HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS2 - Measure MMeasure M Investment 'Plan Update
• Approved in November 1990 by 55 percent after
two failures
• One -half cent local transportation sales tax
• Specific, voter - approved spending plan
• 20 -year program ends on April 1, 2011
• Renewable with two - thirds majority voter
approval
l
Measure M: A Contract Fulfilled
Projects
1 -511 -405 Widening
SR-55
SR-57
SR -91
P.E. ROW Purchase
Metrolink OC to LA
Metrolink Riverside to OC'
Fare'Stabilization
Transitways
-oval "Turnback"
2
it North
Transit
Completed Underway
$15.6 million Won in competition for
major street improvements
+$ 11.2 million Newport Beach local street
maintenance
million Exclusively for Newport Beach
Street Improvement Highlights:
MacArthur, Newport, Jamboree, Pacific Coast Highway
• $1 billion less invested streets and roads
• 1 -5 would be 6 lanes wide north of Tustin
• No El Toro KY" improvements
• No widening of the SR -55, SR -91, SR -57 or
SR -22
• No Metrolink rail service
• No rail rights -of -way
• Higher fares for seniors and disabled
5-
Orange County Future Growth 2000 =2030
39%
"Self -Help" Counties
Ci> Why Renew Measure M Now?
Transportation Investment Plan Approval:
1. Majority of city councils representing
majority of incorporated population
2. Board of Supervisors
3. Two - thirds of OCTA Board
Plus:
Two- thirds majority voter approval
• 30 -year duration
$11.86 billion expected revenue*
• 43 percent Freeways ($4.8 billion)
• 32 percent Streets & Roads ($3.6 billion)
• 25 percent Transit ($2.8 billion)
Taxpayer safeguards emphasized
* In 2005 Dollars
ICI
I
Nina
Point
San dements
--A
rn
1.
$1.5 billion to improve the SR-91
2.
More than $1 billion to improve 1-5
in South Orange County
Widen 1-405 from Irvine to LA
g!�7
"nty
101 453,010 NX-4
"FIR VIRIM-126
aw SO
,w a, MV
A
Fix 'Orange Crush and I-5/SR-55
,,interchanges
Q,
5.
Aftfid"'Skm'55, SR-57 and improve
access to SR-22 and 1-605
I
Nina
Point
San dements
--A
rn
1. More than doubles funds
for local streets
I
1.2
Comparison of current Measure M
Turnback funds* (formula) with
draft plan.
f
* In 2005 dollars
• Increased percentage of local turnback funds
• Eligible projects
. PCH between Dover and Newport Blvd.
. MacArthur and Jamboree intersection
. Bristol couplet areas and SR -73 ramps
. Newport Blvd. from PCH to SR -55
• Water quality
• Local coastal transit
• Increased mobility for seniors and disabled
* Based on letter dated March 14, 2006 from Newport Beach
F Metrolink
)- thirds of jobs &
ations, parking, safety
isions
ate with best projects
not defined
,ays for high -speed rail
services
transit
ow fares
iior mobility program
i- emergency medical
Dn
PV
1. Nearly $240 million
exclusively for
transportation- related water
quality improvements
grant process
is made by
y of Orange,
ewer agencies
wards and audit
3
M kM
Draft Plan Highlights: Safeguards & Audits
Next Steps
y.
h
Measure M Promises Fulfilled
to maintaining and improving the network of streets
On November 6, 1990, Orange County voters ap-
and roads in every community; an expansion of
proved Measure M, a half -cent local transportation
Metrolink rail service through the core of Orange
sales tax for twenty years. All of the major projects
County with future extensions to connect with
promised to and approved by the voters are under-
nearby communities and regional rail systems; more
way or complete. Funds that go to cities and the
transit service for seniors and disabled persons; and
County of Orange to maintain and improve local
funds to clean up runoff from roads that leads to
street and roads, along with transit fare reductions
beach closures.
for seniors and persons with disabilities will continue
until Measure M ends in 2011. The promises made
Strong Safeguards
in Measure M have been fulfilled.
These commitments are underscored by a set of
strong taxpayer safeguards to ensure that promises
Continued Investment Needed
made in the Plan are kept. They include an annual
Orange County continues to grow. By the year 2030,
independent audit and report to the Taxpayers" on-
Orange County's population will increase by 24 per-
going monitoring and review of spending by an in-
cent from 2.9 million in 2000 to 3.6 million in 2030;
dependent Taxpayers' Oversight Committee; require -
jobs will increase by 27 percent; and travel on our
ment for full public review and update of the Plan
roads and highways by 39 percent. Without contin-
every ten years; voter approval for any major changes
ued investment average morning rush hour speeds
to the Plan; strong penalties for any misuse of funds
on Orange County freeways will fall by 31 percent
and a strict limit of no more than one percent for
and on major streets by 32 percent.
administrative expenses.
Responding to this continued growth and broad
No Increase in Taxes
support for investment in Orange County's trans-
The traffic improvements detailed in this plan do not
portation system, the Orange County Transportation
require an increase in taxes. Renewal of the existing
Authority considered the transportation projects
Measure M one -half cent transportation sales tax will
and programs that would be possible if Measure M
enable all of the projects and programs to be imple-
were renewed. The Authority, together with the 34
mented. And by using good planning and sensible
cities of Orange County, the Orange County Board
financing, projects that are ready to go could begin as
of Supervisors and thousands of Orange County
early as 2007.
citizens participated during the last eighteen months
in developing a Transportation Investment Plan for
Renewing Measure M
consideration by the voters.
The projects and programs that follow constitute the
Transportation Investment Plan for the renewal of
A Plan for New Transportation Investments
the Measure M transportation sales tax approved by
The Plan that follows is a result of those efforts. It
Orange County voters in November of 1990. These
reflects the varied interests and priorities inherent
improvements are necessary to address current and
in the diverse communities of Orange County. It in-
future transportation needs in Orange County and
cludes continued investment to expand and improve
reflect the best efforts to achieve consensus among
Orange County's freeway system; commitment
varied interests and communities throughout the
County.
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan is a 30 -year, $11.8 billion program designed to
reduce traffic congestion, strengthen our economy
and improve our quality of life by upgrading
key freeways, fixing major freeway interchanges,
maintaining streets and roads, synchronizing traffic
signals countywide, building a visionary rail transit
system, and protecting our environment from the
oily street runoff that pollutes Orange County
beaches. The Transportation Investment Program
is focused solely on improving the transportation
system and includes tough taxpayer safeguards,
including a Taxpayers' Oversight Committee,
required annual audits, and regular, public reports
on project progress.
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan must be reviewed annually, in public session,
and every ten years, a detailed review of the Plan
must take place. If changing circumstances require
the voter - approved plan to be changed, those
changes must be taken to the voters for approval.
Freeways
Relieving congestion on State Route 91 (the
Riverside/Artesia Freeway) is the centerpiece of the
freeway program, and will include new lanes, new
interchanges, and new bridges. Other major projects
will make substantial improvements on Interstate 5
in southern Orange County and the I -405 (San Diego
Freeway) in western Orange County. The notorious
Orange Crush, the intersection of the I -5, State Route
22 and State Route 57 near Angel Stadium, will be
improved and upgraded. Under the Plan, major
traffic chokepoints on almost every Orange County
freeway will be remedied. Improving Orange County
freeways will be the greatest investment in the
Renewed Measure M program: Forty -three percent
of net revenues, or $4.871 billion, will be invested in
new freeway construction.
Streets and Roads
More than 6,500 lane miles of aging streets and roads
will need repair, rejuvenation and improvement.
City streets and county roads need to be maintained
regularly and potholes have to be filled quickly.
Thirty -two percent of net revenue from the Renewed
Measure M Transportation Investment Plan, or
$3.625 billion, will be devoted to fixing potholes,
improving intersections, synchronizing traffic signals
countywide, and making the existing countywide
network of streets and roads safer and more efficient.
r
Public Transit
As Orange County continues to grow, building a
visionary rail transportation system that is safe,
clean and convenient, uses and preserves existing
rights -of -way, and, over time, provides high -speed
connections both inside and outside of Orange
County is a long term goal. Twenty -five percent of
the net revenue from the Renewed Measure M, or
$2.83 billion, will be dedicated to transit programs
countywide. About twenty percent, or $2.24 billion,
will be dedicated to creating a new countywide high
capacity transit system anchored on the existing,
successful Metrolink and Amtrak rail line, and about
five percent, or $591 million, will be used to enhance
senior transportation programs and provide targeted,
safe localized bus service.
Environmental Cleanup
Every day, more than 70 million gallons of oily
pollution, litter, and dirty contaminants wash off
streets, roads, and freeways and pour on to Orange
County waterways and beaches. When it rains, the
transportation - generated beach and ocean pollution
increases tenfold. Under the plan, two percent of the
gross Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan, or $237 million, will be dedicated to protecting
Orange County beaches from this transportation -
generated pollution (sometimes called "urban
runoff') while improving ocean water quality.
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
When new transportation dollars are approved,
they should go for transportation and transportation
purposes alone. No bait - and - switch. No using
transportation dollars for other purposes. The
original Measure M went solely for transportation
purposes. The Renewed Measure M must be just
as airtight. One percent of the gross Measure M
A
program, or $118.6 million over 30 years, will pay
for annual, independent audits, taxpayer safeguards,
an independent Taxpayers' Oversight Committee
assigned to watchdog government spending, and
a full, public disclosure of all Renewed Measure M
expenditures. A detailed review of the program must
be conducted every ten years and, if needed, major
changes in the investment plan must be brought
before Orange County voters for approval. Taxpayers
will receive an annual report detailing the Renewed
Measure M expenditures. Additionally, as required by
law, an estimated one and a half percent of the sales
taxes generated, or $178 million over 30 years, must
be paid to the California State Board of Equalization
for collecting the one -half cent sales tax that funds
the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan.
In this pamphlet, every specific project, program,
and safeguard included in the Renewed Measure M
Transportation Investment Plan is explained. Similar
details will be provided to every Orange County
voter if the measure is placed on the ballot.
Every day, traffic backs up somewhere on the Orange To make any freeway system work, bottlenecks at
County freeway system. And, every day, freeway traf- interchanges also have to be fixed. The notorious
fic seems to get a little worse.
Orange Crush Interchange — where Interstate 5
(the Santa Ana Freeway) meets the 57 (the Orange
In the past decade, Orange County has made major
Freeway) and the 22 (the Garden Grove Freeway)
strides in re- building our aging freeway system. But
in a traffic tangle near Angel Stadium is in need of a
there is still an enormous amount of work that needs
major face lift. And the intersection of Interstate 5
to be done to make the freeway system work well.
and the Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) is also
You see the need for improvement every time you
slated for major repair.
drive on an Orange County freeway.
Pays Big Dividends
Forty -three percent of net revenues from the Re-
Local investment in freeways also pays big divi-
newed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan
dends in the search for other needed freeway dollars.
are dedicated to improving Orange County freeways,
Because of state and federal matching rules, Orange
the largest portion of the 30 -year transportation plan.
County's local investment in freeway projects acts as
a magnet for state and federal transportation dollars
SR -91 is the Centerpiece
— pulling more freeway construction dollars into the
Making the troubled SR -91 (the Riverside /Artesia)
county and allowing more traffic - reducing freeway
Freeway work again is the centerpiece of the Re-
projects to be built sooner.
newed Measure M Freeway program. The fix on the
91 will require new lanes, new bridges, new over-
passes, and, in the Santa Ana Canyon portion of the
freeway, a diversion of drivers to SR -241 (Foothill
Corridor) so the rest of the Orange County freeway
system can work more effectively.
And there's more to the freeway program than the
fix of SR -91 — much more. More than $1 billion is
earmarked for Interstate 5 in South County More
than $800 million is slated to upgrade the 405
(the San Diego Freeway) between Irvine and the Los
Angeles County line. Another significant investment
is planned on the congested Costa Mesa Freeway
(SR- 55). And needed projects designed to relieve
traffic chokepoints are planned for almost every
Orange County freeway
r
n
Project Aft
Orange Freeway (SR -57) Improvements
Description:
Build a new northbound lane between Katella
Avenue and Lambert Road. Other projects include
improvements to the Lambert interchange and
addition of a northbound truck climbing lane
between Lambert and Tonner Canyon Road. These
improvements will be made generally within existing
right -of -way
The project will increase freeway capacity and reduce
congestion. The daily traffic volume on this freeway
is about 315,000. By 2030, this volume will increase
by 15 percent, bringing it up to 363,000 vehicles per
day
Cost:
The estimated cost to implement SR -57
improvements is $258.7 million.
M W
l W
-%
W
s, Y=
Project UP
1 -605 Freeway Access Improvements
at Katella Avenue
Description:
Construct interchange improvements at Katella
Avenue to improve freeway and arterial system
connections in the Los Alamitos area.
Cost:
The estimated cost to make these 1 -605 interchange
improvements is $20.0 million.
Project
Freeway Service Patrol
Description:
The Freeway Service Patrol (FSP) provides tow truck
service for disabled motorists on the freeway system.
This service helps stranded motorists and quickly
clears disabled vehicles out of the freeway lanes to
minimize congestion from rubbernecking.
Cost:
The estimated cost to support the Freeway Service
Patrol Program for thirty years beyond 2011 is
$150.0 million.
r•al
��M
Orange County has more than 6,500 lane miles of
aging streets and roads many of which are in need
of repair, rejuvenation and improvement. Intersec-
tions need to be widened, traffic lights need to be
synchronized, and potholes need to be filled. And, in
many cases, to make Orange County's transportation
system work smoothly, we need to add additional
lanes to existing streets.
Thirty -two percent of net revenues from the Re-
newed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan
are dedicated to the maintaining streets, fixing
potholes, improving intersections and widening city
streets and county roads.
Making the System Work
Making the existing system of streets and roads work
better — by identifying spot intersection improve -
mems, filling potholes, repaving worn -out streets
— are the basics of making a countywide transporta-
tion system work. Those basics have to be the first
priority. But to operate a successful, countywide sys-
tem of streets and roads, we need more: street widen -
ings and traffic signals synchronized on a countywide
basis. And there's more: pedestrian safety near local
schools needs to be improved. Traffic flow must be
smoothed. Street repairs must be made sooner. And,
perhaps most importantly, cities and the county must
work together —collaboratively —to find simple, low -
cost traffic solutions.
r
U
Renewed Measure M provides financial incentives for
traffic improvements that cross city and county lines,
providing a seamless, county -wide transportation
system that's friendly to regional commuters and fair
to local residents.
Better Cooperation
To place a higher priority on cooperative, collabora-
tive regional decision - making, Renewed Measure M
creates incentives that encourage traffic lights to be
coordinated across jurisdictional lines, major street
improvements to be better coordinated on a regional
basis, and street repair programs to be a high priority
countywide. To receive Measure M funding, cities
and the county have to cooperate.
The Streets and Roads program in Renewed Measure
M involves shared responsibilities — local cities and
the county set their local priorities within a competi-
tive, regional framework that rewards cooperation,
honors best practices, and encourages government
agencies to work together.
AML
Project •
Regional Capacity Program
Description:
This program, in combination with local matching
funds, provides a funding source to complete the
Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways
(MPAH). The program also provides for intersection
improvements and other projects to help improve
street operations and reduce congestion. The
program allocates funds through a competitive
process and targets projects that help traffic the most
by considering factors such as degree of congestion
relief, cost effectiveness, project readiness, etc.
Roughly 1,000 miles of new street lanes remain to be
completed, mostly in the form of widening existing
streets to their ultimate planned width. Completion
of the system will result in a more even traffic flow
and efficient system.
Ile
Another element of this program is funding for
construction of railroad over or underpass grade
separations where high volume streets are impacted
by freight trains along the Burlington Northern Santa
Fe railroad in northern Orange County.
Cost:
The estimated cost for these street improvement
projects is $1,132.8 million.
Project Aft
Synchronize Traffic Signals Across ] urisdictions
Description:
This program targets over 2,000 signalized
intersections across the County for coordinated
operation. The goal is to improve the flow of traffic
by developing and implementing regional signal
coordination programs that cross jurisdictional
boundaries.
Most traffic signal synchronization programs today
are limited to segments of roads or individual cities
and agencies. For example, signals at intersections
of freeways with arterial streets are controlled
by Caltrans, while nearby signals at local street
intersections are under the control of cities. This
results in the street system operating at less than
maximum efficiency When completed, this project
can increase the capacity of the street grid and reduce
the delay by over six million hours annually.
To ensure that this program is successful, cities, the
County of Orange and Caltrans will be required to
work together and prepare a common traffic signal
synchronization plan before receiving funds. In
addition, cities will be required to provide 20 percent
of the costs. Once in place, the program will provide
funding for ongoing maintenance and operation of
the synchronization plan. Local jurisdictions will be
required to publicly report on the performance of
their signal synchronization efforts every three years.
Cost:
The estimated cost of developing and maintaining a
regional traffic signal synchronization program for
Orange County is $453.1 million.
pg
� rtea`
Project 0
Flexible Local Funding Program
Description:
This element of the program will provide flexible
funding to help cities and the County of Orange
keep up with the rising cost of repairing the aging
street system. In addition, cities can use these funds
for other local transportation needs such residential
street projects, traffic and pedestrian safety near
schools, etc.
This program is intended to augment, rather than
replace, existing transportation expenditures and
therefore cities must meet the following requirements
to receive the funds.
1. Continue to invest General Fund monies
(or other local discretionary monies) for
transportation and annually increase this
commitment to keep pace with inflation.
2. Agree to use Measure M funds for transportation
purposes only, subject to full repayment and a
loss of funding eligibility for five years for any
misuse.
3. Agree to separate accounting for Measure M
funds and annual reporting on actual Measure M
expenditures.
4. Develop and maintain a Pavement Management
Program to ensure timely street maintenance and
submit regular public reports on the condition
of streets.
rigA772,
5. Annually submit a five -year Capital
Improvement Program and commit to spend
Measure M funds within three years of receipt.
6. Agree to assess traffic impacts of new
development and require that new development
pay a fair share of any necessary transportation
improvements.
7. Agree to plan, build and operate major streets
consistent with the countywide Master Plan of
Arterial Highways to ensure efficient traffic flow
across city boundaries.
8. Agree to participate in the Traffic Signal
Synchronization Program to implement and
maintain effective signal synchronization. This
requires cities to balance local traffic policies
with neighboring cities - for selected streets - to
promote more efficient traffic circulation overall.
9. Agree to consider land use planning strategies
that are transit - friendly, support alternative
transportation modes including bike and
pedestrian access and reduce reliance on the
automobile.
The funds under this program are distributed to
cities and the County of Orange by formula once
the cities have fulfilled the above requirements.
The formula will account for population, street
mileage and amount of sales tax collected in each
jurisdiction.
Cost:
The estimated cost for this program for thirty years is
$2,039.1 million.
Building streets, roads and freeways helps fix today's
traffic problems. Building a visionary rail system
that is safe, clean and convenient focuses on Orange
County's transportation future.
Twenty -five percent of net revenues from the Re-
newed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan
are allocated towards building and improving rail
and bus transportation in Orange County. Approxi-
mately twenty percent of the Renewed Measure M
funds are allocated to developing a creative county-
wide rail program and five percent of the revenues
will be used to enhance programs for senior citizens
and for targeted, localized bus service. All transit
expenditures must be consistent with the safeguards
and audit provisions of the Plan.
A New Transit Vision
The key element of the Renewed Measure M rail pro-
gram is improving the 100- year -old Santa Fe rail line
through the heart of the county. Then, by using this
well - established, operational commuter rail system
as a platform for future growth, existing rail stations
will be developed into regional transportation hubs
that can serve as regional transportation gateways or
the centerpiece of local transportation services. A se-
ries of new, well- coordinated, flexible transportation
systems, each one customized to the unique trans-
portation vision the station serves, will be developed.
Creativity and good financial sense will be encour-
aged. Partnerships will be promoted. Transportation
solutions for each transportation hub can range from
monorails to local mini -bus systems to new tech-
nologies. Fresh thinking will be rewarded.
The new, localized rail programs will bring compe-
tition to local transportation planning, creating a
marketplace of transportation ideas where the best
ideas emerge and compete for funding. The plan is
to encourage civic entrepreneurship and stimulate
private involvement and investment.
Selection Criteria
Each local rail vision will be carefully evaluated on
well - defined, well -known criteria that values:
• Traffic congestion relief;
• Project readiness, with priority given to projects
that can be implemented within the first five
years of the Plan;
• Local funding commitments and the availability
of right -of -way;
• Proven ability to attract other financial partners,
both public and private;
• Proximity to jobs and population centers;
• Regional as well as local benefits;
• Ease and simplicity of connections;
• Compatible, approved land uses;
• Modern technology; and
• A sound, long term operating plan
In terms of bus services, more specialized transit ser-
vices, including improved van services and reduced
fares for senior citizens and people with disabilities,
will be provided. Safety at key bus stops will be
improved. And a network of community- based,
mini -bus services will be developed in areas outside
of the central county rail corridor.
t�
{
Project
High Frequency Metrolink Service
Description:
This project will increase rail services within the
county and provide frequent Metrolink service north
of Fullerton to Los Angeles. The project will provide
for track improvements, more trains, and other
related needs to accommodate the expanded service.
This project is designed to build on the successes of
Metrolink and complement service expansion made
possible by the current Measure M. The service
will include upgraded stations and parking; safety
improvements and quiet zones along the tracks; and
frequent shuttle service and other means, to move
arriving passengers to nearby destinations.
The project also includes funding for improving
grade crossings and constructing over or underpasses
at high volume arterial streets that cross the
Metrolink tracks.
Cost
The estimated cost of capital and operations is
$1,014.1 million.
Project
High Capacity Transit Extensions to Metrolink
Description:
Frequent service in the Metrolink corridor provides
a high capacity transit system linking communities
within the central core of Orange County. This
project will establish a competitive program for local
jurisdictions to broaden the reach of the rail system
to other activity centers and communities. Proposals
for extensions will be evaluated against clear
criteria such as congestion relief, project readiness,
local funding commitment, private investment,
connectivity, compatible land uses, proven
technology and a sound operating plan.
These connections may include a variety of transit
technologies such as conventional bus, bus rapid
transit or high capacity rail transit systems as long
as they can be fully integrated and provide seamless
transition for the users.
Cost:
The estimated cost to implement this program over
thirty years is $1,000.0 million.
w
I
Project Air
Convert Metrolink Station(s) to Regional Gateways
that Connect Orange County with Nigh Speed Rail
Systems
Description:
This program will provide the local improvements
that are necessary to connect planned future high
speed rail systems to stations on the Orange County
Metrolink route.
The State of California is currently planning a high
speed rail system linking northern and southern
California. One line is planned to terminate in
Orange County In addition, several magnetic
levitation (MAGLEV) systems that would connect
Orange County to Los Angeles and San Bernardino
Counties are also being planned or proposed by
other agencies.
Cost:
The estimated Measure M share of the cost for these
regional centers and connections is $226.6 million.
wly
Amk
Project
Expand Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons
with Disabilities
Description:
This project will provide services and programs to
meet the growing transportation needs of seniors and
persons with disabilities. This includes fare discounts
for bus services, specialized ACCESS services and
future rail services.
One percent of net revenues will be available to
continue and expand local community van service
for seniors through the existing Senior Mobility
Program. Another one percent will supplement
existing countywide senior non - emergency medical
transportation services.
Over the next 30 years, the population age 65 and
over is projected to increase by 93 percent. Demand
for transit and specialized transportation services for
seniors and persons with disabilities is expected to
increase proportionately.
Cost:
The estimated cost to provide these programs over
30 years is $339.8 million.
Every day, more than 70 million gallons of oily
The environmental cleanup program is designed to
pollution, litter, and dirty contamination washes off
supplement, not supplant, existing transportation-
streets, roads and freeways and pours on to Orange
related water quality programs. This clean -up
County waterways and beaches. When it rains,
program must improve, and not replace, existing
the transportation - generated pollution increases
pollution reduction efforts by cities, the county,
tenfold, contributing to the increasing number of
and special districts. Funds will be awarded to the
beach closures and environmental hazards along the
highest priority programs that improve water quality,
Orange County coast.
keep our beaches and streets clean, and reduce
transportation - generated pollution along Orange
Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and
County's scenic coastline.
transit projects, two percent of gross revenues from
the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan are set aside to protect Orange County beaches
from transportation - generated pollution (sometimes
called "urban runoff') and improving ocean water
quality.
Countywide Competitive Program
Measure M Environmental Cleanup funds will be
used on a countywide, competitive basis to meet
federal Clean Water Act standards for controlling
transportation - generated pollution by funding
nationally recognized Best Management Practices,
including:
• Catch basins and state -of- the -art biofiltration
systems;
• Special roadside landscaping systems called
bioswales that filter oil runoff from streets, roads
and freeways;
• Environmentally - sensitive street cleaning
programs.
0M
Project
Environmental Cleanup
Description:
Implement street and highway related water quality
improvement programs and projects that will assist
Orange County cities, the County of Orange and
special districts to meet federal Clean Water Act
standards for urban runoff.
The Environmental Cleanup monies may be used for
water quality improvements related to both existing
and new transportation infrastructure, including
capital and operations improvements such as:
• Catch basin screens, filters and inserts
• Roadside bioswales and biofiltration channels
• Continuous Deflective Separation (CDS) units
• Maintenance of catch basins and bioswales
• Other street-related "Best Management Practices"
for capturing and treating urban runoff
This program is intended to augment, not replace
existing transportation related water quality
expenditures and to emphasize high- impact capital
improvements over local operations and maintenance
costs. In addition, all new freeway, street and transit
capital projects will include water quality mitigation
as part of project scope and cost.
The Environmental Cleanup program is subject to
the following requirements:
• Development of a comprehensive countywide
capital improvement program for transportation
related water quality improvements.
• A competitive grant process to award funds to
the highest priority, most cost - effective projects.
• A matching requirement to leverage other
federal, state and local funds for water quality
improvements.
• A maintenance of effort requirement to ensure
that funds augment, not replace existing water
quality programs.
• Annual reporting on actual expenditures and
an assessment of the water quality benefits
provided.
• A strict limit on administrative costs and a
requirement to spend funds within five years of
receipt.
• Penalties for misuse of any of the Environmental
Cleanup funds.
Cost:
The estimated cost for the Environmental Cleanup
program is $237.2 million. In addition it is estimated
that new freeway, road and transit projects funded by
the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
Plan will include more than $ I65 million for
mitigating water quality impacts.
a�
F: r
When new transportation dollars are approved,
Back to the Voters
they should go for transportation and transportation
Of course, over the next 30 years, things will change.
alone. No bait - and - switch. No using transportation
Minor adjustments can be made by a 2/3 vote of the
dollars for other purposes. The original Measure M
Taxpayer Oversight Committee and a 2/3 vote of
went solely for transportation. The Renewed Measure
the Orange County Local Transportation Authority
M will be just as airtight.
Board of Directors. Major changes must be taken
back to voters for authorization. And, every ten
And there will be no hidden costs in the program.
years, and more frequently if necessary, the Orange
County Local Transportation Authority must conduct
Prior to allocation of funds for freeway, street and
a thorough examination of the Renewed Measure
transit projects, one percent of gross revenues from
M Investment Plan and determine if major changes
the Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment
should be submitted to the voters.
Plans are set aside for audits, safeguards, and
taxpayer protection. By state law, one and one half
There are other important taxpayer safeguards,
percent of the gross sales taxes generated by Measure
all designed to insure the integrity of the voter -
M must be paid to the California State Board of
authorized plans. But each is focused on one goal:
Equalization for collecting the countywide one-
guaranteeing that new transportation dollars are
half percent sales tax that funds the Transportation
devoted to solving Orange County's traffic problems
Investment Program.
and that no transportation dollars are diverted to
anything else.
Special Trust Fund
To guarantee transportation dollars are used for
transportation purposes, all funds must be kept in
a special trust fund. An independent, outside audit
of this fund will protect against cheaters who try to
use the transportation funds for purposes other than
specified transportation uses. A severe punishment
will disqualify any agency that cheats from receiving
Measure M funds for a five -year period.
The annual audits, and annual reports detailing
project progress, will be sent to Orange County
taxpayers every year and will be reviewed in public
session by a special Taxpayers' Oversight Committee
that can raise fiscal issues, ask tough questions,
and must independently certify, on an annual basis,
that transportation dollars have been spent strictly
according to the Renewed Measure M Investment
Plan.
go
Taxpayer Safeguards and Audits
Description:
Implement and maintain strict taxpayer safeguards to
ensure that the Renewed Measure M Transportation
Investment Plan is delivered as promised. Restrict
administrative costs to one percent (1 0/6) of total tax
revenues and State collection of the tax as prescribed
in state law [currently one - and - one -half (1.59'0)
percent].
Administration of the Transportation Investment Plan
and all spending is subject to the following specific
safeguards and requirements:
Oversight
• All spending is subject to an annual independent
audit.
• Spending decisions must be annually reviewed
and certified by an independent Taxpayer
Oversight Committee.
An annual report on spending and progress in
implementing the Plan must be submitted to
taxpayers.
Integrity of the Plan
• No changes to the Plan can be made without
review and approval by 2/3 vote of the
Taxpayers' Oversight Committee.
• Major changes to the Plan such as deleting
a project or shifting projects among major
spending categories (Freeways, Streets & Roads,
Transit, Environmental Cleanup) must be ratified
by a majority of voters.
The Plan must be subject at least every ten years
to public review and assessment of progress
in delivery, public support and changed
circumstances. Any significant proposed changes
to the Plan must be approved by the Taxpayer
Oversight Committee and ratified by a majority
of voters.
Fund Accounting
• All tax revenues and interest earned must be
deposited and maintained in a separate trust
fund. Local jurisdictions that receive allocations
must also maintain them in a separate fund.
• All entities receiving tax funds must report
annually on expenditures and progress in
implementing projects.
• At any time, at its discretion, the Taxpayers'
Oversight Committee may conduct independent
reviews or audits of the spending of tax funds.
• The elected Auditor /Controller of Orange
County must annually certify that spending is in
accordance with the Plan.
Spending Requirements
• Local jurisdictions receiving funds must
abide by specific eligibility and spending
requirements detailed in the Streets & Roads and
Environmental Cleanup components of the Plan.
• Funds must be used only for transportation
purposes described in the Plan. The penalty
for misspending is full repayment and loss of
funding eligibility for a period of five years.
• No funds may be used to replace private
developer funding committed to any project or
improvement.
Funds shall augment, not replace existing funds.
Every effort shall be made to maximize matching
state and federal transportation dollars.
r, NM'7
Taxpayer Oversight Committee
• The committee shall consist of eleven members
— two members from each of the five Board of
Supervisor's districts, who shall not be elected
or appointed officials —along with the elected
Auditor /Controller of Orange County.
• Members shall be recruited and screened for
expertise and experience by the Orange County
Grand Jurors Association. Members shall be
selected from the qualified pool by lottery.
• The committee shall be provided with sufficient
resources to conduct independent reviews and
audits of spending and implementation of the
Plan.
Collecting the Tax
• The State Board of Equalization shall be paid
one - and - one -half (1.5) percent of gross revenues
each fiscal year for its services in collecting sales
tax revenue as prescribed in Section 7273 of the
State's Revenue and Taxation Code.
Cost:
The estimated cost for Safeguards and Audits over
thirty years is $296.6 million.
I -5 Santa Ana Freeway Interchange Improvements
0
$470.0
I -5 Santa Ana/San Diego Freeway Improvements
W104, 0 ®'
1,185.2
SR -22 Garden Grove Freeway Access Improvements
0
120.0
SR -55 Costa Mesa Freeway Improvements
0
366.0
SR -57 Orange Freeway Improvements
258,7
SR -91 Riverside Freeway Improvements
Goo
1,481.5
I -405 San Diego Freeway Improvements
819.7
1 -605 Freeway Access Improvements at Katella Avenue
20.0
All Freeway Service Patrol
150.0
Roads Projects
Regional Capacity Program
•
32.8
Regional Traffic Signal Synchronization Program
:];2,039.1
53.1
Flexible Local Funding Program
ansit Projects (in millions)
High Frequency Metrolink Service
0
$1,014.1
High Capacity Transit Extensions to Metrolink
0
1,000.0
Metrolink Gateways to High Speed Rail Systems
0
226.6
Mobility Choices for Seniors and Persons with Disabilities
G
339.8
Community Based Transit/Circulators
0
226.5
Safe Transit Stops
vironmental Cleanup (in millions)
25.0
Cleanup Highway and Street Runoff that Pollutes Beaches
10
1 $237.2
Collect Sales Taxes (State charges required by law) I I $178.0
Oversight and Annual Audits 118.6
The Renewed Measure M Transportation Investment Plan details the traffic improvement
projects and programs that can be done if the Measure M one -half cent transportation tax
is renewed for another thirty years. We are looking for your thoughts and ideas on this
proposed Plan.
To contribute your ideas, please fill out this card on the reverse side, fold and tape shut,
attach a postage stamp and mail it no later than March 31, 2006.
ajay dwels aoeld
3JV1SOd
96B
6SWCWZ6 `dO 'aBueaO
VW4 xoe Od
ue1d;u9uals9nuJ W ainseaW :u )jV
fquuoglnV uoile}jodsuejl AlunoO eftwo
3IH3H 3dVl