HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS2 - Code EnforcementCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Study Session Item No. 2
April 24, 2007
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: City Managers Office,
John Kappeler, Code &Water Quality Enforcement Manager
949 - 644 -3218 orjkappeler @city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: CODE ENFORCEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Discuss code enforcement procedures, and provide direction to staff regarding
any changes the City Council may find appropriate.
2. Discuss sight distance standards, and provide direction to staff regarding any
changes the City Council may find appropriate.
DISCUSSION:
The Code and Water Quality Enforcement (CWQE) Division enforces the Municipal
Code and ordinances intended to protect and preserve public health and safety, the
character of our residential neighborhoods, and the overall quality of life enjoyed by
Newport Beach residents. The current staff consists of a Division Manager, four
Officers, and a part-time Office Assistant. The budgeted position of Water Quality
Specialist has been vacant for several months, and staff is considering converting that
position to Water Conservation Coordinator, given the role that water conservation
plays in curbing urban runoff.
Code Enforcement Process
Upon learning of a potential violation, an investigation is conducted and, if the violation
is confirmed, action is taken to achieve correction and compliance. Investigation
includes gathering supporting documentation such as maps and photos, reviewing City
records on permits and previous enforcement actions, and closer inspection of the
property, which may require securing an inspection warrant with the assistance of the
City Attorney's Office.
If the investigation concludes that a violation exists, a Notice of Violation (NOV) with a
deadline for compliance is issued. If compliance is not achieved by the deadline, a
second NOV is issued with a new deadline. If the violation continues, the next step is
issuance of an Administrative Citation. According to Municipal Code Section 1.04.010,
Code Enforcement — Study Session
April 24, 2007
Page 2
CWQE can issue a citation each and every day a violation exists, and the associated
fine escalates with each successive citation ($100, $200, $500). Typically, unless an
egregious violation exists, or the property owner is not cooperating at all, citations will
not be issued each day. Likewise, if a violation poses a public safety hazard or a
serious threat to water quality, staff issues a citation immediately, without going through
the NOV steps.
Initiation of Cases
According to City Council Policy K -9 (attached), code enforcement cases should be
initiated based on written, signed complaints from the general public. Most cases are
initiated on this basis, but CWQE staff also responds to referrals from other City
departments, other public agencies, and their own field observations. Other
departments seek assistance to gain compliance regarding landscaping and other
encroachments within the public right -of -way, illegal construction, and violations of the
Building and Zoning Codes, including violations of use permit conditions.
Cases initiated through field observations by CWQE staff include prohibited discharges,
illegal signs and banners, nuisances, commercial photographers on public property
without permits, beach vendors selling without permits, and repeat violations where
there is an established case history. Staff does not actively look for violations other
than these, nor does Newport Beach have a program of regular drive -by inspections of
areas to look for potential violations.
Some people believe that a complaint -based system is not completely fair, because the
same violation may be result in enforcement action in one location but not another. In
addition, it can be argued that the City fails to identify and gain compliance with all code
violations that exist. On the other hand, in the older areas of Newport Beach, it is
difficult to determine from field observation alone whether a condition is truly a violation
or merely one that predates existing codes or has a special approval. Investigation of
every potential violation observed in the field would require a significant amount of staff
time. If the City Council wishes to expand the code enforcement program to include
more proactive work, the City Council Policy should be amended and additional staff
may be needed.
Enforcement of Sight Distance Regulations
CWQE staff has had a number of complaints regarding violations of sight distance
regulations recently. These have occurred in old Corona del Mar, where residents
desire some screening from abutting commercial areas and Coast Highway. Council
Member Gardner requested that staff review existing regulations so that the City
Council can provide direction on whether the regulations are still appropriate for this
and other residential areas.
CWQE staff has been enforcing the Zoning Code (Section 20.60.030 A.6), which limits
fences, walls, and hedges to 3 feet within a required front yard setback. This height
Code Enforcement — Study Session
April 24, 2007
Page 3
limit applies within 60 feet of an intersection of two streets, within 15 feet of an
intersection of a street and alley or two alleys, and within 5 feet of a street and
driveway. The Public Works Department uses a Standard Plan to determine the
required sight distance, and a separate report discusses the applicability and
appropriateness of the standard. Staff believes that a review of these regulations and
standards is needed. If the City Council requests that changes be made, they will be
incorporated into the new Zoning Code and revised Public Works Standards.
Prepared by:
John Kappeler
Division Manager
Attachment: City Council Policy K -9
Submitted by:
Sharon Wood
Assistant City Manager
CODE ENFORCEMENT
PURPOSE
fd7
The City of Newport Beach devotes substantial resources to the enforcement of
Building Municipal and Zoning Ordinances. Building and Zoning Ordinances are
intended to protect and preserve public health and safety, the charm of our residential
neighborhoods, and the overall quality of life enjoyed by Newport Beach residents. The
City Council understands the importance of enforcing Building and Zoning Ordinances
and is committed to do so. However, enforcement of these Ordinances affects the rights
of those citizens who are the subject of complaints or enforcement action. Accordingly,
the City Council directs that all code enforcement activity shall be conducted in
accordance with the following:
A. The City shall not initiate any formal code enforcement action based solely on an
anonymous complaint;
B. Requests for inspections of private property not open to the general public or not
visible from adjoining public or private property shall not be made unless there
is sufficient evidence to support the issuance of an inspection warrant for the
property that is the subject of the request;
C. Code enforcement complaints shall be made in writing and identify the
complainant, specify the facts, acts, events and occurrences which establish the
violation and describe any documentation which would establish a violation or is
otherwise required by law;
D. The City considers written code enforcement complaints to be confidential. The
City will use its best efforts to preserve the confidentiality of any complaint with
the understanding that the City will be required to disclose the identity of the
complainant to the extent necessary to obtain an inspection warrant;
E. All code enforcement activities, including investigative property inspections,
requests for consent to inspect, and related activities shall be conducted such that
the civil rights of the individual or individuals who are the subject of the
investigation are fully protected; and
1
K -9
F. The provisions of this Policy do not apply to inspections of property requested
by the owner or to inspections conducted by Building Department personnel
pursuant to construction being conducted, which is authorized, pursuant to an
active permit issued by the Building Department.
Adopted - June 26, 1995
Amended - October 10, 2006
W
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Study Session Item No. 2
April 24, 2007
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Antony Brine, P.E.
949 - 644 -3329 or tbrine @city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: INTERSECTION SIGHT DISTANCE
DISCUSSION:
The Public Works Department Standard Plan 110 -L outlines the intersection line of
sight requirements for all residential construction and development projects. There are
different requirements for providing a clear line of visibility (or sight distance) based on
the type of roadway and the travel speeds of the adjacent street. For a local residential
street, the standard plan requires that the driver shall have 200 feet of clear sight
distance. The standard plan has an exhibit which shows how the required line of sight
is drawn and defines what is referred to as the "limited use area ".
The limited use area is a triangular shaped area that is located adjacent to the street
and along the curb line. Within the limited use area, different types of permanent
obstructions that can restrict a driver's view are not permitted. These obstructions can
include walls, plants and shrubs that grow higher than 24 inches, and ungraded slopes.
With the current standard plan, the driver's line of sight begins at a point located ten
feet behind the projection of the property line. In many cases, this would locate the
driver as much as 15 -20 feet behind the center of a sidewalk or parkway. This is a
conservative standard that the City has followed for many years. New development
projects are conditioned to meet these standard plan requirements and have worked
well.
However, in many instances, the concern is within existing residential neighborhoods. In
addition to street intersections, there is concern regarding sight distance at alleys and
driveways with respect to pedestrians and bicyclists as well as vehicles. Many of the
intersections, alleys, and driveways in the City's older neighborhoods have limited sight
distance, and these locations do not meet the current City standard plan requirements.
Many existing homes have walls and oversized landscaping within the limited use area
that restricts visibility. Also, the standard plan requirements have not been regularly
enforced at older residential properties because of the pre- existing conditions.
In residential areas, another important factor that impacts the driver's sight distance is
parked vehicles. It is important to note that parked vehicles are not permanent
Intersection Sight Distance — Study Session
April 24, 2007
Page 2
obstructions, and are not specifically addressed in the existing standard plan. In reality,
parked vehicles clearly obstruct the driver's view. Public Works receives many requests
every year for additional red curb markings to restrict parking and to provide for
additional sight distance. In areas such as the Balboa Peninsula, Corona del Mar, and
Balboa Island, the heavy demand for on- street parking has been an important
consideration. The Public Works Department has made concerted efforts over the
years. to balance the demand for on- street parking with sight distance requirements.
When on- street parking is considered, in order to meet the existing standard plan
requirements on local residential streets, 200 feet of clear sight distance, a fair amount
of existing on- street parking would have to be removed. In Corona del Mar, for
example, on every flower street approximately half of the on- street parking would be
lost to meet the existing standard requirements. On the numbered streets, generally all
parking would need to be removed. This clearly points to the need to reassess the
existing standard plan.
It is staff's opinion that the existing standard plan is too conservative in reviewing
residential intersections, and does not adequately address on- street parking impacts.
One option to consider would be to prepare a new, separate Standard Plan for
residential intersection review. A revised Standard Plan would make the requirements
more realistic with the way most drivers approach, stop, and proceed at a local street
intersection. The new plan would place the driver's line of sight at a location closer to
the intersection. New sight distance requirements would impact existing obstructions,
such as overgrown landscaping, less than the current standard plan. Any existing
landscaping that continues to impede visibility could be addressed by providing the
resident with a notice of violation.
Regardless of any requirements that would be included in a new standard plan for local
residential properties, the visibility impacts from on- street parking cannot be solved
without a loss of parking. Many of the intersections in Corona del Mar currently have
only five to 10 feet of red curb adjacent to the corner. This short amount of red curb
only provides approximately 75 feet of visibility. To provide the required visibility, red
curb would need to be installed at a length of 30 feet to the left, and 20 feet to the right
of the driver. Each additional 20 feet of red curb is equal to a lost parking space.
Similar situations exist on the Balboa Peninsula. Providing adequate sight distance at
the intersections along Balboa Boulevard, the existing red curbs needs to be
lengthened. The lengths of existing red curb vary at intersections along Balboa
Boulevard. By providing a uniform 40 feet of red curb to the left, and 20 feet of red curb
to the right of the driver, adequate stopping sight distance would be provided.
It has been staff's experience that the existing Standard Plan 110 -L works well for
reviewing and placing conditions on new development projects on arterial highways.
Therefore, it is recommended that the existing Standard Plan 110 -L continue to be used
for development review on arterial roadways.
Additionally, staff recommends that a new Public Works Standard Plan be prepared for
line of sight requirements for residential intersections that provides a balance between
Intersection Sight Distance — Study Session
April 24, 2007
Page 3
safety and parking. The new Standard Plan will be used to review proposed
improvements, such as walls and landscaping obstructions, on all submitted residential
improvement plans. A powerpoint presentation of the potential alternative residential
sight distance standards will be presented during the study session for consideration by
City Council. In addition to the line of sight requirements, staff is looking for direction
regarding the amount of red curb parking restrictions that would provide a balance
between safety and the potential loss of parking area.
Prepared by:
rzl" �L"
A' o Brine, P.E.
Principal Civil Engineer
Submitted by:
Badum
s Director
!i
�410.FFOB
Rmlo
VrgU 7
SS - L-11a�� 0-7
J 11
5::).:E`�e� rTl�
vi Vv
p�rrn1 C�
77 -777 77
11 i rrI e lJJIJJ r J f !J-S; -J1 -;J S h;-:1 I l 1 n D r
5
..
LINE OF SIGHT (TYF)j
LIMITED USE AREA
1 ••• 7
CURB LINE
DISTANCE (FL) II YI
(VOTES:
5 RAISED
MEDIAN
TOE OF SLOPE
TYP )
1. THE "LIMITED USE AREA" IS DETERMINED BY THE GRAPHICAL METHOD USING THE APPROPRIATE
DISTANCES GIVEN IN THE ABOVE TABLE. IT SHALL BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROHI8I7ING
OR CLEARING OBSTRUCTIONS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE AT INTERSECTIONS.
2. THE "LINE OF SIGHT" LINE SHALL BE SHOWN AT INTERSECTIONS ON ALL LANDSCAPING PLANS,
GRADING PLANS, AND TENTATIVE TRACT PLANS WHERE SIGHT DISTANCE IS QUES770NABLE. IN
CASES WHERE AN INTERSECTION IS LOCATED ON A VER77CAL CURVE, A PROFILE OF THE SIGHT
LINE MAY BE REQUIRED,
J. WALLS OR ANY OBSTRUCTONS THAT COULD RESTRICT THE VIEW WITHIN THE "LIMITED USE AREA"
SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.
4. THE TOE OF THE SLOPE SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE "LIMITED USE AREA ".
5. THE "LIMITED USE AREA" SHALL BE AS NEAR LEVEL AS POSSIBLE YET MAINTAIN PROPER DRAINAGE.
6. PLANTS AND SHRUBS SHALL BE OF THE TYPE THAT WILL GROW NO HIGHER THAN 24 INCHES
ABOVE 7HE GROUND WITHIN THE LIMITED USE AREAS".
S
Y1
I X
XI
MAJOR
525
37
37
13
PRIMARY
450
25
25
13
SECONDARY
350
18
18
6
LOCAL
200
0
0
0
(VOTES:
5 RAISED
MEDIAN
TOE OF SLOPE
TYP )
1. THE "LIMITED USE AREA" IS DETERMINED BY THE GRAPHICAL METHOD USING THE APPROPRIATE
DISTANCES GIVEN IN THE ABOVE TABLE. IT SHALL BE USED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROHI8I7ING
OR CLEARING OBSTRUCTIONS IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN ADEQUATE SIGHT DISTANCE AT INTERSECTIONS.
2. THE "LINE OF SIGHT" LINE SHALL BE SHOWN AT INTERSECTIONS ON ALL LANDSCAPING PLANS,
GRADING PLANS, AND TENTATIVE TRACT PLANS WHERE SIGHT DISTANCE IS QUES770NABLE. IN
CASES WHERE AN INTERSECTION IS LOCATED ON A VER77CAL CURVE, A PROFILE OF THE SIGHT
LINE MAY BE REQUIRED,
J. WALLS OR ANY OBSTRUCTONS THAT COULD RESTRICT THE VIEW WITHIN THE "LIMITED USE AREA"
SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED.
4. THE TOE OF THE SLOPE SHALL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE "LIMITED USE AREA ".
5. THE "LIMITED USE AREA" SHALL BE AS NEAR LEVEL AS POSSIBLE YET MAINTAIN PROPER DRAINAGE.
6. PLANTS AND SHRUBS SHALL BE OF THE TYPE THAT WILL GROW NO HIGHER THAN 24 INCHES
ABOVE 7HE GROUND WITHIN THE LIMITED USE AREAS".
f
-rr
;Drl_J�
�1 Cl �l r�JJ
J
l] J r
Driver behind Prope
b L i � DIY' - 1 •.
Lk
Imo` K
}� VI
lot it,
a
Driver behind Curb Line
.a } ,
7:11
"(
Aim
y.• � S
•tom
-AJ, '
Alley intersection — Corona del Mar
f
S -'
Corona del Mar Landscaping
re
� - 4
11
i
r
Y
1 !
I
F
j
I e _1
V
r�y�t=
-�
- — wa �r.'i t tii T
�' ®_�- �
'_ 1 1
o +� . ,; �,;�I
'' s
• `�� - _ +1 i i -jam ��� 7 + m��'
. � � Y
k' ' �
.n,.
Jr�Jrr
;Jr Jr��rJ
•
�Jr lnr�r��rrl�rJ�
jl e vv
rrl � rJ �f �J ,- J r1 � r �
vrli�l
rr -1 � E) S e � l
rol
200' ,� wr- nv- clraar� 200'
PARKED VEHICLES n3j
I E341 LA=4 PAKKLU VLHIULLb
30' OR 40' RED CURB
20' RED CURB
LENGTH OF RED CURB ON LOCAL STREET
TYPICAL
NOT TO SCALE I
5 j
(BACK
SPEED RED CURB ON LEFT RED CURB ON RIGHT
30 MPH 40' 20'
25 MPH 30' 20'
ALT. I - OMWR'S EYE 7
FROM
EDGE OF PARKED VEHICLES
200' NE -OF -SIGHT 2W
PARKED VEHICLES rM PARKED VEHICLES
60' OR 80' RED CURB 25' RED CURB
I i LENGTH OF RID CURB ON LOCAL STREET
TYPICAL SPEED RED CURB ON LEFT RED CURB ON RIGHT
NOT TO SCALE I I 30 MPH 80' 25'
15 MPH 60' 20'
ALT. 2 = DRILE'RS EYE 7' BACK FROM CURBLINE EXTENSION
r�
.- urlrlrJ!1� rJ r'p\jpL,vj
�r�J�rrJ JrJ �Jrr�r'lcJ
r�l!�ir�rrJnrJ Jr
JprrJ �rlr
yWal r r n