HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS3 - White Sea Bass HatcheryMeeting Date: January 24, 2006
Study Session Item No.: SS3
Subject: WHITE SEA BASS HATCHERY -
ISSUANCE OF NEW PERMIT
WITH CONDITIONS AND
MOVEMENT OF THE FACILITY.
Please refer to Agenda Item No. 21 on the Regular Meeting
Agenda for the staff report.
Thank you!
MnFii!MM
Resources
Division
Agenda Item No. SS3
January 24, 2006
White Sea Bass Hatchery -
Issuance of New Permit with Conditions
Location for the Facility
Newport Beach City Council
Study Session
January 24, 2006
1
Background
• DF &G and Hubbs Sea World funds program.
• 30,000 fish released in Newport, 1 million
released in So. Cal via the 12 other hatcheries
• Success of program depends on the fish
heads being returned and scanned for ID tags
• More years needed to measure true success
• 1993 Permit treated loosely and formal
conditions not applied
• Problems have occurred over the years:
• Lack of maintenance
• Sea lions invading hatchery and
surrounding vessels
Issue
• Harbor Resources cancelled the permit for
mooring #A -174 which is occupied by the Balboa
Angling Club (BAC) who manages the Hatchery.
• Harbor Commission has reviewed a new permit
for the BAC and recommended that the Council
consider the permit conditions & locations and
approve the permit.
• Staff believes Council (not HC or staff) should
issue the permit given the Council approved the
permit in 1993.
2
Mooring Permit Special Conditions
CSCITY OF YBNPORT BEACH
ldaaBOr Raaurees Buvision
829 Habow Bled �v�e
Nexpowf Btuh, CA928d0
M 00RING P ERM IT SPECIAL CONDITIONS
11de: Inlay 15, 2006
To: Bobo% Atagliag Cbub
Re: Specid Cmdiims of a bdoahg Pevmito Operde the Whte Sea Bass
W=arwm Facllig in Hevpat Hmbor
I . The Pubc Ha dwries Eldnr¢wwrd Pcodrm Whim Sva Bass Pem(F'uili[y)
shall be fmW auhmd w a mwowingfm and A n such x mvmer to prevat
IN bap from- rAgMg'=aIg m &tm
1. The vveW,gmaud tukh, ands omg Hrs droll be sired pc the Cbdn e
200218 adopted by Ike Newpon Beall Ctty Cmm11
3. TM weiSkd., ad t.& h, aam opg hxus 4WD b. W d rod 4137. asvttr ad
irspmed evcy 0.w yeas by t hr d mama ccsawm ipcialimg m
ntawiagmaiftn .t tudwepeved as necessary to ussse i is ingood condkim.
Me enwaadow shall catfytha reailfs, mnvmmg,to the Habaw Reswnees
U-6--
4. The mowhvgbwyduh be pandA %v*h he appropdae v hate past sbow dw
wanliu &A epprooY vaibWft p4 Wow we Waal x ad the mamben
%&Mdto the moorunby the Haber Pwo of ldmaga, dab be pasted m
back levers a It art tkoee suhes n kW. The leans shall be nnvdaved ena
lepbh omidalm a aal s.
3. Muspemaa shallbe a namlalamnnblepemiitthtx ybec 11edby
Haber PAsowu based m aormw of the Fuilm/s n mdlnn'nab �*
auiyaenmmeStieews.. Cmdhjmanu }•besubivdtoel!u�svP°<.1�M1
aawwal rawwal
6. The buffs fortke detennnaianw as follows: fm udsite
sea bass ue niml in the ma-ivgpew &&g tlx pnvio ' cderudayaa,ihmthe
mocvnlgpmak n.an be rmiewed
7. Thebuef9sthdoalrnv and wntewae.wre dttmmnurlmwitih esealbvsl:
(v) tlw peemkln—A keep a Pog ofuedly hig4etamte ofehe Fuihryto
dda fmae hu btw avp sn bmhaa v= ads pkIW; fhalmYi err
notedthm der lagshaB dsktruau eae4awestekmwstop thehwYnas. (b)the
pamittee slrll also note milt logffie nesuks of aviul tspecti ofmch
canponaxtdihe Fuiity frufrdigbav .nd.laniedto Pnteig, gees, teak and
fxvefabwods' buoys, b wf „ „� lhus,dix neemrys,nuwrf covt<e and
eB egdptaat and bow seared trmommd Mahe deck. (c) Attu Ftuo=si
clw]]wda pa?pdds arar oisevd. inspv0.iata to wuxv cmaivvuss oftha
opadimi wd wasnaawce for dw solo prim un mud is 7(s) and 7(b)
above.
K If sea lion hwlommthe Fuilttykwsbem raaed by Habcw Rnowes wthe
avaW 5 Haber Pe=1 andrgxx[Ld to the pe¢a ffm, ihmthe pemiissee shall
hovel cataida days ilrom the houdcaidm m hvp—m aHdwar lMeine
FSeFeder Semite elp.v d detrttentg4enae Cr1Y.n nee fM rttakytn hs
oral rmadiim, Svvtlita 30 eekMa dyn �thv recafirtim, m Hvctivv
daaranmemm is rove nntaLedw the FuihV is rata sm td 2s w1j aal
cmdtion, thmdw permt fl allbe cmcelkd.
9. If, inane opnimofHubm Reso+aces ulkw Shai&s Habo Pdml,tmesswe
bidfecaltasma is deposed m tM Fufkq,thm*A p=Wmea sMnhm N0
ca.&M d.r^ Paesem a hhd dneasnt>nereVe 1'mw Haber Renma ,
Y'aw Hdbos R.ns a wprovvdbsd ditw4m www4va ^ plo is cwt
swbmamted w9m. 9O days dtlw appravalwntaicaicm,than du maw2w
pmnt vw» be aacelled.
18. The pwvkw yew's inpemm log skull be s¢kmkbito Hzbw Tdesoavices k)r
aPf +lM'JVwdY lS afeaexyear slut dupemth is mettect Etkww+eakky
".miE leg it •..._. h. dby Hdbw Betowcr td be e&etatiakly de>aime,
*3 du pmttf 4"In cw olkd.
11. Htba Ramat n mty detmnme Ew waft apptap kU loetion in Hewpat DW
to anocm due Facdtymdway nquestdw p—*-e to moat tlw Fwilfytmthe
locdt upmoamdpmntramwal ,athepermtte'selpeme.
12. The FacifXydunpost&mdslgeu mthe lowapmtkwofthe pextw6r
fence the nre,tWb vesseitk ups, chew dam sdvte uesscls, byardes Mdae
G Ry ee`, l:ewpast 77v rh ”
13. Tfwpumssw ch% UbengWndtop sVtlurm=dwdmFu=gacnnl
rrnormgpemitie u edopudbyilw City Comelsnthe sumdn sur Ce
stud de.
i gym: Rc>:adll�., }Ed!•;r Fxzonates
Salbae Anglieg CFilb,hesiekM.
Dee Ennved
Alex Suaios,Bdbaa Wong Club, Boad
Ealboa Angli gClub, SvueWy
3
Optimal Facility Locations
Harbor
Resources
Division
Al
Lc
"A„
Newport
Blvd.
Bridge
"ill
Mooring
Area
Alternate Locations
Considered
r
Coast Hwy
Bridge
«C„
Mooring
Area
"A" Row 30
r
"A" Row 17
Fish and
Game
Entrance
Channel
5
:M.M
White Sea Bass Hatchery
Resources Harbor Commission and Staff
Division
Recommendation:
1. Approve a proposed new mooring permit
(with special conditions) for the Balboa
Angling Club to operate the White Sea Bass
Hatchery in Newport Harbor; and
2. Pick either Al7 or end of A30 for the
permitted location.
0
2 MOM
For More Information
Harbor Resources
Resources
Division
Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Supervisor
(949) 644 -3043
cmilleri. city. newport- beach. ca. us
Tom Rossmiller, Harbor Resources Manager
(949) 644 -3041
trossmiller(a� city, ne
htta :.
.citv.ne
beach. ca. us
rt -beach
Harbor Commission, Agenda / Minutes
'W ri
'r�Ja
�r. .r.
Cons
• Location opposed by some
peninsula residents
• Could be closer to Angling Club
to be better managed
Existing Location
"A" Mooring,
Row 17
0
Pros
ting
F-
Positioned here since 1993
ocZ atio n
.
Circulation & depth excellent
Survivability of fingerlings
' Y
excellent (proven)
• Public is used to a barge at this
location
• Not occupying an existing
�a�Xjl -r,-
mooring location
'way'�ff•
Easily accessible
Close enough to Angling Club to
be managed
• Previously approved by
Tidelands Affairs Committee,
City Manager and Attorney
• View from BI is 1,300' away
• Size and scale of pens easily
blends with the surrounding area
and vessels
0
r
� .63
R.
• Near other houses on the Cons
island and the peninsula
• May interfere with future "A"
plans (see following slide)
• "Target" — Mooring buoy hit
many times by vessels queuing
for fuel dock
CHn NNEL
`;
• May present problems with
restocking vessel
• Existing vessel(s) will be
displaced
• Channel width is smaller and
affects size a scale of area
• Area is a sea lion "hot spot'
"A" Mooring
Area, Row 30
Pros
• Closer to Angling Club
• Easily accessible
• Very close to Angling
Club to be best managed
Public Comments
• Closer to the commercial
area (Fun Zone)
• May be a "dangerous"
location
• Could be lit in a tasteful
way to avoid being a
target
0
M noFT .MM
Resources
Division
Proposed New Boundaries for
"A" Mooring Area
— �— - - -
10
i y � A 4 ��
Y j '� k w
.0
w
� f
Cons
• Area is impacted. May be
difficult to relocate displaced
vessel.
• Near other houses
• Many small vessels in "C"
area
1�.
• If assertion that barge
attracts sea lions is true, then
many additional vessels may
be subject to haul -out
problems
9
"C" Mooring
Area
Pros
• Close to future Nautical
Museum for possible
educational programs
• Easily accessible
• Close to Angling Club
11
X
vp�'
Ma6naoark
Cons
• Area is impacted. May be
difficult to relocate displaced
vessel. Overcrowding already
exists in "J" area.
• Near houses at Lido Peninsula,
Lido Isle & Peninsula.
• Water circulation not ideal.
y,
�� `,_a
" M M
Batt , }
'vihter oo9e
Aug
• Commercial vessel
overload backlash from
nearby residents
"J" Mooring
Area
Pros
• Most commercial vessels
are located in "J"
• Other barges in area
• Bait Barge relocates here
during the winter
Public Comments
• If positioned in the center
of "J ", then it would be
-200 yards from
residences.
12
z9
Lido Marina
Village
Cons
• Water circulation is poor
• Depth questionable
• May collect debris from bridge
• Blocks 20% of channel
• Prone to vandalism
• Survivability of fingerlings questionable
I
!.s
Newport
Blvd, Bridge
Pros
• No houses impacted
• Discreet location
13
~, ,� Coast Hwy.
M � �
_jr. 4% "a
� � 1
• Strong storm surge Cons Impact outrigger canoe
• Strong turbidity launching
• Survivability of fingerlings • Near Bay Shores residences
questionable • Blocks portion of channel
• Depth is questionable • Upland property ownership
• Prone to vandalism and right to waterfront needs
• May collect debris from bridge further evaluation
Bridge
Pros
• Discreet location
Public Comments
• Could it be positioned on
the other side of the
channel closer to
Swales?
14
Cons
• F &G will not allow hatchery
at their facility
• Near Dover Shores
• Depth questionable
• Circulation very poor
• Strong turbidity
• Strong storm surge
• Survivability of fingerlings
questionable
• Remote location
Fish &Game
(Upper Bay)
15
Cons
• Strong tidal currents
• Strong winter storm surge /
swell
• Pens may sustain damage
• Survivability of fingerlings
questionable
• Near houses
F
r.
.r: Entrance
Channel
CDM
Beach
Bait
Barge
April thrL
Nov.)
• If seasonal, needs to be
relocated elsewhere
during winter
Pros
• Could be seasonal or
permanent
• Near existing bait barge
• Public is used to seeing
a barge at this location
16
Salmon Farms
Just as modern dairy, veal, and poultry farms raise animals in crowded confined spaces
that breed disease and create excessive waste, so it is for farmed salmon raised in tightly
packed pens or nets. Other fish that inhabit the same waters are suffering from an
inundation of excessive fecal matter, dead fish, and drugs. (1,2)
i
7 *4)/4/Q1"
9 ,
"A wide body of literature documents raised levels of organic matter underneath cage
operations (Beveridge, 1996), which change the chemical and biological structure of the
sediment. Effects reported from salmon- farming include a dead zone under pens in severe
cases, surrounded by a ring of decreased animal diversity. Impacts can extend roughly
500 feet (150 m) from the site (Beveridge, 1996), although 100 feet (30 m) is a more
usual limit (EAO, 1998)."
Goldburg, R. et al. (2001). Marine aquaculture in the United States: Environmental
Impacts and Policy Options. Pew Ocean Commission, p. 13.
Nutrient loading from aquaculture can be significant on a local scale. A salmon farm of
200,000 fish releases an amount of nitrogen, phosphorus, and fecal matter roughly
equivalent to the nutrient waste in the untreated sewage from 20,000, 25,000, and 65,000
people, respectively (Hardy, 2000b)."
-- Goldburg, R. et al. (2001). Marine aquaculture in the United States: Environmental
Impacts and Policy Options. Pew Ocean Commission, p. 13.