Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20 - Status Report on City Hall Site Investigation• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 20 July 24, 2007 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department Stephen G. Badum 949 - 644 -3311 orsbadum@city.newport-beach.ca.us SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON THE CITY HALL SITE INVESTIGATION AT THE OCTA TRANSPORTATION CENTER AND NEWPORT CENTER PARK WITH POTENTIAL DIRECTION TO STAFF ISSUE: Based on the information presented from DMJM, how does the City Council wish to proceed? • RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff as to the next steps, if any, that should be taken. DISCUSSION: On April 10, 2007, City Council approved a professional services agreement with DMJM Design to perform an investigation of a potential City Hall at the site currently occupied by the OCTA Transportation Center. The existing OCTA Transportation Center is located on Avocado Avenue near the comer of San Joaquin Hills Road and MacArthur Boulevard. The proposed site would require the relocation of the Transportation Center to the parcel at the corner of Avocado Avenue and San Miguel Drive which is currently designated as open space. DMJM has provided the attached concept plans and cost estimate as one potential solution for the redevelopment of the site and the relocation of the existing OCTA transportation center. The City Hall concept is based upon the current building program that envisions a two story 72,000 square foot (42,000sf 13S floor) City Hall facility and 260 vehicle parking structure with 40 vehicle surface parking. The relocated OCTA Transportation Center concept duplicates the capacities and services of the existing facility. The estimated cost including the relocation of the OCTA facility is $65,200,000. •On May 22, 2007, City Council authorized the City Manager and the City Council Building Committee to expand the scope of DMJM's work to include a cost analysis to Status Report —City Hall Site In lion at OCTA Transportation Center . July 24, 2007 Page 2 construct a building pad immediately north of the Central Library (Newport Center Park • site) capable of supporting a two story 72,000 square foot City Hall with 410 space parking facility with 100 at grade parking spaces adjacent to the library, 70 at grade parking spaces for City Hall and a 240 space below grade garage that could serve both facilities. The attached Concept plan and cost estimate depict one potential design solution. The estimated Cost of this concept is $55,180,000 The consultant has emphasized that the designs and cost estimates are conservative figures representing what information they were provided. They acknowledge that various design scenarios could be explored for either site that could reduce or increase costs. Additionally, there may be additional issues that we might not be aware of without more in -depth investigations such as geotechnical, environmental, and traffic studies. Both concept plans and estimates will be presented in a PowerPoint presentation by the consultant, DMJM Design, for further discussion. Environmental Review: Engineering and architectural preliminary design services are not a project as defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Implementing Guidelines. However, • an environmental review and the appropriate documentation will be prepared if the project proceeds beyond the conceptual phase. Submitted by: Badum s Director Attachments: 1) Planning Study 2) City Hall Park Site Estimate 3)City Hall OCTA Site Estimate • • CUMMING CORPORATIO BUILDING VALUE THROUGH EXPERTISE Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 CCorp Project No.07- 00285.01 660S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 1000 • LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA • 90017 PHONE: 213 - 4084518 • FAX: 213- 408.4665 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 CONTENTS Basis of Estimate Scope of Estimate Constriction Cost Summary OCTA Component Summary Sitework Component Summary Prepared by Cumming Corporation Page Nos. 12 • • 46 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study • City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 BASIS OF ESTIMATE 1. Basis Of Estimate This statement is based on "Program Information Documents" dated May 11, 2007 by DMJM Design /AECOM, received on May 11, 2007 along with verbal direction from the architect. A Aerial Photograph B Measurement Diagram C Site Setback Diagram D Study A -1, A -2, B -1, B -2, C -1, C-2, D -1, D -2 E Study Master Plan 1, 2, 3, 4 F Parking Study G Program Overlay Diagram H C2 Site Section I Site Photographs 2. Conditions of Construction • The pricing is based on the following general conditions of construction Start date of construction January 2009 A construction period of 24 months Construction contract procurement method is competitive bid Contractors performance bond is deemed to be included by the general contractor Builders all risk insurance is deemed to be included by the general contractor Phasing requirements have not been included The general contractor will have full access to the site during normal business hours Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 3 of 14 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 BASIS OF ESTIMATE 3. Items Not Included Within Estimate The following cost items are excluded from this estimate. A Professional fees, inspections and testing. B Cost escalation beyond the midpoint of construction. C Plan check fees and building permit fees. D Furnishings, fixtures and equipment (FF &E), except built -in cabinets, counters and other casework indicated. E Major site and building structures demolition unless noted in body of estimate. F Costs of hazardous material surveys, abatements, and disposals. G Costs of offsite construction. H Property acquisition costs. 1 Special communication and 911 systems. J Essential Service Construction Systems. K Construction Contingencies. 4. Notes • We recommend that the client review this statement, and that any interpretations contrary to those intended by the design documents be fully addressed. The statement is based upon a detailed measurement of quantities when possible, and reasonable allowances for items not clearly defined in the documents. The statement reflects probable construction costs obtainable in a competitive and stable bidding market. This estimate is based upon a minimum of four (4) competitive bids from qualified general contractors, with bids from a minimum of three (3) subcontractors per trade. This statement is a determination of fair market value for the construction of the project and is not intended to be a prediction of low bid. Experience indicates that a fewer number of bidders may result in a higher bid amount, and more bidders may result in a lower bid result. I bidder add 15% to 40% 2 to 3 bids add 8% to 12% 4 to 5 bids -4% to +4% 7 to 8 bids deduct 5% to 7% 5. Escalation Escalation is included at 7% for the remainder of 2007 and 6% for all subsequent years. Escalation Is carried to the midpoint of construction which is an industry standard. • Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 4 of 14 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study • City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of probable Cost July 18, 2007 BASIS OF ESTIMATE 6. The LEED System LEED provides four award levels based on the number of environmentally related points achieved by new building projects. The four levels include: Certified (26-32 points), Silver (33 -38 points), Gold (39-51 points and Platinum (52 -69 points). Points can be obtained for 6 "Design Areas" as follows: Design Area 1 Sustainable Sites (14 Points possible) Design Area 2 Water Efficiency (5 Points possible) Design Area 3 Energy & Atmosphere (17 Points possible) Design Area 4 Materials & Resources (13 Points possible) • Design Area 5 Indoor Environmental Quality (15 Points possible) Design Area 6 Innovation & Design Process (5 Points possible) 1 J There is a varying opinion of the impact LEED has on a construction budget. What is agreed is that if sustainability goals are discussed and integrated early in the design process then the cost impact on the construction budget can be minimized. The following is our opinion of premium LEED costs: Premium cost to achieve LEED Certification (Standard construction design methodology implementing codes such as Title 24, etc bring most buildings up to the LEED Certified Standard without Incurring "additional" Cost). 0.00% Base estimate cost plus premium to provide additional improvements to balance of sections that would qualify for LEED'Sllver" status. 5.00% Base estimate cost plus premium to provide additional improvements to balance of sections that would qualify for LEED "God" status. 8.000/0 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 5 of 14 0 • Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 SCOPE OF ESTIMATE The following a brief outline of the assumption taken in the preparation of this report. Buildings: Structure: Moment frame structural steel system totaling 17lbstsf with concrete shear walls. Floor and roof decks are metal deck with reinforced concrete infill. Plumbing: Costs included cover sanitary fixtures, sanitary waste, vent and service pipework, water treatment, storage and circulation, roof drainage and gas. HVAC: Includes heating and chilling equipment, thermal storage and circulation, air handling equipment, air distributions and return, diffusers, controls, unit ventilation and testing. Electrical: Includes main service and distribution, emergency power, machine and equipment power, lighting, convenience power, telephonefdata conduit and cable, av conduit, fire alarm and security systems. Below Grade Parking Structure: Foundations: Excavation to form the basement plus shoring to all sides. A mat slab foundation system has been assumed with perimeter drainage and elevator pits. Structure: Reinforced concrete columns, shear walls, retaining walls, ramp walls, slab on grade, suspended slabs and beams. Interior partitions: All walls at the parking level are CMU with hollow metal doors. Interior Finishes: Columns (partial) and ceilings are painted as are the CMU walls. Floors are unfinished with and allowance of 10,000 per floor receiving a sealed concrete finish. Function Equipment and Specialties: Egress control barriers, bollards, striping and wheel stops. Site Development: It is assumed that the chosen sites will be clear of all above and below grade structures and that no major above or below demolition or utility redirection is required (With the exception of the relocation of the OCTA building which will require the demolition of the existing facility). It is assumed that significant earthwork will be required to form levels needed for the new construction. New retaining walls will be required along McCarthur Blvd. Hard and soft landscaping allowances are included. Utilities are included in this section for connecting the building to the main pipe or electrical runs. It is assumed that these comedians are no more than 1001f from the site. Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 6 of 14 r � L_J r � L_J • 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study �ty of Newport Beach wport Beach, California tanning Study Statement of Probable Cost STUDY C -2.1 CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • July 18, 2007 City Hall 72,000 SF $350.00 $25,200,000 Civic Center Excluded Plaza Deck 33,DOO SF $35.00 $1,155,000 Below Grade Parking 100,800 SF $155.00 $15,624,000 224 Stalls 336 GSF /Stall OCTA Transportation Center 70,000 SF $49.54 $3,467,567 Site Work (Includes OCTA Demolition) 290,000 SF $3627 $10,517,573 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUILDING & SITEWORK CONSTRUCTION COST 5556964.140 Escalation to Midpoint of Construction 16.45% $9,207,314 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUILDING & SITEWORK CONSTRUCTION COST $65.171.454 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 7 of 14 0 • Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 • OCTA TRANSPORTATION CENTER 0 0 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 8 of 14 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study •City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost OCTA TRANSPORTATION CENTER COMPONENT SUMMARY July 18, 2007 Element Subtotal Total Cost ISF Cost ISF EI Site Constmcdon (14 -16) $2,586,000 $36.94 14 Site Preparation & Demolition $0 $0.00 15 Site Paving, Structures & Landscaping $1,886,000 $26.94 16 Utilities on Site $700,000 $10.00 Subtotal $2,586,000 $36.94 Gen'I Cord, Bonds and Insurance 10.00% $258,600 $3.69 Subtotal $2,844,600 $40.64 General Contractor's Fee 6.00% $170,676 $2.44 Subtotal $3,013,276 $43.08 Design Contingency 15.00% $452,291 $6.46 Subtotal $3,467,567 $49.54 See Main Summary for Escalation 0.00% $0 $0.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $3,467,567 $49.54 Total Area: 70,000 SF • Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 9 of 14 0 • Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 OCTA TRANSPORTATION CENTER COMPONENT DETAIL 14 Site Preparation & Suildina Demolition Included in Site Work Section 15 Site Pavina, Structures & Landscapina Vehicular paving and curbs Concrete paving forming bus circulationtstop areas including curbs and striping Asphalt paving forming surface parking including curbs and striping Pedestrian paving Concrete paving Bus shelters OCTA bus shelters OCTA restrooms and office Single story building 16 Utilities on Site Site utilities Storrs drain, sewer, domestic water, electrical, lighting, etc. Unit Unit 33A00 SF $10.00 $330,000 20,000 SF $8.00 $160,000 17,000 SF $8.00 $136,000 7 EA $140,000.00 $980,000 700 SF $400.00 $280.000 $1.886.000 70,000 SF $10.00 $700,000 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 10 of 14 C1 0 0 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study . Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost 0 0 SITEWORK July 18, 2007 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 11 of 14 0 41 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California • Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 SITEWORK COMPONENT SUMMARY 3ement Subtotal Total Cost / SF Cost /SF E) Site Construcdon (14 -16) $784,367 $7,843,667 $27.06 14 Site Preparation & Demolition $1,676,667 $5.78 15 Site Paving, Structures & Landscaping $4,407,000 $15.20 16 Utilities on Site $1,760,000 $6.07 Subtotal TP7,843,667 $27.05 Gen'I Cond, Bonds and Insurance 10.00%. $784,367 $2.70 Subtotal $8,C28,033 $29.75 General Contractors Fee 6.00% $617,682 $1.79 Subtotal $9,145,716 1.54 Design Contingency 15.00% $1,371,867 $4.73 Subtotal $10,517,673 $36.27 See Main Summary for Escalation 0.00% $0 $0.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $10,617,573 $36.271 Total Area: 290,000 SF LJ Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 12 of 14 • i Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study is City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost SITEWORK COMPONENT DETAIL is u July 18,2007 Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total 14 Site Preparation & Building Demolition Site demolition Demolish existing concrete bus shelters (6) Demolish existing concrete canopies between bus shelters (4) Demolish existing retaining wall including foundations (average height assumed to be 20') Site Gearing and grading Ship and remove brush and weeds Strip and remove asphalt paving including curbs, eta Strip and remove concrete paving including curbs, etc. Cut and remove to form level site 18 Site Pavinn. Structures & Landscapina Vehicular paving and curbs City Hall Site Asphalt paving forming entry road and turnaround including curbs and striping Asphalt paving forming surface parking including curbs and striping Pedestrian paving City Hall Site Concrete paving Site walls Reinforced concrete retaining wall and foundations including waterproofing and drainage, average height 25' Reinforced concrete separation wall (between OCTA and City Hall), average height 20' Landscape planting and maintenance Grass, shrubs, trees, etc. 4,800 SF $10.00 $48,000 2,800 SF $5.00 $14,000 400 LF $900.00 $360,000 160,000 SF $0.30 $48,000 80,000 SF $0.50 $40,000 50,000 SF $2.00 $100,000 59,259 CY $18.00 $1,066,667 $1.676.667 20,000 SF $9.50 $190,000 13,000 SF $9.50 $123,500 20,000 SF $12.00 $240,000 40,750 SF $70.00 $2,852,500 2,100 SF $60.00 $126,000 87,500 SF $10.00 $875,000 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 13 of 14 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost July 18, 2007 SITEWORK COMPONENT DETAIL Element Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total 16 (Niiffes on Site Site utilities Storm drain, sewer, domestic water, electrical, lighting, etc. 220,000 SF $6.00 $1,760,000 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 14 of 14 r1 L_J • r� L_J • • CUMMING CORPORATION BUILDING VALUE THROUGH EXPERTISE Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, Califomia Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site July 18, 2007 CCorp Project No.07- 00285.02 • 660 S. FIGUEROA STREET, SUITE 1000 LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA • 90017 PHONE: 213408 -0518 • FAX: 213 - 4084665 • • 1. Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site July 18, 2007 CONTENTS Page Nos. Basis of Estimate Scope of Estimate Construction Cost Summary Park Site Study, Prepared by Cumming Corporation • • Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study • City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site July 18, 2007 BASIS OF ESTIMATE 1. Basis Of Estimate This statement is based on concept plans (site and section) by DMJM DesignhkECOM, received on July 13, 2007 along with verbal direction from the architect. 2. Conditions of Construction The pricing is based on the following general conditions of construction Start date of construction January 2009 A construction period of 24 months Construction contract procurement method is competitive bid Contractors performance bond is deemed to be included by the general contractor • Builders all risk insurance is deemed to be included by the general contractor Phasing requirements have not been included The general contractor will have full access to the site during normal business hours 3. Items Not Included Within Estimate The following cost items are excluded from this estimate. A Professional fees, inspections and testing. B Cost escalation beyond the midpoint of construction. C Plan check fees and building permit fees. D Furnishings, fixtures and equipment (FF &E), except built -in cabinets, counters and other casework indicated. E Major site and building structures demolition unless noted in body of estimate. F Costs of hazardous material surveys, abatements, and disposals. G Costs of offsite construction. H Property acquisition costs. I Special communication and 911 systems. • J Essential Service Construction Systems, K Construction Contingencies. Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 3 ! • Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site July 18, 2007 BASIS OF ESTIMATE 4. Notes We recommend that the client review this statement, and that any interpretations contrary to those intended by the design documents be fully addressed. The statement is based upon a detailed measurement of quantities when possible, and reasonable allowances for items not clearly defined in the documents. The statement reflects probable construction costs obtainable in a competitive and stable bidding market. This estimate is based upon a minimum of four (4) competitive bids from qualified general contractors, with bids from a minimum of three (3) subcontractors per trade. This statement is a determination of fair market value for the construction of the project and is not intended to be a prediction of low bid. Experience indicates that a fewer number of bidders may result in a higher bid amount, and more bidders may result in a lower bid result. 1 bidder add 15% to 400/6 2 to 3 bids add 8% to 12% 4 to.5 bids -4% to +4% 7 to 8 bids deduct 5% to 7% • 5. Escalation Escalation is included at 70/6 for the remainder of 2007 and 6% for all subsequent years. Escalation is carried to the midpoint of constructon which is an industry standard. 6. The LEED System LEED provides four award levels based on the number of environmentally related points achieved by new building projects. The four levels include: Certified (26-32 points), Silver (33 -38 points), Gold (39-51 points and Platinum (52-69 pants). Points can be obtained for 6 "Design Areas" as follows: Design Area 1 Sustainable Sites (14 Points possible) Design Area 2 Water Efficiency (5 Points possible) Design Area 3 Energy & Atmosphere (17 Points possible) Design Area 4 Materials & Resources (13 Points possible) Design Area 5 Indoor Environmental Quality (15 Points possible) • Design Area 6 innovation & Design Process (5 Points possible) Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 4 0 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study . City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site July 18, 2007 BASIS OF ESTIMATE • r, There is a varying opinion of the impact LEED has on a construction budget. What is agreed is that if sustainability goals are discussed and integrated early in the design process then the cost impact on the construction budget can be minimized. The following is our opinion of premium LEED costs: Premium cost to achieve LEED Certification (Standard construction design methodology implementing codes such as Title 24, etc bring most buildings up to the LEED Certified Standard without tnourring "additional" cost). 0.00°A Base estimate cost plus premium to provide additional improvements to balance of sections that would qualify for LEED "Silver" status. 5.00% Base estimate cost plus premium to provide additional improvements to balance of sections that would qualify for LEED "Gold" status. 8.00% Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 5 0 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Altemative Site July 18, 2007 SCOPE OF ESTIMATE The following a brief outline of the assumption taken in the preparation of this report. Buildings: Structure: Moment frame structural steel system totaling 17lbslsf with concrete shear walls. Floor and roof decks are metal deck with reinforced concrete infill. Plumbing: Costs included cover sanitary fixtures, sanitary waste, vent and service pipework, water treatment, storage and circulation, roof drainage and gas. HVAC: Includes healing and chilling equipment, thermal storage and circulation, air handling equipment, air distributions and return, diffusers, controls, unit ventilation and testing. Electrical: Includes main service and distribution, emergency power, machine and equipment power, lighting, convenience power, telephone/data conduit and cable, av conduit, fire alarm and security systems. Below Grade Parking Structure: Foundations: Excavation to form the basement plus shoring to all sides. A mat slab foundation • system has been assumed with perimeter drainage and elevator pits. Structure: Reinforced concrete columns, shear walls, retaining walls, ramp wails, slab on grade, suspended slabs and beams. Interior partitions: All walls at the parking level are CMU with hollow metal doors. Interior Finishes: Columns (partial) and ceilings are painted as are the CMU walls. Floors are unfinished with and allowance for some areas to receive a sealed concrete finish. Function Equipment and Specialties: Egress control barriers, bollards, striping and wheel stops. Site Development: It is assumed that the chosen sites will be dear of all above and below grade structures and that no major above or below demolition or utility redirection is required. it is assumed that significant earthwork will be required to form levels needed for the new construction. New retaining walls will be required. Hard and soft landscaping allowances are included. Utilitles are included in this section for connecting the building to the main pipe or electrical runs. It is assumed that these connections are no more than 1001f from the site. • Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 6 0 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study • Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site 0 PARK SITE STUDY July 18, 2007 Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 7 0 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of probable Cost Alternative Site PARK SITE STUDY . CONSTRUCTION COST SUMMARY • July 18, 2007 City Hall 72,000 SF $350.00 $25,200,000 Civic Center Excluded Plaza Deck 48,000 SF $35.00 $1,680,000 Below Grade Parking 90,000 SF $155.00 $13,950,000 240 Stalls 300 GSF1Stall OCTA Transportation Center Excluded Site Work 178,000 SF $36.82 $6,554,543 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUILDING & SITEWORK CONSTRUCTION COST E47.384.643 Escalation to Midpoint of Construction 16.45% $7,795,784 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUILDING & SITEWORK CONSTRUCTION COST 356.180.327 • Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 8 0 Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study •City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site r LJ • PARK SITE (SITE WORK) STUDY • COMPONENT SUMMARY July 18, 2007 Element Subtotal Total Cost /SF Cost /SF E) Site Construction (1416) $4,888,187 $Y7,46 14 Site Preparation & Demolition $1,880,067 $10.56 15 Site Paving, Structures & Landscaping $1,584,100 $8.90 16 Utilities on Site $1,424,000 $8.00 Subtotal 7,46 Gent Cond, Bonds and Insurance 10.00% $488,817 $275 Subtotal $5,376,11113 .21 General Contractor's Fee 6.00% $322,619 $1.81 Subtotal Design Contingency 15.00% $854,940 $4.80 Subtotal $36,82 See Main Summary for Escalation 0.00% $0 $0.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $6,554,543 $36.82 Total Area: 178,000 SF Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 9 • Newport Beach City Hall Planning Study City of Newport Beach • Newport Beach, California Planning Study Statement of Probable Cost Alternative Site July 18, 2007 PARK SITE (SITE WORK) STUDY COMPONENT DETAIL 14 Site Preparation 8 Suildina Demolition Site clearing and grading Strip and remove brush and weeds Cut and fill, removing excess material o8 site to form required construction levels Temporary shoring -M—Me PaWno. Structures 8 Lerratscapinsr Vehicular paving and curbs Asphalt paving forming entry road and surface parking including curbs and striping - adjacent to Library Asphalt paving forming entry road and surface parking induding cabs and striping - Garage entrance Asphalt paving forming entry road and surface parking induding curbs and striping - East Surface parking Pedestrian paving Concrete paving Site walls Reinforced concrete retaining wall and foundations including waterproofing and drainage, average height 29 Landscape planting and maintenance Grass, shrubs, trees, eta 16 utilities on S #e Site utilities Storm drain, sewer, domestic water, electrical, lighting, etc. 178,000 65,926 16,000 SF CY SF $0.30 $18.00 $40.00 $53,400 $1,186,667 $640,000 $9.50 $17,100 $9.50 S1.880.O6T 41,000 SF 1,800 SF 22,000 SF 3,000 SF 16,000 SF 20,200 SF $10.00 $202,000 S1.584.10D 178,000 SF $8.00 $1,424,000 S1.424 OW f. J Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 10 NIC • $9.50 $17,100 $9.50 $209,000 $12.00 $36,000 $70.00 $1,120,000 20,200 SF $10.00 $202,000 S1.584.10D 178,000 SF $8.00 $1,424,000 S1.424 OW f. J Prepared by Cumming Corporation Sheet 10 • 0 NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA LTV M @f By p WHNAEC ALL WOWS IE M E JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I AECOM OCTA SITE NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA Gt %M OW BYO MHNAEMkAUPo TS MSEMEO i JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I JIECOM 0 W iA y•l�Jf \ � `a .fir w SElf NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA C�RMY O3 By HMAE ALL MWSRE001W Dry 1 J� L E y C, s 9 7;b 0_ qwr fit o •1 I s • JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I AECDM y i STUDY C -2.1 SITE DIAGRAM �r z NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA v +ar zar C,UmpHJ conwum •swsvwrx, rtcou.uno,m �c.a,vm I• NOTES: CLOSE AVACADO AVE BETWEEN SAN NICOLAS DR. AND SAN JOAQUIN HILL RD. PROGRAM: CITY HALL: TOTAL AREA 72,000 SF TOTAL PARKING: 300 SPACES OCTA: (TO MATCH EXISTING) BUS BAYS: 9 BERTHS PUBLIC PARKING: 72 SPACES 9A O JULY 19, 2007 DMIM DESIGN I AECOM 0 0 a STUDY C-2.1 SITE PLAN JULY 19, 2007 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA ol 100 200 DMJM DESIGN I AECOM �Ug0.rJ fVYIOM ©SW Ce WIww.IKaM.LLI wWt41Ci6Y® 0 • • • STUDY C -2.1 PLAZA LEVEL NEWPORT BEACH, CAUFORNIA (�j a so 100 G MW0L MW"N� MWS%SE E0 CITY HALL: PLAZA LEVEL: 42,000 GSF S ECON D LEVEL: 30,000 GSF TOTAL: 72,000 GSF PAR4NG: AT- GRADE: 40 S PACES GARAGE: 260 SPACES TOTAL: 4.7 ACRES / 204,000 SF JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I AECaM r STUDY C -2.1 11 Y st ATAP�EP1�p� GROUND LEVEL PARKING / OCTA PLAN NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 0 so 100 fO,MM ©lYO 91 �IIYNM.IEL(YNIIl PoWiS flESEW r [! DROP OFF, s\ L GE ~-► \ a CITY HALL: PARI9NG: AT- GRADE: 40 S PACES GARAGE: 280 SPACES TOTAL: 300 SPACES OCTA: BUS BAYS: 9 BERTHS PUBLIC PARIdNG: 72 SPACES TOTAL: + 2.3 ACRES / 94,000 S F i r JULY 19, =7 DMIM DESIGN I AECM • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 54g0.MJ W+lgpM Q3YV BY �.UNNNPEfANNL M[YITS FESBNEO 0 0 LIBRARY SITE 11 JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I AECOM C7 SECTION CUT LINE ! SECTION EL. 185' EL. 190' r �c LL V LL. YL'uuu lA l EL 195' CUT LINE SECOND LEVEL: 30,000 GSF TOTAL: 72,000 GSF 00"'.k STUDY: PARK SITE: 1 PLAZA LEVEL PLAN NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA ■ - cornan O sorer wi.r. a�n asemm PARKING AT- GRADE: 170 SPACES (SPACES: 70 -CITY HALL/ 100 - LIBRARY) BELOW- GRADE: 240 SPACES BUILDING PAD: 3.7 ACRES / 178,000 GSF (INCLUDES AT -GRADE PARKING) JULY 19. 2007 DMIM DESIGN I AEODM „ • • STUDY. PARK SITE NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 5o+oa�a G�YRGM 0d0]BY pNYXx AECQyALL MiHI51E56NC-0 CITY HALL SECTION 0. n• e0 W6P=6=mmd JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I AEQOM • • • • STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COSTS • STUDY C -2.1 (OCTA RELOCATION) SITE $65,200,000 - SITE WORK 290,000 SQ. FT. (INCLUDES OCTA) - EXCLUDES REAL ESTATE COSTS • LIBRARY (PARK) SITE STUDY - SITE WORK 178,000 SQ. FT. - EXCLUDES REAL ESTATE COSTS NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA CSI W ®dLIBV KHHAEC�IL MKS MSE EC $55,200,000 JULY 19, 2007 DMJM DESIGN I AECOM • ao- -)lag107 THE FICKER GROUP CONSULTING • PLANNING URBAN PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING WILLIAM P. FICKER, AIA • NCARB ARCHITECTURE MEMORANDUM Date: July 24, 2007 To: City Council, City of Newport Beach From: William P. Ficker, AIA, City Hall in the Park Committee Re: Agenda Item #20; OCTA Transportation Center, City Hall Site Investigation I am fully aware, as a planner and architect, of the purpose of this study and it is tb compare the feasibility of putting the proposed city hall on the present OCTA site and to compare the cost of a like facility if built on the City Hall in the Park site, but I think it is well worth expressing some brief opinions that might help in directing efforts from this point forward and to evaluating the sites rather than reflecting on only one emotional issue or promise that some council members appear to have made during the campaign for office. 1.1 There have been comments about the site only being a block further north. The distance between this site and the library building is approximately one -half mile. 1.2 When asked to evaluate the difference in cost of building on the proposed City Hall in the Park site, the architect, quite appropriately, illustrates a similar building although a slightly different shape due to the more generous and logical dimensions of the site. There are obvious benefits because of the many things in our planning that we have mentioned such as the synergism of the library and the city hall. 1.3 The comparison of building site costs is simple and obvious and, of course, if the same building is built on each site, that would be expected. However, further investigation, which we all knew would occur, would be the cost of moving the OCTA site and perhaps the cost of land acquisition as well, which is not pursued in this report. 417'1 HIM IE'IH S'iREEI *NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92963 • PHONE (949) 875 -9628. FAX (949) 675 -9638 0 0 Agenda Rem #20, OCTA Transporlatlon Center, City Hall Site Investigation July 24, 2007 Page2d2 1.4 It should be obvious to anyone seeing these plans that there are not only better physical opportunities because the simplicity of the site provides them on the park site, but the synergism of the library, and the huge opportunity to integrate the social aspects of walking the park site for library visitors, city hall visitors and staff, would be an immense cultural and social opportunity for our citizenry and visitors as well. 1.5 1 hope that this Council will abandon further expenditures of money and wasted time on the OCTA site. Upon preliminary investigation two years ago, it did not appear to be a good site to anyone, including me or your site committee, and it still is not a site to be pursued today. 1.6 Every constraint is in place to protect views of Harbor View Hills, park area is more than adequate, and I attach to this memo two pages from the General Plan in which this Council has participated. The Council should reject any further consideration of the OCTA site and embrace the City Hall in the Park or library site as the obvious location for the new city hall. 2. Our city has an abundance of experienced, successful people in almost every phase of corporate management, planning, development, construction, and almost every phase of any other business operations. And yes— recreation and environment 3. Many people at this point have stepped forward who are contributing their time and money in the hopes of turning this city around in a direction that actions will reflect both the social, fiscal and intellectual capital of this community, which should be envied by almost any community. I hope that the Council will recognize this and by their actions participate in the groundswell that has surfaced in this community that we all love. 4 ?7 MR1,I1E1H S'T+REE T . NEWPORT BEACH, CA 22683 • PHONE (949)676-9628- FAX(949)675-9638 i Recreation Element CITYWIDE ISSUES AND NEEDS Parks and Recreational Facilities In June 2005, it is estimated that a total of 415.6 acres of parklands are needed within the City to accommodate the current population of 83,120 residents (utilizing the City standard of 5 acres per 1,000 population). As shown in Table 1, below, there are an existing total of 286.4 acres of parks and 90.4 acres of active beach recreation within Newport Beach with a combined total of 376.8 acres. Thus, this represents a total deficit of 38.8 acres of combined park and beach acreage citywide. Seven of the twelve service areas are experiencing. a deficit in this combined recreation acreage. Three planned parks in West Newport, New Center,,and Newport Coast would help alleviate the citywide park deficit. In addition to a deficit in combined park and beach recreation acreage, there is also an overall shortage in active playfields throughout, Newport Beach. Many of the service areas within the City, as discussed in greater detail below, may have a park surplus but are still experiencing a deficit in active playfields. Also, it is difficult to provide playfields because of the large amount of land required for sports fields, the lack of suitable vacant land, and the high cost of such land within the City. The citywide parks and recreation facilities needs described below have been identified through the following: (1) community surveys (administered from December 1996 to February 1997), (2) data shown in Table RI (Parkland Acreage Needs), and (3) monitoring of the use of recreation programs and facilities. service Area ! Park Acres Needed C%ISM Park Acres E)dsfing PaIK AQ e: JVl Awa Active Becch Combined Park/ Recreation Aerea a Beach Acreage Deficit ( ) Excess 1. west Newport 64.7 9.1 34 43.1 - -211.6 - 2. Balboa Peninsula 25.5 6.5 44 50.5 +25_0 - 3. Newport Hef 41slUpper Bay _ - 643 56.2 0 50.2 - 14.1 4. Santa Ana Heights 3.2 6.8 0 6.8 +3.6 5. Lower Bay 17.3 0.1 0 0.1 17.2 6. Balboa Island 17.9 0.3 1 1.3 - 16.6 7. Eastbluff j 31.3 71:G G 71.0 1. +39.7 8. Big Canyon 13.9 0 j 0 0 1 -13.9 9. Newport Center. 10.9 19, 0 19 41 10. Corona del Mar 44.4 23.9 I 11.4 35.3 -9.1 -- 11. Harbor Yew 72.2 99.5 0 99.5 +27.3 12. Newport Coast' 50 I 58.1' 0 -50)?. Totals 415 6 a 286.4 I 90.4 b 1 376.8 j •38.8" Newport Coast includes public and private parks. including 14 acres of Newport Ridge park dedicated for public use upon City acceptance. "Private Park Area is 56.1 ac. Newport Coast parks use and maintenance are subject to the terms of the Pre- Annexation Agreement. "De6citlexcess acreage •d no additional parks are bui6. . 83,120 x 5 ac. per thousand = 415.6 ac. n Includes beach area where active recreation takes place (.e., typcalty within 100 feet of the water). In addition, there are 174 was of passive beach open space, 136 acres of open space land In the Upper Bay Ecological reserve, and an undelenr ined amount of wateropen space in the Upper Bay and Newoort Harbor. Recreation Element Identified Issues and Needs Boating Facilities — Although not as great as the need for sports fields, there is a substantial demand for public boat launching facilities, sailing facilities, marine sanitation facilities, and guest slips. In addition, there is a continuing high level of interest in crew rowing and outrigger paddling activities and facilities. Shoreline Access — Throughout Southern California, access to the. shoreline is restricted to the public due to private residential communities. Although most of the shoreline in Newport Beach is publicly owned and-accessible, there are a few private residential communities that impede public access to and along the shoreline. Temporary Events — Newport Beach's coastal areas have long been the venue for temporary events, including film production, surfing contests, volleyball tournaments, runs, races, concerts, boat shows, and other such competitions, exhibitions, and events. Also, a number of view parks have become popular locations for large private gatherings. The nature and frequency of such events can impact access to the shoreline and other coastal resources. Adddonal bowing fedits are an ldentired need in Newport Beach. SERVICE AREAS The FTt':l no of Two Service Area 9— Newport Center. There is park surplus within this service area. The Back Bay View Park was completed in the summer of 2005, and a ne%v passive park, Newport Center Park, is planned for development sometime after 2006. Service Area 11— Harbor View. There is .a surplus in park area, and the Harbor View Service Area contains substantial active and passive recreation facilities. The City's efforts should be focused on maintaining and/or upgrading existing facilities, such as Grant Howald Park, Arro%.o Park, and - Bonita Canyon Sports Park. Parks and Recreational Facilities Service area parks and recreational facilities needs described below have been identified through community surveys (administered from December 1996 to February 1997), through the data in Table RI (Parkland Acreage Needs), and through monitoring of the use of recreation progams and facilities. E To: Newport Beach City Council From: Ron Hendrickson Subject: Monetary Value of Irvine Co. Planned for OCTA Relocation Dear City Council Members: Open Space Site4 'zo July 24, 2007 Attached is a brief analysis of the value of the subject site, which I believe indicates a prospective value of $4.5 million. This amount added to the $to million comparison differential being discussed, would increase it to $14.5 million. CC: Homer Bludau Robin Clauson Sharon Wood Monetary Value of TIC Owned Open Space (Between San Miguel and the existing OCTA facility) The site between Avocado and MacArthur from San Miguel to the existing OCTA facility is designated as open space and is owned by The Irvine Co. This site is not part of the CIOSA Agreement. The 1992 Planned Community text tabulates this site along with the open space site from the library up to San Miguel, as 17.3 acres. It notes that the open space site north of the library is 12.8 acres. The difference between 17.3 and 12.8 is 4.5 acres, probably gross acres. I understand the net acreage of the site north of San Miguel may be down to 3.4 acres. Certain Council members have recently pointed out that the 450 Irvine Co. dwelling units in the General Plan will generate some $12 million of in -lieu park fees, apparently making the assumption that TIC would not have any land to dedicate for parks. While I have no knowledge of any City discussions with TIC, I suggest that this 3.4 acre site could be used to satisfy part of their park acreage requirement when they develop their 450 dwelling units. Since the City requires that land for park site dedication be relatively level and useable, of course this site would have to be modified to make it acceptable. As I interpret the DMJM cost estimate, it would be around $4 million for grading and retaining walls to make this open space useable. So, if TIC were to provide this land as part of its park dedica instead of paying $2.5 million per acre in -lieu fees, it would save them acres x $2.5 million, or $8.5 million, less $4 million in costs to prepare the site, resulting in a $4.5 million park value for this open space site. My point is, this TIC owned open space site has value, and since it would have to be acquired by the City or OCTA, its value should be added to the $10 million project comparison differential being discussed, making this figure more like $14.5 million. I believe there would still be the requirement to replace this open space if it is utilized for the new OCTA facility, just as the City Hall in the Park Committee is being advised that park area used for the City Hall must be replaced. tex 7r2407 71ag10 -7 - #-a® CITY HALL. • NORTH OF LIBRARY • ti. I, �r _ I NEW PARK CONCEPT PLAN 0 0 A 1 A � SCN)YA"1 1 m m ' I i r 1 11 3.7 AC CITY HALL SITE L 0.31 ac 0.33 ac 0.21 ac PARKING 1.08 ac SLOPE 0.9 ac 0, l� �1' ,1 •Mt�M Y , µ.._ • \ \ • S.K. R , ..�'YbM1 MIl'L/Ja 1 -- - - - - -- PARK AREAS REMOVED-+011 CITY HALL SITE 0 OPEN SPACE COMPARISON PARK LOSS PED USABLE Grass 0.27 ac Amphitheater 0.21 ac NO PED ACCESS Grnd. Cover 0.48 ac Slope Plants 1.69 ac PARKING Library 1.08 ac TOTAL 3.73 ac CITY HALL PLAN Plaza Area 0.90 ac Roof Observation Deck 0.2 to 0.7 ac Landscaping 0.3 ac TOTAL 1.4 to 1.9 ac 11