mr. Chris Miller November 19, 2014 Page 2 of 4 Proposed Project In order to provide more docking flexibility for a greater variety of vessels used for student training and the programs outlined above, a comprehensive review of vessel use cycles at the facility was conducted to assess the berthing of the vessels and their impacts to adjacent vessels. This review has resulted in the development of a new dock design which will provide the public with more access to vessels and the harbor for the purposes of building nautical skills. Additional consideration was given to the safety of vessel movement in and out of the marina in relation to the location of the Nordic Star. The length and height of Nordic Star requires that the vessel be relocated to the east end of the marina to allow smaller school vessels better cross traffic visibility when maneuvering in and out of the marina. Exhibit 4 — Dock Overlay — depicts the existing docks with the proposed dock structures overlaid and outlined in red. The proposed dock reconfiguration also calls for including electrical, water, and firefighting systems, with state and city building and safety codes. replacing or upgrading the marina infrastructure, and will bring the entire marina into conformance In order to achieve the goals of safety and flexibility while providing the maximum opportunity to the public, students and youth to participate in the programs offered, OCC seeks to reconfigure and reconstruct the existing marina as follows: • Removal of 13 of 16 existing steel piles ranging from 8"-14" (9.86 s.£) • Installation of 20 18" dia. octagonal concrete piles (38.25 s.£) • Installation of dock lighting • Removal of existing 17'5" wide x 98'6" dock and replacement with 10' 3" wide x 98" dock and 6'3" wide x 95' dock • Relocate Small Boat Lagoon and floating docks to west end of the property next to Crew docks for improved on water visibility and safety for boats exiting the Small Boat Basin and Crew docks • Replace existing Crew docks with ones of identical size and dimensions. No change in location • Replace existing east and west gangways with longer, better functioning wood gangways. Existing gangway platform to remain in place. With exception of installation of new pump -out sanitary sewer connection (per City of Newport Beach Public Works Standard Details STD -406 and STD -405-L) no additional seawall or landside work to be performed. • Remove existing dock and ramp covering material and replace with new wood framed dock structure incorporating Eco Series grated panels that allow light penetration to the water surface to promote eelgrass growth. Specifications for the Steel Dek Eco Series decking are detailed on Exhibit 5 herein and include features such as 60% open area, Clean Marina and LEED compliant, freshwater and saltwater safe among others. • Update all marina infrastructures, including electrical, water and firefighting systems and a new sanitary sewer connection and pump -out facility The footprint of the existing dock structure is 8,833 square feet (sq. ft.) The reconfigured dock system will have a footprint of 8,267 sq. ft., and a net reduction in the dock footprint of 566 sq. ft. However, the water surface shading would be even less, given the use of the Eco Series grated panels that allow light penetration resulting in a net reduction of the physical dock footprint and the water surface shading as compared to the existing configuration. Drawings of existing and proposed dock layouts (Plan Sheets 1 through 16) are included herein as Exhibit 6. In addition, a Report of Geotechnical Investigation has been Mr. Chris Miller November 19, 2014 Page 3 of 4 prepared by Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. dated October 17, 2012. The report is included herein as Exhibit 7. PreviouslyApproved Dock Renovations The California Coastal Commission approved CDP 5-04-167 in November 2004. The CDP allowed: • Installation of an ADA compliant gangway and landing • Reinstallation of the existing east gangway • Installation of a longer and wider west gangway • Reconfiguration of the existing instructional docks • Installation of two new 30' x 4' fingers and a new 51' x 4' dock with a 22' x 4' backwalk • Installation of eight new steel piles ranging from 8" to 12" in diameter • Removal of ten existing piles ranging from 8" to 10" in diameter • Installation of a new fire -fighting system Implementation of CDP 5-04-167 resulted in the loss of 270 sq. ft. of eelgrass. Subsequent to the 2004 approval, an unapproved plastic modular dock system was placed adjacent to the approved dock resulting in non-compliance with the final approved plans of the CDP. An additional 863 sq. ft. of eelgrass was lost due to this non-compliant action. A total of 1,133 sq. ft. of eelgrass was impacted as a result of the initial project and the unauthorized dock addition. This impact was verified during the project's post - construction survey conducted in December 2005 by Coastal Resources Management (CRM). In April of 2010, the Coastal Commission approved an After -the -Fact Amendment (CDP 5-04-167-A1) for the addition of the plastic dock system (floating pads) for instructional boats. The approval included the requirement for eelgrass impact mitigation at a ratio of 1.2 to 1 for a total of 1,360 sq. ft. of eelgrass replacement. The mitigation plan was implemented in September 2010 and included transplanting 192 eelgrass bundles encompassing 1,937 sq. ft. in the east boat basin (1.74 to 1 ratio). The current status of the transplanted eelgrass has exceeded the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (SCENT) criteria as of the fourth year of the required five year monitoring program. To date, four annual monitoring surveys have been conducted with the most recent occurring in September 2014. The 2014 report is being prepared by CRM and will be submitted upon completion. The attached Exhibit 8, Eelgrass Areal Cover Trends 2011-2014, graphically depicts the coverage of the transplanted eelgrass at each annual survey. The graph confirms that eelgrass coverage has continued to increase. The 2013 monitoring report is also included herein as Exhibit 9. Proposed Project Eelgrass Impacts and Mitigation The proposed dock renovation plans will impact approximately 1,256 sq. ft. of the eelgrass mitigation area established in response to CDP 5 -04 -167 -AI in the east boat basin of the marina. However, the project includes use of Eco Series grated panels that allow light penetration to the water surface in an effort to protect and retain the existing mitigation area. In addition, a new mitigation area in the west boat basin is proposed which would allow for mitigation at a ratio of at least 1.2 to 1. Upon implementation of the proposed dock reconfiguration, the eelgrass remaining in the 2010 mitigation area at the east boat basin (1,256 sq. ft.) plus the new 2,000 sq. ft. of eelgrass mitigation proposed in the west basin would result in approximately 3,256 sq. ft. of eelgrass (Exhibit 10 — Plan Sheet EG1). Mitigation of the entire eelgrass area (existing and proposed) will be subject to a new five year monitoring plan. Mr. Chris Miller November 19, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Approval -In -Conceit This application includes the City's Worksheet for Builiding Permit Application, detailed Project Description, Proposed Dock Plan exhibits, eelgrass reports and a Notice of Exemption executed by the Coast Community College District. Please note that the Notice of Exemption was posted and filed with the Orange County Clerk -Recorder and transmitted to the State Clearinghouse on November 14, 1014. It is understood that the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy requires timely pre- and post - construction surveys for Eelgrass and invasive algae and we understand that the City's AIC will be conditioned to insure compliance with that policy and allow for future pre- and post -construction surveys. A check in the amount of $683.00 has been submitted to the City as required for Harbor Resources to process this AIC request. We understand that there will be an additional fee when the building permit is requested and the amount will be calculated by the City's Building Department based upon the valuation of the improvements proposed. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Tom Mathews if you have any questions, or require any additional information. Sincerely, CAA PLANNING, INC. Shawna L. Schaffner Chief Executive Officer Attachments — Authorization Letter Planning Permit Application/Project Description Exhibit 1- Regional Map Exhibit 2 -Vicinity Map Exhibit 3 - Aerial and Ground Level Site Photographs Exhibit 4 - Dock Overlay Exhibit 5 - Eco Series Decking Exhibit 6 - Plan Sheets 1 thru 16 Exhibit 7 - Report of Geotechnical Investigation Exhibit 8 - Eelgrass Areal Cover Trends 2011-2014 Exhibit 9 - 2013 Eelgrass Monitoring Report Exhibit 10 - Eelgrass Impact -Mitigation Area (Plan Sheet EG 1) Exhibit 11 — Notice of Exemption Brad Avery, Orange Coast College Walters, Lisa From: Miller, Chris Sent: October 02, 2014 4:46 PM To: Walters, Lisa Cc: Levin, Shannon Subject: OCC Marina Reconfiguration Lisa, Tom Mathews said that they dropped off the AIC paperwork for the OCC marina reconfiguration yesterday Since this is a commercial marina, and since it is a complete rebuild, it might have to be reviewed from a CEQA perspective. Usually this rarely happens because most of what comes across your desk is residential and minor commercial alterations, and you therefore check the categorically and ministerially exempt boxes. I'm not sure how I'll handle this one, so I'll need to review with you and others. Please proceed with reviewing the plans from .a design perspective, but don't give it a final without checking with me. Also, please remember to flag me when other larger commercial marina projects cross your desk — CEQA review may, or may not be, required. Thanks! Chris Miller Harbor Manager (949) 644-3043 O d' L M CLRT r—I •_ V-1 O s o N m fu O m N C r N ba m FL ~ (Lu- > N 0 L �(� > N N M O V m Q a o �- 0 bio — m O — co � O O w Q �° s N m - o o N 6i V w = r' V W O O O O O gyri d' m N r -I (sialaw wenbs) aano:) sseaSIa3 Exhibit 9 Eelgrass Transplant Year 3 (2013) Post -Transplant Monitoring Report November 15, 2013 Prepared by: Coastal Resources Management, Inc. ORANGE COAST COLLEGE SCHOOL OF SAILING AND SEAMANSHIP BOA T BJASIN EELGRASS (ZOSTERA MARINA) TRANSPLANT 147 & B AUGUST 8th, 2013 SURVEY Prepared by: Coastal Resources Management, Inc. PMB 327, 3334 E. Coast Highway, Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Contact: Mr. Rick /are, Senior Marine Biologist (949) 4129446 Prepared for. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 W Pacific Coast Highway Newport Beach, CA Contacts: Brad Avery (949) 645-9412 November 15th, 2013 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 2 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Coastal Resources Management, Inc. conducted an eelgrass transplant at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship boat basin in September 2010. The project was conducted to mitigate the loss of 105 square meters (1,133 square feet) of eelgrass vegetation removed as a consequence of dock renovations in the boat basin, located along Mariners Mile, in the City of Newport Beach, Ca. • CRM transplanted 192 bundles of eelgrass encompassing 180 square meters of eelgrass (1,937 square feet) at the project site (a mitigation to impact ratio of 1.74 to 1) in September, 2010. • At the end of the first-year of post -transplant monitoring (September 2011), eelgrass transplant areal cover success criteria was exceeded as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (SCEMP). A total of 117.4 square meters of eelgrass habitat was mapped. A value of 88 square meters (70%) of the adjusted mitigation to impact amount (126 square meters) was required at the end of the first year monitoring program. Eelgrass turion density for the Year 1 transplant monitoring program also exceeded density criteria as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy. Eelgrass turion density was 72 turions per square meter, compared to 24 and 93 turions per square meter prior to the project impact (2004 and 2005, respectively). The target value for the Year 1 turion density success criteria was 30% of the project area density. • At the end of the second year of the five-year transplant monitoring program (September 2012) the eelgrass transplant at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship exceeded mitigation success criteria for areal cover as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Section 10 Success Criteria). The transplant site attained a value of 144.1% (182.2 sq m) of the adjusted impact area (AIA) compared to a required 85% of the adjusted impact area (107 sq m). Eelgrass turion density exceeded density criteria as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Section 10 Success Criteria). The mean shoot density value in the transplanted bed (124.5 turions per sq meter) was 135% of the reference site density (92 turions per sq m), and between 127% (2004) and 508% (2005) of the pre -project area density (2005). A value of 70% is required at the end of the second year of monitoring. • At the end of the third -year of the five-year transplant monitoring program the eelgrass transplant at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship exceeded mitigation success criteria for areal cover as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Section 10 Success Criteria). The transplant site attained a value of 182.6 % (280.2 sq m) of the adjusted impact area (AIA) compared to a required 100% of the adjusted impact area (126 sq m). • Eelgrass turion density at the transplant site during Year 3 (66.8 turions per square meter) attained 68 percent of the required 70% turion density criteria as defined in the Southern Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 2 U California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Section 10 Success Criteria). However, the Harbor Island Reference Site (64.9 turions per square meter) was 66% of the 70% value, indicating the decrease at the transplant site was related to natural variation. Density declined by about 50% at both sites compared to the survey results in 2012. The next scheduled eelgrass transplant monitoring survey (Year 4) is September 1st, 2014 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 2 nr Section Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i 2.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1 2.1 Project Area and Background....................................................................................... l 3.0 YEAR 3 (2013) TRANSPLANT MO TO G SURVE Y METHODS .......................9 4.0 MONITORING SY RESULTS ...............................................................................10 4.1 Areal Cover................................................................................................................10 4.2 Turion Density 13 4.3 Marine Organisms Observed at the Transplant Site................................................14 5.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE EELGRASS MITIGATION POLICY............................................................................16 6.0 LITERATURE, CITED .......................................................................................................16 LIST OPT °"LLS Table Pa e 1 Amount of Donor Eelgrass Material Planted for the Transplant...............................................6 2 Year 3 Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring. Areal Cover. August 8th, 2013 n4onitoi'ing c'ai:'e;' Res'.ilts..................................................................................................10 3 Transplant Site and Reference Site Eelgrass Turion Density. 20042013 ............................134. LIST OF FIGURES Figure Pa e I OCC Sailing and Seamanship Project Location...................................................................2 2 Dock Improvements Shown with Module Dock System......................................................3 3a/3b. View of Module Dock System................................................................................................4 4 Results of the Post -Construction Eelgrass Survey, December 15', 2005 ..................................5 5 Transplant Site and Eelgrass Donor Sites in Newport Harbor .............................................. 7 6 Transplant Site Set -Up ................................................................................................................7 7 Project Planting Area............................................................................................................... 8 8 Example of Planted Eelgrass Bundle...................................................................................... 8 9 2013 Third Year Post -Transplant Monitoring Survey Areal Cover...................................11 10 West Harbor Island Reference Eelgrass Bed, 2013 Third Year Monitoring Survey ........12 11 Eelgrass Areal Cover Trends, 2011-2013............................................................................13 12 Eelgrass Turion Density Data Trends, Pre -Project to 2013 ................................................15 A92endix Page I Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy Monitoring and Compliance Summary..............................................................................................................................18 2 Project Staff................................................................................................................................21 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 2 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION Coastal Resources Management, Inc. conducted an eelgrass (Zostera marina) transplant project for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement Project in Newport Harbor, Newport Beach, California on September 8th and 9th, 2010 (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2010a). This was conducted in accordance with: Coastal Development Permits (CDP) 5-04-167 and 5-04-167-A1 and the project eelgrass mitigation plan entitled Eelgrass Mitigation Plan for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Facility Dock Replacement Project, dated 21 August, 2009 (Coastal Resources Management, Inc., 2009). Per provisions of the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (National Marine Fisheries Service, 1991 as amended), a five-year eelgrass transplant monitoring program is required to document the success of the transplant project. This report presents the results of the third year (36 month) post -transplant monitoring survey, and in accordance with the above-mentioned permits and policies. 2.1 PROJECT AREA AND BACKGROUND Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship is located within the City of Newport Beach, California. The project site (Figure 1) is located on the north side of Lido Reach along Mariners' Mile, in Lower Newport Bay (Newport Harbor). The site coordinates are 330 36.99' N, 117° 55.08' W. Project renovation tasks included removing 10 existing piles, installing an ADA compliant gangway and landing, reinstalling the existing east gangway, installing a longer and wider west gangway, reconfiguring the existing instructional docks, installing two new fingers and a new dock/backwalk, installing eight new steel piles, and installing a new fire system (Figure 2). This project resulted in the loss of 270 square feet (sq ft) of eelgrass. In addition, an unapproved modular dock system was placed next to the approved dock in non-compliance with the final approved plans of Coastal Development Permit No. 5-04-167 (Figure 3) resulting in the loss of an additional 863 sq ft of eelgrass, totaling a loss of 1,133 square feet of eelgrass for the initial project and the unpermitted modular dock system, as determined in the project's post - construction survey, conducted in December 2005 (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2006, Figure 4). This system was approved by the California Coastal Commission in an amendment to the original Coastal Development Permit in April 2010 (5-04-167-A1). Eelgrass was present at depths between -6 and -7 feet Mean Lower Low Water. Eelgrass that was removed exhibited extremely low densities, and ranged between 0 and 42 shoots per square meter; the average shoot density was 24.7 +/ 15.8 (n=11 replicates). The eelgrass was in poor condition and the blades were extremely short (approximately 2 to 4 cm in length). Overall, this eelgrass habitat was determined to be of marginal habitat value. Post -construction, shading effects monitoring surveys conducted in May 2007 and June 2008 by CRM indicated there was no regrowth in the project area (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. unpublished data; Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2010b). Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 Figure 1, OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship Project Location. Newport Bay, Orange County, CA. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 \ it f / 1 1j��r1 Syi F I � � I F I r t w {, 1 M OOO Sc ALL Figure 1, OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship Project Location. Newport Bay, Orange County, CA. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 3 ,CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH v. V. Ppl,rG/N,� CITY OF r New=BEM &T.. 51LK:V LIN MY y- llS ?6?s°a`6JctN� i ' TF#�6tI k066 _=r h00-Mlw FRctF &HIBIT� Xc OCE% �i a PAGE i PROFILE 1 44' YICIliiITY HRP sT wemrowan JEM mlIII hw FM IN FEST RM DEMTE MOMONS W60 ON -HEM LOHER LOH WrER. • ; r'"'%✓�L1rPOSLL? 4`x�[i' t"�-Iti`XY 'F)t✓Ci S�fJ 8 — " ...._.fir.== ..... . c . s :aic..• t 11�u_. F-rIA, N te- A �Pr�si IvE}A/ e ssT� +151 %:t NtI_ air u' i i40 EE� 6RA38-WHIN I"G- P EEL GRASS 1VTHE P nQkUAREA b1Gi�Ailft�Ec�. Figure 2. Dock Improvements Shown with Module Docks. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Facility, Newport Beach, CA Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 riR, i�, ,-FMDock SysteThis stem as approved by the California Coactal a �uv ✓cs. i�.� ;—ry viiM v ,j m. s sy :.'N J Commission in an amendment to the original Coastal Development Permit in April 2010 (5-04-167-A1) Figure 3b. View of Modular Dock System. West and north sides of dock. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 5 Figure 4. Results of the Post -Construction Eelarass Survev. December 15�'. 2005 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 I Project Mitigation Requirements Mitigation a The loss of 1,133 sq ft (105 square meters)of eelgrass vegetation required the successful transplant of 1,360 sq ft (126 sq meters) of eelgrass at the completion of a five-year eelgrass monitoring program (National Marine Fisheries Service, 1991 as amended). Table 2 summarizes the amount of material required for the project. Table to .Amount of Eelgrass Vegetation Planted for the OCC College of wiling and Seamanship Eelgrass 'Transplant TOTAL NUMBER OF PLANTING ELY[MIM Total eelgrass surface area/ (P.U. Density)2 126 m2 1 m ``) = 126 P.U. Review of the September 81h_9th 2010 Eelgrass Transplant Eelgrass Donor Sites. Eelgrass material was collected from West Harbor Island and the vicinity of Linda Isle (Figure 5). A third potential eelgrass collecting zone (Eayshores/John Wayne Beach lacked eelgrass. Eelgrass Transplant Site. Eelgrass bundles were manufactured by the shore -based eelgrass transplant team during the mornings and early afternoons of September Stn and Stn at the OCC transplant site (Figure 6 and Figure 7). The anchor/bundle method employed to produce eelgrass bundles. Prior to the transplant, transplant guide lines were laid out to establish a 12 meter by 15 meter -long transplant area A total of 192 bundles were planted on 1 meter centers within 180 square meters (1,937 square feet) of bottom habitat at depths between a6 and m7 ft Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW). An example of a planted eelgrass bundle is shown in Figure 8. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College school of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 Figure 6. Transplant Area Site Set Up. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 Figure 8. Example of Planted Eelgrass Rundle Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Fear 3 I 3.0 YEAR 3 (2013) TRANSPLANT MONITORING SURVEY METHODS The second year, post -transplant eelgrass survey was conducted on August 8th, 2013 by Mr. Rick Ware, Senior Marine Biologist and Tom Gerlinger, Marine Biologist. The condition of the transplanted bed was initially inspected by conducting a reconnaissance dive. An intensive habitat mapping survey followed this effort. A reference (control) eelgrass bed was also monitored in tandem with the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship eelgrass transplant site. The reference site was located on the west side of Harbor Island. Eelgrass areal cover and density information for this bed dates back to 1998 (Chambers Consultants, Inc. and Coastal Resources Management, Inc., 1998). It was also mapped by Coastal Resources Management for harbor -wide eelgrass mapping surveys in 2003, 2006, 2010 (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2005, 2010a, and 2011. A 30 meter section of the bed was established as the long-term reference site. The monitoring survey was conducted using Wide Area Augmentation System (WARS) GPS (Global Positioning System) technology and differential GPS post -processing. A SCUBA - diving biologist towed a small yellow "pop" buoy around the perimeter of the eelgrass beds. A second biologist in an 11 ft -long kayak trailed the SCUBA -diving biologist and continuously recorded WAAS GPS readings centered on the visible yellow SCUBA tank of the diver or the yellow surface buoy towed by the diver. GPS readings were collected at one second intervals using a Thales Mobile Mapper hand held GPS/GIS unit. The estimated GPS error of the Thales Mobile Mapper unit with differential correction is less than 1 meter. The GPS data were downloaded into a computer using Thales Mobile Mapper software. GIS shape files were then developed from the track data and overlaid on a geo-referenced, high- resolution, photograph of the project area. Final presentation graphics and surface area calculations of eelgrass habitat were made using both ArcGIS 10.0 and GPS TRACKMAKER PRO software. Eelgrass turion counts were made throughout the transplanted eelgrass bed as well as the Harbor Island reference eelgrass bed using 0.07 square meter replicated sampling quadrats. These data were standardized to turion counts per one square meter. Data were also collected on eelgrass depth ranges, sediment types, and common marine organisms observed within and nearby the eelgrass beds. Depths were standardized to Mean Lower Low Water datum (NOAA Newport Bay Entrance Channel Reference Station). Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 10 Appendix I provides the required Southern California Eelgrass Litigation Policy Monitoring and Compliance Deporting Summary. The survey was conducted under clear skies and an air temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit. Underwater visibility ranged four to six feet. High tide occurred during the survey at 1103 noon (5.3 ft MLLW). Water temperature was 71 degrees Fahrenheit. Depths in the eelgrass bed varied between 5.5 ft and 8.5 ft MLLW. Depths in the reference site area were shallower, and varied from -0.3 to -6 ft MLLW, although density data were collected at -5.5 to 8.5 ft MLLW, at depths similar to the transplant site. Sediments consisted of muds and silts at the transplant site. At the reference site, the sediments near the bulkhead were compacted fine sands. At depths similar to the transplant site, sediments were finer, and were sandy silts. Eelgrass Mitigation Area. Transplant site data for all surveys is provided in Table 2 and eelgrass areal cover during the 2013, Year 3 monitoring survey is shown in Figure 9. The total the August 2013 survey was 230.8 sq meters (2,483.4 sq ft). Comparatively, the amount of eelgrass hnhitnt mapped during September 2012. was 182.2 square meters (1,960.1 sq ft) and during the Year 1 survey was 117.4 sq m (1,263 sq ft). The amount of eelgrass in 2013 exceeds the amount of eelgrass required at the end of the third year of monitoring (126 sq m) by 104 sq meters. The eelgrass areal cover data trends for the transplant and the reference sites are shown by year, in Figure 11, relative to the required amount of eelgrass at the end of each survey year (Adjusted Impact Area). Table 20 Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Areal Cover --Fear 1 and Year 2 d P S�rve� P`e>Nioc� ''` l�el�rass Area )l�erce`rit of. erc�til?12e`g�iired for x s m `.` Adjusted Sutccessful l�hfKaY[on Year 1 (201 93.21 Year 112) 144.1i Year 1 1 182.6 100 • •determined1 1 I - OM _ I • be -• • • 11 Reference Site. The reference site eelgrass habitat map is shown in Figure 11. The reference site eelgrass bed encompassed 444.2 sq m of shallow water habitat (4,780 sq ft) at depths between -0.3 and -6 ft MLLW. In 2012, the bed was 402.3 sq in, and in Year I the bed was 277 sq m. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College school of sailing and seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 11 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 12. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 13 Figure 11. Trend Analysis. Eelgrass Mitigation Area and Eelgrass Reference Site. 2011-2013. 4.2 EELGRASS TURION DENSITY Eelgrass Mitigation Area. Turion density during the Year 3 monitoring survey was 66.4 +/- 24.8 per square meter, n=34 replicates (Table 3). Density at the site decreased by about 50% compared to Year 2 (mean --124.5 turions per square meter) but was similar to Year 1 (72.1 turions per square meter (Table 3). The range in individual turion densities varied between 28.6 and 114.3 turions per square meter. The required eelgrass turion density value at the end of the second year of monitoring is 68.6 turions per square meter, based on a pre -project density value of 98 turions per sq meter in July 2004 (Table 3). The density at the transplant site and the reference site were slightly lower in values compared to the required 85% of the adjusted impact density value (98 turions per sq meter) for the Year 3 survey (Figure 12) Prior to the installation of the docks in the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Basin, eelgrass density varied between 24 and 98 turions per square meter between 2004 and 2005, respectively (Coastal Resources Management, Inc., 2005a, 2005b). In 2005 following the installation of the boat docks, density fell to 3 turions per square meter (Coastal Resources Management, Inc., 2006). In 2008, no eelgrass was found within the boat basin (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2010b). If should be noted that eelgrass throughout much of the mid-section of Newport Harbor and Upper Newport Bay either declined in cover and/or density during this period (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2010b). Increases in eelgrass turion density however, were observed in early 2011 in some of these areas (Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2011). Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 14 Table 3. Transplant Site and Reference Site Eelgrass Turion Density. 2004-2013 Sampling Site Date Density/Sq Meter Dev Pre -Transplant Harbor Island Reference Site -Pre Project August 2004 252.7 112.4 60 Harbor Island Reference Site -Pre Project August 2008 105.7 42 30 Harbor Island Reference Site August 2010 90.9 41.2 25 Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship -Pre Project (Transplant Site July 2004 98 31 60 Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship -Pre Project (Transplant Site) February 2005 24.7 15.8 11 Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Post -Con Survey �iransplant Site) December 2u"u5 3 4.5 10 Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Post -Con Survey (Transplant Site) July 2008 0 (no eelgrass) Post -Project Monitoring Period Year 1 Year 1 Harbor Island Reference Site -0.7 to -5 ft depths) July 2011 128.6 39.6 21 Year 1 OCC Boat Basin Transplant Site -6 to -7 ft depths) Sept 2011 72.1 21.5 45 Year 2 Year 2 Harbor Island Reference Site (-4 to -6 ft MLLW) August 2012 92.3 25.6 23 Year 2 OCC Boat Basin Trans lant Site -6 to -8.5 ft MLLW August 2012 124.5 37.2 39 Year 3 Year 2 Harbor Island Reference Site -6 to -8.5 ft August 2013 64.9 29 18 Year 3 OCC Boat Basin -6 to -8.5 ft MLLW Transplant Site Au ust 2013 66.4 24.8 34 Reference Site. At depths between -4 and -6 ft MLLW, turion density within the Reference Site was 64.9 +/ 29 turions per sq m (n=18, Table 2), or slightly less than the eelgrass transplant site (Table 2, Figure 12). Similar to the transplant site, eelgrass density declined in 2013 compared to 2012. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 15 1+'igure 12. 4.3 MARINE ORGANISMS OBSERVED AT THE TRANSPLANT SITE In 2013, the red algae Gracilariopsis sp. again formed a low, canopy of algae at the transplant site The soft ectoproct Zoobotryon verticillatum was present at both the at the OCC Boat Basin Transplant Site and the Reference Site. Other invertebrates observed included the bubble snail (Bulla gouldiana) and the burrowing anemone (Pachycerianthus fimbriatus). Fish observed during included the survey included round sting ray (Urolophus halleri), black perch (Embiotoca jacksoni) and topsmelt (Atherinops affnis). 5.0 SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH EELGRASS MITIGATION POLICY CONCLUSIONS AND COMPLIANCE TO EELGRASS MITIGATION POLICY The Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy states: "the mitigation site shall achieve a minimum of 100 percent area of eelgrass and 85 percent density as compared to the adjusted project impact area after the second year". (Section 10, Mitigation Success) • At the end of the third -year of the five-year transplant monitoring program the eelgrass transplant at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship exceeded mitigation success criteria for areal cover as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Section 10 Success Criteria). The transplant site attained a value of 182.6 % (280.2 sq m) of the adjusted impact area (AIA) compared to a required 100% of the adjusted impact area (126 sq m). Coastal Resources Management, Inc: Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 16 • Eelgrass turion density at the transplant site during Year 3 (66.4 turions per square meter) attained 68% of the required 70% turion density criteria as defined in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (Section 10 Success Criteria). However, the Harbor Island Reference Site (64.9 turions per square meter) was 66% of the 70% value, indicating the decrease at the transplant site was related to natural variation. Density declined by about 50% at both sites compared to the survey results in 2012. 6.0 LITERATURE CITED Chambers Group, Inc. and Coastal Resources Management. 1998. Pre -dredging eelgrass survey in Lower Newport Bay. Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Los Angeles District. 15 pp. plus figures and appendices. Coastal Resources Management (CRM). 2005a. Marine biological resources impact assessment. Pre -construction survey, Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship dock renovation project. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. April 7t', 2005 Coastal Resources Management. 2005b. Final Report. Distribution and abundance of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Newport Bay. 2003-2004 eelgrass habitat mapping project. Bulkhead to pierhead line surveys. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Division. April 2005. 30 pp. Coastal Resources Management (CRM). 2006. Marine biological resources. Post -construction survey, Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship dock renovation project. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. January 26th, 2006. 16 pp. Coastal Resources Management (CRM). 2009. Eelgrass mitigation plan. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship dock renovation project. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. August 21't, 2009. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2010a. Final Report. Status and distribution of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Newport Bay, Orange County, California between 2006 and 2008 and oceanographic conditions in Newport Bay between 2009 and 2009. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Division. July, 2010. 126 pp. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2010b. Letter of completion. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship eelgrass transplant. Letter to Mr. Brad Avery, Orange Coast College Community Services District. Prepared by Mr. Rick Ware, Coastal Resources Management, Inc. October 25', 2010. 7 pp. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2011. Final Report. Status and distribution of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Newport Bay, Orange County, California between 2009 and 2010. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 17 Prepared for the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Division. November, 2011. 126 pp. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2011. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement. Results of Year 1 Post-Eelgrass Transplant Survey. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. December 15th, 2011. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2012. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement. Results of Year 2 Post-Eelgrass Transplant Survey. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. September 6th, 2012 National Marine Fisheries Service. 1991, as amended. (11th Revision). Southern California eelgrass mitigation policy. Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 Appendix 1. Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy Monitoring and Compliance Reporting Summary Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 19 PERMIT DATA 5-04-167; 5-04-167-A1 November 2004;I Fernie Sy April 14th, 2010 EELGRASS IMPACT AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY: Permitted Eelgrass Impact Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement same as permit ref. Estimate 25 mZ Actual Eelgrass Impact, December 6th 2005 (post -const. survey 105.2 m2 date) (reference report is below Brad Avery, Bruce Tice ermittee contact Coastal Resources Management Mitigation Consultant (CRM). 2006. Marine biological 949 412-9446; 949 67i5-2970; rware.crm@earthlink.net resources. Post -construction survey, Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship dock renovation project. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. January 26th, 2006. 16 pp. Coastal Resources Management (CRM). 2009. Eelgrass mitigation plan. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship dock renovation project. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. August 21st, 2009. Eelgrass Mitigation Requirement 126 ,n2 Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Boat Basin Impact Site Location Newport Harbor, California Impact Site Center Coordinates 33036.99 N,117o 55.08' W . NAD 83, ft Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Boat Basin Mitigation Site Location Mitigation Site Center Coordinates 33*36.99 N,117, 55.08' W . NAD 83, ft PERMITTEE CONTACT INFORMATION: Project Name Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement same as permit ref. Permittee Information Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA (mailing address Newport Beach, CA 92663 (city, state, zip) Brad Avery, Bruce Tice ermittee contact brad@occsailin .co • 949 645-9412 hone, fax., e-mail) Mitigation Consultant Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Rick Ware 949 412-9446; 949 67i5-2970; rware.crm@earthlink.net Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 20 PROJECT ACTIVITY DATA: 'tyActivi.. a Sfiart Da#e:. End DatE' . Reference Lnfo'; Eelgrass Impact March 2005 December 2006 Installation of Eelgrass Mitigation Sept 81h, 2010 Sept 911~, 2010 Initiation of Mitigation Monitoring Sept 1s1, 2011 Sept 11t, 2011 MITIGATION STATUS DATA: MitigationScheduled Survey Area (Mn2) Density Reference Info. Milestone SurveyIF Date (ti�rzon/m Requirement 126 sq m 24-98 turions per Coastal Resources ;y 111 , .° sq meter (2004- Management. 2005. j .. 2005) Final Report. Distribution and `eelgrass abundance of (Zosters marina) in Newport ,462 t Bay. 2003-2004 eelgrass habitat ` mapping Project. Bulkhead to F pierhead line surveys. Prepared ' for the City of `' Newport Beach N Harbor Resources h Division. April i 2005. 30 pp. 01 ZE Coastal Resources Management (CRM). y 2005a. Marine biological resources impact assessment. i F i Pre -construction ' survey, Orange Coast College School y;yof Sailing and Seamanship dock renovation project. f Prepared for the F Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. April 7th, 2005 0 -month Sept 81h2010 Sept 911, 2011 180 10-12 turions per bundle; 192 bundles spaced 1.0 sq meter apart Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 21 6 -month 8 March, 2011 Visually Majority of Not determined; CRM. Unpublished inspected on bundles visual survey field data from the day 3/15/2011. observed in only; general of the survey. rows; outline of spreading transplant areas beginning, but visible. limited. 12 -month 6 Sept 2011 1 Sept 2011 117.4 72 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2011. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement. Results of Year 1 Post- Eelgrass Transplant Survey. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. December 151 2011. 24 -month 1 sept 2012 31 August 2012 182.2 124.8 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2012. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement. Results of Year 2 Post- Eelgrass Transplant Survey. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. September 6t' 2012 36 -month 1 Sept 2013 8 Aug 2013 230.2 66.4 Coastal Resources Management, Inc. 2013. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement. Results of Year 3 Post- Eelgrass Transplant Survey. Prepared for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship. November 1511 2013 48 -month 1 sept 2014 60 -month 1 sept 2015 FINAL ASSESSMENT: Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 22 Was mitigation met? Were mitigation and monitoring performed timely? Was delay penalty required or were supplemental mitigation programs necessary? Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 23 APPENDIX 2 COASTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC. PROJECT STAFF Rick Ware, Principal Investigator, Senior Marine Biologist, Field Ops and Report Preparation Mike Anghera, Diving Safety Officer Tom Gerlinger-Field Ops Staff Robin Kohler -Field Ops Staff Amanda Bird -Field Ops Staff Coastal Resources Management, Inc. Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Eelgrass Transplant Monitoring Report -Year 3 Exhibit 7 Report of Geotechnical Investigation October 17, 2012 Prepared by: Associated Soils Engineering SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Prepared For; ORANGE COAST COLLEGE SCHOOL OF SAILING AND SEAMANSHIP 1801 West east Highway Newport Beach, California Prosect No. 12-6349 October 17, 2012 2860 WALNUT AVE, - SIGNAL HILL, CALIF, 90755 PHONL5621426-799()-FAX 5621426-184P SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Consulting Gootochnical Engineer,,; October 17, 2012 Project No. 12-6349 ORANGE COAST COLLEGE (OCC) SCHOOL OF SAILING AND SEAMANSHIP 1801 West Coast Highway Newport Beach, California 92663 Attention: Ms. Sheri Crowe Subject: REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Proposed Docks at OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 West Coast Highway, Newport Beach, California Ladies and Gentlemen: Presented herewith is the Report of Geotechnical Investigation (The Soils Report) prepared by Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. (ASE) for the proposed new docks at the subject site. ASE's analysis has concluded that piling for the proposed dock construction is geotechnically feasible. Presented in this Soils Report are ASE's findings of field investigation, data of laboratory testing, results of engineering analysis, and recommendations and guidelines for piling design and construction. We at ASE appreciate the opportunity to provide our professional services on this important project. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the undersigned. Respectfully submitted, ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. En veering Geologist. Q<j'1929 JRW/LC:jw 0 C Distribution: (5) Addressee Lawrence J.D. Chang, P. Geotechnical Engineer, No.2800r EER 1 13l1-? cj� i r' I I IA ;. V11 Lr- OR WOUGMEM Section Pao. 1.0 INTRODUCTION I 1.1 Proposed Project I 1.1.1 Design Concepts 1 1.2 Scope of Investigation 1 2.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2 2.1 Site Description 2 2.2 Subsurface Solis 2 3.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY 2 3.1 Deterministic Analysis 3 3.2 Probabilistic Analysis 4 3.3 2010 CBC Seismic Design Parameters 4 4.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 6 4.1 Surface Fault Rupture and Ground Shaking 6 4.2 Seismic Hazards 6 4.2.1 Liquefaction 6 4.12 Seismic Settlements 7 4.2.3 Earthquake -Induced Landslides 8 4.2,4 Lateral Spreading 8 4.2 .5 Tsunami and Seiches 9 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 511 Piling Design Parameters 9 5.2 Results of Piling Analysis 10 5.3 Soil Corrosivity Evaluation 11 5.4 Plan Review, Observations and Testing 12 6.0 CLOSURE 12 APPENDIX RECORD OF FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 14 A.1 Site Exploration 14 A.2 Laboratory Testing is Moisture Content and Density Tests 15 Uni-Axial Consolidation and Direct Shear Tests 15 Direct Shear Tests is Particle Size Analysis 15 Section Page No` SolubleSulfates 15 Plate A Boring Location Map Plates B-1 through R-3 Field Logs of erring Plates G-1 and C-2 Consolidation Test Results (dates D-1 through D-3 Direct Shear Test Results Plates G_1 through G -E Particle Size Test Results APPENDIX B SITE FAULTING/SEISMICITY DATA AND SEISMIC HAZARD QUANTIFICATION 16 APPENDIX C GRAPHICAL RESULTS OF PILING ANALYSIS 17 APPENDIX D LIST OF REFERENCES 18 Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Design Response Spectrum Figure 3 Local Seismic Hazard Map Figure 4 Assessment of Ground Displacement Associated with Liquefaction Induced Lateral Spreading 1.0 This Soils Report presents the findings, ' cnncJuokons and recommendations of ASE's geotechnical investigation with regard to the planned piles tobminstalled |nsupport ofdocks for the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship (the School) located at 1801 West [oastHighway in the City of Newport Beach, California, The site location is shown on the Site Location Map (Figure 1). ASE.y geotechnical evaluation and analysis has utilized .relevant subsurface soils information and properties derived from three exploratory borings excavated on site by ASE and laboratory test data from representative soil samples collected from those borings. ASE has concluded that the planned installation of piles for dock support at OL[ School of Sailing and Seamanship is geotechn|caUv feasible. 1n addition to recommendations and criteria for piling design, also presented in this Soils Report are general guidelines for piling construction and load testing. ' The following information provided Uythe School bubderstogd1obeapplicable atthe time of -_ Report preparation. 1,1.1 Design Concepts,, It is proposed to reconfigure existing docks tocreate an88-fuot deep boat slip. piles are to be removed and new piles installed. For pilingASE has assumed that the piles are to be subjected toavertical load of1Ukips and alateral load of10kips, both applied otpile. head a1the same elevation as the current dock level. 1.2 Scopp.of Investigation Inaccomplishing the subject investigation,ASE has performed the following tasks: 1. Review of readily available background information, including onopo and geotechnical reports provided by the School; and published geologic maps and sehm|chazardmaps. 2. A geotechnical site reconnaissance to observe the general conditions at the site and to select boring ' locatuns, followed b� notification toUnderground Service Alert of the planned�eotechnNcm| � drilling. '! ]L Fie dexploratk/D consistingo{3 ho| auger borings, The were .logged hmthe field � sampleswere collected, The locations0ftbe borings ' are shown on. the, Boring � Map, Plate X ! 4. Laboratory _es_h~ on representative soil samples for the classification of soil materials !encountered, and for the determinationnf pertinent engineering properties. .. ' OCC School nfSailing and Seamanship October 17,2o12 Project No. z2-6349 Page | SOILS ENGINEERING, |mC. ` ` 5. Engineering analyses of the collected data, covering the following aspects: o, Evaluation of general subsurface conditions and description of types, distribution, and engineering characteristics of subsurface materials. r ,:,, Assessment of site geologic/seismic hazards and mitigative measures, if appropriate. c) Determination of the seismic design parameters in accordance with Chapters 16 and 18 of the California Building Code, 2010 Edition ("2010 CBC"). o Recommendations for the design and construction of piling for the dock based on results of analysis utilizing the "ALL -PILE" software, Version 3.2. 6. Preparation of this Solis report presenting ASE's findings of field investigation, data of laboratory . testing, results of engineering analysis, and recommendations and guidelines for piling design and construction Please note thatASE's geotechnical investigation did not include any evaluation or assessment othazardous or toxic materials which may or may, not exist on or beneath the site. ASE does not consult in the field of potential site contamination1migaotion. 2.0 SITE AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 2.1 Site Description The subject site is located on the harbor shoreline adjacent to an asphalt -paved parking lot and the School building. The existing docks are currently used to berth boats used by the School. The existing docks are supported by concrete piles and the gangway is attached to a seawall. 2.2 Subsurface Solis The earth materials located in the planned piling areas consist of late Holocene -age estuarine deposits. These soils generally consist of dark gray to black stratified silty sands and clayey sits. Softer materials representing recent sediments were observed up to 7 feet deep from the existing mud line, which is roughly 13 feet deep measured from the existing dock level, Soil stratifications revealed in both the landside boring (i.e. Boring Brl) and the dock -side borings (i.e. Borings B-2 and B-3) have been compared, with laboratory -test -derived soils properties obtained from Boring B-1 being applied to similar soil strata encountered in Borings B-2 and B-3, for the purpose of seismic hazard evaluation and piling analysis. 3.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY The Newport Beach area, like the rest of Southern California, is located within a seismically active region as a result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. Q OCC School of sailing and Seamanship October 17; 2012 1-1 T� Project No- 12-6349 Page 2 -SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. The principal source of seismic activity is movement along the northwest -trending regional faults such as the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Newport -Inglewood and Whittier -Elsinore fault zones. The California Geological Survey (COS) has defined an active fault as one which has had surface displacement within the Holocene Epoch (roughly the last 11,000 years). The CGS has defined a potentiallu active fault as any fault which has been active during the Quaternary Period (approximately the last 1,600,000 years). These definitions are used in delineating Earthquake Fault Zones as mandated by the Alquist-Priolo Geologic hazard Zones Act of 1972 and as subsequently revised in 1997 as the Alquist--Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act and Earthquake Fault Zones. The intent of the act is to require fault investigations on sites located within .Special Studies Zones to preclude new construction of certain inhabited structures across the trace of active faults. The subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No evidence of active or potentially active faulting was observed during our investigation. Several sources were consulted for information pertaining to site seismicity. The majority of data was obtained from the publication by Sadgh, Chang et.al, (1997) which has been incorporated into a digital program (i.e. "EQFAULT") by Blake (20100) that allows for an estimation of peak horizontal acceleration using a data file of approximately ,150 digitized California faults. This program complies information including the dominant type of faulting within a particular region, the maximum earthquake magnitude each fault is capable of generating, the estimated slip -rate for each fault, and the approximate location of the fault trace. Printouts of the results of the fault search using "EQFAULT for the subject site are shown in Appendix B. There are a number of faults in the Southern California area that are considered "active" and could have an effect on the site in the form of moderate to strong ground shaking, should they be the source of an earthquake. These faults include, but are not limited to, the San Andreas Fault, the Sail Jacinto Fault, the Whittier -Elsinore Fault and the Newport -Inglewood Fault Zone. The closest "known active" fault is the Newport -Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault. Known active traces faults within the Newport --Inglewood fault zone are located approximately 0.7 mile (1.2 km) to the north (L.A. Basin segment) and 1.8 miles (2.9 km) to the south (offshore segment) of the site. Other nearby active faults include the San Joaquin Hills Fault and the Palos Verdes Fault, located approximately 3.2 miles (5.2km) and 12.6 miles (20.2 km) away, respectively. 3.1 Deterministic Analysis Based on the referenced literature and deterministic analysis, the Newport -Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault approximately 0.7 mile (1.2 km) to the north of the site, would probably generate the most severe site ;ground motions. A Maximum Probable Earthquake, (defined as the maximum earthquake that carries a 10 nt-rrt-nt exceedance probability in 50 nears and a 100 -year return period), of 7.1 Mw (n orrient magnitude) C, c� OCC School of Sailing and seamanship October 17, 2012 Project ,No. 12-6349 Page -3 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. has been assessed along the Newport -Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault. As shown in Appendix C, the estimated peak horizontal ground acceleration ("PGA") resulting from the above -stated maximum earthquake on the Newport -Inglewood (L.A. Basin) Fault is on the order of 0.54g should this event occur at the fault's closest approach to the site. In addition, approximately 39 active or potentially active faults have been found within 62 miles (100 km) of site. The possibility of ground acceleration or shaking at the site may be considered as approximately similar to the Southern California region as a whole. 3.2 Probabilistic Analysis The probabilistic approach incorporates the contributions from all faults and considers the likelihood of the occurrence of earthquakes at any point on the fault. It also incorporates the. contributions from earthquakes of various magnitudes, including the maximum credible earthquake, as described by ldriss (1985). The seismicity of the Site was evaluated utilizing probabilistic analysis available from CGS. As described in Cao et.al. (2005) and Peterson et.al. (1996), the CGS analytical framework considers two earthquake sources, i.e. fault sources and area sources, together with geologic/soil characteristics and tectonic movements, for the quantification of PGA of bedrock when subjected to a MPE event, As site-specific ground conditions; e.g. soft rock and alluvium, might attenuate or amplify bedrock -based PGA's, CGS further incorporates recornmenclations proposed by NEHRP (1994 & 1997) that modify bedrock -based PGA's for both soft rock sites and alluvium sites. For structural design with a typical damping ratio of 5%, two spectral acceleration (SJ values representing structural periods of 0.2 second (typical of low-rise buildings) and 1.0 second (typical of multi -story buildings) have also been analyzed. As shown in the Appendix 13, CGS's probabilistic analysis with a soil classification of "W', as the site is underlain predominantly by late Holocene -age estuarine deposits, indicates that the site is subject to a PGA of 0.425g, a Sa (0.2 sec) of 1.007g, and a Sa (1.0 sec) of 0.4988. 3.3 2010 CDC Seismic Desian Parameters The earthquake design requirements listed in the 2010 CBC and other governing standards account for faults classified as "active" and the scenario of Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) that carries a 2% exceeclance probability in 50 years (i.e. a 2475 — year return period), in accordance with the most recent fault listing as per the United States Geological Survey (USGS) or the CGS. The proposed structures should be designed and constructed in accordance With applicable portions of Chapters 16 and 18 of the 2010 CBC. The 2010 CBC seismic design criteria for the Site had been determined utilizing the Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator— Version 5.0.8 available from the Seismic Design Values for Buildings webpage on the website of Earthquake Hazard Program of U.S. Geological Survey (htt . earth uakq, s,,s, ov ressea c[V Occ School of Sailing and Seamanship October 17, 2012 Project No. 12-6349 Page 4 SOILS ENCANEERING, INC. IL rn , esjf; i). A Summary of the seismic coefficients for the Site is presented in the table below, followed by the design response spectra shown on Figure 2, General Design Response Spectrum. .. x .--..... . 2010 CBC SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS ............. _ .. Site Latitude# N 33:6165 -- ---� Site longitude: W117.9181 _ - Seismic Parameter Recommended Value site Classb ...._ - -...._.m_ Soil Profile Name b Site Coefficient, Fa ` ------ -- .. �.� Stiff Soil Profile. 1.0 Site Coefficient, FV d 1.5 0,2 -Second Spectral Response Acceleration, Ss e 1.851g, 1.0 -Second Spectral Response Acceleration, S1 f 0.696g Adjusted 0.2 -Second Spectral Response Acceleration, SNis B 1.8518 _ Adjusted 1.0 -Second Spectra) Response Acceleration, Sm1 r 1.0438 .mow Design 0.2 -Second Spectral Response Acceleration, SDs' 1.234g Design 1.0 -Second Spectral Response Acceleration, Soli 0.696g m o- v... � PGA for Site Seismic Hazard Analysis k 0.494g Occupancy Category t orII III IV Seismic Design Category based on Sos i D p _ D Seismic Design Category based on SDI' D D � D a Per 2010 CBC Table 1613.5.2 b Per 2010 CBC Table 1613.5.2 C Per lava Ground Motion Parameter Calculator from USGS;website. Also shown on 2010 CBC Table 16135:3 (1). d Per lava Ground Motion Parameter Calculator from USES website. Also shown on 2010 CBC Table 1613.5.3 (2). e Per lava Ground Motion Parameter Calculator from USGS website. Also shown on 2010 CBC Figure 1613.5 (1). f Per lava Ground Motion Parameter Calculator from USGS website. Also shown on 2010 CBC Figure 1613.5 (2): 9 SMS = Fa x Ss h Sm, =FvxS, i SDs = 2/3 x SMs J SO, =2/3XSK k PGA = SDs/2.5 per 2010 CBC Section 1803.5.12.2. I Per 2010 CBC Table 1613.5.6. Also refer to 2010 CBC Section 1613.5.6 for special conditions. m Per 2010 CBC Table 1613.5.6 (2). ,Also refer to 2010 CBC Section 1613.5.6 for special conditions. Conformance to the above tabulated criteria for seismic excitation does not Constitute any kind of guarantee: or assurance that significant structural damage or ground failure will not take place during the occurrence of a MCE The primary goal of seismic design is to protect.life and not to avoid all damage, since such design may be economically prohibitive. Following a major earthquake, a building may be damaged beyond repair, yet not collapse. As the PGA assessed from the deterministic analysis using "EQFAULT" software, i.e. 0.54 g, appears to be most conservative, it is recommended herein to be incorporated in project structural design and planning, Q OCC School of Sailing and 5eamanshlp Project No. 12-6349 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. October 17, 2012 Page -5 4. c ° S M QJ u a. CL 0 3 Ln 4Jx � 0 c 0) m 1 '. ro d CL tw ® 00 m C l;00 a W 3 v Q w toba3 v c -r: ' w Ix ¢ a as �, 4) i � stn M if dynamic structural analysis is adopted. This RGA has also been incorporated in ASE's liquefaction analysis presentedin Section 4.2.1 below. 4.0 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 Surface Fault Rupture and Ground Shaking The subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. No known active or potentially active faults are shown crossing the site on published maps reviewed. No evidence for active faulting was encountered in the exploratory borings performed during the evaluation. The risk of surface rupture at the Site is considered low. Being in close proximity to several known active and potentially active faults, severe ground shaking should be expected during the design life of the proposed Improvements. 4.2 Seismic Hazards 4.2.1 Liquefaction: As evidenced in Figure 3, Local Seismic Map, the Site, as well as the surrounding area, is within an area identified by CGS as having a potential for soil liquefaction when subject to a MPE event. The term "liquefaction" describes a phenomenon in which a saturated cohesionless soil loses strength and acquires a degree of mobility as a result of strong ground shaking during an earthquake. The factors known to the influence liquefaction potential include soil type and depth, grain size, relative density, groundwater level, degree of saturation, and both the Intensity and duration of ground shaking. The soils to the maximum explored depth of 45 feet 8 inches below the existing parking.lot grade at Boring B-1 generally consist of loose to medium dense sand and silty sand to a depth of 20 feet, followed by interstratified very dense sand and silty sand layers and very stiffto hard clayey silt layers to the terminal depth of Boring 8-1. During ASE's field exploration, groundwater was 7 feet deep in the landside Boring B-1. According to the CGS (1998), historic high groundwater in the vicinity of the subject site has been estimated to be between 2 to 5 feet below grade on the landside. As such, a high historical groundwater level at 2.2 feet deep has been incorporated in ASE's liquefaction analysis. Liquefaction analysis Was performed with LIQUEFY2 Version 1.50 software taking into account 1) 4) ASE's field and laboratory data and soil profile from Boring B-1; 2) PGA from "EQFAULr analysis Le. OCC School of Salting and Seamanship October 17, 2012 1� 1 Project No. 12-6349 page 6 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. C a c a c eq u c w r N su a' m n 61 t S(: �n fi W a, N n 4,w a° a°1 a E a< g 0 n CL u cn E F 0 e t� r a a 0 0-Z a C a c c w N N su a' c n 61 y^ S(: C fi W a, N n a a° a°1 a G ai F 0 it d C a w N N S(: C fi W a, N a a° a°1 ON3931 0.54g; 3) the historical high groundwater level of2.2feet deep aaper county well records; and 4)a maximum earthquake magnitude of 7.1 per GQFAU[T^ASE incorporated aconver kmfactorlfn.63 as suggested in Section 5.4,5 of Reference B for converting ring sampler blow counts into equivalent SPT blow counts (the 0values). These converted blow counts were app||ed in the liquefaction analyses as necessary. ABE!s liquefaction calculations also considered a conservative sampler size correction factor, C,, of 1.1 (oUommNe range between 1.1and 13), and a hammer correction factor Ch, of 1.3 (allowable range between 0.8 and 1.3) for the automatic trip donut hammer utilized for sampling. Itisstipulated in Special Publication 117A (2008; Reference 1Z) that o factor ofsafety against liquefaction of1.30 isdeemed the threshold value |odetermining the liquefaction susceptibility of certain soil stratum. Aspresented in Rates L1 through L3 in Appendix B, /SE's liquefaction analyses indicate that liquefaction -prone soil strata exist between u.S and 8'5 feet deep, and between 19and 1B.5feet deep inBoring B*1. While the soil layer between 4.5 and Q.5feet deep |nBoring 8-1does not correlate with any soil layers encountered in dock -side Borings B-2 and B-3 due to apparent elevation difference, soils up to7feet and Gfeet deep inBorings 8-2and B-3, respectively, are deemed similar tothose between 1Sand 18^Sfeet deep UmBoring B-1.Therefore, ^ forthe pilinganalysis, ' ' soOsuptn7feet deep from the current mud line have been considered Uquefacbortpnonewith extremely large strain potential and assigned mocontribution tu pilingcapadty, 4.2,2 Seismic Settlements: Ground accelerations emitted from a seismic event can causedensification of loose soils both above and below the groundwater table that may result in settlements onground surface due to volumetric compression of soil mass. This phenomenon is often referred to as seismic settlement and commonly takes place in relatively clean sands, as well as soils with low plasticity and less fines. Per Section 4.2.1 above the soils up to 7`feet deep from the current mud line are deemed liquefaction -prone, and have been assessed to exhibit potential for up to Z'Ginches .of seismic settlement as a result of post -liquefaction volumetric re -densification. Upon seismic impact, the liquefied soils are to behave like gel with noshear strength and, therefore, are ignored from 'piling capacity calculation. Also, as there is no non -liquefiable soil crustal layer located above this Uqumfact|nn-pr0neooU|ayer,podowpdrogeffect.homsettlinQorusta|mnD|oyer|saot|cipatedbo impact the piles. NCC School of Sailing and Seamanship A Project m6.12 -6a49 October 17, 2012 Page 7 4,23 Earthquake -induced Landslides: There is no indication that recent landslides or unstable slope conditions exist on or adjacent to the project site that would otherwise result in an obvious landslide hazard to the proposed improvements or adjacent properties. In addition, according to CGS (1999) the site is not located within an area identified as having a potential for earthquake -induced landslides as evidenced in Figure 3. 4.2.4 Lateral Spreading: Lateral spreading, a phenomenon associating with seismically -induced sail liquefaction, is a display of lateral displacement of soils due to inertial motion and lack of lateral support during or post liquefaction. It, is typically exemplified by the formation of vertical cracks on the surface of liquefied soils, and usually takes place ongently sloping ground or level ground with nearby free surface such as dredged channel. Due to the likely sloping gradient of seabed in the vicinity of the site, the potential for the occurrence of liquefaction -induced lateral spreading cannot be ruled but. For the assessment of displacement associated with lateral spreading, Cetin et al. (2004) presented the updated empirical predictive equations for two different ground conditions, i.e, level ground with a -nearby free face and gently sloping ground (0.3 to 5% gradient), as follows: A. Level Ground with Free Face Condition: Log DH = -16.713 + 1.532M --1.406 log R* - 0.01211 + 0.592 log W + 0,540 log T15 + 3.413 log (100 — F15) _,0.795 log (D5015 + 0.1mm) B. GentlySlopjng Ground Condition; Lag DH= -16.213 + 1.532M —1.406 log R* - 0.012R+0.338 log S+0.540 log T15 +3.413 log (100—Fis)-0.795 log (D5015,+0.1mm) Whereas, SOILS ENGINEERINGi INC. DH = Horizontal ground displacement, in meters; M = Earthquake magnitude (i.e. MJ; R = Horizontal distance to nearest seismic source or to nearest fault rupture in km; R* = R + R,, where R, = &'89m' 544) S Gradient or surface topography or ground slope, in %; W free -face ratio, defined as the height of the free face divided by its distance to point of calculation; Tis = Thickness of saturated layers with (N1)r,0:515, in meters, F1r, Average fines content (particles < 0.075mm) in T,5, in %; and D5015 a Average D50 in Tl.,,,, in nim. OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship Project No. 12-6349 October 37, 2012 Page 8 The accuracy of the alcove equations in predicting ground displacement associated with liquefaction -induced lateral spreading has been evaluated to be within a factor-. of 2 by Seed et at (2003) for ground displacements greater than 1.5 meters (roughly 5 feet) and less reliable for smaller ground displacements. As shown on Figural 4, based on the above equation for gentle sloping ground condition, the potential ground displacement associated with seismically -induced liquefaction within the upper 7 feet of soils from the current mud line has been assessed to be on the order of 1.548 meters; or 5.074 feet. 4.2.5 Tsunamis and 5eiches Due to the site's frontage to the harbor, potential hazard from a seismically -excited tsunami exists at the site. Per Legg, et,al., 2003, the coastal region of :Southern California stretching from Santa Monica to Dana Point could be subjected to wave run-up exceeding 3.3 feet, with peaks as high as 4.9 to 7.2 feet expected along the Orange County coast from Seal Beach to Newport Beach, should the footwall block southwest of the Catalina escarpment subside more than 4.3 feet. Seiches are rhythmic movements of water within a lake or other enclosed or semi -enclosed body of water, such as Newport Bay, generally caused by earthquakes. As such, seismically -induced seiches may affect the project site. 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of this Investigation, it is ASE's opinion that the installation of piles for supporting the dock improvements on site is geotechnically feasible, provided the piling foundation design and construction criteria presented herein are incorporated into the project design, plans and specifications and implemented during construction. 5.1 Piling Design Prarmeters As aforementioned in Section 1.1.1, in the absence of loading information on the piles, for the purpose of piling analysis, ASE has assumed that the piles are to be subjected to avertical load of 10 kips and a lateral load of 10 kips, both applied at pile head at the same elevation as the current dock level. The soils profile and pertinent engineering properties adopted for piling analysis using the "All -Pile" software (Version 3.2); are summarized in Table 1 below. Based on ASE's experience with prior projects in the vicinity, a pile embedment depth of 30 feet below mud line has also been selected for analysis. Concrete piles consisting of either round (cross-section) pile or square (cross-section) pile having dimension of 14 inches, 16 inches, 18 inches and 24 inches have been analyzed. ASE should be consulted if other pile material, dimension, or length, or different loading conditions are defined by the Structural Consultant.. Q AZ OCC School of sailing and Seamanship Project No. 12-5349 OILS ENGINEERING, INC. October 17, 2012 Page m 44 3: V E cv ro .T V O to O 'tea® CL 0 cr (D '5 L �CL E m V CL toti W o M 41 M tw cm c fG = :6 4J TO A. E F o N V M "p 0 41 UP !11 IO 0 cr rd 0 A A it A A A A A A m 0 4) E 0 'o OC u ) o 4' 0 QJ CL U 0 acs 42 T .2 4- 'A 4j 0 ixG UO 0 CL N t)D 0 to CL 0 U 4!es 5 0 st 'fu 11 11 w N. j C C In M 01 UJ AL 0 IF C 00 m ID 0 in In It( Fable 1 Solis Properties for Piling Analysis DepthSubmerged p {ft) Density Angie (degree) Cohesion (ksf) Modulus of Subgrade Reaction K c Soil Strain, eso, or Relative Density, Dr (' N pT Soil Type 0.0 g 50.1 15.0 0.05 12.0 2.32 2 SM -ML 7.0 68.21 30.0 0.05 56.7 48.33 K, 17 SP 10.0 48.8 25.0 0.20 1934.3 0.38 40 SM -ML 12.0 65.9 30.0 0.09 72.6 55.94 22 SP 14.0 48,1 25:0 0.50 2188.9 0.35 45 .Yuw ML 17.0 47.8 28.0 0.59 2466.1 0.33 50 ML 25.0 50.4 27.8 1,00 2688.9 0.31 55 ML 1. Ignored in pining capacitycomputation. 5.7. Results of Piling Analysis The piling analysis was performed using "ALL -PILE" software (Version 3.2) that adopts the P -Y Curve methodology and the algorithm presented in the computer program, COM524P, developed by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The results are listed in Table 2 below: Table 2 Summary of Results of Piling Analysis 1. "R" = round cross section; "S" -= square cross section. 4� ct� SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. occ school of Sailing and Seamanship Project No; 12-6349 October 17, 2012 Page 10 Settlement Head Pt, of Max. Max. Pile Shape Allowable under Allowable Deflection Deflection Fixity Moment Shear Concrete Compressive Allowable Uplift from Top under` Pile Length &under Capacity Compressive Resistance Lateral Load of Pile lateral Lateral (ft) Dimension{ki Load. p) toad Load .(kip) (in) (in) (ft) (stip-ft) (kips) R14" 65.6 0.36 37.8 27.10 30.6 223.3 26.1 c R16" 80.1 OA9 44.7 1.5.50 30.9 215.8 23.9 E R18" 95.7 0.43 51.9 9.87 31.E 211.7 22.3 o R24" 1403 0.54 74.6 3.59 34.0 210.8 20.5 m ro au rn c7 514" 83.5 0.45 48.2 1.5,70 30.9 216.7 24,0 in ro S16" 102.0 0.49 56.9 9.42 31:6 213.3 22.2 CU S18" 121.9 0.53 66,2 6.08 32.4 210.8 21.0 S24" 1.79.1 0.68 95.2 2.33 35.5 215.0 20.9 1. "R" = round cross section; "S" -= square cross section. 4� ct� SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. occ school of Sailing and Seamanship Project No; 12-6349 October 17, 2012 Page 10 Plates M-1 through Mix -4 in Appendix C shows the graphical results of allowable bearing and uplift capacities for piles with different embedment depths. For the design pile subjected to different lateral loads, the corresponding pile head deflections are shown on Plates Ml -5 and M-6, the maximum bending moments are shown on Plates M-7 and M-8, the shears are shown on Plates M-9 and M-10, and the points of fixity are shown on Plates M-1,1 and M-12, all presented in Appendix C. The above piling analysis has been performed assuming single piles spaced no closer than 4 pile diameters on centers. ASE should be consulted for possible group effect if singles piles are located closer than 4 diameters on centers. It is recommended that the Structural Consultant should select the appropriate pile type and spacing based on structural requirements while take into account the tolerable lateral deflection and settlement. Upon finalization of pile selection and availability of finalized structural loading, the Geotechnical Consultant should be consulted for provision of updated pile design information, if necessary. The equipment utilized for the installation of piles should be reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant for its driving mechanism and energy rating. During pile installation, the Geotechnical Consultant should be on site to observe and evaluate that subgrade soils condition does not deviate significantly from the lassumed conditions, to provide timely assessment and recommendations upon the encounter of subsurface obstruction or difficult pile driving condition, as well as to verify the attainment of sufficient embedment/tip resistance. At least two (2) piles should be selected and subjected to pile load testing using Pile Dynamic Analyzer (PDA) method to determine that design pile capacity is attainable with sufficient Factor of Safety (FOS, typically no less; than 2.0). The test pile program should be established by the Geotechnical Consultant and implemented prior to installation of production piles. Results of the test pile program will facilitate the review of pile design criteria that are established based on information available from preliminary geotechnical investigation, and will assist In the fine-tuning of production piling plan and establishment of suitable pile cut-off criteria. 5.3 Sail Corrosiyity Evaluation [disintegration of concrete may be attributed to the chemical reaction of soil sulfates and hydrated lime and calcium aluminate within the cement. The severity of the reaction resulting in expansion and disruption of the cement is primarily a function of the concentration of the soluble sulfates and the water -cement ratio of the concrete cs' occ school of Sailing and Seamanship October 17, 2012 Project No. 17-6349 Page 11 SOLS ENGINEERING, INC. Soluble sulfate contents ranging from0.086toO.139%bvweight have been recorded from testing conducted onrepresentative site soils. Per Table 4.2.1ofACI 318-0XLsoils exhibiting soluble sulfate content less than O.2% by weight are classified as having "Moderate" sulfate exposure and "51" sulfate exposure category. As such, for plies to be in direct contact with site soils, the tested "SV sulfate exposure category indicates that the special geotechnical restrictions on the type pfPortland cement, unconfined compressive strength, orwater-cen1ent ratio asper stipulated |nTable 4.3.1ofACI 310-OQtobeapplied. 5.4 Plan Review, Observations an Testing All piling installation, including text piles, should be observed by representative of the Geotechnical Consultant to verify minimum piling embedment depth, competency of bearing soils, of pile installation, andprudenCy ofinstallation procedures. As piling plans are completed, they should be forwarded tothe Geotechnical Consultant for review of conformance with the recommendations of this Soils Report. 6.0 CLOSURE This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Orange Coast College (i.e. the and its ���d^ �� �{d� d�i���d�i�����h����n���e�t|� �� �os��qn proposed development otthe subject site. The. report has not been prepared for 'use byother parties, and may not contain sufficient information for purposes cfother parties. The Owner or their representatives should make guna thatthe information and recommendations contained in this report are brought tothe attention of the projectengineers and architects and incorporated into the plans, and that the necessary steps are taken to confirm that the contractors carry out such recommendations in the field. This office should benotified should any of the following, pertaining to the final site development, occur: 1- Final plans for site development indicating utilization of areas not originally proposed for construction. 2. Structural loading conditions differ significantly, say, ten [_ percent, from those utilized for evaluation and `preparation ofthis report, ]' The site grading/construction doesRototartxvithin 12 months following the date ofthis report. 4. Change of ownership of property that vvoV|d render the proposed development indicated in this report irrelevant orsignificantly different. OCC School of sailing and Seamanship October 1t2n12 Page 12 A��~��� ppUc�wu.12'e349 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Should any qfthe above occur, this office should benotified and provided with finalized plans ofsite development for our review to enable us to provide the necessary recommendations for additional work and/or updating ofthe report. Any charges for such review and necessary recommendations would be at the prevailing rate etthe time ofperforming review work. The findings contained inthis report are based upon our evaluation and interpretation qfthe information obtained for the limited number of test borings and the results of the laboratory testing and engineering analysis, As part ofthe engineering analysis |thas been assumed, and is expected, that the geotechnical conditions which exist across the site are similar to those encountered in the test excavations, However, no warranty is expressed or implied as to the conditions at locations or depths other than those excavated. Should ' any cqnditiqnSeMcountered during construction differ from those described herein, this office should be contacted immediatelyfor recommendations prior to continuation of work.. Our findings and recommendations were obtained in accordance with generally accepted current professional principles and local practice in geotechnical engineering and reflect our best professional judgment. We make no other warranty, either express or implied. These findings and recommendations are, hmwever, on the above assumption ofuniformity and upon proper quality control of fill placed and foundations installed. Geotechnical observations and testing� should be provided unucontinuous basis dudn0atthe 8�etocon�rmdes�n sand to verify conforconformance�once i the � intent of ourrecommendations.� if parties, other than Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. are engaged to provide services during construction they must be informed that they will berequired toassume complete responsibilityfor ' phase of the o—bYconcurring with the recommendations |nthis report nrproviding alternative ! This concludes our proposed scope ofservices. .However, our report issubject toreview the controlling ! authorities for theoroect. Any further geotechnical services that may berequired ofour office to respond � to uestoOa/conlment ofthe controlling aUthodtiesafter their review of the report will heperformed ona ! time and expense. basis as,per our current fee schedule. We would not proceed with any response to report � without authorization from your office. VVeappreciate ' your business and. hope that we can assist you during construction related service. OCCSchool of Sailing and Seamanship SOILS ENGINEERING, M. October 17, 2012 Page 13 APPENDIX A SITE EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING The following Appendix A presents 1.} a description of the field exploration program and the logs of exploratory barings, and 2) substantiating data and Laboratory test results. Both are a part of the basis of our engineering evaluations and recommendations presented in this report. A.1 Site Exploration Pursuant to your authorization of the geotechnical services proposed by ASE on August 8, 2012, field explorations were performed by drilling test borings at 3 pre -marked locations within the limits of the subject site on August.23, 2012, The approximate locations are indicated on the attached Site Map, Plate A. The exploratory borings were excavated by .let grilling, Inc.. utilizing a truck -mounted, Mobile B-61 8 -inch diameter hollow -stem auger for Boring 1, and a tri -pod supported 8 -inch diameter hollow stem auger for Borings 2 and 3. The borings were extended to a maximum depth of 45 feet 8 inches from the corresponding existing grades. Continuous observations of the materials encountered in the borings were recorded in the field. The soils were classified in the field by visual and textural examination and these classifications were supplemented by obtaining bulk soil samples for future examination in the laboratory. Relatively undisturbed samples of soils were extracted in a Modified California barrel sampler lined with 2.375 -inch diameter by one -inch high rings and tipped with tapered cutting shoe. Additional samples were obtained in a Standard Penetration sampler in accordance with specifications outlined in ASTM D1586. All samples were secured in moisture - resistant bags as soon as taken to minimize the loss of field moisture, followed by timely transportation to ASE's laboratory for ensuing testing:. Detailed descriptions of the soils encountered and conditions observed during the subsurface exploration are shown in the attached Field Logs of Boring B-1, B-2 and B-3. The boring logs also present the USCS classifications of soils encountered, depths and types of soil samples, field dry densities and moisture contents; as well as the corresponding laboratory tests performed. OCG school of Sailing and Seamanship Project No. 12-6349 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC;. October 17, 2012 Page 14, Parking Lot Sea Wall i_ Da Docks Docks it zs' 0 Zz Is' LB- Iz, Dock Dock Qu"to Newport Bay EXPLANATION ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC - B -3 PLATE • Approximate location of exploratory boring BORING LOCATION MAP Base map provided by OCC Sailing Center Map not to scale JOB NO. DATE A 12-6349 1 10/17/12 Dates(s) Drilled* 812312012 Logged By: Gary L. Martin 23(Ring) Drilled By: JET Drilling,lnr,. Total Depth: 45 Feet 8 Inches SM Rig Make/Model, CME 76 Hammer Type: Automatic . . ...... . . Drilling Method: Hollow -stem Auger Hammer Weight/Drop, 140 Lb.1±30 In. 4/6"(Ring) Hole Diameter: 8 Inches Surface Elevation: NIA S M Comments: Water encountered at 7 ft. Backfill not determined. . ..... . .... SAMPLE INTERVALS SID 26(SPT) z 0 za U_ 0 W z 0 I ry 5 z � W P a V > GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION W (n _jW 0 Z Z _j 72; W 01 T W 0 W 0 0 0 —0 5 10-11 10 15 z 15 . . ............ . .. . . . ...... 1. . ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT 5 ................ I ".. . . .__ I I - I .................... . - . . ...... - AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL: 6.0" SILTY SAND: FILL -Light olive brown, m oist,fine to medium -grained sand __ ........... . . . . . . ....... . ... ... . ............................... SAND: FILL Light graydamp,fine-grained sand,with shell pieces SILTY SAND: NATIVE -Dark gray,wet,fine- grained sand,trace clay,with lens Clay at 5 feet same as above __ . . ........... . .. . . .. . ................ . . . ... ............... . SILTY SAND: Dark gray to gray,wet,.fine- grained sand,with shells SAND: Dark gray,wet,fine-grained sand same as above SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray to gray,wet,fine-grained sand trace shell pieces 102.6 .3.1 36.1 983 26.6 113.6 19.1 24.2 101.7 119.1 22.7 .. ...... . .............. GRAIN SIZE GRAIN SIZE GRAIN SIZE .......... . .. . SM 23(Ring) SP SM 4(SPT) . . ...... . . 4/6"(Ring) SM 16/6" S M (Ring) . ..... . .... SID 26(SPT) 32(Ring) I SP 4(SPT) SP -SM . . ............ . .. . . . ...... 1. . ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT 5 ................ I ".. . . .__ I I - I .................... . - . . ...... - AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL: 6.0" SILTY SAND: FILL -Light olive brown, m oist,fine to medium -grained sand __ ........... . . . . . . ....... . ... ... . ............................... SAND: FILL Light graydamp,fine-grained sand,with shell pieces SILTY SAND: NATIVE -Dark gray,wet,fine- grained sand,trace clay,with lens Clay at 5 feet same as above __ . . ........... . .. . . .. . ................ . . . ... ............... . SILTY SAND: Dark gray to gray,wet,.fine- grained sand,with shells SAND: Dark gray,wet,fine-grained sand same as above SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray to gray,wet,fine-grained sand trace shell pieces 102.6 .3.1 36.1 983 26.6 113.6 19.1 24.2 101.7 119.1 22.7 .. ...... . .............. GRAIN SIZE GRAIN SIZE GRAIN SIZE GRAIN SIZE CONSOL SHEAR. SLILFAfE GRAIN SIZE . . 44(Ring) SAMPLE _ ... ....... SAND: Dark graywet,fine-grained 1. 5 8 3 ._.i sand with shell pieces INTERVALS .' SP U 122.0 z F ; ML z O- l 32A 3916„ ®(SPT) � 0 E' cn W 17— :E w z 0 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION SP W LU x 55(SPT) ML- SILT WITH SAND: Very dark grayish brown 37:9 to black,very rnoist,with organic odor W ° 0 ° r 74/9" t1 O Q WJ (Ring) black,very moist,with organic odor [� [] U GRAIN SIZE CONSOL SHEAR. SLILFAfE GRAIN SIZE . . 44(Ring) . . . ........... ......... .-.. SP _ ... ....... SAND: Dark graywet,fine-grained 1. 5 8 3 ._.i sand with shell pieces 20 202216" .' SP 122.0 (SPT) ; ML CLAYEY SILT: Very dark grayish l 32A 3916„ ®(SPT) - brownvery moist i 33(Ring) SP SAND: Dark gray,wet,fine-grained sand 105.2 22.4 55(SPT) ML- SILT WITH SAND: Very dark grayish brown 37:9 to black,very rnoist,with organic odor E 74/9" ML CLAYEY SILT: Very dark grayish brown to 63:9- 39:6 (Ring) black,very moist,with organic odor 30---- 3080(SPT) I same as above 39.6 £ E 54(Ring)ML same as above,becoming black 79.9 37.9: 35 - 35 82/11 N1L same as above 33.3 i 78/9` ML same as above 81.6 85.1 (Ring) 40 40, _ ...... ..... , — ...... - ---- ...... .....__- - ...._ ... GRAIN SIZE CONSOL SHEAR. SLILFAfE GRAIN SIZE FIELD LOG OF BORING- I Street 3 of 3 01LS ENGINURING. INC Project: New Boat Docks-OCC Sailing Center-Newport Beach Location: 1801 West Coast Highway Project No. 92-6349 SAMPLE INTERVALS 9- W W O GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION � tr � � t= � W X cn > = to 9 co V) � ZW � t- Z a W0 W m W J- m00- � c a 6 : 6 a6 Q 0 w JD &0 80{9°........, .- __. ML CLAYEY SILT: Very dark grayish brown to 37.9 (SPT) btack,with thin layers olive,very moist,with E: t ` - organic odor t 45 _— Qac i 67/8" MLsame t n as above 49:3 GRAIN SIZE (SPT) FIELD LOG OF BODING -2 T A Sheet 1 of 1 Project: New Boat Docks-OCC Sailing Center-Newport Beach SOIL L-NGINlr MN , lid(:_ Location: im West Coast Highway Project No. 12-634.9 Dates(s) Drilled. 8/3012012 Logged By.- Gary L. Martin Drilled By: JET Drilling,inc. Total Depth: 9 Peet 8 Inches Rig Make/Model Tripod Hammer Type: Cathead/Rope Drilling Method: Water jetting Hammer Weight/Drop: 140 Lb,1±30 in. Hale Diameter: 4 Inches Surface Elevation: N/A Comments: Boeing drilled on floating dock. See'NOTE' below. SAMPLE INTERVALS a p � U LL 17 O `> a GEOTEGHNIGAL DESCRIPTION W J X w Ct > Eur r'' paw O O cn_h U- �W fld WC7 h Q ii1 m Cao U 0- -- 0 SM _ .__.._._.-_ _._.._ FSILTY SAND. Dark gray,wet,fine-grained _.._ __ r -....... i sand,with shell pieces,organic odor 2(SPT)25.0 i1 i 5 difficult to drive outer pipe into soil at depth l of 5-feet below soil surface 17(SPl) SR SM SAND WITH SILT: Dark gray,wet,fine to 19.6 medium-grained sand,trace gravel;shell i fragment content increases 5072" #no recovery!:.._._ ......_ - # 10 10 (SPT) iNOTE::Drilling.performed on floating boat ' dock.approximately 1 foot 6 inches above ( water level. Soft soil bottom encountered approximately 13 feet below dock, with firm soil at 15 feet below dock. Boring logged from surface of submerged soil below dock. FIELD LOG OF BORING Sheet 1 of 1 s Project; New Boat Docks-OCC ,wiling Center-Newport Beach Soft-'s ENGINEERIN(; Ill(:, Location: 9801 West Coast Highway Project No. 12-6349 Dates(s) Drilled: 613012012 Legged By: Gary 'L. Martin Drilled By. JET Drilling,lne Total Depth: 12 Feet 11 inches Rig Make/Model: Tripod Hammer Type: CatheadlRope Drilling Method' WaterJetting Hammer Weight/Drop: 140 Lb.1±30 In. Hole Diameter: 4 Inches Surface Elevation: N/A Comments: Boring drilled on floating dock, See 'NOTE' below. SAMPLE INTERVALS, c�i a 0 O UL O a. W 9- Z w Q j F_ 0 GEOTECHNICAL DESCRIPTION- W LU fl- !Ll {Xi Ll cL p® � N C Z W 21 2 W -J i" m J C 0 Q� U 0 0 - : SM _.. SAND Dark gray;wet,fine-grained ..__. __.-.......... s51LTY and,with shell pieces - 4(SPT) i t 31.6 5 5 ML CLAYEY SILT.'Black,very moist to wet 46(SPT) i . .- l 39.9 II `i 10 10 f 50/5" ML same as above (SPT) unable to retrieve sample NOTE:Drilling performed on floating boat dock approximately 1 foot 4 inches above water levet. Soft soil bottom encountered approximately 13 feet below dock. Boring logged from surface of submerged soil 15 15 i below dock. X2 Laboratory Testing After samples were visually classified in the laboratory, a testing program, aimed at providing sufficient Bata for the ensuing engineering analysis, was established and consisted of: a Moisture Content and Density Tests Relatively undisturbed soil samples retained within the thin-walled Shelby tube sampler were tested in the laboratory to determine their respective in-place dry densities and moisture contents. The results are presented on the respective Field Logs of Boring, B-1 through B-3. 0 Uni-axial Consolidation and Swelling Tests Consolidation testswere performed on selected relatively undisturbed soil samples in general accordance with the latest version of ASTM D2435. The samples were inundated during testing to represent adverse field. conditions. The percent consolidation for each load cycle was recorded as a ratio of the amount of vertical compression to the original height of the sample. The results of the tests are presented on Plates C-1 and C-2. Direct Shear Tests In order to determine shear strength parameters of representative soil samples, direct shear tests were performed on both relatively undisturbed and remolded ring samples in accordance with ASTM D 3080. The test results are presented on Plates D-1 though D-3, a Particle Size Analysis Particle size analyses were performed on selected representative samples in accordance with ASTM D422. The results are plotted on the appended Plates G-1 through G-6. a Soluble Sulfates Tests of soluble sulfate content were performed in accordance with California Test Methods 417 to assess the degree of corrosivity of the subgrade soils with regard to concrete. The test results are as follows: Al SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. Boring Depth (ft.) % Sulfate in Dry Soil (CT 417) B-1 18 0.139 B-1 33 0.086 ... . . . .... OCC School of Salting and Seamanship Project No. 12-6349 Dictober 17, 2012 Page 15 0-00 1,00 2.00 100 4.00 5.00 6.00 0 a 7.00 ca 8.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 0.1 Boring No. B-1 Depth (ft.), 28.0 Sample Type: Clayey Silt 1.0 10.0 Pressure p (ksf) bry,Density (pcf = 83.9 Moisture (%) = 31.6 Project Name. -New Boat Docks -'1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach Project No.: 12-6349 ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PROPERTIES OF SOILS (ASTM D 2435) PLATE V OM 1 M 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7,00 ro 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 13.00 14.00 15.00 0.1 Boring No. BA Depth (ft.) 38.0 Sample TypeClayey Silt 1.0 10.0 Pressure_,p (ksf) Dry Density (pcfl = 81.6 Mo istu, re (%) = 35.1 I UUM Project Name.'New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast _Hwy.,Newport Beach Project No.: 12-6349 ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PROPERTIES OF SOILS (ASTM D 2435) PLATE C-2 4.O M 2.0 MJ 1.0 M 0.0 1.0 2,0 3.0 4.0 Normal Stress (kip/ft) Boring No. B-1 Depth (ft.) 33.0 Sample Type Relatively Undisturbed Soil Type Clayey Silt Cohesion(C) = 395 psf Friction (�) = 80 Dry Density (pcf) - 79.9 Moisture (%) = 37.9 Project Name:New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach Project No.: 12-6349 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 3080) PTATE DRI r`e 7:0 6.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 Normal Stress (kip/ft2) Boring No. : B-1 Cohesion{G) = 205 psf Depth (ft.) 38.0 Friction (c) = 18° Sample Type.:: Relatively Undisturbed Density (pcf) = 8'1.6 ed Moisture (%) = 35.1 Soil Type ; Clayey Silt {project Name:New Boat Docks-1801West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach Project No.: 12.6340 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. DIRECT SMEAR TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 3080) 4.0 3.0 1.0 M1 0-0 1.0 2.0 Normal Stress (kip/ft2) Baring No. B-1 Depth (ft.) 23.0 Sample Type Relatively Undisturbed Soil Type Fine Sand 3.0 Cohesion(C) = 90 psf Friction (�) = 30* Dry Density (pcf) = 105.2 Moisture (%) = 22.0 4.0 Project Name:New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach Project No.: 12-6349 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. DIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS (ASTM D 3080) GRAVEL SAND FINES ........ __, .__.. ..... _.__ ..... . _._... - U.S.. STANDARD SIEVE OPENING U:S. STANDARD SIEVENUMBERHYDROMETER 3" 1112° 3/4" 318" 04 #10 #30 #60 #100#200 100 10 1 0A 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE SIZE IN (MM) Boring No. : B-1 1-00 Depth (Ft.) 5.0 R -r Sample Type : Silty Fine Sand (SM) % Gravel: 00 % wand: 68.8 % Sift: 213 % Clay: 9.5 t ('� 9l 8 I I , 70 I F i i 60 i £ 1 w 50 1l% ' £ � Z 40 E j u I I] ! � s } p I 3 20 41 �I 10 l� E 100 10 1 0A 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE SIZE IN (MM) Boring No. : B-1 Depth (Ft.) 5.0 Sample Type : Silty Fine Sand (SM) % Gravel: 00 % wand: 68.8 % Sift: 213 % Clay: 9.5 Project Name New Boat :Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach Project No.:12-6349 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, ING. PARTICLE -SIZE CURVE (ASTM D422) PLATE -1 Boring No. B-1 Depth (Ft.) 10.0 Sample Type: Fine Sand (SP) %Gravel: 0.0 % Sand: 99.4 % Silt: 0.6 % Clay: 0.0 1project Name -.New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport BeachI Project Nt�.:12-fi349 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.PARTICLE-SIZE CURVE I (ASTM D422) Boring No. : B-1 Depth (Ft.) : 15.0 Sample Type: Fine Sand with Silt (SP -SM) Graver 0.0 0/0 Sand: 92.6 • Silt: 7:4 • Clay: 0.0 Project Name:New Boat Docks -1801 West Const Hwy.,NewportBeach Project No.12-6349 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PARTICLE -SIZE CURVE (ASTM X422) PARTICLE SIZE IN (MM) Boring No. B-1 Depth (Ft.) 25.0 Sample Type Silt with Fine Sand (ML) %Gravel: 0.0 % Sand- 22.4 • Silt: 64.6 • May: 13.0 lProiect Name:New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach I Project No.: 12-6349 1 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC.PARTICLE-SIZE CURVE I (ASTM D422) Boring No. B-1 GRAVEL .. ........... . ............ .. ................. SAND . ................ .......... .. . FINES Sample Type: Clayey Silt (ML) . . ................... .................... . U S. STANDARD SIEVE OPEN114G U.S. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER HYDROMETER 0.0 3" 1112" 314" 3/8" #4 #10 #30 #60 9100 ff200 % SOL 100 % Clay: 23.2 90 80 70 60 ry/5 0 z LL Z 4 0 w w 30 CL 20 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 PARTICLE SIZE IN (MM) Boring No. B-1 Depth (Ft.), 35.0 Sample Type: Clayey Silt (ML) %Gravel: 0.0 % Sand: 8.0 % SOL 68.8 % Clay: 23.2 JProject Name::New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach I Project No.. -12-6349 I ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC PARTICLE -SIZE CURVE I (ASTM D422) PARTICLE SIZE IN (MM) Boring No. B-1 .... . ....... . GRAVEL ........ ..................... SAND ........... .. ........ . FINES ........... — .......................................... .... U.S, STANDARD STEVE OPENING ......................... U.&. STANDARD SIEVE NUMBER . . ............. ........... HYDROMETER 3" 11/2" 3/4" 3/8" #4 #10 #30 #60 #40D#200 100 0 7 90 80 70 60 — - — - ----------- ------ 50 40 30 20 Ii I 10 100 10 1 01 0:01 0,001 PARTICLE SIZE IN (MM) Boring No. B-1 Depth (Ft.) 45,0 Sample Type: Clayey Silt (ML) % Gravel: 0.0 % Sand: 5.:0 • Silt: 67.5 • Clay., 27.5 1project Name: New Boat Docks -1801 West Coast Hwy.,Newport Beach I Project No.: 12-6349 1 ASSOCIATED SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. PARTICLE -SIZE CURVE I (ASTM D422) APPENDIX B SITE FAULTING AND SEISMICITY DATA Project Site Coordinates: longitude - W - 17.91810 Latitude -.N 33.6165°i Project Site Sail Classification: Alluvium Table of Desi n Ground Motions from CGS Probabilistic Analysis Soil Type Design Acceleration (g) Firm RocIP Soft RoekI21 Alluviunti21 PGA (3) 0.383 .0.387 0.425 SQ (0.2 second){4) 0.894 0.919 1..007 S,, (1.0 second)(4) 0.330 Q.41 o 0.498 (1) Classified by NEHRP (FEMA,1997) as rocks having a shear wave velocity no less than 760 meters per second. (2) Modification factors from PGA reflecting local site soils conditions are per NEHRP (FEMA, 1997), which are ground acceleration -dependent.. (3) Per Cao et al. (2003), it is defined as the peak ground acceleration for the subject site that carries a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years. (4) Spectra acceleration derived from respective PGA with a 5% damping ratio incorporated. I1� � SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship Project No. 12-6349 October 17, 2012 Page 16 BQFAULT version 3.00 DETERMINISTIC ESTIMATION OF PEAK ACCELERATION FROM DIGITIZED FAULTS jos NumBER: 12-6349 DATE. 09-20-201? 309 NAME: New Boat Docks -1801 West coast Highway,Newport Beach,CA CALCULATION NAME: Test Run Analysis FAULT -DATA -FILE NAME: C:\PrograM File5\EQt-AULT1\cgsflte.dat .SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE: 33.6165 SITE LONGITUDE: 117.9181 SEARCH RADIUS: 62 mi ATTENUATION RELATION: 20) sadigh et al. (1997) Hori,Z. - Soil UNCERTAINTY (m=median, S=Sigma): M Number of sigmas: 0.0 DISTANCE MEASURE: clodis SCOND: 0 Basement Depth: 5.00 km Campbell SSR: Campbell SHR: COMPUTE PEAK HORIZONTAL ACCELERATION FAULT -DATA FILE USED: C:\PrograM FileS\EQFAULTI\CgSflte.dat MINIMUM DEPTH VALUE (km): 0.0 Page I ----- --------- EQFAULT SUMMARY --------------- ----------------------------- DETERMINISTIC SITE PARAMETERS ----------------------------- Pagc 1 TEST .OU' ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME NFWPORT-INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD (offshore) SAN JOAQUIN HILLS PALOS VERDES WHITTIER PUENTE HILLS BLIND THRUST CHINO -CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) ELSINORE (GLEN IVY) CORONADO BANK SAN JOSE , ELSINORE (TEMECULA) UPPER ELYSIAN PARK BLIND THRUST SIERRA MADRE RAYMOND CUCAMONGA VERDUGO CLAMSHELL-SAWPIT HOLLYWOOD SANTA MONICA ROSE CANYON MALIBU COAST SAN JACINTO-SAN BERNARDINO SAN JACINTO-SAN JACINTO VALLEY SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando) NORTHRIDGE (E. oak Ridge) ANACAPA-DUME SAN ANDREAS - San Bernardino M-1 SAN ANDREAS - SB -Coach. M -Ib -2 SAN ANDREAS - SB -Coach. M -2b SAN ANDREAS - whole m -la. SAN ANDREAS - Mojave m -lc -3 SAN ANDREAS - Ch0-M0j M -lb -1 SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture M -2a SAN GABRIEL CLEGHORN ELSINORE (JULIAN) SAN JACINTO-ANZA SANTA SUSANA NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) ----------------------------- JESTIMATED MAX. EARTHQUAKE EVENT APPROXIMATE-------------------------------- DISTANCE MAXIMUM I PEAK JEST. SITE Illi (km) EARTHQUAKE1 SITE JINTENSITY MAG (Mw) I ACCEL., 9 IMOD MERG: 2Z 23 39.1 39.1. 42.1 44.4 45.5 47.3 48.2 50.6 50.8 51.4 52.3 52, 52. 54. 54. 58. 53. 60. 5. 20. 34. 35. 36.- 37. 38. 47. 52. 53. 58. 59. 59. 61. 62. 62. 67. 71. 73. 76. 77. 7,1 0.540 ._. x 7.1 0.485x 6,6 0.494 X 7.3 I 0.233 I IX 6.8 I 0.112 I VII 7.1 0.169 VIII 6:7 I 0,127 I VIII 6.8 0.103 I VII 7.6 0.158 I VIII 6.4 1 0.075 I VII 6.8 0.068 I VI 6.4 J 0.064 1 VI 7.2 I 0.104 I VII 6.5 I 0.061 I VI 6.9 I 0.082 1 VII 6.9 1 0.079 I VII 6.5 0.056 1 VI 6.4 I 0.051 j VI 6.6 I 0.055 f V1 7.2 I 0.063 VI 6.7 0.054 V1 6.7 0.040 V 6.9 0.045 I V1 6.7 J 0.047( VI 7.0 0.059 VI 7.5 I 0.084 I VII 7.5 I 0.064 I VI 7.7 I 0.074 VII 7.7 J 0.074 VII 8*.0 0.091 7 4 1 0.059 J VII 78 I 0.079 I VII 7.8 I 0.079 I VII 7.2 J 0.051 I VI 6.5 J 0.028 I V 7.1 I 0.045 I vI 7.2 J 0.045 I VI 63 I 0.038 i V 7.2 ► 0.055 1 VI -END OF SEARCH- 39 FAULTS FOUND WITHIN THE SPECIFIED SEARCH RADIUS. THE NEWPORT-INGLEWOOD ( L. A.Basin) FAULT IS CLOSEST TO THE SITE. IT IS ABOUT 0.1 MILES (1.2 km) AWAY. LARGEST MAXIMUM -EARTHQUAKE SITE ACCELERATION: 0.5402 g Page - 2 LIQTEST L I Q U E F Y 2 version 1.50 EMPIRICAL PREDICTION OF EARTHQUAKE -INDUCED LIQUEFACTION POTENTIAL 708 NUMBER,: 12-6349 DATE: 09-20-,2012 JOB NAME: New Boat Decks -OCC Sailing Center 1841 west coast Highway,Newport BeaCh,CA SOIL -PROFILE NAME: 634981. LDW BORING GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 7.00 ft CALCULATION GROUNDWATER DEPTH: 2.20 ft DESIGN EARTHQUAKE MAGNITUDE: 7.10 MW SITE PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION: 0.540 g BOREHOLE DIAMETER CORRECTION FACTOR, 1.00 SAMPLER SIZE CORRECTION FACTOR 1.10 N60 HAMMER CORRECTION FACTOR: 1.30 MAGNITUDE SCALING FACTOR METHOD: Idriss (1997, in press) Magnitude scaling Factor: 1.150 rd -CORRECTION METTHOD NCEER (1957) FIELD SPT N -VALUES ARE CORRECTED FOR THE LENGTH OF THE DRIVE RODS. Rod stick-up Above Ground: 3.0 ft CN NORMALIZATION FACTOR: 1=-044 tsf MINIMUM, CN VALUE: 0.6 NCEER [1357]-MethodLIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY PAGE 1 File Name: LIQTEST.OUT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CALC.j TOTALI EFF. (FIELD 1 FC I j CORR.ILIQUE.1 jINDUC. LIQUE. SOIL DEPTHjSTRESS STRESS N DELTA( C I(Nl)60 RESISTI r STRESS SAFETY NO.1 (ft) I (tsf)l (fSf)1(B/ft)1N1_60j N I(B/ft)= RATIol d I RATIOIFAc-rOR ----+-------------+------+------+--------_----------+------+-----+------+---- 1 1 0.251 0.0131 0.0131 15 1 1.571 * 1 * I * 1 * I * I ** mage 1 PLATE L-1 LIQTEST 9 1 27.751 1.658 0.6541 55 1 I I M I 1 w M 10 1 28.251 1.685 0.8661 93 1 i 1 I i 10128.75 1.713 0.8781 93 1 - i , N" 10 29.25 1.740 0.890.1 93 1 N 1 I ti 10 29.751 1.7681 0.9021 93 , I 10 ( 30.251 1.796( 0.914 93 I I w I 10 1I30.751 1..623 0.926 93 1 w 1 10 ( 31.251 1.851 0.938 93 10 1 31.75( 1.878 0-950 93 10 j 32.251 1.9061 0.9621 93 10 132.751 1.9331 0.9741 93 10 133.251 1.9611 . 0.986 93 10 33.75 1.989 96 93 10 34.25 2.014 1.09 93 10 34.752.04 II l 1.022, 93 10 1 35.251 2.0711 1.034 93 I i 10 135.75 2.0991 1.046 93 10 t 36.25 2.1271 1.058 93 10 136.75 2.1541 1.070 93 ! 10 1 37.25= 2.1.821 1.062 93 10 1 37.75 2.2091 1.094 93 10 1 38.25 2.2371 1.1061 93 1 ! ( 1 ^^ 10 138.751 2.2641 1.1181 93 10 k 39.251 2.2921 1.1301 93 10 (( 39.751 2.320 1.142 93 10 140. 25t 2.3471 1.154 93 10 1 40.75] 2.375( 1.166 93 10 1 41.251 2.402] 1.1781 93 l I ry 1 1 I 10141.7x.-1 2.4301 1.1901 93 1 10 ( 42.251 2.457] 1.2021 93 1 w F N 1( 1 M 1 I a 10 1 42.751 2.4651 1.2141 93 1 1 N 1 N I ! 1 10 1 43.251 2.5131 1.226 93 1 1 I N I I -------------------------------------------------- NCEER [19971 Method LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS SUMMARY PAGE 3 File Name. LIQTEST.OUT -----r-ALc.1 TOTALI EFF. - ------------------------------------------ IFiELD CORR.IL=QUE.----INDUC.ILIQUE. SOILI DEPTH STRESSISTRESS N IDELTAI C I(N1)601RESISTI r STRESSISAFETY NO(B/ft) Nl-60 N 1(e/ft)1 RATio d I RATIOIFACTOR ------------ - �------ ------ ----- ----- ------ 10 43.751 2.5401 1.2381 93 t 1 I ! t I N I ^� 10 44.251 2.568 1.2501 93 ! 1 t I M 10 44.751 2.5951 1.2611 93 10 1 45.251 2.6231 1.2731 93 1 Page 3 APP NDIX C GRAPHICAL RESULTS OF PILING ANALYSIS Plates M-1 through M-12 ;1 ��� OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship -z- Project No. 12.6349 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC. October 17, 2012 Page 17 00 t- � Q 0- � sof' - O. ri ri r -i_ -e-t- q (d1j) Alpedej Rupeaq B1►d DlqemOIIV r�ch Q Ln �a � Q Ln �a � m ..� a o a� ra 7 a tw `6 � � a = Q p v 0 m CL sn t N � C V a LO v w C) y N 0 M m z N (� 7 N LU U Antu to 0 0 Q. CL C. Q p Q !L m Ln k u d t7e7 M (V CL O tiS _ - LnC E. LU i s 470 C a A M 49 M. + c m a CD 1 N a ro Q 4 R a � � E 6 p j - to Ln LAh z 41 E( _fl N M LU 3 --uj -: - - 0 dA Z (D of 41 N ,C z to O N W -' C s O /y t M - -. E 0-0 � c m co 0 �. N 410 z 11 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 00 tD (N 0 00 f.0 Zt (dpi) Al!:)ude:) Oupeog ON alqemoliv , w CL C 0 Ln $D 0 ro z 4� u 41 (a (D 41 m E ta txo .,R 40 CL C u 0 Ln 0 V z U Gq tz, > 0 .0 E 44 m A E 0 3: 4, C Da•o o IMA C) N c CL U E V) x c 0 ta' iv E o 41 CL CL cu m .2 m 0 in E E u uj M 4-; C m co (U + c 41 41 W E E fo CL Z E E Ln Lo o Ln Ln 0 E w x , 41 z CD -a- LU 5 LU N w o L E -C til V) tko 4D z 0 Cl = CL LU 4- 0 0 Cc E 0 A ,v 0 -0 4� 0 m VMI cc 0 .moi iA 0 z 0 cr 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 00 tl� kD in (dij) a3uejsisau:qjjdh 4lld;alqemOIIV = 0 tv 41 E 2 2 0. 2 E 0 LU �40 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 00 tl� kD in (dij) a3uejsisau:qjjdh 4lld;alqemOIIV o 0 0 a= TU 'uj CL -0 4- 0 = 0 tv 41 E a' c E 0 LU Do ti 0 u4a (U 0 M Ln Vj 0 0 o z ra 4� 4W m 0 L- 0- 0 m U 0 E to u M to m o 0 Ln U .1p E I tv z > E::, 2 ui E A? N 0 > 41 .5 0 -> 0 0 114 C: :E ru u Q 41 0 m 0 V) E m u- v r_ 10 0 w .0 -0 m E E uj M 4,; a 9L c 4) a) u G) CL 0 m 41 M + -C 0) m 0 C cL E E CL ao E 4o- 4- E Ln 0 m E E 4iEn Ln 0 41 z 4w at CG m LU M 0 E z I o 0 0 a= TU 'uj CL -0 4- 0 = 0 41 E a' c E 0 LU Do ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n cc r- Uo m13 m r1l r -i rq (diN) a-)uej5!5atj:q!jdn 011d alqemolIV 0 in uo 0 0 I z 41 t 0 41 m y. 41 c > CL =F m Ew 0 4.0 CL m 2 CL c CL S? +- t m u 0 M :3 x -0 u CL 0 u T 0 " z 4� > 4JiQ n LU E 0 > tw S m o cv u M, 0. a 0 E x co ELu 0 +1 w m r4 CL Ln E E uj N 41 3t m 4-; 4) 0)CL 0 ram 44 IA 14 4) M + c -C 41 O CL oj w -C -0 0 t5 w = = 0) E E v L E m Z � -4- E Lnm E E z Ln w E cn 41 z W -0 -0 LU mi X 0 a z m €c C 4, W CL = CL z LU LID Q) .0 4 6 tco _co 41 tA 4v v) E > LU E 0 .4 r; 00 0- z ri H r1 H (del) t peol jejalel 9 C� 0 LiJ 0 z tC z (� C a_6 uj 0 4) 9 _ a; CL Ci 3 to a) u NC ho bD to u .fa 0 ta 0 Do V r .- N 0 y- tto r 0 m O A > O7 in 44 41 -4 m �' y ak N c a+ uy 4? m CL Gi QJ X (D -0 QJ at. M4J_ A. = . MLn 0 t3 O 0) c m � d ci -- d 1� CL 41 1 M Lu G a 0 CCL L 010 II 1.4 (i y O'1 Qd E ajE l0 G/. CL z -0 N 0 e LO 41m C-4 u +�r4 z C� 0 LiJ z tC (� C a_6 uj 0 4) 9 _ 0 3 to 0 to Do N (d1j) t peol je.1?zel Ln N [r I N Ln v a f° - I n 0 :L U C z uj w c1 3 0to an N 0 z Y '_ #. G u tw a) c. -S3 [Q N co d (li i. 0 to c Q tll -j > v in iv 3 c E W4 D ro X tkf) Ql '4'. (v --- N w ai O -- ci 1 4 a, a � CLE 00 ao S u E fu 10 q) 4 C 0 Gl en Min �4 cV LJ Z :L U C z uj w c1 3 0to an N i N o ai N g a io eo a N; b Cc v C O 0 Ln m d z v 01 L p C Q D � U u m m -° c ' a = to m o •o m a ca .0 0 3 z N $ a L 40 x Fn 3 ~ '� fD ..1 � Z• o C C M d CL E N O X +, m v m tL -� o . t 3 o° 0 C) a)C • o a c m - 4, 04 >ti D E ea aR .o � W m o 00 {' m to s cis E °' E S a i Z CL ca m a c _ o m -p Ln -,a w J m V ? Ln Ln n O Z ar W Lii = Z � CO iii to vii �N-1 O 00 [O d ni d w (dpl) t PeOI Hemel o Y Q u 3 a N a io eo a . N k k i � E E E « § § k k � 2 � Ln k z J L k 3 � � � § ƒ f o m Q Ln § 6. g$® >% t� _ ■ § 2 �\ 4.0 § 2 a k ° m o M� :� CL� E R 0ao 2 �� C.6 - �■ @ 3 ■ 2 2 § Z3 E a .§ 2 C7 a� e § ■ 2 +., � 2i § .� wE C ,m wC u e % _� a [ Em § z . 2 L / § 7 m m Ln Q § ° v . . z .. z o z W Lo q o 00 m # N o u (di iP� ]|� m « k � k Q � k k i � E E E « § § k k . � I - � i \ § % k N o f . # �N 2 � / � § d z a 4. C 4w 2 tko u e 2 2 ■ � ■ � g 2 .$ � cn \\ �k k � . Ln § @ƒ � § � o� � % m A � � � •© �2 �©- C 0� 2 $ L a .. . qCL & ¢ E E- E 2J abam \> ) . . a m E fuz . ; m ® a 0 & . _ _ 41 LM m z - 4w .� z _z = u s . z q ... z & LO g o 00 � # o � .. c m|,P |� mm 2 . 0 . y O .� . .. co . � I - � i \ § % k | & ■ ■ � � � � J © q to 2 a o q 6 2 � a ` E CL � a I k 2 \ u T 5 o . = . m V $ 2 ■ ; / . - O Q0 A \ \ �` e § - CL m kk N /_ ' §� .§ _ 3 o CL ■ ■ L IV ■ M.0 ¥ 2 = % 0 x = 7 CL L. ■. CL � m§ . . m� E /C . . 7' " 2 Al) & . ; ; a z Ln -� / E . \ u z LLM n 8 . Qw . 41 2 _z L _ � z Z & q / / 00 e # N o LU ® � 2 0 m|,P� ]|� o m « . ui k k 0 � K � « | & ■ ■ � � � � 00 m n m w E m o m CD m m Ln O M SOU G C � r N N y 'a $m y � c m N ai D a •" m .e W sis m ,1- 0 > 0 m a m C m •a C'm Co N m +s+ m °w en -0-r- 0) m u E D c A E= v o aro Y M O e4 N hi 41 Z O) N 00 N 0 00 w ami rN1 O 00 %D d N � (dil) s peol jejejel I u Ln z n O1 z U L W � ro c 9 W H d, ..1 7 0 �n a v ur � a u 3 Q N IL CL 3 3 7 7 9 i 9 16 6 00 m n m w E m o m CD m m Ln O M SOU G C � r N N y 'a $m y � c m N ai D a •" m .e W sis m ,1- 0 > 0 m a m C m •a C'm Co N m +s+ m °w en -0-r- 0) m u E D c A E= v o aro Y M O e4 N hi 41 Z O) N 00 N 0 00 w ami rN1 O 00 %D d N � (dil) s peol jejejel I u Ln z n O1 z U L W � ro c 9 W H d, ..1 7 0 �n a v ur � a u 3 Q N Q a O 00 LO d N O 00 9D N N e-1 ei ei ri r-1 (d1n) s pool leimel Go m m c E S E a + �M rl V " O s ' m 'a a m m P N � a •m -O � � v m c a M 0. v CL M N 01 d d d d 'a 'c 'a � A h N N N X N N N E a u Q� E to .a M 2 -0 v` Q-� 3 in o a ccw 10 O 00 LO d N O 00 9D N N e-1 ei ei ri r-1 (d1n) s pool leimel Go m m c E S E a + �M rl V " O s ' m 'a a m m P N � a •m -O � � v m c a M 0. v CL M N 01 41 N rn E a u Q� E to .a M 2 -0 v` Q-� 3 in o a ccw 10 C ei N N z N 00 N O 0 z C U u C u Mca PL o m z i � m CLa+ O � o c° � o ii t1 C a IO1 6- '. 0., Z J In z In 0 2 mi W = z m Ow Z W c Q � v LLL 7 c a u 3 cc a N a a gill g E a:( 0 1. "ALLPILE" software, Version 3.2, 2002, by CivilTech Software. 2. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2006, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures 05. , Standard 7- 3, Blake, T.F., 1998, Documentation for Egsearch and Eqfault Versions 2.20 Update. 4. Bonilla, M.G., 1970, Surface Faulting and Related Effects in Wiegel, R. L, Earthquake Engineering, 5. Cao, T,, Bryant, W.A., Rowshandel, B., Branum, D., and Wills, C,J., June 2003, The Revised 2002 California Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps, California Geological Survey. 6. California Building Code, (CBC) 2010 Edition: Sacramento, CA, California Building Standards Commission, 3 Volumes. 7. California Department of Transportation, 1995, Solider Pile Systems and Distribution of Lateral Soil Pressure. sp California Earthquake Center, 1999, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117- Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction in California, University of Southern California. 9. California Gedlogical Survey, (CGS) 1994 Fault -Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alguist-Prlolo Special. Studies Zones Act of 1972 Revised. 10. California Geological Survey., 1997, Seismic Hazard Zones Official Map, Newoort Beach —Quadrangle released April 17. 11. California Geological Survey, 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the .Anaheim and New ort Beach 7.5 -Minute Quadrangles, Orange County, California Seismic Hazard Report 003, Revised. 2001. 12. California Geological Survey, 2008, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117A. 11 Cetin, K.O., Youd, L.T., Seed, R.B., Bray, J.D., Stewart, J.P., Durgunoglu, T. H., Lettis, W., and Yilmaz, T.M., 2004; Liguefaction7induced Lateral Spreading at lzmit Bay During the Kocaeli (Izmit)-Turkgy Earthquake, Journal of Geotechnical and GeoEnvironmental Engineering, ASCE Vol. 130, No. 12, P. 1300-1313. 14. Cubrinovski, M., Ishihara, K., and Poulos, H., 2006, Pseudo -Static Analysis of Piles Subjected to Lateral Spreading, New Zealand Workshop on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, New Zealand. AMIN OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship October 17, 2012 Project No. 12-6349 Page 18 SOILS ENGINEERING, INC, APPENDIX D REFERENCES l[Confinued J 15. Department of the Navy, 1982, Foundations and Earth Structures Dgggn_MggUgLZLNaval Facilities Engineering Command, NAVFAC DM -7.2. 16. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1994, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildiggs,,FEM 222A 17. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1997, NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic RpgMat ions for New Buildings and Other Structure, FEM 302. 18. MTGL, 2006, Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship, Proposed Boat Storage Addition, 1801 W. Coast HihwaY Neuvport Beach. California, September 6.2006, -Pro). No. 1085-A5.0 19. Peterson, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Cramer, CH., Cao, T., Reichle, M, Frankel, A.D,, Lienkaemper, J.J..., McCrory, P.A., and Schwartz, D.P., 1995, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Open -File Report 96- 706. 20. Seed, H.B., ldriss, I.M., and Arango, L, .1983, Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using_fielcl Performance Data, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol.• 109, No. 3. 21. Seed, R.B., Cetin, K,O., Moss, R.E.S., Kammerer, A.M., Wu, J,, Pestana, J.M., Riemer, M.F., Sancio, R.B., Kayen, R.E., and Faris, A., 2003, Recent Advances in Soils Liquefaction Engineering: A.Unified and Consister►t Framework , Keynote Presentation, 26'h Annual ASCE Los Angeles Geotechnical Spring Seminar. 22. Stewart, J.P., Whang, D.H., Moyneur, M., and Duku, P., 2004; Seismic Compression of As - Compacted Fill Soils with Variable Level of Fines Content and Fines Plasticity> CURSE Publication No. EDA -05. 23. Tokimatsu, A.M. and Seed, H.B., 1987, Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 113, No. 8 Q '7 SOILS ENGINEERIN(;, INC. OCC School of Sailing and Seamanship Project No, 12-6349 October 17, 2.012 Page 19 Exhibit 1— Region Map Exhibit 2 —Vicinity Map Exhibit 3—Aerial Photograph/Ground Level Photographs Photo 1— East boat basin looking southeast towards Lido Isle; down -ramp in foreground will remain Photo 2 — East boat basin looking south towards Lido Isle Photo 3 — West boat basin looking southwest towards Lido Isle STEEL DEK" ECO SERIES XCCENT MARINA DECKING rrr�rin� w t, . .. bistrbuted B Oft� SIURMO, Marina bock Parts ® Sea grass friendly design 2919 Wilson dive ® 60% open area Bellingham, WA 98225 P; 360-739-1056 ® Attractively engineered F: 360-232-4199 0 12ga. Gussets on standard panel. marinadockparts@gmaii.com Spans up to 24" OCA , , www.marinadockparts.com 0 Hidden attach points 0 Tri -Frame covers and multiple sizes available ® Clean Marina' and LEEDDcompliant 0 Freshwater and saltwater safe.. -, 0 2,915 load capacity 24" OC a Resists oil and gas staining 0 35% recycled steel ® 45 year life cycle ® 25 year limited warranty{ @ 75% fewer fasteners needed SU, KILL, ® Saves labor costs on installation ASTM E 84 surface burn rating ® Self extinguishing, ® Flame spread of less than 200°'"x' ® Encapsulated in 1/8" PVC ® Naturally mold and fungal resistant UV inhibitor ® Standard and custom sizes available • The ECO Series panel meets requirements for ADA I �r standards 02012 by Xccent Inc. All rights reserved Exhibit 5 - Eco Decking 0512112011 10:43 9496313122 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 09115 ��F.»n• axe a'nn,r, os n Regulatory Division E)EPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O, Box 532711 ' LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325 April 26, 2011 Brad Avery Orange Coast College of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 West Pacific Coast Highway Newport Beach, California 92663 Dear Mr. Avery: At - Refererice is made to your request (File No. SPL,-2010-01129-SNL(u) dated November 17, 2010, for a Department of the Army authorization to construct the Orange C6ast College of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Replacement Project. Under the provisions of Sermon 10 of the Divers and Harbors Act of March. 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), you are hereby authorised to conduct the work described below within Newport Bay in the City ofNevwport Beach, O,'.=ge County, California, as shown on the attached Figures 1-3. Specifically, you are authorized to conduct the following regulated activities: L Remove two 4.25 -foot -wide by 30 -foot -long straight dock finger, in the locations shown on the attached Figures 1 and 3; 2. Install a new, 4.25 -foot -wide by 22.5 -foot -long straight dock fi:n�er (widening at the base), in the location shown, on the attached, Figures 2 and 3; 3. Relocate and sbo.rten the existing L-shaped dock finger, in the locations shown on the attached Figures 1-3, The modified L-shaped dock finger would 1consi st of two sections with dimensions of 4.25 feet wide by 52 feet long* and 4.25 feet wide by 22.5 feet long (widenin;g at the base); and 4, Remove and relocate two existing pipe piles to the neje straight dock finger and the. ivnsidc of the relocated L-shaped dock finger, in the locations shown ort the, attached Figure 3, I The owner or authorized responsible official must sign, and date ali copies of this Letter of Permission (LOP) indicating that he/site agrees to the work as described and will comply with all conditions, One of the signed copies of this LOF must be returned to the Corps Regulatory Division. In addition, please use the two attached postcards to notify t1iis office as to the dates of cornmencerneni (within 10 days prior to the start of wrnstruction) and ¢otnpletion of the activity (within 10 days following the end of construction). Furthermore, you are hereby advised that the Corps Regulatory Division. has established an Administrative Appeal Process which is fully described in 33 C.F.R. P,'rt 331. The complete appeal process is diagrammed in the enclosed Appendix A. Thantk, you for participating in our regulatory program,. If you hal:•e any questions, please contact Stephen Estes at 213-452-3660 or via e-mail at Stephen.M,.Cs'tes@ usace.army.mil. 05/2112011 10:43 9496313122 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 10115 2 Please be advised that you can now comment on your experiencel with Regulatory Division by accessing the Corps web -based customer survey form at: http;//per2.iiw p.t�saec:.aTmy-znil/survey.Iiiml. Sinccrcly, Corice J. Farrar Chief, Orange and Riverside Counties Section South Coast Branchi Enclosures PERMITTEE DArE 051211'2011 10:43 9496313122 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 11/15 —4— PERMIT CONDITIONS General Conditions: I. The time limit for completing the authorized activity ends on April 26, 2013, If you find that you meed more time to complete the authorized activity, submit yobr request for a Time extension to this office for consideration at least one month beforef the above date is reached_ 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved df this requirement: if yon abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good fault transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activ9ty or should you desire to abandon it without a gobd faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3, If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological :ri mains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must. immediately notify, this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordination requiredito determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Maces. 4. If you sell the property associated with this pertrxit, you must obtai,6 the signature of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to dos office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. You must al low representatives from this office to inspect the auth&i7ecl Activity at any time deeracd necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished with the terms and conditions of your permit. Special Conditions: 1. The permitted activity shall not interfere with the right of the public to fxee navigation on all navigable waters of the Unitech States as defined by 33 C_r.R. Part x329. 2. No earthwork is authorized by this LOP 3. Creosote treated pilings shall not be placed in navigable waters unless all of the following conditions are met: a) The project involves the repair of existing staztctures that vvcTG Originally constructed using wood products; b) The creosote treated pilings are wrapper! in Plastic.; C) Measures are taken to prevent darrrage to plastic wrapping froffi. boat use. Such measures may include installation of rub strips or bumpers; d) The plastic wrapping is sealed at all joints to prevent leakage; afid 05121/2011 10:43 9496313122 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 12/15 'S— e) The plastic material is expected to maintain its integrity .for at ll✓ast ten years, and plastic wrappings that develop boles or leaks must be repaired or replaeed. in a timely manner by the permittee. 4. No other modifications or work: shall occur to the structure permitted herein. Apre-construction survey of the project area for eelgrass shall be donducted in accordance widl the Southern Califomia EelgraGs MitiEption Policy (SCF-Mp) (see littp:#swT.r.T.nfs.noaa.gov/heftolicies/EEI,POLrevll, final. df) ncIt earlier than 90 calendar days prior to construction and not later than 30 calendar days prior to construction. The results of that survey shall be furnished to the Corps Regulatory Division,;NOAA Fisheries, and the California Department of Fish. and Game (CDFG) at least 15 calendar days prior to initiation of work in tauvigable waters, If this survey indicates the presence of oclgrass within the project vicinity, a post -construction eelgrass survey shall be conducted. within 30 days of completion of work within, navigable waters. The post -construction survey shall �e submitted to the Corps Regulatory Division, NOAH Fisheries, and CDFG within 15 days ref the survey. If the Corps Regulatory Division determines eeigrAss has been impacted by project -related activities, further monitoring and compensatory mitigation .nay be required, as descidbed in the SCEMP. 6. The permittee shall discharge only clean construction materials suitable for use in the oceanic environment. The permittee shall ensure no debris, soil, silt, sand, !sawdust, rubbish, cement or concrete wa-,hings therev.C., oil or petroleum products, From construLtion shall be allowed to enter into or be placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the United States_ i Iron completion of the project authorized herein, any and ;aJ.l excess material or debri3 shall be completely removed from the work area and disposed of iri an appropriate upland site. 7. To ensure .navigational safety, the permittee shall provide appropriate notifications to the U.S. Coast Guard as described. below. - Commander, 11 di Coast Guard District (dpw) Telcpb,onc: 510-437-2980 E-mail: d11.i.NM@uscg_nxil Website: httP://wwer.uscg.mi.l/dp/Inmraquest.asp U.S, Coast Guard, Sector LA -LB (COTP) Telephone: 310-521-3860 E-mail: john.p.hennigan@uscg,mil a) The penmittee shall notify the U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, lth Coast Guard District (dpw) and the U,S. Coast Guard, Scetor LA -L13 (COTP) (contest lorurrrtaLion shown above), not less than 15 calendar days prior to commencing work and as project information changes. The .notification shall be provided by e-mail with at bast. The following information, transmitted as an attached Word or PDF file: 05/21/2011 10:43 9496313122 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 13/15 —6— i, Project description including the type of operation (Le, dreUlging, diving, construction, etc); ii. Location of operation, including Latitude/Longitude (NAD 83); Work start and completion dates and the expected duration;of operations. The Coast Guard needs to be notified if these dates change; iv. Vessels isxvolvcd in the operation (nwixv., sizc and type); v. VHF -FM radio frequencies monitored by vessels on the scene; vi. Point of contact anti 24-hour phone number; vii. Potential hazards to navigation; viii. Chart number for the area of operation; and ix. The Corps Regulatory Division recoim.' wends the followingjlangu,age be used in the LNM: "Mariners are urged to transit at their slowest safe speed to minimize wake, and proceed with caution after passing arrangements have been Made." b) The permittee mzd its contractor(s) shall not remove, relveatu, d,bstruct, willfully damage, make fast to, or interfere with any aids to navigation defined at 33 C.F.R. chapter 1, subchapter C, part 66_ The permittee shall erasure its con.tra.ctot notifies the Eleventh Coast Guard District in writing, with a copy to the Corps Regulatory Division, not less than 30 calendar days in advance of operating any equipment adjacent to any aids to navigation that requires relocation or. removal. Should any federal aids to navigatiolt be affected by this project, the permittee shall submit a request, in writing, to the corps Regulatory Division as well as the U.S. Coast Guard, Aids to Navigation office (contadt in-fOranation provided above). The permittee and its contractor are prohibited from relocating or removing any aids to navigation until authorized to do so by the Corps Rcgul4.toiy Division and the U.S. Coast Guard. c) Should the pennittee determine the work requires the temporary placement and use of private aids to navigation in navigable waters of the United Stakes, the permittee shall submit a request in writing to the Corps Regulatory Division a� well as the U.S. Coast Guard, Aids to. Navigation office (contact information providers above)_ The pennitlee is prohibitcd fives calablishing private aids to navigation in ravigiable waters of the United States until authorized to do so by the Corps Regulatory Division and the U.S. Coast Guard. d) The COT? may modify the deployment of marine construction.;equipment or mooring systems to safeguard navigation during project construction. The perrrxittee shall direct questions concerning lighting, equipment placerricnt, and mooring to the appropriate COTP Within 30 calendar days of completion of the project authorized b3, this permit, the Permittee shall conduct a post -project survey indicating changes to structures: and other features in navigable waters. The Permittee shall forward a copy of the survey to the Corps Regulatory Division and to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for chart updating: Gerald E. Wheaton, NOAA, Regional Manager; West Coast and P61cific Ocean, DOD Center Monterey Bay, Room 5082, Seaside, California 93955-6711. 0512112011 10:43 9496313122 SIAIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 14/15 —7- 9_ The permittee understands and agrees dhat, if future operations by :the United States requite the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized., or if, in the opiriion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the tavigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice ,from, the Corps Regulatory Division, to remove, Tclocatc, or alter the W11Ct«ral work or obstructions caused therebj , without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States oar account of any such re.rnoval or alteration. Further Information: 1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). 2. Limits of this authoriza6un. a) This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorizations required by law. b) This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privalleges. c) J his permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d) This permit does not authorize interference with any c.xisliing ai proposed Federal project_ 3. Limits of Federal Liability. Tn issuing thiti permit, the Federal Goi7ernment does not assume any liability for the following: a) Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of dther permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes, b) Damages to the peunitted, project or uses thereof as a:result of durrent or future activities undertaken, by or on, behalf of the United States in th. public inierest. c) Darnages to persons, property, or to other permitted of un.permi4ted activities or 5tnictnres caused, by the activity authorized by this permit. i d) Design or construction deficiencies associated. with the permitted work. I e) Damagc clairns associated with any future 1lxmodificati6n, suspeiision, or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance 01 n the it fdrmation you provided. 05/2112011 10:43 9496313122 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 15115 8 S. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may -re-evaluate its &cision on this permit at any time the lcircurnstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a re-evaluation include, bttt are not limited to, the following: a) You fail to comply with tlae terms and conditions of this perrxiit b) The information provided by you in support of your permit application. proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (See 4 above). c) Significant new information surfaces which this office dial not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a re-evaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, an,d revocation procedures contained in 33 C.F.R. 325.7 or enforcement procedures such Eo those contained in 33 CTA- 326.4 and 326.5. f The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order reg4inng you to comply with the terms and conditions of yn„r penydt and for the initiation of lekal action where appropriate. You. will be required to pay for any corrective measure ordered by!this office, and .if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in, certain situations (such as those specified in 33 C.F.R. 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract of otherwise and bill. you for the cost. 6. Extensions. General Condition 1 establishes a time limit for the ebmpletioa of the activity authorized by this permit_ Unless there arc circumstances rcquiriuig ei.Qmr a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest d6cision, the Corps .Regulatory Division will normally give you favorable consideration to a requkst f:or an extension of this time limit. I fir C3 R A N G E C 0 U N T Y (0.,/CCommunity Resources our cornmuoity, Our Commitment. STEVE FLANKS`� DIRECTOR OC COMMUNITY RESOURCES Mark Denny, Director, OG Warks cc: Mike Mentzer 13042 OLD MYFORD ROAD miNE, CA 92602 PHONE' 866 ' OCPARKS FAX: 714-667-65�11 August 11, 2010 RYAN'DRA8.EK DIRECTOR OC ANIMAL CARE Brad Avery, Director Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship KAREN ROPER DIRECTOR 1801 W. Pacific Coast Hwy, OC COMMUNITY SERVICES Newport Beach, CA 92663 MARK DENNY Subiect: Dock Modifications DIRECTOR OC PARKS Dear Mr. Avery: Mark Denny, Director, OG Warks cc: Mike Mentzer 13042 OLD MYFORD ROAD miNE, CA 92602 PHONE' 866 ' OCPARKS FAX: 714-667-65�11 STATE OF CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN JR., Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION y SOUTH COAST DISTRICT OFFICE =mom ' - P O BOX 1450 200 OCEANGATE 10TH FLOOR ,. LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4325 (562) 590-5071 Z W AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PER TO a p U Date: May 5, 2011 r z z � <t O Permit Application No.: 5-04-167-A2 �+ E� Issued to: Orange Coast College of Sailing and Seamanship for: The proposed project will consist of: 1) installation of ADA compliant gangway and landing; 2) reinstallation of the existing east gangway; 3) install longer and wider west gangway; 4) reconfiguration of the existing instructional docks; 5) installation of two (2) new 30'x 4' fingers and a new 51'x 4' dock with a 22'x 4' backwalk; 6) installation of eight (8) new steel piles ranging from 8" to 12" in diameter coated with NSP -120; 6) removal of ten (10) existing piles ranging from 8" to 10" in diameter; and 7) installation of a new fire system. at: 1801 West Pacific Coast Highway., Newport Beach, Orange County has been amended to include the following changes: Remove an existing finger, relocate and shorten one (1) existing finger to 4.25 feet x 22.5 feet, relocate (2) steel pipe piles; and shorten and relocate an existing L shaped finger to 4.25 feet x 52 feet and 4.25 x 22.5 feet. The proposed project would reduce the area of water coverage from 750 square feet to 540 square feet. The dock system will be composed of Douglas fir and Trex decking. This amendment was determined by the Executive Director to be immaterial, was duly noticed, and no objections were received or the Commission concurred with the Executive Director's determination of immateriality (Sec. 13166 (b)(2)). This amendment will become effective upon return of a signed copy of this form to the South Coast District Office. Please note that the original permit conditions are still in effect. Sincerely, PET R M: O�GILAS Exec utivereor By: ernVi,y Co tal am Analyst II ACKNOWLEDGMENT I have read and understand the above amendment and agree to be bound by its Conditions and the remaining conditions of Permit No: 5-04-167-A2 Date: Signature: AMENDMENT TO COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT Date: May 5, 2011 Permit Application No.: 5-04-167-A2 Page 2 of 2 STANDARD CONDITIONS: Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 4. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 5. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. CJ Cil_ CITY OF NEWPQRT--O.E,RQH CITY OF XUPORT GERCH '--W7.' 907 -MA ILI it JEM PROFILE LE 1 40' YICINITY MRP m3f= girl OLD-Wfo A77Y SOUNDINGS FIRE E*W-SM IN FEET PND DENOTE Q.WIOt6 WS0 ON HUN LOHER LOW HRTER- `%' e P--e,(acvfy- e7, EEL GRASS INSPECTION ftECEI Kirmpog R Eelgrass, within 15' of VED Y Vr— 11F—yy. 1A,&O u t ast-Reqio� V 0in 15 - m v -D --- ca E3. N, Eel ra3, in proectare NOV 2 9 2010 %Wgriature %i �/� JCALIFORNIA YbA ljo. t Inspection Date & T067.' COA TAL COMMISSION PLAN VIEW 40' PP?LiCPff,s NIPVLI- occ S410vt", scWOOL7 l.IJOBRDDRESS1861W.00AS,7'HYI,K Ja9TE ATF -9F CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G...BROWN 'JR. Govemor A,;LIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 12=ta i uh Coast Area Office 0 Oceangate, Suite 1000 ng Beach, CA 90802-1302 M) 590-5071 5-04-167-A2 - RECEIVED BY NOTICE OF PROPOSED PERMIT AMENDMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: All Interested Parties. APR 0 20jI FROM: Peter Douglas, Executive Director CITE'` OF NEWPORT BEACH DATE: April 4., 2011' SUBJECT: Coastal Development Permit No. 5-04-167 granted to Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship: The proposed project will consist of: 1) installation of ADA compliant gangway and landing; 2) reinstallation of the existing, east gangway; 3) install longer and wider west gangway; 4) reconfiguration of the existing instructional docks; 5) installation of two (2). new 30' x 4' fingers and a new 51' x 4' dock with a 22' x 4' backwalk; 6) installation of eight (8) new steel. piles ranging from 8 to 12 in diameter coated with NSP -120;6) removal;; of ten (10) existing piles ranging from 8" to 10" in diameter; and 7) installation of'anew fire system. PROJECT SITE: Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 West Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach (Orange County) The Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission has reviewed a proposed amendment to the above -referenced permit, which would result in the following change(s): Remove an existing finger, relocate and shorten one (1) existing finger to 4.25' x 22.5', relocate two (2) steel pipe piles; and shorten and relocate an existing:"L shaped finger to 4.25' x 52' and 4.25 x 22.5'. The proposed project would reduce the area of water coverage from 750 square feet to 540 square feet. The dock system will be composed of Douglas fir and Trex decking. : FINDINGS: Pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Section 13166(a)(2) this amendment is considered to be IMMATERIAL and the permit will be modified accordingly if no written objections are received within ten working days of the date of this notice. This amendment has been considered "immaterial" for the following reason(s): The proposed development will not result in adverse impacts to marine resources and water quality. The proposed amendment is consistent with the underlying permit approval (CDP# 5-04- 167), the previous amendment:(CDP# 5-04-167-A1) and will not prejudice the City's ability to prepare a certified Local Coastal Program. The proposed project reduces overall water coverage allowing for more sunlight to reach the harbor bottom which increases potential eelgrass growth. The project is consistent with the land use designation in the City's certified Land Use Plan, past Commission actions in the area and Chapter Three policies of the Coastal Act. If you have any questions about the proposal or wish to register an objection, please contact Fernie Sy at the Commission District Office in Long Beach (562) 590-5071. 07'0412011 18:10 9496313122 &%1IFTSLIPDOCKPIER SWiFT SLIP DOCK & PIER BUILDERS, INC. 2027 PLACENTIA AVENUE COSTA MESA, A 92627 (949) 631-3121 PHONE (949) 631-3112 FAx EMAIL: amanda_swiftslir) a7sbcalohai_net www.swiftslipdocks.com November 23, 2010 Adam Fisher California Regional Water Quality Control Board 3737 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501 Re: Boat Dock & Pile Replacement Dear Mr. Fischer: We are acting as agents for the applicant listed below. This is nc replace the boat dock and pile at the address referenced below. It with all Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements. We waste of any kind or adversely impact water quality at this location - 1 _ ocation_ 1_ 2, 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8, 9. PAGE 01/01 tification that we intend to is our intention to comply will not discharge vessel Applicant Name: OCG Sailing- Brad Avery Project Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy Applicant Phone: 949-631-3121 Parcel Number: 049-161-01 Scope of Work: Remove one finger. Re -locate and shorten one finger. Re -locate L-shaped finger. Re -locate 2 pipe pile. Latitude/Longitude: N. 33.36'61.46" W117.54'14. 6 Applicable Fees: Enclosed is a check for the ap�licatinn fee of $77-00. Statement: This notice is being submitted according to Regional Board General Certifiication for sheet and dock pile replacement, issued on September 29, 2005. Statement: The information in this notice i, complete and accurate. Please contact our office if you should have any questions. Very truly yours, SWIFT SLIP DOCK & PiFR BUILDERS, INC, Amanda Spooner Permit Division i 07/03/2011 18:02 9496313122 vMl Vv I I VVi7u vvv VC111111!j IIIIIVO tMf 1tW YGll Ll : Mo %Jgvbjl ail 11 SWIFTSLIPDOCKPIER 5wza- +`sLiPnoc�z� li f HARBRF; RESOURCES DIVISION r 829 Harbor Island bfive i (949) 644-3034 Fax 9,491. 723- � � 723-0588! Special CoridlOpits September 9, 20'f Q Property Address; 180'i W, Coast lgv4V. With reference to the plans currently under consideratibn at the ab reconligure or modify the dock system or bulkhead, t11e follamArV effect: 1- The Project Proponent is aware of the H 17 of the IGlty of Newport Beach Maanit;i at Cv�r The fro� �. olicies (Ce above referenced strGcture(s) is under the purview of thepseP iciaR ar �y future warn( on the above mentioned stnrct_ur*s) requires Newport Beach and aan�r other aP<Nic able agencies. Mamotic In nature does not require a perm' n. Palntinp arrd 3. The conditions set forth to this document perlain to the propo bulkhead under wnsider2tlen. Any futurr" and/or bmadrtfcaiians or afteradt bulkhead Mayrequire new conditions which rnay,:ovemdQ or, c These conditions supumetle au past conditions assaclated with this pro 4. Only marine oriented uses are allowed on the pier, pier platforrri, furniture, Plante etc..,are not permitted_ �. fn aecordanoe With Municipal Code 10.08.030 A, tine nroJect prc proper pormits for equlprrtent and Mweriaals storage. "Except as ctr section, no person shall use any public street, sldawalk, alley or p property for this purpose of storing or disptayir,� any a ny offer cornrnercial purpose. B. Public streets.e�uism� �$y rel sidewwaf! for thy, purpose of salltng, storing, or dlspleying Gray equipment, miter the foll other commrcial i�urposes Ira owing cases: ,..For the temporary equipment or maiariyl provided a pe(trtftis IssilFXi the storage is Consistent with prov,$,Ons of the Ut1lfoRart Building Co rsdaOt to Ater 6. The proj shall be arinpfemertte`d In corT%brrnance with the Local Co, Land Use Plan. Page 9 & Z PAGE 01/02. P. i PAGE 02103 referenced address to ditlorts will nOw be In teff POUCy 1.1-1) artd Title nt understands that the cedes. ermits with the City of V41�k considered to be '.d do -k systerrt and/or s to the dock system ango these conditions, and float. Patio lonerft shall oblain the rwlse provided In this ray or other puU11c ils or merchandise, or arkuvays May be used rl, merchandise or for forage of cOnstructlon 2-62 of this Code and Program - Coastal 0� 07103!2011 18:08 9496313122 S14IFTSLIPDOCKPIER PAGE 02102 UW; W2111! 3IZ�'7 V 0-4J'IOpp p,z SWIl:TSUPWOKPIER PACE 93/93 7. Inaccordance with Municipal Cods 10.28,041) the tollowi Weekdey+s and Saturdays. No arson shall, n iso rcgu(etions a grading, demolition, pai.tln while errg�ged in const etton, ^Emodeti ;�' "a equipment or machine in a gran er which arOdu thw refaitarl buil�"rrl activi to any g9in9, P ces lot,d noise that disturbs, or ceuid disturb, person 4f normal sensitivity who Woft or resides 'l►, the vicirjFEy nn ani weekday oxcg be-twvon the hours of seven a.m. and six-thi pp pf hours of eight a.m_ and six m, dY P m-, nor an any )a Urday except between the cvnstructior', rcrnodefing, dIA•'_n B. Sundays end Holi'dayu, No p6Qn shall, while engaged in building activi 9. grading, demolilian," painting, p�asiIl`errng or any other related tY operate any foci, e�ulpmenf or m�c'hine in a noise that disturbs. or evtrld disturb, a person of normal sensiti riar1r18r which p feces lacxi vicinity, on any Sunday Or any federal holiday," �9 w+ orfcs or resides in the 8. Tour side property lines a bend in the w net encroach upon the neigh L -M afar along their s a bearing. Vessels shall b Vessels may not exfond beyond the end of the 19rtgbrs by s o than the beam. width of its i t,iSa VI! @r5. Harh�� 1 �UUMUS rrt quint Pler App9 —Ca Signature (if applicolafe punt Koine - me 7/� cater 2Lar/t L I HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-3044 / Fax (949) 723-0589 HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Remove one finger. Re -locate and shorten one finger. Re -locate L-shaped finger. Re -locate 2 -pipe pile. Address number must be stenciled on at least 1 bayward facing pile. Pier conditions must be signed by applicant prior to final approval. Property Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy. Legal Description: Harbor Permit Number: 129-1801 Plan Check Number: 1550-2010 Applicant: OCC Sailing Club Applicant's Mailing Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy. Phone Number: (949) 631-3121 I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including: 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. Page 1 of 2 And find �, They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Municipal Code, Title 17 and any applicable specific or precise plans or, ❑ That a variance of exception has been approved and final. A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated. Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Municipal Code or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or the design of a project located thereon, this Approval In Concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of this said ordinance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development: Has been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt. ❑ Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy attached). ❑ Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached). All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a harbor permit and a building permit have been given and are final. The development, is not subject to rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed. This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport Beach. See attached Special Conditions. Lisa Walters, Harbor Resources September 9, 2010 Attachments: Worksheet for Building Permit Application Drawing Pier Conditions Page 2 of 2 Worksheet for Building GSW!bo Permit Application City of Newport Beach - Building Department HARBOR RES-ou Please print 3 copies 17IBuilding F-, Grading [7Drainage F- Elec F7 Mech qj�uOIF NEWPORT H 1. Project Address (Not mailing address) 7' Tenant Nama(ifApplicable) / 5A�Ift �---��-�--'-----'�--f--� ----- ---'� 2. Descrit)tion of Work Extg Building SF Demo Garage sf New Add �� Alter � # Units (if Residential) Use ,w '^" ` | Valuation $ L_---__- --------ldn -~- # Stories | |xdd�e�nmm�Gn�g � ._�-^ �-_�-'�-�ID_| TOTAL BLDG Sr ! 'ub u c"YdCut [7Demo F77`--------------~ TOTAL GARAGE sr [ 'H� r�cuYunn> i L_-°�~ron/ ......... 17 OFFICE USE ONLY ENERGY P/C FEE $ GRADING P/C FEE $ n",una»`o ELEC0MECH0zLUN1P/C FEES PERMIT NO PLAN CHECK NO. P|mxCHF(-xFFFIt CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH, CITY OF KEWPORT SEPVi WE5T UPPER N3fCRT BRY MY X04' go r roll PyCli' C OCERN P I EER HEST YICINITY MRP E r PR( I L E 1 40' KWKRT sir, , SaMINGS FRE EXPRESSED IN FEET AND DENOTE QEVRTIONS BASED ON MEWIMR LOW HATER. C v e At to Map Output Pa(ye t of 1 http://www6.city.newport-beach.ca.us/seivlet/com.esn'.esi imap.Esn'map? ScrviceName=n... 09/09/2010 CITY OF NEEPORT BERG CITY OF Ka PC RT 8E.P01{ i 172 i YICINITY HRP K3euzT Vf, O:LD� -M- U� S Pry✓'i � /N�- ='`� U.S. BLJ<D L INF. I U, S. PRN'p LiF✓ � - —,— 1 f�,POP05ED P1PC P2iNG ; -7.0__ ' u�. it �xrsr �I orro,ti �7, tl I a - • . :'• mal •, - a :a• • - • 4' x 8o' G W/Y 4c.3 a o PLAN V I EW 1 " - 40' F'PL I CRW' S t,P?E OCC S;a1L 1NG SCNOOL JOB ADDRESS 1861 W. 00R5'7- R W',v DATE Page 1 of 1 John Selleck From: Kira Withy -Allen [KiraWithyAllen@wssica.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 4:28 PM To: john.selleck@sbcglobal.net Subject: Fwd: Completed report for OCC Kira Withy -Allen WSSI Environmental Consulting 2726 Shelter Island Dr San Diego, CA 92106 619-246-1597 Cell 800-236-0013 Office 800-225-9730 Fax kirawitiayaiie� t,wssica.com Begin forwarded message: From: Kira Withy -Allen <kira iti eyalie @wssica.ccr > Date: September 15, 2010 2:33:03 PM PDT To: Brady Helm <b s iftsli @s c lc al. ;et> Cc: Richard Mann < a n@wssica.cc > Subject: Completed report for ®CC Iii Brady, Attached is the report for OCC sailing school. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Best, Kira Kira Withy -Allen WSSI Environmental Consulting 2726 Shelter Island Dr San Diego, CA 92106 619-246-1597 Cell 800-236-0013 Office 800-225-9730 Fax kirawithyallen," wssica.com 9/22/2010 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING WSSI2726 Shelter Island Dr.(800) 236-0013 - (8001225-9730 15 September 2010 To: Mr. Brady Helm Swift Slips 2027 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92627 R- Preliminary r d Caulerpa Survey, Orange Coasto-rr Sailing �,.: • . Newport Beach,A Dear Mr. Brady Helm, Attached is the preliminary Eelgrass (Zostera marina) survey as well as a Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form for a dock replacement project at Orange Coast College Sailing School,1801 W. Coast Hwy, Newport Beach, CA. No Caulerpa was observed, but eelgrass was found within the general vicinity of the project area. However, this eelgrass was part of a replanting project, and was > 20 feet distance from where construction would be taking place. Therefore, we do not foresee direct impact on this eelgrass bed if best management practices (BMPs) are used during pile removal/installation and during the placement of the new dock. We also do not foresee any negative impact of shading on the since eelgrass was not found near the construction site. A Post -Construction survey will be conducted within 30 days of project completion to determine whether there were any direct impacts on the eelgrass. This Preliminary Eelgrass report was required in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (SCEMP) since eelgrass is widely distributed throughout Newport Bay. This policy protects an important marine habitat, seagrass beds, which provide habitat and food for adult and juvenile marinelife such as halibut, lobster, seabirds and even endangered sea turtles. Responsible development by contractors like you help to protect these sensitive marine ecosystems here in southern California, contributing to the greater challenge of protecting our ocean resources. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Kira Withy -Allen & Richard Mann WSSI Environmental Consulting 2726 Shelter Island Dr. San Diego, CA 92106 800-818-1020 Office l � ry kf . y, N �V@�w'^ �� .FSA-'�,��r``.��'�t' J, �. '�<�.a�A, .. .. The management at Orange Coast College Sailing School,1801 W. Coast Hwy, Newport Beach, CA has proposed to rearrange the configuration of some docks to fit a larger boat. This includes removing two fingers and replacing it with one finger, as well as slightly relocating another finger. Two pipe piles will be removed and reinstalled in a different location. Please refer to additional documents submitted by Swift Slips for more information regarding the proposed dock. About one week prior to our survey, Rick Ware from Coastal Resources Management had replanted eelgrass in an area that is > 20 ft from the proposed construction site. This survey was conducted to determine the presence or absence of the invasive Caulerpa sp., and to survey for and map the extent of eelgrass, Zostera marina, in the vicinity of the project. .a ,., .. .., .. .. aC S.. =ON :art UF,ti;.LY4't! ~. This survey was conducted on 13 September 2010 beginning at 1130 hr, at approximately N 33.61656',W117.918000. It was sunny and in the high 70s°F, the water temperature was approximately 68°F. Two divers entered the water from the existing dock. The survey area was delineated to cover all shade -impacted and potential work areas and spanned approximately 100 ft (-30 m) by 140 ft (-42m). Water visibility was approximately 1-2 feet. The divers surveyed along transects at approximately 10 ft (3 m) intervals, scanning a 3 -foot area on either side, through the entire survey area to ensure a minimum of 75% bottom area coverage (Figure 2). No Caulerpa spp. were observed (see attached Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form). The only eelgrass that was found was in the replanting site, with the exception of one blade in the u - shaped dock area (see Figure 3). Eelgrass was healthy, about 1.5 m in length, and in bunches of 7-8 turions all spaced about 1 square meter apart. Most of the shallow area was covered in filamentous green algae, which would most likely outcompete any eelgrass that attempted to grow in the area. Sargassum was also observed at random in large bunches. The bay floor was silty and the fauna observed included tube anemones, tunicates, bivalves, and nudibranchs. The water depth ranged from 3 ft near the bulkhead, to 17 ft MLLW near the channel. Depth adjustments based on local tide information: 1.51 AV 3.5 6:28, ANA, 1.3 < ti Day Win, Sep 13, 2010 Day = > 1:13 PM 5,5 8:5 7 PM O£ 7 WSSI ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING2726 Shelter Island Dr. Since the construction site is > 20 feet distance from the construction site, we do not foresee any direct impact on the eelgrass. However, caution should be taken by properly implementing best management practices (BMPs) during dock implementation to avoid indirect damage. BMPs may include the use of silt curtains during pile installation and removal, which will help to minimize potential impact caused by increased turbidity. Further, direct contact by equipment, including boat props, should be avoided, and unused equipment (dock materials/floats/boats & � � a � s �� � � ,, . , � , �v ., � F. ,, Site Photos: . . >� y �., _ - , ,: � , © � � ©\ ,: , « : . « .\<,^ y.��/�, yy�, . . s,� «<�. .�� wz:, >/Q ��? � 4« �� r : y� y > � .. ...\\ >� � w ._ � �. � «z. w<\�\ . .� . : :, ����� d . » a�� �� � « � ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 2726 Shelter Island Dr. San Diego CA 92106 Current dock layout W I ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING 2726 Shelter Island Dr. San Diego CA 92106 Proposed dock layout ", Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for the invasive exotic alga Caulerpa taxifolia that are required to be conducted under federal or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regions 8 & 9). The form has been designed to assist in controlling the costs of reporting while ensuring that the required information necessary to identify and control any potential impacts of the authorized actions on the spread of Caulerpa. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification through publication of revisions to the Caulerpa survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols, please contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries), (562) 980-4043, or William Paznokas, California Department of Fish & Game, (858) 467-4218). Report Date: 14 September 2010 Name of bay, estuary, lagoon, or harbor: Newport Bay Specific Location Name: (address or common 1801 W. Coast Hwy, Newport Beach, CA reference Site Coordinates: (UTM, Lat./Long., datum, N 33.61656 L a t accuracy level, and an W -117.91800 Long electronic survey area map or hard copy of the map must be included) Survey Contact: name, hone, e-mail)Kira Withy -Allen, 619-246-1597 Personnel Conducting Survey (if other than Kira Withy -Allen & Kelly Tait, above): (name, phone, kirawithyallen@wssica.com e-mail Permit Reference: pending (ACOE Permit No., RW CB Order or Cert. No. Is this the first or second First survey by WSSI survey for thisproject? Was Caulerpa Detected?: (if Caulerpa is found, please Yes, Caulerpa was found at this site and immediately contact NOAA Fisheries or CDFG personnel identified above) has been contacted on date. XXX No, Caulerpa was not found at this site. Description of Permitted Work: Two fingers will be removed and replaced with (describe briefly the work to one finger. Another finger will be slightly be conducted at the site relocated. Two pipe piles will be removed and under the permits identified above) installed in a different location. Description of Site: range: _ -Depth Substrate e: (describe the physical and biological conditions within the 68 deg F survey area at the time of the survey and provide insight into variability, if known. Please -Temperature., Salinity Dominant flora: Replanted eelgrass, filamentous provide units for all numerical information). green algae, Sargas sum Dominant fauna: tunicates, nudibranch, mussels Exotic species encountered none (including any other Caulerpa species): Other site description notes: none Description of Survey Effort• • Survey date and time period: 13 Sept 2010 11:30 hr Horizontal visibilityin water: 1- 2 feet (please describe the surveys conducted including type of Survey type and methods: Two divers conducting belt transects on SCUBA survey (SCUBA, remote video, etc.) and survey methods employed, date of work, and survey density (estimated percentage of the bottom actually viewed). Survey personnel: Kira Withy-Allen & Kelly Tait Describe any limitations encountered during the survey efforts. Survey density: none found Survey limitations: low visibility Other Information: Please see attached eelgrass report for further (use this space to provide additional information or information. references to attached maps, reports, etc.) Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (version 1.2, 10/31/04) HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-3034 / Fax (949) 723-0589 Special Conditions September 9, 2010 Property Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy. With reference to the plans currently under consideration at the above referenced address to reconfigure or modify the dock system or bulkhead, the following conditions will now be in effect - 1 . ffect: 1. The project proponent is aware of the Harbor Permit Policies (Council Policy H-1) and Title 17 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code. The project proponent understands that the above referenced structure(s) is under the purview of these Policies and Codes. 2. Any future work on the above mentioned structure(s) requires permits with the City of Newport Beach and any other applicable agencies. Painting and work considered to be cosmetic in nature does not require a permit. 3. The conditions set forth in this document pertain to the proposed dock system and/or bulkhead under consideration. Any future modifications or altera�ions to the dock system and/or bulkhead may require new conditions which may override or change these conditions. These conditions supersede all past conditions associated with this property. 4. Only marine oriented uses are allowed on the pier, pier platform, gangway and float. Patio furniture, plants etc ... are not permitted. 5. In accordance with Municipal Code 10.08.030 A. the project proponent shall obtain the proper permits for equipment and materials storage. "Except as otherwise provided in this section, no person shall use any public street, sidewalk, alley or parkway or other public property for the purpose of storing or displaying any equipment, materials or merchandise, or any other commercial purpose. B. Public streets, sidewalks, alleys, or parkways may be used for the purpose of selling, storing, or displaying any equipment, material, merchandise or for other commercial purposes in the following cases: ...For the temporary storage of construction equipment or material provided a permit is issued pursuant to Chapter 12.62 of this Code and the storage is consistent with provisions of the Uniform Building Code." 6. The project shall be implemented in conformance with the Local Coastal Program - Coastal Land Use Plan. Page 1 of 2 7. In accordance with Municipal Code 10.28.040 the following noise regulations apply: "A. Weekdays and Saturdays. No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting, plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that disturbs, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, on any weekday except between the hours of seven a.m. and six -thirty p.m., nor on any Saturday except between the hours of eight a.m. and six p.m. B. Sundays and Holidays. No person shall, while engaged in construction, remodeling, digging, grading, demolition, painting, plastering or any other related building activity, operate any tool, equipment or machine in a manner which produces loud noise that disturbs, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, on any Sunday or any federal holiday." 8. Your side property lines extend in the water along their same bearing. Vessels shall not encroach upon the neighbor's property on either side. 9. Vessels may not extend beyond the end of the fingers by more than the width of its beam. Lisa Walters, Harbor Resources Date Applicant Signature Joint Pier Applicant Signature (if applicable) Print Name Print Name Page 2 of 2 Date Date HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-3044 / Fax (949) 723-0589 HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT HARBOR PERMIT/APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Remove 1- 4'X30' finger & 1-8'X 17' head walk section. Shorten 3-4' wide fingers 6' each in length. 1-16' wide finger 6' in length. Remove 1 existing pipe pile. Widen main walk from 4' to 8' to be ADA compliant. Install 8'X 28' main walk section to be ADA compliant. Install 1 new 10" pipe pile, 6-12" steel pipe pile. Address number must be stenciled on at least 1 bayward facing pile. Pier conditions must be signed by applicant prior to final approval. Propertv Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy. Legal Description: Harbor Permit Number: 129-1801 Plan Check Number: 0335-2012 Applicant: Orange Coast College Applicant's Mailing Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy., Newport Beach CA 92663 Phone Number: 949-631-3121 I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including: 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. Page 1 of 2 And find '). They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Municipal Code, Title 17 and any applicable specific or precise plans or, ❑ That a variance of exception has been approved and final. A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated.. Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Municipal Code or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or the design of a project located thereon, this Approval In Concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of this said ordinance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development: Y Has been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt. ❑ Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy attached). ❑ Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached). All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a harbor permit and a building permit have been given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed. This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport Beach. See attached Special Conditions. Lisa Walters, Harbor Resources March 1, 2012 Attachments: Worksheet for Building Permit Application Drawing Pier Conditions Page 2 of 2 Worksheet for Building Combo Permit Application 99: i I City of Newport Beach -Building Departme t Please print 3 copies 14A, MR, N`00URC&,- [713uilding J7 Grading [7:Drainage f Elec I MechCJTQFnNEWP0RT BEACH C 1. Project Address (Not mailing address) r� T _*IsluilltAc 0 71 01 ...... .......... : .............. ................ Tenant Name(if Applicable) # Units (if Residential) 2. Description of Work Use 4 h I .......................................................................... . . ... ........ * . ... .......... & ............... .... ............... WVA ation $ S ui d dgeNkuct 4 ................ ................... ............................ g sf # Stories Extg Gar sf Demo Garage sf Add/Reconstruct Garage sf F7 .............................. TOTAL BLDG SF Cu Yd Cut New F7. Add [7 Alter [7 Demo TOTAL GARAGE SF Cu Yd Fill ....................................._.............__....i (7 5. Engineer's Name Last Lic. No. MR E%ineer's A ddress in "figineer's E-mail Address P aj0l) V V LA 0 N lfflnA OlDb ............. .......................................................11.................................. .. .....,t ............................................................. : ............... ............................. ................ ..................................................... City State Zip ,b?1Telephone i Yyl YU.111D ........................... ............ ...................... . F.-,, 6. Contractor's Name Last No. lass ......................... OFFICE USE ONLY ENERGY P/C FEE $A GRADIO&, '0F&E*FQRT BF,4C� FIRE P/C FEE $ Rev 4116109 ELEC/MECH/PLUM P/C FEE$ PERMIT NO. — PLAN CHECK NO. PLAN CHECK FEE $ s-. � e� � :�'��aaa e• ��-; e. ;�® a �a, section ant pliant Ale f 2.13.20 Map Output Page 1 of 1 http://www6.city.newport-beach.ca.us/servlet/com.esri.esrimap.Esrimap?5erviceName=nb... 2/2/2012 f; . 2027 Placentia (94;9) Avenue., Costa Mesa, California 631-3121 Fax (949) 631-3122 92627 DOCK & PIER BUILDERS, INC. . . . . . . . .. . 92627 DOCK & PIER BUILDERS, INC. 2027 Placentia Avenue, Costa Mesa, California (949) 631-3121 Fax (949) 6311-3122 1 , t I I! I 1 - - - - -- - - = LQ -l- - - - t ---r--1 -- _--- 92627 t -r- 1j► 1 b -i- - - - DOCK & PIER I , 7 --- BUILDERS INC. � �' ::, ,,,` ms's �'�- � �' �,�a. *�.+�' c� � � � �r�'' rs ;< � ��� v �✓ �� �'�"1 � �. � � ✓!� to , ! �n �� ,� a�ri '� :. r 0�>"' at��y s r r anj�a a a� E/, d S r L r: h r k gy / F - fl - f 1 r l r s .. - 4x. �: H �',.., :.t? rtii`v.• i,�a_:. , :W,.s,z. ar v :. ; .. %.Iii 5......'4>� ' Dock and Pier Builders, Inc. Contractor's License 797052 A www.swiftslipdocks.com 2027 Placentia Avenue - Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Telephone (949) 631-3121- Fax (949) 631-:3122 2 February 2012 Re: Brad Avery, Director Orange Coast College, College of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 West Coast Highway Newport Beach, California 92663 Remove 1 —4'x30' finger, 1- 8'x17' head walk section Shorten 3 — 4' wide fingers 6' each in length, 1 — 16'wide finger 6' in length Remove 1 existing pipe pile Widen main walk from 4' to 8' to be ADA compliant Install 8'x 28' main walk section to be ADA compliant Install 1 new 10" pipe pile, 6 new 12" steel pipe pile This improvement is necessary as the College of Sailing and Seamanship has recently acquired an 85' boat. This boat will be utilized to expose sailing to those people who have a desire for boating knowledge but who may not be . Vit'` able to afford their own boat. Document #1 — Satellite photograph of project location. Document #2 — Satellite photograph of existing dock. Document #3 - Drawing of existing dock. 1,716 sq. ft. Document #4 — Drawing of proposed dock. 2.048 sq. ft. Document #5 — Drawing of overlay of existing and proposed dock. STATE OF,CALIFORNIA- NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIK. RNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office Page 1 of 3 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 itlw ° Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 Date: April 29, 2010 (562) 590-5071 Permit No: 5-04-167-A1 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT On April 16, 2010, the California Coastal Commission granted to Orange Coast College, Attn: Bruce Tice & Brad Avery Coastal Development Permit 5-04-167-A1, subject to the attached Standard and Special Conditions, for development consisting of: After -the -Fact (ATF) authorization for the addition of a modular plastic dock system (floating pads) for instructional boats. In addition, the loss of 1,133 square feet of eelgrass from the shading effects will be mitigated at a ratio 1.2 to 1 for a total of 1,360 square feet is proposed.... More specifically described in the application file in the Commission offices. The development is within the coastal zone at 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach (Orange County) . Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission on /29/20 PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director Title: Co tal P ogr, m Analyst ACKNOWLEDGMENT, The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. The undersigned permittee acknowledges that Government Code Section 818.4 which states in pertinent part, that: "A public entity isnot liable for injury caused by the issuance ... of any permit ..." applies to the issuance of this permit. IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. 14 CAL. ADMIN. CODE SECTION 13158(a). Date Signature of Permittee Please sign and return one copy of this form to the Commission office at the above address. STANDARD CONDITIONS 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment: The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2.. Expiration. If developmenthas not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 4. Assignment. The permit.may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 5. Terms and Conditions. Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: A. PRIOR CONDITIONS Unless specifically altered by this amendment, all regular and special conditions attached to Coastal Development Permit No. 5-04-167 remain in effect, with the following exception: To the extent development specifications in any plans approved by the Executive Director pursuant to this amendment are inconsistent with specifications listed in any plans approved prior to this amendment, compliance with which was required by the existing permit conditions, those requirements for compliancewith those prior plans are hereby modified as necessary, but only as necessary; to require compliance with the new plans. In addition, all standard and special conditions imposed under Costal Development. Permit No. 5-04-167 that could apply equally to this amendment, are so applied. B. ADD THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS 4. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the applicant shall provide to the Executive Director a copy of apermit issued by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), or letter of permission, or evidence that no permit or permission is required. The applicant shall inform the Executive Director of any changes to the project required by the. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). Such changes shall not be incorporated into the project until the applicant obtains a Commission amendment to this coastal development permit, unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. 5. EELGRASS MITIGATION PLAN The applicant shall conform with the Eelgrass Mitigation Plan Orange. Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Dock Renovation Project prepared by Coastal Resources Management dated August 21, 2009. The quantity of eelgrass mitigation to occur shall be as described in the approved mitigation plan, along with any additional eelgrass mitigation required pursuant to SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 2 of the original permit (CDP No. 5-04-167). Any proposed changes to the approved plan shall be reported to the Executive Director. No changes to the approved plan shall occur without a Commission amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. 6. CONDITION COMPLIANCE Within 120 days of Commission action on this coastal development permit application or within such additional time as the Executive Director may grant for good cause, the applicant shall satisfy all requirements specified in the conditions hereto that the applicant is required to satisfy prior to issuance of this permit. Within 1 year of Commission action on this coastal development permit application or within such additional time as the Executive Director may grant for good cause, the applicant shall complete the initial eelgrass planting/transplant at the optimal time for such planting/transplant, as acknowledged and required in SPECIAL CONDITION NO. 5, and the applicant shall provide documentation to the Executive Director that this initial phase of the eelgrass mitigation has been completed. Failure to comply with this requirement may result in the institution of enforcement action under the provisions of Chapter 9 of the Coastal Act. G/permit/2004/rh Date of Survey:. March 1, 2012 DIVE WORKS 429-0 Shoreline Village Drive (949) 759-0773 Long Beach, CA 90802 Swift Slips 2027 Placentia Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92627 Subject: Preliminary Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Survey Report and Caulerpa taxifolia Survey 1801 W. Coast Hwy, Newport Beach, Ca 92663 Attached are the Preliminary Eelgrass (Zostera marina) Survey Report and Caulerpa taxifolia Survey Report for the dock replacement project ordered for Orange Coast College, College of Sailing and Seamanship, located at 1801 W. Coast Hwy. No Eelgrass patches were observed in the subject area. No Caulerpa taxifolia was observed in subject area. This is a Preliminary report as required in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (SCEMP) since eelgrass is widely distributed throughout Southern California Coastal and Harbor Regions. This policy has been set in place to protect marine habitats and sea grass beds that play a role in the life cycle chain for marine life to reproduce. This survey's assist development projects by contractors like you to conduct activities in conjunction with BMP's concerning impact and management for promoting Eelgrass and controlling the spread of Caulerpa. Responsible development by contractors like you helps protect these sensitive marine ecosystems, which in turn protects our ocean resources. Thank you. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us. Respectfully, DiveWork@gmail.com (949) 759-0773 Orange Coast College 1801 West Coast Highway Newport Beach, Ca 92663 Swift Slips Dock & Pier Builders, Inc. Costa Mesa, California Preliminary Eelgrass Survey Report Prepared March 1, 2012 In Dive Works Robert Wiegand Survey assistance by Sean Donovan 'l—U701DIVE WORKS 429-0 Shoreline Village Drive (949) 759-0773 Long Beach, CA 90802 Current Situation — Preliminary The institution at 1801 W. Coast Hwy, Newport Beach owns a Sailing Club Dock; due to the recent acquirement of an 85' boat, renovations to the existing dock have been proposed. ® One (1) 30' dock finger and one (1) 8'x17' head walk section are to be removed ® The remaining four (4) fingers are to be shortened ■ The main walk will be widened from 4' to 8' ® A new main walk section measuring 8'x28' will be installed ® One (1) existing pile will be removed and one (1) 10' pipe pile, and six (6) 12' steel pipe piles will also be installed This survey was conducted to determine the presence or absence of Eelgrass and Caulerpa species in and around the project area, and to illustrate the extent thereof. DIVE WORKS 429-0 Shoreline Village Drive Long Beach, CA 90802 Survey conducted March 1, 2012 beginning at 1358 hr approximately N Lat 33.365940° - W Long 117.550522. Day was overcast with a temperature of 57° F. Water temperature was 63' F. Depth ranged from sea wall approximately 14 feet to approximately 22 feet just past end of dock. Visibility was 3-5 ft. Divers entered the water from sea using boat. Survey area delineated spanning 140' by 50' to cover the surrounding area. Survey conducted with divers spaced 1-3 ft apart perpendicular to sea wall. Lane finger width was approximately 4 ft wide — the finger at the end of dock was 16' wide - scanning approximately 2 ft on either side, covering the entire area to ensure >75% coverage of bay floor. No patches of Eelgrass were observed around the property. No Caulerpa was observed (see attached Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form), neither was Eelgrass observed in the area surrounding the property. Dimensions of existing dock: ® Outermost finger measures 34' long by 16' wide ® Three (3) fingers measuring 30' long by 4' wide stemming from large U -portion of dock • One (1) finger measuring 30' long by 4' wide stemming from indented innermost section of dock Fauna observed included schools of juvenile fish. Visibility was moderate, 3'-5'. The water depth ranged from 14 feet at the sea wall to 22 feet at end of dock. Figure 2. Eelgrass survey: 1801 W. Coa!E ryvyp e ®& ® ^ai. a Newport Beach CA Y r; ,t ae�br^S:.�mo. Discussion WORKSDIVE Long Beach, CA 90802 Eelgrass (Zostera marina) was not observed throughout the area from beginning of dock nearest sea wall to about 14 feet from sea wall bulkhead. There was no eelgrass under the dock or forward from the seal wall from beginning of dock on either side up to about 6 feet away from dock. No impact to eelgrass is expected with the renovation of the existing dock, pier, gangway, and piles. This Preliminary survey can serve as the baseline for Pre and Post -Construction surveys. It is recommended to use Best Management Practices in the construction process of replacing this dock. Figure 3. Eelgrass survey: 1801 W. Coast Hwy, Newport Beach CA Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for the invasive exotic alga Caulerpa taxifolia that are required to be conducted under federal or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or Regional water Quality Control Boards (Regions 8 & 9). The form has been designed to assist in any potential impacts of the authorized actions on the spread of Caulerpa. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification through publication of revisions to the Caulerpa survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols, contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, 562-980-4043, or William Paznokas, California Department of Fish & Game, 858-467-4218. Required Information Specific Location Name: 1801 W. Coast Hwy (address or common reference) Newport Beach CA Report Date: March 1, 2012 Name of bay, estuary, lagoon, channel, or Newport Harbor harbor Permit Reference:. Pending (ACOE Permit No., CCC Permit No.) Site Coordinates: N 33.3659400 Lat (LITM, Lat./Long., datum, accuracy level, attach W 117.550522° Long electronic survey area map if possible) Personnel Conducting Survey Robert Wiegand (if other than above) : (name, phone, e-mail) Sean Donovan Is this the first or second survey for this Preliminary project? Was Caulerpa Detected?: (if Caulerpa is found, please immediately contact NOAA Fisheries or CDFG No Caulpera was found at this site. personnel identified above). Description of Permitted Work: n/a (describe briefly the work to be conducted at this site under the permits identified above) Description of Site: Depth Range: 14' to 22' w' DIVE WORKS 429-0 Shoreline Village Drive Long Beach, CA 90802 (949) 759-0773 (describe the physical and biological Substrate Type: Bottom is sediment of sand conditions within the survey area at the time and heavy silt cover of the survey and provide insight into variability, if known. Please provide units Temperature: Air 57° Water 63° for all numerical information). Salinity: Salt Water Dominant Flora: n/a Doninant Fauna: Small fish, muscles Exotic species None encountered encountered (including any other Caulerpa species): Other site None noted description notes: Description of Survey Effort: (please Survey date and March 1, 2012 describe the surveys conducted including type of survey (SCUBA, remote video, etc.) time period: 1358 hr and survey methods employed, date of work, and survey density (estimated Horizontal visibility in water: 3-5 feet' percentage of the bottom actually viewed). Survey type and SCUBA, camera Describe any limitations encountered during the survey efforts. methods: Survey Robert Wiegand, personnel. Sean Donovan Survey Density: > 75% area surveyed Survey None Limitations: Other Information: (use this space to provide any additional information or references to attached materials such as maps, reports, etc.) Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (version 1.2, 10/31/04) This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for Eelgrass located in Newport Harbor, Newport Beach, which is required to be conducted under federal and/or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Coastal Commission and required for review by City of Newport Beach Marine Bureau and Planning Department. The form has been designed to assist in identifying eelgrass while ensuring that the required information is consistently documented. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification through publication of revisions to the Eelgrass survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols, contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, 562-980-4043, or William Paznokas, California Department of Fish & Game, 858-467-4218. This survey was conducted on March 16, 2011 and is valid for (90) ninety days from date of survey. For information regarding this survey please contact Robert Wiegand, Dive Works Diving Service at 949-759-0773. Required Information Site Name: 1801 W. Coast Hwy Newport Beach CA Survey Contact: Robert Wiegand (949) 759-0773 DiveWork@Gmail.com Permit Reference: Pending (ACOE Permit No., CCC Permit No.) Name of bay, estuary, lagoon, channel, or Newport Harbor harbor Specific Location: N 33.365940° Lat (UTM, Lat./Long., datum, accuracy level, attach W 117.550522° Long electronic survey area map if possible) Was Eelgrass Detected: XXX No, Eelgrass was not found at this site. Description of Permitted Work: n/a (describe briefly the work to be conducted at the site under the permits identified above). Description of Site: Depth range: 14' to 22' (describe the physical and biological conditions within the survey area at the time of the survey and provide insight into variability, if known. Please provide units for all numerical information). Substrate type: Sediment, sand, dirt Temperature: 630 Salinity: Salt Water Dominant flora: n/a Dominant fauna: Mussels, fish Exotic species None encountered Other site description None notes: Description of Survey Survey date and time Survey conducted using SCUBA and camera. Effort: (please describe period: the surveys conducted including type of survey DATE: September 28, (SCUBA, remote video, 2011 etc.) and survey methods TIME : 1203 hr employed, date of work, and survey density (estimated percentage of the bottom actually viewed). Describe any limitations encountered during the survey efforts. Horizontal visibility in 3-5' water: Survey type and SCUBA methods: Survey Personnel: Robert Wiegand Sean Donovan Survey density: >75% area surveyed Survey limitations: None Other Information: (use Due to the depth of the water (up to 22ft), this space to provide any there is not enough sunlight for Eelgrass to additional information or thrive. references to attached materials such as maps, reports, etc.) Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form (April 2009) CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH lFffR WST BRY l:'lqclPlcR PIE OCERN JMY HMT ILE 1 PROF U. = 40' MINITY MAP 0:6T m3f= W?r, otDvwm JMY SOLMINGS PRE DR;F-SSED'IN FEET AND DENOTE ELEVATIONS BASED ON, tEM LaCR LOW WATER, We 000 Cb UAAOS '4 /Z- T- tl-S r i Im U.S 64g:o ZINC. c aockil W 0 Nh O EdLt'PRASS WITHIN 4 RE oo - MODUL- Q PLAN VIEW ly = 40' R 06.=ONAL Z- FWoz- MAD.E I wi L7- X. G,41,IG %14,4- FPPLIW'S BANE GCC SAID NO SCHOOL . _LOB RDDRESS 186 / W. COAST H 1W I DATE -- I HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach,, CA 92660 949-644-3034 / Fax 949-723-0589 APPROVAL IN CONCEPT APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Install new floating modular Candock" docks stem along, and attached to, existing traditional system. Address number must be stenciled on at least 1 bayward facing pile. Pier conditions must be signed by applicant prior to final approval. Pro ertAddress: 1801 W. Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA Legal Description: (Harbor Permit Number: 129 -1801 1 Plan Check Number: App scant: OCC Sailing School Applicant's Mailing Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA Phone Number: (949) 645-9412 I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including: 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. Page 1 of 2 Andfid ;They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and any applicable specific or precise plans or, ❑ That a variance of exception has been approved and final. A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated. Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Zoning Ordinance or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or the design of a project located thereon, this approval in concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of this said ordinance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local guidelines adopted hereunder, this development: SIKHas been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt. ❑ Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy attached). ❑ Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached). All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a building permit have been given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed. This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport Beach. See attached conditions to the pier permit. Tom Rossmiller, Manager, Harbor Resources Mike Ure, Harbor Resources April 4, 2006 Attachments: Worksheet for Building Permit Application Drawing Pier Conditions Page 2 of 2 HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-644-3034 / Fax 949-723-0589 Pier Permit Conditions April 4, 2006 Property Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA With reference to the plans currently under consideration to reconfigure or modify the dock system, the following conditions will now be in effect on the above referenced pier. 1. The pier permittee is aware of the Harbor Permit Policies and Chapter 17 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code. The pier permittee understands that the above referenced pier is under the purview of these Policies and Codes. 2. Any future work on the above mentioned pier requires permits with the City of Newport Beach and any other applicable agencies. Painting, replacement of rub rails and work considered to be cosmetic in nature does not require a permit. 3. The conditions set forth in this document pertain to the current, proposed dock system under consideration. Any future modifications or alterations to the dock system may require new conditions which may override or change these conditions. These conditions supersede all past conditions associated with this property. 4. Only marine oriented uses are allowed on the pier, pier platform, gangway and float. Patio furniture, plants etc ... are not permitted. 5. The side property lines extend in the water along their same bearing. No moored vessel shall encroach on these lines. 6. The dock float will be permitted to extend to, but not cross the U.S. Pierhead Line. 7. A moored vessel may not extend beyond the end of the fingers by more than the width of it's beam 8. Moored vessels shall comply with all applicable municipal Fire Codes. Signature: Mike Ure, Harbor Resources Date Applicant Signature Print Name Date Joint Pier Applicant Signature (if applicable) Print Name Date The School of SAILING SEAMANSHIP \ Orange Coast College March 23, 2006 Harbor Resources Division 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Tom, Chris & Mike, As a follow up to our conversation reference the dock project at the College Boathouse, please find enclosed a site plan showing the area where the modular "Candock" boat float system has been installed. It supports the small boat fleet independently and is merely tethered to the permanent wooden dock by means of welded stainless steel hinges lagged into the 4x6 stringers of the wooden dock. The hinges are mounted on 12 foot centers and were engineered and supplied by the manufacturer of the modular dock floats. In order to appease the California Coastal Commission, please let me know what else I can supply to you in my effort to attain your secondary A.I.C. on this project. for your W. Tice 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ■ 949-645-9412 ■ Fax 949-645-1859 Orange Coast College «»+w t &wl" »y .80Zr.Pacific Coast 226.6 Newport Beach, CA Contact. Bruce Tice Corona del Mar, CA 92625 Contact. f:< Ware, « « w..x (949) 412-9446 3.1 Sediment Characteristics, Underwater Visibility, and Water Temperature .................... 0 I Location nfProject Area in Newport Bay ..................................................................................... 1 2 Project Improvements --_--_--_'_-_.--'_'.-._.—..-...................................................... 3 3 Location of Eelgrass in the Project Area During the ........................... 5 4 Results ofthe -.,--_—__—._---'__---__--_.--8 I Pre -Dock Renovation Project Area, February 2005 .-------_..-------_.-------__. 2 2 New OCC Sailing Facility Dock System, December 2005......................................................... 4 3 View nf Floating Launch Pad for Small Vessel Sailing Classes ................................................ 9 4 Secondary Eelgrass Transplant Site, near the Bayside Peninsula, Upper Newport Bay ................ 15 OCC Sailing and. Seamanship Center Dock Renovation / Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrawmabitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation mm HABITAT SURVEYS AND EMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR A DOCK RENOVATIONPROJECT Coastalources Management (CRM) Rconducted post -construction eelgrass habitat impact assessment at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship in Newport Beach, California foon December 15g' 2005. The purpose of =ar o determine from the removalof existing boat docks and the emplacement of new boat dock facilities. The project location is shown in Figure I and Photograph 1. NEVv?ORT BAY Cha,. 18754_1 (ESB Ele.t— t Chari) Depth Uma'. FEc? A 71 2 ii � �x� � x> � � .� ate• •� HL _- N l _NauC:a� Mites 0.00 010 .:-.0,20 0.30 -0.40 O.EO 0.60 0. (�'.;i_ 'fin„�+` '� � �1;I . �•.1'! �<� �"• .w� �,� it. The project o . "d on the north id' of Lido Reach alongLower ProjectNewport Bay (Newport Harbor). The site coordinates are 33' 36.99' N, 117' 55.08' W . 1'-, i!tasks'died removing 10 existing piles,r * an ADA compliant gangway and landing, reinstalling the existing east gangway, installing a longer dj wider west gangway, reconfiguring the existing instructional docks, installing two new fingers and a new dock/backwalk, installing eightd installing 1 new fire system. Specific o;:'ct attributes are provided in Figure•Photograph 2. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation I Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan Photograph 1. Pre -Dock Renovation Project Area. Source Photo: City of Newport Beach GIS Division OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 2 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan CITY OF NEWPORT SERCH oziv AIC -W 4 ®RDPDSFC SGC'O. MMM�� J ry, U AIR Tz- a —Z= I 5� &X.'4'xW' GA"G;VA?- PLAh VIEW 16 =40' Wr URTE Figure 2. Project Improvements, OCC Sailing and Seamanship Facility, Newport Beach, CA OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 3 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan Leu± J ry, U AIR Tz- a —Z= I 5� &X.'4'xW' GA"G;VA?- PLAh VIEW 16 =40' Wr URTE Figure 2. Project Improvements, OCC Sailing and Seamanship Facility, Newport Beach, CA OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 3 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan Photograph 2. View of New OCC Sailing Center Dock System, December 2005 The project pre -construction eelgrass survey was conducted on 15 February 2005 (Coastal Resources Management 2005a). A total of 1,132.6 square feet (105.3 square meters) of eelgrass habitat was located at the project site within a single bed and a second small patch Figure 3). 'These areas of eelgrass cover were located at depths between -6 ft and -7 ft L. The eelgrass bed was located within the center basin nearby where Lido 14 sailboats are stored. An additional patch of eelgrass (I sq m) was located within the east basin. The green algae Enteromorpha calif®rnica formed a thick, 4 to 6 inch mat throughout a large portion of the basin. Its abundance likely was responsible for the limited amount of eelgrass observed during the survey. Prior to heavy winter rains in 2004-2005, eelgrass beds were present within this area during City of Newport Beach eelgrass inspections in October 2003 (Eelgrass survey report submitted to the City of Newport Beach by W. Shofstall) and in March 2004 (Coastal Resources Management 2005b). However, this west basin bed was not present during the February 2005 survey. between 0 and 42 shoots per square meter; the average stioot density was 2,,1. / +/ I �).A (n= I I replicates). The eelgrass was in poor condition and the blades were extremely shoft (approximately 2 to 4 cm in length), By comparison, eelgrass shoot density within the same eelgrass bed during the July 2004 summer growth period for eelgrass was 98 +/31 shoots per square meter and shoot lengths varied in length between 30 and 60 cm (CRM 2005b). OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 4 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan I % f�� 3 . J, v' } 1@ , � 'C !, i � t= t i • 4 ° a s = s r " rl, �P � cps U. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 5 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan The dock renovation project was estimated to have a potential to affect 68 sq ft (6.3 sq m) of eelomss vegetation. Mitigation proposed included conducting an eelgrass transplant program on site at a mitigation ratio of 1.2 to 1, so that a total of 81.2 sq ft (7.6 sq m) of eelgrass would be successfully transplanted according to the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (National Marine Fisheries Service, 1991 as amended). Eelgrass habitat surveys were conducted by CRM biologists Rick Ware and Stephen Whitaker on 15 December 2005 between 0930 and 1200 hours. Methods employed were the same as those used during the pre -construction survey (CRM 2005a). A biologist in a kayak equipped with the GPS followed a SCUBA -diving biologist who towed a surface buoy to mark the perimeter of the eelgrass vegetation. The estimated GPS error of the Thales Mobile Mapper unit with post -processing correction was less than 1 meter. GPS data were initially entered into the Mobile Mapper Software and then transferred into GPS TRACKER and ARCVIEW GIS software. The amount of eelgrass habitat in the project area was calculated using Mobile Mapper Software. Eelgrass turions are a structural unit of an eelgrass plant and consist of the above -surface, green eelgrass shoot and attached eelgrass blades. Following the GPS mapping effort, biologists ran underwater transects within the bed perimeter and estimated eelgrass turion density by counting the number of eelgrass turions within eleven, 0.07 square meter quadrats throughout the eelgrass bed. These counts were standardized to counts per square meters. 3.1 SEDUVIENT CHARACTERISTICS, c G! J^ cR tl= ` s AND WATER TEMPERATURE The project area bayfloor sediments were uniform lane silts throughout the study area. Underwater visibility was five feet. Water temperature during the survey was 62 degrees F. .. 10= eelgrass (Figure 4). Two patches were within the basin where the new dock system located; d patch was locatedOCC basin west of the new dock structure, majority of eelgrass that was located in February 2005 is no longer is present (1,133 sq ft small sail boats attac1h to the dock (Figure 4, Photograph 3). Another 270 sq ft of previously present eel hab 'tatlocatedimmediatelyfloating pad. is ��� a o 1, 133 sq ft of very low density and marginal eelgrasshabitat. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 6 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan Eelgrass shoot density within the three patches was extremely low and averaged 3 turions per square meter, compared to 24 turions per sq meter in February 2005 (CRM 2005a), and 98 turions per square meter in July 2004 (CRM 2005b). lQVIUM-1111 OJL a 110atlig Pau ne"'i"n""""ITIMIMI which was not shown in the project drawings and therefore not considered in pre - construction eelgrass bed impact analysis (See Photograph 3). The dominant marine plant observed on the seafloor during the post -construction survey was the red algae Acrosorium uncinatum. The brown algae Cystoseira was observed attached to the boat floats, and old dock debris observed on the bayfloor near the pierhead line. No marine invertebrates or fishes were observed during the survey, I TIUST I - the project site, in the eelgrass habitat mapping area, or in the proximity of the boat docks and piles that were renovated. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 7 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan IF St?-ar r, �: err r.; �?��iL1�1►' v ®CC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 8 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Flan Photograph 3. View of floating docks for small vessel sailing classes located over previously existing low-density eelgrass habitat OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 9 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan The dock renovation project resulted in the loss of 1,133 sq fl (105.3 sq m) of very low density (mean density of 3 shoots/sq m) and marginal eelgrass habitat due to shading effects from a floating small boat launch pad. However, this eelgrass bed has been Ander stress for at least 12 months prior to the construction of the dock system, likely a consequence of extremely heavy rainfall and high levels of turbidity in late 2004 and early 2005, and secondarily, extended red tide episodes in Newport Bay and the nearshore coastal areas over the spring -to -summer 2005 period. Therefore, there appears to be multiple causes that are not clearly separable which lead to the decline of the ®CC basin eelgrass beds. rsa. s se conr 2006. Amount of Habitat Impacted. A total of 1,133 sq ft of eelgrass (105.3 sq 1n) was impacted by shading effects as a result of the OCC dock construction project. The loss of this eelgrass will be mitigated at a ratio of 1.2 to 1, such that a total of 1360 sq ft (126.4 sq ) of eelgrass will be successfully transplanted to the selected mitigation site A mitigation program will involve several tasks; (1) selecting a potential eelgrass receiver site, (2) conducting eelgrass transplants at a replacement ratio of 1.2 to 1, (3) conducting relitigation monitoring surveys to rate the level of transplant success, and (4) if required, conducting additional transplants if the primary transplant does not meet project success criteria. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 10 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan We propose to conduct the eelgrass transplant on-site at the OCC facility where eelgrass has occurred in the past, but is not currently present. This will be followed by a five-year monitoring program at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly for a period of five years. The condition of this site will be re-evaluated prior to the conduct of the transplant. If this site is not conducive to transplants, then we proposed to transplant eelgrass to the inner side of Bayside/De Anza Peninsula, where patches of eelgrass survived the heavy winter rains of 2005 (Photograph 4 ). Transplant site will be dependent upon the condition at these sites in spring/early summer 2006. We will transplant at the mitigation site which demonstrates the highest eelgrass transplant success rate. Transplant timing. Transplants will be conducted in late spring or early summer 2006. Permission to transplant within tideland areas. Permission will be required to transplant within tidelands that are under the City of Newport Beach and/or the County of Orange jurisdiction. The appropriate agency will be contacted and permission to transplant obtained once the transplant site is selected. Contacts to obtain permission include Mr. Tom Rossmiller, City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Director (949) 644-3041 and Ms. Andrea Richards, County of Harbor Department of Harbors, Beaches, and Parks Tidelands Lease Administrator (714) 834-4677. Permission to collect eelgrass donor material. State of California Scientific Collecting Permits will be required for staff involved with the actual collecting of donor material for the transplant. CRM personal already have these permits. In addition, special permission will be required from the California Department of Fish and Game to collect eelgrass donor material. CRM will obtain the necessary special permit from the CDF&G following the selection of the final transplant site. The CDF&G contact is Ms. Marilyn Fluharty (858) 467-4231. Responsible Parties. The Applicant, The Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship (Brad Avery, Director) will be the responsible party for this project, Coastal Resources Management will conduct the eelgrass transplant and the mitigation monitoring program. The California Department of Fish and Game, National Marine Fisheries Service, and the California Coastal Commission will be responsible for reviewing the project's monitoring program results and for determining if the project meets or does not meet criteria as a successful eelgrass mitigation project. Eelgrass Transplant Methods. The following program will be implemented to restore eelgrass at the project site. The eelgrass transplant will involve several steps; collecting stock material from the donor site(s), preparing the material for transplanting, replanting the eelgrass in the mitigation area receiver site, following up the transplant with monitoring surveys, and evaluating the success of the transplant. Donor material will be harvested by diver -biologists from the shallow subtidal zone around Harbor Island, Linda Isle, and Balboa Island. The preferred transplant method is the anchor/bundle method (Fonseca et al. 1982) in which eelgrass is collected by divers from the donor site, transferred to shore, separated into planting its by a shore -based team of OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation I I Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan Photograph 4. Secondary eelgrass transplant site at Bayside Peninsula (DeAnza Peninsula) located immediately north of the Coast Highway Bridge in Upper Newport Bay. This site retained eelgrass following the heavy winter storms of 2004, whereas the main channel eelgrass beds did not survive. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 12 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, impact Assessment and Mitigation Plan technicians, and replanted by SCUBA -divers along a pre -determined grid. The donor material will be separated into planting units consisting of about 10 turions and associated substrate and root mass. Turions will be bundled and tied together with biodegradable line and a sediment anchoring device. The bundles will be transferred to the divers who will then replant the eelgrass bundles in spacing units of i unit per 1 square meter over the entire transplant site. At a 1.2 to I (mitigation to loss ratio), a total of 126 bundles, each consisting of 10 shoots per bundle (1,260 total shoots) will be transplanted at the project site. Based upon pre-and-post 2005 winter data, we anticipate that final eelgrass shoot density will likely fall within values between 50 and 100 shoots per square meter (CRM 2005b) 5.2 FIELD MONITORING Transplant Monitoring Surveys. A series of seven monitoring surveys will be required to evaluate transplant success over a period of five years. Furthermore, if the initial transplant fails to conform with required performance standards, a supplemental transplant area and monitoring in conformance with SCEMP (Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy) will be required. Post -transplant monitoring surveys will be conducted during the active vegetative growth periods of eelgrass (March through October) at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years after the transplant to determine the health of the transplanted vegetation and to evaluate transplant success based on established criteria (NWS 1991 as amended). Eelgrass areal cover and shoot density of eelgrass will be determined during each monitoring survey. Undisturbed areas of the eelgrass meadows in the vicinity of the transplant site will be used a control area when assessing the results of the transplant. If yearly criteria are not met; then a replant will be conducted. The amount to be replanted is based upon a formula that takes into account area and/or density deficiencies (NWS 1991 as amended). 5.3 REPORTING AND EVALUATING NIITIGATION SUCCESS Field survey results will be submitted to the resource agencies and the Executive Director of the California Coastal Commission in report format within 30 days of the pre -and post - project monitoring surveys, and seven post -transplant monitoring surveys. The reports will present eelgrass area and density data, an assessment of the functional quality of the area, a qualitative assessment of invertebrate and fish use of the area, determination if mitigation success criteria have been met, and recommended remedial measures if the transplant is not meeting mitigation success criteria. Mitigation Success Criteria (NMFS 1991 as amended) Criteria for determination of transplant success shall be based upon a comparison of vegetation coverage (area) and density (turions per square meter) between the project impact area and mitigation site(s). Extent of vegetated cover is defined as that area where eelgrass is present and where gaps in coverage are less than one meter between OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 13 Coastal Resources Management Post -Construction Eelgrass Habitat Survey, Impact Assessment, and Mitigation Plan SfiATE OF CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION µ� . South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302. (562) 590-5071 NOTICE OF VIOLATION OF THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT REGULAR AND CERTIFIED MAIL July 30, 2009 Bruce Tice Brad Avery Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway Newport Beach, CA Violation File Number: V-5-06-006 Property Location: Orange Coast. College School of Sailing and Seamanship, 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach, Orange County Unpermitted Development: Construction of a floating pad next to an approved dock in non-compliance with the final approved plans of Coastal Development Permit No. 5-04-167 resulting in the loss of 1,133 square feet of eelgrass Dear Mr. Tice and Mr. Avery: We have verified that you are in receipt of our letter dated March 17, 2006, which informed you that: (1) development, resulting in the loss of 1,133 square feet of eelgrass,' has occurred on your property that does not fully comply with the final approved plans of Coastal. Development Permit No. 5-04-167 (enclosed); and (2) in order to resolve this matter, the deadline for you to submit a complete application for an amendment to Coastal Development Permit No. 5-04-167 to either authorize the changes to your project or remove the unauthorized development and restore the site was April 17, 2006. As of this date, our office has not received a complete amendment application for the above unauthorized changes to your project or to authorize restoration of the site. In addition to obtaining an amendment to your coastal development permit to authorize removal of the unpermitted development and restoration the site or to authorize the changes to your project, pursuant to the "Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Revision 8 (developed by the National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the California 1 The December 2005 Post -Construction Eelgrass Survey required by your coastal development permit states that construction of the unpermitted floating pad resulted in an actual loss of 1,133 sq ft of eelgrass Department of Fish and Game), and Special Condition #2 of your coastal development permit, you must mitigate for loss of eelgrass. Mitigation must be performed at a minimum 1.2:1 ratio on-site, or at another location, in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy. Implementation of mitigation also requires an amendment to your permit. Your biological consultant, Mr. Rick Ware of Coastal Resources Management, Inc. has informed Commission staff of eel grass growth observations and transplant impediments. Commission staff appreciates your efforts at resolving this issue. However, a complete amendment application has still not been received and required mitigation actions remain neglected as of the date of this letter. Eelgrass is ephemeral and its period of active growth is typically March through October. If any eelgrass is present in the area of a proposed project, adverse impacts could result. Moreover, building an unpermitted floating dock above an eelgrass patch during the growing off-season negatively affects its ability to grow. Therefore, the eelgrass remains underdeveloped and the dock presents an obstruction to its capability to grow and flourish. Eelgrass beds provide areas for fish egg laying, juvenile fish rearing, and waterfowl foraging. Sensitive species, such as the California least tern, a federally listed endangered species, utilize eelgrass beds as foraging grounds. Therefore, measures to avoid or minimize such potential impacts must be in place in order for the project to be found consistent with Section 30230 of the Coastal Act. By August 28, 2009, please respond to this letter by: 1) removing the unpermitted floating dock and submitting a complete permit amendment application authorizing eelgrass restoration and mitigation or 2) submitting an application for an amendment to your permit authorizing the changes to your project and eelgrass mitigation. Please be advised that staff may not recommend approval of development that results in loss of eelgrass because of Coastal Act and Newport Beach land use plan polices that protect such resources. While we remain hopeful that we can resolve this matter amicably, please be advised that Section 30820(a)(1) of the Coastal Act provides that any person who violates any provision of the Coastal Act may be subject to a penalty amount that shall not exceed $30,000 and shall not be less than $500. Coastal Act section 30820(b) states that, in addition to any other penalties, any person who "knowingly and intentionally" performs or undertakes any development in violation of the Coastal Act can be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $1,000 nor more than $15,000 for each day in which the violation persists. Additionally, the Executive Director is authorized, after providing notice and the opportunity for a hearing before the Commission as provided for in Section 30812 of the Coastal Act, to record a Notice of Violation against your property. Please. note that it is, necessary we receive a response to this letter and that you complete a permit amendment application by August 28, 2009. If you do not, we will consider taking further enforcement action to resolve this matter. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (562) 590-5071. Sincerely, r Ma -nda Griffin South Coast District Enforcement cc: Chris Miller, City of Newport Beach Patrick Veesart, Southern California Enforcement Supervisor, CCC Teresa Henry, District Manager, CCC Karl Schwing, Orange County Planning Manager, CCC Enclosures: Coastal Development Permit CDP 5-04-167 ffi • , i 1 1tT H-A-RB'cl @ � 1 IiTY ....... ... • DESIGN MARINE D'EP'T APPROVAL. T'E�,A�VICIN"ITY .. - MA (Hili : vYw, .... .a, ,./` • !t?i Ali •� ' :%:. �< e , "'C `,1Q_ i 5 Harbor Permits Bind Drawings B q, 1 General _ - � "• - �' `Ar ` i,4 r"U � Lt37C'LTfF q4 P Y .-. •� J '.-c 9 {��{ �s 'p�( GERC , a - � Permit Policy H-1. Detailed ®� NEWPORT W � � � i sF ' ��. _ � .�: � � ��. ; . Fe,, . � » � ° `' �' •.. ' ETpk A'D j 9y -•a ;:� o� � R��. _,t�,r. 5.) Harbor permits shall be obtained per Harbor P y CITY � i 1.1. The constru ' ' 'passenger'� ' • � • -Y} • :. , , »- .,,n, �� . F a �. y r_ r .R � . ctio of harbor facilities shall accommodate the`need for safer 2,2,15 Dock float' minimum clear width for commercial use T .. � Y of ( ) tion lens 4 sets and substantiating calculations (1 set} shall be • v s, PRS r uti� � .... , : � y, �; • ,� .^ �-..�,;,..a,..,�,�E ,�� �, :,� :� .�,• ; .:�f ._ ,-,, ^. � •`� . � �. , '�.�� � , ..c� DR � -;;:: and -durability r construction p (. ) iy as well as convenience and appearance. Structural elements shall be 6 feet to 80 feet long and 8 feet for docks over 80 feet - c of r �,r �: �, ' o� o o� " p r} u` s • :r. J�:q , , ,'{"`' • submitted to the Building Department with the permit application for the CITY - x Q XUPORT BE= , u ti . • 3 ".:' ; _v, ec [ ; gangways, flows, piles, etc. shall be adequate to safeguard human life, boats Tong. l • . following items: and boating '. • tit U.s BL1C`D GINE U S• PRJ°�`!� UNE ..._ �~'<. •n O' � RF �n Af {� �,fi • 0,�. ' 04,Q- � �i Et >v�x �.. 4; g equipment. Boat berthing facilities shall be designed to � ►oRr " �. equately handle anticipated loads with an ample factor of safety, 2.2.16 Walkways or landing platforms shalt not have less than 4 feet t P,eoPos�A P/P� P�u•� , a� l� o`er moo`' .� h :• =:} j . '. �`� .:F = . `r�� . y n 5.1.1 bulkheads and groins .... .tilQ T.V, "�� QP. '� O ' Q' - • fv t t. O .. ST`q 1�. ' clnobstrticted width adjacent to gangways, nor 6 feet in front of , ` I t<L9 r' NENPORi 1.2 Materials of construction shall resist the corrosion of saltwater In order to ° , gangways. -at +7.5 foot M LLW wafer surface elevation. _ r �, , 5.1.2 piers and landings ,__moo SEC OOCx Cl Ff : v'ti �; .�v �ti . l ■ HARBOR ?: NESTCLIFF': assure iow mai tenance requirements and long life of the facility. _ _ a - _ , . o.a _ �uF mitt PARK ..17 Fillets at the connection of marginal walkways, main walkways , 2 2 r9 D P R .. 4�w 1.3 Floats shalt ° ' and fin er floats shall be'inctuded in the ber#h designs and shah 5.1.3 gangways, including fiinge connections and hand railings \li be designed to assure stability and buoyancy throughout the life of 9 u cX�sr eorroti! 4 +R �, g..s�.• `: s�'' .. �;A �„ the float. extend at least 4 feet -along both floats. - _ _ _ , II u 5.1.4 anchor piles and guide piles, including roller assemblies >� : ' • pRC � t @ � ,�„� . _ � -• � �P a � Orsi ~ .. ...... �' . jF � ' , ... - ^ � ; ` rt trioti a f .. �D$ Y • N I'A Adequate utiliti s shall be provided for the convenience and safer of beaters 2.2.18 Gangway (brow) slope for commercial passenger, multiresidentlat - rc oe P> s, ��- d r a n u as PATI and maintenance workerY and small craft'marine use shall not exceed 1 foot vertically for ; 5.1.5 cantilevered patio decks E'Rl� ., .� -- y I TERRACE ` + r - NEHPORrk ,0 z AHZA Sr NEWPORT S ' ]oil KING N KINGS 1� # DUNES v w c o s BEAM DR BAY RD I each 3 feet of length when the tide is at -2.0 feet MLLW. All other sir , �' $ a !f W COAST ' NWY j E }` ,r gangway p g 5.1.6 other harbor structures Y I C I N I TY h1RP ' PROP I LE 1°= 40 ■ �. < Lint C E ._- a, slopes shall -not exceed 1 foot verticallyfor each 2 %: S F r op p : RESORT ; tiF cBO4 . ; `kcRtsTy► wh n the tide is at -2,0 feet M LLW. a_ 2 Layou feet of length a airs 90tNDINGS flRE t Essen rrf �t DEFIOTE O9�Q 401 ST !r s ! ■ vt TA S t, ,5,� V yX4 (7?3RF6 E yr y ut and RD�f lgn 5.2 Plans and calcuiatfons far the above items shall be prepared by a Civil or �tia 31ns 57 $ `"� ° 27 ecus �eqr <Q ' LVWER c dNI ` c��sT 3 ='I ElEliftTIOtlS l ON FEfii! LOi�R LOW 1�RTER. 3 �, a� I s �SZ 50 ST art ucc + ' ` j010 ��` � ' NEWPORT StE Q 9y �p HWY q { 2.2,19 Walking surfaces of gangways (brows), piers and floats shelf Have Structural Engineer registered in the State of California. �. < , ti9� o %E �� Z� _ '4a SyQR f• ; 2.1 Designs for harbor facilities shall be based upon the use of the facility, defined 0 �-`-C�Z7•�,-C„_ �t�CDC..�. Bid? ���' � � �i� � � �tiF� �Y non-skid finish, such as punched metal, unpornled timber, or grit --� _ as follows: b ' .... � .• s :::,� _ . 5.3 in addition, detailed- construction plans shall include, but not be limited to, �-- on' metal, timber or .plywood. t'Y-tC._. �`lt4l�.tC��(� �v � RaU/�lDS � .S � _� ;„;' ., � ;i• y* r� `�� � Indicating the following dimensions and detailed items: 2.1.1 Si gle or joint residential: a To -WL- - �� (,U� t g OC)O C ij' ti 1 L NARBo? , , , 2.2.20 Gangway brow minimum clear width for commercial passenger, r, CMZ' tiy� s� ''' " ��t:� :� yEWf i ISLAND �'" 9"" ,s 9 i ential or craft marina use shall be 48 -inches. All 5.3.1 dock, pier gangway and anchor pile layout' .ter c: 33 :loo tscE P,syO�POSC© 4` x 80' C .cY;"y ti e� i `ti atu f, cLUMSE r eoLLINS k 2.1.2 M41ti•residential and small craft marina. multi res d -- ---- - - -- - -- ---- - - --- - -- - - olhergangway minimum clear width shall be 30 -inches. `� ti� y� r vERI 146,a > > > > ,��� Q�, y o hZTS`Txti rarrr rice I VIA Outro ISLE { 1 nr z STRAIN CENTRO t Z { 5.3.2 pontoon or float layout (with flotation calculations provided separately) - , ti�5� N • BALBpq • Y 3 ZURICN cIR BAY < 2,1.3 Commercial Passenger. -, .21 Gangways brows for commercial passenger, multi -residential or r x��rIPc�s�D NC W �oc�s ," g� -� H � 140 e� y k' rN y ISLE � y 2 2 g Y (brows) g 5.3.3 framing details including angles, bent plates, Boit and nail { �, _ X. 4 xzn [/�� F t v smalLcraf#.ma{rfna uses shall be equipped with self-closing, self i G,4t�/r, AV 2.2 Harbor structures shall conform with "Layout � Design Guidelines for Small _ patterns, splices, bumpers, cleats, etc. _ o ` y g :.latching gales at the bulkhead end. Gates shalt not open into ' : --- -� - .. Crag Berfhir�gacitit9es ;latest edition published by the State. of California i ►� �UcKfrr•: SEAN,.. q.: • �+�� " " intersecting walkways. �- P . �n s;rr a- i�1 _ _._., � - ___..,... '- " F ion. L,B �,, PAVItJav_ _ SANTA _ _ _ _ C TRL, Department of Boating and Waterways (dal Boating), 9629 SStreet, 5.3.4 knee connections NEWPORT 34 RON] t . Sacramento, California 95814; telephone (916) 263.0784, except as modified " r 2.2.22 Toe steps at the bottom -of gangways (brows) for single or Joint ' BA by the City's "Standard Drawings. for Harbor Construction, or as follows: - 5.3.5 guide pile roller assemblies r i ` FRONT �" _ ► NEWPORT Y [ P residential 03e shall not exceed 9 inches. Skid resistant toe . t /Y. 5 TYPtcAL , 2F Plates snail be instailed on all other gangways. 6 ler lies and anchor lies" . - ��la Ott BEACH '< G 2.2.1 berths shall not be occupied by vessels more than a beam width 5 3, p p p , 35 logger than the berth not larger than the vessel used in design CITY F N IGH 2. '�,23 Railings -for single or oint.residential use shall be 36 -inches �` o 44 •o.6, t y;,- 2 9 9 j to of bulkhead and pier deck elevations d �1. _ " calculations. 5.3.7 p p �, nPosEa lJci�r i ,P n minimum height. All other railings shall be 42 -inches rmnimum ; �; IF li�G11-; l :3"� r s a+_.m e C• (�j ' is height. 5.3.8 maximum dredge contours labeled as such L,,C EE US-b�tTrilN '! ` 0 2.2.2 Maximum length vessel,is the largest vessel that shall be g ( ) Ir -- pe nutted to occupy a berth, 2,2,24 Railings for commercial harbor structures shall be built such that a EEL GLASS IN THE P�ROJ CTAREAU4. .. sphere 4 -inches in diameter cannot -pass through: 5.3.9 Maximum length vessels used in design calculations for each berth, circled within the berth). � • • _.. _ _- 2.2.3 Applied loads shall. be calculated for not lower.than a +7.5"feet ) SIGNATUREN SG 4G.3 s, Prr: �� r� pro �.,i�✓� above MLLW water surface. 2.2.25 Railings for commetciat passenger, multi -residential or small craft 5.4 Harbor permits will be conditioned to.`ifmit the size of vessels berthed in the �? t $-�'t ' _ d - u,5 2 2 4 W{ marina rises shall be capable of resistor a -horizontal force of at "The Harbor Permit for this facilit shall be conditioned to allow ` `�' ` ``I "' Wind loads shall. be calculated both parallel Wand perpendicular g facility; e.g., y Ieast 30,pounds per linear foot applied at the top rail. Aii other to maximum length vessels and structures. .. berthing of one -70 foot and three- 45 foot maximum length vessels".' . --%�Li��NA�. - 1!CAC�� SMALL- W47 g harbor railings shall be capable of supporting a horizontal force of 20 pounds per linear foot applied at the to rail. p 5.5 Future dred in ' in the vicinity of a rmitted harbor facilit will be restricted�u 2.2.5 Wind loads cart lateral area of vessels or structures shall not be" dredging . h► i Y " A MAS �,(} �- les than 15 pounds pet squats foot. i e.g., Dredging not permitted below the contours shown hereon". • PLAN VIEW 1' = 40' :.:,..... , ... .... 2:2.6 Literal area of vessels for wind toad calculations shall be equal to P RO C � D U SJOB FWDRE551801 W. COAsT ti 1Y`Y [SITE 3 MaterialsIFPPLIM'S t�t1E occ sAiclNc scNoO� (OAS) X (maximum length. vessel) X (maximum length vessel) ' _ . , Y _ O�`�'tCE �.�1E �N�. 3.1 Materials for harbor facilities shall conform to the Standard Specirications for 2.2.7 Ten � erceht 10% of the full wind load for an unshielded vessel " Ine-except as , p ( ) Public Warks Construction" published by Building News, PERMIT PROCESSING PROCEDURES SITE PLAN INSTRUCTIONS APPROVALS s Iall be applied -to each vessel in the fee of the unshielded vessel. modifiied as follows: ' The following checked iii a ravals are required riorto Issuing a Building Permit: ° 1.: Fill out a Building permit application at the Building Department permit Provide a partial site len in the space provided above drawn to an adequate 2.2.8 Guide piles (those than provide lateral support for floats) shall be p p p p q ate scale to clearly show the following 9 ( ) Pp q P g d ng Perm f 3.2 Floatation units shall consist of: counter. information: PC, itioned around berthing are;ss such that the centroid of lateral i syppott provided at the +7.5 foot M tt�aN water surface elevation 3,x,1 Concrete cast arour# a solid, closed tuft faaci7 core, r harbor construction drawings s cost : $2.00 er sheet .draw Approval in Concept Newport Beach Council i 2. Use city standard a g ( P ) 1. Location and dimension of proposed structure Including piles and location of existing structures on adjacent coincides with the centroid of applied latorat toads. a site plan showin the scope of work and select the applicable details, S mit P ti P PP 4� properties. Army Corps' of Engineers California Coastal Com 1S$�o11, , 3.2.2 " Fiberglass, polyethylene or plastic shell with a;ffrm fitting solid, r 0 � r 2.2.9 Pile penetration shall not be ides titan '14feet; nor r{Iculated engineering calculations as required. Follow the instructions on drawings. I E I P closed cell foam core, or p netratlon plus.3 feet. 2, Location of bulkhead, prerhead and project lines. Public Works Department Building Department fit.iri; Region 3.2.3 A solid, closed cell foam core covered with an approved coating 3: Three sets of drawings are required. Do step 2 on three sets or make copies. ^ 2.2.10 Pile cutoff elevation shall not be lower'thah +i1.0 feet M LLW, prevent physical dama e, 3, Location of property lines. County of Orange APR 2006 � top p y g 4. Permit Technician will process the permit' application and charge the plan �. RI 2:2.11 Floatation systems and (riles shall be the products of , check fees. 4. Location of channel t,�arkers within 200 feet. Site inspection. Site Re-inspectiori-',' �-: ' ,' �r misslo , manufacturers and contractors regularly engaged in the 3.3 Timber for decks shall have a minimum net thickness of 1 inches. g 5. One set of drawings is placed in the Building Department plan check stack. "i 5. Lot sizes and lot numbers, it available. Call (949) 644-3043 for appointment production of such Items for marine. construction. i 3,4 Walking surfaces of gangways (brows), piers and floats shall have a non-skid F finish, such as punched metal, unpainted timber, or grit on metal, timber or The remaining two sets are given to the applicant to carry to Harbor South cCa"fornia Coastal commissio:I Resources. 6. Existing round profile beneath proposed structure boast D 2.2.12 Sufficient flotation shall be provided to support dead load plus 20 : plywood. g 9 P P P Ro �� stnct of .o CONDITIONS �I N pounds per square foot Yoe load with a.freeboard of not less than: 6. Harbor Resources will review the drawings and stamp the drawings "Approved 7. Elevation of top and bottom of bulkheads and piles with respect to M LLW. --- - 4 Zrl 2.2.12.1 10 -inches for modular concrete flotations stems. for 3•h Timber shall be treated with ammoniacal copper arsenate (ACA} chromated in Concept .The Harbor Permit for this facilfiy.shall be:conditioned to altow-the berthingof: Y Coppet arsenate (CCA) -or ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate (ACZA), per 8. Area and profile of any proposed dredging with elevations showing depths with respect of M L.LW. Wmmercial,passenger use. AWPA Standard C2. Field cuts and bored holes shall receive a brush coat of 7. The applicant will pick up these drawings from Harbor Resources and pursue Number of boats Maximum boat length I concentrated CCA, ACA or ACZA. state and federal approvals as required b Harbor Resources. Plan check may g 2.2.12.2 � f9 -inches for nodular concrete floatation systems for all , - PP q y Y 9. Any special conditions affecting the construction or affecting boating operations. .. • �1•�-_4®®® . resume simultaneously while these approvals are pending. other uses. 3.6 Timber piles shall be dual treated per AWPA Standard C3. 10. Existing structures shall be shown in light dashes. New work shall be shown In heavy solid -lines. 2.2.12.3 3 -inches pontoon freeboard for detached pontoon 3.7 Rollers shall be fabricated from polyethylene or polyolefin material. 8. After the Building Department plan check has been completed, the applicant flotation systems for commerclat passenger use, will pick up and resolve Building Department corrections. 2.2.12.4 " 14nch pontoon freeboard for detached'pontoon' flotation 3.8 iron and steel (including fasteners) in harbor structures, except for 9. The applicant will resubmit to the Building Department the Building check set P P reinforcement covered by at least 3 inches of concrete, shalt be stainless steel I systems for all other uses. w alto h'at-till . alvanizedi or epoxy coated. and two sets bearing required state and federal approvals.'STAND-ARDS . HA�sOf� �C�N�T�tt�GT�C�N Y p g 10. The Building Department � - g will verily that the Building corrections hada been ° C� OF NEWPORT BEACH BUILDING DEPARTMENT o - 2.2,13 . Weight of treated Douglas Pit shall be assumed to'be 35 pounds >+� resolved and all the required federal and state approvals are on the drawings per cubic foot. Weight of sea water shall be assumed to be'64 ltowable` Stresses TITLE HM & SPECIPICATIONS 1po ounds et cubic (oat.. 4 A and issue the Harbor permit: The Building Department record set must bear all Of LIFO p WG. SCALE: A required approvals. HM -80R -"REWURCES APPROVAL D E: DATE cN� 2.2.14 Finger floats with wood decks shall be equipped with 2 %cinch ' 4.1 Allowable stresses for harbor structures shall not exceed those recommended AS SHOWN AUGUST 25, 2000 g in the "Uniform Building Code: tit �� (� p DMWING No. minimum diameter steel pipe' torsion bars along float centerlines, DATE: • SHEET �'�" .,.,. _ ... BY .E I . a IMIT AICW g' x 28 G41,1G ,4Y, fN NO. I DATE REVIStON: XI -577, G',eol" 014L&RUGL-MED,bL.A&0pqALS L 7LCA-ML SV�lL ZDjAT �LCAF/0 AIDE �t QJ CTH CAMLOC,41, KMULA ! QC% rc GA�1Gl�(fl Y�iV >,c',J MNG NOTE' .SG -Y �,E NL --W PII-11,/G bC%�JGS, .IAfDex 1CoVG'� sverr ___ 2, PL or PlAiv 3, PO V7700AI 4AY0617- 4. P11-11-10 4AyoUr 5 FR444INNS DF7A, 1Gs 6- FiP.4Jr IAIG,DL'rAll_ S 7 ).4,&R1cA -rc,o s r�,�gL P161,10 �.eOvcIL.CS 8r CLC -Ar ?4 BU PG,p 1,4YD07- !. • < California Coastal Commission South Coast District Off ce ca `' ROVE APP _ leo r- ►'LO. ��c-�, c_ W �� i�--t 1 �1. � �� c�o�vt��s4�r� .tU �E-t � l q L cv��-t or �r � --- a ---- ----- 6 -7r G ...... ... { O 2004 y----- ----- -T-------- . .;f V V SA &CI)SCD EFFEM) Date' C- AMV DRAWN'bY PLOT PLAN DATE MARINE CONSULTING & DESIGN 324 EL MODENA AVENUENEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 0 C C SAILING SCHOOL NEWPORT BEACH3.,.03 949 642-2206 t:!........ SHEET NO. — 2 OF SHEETS X 0 N X 4 3116• 3 3116" 4114" Ilodir Floa6epSyt"n InDOCK 9441 bd BQURQUE� DEAUVILLE (QU TRLE CANADA Jt N 3G1 TEL (B1 847.2599 PEwURE POUR QUAL FAX: (819) 847-3250 DETAIL DrASSEMBLAGE DRAWING No: DATE-. PeMuue Asea 08109!2003 23 afar. Modular Floating System r s �\ 4 1 c" f EAT • Infinite configurations r • Easy and quick assembly r 1 • Environmentally friendly h� ; • Light, sturdyand user safe Bumper • Maintenance free (100% plastic) a Connecting pin • Resistant to pollution and UV Exterior lug • Limited lifetime warranty Nut Sliding nut connector Cleat SPECIFICATIONS •Material: Polyethylene resins 3 -block width = 57 1.5 m 4 -block width = 6.67 1.98 m hiah densitv • Colour: Light gray or beige • Surface: Non -slippery • Dimensions: 19" x 19" x 16" /full float block 18 19" X 19" X 9" / half float block • Weight: 14 lbs (6.4 kg) / block • Floating 190 lbs (86 kg) / block capacity: or 68 lbs / ft2 (325 kg / m2) LENGTH BLOCKS PINS SURFACE PRICE 1073 m 18 10 50 ft'/4.5 m2 $ 157 4.5 m 27 16 75 ft'/6.75 ml $ 207 6 m 36 22 100 ft2/9 m2 $ 257 7.5 m 45 28 125 ft'/11.25 m' $ 307 9 m 54 34 150 ft'/13.5 m2 $ LENGTH BLOCKS PINS SURFACE PRICE 1073m 24 15 66 ft'/5.94 m2 $ 15'14.5 m 36 24 99 ft'/8.91 m2 $ 20'16 m 48 33 132 ft'/11.88 m' $ 257 7.5 m 60 42 165 W/14.85 m' $ 30.19 m 72 51 198 ft'/17.82 m' $ 1 � g P _ c i \ <. 4 4 " i a \ . t 3\ fir' i13 4 f + t�., '7 s' I a j\ r F \ ' r x r t L d � \ , 1 } 110 ""1 1 FT ITEM QTY PARTS NAME DESCRIPTION 1 1 Pte a 01875 - ncra PLAQUE 4" X 10" X 3116" A.I.304 2 2 Plagm 025 - shim PLAGUE 1" X 1 112" X 114" A.I.304 3 2 Tuyau 1 po C046exteriieur LG. 1" A.I.304 41 4 Bane Rd. UHMVV 1500 - Bushing LG. 718" UHMW NOIR 5 1 Tuvau 1 Po CD46 milieu LG. 3" A.1.304 6 1 PlaqW 01876 - Wq Cannector PLAQUE 3" X 12 718" X 3111'i" A.I. 304 11 1 Barre Rd 0625 - Pin penture LG. 6 318" A.I.304 18 1 Randelle 3/4" 1 Acier Plagub Zinc 19 1 1101oullon 3/4 -10 UNC x 6'/Z Acier plaqu&Zinc 20 1 Randelle de bloc` a/4" Acler vllacO Zinc 21 1 tCrou'/: ` -10 I Acler plaqudl Zinc 22 1 Washer W' Acier Pllaqu6 Zinc 23 1 LOCK PIN Acier plaqu& cadmjium � 20 21 a•a„bca�srm�+ CanDOCK 9441 bd BOURQUE�� DEAUVILLE {QUE) CANADA J1 3G1 TITLE: TEL: (8191947-2599 PENTURE POUR QUAL ; FAX: (819) 847-3250 DRAWING NQ DATE: Par�ture AssQ 6MGM03. 0114" n 6 318' ;HAMFREIN 11$" DETAIL ITEM 11 .09 01 5116• t I 1 �t rf 518 DETAIL 0 518 1' DETAIL ITEM 4 314" 10" -ow—i I — 8112" =i l 314" 4" 2 112" $112" DETAIL ITEM 1 l; i RUN' 07W 1 112" i 3" I r 10-1 r 1 112" DETAIL ITEM 6 CK 9441 hd BOURQUEVA DEAUIVILLE iQUE) TriLE: CANADA J1 N 3G1 TEL: (819) 847-,599 f —.RE POUR QUAI FAX: (819) 847-3250 DETAIL ITEM 1,4.6.11 DRAWING H&. DATE: PeMm Fabr B&m D=11UM W -ft Modular F .anoc -rrl: 2 ty c row:candock:com!! • s aor i�)AT h -OA -F DIM 36170 POONDS le�rrAL. bUOyiWLt /6 /011 d �tAU�, dV V E% -t 0 r,,, bFL:T- 60 V ELZZ U t\i t ON1 t i o J/ C.�t� 4� 7�•p 0� �.D l CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH CITY OF gal .S PR✓r uNc -� FiEHP01ZT BERM� � WT U'PER U.S BLgC o t 1N� U. S. FRA4',O c iNc i NWO RT4 P.�POSEC DECK Ca MYU. p �xtsr II Borrotir 1 OCERN "PIWIrr 1+Esr YICINITY MRP e r PROFILE 1y = 40' x3f= wr, JE7'tY SO WINGS R2E EXPRESSED IN FEET R D DENOTE OXTITIONS BRSED ON MEAN LOWER LOW LEITER. 0 ` T OTA -C CANDCaCtl,� 80A'T (.Z-L_JLAT AP -0-A — 26 '262) FOUNDS a Te�TAI welc_j4-c = fes Cbum s 4' x 80'(0-4 W/Yr' 13.COR65EP /JGW ?"6C!!5 4 "X 20' tu I � I / 01 K,,Lit::%: 1 r _ I' I 1 pr • "RcAT- RIB fo�Vl I Iyit`i``Er��: NL 4- �' � �E ACH II 005Ep A/CW C-1 1� rs*) -- i. i`eJ LEI. G S �1if�i°ILd I t er' t I i L EEL GFASS IN THE RROJ CT AREA 4' o SIGNATURE P� 4G.3' — -� r/, sa. Pir: �,yc:uo r./i✓� __...._.__ _-. b . ffi� 01 It MAL W/ '1101)ULdw -Ocx�-' PLAN VIEW 1' = 40' RPPLIM'S NWE OCG SA11116 SCPOOL. JOB RDDRESS /80/ W. COAsT HW'Y DATE__ _.. .EXtST(P_(G Doct(" SUZFVAC 6 x 12- i DOU64.As Ra- 2_x t22x t2--'} (�stilniv t� C-tbr4T' MODUL AP. PLASTIC. DOCV, gxk� 6 --�s t2 - California Coastal Co °ssion South Co tCDistrict ice _ o D Permit N-? EFFECTI Date: ------®----- Section Pa e 1.0 INTRODUCTION ODUCTION.................................................................................................................... 1 200 SURVEY METHODS .............................................................................................................. 4 3.0 RESULTS .................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Sediment Characteristics, Underwater Visibility, and Water Temperature .................... 4 3.2 Eelgrass Cover and Shoot Density................................................................................... 4 3.4 Other Marine Flora and Fauna......................................................................................... 6 3.4 Caulerpa toxifolia.... ........ .... ..... .... ....... ..... ---- ..... .................. .......... .... .............. ...... -- 6 4.0 IMPACT ASSESSMENT............................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Proposed Project Elements................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Proposed Construction Methods........................................................................................... 7 4.3 Impacts on Water Quality and Eelgrass Bed Resources ................................................ 9 5.0 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND MITIGATION MEASURE,S.................... 10 5.1 Water Quality................................................................................................................. 10 5.2 Resource Protection Plan................................................................................................ 10 5.3 Boat Dock Design BMPs............................................................................................... 11 5.4 Eelgrass Transplant Program.......................................................................................... 11 Eli 1 Maximum Potential Eelgrass Habitat Loss.................................................................................. 10 2 Amount of Eelgrass Vegetation Required for the Eelgrass Transplant ...................................... 15 LIST OF FIGURES 1 Location of Project Area in Newport Bay................................................................................... 1 2 Proposed Project Improvements.................................................................................................. 3 3 Location of Eelgrass in the Project Area...................................................................................... 5 4 Location of Eelgrass Relative to the Proposed Dock Layout........................................................... 8 5 Location of ACOS Pilot Eelgrass Restoration Sites in Newport Bay.............................................14 LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS 1 Local Project Area....................................................................................................................... 2 OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation i Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment EELGR HABITAT 3 3 A B 3 '\ RV\j AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR I,t 1+_ DOCK RENOVATION PROJECT ,r��,Utf,*F,Sk , LJGANDSEAMANSHJ Coastal Resources Management (CRM) conducted an eelgrass habitat impact assessment at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship in Newport Beach, California. The purpose of the investigation was to determine the potential environmental effects resulting from the removal of existing boat docks and the emplacement of new boat dock facilities. The project location is shown in Figure 1 and Photograph 1. NEWPORT BAY Chad 18754 1 (BSB Electronic Charts) Depth Units- FEET NaUbeal Mlles _ 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.7C Figure 1. Project Area Location in Newport Bay, Orange County, CA. The project site is located on the north side of Lido Reach along Mariners' Mile, in Lower Newport Bay (Newport Harbor). The site coordinates are 33° 36.99' N, 117° 55.08' W . Project renovation tasks include installing an AICA compliant gangway and landing, reinstalling the existing east gangway, installing a longer and wider west gangway, reconfiguring the existing instructional docks, installation of two new fingers and a new dock/backwalk, installing eight new steel piles, removing 10 existing piles and installing a new fire system. Specific project attributes are provided in Figure 2 and in Section 4. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 1 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment !t e t tiP r� 4 b WC �awng S�11001 I( i lo: c�,\\\�`j' 21 ••:. ZL 11111 j i[�y (� I FSj - ... NaUbeal Mlles _ 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.7C Figure 1. Project Area Location in Newport Bay, Orange County, CA. The project site is located on the north side of Lido Reach along Mariners' Mile, in Lower Newport Bay (Newport Harbor). The site coordinates are 33° 36.99' N, 117° 55.08' W . Project renovation tasks include installing an AICA compliant gangway and landing, reinstalling the existing east gangway, installing a longer and wider west gangway, reconfiguring the existing instructional docks, installation of two new fingers and a new dock/backwalk, installing eight new steel piles, removing 10 existing piles and installing a new fire system. Specific project attributes are provided in Figure 2 and in Section 4. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 1 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Photograph 1. Dock Renovation Project Area. Source Photo: City of Newport Beach GIS Division OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 2 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Irnpact Assessment .--:�r�, U - - - _ it CITY OF l ` lPf'ER BAY Ia-F ,M p�CrFI OCeRIER N P` 1 a>;sr VICINITY MRP aerYv issemr Wr, olrrawm 1�,CC1f'QSE� NCW t I 11 I I I 1 1. �Q U.S, BLKD t/NE U.S. PRJa' C./n/c fF'�OPOS€D P/PG P141AV U C-Xt,� IIBarTo.�rr p U 1 Pz0.R0SG-D .4, x 8©' E -X. 4'xzQ' (3AA/Gkl'f- y I i 1 I I I OG 1C SSP NGW 17, '/L_ lkG I I I I I I �--- PLAN VIEN 1" =40' I cy Trlavr n nrr 1;161/ /N/,' Scgo(V JOB FMIWSS IRW W. COAST h'W y f ITE Figure 2. Proposed Project Improvements, ®CC Sailing and Seamanship Facility, Newport Beach, CA OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 3 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Eelgrass habitat surveys were conducted by CRM biologists Rick Ware and Stephen Whitaker on 15 February 2005 between 1030 and 1230 hours. Initial swim throughs were conducted to first determine if celgrass was present. Once it was determined to be present, Wide Area Augmentation System (WARS) GPS (Global Positioning System) technology and a Thales Mobile Mapper GPS/GIS Unit were used to map eelgrass areas. A biologist in a kayak equipped with the GPS followed a SCUBA -diving biologist who towed a surface buoy to mark the perimeter of the eelgrass vegetation. The estimated GPS error of the Thales Mobile Mapper unit with post -processing correction is less than 1 meter. GPS data were initially entered into the Mobile Mapper Software and then transferred into GPS TRACKER and ARCVIEW GIS software. The amount of eelgrass habitat in the project area was calculated using Mobile Mapper Software. Eelgrass 'Purion Density. Eelgrass turions are a structural unit of an eelgrass plant and consist of the above -surface, green eelgrass shoot and attached eelgrass blades. Following the GPS mapping effort, biologists estimated eelgrass turion density by counting the number of eelgrass turions within eleven, 0.07 square meter quadrats randomly selected throughout the eelgrass bed. These counts were standardized to counts per square meter for reporting purposes. Invasive Algae. The project area bayfloor was also surveyed for the presence of the invasive algae (Caulerpa taxifolia). Visual inspections were made by the SCUBA -diving biologists as they conducted the eelgrass surveys within six transects spaced 10 meters apart. The Area of Potential Effect (APE) was 16,500 sq fi; 3,600 sq ft of bottom habitat (22%) was surveyed. 3.1 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS, VISIBILITY,AND The project area bayfloor sediments were uniform fine silts throughout the study area. Underwater visibility varied between three and 5 feet. Water temperature during the survey was 64 degrees F. A total of 1,132.6 square feet (105.3 square meters) of eelgrass habitat was located at the project site within a shingle bed and a second small patch (Figure 3). These areas of eelgrass cover were located at depths between -6 ft and -7 ft MLLW. The eelgrass bed was located within the center basin nearby where Lido 14 sailboats are stored. An additional patch of eelgrass (1 sq m) was located within the east basin. Prior to heavy winter rains in 2004-2004, additional eelgrass beds were present within the west basin OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 4 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Figure 3. Location of Eelgrass in the Project Area OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 5 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Q) Q) � C Q O F O O) G c U) O I t vm w a, 4 - o x W a o C J Q l":Ji M C Y 2 LL i IICD ° N h CO _ U zi zI Figure 3. Location of Eelgrass in the Project Area OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 5 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment during initial City of Newport Beach eelgrass inspections in October 2003 (Eelgrass survey report submitted to the City of Newport Beach by W. Shofstall) and in March 2004 (Coastal Resources Management 2005). However, this west basin bed was not present during the February 2005 survey. Eelgrass shoot density was extremely low and ranged between 0 and 42 shoots per square meter; the average shoot density was 24.7 +/ 15.8 (n=11 replicates). Generally, the eelgrass appeared in poor condition and the blades were extremely short (approximately 2 to 4 cm in length). By comparison, eelgrass shoot density within the same eelgrass bed during the July 2004 summer growth period for eelgrass was 98 +/31 shoots per square meter and shoot lengths varied in length between 30 and 60 cm (CRM 2005). The dominant marine plant observed on the seafloor was the green algae Enteromorpha californica. This bottom algae formed a thick, 4 to 6 inch mat throughout a large portion of the basin. Its abundance likely was responsible for the limited amount of eelgrass observed during the survey. The brown algae Cystoseira was observed attached to the boat floats and debris observed on the bayfloor near the pierhead line. No marine invertebrates or fishes were observed during the survey. Biologists did not observe any invasive algae (Caulerpa taxifolia) in the general vicinity of the project site, in the eelgrass habitat mapping area, or in the proximity of the boat docks and piles to be renovated. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 6 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment 1-1-JR1317s f1f1I_`Xy�f y►f1�ICY:11 The proposed project includes the following components; ® the installation of ADA compliant gangway and landing; ® reinstallation of the existing east gangway; ® install a longer and wider west gangway; ® reconfiguration of the existing instructional docks; ® installation of two (2) new 30' x 5' forgers and a new 51' x 4' backwalk; dock with a 22' x 4' installation of eight (8) new steel piles ranging from 8" to 12" in diameter and coated with NSP®120; removal of ten (10 existing piles ranging from 8" to 10" diameter; and installation of a new fire system. The layout of the proposed dock system in relation to existing eelgrass habitat is shown in Figure 4. Construction methods were provided to CRIB by Cash & Associates Engineers and Swift Slip Dock and Pier Builders. Existing piles will be pulled and installed with a standard barge -mounted rig, and installed using either a drop hammer or diesel hammer. No jetting is permitted. These rigs are generally about 30' by 60'. There may be as many as two work boats in the water at any one time, for the carpenters and various subcontractors. Work boats are approximately 15' long. Docks will be manufactured by Swift Slip Dock and Pier Builders at their offsite facility and floated in-place and connected to one -another. The water-based construction is expected to take between 2.5 to 3 months. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 7 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment �f ID a` 'N Z Z' OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Water Quality. During the pile removal and reconstruction process, water turbidity will potentially increase due to bayfloor disturbances when piles are removed and when they are replaced. Piles will be driven into the sediment using a pile driver. Ilydrojetting will not be employed. Turbidity may also increase if vessel propellers impact the bay floor or prop wash stirs up bottom sediments. To prevent the spread of any turbidity plume out of the area, Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be implemented such as (1) installing a siltation curtain around the pier and dock and (2) removing and installing the piles on high tides. Implemented BMPs that will eliminate any disposal of trash and debris will assist in preventing water quality and eelgrass habitat degradation. See Section 5 for a complete list of BMPs and mitigation measures. Short -tern Construction Impacts on Eelgrass. The shallow bay floor is vegetated with eelgrass within the center basin where the existing dock walkway will be elongated. Pile removal and pile installation activity and the presence of a vessel working near the dock walkway has a potential to impact eelgrass through (1) bayfloor disturbance during pile driving activity, (2) deployment of any anchors and anchor chain within eelgrass habitat (3) grounding of a vessel over eelgrass habitat and (4) propeller scarring and prop wash of support vessels. These activities would create furrows and scars within the eelgrass vegetation and would result in adverse losses of eelgrass habitat. Implementing mitigation measures identified in Section 5 will result in minimal disturbance related to vessel activities. Small work vessels in the project area will create minimal shading effects on eelgrass since the position of the boats will shift each day. This will prevent continuous shading of any one part of the eelgrass bed. With the implementation of BMPs described in Section 5, there will be no short-term construction impacts on eelgrass habitat. Long Terra Impacts on Eelgrass Habitat. Potential impacts to eelgrass are listed in Table 1; the location of eelgrass relative to the proposed dock and pier is shown in Figure 4. The project has a potential to impact 68 sq ft (6.3 sq meters) of eelgrass habitat. This would result from long-term shading of eelgrass beneath the new section of the dock. This impact will be mitigated by conducting an eelgrass transplant program, according to the guidelines of the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (NMFS 1991 as amended). See Section 5.2 and 5.3 for proposed eelgrass habitat protection and mitigation measures. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 9 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Table 1. Maximum potential eelgrass habitat losses and required habitat mitigation. Source of Eelgrass Loss Square feet Square meters Piling Installation (8 new steel pilings, 8" to 12" diameter) none none Potential dock footprint shading effect 68 sq ft 6.3 Vessel shading effects none (no permanent boat tie-ups) none Total potential affected eelgrass area 68 6.3 Habitat to be mitigated at a 1.2 to 1 ratio 81.6 7.6 During construction, the following mitigation measures and Best Management Practices (BMPs) are recommended to prevent water quality degradation in Newport Bay and to reduce potential adverse impacts on marine resources. All debris and trash shall be disposed in suitable trash containers on land or on the work barge at the end of each construction day; Discharge of any hazardous materials into Newport Bay will be prohibited; and Silt curtains will be deployed around work vessels and the boat floats when appropriate and feasible to minimize the spread of turbid waters outside the project area During construction the following BMPs will be followed to minimize on-site damages to existing eelgrass bed resources. Vessel operations in the vicinity of eelgrass at the project site shall be conducted on tides higher than +4 f1 MLL W; ® Prior to construction, the project marine biologist shall mark the positions of eelgrass beds in the vicinity of the dock construction project with buoys prior to the initiation of any renovation activity; OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 10 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment The project marine biologist shall meet with the construction crew to show them the specific areas where eelgrass occurs; Work vessels should avoid anchoring over eelgrass meadows to prevent possible damage to eelgrass vegetation. No construction -related impacts on eelgrass will occur. However, a post -project, NMFS and DFG-approved eelgrass survey will be conducted within 30 days of the dock completion project to evaluate construction impacts and then again annually for two years following completion of the project to determine the actual extent of eelgrass loss due to shading effects (NMFS Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy guidelines, 1991 as amended, Revision 10). If losses of eelgrass are identified at the end of the two-year monitoring period, then the applicant shall be responsible for mitigating the losses at a ratio of 1.2 to 1 either on site or at another location in Newport Pay. A conceptual eelgrass mitigation plan is presented in Section 5.4. 5.3 BOAT DOCK DESIGN BMPs TO REDUCE POTENTIAL ADVERSE IMPACTS Iz A EELGRASS The project applicant may wish to incorporate new technology to reduce potential impacts to eelgrass. This design includes the use of open grating only on the portion of the dock where eelgrass is present. The use of open grating to allow light to penetrate beneath the docks will increase the potential for an additional 15% of the seafloor under the dock to be exposed to light. This may potentially result in a reduction of eelgrass habitat loss underneath the dock where eelgrass will be located (Figure 4). Over the long-term, the proposed project has a potential to affect 68 sq R (6.3 sq m) of eelgrass vegetation. The loss of this eelgrass will be mitigated by conducting an eelgrass transplant program on site within Newport Bay, at a mitigation ratio of 1.2 to 1, so that a total of 81.2 sq ft (7.6 sq m) of eelgrass will be successfully transplanted according to the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (National Marine Fisheries Service, 1991 as amended). As stated, a post -project completion eelgrass habitat map will be prepared within 30 days of dock project conipletion to detern-tine impacts of dock construction (if any) and then again one and two years following dock construction to evaluate the final amount of eelgrass to be mitigated due to dock shading effects. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 1 1 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment A mitigation program for the removal of eelgrass will involve several tasks; (1) selecting a potential eelgrass receiver site, (2) conducting eelgrass transplants at a replacement ratio of 1.2 to 1, (3) conducting mitigation monitoring surveys to rate the level of transplant success, and (4) if required, conducting additional transplants if the primary transplant does not meet project success criteria. Selection of a Transplant eceiver) itiation Area. Eelgrass occurs widely throughout much of Newport Harbor between the Entrance Channel and the Coast Highway Bridge, along Bayshores, and extending back into Lido Reach along the north side of the channel (Mariner's Mile) (Coastal Resources Management (2005). In addition, eelgrass is beginning to recolonize Upper Newport Bay along the Castaways shoreline and along the De Anza/Bayside Peninsula and in the small channel between Bay Isle and the Balboa Peninsula. However, following the recent heavy rainfall period in winter 2004-2005, there appears to be some decline in the amount of eelgrass within Newport Bay (R. Ware, Pers. observations, Bahia Corinthian Yacht Club and Orange Coast College boating facilities). We proposed to conduct the eelgrass transplant on-site at the OCC facility where eelgrass has occurred in the past, but is not currently present. This will be followed by a five-year monitoring program at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and yearly for a period of five years. This program will be initiated at the completion of the two-year boat dock shading effects monitoring survey program. If celgrass has naturally recolonized the area after the two-year annual monitoring surveys then we proposed to transplant eelgrass to one of seven U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pilot Eelgrass Restoration Sites that were established in summer 2004 (Figure 5). The selection of this site will be dependent upon monitoring success results for the project in 2005 and 2006. We will transplant at the mitigation site which demonstrates the highest eelgrass transplant success rate. Should the transplant be conducted at the ACOE restoration site, the following will be incorporated into the project design plans: (1) The mitigation area will be distinctly separate from the perimeters of the ACOE restoration transplants. Differential CIPS will be used to determine the positions of the mitigation site for 31 Linda Isle eelgrass transplant program. (2) The monitoring will be conducted over a seven-year period rather than a five-year period, to ensure project success. Should a project failure occur and a re -plant is necessary, then the time frame for the seven-year monitoring period will proceed upon the completion of the replant. >Eelrass 'Transplant Procedures. The following program will be implemented to restore eelgrass habitat to Newport Bay. The eelgrass transplant will involve several steps; collecting stock material from the donor site(s), preparing the material for transplanting, OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 12 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment replanting the celgrass in the mitigation area receiver site, following up the transplant with monitoring surveys, and evaluating the success of the transplant. Donor material will be harvested by diver -biologists from the shallow subtidal zone around either Corona del Mar, Harbor Island, or Balboa Island. The preferred transplant method is the anchor/bundle method (Fonseca et al. 1982) in which eelgrass is collected by divers from the donor site, transferred to shore, separated into planting units, and replanted by divers along a pre -determined grid, The donor material will be separated into planting units consisting of about 10 shoots and associated substrate and root mass. Shoots will be bundled and tied together with biodegradable line and a sediment anchoring device. The bundles will be transferred to the divers who will then replant the eelgrass bundles in spacing units of 1 unit per 0.5 square meters over the 7.6 sq In transplant site. The number of eelgrass bundles and eelgrass shoots required for the transplant are shown in Table 2. These figures are based upon the preliminary area of impact. The actually numbers will be determined following the completion of the boat dock construction project. The numbers are provided as an example of the level of effort which may be expended. Transplant Timing. Transplants will be conducted following the completion of the 2 -year shading -effects monitoring surveys. Field Monitoring and Transplant Evaluation. A series of seven (7) post -transplant surveys will be conducted at the ®CC transplant site. If the transplant occurs within the AC®E restoration area, a total of nine (9) posttransplant monitoring surveys will be required to evaluate transplant success over a period of seven years. Two extra years (years six and seven) will be required because the proposed mitigation sites involve a relatively high degree of uncertainty for longterm persistence and success. Furthermore, if the initial transplant fails to conform with required performance standards, a supplemental transplant area and monitoring program will be conducted in conformance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 13 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment - ro m c CO o ro M o s- 0 L 0-0 CL m c � m (0 O O 0 0 w m v •.0 m c c CCi Ql c c -6 m 0 D G C:�: m m cca a a t8 s s s U � vc 0 U _ C u m c c c 0 0 2 LU Ui W mT N M -HSaYSS� 'i S mwjl �eES ws'910'l 3 ' / a } 10 C co 8 J ` � n e \j S b - Figure 5e Location of ACE Pilot Eelgrass Restoration Sites Source: CRM 2004 OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 14 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment ESTIMA TED NUMBER OF PLANTING UNITS (I' U ) Total eelgrass surface area/(P,U. Density) 8 meters2 0.5 meters (2) TotalPlanting Units 0 TOTAL NUMBER OF SHOOTS Total number of P.U. x 10 shoots/P.U. 10 shoots/P.U. x 20 P.U. (, 1> 11� +1 1 E Post -transplant monitoring surveys will be conducted to determine the health of the transplanted vegetation and to evaluate transplant success based on established criteria (NMFS 1991 as amended). Eelgrass areal cover, percent cover and shoot density of eelgrass will be determined during each monitoring survey. Undisturbed areas of the eelgrass meadows in the vicinity of the transplant site will be used a control area when assessing the results of the transplant. If yearly criteria are not met, then a replant will be conducted. The amount to be replanted is based upon a formula that takes into account area and/or density deficiencies (NMFS 1991 as amended). Reporting. Field survey results will be submitted to the AC®E and the resource agencies in report format within 30 days of each of the monitoring surveys. The reports will provide a map of habitat cover, eelgrass percent cover, turion density data, a qualitative assessment of invertebrate and fish use of the area, and recommended remedial measures if the transplant is not meeting mitigation success criteria. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 15 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment Coastal Resources Management (CRM). 2005. Distribution and abundance of eelgrass in Newport Bay. 2003-2004 eelgrass habitat mapping project. Bulkhead to pierhead line surveys. Prepared for the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Department. 10 January 2005. Coastal Resources Management (CRM). 2004. Power Point presentation prepared for the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Department regarding the Army Corps of Engineers Newport Bay Pilot Eelgrass Restoration Project. ljgp: beach.cacams/HB / Fonseca, M.S., WS Kenworthy, and G.W. Thayer. 1982. A low-cost planting technique for eelgrass (Zostera marina L.). Coastal Engineering Tech. Aid. No. 82-66. Coastal Engineering Research Center, Kingman Bldg., Ft. Belvoir, Virginia. 15 pp. National Marine Fisheries Service. 1991 (as amended). Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy. 4 pp. Revision 10, February 2005. OCC Sailing and Seamanship Center Dock Renovation 16 Coastal Resources Management Eelgrass Habitat Survey and Impact Assessment South Coast R( glon KEY NOTES _ LEGEND T __ - -- -;. REMOVE EXISTING 4" DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK AND FHc _____- -- -FIRHOSE CABINET _____ - AC�R INSTALL A NEW 6" DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY. ISSI U-2 _d.._ COASTALCLA-VALVE 16-4, FEBCO OR DSA/CITY APPROVED _ EQUAL, 8" DI -FW- FIRE PROTECTION WATER LINE PW _ _ ---- — �`— _ 2❑ CONSTRUCT NEW FDC FOR BUILDING AND DOCK. SEE 3,4/U-2. —W— POTABLE WATER LINE — g" DIP w ____ _ — ° EDISON } _ ° VAULT LABEL WALL OF BUILDING WITH SIGNAGE FOR HOSE BIB _ ------ - - EACH FDC. "BUILDING FIRE DEPT. CONN." AND "DOCK FIRE DEPT. CONN.". -GAS- NATURAL GAS PIPELINE DIP W i -- -1� 4 THRUST BLOCKS PER CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH -POC- POINT OF CONNECTION c °OI ICRETEvVALI^ IDE ___ -__ - _= _-- �',tl ►, STANDARD PLANS STD -510 -L-A. p" (' S❑ CONSTRUCT NEW 6" CONNECTION PER CITY STANDARD _,MUWALL PLANS. " ® FIRE DEPAR ,Te.�4ENT CONNECTION PER CITY OF pLA,.NTEP 0 __ ¢ - - I } ® _- _ .�____ . NEWPORT BEACH STANDARD PLANS. - ITER <r, CD -- _. _ - LA y r d GENERAL 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO A( � �, , �) o CD 2001 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (TITLE 24) a REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS: STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC W ,�, � L C ORKS CONSTRUCTION 2003 EDITION f . 1w 4 i �/ 2 =, I TI �E_, 1 , ; , � 2. REPORT DISCREPANCIES ON DRAWINGS AND/OR SPECIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK co z ! BLS}+.. ' % _ 3. REPORT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION, AS OBSERVED IN THE FIELD AND AS i a f � i ' 3 Q , , , v , SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS TO THE ENGINEER BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 4. VERIFY AND COORDINATE D E DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO STARTING WORK. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR INCONSISTENCIES. 5. STRICTLY ENFORCE APPLICABLE SAFETY LAWS AND MAINTAIN A SAFE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. J C)6• IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SUPERVISION OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORK TO ENSURE THAT IT IS BUILT IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. a W ' -__ _ ,E , 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE AND KEEP CURRENT A SET OF RECORD DRAWINGS SHOWING EXACT it N , DIMENSIONED LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, STUB OUTS, CONSTRUCTION CHANGES, ETC. i o ASPHALT PARKING LOT 8. INSTALL ALL TEMPORARY BRACING AND SHORING TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THE WORK UNTIL IT IS IN I ITS COMPLETED FORM. N ��� 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EARTH EXCAVATION AND EARTH SHORING WORK AND SHALL N d I C R ' _ _ BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REPAIRING DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES AND I f ( ! p " ADJOINING r OPERTY. t ` " 10. NO PIPES OR SLEEVES FOR MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL OR PLUMBING TRADES SHALL PASS THROUGH Q � 6 - -- - - - - - 4 STRUCTURAL MEMBERS; WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. ° 4 I B ! I -{� -=— __--- 1 1 • LOCATION OF SUBSTRUCTURES ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY. THEREFORE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE �_ _ _ L_— _ __ _ _ LP -1 _ �_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1 _ _ _ I — _ _ _ EXTREME CAUTION WHEN EXCAVATING, DRILLING, REMOVING, ETC. IN THE VICINITY OF S'_I- _ TRUCTURES. EXISTING 1-1 4" 6 VC SCHEDULE 40 AFIRE 6 PVC SCHEDULE -40 RE) 1 BACKFLOW PREVENTER. tt�I P� (Ep WALK ,� 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT SUBSTRUCTURE OWNERS TO VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF SUBSTRUCTURES — -__ PRIOR TO EXCAVATING ! POC +'— ^ _ _ FHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ —__ 13. WHERE CROSSING ANY SUBSTRUCTURES WITH NEW SUBSURFACE IMPROVEMENTS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 1-1 /4 , 6 !� , 1-1j w. - - _ 4�' Z'OPF�tR 'K FIRE) - ® - f TRENCH �'�R"FULLY TO LOCATE ALL ACTIVE AND IDLE SUBSTRUCTURES AT THESE CROSSINGS. THE -- a CONTRACTOR: SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR ALL SUBSTRUCTURES DAMAGED DU .-' iJ(:' CONSTRUCTION - = - _ _ - _ - AT NO ADnITI�JNAL COST TO THE DEPARTMENT IF THF uAMAGED SUBSTRUCTURE I'� SHOD"N ON THESE 6 4'� COPT �R "K" F/RE ,. �„ W w DRAWINGS OR_ THE REFERENCE DRAWINGS. !I 1-1 /4" 14. ALL FILL, FACKFILL OR CUT AREAS SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION AS AS DETERIv11Nv_ BY A.S.T.M. METHOD D1557 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE T ON THESE "` - DRAWINGS OR FLEX SOILS REPORT. SUB -DRAINS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE REQUIRED BY CODE. 15. CRUSHED MISCELLANEOUS BASE (C.M.B.) SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 200-2.4 OF THE suj REFERENCE SPECIFICATION WITH FINE GRADATION. 4o 16. PLACING SPREADING AND COMPACTING OF C.M.B. SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTIONS 301 2.2 AND 301 2 - - .3 OF THE REFERENCE SPECIFICATIONS. COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% RELATIVE DENSITY. FHC - - -- - i 17. SAFE CONSTRUCTION EXCAVATION SLOPES AND SHORING ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR - AND SHOULD COMPLY WITH ALL OSHA AND OTHER APPLICABLE SAFETY REGULATIONS. 4�, COPPIER ! „K„ "'(FIRE) , , 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL PIPE BEDDING, BACKFILL, AND COMPACTION OVER PIPES PER REFERENCE a ; ` ISPECIFICATION. i i C) n.( z o 19. ONE FIRE EXTINGUISHER HAVING A MINIMUM RATING OF 2A:20BC SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EVERY HOSE CABINET. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TO FIRE DEPARTMENT A COMPLETED "CONTRACTOR'S MATERIAL AND TEST CERTIFICATE LA_I I �� - - , A ' ° FOR UNDERGROUND PIPING " AT TIME OF FINAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 10 OF NFPA 13 1999 EDITION" L-A - - U-3 Ii 21. BACKFILL SHALL BE WELL TAMPERED IN LAYERS AND WETTED UNDER AND AROUND PIPES TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT OR LATERAL MOVEMENT BACKFILL SHALL CONSIST OF CLEAN FILL SAND TO A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES - BELOW AND 12 INCHES BELOW AND TO A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES ABOVE THE PIPE. California Coastal Commission `w. 22. UNDERGROUND PIPING LISTED FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE AND IN R South Coast District (tics I COMPLIANCE WITH AWWA STANDARDS AND SUITABLE FOR: FIRE RESISTANCE; �; - _ r-�-� pt :. r , MAXIMUM WORKING PRESSURE, LAYING CONDITIONS; RATED FOR AT D I AL R � South O ' ' i �C_ LEAST 150 PSLss�icsn ------- - .......... i e 23. UNDERGROUND FERROUS METAL PIPE TO BE LINE, COATED, WRAPPED MAY , - 004 I EFFE AND SLEEVED WITH 8 MIL POLYETHYLENE { SLEEVE. Date. __ t �� � f o _-` _-__-___- I o w 24. ALL PIPING TO BE FLUSHED CLEAN OF FOREIGN MATERIAL. Ct;tg: �. ,r COASTAL , r 25. COAST HIGHWAY ROADWAY PAVEMENT AND/OR TRENCH REPAIR WORK IvISSiON SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY/STATE REQUIRMENTS. d 26. COAST HIGHWAY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT IS REQUIRED .FOR WORK WITHIN PCH RIGHT-OF-WAY _...... a:. o i i i i SECTION '4216/4217 OF THE GOVERMENT o � 27. ALL UNDERGROUND PIPING CONNECTION BQ�LTS' fi SS STEEL CODE REQUIRES A DIG ALERT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER BE _ _ _ -_ __ _.__ __ __ .______- __ __ ________ _ ___ ,__. _ _ _ __�_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ � ` e � � EXCAVATr' WILL UBE VALID ED RFOR E A 'YOUR IDIGO c _.y�`, a. ALERT I.D. NUMBER CALL UNDERGROUND PLAN 1' c� �� r SERVICE ALERT TOLL FREE SITE t . � � � � � � If w . ����� �` .y r 1-800-422-4133 CL W ExR.�l o � TWO WORKING DAYS BEFOR YOU DIG � SCALE: 1/16"=1,-0„ W o Q m CD 00 oa o CD10 cD CD 2 10 04 PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS F � A 12 10 03 ISSUED FOR BID X N0, DATE DESCRIPTION Y 0- X REVISIONS CTM CTM BY ENGINEER CTM DESIGNER CTM CASH & ASSOCIATES CAD OPERATOR SG ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE CHECKER RHM (714) 895-2072 PROJECT MANASER RHM NOTE: STREET LIGHT CONDUIT TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE IF ANY. lJ OF b"_ ANG 0 S COLLEGE SCTLE School of Sailing & Seamanship Newport Beach, CA PROJECT NUMBER Seth Cao, t Rec ion 6087.00 WATER LAYOUTMAY 3 _ 2U04 DRAWING NUMBER CAHFC':,7?NI,& U COASTAL COMMISSION r7 z a 00 r, U 0 Q Cn Cn D J E Q r` N C) \ N N to 0 0 00 r~ U d 0 0 O r - 00 0 r Cnm Q CD aCO rox � FIREHOSE CABINET 1 /2 / 1 1/2" ANGLE VALVE 8„ 31 1 1/270x100' LONG 26" HOSE W/ NOZZLE _X FIRE EXTINGUISHER SEE NOTE 19 ON U-1 2 1/27 STAND PIPE N IIS —4'0 COPPER 'K' PIPE 4'O COPPER 'K' ELECT. BOX @ _ 30' 0. C. I ' 5/8 0 THRU _-- BOLTS, TYP. SIDE VIEW 00 SCALE: 1/27=1'—O" MINIMIZE HEIGHT TO EXTENT POSSIBLE PIPE INSULATION AT CONCRETE 5 -1 /2" REF. WALKWAY I r C 4' COPPER FIRE WATER LINE p GANGWAY WATER LINE W/ CLAMP TYP. FDC: POTTER ROEMER "TWO—WAY" BRASS BODY WITH CLAPPERS MODEL NUMBER 5761 (UL LISTED.) CHECK VALVE: UNITED BRASS WORKS, INC. MODEL 68 (UL LISTED.) 4"x2 1/2"x2 1/2" FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC) 4" CHECK VALVE 1_,1111- —1 r 36" MIN. 48" MAX. I 4" D. 1. p s l—III—I I I�I I I�I I' i� z "P—IEl�llo 6" D. 1. CONCRETE THRUST —/ BLOCK PER CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STANDARD PLANS STD-510—L—A. FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION DETAIL U-2 SCALE: 3/4!'= 1 ' CV BENT ALUMINUM PL 3/8"x6'x7 1/2"x12" ALUMINUM UNISTRUT PLAN 1 /8 _// TVD f ALUMINUM i C 6 x 2.83 DRILL 4-5/16"0 12" 1— S.S. UNISTRUT P1001 I HOLES a @ 6'—O„ 0. C. o, ( I I o 2 COPPER "_.___ __�_____ 1 i �} STIFFENER PL 114!' a DOMESTIC 1 ° ! N 1 4 ALUMINUM WATER LINE 4 GOODYEAR PLICORD 1 FLEXWING PETROLEUM TRANSFER HOSE OR i i 3/16 EQUAL o, CO SILICONE GASKET- € 1 DECK ' I fr GOODYEAR PLICORD-- GRAY FOOD HOSE OR PIPE ilr; EQUAL _ _------ BRASS INTERNALLY ------ EXPANDED PERMANENT 3/4"0 — EXIST. SEAWALL THRU BOLT L 111 COUPLINGS (SGOVILL STYLE) 250 PSI 5/8"M M B W/ NUTS s GANGWAY TO DECK SCALE: 1127=1'—O" (GALV.) (THROUGH BOLTS) e q A----1 �6 PIPE SUPPORT U-2/ SCALE: 1 /2" =1 '-0" DRILL HOLES EXISTING CIN MAIN �J EXISTING STREET / VALVE TO REMAIN, PROTECT ' IN PLACE E REMOVE ' EXISTING I 4' DUCTILE g� IRON LINE REMOVE EXISTING FDC REMOVE EXISTING 4' REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY & CONCRETE SUPPORT EXISTING 3 DETECTOR ASSEMBLY NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO DOCKS NEW 6" CHECK VALVE NEW 6" HOT TAP INTO CITY MAIN NEW 6" VALVE EXISTING CITY MAIN IX r— �_'=��=`—� CAP OFF EXISTING SUPPLY ILu Lu .� CL L - ( W ..�/ W !l 1 1 E—==--3 Im F l m 0 III ri i4~ri - ill Ilk I I jII --JIL.--__.Ilu, till - Lu W / W NEW 6" CHECK VALVE NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO BUILDING 4'x6" REDUCER NEW 6" DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY "CLA—VALVE", "FEBCO" OR CITY/DSA APPROVED EQUAL REVISED PIPELING 4 ALIGNMENT SCALE: 314!'= l '-0" ��2SCALE: 3/4!'=1'-0P LOCATE WATER LINES IN MIDDLE THIRD OF DOCK f F_ � raISSUED FOR :D © R,mi 7 DESCRIPTION REVISIONS (GALV.) (THROUGH BOLTS) e q A----1 �6 PIPE SUPPORT U-2/ SCALE: 1 /2" =1 '-0" DRILL HOLES EXISTING CIN MAIN �J EXISTING STREET / VALVE TO REMAIN, PROTECT ' IN PLACE E REMOVE ' EXISTING I 4' DUCTILE g� IRON LINE REMOVE EXISTING FDC REMOVE EXISTING 4' REDUCED PRESSURE DETECTOR ASSEMBLY & CONCRETE SUPPORT EXISTING 3 DETECTOR ASSEMBLY NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO DOCKS NEW 6" CHECK VALVE NEW 6" HOT TAP INTO CITY MAIN NEW 6" VALVE EXISTING CITY MAIN IX r— �_'=��=`—� CAP OFF EXISTING SUPPLY ILu Lu .� CL L - ( W ..�/ W !l 1 1 E—==--3 Im F l m 0 III ri i4~ri - ill Ilk I I jII --JIL.--__.Ilu, till - Lu W / W NEW 6" CHECK VALVE NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO BUILDING 4'x6" REDUCER NEW 6" DOUBLE DETECTOR CHECK ASSEMBLY "CLA—VALVE", "FEBCO" OR CITY/DSA APPROVED EQUAL REVISED PIPELING 4 ALIGNMENT SCALE: 314!'= l '-0" ��2SCALE: 3/4!'=1'-0P LOCATE WATER LINES IN MIDDLE THIRD OF DOCK SECTION SCALE: 3/4!'=1'-07 WATER LINES DECKING WALER (TYP.) ENGINEER CTM DESIGNER CTM CASH 8c ASSOCIATES CAD OPERATOR SG ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE CHECKER RHM (714) 895-2072 PROJECT MANAGER RHM BRASS INTERNALLY EXPANDED PERMANENT COUPLINGS (SCOVILL STYLE) 250 PSI 4' GOODYEAR PLICORD FLEXWING PETROLEUM TRANSFER HOSE OR EQUAL 8 \ GANGWAY TO DECK U-2 SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" ORANGE COAST COLLEGE School of Sailing & Seamanship Newport Beach, CA WATER SECTIONS AND DETAILS 'm fit I11 o � o =T 1 I 1 4" COPPER 'Y FIRE WATER LINE 2" COPPER ' DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE WATER LINES IN 4" COPPER "K" IN DOCK SYSTEM f PONTOON � SECTION SCALE: 3/4!'=1'-07 WATER LINES DECKING WALER (TYP.) ENGINEER CTM DESIGNER CTM CASH 8c ASSOCIATES CAD OPERATOR SG ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE CHECKER RHM (714) 895-2072 PROJECT MANAGER RHM BRASS INTERNALLY EXPANDED PERMANENT COUPLINGS (SCOVILL STYLE) 250 PSI 4' GOODYEAR PLICORD FLEXWING PETROLEUM TRANSFER HOSE OR EQUAL 8 \ GANGWAY TO DECK U-2 SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0" ORANGE COAST COLLEGE School of Sailing & Seamanship Newport Beach, CA WATER SECTIONS AND DETAILS 'm fit I11 o � o =T 1 I 1 4" COPPER 'Y FIRE WATER LINE 2" COPPER ' DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE WATER LINES IN 4" COPPER "K" IN DOCK SYSTEM 0 a 0 r n C) 0 0 91. DATUM M,L.L.W, EL. 0,0 CORE DRILL HOLES FOR WATER LINES SEE DETAIL 5/U-3 0 CD CD 0'-6" v 1 3 CORE DRILL 5" DIAMETER HOLE i CORE DRILL 3 DIAMETER HOLE P P 4 O 00 CDE Pr M 0 o00 CD CO _ X r a X 6 TO 4' CONCENTRIC REDUCER, FLANGED .-\ 6 PVC V/S FLG SOC CL150 FLANGED SOCKET PVC SUPPLY (7i EXPANSION JOINT TYP ELEVATION SCALE: 1 I = 1'-0" U-3 EXISTING 10" SHEET PILE TYP `L--' D;-'� 90° STEEL ELL STEEL PIPE @ GANGWAY 4'-D.I. FLANGED 4'OSTEEL PIPE FITTING COMPANION MALExMALE THREAD PIPE SUPPORT, SEE U-2 (FEMALE THREAD) 99 STEEL ELL SEAWALL DETAIL 1 1 7 SCALE: 1/2"=1'-O7 U-3 FA M FAIrIefflk _ �I PLAN CHECK CORRECTIONS I0 • •• = • - • • m REVISIONS FEMALE BRASS � � � 4'�sSTEEL PIPE SCOVILLE FITTING. MALExMALE THREAD SS BANDS FEMALE BRASS ,r a. 90° 4'0 SCOVILLE FITTING / COPPER 4"�iSTEEL PIPE � \ SS BANDS MALExMALE THREAD PIPING DETAIL SCALE: NTS 4'0 GOODYEAR PLICORD FOOD GRADE HOSE (4 FT TO 5 FT LONG) FEMALE BRASS SCOVILLE FITTING SS BANDS 4'0 GOODYEAR PLICORD FOOD GRADE HOSE (8 FT TO 10 FT LONG) - EXISTING WALE BEAM -' TO BE REPAIRED. SEE REPAIR SEQUENCE NOTES CORE DRILL HOLES FOR WATER LINES SEE DETAIL 5/U-3 d"rA rnpPER 'K' PIPE 9 COPPER ELL FEMALE BRASS ' SCOVILLE FITTING P CASH 8c ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE (714) 895-2072 COPPER PIPING ON DOCI ENGINEER CTM DESIGNER CTM CAD OPERATOR SG CHECKER RHM PROJECT MANAGER RHM HIGH GUARDRAIL f ORANGE COAST COLLEGE School of Sailing & Seamanship Newport Beach, CA WATER SECTIONS AND DETAILS EL. +9.0 MLLW CONC. DECK SCALE Q AS NOTED B PROJECT NUMBER 608700 DRAWING NUMBER U-3 ■ ft tz MON. 9. PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL KELtEMS GRIP CABLE SUPPORT WITH CONNECTOR TO PULL BOX AS REQUIRED I ' \ DECK *G7 CABLE r I if ---CONDUIT WITH CONDUCTORS TO POWER CENTER, SEE PLAN PONTOON 9 PULL BOX INSTALLATION NOT TO SCALE PEDESTAL POWER CENTER, MIDWEST WITH GFI CIRCUIT BREAKER rw 1 0 : A PEDESTAL POWER CENTER, 10, NOT TO SCALE NO. I DATE DESCRIPTION _BY REVISIONS FRONT POWER CENTER SEE ,,--'DETAIL "E- THIS SHEET GALV. MACHINE BOLTS TO MATCH SUPPLIED BASE PLATE TO BOLT THRU DECK,lYP. TWO (2) 2x6 BLOCKINGS WITH SIMPSON S.S. HANGERS TO ATTACH TO DOCK BEAMS. DECKING 00 0 WATER LINES ELECTRICAL CONDUITS PONTOON POWER CENTER MOUNTING DETAIL AT NOT TO SCALE 12"Wx16'HxErD. STAINLESS STEEL, NEMA 4X, PULL BOX MOUNTED ON EXISTING RAILING AS REQUIRED EXISTING SEAWALL 6994 WALER (TYP.) A PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL KELLEMS GRIP AS REQUIRED AND SUPPORTED FROM SEAWALL 4#2 WITH GROUND CONDUCTOR TYPE -07 CABLE OF LENGTH AS REQUIRED FOR LOW TIDE. PROVIDE STAINLESS STEEL, NEMA 4X, JUNCTION BOX MOUNTED AT THE END OF NEW DOCK TO RECEIVE -G7 CABLE SEE DETAIL -Y' THIS SHEET 8G, 1-1 4°C. INSIDE DOCK 1-1/ C INTO DOCK SPACE "G" CABLE INSTALLATION �C NOT TO SCALE FRANK Y. TSO ..... . ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS HunUngton Beach, CaMomia -f 5 EXIST. POWER CO. SERVICE I EXIST. DEMAND LOAD (11-19-03) 0.4x60= 24 KW. OR 30 KVA @0.8PF = 83.3 AMPS EXIST. MAIN SWITCHBOARD NEW LOAD = 1080OW OR 60 AMPS TOTAL 143.3 AMPS 120/208V, 30, 4W ............ EDISON CO. METER #PO801-15552 .7 80OA-3P 400A I 800A BUS 3P 1 ODA 200A 200A 3p 3p F3P OA _F00A 3P REPLACE EXISTING 10OA-2P BREAKER WITH NEW 10OA-3P BREAKER OF TYPE AND MFGR TO MATCH EXISTING. VERIFY IN FIELD. REWIRE EXISTING 3#1/0, 1#6, 1-1/2%. WITH NEW 4#1/0, 1#6 AS REQUIRED. 2#2,1 #8,1_1/4' C 3#2,1#8,1-1/47C. 4#2,1 #8,1 —1 /,f 7— I C — NEW FEXIST FEXIST EXIST I STI rEXis T rEX T ]PANEL PANELPANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL L "DOW 1%6�p $1 B" if C'l Mll L� Li L �_l — LJ \—REMOVE EXISTING PANEL AND PROVIDE 30/1 1 1 30/1 1 30/1 1 NEW. REMOUNT ALL EXISTING RECPTS. AND RECONNECT ALL EXISTING CIRCUITS 0C OB OA AS REQUIRED. 30A 30A 30A RECPT. RECPT. RECPT. POWER CENTER POWER CENTER POWER CENTER WITH ONE 30A RECPT. WITH ONE 30A RECPT. WITH ONE 30A RECPT. SYMBOL — (9 SYMBOL — (0 SYMBOL — 0 -SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM CASH & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE (714) 895-2072 BLACK-ON-WHffE NAMPLATE MOUNMG SURF. W.P. PANEL "Doc MON 100A 3P I.C. 10,000 A. SYM. 12V208VOLTS HASE BUS 100A CU 3 4 WIIRE CFO REDUCED SET - HALF SIZE 0 ca SCALE 0 C) AS NOTED A EXIST. RECPT PROJECT NUMBER co 5646.00 DRAWING NUMBER E�2 1�7 NEW RECPT. no r����rtttttitit t11 illm �■t���tit�tt�tr,►�a OPEN �/0 MENm ■ 1r MEN ttt��titt■t���ttt�� MONrttw m ONO = ------- WATTS: OA 10560 0 B = 10560 0 C = 3060 ENGINEER FYT DESIGNER FYT CAD OPERATOR FYT CHECKER FYT PROJECT MANAGER RHA4 rn REDUCED SET - HALF SIZE 0 ca SCALE 0 C) AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER co 5646.00 DRAWING NUMBER E�2 1�7 W 1/2"0 X 1/4" B WALL ALUM TUBING f f _ r I f 7 1/2" RAD. (BOTH ENDS) C I 4'-8 1/4" TWO 1 4" S.S. FLAT WASHERS & 1 4 S.S HEX NUT 4'-8 13/16" 5'-0" TYP. i A " WE�b) ONE FNOTE- CABLE AND CABLE HARDWARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. 1/4-0 S.S. THREADED STUD TYP. ---------------.,_... .m. .®. — ...m. ..e.. .... — ;--..—..—.o..o—.—,—.«—.--.— ..m.. — ..._.—,®.—®._... .._ --.-----®.--—..-------.-------..-- — ----..----.—.— --. —.—. ,— --- —.P --.—.—.-----.----.—.—.----.--.— —.----- -----. .--.---._....a—.—.--.— --.—.—.. .s.—. 4.._.----.---.--.-------- 0: 1 O'-3" 44 -0C 3 16'°0 S.S. CABLE 6 3/8" X 3 1/2" X 5/32" 2" X 2" X 3/16" DECK LEVEL TYP. 3 ALUM RECT BEAM TUBE ALUM ANGLE 5 32 4-12 5/32 5 32 SCALE: 3/8 = 1 -0 1/2"0 DRILL FOR 3/8"0 X 3 1/2" REINFORCEMENT PLATE ALUM ANGLE NOTE: CABLE AND CABLE HARDWARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY. SCALE: 1/2" CONFIDENTIAL - TECHNICAL DOCUMENT F THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND CONTAINS TRADE SECRETS AND/OR INFORMATION THAT IS THE PROPERTY OF HALLSTEN CORPORATION, HEREAFTER "HALLSTEN". ANY DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, OR PUBLICATION OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY, INCLUDING REPRESENTATIVES OR AGENTS OF HALLSTEN, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING, IS PROHIBITED. THE PRODUCT DEPICTED ABOVE IS COVERED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING U.S. PATENTS AND/OR OTHER FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC PATENTS PENDING: 5,050,361, 5,325,646, 5,454,195, 5,526,620, 5,545,358, 5,617,677, 5,689,920, 5,845,594, 5,911,662, 5,941,027, 6,012,259, 6,151,835 AND 6,255,102. M 2 7/8" 0 I N NOTE: FOR USE WITH THE 80'-0" GANGWAY. 10`-11 7/8" 1 1/2"0 X 1/4" WALL ALUM TUBING 7 1/2" q RAD. (BOTH ENDS) 1/4" X 3 71/2"UHMW �t E EWIQH RUB PAD, 2'-2" LONG SCALE: 1/2" = 1 -0 NOTE: 1) TOP OF ALUMINUM DECKING IS RIBBED AND SANDBLASTED TO A COMMERCIAL FINISH FOR A NON-SKID SURFACE. 2) ALL ALUMINUM RAILING (EXCEPT POSTS) TO RECEIVE A BRUSHED FINISH. 3) ALUMINUM BEAMS TO BE SANDBLASTED FOR A NON -GLARE FINISH. 4) ALL STEEL PARTS TO BE HOT -DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 24 NOV 03ORANGE COAST COLLEGE _Manager:- WRIGHT A ST 7 T1 TEL: (91613 31 -7 211 }Drawn By: L. SASEVICH ■ ::' F' c F" E301-011 �., �■I■�_� fit. Sheet:IFAX: (916) 331-7223 ALUMINUM GANGWAYS THEN DRAWING IS P.O. Box 41036, Sacramento, CA 95B41 IF THIS BAR DOES INDUSTRIAL MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL 41-011 X 351-011 NEWPORT BEACH, CA NOT MEASURE 1" Q ��ALUMINUM GANGWAYS ! • SCALE .. REVISIONS HDG CARR. BOLT, NUT & FLAT WASHER 0: 1 O'-3" cn 6" 3'-1" 3'-1„ 3,-1" 61' 4'-0" X 2'-1 1/4" X 1/4" ++++++++++++t+++. ALUM CHECKER PLATE + + + + + + ++++++ ++++++++++++i+++++a++++++ + 4 + + UHMW RUB STRIP 00 \ 1 1 /2" X 1/8- 6 3/8" X 3 1 /2" X 5/32" 1 1 /2"� X 1 /4" ALUM SQUARE TUPt- ALUM RECT BEAM TUBE WALL ALUM TUBING 4" ALUM INTERLOCKING 2"0 ALUM INTERLOCKING DECK SLAT HINGE EXTRUSION 2 7/8" 0 I N NOTE: FOR USE WITH THE 80'-0" GANGWAY. 10`-11 7/8" 1 1/2"0 X 1/4" WALL ALUM TUBING 7 1/2" q RAD. (BOTH ENDS) 1/4" X 3 71/2"UHMW �t E EWIQH RUB PAD, 2'-2" LONG SCALE: 1/2" = 1 -0 NOTE: 1) TOP OF ALUMINUM DECKING IS RIBBED AND SANDBLASTED TO A COMMERCIAL FINISH FOR A NON-SKID SURFACE. 2) ALL ALUMINUM RAILING (EXCEPT POSTS) TO RECEIVE A BRUSHED FINISH. 3) ALUMINUM BEAMS TO BE SANDBLASTED FOR A NON -GLARE FINISH. 4) ALL STEEL PARTS TO BE HOT -DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 24 NOV 03ORANGE COAST COLLEGE _Manager:- WRIGHT A ST 7 T1 TEL: (91613 31 -7 211 }Drawn By: L. SASEVICH ■ ::' F' c F" E301-011 �., �■I■�_� fit. Sheet:IFAX: (916) 331-7223 ALUMINUM GANGWAYS THEN DRAWING IS P.O. Box 41036, Sacramento, CA 95B41 IF THIS BAR DOES INDUSTRIAL MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL 41-011 X 351-011 NEWPORT BEACH, CA NOT MEASURE 1" Q ��ALUMINUM GANGWAYS ! • SCALE .. REVISIONS 1 1 2 1 3 W I a C A 3'-4 1/2" SEQIIQU YIEW v 1 1/2" 2"0 ALUM INTERLOCKING 1/2"0 DRILL FOR 3/8"0 X 3 l/2" CARR. BOLT, NUT & FLAT WASHER 6'-1 1/4" 5'-7 1 /4" 3" WALL ALUM TUBING ALUMINUM HINGE PIN SCALE. 3 - l' -O" MAKE (2) TWO CONFIDENTIAL - TECHNICAL DOCUMENT F THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS CONFIDENTIAL AND CONTAINS TRADE SECRETS AND/OR INFORMATION THAT IS THE PROPERTY OF HALLSTEN CORPORATION, HEREAFTER "HALLSTEN". ANY DISCLOSURE, COPYING, DISTRIBUTION, OR PUBLICATION OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN, BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY, INCLUDING REPRESENTATIVES OR AGENTS OF HALLSTEN, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AUTHORIZED IN WRITING, IS PROHIBITED. THE PRODUCT DEPICTED ABOVE IS COVERED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING U.S. PATENTS AND/OR OTHER FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC PATENTS PENDING: 5,050,361, 5,325,646, 5,454,195, 5,526,620, 5,545,358, 5,617,677, 5,689,920, 5,845,594, 5,911,662, 5,941,027, 6,012,259, 6,151,835 AND 6,255,102. 4 1 5 1 6 5 1/2" _ 4'-8" I 5 1 /2.. 5'-7" N r � COE 7 1 s •> a, 0 SCALE: 3" v 0 1/2"0 DRILL FOR 3/8"0 X 3 1/2" HOG CARR. BOLT, NUT & FLAT WASHER 0 6'-10" ELEVATION VIEW N. co 6" 2#-11 " 2' 11 „ 6" ON -SHORE HINGE A, SEMBLY f�_ ���______ SCALE: 1 - 1'-0" 4'-0" X 1'-5 1/4" X 1/49p. MAKE (2) TWO + + + +I++ 00 `+++++++ALUM CHECKER PLATE +++++++++++c, ++++++++++++++++++++++++UHMW RUB STRIP++++++ 3'-0" 1 1 /2" X 1 /8" 2" 4 \ 1O" 1'-O" 10" 2" ALUM SQUARE TUBE CR WALL ALUM TURING 6 3/8 X 3 11/2"..X 5/32 ALUM RECT BEAM TUBE 12 ALUM INTERLOCKING 4" ALUM INTERLOCKING HINGE EXTRUSION DECK SLAT N DRILL AND COUNTERSINK 3 5/8" X 1 1/8" X 5Z32"�,_0" X 6'— J 0" AbTOE RAMP -'ELAN VIEW FOR 1/4"0 FASTENER ALUM WHEEL TRACK .- SCALE:1 = 1 -0 (SUPPLIED BY OTHERS) MAKE: 2(1) ONE WHEEL TRACK DETAIL NOTE: FOR USE WITH THE 35'-0" GANGWAY. SCALE: 1 1 = 1 -a MAKE 4) FOUR 7'-6 7/8" 1 1/2"0 X 1/4"_ WALL ALUM TUBING 2 7/8" 1'-6- 3'-0" 0 V 2" 10" 1'-0" 10" 2" i I I I I DRILL AND COUNTERSINK 3 16" X 3 1 2" FOR 1/4"0 FASTENER ALUM FLATBAR (SUPPLIED BY OTHERS) Ip ALUMI UM RUB SCALE: 1 1 = l' -O" MAKE 4y FOUR oil F TIQN Yl Jl _.. n i, 7 1/2" q RAD. (BOTH ENDS) 00 1/4 X 3 1/2" UHMW RUB PAD, 1'-6" LONG 1) TOP OF ALUMINUM DECKING IS RIBBED AND SANDBLASTED TO A COMMERCIAL FINISH FOR A NON-SKID SURFACE. 2) ALL ALUMINUM RAILING (EXCEPT POSTS) TO RECEIVE A BRUSHED FINISH. 3) ALUMINUM BEAMS TO BE SANDBLASTED FOR A NON -GLARE FINISH. 4) ALL STEEL PARTS TO BE HOT -DIP GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. H A T G O F l F3 O f� A T I O N INDUSTRIAL • MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL P.O. Box 41036, Sacramento, CA 95B41 HALLSTEN.COM CC,�LLEGE ORANGE COASTManager: Date: 24 Nov o3 R. WRIGHT TEL: (9161331-7211 ALUMINUM GANGWAYS NEWPORT BEACH CA SECTION VIEWS & D ETA I LO 0 1 /2 1 IFTHIS IMEASURE01'S THENDRAWING TTOASCALE IS Drawn By: L. SASEVICH FAX: (91 G] 331-7223 3 29 JAN o4 LS Sheet. r-� r� 2 Of 3 2 09 JAN O4 LS (0 2003 1 O9 DEC 03 LS pwg, No.: 10244 REVISIONS HA N ST C O R P O RAT I O N INDUSTRIAL MARINE • ENVIRONMENTAL P.O. Box 41036, Sacramento, CA 95841 HALLSTEN.COM ORANGE COAST COLLEGE Date: 24 Nov o3 Manager: R. WRIGHT TEL: (916) 331-7211 ALUMINUM GANGWAYS NEWPORT BEACH, CA SECTION VIEWS & DETAILS 0 1/2 1 IF THIS BAR DOES NOT MEASURE 1" DRATO ING IS THENDRAWING Drawn By: L. SASEVI C H FAX. (916] 331-7223 3 29 JAN o4 LS Sheet: rr�� rr�� a� of �7 2 og JAN 04 LS ©2003 1 09 DEC 03 LS Dwg. No.: 10244 REVISIONS STP _ • H,,A T UCT-IIDN ` - R B ID R- CiONS R 8 C W1=10RT ACH U LDI,NG D. A R M N w DESIGN CRITERIA'0. MARINE DEPT PI3RQVAL VICINITYMAP 4 General 5 Harbor Permits and Drawings � I TY OF NEWPORT EEREH N .,� qy �� ` , :�5� > IRE 4�� YY= ;Ni .. ... .., '.. 'n.? �� `.. xr" '� ' " ` rtx.�. ,:.`� . ��.. � .•�- . d� . '=.: .. i obtained per Harbor Permit Policy H-1. Detailed `Y�, C.. .� ���^. �,�..a�`Y4n. j"� ° ice.•..-• .&.;.,_ .Lry g - � :, �� -..s�` 9'�" i:< 5.1 Harbor permits shall be o p Y 11, The construction of harbor facilities•shail accommodate the need for safety 2.2.15 Clock {float} mirnmum clear width for commercial passenger use v. s PA?� r LiN� • construction Ian's 4 sets and substantiating calculations (1 set} shall be CITY of _ >. ' . •Y �� { . �1 I" " `' aj `� P (. • } r Y y,• n ..r*, Q �' :,Fay_ r : x' �, �tAY' : ;... F ` B c++aa. I" ' �cY IR and durability as well as convenience and appearance. Structural elements of • steal{ be 6 feet to 80 feet long and 8 feet for docks over 80 feet rlFr+ 8 , �, gangways, submitted to the Budden Department with the permit application for the - EaC}r floats, piles, etc. shall be adequate to safeguard human life, boats long. g P UPPP as aLxa c/NF u, s P�� 0L_ fnic following items: , , N f f oy a,�� _=y o ��; �, Y;. ,,. u , :,� o ' and boating equipment. Boat berthing facilities shall be designed to - � � � ��tTAEz � r � "F ..• �. � - -. � 0 1TEcc : � ` s adequately handle anticipated toads viiitFr an ample factor of safety. 2.2.16 Walkways or landing platforms shall not have less than 4 feet P,Po�osE� P/Pc PCU 5.1.1 bulkheads and groins unobstructed width adjacent to gangways, nor 6 feet in front of � t�� .. � �sr � •-•^ "�F ,� ;u .°.�a�,� � . � .. � , � . �� `;: �, �. � :, . • � : .�,� . Q o w� �:° �� , \ ` I PRUPOSEC DaCK s g o 01 o J I, . f `� ~`f •. r. �h': 1.2 Materials of construction shalt resist the corrosion of saltwater in order to • , gangways. -at +7.5 foot M LLW water surface elevation. l . � ,� , 5.1.2 lets and lanolin s _ )assure tow maintenance requirements and long life of the facility. P g `-fir 6`'' 2.2.17 Fillets at the connection of mar inal walkwa s, main walkwa �F'"E�� NESTCLIFF: • � 9 Y � Ys .... .. _ ,,,,_ �� ISt�i+� _ I �T w•-. ' -- "- -�, e -7.0 � � -�o .... � '�l cu st ':, �.,6 c:'.' • �.', „ ,�`' I�jy r. XS '� 1 �_:� ;' .. PARK . S�t � r 1.3 Floats shall be designed to assure stability and Duo anc throe hoot the life of and fin er floats shall be included in the berth desi ns and shall 5.1.3 gangways, including hinge connections and hand railings 9 Y Y Y 9 e 9 9 - � u. p �X/5r e0r7VA 7 fr �. �•: 4� .• 5 JAM�s'O 1',�,` the float. extend at least 4 feet'slong both floats. FR , i' p II 4 r9'R • •' �� �$ sr� � : 5.1.4 anchor piles and guide piles, including railer assemblies CIF �'• m .°`� IC 0� PIER ��. ,�C note ' - c,:^. y♦ ^ YSi� - Q r 1-.4 Adequate utilities shall be provided for the convenience and safe( of boaters 2.2.18 Gangway brow slope for commercial passenger, multiresidential R q Pr � Y 9 Y { } P P 9 N '�...... t � ... .� ., �.� �, -•► . � � � � :. �` � ,., and maintenance workers. and small craft marina use shall not exceed 1 foot vertically for 5.;1,5 cantilevered patio decks - �' y 1 TERRACE •• -�� aoo R` r An JE1 fY z ARu sr NEWPORT.-•.• NEWPORT each 3 feet of length when the tide is at -2.0 feet MLLW. All other 516 other harbor structures VICINITY MRP �sr r "- A 3"' od � ' ~ . 1� X uw KINGS KINCs$ `70I y , PROFILE 1 - 40 � �,� aAv . � �o .. - � LX1NE5 �..: ■ gangway slopes shall not exceed 1 foot vertically for each 2 /: S �+ f� ;; W' CpAST NWY _ I .r K3FW stf, QZ�p JETTY ■ L LID)< C a p RESORT 2 Layout and Design feet of length when the tide is at -2.0 feet M LLW. S011rlDltJGS �E EXPRESSED IN FEET DENOTE f* `y� ceaA .. ala...- f `kX g prepared Y ELEVATIONS BRSED ON NUN LOWER LOW WR'I'ER. ? O�� p s < <r� el ■ % % � vl rA ' '' i . t, ,sem � ' .. I IocE yr 5.2 Plans and calculations for the above items shall be re ared b a Civil or� n sT Y ' , $- CEUB cQ9Yri'"�a! Vc� O 2 REVERE yr Structural Engineer registered in the State of California. o� F ST 4 y�' 27 , y ' , � �, towER EfNQ4 qsT 3 MCC E" 2.1 Designs for harbor facilities shall be based upon the use of the facility, defined 2.2.19 Walking surfaces of gangways (brows), piers and floats shah have 9 g• err o �2 , �. loo NEwPORr SEC 91- Hwy as follows: non-skid finish, such as punched metal, unpointed timber, or grit `� �� "` p ; z` cti�N �?� .1 BAY a "� 5.3 In addition, detailed construction plans shall include, but not be limited to, rE . on- metal, timber or plywood. - P Indicating the following dimensions and detailed items: 2.1.1 Single or joint residential: - - :� . - L0 0 --. � �\ �. � �•----- ,� . � f 2.2.20 Gangway brow minimum clear width for commercial passenger, z Sst R �, t 4 4 L HARBOR, 9 Y ( ) P 9e ... �-.. • . 5.3.1 dock, pier gangway and anchor Ile to ttpr'n :R NFu > 3 a ISLAND 2.1.2 Mulkesidential and small craft marina. multi -residential or small -craft marina use shall be 48 -inches. All g g Y p` layout __ ��aP�scD 4 ` x 8a' xiG�•rr�rr f 3 /ACM Et - --- - - -- - - h'�r i - --- -- -.. --- -- --- - - ti0. S f �ti 33 atv foo IslL F other gangway minimum clear width shall be 30 -inches. ti� y, q F �F� oLU SE r COLLras k 5.3.2 '' W�Rr �6,a ti - �'--- YACK cue I VIA QUITO ISLE < > < < 2.1.3 Commercial Passenger, pontoon or float layout (with flotation calculations provided separately}' - Z nRAa� < < rt C C?/'C1 SSC/ 1\119W �/t 7C1y O 2�S , BACBOA 3 ZURICH CIR BAY t i 1 2.2.21 Gangways (brows) for commercial passenger, multi -residential or o �.= Lx. 4'X��' ;� - �..y � I4°f e ISLE 5.3.3 framing details including angles, bent plates, Boit and nal!- �����,,�;�; Isco f y . " >n 2.2 Harbor structures shall conform with %a out Design Guidernes for Small small.craft marina uses shall be equipped with self-closing, self- --- Q F r� y9ti i ... d �q rnorr cue y g fetching gates at the bulkhead end. Gates shall not open into patterns, splices, bumpers, cleats, etc. g o � Y . � U Craft Berthing Facilities" latest edition published by the State. of California 9 9 P i `t.� � i� � -..a f� .� `•• � �A :. �� '.� � • � _-=r�la�ry----i-- f�C'r.`•�U�x�_�r�,;, _m , intersecting walkways. . • _ a BAIBoA De " �a _ ailment of Boating and Waterways Cat Boating), SStreet,------�, ,r-----, � ��c, �uc�. � � ,,u� < ( i NEWPORT .a I01 gPAVILIAY SANTA TALP 9 Y g 5.3.4 knee connectionT }` Sacramento, California 95814; telephone (916) 263-x784, except as modified - - � � ,. � ..••Jo . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ by the City's "Standard Drawings, for Harbor Construction" or as follows: 2.2.22 To steps at the bottom of gangways (brows} for single or joint 5.3.5 guide pile roller assemblies i --_- r - residentia� use shall not exceed 9 inches. Skid resistant toe g - a ; - �- ` ,.F�Nr NEWPORT BAY i plates shall be installed on all othergangways.i ' i 9�,m 3 s 2.2.1 Berths shall not be occupied by vessels more than a beam width p - 5.3.6 pier piles and anchor piles , ��� Por, r v(• BEACH< longer than the berth not larger than the vessel used in design 2.2.23 Railings for single or oint.restdential use steal! be 36 -Inches calculations. g g j • 5.3.7 top of bulkhead and pier deck elevations ' minimum height. All other railings shall be 42 -inches rrirtimum . ; �`_ _ _ __ , ; � � • I - � �, 2.2.2 Maximum length vessel.is the largest vessel that shall be height.. 5.3.8 maximum dredge contours (labeled as such) !S permitted to occupy a berth, L,a 2.2.24 Railings for commercial harbor structures shall be built such that a 5.3.9 Maximum length vessels used in design calculations for each - 2.2.3 Applied loads shall. be calculated for not lower•than a +7,5feet sphere 4 -inches in diameter cannot pass through. berth, (circled within the berth). above MLLW water surface. 2.2.25 Railings for commercial passenger, multi residential or small craft . . marina uses shall be capable of resisting a horizontal force of at 5.4 Harbor permits will be conditioned to. limit the size of vessels berthed in the 2.2.4 Wind loads shall be calculated both parallel to -and perpendicular facility; e.g., "The Harbor Permit for this facility shall be conditioned to allow least 30.pounds per linear foot applied at the top rail. All other , to maximum length vessels and structures, berthing of one -70 foot and three- 45 foot maximum length vessels . . harbor railings shall be capable of supporting a hors ntal force of r 2.2.5 Wind loads on lateral area of vessels or structures shall not be 20 pounds peri{near foot applied at the top rail. 5.5 Future dredging in the vicinity of a permitted harbor facility will be restricted; } fess than 15 pounds per square foot. i e.g., "Dredging not permitted below the contours shown hereon„. PLAN VIEW 11 = 40' :.. : r _.._ ._ ' 2:2.6 Lateral area of vessels for wind toad calculations shah be equal to ` - - - � _ 3 Materials PROJECT ADDRESS,, e 1°et7/ ill. CC�LiS / NW Y (0.15) X (maximum length vessel) X (maximum length vessel) PROCEDURES OWNER NAME: -.CO,� ST_ COM/Il iY CCiLLLGE : 91,S-MC_7' TELEPHONE No: 2.2.7 0 3.1 Materials for harbor facilities shall conform to the "Standard Specifications for E USE ONLY Ten percept (10 !o) of the felt wend load for an unshielded vessel: - - Public Works Construction". published by Building News, Inc..except as PERMIT PROCESSING PROCEDURES shah be applied to each vessel in the lee of the unshielded vessel. modified as follows: SITE PLAN iNSTRUCTIONS -APPROVALS 2.2.8 Guide piles (those that -provide lateral support for floats) shall be 1.. Fill out a Building permit application at the Building Department permit positioned around berthing areas such that the centroid of latera! 3.2 Floatation units shall consist of: counter. Provide a partial site plan in the space provided above drawn to an adequate scale to clearly show the following The following checked W) approvals are required prior to Issuing a Building Permit: information: support provided at the +7.5 foot M ti.W vVater surface elevation 3,2,1 Concrete cast around a solid, closed tell foam core, Approval in Concept Newport Beach Council coincides with the centroid of epplied la'toral toads. t 2; Use city standard harbor construction drawings (cost . $2.00 per sheet). Draw 1. Location and dimension r f proposed structure including piles and location of existing structures on adjacent a site plan showing the scope of work and select the applicable details, Submit Arm Co s of Engineers California Coastal Commission 2.2.9 Pile penetration shall not be less than 10 feet, nor calculated 3.2.2 Fiberglass, cel, oe,polyethylene or plastic shell with a firm fitting solid, engineering calculations as required. Follow the instructions on drawings. properties. y � g penetration plus 3 feet. closed veli foam core, or - 3: Three sets of drawings are required. Do step 2 on three sets or make copies. 2• Location of bulkhead, plerhead and project lines. Public Works Department Building Department 2.2.10 Pile cutoff elevation shall not be lower +i1.Ofeet M LLW. 3.2.3 A solid, closed cell foam core covered with an approved coating 3. Location of property lines. Coon of Orange to prevent physical damage, 4. Permit Technician will process the permit application and charge the plan 2:2.11 Floatation systems andpilesshall be the products of • check fees. - manufacturersand contractors regularly engaged in the 3.3 Timber for decks stiaN have a minimum net thickness of 1 inches. 4. Location of channel markers within 200 feet. ' Site inspection. Site fie -inspection production of such items for marine -construction. 5. One set of drawings is placed in the Building Department plan check stack. 3.4 Walking surfaces of gangways (brows), piers and boats shall have anon -skid �F� 5, Lot sizes and lot numbers, it available. � _ CAN (949) 644.3043 for appointment • The remaining two sets are given to the applicant to carry to Harbor finish, such as punched metal, unpainted timber, or grit.on metal, timber or Resources. 2.2.12 Sufficient flotation shall be provided to support dead load plus 20 piywood 6. Existing ground profile beneath proposed structure pounds per square foot:Yve load with a.freeboard of not less than: CONiiTIt1NS 6. Harbor Resources will review the drawings and stamp the drawings "Approved 3.5 Timber shall be treated witty ammoniacal copper arsenate (ACA) chromated 7. Elevation of fop and bottom of bulkheads and piles with respect to MLLW. - 2.2.12.1 10 -inches -for modular concrete flotation systems for in Concept". copper arsenate (CCA) or ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate (ACZA), perThe Harbor Permit for this facitiiy.shall be (conditioned to altow1he berthing of - Commercial passenger use. AWPA Standard C2. Field cuts and bored holes shall receive a brush coat of 8. Area and profile of any proposed dredging with elevations showing depths with respect of M L.I.W. 7. The applicant will pick up these drawings from Harbor Resources and pursue concentrated CCA, ACA or. ACZA. Number of boats Maximum- boat ler( th 'h 2.2.12.2 8 -inches for modular concrete floatarton systems for all state and federal approvals as required by Harbor Resources. Plan check may 9• Any special conditions affecting the construction or affecting boating operations. _ g feet other uses. 3.6 Timber piles shall be dual -treated per AWPA Standard C3. resume simultaneously while these approvals are pending. 2.2.12.3 3 -inches pontoon freeboard for detached pontoon r t 8. After the Building Department plan check has been completed, the applicant 10. Existing structures shall be shown in light dashes. New work shall be shown In heavy solid lines. - flotation systems for commercial passenger use. 3.7 Rollers shall be fabricated from polyethylene o polyolefin material. will pick up and resolve Building Department corrections. • • 3.8 iron and steel (including fasteners) in harbor structures, except for - - - 2.2.12.4 1 -inch pontoon freeboard for detached pontoon flotation 9. The applicant will resubmit to the Building Department the Building check set reinforcement covered by at least 3 inches of concrete, shalt be stainless steel systems for all other uses. and two sets bearing required state and federal approvals. cW alloy, hot -dip galvanized; or epoxy coated.¢ q�� moa r� gpUD� HARBOR -C-STRt��T�t�N 'STANDARDS 2.2.13. Weight of -treated Douglas Fir shall be assumed to'be 35 pounds g Department will verify that the Building corrections have been �; �" NDA -RDS Ty. B I 10, The Building �,� � '� Cit' OF ��iN��RT g�� BUILDING D���tR�NIEi�'i - u 4 Allowable Stresses 812 - per cubic foot. Weight of sea water shall be assumed to be 64 _ resolved and ail there required federal and state approvals are on the drawings # � � TITRE - >+� g q. PP 9 �JSA (ooSD oar m H ET � SPECIFICATIONS pounds per cubic foot.. and issue the Harbor permit. The Building Department record set must bear all . ,-. °''ttl=oR'r required approvals. d� DWG. SCALE: DATE 2.2.14 -Ringer floats with wood decks shall be equipped with 2 Yrinch 4 4.1 Allowable stresses for harbor structures shall not exceed those recommended ' e NR RESDUR ES >ROVAL - ®F� AS SHOWN AUGUST 25, 2000 minimum diameter steel pipe in the "Unfforrn Building to bars along float centerlines � Code„. �- - Imp* wommo� W. VdINNONOWN WING NO. BY: DATE• SHEET 175117 Our, Twu 8' R/pc- T7;,IrLX'P FZ- 6 ,911 -IG IDIL11\IG D1A4c-1\1'5101\1S o P&L C- h -D.- '=----T,9W1- /0', PIL'5— Z2, - /0' m J 0,,0 =/0,76° 3c .5", Je� L;?, z1Z. 0 0, 0, r 12, 75" l .975 "/ W52ILL California Coastal Cormnission South Coast-nistri uum Uoas,�,stri 0 Ov X ermit .......... B...... . ......... ce FFECrCTI Date:... -.-It/ NO. DATE REVISION: PILING LAYOUT DRAWN BY V. MARINE CONSULTING DESIGN 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 949 642 — 2206 SHEET NO. 4 OF 8 SHEETS DATE sCALZ 0CC SAILING SGHOOL NEWPORT BEACH CALIF J. N. 175117 ke X/O lc;4 C1,4 S- CAI?, 1901-7-5- 90 c 5RZ-1CL::- X4 C919,5�1-19 0 Clr'lllla 18' J3 416 - K 8& 0 Clk'IA16� ), 0C C -0. ................ 014 51RLlce WALK A-23 ;21 '5 (5,49, 90Z. 77,5" ee 2 X /9 F,4CIA.-> C,4'jC?, /30/ 7:5-2- IT9 a.el'. 90 7-1-1 1 W,4),Il xe" ted N�/LSA ; : !S"6C• Lcl;?IAJGecp Ll t XT/ \TIIZ 4,y(, 7 2 X,6 r v \1 IV 100/,/700/,/ /0-0 - 2Y4 C09911VO ' -�P, C I y THry rle-1,9rC -X7. I -:Z W000 3,4r,5 V 2 X /Z 54C1,45 6 Ig"o. C., Ifs, WP ��r' Z. TY,-, 7Ne006Y-OUT I-RO.I,--C7- EC 7-101V 0 x C. D2Fa-<'11lX;l .5 � I Af w vl\ 'Pat c'' F053 PoN7'00/V PoNTooiN PONTOON x6 Dl-ickll-l(g L -X, 7'aa7 EP I-LYW00-10 -- l \ E 3-4 Xo 16-W VAILS-/-"0, C. -F07" YVOY5TX 1c'4c14g O-T— PNT(I)olkl Icj Sf- CT/OV 16, d M41L 0 6 # 0 C 7)4RO T -;4TED EXT 14';Kyw000 914rl- SEC 770"(c C �7D�7- " 1 1( FUV700" 7- CAR. 80LT5- eX3 cAllBeiNG - 1Gd NQICs a,0.6., rqRZJ 11,'7RC-,-q7W,0 EX7-. RILYWOOP BATS -ALL 4 -slDc-s'. XC, FTRIAZ -,e5 )C,4e, 901 rS S 2X6 -s7;PIG 3x4 0,919-511-16' t-cuoki d- I 6'1yl1A1 90L T!57 1C-lC,-e wo FACIA f f 4 Y&�4 tl YC- !�PZICC- /i 4 e-'llz MWCA1. E0Z.T9Pz---R 01 900 CLllt'--' 41-r Ag"'130ZTS I I][ V's 4 Y6 Sr,01A1G&-,0 r '2 x c' ac--reil"u 0 -sI -p'4c111vc �7 4 x 6 Flb5 Ce&S //,(g 4 WALK M,40-1 EOLT2�* P,5R .oil x SPL /cr ab S"5' i F TIT 0 cz//1 re -7z5 1 4 wa X6 10. Z1111IN All IIN .0 . .01 .0. c). a. .Or -0. /Z FAC1,4S (- 11-4/6 '- 0 V6 RLIOC�Aa"cl 0 PACIAIS e-0 CAA� SOLTS OX 6 0Z:CA'1AAG 4"S W'4L K '6 3IS11 6 SD y 8 1 Vil VN I PON 3X 41 CRIOSWI;' 16d AIA11-5 K -D O. C• T/-1201 / )`;'LYW00D Z?,4TS, ,qLL 4 5; S;f- ij�r- Af coo :5 co inil 0 3 mr, I it W-5 A (a 0 ISO FE B 10 2004 4*� Rze6_1 SHEET NO. DRAWN BY NO. DATE REVISION: FRAMING DETAILS DATEMARINE CONSULTING & DESIGN 5 SCALE 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 OCC SAILING SCHOOL T' NEWPORBEACH, CA.J. N. , 3.1,03 949 642 - 2206 OF 8 SHEETS aloft 2 X /9 rA C145 .4 X S7R1V6C-R5 24"4, C. -;r4c6nq z%" EXT PIC YWO 00 �j FUV700" 7- CAR. 80LT5- eX3 cAllBeiNG - 1Gd NQICs a,0.6., rqRZJ 11,'7RC-,-q7W,0 EX7-. RILYWOOP BATS -ALL 4 -slDc-s'. XC, FTRIAZ -,e5 )C,4e, 901 rS S 2X6 -s7;PIG 3x4 0,919-511-16' t-cuoki d- I 6'1yl1A1 90L T!57 1C-lC,-e wo FACIA f f 4 Y&�4 tl YC- !�PZICC- /i 4 e-'llz MWCA1. E0Z.T9Pz---R 01 900 CLllt'--' 41-r Ag"'130ZTS I I][ V's 4 Y6 Sr,01A1G&-,0 r '2 x c' ac--reil"u 0 -sI -p'4c111vc �7 4 x 6 Flb5 Ce&S //,(g 4 WALK M,40-1 EOLT2�* P,5R .oil x SPL /cr ab S"5' i F TIT 0 cz//1 re -7z5 1 4 wa X6 10. Z1111IN All IIN .0 . .01 .0. c). a. .Or -0. /Z FAC1,4S (- 11-4/6 '- 0 V6 RLIOC�Aa"cl 0 PACIAIS e-0 CAA� SOLTS OX 6 0Z:CA'1AAG 4"S W'4L K '6 3IS11 6 SD y 8 1 Vil VN I PON 3X 41 CRIOSWI;' 16d AIA11-5 K -D O. C• T/-1201 / )`;'LYW00D Z?,4TS, ,qLL 4 5; S;f- ij�r- Af coo :5 co inil 0 3 mr, I it W-5 A (a 0 ISO FE B 10 2004 4*� Rze6_1 SHEET NO. DRAWN BY NO. DATE REVISION: FRAMING DETAILS DATEMARINE CONSULTING & DESIGN 5 SCALE 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 OCC SAILING SCHOOL T' NEWPORBEACH, CA.J. N. , 3.1,03 949 642 - 2206 OF 8 SHEETS 175117 gl PILL:- GUID !X �.,, GAG 13oL7 -:5l 8 J -4 X0 X45- 3 90 C�,1p LSAL y`'/9 eOLTS l'4x6 , /�TS' /'77 5A CL ISG CZ -ASS 490 CI<," 4! Op J'02s/ON B.4I2 2 X6 OCGK 2X6 2 -4 X6 577-Rds 2 t 2X/2 F.�G4S /PC1/JTOON 3 X4 C21F,&-11 3 16d /((,4JL5 e 6 ,, o' 0. Ty,2U SL CTION ,G . s1 i C19R, Y12 s`T21A'16f-''S ?-)'6 BLOC1CIIV(' Y4 C'121e, IAIG 2 X ST12/1tilGt e 154- 9 L 0/,/0 7OMS10AI P,4k-5- o /7 I 8 SAIK IAIG CL A .9.5 DQ Cl-<' 4 X6 F'/GG a!2/1�131�1G 2x/2 F•4C/A __-_ 2 X( LOCA y fI' FC.4.VG , - xC- sr�/,UGL P 90 ` CG /F Gr FYPICX T0,ew10A/ 13,412 COl &VE -C 7101Y NO. DATE REVISION: _,.,___ _ _.--_. FRAMING DETAILS OCC SAILING SCHOOL 3r7 , 30 14-11\1GE2 S r�� l 1 0 ov V ` / � o �c X 1= XI.S'T 4 X c S% f2//VGL:"e-5 Lw CX1ST. 2x6 S7-10WIV 7ol 41X/7// cP� k 1 f ... ♦_ •.x �m %7' GA1\1swAy L.AIlz)ll\IG Z X12 19gc-z4S 2fz j x Y1 Z X6 Fl, 3/8y=lf }tla� lL 3B1 k 3% 005 Tl " F E B 1 0 2004 DRAWN BY DATE SCALE NEWPORT BEACH, CA. N. 3,1.03 MARINE CONSULTING & DESIGN 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 949 642 — 2206 - JU t SHEET NO. - 6 OF 8 5HEETS 175117 �i i _J � 1 � C, -36'1b94 "F6R1A4c-T6P"9VA4PER B cole-R gu"F&Rs, 6/v L 'BOLT BOLT BOLT LENGTH BASE SIZE H WEIGHT PART LENGTH SIZE SPACING IN CLEAT C 0 HEIGHT POUNDS NUMBER 10" 3/8" 2-1/4 1-7/8 1-3/4 4 2-5/8 3 5110S STANDARD 12" 3/8" 3-3/16 2-1/2 1-3/4 5 3-1/4 4.2 5112S WEIGHT 14 112" 3-3/8 2-1/2 2-1/4 6-3/8 3-5/8 6.5 5114S 18" 5/8" 4-5/8 3-5/8 3, 7-5/8 4-3/8 13 5118S COA177 MEDIUM WT. 12" 1/21' 2-5/8 2-11/16 2-5/8 4-3/4 3-1/2 7.5 5112M 0 CO) 18 (10" 1/2" 2-1/2 2-7/8 2-1/2 4-1/2 3-1/2 6.5 5110H HEAVY SHIP '12„ 5/8" 3-5/16 2-7/8 3 6-7/8 3-3/4 11.5 5112H AND DOCK 1511 3/4" 3-1/2 3-1/8 3-1/2 7 4-3/8 14 5115H 18" 3/411 3-1/2 4 4 7-1/2 4-3/4 21 5118H 1124" 7/8" 4-1/2 13 35 5124H L- ALL CLEAT BOLT HOLES HAVE HEXIGON RECESSES SO THAT 41o BOLT HEADS ARE FLUSH WITH --j A THE TOPS OF THE CLEATS. 0 v u Rs Tj DS4,;pc-'0114 c- Tc- /e IL 604015'e. 9-10"CZC-A7-S Ca) /9 /10. C .4*12- ovc;p .4x6 C0011czp 9014F,51e ()/v ALL 0Vr31DC- 421 M 2UM �,L:;- 9;re1,0,p1NG JJIV&C-SS ,930AI-F G)QAPf-- YhVY4,, SrAIV,014 PV C5 2,6o - (e 0, 5;q4L& SC- 094 CLL--ATS: ,4tL C&C-4TS' 511Ae-L- 1 -3,C - CLE/ T -T AS S1-10W1V,,4?- BE 1461VD�5-P-901V 1TC--11-7 �*&04 OR C-01J4L, California Coastal Commission South Coast pl-),istric lt9f P- '7 V D, e en -nit ............ outh Coast 4Pstric,, V D rmjtj By: .... . ............ EFFECrI Date: -----ll.- HO/P --- q -------- 1 1 �; I �A #60SO FEB 10 Z004 E NO. DATE REVISION: CLEAT & BUMPER LAYOUT 0 C C SAILING SCHOOL NEWPORT BEACH CALIF DRAWN BY SHEETNO. , MARINE CONSULTING & DESIGN. 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 8 949 642— 2206 or 8 -SHEETS_] DATrv,/:,/,y SCALE - /0 /0 ,.N. 3 1'03 HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-644-3034 / Fax 949-723-0589 Pier Permit Conditions April 4, 2006 Property Address: 1801 W. Coast Hwy., Newport Beach, CA With reference to the plans currently under consideration to reconfigure or modify the dock system, the following conditions will now be in effect on the above referenced pier. 1. The pier permittee is aware of the Harbor Permit Policies and Chapter 17 of the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code. The pier permittee understands that the above referenced pier is under the purview of these Policies and Codes. 2. Any future work on the above mentioned pier requires permits with the City of Newport Beach and any other applicable agencies. Painting, replacement of rub rails and work considered to be cosmetic in nature does not require a permit. 3. The conditions set forth in this document pertain to the current, proposed dock system under consideration. Any future modifications or alterations to the dock system may require new conditions which may override or change these conditions. These conditions supersede all past conditions associated with this property. 4. Only marine oriented uses are allowed on the pier, pier platform, gangway and float. Patio furniture, plants etc ... are not permitted. 5. The side property lines extend in the water along their same bearing. No moored vessel shall encroach on these lines. 6. The dock float will be permitted to extend to, but not cross the U.S. Pierhead Line. 7. A moored vessel may not extend beyond the end of the fingers by more than the width of ifs beam. 8. Moored vessels shall comply with all applicable municipal Fire Codes re: U At'/ 0 d o t) , ) )L,- 41&/0(0 Mike Ur&, Harbor Signature Print Name Date Joint Pier Applicant Signature (if applicable) Print Name Date 175117 y/ -s7-, k/c, NO. I DATE I REVISION: v 4-1-- •-! 1 DRAWN BY PLOT --PLAN DATE f/.�1 �� SCALE lfr=lnl NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF].J. N. 'g.1,03 0 C C SAILING SGH-0 COL /VOTE' ::O,o Df- 7X/L.57, I,VZ-D E- x PZ- 07- FLAAJ 3, powTooAl L,4Y06T Ply ING Z-14)"1007- PPXMIIG FleoFILC-19 fLf--A7- 9044PE-,e L,4yOL1T S 3812 _5A 0&05c' MARINE CONSULTING & DESIGN 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 949 642 — 2206 -SHEET P40- 2 OF 8 S'1'rsTS Its 110 � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 02/24/2005 FINAL LETTER - COMPLETE HARBOR RESOURCES - 829 Harbor Island Dr., Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tom Rossmiller - 949-644-3041 / Chris Miller - 949-644-3043 FIRE DEPARTMENT - P.O. Box 1768, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Nadine Morris - 949-644-3105 OCC INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING & ROWING B ATTN: BRAD AVERY 1801 W. COAST HIGHWAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 Dear Commercial Pier Permittee, Permit number: HC2004-040 Location : 1,801.00 W COAST HWY Status: CLOSED This is an acknowledgement letter stating that you have successfully corrected the violations previously noted in the City report that was sent to you earlier this year. Your docks have met the minimum standards as set by The City of Newport Beach Municipal Code. Your actions will help reduce the potential for fire related injury and property damage in Newport Harbor. Please remember that it will be your responsibility to ensure that your docks maintain this level of safety in the years to come. The Harbor Resources and Fire Departments will be conducting routine inspections of your property in the future. Thank you for your compliance. Please feel free to give us a call if you should have any additional questions. CHRIS MILLER - HARBOR RESOURCES SUPERVISOR NADINE MORRIS - FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR Page 1 of 2 &fi CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 02/24/2005 FINAL LETTER - COMPLETE e�+.tit°i�M'Y6� HARBOR RESOURCES - 829 Harbor Island Dr., Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tom Rossmiller - 949-644-3041 / Chris Miller 949-644-3043 FIRE DEPARTMENT - P.O. Box 1768, Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Nadine Morris - 949-644-3105 OCC INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING & ROWING B ATTN: BRAD AVERY 1801 W. COAST HIGHWAY NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663 DATE COMMENTS Permit number: HC2004-040 Location : 1,801.00 W COAST HWY Status: CLOSED ultiple Berthing 10/13/2004 All boats shall be readily removed in an emergency without the necessity of moving other boats. At the time of the inspection, two Whalers were docked in the narrow channel along the eastern most side of the property. Also, two vessels were rafted on an end tie and the Alaskan Eagle was blocked. Other vessels were rafted or nested. NFPA 303 Chapter 5 Section 5.1.1 11/19/2004 Multiple Berthing Action Plan is Approved. Implementation by January 30, 2005. CHRIS MILLER - HARBOR RESOURCES SUPERVISOR NADINE MORRIS - FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR Page 2 of 2 I Zoe iW 10 #,I lat I A V, I Novembe - November 12, 2004 Bruce Tice The School of Sailing & Seamanship/Orange Coast College 1801 W. Coast Hwy. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Subject: 1801 W. Coast Hwy. - Multiple Berthing Action Plan Permit Number HC2004-040 Dear Mr. Tice: I am in receipt of your letter dated November 4, 2004, regarding the issue of multiple berthing occurring at the above subject facility. Your correspondence states that multiple berthing will be discontinued at this facility. We appreciate your concern for the safety of the harbor and the decision to change your business practice to comply with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 303). This action plan submitted is approved and required to be implemented by January 30, 2005. Please contact Nadine Morris at (949) 644-3105 if you have any questions. During the next reinspection of your facility, the fire extinguisher and dock maintenance violations will be verified for compliance. Thank you for your cooperation. We look forward to achieving a fire safe harbor in Newport Beach. Sincerel Timothy Riley Fire Chief The School of SAILING &SEAMANSHIP \ Orange Coast College November 4, 2004 V�e-L-1-0 Fire Chief Riley Newport Beach Fire Department P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658 Dear Chief Riley, At the request of the Harbor Resources Office, I'm writing to inform you of our corrective measures for the various violations at our facility noted on October 13th Multiple Berthing — The fleet has been downsized. Two large vessels have been sold and several smaller vessels have been put in storage at our yard in Costa Mesa. The two Boston Whalers specifically mentioned in the Corrections Report belong to U.C.I. and their staff has been advised to remedy the situation. Fire Extinguishers — An adequate number of 3-A:40-B:C dry chemical extinguishers have been ordered and will be placed on the floats with the appropriate hardware and spacing so as not to exceed the maximum travel distance of 75 feet. Walkways and float access — The offending rowing machines and dock boxes have been reconfigured and/or moved to provide the minimum lateral clearance of 24" for emergency personnel and equipment. Thank Bruce 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ■ 949-645-9412 ■ Fax 949-645-1859 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FIRE MARINE DEPARTMENT HARBOR PERMITAPPLICATION(Please print all information) 1. Applicant (P erty Owner) Add ess Telephone AP c �. e o A. _ J _ i, 1 I_ _ e P e n /1 I C-,-% 2. roject A dress (Street Address) ( Harbor Permit Number 3. New Construction Revision Maintenance' V Dredging 4. Fee �N � , Check No. 10R - Date 42.1 5. Brief Description of Proposed o _ p'he n0,J,*NA(_t96(. 6. Submit 8 1/2" x 11" Drawings (3), Include: 1). Location and dimension of proposed structure including piles and location of existing -structures. on adjacent. properties. 2). Location of bulkhead, pierhead and project lines 3). Location of property lines. 4). Location of channel markers within 200 feet. 5). Lot sizes and lot numbers, if available. - 6). 'Existing ground profile beneath proposed structure. 7). Elevation of top and bottom of bulkheads and piles with respect:to -M.L.L.W. 8). Area and profile of any proposed dredging with elevations showing depths with respect of M.L`:L.W. 9). Any special. conditions affecting the construction or affecting boating operations. 10).Complete all information required in information block, bottom of sheet. Note that the.OWNER. . of the property is the applicant. 11). Drawing size shall be 8 -1/2" x 11". 12).Scale shall be adequate to clearly show the above. information. 13).Existing structures shall be shown in light dashes. New work shall be shown in heavy. solid lines: 7. Owner -Builder Declaration must be co (on re side -of this sheet) - 8. Applicant's/Agent's Signature: Date: Joint Permittee Signature.(If applicable): Dater 9. Work can begin once the City has received evidence of the following.additional approvals and you have . . been notified to proceed. If you begin- prior to the notice you -will be in violation of the..Newport Beach Municipal Code and subject to penalties. . 10. Your permit will -not. be final until we have conducted an on .site inspection --.once construction is completed as per Municipal Code, Section 17.24, if we have not been contacted fora -final inspection. . OFFICE USE ONLY Approval in Concept. Date Approval of the -City of Newport Beach Council: Date Approval of the Army Corps of Engineers Date Approval of the California Coastal Commission. Date Approval of the City's Public Works Department. Date Approval -.of the City's Building Department. Date Approval of County of Orange. Date Electrical and/or plumbing permit (Building Department) Date ��Site sued. (Permit is stamped drawing) DateInspection. (call 644-3043 for appointment) Date Site Re -Inspection Date Conditions: OWNER -BUILDER DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the contractor's license law for the following reasons: (Sec. 7031d.5, Business and professions Code). Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior; to.its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provision of the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000, of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) .or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty for not more than five hundred dollars ($500). I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who. builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or. through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale). I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensed contractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts -for such projects who builds or improves. thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a Contractor(s) License pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Sec. of Business and. Professional Code for this reason: Owner's Signature: Date: Contractor: P. L7�elephone: Address: License class: State Board No. 5 ®A —City License NoR R® Z 42'?e2:7 License Contractor's Declaration I hereby affirm that I am licensed er provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Bus' ss a Prof ions Code, and my license is in full force and effect. Date: Contractor's Signature f qT_ APPROVED BY: DATE OCHD El ENGR COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. El / pyo NS i SPECIAL CONDITIONS: IADDRESS OF PROOPO ED FACILITY 1�]//]ii}C PERMIT N� wt TELEPHONE V FEE ` CHECK NO. Z D APPLICATION S�IS HEREBY MADE FOR A HARBOR PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT /REVISE /� �^��" ✓� • d, AT THE ABOVE LOCATION IN"ACCO DANCE WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PER�MI/zq POLICI/ESANDD THE AT/JyA/C�Ij[`ED�DR��.A�]W-I-N/Cyyy�y/ BY l�l�" C—"" ,� Cf' DATED DATE SIGNATURE IC� i/J/ • �/ / CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. Wx FORM se -iota ._..e.:_._..._.._.._.._._.._._._.._.._._.- -_.._._-_-._.._.�._.._._.._.._.._�.._.:r �.�. PoRT CITY ,OF NEWPORT BEACH RECEIPT � NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92663 No. t IV 1� - -19 DATE - RECEIVED FROM 1.8-cs CP•[x-c�'- - tiX@-�1 1 . C.,slo 0 • t7 C� - ACCOUNT NO- - - AMOUNT ✓.�.U.11 V` ���� J / - - - - - DEPARTMENT!_�11.J_--{3_..�. SY t CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MARINE DEPARTMENT November 24, 1980 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ITEM NO.: i4 14 FROM: Marine Department SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION #129-1801 FOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING Recommendation: If desired, approve the maintenance dredging application. Discussion: The application requires City Council approval under the conditions of approval placed on the City of Newport Beach general permit for maintenance dredging issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, on February 12, 1974, and subsequently amended on May 10, 1977, to allow beach restoration. The location and applicant for the proposed dredging and beach restoration is: 129-1801 Intercollegiate Sailing & Rowing Base 1801 West Coast Highway The staff has reviewed the project and has determined that the work will be done within the parameters of the Corps of Engineers' permit. Th_ ar 'o --o -� 443r�. There is no known eel grass in the vicinity of the project. All.dredged material will be hauled to sea and dumped. DAVID HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Tony Melum Tidelands Administrator TMak 20 1 su +tXX o ii 1A.U,. W. eLj=-v/s'TlOt j /„r, 6ao ac VILA -r%e VQA P ►JE`vF'L�T t31�•f-•C6..tiF�V � 0 Vt- 1 _ter Qhw ulaE pACIFIC- � I �cts-r,+•� e�� Kum ; J FLL&"r -- 4F--. m SZd.120) 1'_ t ,t Q I i G��� i I i 1 tat 7 uw 0.5' FRI.Dit " T Ltu+ i t -C —re `- u? J6 v w .45C.61E- / R2pOir 44,(y CO T I IV -F1 a� -. ?r p to cc M.LL1V I I L- I, �fj� fLV%�� i Id?, 33°36_\-�\�Y \iJ►\ \� r7lA�• e M.L.�.w: P%xf�C r CK1�TCKG r I o��O DiLELYaED `� URL�utitO PI�RY..aE.fl s6CTco�.-n sc�Ls MOKI eLMMA SU:µ Cr jaTE : KK> 02EDCalkla RVQ1xf2r---D) P/sCIF�� GOL��-C •�,,„. �- PROPOSED a IFLOATADOI Flo a c r -- I I .-I 1 - +l I. TR>✓OOIXVR%LZE:, If/Fk(LSJI IIllL(i4_�1LJ �� 57'+ r - -�J II '1I • I . �5' 14Ifc+ PRDPo3ED /-Nwc4AOR PILE o U.S..I T LI(.7� LAS 2EQUL2EC713 -1 >��v u FST A PR.OP05F.D PLONr ,, �o ->ED / I?,.FLOCj`T40M 4 ADD1-C101`1S PROPOSED RELOCATION" 18 Reoc EoliT� yS1lLlhlG MAMC)ROVIMG 56, p 1 \WEST C OAST 141 G HNVV/� OF EX'IS11 NG LsEwPoszr �E�cH ,:.CALM•=oszulA FLOAT i ;oaST COMMUNITY. COLLEGE dlszwcf JP - 1,5 -70 Aoauls �v50 fmc y `ales ��' w ,Y PRdFE981D a.Lf �TNVAAONMEVJ(�AL EidfQi ad:. nia . � 1qz`' e ok�ot2,*iaa° 1No�pA, &TrreFi*�J �y,otta��arv,'rKd» �roaee d r. "F. A' CITY OF NEWPORT REACH HARBOR PERMTCONSTRUCIjoA PERMISSION IS 3=E' c4r-.BY E',v33diNTED TO CO'NSTRUCT'- alum ikiJailMTA1F! TIlc. F3f a� a Y St,/ `' Cr n DATE �� # z c � AT THE SITE i�aa`� a: !� .y ar �' ]E�a1:C3i, ' _ _.d-,. f _ ! --•-- ...... . TF1$ > . Or �,t:s: << u .:� z... SEE ATTACHED SHE , .:� � _ACH Allt. C { V a +. 5 M f4D rW i-� ) �1A J.: • ! L�'iVii.. 1., �1i35' LET 7yy , A;z T %T ir i, 10 4 � 'frig' C,' �'o � s�u+y�� -,,,, , � ,y,:?L � ,a1.,?•,s'a.�.3 '�;.� �lU3i' 2 Tri �i £ ,,�. AND @ 9� r I a fia 9 d�; S a t:�r,�" ONLN �� sA l�� l r as � . � � s i$I. a.�9L"1 CIL IN ACCt3fitf.+aRP&CE aal� �'iTLlE SICONDITIONS: 17 Cb; TI-iE 2"AU iiCiPAL CODE, Cor Ps of Engineers Permit'g, County Permit 9-41 T HARBOR C06—,R FN 0R /910l ��'I��•r:SC�J2C� (0 4 - 7 1'EBAlilr NO. DAT�E u.-;,. ICK 4� lul 1 Z4.5± -Ts), 5ULKHE.&D + 4D.C. M.1..L-W -W I ii 4i �.= -", �so, V=WITY LA/ -%.4= e Le -\/A -r to w / "-- &,o' I vi v :low 911-051C aKr=71�4 eULk�Aff/-Dl 4z-- - - - - - - "I PIZ1,67 11 5ul-K"eAp UQF- 70 -TO 94,4 1 1 C,O V +�L 4 z > A;r e4D Uwe LJ ----I —L--' I j jzg I let U-,S.vf?Djm=T uup- ED n 00000 OrAOS. 4-7?wq(,o u.5. 1�1 tiy,d t U.S. CI lu I 6Ut KNE&D I t I M. L1:0W — — F.- ELPEVAMOKI N Q VIGIJITV AA^-F=VE � Q/�V ul.iE P/�Cl FIG CMS -T 1alG�-1�VGY •• - a PAO" �--- - - I ( I Ex tt-tc 5UIOC14F�O _ --- I ecc wuticNl►sc, p. t I t Gj � j R,a1rlP i � i P�T 10 13' LIZ! I {e± ,Q OF lf�U STOVG =, D � BION. (C6#OVAL OF I✓ O �� C�iES7 Ce `fir ��E RLI N bS! MOVE o �1 FTC- C 8A,] S CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERMIT ANID r IE CE TT.O gM,.%U.ER.OF. IS H M'.. SHOWN R. ' IVY AINTAW ME FA s of A HE INDICATED. No SITE INI D T 1 S ERMIT tg= THE HARBOR P HERE ANY S E= IS A;= S 140T==�g= COUNCIL THS HFE rry "OR I= ff ARE ;:%SWSICVEoMLY O=D T S R UN uNclL �8: OF THE MUNICIpAl. SDE. THIS PERMIT MA:7E REV, KED By IN ACCORDANCEW D RE PERMIT NO. >L C r a AD S r w I) G a a ii PHI ^J I yr 2 H l C AGENDA ITEM T Ri 15 M I TTA L AGENCY/ DEPT. CLERK USE ONLY CAO REVIEW CONSENT 0 YES ,l Concur r ❑ NO ❑ Do Not Concur f 1-1 Exempt BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF ORANGE CONTACT FOR INFORMATION )M• EMA D. Rosso --- 7064 _ - Nares--- -----_ --�F— — :ETING DATE SUBJECT SUPV. DIST. JU L 13 1985 Intercollegiate Rowing Base - Lower Newport Bay and Lease to Orange Coast College 5 MMARY OF REQUEST (Description for agenda) oast Community College District, lessee of County's Intercollegiate Rowing Base in Newport arbor requests approval of addition of classrooms and observation deck to facility and Iso extension of current lease for a new 10 year term. DITIONAL DATA: ince 1953, College District has operated the existing facility as a base for intercollegiate owing and sailing activities, with classes open to all persons and use of facilities shared ith other universities and colleges. n February 6, 1979, the Board of Supervisors approved a 10 -year, rent-free lease to Coast Dmmunity College District for additional development of facility to provide expanded cean-oriented programs to the public. The base is located in Lower Newport Bay on 1.49 cres of County -owned tidelands. Coast Community College has submitted plans for classroom rid observation deck additions for County approval as required by lease, and in addition as requested extension of current lease for a new 10 -year term. _ (continued on reverse side) =VIOUS RELEVANT BOARD ACTIONS ON THIS SPECIFIC ITEM - ane JDING SOURCE(S) CURRENT YEAR COS7t ANNUAL COSTUB DGETED? YES NO /A -0- -0- N/A L PROPOSAL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL? CONSISTENT WITH BOARD POLICY? NO IF YES,STATE NUMBER PERMANENT LIMITED TERM OX YES ❑ NEW ITEM_ OR EXCEPTION ,OMMENDED ACTION - Approve plans for proposed improvements to Coast Community College District Sailing and Rowing Base in lower Newport Bay as submitted. Authorize GSA prepare lease amendment for a new 10 -year lease term. JCURRENCES (If applicable) ATTACHMENTS 1) Location Map 3P Commissic�rr'�"""-` Cty Newport Beach } 2) Letter of Request 2/28/85 of 3) Proposed Plans DATE AGENCY OR DEPARTMENT AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Additional Data Continued College District proposes construction of improvements to existing facility to include addition of two classrooms on second floor and of "navigation bridge" atop existing boat storage area (plans attached). Plans include replacement restrooms and minor landscape/ walkway improvements. Total of approximately 5,000 square feet of building space, decks, classrooms and restrooms would be added. Project development and construction, as well as operations and maintenance expenses through extended term of lease would be at no cost to County. Clause 9 of lease, 11CONSTRUCTION AND/OR ALTERATION BY TENANT," specifies that improvements within Demised Premises must be approved by Director, EMA. EMA believes improvements as proposed by College District exceed scale of the previous improvement plans approved by the Board for the site, and therefore consideration and approval by Board of Supervisors is ap- propriate. Existing facility is 6,129 square feet, proposed improvements would add approxi- mately 2,500 square feet of usable floor area to building and approximately 1,500 square feet of deck area. The current 10 -year, rent .free lease will expire in 1989. Staff feels that request to extend the lease, with a new 10 -year term beginning 1985, is compatible with. Board policy for revenue lease extensions adopted March 5, 1985, given the added level of public service to beprovided by the proposed capital investment. Proposal also constitutes an extension of past policy to utilize subject Newport Bay Tidelands parcel (as well as nearby parcel/Boy Scouts" Sea Scout Base) on a rent free lease basis to non-profit organizations providing and financing ongoing specialized recreational services to the public. However, it is noted that this policy use precludes alternative development of parcel for possible lease/concession uses that could generate revenues to County's Newport Bay Tidelands Fund. Current Newport,Bay Tidelands revenues are insufficient to fully finance associated annual operating expenses. As a result, such unfinanced expenses (about $150,000 annually), plus any periodic dredging or capital improvement needs are subsidized by Coi.mty's ]iar.bors, Beaches and Parks District. It is further noted that such subsidy of Newport Bay Tidelands expenses commensurately increases HBPD4s need for allocations from County's Special Districts Augmentation Fund to finance current levels of HBPD services. On March 27, 1985 at a regular meeting, the Harbors, Beaches and Parks Commission considered the request and recommended Board approval. The City of Newport Beach has also reviewed the project and. indicated they have no interest or concerns. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA: Negative Declaration IP 85-040 has been issued and will become final on July 12, 1985. The proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 12- t/ N~,,00,er de-4CIV ro. Low Beoch /Il�fl' � Q p • A !.s •,o' / /wc rao X40. OQ Coto.v.. SA P V I C I f V I T Y SKETCH w[,. Jinr NawPOQr (JAY CAt woaN1A s J[rry 66 So 4/no'in95 ore nd dinole &ORiA5 be/ow Mcor1 Lavaiar Low Wo O'er. Moxi...civ, ronye of 1lde 4 Prw Xi.rr��e/y �O !iei Nor bor �r %!Cs /h:s are es�ob/i'shed�in SCC/ioo Qor 1/ew�r/ Bar All �unTy o� e, ---y If j i { I 2� J� re'r Cl, % (!5m.44 ul Aaw -0 •!.e 7 A 8 L G P!7 ../ .e► oDkMSS • /PO/ A -%O? 10' sT /�/ Co•VrR.+cTo CM OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERMIT PERMISSION IS HERrSY GRANTED TO CONSTRUCT ANC MAINTAlk' THE FAZ�Eulyy ON TME . REVERSE HEREOF AT THE S9TE u K 1�,Cp, SUE-iECT TO Ti' r: r-PoViSIONS 0, THE HARSOR P. -RVAT PCL, n%ACH AN, ANY V S N, SJR 't A K �F z-. p BL E 'Af 2S U 17 'r, L E t T F E Ci'G Y HA -,R' t�,' CiTY COUNI'L. TC, RiGFTS GAIE,:T4 U.NIVER, TH"E'S :UMC PrR1Tii!;E'iVZ CNIL AND T11 -20S PERFINT UA AY PC-" REVOKED By THE C,Ty IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17N"CiPAL CODE. TPF- MU CITY HARBOR COO 129- 1801 -312B/73 SPECIAL COMMONS: Cer I Ps Of Engineers Permit 1/28/83 orairi,gp M. c"Gur"_i " �7 � ermit Other Dredged material to be barged to sea PERMIT NO. LZ L/—td DREDGING APPLICATION Project Location: 1801 West Coast Hwy Cubic Yards to be Dredged: 266 . Method of Dredging: Hydraulic Suction Nature'of Dredged Material: Sand/Silt Disposition of. Dredged. Material: Haul to Sea and dump at Latitude 33"31'42"N, Longitude 117°54'48"W Method of Material Disposition:• Barge to sea Turbidity Control Method: Material to be contained in Dump Barge at dredge site. Effect of dredging on contiguous bulkheading and beaches None I, Laverne Harris , hereby state that I have read the U. S. Army (print name) Corps of Engineers permit for maintenance dredging in Newport Harbor, the City of Newport Beach and Orange County Harbors,Beaches and Parks District (if applicable) permit for maintenance dredging and that I accept all the provisions therein. Additionally I guarantee that the proposed dredging will not occur because of any altering of existing use of the affected zone. Intercollegiate Sailing & Rowing Base Oranize Coast Colle e Shellmaker, Inc. (Applicant -type name Contractor -type name) (Date) Signed:f Contractor's Representative Shellmaker, Inc. has a valid permit from the Water Quality Control Board., Cl 7K c,=- 1V2x,V,,z7©>Pr 56-4C,41 �to•v Beoch - Ni�f9'' 0 �F21 `a < p/ p ai�� o R T i,« •� �.r � � •wcQOA D /d4 A'vD Q 00 � Gam'e MA VICIMITY SKETCH "'if°jgrr, Nswvocir 13AY CAt iroaP.11A 5ouoidle)95 ore e.tOressed .n Adel and aonafa dep/hs below r-con Go,ver Low Wa fdr, y%oxssKJaar rar9e of d/c% gPprc�R.rnOa�•�/y /D �,r•a� /-�csr.bor /.r7C5 Ore c Yo6/."5hed Yn i(/yis secl,orl O�N¢w�erf e3 a) e �3 - X v o-.; Ty 1 / c a ell f-----I 1 li_ � _I I r / y �"7T'e r G'7G �' eP 1 ,1 R TL,. +✓�¢ / i/�cj e O ,�✓Y �'-•,�' ', e � � G%r7r"YY/ l'S Oc<J✓�,�-i +t�J7 Gc .:.a� ../ ry �. L:J +'% ., %`fp "� r/T�. i C0 A17-,fA CT0 CITY OF NEWPORT HARBOR PERMIT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO Ct)NSTFUCT AND MA!NTAIN THE FACHA-a"Y sqnoy�!�4 0,z TRZ HER70F, AT THE SITL UVENICATIZC�,, THE KARPCx? ANY SPECiAL M NOT .HE CZTY AND VVi-y co,,Jlmc� IN ACCORDANCE %,Vis'.H TiTLE` 17 OF THE EWUNICIPAU CODE. CITY x5zl — 40 / PERMIT NO. DATE SPECIAL CONDITIONS09 Corps of Engineers Permit 7 Orange County Permit otilern- Cc -2 90 SPLCO-N 1W CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053 Orange Coast College ATTN: Dean David A. Grant 2701 Fairview Road Costa Mesa, California 92525 Gentlemen: 18 May 1977 Reference is made to your request of 3 May 1977 (77-158). Upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers and under the provisions of Section 10 of the River and Harbor Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), you are hereby authorized by the Secretary of the Army to relocate existing floats and piling at 1801 West Coast Highway, Lot H, Tract 919, in Newport Bay, Pacific Ocean, City of Newport Beach, Orange County, California, as shown on the attached drawing and subject to the attached conditions (a) through (v). Notice of the commencement of the activity must reach this office at least five (5) days before the activity actually starts. Please use the inclosed forms. BY AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 1 Incl ROBERT H. REINEN Work Status Forms (dupe) LTC, CE Acting District Engineer • r z.U.11b, lot� � I C 24.5± � I -1 CD I j I �IJCHEhD + .O t0 a E�g711JG 1 EL6ED 4Rr�uti o P RnP�-� �C� ��cLicsz F�IL�. sEcrlo►.i %-a �b 5 5 L&14D Cc ►,�E��T 8bY-cd-u�L11/s 1 � � I c.«c �U MiLE� alp cz�yylt•-1G �S� ___ 0 EVISTIMA- ?JULVLW�AD :Acc�ns~ LS, unlw114Cs �Ls,►T � ri4MQ r ? I— I ------- 5 X C� tv W — us os(z J Lu L� — ! J 30L L— PROPOSED --- -� RELOCATION OF EXISTING PsOPQ3E0 bUCJAosz FILe FLOAT I hg_2rcG�Uliz�� , David A. Grant �pP[./cA,vTS M41W6E Oran!e Coast Co I I eke — /0,5 �nPFSS 180t W COAST HIGl WA( _ Ll-&- bWLXufAlt IiNb 3 3'7 51 I To ST&•I3o Cy r H Bck, T�-ZACT 91 Co.uTRAC roc DArE 3/8/77 �-, n. .;• r •r,; ' n �3"�.S'�'C".Li:ii '" Q'i .W,'�.'ii..r:�—ai�'�r 1.�` •'i I U.db. lot 13uLxHE&o v v +�.o M, L.. L AV, 36.' ,-_-`•��� �� __ pfZJ LYS ED X15 ` �.L[=.V/�."t' �O �l ►aE�v�' B���a,L.lr-r�sz� vs o �" i/z � ? �' � 61�' "� ' '3EGTIDIJ /�-A. s�t.� �u ►A1L.E� �• ?' q f it t? A• 1 ,.A a. ,..,. > �.. � e w lei•$ • r�� +� i. k �1 � � � � � M � r 1.r n, 14 PROPOSED.�.•r.,���� r, � S s I x� 7-1 RELOCATION 01" EXISTING w .�....... , .�..., ,.. _. _._..,.FLOAT David A. l;r4ant Ti�f+cT L/CAwT'S Crans'e' Coast Co I I este 7- Jae .4voEsS 1�3C1 W. Coast Hi?ha�av: Newport Deach Go,cirA?ACTo� O.ATE 3/8/77 CITY OF 14E POT BEACH H A R B 0 Rt P mE i ME T FIC,.oXSTRUCT ANZ PERMISSION IS HEREOV a"'' S'� - MAiNTAIN TFE FACsUTV SECV�Z,-,' 0�� AT THE S',TE SIC ZiV* i THE HARBOR ANY IS THIE V4;GH`%3 GIAJEh ' WNZ.�t-R 712-, ,: C AN -0 PUMUT 'M9AY rS,Z' KH IN ACCORDAWLE TbVZTH 'iuTLE 17 CF TH,= i`w,iUKXCEPAL GOVE. PERMIT NO. CITY RA0FG—R COUKDiNKTOIR DATE CONSTRUCTION PERIUIT DATE ----- SEE ATTACHED SHEE Vv SPECIAL CONDITIOMS-- corps of En"pneers Permit orange CountY Permit Other: HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 949-644-3034 / Fax 949-723-0589 APPROVAL IN CONCEPT APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Install new ADA compliant gangway. Install new, landing. Reinstall existing northeaast ganway. Install longer north- west gangway.,Reconfigure instructional docks. Install 8 new pile. Remove 10 pile. Install new fire plumbing. Eelgrass present withing 15' of dock. Corresonding agencies will decide whether to proceed. Property Address: 1801 W. Coast Highway Ell Legal Description: Harbor Permit Number: 129-1801 Plan Check Number: 2405-2003 Applicant: Orange Coast College Applicant's Mailing Address: 1801 W. Coast Highway, CA 92663 Phone Number: 949-645-9412 I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including: 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. Page 1 of 2 And find X. -The -y- comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and any applicable specific or precise plans or, ❑ That a variance of exception has been approved and final. A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated. Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Zoning Ordinance or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or the design of a project located thereon, this approval in concept shall become null and void as of the effective date of this said ordinance. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local guidelines adopted thereunder, this development: WHas been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt. ❑ Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy attached). ❑ Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached). All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a building permit Piave been given and are final. The development is not subject to rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed. This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport Beach. Tom Rossmiller, Manager, Harbor Resources Signature: C11 v -� V Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Supervisor December 11, 2003 Attachments: Worksheet for Building Permit Application Drawing Page 2 of 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BENCH CITY hlE11P0AT S BEACH d� WE5T r � � —mac PACI��C OCA R/V VICINITY MRP M3eCU Wr, aLYCRU l�v rT ERY PZLl 0 U S P,p✓'r � /,vE � I I ' A U.S BMX D �1NF. U, S. PRJ•a��J L/NE 0P054':P P/PC P/41n6 Pk�POSEC DOCK , o.b -7.0 U. !p 5x/ 7' 118orrow� UST PROFILE 1 = 40' 7E7 iY SO(MINGS RRE DPRESSE:D IN FEET AMID DENOTE ELEVATIONS BASED ON PEI LO±KER LOH HATER. pC'aPvsC'D 14' x 8o' 0-4Pc- WfaY Sc I 1, 10I I l P/1. /,vG I I I I I 1..../l✓!'- �0 ' K EEL GRASS INSI ItTI O NO EEL GRASS WITHIN 15' OF PROJECT HARBOR RESOURCES DIV. EEL GRASS IN THE PROJECT AREA C6),-; -s n,& CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SIGNATURE G%ri 6 �°'1t ll� r L/r,ra3 12,9-•i-1 I z 11 3 PLAN VIEW 1 ` = 40' PEMMIT# BATE Ap LImf T'S NFME OCC S,41LlN9 SC/ -100L JOB RDDRESS /SDl W. 00,45-7- lHly"K DATE 0 WORKSHEET FOR BUILDING / FIRE PERMIT APPLICATION HARBOR RESOURCES DIV. EACtDCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH- 01 I CAC= DDINIT P1Q TVD' '4roF+ BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1. PROJECT ADDRESS (NOT MAILING ADDRESS) I �)o � -,,&[ .. (:L'nmn"�- —, t--\ k ut4v'u A q 9; 1 (--,, FLOOR I SUITE NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT BLOCK. TRACT OWNER'S ADDRESS No. UNITS 18n� RL 2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK C,N C P is AC4L-Ae-j�{—P 0tA r;7,: -c k e- —1k r A f -r QQCA 0 MYL&kW CS Ea ( USE # OF STORIES VALUATION $ SQ FT (NEW/ADDED/EXTG) I ts. Vl1 Ute (sS, `TW C) t2 �1�- lF� c!2c �-"�•C � C) -1 \ZL, NI V:-- IA t YkL-,A a can,) —vn NEW)KGM ADD ❑ ALTER ❑ DEMO ❑ �: Check Appropriate Box ❑ 3. OWNER'S NAME LAST FIRST ot4AMC3!-- C -0 044K7 G®(-�� OWNER'S ADDRESS OWNER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS 18n� RL CITY STATE ZIP PHONE NO. , C'4-, cA T "-�' 91t� - GL( -q ❑ 4. ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S NAME LAST FIRST LIC. NO. ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S ADDRESS ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE PHONE NO. ❑ 5. ENGINEER'S NAME LAST FIRST Sep d _IC. NO. 1 ENGINEER'S ADDRESS ENGINEER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP P ONE NO. ❑ 6. CONTRACTOR'S NAME BUSINESS LIC. STATE LIC., t -')ti -t4 -A No. Class CONTRACTOR'S ADDRESS CONTRACTOR'S E-MAIL ADDRESS t CITY STATE C ZIP PHO NO. �j .� ►c� --t' t� e� (z z66 OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT NO. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION PLAN CHECK NO. � ppb/� PLAN CHECK FEE $ OCCUPANCY- GROUP�CO -1 PLAN CHECK ENG. Forms\Bldg—application 10-1 B-02 1EA Eelgrass 811rvey Reporting Form (Version 1.0', Jane 20, 2003) This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for the eelgrass, Zostera marina, that are required to be conductedunder federal or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Coastal Commission. The form has been designed to assist in identifying eelgrass while ensuring that the required information is consistently documented. Surveys required to be conducted. for this species are subject to modification through publication of revisions to the eelgrass survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols, please contact. Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, (562) 980-4043, or William Paznokas, California Departinent of Fish & Game, (858) 467-4218). * Required Information Site Name: (common reference) Survey Contact: T,A,L xZ A-Iew8 (name, phone, e-mail) Permit Reference; (ACOE Permit No., CCG Permit No.) Hydrographic System: (bay, estuary, lagoon, or harbor) ,/•�/�A-6�/i� Specific Location: (UTM, Lat./Long., datum, !( accuracy level, attach 14 007A- 1 electronic survey area map if possible) -- _ 1� Was Eelgrass * i -_3 Yes, Eelgrass was found at this site. Detected: * No, Eelgrass was not found at this site. Description of Permitted Work: (describe briefly the work to be conducted at the site under the permits identified above) W, l 'I Description of Site: (describe the physical and Depth range: _ �� �,� [,{� �/r3A# /7 biological conditions within the survey area at the time of / the survey and provide insight into variability, if known. Please units provide for all numerical / 1 information). �O Substrate typer/;�ac/ti Ste` ✓ — Temperature: _ Salinity: Dominant ora: ivn��t Dominant auna: e�w✓; Exotic species encountered: Other site description notes: Description of Survey 11Su rvey date Effort: and time (please describe the surveys eriod: conducted including type of survey (SCUBA, remote video, etc.) and survey methods employed, date of work, and survey density (estimated percentage of the bottom actually viewed). Describe any limitations encountered during the survey efforts. Iforizontal visibility in Survey type and methods:�� Survey personnel: Survey / density: I � v 10AA ISurvey IVC A,' d5 Other Information: A �f- use this space to provide ��1 any additional information or , ''"�4�,Z�✓.� references to attached / materials such as maps, _02� reports, etc.) / �,G G�ia/Z / Q � //.<1 /clgl c� /� � t✓ sem. Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form (version 1.0, 6/20/03)3 1 109 All ts� Within 30 days following confirmation of no viability in tested cores, the treatment area shall be surrounded by a containment screen of no greater porosity than 0.5 nun and the liner cover shall be removed. The surface sediments within the containment area shall be removed to a depth of 25 centimeters using a diver -assisted suction dredge. 3) Material, including return water, shall be pumped into a chlorination tank and maintained at a concentration of 0.5% chlorine for a period of not less that 6 hours prior to upland disposal of treated material or other authorized disposal alternatives. 5. If dredged material is to be removed from the APE and placed elsewhere in the marine environment, then no sooner than 60 days after completion of the dredged area and disposal site, during the next high growth period, the applicant shall conduct a Surveillance level survey of any disposal areas except where material is disposed of within an existing EPA designated deep ocean disposal site. The specific survey requirements will be determined by NMFS and CDFG on a case by case basis. This policy does, not vacate any additional restrictions on the handling, transport, or disposal of Caulerpa that may apply at the time of permit issuance or in the future. It is incumbent upon the permittee to comply with any other applicable State or Federal regulations, restrictions or changes to the Protocol that may be in effect at the time of '- initiation of authorized activities. Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (Version 1.0, September 18, 2001) This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for the invasive exotic alga Cauleppa tax folia that are required to be conducted under federal or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regions 8 & 9). The form has been designed to assist in controlling the costs of reporting while ensuring that the required information necessary to identify and control ax�y potential impacts of the authorized actions on the spread of Coulerpa. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification through publication of revisions to the Caulerpa survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols, please contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, (562) 98074043, or William Paznokas, California Department of Fish & Game, (858) 467-4218). SiteName: (comofn reference) '� — ' ��'Z� Survey Contact: �✓ �i7/�fN�1�ysS' �,�f crz ,�}©4, e;O (name, phone, e-mail) Permit Reference: 3 (ACOS Permit No., RWQCB Order or Cert. No.) Hydrographic System: (bay, estuary, lagoon, or harbor) /7 /L Specific Location: (UTM, Lat./Long., datum, accuracy level, attach electronic survey area map if possible) Was Caulerpa Yes, Caulerpa was found at this site and Detected: (if Caulerpa is found, please has been contacted on date. immediately contact the permitting agency project staff and NWS or CDFG �No, Caulerpa was not found at this site. Detected: identified above) Description of Permitt:,,d Work: (describe briefly the work to be conducted at the site under the permits identified above) Description of Site: Depth range: (describe the physical and biological conditions within �cli2 drZ y �/�r1� 71 the survey area at the time of j— the survey and provide S: 'l /r- Sr)OF 2I rn insight into variability, if— known. Please provide units S':y R "'0 for all numerical _,_._ � % information). / "� t 1C c 4S ;, .•v d C- s i'f• / G Substrate type' Temperature. ` �- Salinity: Dominant ora: putt 15 Dominant fauna: Exotic A%N/C SP ecies encountered. Other site description notes: Description of Survey Survey date Effort: (please describe the surveys conductedincluding type of survey (SCUBA, remote video, etc.) and survey methods employed, date of work, and survey density (estimated percentage of the bottom actually viewed). Describe any'limitations encountered during the and time period.- riod.conducted s L) --� l / G survey efforts. Horizontal visibility in - 1 ---- water: Survey type and methods: R J uauierpa awvuy x�vjjuiuur 1'v11u kv—Kivu —Y..1 Caulei a Ezadication in Southern a/x". Q `'-�� ✓% �/ California y 9 Southwest Region Home Page Survey personnel: Survey densih' Survey limitations: JL- 11 Other Information: (use this space to provide any additional information or references to attached materials such as maps, reports, etc.) uauierpa awvuy x�vjjuiuur 1'v11u kv—Kivu —Y..1 Caulei a Ezadication in Southern a/x". Q `'-�� ✓% �/ California y 9 Southwest Region Home Page STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100 -South Sacramento, CA 95825-8202 Mr. Bruce Tice School of Sailing & Steamship 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway Newport Beach, CA 92663 February 25, 2004 - ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Govemor PAUL D. THAYER, Executive Officer (916) 574-1800 FAX (916) 574-1810 Califomia Relay Service From TDD Phone 1-800-735-2922 from Voice Phone 1-800-735-2929 Contact Phone: (916) 574-0234 Contact FAX. (916) 574-1324 File Ref: G09-00 / SD 2004-01-29 RE: Proposed Reconfiguration of Instructional Docks Located at 1801 West Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach, Orange County Dear Mr. Tice: This is in response to your recent request for a determination by the State Lands Commission (CSLC) whether it asserts a sovereign title interest in the property that the subject project will occupy and whether it asserts that the project will intrude into an area that is subject to the public easement in navigable waters. The facts pertaining to the proposed project, as we understand them are these: The purpose of the project is to reconfigure the instructional docks to provide for improved handicapped access and instructional use for ongoing sail and power boating classes at the School of Sailing & Seamanship. The project will include a new A.D.A. compliant gangway, new landing, longer northwest gangway, new dock layout, installation of eight new pilings, and removal of ten old pilings, and installation of required fire system plumbing. The CSLC has jurisdiction and management authority over all ungranted tidelands, submerged lands, and the beds of navigable rivers, sloughs, lakes, etc. The CSLC has certain residual and review authority for tide and submerged lands legislatively granted in trust to local jurisdictions (Public Resources Code §6301 and §6306). All tide and submerged lands, granted or ungranted, as wells as navigable rivers, sloughs, etc., are impressed with the Common Law Public Trust. The State's sovereign lands at the proposed project location have been legislatively granted in trust to the County of Orange pursuant to Chapter 526, Statutes of 1919, as amended, with minerals reserved to the State. Therefore, CSLC authorization will not be required. February 25, 2004 Page 2 The School of Sailing & Seamanship should, however, apply to all other agencies having approval authority over the project, including the County of Orange. This does not constitute, nor shall it be construed as a waiver of any right, title or interest by the State of California or any grantee of the State, in any lands under their respective jurisdiction. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Jennifer Lucchesi, Public Land Management Specialist, at (916) 574-0234. �incerely, Robert L. Lynch Chief, Land Management Division cc: Mr. Jim Volz, County of Orange Chris Miller, City of Newport Beach Jennifer Lucchesi STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7HE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Govemor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST DISTRICT tl� PO Box 1450 �.., 200 Oceangate, 10th Floor LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4416 www.coastal.ca.gov Date: November 29, 2004 Permit No. 5-04-167 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT EFFECTIVENESS Please be advised that the Administrative Permit with the above permit number which was sent to you on' October 29, 2004 and was reported to the Commission on Thursday, November 18, 2004 is now fully effective. Development of your project is subject to compliance with all terms and conditions specified in the Administrative Permit. Should you have any questions please contact our office. Sincerely, PETER M. [ , — lutive D By: BERN EJ Y Coastal Pr ram Analyst STATE OF CAL' IFORNW- THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area OfficeTH Date: October 28 2004 Permit Application No. rJ-04-1 67 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 Page 1 of 6 ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT APPLICANT: Orange Coast College; Attn: Bruce Tice, Brad Avery & Mette Segerblom PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The proposed project will consist of: 1) installation of ADA compliant gangway and landing; 2) reinstallation of the existing east gangway; 3) install longer and wider west gangway; 4) reconfiguration of the existing instructional docks; 5) installation of two (2) new 30' x 4' fingers and a new 51' x 4' dock with a 22' x 4' backwalk; 6) installation of eight (8) new steel piles ranging from 8" to 12" in diameter coated with NSP -120; 6) removal of ten (10) existing piles ranging from 8" to 10" in diameter; and 7) installation of a new fire system. PROJECT LOCATION: 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, Newport Beach (Orange County) EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION: The findings for this determination, and for any special conditions, appear on subsequent pages. NOTE: P.R.C. Section 30624 provides that this permit shall not become effective until it is reported to the Commission at its next meeting. If one-third or more of the appointed membership of the Commission so request, the application will be removed from the administrative calendar and set for public hearing at a subsequent Commission meeting. Our office will notify you if such removal occurs. This permit will be reported to the Commission at the following time and place: Thursday, November 18, 2004 9:00 am Sheraton Los Angeles Harbor 601 South Palos Verdes Street San Pedro, CA 90731 IMPORTANT - Before you may proceed with development the following must occur: Pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 13150(b) and 13158, you must sign the enclosed duplicate copy acknowledging the permit's receipt and accepting its contents; including all conditions, and return it to our office. Following the Commission's meeting, and once we have received the signed acknowledgement and evidence of compliance with all special conditions, we will send you a Notice of Administrative Permit Effectiveness. BEFORE YOU CAN OBTAIN ANY LOCAL PERMITS AND PROCEED WITH DEVELOPMENT YOU MUST HAVE RECEIVED BOTH YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT AND THE NOTICE OF PERMIT EFFECTIVENESS FROM THIS OFFICE. PETER DOUGLAS Executive Director By: Fernie Sy Title: _Coastal Program Analyst 5 -04 -167 -[Orange Coast College] Administrative Permit Page 2 of 6 STANDARD CONDITIONS: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date this permit is reported to the Commission. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any term or condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 4. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 5. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: See pages four to six. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION (continues!): The Executive Director hereby determines that the proposed development is a category of development, which, pursuant to PRC Section 30624, qualifies for approval by the Executive Director through the issuance of an Administrative Permit. Subject to Standard and Special Conditions as attached, said development is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act of 1976 and will not have any significant impacts on the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. If located between the nearest public road and the sea, this development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3. FINDINGS FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION: A. Proiect Descriotion The subject site is located at 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway in the City of Newport Beach (Exhibits #1- 2). The subject site is currently developed with the Orange Coast College Sailing Center. The Sailing Center offers courses in basic and advanced sailing, seamanship, navigation and similar activities. Classes and activities offered by the Sailing Center are available to all members of the general public. To the east of the project site is the Balboa Bay Club and to the west is the Boy Scout Sea Base. The purpose of the project is to replace existing docks that are old and deteriorating and to bring the education facility up to all codes. The proposed project (Exhibit #3) involves the following: 1) installation of ADA compliant gangway and landing; 2) reinstallation of the existing east gangway; 3) install longer and wider west gangway; 4) reconfiguration of the existing instructional docks; 5) installation of two (2) new 30' x 4' fingers and a new 51' x 4' dock with a 22' x 4' backwalk; 6) installation of eight (8) new steel piles ranging from 8" to 12" in diameter coated with NSP -120; 6) removal of nine (9) existing piles ranging from 8" to 10" in diameter; and 7) installation of a new fire 5 -04 -167 -[Orange Coast College] Administrative Permit Page 3 of 6 system. The new docks and gangway will be constructed of wood, TREX Composite and aluminum. The proposed coating material (NSP 120) has been determined by the Commission's water quality unit to have a low impact on the environment. The dock project will update and help continue the existing use at the site, which encourages water - oriented recreational activities. The existing use at the site provides significant public use of this harbor -front site through the provision of ocean -oriented programs such as instruction in sailing, navigation, piloting, seamanship, weather and emergency medicine at sea. The site has been surveyed by the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Division for eelgrass and eelgrass was discovered within 15 feet of the project area. However, the project does not anticipate adverse impacts to eelgrass associated with the proposed project since the dock and piles will be moved further away from the existing eelgrass beds on site. The site has also been surveyed for Caulerpa taxilfolia and none was found. These eelgrass and Caulerpa taxilfolia surveys are valid for a limited period of time (until the next growing season for eelgrass and 90 days for Caulerpa taxilfolia). If construction does not occur within the respective time periods, a subsequent survey will be required. Since eelgrass has been identified in the project site, Special Condition No.2 identifies the procedures necessary to be completed prior to beginning any construction. If any Caulerpa taxilfolia is found on the project site, Special Condition No. 3 identifies the procedures necessary to be completed prior to beginning any construction. The proposed project has received an approval in concept from the City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources Division. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) has determined; that the proposed project will not adversely impact water quality if standard construction methods and materials are used. The applicants have applied for a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. B. Marine Resources The proposed recreational boat dock development and its associated structures are an allowable and encouraged marine related use. The project design includes the minimum sized pilings and the minimum number of pilings necessary for structural stability. There are no feasible less environmentally damaging alternatives available. As conditioned, the project will not significantly adversely impact eelgrass beds and will not contribute to the dispersal of the invasive aquatic algae,- Caulerpa lgae,Caulerpa taxifolia. Further, as proposed and conditioned, the project, which is to be used solely for. recreational boating purposes, conforms to Sections 30224 and 30233 of the Coastal Act. C. Water Quality The proposed work will be occurring on, within, or adjacent to coastal waters. The storage or placement of construction material, debris, or waste in a location where it could be discharged into coastal waters would result in an adverse effect on the marine environment. To reduce the potential for construction related impacts on water quality, the Commission imposes special conditions requiring, but not limited to, the appropriate storage and handling of construction equipment and materials to minimize the potential of pollutants to enter coastal waters. To reduce the potential for post -construction impacts to water quality the Commission requires the continued use and maintenance of post construction BMPs. As conditioned, the Commission finds that the development conforms to Sections 30230 and 30231 of the Coastal Act. D. Local Coastal Program The LUP for the City of Newport Beach was effectively certified on May 19, 1982. The certified LUP was updated on January 9, 1990. As conditioned, the proposed development is consistent with Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act and with the certified Land Use Plan for the area. Approval of the project, 5 -04 -167 -[Orange Coast College] Administrative Permit Page 4 of 6 as conditioned, will not prejudice the ability of the local government to prepare a Local Coastal Program that is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3. E. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA As conditioned, there are no feasible alternatives or additional feasible mitigation measures available that would substantially lessen any significant adverse effect that the activity may have on the environment. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned to mitigate the identified impacts, is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative and can be found consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act to conform to CEQA. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Water Quality A. Construction Responsibilities and Debris Removal (1) No construction materials, equipment, debris, or waste will be placed or stored where it may be subject to wave, wind, or rain erosion and dispersion. (2) Any and all construction material will be removed from the site within 10 days of completion of construction. (3) Machinery or construction materials not essential for project improvements will not L... ..II�....�.J .L L:.v_ : LL_ .1_J-� - ue allowed al any 'time In the Intertidal zone. (4) If turbid conditions are generated during construction a silt curtain will be utilized to control turbidity. (5) Floating booms will be used to contain debris discharged into coastal waters and any debris discharged will be removed as soon as possible but no later than the end of each day. (6) Non -buoyant debris discharged into coastal waters will be recovered by divers as soon as possible after loss. B. Best Management Practices Program By acceptance of this permit the applicant agrees that the long-term water -borne berthing of boat(s) in the approved dock and/or boat slip will be managed in a manner that protects water quality pursuant to the implementation of the following BMPs. (1) Boat Cleaning and Maintenance Measures: a. In -water top -side and bottom -side boat cleaning shall minimize the discharge of soaps, paints, and debris. b. In -the -water hull scraping or any process that occurs under water that results in the removal of paint from boat hulls shall be prohibited. Only detergents and cleaning components that are designated by the manufacturer as phosphate - free and biodegradable shall be used, and the amounts used minimized. 5 -04 -167 -[Orange Coast College] Administrative Permit Page 5 of 6 c. The applicant shall minimize the use of detergents and boat cleaning and maintenance products containing ammonia, sodium hypochlorite, chlorinated solvents, petroleum distillates or lye. (2) Solid and Liquid Waste Management Measures: a. All trash, recyclables, and hazardous wastes or potential water contaminants, including old gasoline or gasoline with water, absorbent materials, oily rags, lead acid batteries, anti -freeze, waste diesel, kerosene and mineral spirits will be disposed of in a proper manner and will not at any time be disposed of in the water or gutter. (3) Petroleum Control Management Measures: a. Oil absorbent materials shall be examined at least once a year and replaced as necessary. The applicant will recycle the materials, if possible, or dispose of them in accordance with hazardous waste disposal regulations. The boaters will regularly inspect and maintain engines, seals, gaskets, lines and hoses in order to prevent oil and fuel spills. Boaters will use preventive engine maintenance, oil absorbents, bilge pump -out services, or steam cleaning services as much as possible to clean oily bilge areas. Bilges shall be cleaned and maintained. Detergents will not be used for cleaning. The use of soaps that can be discharged by bilge pumps is prohibited. 2. Eelgrass Survey A. Pre Construction Eelgrass Survey. A valid pre -construction eelgrass (Zosters marina) survey shall be completed during the period of active growth of eelgrass (typically March through October). The pre -construction survey shall be completed prior to the beginning of construction and shall be valid until the next period of active - growth. The survey shall be prepared in full compliance with the "Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Revision 8 (except as modified by this special condition) adopted by the National Marine Fisheries Service and shall be prepared in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game. The applicant shall submit the eelgrass survey for the review and approval of the Executive Director within five (5) business days of completion of each eelgrass survey and in any event no later than fifteen (15) business days prior to commencement of any development. If the eelgrass survey identifies any eelgrass within the project area which would be impacted by the proposed project, the development shall require an amendment to this permit from the Coastal Commission or a new coastal development permit. B. Post Construction Eelgrass Survey. If any eelgrass is identified in the project area by the survey required in subsection A of this condition above, within one month after the conclusion of construction, the applicant shall survey the project site to determine if any eelgrass was adversely impacted. The survey shall be prepared in full compliance with the "Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Revision 8 (except as modified by this special condition) adopted by the National Marine Fisheries Service and shall be prepared in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game. The applicant shall submit the post -construction eelgrass survey for the review and approval of the Executive Director within thirty (30) days after completion of the survey. If any eelgrass has been impacted, the applicant shall replace the impacted eelgrass at a 5 -04 -167 -[Orange Coast College] Administrative Permit Page 6 of 6 minimum 1.2:1 ratio on-site, or at another location, in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy. All impacts to eelgrass habitat shall be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 1.2:1 (mitigation: impact). The exceptions to the required 1.2:1 mitigation ratio found within SCEMP shall not apply. Implementation of mitigation shall require an amendment to this permit or a new coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment or new permit is required. 3. Pre -construction Caulerpa Taxifolia Survey A. Not earlier than 90 days nor later than 30 days prior to commencement or re -commencement of any development authorized under this coastal development permit (the "project"), the applicant shall undertake a survey of the project area and a buffer area at least 10 meters beyond the project area to determine the presence of the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia. The survey shall include a visual examination of the substrate. B. The survey protocol shall be prepared in consultation with the Regional Water Quality Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the National Marine Fisheries Service. C. Within five (5) business days of completion of the -survey, the applicant shall submit the survey: (1) for the review and approval of the Executive Director; and (2) to the Surveillance Subcommittee of the Southern California Caulerpa Action Team (SCCAT). The SCCAT Surveillance Subcommittee may be contacted through William Paznokas, California Department of Fish & Game (858/467-4218) or Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service (562/980-4043). D. If Caulerpa taxifolia is found within the project or buffer areas, the applicant shall not proceed with the project until 1) the applicant provides evidence to the Executive Director that all C. taxifolia discovered within the project and buffer area has been eliminated in a manner that complies with all applicable governmental approval requirements, including but not limited to those of the California Coastal Act, or 2) the applicant has revised the project to avoid any contact with C. taxifolia. No revisions to the project shall occur without a Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment is legally required. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PERMIT RECEIPT/ACCEPTANCE OF CONTENTS: I/We acknowledge that I/we have received a copy of this permit and have accepted its contents including all conditions. Applicants' Signature Date of Signing H:\FSY\Staff Reports\Nov04\5-04-167-[Orange Coast College]AP(NB) 0 0 N 'o p !e P `Q Arm J.FiY.9 N � S ---+:Wc-'—, a cNi+ 3 03- vvs A O NUISSIWWOJ 1b1S9'pJ a VINa0jjj VJ rmm c a C o I ti00Z — 9 AVkV n I I oca ! uo'Sea sao y� nos O Nim -j x x zmZ v —r-----J o OM _C N c rx� g00 .. s c z N 'I \I r CEJ zD0 1� \ O 1E a Z 0 r J 0Nz C) y3r r Zto t \I h Z r 1 � rl ds� L N Z9I-to M9 rww ---+:Wc-'—, c N A V \ I I W I I �3 o � I e,ass —�T•rrT4'�[T —r-----J g :f 'I \I 1� \ O a ;I V ql L ` t \I m 1 � rl � 51 Description: Orange,CA Assessor Map 49.16 Page: 1 of I Order: OC Comment: • y 2 COASTAL COMMISSION EXHIBIT # 'AGE I OF --L_ 4 yIL 2 a c i 01 k . I 0�7►'NS HMWY SJI.JO(/ M71V _ _ _. K t I '* f I a si a I I C j � V I ' C I� T P li COASTAL COMMISSION EXHIBIT # f N l a Z a c� 2 CIO W J cn 8 W Z % m f O� m � 5 4 OnI �h OjN5V0 NA10H5 YJOO 13/X3 9 i0 i 1 Y � til U c W �I 4 yIL 2 a c i 01 k . I 0�7►'NS HMWY SJI.JO(/ M71V _ _ _. K t I '* f I a si a I I C j � V I ' C I� T P li COASTAL COMMISSION EXHIBIT # f N l Z a c� CIO J cn 8 W Z % m Al rr®ire 4 yIL 2 a c i 01 k . I 0�7►'NS HMWY SJI.JO(/ M71V _ _ _. K t I '* f I a si a I I C j � V I ' C I� T P li COASTAL COMMISSION EXHIBIT # f . ptp if m 1 l q Y h V, Mro� O m W R QGO v6o � 2 daa R � WWF i UA Z cr LL3 d 3 E L .J U 4 �L Y W 'o W m •Q Q W �°. O b W N . ptp if m 1 l z� C7 O z UA Z cr LL3 d 3 E L .J U S W m r O a z Z a J U' I ;s I Bio II it i =1 N� I h COASTAL COMMISSION EXHIBIT # 3 PAGE ?- OF -2H - I 101 9N19HYd LlWdSV v�. , �I IL - a - ------------ -1 i �I T7 i i i f-(;(TASTAL-COMmiS _ N E�HIBIT # I i I yplfl ���---- � I e 1-1 4 �I T7 i i i f-(;(TASTAL-COMmiS _ N E�HIBIT # I i I yplfl ���---- CITY OF NEWPORTHERLH US P,p✓'r c/,vE CITY OF �� KE34POU BEACH I r T , � � A U.S. 8[.X D G1NF. U S. PR.�•('p L/NC HEST / f� I. f\ �c � ( I P,POPOSEo P/Pc PiUr.�' '' PkbPOSEC OdCK amu— U II cxl5r Borro,<,a 7 II II II PRCj,r-jC OCERN PIER E YICINITY MRP E r PROFILE 1' = 40' ' ► , ��, '� MWINGS ARE D PREM iN FEET AtqD DENOTE ELMTIONS 31SO ON MEM LOU LOW WRTER. HE South Coast District Office South Coast Region COASTAL COMMIS APPROD--� Permit —__� �/ f MAY 3'- 2004 EXHIBIT # 3 - -- PAGEOF _ �rcrrvE-------------- _ CALIFORNIA _ �-p2a�osCo 4' x so' GA4/cwfrr J �1�,��Pf SSD NC 1V ljCJC!!S t I I I = I �'y 17 P/(. /•VCS r I I� I I 0 —SEL GRASS INSPECTIOI — 71 NO EEL GRASS WITHIN 15' OF PROJECT 8( EEL GRASS IN THE PROJECT AREA �� Aftac��ti� vr�e /CI, �I SIGNATU E I zCl4u1 •. o E- X. 4"XZ0 G,4AI I I. I I I I I I I • I I PPnPvsED /W -7w I � .I I I i I 7 - HARBOR HARBOR RESOURCES DIV. CIT, '! OF NEWPORT E3EACH PLAN MIEN 11 = 40' r_crlvu_I DETE ON a CIiY 6F, NEWPORT PERCH U S P�✓`r L//✓E CITY OF �/ �' Y K54PQRT SERCN / WE57 htLPPER 3T U.S BC1<D G1NF. U S. PRIa"!J L/NE � f I P,POPOSE� P/Pc P/Ur.�' \ PkbPOSEC OOCK 7.0 ERY — ; A. ul`jl cXl r 11,90 r7 -01,-f II II p"CIFIC OCEAN PIER HEST ' PIS I LE V. = 40 ` YICINITY MRP UST www sir, w g JETTY SOCMINGS FEE D?R£SSED IN FEET RND DENOTE EL1=VATIONS BASED ON tlEAN L%U LOH WATER. South Coast District Of ce AP P rmit t BY--- -------- ---- ----- South Coast Region MAY 3 - 2004 CALIFOR ti ,,�4' x so, c,�fuc�,4r T A I r';r> A A k..! I C C rl K I g5l i Rol - I I ^I 4 L----- /B L----' EEL GRASS INSFECTro�— L71 NO EEL GRASS WITHIN 15' OF PROJECT HARBOR RESOURCES DISI. EEL GRASS IN THE PROJECT AREA CI OF �iC'Ji1POP? BEACH SIGNATU E Cr;��� 5 h7i 11Gy I L/nl�� 1 Z9491 -)l I L. /If p .s P L.4N Y I D i` nTom• - _ May 3, 2004 Bruce Tice, Project Manager Orange Coast College Sailing and Rowing Center 1801 W. Pacific Coast Hwy. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Re: Orange Coast College Sailing and Rowing Center - Dock Reconstruction Plans Dear Mr. Tice: In accordance with Clause 9 ("Construction and/or Alternation by Tenant") of the Orange Coast College lease with the County for the Sailing and Rowing Center, this letter constitutes the Lessor's Consent for the dock reconstruction plans you submitted earlier this year. The plans include installation of new pilings, a new landing and an ADA -compliant gangway, along with reconfiguration of the instructional docks. As you know, this consent only satisfies the requirements of the lease.'All necessary planning approvals and building permits must be secured before you can move forward with the construction itself. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Rich Adler of my staff at (714) 834-6792. Very truly yours, Kevin G. Thomas Director, RDMD/Harbors Beaches & Parks cc: Bryan Speegle, Director, RDMD Parker Hancock, District Supervisor, RDMD/HBP/Coastal Facilities Rich Adler, Chief,RDMD/HBP/Lease Management California. Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region Terry Tamminen. 3737 Main Street, Suite 500, Riverside, California 92501-3348 Arnold Schwarzenegger Secretaryfor (909) 782-4130 • Fax (909) 781-6288 Governor Environmental http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb8 Protection February 2, 2004 Bruce W. Tice The School of Sailing & Seamanship 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway Newport Beach, CA 92663 PROPOSED REBUILDING OF BOAT DOCK, ORANGE COAST COLLEGE, 1801 WEST COAST HIGHWAY, NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY Dear Mr. Tice: If standard dock construction methods and materials are utilized, this project should not adversely impact water quality. A statement has been submitted that there will be no waste discharged from the proposed project. Based on these assurances, clearance is provided. However, should the Army Corps of Engineers determine that this project requires a Section 404 permit, it will be necessary for the project proponent to obtain from this Board a Water Quality Certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Should you have any questions, please contact J. Shami at (909) 782-3288. Sincerely, ilomeno (JunT. Martirez, Jr., P. . Chief, Regulations Section cc: California Coastal Commission, Long Beach Army Corps of Engineers — Erik Larsen City of Newport Beach, Marine Department - Tony Meller JIS/blutagMlet California Environmental Protection Agency �a� Recycled Paper CI°I DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY _ LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 532711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325 December 9, 2004 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Office of the Chief Regulatory Branch Bruce Tice & Brad Avery Orange Coast College of Sailing 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway Newport Beach, California 92663 Dear Mr.'s Tice & Avery: Reference is made to your request of November 22, 2004 (File No. 200401082-SJH). Under the provisions of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), you are hereby authorized to modify an existing marina facility that results in a net increase of coverage of 0.07 -acre of open waters of the U.S. bayward of 1801 W. Pacific Coast Highway, in Newport Bay, in the city of Newport Beach, Orange County, California, as shown on the enclosed drawings. The owner or authorized responsible official must sign and date all copies of this Letter of Permission (LOP) indicating that he/she agrees to the work as described and will comply with all conditions. One of the signed copies of this Letter of Permission must be returned to the Corps of Engineers (a pre -addressed envelope is enclosed). In addition, please use the two attached postcards to notify this office as to the dates of commencement (within 10 days prior to the start of construction) and completion of the activity (within 10 days following the end of construction). Furthermore, you are hereby advised that the Corps of Engineers has established an Administrative Appeal Process which is fully described in 33 CFR Part 331. The complete appeal process is diagrammed in the enclosed Appendix B. Thank you for participating in our regulatory program. Sincerely, Mark Durham Chief, South Coast Section Regulatory Branch 18p `tGF' DATE dpa When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this LOP will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property. To validate the transfer of this permit and the liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date below. , TRANSFEREE DATE Enclosure(s) i CITY OF NEWPORT BIRCH Z,1 -S P,p✓'T Z/,,/E CITY OF r Z, HExPOR7 BERC3-f � ' ' ' l�t-R C1.S B��CJ✓ G1NF.� U S. PR,r-lip L/�� WEFT r H My -70 ACIFr ��' fR� PIER C K3T YICINITY �iRP :� E r PROF 40` ILE 1' = ►ter ter, MMINGS ARE DP -2t:= IN FEET Ft0 DENOTE ELEVETIONS DRSED ON t� L%a LOH 69TER. • P,�aP�sCD 4 ` x 80' C,¢ c�kY r — a I � C P.0 C�Pf SED NClti f JCJCFI.S ' . ° I. I r L)L F"5, L Isr -, ly L\ L-----` -- - EELUTASS IIHECTI _ - - - --- - - NO EEL GRASS WITHIN 160F PROJECT HARBOR RESOURCES DIV. EEL GRASS IN THE PROJECT AREA �6�r s n? CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ,�-��.I v��2 SIGNATURE 1Lhi�,S PLAN VIE 1' = 40' nrr FPP-ICFh7'Sk NFff OCC S,4ICIN67 SC/,/00L .TOB RDDFESS 1801 W. COAST / l�r'Y DATE J- L- 80' I a EX/S7: DOC k SHOWv Of15Hsp -J Ih it I� �� efll LJ --J LJ U I� O � I t I I 6' I�3 •I s ! � p i V NEW DOCKS SyOY✓N SHADED ri�I w 992 ' + z z ` ip lN 'O I� th z �. z o = o IT Z fm IOC e c Z { z Z v n H v w N n H l -3 - PERMIT CONDITIONS General Conditions: 1. The time limit for completing the authorized activity ends on December 9, 2006. If you find that you need more time to complete the authorized activity, submit your request for a time extension to this office for consideration at least one month before the above date is reached. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and state coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner in the space provided and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished with the terms and conditions of your permit. Furthermore, you must comply with the following non -discretionary Special Conditions: Special Conditions: 1. The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration. 2. Creosote treated pilings shall not be placed in navigable waters or waters of the United States unless all of the following conditions are met: -4- a) The project involves the repair of existing structures that were originally constructed using wood products; b) The creosote treated pilings are wrapped in plastic; c) The use of plastic -wrapped creosote pilings is restricted to marine waters; d) Measures are taken to prevent damage to plastic wrapping from boat use. Such measures may include installation of rub strips or bumpers; e) The plastic wrapping is sealed at all joints to prevent leakage. f) The plastic material is expected to maintain its integrity for at least ten years, and plastic wrappings that develop holes or leaks are repaired or replaced in a timely manner. 3. No debris, soil, silt, sand, sawdust, rubbish, cement or concrete washings thereof, oil or petroleum products, from construction shall be allowed to enter into or placed where it may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the United States. Therefore, the permittee shall employ all standard Best Management Practices to ensure that toxic materials, silt, debris; or excessive erosion do not enter waters of the United States during project construction. Upon completion of berthing improvements, any excess material or debris shall be removed from the work area and disposed of in an appropriate upland site. 4. The permittee shall discharge only clean construction materials suitable for use in the oceanic environment 5. The permittee shall notify the Army Corps of Engineers of the date of commencement of operations and the date of completion of operations at least five days prior to such completion. 6. Prior to the commencement of construction, the permittee shall notify the US Coast Guard in writing. Please include: name of company conducting the operation, work to be completed, project location, hours of operation, duration of project, equipment being used, and an on-site point of contact. This information will be used in the Local Notice to Mariners (LNM) to notify the maritime community of activities affecting navigation. Please send the notification letter to: US Coast Guard,11th District, Attn: QM1 Mike Carlson, Staff Symbol: oan, Coast Guard Island, Bldg. 50-6, Alameda, CA 94501-5100. 7. Should any federal aids to navigation (AtoN) be affected by this project, the permittee shall contact the US Coast Guard AtoN office at (510) 437-2982. 8. Upon the US Coast Guard's receipt of the notification to start work, a copy of the applicant's letter will be sent to the Coast Guard Captain of the Port (COTP) for review. The COTP may modify the deployment of marine construction equipment or mooring systems to safeguard navigation during the project. Questions concerning lighting, equipment placement, and mooring should be directed to the COTP. 9. A pre -construction survey of the project area for Caulerpa taxifolia will be conducted in accordance with the Caulerpa Control Protocol (see http://swr.ucsd.edu/hcd/ccpvl.htm) not earlier than 90 days prior to planned construction and not later than 30 days prior to construction. The results of that survey shall be transmitted to NOAA Fisheries and CDFG at least 15 days prior to initiation of proposed work. In the event that Caulerpa is detected within -5 - the project area, no work shall be conducted until such time as the infestation has been isolated, treated, and the risk of spread is eliminated. 10. The permitee is required to conduct two years of post -construction monitoring per the mapping guidelines in the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (see http://swr.nmfs.noaa.gov/hcd/eelpol.htm). A determination of the need and/or amount of eelgrass mitigation shall be made based upon two annual surveys conducted post -construction during the time period of August to October, which document any changes in the area and/or density of the bed in the vicinity of the proposed project. If the monitoring surveys demonstrate an adverse impact to eelgrass, it will be mitigated in accordance with the policy. All required surveys shall be submitted to the Corps and NOAA Fisheries within 30 days of survey completion. 11. The permittee shall send a post -project survey to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Service for chart updating: Gerald E. Wheaton, NOAA, Regional Manager, West Coast and Pacific Ocean, DOD Center Monterey Bay, Room 5082, Seaside, CA 93955-6711. 12. Your use of the permitted activity must not interfere with the publics' right to free navigation on all navigable waters of the United States. 13. You must install and maintain, at your expense, any safety lights and signals prescribed by the United States Coast Guard (USCG), through regulations or otherwise, on your authorized facilities. The USCG may be reached at the following telephone number: Mr. Brian Aldrich (510) 437-2983. Further Information: 1. Congressional Authorities: You have been authorized to undertake the activity described above pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403). 2. Limits of this authorization. a. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, state, or local authorizations required by law. b. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. c. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. d. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project. 3. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: a. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or un -permitted activities or from natural causes. b. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. c. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or un -permitted activities or structures caused by the activity authorized by this permit. d. Design or construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. e. Damage claims associated with any future modification; suspension, or revocation of this permit. 4. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 5. Reevaluation of Permit Decision. This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: a. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. b. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (See 4 above). -7- c. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the issuance of an administrative order requiring you to comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measure ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CFR 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6. Extensions. General condition 1 establishes a time limit for the completion of the activity authorized by this permit. Unless there are circumstances requiring either a prompt completion of the authorized activity or a reevaluation of the public interest decision, the Corps will normally give you favorable consideration to a request for an extension of this time limit. � �, uauei� ea'• a epi . la LOS ANGELES DISTRICT U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Permit Number: 200401082-SJH Name of Permittee: Orange Coast College of Sailing Date of Issuance: December 9, 2004 Upon completion of the activity authorized by this permit, sign this certification and return it to the following address: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch ATTN: CESPL-CO-R-200401082-SJH P.O Box 532711 Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 Please note that your permitted activity is subject to a compliance inspection by an Army Corps of Engineers representative. If you fail to comply with this permit you may be subject to permit suspension, modification, or revocation. I hereby certify that the work authorized by the above referenced permit has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of said permit. Signature of Permittee Date T \/Tf � '���T •T ���� f��� � �-�.K�'4� " d '.i4L�, .v' t f r Y t J �' � y., 1 � � �����t � n 1�-✓C r .#j i ( 1 z.��rkss� � t iD �+ ,. � r s Applicant: ®range Coast College of Sailing File Number: 200401082 Date: December 9, 2004 Attached is: See Section below X INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) A PROFFERED PERMIT (Standard Permit or Letter of permission) B PERMIT DENIAL C APPRO�JED JURISDICTIONAL DE T ERiviINA T 1 iN D PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION E SECTION I The followtng identtfies y+ur ghf and optton5 rgdtng an adrnnistraYe appeal oftlZe above decas�on Additional intormat�cn may�re fouri at http llusace army rrntl/metlfunctzocrs/cw/cecwolre or Corps re ulat ans ... 33. CFR ;Part 33 A: INITIAL PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or object to the permit. ACCEPT: if you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return It to the district engineer for tial authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. ® OBJECT: If you object to the permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may request that the permit be modified accordingly. You must complete Section II of this form and return the form to the district engineer. Your objections must be received by the district engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice, or you will forfeit your right to appeal the permit in the future. Upon receipt of your letter, the district engineer will evaluate your objections and may: (a) modify the permit to address all of your concerns, (b) modify the permit to address some of your objections, or (c) not modify the permit having determined that the permit should be issued as previously written. After evaluating your objections, the district engineer will send you a proffered permit for your reconsideration, as indicated in Section B below. B : PROFFERED PERMIT: You may accept or appeal the permit. ® ACCEPT: If you received a Standard Permit, you may sign the permit document and return it to the district engineer for final authorization. If you received a Letter of Permission (LOP), you may accept the LOP and your work is authorized. Your signature on the Standard Permit or acceptance of the LOP means that you accept the permit in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the permit, including its terms and conditions, and approved jurisdictional determinations associated with the permit. ® APPEAL: If you choose to decline the proffered permit (Standard or LOP) because of certain terms and conditions therein, you may appeal the declined permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. C: PERMIT DENIAL: You may appeal the denial of a permit under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. D: APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You may accept or appeal the approved JD or provide new information. ® ACCEPT: You do not need to notify the Corps to accept an approved JD. Failure to notify the Corps within 60 days of the date of this notice, means that you accept the approved JD in its entirety, and waive all rights to appeal the approved JD. ® APPEAL: If you disagree with the approved JD, you may appeal the approved JD under the Corps of Engineers Administrative Appeal Process by completing Section II of this form and sending the form to the division engineer. This form must be received by the division engineer within 60 days of the date of this notice. E: PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION: You do not need to respond to the Corps regarding the preliminary JD. The Preliminary JD is not appealable. If you wish, you may request an approved JD (which may be appealed), by contacting the Corps district for further instruction. Also you may provide new information for further consideration by the Corps to reevaluate the JD. SECIOI�t „ii RIIEST FOIAl'PA 0� TLONS T.,C3 A1�T'INI[ i PFY~ER, i�T REASONS FOR APPEAL OR OBJECTIONS: (Describe your reasons for appealing the decision or your objections to an initial proffered permit in clear concise statements. You may attach additional information to this form to clarify where your reasons or objections are addressed in the administrative record.) ADDITIONAL. INFORMATION: The appeal is limited to a review of the administrative record, the Corps memorandum for the record of the appeal conference or meeting, and any supplemental information that the review officer has determined is needed to clarify the administrative record. Neither the appellant nor the Corps may add new information or analyses to the record. however, you may provide additional information to clarify the location of information that is already in the administrative record. If you have questions regarding this decision and/or the appeal process you may contact: DISTRICT ENGINEER Los Angeles District, Corps of Engineers ATTN: Chief, Regulatory Branch P.O. Box 532711 Los Angeles, CA 90053-2325 Tel. (213) 452-3425 FAX (213) 452-4196 If you only have questions regarding the appeal process you may also contact: Douglas R. Pomeroy, Appeal Review Officer U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CESPD-ET-CO 333 Market Street San Francisco, CA 94015-2195 Tel. (415) 977-8035 FAX (415) 977-8047 RIGHT OF ENTRY: Your signature below grants the right of entry to Corps of Engineers personnel, and any government consultants, to conduct investigations of the project site during the course of the appeal process. You will be provided a 15 day notice of any site investigation, and will have the opportunity to participate in all site investigations. Date: Signature of appellant or Telephone number: Applicant Optib With 'InItial Pr, red Permit permcv5ntb, apprmarit, A#Oj— fCorp§,,,sig. ��O�ord bges pe., `-P ?PP!IQ a 7 40, letter ., d permissibm �tewrns,arr,.' c tion, -the Th 00�!§A z0- ,y . ..... , h�iaI ` pr er6d NO Appylicant declines proffered -9d permit App.11cantsends specific objections to rth' The=declrnedindlvicliaf d[4n'ct,eng.inee�rf`The ftfiict.,engineer diyis' jQn qnt,ihee-r, "th 13,1,1daysQfi th'er f�hepprmi,_ ;wJ,ll,;either mp`-qN�I 93tjemove'wl dale of the':NRP o A " w "', 'PIPAP,d d'i6CUdirlAble Ion Aor,6ftr6d the peri �t permit is sent"to the; ti A applrcantorp9co tT, th,',N P 'anal an RF%kform: --� , zttt I p man Dorps�sign standard "Pi C3oes t'h'e permit'or ap tacc pl6h epts lapprtcarnitaoc e aoc letter of )rl:, , , 'fotn 4.0 6 Th 00�!§A z0- , YMEi TIP proffeecl No Appylicant declines proffered -9d permit rth' The=declrnedindlvicliaf appealed by.submitt . ingal RFA.,toJ'h',e diyis' jQn qnt,ihee-r, "th 13,1,1daysQfi th'er dale of the':NRP o A " w "', 'PIPAP,d AOpeb lik, B, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR RESOURCES R June 26, 2007 Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship Attn: Brad Avery 1801 W. Pacific Coast Hwy. Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: 2003-04 Bulkhead Repairs at OCC Dear Mr. Avery, Per your request, I am providing approval regarding the bulkhead repairs that occurred at the Orange Coast College School of Sailing and Seamanship in 2003-04. Specifically, you had asked me to review the plans and provide `after the fact' approval for the work performed. (Plans: Cash & Associates, Project No: 6646.00, S-1) After reviewing these plans, I note that the following work was completed with respect to the bulkhead: 1) Remove and replace concrete cap along bulkhead, and 2) Repair existing whale. Because these repairs are considered minor and do not impact the water nor the soft bottom habitat of the harbor, or change the configuration of the bulkhead, Harbor Resources would have approved your project at a local level by stamping your plans without the need to issue an Approval in Concept. This letter, along with the stamped and signed plans, will act as an `after the fact' approval for your bulkhead repair work at your facility. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me directly. Thank you, Chris Miller Harbor Resources Supervisor cmiller@city.newpgrt-beach.ca.us (949) 644-3043 829 Harbor Island Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 PH: (949) 644-3034 FX: (949) 723-0589 • Website: www.newport-beach.ca.us/HBR/ MARINE DEPARTMENT May 27, 1975 ITEM NO.: H-11 (b) TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM Marine Department SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION #129-1801 BY COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT TO REVISE EXISTING FACILITIES AT 1801 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation If desired, recommend that the Newport Beach City Council approve the Harbor Permit Application subject to: 1) The approval of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2) The applicant obtaining permits for any plumbing, electrical and fire protection installations from applicable City departments. Discussion The Joint Harbor Committee and the Orange County Harbors, Beaches, and Parks District approved the application at their March 12 meeting. The proposed revision will relocate easterly three existing fingers, add two 4' x 32' fingers, and add one 14' x 78' finger to existing facilities at the Coast Community College District Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base. The relocation of existing fingers and the additional 14' x 78' finger is desired because of a need to moor the Argus, a large square rigged vessel donated to the College. The additional two smaller fingers are desired for safer mooring of vessels used by the college sailing classes. The existing parking spaces and restroom facilities are within the Harbor Permit Policy requirements. The proposed floats differ from the City of Newport Beach Standard Drawings only in configurations, not in structural design. R. E. REED, DIRECTOR Glen E. Welders Tidelands operations Coordinator Marine. Department GEW:1f Application No. 75-59 Name of Applicant _ Coast COMU'unity College District Effective Date - 11 February 1975 Expiration Date (If applicable) 31 December 1979 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT Referring to written request dated 17 March 1975 for a permit to: ( X) Perform work in or affecting navigable waters of the United States, upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers, pursuant to Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403); ( ) Discharge dredged or fill material into navigable waters upon the issuance of a permit from the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chief of Engineers pursuant to Section 404 of the Federal W«'er Pollution Control Act (86 Stat. 816, P.L. 92.-500); ( I Transport dredged material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters upon the issuance of a permit from the Secretary of the Army acting through the Chiefof Engineers pursuant to Section 103 of the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (86 Stat. 1052;p.L. 92-532); Coast Community College District -a (Here insert the full name and address of the permittee) Physical Facilities Planning 1370 Adams Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 is hereby au ooze y the Secretary of the Army: to relocate approximately 1,000 square feet - (Here describe the proposed structure or activity, and its of existing floats and construct approximate lyintended use. In the case of an application for a im 1,200 square feet Of additional floats permit, describe the structures, if any, proposed to be '— �• erected on the fill- Tu the case of an application for the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters or the transportation for discharge in ocean waters of dredged material, describe the type and quantity of material to be discharged.) rliewport Harbor, Pacific Ocean (Here to be named the ocean, river, harbor, or waterway concerned.) at- e Intercollegiate Rowing .and Sailing - (Here to be named the nearest well-known loca]ity Base, 1801 West Coast Highway (portion of preferably a town or city-and the distance in miles and Lot H, Tract 919), Newport Beach, Count Of tenths from some definite point in the same, stating y whether above or below or giving direction by points of Orange, California, as shown on the attatched compass.) il#'3`C`c�l`�arrEe wit s the plans and drawings attached hereto which are incorporated in and made a part of this permit (on drawsn file number or other definite identification marks); gs• gave Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base 1801 West Coast Highway Newport Beach, California _ ]ect to the following conditions: 1. General Conditions. a. That all activities identified and authorized herein shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit; and that any activities not specifically identified and authorized herein shall constitute a violation of the terms and conditions of this permit which may result in the modification, suspension or revocation of this permit, in whole or in part, as set forth more specifically in General Conditions j or k hereto, and in the institution of such legal proceedings as the United States Government may consider appropriate, whether or not this permit has been previously modified, suspended or revoked in whole or in part. ENG FORM 1723 EDITION OF7UNE 1968 ISOBSOL£TE, (ER 3145-2-303) t APR 74 fi � FEET - �.CIVISKWAL eN'JIPpNNeNTAL eNGINRgk9 h PL.NNE 9 Q4 D b. That .all activities authorized herein shall, if they involve a discharge or deposit into navigable waters or ocean waters, be at all times consistent with applicable water quality standards, effluent limitations and standards of performance, prohibitions, and pretreatment standards established pursuant to Sections 301, 302, 336 and 307 of the. Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-500; 86 Stat. 816), or pursuant to applicable State and local law. c. That when the activity authorized herein involves a discharge or deposit of dredged or fill material into navigable waters, the authorized activity shall, if applicable water quality standards are revised or modified during the term of this permit, be modified, if necessary, to conform with such revised or modified water quality standards within 6 months of the effective date of any revision or modification of water quality standards, or as, directed by an implementation plan contained in such revised or modified standards, or within such longer period of time as the District Engineer, in consultation with the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may determine to be reasonable under the circumstances. d. That the permittee agrees to make every reasonable effort to prosecute the work authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any adverse impact of the work on fish, wildlife and natural environmental values., e. That the permittee agrees to prosecute the work authorized herein in a manner so as to minimize any degradation of water quality. f. That the permittee shall permit the District Engineer or his authorized representatives) or designee(s) to make periodic inspections at any time deemed necessary in order to assure that the activity being performed under authority of this permit is in accordance with the terms and conditions prescribed herein. g. That the permittee shall maintain the structure or work authorized herein in good condition and in accordance with the plans and y drawings attached hereto. i h. That this permit does not convey any property rights, either in real estate or material, or any exclusive privileges; and that it does not authorize any injury to property or invasion of rights or any infringement of Federal, State, or local laws or regulations, nor does it j obviate the requirement to obtain State or local assent required by law for the activity authorized herein. L That this permit does not authorize the interference with any existing or proposed Federal project and that the permittee shall not be entitled to compensation for damage or injury to the structures or work authorized herein which may be caused by or result from existing or future operations undertaken by the United States in the public interest. 1 j. That this permit may be summarily suspended, in whole or in part, upon a finding by the District Engineer that immediate suspension of the activity authorized herein would be in the general public interest. Such suspension shall be effective upon receipt by q the permittee of a written notice thereof which shall indicate (1) the extent of the suspension, (2) the reasons for this action, and (3) any corrective or preventative measures to be taken by the permittee which are deemed necessary by the District Engineer to abate imminent hazards to the general public interest. The permittee shall take immediate action to comply with the provisions.of this notice. ? Within ten days following receipt of this notice of suspension, the permittee may request a hearing in order to present information 1 relevant to a decision as to whether his permit should be reinstated, modified or revoked. If a hearing is requested, it shall be conducted pursuant to procedures prescribed by the Chief of Engineers. After completion of the hearing, or within a reasonable time after issuance i of the suspension notice to the permittee if no hearing is requested, the permit will either be reinstated, modified or revoked. y k. That this permit may be either modified, suspended or revoked in whole or in part if the Secretary of the Army or his authorized { representative determines that there has been a violation of any of the terms or conditions, of this permit or that such action would otherwise be in the public interest: Any such modification, suspension, or revocation shall become effective 30 days after receipt by the permittee of written notice of such action which shall specify the facts t,r conduce warranting same unless (1) within the 30 -day period the permittee is able to satisfactorily demonstrate that (a) the alleged vio"ation of the terms and the conditions of this permit did not, in fact, occur or (b) the alleged violation was accidental, and the permittee has been operating incompliance with the terms and conditions of the permit and is able to provide satisfactory assurances that future operations shall be in full compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit; or (2) within the aforesaid 30 -day period, the permittee requests that public hearing be held to present oral and written evidence concerning the proposed modification, suspension or revocation. The conduct of this hearing and the procedures q for making a final decision either to modify, suspend or revoke this permit in whole or in part shall be pursuant to procedures prescribed 3 by the Chief of Engineers. 1, That in issuing this permit, the Government has relied on the information and data which the permittee has provided in connection with his permit application. If, subsequent to the issuance of this permit, such information and data prove to be false, incomplete or inaccurate, this permit may be modified, suspended or revoked, in wholeror in part, and/or the Government may, in addition, institute appropriate legal proceedings. m. That any modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit shall not be the basis for any claim for damages against the United States. - -- — - n. That the permittee shall ,notify the District Engineer at what time the activity authorized herein will be commenced, as far in advance of the time of commencement as the District Engineer may specify, and of any suspension of work, if for a period of more than one week, resumption of, work and its completion o. That if the activity authorized herein is not stated on or before 31st day of T)p cPmher ,1577 (one year from the date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified) and is not completed on or before 31St day , of December , 197C) _ (three years from the date of issuance of this permit unless otherwise specified) this permit, if not previously revoked or specifically extended, shall automatically expire. s p. That no attempt shall be made by the permittee to prevent the full and free use by the public of all navigable waters at or adjacent to the activity authorized by this permit. q. That if the display of lights and signals on any structure or work authorized herein is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may be prescribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and maintained by and at the expense of the i permittee. r. That this permit does not authorize or approve the construction of particular structures, the authorization or approval of which may require authorization by the Congress or other agencies of the Federal Government. s s. That if and when the permittee desires to abandon the activity authorized herein, unless such abandonment is part of a transfer R procedure by which the permittee is transferring his interests herein to a third party pursuant to General Condition v hereof, he must restore the area to a condition satisfactory to the District Engineer.. - a t. `That if the recording of this permit is possible under applicable State or local law, the permittee shall take such action as may be necessary to record this permit with the Register of Deeds or other appropriate official charged with the responsibility for maintaining records of title to and interests in real property. u. That there shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the existence or use of the activity authorized herein. tt, v. That this permit may not be transferred to a third party without prior written notice to the District Engineer, either by the transferee's written agreement to comply with all terms and condition of this permit or by the transferee subscribing to this permit in the space provided below and thereby agreeing to comply with all terms and conditions of this permit. In addition, if the permittee transfers the interests authorized herein by conveyance of realty, the deed shall reference this permit and the terms and conditions a specified herein and this permit shall be recorded along with the deed with the Register of Deeds or other appropriate official. i The following Special Conditions will be applicable when appropriate: STRUCTURES FOR SMALL BOATS: That permittee hereby recognizes the possibility that the structure permitted herein may be subject to damage by wave wash from passing vessels., The issuance of this permit does not relieve the permittee from taking all proper steps to insure the integrity of the structure permitted herein and. the safety of boats moored thereto from damage by wave wash and the permittee shall not hold the United States liable for any such damage. — E — F — R E DGEE) MATER! a permittee shall pleee a eepy Of !his it -+n --a UOUS Plaee the— a, to ho used ggr ;he z;anc.caumeuacuci rx�aa�iaaS aU646H-srs: tCTION OF STRUCTURE IN OR OVER NAVIGABLE WATERS: That the permittee, upon receipt of a notice of revocation of this permit or upon its expiration before completion of the authorized structure or work, shall, without expense to the United States and in such time and manner as the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative may direct, restore the waterway to its former conditions. If the permittee fails to comply with the direction of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, the Secretary or his designee may restore the waterway to its former condition, by contract or otherwise, and recover the cost thereof from the permittee. . 3 „- ... ,. u s. ►0i r ED 1 24.5± Q • ! PROPOSEDFLOAT : ��� ► �, -77 0 M L.L.YJ. C Le-VA LES 1 2 C1`10ri'E : � 022E=DCat1,.1G F�i(�SO} _ t 11cagwla PROPOSED FLOAT ADDITION L— I EXIS {IY� 5L)LKPE/S—D I � '7-dl�tP 'I - ----- ---_--_-----��-- —� I TILE I �� • � i FIL.iA 1 I L 1 r-- --7 �� --'TO 5-v4.t2c� € 1_ _ j --1 I 1 1 33r5 ' i 1 ail, I c► 11 j. 1 i t -To sties 130 C_ G� li 1 1 f + s-i RowiKG FLCr� l i 51_ L_J _ - L J _ L__J J.S.fIE�'aEhL7 Lid s' 14 Gt�PRDF05ED /swc Acxz 91 LE o! f^ F,CFSiII r FLLa4T J A PpaOpV5ac PL4/ A,/� [� /'�' ` `� /� /� fie/ Szr CO BE REIDCATED / RJ—=:.�.L)�. A i 10� 4 ` D 1-T1 \..d 1� 5 PROPOSED RELOCATION IurEROLI- G,IETa 5WUUG AKo RO\ulklG 545a I0ol WEST CO/�ST \ OF EXISl I NG h1Fc�VPOi�.i '�3E/aGH , C/�.LI FOR1JiA ` FLOAT COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE D1STF;4,CT A-V -7 CO✓T,A 1570 /40 fl 30 bfl b u," 3Tzbst � s.9DcIStC3 PROFE'SSfONAL ENVIRONME IT L ENGINEERS 6 PlA13M `�L�-• F�i=.T M- .o .a.x�ou.�b�a�„�.R�� �..o�,s�,�N�.L»a.....:N� i + � o� I. j %ten 4 REGULAR MEETING C! f `C) ; C -'--,'.t-1 NEWPORT HAR30R JOINT HAR30R C0MI1ITTEE j ! i 3 November 12, 1971+ 1+:30 P:M... _. 1 } ATTENDANCE 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 2.1 d ' I Nays t Niotn I 2. PROPOSED ADDITION TO ORANGE COAST COLLEGE 2ndFACILITY. Kays j # Digest: Orange Coast College,is requesting autho.. i rization to const ruzct' an addition to the existing t !1 building at the Intercollegiate Rowing Base. The?, ! structure would be used for additional rowing 1 l shell storage. County (District) staff has reviewed.the plans and found the proposed addition I to be architecturally compatible with the existing 1. i } structure. The site in question is County Tide- lands leased to the College and therefore a`` ? County Commecial Permit , .approved by the Board of Supervisors, is customarily required. An 3 application for such a permit has been submitted ' } { along with the appropriate fee. ' 1 RECOW4ENDED ACTION: Recommend approval of subject project,_ subject to meeting City and s State coastal Zone Permit requirements, and f ' issuance of the Commercial Permit by the Board } of Supervisors. i 3: OTHER BUSINESS I 6 I I ; I i s j r i • y 1 1 t 5J od P HARBOR R Y R N "'• Fr1'.rd PERMISSION IS I• EPEBY GR N7 ,g5 r-"H� P:, 1 �' s , � ,s�; d' AND MAINTAIN THEE rAC�L,77 —2 AT THE SITE Ifl' D9a':ATrD, THE 6x,15a3BOR ANY SPECIAL �_ xa IS NOT T4c"Sin�"S�r�IrAS�., u5.'�:e ', 'i' z7':_(>a THE CITY HAR13OR Ct�,O'jm f „ CK 9 I RIGHTS GlVj N C9N:D p.�zn3u.: AND TIUS tarF3FAIT iv7,y EE [ ; r:;v": ECD By aH M k u ;:0,J IN ACCORDANCE W941,-' ITI_E 17 OF 1 -RE RFiUlq,,C©&=AL CC) Dr. 14TY�440R CC)02" � 1 /��=i -off-7-,? z- 2 z - PERMIT NO. ®ATE. AUTHORIZED BY CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL. CONK), Corps of Encepnee� s e'en at PV 0 11 �^ : C,. A.7 IZ u ~ -- — - \� C ✓�e on/ -'Q'VICINITY S KETC fGstLE <.ro2.0. /"- Coo' H JETTY ✓E/tf. t', AGO' )VC:"L-�02T 4YAY —CAG/FO::,Y'/Q O r � p,Q c 1 Ft C c o d e r �� 2,��✓ • � go�T !-fod5� 9 8. I F 7—,"7 i Cl— IT_ IL I E ! L I I 511L - 9 of "Go" a: Go37. 9' J v _ //LE `l � � • 1 � GfICLIOr� Jo II�C�'" P/LE I7'Tx 62- Ivo Doc, 1 r4 �. 161 � 9•._._ E'YGIPJLrIIS SUI.' 0 J.760 ;97/ s'�PLIGi?Y/C;./ ' c,n_.rr ,.. ._.;.-�. F�E.T -';,:: ll�l//•5GP /� sfL'G.J:6� � 13G0 / ��-;� l?a .r;� '- v_.s�:'•a��+a..�.w..x�.a�..i.:.�.I.rrr.err.M.�.-�la...rn!n�.T.'NM�IY.TM.R�V r'.:ix•tiWlti•.YI[rMM�...J�,.w WNr�l JLin'.IL.i+....4 nR ..w. M'v..r[•%....i �-✓�•�.rv••IPxw•.: �.�• .K.+ww:.. �v.., ..�.-... .. _.._--. ��NPo r OA C.OAlreACro� %3o%S" CifY 00 NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERMIT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO CONSTRUCT AND MIAIMTAIIr THE FACILITY SHOWN ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, AT THE SITE INDICATED, SUBJECT TO THS I ROWSIONS OF THE HARBOR PERMIT POLICIES OF NEW1iPOI%T BEACH ANE, ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS LISTED HEREON. THIS PERffir, IS NOT TRANSFERABLE W fT1IOUT THE Vifr.41.-3'EN CONSENT" G; THE CITY HARBOR CCORDU4ATOR OR CITY COUNCIL. T'A't RIGHTS GIVEN UNDER TI -RS PE"UNUT ARE F-CKPA$SSIVE ON:�t AND THIS PEPP41T MAY BE REVOKED BY TfIZ CITY COUNCet IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE E9.g iI6„E h'IU%9(,;PAL CODE,. CITY ISAR R PERMIT NO. �E SPECIAL CONDITIONS; COrPs Of Eroneers Permit Orange C Permit Otfler PERMIT ISSUED SIIBJECr TO DREDGE MATERIAL GeINC �HAULEDTCSEA___, t PLACED ON BEAD T-- 1701 0 pT O?T W ,o O 13AL/9CA, 111ilfill Fill T n.u. ORB06EYO-10g . 0.4 oc E L E V A T 1 O, h/r4Al DOROYA MAR Vlc//V/TY SKETCH nsT j•G�fGE : Ho2Ic. . fe0' WEST Yerif. I» AGO' � rrY BETTY. N6WAORT BAY — CAL/FO?NIR O° 1/2 GIZAP77JE L MILES GOX:37' N/GW� y P,4/ F/ C -_ AZ/PV ----------------- odt N u56 gf4 %2- �a h 7 _. 0 I CX/sX G3C/LCHG ID Ci I ISIO d1 NEW CO S�RUCTION I . t j' 130.47' Srors.(GE. � I I , 4..4C//VG/V1A1Cw /LAMP PLOAT h � I � SUL.�f1e,4D L1NB' r TO dT� 129— 5 61'00' a Go37. 9J TO .4 r4. Ido 0 I t l 0 h J�v�Q �o f 1 eu B T ._51 �• 1/.� h oST�4NOT I I I 1 1 P/,_ 40 L/NE poc,G � .• �" ° u.J. PIZ aJFCT LWe ' 7ZAUB-QEIN-FRO57s'ASS0CIATES " ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS i f 1• 'f. °' 1 �' �✓ 136 teocussroe•COSTA :MESA, CAL/F. 012.41.16E LO,1 >7" COLLEGE P2OP05ED 12EWON,dL S.QlLWO F.d CILMES ' j 13ULKN8 n0/2CUG/NGY , P/E125 47 ao 60�lPPL/C�Q'T'tON -- N 00 ° 024N45.E COA67COLLedit- cY2.fPraiC GC-_ - -..�4uPVC 40,4$ r R.16HWWY' L.0 F'CCi /$470 ` A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERMIT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN THE FACILITY SHOWN ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, AT THE SITE INDICATED, SUBJECT TO THE PROV,SIONS OF THE HARBOR PERMIT PCLICIES OF NEWPORT BEACH ANC ANY SPECIAL COhDITICNS LISTED HEREON. THIS PERM.,.* IS NOT TRANSFERABLE VISTHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT C-< THE CITY HARBOR COORDINATOR OR CITY COUNCIL. T; RIGHTS GIVEN UNDER THUS PERMIT ARE PERMISSIVE ONL. AND THIS PERMIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY COUNC,L IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 87 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. 6./ ,i uJ - CITY HXR130 OOR aIi ;41.nj 2 2 - W/ SEP 2 9 196..9 PERMIT NO. IRATE JNSP_ECTED By SEP 2 9 1969 D� f SPECIAL CONDITIONS: Corps of Engineers Permit Orange County Permit -�e 2 3 l 5 41* Others 7'%'"'"*ee -Aa 4 1 A 121, AUTHORIZED 13Y CITY COUNCIL off AUG 1 1 9969 /- CITY CLERK ; CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERMIT PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO CONSTRUCT AM MAINTAIN THE FACILITY SHOWN ON TH , ,REV'uFi"i'GE HZEREOF: AT THE SITE ,NDICAYjr�D'v SU,".jEC 7'0 T6 -':j '*2 sLV S10 S Or THE HARBOR PES MZT OF N vr°i ,� T aa".'ACH AN1- ANY SPECIAL CGk%,DiT;0-dS Li,!TE'D klF1 VF t y PER*r. • IS NOT TRANSFERABLE V%l ' H-3 . TE" THE C.iiY HARZOR C'�Ci''1:5r: ,?sat On' ::R'i :' (:CUNCiL. TK' RIGHTS G'.VEN UNVEi? THj R.4e. s * £'ai^ ire i� ui'ys OIVLI' AND TEIS PL.RAIT MAY Ise RiZV KED BY TWE C TY COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 OF THE MUNIC➢PAL CODE. iCITY HARBOR COORDINATOR ii-r,�'v1 ERIMIT NO. DATE. SPECIAL CONDITIONS:, Cerps Of Engineers Permit Crsnge County Permit Otile.: 5'c. v ? c c C--199-74 ' ; MIT CONSTRUCTION DATE.--- ................. SEE ATTACHED T C) I F0 November 26, 1980 U. S. Corps of Engineers Waterways Control Section P. 0. Box 2711 Los Angeles, CA 90053 ATT: NAVIGATION BRANCH Gentlemen: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH The enclosed permit drawing(.$) is being sent for your approval in accordance with conditions of approval under the U. S.'ArmY Corps of Engineers "blanket" permit for maintenance dredging issued to the City.of Newport Beach on February 12, 1974 and amended on'May 10,"1977. The City Council of Newport Beach approved ,the application at its November 24, 1980 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact the City of Newport Beach,'Marine Department at (.714) 640-2156, D. HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Tony Mel um,/ Tidelands Administrator TM: a k encl City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvi Area Code 714 640-2156 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MARINE DEPARTMENT November 24, 1980 TO: MAYOR AND CITY. COUNCIL ITEM NO.: H-14 FROM: Marine Department SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION #129-1801 FOR MAINTENANCE DREDGING Recommendation: If desired, approve the maintenance dredging application. Discussion: The application requires City Council approval under the conditions of approval placed on the City of Newport Beach general permit for maintenance dredging issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, on February 12, 1974, and subsequently amended on May 10, 1977, to allow beach restoration. The location and 'applicant for the proposed dredging and beach restoration is: 129-1801 Intercollegiate Sailing & Rowing Base 1801 WestCoast Highway The staff has reviewed the project and has determined that the work will be done within the parameters of the Corps of Engineers' permit. The dredging contractor will place a filter screen around the dredge area to control turbid- ity. There is no known eel grass in the vicinity of the project. All.dredged material will be hauled to sea and dumped. DAVID HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Tony Melum Tidelands Administrator TM:ak Cl r Y 7,2�e.as a�o�. a�•�r h ti 21� / cA4 a!•/ate lPAA".w Qa', �T', DO ..�L.7` C•a•Nw a a[a awt wsvv JiTtr. � war V I.0 i iV I. T 1 SKETCH 200 _ Nawaoar 5AY, Y AC IFVRNIp yr i Iury s JO Undin95 ora etpicssed in lstf and c/rn01d &ep?A5 be/ow "Wear? Lorver Low Wofar. Moxi...cirr► range of d�'d� q,Pprvx/dsoi�/y /O +rm.gf Horbor /.ineS care cs/o6/r5hrd �.� fh.s Sc•C�ion of NawPorf Scs1r �rV ram, -c/ rl ll _ Yl Co r/7 ®C77t A �O rf.rJ.9T�f/ .has r P40k'eS ' ---- - CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH U a -November-18, 1980 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service 300 S. Ferry Street - Room 2016 Terminal Island, CA 90731 Gentlemen: The enclosed permit drawing(s) is being sent for your infor- mation in accordance with conditions of approval under the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers "blanket" permit for maintenance dredging. This "blanket" permit was issued to the City of Newport Beach on February 12, 1974, and subsequently amended on May 10, 1977 to allow beach restoration. As required by this permit, the Marine Department has in- spected the dredging site and found no eel grass within or near the project. The City Council of Newport Beach will hear the application at i is Naov&Tiber 24, 1980 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this application, please contact the City of Newport Beach Marine Department at (714) 640-2156. Sincerely, 0. HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Ile Tony Mel6m Tidelands Administrator TO: U.S. DEPT INTERIORS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: DPT F&G; U.S.C.G; DEPT COMMERCE NAAA; S.A.R.WQ.C.B. City Hall - 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport .Beach, California 92663 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MARINE DEPARTMENT May 27, 1980 TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ITEM NO: H-16 FROM: Marine Department SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION NUMBERS 258-202,; 129-1801, 139-10 Recommendation If desired, approve the maintenance dredging applications. Discussion The applications require City Council approval under the conditions of approval placed on the City of Newport Beach general permit for maintenance dredging issued by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, on February 12, 1974, and subse- quently amended on May 10, 1977, to allow beach restoration. The locations and applicants for the proposed dredging and beach restorations are: 258-202 W. E. Hunt, Jr. 202 S. Bayfront Intercollegiate 129-1801. Sailing and Rowing Base 1801 W. Coast Highway 139-10 _ J. E.Rogers #10 Harbor Island The staff has reviewed the projects and has determined that the work will be done within the parameters of the Corps of Engineers permit. The dredging contractor will place a filter screen around the discharge site to control turbidity. There is no known eel grass in the vicinity of the projects. At 202 S. Bayfront, the dredged material will be placed on adjacent beaches. This will aide in the restoration ofdbeaches bayward of private residences. At #10 Harbor Island and 1801 W. Coast Highway,. the dredged material will be hauled to sea and dumped. D. HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Tony Me'� um Tidelands Administrator TM: ak PERMIT NO.�� DREDGING APPLICATION - Project Location: - 1801 West Coast Highway Cubic Yards to be Dredged: 200 Method of Dredging: Hydraulic Suction Nature of Dredged Material: Sand/Silt Disposition of Dredged Material: Haul to sea and dump at Latitude 33°31142"N, Longitude 117°54'48"W Method ,of Material Disposition: Barge to sea Turbidity Control Method: Material to be contained in dump barge ,at dredge site. Effect of dredging on`,'contiguous bulkheading and beaches None I, Wm. L. Harris , hereby state that I have read the U. S. Army (print name) Corps of Engineers permit for maintenance dredging in Newport Harbor, the City of Newport Beach and Orange County Harbors,Beaches and. Parks District. (if applicable) permit for maintenance dredging and that I accept all the provisions therein. :Additionally I guarantee that the proposed dredging will not occur because of any altering' of existing use of the affected zone. Intercollegiate Sailing ,& Rowing Base (Applicant -type name 4/28/80 (Date) Shellmaker, Inc. (Contractor -type name) Signed: Wyh Contractor's Representative Iii Cit/ Hali j `3300 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 714 640-2156 May 28, 1980 U. S. Corps of Engineers Waterways Control Section P. 0. Box 2711 Los Angeles,, CA 90053 ATT: NAVIGATION`'BRANCH Gentlemen: The enclosed permit drawing(,$) is being sent for. your approval in accordance with conditions of approval under the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers "blanket" permit for maintenance dredging issued to the City of Newport Beach on February 12 1974 and amended on -May 10,'1977. The City Council of Newport Beach approved the application at its May 27, 1980 meeting. If you have any questions regarding this application, please .contact the City of Newport Beach,'Marine Department at (714) 640-2156. D. HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Tony Mel m Tidelands Administrator TM: ak encl /VS;xPoRr &,s -,4c1-1 �+ LC y,2 rQcos�osh n�•�d• <o �• 55 I �v0 �'�-� r•Op Na.�•o.rr 'p•^ a '' o � T � ®$c,�oo D � /•!i � �•"' O ! LAM -2.00j- { va{. MIa N V t C i ALJ 1 TY 5 X E 1g C 1�a� wear J6rTr a �qa. r. -.y NawvaaT taJAY CA[ tGORN(A2 Lo u. / Oig,� � �,� 15 5 1 J Sound�n9s oro e.coressed in iac/ and dvnola dep /i, s be/pw Meon LP wer Low Wo P'er, A40A .vtlna 6 ron9e of f!o!C OpPrvk��no�o/y' /O �ee� Hcar�oi /��es fi� are esyob/r'shed a? -IA:s seC4,007 oor vowpoel Coy c�47 C,D�sr ��- ,%dq�6 r ,8u/K/ieac>' I t � i t j I f � I i I j i •r �f � � � ` i 1 y n -r-e• ra n PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO CGINSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN THE FACILITY SHOWL4 ON THE REVIERSE HEREOF, AT THE SITE INDICATED, SUPUBJECT To 'THE PROVISIONS OF THE HARBOR PER-MiT POLICIETS OF NEWPORT C -EACH AN! ANY SPECIAL CON5031RONS LIZTED HEREON. THIS PERMJ- IS NOT TRANSFEM-M-SLE Vt,(,IrRrjU-n- V.."T-77TELN CONSENT Q� THE CITY �dlrK3 Sf t.@ 1 7 . V CGUNCM. TW' RIGHTS GIVEN U;tgDFR pZE- �IRF INSSWE Om PEFN� AND THIS PERMIT MAY BE REV0,1tC,1D ry 'I -21E CETY COUNCIL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 OF THE PAIJXIPAL CODE. A:(b/ CITY HARBOR COORDINIAT R PERMIT N—O. DATE SPECIAL CONDITIONJS.- Corps of Engineers permit -0 - 7 7 Orange COuntY Permit other- CC— Cl i" �— X12 -�•,�'�=---- �'D'--�� .� o MIN 21 idawNp • ,L_ � o.na .L. ro FT:7- JIMIJO, J /TPi% . s oda wn,aQ VICIMITY 5XETCH •"Y'r/6rpr � �+9r NY wpORT f3AY CAL Ii oRJ.11,A s rry ,516 u.,7 dlogs ors N,�ps�ssrd �n �'ecl and d®naAa deP1%+5 be/ow Mco.! Lover LOW J,/ofes-. MoYi.r.cJ ss r0»9e o/- are fare es yob/r'sscrcf.o i ofNewPorf 80,: v � IIQ P - - 361za ' ss I i Q � G. �7!/ /�(%GaJ /iIJ �'7 �rii. J� J I � F' � i. P� s A '� / Ir^..'¢%�'or•i! 8 RA !CITY OF NEWPORT BEAC9 H A R B 0 R P E RIFA pERILqISSIG,�4 15 G�FIANTED To Amn MAM4TA;H THIE FA-Z"HUTY SHOLVIkIN 04�-1 112Z AT THE S27E S Gi TPE HARSOR 7EAC'j4 AN1 ANY SFEZ,AL IS NOT Gi 7HE cl�linul TH ! RIGHTS GIFIU711M U5 AND THts PER, MIT gy 4. '3-Y COUNCIL Af.)— ";,FL rfoU�,4ECUFIAL CODE. IN ACCORDANCE WiTH TE�M%E'ff' F CITY H#,RSOBM: INTOR --//- -,V4 -,qo 1. PERMIT NO. DATE SPECIAL CONDITIONS: (,C;rr rll-lit S -/O-'77 meerz pc ora�lge County Permit Other: c-62 PERMIT NO. '07 . DREDGING APPLICATION Project Location:1801 West 'Coast Highway Cubic Yards to be Dredged: 200, Method of Dredging• Hydraulic Suction Nature of Dredged Material: Sand/Silt Disposition of Dredged Material: Haul to sea and dump at Latitude 33131'42"N, Longitude 117°54'48"W Method of Material Disposition: Barge to sea 6 , Turbidity Control Method Material to be contained. in Dump Barge at drudge site. Effect of dredging on `contiguous bulkheading and beaches None I, Wm. L. Harris , hereby state that I have read the U. S. Army (Print name) Corps of Engineers permit for maintenance dredging in Newport Harbor, the City of Newport Beach and orange County Harbors,Beaches and Parks District ` (if applicable) permit for maintenance dredging and that I accept all the i provisions therein. .Additionally I guarantee that the proposed dredging will not occur because of any altering'of existing use of the affected zone. Intercollegiate Sailing ,& Rowing Base (Applicant -type name Shellmaker, Inc. Contractor -type name) . �-�- Si gned: �-- Contractor's Representative COUNCILME 0 A pni I ral I G_,,,-( OF NEWPORT K,,d,H N March 28. 1977 MINUTES of Balboa Boulevard, Contract 1896, were approved; and the City Clerk was authorized to advertise for bids to be opened at 10:30 A.M. on Tuesday, April 12, 1977. (Report from the Public Works Director) 11. Harbor Permit Application Orange Harbor ' Coast College to revise their existing slips atPerini, 1801 W. Coast Highway was approved, subject to the approval of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Orange County Harbors, Beachs and Parks District. (Report from the Marine Department) 12. The request for retention of a police motorcycle Police for training purposes was approved; (Report to Department the City Manager from the Police Department) 13. The expense account of Mayor Dostal in the amount of $652.04 for attendance at the National League of Cities Congressional -Cities Conference, the meeting of the National League of Cities Environmental Quality.Committee, the meeting of the Board of Directors of N.O.I.S.E. and the annual symposium of N.O.I.S.E. on March 5 through 8, 1977, in Washington, D.C., was approved. 14. The following budget amendments were approved - BA -79, $28,615.00 increase in Budget Appropriations and in Revenue Estimates, contributions by City of Irvine and Koll Center Newport toward installa- tion of traffic signal at Campus Drive and Von Karman Avenue, from Unappropriated Surplus and Donations and Contributions to Install/Upgrade Traffic Signals, Contributions Fund. BA -80, $25.00 increase in Budget Appropriations and in Revenue Estimates, contribution by Anglers Friday Luncheon Club to Litter Committee, from Unappropriated Surplus and Donations and Contribu- tions to Nondepartmental, Special Departmental Expense. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR: 1. A report was presented from the Chief of Police Vehicles regarding the display of vehicles for sale. for Motion x Sale Ayes x x x x x A proposed ordinance relating to display of Noes x x vehicles for sale was postponed to April 25, 1977. 2. On advice from the City Attorney the following Motion x ordinances were introduced and set for public Ayes x x x x x x x hearing on April 11, 1977: (a) Proposed Ordinance No. 1723, being, AN Building ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Site AMENDING SECTION 20.87.090 OF THE NEWPORT 0-1723 BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE, REDEFINING "BUILDING SITE," Planning Commission Amendment No. 489, a request initiated by the City of Newport Beach. (Report from the Community Development Department) Volume 31 - Page 89 COUNCILMEN 1p - y �p �_ 'F0 0 C p `P s AA p��y T2s Rni i ra i i OF NEWPORT B -L -AC H MINUTES March 28. 1977 (b) Proposed Ordinance No. 1724, being, AN Prezoning ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH-' C.B.S. PREZONING UNINCORPORATED TERRITORY LOCATED ON Publishing THE WESTERLY SIDE OF MONROVIA AVENUE AT ITS Site INTERSECTION WITH 15TH STREET, NORTHERLY OF 0-1724 THE NEWPORT CREST RESIDENTIAL COMPLEX, ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE EVENT OF SUBSEQUENT ANNEXATION, AND ESTABLISH- ING PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR THAT PORTION OF THE C.B.S. PUBLISHING' SITE ON PROPERTYLOCATED IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, Planning Commission Amendment No. 491, a request of the United California Bank, Trustee, Los Angeles, to prezone Unincorporated Territory of Orange County on the westerly side of Monrovia Avenue at its intersection with 15th Street to the Planned Community District in the City of Newport Beach. Further request to establish the Planned Community Development Standards for the proposed expanded C.B.S. Publishing site on the property in question and on adjoining' property now located in the City,` and the, acceptance of an environmental document. Property located at 1499 Monrovia Avenue, on the westerly side of Monrovia Avenue at its intersection with 15th Street, northerly of the Newport Crest residential complex. (Report from the Community Development' Department) 3. Marguerite Forgit addressed the Council in regard Vehicle to the proposed ordinance pertaining to the Storage removal and storing of vehicles. Proposed Ordinance No. 1725, being, AN ORDINANCE 0-1725 OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 12.40 OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 12.40.035; AMENDING SECTION 12.40.040 AND SECTION 12.40.190 DEALING WITH THE Motion x CAUSES FOR REMOVAL AND STORING OF VEHICLES, was Ayes x x x x x x x introduced and passed to second reading on. April 11, 1977. ADDITIONAL BUSINESS: 1. Resolution No. 9049, setting forth the total CEQCAC membership of the Environmental Quality Control R-9049 Motion x Citizens Advisory Committee, together with certain Ayes x x x x x x x procedural rules, was adopted as amended. 2. The extension of the lease for the Carden School Carden on the property at 5th and Marguerite was con- School sidered with Agenda Item F-3. Lease Motion x 3. The Mayor was authorized to send a letter to the Ayes x x x x x x x appropriate agencies supporting acquisition of land by the State in the TICMAP area. Mayor Dostal adjourned the meeting at 12:06 A.M., March 29, 1977. I Volume 31 - Page 90 MARINE DEPARTMENT March 28, 1977- ITEM NO.: H-10 (a) T0: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Marine Department . SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION #129-1801 BY ORANGE COAST COLLEGE TO REVISE THEIR EXISTING SLIPS AT 1801 W. COAST HIGHWAY RECOMMENDATION If desired, approve the Harbor Permit Application subject to: 1. The approval of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 2. The approval of the Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District DISCUSSION The Joint Harbor Committee, at its March 2.2, 1977 meeting, reviewed the application and recommended approval. The approval of the Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District is required because the proposed revision is over tidelands held in trust by Orange County. The proposed revision will relocate four existing fingers easterly approxi- mately 16 feet. The relocation is desired to accomodate two large sailing vessels donated to Orange Coast College for use in their sailing program. The proposed configuration will provide adequate mooring for the two vessels without interferring with the crew program. D. HARSHBARGER, DIRECTOR MARINE DEPARTMENT Gle�nE Weden Tidelands Administrator GEW:ll �1 s 24.5- -t9 BULK i I M.L.L.W. — E)V'STIAJC �" 0M.L.I.W. �— pR,LGYaED 4�rx�ND PF�OE= SLO- ATIOW cr`.raaaz aIL� dbeano1.1 &-4 17 I u. \ b L I ct, VICIMITY 1.� o ��\ I ►Jm\VFblzr 8dY-C&uFCQ .1 V.- 0 ✓t l.+CALE_'+ lu MILMe2" A l&J-re-R-OLLE(::;ATC- SSIUI-!G /Si..lp i2Ly.V11JG �.si=. FXISTMir 6ut.KV/►0 :-DGGLW /LANI�tW�N4r EX, s r Fin ♦i PROPOSED 1•1EIOCATION . OF EXISTING FLOAT vo $&olb O _u _ U•S• b"Lk(utlis IFN4 33?S'� To ST�•13o AL LAASW UAL 94 .Q David A. Grant Q DGS j'-.dA-jTs AIjA wo Orange Coast Co I I ege 1801 W. Coast Highways Newport Beach lCaA17WAcro-s DATE' 3/8/77 44 I .+ aL . PWP0P3ED ,OuciAOR PIIS �! 'fig 2SQU1(2Ec> 1 l&J-re-R-OLLE(::;ATC- SSIUI-!G /Si..lp i2Ly.V11JG �.si=. FXISTMir 6ut.KV/►0 :-DGGLW /LANI�tW�N4r EX, s r Fin ♦i PROPOSED 1•1EIOCATION . OF EXISTING FLOAT vo $&olb O _u _ U•S• b"Lk(utlis IFN4 33?S'� To ST�•13o AL LAASW UAL 94 .Q David A. Grant Q DGS j'-.dA-jTs AIjA wo Orange Coast Co I I ege 1801 W. Coast Highways Newport Beach lCaA17WAcro-s DATE' 3/8/77 Al 7 u aj 1 24.5 5 '1 5ULJ(HF-&D + �.0 M. L.L.W. vgecueD P Rc*co-0-11 r_- C) JW."Cv. PILV—= In 47 v:vo 1--rA A, r &T 7, RELOCATION f .__ . _...... y �' �w. �," . `� OF EXISTING.....� ' �. ,� .... k4 ICA e)1.4 VILL, _,..FLOAT David Z -Grand .4 VOL / CAA . JrS Coast Collei-se Coast FUF!hway, Newport h I COA-IrIVAC r -Da F. C),Ar---' 3/8/771 PROPOSED 7, RELOCATION f .__ . _...... y �' �w. �," . `� OF EXISTING.....� ' �. ,� .... k4 ICA e)1.4 VILL, _,..FLOAT David Z -Grand .4 VOL / CAA . JrS Coast Collei-se Coast FUF!hway, Newport h I COA-IrIVAC r -Da F. C),Ar---' 3/8/771 CITY OF NEWPC 'BEACH HARBOR PERF �T PERMISSION IS HFSCE! -e TO CQNSTRUCT AMC. MAINTAIN THF FACILITY AT THE S17E 0, THE HARSO-R,. �r, 'T 0--r4"CH, ;%,W ANY SPEC'AL PERRV IS NOT N T THE C^y AND THIS Ci IN ACCOSROANCE VV$Tli ltuTLE 17 C`F 74M' iAiU'NXL,,`AL CODE. CITY MARS i'OR 4 2A -M I �TYDN O� CONSTRUCTION PERNUT DOT..................... Sm Corps of Engnseils 'PeI'mit erw---1-7 crange counl& POMI '7'7 other. 6 6�A :7 23 February 1977 Mr. Dave. Harshbarger Marine Director City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Bear Daveg ORANGE COAST COLLEGE 2701 FAIRVIEW ROAD COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 (7141 556-5651 Enclosed are the drawing's representing the existing dock arrangement at the Intercollegiate Sailing and Flowing Base as well as the Planned7 requested change. The change comes as a result of Orange Coast College's acqui- sition of two.large sailing craft. Under the new arrangementg both craft will be able to be secured safely without inter- fering with the crew program. It will mean utilizing one existing Piling and adding one Piling. I very much appreciate your assistance in obtaining the Per- mission to move ahead with this Project. As you no doubt knows we are really on top of each other at the Base until we can get these docks spread out a little. Thanks again. I look forward to hearing of our Progress.. With/beast regards9 David A. Grant Dean, St dent Affairs Enclosures 2 pleuious S E R V I NG T E COMMUN I T Y S I N C E 1 94,7 4 NORMAN E. WATSON - CHANCELLOR Mr. Glenn Weldon CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HarbbrrDepartment 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, Ca. Dear Mr. Weldon: 'ea lev toastCommunitytollege d istrict 1370 ADAMS AVENUE • COSTA MESA • CALIFORNIA 92626 (714) 556-5709 August 16, 1976 I am enclosing a copy of our permit from the U. S. Corps of Engineers for the Intercollegiate Rowing and Sailing Base float addition as we discussed last week. Please feel free to call if I can be of further help. Cor, 'ally, �.. Zohn Potter Director, Physical Facilities Planning cc Enc. ORANGE COAST COLLEGE COSTA MESA GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE HUNTINGTON BEACH City of Newport B 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 714/673-2110 May 29, 1975 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Operations Branch P. 0. Box 2711 Los Angeles, California 90053 Attention: John McVey Gentlemen: On May 27, 1975, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach approved a revision to Harbor Permit #129-1801 applied for by the Orange Coast College Sailing Base. Sincerely, Glen E. Welden Tidelands Operations Coordinator Marine Department GEW:lf ILI ➢1 124.5± I- s PROPOSED BULKHE&D I �I w I� M FLOAT IL EKI�iTIAJG (- 0 M.I.L.W. VNIV r JG DREt�ED 3` .. ctzoultt� PidGFt7S�.v VIGIM-ry w&^--AP U ``.. 61.1C��OIZ PILE \' sEc-r-lotu �-A mss= �u M� i (,I�JOrTE : ►J� DFZEi7Ca I {.1G �QUI(Z�.C7 o(��/`v PROPOSED FLOAT ADDITION -- I Accessut.�c�lllc, I RAMP . �LQoT --k --r I I I I I , PA I �-- `-1 LRtat�lF�--- I_---�I I I I U.5_P�l1LKU�/�D L1VlE, -, — — �-I- � — -1— + TO S'L<.IZo) I� I r F1 C=_i I i i i 1 -To 5Ti1 , t5o raai. I - ,f d I + 1✓XISTI{.lC7 � 77j � I � `' ,. � � 5"I + r --J I 1 I JZOIV(fJC� FLMT i s lL I ( I I I f TO L_JS.PIERFhi7 Is' 14 tom± pwpo5ev /�:.CAAM P Le o 1/�S U•S.PR0.1�GT LIkJE—= , �►.,� FLG18T A P2OPO5F.D FL.O/-\T ,co 8E REl0c4&TWH/ PROPOSED P.ELC)CAXIOM 4 ADD1- IOK15 ,� .- . _ IIJTERCI)L.LEGI/STE'tNLIKIG AMO ROWIMG 565E RELOCATION.. 1801 \VEs Co�sT HIGH\vl,-�Y OF EXIST I NG NEWPDrzT $E/�GH , CALI FORUI/� FLOAT COAST COMMUIUITY COLLEGE DISZRIC 37P ADAMS pVE COST6 Nth 0,,CAL1FQR#Ri. SCl-�L.E - FEET 24 FM MARINE DEPARTMENT March 12, 1975 TO: CHAIRMAN & MEMBERS OF THE JOINT HARBOR COMMITTEE FROM: Marine Department" SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION #129-1801 BY COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT TO REVISE EXISTING FACILITIES AT 1801' PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation C If desired,recommend that the Newport Beach City Council approve tr-e Harbor Permit Application subject to: 1) The approval of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2) The approval of the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission. 3) The applicant obtaining permits for any plumbing, electrical and fire protection installations from applicable City departments. 4) Approval of the Orange County Harbors, Beaches, and Parks District. Discussion The approval of the Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District is required because the proposed revision is over tidelands held in trust by Orange County. The proposed revision will relocate easterly three existing fingers, add two 4'x 32' fingers, and add one 14' x 78' finger to existing facilities at the Coast Community College District Intercollegiate Sai li-g and Rowing Base. The relocation of existing fingers and the additional 14' x 78' finger is desired because of a need to moor the Argus, a large square rigged vessel donated to the College. The additional two smaller fingers are desired for safer mooring of vessels used by the college sailing classes. The existing parking spaces and restroom facilities are within the Harbor Permit Policy requirements. APPLICANT: COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE Page Two The proposed floats differ from the City of Newport Beach Standard Drawings only in configurations, not in structural design., The County staff may have further oral input for the committee regarding ,recommendations for the County Harbor Commission. R. E. REED, DIRECTOR D. Harshbarger, Assistant Director Tidelands Operations Division Marine Department DH:GEW:lf ' U. S. Corps of Engineers ". Post Office Box 2711 Los Angeles, California 90053 Attention: Waterways Control Section Subject.: Harbor Permit Application No. Dear Sir; 3 hereby request a.U. S. Corps of Engineers'. Permit for the construction and installation of U additional floats & relocation of existing floats and appurtenances thereto, to be located in Newport Bay, ayward of Lot No. H , Block No. __ , Tract 919 ,,Newport Beach, Ca i ornia. I am UTe owner of the aforementioned property, and I have made application for a Harbor Permit to the City of Newport Beach. - The adjoining property owners are: Portion of Portion of Lot H Block -- Lot H , Block -- Tract 919 Tract 919 Orange Empire Area Sea Scouts City_ -of Newport Beach (Bay Club 1_931 W. Coast Highway 1221 W. Coast Highway tort Seach, CA Newp_o_rt�Beach. CA Respectfully submitted, Date February 26. _1975 Enc Plans dated. Feb 24,.-.1975t J n ; f7 .Poter r_ect-or., P ys. ra6.. -R-Inc cop .D. ...COAST COMMUNITY. COLLEGE- DISTRICT .- _37_Q_Ariim�z Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626" CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,APPROVAL The Harbor and Tidelands Administrator of the City of Newport Beach has reviewed Harbor Permit application by and subject to the approval of the U. S. Corps o ngineers, will issue Harbor Permit No. / 7- 400/ . Date s j j D. Harshbarger, Captain Marine Safety Department CC: CALIFORNIA CO' rAL ZONE CONSERVATION C0; ISSICN SOUTH U0AST REGI0:1AL CO3•u-1ISSIO1 P.O. Box 1450, Long Beach, CA 90801 - APPLICATION FOR PERMIT SECTION 1: APPLICAI T 1, Narver address, and telephone number of applicant: Coast Community College District - 1370 Adams Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA_ __ 92626 (714 ) 556-5709 - (zip code) (area code) 2. Name, address and telephone number of applicant's representative, if any: John P Potter, Di rector Physical Facilities Pl anni na oast Commrjni to c'o3 l agP n -i strict 1370 Adams Avenue, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714 ) 556-5709 (zip code) (area code) SECTIOIT IIOF' WORK PROPOSED P!,;D PROJECT LOCATION 3. Brief (one or two sentence) description of wort. proposed: Re oc _tiQn wilKin-thp. . 4� Brief description .of. project location ,(city or county, .near.est roads, . 1801 West Coast Highway, NewQort Beach, CA Between Bay Club and Orange Empire Sea Scout Base on west side of highway TO BE FILLED IN BY THE CO N::4ISSION: Application Number Date. Filed Filing Fee Public Hearing Date (Not less than 21 days nor more than. 90 days; after filing) Describe (a) designa-�_ons of the property show�._,.on any applicable city or county general plans, and (b) the p -resent zoning of the property. Explain whether the proposed project is consistent with local plans and zoning. This property is being eased as a sailing and rowing baseby_a nur�ber of Pduc�tinnal ; ncfi; t�iti nnc as well as the City of Newport Beach. 6. Attach to this application adequate illustrations (such as a U.S. Geological Survey 72 -minute quadrangle map and a detailed project map) to show: (a) the proposed development in relation to nearby areas, and, as appropriate, to the line of mean high tide, the inland boundary of the permit area, any nearby beaches any nearby public recreational areas, any nearby marshes, and: any other major features of the natural topography or any major buildings; and (b) precisely -hat development is proposed. ?. Does the proposed develocment'consist only of _a repair or improve— ment to.an existing structure at a cost not in excess of $25,000? If so, please explain briefly and indicate how the cost of the repair or improvement was computed Cost of construction estimated at $10,000 and consists of relocation of approximately 1,000 sq ft of existing floats plus the addition of'1 200 sa ft. of DPW- flnai�. _ Estimate prepared by John P. Potter, Director, Physical Facilities Plaannir�g C D. S. If not a repair. or,` improvement 'to an e ist"in structure; is:the cost of t2;.e' _oroposed development less than $10, 000? if so, phease explain briefly and indicate how` the. cost of the development. -was- . computed: evelopment. was - computed: This is an improvement to an. existing 9, Attach to this application sufficient documentation to show appli Cant's interest in the property. (such as copies of deed, title report, parcel map, etc.), and any easements or other restrictions affecting the property. 10. The parcel (s,) of property on which the work is proposed are Assessor's Parcel (s) nu -tuber 049-161-01' Bloc: Tract g -1 c) or) Lot y _ -- ori Attach a copy of the legal description. -2— 16. Would the development have the potential for adversely affecting water quality, existing areas of open water free of visible struc- tures, existing and pot`ntizl Lo: mercial and sport fisheries, or agricultural uses of land which are existing on November 8, 1972? If so, please explain. No adverse effect 17. Mould the project increase access to publicly-owned or publicly- used beaches, to recreation areas, or to natural reserves? Please explain. Project will provide additional float space for storage of small sailing craft heavily used by several major educational institutions as well as the City of Newport Beach. 18. Would the development affect any area that could be used for public recreation or as a wildlife preserve? No.uld the developwment af�ect any area of historic or archeological importance? Please explain. No effect 19. What provisions have :16en'. riade in `the' pre j ct far treatment of solid and liquid wastes, and for their disposition and management, so that adverse effects upon coastal zone resources will be miniinized r `Not appi i cable . . 20. Describe any p-rovisions in the ,Dr.o-iect to ensure that alterations i to existing land forms and vegetation, and construction of struc- tures, will cause minim,u_-n adverse effect to scenic resources and minimum danger of flo.ods,'Iandslides, erosion, siltation, or failure in the event of earthqualt"e. No adverse effect- -4_ SECTION IV : OTHER PEMITS OR APPROVhLS NF:EDEI7 all permits, P 2k. Lista ermitspermissions, or approvals required from public agencies for this project, and indicate whether these permits, • permissions, or approvals have been (a) applied for and (b.) granted. ("Public agencies" includes cities, counties, regional agencies, redevelopment agencies, etc., and also includes the State lands Commission, the Army Corps of Engineers, and the appropriate Regional I -later Quality Control Board.) City of Newport Beach -- Harbor Department (permit applied for) U. S. Corps of Engineers (permit applied for) Orange County Harbor Beaches and Parks District -(permit applied furl SECTION V: PROJFCT' S CO*:SISTE`.CY WITH THE CALIFORNIA COASTIAJ, WIE CONSERWiT, ION tCT OF 197.2 22. yhe California Coastal Zone Conservation Act of 1972 states, in Section 27402, that no permit shall be issued unless the regional commission has first found both of the following: (a) That _the development will not have any substantial adverse environmental or ecological effect, and (b) That the development is consistent with the following find-- declara,ti�ons, 'ani objective; (1) "T:ze California coastal zone is a 'distinct and Valuahl o natural resource belonaing to all the people and exist- ing as.a delicately balanced eco -system ...the per- manent -protection of the remaining natural and scenic resources o'f the coastal Zon'E� 'is -a pa' amount ' concern ,to _pr;es:ent and future. residents ,of the state and nation; in order to "pron�.ote the' public`'safety health and welfare, and to pzotect public and private property, wildlife, marine fisheries, and other ocean resources, and the natural environment, it is neces- sary to preserve the ecological balance of the coastal zone and prevent its further deterioration and destruc- tion; ...it is the policy 'of the state to preserve, protect, and, where possible, to restore the resources of the coastal zone for the enjoyment of the current and succeeding generations...." (2) "(a) The nnaintenance, restoration; 'and enhancement of.the overall quality of the coastal zone en- vironment, including, but not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values: "(b) The continued existence of opt inum populations of all species of living organisms, O(c) The orderly, balanced utilization and preserva- tion, consistent with sound conservation principles, of all living and nonliving coastal zone resources, "(d) Avoidance of irreversible and irretrievable com- mitments of coastal zone resources." Please explain whether the project is consistent with these re- quirements of law. Use additional paper if necessary. This project is consistent with the above reguirements SECTIQIZ VI EN'VTP.O -'iLNTA IMPACT STA` ELI 17rr 23. Has an environmental impact statement been prepared for the project> If so, attach a copy to this application. If not, please so indicate. -- It is believed that this prosect will haya ;nsinni!cant envi-renm"t,11 impact; therefore, no EIS has been prepared SECTIO'N' VII: ADD TTI,117. 07 i!,TTO . R�?'Gr I2DI'yC PT:O'POSET� �rORK If you feel_ you would like to provide.more-information in order to describe your proposed develop.^.ent in greater detail, please do so and attach it to.this application and title it accordingly. 'SECTION VIII: CERTIFICATION 24. :.._I hereby certify that+ to the best .of my knowledcle the information in this application and all attached exhibits is full, cc,-nDlete, and. Correct, and I understand that anv- miss tatement or omission of the requested information or of any inforrration subsequently requested, shall be grounds for denying the permit, for suspending or -revoking a permit issued on the basis o -f triese or subsequent representaticns , or for' the seeking of such other and further relief as may seem proper to the Commission, ;§, gnature of :Applicant or Agent -6 ty�yr�d c'r��S s4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA , �a1 y C, . �, City Hall 4�`FOR ani MARINE SAFETY DEPARTMENT 3300 Newport. Bled. 1 70 Newport Pier (714) 673-2110 APPROVAL IN CONCEPT APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211. General Description of Proposed Development: Relocation within the U.S. Rierhead line f aUrgximately 1,000 s . ft. of existing floats plus.the addition of 1,200 ± sq. ft. of additional floats. Property Address: W, Coa5t Hi.cihway,Newport 'f i Legal Description: ASSPSSnr's narC 1 jUdg-161-01 I of H. _Rlgck ---. Traci' 919 City Harbor Permit Number - Applicant: ro 14 Coll pqt tr Applicant`s Mailing Address: 1170 AriamcAvPniiPt f.ncta tdPsa'..ra ,99626 Applicant's Telephone Number: (114) 556-5709 I have reviewed.the plans for.the:foregoing d0--velopment.inclu4i0g 1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline. 2. The grading plan, if any. 3 The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered in the application. and find 1 They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, boning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance, and any applicable specific or precise plans or 0 That a variance or exception has been'approved and is final. Clnr w E R THIS PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL PACKAGES, INVOICES, SHIPPING PAPERS AND I,TY COLLEGE DISTRICTCORRESPONDENCE. ow rc r 1 s I 7 Iul�,ll'1" �1 1 MSV IVi1 N i11N1 1181�i��u i�� �ib11: '�. r� No. 34 16832 O S T A MESA, CA. 92626 DIRECT ALL INQUIRIES CONCERNING THIS ORDER TO PURCHASING DEPT. AT ABOVE, ADDRESS, PHONE (714) 556-5750 DATE: February 24, 1975 CONTACT PURCHASING DEPT: PRIbR TO SHIPPING IF THERE SHIP TO: 1S ANY INCREASE IN PRICE FROM THAT SHOWN BELOW: DROP SHIPMENTS MUST REFERENCE P.O. NUMBER. TO: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Marine Safety Dept. 70 Newport Bier Newport Beach,CA. ITEM NO. QUANTITY 1 D ES C R I P T ION HENDEH INVUIUL IN DUHLIGA I t BILL TO: COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Accounting Dept. (714) 556-5742 1370 Adams Ave. Costa Mesa, Ca., 92626 UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE Permit fee for seven (7) additional tie-up spaces @ $10 per space REVOLVING CHECK # /` NOTE: Materials supplied or services performed by vendor shall comply with Cal. OSHA regulations QUOTE* DELIVERY REQ./PROMS. IBUDGET ORDERED BY: BUYER 1-6120-0835-0607-2-01 John Potter PURPOSE & LOCATION Permit Fee THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS SUBJECT TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS PRINTED ON THE FACE AND ON THE REVERSE SIDE, ALL OF WHICH FORM AN INTEGRAL PART OF IT. �a r J opperrvny ir1r10 i 1 T ,:.. ;:'1 � �7 i14i• �®■ � � 16832 "'or % 1n.! _ n.d or e ng!,,"'inen, policies dl3cr.,r.. C e on the ao,..s of rcce, color, sex, or no''rionc1 origin. P-003 20M 11/73 VENDOR'S COPY N 70.00 $ 70.00 TOTAL CORREI,LAN J. THOMPSON EXEC. VICE CHANCELLOR/ BUSINESS AFFAIRS GOODS WILL NOT BE RECEIVED AFTER 4:30 P.M. OR ON SATURDAY, SUNDAY, OR HOLIDAYS. TERMS AND CONDIT�ONS I This orderns' s erre. ,nd conditions cnd by accepting tixe order, or U,,,.y pars thereo�,;tY7e SePI'er agrees to and accepts u 'eat to a following S said terrrs.,and conditions, i. sTKe'vendor shall ryrefser.f 'his invoice or demand IN DUPUCATE to the Accounting Department by 'the .20th of each momh following ➢ c+eY➢wery. .of aYl� m�,�e ass .➢n order That Elle o➢sfir➢ct order may be, processed in payment "7''-;e eo€ thr)ku➢gh the offires of the County Depar'rrnen" of Education and the Auditor (School CYacros), and paymen= r7cdc to The wandn, an or about the lith of t.➢e-atYowcng monfih. Invoices must be itemized, showing quantity, unit price and total, and, in addition to d te, �„dwfo ous T LrcS��-a order nun -r, must beer your �invoice number. .•. ,. 2. DO NOT SUSS E l71`UTE'V/IT-YOUT PRICK APPROVAL PPCs"d PURCHASING P:EPAICTMENT. 3. Ship F.O.B. Dessination unless otherwise spea:fied^ When specified, Transparaation, nage; 'arid deli -very ,eFrcrges may be paid' p, cy -cl i'emized receipts, fa7 sucYa charges accompany invoices'. C oPleet shipments well no.., '6'a aCce sad. 4. The Seller shall "Hold the' District,i^s officers, agents, servants and employees harrTless'rromr`-:H a•u➢lrot�r'of ai'y nature rt�r Kind o^ account of any copyrighted or, uncopyrigllted composition, secret process, � patented or unpotenfed invention, c;9icle or appliance furnished or used _under bh➢spurchase order. 5. Assignment of Contract: The Contractor shall not assign, transfer, convey, sublet or 041er^,rise dispose of i'his contract or cry par, ?nerccf, or any righ-s accruing thereunder, 'Title or in4'•eres'" therein, funds to be received °.'7erouncle , or any power to execu''e the sas-.xe v+itliau•t the consent in wrifing, of the Dist7ic''t Purchasing gcn,te Hcfiice is hereby not honor any ass,ig. Tani mode by th� Contrcictor ua less Fh`.ei co.- s� iirPi'n wr i,rrt�, �s sir'?! _a..ed abt>ve' hos bee¢x given'` C Parf➢as shipments v+i,li be accepted; However, payraenr on -`,his order w; 11 ba made' on y` §or°'c C61, :de 'Iivory of the order urdess otherwise specified in the bod-Y of the order. Cash disc.cunts will be computed frorn date of invoices are on wile. If invoices are not on fi:ie cash discoun.;s will Ea conaputld from date al receipt of invoices. A. 1 De svery -us's` actually, Le effected ws,ia,n yne•a'race s'ya£^c:w on elle Ycarcl:Gse order, faiCi-sg ;:s.°';.lt fill.: L' Te right to purchasa•'cls'eahcra ,cn'd charl-e The suiopd.4, wi^'T :_ny Icss incurred as a resin a'Hicrcof C', e', i£s Opti CL - to cunc,_I t:➢c_. order. CancoHietion Or all items- rornair:irag undeNvered after 90 days ;Yo,m ldhc data of -This purcllc.•se.ardcr W;ii be autamatic,'ur:Yess ofhcrwisc specified an This cider. 8. Casualties, delays, cnd Acts, of God beyond tnet con'trea of ,,he Seiler, and s£'ri'?Ces, fires or Io:'H outs sholY be suf'.'icienl' excuse for not shipping nnut'erial promptly. 7hase reasons must ba documented in viriiing tobe eilower:Y. 9. 1fa, aY is s➢.�leet to Buyer's inspection and app,o'vcl at a reasonable ...,,e after delivery; s' spec ` cc!iGns Gro: r.ct met, rnateriai may be returned ct .Sealer's exper➢se. 10. The Sa"ICr %CrCL1y `Nor➢'G r➢'ao iho merchandise OC iVa rl<I'G!anSlxdp 5"G be aS5 -Tr'iGS Ord i::i 'e0 H.A c in aC C:i :'d CdnCe 'Ni.ii dire s➢.: t: C7 C'➢C6. Skis, d.owings or samples in, fill rL'_.p C'C: S end agrees That t:`ai5'!,1arrO4'"tb'yshoHY Sur ViVe OCCep'''C.TICC. 11. The Coast Community CoNoge Dissrict is exempt from paymant-of I' ederrr. Excise Tax. An ➢cerxp'inn C r ificate tviHH be .".:noshed in Yieuof paymen, of 47�➢e Excise Tax, and prices as stated shaU be exclusive of such Excise ;'ax, ,. a`" In case a uss,cu"•e slxatls arise s:s''� e`•r1Tee°:ar an liter➢ as or as ~*�' �'' °<v . . L. y ,.n -r ddtecb; ear complies of aa�s slab- c..:r�i„y w�,ra ..pec.':➢est?ons the qucstion in find Gnaiysis sha,YI be sup mit'ted t'o the Co n, y Counsel of Grungc County, 13. Seller re,per;s and warrants ,:aa; no t a.dc•ra; or State ,'ritaiuva os•.aa'lsation or iv4un➢c➢par CJrdincncc laeen cr w.19 `c. ,:eEa<ec' -'F+e r aril c. Ping, sot% a d dose ecu y of Gny` arxicle or se:-Acc sc, . , _ r ed c°'were .^ere ,ndar, •env vsola..cn does cease ., .. _''ter .J➢Si ora_:..:. and zav:: Sia nTales.., F`,jr:`-.aser from c;, lass, pone ^7cs or '7ile paymcn C. io, ,: Lr.� -7 w li 'C: U' '.f.a C:u .;ch Vaaiailen. r + t°.is :urchase �rd'cr must be furnis`_ed' in c:.cordance with el: �r � c Ccve:nn.-,_;-° C..a,,, C'2ii.oii, '4.- All s'?cors co�cred' or. ' v �ec'adcsls Education Code; Rules and RcqMations of the S'l'ate 3aard of Education, arse the Rules and Rcguaeiions o➢ til T 6 cf fine Coast Community CarYcge 'distract. Fs pp g• se::urc -ld enc,.`::Pain in -crcc such iicenscs cnd permqJ as care scqui.'c.d' 2ne -su tier gnat eYY o his an:�'c•�ces or agents ss -7€d �. c such lain, in connec'iion .vitt Inc °„isilida :n_ ma'reriais, .:"talcs cd' serve .cs herein listed, - t!'cr.,rc .er,s cnd inc-c.-iols _tell doe in cceordence with dov/..:,. e l G. �t":i!e engaged in earrydrrg out the and ebncdr:or.s ?:: _...,,z'irc supplier is r_n it=c._,�c:Tdcr.•...coc�:'ccc�cr, cr-' not (]:T c icer, cmpiayae cr agent O' ..a `E 7s?ries'. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P. O. BOX 2711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053 Public Notice No. 74-117 5 June 1974 YOU ARE INVITED TO COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT APPLICANT: Mr. Correllan J. Thompson Executive Vice Chancellor, Business Affairs Coast Community College District 1370 Adams Avenue Costa Mesa, California 92626 ACTIVITY: Proposed construction and installation of anchor pilings and float (3 slips) to extend thirty-one (31) feet bayward of the U.S. Bulkhead Line in front of Lot H, Tract 919, Newport Beach, Orange County, California, as shown on the drawings accompanying this notice. PURPOSE AND USE: To provide educational and recreational docking facilities for the Coast Community College District. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL AUTHORIZATIONS: Approved by the City of Newport Beach; California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission - South Coast Region, Application No. P-4-15-74-3081. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: This office does not intend to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on this activity unless significant detrimental effects are brought to our attention. CRITERIA: Your written comments or objections should include the number and date of this notice and must reach this office within thirty (30) calendar days. The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable impact of the activity on the public interest. That decision will reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. The benefit which reasonably"bay-be'expected to accrue from the activity must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. All factors which may be relevant to the activity will be considered; among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns, historic values, fish and wildlife values, flood damage prevention, land use classification, navigation, recreation, water supply, water quality, and, in general, the needs and welfare of the people. Details of changed conditions on the final permit action will be provided upon request. JOHN V. FOLEY COL, CE District Engineer t 9S,+ I PROPOSED s FLOAT 5ULO D I a y I IsDOITIOPJ j I +It'0 M. L. L.\V1�1 EX15,uCq fir-8'11L—.,v 1 I - DREDGED� II((( (�q DRC-DGI►ICa REQUIRI=D) GszDUUO I E L. E- u/�,'T I O h ) .\ r s• a\ - 0./ C ` �• —� _ VICINITY 1.A/1F' acsT 1 I 1 ` NEWPOfZT E5,^ -'Y'— C&.L_1 F- ,rlu i.> & It--� Jri'1�C.-JETTT (47 oPr� PROPOSED �-- -- F LOAT . J�OUII10fd F-m-7TIUC, But --Ku Eno �R P� �G EMI ►nP � I TO '�7/r 129 F� I — r �_-- 'K� UICWOF 4 TO a nT1o1 i PILE t W U S. FI ER UFJIO L_11LJ2 U.S. r^Ro-jCCIT: �. 1fJTERtOI LEGIATE SAILIWCA AWD ROI . \ VIUG 5&5F- NJ ASEN L. \V PCDP-- ' P3�Y F L4/1 -r FLOOD �---«_ /S. D D 1_'T 10 til APPLI""T'IOQ SY . �IBOI P�[,F1C COi]ST NLVY. 1.1EW ��iT' E3FJJCII. U]:.1F7Kk}I �j e so co S"LE - FEE T '�aub,BBci t`Frost ` ssoc ates. ii PHOT ESS!ONAL EhV,�ROhMk.NT�� k ulhik R>���• P. nntFi 1. MARINE SAFETY DEPARTMENT 70 Newport Piet April 8, 1974 Item No.: H-16 (b) TO MAYOR & CITY COUNCIL FROM: Marine Safety Department SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION #129-1801 .BY COAST' COMMUNITY COLLEGE'DISTRICT TO REVISE EXISTING THEIR FACILITIES AT 1801 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation If desired, approve the Harbor Permit Application subject to: 1`) The approval of the U. S. Army'Corps of Engineers, 2) The approval of the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission, 3') The applicant obtaining permits for any plumbing, electrical and fire protection installations from applicable City depart- ments. Discussion City Council approval is required under Section 5;paragraph B which states: "Prior approval of the City Council will be required before the Marine Safety Department may issue any permit that does not conform to the standard harbor drawings and the adopted Harbor Permit Policies." The proposed floats differ from the standard drawings only in configura- tion, not in structural design. The Joint Harbor Committee at its March 11 meeting recommended approval of the application. The proposed revision will add 'three fingers one 13' long, ,one 16' long and one 20' long plus a 20' x 37' landing area to existing facilities at the Coast Community College District Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base. The additional storage and landing area is desired because of expand- ing sailing and rowing programs sponsored by Orange Coast College District, the City of; Newport Beach -Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department, Goldenwest College, University of California at Irvine, University of Southern California, and Harvey Mud College among others. t i f 4 ? MARINE SAFETY DEPARTMENT 70 Newport Pier March 12, 1974 TO: CHAIRMAN & MEMBERS OF THE JOINT HARBOR COMMITTEE FROM: Marine Safety Department SUBJECT: HA- CrR P--Z-FuX2T APPLICATION #'1 BY COAST V , COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT TO REVISE EXISTING cl� FACILITIES AT 1801 PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY Recommendation If desired, recommend that the Newport Beach City Council approve the Harbor Permit Application subject to: 1) The approval of the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2) The approval of the South Coast Regional Zone Conservation Commission, 3) The applicant obtaining permits for any plumbing, electrical and fire protection installations from applicable City departments. / 4� 4yr4VOL/U� Discussion The approval of the Orange County Harbors, Beaches and Parks District is required because the proposed revision is over tidelands held in trust by Orange. County. The proposed revision will add three fingers - one 13' long, one 16' long and one 20' long - plus a 201x 37' landing area to existing facilities at the Coast Community College District Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base. I S 6ecaysc The additional storage and landing area4desired a4--a--re a -1-t of expanding sailing and rowing programs„,sponsored by.Orange Coast College” "''the City of Newport Beache""&ldenwest College, University of California at Irvine, University of Southern California, and tm-Mly Mud College? ,0-W N,? ,-U.,10. 4',"Wy UJ 441, , The existing parking spaces and restroom facilities are - e the Harbor Permit Policy requirements. \ 5-0 PXts pav�r+Sates Page Two The proposed floats differ from the City of Newport Beach Standard Drawings only in configurations, not in structural design. The County staff may have further oral input for the committee regarding recommendations for the County Harbor Commission. R. E. REED, DIRECTOR MARINE SAFETY DEPARTMENT D. Harshbarger, Captain DH:GEW:lf 1 X 4 (X 1 X f REGULAR MEET I NEWPORT HAR40R JOINT 'HARGOR COMMITTEE March 12, 1974 12:30 P.M. ATTENDANCE 1•. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (February.13, 1974 2, . 3. STAFF REPORT ON HARBOR PERMIT POLICIES Digest: At'kthe January 8 Joint.Harbor Committee meeting staff was requested to report on the established Harbor Permit Policies with regard to the number of variances being given, 'City staff has prepared such a report, and concludes that the policies are reasonable.to administer and that an appeal system; even though it may lead to approval of said appeals for -variances,' is vital to any such -policy. (Continued from February 13 meeting) RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approve staff report, REQUEST.FOR FLOAT MODIFICATION ON COUNTY TIDE - ,City staff requested 'to prepare and:pr.esent summary at next meet i ng containing(1 ) hovi many p;ermi t:s issued, (2)how many variances(•")any significant trehds indicating need for change. LANDS, COAST COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT ORANGE , COAST COLLEGE { Digest Orange Coast College,.lessee of submerged and dry County Tidelands in Newport Harbor, has t submitted application for City and County Permits.f for the modification of existing floating docks. } The modification consists ofadding a float and two slips, '.RECOMMENDED ACTION:.. Recommend that the City Council issue the appropriate City permit and that the County Board of Supervisors issue a commer- ? ciai permit to authorize said improvements. Saidj permits do not relieve the applicant from j responsibility to secure r.equired.State and b Federal permits, 4. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS STATUS REPORT AND POLICY Recommended that staff RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROPOSED ENVIRONMENTAL REHABIL'be instructed to select ITATION DREDGE SITE (SALT WORKS AREA) TO BE USED a specific area of the BY STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FOR FILL DURING ipatent tidelands For a CORONA DEL MAR FREEWAY CONSTRUCTION. cdemonstration pro;�ct of }restorati.on; that a con - At City Council meeting on February 25, the ;ceptual plan and budges Citizens' Environmental Quality Control Advisory ?for said restoration be Committee appeared before the Council by memo andsprepared; and that s -"d resentation with regard to the p g proposed dredg- material be presented Ito Ing of Upper Bay (Salt Works Area) for fill. the Joint Harbor �I Committee within 30 +' Anys at which, C i me qtr, maternal to be used by State Division of Highways i in the construction of Corona Del Mar Freeway.. j City Council has requested District staff to i report on the status of the proposal including an outline of items to be resolved such as engineer- ing, studies, Environmental Impact Report, right of -access to the property with regard to legal right to remove soil therefrom. .OM�MENDEb ACTION: Recommend policy 'wi t,h. regard' y to forwarding request to'the.State Division of t H.i'ghways for utilizing fil.l material from the F Salt Works Area of Upper -Newport Bay. OTHER BUSINESS: Items which staff', the public or members orf the Committee wish to .discuss. " jA, Chamber of Commerce letter with attached X, •laboratory:report on coliform and plate count taken from San Diego'Creek at the San Joaquin Golf Course was received too:late to be. on the agenda. Chamber requested Joint Harbor. Committee to'investigate, 1. i� !F pago 2 linterested partie- 'y.and agencie-, parti cul arl y State Fi',h.: ' and -Game be invited to be present. Staff requested to forward .copy of l-:tte and report to Orannc. County Health Depart- " ment for input. Si:aff to present an inter- pretation at next meeting. } j fzt j! l ? 1 maternal to be used by State Division of Highways i in the construction of Corona Del Mar Freeway.. j City Council has requested District staff to i report on the status of the proposal including an outline of items to be resolved such as engineer- ing, studies, Environmental Impact Report, right of -access to the property with regard to legal right to remove soil therefrom. .OM�MENDEb ACTION: Recommend policy 'wi t,h. regard' y to forwarding request to'the.State Division of t H.i'ghways for utilizing fil.l material from the F Salt Works Area of Upper -Newport Bay. OTHER BUSINESS: Items which staff', the public or members orf the Committee wish to .discuss. " jA, Chamber of Commerce letter with attached X, •laboratory:report on coliform and plate count taken from San Diego'Creek at the San Joaquin Golf Course was received too:late to be. on the agenda. Chamber requested Joint Harbor. Committee to'investigate, 1. i� !F pago 2 linterested partie- 'y.and agencie-, parti cul arl y State Fi',h.: ' and -Game be invited to be present. Staff requested to forward .copy of l-:tte and report to Orannc. County Health Depart- " ment for input. Si:aff to present an inter- pretation at next meeting. STATUS SHEET HARBOR PERMITS CITY OF NEWPORT TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Harbor & Tidelands Administrator BEACH iz9-i7oi January 10, 1972 ITEM NO. SUBJECT: HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 129-1701 APPLICATION TO: Revise the existing harbor permit by,the addition of two floats bayward of 1701 West Coast Highway.,. APPLICANT: Orange Coast College. RECOMMENDATION: If desired, approve Harbor Permit Application.No. 129-1701 subject to the approval of the County of Orange and the U. S. Corps of Engineers. DISCUSSION:, 1. This applicati.oxi requires the approval ,of the City Counc.1 because the proposed floats do not conform to the standard harbor drawings. The proposed floats differ from the _standard ;drawings; only in design, not ,in struc- tural specifications and the proposed design has staff support from this office and.from the Orange County Harbor District 2. Application to the.U. S.,Corps of Engineers was made on 12/20/71., The Corps of Engineers staff has indicated that they have no.objection to the proposed floats, however, the City Council approval is made subject to the receipt_of a Corps. of Engineers permit. 3. Application has been made to the Orange County Harbor District. This application will be brought before the Joint Harbor Committee'and the Harbor Commission on January ll, 1972; however, as previously stated, the Harbor District staff is recommending approval and the. City Council approval is made.subject to the approval of the County of Orange., 4. The applicant is hopeful of constructing these floats during the upcoming semester break and it is for this reason that City Council.'acti.on '-s-e' requested at this time G. M. DAWES Attachment ��..M.:;:ii:_--._._�._.---- _---. �.__.�.._J._...,..rc.-.,�• _-gun - ..� �.____ ��.�__.._...-._�y.t<..9,. �.u:' .,. � � September 10, 1971 To: Advisors of Organizations using the Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base; Dr. Norman Watson, Chancellor, Coast Community College District Dr. Robert Moore, President, Orange Coast College Mr. Cornelius Shields Mr. Robert Allan, Representative of U.S.C. and Stanford Mr. Richard Sweet, Coach, U.C.I. Sailing Team Dr. Raymond Thornton, Athletic Director, U.C.I. Mr. Cal Stewart, Director, Parks, Beaches, Recreation, Newport Beach Mr. Brian Lewis, Coach, O.C.C. Sailing Team Dr. Jack Alford, Faculty Advisor, Harvey Mudd Col. George Dawes, Harbor and Tidelands Administrator. 11r. Carl Reinhardt, Shields Representative Mr. Don Davis, Faculty Sailing, V.C.I. Mr. Carter Ford, Coach, U.S.C. From: David A. Grant, Coordinator, Intercollegiate Base. Re: Use of the Base, 1971-72 There are a few developments of which you should be appraised: 1) The BBC docks should be gone within three weeks. The BBC dock was given a "summer extension", but we can look forward to opening up the basin within a matter of days. 2) The Newport Beach Recreation Dept. will be teaching Saturday sailing classes in their Sabots at the Fast end of the.property (small boats float). These boats may also be used by Collegiate organizations by application to the City Recreation Dept., Mr. Cal Stewart. Gear for these boats will be stored in dock boxes of the same manufacture as OCC's and Irvine's and will be cantilevered out from the inside of the small boat's float. No land storage of boats or gear can be allowed, due to the need to keep the property clear and with the neatest possible appearance. 3) The docks will be painted as UX. Irvine's contributionto the Base this fall; also, a varnished rail above the top of the galvanized bulkhead rail, will be an Irvine project. 4) An extension of the small boats float is planned, and will be funded by Orange Coast College. It will enable us to store more F.J.'s and Sabots as far out as the pier -head line. 5) A bulletin board is now really necessary, and, hopefully, Harvey Mudd will accept the responsibility for that item. Unless I hear any objections from Mudd, I will move ahead on our architect's advice and get this project moving. The cost should not be over $300. 6) A nautical flagpole is the responsibility of USC and we are still awaiting word on KAMALII's mainmast. This could fly flags from each of the college members of the Base. 7) Landscaping is beginning to take hold; a brushed concrete ramp is being installed next week between the boathouse and the rowing dock; a new sign at the entrance has been installed and we are awaiting the lighting fix- tures. Sidewalks outside the wall are stalled until the Edison Company will put the power lines underground. All drawings for the walks are complete. A pay telephone has been installed also. 8) Scheduling of the Base has now become reasonably important in order to avoid conflicts. Obviously member colleges are taken care of first. But, we need to know what your plans and schedules are so that we may make the property available to community groups when we are not using it. I will maintain a master calendar at my office on campus and Mr. Johnson will have a copy at the boathouse. 9) Rules and regulations we have truly tried to stay away from posting. None- theless, there are two fundamental rules from, which there can be no devia- tion: A) NO, absolutely no alcoholic beverages on the Base property or boats. This piece of waterfront property and equipment are simply extensions of our campus. And, boy, do the fireworks fly when there is a violation of this. Please, remind your sailors of this. B) Return your Shields to the slip under bare poles only. For everyone's safety of life and property, don't sail into the dock. Drop your sails upwind of the dock and drift back down. 10) As per our agreement when the Base was opened, only the following type boats may be stored there: Flying Juniors Shields 30 sloops Sabots Boston Whalers. If you have anything else there, please remove it, as well as dock boxes that are not of the fiberglass type used by UCI and OCC. February 2, 1971 To: • Dr. Norman Watson, Chancellor, Coast Community College District Dr. Robert Moore, President, Orange Coast College Mr. Robert Allan, Jr., Representative of USC and Stanford Coach Richard Sweet, UCI Sailing Coach Dr. Raymond Thornton, Athletic Director, UCI Mr. Cal Stewart, Director, Parks, Beaches, Recreation, Newport Beach Coach Brian Lewis, OCC Sailing Coach Dr. Jack Alford, Faculty Advisor, Harvey Mudd Col. George Dawes, Harbor and Tidelands Administrator Mr. Carl Reinhardt, Shields Representative From: David A. Grant, Coordinator, Intercollegiate Sailing & Rowing Base Re: _ Intercollegiate Sailing & Rowing Base Organization Meeting, January 23, 1971. The members present: 1. Agreed to construct a bulletin board on the east side of the crew boathouse (architect willing); one section would be locked under glass; another, where short range notices could be tacked up. 2. Agreed to utilize fiberglass dock boxes, all of the same manufacture. :Brian Lewis will handle the first increment. 3. Agreed that a nautical flagpole, complete with gaff and yard, should be installed next to the boathouse. Bob Allan suggested USC take that responsibility and agreed to pursue this. (Just what Bob needed - another project.) 4. Heard a report that the waiting list for use of the property is grow- ing daily: Sailing clubs from UCI, OCC; Sailing teams from USC, OCC, UCI, CSCLB, Harvey Mudd; Sailing classes from GWC, UCI, and soon, OCC; Oceanography boat space requested by Fullerton,Junior College, Cal State Fullerton, OCC; the Newport Beach Recreation Department to use the Base as a major center for teaching. The phone rings at least once a day for a new group: SCUBA, Scouts, YMCA, church, etc. 5. Agreed that a list of "standards" as to use of the Intercollegiate Base be adopted and circulated with copies each semester to personnel involved. This may involve simply a sailor initialling a copy of the "standards" so that we know he knows the rules. (i.e., No alcoholic beverages on the property or aboard the boats; Shields enter the Shields slips under bare poles only, etc.) 6. Acknowledged that we have a problem with Balboa Bay Club boat owners using our parking lot and entering the BBC through a keyed gate. We can solve this with a barracade, though removal of the slips in front of the property may obviate the problem. Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base Page Two 7. Agreed that we should pursue removal of the Balboa Bay Club's 10 existing slips enclosing the Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base. It appears that further growth is stalled until these slips are removed. 8. Accepted the City's offer to pick up the trash regularly so that it could not accumulate. 9. Considered installation of a pay phone somewhere on the property; agreed it would be important, particularly during the summer. Advice will be sought from the architect as to placement. So, that's a start. The contractors are done, the landscapers have gone home and though we still have a ramp and dock to install for small boats, we're ready to make good use of the Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base. It's a facility of which we can all be very proud. The official address, by the way, is 1801 W. Coast Highway, and the boathouse phone is 645-3505. 9RANUIMT lfifflii 2701 FAIRVIEW ROAD COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA 92626 January 11, 1971 Col. George Dawes Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Dear Col. Dawes: Now that the Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base is a reality., I think it would be appropriate for representatives of each of the participating institutions to meetand discuss the future'operations of this exciting new facility. Would Saturday morning, January 23 at 10:00 a.m., be a convenient time for you to meet at the base for such a meeting? I think we could handle most of the details within an hour's time. If you could respond at your earliest convenience, I would very much appreciate it. My number here at the College is 834-5730. The new boathouse phone, by the way, is 645-3505. Wit best regards, D id A Grant; Coordinator I terco legiate Sailing and Rowing Base DAG:ps SERVING THE COMMUNITY INC C E 1 9 4 7 enrl'a `the o ems an ar riew`of the bay. The �ielv will , have two, UCC twa, Stan o� namnds ci arta tete ehanw = the' only "one reainig one, ntmuO,one at March 9, 1970 TO: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Director FROM: Harbor & Tidelands Administrator SUBJECT: INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING CENTER In accordance with our meeting and discussions with Mr. Dave Grant, O.C.C. Crew Coach, on 6 March, it is requested that your department: a. Either provide a flagpole or move Mr. Bob Allen's flagpole to the O.C.C. facility by 11 or 12 March. b. Deliver potted plants to the O.C.C. facility by 13 March for O.C.C. to arrange around the site for the ceremony. �c. when practical, provide me data concerning PB&RIS recommendations for use of intercollegiate Shield's Class sailing boatsi'h-','-the Recreational Program. Specifically, I'd appreciate your"adai sing the following: (1) Number of Shield's boats desired. (2) Approximate hours and days desired per week. (3) Commencement and ending of sailing,season involving Shield's sloops. (4) Recommendations for agreements or reservations to be included in a letter of agreement for use of Shield's sloops. On my part, I will: a. Endeavor to obtain General Services Department sand cleaning efforts at the O.C.C. facility by 12 or 13 March. b. Distribute invitations to the 15 March opening Ceremony to PB&R Commissioners and PB&R.Department staff per your request. c. Draft a letter of agreement for use of Shield's sloops, in coordination with the City Attorney, and endeavor to obtain whatever Council approvals are necessary. G. M. DAWES GMD/db March 9, 1970 TO: City Manager FROM: Harbor & Tidelands Administrator SUBJECT: INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING CENTER There will be an opening ceremony on 15 March for the intercollegiate sailing center to be established at the present O.C.C. Crew Facility adjacent to the Balboa Bay Club. As you may recollect, the Council previously approved bulkheading and dredging at the facility. In connection with the Council approval, the concept of the facility was discussed bringing forth the following pertinent points: a. The Crew facility would be enlarged to include a base for intercollegiate sailing involving eight colleges or universities. b. The present Crew House would be moved so that its narrow axis would front on West Coast Highway, thus increasing the bay view to motorists and passersby. c. Some collegiate Shields 30 sloops would be made available to the PB&R Department for use in the summer Recrea- tional Sailing Program. Developments have.proceeded to the point where: a. Dredging and bulkheading are completed. b. An opening ceremony will be conducted on 15 March. ,c. The PB&R Department and I are working on an agreement for the use of Shields 30 sloops. Invitations to the Opening Ceremony have been sent to the .Mayor, Vice Mayor, Chairman of the PB&R Commission, Chairman of the Planning Commission, you and appropriate members of the City Staff. it is my opinion.that the establishment of an intercollegiate sailing center in Newport Beach enhances the yachting image of the City a.nd'that official support by the City is desirable from both the academic and yachting viewpoints. Further, the offer by collegiate circles for the use of Shields 30 sloops, if properly controlled, can Intercollegiate Sailing Center 3/9/70 Pg. be a great,asset to the City's Recreational Sailing program. Cal Stewart and I are working on the details of using the Shield's slobj?s, and I will draft a letter of agreement for your consideration at a future date. In the meantime, I solicit the attendance'of the mayor, the ViceMayor and yourself' at the Opening Ceremony on 15 March. G. M. ` DAWES GMD/db <. :. w .. . �r Fr vi Y OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: Harbor and Tidelands Administrator SUBJECT: HARBOR APPLICATION #129-1701 August ll, 1969 H-1 APPLICATION TO: Construct 340 feet of bulkhead bayward of 1701 West Coast Highway (OCC Crew facility). APPLICANT: Orange Coast College, the long term lessee of the upland property. The property is Orange County filled tidelands. RECOMMENDATION: If desired, approve the application subject to obtaining and Orange County permit and subject to approval of the Joint Harbor Committee. SITUATION: A. Orange Coast College and other collegs and.universities are planning a collegiate sailing center, to reach fruition after a number of sequential steps. Mr. Robert M. Allan, Jr, is coordin- ating the effort on behalf of the colleges and universities. As funds become available, it is planned to install floats and piers to accommodate about fourteen Shield's 30' sloops. Flying Junior sloops will be stored on and launched from a float. B. The present OCC Crew building will be relocated as shown on the attached sketch in order to accommodate the proposed use, permit increased parking and open up a view of the harbor. C. The first step,is the construction of the bulkhead as requested in their application. D. Coordination with the Orange County Harbor District and the Balboa Bay Club has been effected by Mr. Allen. The Har- bor Commission has indicated its tentative approval of the plan and a County permit has been applied for. The Joint Harbor Com- mittee is to consider the application on Tuesday, 12 August. r S�L�� t -z -G -Q G. M. DAWES' IR -Pb GMD : sr Att. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF T1M CITY MWER October 28, 1968 TO: PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM; City 'Harbor Coordinator SUBJECT.: INTER-COLLEGIATEMARINE FACILITY 1. Dr. Norman Watson, Superintendent of the Orange Coast" Junior College bistrictb presented the enclosed pro- posal to me for study by the City in conjunction with further action by the Orange County Harbor Commission, Other than issuance of a harbor permit, when tim— ly I believe the proposal falls into your bailiwick. � 2. I have discussed this with the Director of the Harbor District who bel.ievese a. The Harbor Commission will act favorably at some indeterminate time in the future. b. The City of Newport Teach should not take action until the Harbor Coo mission approves use of the County tidelands for this purpose. 3. T concur and, after discussion, so does Dr. Watson and - he wishes to take no further action at this time. There- fore, the material is forwarded for whatever use you may make of it at this time. C. M. DAWES _. 5714D a pg - - JOHN P. POTTER DIRECTOR PHYSICAL FACILITIES ( 714) 834-5709 Coast Community College district I 1370 ADAMS AVE., COSTA MESA, CALIF. 92626 ORANGE COAST COLLEGE GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE COSTA MESA HUNTINGTON BEACH J;EG(ff-ATICNS INTETF&TIECUATE SPJ-IT-NL(-,' PND RUNING EVEE 1973-74 1. No alcoholic beverages are allowed on collegiate pirperty, including Shields and small boats. Z. Do not sail into -die Slyields dock area.® When retuxning to the dock, always ccue under bare pules 3. Lido 14's and P.J.'s belong on their cradles, Sabots belong in the Sabot racks. There is no storage available in the parking lot except for visiting boats Just before regattas. C Only F.J.'s, Shiolds, Sabots, Lido 14's, Boston Whalers, and the Seacrafts may be kept permanently at the base. Permission for tenporaxy mooring of any other craft mazit --cM f tin CocKinator's office -4714) 556-5730® 5. Scheduling of classes, special eVeDtS, races, and regattas is done through the AcKinator's office. Q Please leave the Base and docks as neat as you found them (e.g., trash, hoses, etc®) t Your cooperation is very nuc h appreciated! DAITD A. GGRWhTT Coordinator Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base � c c Each of the seven Shields 30's were donated to ffie participating colleges by eastern yachtsman Cornelius Shields. Wange, Coast College owns two; u.c.l. ownns three; Harvey Nuid, one; U.S.C., one, Each college nointains its own fleet. INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING AND ROWING BASE WEEKLY SCHEDULE 82ring, 1974 MONDAY 7:00 - 9:00 OCC Crew (60) 1:00 - 3:00 UCI Elementary Sailing (20) 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Elementary Sailing (20). 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Intercollegiate Sailing (20) 5:00 - 7;00 OCC Elementary Sailing -_ (Evening College) (20) TUESDAY 7:00 - 9:00 OCC Crew (60) 12:00 - 2:00 GWC Elementary Sailing (20) 1:00 - 3:00 UCI Intermediate Sailing (Shields) (20) 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Intermediate Sailing (Shields). (20) 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Elementary Sailing (20) - 3:30 - 5:30 GWC Elementary Sailing (20) 6:00 - 8:00 GWC Elementary Sailing (Evening College) (20) WEDNESDAY 7:00 - 9:00 OCC Crew (60) 10:30 -"12:30 OCC Elementary Sailing (20) _ 1:00 - 3:00 OCC `Elementary Sailing (20) 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Intercollegiate Sailing (20) 3:00=- 5:0.0 UCI` Intercollegiate Sailing (20) 5:00`- 7:00 OCC Intermediate Sailing (Evening College) (20) THURSDAY' 7:00 - 9:00 OCC Crew (60) 3:30 - 5:30 GWC - Intermediate Sailing (20) 6:00 - 8:00 GWC Elementary Sailing (Evening College) (20) FRIDAY 7:00 - 9:00 OCC Crew (60) 10:30 - 12:30 OCC Elementary Sailing (20) 3:00 5:00 UCI Intercollegiate Sailing _ (20) SATURDAY 7:00 - 9:00 OCC Crew {60) 9:00 - 5:00 City,of Newport Beach, Parks, Beaches, Recreation Dept. Elementary, Intermediate, Advanced Sailing Classes - 20 per class (100) F 11/7/73 DAG or p G i S ' ............. .I R� L t q �E �Sv 6v i c � Warning how to rig and maintain boats is I xury much a part of leaxning about sailing. The axe classes in eleventary, intermedi- ate, and advanced sailing. Classes are oonductAA in various types of sailing craft - Sabots, Flying Juniors, Lido 14's, Shields. x� d I s� f F* F� Y ' vw SYv a towe � arc a , f F � A h F'^ 4 � � J �.y zkg731 x� d f F* F� Y ' SYv f F � A �.y And scire stere -sting statistics..... --54 college or city-cwned boats axe moored at the Base, --350 boat -feet of dock space now occupied. --300 boat -feet of dry storage now occupied. --$170,000,worth of vessels ncw remed here. --26 classes taught each week --300 people per week in sailing, rowing, oceanographic classes. f INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING AND ROWING BASE Marine Vessels 1973-1974 ORANGE; COAST COLLEGE Row in g Blitzachter VIII -Oared Shell 57' Resolution VIII -Oared Shell 61' Pride VIII -Oared Shell 61' Spirit VIII -Oared Shell 61' P. A. Palmer IV -Oared Shell 42' '73) Unnamed IV -Oared Shell 42' (to be delivered Dec.,, Prelude Pair -Oared Shell 37' Dispatch Pair -Oared Shell 37' Dr. Benson Single Scull 26' Great Scott Single Scull 26' The Other One Single Scull 26' Sailing Katherine (157) Shields 30 30' CF 0557 XC Alert (136) Shields 30 30' CF 0488 XC OCC #1 Flying Junior (White) 13' CF 3708 XC OCC #2 Flying Junior (White) 13' CF 0531 XC OCC #3 Flying Junior (White) 13' CF 0684 XC OCC #4 Flying Junior (Yellow) 13' CF 075.7 XC UCC #5 Flying Junior (Blue) 13' CF 0711 XC OCC #6 Lido 14.(White) 14' (to be delivered Nov., '73) OCC #7 Lido 14 (White) 14' (to be delivered Nov., '73) Launches Crew #1 Boston Whaler 13' CF 0763 XC Engine: Evinrude (18hp) 18202-R-EO1338 Crew 02 Bostqn Whaler 13' CF'0817 XC Engine: Evinrude (18hp) E-0002827 Oceanographic #1 Boston Whaler 16' CF 0636 XC Engine: Evinrude (100hp) Oceanographic #2 Boston Whaler 16 CF 0688 XC Engine':' Fischer -Pierce (55hp) Oceanographic #3 Seacraft 23' (to be delivered Nov., '73) '73) Oceano ra hic #4"Seadraft g P 23' (to be delivered Nov., Authorized Organizations OCC Crew OCC Varsity Sailing Team OCC Oceanographic Dept. OCC Physical Education Dept. Marine Vessels, 1973-1974 (cont.) -2 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Sailing Charlotte (No. 94) Shields 30 30' CF 0539 XS Jean (No. 175) Shields 30 30' CF 0741 XS Columbia. (No. 189) Shields 30 30' CF 0763 XS Prudence (No. 135) Shields 30 30' CF 1074 EC UCI til (No. 2131)Flying Junior 13' 13' CF 9270 EB CF 9269 EB UCI X12 (No. 2134) Flying Junior UCI #3 (No. 346) Lido 14 14' CF 8034 BC UCI #4 (No. 3882) Lido 14 14' CF 1032 XS UCI #5 (No. 3883) Lido 14 - 14' CF 1033 XS UCI #6 (No. 3884) Lido 14 14' CF 1034 XS UCI X17 (No. 3885) Lido 14 14' CF 1035 XS Launches Sailing Boston Whaler 13' CF 1031 XS Authorized Organizations UCI Varsity Sailing Team UCI Physical Education Dept. UCI Sailing Association GULDEN WEST COLLEGE Sailing GWC #1 (No. 3778). Lido 14 14' 14' CF 0904 XC CF 0905 XC GWC #2 (No. 3779)_ Lido 14 14 14' CF 0906 XC GWC X13 (No. 3780) Lida 14' CF 0873 XC GWC #4 (No. 3776) Lido 14 Launches Sailing Boston Whaler 13' CF 1324 FF Authorized Organizations GWC Physical Education Dept. HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE Sailing Mildred (No. 174) Shields 30 30' CF 2410 EK Authorized Organizations Mudd Sailing Club Marine Vessels, 1973-1974 (cont.) _j~ UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Sailing Aileen (No. 139) Shields 30 30' CF 8107 CW Authorized Organizations USC Sailing Team. CAL. STATE, FULLERTON Launches Oceanographic 411 Boston Whaler 16' CF 0671 XC CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH: DEPARTMENT. OF PARKS, BEACHES, RECREATION Sailing City 411 Sabot 8' City 412 ,Sabot 81 City #3 Sabot 8' City 414 Sabot 81 City #5 Sabot 8' City ;416 Sabot 81 City #7 Sabot 8' City 418 Sabot 8' City 419 Sabot 81 City 4110 Sabot 8' Authorized Organizations Dept. of Parks, Beaches, Recreation DAG 11/12/73 rMe Base is, also the hcii-e of the Pacific Coast Intercollegiate Yacht Racing Associa- tion's major regattas in the Shields Sloops, as well as the PCTYRA Small Boat Cha mpicn- ships. Intercollegiate sailing regattas occur off the Base several tines every month during both the Fall. and the Spring. It's a rare YoNakETO t1hat the Base is quiet. When the colleges retire Ln June, the City of Newr-ort- Beach begins its six -day -a --week, all day and ev6ning sailing program for youngsters from ages 6 to 70! � < d y The College Watho is the home of the Orange Coast College Crew. The facility I contains showers and lockers for sAtty i oarsmen, as well as storage for the racing shells. I I m I Ciews from Orange Coast College have won. several Pacific coast championships and have s-ulceessf-ti lly cuape ted at the National ChEapicnshaps in Syracuse, New York, as well as the Henley Royal Regatta in England and the Dublin Regatta in Ireland. 111ie Base is'the host of major rowing regattas such as the Annual Newport regatta, which each year draws 300 participants and 35 crews frame University of California, herkeley U.C.L.A. U.S.C. orange Coast College University of California, Irvine Santa Clara University Loyola University Cal State, Tong Beach. Spectators? `Dere will be thousands! Somie will be anchored in private yachts at the finish; n=y will be at the finish line; rowing fares will be watching from the Boathouse; and, of course, residents will enjoy the Regatta just by looking out their front windows! i �:, �;. ti t� � � £� �� � � �` � �� �:, �;. t� � � £� �� � � �` � �. a �� ,'' ��, �, `� � � �._ ` �_ �� J .. x lu i I' J I� I Z4.5* '1s' 1 1 ~ buu(NEW j u7 DRE �L�V/1'Tt[�IJ i L -.,Z X- ulc It i-ne AA/--jw 1JM�QT 9�Y-CA.LIfC)RU Vs yAS ILL lG co'c'.5T �1tGt -1�VGY r r --.- 1� Q/�V u1.lE I I I EXrMM J 4 eULKNF 0 --- ( AccEss Lauwcwluc, RdMP Eve OJ�� -- --- �- —r- V.S. PJB= L y�� I`Nl '^ TE SdlU1,-IG r r /801A PAC -I FTC- CnAy ACl L Ti Jiw9;A) tT/aO S , G77-1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR PERMIT pFRMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO CONSTRUCT AND ;ikAINTAIN THE FACILITY SHOWN ON THE REVERSE HEREOF, s>:F THE SITE INDICATED, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF HE HARBOR PERMIT POLICIES OF NEWPORT BEACH AND ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS LISTED HEREON, THIS PERMIT € N"01 TRANSFERABLE WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF —'_ CITY HARBOR COORDINATOR OR CITY COUNCIL THE _ GIVEN TINDER THIS PERMIT ARE PERMISSIVE ONLY =itr ^FRPAIT MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY COUNCIL :^-.NCE WITH TI F':TM-4- UNICIPAL.CODE. v� DATE INTERCOLLEG IATE SAILING AND ROWING BASE 1976 - 1977 The Coast Community College District provides the organization and coordination of the Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Basel on property leased from the County of Orange. This beautiful piece of waterfront property has evolved from a Pair of quonset huts on drifting sand dunes in the 1950s to an impressive intercollegiate and community center for sailing and rowing. The Base is operated for the use of students of Orange Coast College, Golden West College9 Harvey Mudd College: and University of California, Irvine. In additions the City of Newport Beach uses the property on weekends and in the summer months. This booklet is intended to give you a good look at the many aspects of the Base operations. I think you will be impressed. David A. Grant Coordinator Take a look at the class schedule!: Thirty-six different classes per week (up thirty-five from five years ago); three hundred people taught per week in sailing+ rowingg oceanographic+ navigation classes. The Orange Coast College Oceanographic Department maintains two 23 -foot vessels and two 16 -foot auxiliary survey launchesT constructed especially for the purpose of marineexploratory work. All laboratory work is conducted back on the Orange Coast College campus. And this years Orange Coast College has added a new dimension to the Base program: coastal and celestial navigation classes taught in the evenings at the Boathouse. Jc h e d u l inG f o r all t hes e classes is 'done each KIO v emb e r and May in the Base Coordinator's office. INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING AND ROWING BASE SCHEDULE - FALL9 1976 Monday - 12:00 GWC Elementary Sailing 10:30 - 12:30 OCC Elementary Sailing (A) 1:00 - 3:00 OCC Elementary Sailing (B) 1:00 - 3:00 UCI Elementary Sailing 3!00 - 5:00 UCI Elementary Sailing 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Intercollegiate Sailing (C) 5:00 - 7:00 OCC Elementary Sailing (F) Tuesday DAG --6/17/76 3:00 - 5:00 10:00 - 1,2:00 GWC Elementary Sailing 10:30 - 12:30 OCC Intermediate Sailing (D) 1:00 - 3:00 OCC Advanced Sailing (E) 1:00 - 3:00 UCI Intermediate Sailing 1:00 - 3:00 GWC Elementary Sailing 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Intermediate Sailing 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Elementary Sailing 3:00 - 5:00 GWC Intermediate Sailing 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Crew 6:30 - 9:30 OCC Coastal Navigation Wednesday 10:30 - 12;30 OCC Elementary Sailing (A) 1:00 - 3:00 OCC Elementary Sailing (B) 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Intercollegiate Sailing (C) 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Intercollegiate Sailing 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Crew 5:00 - 7:00 OCC Elementary Sailing (F) ■�rss�n Sabots/Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Int.) Sabots/Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Int.) Lidos Lidos Lidos/Shields Lidos/Sabots (2nd 9 weeks --Int.) Lidos Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Advanced) Lidos/Shields (2nd 9 weeks -- Lidos Beginning) Lidos Lidos Lidos Lidos/Sabots Racing shells Boathouse Sabots/Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Int.) Sabots/Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Int,) Lidos/Shields Lidos/Shields Racing shells Sabots/Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Int.) 10:00 - 12:00 GWC Elementary Sailing Lidos 3:00 - 1030 - 12:30 OCC Intermediate Sailing (D) Lidos (2nd 9 weeks --Advanced) 1:00 - 3:00 OCC Advanced Sailing (E) Shields/Lidos (2nd 9 weeks -- 1:00 - 3:00 GWC Elementary Sailing Lidos Beginning) 3:00 - 5:00 GWC Intermediate Sailing Sabots/Lidos DAG --6/17/76 3:00 - 5:00 OCC Crew Racing shells 6:00 - 800 GWC Elementary Sailing Sabots/Lidos (9 weeks) 6:30 - 9:30 OCC Celestial Navigation Boathouse Friday 3;00 - 5:00 OCC Intercollegiate Sailing (C) Lidos/Shields 3:00 - 5:00 UCI Intercollegiate Sailing Lidos/Shields 3:00 - Saturday 5:00 OCC Crew Racing shells 10:00 - 12:00 GWC Elementary Sailing Lidos 9;00 - 5:00 City of Newport Beach--Parks/Beaches/Rec. Dept--Elem/Inter/Adv.Sail.-- Sabots/Shields DAG --6/17/76 Learning how to rig and maintain boats is very much a part of learning about sailing. There are classes in elementary9 intermediate9 and advanced sailing. Classes are conducted in various types of sailing craft: Sabotsq Lido 14sq Shields 30 sloops, as well as the sixty -foot sloop SALLY, owned by Orange Coast College. The Base is also the home of the Pacific Coast Intercollegiate Yacht Racing. Association's major regattas in the Shields sloops, as well as the P.C.I.Y.R.A. Small Boat Championships. Intercollegiate sailing regattas occur off the Base several times every month during both Fall and Spring. It's a rare weekend that the Base is quiet. Each of the ten Shields 30s was donated to the participating$ colleges by eastern Yachtsman Cornelius Shields. Orange Coast College owns two; U.C.I. owns seven; Harvey Mudd, one. Each college maintains its own fleet. And some interesting statistics..... ---70 college- or city -owned boats are moored at the Base. ---450 boat -feet of dock space now occupied. ---350 boat -feet of dry storage now occupied. ---$320,000 worth of vessels now moored here. ---42 classes taught here each week. ---Over 300 persons per week in sailing, rowing, navigation, oceanographic classes. INTERCOLLEGIATE SAILING AND ROWING BASE Marine Vessels 1976 ORANGE COAST COLLEGE Rowing VIII -Oared Shells Blitzachter 57' Resolution 61' Pride 61' Spirit 61' Maruja 61' Yankee 56'(kept in Great Britain) IV -Oared Shells P. A. Palmer 42' Lady Agnes 42' Sid Common 42' Dorothy Baie 42' Pair -Oared Shells Prelude 37' Dispatch 37' Single Sculls Dr. Benson 26' Great Scott 26' The Other One 26' Sallie 26' Sailing Ten Meter Sloop Sally (5712) 60' CF 1155 XC Shields Sloops Katherine (157) 30' CF 0557 XC Alert (136) 30' CF 0488 XC Lido 14 Sloops #3915 14' CF 0892 XC #3916 141 CF 0893 XC #4057 14' CF 1020 XC #4058 14' CF 1021 XC #4059 14 CF 1022 XC *Flying Junior #1 (white) 13 CF 0684 XC Sloops #2 (yellow) 13� CF 0757 XC #3 (white) 13' Boston Whaler #1 (Crew) 13' CF 0763 XC Launches Engine --Johnson (25hp) 04446576-02-76--059004 #2 (Crew) 13' CF 0817 XC Engine--Evinrude (18hp) E-0002827 #3 (Sailing) 13' CF 1058 XC Engine--Evinrude (18hp) J-2592682 *Stored at O.C.C. but launched at the Boathouse Marine Vessels - 1976 (cont.) Oceanographic Vessels #1 --Boston Whaler 16' CF 0636 XC Engine: Evinrude (100hp) #2 --Boston Whaler 16' CF 0688 XC Engine: Fischer -Pierce (55hp) #3--Seacraft "Orca" 23' CF 0889 XC #4--Seacraft "Moho" 23' CF 0888 XC Boat Trailers #1 --OCC Sailing Cal. Lic. E-304814 #2 --OCC Sailing Cal. Lic. E-311125 #3 --OCC Crew Cal. Lic. E-301755 Authorized Oraanizations OCC Crew OCC Varsity Sailing Team OCC Oceanographic Dept. OCC Physical Education Dept. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Sai Zing Shields Sloops Charlotte (No. 94) 30' CF 0539 XS Jean (No. 175) 30' CF 0741 XS Columbia (No. 189) 30' CF 0763 XS Theresa.(No. 125) 30' CF 7588 ET (No. 4i20.J1J �� rfX671 XCCornelia Cruncher (No. 135) 30' CF 1074 EC Aileen (No. 139) 30' CF 8107 CW Lido 14 Sloops #1 14' CF 1032 XS #2 14' CF 1033 XS #3 14' CF 1034 XS 44 14' CF 1035 XS 115 14' CF 4261 EV #6 14' CF 1731 AP #7 14' CF 8585 AX 118 14' CF 8372 AX #9 14' CF 8034 BC #10 14' CF 7104 CA Flying Junior #1 13' CF 1103 XS Sloops #2 13' CF 6699 CR Launch Boston Whaler 13' CF 1031 XS Au iivl-L zeCL vY�gani zatioris UCI Varsity Sailing Team UCI Physical Education Dept. UCI Sailing Association Marine Vessels - 1976 (cont.) GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE Sai Zing Lido 14s #3778 14= CF 0904 XC #3779 14; CF 0905 XC #3780 14' CF 0906 XC #3776 14' CF 0873 XC #4053 14' CF 1023 XC 44171 14' CF 1129 XC Launch Boston Whaler 13' CF 0953 XC Authorized Organizations GWC Physical Education Dept. HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE Sai Zing Shields Sloops Mildred (No. 174) 30' CF 2410 EK Authorized Organizations Mudd Sailing Club CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH: DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, BEACHES, RECREATION Sai Zing Sabots City #1 8' City #2 8' City #3 8' City #4 8' City #5 8' City #6 8' City #7 8' City #8 8' City #9 8' City 410 8' Authorized Organizations Department of Parks, Beaches, Recreation DAG - 12/15/75 Orange Coast College When the colleges' academic semesters end in June, the City of Newport Beach begins its five -day -a -week, all day and evening sailing program for youngsters from ages six to seventy! SALLY is the gift to Orange Coast CoIIegO of Ernest Kanzler. She is a sixty -foot, ten -meter sloop, built to the finest specifications fifty years ago in West Germany. SALLY is used in all kinds of sailing classes from beginning to advanced. Since she was acquired by Orange Coast College a little over a year agn., her log indicates she has been at sea more than eighty times and that more than 17000 sailors have experi- enced some valuable lessons aboard her. A good portion of the supplies and funds for SALLY's upkeep comes from continuing gifts and support from members of the community. The College Boathouse is the home of the Orange Coast College Crew. The facility contains showers and lockers for seventy oarsmen, as well-as storage for the racing shells. Crews from Orange Coast College have won several Pacific Coast championships and have successfully competed at the National Championships ir. Syracuseq. New York, as well as the Henley Royal Regatta in England and the Dublin Regatta in Ireland. The Base is host to major rowing regattas such as the Annual Newport Regattas which draws more than three hundred Participants and thirty-five crews each year from: University of Californias Berkeley U.C.L.A. U.S.C. Orange Coast College University of Californias Irvine Santa Clara University Loyola University California State Universityq Long Beach Stanford University. Spectators? Thousands!! Some anchor in Private Yachts at the finish line! other rowing fans are onshore at the finish; many watch from the Boathouse, and+ of course+ residents enjoy the Regatta .lust by looking out their front windows! For further information on the Intercollegiate Sailing and Rowing Base or gifts to the Orange Coast College Foundation, Please contact: David A. Grant Orange Coast College 2701 Fairview Road Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Telephone: (714) 556-5730