HomeMy WebLinkAboutM2006-0112DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
915 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
Carl Raymond
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, California 92660
Dear Mr. Raymond:
August 15, 2014
I am replying to your application (File No. SPL -2014 -00454 -SME) dated June 17, 2014, for
a Department of the Army Permit to conduct work in navigable waters of the United States and
discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, in association with the 40
Linda Isle Maintenance Dredging Project. The proposed work would take place bayside of
Linda Isle in Newport Bay within the city of Newport Beach, Orange County, California (Figure
1).
Based on the information you have provided, I have deten-nined that your proposed activity
complies with the terms and conditions of Regional General Permit (RGP) No. 54 -Maintenance
Dredging and Beach Nourishment. As long as you comply with the terms and conditions of
RGP No. 54, an individual permit is not required. A copy of RGP No. 54, including terms and
conditions related to ocean disposal of dredged sediment, is available at
httl):Hww,vv.spl.usace.arii-iy.mil/Portals/I 7/docs/regulator�/RGP/RGP54.yd
Specifically, you are authorized to dredge up to approximately 502 cubic yards of sediment
from approximately 0.064 acre of non -wetland waters of the United States using an excavator,
barge, dump scow, and tug boat and dispose of the dredged material at the LA -3 Ocean Dredged
Material Disposal Site (Figure 2).
Furthermore, you must comply with the following non -discretionary Special Conditions:
1. This letter of verification is valid through December 20,2015.
2. A new pre -construction Caulerpa (Ccudeipa taxifolia) survey shall be conducted in accordance
with the Caulerpa Control Protocol
(httl2://w�N,-vv.-vvestcoast.fisheries.noaa.goy/publications/habitat/cauteEpa taxi folia/caulMa contr
ol protocol 4 pdf) and submitted to the Corps Regulatory Division before project -related
activities commence. Furthermore, a pre -project eelgrass survey shall be conducted in
accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy (SCEMP)
(http://ww,,v.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/ptiblications/habitat/califoiiiia celgrass mitigation/eel
polreyll finqLpdf) and submitted to the Corps Re ore project -related
. gulatory Division bef
activities commence. No work shall be conducted until a Notice to Proceed is issued by the
Corps Regulatory Division.
3. Within 45 calendar days of completion of authorized work in waters of the United States, the
Permittee shall submit to the Corps Regulatory Division a post-projcct implementation
memorandum including the following information:
A. Date(s) work within waters of the United States was initiated and completed;
B. Summary of compliance status with each special condition of this permit (including any
noncompliance that previously occurred or is currently occurring and corrective actions
taken or proposed to achieve compliance); and
C. One copy of "as built" drawings for the entire project. Electronic submittal (Adobe PDF
fon-nat) is preferred. All she e-ts must be signed, dated, and to -scale. If submitting paper
copies, sheets must be no larger than 11 x 17 inches.
4. Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. section 800.13, in the event of any discoveries during construction of
either human remains, archeolomical deposits, or any other type of historic property, the
Permittee shall notify the Corps'Archeology Staff within 24 hours (Steve Dibble'at 213-452-
3849 or John Killeen at 213-452-3861). The Permittee shall immediately suspend all work in
any area(s) where potential culturat resources are discovered. The Permittee shall not resume
construction in the area surrounding the potential cultural resources until the Corps Regulatory
Division re -authorizes project construction, per 36 C.F.R. section 800.13,
Thank you for participating in the Regulatory Program. If you have any questions, please
contact me at 213-452-3660 or via e-mail at Stephen.M.Estes@usace.anny.mil. Please complete
the customer survey form at http://coMsmqpu.usace.army.mil/cm gpex/ppfregulatory sunLey,
which would help me to evaluate and improve the regulatory experience for others.
Sincerely,
Stephen M. Estes
Project Manager
Orange and Riverside Counties Section
South Coast Branch
Enclosures
V=
uw�'l
0
-i
L
I
14,
m
I
I
Ld
Ln
C
<1
CL
rq
LC
CN
oi
cn
V� W 0
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive
29
............. Long Beach, CA 90802
Mary Raymond
40 Linda Island
Newport Beach, CA
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Subject: Pre Dredging Eelgrass (Zostera marina) and Caulerpa Taxifolia Survey
40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach CA (949) 673-2323
Summary:
Eelgrass patch (Zostermarina) was observed in subject area noted above.
Caulerpa (Caulerpa Taxifolia) was not observed in subject area noted above.
This is a Pre Dredging report as required in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass
Mitigation Policy (SCEMP) since eelgrass is widely distributed throughout Southern California
Coastal and Harbor Regions. This policy has been set in place to protect marine habitats and sea
grass beds that play a role in the life cycle chain for marine life to reproduce. This survey assists
development projects by contractors like you to conduct activities in conjunction with best
management practices (BMPs) concerning impact and management for promoting eelgrass and
controlling the spread of Caulerpa. Responsible development by contractors like you helps protect
these sensitive marine ecosystems, which in turn, protect our ocean resources.
Thank you. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us.
Respectfully,
Rss6ZUo-�
DiveWork@gmaii.com
(949) 759-0773
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 1 of 17
W 0"�
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
-d A
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive
29
Long Beach, CA 90802
'G SE
Mary Raymond
40 Linda Isle
40 Linda I-qle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Newport Beach, California
Pre Dredging Survey
Report Prepared
October 16, 2014
by
Dive Works
Robert Wiegand
Survey assistance by
Sean Donovan
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 2 of 17
F, wo
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
40 Linda Isle
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
29
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
CONTENTS
Introduction 4
Location 4
Purpose 4
Survey Method 4
Bounding Coordinates 6
Description of Existing Habitat and 6
Conditions
Findings 8
Discussion 8
Conclusion 10
List of Figures
Figure 1. Location of 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, California
Figure 2. Dive Transects, eelgrass presence, quadrat location and proposed dock slip
Table 1. Tides and Currents
Table 2. Baseline Eelgrass Evaluation
Table 3. Bounding Coordinates
Caulerpa Survey
Eelgrass Survey
List of Tables
Surveys
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 3 of 17
10
11
12
12
13
14
16
A -4b wo
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
Shoreline Village Drive
..........
- - - - - - - - ...
Long Beach, CA 90802
Introduction
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Please note, as is typical of eelgrass in Newport Harbor, conditions will vary at any time. This
survey was completed within the eelgrass growing season and per the Southern California Eelgrass
Mitigation Policy (SCEMP).
Impacts to eelgrass were difficult to assess due to the size of the survey area. Considerable time
diving and mapping taking quadrats where possible and were conducted based with results based
on visibility, depth, and tidal flow (current).
Existing dock system has been in place more than 10 years.
The proposed dredging has not been conducted at time of this survey. (Refer to Figure 2)
Survey conducted is for the purpose of Dredging and addressing the requirement to determine
impact on existing natural habitat and navigational impact to waters and channel.
Location
Client at 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA proposes to dredge dock slips to increase depths for
vessel draft. (Refer to Figure 2).
Purpose
This is a dredging survey report addressing one of the requirements under the SCEMP to
establish a baseline for the density and extent of eelgrass for the purpose of evaluating future
proposed impacts on existing natural habitat, in particular eelgrass within the waters of the United
States (U.S.), in Newport Harbor, California (Refer to Figure 1).
Please note that this survey report is not a scientific research paper. This report is provided to a
private individual with limited resources for the purpose of obtaining the required Coastal
Development permits to float a dock into place and comply with the SCEMP.
Survey Method
Survey was conducted on October 16, 2014, beginning at approximately 0930 hour. The survey day
was sunny, air temperature was 76' Fahrenheit (F), water temperature was 68' F. Pursuant to
SCEMP, Section 3 for "Mitigation"', eelgrass habitats and potential habitats were measured.
1 The project applicant shall map thoroughly the area, distribution, density and relationship to depth contours of any
eelgrass beds likely to be impacted by project construction, This includes areas immediately adjacent to the project site
Which have the potential to be indirectly or inadvertently impacted as well as potential eelgrass habitat areas. Potential
habitat is defined as areas where eelgrass would normally be expected to occur but where no vegetation currently
exists. SCEMP 1991.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 4 of 17
-44v, W"
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Determining sample size is complex. The dock slip was reviewed from the surface and a
determination of sample size was completed prior to conducting the survey. Sample size was
confirmed after a thorough evaluation of potential eelgrass habitat within project site had been
completed. No additional quadrats were felt to be needed to provide reliable survey results of the
potential impact area and changes that could occur in the future.
A total of 9 quadrats were placed in approximately 11,400 square feet (3,474.7 meters square) of
the sample area (i.e., dock slip + adjoining properties either side of Clients property lines, see Figure
2). The sample size was believed to be adequate because of the pattern of the eelgrass near the
shoreline. Expected eelgrass patterns, although ever changing, are expected to be fairly similar
over time.
For the potential impact area under the gangway and around the dock slip (eelgrass is not in area of
existing dock slip), the sample size is 0.2 percent (9 square feet sample size/4,800 square feet area
of potential impact). (Refer to Figure 2). Thus, the largest sample areas would be where it is
important to measure impacts around proposed dredging area and the eelgrass (potential) habitat.
Determining location and placement of 9 quadrats as per requirements of SCEMP is complex and
must be completed using numerous considerations, in addition to considerations of habitat
suitability, primarily in association with the level of expected impact from the proposed -project. After
an initial over -water and under -water review of the eelgrass area, quadrant locations were selected
representing a range of suitable habitat, potential habitat and anticipated impacts to eelgrass habitat
from within and around Clients dock slip. (Refer to Figure 2).
As described above, a total of 9 quadrants were placed within the entire survey area (11,400 square
feet). Each quadrant measured one square foot (0.3 meter) and was used to measure eelgrass
density. They were placed in depths of 6 feet (1.8 meters), 8 feet (2.4 meters), 10 feet (3.1 meters)
and 12 feet (3.7 meters). Eelgrass in Southern California has been found in depths of up to 98 feet
(27.8 meters)2 ; however, eelgrass is primarily found up to 20 feet (6.0 meters) in depth in this type of
sheltered intertidal habitpt3 , and therefore representative depths found within the dock slip were
selected, including potential habitat found within the dock slip. Due to limited private individual
resources, a basic assumption was made the eelgrass presence is considered to be the most likely
area to support suitable eelgrass habitat within the survey area in the future. (Refer to Figure 2).
Other considerations must be discussed as there are factors within this dock slip that appear to be
limiting the growth of eelgrass beyond a certain depth (Refer to Figure 2 and the Discussion section
of this report below).
The survey area was delineated as 95 feet by 120 feet (11,400 square feet) and accounted for a
minimum of 15' past Clients property lines. Diver transects, were parallel to the rock wall and starting 15'
feet out from end of dock slip fingers. The survey was conducted with 2 divers spaced approximately
1 foot apart. Lanes ran parallel to sea wall and the width of each lane was 5 feet wide with divers
scanning approximately 1 foot on either side, thus 19 transects were conducted going out 95 feet
from sea wall (Refer to Figure 2) covering the entire area to ensure >75% coverage of bay floor. A
1' square (0.3 meter square) grid was used to take 9 quadrant samplings. (Refer to Figure 2).
2 California Department of Fish and Game. State of Fisheries Report (2008).
3 California Department of Fish and Game. State of Fisheries Report (2008).
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 5 of 17
V4, F, W op
'IV
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
40 Linda Isle
-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
429
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16,2014
The exact location of the proposed dredging was designed with the anticipation to avoid impact to
eelgrass roughly estimated in Figure 2. Bated on this information, 9 qaudrats were placed in the
expected areas adjacent to proposed gangway and dock slip and a minimum of 15' past property
lines of subject property.
As per the SCEMP and due to the size of the dock slip, other potential eelgrass habitats were also
observed and found barren of eelgrass in what might be considered potential habitat. (Refer to
Figure 2). All 9 quadrats were placed in areas where eelgrass is present and probably has grown
for several years; exact length of time is unknown. The potential eelgrass habitat was surveyed and
determined abiQtic parameters are consistent with the existing eelgrass habitat. A review of any
potential differences in the eelgrass habitat and potential eelgrass habit could be compared as both
are comparable for the proliferation of eelgrass.
Bounding Coordinates
Bounding Coordinates for existing eelgrass are calculated as per requirements of SCEMP and are
listed in Figure 3.
Description of Existing Habitat and Conditions
According to SCEMP, Section 3, "Mitigation", factors to be considered in delineating potential habitat
areas include appropriate circulation, light, sediment, slope, salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen,
depth, proximity to eelgrass, history of eelgrass coverage, and etc. The data in this report is
compared with the data of habitat in P.L.A. Erftemeijer and K.E. van de Wolfshaar (2006) report that
describes minimum tolerated, optimum range and maximum tolerated conditions for Zostera marina
eelgrass and personal experience of diving in Southern California Bays. (Refer to Dive Observations
and Discussion below,)4. Please note that in general, abiotic parameters are generally stable year
around for this site location.
Dive Observations of 40 Linda Isle:
Depth: Depth ranged from 6 feet near shore to 15 feet at end of survey area at a length of 95 feet
out from sea wall and 120'wide. (Refer to Figure 2).
Appropriate Circulation: Circulation in this particular dock is likely similar to the circulation pattern in
the main channel of the Newport Harbor because of proximity of this survey area to the main
channel.
Light: Within the dock slip, visibility was > 1 foot and murky due to particulate matter in water. The
origin of the particulate matter is unknown, but is likely to be the same as the condition in the nearby
Harbor channel.
Sediment: The survey area bottom substrate was sand and dirt (sediment).
Salinity: Salinity would be expected to be the same in the dock slip as in Newport Harbor.
4 P.L.A. Erftemeijer and K.E. van de Wolfshaar. May, 2006. Ecological model of the Lagoon of Venice. Part 111.
Seagrass Habitat Model.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 6 of 17
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
42. -9-0 Shoreline Village Drive 40 Linda Isle
...............
Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Temperature: Water temperature variation ranges from 590 to 620 F in Newport Harbor,
California. Water temperature is likely higher due to shallow waters and extreme daily
temperatures at time of survey.
Dissolved oxygen: Hypoxia, which is generally defined as dissolved oxygen levels that are less than
2 to 3 mg/L and creates dead zones where this condition is present in some locations of Newport
Harbor from water runoff of Newport Beach City. Dissolved oxygen in Harbor Waters near 40
Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA can range from 4.2 mg/L to 10.3 mg/L due to several Abiotic
factors. What is important here is this range is acceptable for eelgrass habitats. At time of
survey dissolved oxygen was approximately 7.1 mg/L using the LaMotte Dissolved Oxygen Test
Kit. The data in this report is compared to the data of habitat in Recommended Options for
Maximum Water Temperature Limits and Minimum Dissolved Oxygen limits at a Compliance
Point for Discharges from the South Bay Power Plant in San Diego Bay, Necessary to Protect
Beneficial Uses October 16, 2003, Richard F. Ford, Ph.D.5 Please note that in general, abiotic
parameters are generally stable year around for this site location.
Depth: The depth of the eelgrass habitat measures between 6 and 12 feet and 1 eelgrass patch (1),
while the depth of the potential eelgrass habitat measures 6-9 feet in depth. (Refer to Figure 2).
Proximity to eelgrass coverage: The potential eelgrass habitat is located immediately adjacent to
the eelgrass habitat so eelgrass has the potential to spread.
Low Tide Exposure: Optimum conditions for eelgrass habitat include less than 0 to 5 percent of the
time for low tide exposure. Due to the dock's location in the southern portion of Newport Harbor,
the proposed dock slip would not have any low tide exposure.
Slope: Slope descent increases as distance increases from rock wall. The slope of survey site
bottom depth starts at 6 feet at the sea wall and slopes out 95 feet out from sea wall, where the
depth is 12 feet with an overall slope of 6.3 percent (6 foot depth differential / 95 feet). The slope of
the eelgrass covered portion of the survey area (3 foot depth / 45 feet from sea wall) is 6.6 percent.
The potential eelgrass (eelgrass absence) habitat slopes from sea wall at 6 foot depth to 95 feet
from sea wall at 12 foot depth (6 feet depth / 95 feet non-eelgrass extending out from sea wall) and
has a slope of 6.3 percent. There is a 0.3 percent difference in slope between the eelgrass habitat
and the potential eelgrass habitat since they parallel from sea wall to channel. The contour of
bottom is a slow descent from sea wall out to the channel at a slightly increasing rate evenly
paralleling the length of the sea wall within the surveyed area.
Circulation: Please note that this tide information is not exact as circulation is difficult to estimate in
the Newport Harbor because there are no gauges available in that area. However, circulation would
be anticipated to be similar as in the Newport Harbor channel.
Fauna: Observation included common species of Newport Harbor mussels on pileS6 and common
5 Richard F. Ford Ph.D. April 4, 2003. Recommended Options for Maximum Water Temperature Limits and Minimum
Dissolved Oxygen limits at a Compliance Point for Discharges from the South Bay Power Plant in San Diego Bay,
Necessary to Protect Beneficial Uses
6 US Army Corps of Engineers. Biological Report 82(11.84). Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal
Fishes and Invertebrates (Pacific Southwest); California Sea Mussel and Bay Mussels.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 7 of 17
WO
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
round rays (Urobatis hallefi, rays)7.
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Other factors effecting eelgrass growth is visibility, dissolved oxygen, and water depth. Some
areas of Newport Harbor show signs of hypoxia and no marine life exists in these areas due to
water run-off from the city. A complete study of dissolved oxygen in Newport Harbor has not
been conducted but having dived nearly 50% of the Bay since 1995 and observed large areas
devoid of much of the marine life. The need to monitor and protect our marine life is paramount
in Newport Harbor.
Findings
Caulerpa: No caulerpa was observed (see attached Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form).
Eel -grass: Eelgrass was observed within the survey area. (Refer to attached Eelgrass Survey
Reporting Form and Figures 2).
This dredging survey site has existing dock structure and proposal is to dredge inside the "U"
shape dock structure. This survey was conducted and is based on proposal to within existing
floating dock system (Refer to Figure 2). Eelgrass distribution was observed at 1 location noted as
Patch 1 shown in Figure 2. Density and length throughout survey area was uniform. After the 9 foot
depth mark no eelgrass was observed while diving further out from the sea wall towards the
channel where it appears dredging has taken place in the past some time ago. Near sea wall at
the 6 foot depth and going out to the 9 foot depth, eelgrass was approximately 8" to 12" inches in
length and ranged in density from 15 turions sq meter to 90 turions per square meter. Eelgrass was
not present after approximately the 9 foot depth and deeper. At the 9 foot depth, eelgrass did exist,
and, a rapid decent of the bottom was observed after 12 feet from end of dock. The 12 foot depth
started at approximately 85 feet from sea wall. (Refer to Figure 2).
Due to murky water and a less than 1' foot visibility pictures underwater were not possible. to help
determine eelgrass distribution, eelgrass density in relation to depth, and eelgrass lengths, including
sediment type, slope and contour of bottom a total of 9 quadrats were taken at varying depths and
distances from the sea wall. Table 2 lists all quadrats taken in relation to existing and potential
eelgrass habitats and are shown as blue stars in Figure 2.
Discussion:
First, it is important to understand that SCEMP requires a level of assessment in accordance with
the level of impacts, and does not require an exhaustive research report. The observational survey
report should provide a baseline for evaluation of future impacts to eelgrass. The survey should
provide an assessment of the survey site such that the baseline can be used to adequately assess
impacts to eelgrass in the two sequential years. Thus, a selection of sample size and evaluation of
the quadrats are of primary importance.
Wien, Larry G., Amy M. Findlay, and Carol M. Phalen. 20OZ. Structure and Standing stock of the Fish Assemblages of
San Diego Bay, California from 1994 to 1999. Bulletin of Southern California Academy of Science. 101(2), 2002. Pp 49-
85.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 8 of 17
W (-)p
Is,
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
40 Linda Isle
4Z9-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
F Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Second, it is important to know the history of dock slip. Historically, the existing dock has been
present more than 10 years.
The distribution of eelgrass within bay and estuarine systems is defined by numerous variables,
including light, temperature, salinity, substrate, wave exposure, currents and nutrient availability.
Eelgrass forms extensive meadows in soft -bottom habitats from the low intertidal to depths of about
20 feet (6 meters), and from sheltered areas to exposed coasts. In southern California, eelgrass has
been reported to occur as deep as 98 feet (30 meters). Optimum temperatures for eelgrass growth
seem to lie between 50 and 680F (10 and 20*C). However, eelgrass is known to survive with a lower
tolerance level of 21'F (-6'C) and an upper level of 104.9'F (40.5'C). Eelgrass is a euryhaline
species (able to live in a wide range of salinities) that is capable of growing near stream mouths
when the water is fresh at low tide, but does not 9 row in persistent fresh water. A salinity range of
10 to 30 parts per thousand is optimum for growth.
In general, low circulation (<5 cm/second) to medium circulation (20 — 40 cm/second) is considered
an optimum range of circulation for eelgrass to grow9. Circulation October increase in the main
Harbor channel, which could account for lack of eelgrass in the outer portion of the dock slip,
although there are likely other causes for this lack of eelgrass in the potential eelgrass habitat of the
dock, which cannot be fully analyzed due to limited resources of the customer. However, circulation
would be expected to be suitable to support eelgrass.
Reduction in light due to turbidity has been identified as a major cause of the loss of seagrasses
worldwide (Shepherd et al., 198910; Green and Short, 200311). Particulate matter in Newport
Harbor is high, but is likely equal in all areas of the dock slip. Visibility in Newport Harbor is low
due to an increased density of particulates in the sea water. Low visibility has effect on sunlight
penetration into water and is a limiting factor for eelgrass existing at deeper than 12-15' depths.
This measurement varies throughout Newport Harbor.
Sediment is a general term, which in this case is used in describing Newport Harbor bottom make
up which sediment is in this case made up of silt to clay saturated with traces of fine sand, shell
fragments. No observation of boulders or gravel has been noted while diving throughout most
Newport Harbor docks. There is bedrock that does exist and sometimes some form of obstruction
whether rocks/boulders/refuse at varying depths roughly averaging 20 feet below bottom existing
slowing down pile installations. This bedrock does not appear to have a visible impact on the
surface of the bottom of Newport Harbor water ways.
11 California Department of Fish and Game. State of Fisheries Report (2008).
9 P.L.A. Erftemeijer and K.E. van de Wolfshaar. May, 2006. Ecological model of the Lagoon of Venice. Part Ill.
Soagrass Habitat Model.
10 Shepherd, S.A., A.J. McComb, D.A. Bulthuis, V. Neverauskas, D.A. Steffensen and R. West, 1989. Decline of
seagrasses. Ini A.W.D. Larkum, A.J. McComb and S.A. Shepherd (Eds.) Seagrasges: A Treatise on the
Biology of Seagrass6s; with Special Reeference to the Australian Region. Elsevier, North Holland, pp.
346387.
11 Green, E.P. and F.T. Short, 2003. World Atlas of Seagrasses. Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation
Monitoring Centre. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA, 298 pp.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 9 of 17
T;, W 0"�
DIVE WORKS
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
A total of 9 quadrats were placed in 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, California. In addition to the
general results of the survey, the results in Table 2 of each quadrat should be used in evaluating
any future surveys conducted and potential future mitigation. The cause of the lack of eelgrass in the
inner and outer portion of the dock slip cannot be specifically identified by observations or anecdotal
accounts.
evv*ort Beach. California
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 10 of 17
DIVE WORKS
&
1 40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Newport Beach, CA
010t
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Figure 2. Dive transects, eelgrass presence, quadrat location and proposed dock slip
Transects Quadtats
Survey Area Patch 1
95' x 120'
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 11 of 17
DIVE WORKS
40 Linda Isle
4,29-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Table 1 below depicts tide at + 3' ft MLLW during the survey. Additionally, tidal variations
are also included.
NEWPORT BAY ENTRANCE, CORONA DEL MAR, CA Station1d: 9410580
I H �A 10/16 10/16 10116 10/16 10/17 10/17 10/17 10/17 10118
12an 6an 12pn 6pn 12an 6an 12pn 6pn 12an
Date/Tine (LST/LDT)
Table 2. Baseline evaluation of depth, length of turions and density of turions in quadrats,
per square meter, in the dock slip. Evaluation is based on quadrat reading of left to right in
Fiqure 2.
Quadrat
1
2
3
4.50
5
6
7
8
9
Length of
r 1 L
4.00
8"-12"
Turions
3.50
Photograph
3.00
Date Dity
Thine
fiqt
4,04
Turions/
2.50
P'l
30-45
Quadrat
2.00
j
Depth in
12'
10,
10,
91
10,
8'
1,50
91
61
Feet
4j
�4 P(A
1.00
Quadrants
0 50
I H �A 10/16 10/16 10116 10/16 10/17 10/17 10/17 10/17 10118
12an 6an 12pn 6pn 12an 6an 12pn 6pn 12an
Date/Tine (LST/LDT)
Table 2. Baseline evaluation of depth, length of turions and density of turions in quadrats,
per square meter, in the dock slip. Evaluation is based on quadrat reading of left to right in
Fiqure 2.
Quadrat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Length of
8"-12"
Turions
Photograph
Turions/
30-45
Quadrat
Depth in
12'
10,
10,
91
10,
8'
8'
91
61
Feet
Quadrants
in Impact
Area
Quadrants
in Eelgrass
x
Habitat
Quadrats in
Potential
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Eelgrass
Habitat
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 12 of 17
"JE wo
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
..............
...............
Long Beach, CA 90802
G SEVN'
Table 3. Bounding Coordinates
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
EELGRASS SPECIFIC LOCATIONS
Square Feet
Universal Transmercator
Square Meters
Patch
Latitude and
Zone 11 Hemisphere N.
Length
Longitude
NAD 83
Density
33.612771,
Easting
416082
-117.904618
Northing
3719588.9
33.612798,
Easting
416077.5
-117.904666
Northing
3719591.9
30 feet x 7 feet
33.612747,
Easting
416070.4
9.1m x 2.1m
-117.904743
Northing
3719586.3
1
24-90 Turions sq meter
33.612742,
Easting
416073.2
8'�- 12 " length
-117.904712
Northing
3719585.8
Depth 6-8" foot
33.612770,
Easting
416075.9
-117.904683
Northing
3719588.8
33.612758,
Easting
416078.7
-117.904653
Northing
3719587.5
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 13 of 17
W 0
Is,
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
.......... Newport Beach, CA
. . . . . . . . . . . .
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form
This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for the invasive exotic algae, (Caulerpa)
which is required to be conducted under federal and/or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Commission, and/or Regional Water Quality Boards (Regions 8 & 9). The
form has been designed to assist to identify and control any potential impacts of the authorized actions on
the spread of Calupera. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification
through publication of revisions to the Calupera survey policy, It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee
to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols,
contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, 562-980-4043, or William Paznokas, California
Department of Fish & Game, 858-467-4218. This survey is valid for (60) sixty days from March to August
and valid for (90) ninety days from August to October. For information regarding this survey please contact
Robert Wiegand, Dive Works Diving Service at 949-759-0773.
Required Information:
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 14 of 17
40 Linda Isle
Site Name:
Newport Beach, CA
Robert Wiegand
Survey Contact:
(949) 759-0773
DiveWork@Gmail.com
Permit Reference:
(ACOE Permit No., CCC Permit
No.)
Hydrographic System:
Newport Harbor
(bay, estuary, lagoon, or harbor)
Specific Location:
(UTM, Lat./Long., datum,
Caulerpa not observed
accuracy level, attach electronic
survey area map if possible)
Yes, Caulerpa was found at this site and
Was Caulerpa Detected:
Has been contacted on date.
xxxx No, Caulerpa was not found at this site
Description of Permitted Work:
(describe briefly the work to be
Dredging
conducted at the site under the
I permits identified above)
I
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 14 of 17
W 0
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
15-A
40 Linda Isle
4 -OS
29 horeline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
aaaaaaa
a-
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
i
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2 014
Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (Cont.)
Description of Site:
(describe the physical and
biological conditions within
the survey area at the time
Bottom is sediment composed of
of the survey and provide
Depth range: 6'— 15'
sand and dirt.
insight into variability, if
known. Please provide units
for all numerical
information).
Substrate type:
Sediment is sand and dirt
Temperature:
760 Air 680 Water
Dissolved Oxygen:
7.1 mg/L
Salinity: I
Newport Harbor salinity
Dominant flora:
Eelgrass
Dominant fauna:
Common Bay mussels, round rays
Exotic species encountered
None
- Caulerpa
Other site description notes:
Description of Survey
Effort: (please describe the
surveys conducted
including type of survey
(SCUBA, remote video,
Survey date and time
Survey conducted using SCUBA
etc.) and survey methods
period:
>75% area including bottom
employed, date of work,
surveyed.
and survey density
DATE: October 16, 2014
Refer to the above report.
(estimated percentage of
TIME :0930AM
the bottom actually viewed).
Describe any limitations
encountered during the
survey efforts.
Horizontal visibility in water:
> 1 foot
Survey ype and methods:
SCUBA
Survey ersonnel:
Robert Wiegand, Sean Donovan
Survey density:
None noted
Survey limitations:
None noted
Other Information: (use
this space to provide any
additional information or
Refer to the above report.
references to attached
materials such as maps,
reports, etc.)
Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (version 1. 2, 10131104)
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 15 of 17
I P- wo
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Long Beach, CA 90802
Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey October 16,2014
This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for Eelgrass which is required to be
conducted under federal and/or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and the Coastal Commission and required for review by Marine Bureau and Planning Department. The form
has been designed to assist in identifying eelgrass while ensuring that the required information is
consistently documented. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification
through publication of revisions to the Eelgrass survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee
to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols,
contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, 562-980-4043, or William Paznokas, California
Department of Fish & Game, 858-467-4218, This survey is valid for (60) sixty days from March to August
and valid for (90) ninety days from August to October. For information regarding this survey please contact
Robert Wiegand, Dive Works Diving Service at 049-759-0773.
Required Information:
Site Name:
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Robert Wiegand
Survey Contact:
(949) 759-0773
DiveWork@Gmaii.com
Permit Reference:
(ACOE Permit No., CC Permit
No.)
Hydrographic System:
(bay, estuary, lagoon, or
Newport Harbor
harbor)
Specific Location:
(UTM, Lat./Long., datum,
accuracy level, attach
Refer to Bounding Coordinates Table 3
electronic survey area map if
possible)
Was Eellgrass Detected:
xxx Eelgrass within 15' of proposed project
Eelgrass within 15-30' of project] disposal
No eelgrass in project / disposal site
Description of Permitted
Work:
(describe briefly the work to be
Dredging
conducted at the site under the
permits identified above)
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 16 of 17
W
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey October 16, 2014
Eelgrass. Survey Reporting Form (Cont.)
Description of Site:
(describe the physical and
biological conditions within
the survey area at the time of
Depth range: 6'— 15'
Bottom is sediment composed
the survey and provide
of sand and dirt.
insight into variability, if
known. Please provide units
for all numerical information).
Substrate type:
Sediment is sand and dirt
Temperature:
760 Air 680 Water
Dissolved Oxygen
7.1 mg/L
Salinity:
Newport Harbor salinity
Dominant flora:
Eelgrass
Dominant fauna:
Common mussels; Round
Rays
Exotic species encountered
none
Other site description notes:
Refer to Table 2 — Quadrat
Samples
Description of Survey
Effort: (please describe the
surveys conducted including
type of survey (SCUBA,
Survey date and time
remote video, etc.) and
period:
Survey conducted using
survey methods employed,
SCUBA
date of work, and survey
DATE: October 16, 2014
>75% area including bottom
density (estimated
TIME :0930AM
surveyed.
percentage of the bottom
actually viewed). Describe
any limitations encountered
during the survey efforts
Horizontal visibility in water:
> I foot
Survey type and methods:
SCUBA
Survey Personnel:
Robert Wiegand, Sean
Donovan
Survey density:
Patch 1 : 8-30 Turions sqft
Survey limitations:
None noted
Other Information: (use this
space to provide any
additional information or
Refer to the above report.
references to attached
materials such as maps,
reports, etc.)
Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form (April 2009)
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 17 of 17
Condition Compliance - 5-06-117
Consistency Certification Compliance — CC -031-06
Page 2 of 3
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Islan& Public beach at South Bay
917
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
Front at Diamond Avenue
3/28/2014 (Expires
7/26/2014); Cauterpa
survey 3/28/2014
(EXPIRES 6/26/2014)
City of Newport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at South Bay
867
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
Front at Coral Avenue
3/28/2014 (Expires
7/26/2014) ' Caulerpa
survey 3/28/2014
(EXPIRES 6/26/2014)
Philip Doane
1302 — 1316 East Bay Avenue
723
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
(RESUBMITTAL
4/16/2014 (Expires
UNDER EXTENSION)
8/14/2014); Caulerpa
survey 10/28/2013
(EXPIRED 1/28/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at Turquoise
61t
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
(RESUBMITTAL OF
Avenue and South Bay Front
3/28/2014 (Expires
2013 PROPOSAL,
UNDER EXTENSION)
7/26/2014); Caulerpa
survey 3/28/2014
(EXPIRES 6/26/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at Grand Canal
144
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
at South Bay Front
10/20/2013
(EXPIRED); Caulerpa
survey 10/20/2013
(EXPIRED)
David Shockley
517-537 Via Lido Send
603
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
5/16/2014 (Expires
9/13/2014); Caulerpa
survey 5/16/20143
(Expires 8/14/2014)
Abbott Ayloush
915 Via Lido Send
140
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
5116/2014 (Expires
9/13/2014); Caulerpa
survey 5/16/20143
(Expires 8/14/2014)
�ry ayMopcl,,,
Linda Isle,
0
502
No
Eelgrass Survey
5/16/2014 (Expires
9/13/2014); Caulerpa
survey 5/16/20143
(Expires 8/14/2014)
Andy Crean
92 Linda Isle
0
787
No
Eelgrass Survey
5/16/2014 (Expires
9/13/2014); Caulerpa.
survey 5/16/20143
1 (Expires 8/14/2014)
Don & Sandy McCalla
105 Linda Isle
0
546
No
Eelgrass Survey
5/16/2014 (Expires
9/13/2014) ' Caulerpa
survey 5/16/20143
(Expires 8/14/2014)
Kevin Moriarty
2782 Bayshore Drive
0
455
No
Eelgrass Survey
5/14/2014 (Expires
9/11/2014) ' Caulerpa
survey 5/19/20143
(Expires 8/ 17/2
Sub -total
8786
2290
1
1
1
Condition Compliance - 5-06-117
Consistency Certification Compliance — CC -031-06
Page 3 of 3
I Year-to-date total 1 10551 1 2290 1 12841 1 1
Commission staff have reviewed the information submitted and determined that the above referenced dredging events conform with Consistency
Certifications CC -031-06 and the Special Conditions of Coastal Development Permit 5-06-117. Please note that the celgrass and Caulerpa taxifolia
surveys completed are only valid for a limited time period and that additional surveys must be completed and submitted to Commission staff for
review if the dredging and beach nourishment events listed above do not commence prior to expiration ofthe initial survey. In addition, please note
that th es authorization shall expore on December 20, 2015 and that all authorized work must be completed prior to that date.
Please be advised that only the projects described in the materials submitted for the sites listed above have been found to conform with Consistency
Certification CC -031-06 and/or conform with the terms and conditions of Coastal Development Permit 5-06-117. Any change in the projects may
cause them to lose their status as consistent with CC -031-06 and/or CDP 5-06-117. This certification is based on information provided by the
recipient ofthis letter. If, at a later date, this information is found to be incorrect or incomplete, this letter will become invalid, and any development
occurring at that time must cease until a new determination regarding conformance with CC -031-06 and/or CDP 5-06-117, is obtained.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (562) 590-5071 or Mr. Mark Delaplaine at (415) 904-5200.
Sincerely,
Karl Schwing
Coastal Program Manager
Orange County
Cc: Mr. Mark Delaplaine, California Coastal Commission
Mr. Steve Estes, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
STATE OF. CALIFORNIA - NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
South Coast Area Office
200 Ocean gate, Suite 1000
Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 June 24, 2014
(562) 590-5071
Mr. Chris Miller
City of Newport Beach/Division of Harbor Resources
829 Harbor Island Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Subject: Condition Compliance— Coastal Development Permit 5-06-117
& Conformance with Consistency Certification CC -031-06 - DREDGING
Dear Mr. Miller:
Commission staff has received information submitted as evidence of compliance with Coastal Development Permit 5-06-117, and/or as evidence of
conformance with Consistency Certifications CC -031-06 for the following sites in the City of Newport Beach:
Applicant
Site Address
Beach
Ocean
Cumulative
Eelgrass Present
Comments
Disposal
Disposal
Totalt for 2014
betvieen 15 - 30 Feet
Eelgrass Survey
Qty* (c. -yds)
Qtyt (cu.yds)
ofdisposaJ
Date/Expiration";
footprint?N
Caulerpa Survey
Date/Expirationtt
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at North Bay
431
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
Front at Grand Canal
3/29/2014 (Expires
7/27/2014); Caulerpa
survey 3/29/2014
(EXPIRES 6/27/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at East Bay
833
0
No
EcIgrass Survey
Front at Park Avenue
3/29/2014 (Expires
7/27/2014) ' Caulerpa
survey 3/29/2014
(EXPIRES 6/27/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at South Bay
667
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
Front at Amethyst Avenue
3/28/2014 (Expires
7/26/2014); Caulerpa
survey 3/28/2014
(EXPIRES 6/26/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at South Bay
1000
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
Front at Marine Avenue
3/28/2014 (Expires
7/26/2014); Caulerpa
survey 3/28/2014
(EXPIRES 6/26/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at South Bay
850
0
No
Eelgrass Survey
Front at Jade Avenue
3/29/2014 (Expires
7/27/2014); Caulerpa
survey 3/29/2014
(EXPIRES 6/27/2014)
City ofNewport Beach
Balboa Island: Public beach at South Bay
1000
0
No
EcIgrass Survey
Front at Abalone Avenue
3/29/2014 (Expires
�/27/2014); Caulerpa
survey 3/29/2014
(EXPIRES 6/27/2014)
Not to Exceed 1,000 cubic yards per dredging and beach disposal event
Not to Exceed 1,000 cubic yards per dredging and off -shore disposal event
Not to Exceed 20,000 cubic yards per year
If "Yes" then if celgrass is present between 15-30 feet from the proposed dredge material disposal footprint (in any direction), then monitoring ofthe site for potential
eelgrass impacts ftom disposal operations shall be required.
.. A] I ecigrass survey/mapping efforts must be completed during the active growth phase for the vegetation (typically March through October) and shall be valid for a
period of 120 days with the exception of surveys completed in August - October- A survey completed in August - October shall be valid until the resumption ofactive
growth (i.e., March 1).
Caulerpa taxifolia surveys are valid for 90 days from date of survey
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
HARBOR RESOURCES
June 17, 2014
California Coastal Commission
Attn: Karl Schwing
200 Oceangate, STE 1000
Long Beach, CA 90802-4416
Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Corice Farrar
915 Wilshire Blvd.
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
Attn: Adam Fischer
3737 Main Street, STE 500
Riverside, CA 92501-3348
RE: Regional General Permit No. 54 -Dredging Application Submittal
Enclosed is a dredging application for your approval, per the California Coastal
Commission Permit 5-06-117 & Federal Consistency Certification CC -031-06, the
Army Corps of Engineers Permit No. 54 (File No. 200501233 -DPS) and the
Regional Water Quality Control Board General Certification Permit, $77 Regional
Water Board check included for each application. All of these applications have
been checked for accuracy and completeness as evidenced by the attached
Dredging Application City Checklist.
Thank you for your time in reviewing these applications. Please do not hesitate
to contact this office with comments or questions, 949-644-3044.
Raymond- 40 Linda Isle
Crean- 92 Linda Isle
McCalla- 105 Linda Isle
Moriarty- 2782 Bayshore
Sincerely,
cj'Q'G
Lisa Walters
829 HARBOR ISLAND DRIVE, NEwPoRT BEACH, CA 92660
P (949) 644-3034 1 F (949) 723-0589 1 WWW.NEWPORTBF-ACHCA.GOV
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
HARBOR RESOURCES
DREDGING APPLICATION
CITY CHECKLIST
Applicant Name:
Project Site Address: ic) L i rJ a- T -G- Je,
I r_4
0
i-2
07.4
Applicant address, phone number
Agent & Contractor name, address, phone number (if applicable)
Project site address
Assessor's parcel number
Dredge site latitude and longitude
Disposal site:
El Beach disposal latitude and longitude
19 Ocean disposal LA -3
Purpose and final goal of dredging
Method of dredging. Vessel and equipment description.
Vessel(s) Captain, Dredging & Disposal Inspector
Cubic yards dredged and disposed ( must be less than 1,000 cy.)
Area impacted (in ac res)
If beach disposal, linear feet of affected beach area
Dredging and Disposal Operations Schedule
Scaled drawings (plan view and cross sectional view)
Site address
Location within the Harbor
829 HARBOR ISLAND DRIVE, NEwPoRT BEACH, CA 92660
P (949) 644-3034 1 F (949) 723-0589 1 WWW.NEWPORTBEACHCA.GOV
Page 2
Location of existing dock structures
Location of existing dock structures on adjacent properties
Location of Bulkhead, Pierhead and Project Lines
Dredge depth (limited to -7 MLLW with a F allowable overdraft)
Photo(s) of dredge and disposal areas at low tide (including 30' buffer area)
Eelgrass Survey
Survey for presence of eelgrass within 30' of the entire project area
Yes 54 No Eelgrass within 15' of entire project area. Praject no
permitted.
If ocean disposal and eelgrass is located greater than 15' from the project
area, then no further.monitoring required
El If beach disposal and eelgrass is not located within 30'.of the project
area, then no further monitoring is required
El If beach disposal and eelgrass is located between 15' and 30' from the
project area, then pre- and post -monitoring is required
0 Pre -monitoring survey attached
El Post -monitoring survey attached. Date submitted:
Eelgrass Stamp
Caulerpa Survey
R1 Survey for Caulerpa within 30' of the entire project area
Grain Size Analysis
(1) sample per 'Aacre and / or at least (1) sample at dredge site and (1) sample at
beach disposal site (if applicable)
Beach disposal:
El Sample(s) must be at least 80% sand, or;
El At least 75% sand and within 10% of the sand content of the receiver beach
Ocean Disposal:
W Sample(s) must be less than 80% sand
4
Page 3
Project is over (check one box):
W City Tidelands
El County Tidelands (State Lands Commission Dredge Lease Approval)
If applicable, check one box:
El The Irvine Company owner's approved area
El Bay Island owner's approved area -
El Dover Shores owner's approved area
X Linda Isle owner's approved area
Check made payable to The City of Newport Beach
Check for $77 made payable to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
Signed application
El Neighbor notification
POST DREDGIING
El Post Dredging Report. Date submitted:
0 Post eelgrass monitoring (if applicable)
Carl & Mary Raymond
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Atlas Engineering
837 W 17'h St.
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
949-525-2689 C
Dredging Application & Survey
for RGP 54 for the City of Newport Beach
Report Prepared 5/30/14
Hydrographic Surveyors, General Engineering Contractor, Inspections, Marine Services & Equipment
837 West 17"' Street License 4 A850635
Costa Mesa, CA 92627 PLS # 4278 ACSM # 0221
PH 949-525-2689 4 FAX 949-597-8518 atlas-engineering@sbeglobal.net
Table of Contents
1.
Application
2.
Plan View
3.
Plan View With Ariel
4.
Cross Section
5.
Eel Grass/Caulerpa Survey
6.
Soil Sample Analysis
7.
Low Tide Picture
Hydrographic Surveyors, General Engineering Contractor, Inspections, Marine Services & Equipment
837 West 17t" Street License # A850635
Costa Mesa, CA 92627 PLS # 4278 ACSM # 0221
PH 949-525-2689 * FAX 949-597-8518 atlas-engineering@sbcglobal.net
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Harbor Resources Division
Dredging Application
Regional General Permit 54
Corps File No. SPL -2011 -00249 -SME
CDP 5-06-117-A2 & CC -031-06
Water Board Consistency Permit
Exr)ires March 31, 2014
,pplicant Name, Address, Phone Number:
0-0,V'N yy)
4D L-AVI C", V-S"N-f-1
41�1?Aclk 01vu-0 L or)
Agent & Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number:
-�� —Z;,kV-VyTT- V'T C- ov q-z&Z7
mxof-., 1-k-al6pi
Project Site Address: Assessor's Parcel Number!
ALP\
F o -
Dredge Site: Latitude F Longitude cA �'11 17-115`0
J,
Disposal Site: Latitude Longitude L
0 Beach Disposal
.^ Ocean Disposal (LA -3): Latitude 33 31'00"N Longitude 117 53'30"W
urpose and Final Goal of Dredging (Effect on Bulkhead and Beaches):
To -p- llesse,\
Ao Cz6��—t o It -
I of Dredging (Hydraulic, Clamshell, Tractor,
EXLAVA4012— frvtyf
Dumi2 ScouD &
s) & Captain(s): F---� ;z
JDredging Operations Inspector:
Operations Inspector:
S'1, rv-\ 4-rz- L;
,Y,ry,-
t
T
)km 140 0/4-C
Harbor Resources Division 829 Harbor Island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 newportbeachca.gov/harborresources (949)644-3044
Cubic Yards Dredged and Disposed (Must be less than 1,000cy total):
rD, 0.-,7
Area impacted (in acres): C, YM
if Beach Disposal, Linear Feet of Affected Beach Area: [
Estimated Quantity of Material Dredged from or Disposed Onto the Site
from Previous Activities: I
iing and Disposal Operations Schedule:
7- PALtS
,�_ Apia",v 4v6- 00 J Lf
1please submit the following on a separate page. Use the check boxes to ensure a complete application is filed. incomplete applications
not be processed.
_V Scaled drawings of the project and disposal areas (plan view and cross sectional view)
J5k Site address
.2K Location within the Harbor
Location and physical dimensions of existing structures on site (e.g. float, pier, gangway, pile, bulkhead)
Location and physical dimensions of existing structures of existing structures on adjacent properties.
Location of Bulkhead, Pierhead, & Project Lines
_.EK Dredge depth (limited to -7MLLW with a 1' allowable overdredge)
S�V Photos of entire dredge and disposal areas at low tide (including 30' buffer area) with emphasis on Eelgrass
_9 Eelgrass Survey- Completed by a Certified Eelgrass Diver
A. Survey for the presence of Eelgrass within 30'of the entire project area (dredge & dispose site)
B. if Eelgrass is within 15'of project area, then the project will not be permitted via RGP 54.
C. If ocean disposal:
*Any eelgrass must be located greater than 15' from the project area
*No further eelgrass monitoring is required
D. if beach disposal:
elf eelgrass is not present within 30' of the project site then no further monitoring is required.
elf eelgrass is present 15'-30' of the project area then pre- and post -monitoring is required.
Cauierpa Survey- Completed by Certified Caulerpa Diver
*Survey for Caulerpa within 30' of the project area (dredge and disposal sites)
Grain size analysis
e(l) sample per 1/4 acre and/or at least (1) sample at dredge site and (1) sample at beach disposal site
elf beach disposal sample must be at least 80% sand
Project is over (check one):
11 City Tidelands
e County Tidelands (State Lands Commission Dredge Lease Approval)
< if applicable check one box:
• The Irvine Company owner approved area
• Bay island owners' approved area
11 Dover Shores owners' approved area
,R Linda Isle owners' approved area
_,W Check for $1,690 made payable to City of Newport Beach
,Z Check for $77 made payable to Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board
Harbor Resources Division 829 Harbor island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 newportbeachca.gov/harborresources (949)644-3044
Dredging is not authotiied in certain areas of Newport Bay, including the Rhine Channel, portions of the West Lido Channel, areas west of
Newport Boulevard, areas north of Dover Shores, portions of the Bayside Village Marina, Promontory Bay, and portions of the Balboa
Yacht Basin.
RCAX-4 PZA_ Applicant / Agent), hereby certify that the information on this application is accurate
M
and complete. I also certlf�ihati have read the California Coastal Commission Permit 5-06-117-A2 & Federal Consistency Certification CC -
031 -06, the Army Corps of Engineers Regional General �ermit No. 54 (SPL -2011 -00249 -SME) and the California Regional Water Quality
Control Board General Certification f6r"Regional General Permit No. 54 for maintenance dredging in Newport Harbor and that I will comply
with all of the conditions in those permits. I also certify that by acceptance of this Permit, the applicant acknowledges and agrees that the
site may be subject to hazards from waves and erosion.
I will further hold the City of Newport Beach harmless from and indemnify the City against any claim for damages arising out of the
exercise of these permits. In addition, I shall reimburse the City of Newport Beach for all attorney's fees and other costs expended by
them in defending any claim, lawsuit, or judgment arising out of the activities of the applicant carried on under the authority of such
Permit.
I understand that any work authorized must be completed by March 31, 2014 after which a new authorization is required. I also
understand that the applicant will submit a Post Dredging Completion Report no later than 30 calendar days after completion of each
dredging project. All work scheduled to be completed before 7:00 AM or after 6:00 PM (Monday — Saturday) or on Sundays or holidays
must be approved by Harbor Resources.
Per the RGP Permit, all dredging applications will be processed by the various agencies through monthly batch submittals sent to them by
Harbor Resources. Therefore, all dredging applications must be submitted to and received by Harbor Resources by the Ist Monday of
every month. Applications submitted prior to this deadline are encouraged and appreciated.
'30,
aryf / or Agent
Updated January 2013
Harbor Resources Division 829 Harbor island Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 newportbeachca.gov/harborresources (949)644-3044
M 0
4 1 ltw i
June 10, 2014
Lisa Walters
City of Newport Beach Harbor Resources
100 Civic Center Dr.
Newport Beach, CA 92660-7206
RE: Linda Isle Community Association — Dredging of Private Boat Slips
Dear Lisa Walters:
Due to the uncertainties of when the Linda Isle Lagoon dredging project will commence, the Linda Isle
Board of Directors has recommended to homeowners that they proceed with dredging their slips as they
are able and currently include the following addresses: 40, 41, 48, 81, 86, 92, 102, 103, 104, 105 Linda
Isle.
Thank you again. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at (949)838-3229.
Sincerely,
At the Direction of the Board of Directors,
Linda Isle Community Association
Z&a Ewa""
Lisa Brannon, CCAM.
Senior Community Association Manager
lbrannon@keystonepacific.com
cc: 40, 41, 48, 81, 86, 92, 102, 103, 104, 105 Linda Isle
Professionally A4anaged by:
Keystone Pacific Property Management, Inc.
16845 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 200 - Irvine, CA 92606-4960 - Tel (949) 833-2600.- Fax (949) 833-0919
www.keystonepacffic.com
CP
cb
C)
4:�.
lb/'
V C;�
-1.
-0 e!
Z,
.
0)
Cb (b
0 14
A
(b
(lab
00
(0
(Z)
— Cf)
Cb
Q)
14
Ul —
Cb
Ka::r
�n m
41.
(b
N3
70
(0
1�,
rrl
0
<
Z
rr,
C)
(0
0) CU
(0
PD
Ln
L4
A
0
Ul
0
rri
Cl-
0,0
Cu
0
Ul
I
C+
GL
ro
W
C)
Q
(b
(0
I
QL
.(::9
CD
-N
4�1
CU
C)
IZD
r_ -j
tz
-j
r
CU
0
41.
cil
C:5
I
Cb
w
1,D
4S,
CO
Q
rrl
rri
QL
a. 30 r- S? 20
CL — COL
wa. "W -0-
m
Z
0
0-
0
0 0.1
0 r - G
:6 0 0.
r-
m
OD
J � a
(AM
0
(A)
0
C�
2.
P.-aio-- - n
. . :, . g j, -0
ccomr-
0
3 -0 Z,
rq
zo
3 w w
Cr c o
rq
i
0.0
0
3W
0 Z',o - '0 �
lo'<
5
0. <
0
r4-
rri
_0 00
Z� u
023 CD .0 d C, G-ko
w
ce
rn CA 0 *
= 0 &0
0 14
N
o
00* 2 103
a
ou)';,: �� 2!: COO scu 6 0,
0-
cm, 0
a 0 S
U)
CL% 3 :1
0 IA
0
0
o
CD
0 - Ir
r_
0 -:2
C/)
C-)
C--
0
F—
9
3-
zr
0 7v , < 2 S�
m mr 0 CD4
o
:3
= =L U)
UDn
Z
IE 2 3a , $0 0
Ot
2. 0
6=
90 4<0 0 =to
0') m
00
04 1 G
a 2
0
o
0
- CL b-
m CD 0
0
C-)
SO
0
,
CO, 3,�z .1,
'a 0 to 22
0
A.
ZM
(A woo. 3U
0"O!R
3
2 C'. z Co..
2. 0 m
=
U)
r 0
a c 0
0 2 A 0
>
6, Po W C, w
5 4.5 CL 0 0.-
(D
("A -r
M
0c)
::�i m
a Ln
-P.
05
bri
4�
Pa
n
tb
-0-5.
0
Un
;;u
ND -
(A
0
0
0
00
�4.
o
COL co (D :
to
C, 0.
5
C/�
CM
4
C, 0 cp
--icmK3 Ln
9 * a no
a u 3 a *<AA.
Cf)
-0- F Er C'
0.0 0 *-D 1, MIE
g y gq
0.0
SY
m
Cf)
Cc) FS -a
to
m
Fr, ,cr
o
Z
0
n
---1
CA
w
;r 0 a
-4
rn
5:3 -0 3 KIM ,
,U
3 OEG ZO w
m
C) 0
0 c e�-,
w
0
17*0
G)
61
0
C -L
Ln
CL
co 3E mtr,
CO
0
:3
(D
Ea
-0 A:
C)
ED
t3i
0
CL
14
0
r_
0
0
C:)
CL
m
C3
A:
Cf)
P.-aio-- - n
. . :, . g j, -0
ccomr-
0
3 -0 Z,
rq
zo
3 w w
Cr c o
rq
i
0.0
0
CO.= 23 r, -
RA�O_% ,
0 Z',o - '0 �
lo'<
5
0. <
-0 r.- D. S,
00
a
023 CD .0 d C, G-ko
w
ce
rn CA 0 *
= 0 &0
> >
>>
o
00* 2 103
a
ou)';,: �� 2!: COO scu 6 0,
0-
cm, 0
a 0 S
6-0.,
CL% 3 :1
0 IA
0
0
o
r
0
jE. -,W
0 - Ir
r_
0 -:2
Z,
w
, . Mll z
0
to w = w 0
OS &:r C CL
0
9
3-
S
0 7v , < 2 S�
m mr 0 CD4
o
gr a
a r, 0 ,
= =L U)
UDn
—
03
IE 2 3a , $0 0
Ot
2. 0
6=
90 4<0 0 =to
0') m
or
a :03 0' 5 -
0 = 13, r.-
a 2
0
o
0
- CL b-
m CD 0
0
z C,
o. 0. 0- Wft crjr
SO
0
,
CO, 3,�z .1,
'a 0 to 22
0
A.
ZM
(A woo. 3U
0"O!R
3
2 C'. z Co..
2. 0 m
=
81
RL
r 0
a c 0
0 2 A 0
>
6, Po W C, w
5 4.5 CL 0 0.-
:c i
("A -r
M
0c)
::�i m
a Ln
-P.
05
.4.0.3gs,
-0 m
E.
02-
P.-aio-- - n
. . :, . g j, -0
ccomr-
.0 30:
01 ".
a torn <
;2 < B*M-0-0
6- !-: -
'P, a,
zo
Z Z
�.
M-0.
eml No=
0 Z',o - '0 �
lo'<
5
0. <
--1
m
00
(D >
0 !9=wv�cLgao-
=
0 5
003 0 0= 0
Orn, 7--w a Coto
::a
U2 0 -Oa !�L
00-00
mm3
> >
>>
0
a
ou)';,: �� 2!: COO scu 6 0,
0-
a' to 0 C) 0
6-0.,
0
iza>-r-wo to
-06:7
0 -j CD =r
0 - Ir
r_
0 -:2
S. 00-
:5 ;u
0
--.
Cr:� .
CO . 0 0�
9
3-
-':2 0
-3 C)mm
too
m
0
CD M
= =L U)
UDn
w
a
0" %< $4:3-< Oc
30 0
2. 0
6=
-"% (D
0') m
or.
N
0 cr
a 2
0
o
0
0
fo < 0 =r a
SO
"D .0.
81- 0
X,
D
3
0
Z M
Z
ZM
(A woo. 3U
0"O!R
mo-
—0
0 , Sr -0,,
Z, ,:, - to 0
81
RL
r -t-
>
6, Po W C, w
5 4.5 CL 0 0.-
:c i
("A -r
0c)
::�i m
0 Clo. !, 9 1,zi zoo
C
OP�3
05
.4.0.3gs,
-0 m
E.
>2
5g 2.0
-r-
tb
-0-5.
0
Un
CD
'o 0
0
0
00
d ARM, lus
0-0
o
COL co (D :
to
C, 0.
5
(A
C, 0 cp
--icmK3 Ln
9 * a no
a u 3 a *<AA.
r
- 0
-0- F Er C'
0.0 0 *-D 1, MIE
2 Wca
Lo o
00-
:3 = cL
CL
to
:3 -oN3
0
0 Q
jr, r r 0, '< a
5�i a.
Fr, ,cr
o
0 0
w
5:3 -0 3 KIM ,
,U
3 OEG ZO w
m
a (n
G)
CL
0
C -L
to 0 Z
co 3E mtr,
0
:3
(D
Ea
ODO K
3 P
CL
3 to
1 F :e
o
0
CL
-,Je WOR
-0773
DIVE WORKS (949) 759
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive
29
Long Beach, CA 90802
G
Atlas Engineering
837 W 17th St.
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Subject: Pre Dredging Eelgrass (Zostera marina) and Caulerpa Taxifolia Survey
40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach CA
Summary:
Eelgrass patches (Zoster marina) were observed in subject area noted above.
Caulerpa (Caulerpa Taxifolia) was not observed in subject area noted above.
This is a Pre Dredging report as required in accordance with the Southern California Eelgrass
Mitigation Policy (SCEMP) since eelgrass is widely distributed throughout Southern California
Coastal and Harbor Regions. This policy has been set in place to protect marine habitats and sea
grass beds that play a role in the life cycle chain for marine life to reproduce. This survey assists
development projects by contractors like you to conduct activities in conjunction with best
management practices (BMPs) concerning impact and management for promoting eelgrass and
controlling the spread of Caulerpa. Responsible development by contractors like you helps protect
these sensitive marine ecosystems, which in turn, protect our ocean resources.
Thank you. If you have any questions please feel free to contact us.
Respectfully,
R4a'� uio-�
DiveWork@gmaii.com
(949) 759-0773
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 1 of 17
16 wok 41
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive
29
Long Beach, CA 90802
sli �
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, California
Atlas Engineering
837 W 17th St.
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
Dredging Survey
Report Prepared
May 16, 2014
by
---�Work§
Robert VV--iegand
strvey-asCistance by
Sean Donovan
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 2 of 17
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
DIVE WORKS (9491759-0773
40 Linda Isle
-77 429-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
G sf� Dredging Survey May 16, 2 014
CONTENTS
Introduction 4
Location 4
Purpose 4
Survey Method 4
Bounding Coordinates 6
Description of Existing Habitat and 6
Conditions
Findings 8
Discussion 8
Conclusion 9
List of Figures
Figure 1. Location of 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, California
10
Figure 2. Dive Transects, eelgrass presence, quadrat location and proposed dock slip
................................................................................................................. 11
List of Tables
Table 1. Tides and Currents
12
Table 2. Baseline Eelgrass Evaluation
12
Table 3. Bounding Coordinates
13
Surveys
Caulerpa Survey
14
Eelgrass Survey
16
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 3 of 17
P, WOR 1� DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive
29
Long Beach, CA 90802
Introduction
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Please note, as is typical of eelgrass in Newport Harbor, conditions will vary at any time. This
survey was completed within the eelgrass growing season and per the Southern California Eelgrass
Mitigation Policy (SCEMP).
Impacts to eelgrass were difficult to assess due to the size of the survey area. Two divers spent
considerable time diving and mapping taking quadrats where possible and were conducted based
on visibility, depth, and tidal flow (current).
Existing dock system has been in place more than 10 years.
The proposed dredging has not been conducted at time of this survey. (Refer to Figure 2)
This is a Dredging Survey Report addressing the requirement to determine impact on existing
natural habitat and navigational impact to waters and channel.
Location
Client at 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA proposes to dredge dock slips to increase depths for
vessel draft. (Refer to Figure 2).
Purpose
This is a dredging survey report addressing one of the requirements under the SCEMP to
establish a baseline for the density and extent of eelgrass for the purpose of evaluating future
proposed impacts on existing natural habitat, in particular eelgrass within the waters of the United
States (U.S.), in Newport Harbor, California (Refer to Figure 1).
Please note that this survey report is not a scientific research paper. This report is provided to a
private individual with limited resources for the purpose of obtaining the required Coastal
Development permits to float a dock into place and comply with the SCEMP.
Survey Method
Survey was conducted on May 16, 2014, beginning at approximately 1230 hour. The survey day
was sunny, air temperature was 850 Fahrenheit (F), water temperature was 630 F. Pursuant to
SCEMP, Section 3 for "Mitigation"', eelgrass habitats and potential habitats were measured.
1 The project applicant shall map thoroughly the area, distribution, density and relationship to depth contours of any
eelgrass beds likely to be impacted by project construction. This includes areas immediately adjacent to the project site
which have the potential to be indirectly or inadvertently impacted as well as potential eelgrass habitat areas. Potential
habitat is defined as areas where eelgrass would normally be expected to occur but where no vegetation currently
exists. SCEMP 1991, PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 4 of 17
,,:-e wo]�
(949) 759-0773
DIVE WORKS 40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
AIR, -0 Shoreline Village Drive
429
Long Beach, CA 90802
rvey May 16,2014
Dredging Su
Determining sample size is complex. The dock slip was reviewed from the surface and a
determination of sample size was completed prior to conducting the survey. Sample size was
confirmed after a thorough evaluation of potential eelgrass habitat within project site had been
completed. No additional quadrats were felt to be needed to provide reliable survey results of the
potential impact area and changes that could occur in the future.
A total of 9 quadrats were placed in approximately 11,400 square feet (3,474.7 meters square) of
the sample area (i.e., dock slip + adjoining properties either side of Clients property lines, see Figure
2). The sample size was believed to be adequate because of the pattern of the eelgrass near the
shoreline. Expected eelgrass patterns, although ever changing, are expected to be fairly similar
over time.
For the potential impact area under the gangway and around the dock slip (eelgrass is not in area of
existing dock slip), the sample size is 0.2 percent (9 square feet sample size/4,800 square feet area
of potential impact). (Refer to Figure 2). Thus, the largest sample areas would be where it is
important to measure impacts around proposed dredging area and the eelgrass (potential) habitat.
Determining location and placement of 9 quadrats as per requirements of SCEMP is complex and
must be completed using numerous considerations, in addition to considerations of habitat
suitability, primarily in association with the level of expected impact from the proposed project. After
an initial over -water and under -water review of the eelgrass area, quadrant locations were selected
representing a range of suitable habitat, potential habitat and anticipated impacts to eelgrass habitat
from within and around Clients dock slip. (Refer to Figure 2).
As described above, a total of 9 quadrants were placed within the entire survey area (11,400 square
feet). Each quadrant measured one square foot (0.3 meter) and was used to measure eelgrass
density. They were placed in depths of 6 feet (1.8 meters), 8 feet (2.4 meters), 10 feet (3.1 meters)
and 12 feet (3.7 meters). Eelgrass in Southern California has been found in depths of up to 98 feet
(27.8 meters)2 ; however, eelgrass is primarily found up to 20 feet (6.0 meters) in depth in this type of
sheltered intertidal habitat3 , and therefore representative depths found within the dock slip were
selected, including potential habitat found within the dock slip. Due to limited private individual
resources, a basic assumption was made the eelgrass presence is considered to be the most likely
area to support suitable eelgrass habitat within the survey area in the future. (Refer to Figure 2).
Other considerations must be discussed as there are factors within this dock slip that appear to be
limiting the growth of eelgrass beyond a certain depth (Refer to Figure 2 and the Discussion section
of this report below).
The survey area was delineated as 95 feet by 120 feet (11,400 square feet) and accounted for a
minimum of 15' past Clients property lines. Diver transects were parallel to the rock wall and starting 15'
feet out from end of dock slip fingers. The survey was conducted with 2 divers spaced approximately
1 foot apart. Lanes ran parallel to sea wall and the width of each lane was 5 feet wide with divers
scanning approximately 1 foot on either side, thus 19 transects were conducted going out 95 feet
from sea wall (Refer to Figure 2) covering the entire area to ensure >75% coverage of bay floor. A
1' square (0.3 meter square) grid was used to take 9 quadrant samplings. (Refer to Figure 2).
2 California Department of Fish and Game. State of Fisheries Report (2008).
3 California Department of Fish and Game. State of Fisheries Report (2008).
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 5 of 17
-0773
DIVE WORKS (.949)759 40 Linda Isle
ewport Beach, CA
N
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
4)v
IG S:. \1 Dredging Survey May 16, 2 0 14
The exact location of the proposed dredging was designed with the anticipation to avoid impact to
eelgrass roughly estimated in Figure 2. Based on this information, 9 qaudrats were placed in the
expected areas adjacent to proposed gangway and dock slip and a minimum of 15' past property
lines of subject property.
As per the SCEMP and due to the size of the dock slip, other potential eelgrass habitats were also
observed and found barren of eelgrass in what might be considered potential habitat. (Refer to
Figure 2). All 9 quadrats were placed in areas where eelgrass is present and probably has grown
for several years; exact length of time is unknown. The potential eelgrass habitat was surveyed and
determined abiotic parameters are consistent with the existing eelgrass habitat. A review of any
potential differences in the eelgrass habitat and potential eelgrass habit could be compared as both
are comparable for the proliferation of eelgrass.
Bounding Coordinates
Bounding Coordinates for existing eelgrass are calculated as per requirements of SCEMP and are
listed in Figure 3.
Description of Existing Habitat and Conditions
According to SCEMP, Section 3, "Mitigation", factors to be considered in delineating potential habitat
areas include appropriate circulation, light, sediment, slope, salinity, temperature, dissolved oxygen,
depth, proximity to eelgrass, history of eelgrass coverage, and etc. The data in this report is
compared with the data of habitat in P.L.A. Erftemeijer and K.E. van de Wolfshaar (2006) report that
describes minimum tolerated, optimum range and maximum tolerated conditions for Zostera marina
eelgrass and personal experience of diving in Southern California Bays. (Refer to Dive Observations
and Discussion belOW)4. Please note that in general, abiotic parameters are generally stable year
around for this site location.
Dive Observations of 40 Linda Isle:
Depth: Depth ranged from 6 feet near shore to 12 feet at end of survey area at a length of 95 feet
out from sea wall and 120'wide. (Refer to Figure 2).
Appropriate Circulation: Circulation in this particular dock is likely similar to the circulation pattern in
the main channel of the Newport Harbor because of proximity of this survey area to the main
channel.
Light: Within the dock slip, visibility was > 1 foot and murky due to particulate matter in water. The
origin of the particulate matter is unknown, but is likely to be the same as the condition in the nearby
Harbor channel.
Sediment: The survey area bottom substrate was sand and dirt (sediment).
I P.L.A. Erftemeijer and K.E. van de Wolfshaar. May, 2006. Ecological model of the Lagoon of Venice. Part Ill.
Seagrass Habitat Model.
9 Richard F. Ford Ph.D. April 4, 2003. Recommended Options for Maximum Water Temperature Limits and Minimum
Dissolved Oxygen limits at a Compliance Point for Discharges from the South Bay Power Plant in San Diego Bay,
Necessary to Protect Beneficial Uses PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 6 of 17
wo�k
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
. . . . . . Long Beach, CA 90802
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16,2014
Salinity: Salinity would be expected to be the same in the dock slip as in Newport Harbor.
Temperature: Water temperature variation ranges from 590 to 620 F in Newport Harbor,
California. Water temperature is likely higher due to shallow waters and extreme daily
temperatures at time of survey.
Dissolved oxygen: Hypoxia, which is generally defined as dissolved oxygen levels that are less than
2 to 3 mg/L and creates dead zones where this condition is present in some locations of Newport
Harbor from water runoff of Newport Beach City. Dissolved oxygen in Harbor Waters near 40
Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA can range from 4.2 mg/L to 10.3 mg/L due to several Abiotic
factors. What is important here is this range is acceptable for eelgrass habitats. At time of
survey dissolved oxygen was approximately 7.1 mg/L using the LaMotte Dissolved Oxygen Test
Kit. The data in this report is compared to the data of habitat in Recommended options for
Maximum Water Temperature Limits and Minimum Dissolved oxygen limits at a Compliance
Point for Discharges from the South Bay Power Plant in San Diego Bay, Necessary to Protect
Beneficial Uses May 16, 2003, Richard F. Ford, Ph.D. 5 Please note that in general, abiotic
parameters are generally stable year around for this site location.
Depth: The depth of the eelgrass habitat measures between 6 and 12 feet and 3 patches (1,2,3),
while the depth of the potential eelgrass habitat measures 6-12 feet in depth. (Refer to Figure 2).
Proximity to eelgrass coverage: The potential eelgrass habitat is located immediately adjacent to
the eelgrass habitat so eelgrass has the potential to spread.
Low Tide Exposure: optimum conditions for eelgrass habitat include less than 0 to 5 percent of the
time for low tide exposure. Due to the dock's location in the southern portion of Newport Harbor,
the proposed dock slip would not have any low tide exposure.
Slope: Slope descent increases as distance increases from rock wall. The slope of survey site
bottom depth starts at 6 feet at the sea wall and slopes out 95 feet out from sea wall, where the
depth is 12 feet with an overall slope of 6.3 percent (6 foot depth differential / 95 feet). The slope of
the eelgrass covered portion of the survey area (2 foot depth / 35 feet from sea wall) is 5.7 percent.
The potential eelgrass (eelgrass absence) habitat slopes from sea wall at 6 foot depth to 95 feet
from sea wall at 12 foot depth (6 feet depth / 95 feet non-eelgrass extending out from sea wall) and
has a slope of 6.3 percent. There is a 0.6 percent difference in slope between the eelgrass habitat
and the potential eelgrass habitat since they parallel from sea wall to channel. The contour of
bottom is a slow descent from sea wall out to the channel at a slightly increasing rate evenly
paralleling the length of the sea wall within the surveyed area.
Circulation: Please note that this tide information is not exact as circulation is difficult to estimate in
the Newport Harbor because there are no gauges available in that area. However, circulation would
be anticipated to be similar as in the Newport Harbor channel.
Fauna: Observation included common species of Newport Harbor mussels on piles5 and common
5 US Army Corps of Engineers. Biological Report 82(11.84). Life Histories and Environmental Requirements of Coastal
Fishes and Invertebrates (Pacific Southwest); California Sea Mussel and Bay Mussels.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 7 of 17
"4v, wojv�
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
4 -0 Shoreline Village Drive
29
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I ....... ..... -
Long Beach, CA 90802
round rays (Urobatis halleri, rays)6.
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Other factors effecting eelgrass growth is visibility, dissolved oxygen, and water depth. Some
areas of Newport Harbor show signs of hypoxia and no marine life exists in these areas due to
water run-off from the city. A complete study of dissolved oxygen in Newport Harbor has not
been conducted but having dived nearly 50% of the Bay since 1995 and observed large areas
devoid of much of the marine life. The need to monitor and protect our marine life is paramount
in Newport Harbor.
Findings
Caulerpa: No caulerpa was observed (see attached Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form).
Eelgrass: Eelgrass was observed within the survey area. (Refer to attached Eelgrass Survey
Reporting Form and Figures 2).
This dredging survey found an existing dock structure within survey site. This survey was
conducted and is based on proposal to within existing floating dock system (Refer to Figure 2).
Eelgrass distribution was observed at 3 locations noted as Patches' 1,2, and 3 as shown in Figure
2. Density and length throughout survey area was uniform. After the 10 foot depth mark no
eelgrass was observed while diving further out from the sea wall towards the channel. Near sea
wall at the 6 foot depth and going out to the 12 foot depth, eelgrass was approximately 8" to 12"
inches in length and ranged in density from 15 turions sq meter to 90 turions per square meter.
Eelgrass was not present from approximately the 10 foot depth and deeper. At the 12 foot depth,
eelgrass did exist. The 10 foot depth started at approximately 65 feet from sea wall. (Refer to
Figure 2).
Due to murky water and a less than 1'foot visibility pictures underwater were not possible. to help
determine eelgrass distribution, eelgrass density in relation to depth, and eelgrass lengths, including
sediment type, slope and contour of bottom a total of 9 quadrats were taken at varying depths and
distances from the sea wall. Table 2 lists all quadrats taken in relation to existing and potential
eelgrass habitats and are shown as blue stars in Figure 2.
Discussion:
First, it is important to understand that SCEMP requires a level of assessment in accordance with
the level of impacts, and does not require an exhaustive research report. The observational survey
report should provide a baseline for evaluation of future impacts to eelgrass. The survey should
provide an assessment of the survey site such that the baseline can be used to adequately assess
impacts to eelgrass in the two sequential years. Thus, a selection of sample size and evaluation of
the quadrats are of primary importance.
Second, it is important to know the history of dock slip. Historically, the existing dock has been
present more than 10 years.
6 Allen, Larry G., Amy M. Findlay, and Carol M. Phalen. 2002. Structure and Standing stock of the Fish Assemblages of
San Diego Bay, California from 1994 to 1999. Bulletin of Southern California Academy of Science. 101(2), 2002. Pp 49-
85.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 8 of 17
W O'DI?
IS! DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773 40 Linda Isle
kP
Newport Beach, CA
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
GS. Dredging Survey May 16,2014
The distribution of eelgrass within bay and estuarine systems is defined by numerous variables,
including light, temperature, salinity, substrate, wave exposure, currents and nutrient availability.
Eelgrass forms extensive meadows in soft -bottom habitats from the low intertidal to depths of about
20 feet (6 meters), and from sheltered areas to exposed coasts. In southern California, eelgrass has
been reported to occur as deep as 98 feet (30 meters). optimum temperatures for eelgrass growth
seem to lie between 50 and 68F (10 and 20*C). However, eelgrass is known to survive with a lower
tolerance level of 21'F (-6'C) and an upper level of 104.90F (40.50C). Eelgrass is a euryhaline
species (able to live in a wide range of salinities) that is capable of growing near stream mouths
when the water is fresh at low tide, but does not 9row in persistent fresh water. A salinity range of
10 to 30 parts per thousand is optimum for growth.
In general, low circulation (<5 cm/second) to medium circulation (20 — 40 cm/second) is considered
an optimum range of circulation for eelgrass to grow8. Circulation may increase in the main Harbor
channel, which could account for lack of eelgrass in the outer portion of the dock slip, although
there are likely other causes for this lack of eelgrass in the potential eelgrass habitat of the dock,
which cannot be fully analyzed due to limited resources of the customer. However, circulation would
be expected to be suitable to support eelgrass.
Reduction in light due to turbidity has been identified as a major cause of the loss of seagrasses
worldwide (Shepherd et al., 19899; Green and Short, 200310). Particulate matter in Newport Harbor
is high, but is likely equal in all areas of the dock slip. Visibility in Newport Harbor is low due to an
increased density of particulates in the sea water. Low visibility has effect on sunlight penetration
into water and is a limiting factor for eelgrass existing at deeper than 12-15' depths. This
measurement varies throughout Newport Harbor.
Sediment is a general term, which in this case is used in describing Newport Harbor bottom make
up which sediment is in this case made up of sand and dirt. No observation of clay or boulders or
gravel has been noted while diving throughout Newport Harbor docks. There is bedrock that does
exist and sometimes some form of obstruction whether rocks/boulders/refuse at varying depths
roughly averaging 20 feet below bottom existing slowing down pile installations. This bedrock does
not appear to have a visible impact on the surface of the bottom of Newport Harbor water ways.
Conclusion
A total of 9 quadrats were placed in 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, California. In addition to the
general results of the survey, the results in Table 2 of each quadrat should be used in evaluating
7 California Department of Fish and Game. State of Fisheries Report (2008).
8 P.L.A. Erftemeijer and K.E. van de Wolfshaar. May, 2006. Ecological model of the Lagoon of Venice. Part 111.
Seagrass Habitat Model. est, 1989. Decline of
9 Shepherd, S.A., A.J. McComb, D.A. Bulthuis, V. Neverauskas, D.A. Steffensen and R. W
seagrasses. In: A.W.D. Larkum, A.J. McComb and S.A. Shepherd (Eds.) Seagrasses: A Treatise on the
Biology of Seagrasses with Special Reeference to the Australian Region. Elsevier, North Holland, pp.
346387.
10 Green, E.P. and F.T. Short, 2003. World Atlas of Seagrasses. Prepared by the UNEP World Conservation
Monitoring Centre. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA, 298 pp.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 9 of 17
W
�0- OR
DIVE WORKS 40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
429-0 Shoreline village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey May 16,2014
any future surveys conducted and potential future mitigation. The cause of the lack of eelgrass in the
inner and outer portion of the dock slip cannot be specifically identified by observations or anecdotal
accounts.
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 10 of 17
DIVE WORKS
429-0 Shoreline Village 011VC
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey May 16, 2 014
------ minrlrnt Innnfinn and nronosed dock SUP
4'.
Transects <po, Quadrats
Patchl
4V L-11MUM
3' 1 3 10-15 Turions - e",12" -Ty,2 I urions 81' 12"
Patch 2 NPatGh 3
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 11 of 17
Bulk Head Line 0.0'
Time: 1230 Date: May 16, 2014
Air Temp 86 degF Water Temp 63 degF
Visibility > T
W
DIVE WORKS 40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90807, Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Table 1 below depicts tide at + 3' ft MLLW during the survey. Additionally, tidal variations
are also included.
NEWPORT BAY ENTRANCE, CORONA DEL MAR, CA Station1d:
9410580
, 0 � -7
q0%- Tide Pre-dictiol-i in Feek � -00
Tt�j,,p 7,3n,�
LST;LDT
5
6.00
4
5
6
7
5.00
Date
Day
-rime
"9t
4.00
05�'16
Fri
05i!6Ari
-1.1-L
8"-12"
Turions
3.00
0 5,'! 6
Fri
111: 4 Z A, M
3,79 H
2.00
05.116
Fri
0 4: 31 PrA
!.69 L
Photograph
d)
cu
1.00
(3 51/ L 6
Fri
10:50 PNI
6,03 4 H
5,,, '7
Sat
0 0 _3 �:Jl
- 1. 01 2 L
0.00
15-60
24-90
—1.00
13 5�1 1
Sat
1- 2: 3 8 PM
3. �,, 9 H
rjS'i--� Sat 07:-9 PNI 1,95 L
03.; i7 Sat :37 PM 5,�5 H
-2.00 L---
05/16
12an
RL --
05/16 05/16 05/16 05/17 05/17 05117 05117 05/18
6an 12pn 6pn 12an 6an 12pn 6pn 12an
Date/Tine (LST/LDT)
Table 2. Baseline evaluation of depth, length of turions and density of turions in quadrats,
per square meter, in the dock slip. Evaluation is based on quadrat reading of left to right in
uadrat
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Length of
8"-12"
8"-12"
8"-12"
Turions
Photograph
Turions/
15-60
24-90
30-45
Quadrat
Depth in
12'
10,
10,
91
10,
8'
8'
91
61
Feet
Quadrants
in Impact
Area
Quadrants
in Eelgrass
x
x
x
Habitat
Quadrats in
Potential
x
x
x
x
x
x
Eelgrass
Habitat
The photographs of eelgrass in the sample quadrats below are representative of the type of
eelgrass coverage within the eelgrass habitat in the dock slip. (Refer to Figure 4).
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 12 of 17
'e wo"R
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
-0 Shoreline Village Drive
................
429
Long Beach, CA 90802
Table 3. Bounding Coordinates
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16,2014
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
.Page 13 of 17
EELGRASS SPECIFIC LOCATIONS
-
----7
Square Feet
Square Meters
[Patch
Lattitude and
Universal Transmercator
Length
Longitude
Zone 11 Hemisphere N.
Density
NAD 83
3 feet x 3 feet
0.9m x 0.9m
1
33.612709
Easting
ort
[Northing
416067.3
15-60 Turions sq meter
-1 17.90477�
3719582.1
8'�-12 .... length
Depth 10'foot
33.612771,
Easting
416082
-117.904618
Northing
3719588.9
33.612798,
Easting
416077.5
-117.904666
Northing
3719591.9
10 feet x 10 feet
33.612747,
Easting
416070.4
3mx3m
-117.904743
Northing
3719586.3
2
24-90 Turions sq meter
33.612742,
Easting
416073.2
8'�- 12 " length
-117.904712
Northing
3719585.8
Depth W-8" foot
33.612770,
Easting
416075.9
-117.904683
Northing
3719588.8
33.612758,
Easting
416078.7
-117.904653
Northing
3719587.5
2 feet x 2 feet
0.6m x 0.6m
3
33.612916,
Easting
Northing
416057.1
30-45 Turions sq meter
-117.904888
3719605.2
8'�-12"length
Depth 9'foot
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
.Page 13 of 17
f- wo-k'k-
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773 40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
V. Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form
This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for the invasive exotic algae, (Caulerpa)
which is required to be conducted under federal and/or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Coastal Commission, and/or Regional Water Quality Boards (Regions 8 & 9). The
form has been designed to assist to identify and control any potential impacts of the authorized actions on
the spread of Calupera. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification
through publication of revisions to the Calupera survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee
to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols,
contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, 562-980-4043, or William Paznokas, California
Department of Fish & Game, 858-467-4218. This survey is valid for (60) sixty days from March to August
and valid for (90) ninety days from August to October. For information regarding this survey please contact
Robert Wiegand, Dive Works Diving Service at 949-759-0773.
Required Information:
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 14 of 17
40 Linda Isle
Site Name:
Newport Beach, CA
Robert Wiegand
Survey Contact:
(949) 759-0773
DiveWork@ mail.corn
Permit Reference:
(ACOE Permit No., CCC Permit
No.)
Hydrographic System:
Newport Harbor
(bay, estuary, lagoon, or harbor)
Specific Location:
(UTM, Lat./Long., datum,
Caulerpa not observed
accuracy level, attach electronic
survey area map if possible)
Yes, Caulerpa was found at this site and
Was Caulerpa Detected:
Has been contacted on date.
xxxx No, Caulerpa was not found at this site
Description of Permitted Work:
(describe briefly the work to be
Dredging
conducted at the site under the
1 permits identified above)
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 14 of 17
Wokk DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773 40 Linda Isle
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive Newport Beach, CA
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (Cont.)
Description of Site:
(describe the physical and
biological conditions within
the survey area at the time
Bottom is sediment composed of
of the survey and provide
Depth range: 6'— 12'
sand and dirt.
insight into variability, if
known. Please provide units
for all numerical
information).
Substrate type:
Sediment is sand and d rt
--t—emperature:
850 Air 630 Water
Dissolved Oxygen:
7.1 mg/L
Salinity:
Newport Harbor salinity
Dominant flora:
Eelqrass
Do -ninant fauna:
Common Bay mussels, round rays
Exotic species encountered
None
- Caulerpa
Other site description notes:
De;cription of Survey
Effort: (please describe the
surveys conducted
including type of survey
(SCUBA, remote video,
Survey date and time
Survey conducted using SCUBA
etc.) and survey methods
period:
>75% area including bottom
e�mployed, date of work,
surveyed.
and survey density
DATE: May 16, 2014
Refer to the above report.
(estimated percentage of
TIME : 1230 PM
the bottom actually viewed).
Describe any limitations
encountered during the
survey efforts.
Horizontal visibility in water:
> 1 foot
Survey type and methods:
SCUBA
rvey Personnel:
Robert Wiegand, Sean Donovan
rvey densi�y:
None noted
rvey limitations:
N ane noted
Other Information: (use
this space to provide any
additional information or
Refer to the above report.
references to attached
materials such as maps,
reports, etc.)
Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (vers n 7.Z, 7U/,J-1/U4)
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 15 of 17
w-6 W0'R
DIVE WORKS (949) 759-0773
tP
ZZ. -
4
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
This form is required to be submitted for any surveys conducted for Eelgrass which is required to be
conducted under federal and/or state permits and authorizations issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and the Coastal Commission and required for review by Marine Bureau and Planning Department. The form
has been designed to assist in identifying eelgrass while ensuring that the required information is
consistently documented. Surveys required to be conducted for this species are subject to modification
through publication of revisions to the Eelgrass survey policy. It is incumbent upon the authorized permittee
to ensure that survey work is following the latest protocols. For further information on these protocols,
contact: Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service, 562-980-4043, or William Paznokas, California
Department of Fish & Game, 858-467-4218. This survey is valid for (60) sixty days from March to August
and valid for (90) ninety days from August to October. For information regarding this survey please contact
Robert Wiegand, Dive Works Diving Service at 949-759-0773.
Re
uirea iniorma-tium
40 Linda Isle
Site Name:
Newport Beach, CA
Robert Wiegand
Survey Contact:
(949) 759-0773
DiveWorkgg-mailcoT
Permit Reference:
(ACOE Permit No., CC Permit
No.)
Hydrographic System:
(bay, estuary, lagoon, or
Newport Harbor
harbor)
_ __
Specific Location:
(UTM, Lat./Long., datum,
accuracy level, attach
Refer to Bounding Coordinates Table 3
electronic survey area map if
possible)
xxx Eeigrass within 15' of proposed project
Was Eelgrass Detected:
Eelgrass within 15'-30' of project / disposal
No eelgrass in project / disp2sal site
Description of Permitted
Work:
(describe briefly the work to be
Dredging
conducted at the site under the
permits identified above)
t
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 16 of 17
�'J-e W0'R (949) 759-0773
DIVE WORKS 40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA
429-0 Shoreline Village Drive
Long Beach, CA 90802
Dredging Survey May 16, 2014
Eelgrass Survey Reporting Form (Cont.)
Description of Site:
r -ILA If-LARC21 Vl,�I"--- I'
type and methods:
SCUBA
CU�A
(describe the physical and
!Survey
Robert Wiegand, Sean
obert V�
biological conditions within
the survey area at the time of
Depth range: 6'- 12'
Bottom is sediment composed
the survey and provide
of sand and dirt.
insight into variability, if
Survey density:
D tj, 9
Patch 2: 8-30 Turions sqft
known. Please provide units
Patch 3: 10-15 Turions sqft
for all numerical information).
Substrate type:
Sediment is sand and dirt
Temperature:
8 30 Water
Dissolved Oxygen
7.1 mg/L
Salinity:
Newport Harbor salinity
Dominant flora:
Eeiqrass
materials such as maps,
Common mussels; Round
Dominant fauna:
Rays
Exotic species encountered
none
Refer to Table 2 - Quadrat
Other site description notes:
I Samples
Description of Survey
Effort: (please describe the
surveys conducted including
type of survey (SCUBA,
remote video, etc.) and
survey methods employed,
date of work, and survey
density (estimated
percentage of the bottom
actually viewed). Describe
any limitations encountered
durinq the survey efforts.
Survey date and time
period:
DATE: May 16, 2014
TIME :1230 PM
Survey conducted using
SCUBA
>75% area including bottom
surveyed.
- 4 f--+
Eelgrass Survey Reporting t-orm k/April zVUZ71
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 17 of 17
r -ILA If-LARC21 Vl,�I"--- I'
type and methods:
SCUBA
CU�A
!Survey
Robert Wiegand, Sean
obert V�
r
Survey Personnel:
11
ov
Donovan
Patch 1 5-20 Turions sqft
Survey density:
D tj, 9
Patch 2: 8-30 Turions sqft
Patch 3: 10-15 Turions sqft
Survey limitations:
None noted
ot ier Information: (use this
space to provide any
additional information or
Refer to the above report.
references to attached
materials such as maps,
reports., etc.)
Eelgrass Survey Reporting t-orm k/April zVUZ71
PRE DREDGING SURVEY
Page 17 of 17
-AT!—AS Engineering
83-1'West lTh Street
Cost -a Mesa, CA 92627
Liridsey Banghart
May 15,2014
Our Project 14.018.00
Phi Grain Size Test Results for the Soil Sample Obtained at from
40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, 'Catifornia,
Dear Ms. Banghart:
Presented herewith are the results of our phi grain size analyses performed on
the soil samples provided to us by Atlas Engineering. The sample is from the
dredge area. The test procedures were in accordance -with ASTM D 422-63
(2-007) and US. Army Corps of Engineers Report Number CETA 79-7 criteria.
Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions after you have reviewed
the attached data.
Respectfully submitted,
E���
p"
Plates I Grain Size Summary
Plates 2 Cumulative Grain Size Distribution PHI Units
P:\PROJECTS\14.018.00�14018 PI -11 GSLE7TER.doc, Wel\dhl
Sieve Opening
Particle Diameter
U.S. Standard
% Material
Cumulative
(mm)
in Phi Units
Sieve Size
Retained by
Percent Retained
Weight.
38.1
-5.25
1112"
0
0.0
19
-4.25
3/4"
1.9
1.9
Gravel 9.5
-3.25
3/8"
5.5
7.4
4.75
-2.25
4
4.8
12.2
2.83
-1.50
7
2.6
14.9
2
-1.00
10
1.5
16.4
1.41
-0.50
14
1.2
17.5
1
0.00
18
1.4
18.9
0.71
0.50
25
1.6
20.5
0.5
1.00
35
4.9
25.5
0.35
1.50
45
8.5
34.0
Sand
0.25
2.00
60
15.2
49.2
0.177
2.50
80
13
62.2
0.125
3.00
120
5.9
68.1
0.088
3,50
170
2.1
70.1
0.075
3.75
200
0.4
70.5
0.063
4.00
230
0.3
70.9
Silt -Clay <0.063
<4.00
<230
100
A sample was provided to David H. Lee & Associates, Incorporated in a sample bag by
ATLAS ENGINEERING COMPANY. The sample consists of a Silty Sand to Clayey
Sand (SM -SC): black (5Y 2.5/1); saturated;fine to medium sand-, shells and shell
fragments; vegetation. The sample was obtained from the Dredge Area, 40 Linda Isle,
Newport Beach, California.
-H� -
I DAVID H. LEE & ASSOCIATES
23011 Moulton Parkway #D-1 1 PHI GRAIN SIZE SUMMARY
LAGUNA HILLS, CA 92653
4 1, -1
T_ Telephone: 949-461-5690
Fax: 949-461-7901 CLIENT: ATLAS ENGINEERING COMPANY I I RI! I I EIC] IT, I DATE: PLATE
j
1 0 00
4.01&00 May, 2014
Ct) -. 2 .,�Jnq Uo sit-".,,qCj'pPFIIOuf f0c"I
LO
CM
OD F
CO
00
IR
z
NI,
0
< cq
0
0 0 R R
LL < NM
0
Ol
�e
C, Al
rri
zz-�2
LLgtiv
O'd 8 a
�C, I �r
IM 0
z
0
[no
z
E7,
z
0
'm
z
N�k
01
LG
C)
(0
U)
U) D 'No
w (CY)
rkf W
0
F- -J <
U) U) c)
0
011
CY z <
ru
ru
7>- Z <
-af
CD
Z� W
0 (::) M
W
C) w
. 1— 6
Cl) CD
CD
rij
U-1
C\j
w E w
w
M LL
w 2i
w
i
<r
cf) CO
W
0
0
w
0-0
LLI
2
ct� z <
0
—Z <
Z -J W,
0 CD ED
0
< 0-
IW LL
w 3:
1--0
w
z
0 ir
w
<
0-0
Ct) -. 2 .,�Jnq Uo sit-".,,qCj'pPFIIOuf f0c"I
LO
OD F
0
C, Al
LLgtiv
O'd 8 a
�C, I �r
z
[no
z
0
z
N�k
W C\l
C) w lll�
C)
(0
U)
U) D 'No
w (CY)
rkf W
F- -J <
U) U) c)
CY z <
0 0
7>- Z <
Z� W
0 (::) M
ry 0
<
w
M LL
w 2i
w
PO
Ow\z
I--
W
0
w
0-0
LLI
2
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
HARBOR COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No.
June 14, 2006
TO: HARBOR COMMISSION
FROM: Harbor Resources Division (City Manager's Office)
Chris Miller, (949) 644-3043
cmiller(a-)-city.newport-beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: 40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
ISSUE:
Mr. Raymond of 40 Linda Isle, proposes to replace his current dock system in the same
general configuration. This residential dock was originally built with two slips in 1968
even though the Harbor Permit Policies (H-1) state that only one slip is permitted at
residential properties. Should the Commission authorize this proposal to rebuild the
dock in the same general configuration with two slips?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposal to replace the existing dock system in the same general
configuration with two slips.
BACKGROUND:
The original dock layout from a 1968 file drawing indicates that this address was built
with two slips. However, the file does not have any evidence to support the rational for
two slips.
Mr. Raymond proposes to rebuild his dock in the same general configuration with two
slips. He is also proposing to build anew 10'x 14' pier and to relocate his gangway so
that it is parallel to the bulkhead.
Harbor Permit Policies state that "only a single pier and float or slip shall be permitted
bayward of each parcel or lot." It is possible that this pier was built prior to the adoption
of the Policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Harbor Commission's approval of this Agenda Item does not require environmental
review.
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page 2
PUBLIC NOTICE:
This agenda item has been noticed according to the Ralph M Brown Act (72 hours in
advance of the public meetings at which the Harbor Commission considers the item).
Prepared by:
Chris Miller
Harbor Resources Supervisor
Attachments: Aerial Photos
Proposed Dock Layout
Original Dock Layout - 1968
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page 3
�s Z-
m
0 C'UO
m
J7 n
Pre c*s
Ol
iA
cn
a5
CC',O, >�
llv�
'C')
cl�l
m t7
m
0 C'UO
m
J7 n
Pre c*s
Ol
iA
Z-APew
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page 5
Original Dock Layout - 1968
//Zp le-
,5z-�e
�-evxw-e
1,7
CN
VICIMATY 5kETCH
, asseol
o�ep eA 5 below Alco -17. 46rve...- zoo/
e c /, .17 Q I" "Ve?
AS Z— e-:
I - SC-'l"!::l --------------
�o
L3
co
HARBOR RESOUR S DIV. ct� M
m
Co
Ty 0 WPO/
OF NEWP BEACH
I , 0)
cn
m
've. �v
0
Agn'e r
M.
--q 0
cn-h e -e- Cil' IA
lie
60
ICY
nj
7-.
q'
szz_
boc
WORKSHEET FOR BUILDING / FIRE PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLFARF PRINT OR TYPF 0 BUILDING DEPARTMENT
N
1. PROJECT ADDRESS (NOT MAILING ADDRESS)
FLOOR
SUITE NO.
zlo_ �e
OWNER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
No. UNITS
LOT BLOCK TRACT
PH07 NO
2. DESCRIPTION OF WORK /Q tk l9d iqr+ C10C USE
zo X
# OF STORIES
$
VALUATION 45
NEWAOtt,A) ADD[-] ALTER DEMO SQ FT
(NEW/ADDED/EXTG)
Check AwroDriate Box for ADDlicant
3. OWNER'S NAME
LAST
FIRST
OWNER'S ADDRESS
OWNER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS
CITY"�
STAT
ZIP
PH07 NO
4. ARCH ITECT/DESIGNER'S NAME LAST
FIRST
LIC. NO.
ARCH ITECT/DESIGNER'S ADDRESS
ARCHITECT/DESIGNER'S E-MAII ADDRESS
CITY
STATE
ZIP
PHONE NO.
[j 5. ENGINEER'S NAME
LAST
F
FIRST
STATE LIC. NO.
c s--0
ENGINEER'S ADDREfSS
ENGINEER'S E -MAIL ADDRESS
CITY!��
S 6TT 4E
ZIP
PHONE NO.
6. CONTRACTOR'S NAME
I
B Si ES�LIC.
V?0, . � � ;� 3'0'No-7q?0-572C-Iass,-+
STATE LIC.
CONTRACTOR'S ADDREP
CONTRACTOR'S E-MAIL ADDRESS
CITYC-
STATE
NE N�.
OFFICE USE ONLY
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION
OCCUPANCY- GROUP
MAY 12 2006
PERMIT NO.
PLAN CHECK NO. Poo, Ma?,- 2
PLAN CHECK FEE $
PLAN CHECK ENG.
vulllloxujuv__apjjll�tivll 0141—
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
HARBOR COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No.
June 14, 2006
TO: HARBOR COMMISSION
FROM: Harbor Resources Division (City Manager's Office)
Chris Miller, (949) 644-3043
cmiller(a-_)city.newport-beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: 40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
ISSUE:
Mr. Raymond of 40 Linda Isle, proposes to replace his current dock system in the same
general configuration. This residential dock was originally built with two slips in 1968
even though the Council Policies (H-1) state that only one slip is permitted at residential
properties. Should the Commission authorize this proposal to rebuild the dock in the
same general configuration with two slips?
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the proposal to replace the existing dock system in the same general
configuration with two slips.
BACKGROUND:
The original dock layout from a 1968 file drawing indicates that this address was built
with two slips. However, the file does not have any evidence to support the rational for
two slips.
Mr. Raymond proposes to rebuild his dock in the same general configuration with two
slips. He is also proposing to build anew 10'x 14' pier and to relocate his gangway so
that it is parallel to the bulkhead.
The Council Policies (H-1) state that "only a single pier and float or slip shall be
permitted bayward of each parcel or lot." It is possible that this pier was built prior to the
adoption of the Policies.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Harbor Commission's approval of this Agenda Item does not require environmental
review.
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page2
PUBLIC NOTICE:
This agenda item has been noticed according to the Ralph M Brown Act (72 hours in
advance of the public meetings at which the Harbor Commission considers the item).
Prepared by:
Chris Miller
Harbor Resources Supervisor
Attachments: Aerial Photos
Proposed Dock Layout
Original Dock Layout - 1968
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page 3
ET �-T �I - �m W
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page 4
G>
CP
:E Cn
M—.
zu -D!r
X, — CD
m C:, Z, 0
�C)
r"I
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
June 14, 2006
Page 5
Original Dock Layout - 1968
NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR COMMISSION MINUTES
City Council Chambers
June 14, 2006
CALL TO ORDER 6:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL: Commissioners Seymour Beek, Tim Collins, John Corrough, Don Lawrenz, Ralph
Rodheim, and Marshall Duffield were in attendance. Paulette Pappas was an excused
absence. Staff: Lorrie Arcese, Chris Miller and Tom Rossmiller.
MINUTES: The minutes for May will be approved at the next meeting.
ACTION ITFIVI
ITEM #1
Subject: 2115 Bayside Dr. — Dock Reconfiguration
Summary: Chris gave a staff report on Mr.Tsong proposal to add (2) 40' sections to his existing
fingers on his U-shaped float which currently extends past the U.S. Pierhead Line
and are considered 'existing non -confirming'. Unless otherwise noted in Council
Policy H-1, dock structures are not permitted to extend beyond the Pierhead Line;
there is not a provision for this address.
Discussion: The dock is already over the pierhead line. The client or their representative was
not present for questions.
Public Comments:
Action: Commissioner Rodeim made the motion to deny the proposal to add extensions to
the existing float. The motioned was seconded and carried with all ayes.
ITEM #2
ubject:
ummary:
Discussion:
Public Comments:
Action: Commissioner Rodheim made the motion to approve the proposal to replace the
existing dock system in the same general configuration with two slips and to
document this decision in the file. The motion was seconded and carried with all
40 Linda Isle — Dock Reconfiguration
Chris gave a staff report regarding Mr. Raymond of 40 Linda Isle, who proposes to
replace his current dock system in the same general configuration. This
residential dock was originally built with two slips in 1968 even though the Council
Policies (H-1) state that only one slip is permitted at residential properties. Mr.
Raymond is asking for approval.
ayes.
ITEM #3
Subject: Commercial Dock Finger Width Exception at 2527 West Coast Highway
Summary: Tom gave a staff report on whether the commercial dock replacement applicant at
2527 West Coast Highway should be allowed to reconstruct a dock that will be
used for charter passenger loading with a six foot finger width as an exception to
the current and proposed commercial dock standards finger width of eight feet.
Discussion: Tom said that the construction of the dock is very secure. There will be a condition
for stern loading only. He recommended that this be approved for six feet.
Commissioner Lawrenz added that this is an exceptional good dock. He noticed
that fire suppression is not noted, but Tom said it is there and has passed fire
requirements. Commissioner Rodheim said that by going with six feet wide, it
would increase the size of boat that could fit in the slip. Commissioner Beek and
Rodheim asked if we can put a restriction on the size boat that would go in that slip.
It currently sticks out about 20 feet further than it will with the new dock system -
Lisa Miller and staff were unaware of the eight foot rule on docks over 80 feet, so
Building Dept. kicked it back at the end of the process. Building Dept. also agreed
that this type of pier is a very strong product and it would be okay, but it still needed
Harbor Commission approval.
Commissioner Collins Rodheim asked the applicant if they would accept the
condition that their vessel not exceed 120 feet, (which is a variance to current
policy). The applicant feels this is unfair and no other marinas have this restriction,
and this current issue is not about a future boat. Commissioner Rodheim said they
will be restricting boat size in the future if they come before the Commission. Chris
said this may be a consistency issue as other boats come in the harbor. Harbor
Resources looks to the policies for direction and City Council has allowed the docks
to be built to the pierhead line on Mariners Mile and the policy currently states they
are allowed to extend past the end of the dock by the width of the beam.
Roheim made the motion to approve with condition that any vessel cannot extend
past six feet. Commissioner Lawrenz added that there must be throwable life
preservers at the end of each finger.
Lisa asked that the issue be tabled if this condition is imposed. If they go back to 8
feet it will not come back to this Commission, since it would be incompliance with
the current rules. She was unprepared for the issue of the boat size to enter into
this decision.
Public Comments: Glenn Twitchell got a clarification that the length of the boat is LOA.
Action: The motion was made to table the motion and carried with all ayes.
ITEM #4
Subject: Mooring Rental Request on A-243
Summary: Chris gave a staff report on Mr. Vance's request to rent a mooring for his
recreational sailboat from Mr. Moon (A-243) on a temporary basis for up to six
months.
Discussion: Mr. Vance said that this boat has lots of history. He wants to get it at 100% and
sail it. Chairman Corrough said that Mr. Vance is asking the Commission to
knowingly okay a derelict boat in the harbor. We may get complaints on it.
Public Comments: Glenn Twitchell said that this is a big issue and opens up to a lot of
exposure. According to the mooring agreements Mr. Moon cannot receive
money for renting his mooring and this would be an exception.
Action: Commissioner Rodheim made the motion, and it was seconded, to approve the
request to allow mooring A-243 to be rented to Mr. Vance for up to six months with
the following conditions:
1. Mr. Vance must show proof of ownership of the vessel prior to renting the
mooring.
2. Mr. Vance must produce a progress report showing substantial progress in his
effort to secure the restoration fund within 120 days of renting the mooring, or,
if the funds are not secured, Mr. Vance must show progress in converting 1he
vessel to non -derelict status.
3. Mr. Vance must secure a bond for the disposal cost of the vessel should any
dispute arise concerning the ownership of the vessel.
The motion carried with all ayes.
ITEM #5
Subject:
Consideration of Mandatory Boater Education - Comments to the
Department of Boating and Waterways
Summary:
Should the Harbor Commission provide input to the California Department of
Boating and Waterways on the topic of Mandatory Boater Education? If the
Harbor Commission determines that comments to DBAW should be formulated,
authorize staff to draft a letter for the Chairman's signature delineating the Harbor
Commission's comments.
Discussion:
Public Comments:
Action:
The Harbor Commissioners saw no reason for this and chose not to take action or
give any input on this item.
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS:
Chairman Corrough said that Title 17 is being wrapped up with final comments.
Commissioner Lawrenz said that the Shoring Mooring subcommittee is sunset.
HARBOR RESOURCE UPDATES:
Tom Rossmiller harbor updates on the RGP-54 renewal, Balboa Island beach replenishment, sea lions,
Upper and Lower Bay dredging projects, Channel Reef dredging, Corona del Mar beach replenishment,
multiple vessel mooring systems and the harbor valuation study. A subcommittee was formed to help with
the harbor valuation, headed by Commissioner's Collins and Lawrenz.
PUBLIC COMMENTS ON SUB -COMMITTEE REPORTS OR HARBOR RESOURCES UPDATE:
COMMISSIONER'S ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS TO BE PLACED ON FUTURE AGENDAS FOR
DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT:
It was asked what had happened to the Rhine Channel Dock and the Commission was reminded that they
were told they needed to speak to a City Councilman to push for this. The next City Council meeting will be
the last time for input.
Vessel Overhang — the Commission would like this as a priority and requested that staff do an inventory on
the overhang in the harbor, look at risk factors, safety, the Municipal Code and those in the way even if they
are in conformance. A subcommittee will then be formed. Tom said that it will take at least two months for
staff to accomplish this on commercial docks. Residential will take much longer.
RECOMMENDED TOPICS FOR FUTURE AGENDAS:
• Presentation of the Coast Guard Report on the Endeavor Accident (when released).
• Vessel Overhang
DATE OF NEXT MEETING: Wednesday, July 12, 6:00 pm
Council Chambers
ADJOURNMENT
HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION
829 Harbor Island Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
949-644-3034 / Fax 949-723-0589
APPROVAL IN CONCEPT
APPROVAL IN CONCEPT BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH as required for permit
application to the South Coast Regional Commission pursuant to California
Administrative Code, Sections 13210 and 13211.
General Description of Proposed Development: Remove existing float.
Install new with (2) new pile. Install 1 O'X 14'new concrete pier with (2)14"
pile for support.
Address number must be stenciled on at least 1 bayward'facing pile.
Pier conditions must be signed by applicant prior to final approval.
jProperty Address: 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA 92660 1
Legal Description:
lHarbor Permit Number: 134-40 1
IPlan Check Number: 1182-2006 1
jApplicant: Carl Raymond I
Applicant's Mailing Address: 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA 92660
Phone Number: (949) 631-3121
I have reviewed the plans for the foregoing development including:
1. The general site plan, including any roads and public access to the shoreline.
2. The grading plan, if any.
3. The general uses and intensity of use proposed for each part of the area covered
in the application.
Page 1 of 2
And find
)They comply with the current adopted Newport Beach General Plan, Zoning
Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and any applicable specific or precise plans or,
Ei That a variance of exception has been approved and final.
A copy of any variance, exception, conditional use permit or other issued permit is
attached together with all conditions of approval and all approved plans including
approved tentative tract maps. On the basis of this finding, these plans are approved in
concept and said approval has been written upon said plans, signed and dated.
Should Newport Beach adopt an ordinance deleting, amending or adding to the Zoning
Ordinance or other regulations in any manner that would affect the use of the property or
the design of a project located thereon, this approval in concept shall become null and
void as of the effective date of this said ordinance.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act or 1970, and state and local
guidelines adopted hereunder, this development:
"'16 Has been determined to be ministerial or categorically exempt.
o Has received a final Exemption Declaration or final Negative Declaration (copy
attached).
o Has received a Final Environmental Impact Report (copy attached).
All discretionary approvals legally required of Newport Beach prior to issuance of a
building permit have been given and are final. The development is not subject to
rejection in principal by Newport Beach unless a substantial change is proposed.
This concept approval in no way excuses the applicant from complying with all
applicable policies, ordinances, codes and regulations of Newport. Beach. See attached
conditions to the pier permit.
Tom Rossmiller, Manager, Harbor Resources
Signature:Ji"'.�"Q1.,g ce
Lisa Walters, Harbor Resources
June 21, 2006
Attachments:
Worksheet for Building Permit Application
Drawing
Pier Conditions
Page 2 of 2
HARBOR RESOURCES DIVISION
829 Harbor Island Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
949-644-3034 / Fax 949-723-0589
Pier Permit Conditions
June 21, 2006
Property Address: 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA 92660
With reference to the plans currently under consideration to reconfigure or modify the dock
system, the following conditions will now be in effect on the above referenced pier.
1 - The pier permittee is aware of the Harbor Permit Policies and Chapter 17 of the City of
Newport Beach Municipal Code. The pier permittee understands that the above referenced
pier is under the purview of these Policies and Codes.
2. Any future work on the above mentioned pier requires permits with the City of Newport
Beach and any other applicable agencies. Painting, replacement of rub rails and work
considered to be cosmetic in nature does not require a permit.
3. The conditions set forth in this document pertain to the current, proposed dock system under
consideration. Any future modifications or alterations to the dock system may require new
conditions which may override or change these conditions. These conditions supersede all
past conditions associated with this property.
4. Only marine oriented uses are allowed on the pier, pier platform, gangway and float. Patio
furniture, plants etc ... are not permitted.
5. Your side property lines extend in the water along their same bearing. Vessels shall not
encroach upon the neighbor's property on either side.
6. Vessels may not extend beyond the end of the fingers by more than the width of its beam.
7. The maximum beam of a vessel that is permitted to side tie to the westernmost finger is 18'
at the tip of the finger and 7' at the headwalk.
8. The maximum beam of a vessel that is permitted to side tie to the easternmost finger is 5'.
Signature(
Lisa Walte�s—, Harbor Resources
F -MAS
Joint Pier Applicant Signature (if applicable) Print Name Date
INSPECTION FORM
Harbor Resources Department
Date: S///o
Inspection Requested By: cri
Inspector: Don Duffy
Pier Address: 0 2 4 (4 T3 le
Pier Transfer
Reinspection
GFI Present Yes Need None Needed Yes Need
Anti -Siphon / Backflow Present
Other Comments
EeIg ass
Yes, No
Pump 0 . ut Presentl I
Pier Location
Yes No
OperationalF--7—
Recommended Action
Encroachmenet
Address of Complaining Party—
Boat Description
CF Number
Location on Dock
Comments Observations
Other Request
MWIM
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 532711
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325
August 11, 2006
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF:
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
Mary Raymond
c/o Swift Slip Dock & Pier Builders
Attention: Beth Swift
2027 Placentia Avenue
.Costa Mesa, California 92627-3405
Dear Ms. Raymond:
Reference is made to your request of June 26, 2006 (File No. 200601364-SJH). Under the provisions
of Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 403), you are hereby authorized to
modify an existing floating dock structure bayward of 40 Linda Isle, within Newport Bay, in the community
of Newport Beach, Orange County, California, as shown on the enclosed drawings.
The owner or authorized responsible official must sign and date all copies of this Letter of Permission
(LOP) indicating that he/she agrees to the work as described and will comply with all conditions. One of
the signed copies of this Letter of Permission must be returned to the Corps of Engineers (a pre -addressed
envelope is enclosed). In addition, please use the two attached postcards to notify this office as to the dates
of commencement (within 10 days prior to the start of construction) and completion of the activity (within
10 days following the end of construction).
Furthermore, you are hereby advised that the Corps of Engineers has established an Administrative
Appeal Process which is fully described in 33 CFR Part 33 1. The complete appeal process is diagrammed
in the enclosed Appendix B.
Thank you for participating in our regulatory program,
Sincerely,
Mark Durham
Chief, South Coast Section
Regulatory Branch
DAW
Phone#: 949-631-3121 Phone #: 949-278-0204
Notation: Notation:
Cha(ges,
Description Cost Qty Subtotal Tax Charge Fee Item Coding
CPP HBP Construction ------- ---- ---------- No $100.00 2 0 62 4 0 54 0 5 5 7 4 0 6 4 6 0 22
Total Charges $100.00
ayment
Type Amount Account Notation
Check $100.00 ------ No.33550
Total Paid $100.00
'Notation
CPP#2006-01979
Printed: 12/14/2006 3:09 PM
The fees, deposits, dedications, reservations or other exactions imposed by this development approval must be protested, if at all,
within the 90 day -approval period imposed by Government Code section 66020.
SWIFT50P
Dock, and Pier Builders, Inc.
2027 Placentia Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
(949) 631-3121
Fax 1949) 631-3122
email: bhswiftslip@sbcglobal.net
www.swiftslipdock.com
June 22, 2006
Adam Fischer
California Regional Water Quality Control Board
3 73 7 Main Street
Riverside, CA 92501
Re: Mary Raymond Boat Dock and'Pile Replacement
40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, Orange County
Dear Mr. Fischer:
This is notification that we intend to replace the boat dock and pile at the above -referenced address.
It is our intention- to comply with all Regional Water Quality Control Board requirements.. Ve will
not discharge -vessel waste of any kind or adversely impact water quality at thi's location
1). Apj�lica'ht ame: Mary Raymond
2) Pto'j'ect -Address: 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach, CA 92660
3) Applicant elephone: (949) 278-0204
4) �S67 bt of Work: Replace floating do.ck. and pile, There will -be two new 14"
concrete guide pile.and two 14" pier support pile (and two
existing 14 pile to remain).
5) Federal rile number: Pending
6) -Latitudglongiiude: -117,90443; 33,61467 $60 appli I cation fee.
AiDn'licilble ees: Enclosed is a checkfor the.,'
8) $�tiieent: This notice is beirig.submitted, according to Regional Board
General Certification for sheet and dock pile replacement,
issued on September, 29, 20Q5.
Statemen The information in this notice is complete and accurate.
9)
Please contact our office if you should have any questions.
Very.truly yours,
SWIFT, SLIP DOCK & PIER BUILDERS
-13oh Swift
Termit Division
b rs
Endlospres".
cc: �Califbnua Coastal Commission
US. Army Corps of Engineers
SWIFT SLIP
Dock and Pier Builders, Inc.
2027 Placentia Avenue
Costa Mesa, CA 92627
(949) 631-3121
Fax (949) 631-3122
email: bhswiftslip@sbcglobal.net
www.swiftslipdock.com
FAX TRANSMITTAL
TO: Lisa Walters
FAXNO: (949) 723-0589
FROM: Beth Swift, Permit Division
DATE: January 25, 2007
RE: Approvals for Permit - Plan Check Number 2868-2006
Lisa -Here are the required approvals for the above -referenced project at 40 Linda Isle.
Please call Brady or me if you should have any questions.
2-
�4
RECEIVED 0 C,
South Coast Reglo
VICI-vi. TY '51< -ETCH,
N-pQRr 5AY CAt
JUN 2 2009
-7 D
�h below; A,1,0�?
C)�LJFORNIA '76,- 41:5vver
(; m I
0 m
COASTAL r"O,� or ,."?
OA-
/, -5 Z-
eo,(W-C�,
�q
(e, �44 /I
Cahfornia Coastal '�ommission
vW" /'I' Sopth Coast District Office
A��PROVED
. . ........... .
m 2�
By: -- -- -- -- ---- M
IARBOR RESOUR S DIV.
EFPECrIVF, Cl) 0
Date: rr - ---- -- Cf) X
ITY OF NEWPO BEACH
5E 20
0Y Cj)
k(.11 (e, M
m
C: -z 4
16'.
m 0 Z r
�5
Ale W
T C-)
> -n
01 In, (Jr5
m X
> 0
p
C)
fA
q, �e�4i
I . --7 e L. . . , if-> 4<
C
W3 5
14 e- �1
Z//v-"n A. As zi�-
ni-, IV
6y:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA — THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Govemor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
SOUTH COAST DISTRICT
PO Box 1450
200 Oceangate, 10th Floor
LONG BEACH. CA 90802-4416
www.coastal.ca.gov
Date: September 18, 2006
Mary Raymond Permit No. 5-06-245
40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, CA 92660
NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT EFFECTIVENESS
Please be advised that the Administrative Permit with the above permit number
which was sent to you on August 28, 2006 and was reported to the
Commission on Wednesday, September 13, 2006 is now fully effective.
Development of your project is subject to compliance with all terms and conditions
specified in the Administrative Permit.
Should you have any questions please contact our office.
Sincerely,
PETER M. DOUGLAS
Executive Director
By: MEG VAUG N
Coastal Program Analyst
cc: Local Planning Dept.
Swift Slip Dock & Pier Builders, Attn: Beth Swift
dt CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA -THE RESOURCES AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor
CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION
South Coast Area Office Permit Application No. 5-06-245
200 Oceangate, Suite 1000
Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 Date: August 24, 2006
(562) 590-5071 W 10C Page 1 of 6
ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT
APPLICANT: Mary Raymond
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: Remove existing and construct new boat dock in same configuration.
Proposed dock will include an 10' by 14' pier platform supported by two new 14"diameter
concrete piles, re -use existing 3' by 24' gangway, float consists of modified "W" shape (one
larger "U" and one smaller "U" with shared center finger). Two fingers are 5' by 58' (one of
which is the shared center finger) with a 8' by 22' backwalk; third finger is 5'. by 51'with a
10' by 14' backwalk. Two 14" diameter concrete piles will be re -used in the same location,
and two new 14" diameter concrete piles will replace two to be removed.
PROJECT
LOCATION: 40 Linda Isle, Newport Beach (Orange County)
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION: The findings for this determination, and for any
special conditions, appear on subsequent pages.
NOTE: P.R.C. Section 30624 provides that this permit shall not become effective until it is
reported to the Commission at its next meeting. If one-third or more of the appointed
membership of the Commission so request, the application will be remo " ved from the
administrative calendar and set for public hearing at a subsequent Commission meeting.
Our office will notify you if such removal occurs.
- This permit will be reported to the Commission at the following time and place:
Wharfinger Building Wednesday, September 13, 2006
1 Marina Way 10 a.m.
Eureka, CA 95501
IMPORTANT - Before you may proceed with development, the following must occur:
Pursuant to 14 Cal. Admin. Code Sections 13150(b) and 13158, you must sign the enclosed
duplicate copy acknowledging the permit's receipt and accepting its contents, including all
conditions, and return it to our office. Following the Commission's meeting, and once we have
received the signed acknowledgement and evidence of compliance with all special conditions, we
will send you a Notice of Administrative Permit Effectiveness.
BEFORE YOU CAN OBTAIN ANY LOCAL PERMITS AND PROCEED WITH DEVELOPMENT,
YOU MUST HAVE RECEIVED BOTH YOUR ADMINISTRATIVE PERMIT AND THE NOTICE OF
PERMIT EFFECTIVENESS FROM THIS OFFICE.
PETER DOUGLAS
E.xecutive DOctor
By: Meg Vaughn
9__
Title: Coastal Progra
5-06-245 Raymond
Administrative Permit
Page 2 of 6
STANDARD CONDITIONS:
1 Notice of Receipt and -Acknowledgment;. The permit is hot valid and development shall not
commence until a copy of the permit signed by the permittee or authorized agent,
acknowledging receipt -of the permit �nd acceptance of the terms and conditions, is
returned to:the Commission office.
2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the
date this permit is reported to the Commission. Development shall be pursued in a diligent
manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the
permit must be made prior to the expiration date.
3. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any term or condition will be
resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission.
4. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files
with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit.
5. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual,
and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and
possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS: See pages four.to six.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION (continued): -
The Executive Director hereby determines that the proposed development is a category of
development, which, pursuant to PRC Section 30624, qualifies for approval by the Executive
Director through the issuance of an Administrative Permit. Subject to Standard and Special
Conditions as attached, said development is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the
Coastal Act of 1976 and will not have any significant impacts on the environment within the
meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. If located between the nearest public road
and the sea, this development is in conformity with the public access and public recreation policies
of Chapter 3.
FINDINGS FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S DETERMINATION:
A. Promect Description
The applicant proposes to remove an existing boat dock and construct a new boat dock in the
same configuration. The proposed dock will include an 10' by 14' pier platform supported by two
new 14" diameter concrete piles, re -use of existing 3'by 24'gangway, float consists of modified
"W" shape (one larger "U" and one smaller "U" with shared center finger). Two fingers are 5' by 58'
(one of which is the shared center finger) with an 8' by 22' backwalk; third finger is 5' by 51' with a
10' by 14'backwalk. Two 14" diameter concrete piles will be re -used in the same location, and two
new 14" diameter concrete 'piles will replace two to be removed. The dock is proposed to be
constructed of Douglas fir and "Trex" -composite decking and conforms with the U.S. Pierhead line.
5-06-245 Raymond
Administrative Permit
Page 3 of 6
The subject site is located at 40 Linda Isle in Newport Beach, Orange County. The site fronts on
Newport Harbor. The majority of harbor front, residential development in Newport Harbor is '
surrounded by private recreational boat docks. The proposed dock project is similar in function to
other docks associated with residential.development in.,the JrnmediatpwiQinity. The boqt dock will
be used solpi.y,,f,qr:,boatina,.recreat�on:p.prpp5ps.. The sitebas, been surveyed byjhe�Qity of. Newport
Beach Harbor Resources Division foreelgrass and npieelgrass was:discovered wit
hin,15feetof
the project area. In addition, Special Condition 4 requires a Caulerpa taxiffipfia.survey not more
than 90 days prior to commencement of construction. The surveys are valid for a limited period of
time (until the next growing season for eelgrass and 90 days for Caulerpa taxilfolia). If construction
does not occur within the respective time periods, subsequent surveys will be required. Special
conditions 3 and 4 identify the procedures necessary to be completed prior to beginning .
construction in case the surveys expire prior to commencement of construction. In addition,
special conditions 3 and 4 identify post -construction eelgrass and Caulerpa taxifolia procedures.
The nearest public access is located approximately. 1/4mile west of the subject site at the public
beach along the Balboa Peninsula. The proposed project has received approval in concept from
the City of Newport Beach (Harbor Permit No. 334-40). The applicant has applied for approval of
the. proposed project from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB).
B. Marine Resources
The proposed recreational boat dock development and its associated structures are an allowable
and encouraged marine related use. The project design incl ' udes. the minimum sized, �pilings and
the minimum number of pilings necessary for structural stability. There are no feasible less
environmentally damaging alternatives available., As conditioned; the project,will not, significantly
adversely impact eelgrass beds and Will not contribute to the dispersal - of the invasive aquatic
algae, Caulerpa taxifolia. Further, as -proposed and conditioned, the. project,, which is to be:used
solely for recreational boating purposes, conforms to Sections 30224 and,302.33 of the Coastal
Act.
C. Water Quality
The proposed work will be occurring on, within, or adjacent to coastal waters. The storage or
placement of construction material, debris, or waste in a location where it could be discharged into
coastal waters would result in an adverse effect on the marine environment. To reduce the
potential for construction related impacts on water quality, the Commission imposes special
conditions requiring, but not limited to, the appropriate storage and handling of construction
equipment and materials to minimize the potential of pollutants to enter coastal waters. To reduce
the potential for post -construction impacts to water quality the Commission requires the continued
use and maintenance of post construction BMPs. As conditioned, the Commission finds that the
development conforms to Sections 30230 and 30231 of the Coastal Act.
D. Local Coastal. Program
The LUP for the City of, Newport Beach was effectively certified -.on May 19, 1982. The certified
LUP was comprehensively updated in,.Octobpr,2005.. As conditioned,,the proposed development, .
is consistent with Chc1pter. 3 of,. the Qoaptali Act and with'.1he'.certified Land.Use,, han_for_Jh6 area._
Approval of the project, as co3 ndlitioned', 'will not prejudice the ability of the local government- to -
prepare a Local Coastal Program that is in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3.
5-06-245 Raymond
Administrative Permit
Page 4 of 6
E. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQX)
As conditioned, there are no feasible alternatives or additional feasible mitigation measures
available that would substantially lessen any significant adverse effect1hatt-he activity may have
on the environment. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned to
mitigate the identified impacts, is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative and can
be found consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act to conform to CEQA.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
1. Construction Responsibilities and Debris Removal ,
(a) No construction materials, equipment, debris, or waste shall be placed or stored where it
may be subject to wave, wind, or rain erosion and dispersion.
(b) Any and all construction material shall be removed from the site within 10 days of
completion of construction.
(c) Machinery or construction materials not essential for project improvements shall not be
allowed at any time in the intertidal zone.
(d) If turbid conditions are generated during construction a silt curtain shall be utilized to control
turbidity.
(el Floating booms shall be used to contain debris discharged into coastal waters and any
debris discharged shall be removed as soon as possible but no later than the end of each
day.
(f) Non -buoyant debris discharged into coastal waters �shall be recovered by divers as soon as
possible after loss.
2. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PROGRAM
By acceptance of this permit the applicant agrees that the long-term water -borne berthing of
boat(s) in the approved dock and/or boat slip will be managed in a manner that protects
water quality pursuant to the implementation of the following BMPs.
(a) Boat Cleaning and Maintenance Measures:
1. In -water top -side and bottom -side boat cleaning shall minimize the discharge of
soaps, paints, and debris.
2. In -the -water hull scraping or any process that occurs under water that results in the
removal of paint from boat hulls shall be prohibited. Only detergents and cleaning
components that are designated by the manufacturer as phosphate -free and
biodegradable shall be used, and the amounts used minimized.
3. The applicant shall minimize the use of detergents and boat cleaning and
maintenance products containing ammonia, sodium hypochlorite, chlorinated
solvents, petroleum distillates or lye.
(b), Solid and Liquid Waste Management Measures:
1. All trash; recycla bles, and hazardous wastes or potential water contaminants,
I including old gasoline or gasoline with water, absorbent materials, oily rags, lead
5-06-245 Raymond
Administrative Permit
Page 5 of 6
acid batteries, anti -freeze, waste diesel, kerosene and mineral spirits shall be
disposed of in a proper manner and shall not at any time be disposed of in the water
or gutter.
(c) Petroleurn Control Management Measures:
1 . Oil absorbent materials shall be examined at least once a year andreplaced as
necessary. The applicant shall recycle the materials, if possible, or dispose of them
in accordance with hazardous waste disposal regulations. The boaters shall
regularly inspectand maintain engines, seals, gaskets., lines and hoses in order to
prevent oil and fuel spills. Boaters shall also use preventive engine maintenance, oil
absorbents, bilge pump -out services, or steam cleaning services as much as
possible to clean oily bilge areas and shall not use detergents while cleaning. The
use of soaps that can be discharged by bilge'pumps is prohibited.
3. Eelgrass Survey
A. Pre Construction Ee,11grass Survey. A valid pre -construction eelgrass (Zostera
marina) survey shall be completed during the period of active growth of eelgrass
(typically March through -October), The pre -construction survey shall be completed
prior to the beginning of construction and shall be valid until the next period of active
growth. The survey shall be prepared in full compliance with the "Southern
California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Revision 8 (except as modified by this special
condition) adopted by the National Marine �Fisheries Service and shall repared
p
in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Game. The applica nt
shall submit the eelgrass survey for the, review and approval �of:the Executive
Director within five (5) business days of completion of each eelgrass-surVey and in
any event no later than fifteen (115) business days prior to commencement of any
development. If the eelgrass survey identifies: any e e7lgrass -withiri the project . area
which would be impacted by the proposed project, the development shall require an
amendment to this permit from the Coastal Commission or a new coastal
development permit.
B. Post Construction Eellgrass Survey. If any eelgrass is identified in the project
area by the survey required in subsection A of this condition above, within one
month after the conclusion of construction, the applicant shall survey the project site
to determine if any eelgrass was adversely impacted. The survey shall be prepared
in full compliance with the "Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy" Revision
8 (except as modified by this special condition) adopted by the National Marine
Fisheries Service and shall be prepared in consultation with the California
Department of Fish and Game. The applicant shall submit the post -construction
eelgrass survey for the review and approval of the Executive Director within thirty
(30) days after completion of the survey. If any eelgrass has been impacted, the
applicant shall replace the impacted eelgrass at a minimum 1.2,11 ratio on-site, or at
another location, in accordance with the Southern California-Eelgrass Mitigation
Policy. All impacts to eelgrass habitat shall be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 1.2:1
(mitigation: impact). The exceptions, to, the required 1.2-m 1 mitigation ratio -found
within SCEMP shall not apply. Implementation of mitigation shall require an
amendment10-this permit ora.new coastal development -,permit; unless the
Director determines that no,amendment,or new p'ermit'is-required.
5-06-245 Raymond
Administrative Permit
Page 6 of 6
4. Pre -construction Caulerpa Taxifolia Surve
A. Not earlier than 90 days nor later than,30 days prior to commencement or
re -commencement ofany development- authorized under this coastal development
permit (the "project"), the applicants shall undertake�a survey of the project area and
a buffer area at least 10 meters beyond the project area to determine the presence
of the invasive alga Caulerpa taxifolia. The survey shall include a visual
examination of the substrate.
B. The survey protocol shall be prepared in consultation with the Regional Water
Quality Control Board, the California Department of Fish and Game, and the
National Marine Fisheries Service.
C. Within five (5) business days ot completion of the survey, the applicants shall submit
the survey -
for the review and approval of the Executive Director- and
F
ii. to the Surveillance Subcommittee of the Southern California Caulerpa Action
Team (SCCAT). The SCCAT Surveillance Subcommittee may be contacted
through William Paznokas, California Department of Fish & Game
(858/467-4218) or Robert Hoffman, National Marine Fisheries Service
If Caulerpa taxifolia is found within the project or buffer areas, the applicants shall
not proceed w ' ith the project until 1) the applicants provide evidence to the Executive
Director that: all. C. taxifolia discovered within the project area and all C. taxifolia
discovered within the buffer area have been eliminated in a manner that complies
with all applicable governmental approval requirements, including but not limited to
those of the California Coastal Act, or 2) the applicants have revised the project to
avoid any contact with C. taxifolia. No revisions to the project shall occur without a
Coastal Commission approved amendment to this coastal development permit
unless the Executive Director determines that no amendment, is legally required.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PERMIT RECEIPT/ACCEPTANCE OF CONTENTS:
I/We acknowledge that I/we have received a copy of this permit and have accepted its contents
including all conditions.
Applicants' Signature Date of Signing
5-06-245 Raymond btdk noEGpis Admin 9.06 mv
U)
s! F F,
Ln -0
7- .2 0
)MR16
Ito
00 A- A ,
03 P-0.
tj,
AS
ca
'it
-RECEI E
Degio
south _ocisil 1, U.- I
IHM 9
VICI�JITY 5kETCH
N , ,,, Rr f�.4y, CA( lForINI,
9.5 ae'r
CAILIFOP,NIA
C
.C)MMISSION
CC.)ASTAL
Mew a -l; -el
HARBOR RESOU
"ITY OF NEWPO
, /tD -
,j �C;CLI�
61-- — 0, —c�� q rD
43
Ll �x
m z
0
m
m
M
CD
co
cf)
c) >
* C")
m
M m co
P !� r -on
m
--10"-
n
M
>
t. I e- 0
M,
DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT
SADDLEBACK ESCROW CO. THE ATTACHED CHECK 15 IN PAYMENT Or ITEMS DESCRIBED BEI -DW.
IF N& -ORRECT PLEASE NOTIFY US PROMPTLY. NO RECEIPT DESIR--
DELUXE FORM WVO-3 SPL N-4503
DATE
DESCRIPTION
08/30/84 Escrow No. 1-11834
Property:. 40 Linda Isle
Newport Beach, Ca.
Lot 40 Tract 4003
Buyer: RAYMOND
Funds due you
Pier Permit Transfer
N-4503
AMOUNT
$********230.00
Sm LO
m Go
GO
0
>
CN LO
C) 00 LO
0 CNL
a) C:)
01- M '0 -�L
E - 0 r"
t C-4
0 0'
CL
0
E5
Lo Z u
0
u
0
FV
u
v
u
CID
r8
8 4-) LH
r
a)
04
Q) p ro
Q4 *ri
0 (1) fri
� r -I U)
4'P4 4-)
a) a) 0
a)
44
44
�4 Q)
0 0
LH 0
z
C)
S
4-) C;
c"I
z rd r -I VY
0 -H 04
4-) P4 4-4
41 (o 0
I a) 4-)
U)
H
0 ro
4-4
ro o
�004 ra 9 0) �4
Q) W a)
E-1 4-) U -LH
�4 4-4
rd 0 1 a � - 0
�:- 0
ro a)
4-3 z z �4
LH -H
'00 5 o puq,
4-) r -i a)
00 �4 LA r -I El) In tn
m r. �4
r -I 0
4-4
C) z 0
m 4-4 r8 -H 0
4-3 0 U) 44
0 C) ul
4>-)'
ri r -i U)
rd (a, M
STATUS SHEET
HARBOR PERMIT TRANSFER
Z- 1A
LOCATION— FERMIT NO.
Seller 8uye r- 41'111',"';�r-jt
Date Application Received: Date Fee Received:
Request for Inspection made by:
Escrow Co.
Escrow Officer. �b h, E s crow No.
Address 5 2- Phone: �'J—Jr-
Date.Inspection made:.
Deficiency Letter sent: Deficiency corrected:
Transfer completed: Date
Inspection:
1. Location
2. P1,umbing:
3. Elettrical:
4. Structural:
5.OTHER:
REMARKS:
Inspected by:
ff"
1.3
7. -41
lb
"49W,00,, r
PJ'C&L 7
AL/
VICIMITY SKETCH
4 WPORI- SIAY, CAL IFORNIA
/I? I Jr.? ,
\ v Ir
510eln0'Ing5 Or /f7 OreeYl Ono( c
olipp 0A s below A-Ican I-oover Zow Marle-.-. A4'axi."("'"
0r if'o" cj)L /'P"o Ar/ AF'6rbo,- 1'ne5
'77:
ore --viabl.-'sheal /;I
/A�'S 5CCA'o" O?rIVCW 6 C77-.
Z'
t
'77: