Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18 - Attachment JATTACHMENT NO. J INITIAL STUDY /MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION' 'Distributed separately due to bulk. The entire document is available in the City Clerk's Office and Planning Department 1 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS EXPANSION PROJECT July 2006 %�� EXPANSION Prepared for: City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 Prepared by: PCR Services Corporation One Venture, Suite 150 Irvine, California 92618 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... ............................1 -1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ..................................................................... ............................2 -1 I. Project Location and Surrounding Area ............................... ............................... 2 -1 II. Existing Characteristics ........................................................ ............................... 2-5 III. Proposed Project ................................................................... ............................... 2 -8 IV.. Schedule .................................................................................. ...........................2 -22 V. Necessary Approvals .......................................................... ............................... 2-24 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM ....................................... ............................... 3 -1 4. EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST DETERMINATION 4-1 IAesthitics .................................................................................. ............................4 -1 II. Agricultureal Resources ........................................................... ............................4 -3 III. Air Quality ............................................................................ ............................... 4 -3 IV. Biological Resources .......................................................... ............................... 4-10 V. Cultural Resources .................................................................. ...........................4 -12 VI. Geology and Soils ................................................................... ...........................4 -15 VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials .......................................... ...........................4 -17 VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................. ...........................4 -21 IX. Land Use and Planning ....................................................... ............................... 4 -27 X. Mineral Resources .................................................................. ...........................4 -29 XI. Noise ....................................................................................... ...........................4 -30 XII. Population and Housing .......................................................... ...........................4 -37 XIII. Public Services ........................................................................ ...........................4 -38 XIV. Recreation ............................................................................... ...........................4 -39 City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July2006 Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page XV. Transportation and Circulation ........................................... ............................... 4 -40 XVI. Utilities and Service Systems .............................................. ............................... 4 -48 XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................... ............................... 4 -52 5. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM .... ............................5 -1 TECHNICAL APPENDICES: APPENDIX A. AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX B. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT APPENDIX C. PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT APPENDIX D. NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA WORKSHEETS APPENDIX E. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Project Name PCR services Corporation Page ii Client Name Daze Figure Figure 2 -1 Figure 2 -2 Figure 2 -3' Figure 2 -4 Figure 2 -5 Figure 2 -6 Figure 2 -7 Figure 2 -8 Figure 2 -9 Figure 2 -10 Figure 4 -1 LIST OF FIGURES RegionalMap ........................................................ ............................... VicinityMap ......................................................... ............................... AerialPhotograph ................................................. ............................... Existing Site Layout - OLQA ............................... ............................... Existing Site Layout - St. Mark ............................ ............................... ProposedSite Plan ................................................ ............................... NewChurch Site Plan ........................................... ............................... New Church Floor Plan ........................................ ............................... New Church Elevations ........................................ ............................... New Church Perspectives ..................................... ............................... Existing Noise Sources, Receivers, and Monitoring Positions............ Page ............ 2 -2 ............ 2 -3 ............ 2 -4 ............ 2 -6 ............ 2 -7 .......... 2 -10 .......... 2 -11 .......... 2 -12 .......... 2 -14 .......... 2 -15 .......... 4 -33 CRY of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page iii LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 2 -1 Existing Characteristics at OLQA and St. Mark ............................ ............................2 -9 Table 2 -2 Statistical Summary of Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project ................... 2 -18 Table 2 -3 School Enrollment Phasing Plan ................................................... ...........................2 -19 Table 2-4 Hours of Operation Our Lady Queen of Angels ....................... ............................... 2 -20 Table 2 -5 Construction Schedule ............................................................... ............................... 2 -23 Table 4 -1 Estimated Maximum Construction Emissions ............................ ............................... 4 -6 Table 4 -2 Operational Emissions .................................................................... ............................4 -9 Table 4 -3 Summary of Ambient Noise Measurement Data (dBA) ........... ............................... 4 -32 Table 4 -4 Projected Traffic Noise Levels From Nearby Roadways .......... ............................... 4 -34 Table 4 -5 Existing (2005) Level of Service at Study Intersection ............. ............................... 4-41 Table 4 -6 Future 2010 Level of Service at Study Intersection without Proposed Project........ 4-42 Table 4 -7 Trip Generation Summary ......................................................... ............................... 4 -43 Table 4 -8 Future 2010 Level of Service at Study Intersection with Proposed Project ............. 4 -44 City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page iv 1. INTRODUCTION /` nd POO 1. INTRODUCTION Our Lady Queen of Angels church (OLQA), located at 2046 Mar Vista Drive in the City of Newport Beach, is requesting approval for the expansion of the church and school facilities. OLQA is proposing to relocate its church to the adjacent property to the east and expand its school within its existing boundaries. The adjacent property is currently occupied by the St. Mark Presbyterian Church (St. Mark) worship and education facilities. St. Mark is currently constructing new worship and education facilities on the comer of San Joaquin Hills Road and MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed project would include land uses that are comparable to the project site's current land uses; however, a Use Permit would be required to accomplish the following: (1) allow the expansion of the school and church; (2) allow the temporary use of portable classrooms; (3) allow the new church facility to exceed the height limitation; and (4) allow for the transfer of development intensity between the two sites. This Initial Study has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as amended, to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the proposed project. The City of Newport Beach is the Lead Agency for the project under CEQA and, as such, has primary responsibility for approving the project. The Initial Study evaluates the potential environmental impacts associated with the project for each environmental category listed in the City of Newport Beach's adopted Environmental Checklist Form. Mitigation measures have been developed and outlined in this Initial Study, which will mitigate the potential effects of the project to a point where no significant effect on the environment would occur. The following annotated outline summarizes the contents of this Initial Study: Initial Study for Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project • Section 1. Introduction, provides the reader with the procedural context regarding the preparation of the Initial Study and insight into its composition. • Section 2. Project Description, provides a description of the project based on available data including background information, project location, site characteristics, schedule, and necessary approvals. • Section 3. Environmental Checklist Form, provides an issue -by -issue determination of whether the potential environmental effects of the project are considered to be Potentially Significant, Potentially Significant unless Mitigation Incorporated, Less than Significant, or No Impact. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2606 Page 1 -1 I. Introduction • Section 4. Explanation of Checklist Determination, contains the environmental analysis to support the conclusions of the Environmental Checklist Form, recommended mitigation measures, and a determination of the significance of each impact with implementation of recommended mitigation measures. • Section 5. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, lists all of the mitigation measures to be implemented as part of the project as well as the timing of each mitigation measure, the agency or party responsible for implementing it and the agency or party responsible for monitoring it's implementation. Technical Appendices for Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project • Appendix A. Air Quality Analysis Worksheets, represents the output files of the URBEMIS 2002 emissions inventory model used to calculate project- related emissions. • Appendix B. Geotechnical Engineering Report, provides preliminary information regarding the subsurface conditions at the project site as well as design parameters and recommendations for the proposed construction based on these subsurface conditions. • Appendix C. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, provides a discussion of the likelihood of past, present, or potential releases of hazardous materials on the project site. • Appendix D. Noise Measurement Data Worksheets, provides the noise measurement data taken at the project site using Larson -Davis Model 820 Type I sound level meters. • Appendix E. Traffic Analysis, describes the existing traffic conditions at the project site and identifies potential traffic and circulation impacts that may occur as a result of the proposed project. City of Nmvport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page I -2 i • 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a r 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our Lady Queen of Angels (OLQA), located at 2046 Mar Vista Drive in the City of Newport Beach, is requesting approval for the expansion of their church and school facilities. OLQA is proposing to relocate its church to the adjacent property to the east and expand its school within its existing boundaries. The adjacent property is currently occupied by the St. Mark Presbyterian Church (St. Mark) worship and education facilities. St. Mark is currently constructing new worship and education facilities on the comer of San Joaquin Hills Road and MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Newport Beach. I. PROJECT LOCATION AND SURROUNDING AREA The project site is located in the northwest area of the City of Newport Beach in Orange County, California. Newport Beach is located in the western portion of Orange County, adjacent to the cities of Costa Mesa,. Irvine, and Laguna Beach. John Wayne Airport is located approximately two and a half miles north of the project site, while the Pacific Ocean is located approximately three miles to the south. Figure 2 -1 on page 2 -2 depicts the project site in a regional context. Regional access to the project site is provided via Pacific Coast Highway 1 and the 73 Foothill Transportation Corridor located approximately two miles south, and one and a quarter mile northeast, of the project site, respectively. The project site is located within the Eastbluff community of Newport Beach and comprises two adjacent properties; the OLQA site, and the St. Mark site located east of OLQA (across Domingo Drive) at 2100 Mar Vista Drive. Figure 2 -2 on page 2 -3 depicts the project site in a local context. The project site is bound by Mar Vista Drive to the north. To the west and south, the project site is bound by Domingo Drive. Domingo Drive also curves north and bisects the project site between the OLQA and the St. Mark area of the project site. To the east, the project site is bound by Eastbluff Drive and Jamboree Road. An aerial photograph of the project site and surrounding uses is shown in Figure 2 -3 on page 2 -4. As shown on Figure 2 -3, Corona Del Mar High School is located north of the project site, directly north of Mar Vista Drive. Single - family residences (Bluffs) and multi- family residences (Eastbluff Apartments and Villa Granada) and are located to the west and south of the project site, respectively, beyond Domingo Drive. To the east, the project site is bound by Eastbluff Drive and Jamboree Road, beyond which are single - family residences (Eastbluff and Big Canyon). Multi - family residences directly abut the St. Mark portion of the project site to the south. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -1 Whittier L.0 ANGEL S Chino o OUNTY o i— • —• —•— — • - - - -k1 Norco talk % \ — J o % Fullerton \ RIVER I D E i i ° \ CO / Anaheim o ° \ Coro 1 ORAN E \ j C 0 U N Y \ PROJECT SITE \ \ _ '1 \ CLEVELAND NATIaTdAL,. Costa o FOREST Huntington Be Mesa Irvine o Newport Beach o Toro Laguna Bed Dana Poi t f• -- — Pacific Ocean r �" San Clemen Figure 2 -1 0 5 10 Miles Regional Map Source: PCR Services Cory ratm. 7005. SEE A 81 4 FOR U 3 LDU� 4 F901" A N I, VIS 6 FAIJUFUUI, A sT Is SUER STA ' CR4 /P\ _11PROJECT SITE a A IS W- ORO �CLL NEMPOR, P ■ VIS7-A 84Y AEhPURr M uc DYER ■ AXTS A53mr 2 NnImzt w 3 �u PCR BYArr VIW7FR ■ PS �nAb V Ids ■ Ll w"forr ■ hVM AfWmr BFAOV COWRY COLS FAJW,,aV*q Ismw 8ZG C4WW 0 800 1600 3200 Feet Sou" PCR Services Goiporabon,2005. 7 Po C ■ 4 CAW ■ a, B6WIrA pity Figure 2-2 Vicinity Map w.,rvW.�� Corona Del Mar "rsW� a { mow, r Hlgh School Singie,Family, Multi�Family Single Family 'Residential VO D Residential w.,rvW.�� Corona Del Mar r Hlgh School Singie,Family, Multi�Family Single Family 'Residential Residential D Residential . Mar �Usta Ir BIT Canyonr,z Go_If Course': '..} E... , 1 y: N �T �q.' � Yi v PROJECT . SITE s I t i* �m Corona Del Mar r Hlgh School Singie,Family, Multi�Family Single Family 'Residential Residential D Residential . Mar �Usta Ir BIT Canyonr,z s I t i* �m L"f Figure 2 -3 Aerial Photograph 0 200 400 800 Feet Source: Eagle Aenal, 2001. r190 m Multi�Family ;' > „•_. 'Residential BIT Canyonr,z Go_If Course': '..} E... , 1 y: N �T Yi v L"f Figure 2 -3 Aerial Photograph 0 200 400 800 Feet Source: Eagle Aenal, 2001. 2. Project Description II. EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS A. Our Lady Queen of Angels Originally constructed in the early 1960s, the OLQA site is currently developed with a church, parish center, rectory, school, athletic field, and associated parking areas on approximately 8.0 acres of land. Figure 2 -4 on page 2 -6 depicts the existing layout of the OLQA site. The church has a maximum seating capacity of 872 people. The school, which consists of a preschool and grades K -8, comprises two (2) one -story buildings and has a capacity of 350 students. The gross floor area for all buildings combined is 58,160 square feet, which results in a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.17. Four separate surface parking lots are located throughout the property. The main parking lot (Parking Lot No. I) is located between Mar Vista Drive and the school buildings, while the other three lots are located north of the parish center (Parking Lot No. 2), east of the school (Parking Lot No. 3), and south of the rectory (Parking Lot No. 4). The four parking lots combined provide a total of 213 parking spaces. Vehicular access to the OLQA site is provided via six driveways (four driveways along Mar Vista Drive and two driveways along Domingo Drive). The four driveways along Mar Vista Drive provide access to Parking Lot Nos. I and 2 (two driveways within each parking lot). The two driveways along Domingo Drive provide access to Parking Lot Nos. 3 and 4 (one driveway within each parking lot). The site, which is located in the Eastbluff GEIF section of Statistical Area K2 (The Bluffs Area) of the General Plan Land Use Element, has a General Plan land use designation and zoning of Government, Education, and Institutional Facilities (GEIF). The maximum permitted FAR for this section of Statistical Area K2 is 0.17. The properties located north and east of OLQA are also designated and zoned GEIF. The 32/50 Foot Height Limitation Zone applies to sites within the GEIF zone. All structures within this height zone are permitted up to 32 feet. Structures may exceed 32 feet up at a maximum of 50 feet (1) through the adoption of a Planned Community, (2) through the adoption of a Specific Plan, or (3) through the approval of a Use Permit provided the required findings within Section 20.65.055 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code are met. Church structures used for church purposes are exempt from these height restrictions provided a Use Permit is approved. The properties located south and west of OLQA are zoned Multi - Family Residential (MFR) and Single - Family Residential (R -I -B). B. St. Mark Presbyterian Church The St. Mark site consists of 4.37 acres and is currently developed with a church facility and a school and administration building originally constructed in the early 1960s. Figure 2 -5 on page 2 -7 depicts the existing layout of the St. Mark site. The church has a maximum seating City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -5 ---------- 7 1 JC-mi0c; I C I =1 0 60 120 240 Feet Source: AC M.din Partners, Inc.. 2005, ti Figure 2-4 Existing Site Layout - OLQA v I' / � I . CHURCH W 1 " �- �� PARKING LOT ✓ rR-q;� ����.\ i yr x�� I {'�!! 'l SCH OOLAND 00 \\ .,, _ ADMINISTRATION O� V. le mil �i IL rcu a I LU LI Figure 2 -5 0 40 60 160 Feet Existing Site Layout - St. Mark Sauna: AC Makin PaMem, Inc., 2005. 2. Project Description capacity of 350 people, while the preschool has a capacity of 70 students. The gross floor area for all buildings combined is 15,324 square feet, which results in a FAR of 0.08. The surface parking lot, located west of the buildings, contains a total of 137 parking spaces. Vehicular access to the property is provided via one driveway along Domingo Drive. The site, which is also located in the Eastbluff GEIF section of Statistical Area K2 (The Bluffs Area) of the General Plan Land Use Element, has a General Plan land use designation and zoning of GEIF. The maximum permitted FAR for this section of Statistical Area K2 is 0.17. The site is subject to the same zoning and height restrictions as the OLQA site. C. Overall Summary (Properties Combined) Table 2 -1 on page 2 -9 summarizes the existing characteristics of both properties. As shown in Table 2 -1, combined, the two properties have a church seating capacity of 1,222 people, a school capacity of 420 students, 350 parking spaces, and 73,484 square feet of development on 12.37 acres of land, which results in a FAR of 0.14. 111. PROPOSED PROJECT OLQA is proposing to expand their church and school facilities. To provide for the expansion, OLQA is acquiring the 4.37 -acre parcel of land to the east across Domingo Drive, which is currently occupied by St. Mark. St. Mark is currently constructing new worship and education facilities on the corner of San Joaquin Hills Road and MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Newport Beach. The proposed project would remove all the existing buildings on the St. Mark site, allowing OLQA to relocate its church to this location and expand its school within the existing OLQA site. With this new parcel, the OLQA site would expand to 12.37 acres bound by Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive to the westerly end of Domingo Drive, and bisected by the easterly end of Domingo Drive. Figure 2 -6 on page 2 -10 depicts a detailed site plan for both properties. A detailed description of the individual construction projects on each site is provided below. A. Proposed Site Plans 1. Expansion onto Adjacent St. Mark Property (New Church Site) The proposed project would demolish the entire 15,324 square feet of existing buildings located on St. Mark as well as the parking lot, exterior lighting, and signage. Additionally, the majority of the landscaping would be removed with the exception of the mature trees located on the perimeter of the property. Approximately 3,759 cubic yards of soil are estimated to be exported off -site. A new 22,336 -square foot church and associated parking lot would then be City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -8 2. Project Description Table 2 -1 Existing Characteristics at OLQA and St. Mark Characteristic OLQA St. Mark Combined Land Area 315 0 315 Acres 8.00 4.37 1237 Square Feet 348,647 190,352 538,999 Floor Area Church 34,305 12,394 46,699 School 23 855 2 930 26 785 Total Floor Area 58,160 15,324 73,484 Floor Area Ratio 0.17 0.08 0.14 Church Capacity 872 350 1,222 School Capacity Preschool 35 70 105 Grades K -8 315 0 315 Total School Capacity 350 70 420 Parking Spaces 213 137 350 Source: Barnard Ventures, June 2005. constructed. As shown in Figure 2 -7 on page 2 -11, the layout of the new church site would be similar to the existing St. Mark layout with the church on the eastern portion and the parking lot on the western portion. Figure 2 -8 on page 2 -12 depicts the interior floor plan of the church. As shown in Figure 2 -8, the church would include the main sanctuary (1,170 seats), a reservation chapel (32 seats), a reconciliation chapel, a sacristy, community room, nursery, kitchen, storage areas, and restrooms. The exterior would include a circular pedestrian plaza with a water fountain, tree courtyard, and colored concrete accents located near the main entrance of the church. Additionally, a colored concrete walkway would be constructed from the intersection of Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive to the plaza and main entry (refer to Figure 2 -7). Along the southern property boundary, a 4 -foot wall would be constructed between the church and the multi- family residences that directly abut the site. The design of the church building is tiered and thus ranges in height from approximately 12 feet to 55 feet, 4 inches as illustrated in the City of Newport Beach our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -9 i ppM/NGp pRl� MAR VISTA paw. Figure 2 -G - - -��� Proposed Site Plan 0 80 160 320 Feel Source: AC Martin PaMem, Inc, 2005, III Illll f iflll 11111'.1 hip M.--ff I I I I (I I I ITEE 0-111! . . fl.T. I.r, n, I II�'i i.� I � I- J-, LT:: L COMMUNITY ROOM USHER'S ROOM PCR a NURSERY ENVIRONMENT ROOM ELECT ROOM VORKING SACRISTY . STORAGE ROOM I! ifs Ir I Z."J ? S1 'ALTER BAPTISMA LI'l FONT CHAPEL ROOMS RECONCILIATIOJ CHAPEL 0 is 30 60 Feet So.": AC Marlin Partners, Inc., 2005. Figure 2-8 New Church Floor Plan S, T., . . ....... .. .. . .. ..... t: -FIX-6 'SEATING NARTHEX �-j : FIXED SEATING AI I 2_, 4 --I j Ir I Z."J ? S1 'ALTER BAPTISMA LI'l FONT CHAPEL ROOMS RECONCILIATIOJ CHAPEL 0 is 30 60 Feet So.": AC Marlin Partners, Inc., 2005. Figure 2-8 New Church Floor Plan 2. Project Description elevations provided in Figure 2 -9 on page 2 -14. The maximum height of the church would be the cross on the church tower at 90 feet, thus exceeding the permitted height limit for churches under the existing zoning limitations. As such, the proposed project would require a Use Permit (refer to Section 2.V., Necessary Approvals). The parking lot would provide for a total of 238 parking spaces. Vehicular access to the church would remain unchanged (one driveway along Domingo Drive). Figure 2 -10 on page 2 -15 depicts perspectives of the new church from two separate locations.' 2. Expansion within Existing OLQA Property (New School Facilities) As shown on Figure 2 -6, the new school facilities within the existing OLQA property would include the renovation and expansion of two existing school buildings, as well as the construction of a new school building, a gymnasium, a parking lot, and other general improvements. All the improvements are designed to blend with the architectural style of the existing school and parish center. They would be similar in design, height, materials, and color. Upon completion of the improvements, the OLQA property would be developed with 69,294 square feet and 201 parking spaces. The expanded school would have a capacity of 600 students. A detailed description of each of the improvements proposed within the existing OLQA property is provided below. In order to accommodate on -going school operations during these improvements, ten 24 by 60 triple -wide temporary portable classrooms and one 12 by 40 portable boys and girls restroom would be placed on the northeast corner of the athletic field. The portables would not interfere with school operations (i.e., enrollment numbers, parking, or drop- off/pick -up procedures). Upon completion of construction activities at the school, all portables would be removed from the project site. In compliance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 20.60.015 C, a Use Permit to allow the temporary use of portable classrooms would be required (refer to Section 2.V., Necessary Approvals) (a) Renovation and Expansion of Existing School Buildings The two existing school buildings at OLQA were constructed in 1965 and 1991. The older of these two buildings has been in continuous use for over 40 years and requires substantial renovation, including roofing, windows, lighting, cabinetry, flooring, restrooms, etc. The 1991 building also requires some improvements. In addition to the renovation of these two school buildings, the proposed project would remove two covered structures and outdoor playground Figure 2 -10 presents an artist's interpretation of the new church and is intended to serve as an illustrative representation rather than a precise, scaled drawing of the new church. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -13 FLIM East Elevation West Elevation — PCR No scale Source: AC Ma2n Pa em, Ina, 2005. feel North Elevation ..................................... 9.01 feel South Elevation 75 feet _ _ _ _ _ 55 feet, 4 inches Figure 2 -9 New Church Elevations ' • � +r i. •N : a C�.�! PC:R --t 2. Project Description equipment to accommodate the lateral expansion of these two buildings. The expansion, which would occur on the west side of the buildings as shown in Figure 2 -6, would include a total of six new classrooms (three classrooms within each building) and a restroom (southernmost building only). Each classroom would be approximately 950 square feet in size. The elevation of the new structures would match the existing buildings, which are 13 feet except for the equipment screens (if needed) which extend another 4 feet and 6 inches for a maximum height of 17 feet and 6 inches. (b) New School Building The proposed project would demolish Parking Lot No. 3 (25 parking spaces) and its associated driveway along Domingo Drive to accommodate the construction of a new one -story school building. The new building, which would be located on the east side the existing school buildings as shown in Figure 2 -6, would include four classrooms (each approximately 950 square feet in size). The elevation of the new structures would match the existing buildings, which are 13 feet except for the equipment screens that extend another 4 feet and 6 inches for a maximum height of 17 feet and 6 inches. (c) Gymnasium The proposed project would demolish the northern portion of Parking Lot No. 1 (50 parking spaces) to accommodate the construction of a new 9,450 - square foot gymnasium. As shown in Figure 2 -6, the gymnasium would be located along Mar Vista Drive which is close to other school uses (i.e., Corona Del Mar High School) and away from residential uses. The gymnasium would include a basketball court, retractable bleachers, boys' and girls' locker rooms with restrooms, and storage areas. Wall- mounted fold out tables would be located on the southern exterior of the gymnasium. The gymnasium would be 32 feet in height. (d) Parking Lot Upon completion of the new church on the adjacent property, the existing OLQA Church would be demolished and replaced with a surface parking lot (Parking Lot No. 5). The parking lot would be connected to the existing parking lot to the west (Parking Lot No. 2). Additionally, street access to the parking lot would be provided by a driveway along Domingo Drive. (e) General Improvements The pedestrian entrance along Domingo Drive, which consists of a sidewalk and stairs, would be removed. Both driveways currently providing access to Parking Lot No. 2 on Mar City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 201)6 Page 2 -16 2. Project Description Vista Drive would be eliminated. Existing parking lots would be resurfaced and re- striped so as to allow the flow of traffic between Parking Lot Nos. 1, 2, and 5. Upon completion of these parking improvements (including the construction of Parking Lot No. 5), 63 additional parking spaces would be provided at the OLQA property. General improvements would also include lighting, landscaping, and signage. These general improvements would be part of the proposed project. However, the Project Applicant would be required to obtain the necessary approval and permits for such improvements. 3. Overall Summary (Properties Combined) Table 2 -2 on page 2 -18 provides a statistical summary of the proposed project including demolition, construction, and the net change on the properties combined. As shown in Table 2- 2, upon completion of the proposed project, OLQA would have 1,170 church seats and 600 students, representing a slight decrease in the number of church seats and an increase of 180 students. The FAR for the school site and the new church site would be 0.20 and 0.12, respectively. The latter exceeds the allowable FAR permitted for this section of Statistical Area K2 per the Land Use Element of the General Plan (0.17). As such, the proposed project would require a Use Permit to allow the transfer of intensity from the St. Mark site to the OLQA school site (refer to Section 2.V., Necessary Approvals). The square footage for the two properties combined would be 91,630 square feet resulting in an overall FAR of 0. 17, which is consistent with the maximum FAR allowed by the Land Use Element of the General Plan. B. Operations Currently, there are three separate school schedules in operation on the two properties. St. Mark operates a preschool with 70 students, and OLQA operates a preschool with 35 students as well as grades K -8 with 315 students. Although the proposed project would increase overall enrollment by 180 students, classes would be limited to grades K -8 with two classrooms for each grade level (no preschool). Furthermore, the project proposes to implement an enrollment phasing plan which would allow the increase in enrollment to occur gradually over the course of approximately six years. Each year, a second classroom for different grade levels would be added until each grade level (K -8) has two classrooms with approximately 33 students each. Table 2 -3 on page 2 -19 summarizes the enrollment phasing plan. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -17 2. Project Description Table 2 -2 Statistical Summary of Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project Net change on properties combined. 6 The maximum permitted floor area ratio for each site is 0.17 ` Because this exceeds the maximum permitted floor area ratio, a Use Permit to allow the transfer of intensity from the St. Mark site to the OLQA school site will be required. As shown, the two properties combined would result in a floor area ratio of 0.17. Source: Barnard Ventures, March 2006. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -18 Existing Demolition Construction Proposed St. St. St. OLQA OLQA Net Characteristic OLQA Mark Total OLQA Mark Total OLQA Mark Total School Church Total Changes Laud Area Acres 8.00 4.37 12.37 8.00 4.37. 12.37 Square Feet 348,647 190,352 538,999 - - - - - - 348,647 190,352 538,999 - Floor Area Church 34,305 12,394 46,699 - 11,050 - 12,394 - 23,444 0 22,336 22,336 23,255 .22,336 45,591 -1,108 School 23,855 2.930 26785 0 -2 930 1M 22,184 0 22,184 46,039 0 46 039 ly Total Floor Area 58,160 15,324 73,484 - 11,050 - 15,324 - 26,374 22,184 22,336 44,520 69,294 22,336 91,630 18,146 Floor Area Ratio b 0.17 0.08 0.14 - - - - - - 0.200 0.12 0.17 - Church Capacity 872 350 1,222 -872 -350 -1,222 0 1,170 1,170 0 1,170 1,170 -52 School Capacity Preschool 35 70 105 -35 -70 -105 0 0 0 0 0 0 -105 Grades K -8 315 0 315 0 0 0 285 0 285 600 0 600 285 Total School Capacity 350 70 420 -35 -70 -105 285 0 285 600 0 600 180 Parking Spaces 213 137 350 -75 -137 -212 63 238 301 201 238 439 89 Net change on properties combined. 6 The maximum permitted floor area ratio for each site is 0.17 ` Because this exceeds the maximum permitted floor area ratio, a Use Permit to allow the transfer of intensity from the St. Mark site to the OLQA school site will be required. As shown, the two properties combined would result in a floor area ratio of 0.17. Source: Barnard Ventures, March 2006. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -18 2. Project Description Table 2 -3 School Enrollment Phasing Plan Currently, there are two separate worship schedules in operation on the two properties. Upon completion of the proposed project, only one worship schedule would be in operation at the new OLQA Church. With construction of a larger church (298 additional seats), OLQA would be able to accommodate more parishioners at each mass. No change would occur to other existing parish operations and services (i.e., OLQA Youth Ministry, Music Ministry, Adult Faith Formation, Children's Faith Formation, Parish Support Groups). It is estimated that approximately 50 employees would work on the two properties combined. Of these 50 employees, approximately 30 would be affiliated with the school and would therefore only work when school is in session. The hours of operation for each of the facilities located at the project site are shown in Table 2 -4 on page 2 -20. C. Traffic, Circulation, and Parking Vehicular access to the new church would remain unchanged (one driveway along Domingo Drive). Vehicular access to the existing OLQA property would be reduced from four driveways along Mar Vista Drive to two driveways. Both driveways currently providing access to Parking Lot No. 2 on Mar Vista Drive would be eliminated. Vehicular access along Domingo Drive would still be provided via two driveways; however, the location of one of the driveways would be altered. The existing driveway, which provides access to Parking Lot No. 3, would be eliminated and a new driveway would be constructed directly across from the existing driveway City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -19 Year Class 2005 -06 2006 -07 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012-13 Preschool (St. Mark) 70 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 Preschool (OLQA) 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kindergarten 35 66 67 67 67 67 67 67 First 35 35 66 67 67 67 67 67 Second 35 35 66 66 67 67 67 67 Third 35 35 66 66 66 67 67 67 Fourth 35 35 35 66 66 66 67 67 Fifth 35 35 35 35 66 66 66 67 Sixth 35 35 35 35 35 66 66 66 Seventh 35 35 35 35 35 35 66 66 Eighth 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 66 TOTAL 420 416 440 472 504 536 568 600 Source: Our Lady Queen of Angels, August 2005. Currently, there are two separate worship schedules in operation on the two properties. Upon completion of the proposed project, only one worship schedule would be in operation at the new OLQA Church. With construction of a larger church (298 additional seats), OLQA would be able to accommodate more parishioners at each mass. No change would occur to other existing parish operations and services (i.e., OLQA Youth Ministry, Music Ministry, Adult Faith Formation, Children's Faith Formation, Parish Support Groups). It is estimated that approximately 50 employees would work on the two properties combined. Of these 50 employees, approximately 30 would be affiliated with the school and would therefore only work when school is in session. The hours of operation for each of the facilities located at the project site are shown in Table 2 -4 on page 2 -20. C. Traffic, Circulation, and Parking Vehicular access to the new church would remain unchanged (one driveway along Domingo Drive). Vehicular access to the existing OLQA property would be reduced from four driveways along Mar Vista Drive to two driveways. Both driveways currently providing access to Parking Lot No. 2 on Mar Vista Drive would be eliminated. Vehicular access along Domingo Drive would still be provided via two driveways; however, the location of one of the driveways would be altered. The existing driveway, which provides access to Parking Lot No. 3, would be eliminated and a new driveway would be constructed directly across from the existing driveway City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -19 2. Project Description Table 2-4 Hours of Operation Our Lady Queen of Angels Facility Monday- Friday Saturday Sunday Churcha 6:30 A.M. — 9:00 P.M. 6:30 A.M. — 9:00 P.M. 6:30 A.M. — 9:00 P.M. Parish Center 7:00 A.M. — 10:30 P.M. 7:00 A.M. —10:30 P.M. 7:00 A.M. —10:30 P.M. School (Academics)" 7:30 A.M. — 2:30 P.M. School (Extracurricular /After 7:30 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. 7:30 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. 7:30 A.M. — 6:00 P.M. School Activities)` Gymnasium 7:30 AM — 9:00 PM 7:30 A.M. — 9:00 P.M. 7:30 A.M. — 9:00 P.M. a Except during Christmas when there is a midnight mass and Easter when there is an Easter Vigil from 8 P.M. to II P.M. ° General session only with customary school holidays. Counseling, sports, special education, religious education, etc. Source: Our Lady Queen of Angels, August 2005. at the new church. The alignment of these two driveways would allow vehicles to traverse the two properties. The existing driveway along Domingo Drive which currently provides access to the rectory (Parking Lot No. 4) would remain unchanged. To assist with circulation of traffic, the school plans to implement a mandatory student drop- off /pick -up procedure. The school would distribute guidelines for the procedures to each family. The student drop - off/pick -up procedure is described below. Upon completion of the proposed project, a total of 439 on -site parking spaces would be provided. The majority of the parking spaces (238) would be located at the new church while the remaining parking spaces (201) would be located at the school. The City of Newport Beach Parking Code requires one parking stall for every 3 church seats. Given the number of seats within the main sanctuary (1,170 seats), the proposed project would be in compliance with the City's parking requirement. To assist with effective use of parking spaces, the church plans to implement a parking management plan. The plan would be communicated seasonally to parishioners through bulletins and the church website. The parking management plan is described below. Student Drop- off/Pick -up Procedure The student drop -off procedure would require all drivers to enter through the westerly driveway on Mar Vista Drive. The drivers would line up in the schoolyard and wait for direction from the parking lot manager. The parking lot manager would direct a row of vehicles (approximately 4 -6) to proceed to the curb of the yard with the passenger side of the vehicle alongside the sidewalk. Upon direction from the parking lot manager, the students would exit City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -20 2. Project Description the vehicles and proceed away from the unloading areas. When all the students have been unloaded and the vehicle doors are closed, the parking lot manager would allow the vehicles to exit the schoolyard through the easterly driveway on Mar Vista Drive. This procedure would be repeated until there are no additional vehicles. Shortly after the commencement bell rings, the gates to the driveways would be closed. For the pick -up procedure, the gates to the driveways on Mar Vista Drive would be reopened approximately 40 minutes prior to school dismissal. All drivers would enter through the westerly driveway on Mar Vista Drive and line up in the schoolyard to await direction from the parking lot manager. Students would line up in the designated area on the sidewalks and await direction from the monitors who would await direction from the parking lot manager. Upon direction from the parking lot manager, an entire row of vehicles would proceed to the curb of the yard with the passenger side of the vehicle alongside the sidewalk. Upon direction from the monitors who would take direction from the parking lot manager, the students would enter the vehicles. When all the students have been loaded and the vehicle doors are closed, the parking lot manager would allow the vehicles to exit the schoolyard through the easterly driveway on Mar Vista Drive. This procedure would be repeated until there are no additional vehicles. The school would conduct periodic review of the proposed student drop-off/pick-up procedure and modify it as needed to ensure that no stacking of vehicles occurs off -site. Parking Management Plan The parking management plan would instruct the members of the parish where to park in order of priority as follows: (1) the church parking lot; (2) the parish center parking lots; and (3) the school parking lot. Additionally, all weddings would include a map illustrating the parking lots and circulation paths for vehicles and pedestrians; a minimum 30- minute buffer would be maintained between the end of a service and the start of another; the gymnasium would not be used when a service is scheduled; a wedding, funeral, or memorial service would not be scheduled prior to 9:00 A.M., nor within 30 minutes before or after the dismissal times of both Corona Del Mar High School and OLQA School; funerals or memorial services, occurring on days and times when OLQA School is in session, would not exceed 1,000 people; consideration would be given to maintaining services on Saturday evening and Sunday night so as to disperse parking demand; and church staff would be required to utilize on -site parking so as to leave the maximum amount of street parking available for surrounding properties. D. Utilities A 12 -inch and 8 -inch water line are located along Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive, respectively. An 8 -inch sewer main is located at the westerly intersection of Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive. The sewer main continues in an easterly direction along Mar Vista Drive to the center of the OLQA property where it terminates. The sewer main continues in a southerly direction along Domingo Drive to the first bend where it terminates. Existing utilities City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -21 2. Project Description (electricity, natural gas, telephone, water, sewer, and storm drainage) would be reused and/or reworked as necessary. However, additional lateral connections to existing mains may be necessary for new construction. The grading design for the new church site would maintain its existing drainage patterns, which connect to the storm drains, located along the perimeter of the property. A series of catch basins would be constructed within the parking lot. The catch basins would be connected to the storm drain system. A Continuous Deflective Separation storm water filtering unit would also be constructed near the easterly intersection of Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive. The church would connect to the existing gas line along Jamboree Road. The OLQA property would also maintain its existing drainage patterns which connect to the storm drains located along the perimeter of the property. A storm water clarifier would be constructed near the entrance to Parking Lot No. 1. The new gymnasium would connect to existing sewer main and water line along Mar Vista Drive. E. Landscaping Numerous mature trees are located along the perimeter and interior of the project site. The proposed project would retain many of the mature trees located within the landscape setbacks along Eastbluff Drive and Jamboree Road. Additionally, eucalyptus trees, palm trees, olive trees, orange trees, shrubs, and grass would be planted at the project site. However, the proposed project would result in the overall reduction of landscaping, particularly on the new church site. IV. SCHEDULE The construction schedule for the proposed project is shown in Table 2 -5 on page 2 -23. As shown in Table 2 -5, construction of the proposed project would occur over a period of approximately three years. Construction would begin with the school improvements within the existing OLQA property. The existing school buildings would be expanded and the new school building on Parking Lot No. 3 would be constructed. After completion of these improvements, construction of the new church and parking lot at the St. Mark property would begin. The first few months of construction on the St. Mark site would focus on partial construction of the parking lot to help offset the parking already lost from demolition of Parking Lot No. 3, as well as the parking to be lost from the construction of the new gymnasium within Parking Lot. No. 1. Once additional parking has been secured, construction of the new gymnasium at the OLQA property would commence. As shown in Table 2 -5, construction of the gymnasium would overlap for a period of approximately eight months with continuing construction of the new church. Upon completion of the new church, the existing church on the OLQA property would be demolished and converted into a surface parking lot. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -22 2. Project Description Table 2 -5 Construction Schedule Construction Activities Month Tentative Dates" a Subject to change. Source: Barnard Ventures, May 2006. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -23 I 2 3 4 Demolition of Parking Lot No. 3, 5 expansion of existing school buildings, and January 2007 - December 2007 construction of new school building. 8 9 10 11 12 13 Demolition of St. Mark property and partial 14 January 2008 — April 2008 construction of new parking lot (137 stalls). 15 16 17 18 Continuing construction of new church and 19 parking lot. 20 May 2008 - December 2008 21 Construction of new gymnasium. 22 23 24 25 26 27 Completion of new church and parking lot. 29 January 2009 - August 2009 30 31 32 Demolition of existing church and 33 construction of new parking lot and general 34 September 2009 - December 2009 improvements (i.e., resurfacing and re- 35 striping of existing parking lots). 36 a Subject to change. Source: Barnard Ventures, May 2006. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -23 2. Project Description V. NECESSARY APPROVALS A. Lead Agency Approval The City of Newport Beach will serve as the Lead Agency. Implementation of the proposed project would require the following approval from the City of Newport Beach: • Use Permit (UP2005 -020): The proposed project would require the temporary use of portable classrooms during construction activities, which requires the approval of a Use Permit. The new church facility would exceed the permitted height limit for churches under the existing zoning and land use designation by a maximum of 55 feet. Authorization to exceed the permitted height limit is only allowed with the approval of a Use Permit. Additionally, upon completion of the proposed project, the FAR for the new church site and the school site would be 0.12 and 0.20, respectively. The former exceeds the allowable FAR permitted for this section of Statistical Area K2 per the Land Use Element of the General Plan (0.17). A Use Permit to allow the transfer of density from the new church site to the school site would be required. The square footage for the two properties combined would result in an overall FAR of 0.17. Therefore, the Project Applicant is requesting a Use Permit (1) to allow the expansion of the school and church; (2) to allow the temporary use of portable classrooms; (3) to allow the new church facility to exceed the height limitation; and (4) to allow for the transfer of development intensity between the two sites. B. Other Required Permits and Approvals A public agency other than the lead agency that has discretionary approval power over a project is known as a "Responsible Agency," as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15381. The Responsible Agencies, and their corresponding approvals, for this project include the following: • Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Clean Water Act Section 401 Permit; National Pollution Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] Permit) • Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (Finding of consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport) C. Reviewing Agencies Reviewing Agencies include those agencies that do not have discretionary powers, but that may review the Initial Study for adequacy and accuracy. Potential Reviewing Agencies include the following: City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corpmtion July 2006 Page 2 -24 2. Project Description • South Coast Air Quality Management District • Native American Heritage Commission • California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance • Metropolitan Water District of Southern California • Orange County Sanitation District • Southern California Edison • Southern California Gas Company • City of Irvine • City of Costa Mesa City of Newport Beach Our Lary Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 2 -25 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM tl. y T' k l •. iy �' I.}� n'i'1 � kJ � r 3. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project title: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project 2. Lead agency name and address: City of Newport Beach Planning Department 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 3. Contact person and phone number: Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner (949) 644 -3208 4. Project location: 2046 and 2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, California 92660 5. Project sponsor's name and address: Our Lady Queen of Angels 2046 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 6. General plan designation: Government, Education, and Institutional Facilities (GEIF) 7. Zoning: Government, Education, and Institutional Facilities (GEIF) 8. Description of project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Refer to Section 2., Project Description 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: Briefly describe the project's surroundings: Refer to Section 2., Project Description 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) • Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Clean Water Act Section 401 Pernut; National Pollution Discharge Elimination System [NPDES] Permit) • Orange County Airport Land Use Comrnission (Finding of consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport) City d [Newport scam PCR Smry s Corporation Page 3 -t Our Lady Queen of Angels Expwmon Project July 2006 3. Environmental Checklist Form ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑Aesthetics [D Biological Resources ® Hazards/Hazardous Materials ❑Mineral Resources El Public Services ®Utilities/Service Systems ❑Agriculture Resources ®Cultural Resources ®Hydrology/Water Quality ®Noise ❑Recreation []Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: ® Air Quality ® Geology /Soils ® Land Use/Planning ❑ Population/Housing ® Transportation/Traffic ❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ® I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or City of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3 -2 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2006 3. Environmental Checklist Form NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Printed Name June 29, 2006 Date City of Newport Beach For EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact' answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where it is based on project- specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors. to pollutants, based on a project - specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project - level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII, "Earlier Analyses," may be cross - referenced). City or Newport Beach Our Lady Queen or Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 3 -3 3. Environmental Checklist Form 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site - specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. City of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3-4 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2006 3. Environmental Checklist Form I. AESTHETICS — Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Potentially ❑ Significant Issues: Potentially Unless less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS — Would the project a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not ❑ ❑ ❑ limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland within a state scenic highway? of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ quality of the site and its surroundings? Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ ❑ ® ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the H. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES — In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland ❑ ❑ ❑ of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, ❑ ❑ ❑ due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY — Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable ❑ ❑ ® ❑ air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially ❑ ® ❑ ❑ to an existing or projected air quality violation? City of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3 -5 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2006 Issues: c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? 3. Environmental Checklist Form d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant Potentially concentrations? Significant ❑ ❑ ❑ Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ® ❑ concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ❑ ❑ ❑ of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or ❑ ❑ ❑ other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected ❑ ❑ ❑ wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native ❑ ❑ ❑ to resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting ❑ ❑ ❑ biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? i) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Clty of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3-6 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2006 Issues: V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Sty of Newport Beach PCR Services Cmporation Page 3 -7 3. Environmental Checklist Form Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact El El K ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Our Lady Queen of Angels Exp—M Project July 2006 Issues: 3. Environmental Checklist Form Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS — Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ® ❑ ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely ❑ ❑ ® ❑ hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ ® ❑ ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ ❑ would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ❑ ❑ ® ❑ adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ ❑ injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ ® . ❑ ❑ requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere ❑ ❑ ® ❑ substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Prrojed PCR Services Corpommfim July 2006 Page 3 -8 3. Environmental Checklist Form or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or area, including through the alternation of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. I) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ g) Place housing within a loo -year flood hazard area as ❑ ❑ ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures ❑ ❑ ❑ which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ ❑ injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially ❑ ❑ Significant k) Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality Issues: Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ® ❑ ❑ or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site ❑ ❑ ® ❑ or area, including through the alternation of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. I) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ g) Place housing within a loo -year flood hazard area as ❑ ❑ ❑ mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures ❑ ❑ ❑ which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, ❑ ❑ ❑ injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ k) Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality ❑ ❑ ® ❑ during or following construction? 1) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater ❑ ❑ ❑ pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? m) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to ❑ ❑ ® ❑ affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? n) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow ❑ ❑ ® ❑ velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? o) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ surrounding areas? City or Newport Beach PCR Services Caporalim Page 3 -9 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Protect July 2006 Issues: D{. LAND USE AND PLANNING — Would the project: 3. Environmental Checklist Form Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or ❑ ® ❑ ❑ regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or ❑ ❑ ❑ natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES — Would the project: a) . Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important ❑ ❑ ❑ mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE — Would the project result in a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise level in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑ ® ❑ groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels ❑ ❑ ® ❑ in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient ❑ ® ❑ ❑ noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project`? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, ❑ ❑ ❑ where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would ❑ ❑ ❑ the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? City of Newport Reach PCR Services Corporation Page 3 -10 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project My 2006 Issues: XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING — Would the project: 3. Environmental Checklist Form Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either ❑ ❑ ® ❑ directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ ❑ El necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ ❑ ❑ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ ❑ neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require ❑ ❑ ❑ the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XV. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC— Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation ❑ ® ❑ ❑ to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? City of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3 -11 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expamon Proje! My 2006 Issues: b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? '1 3. Environmental Checklist Form e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Ctty of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3 -12 ❑ ❑ U 0 0 El El El El El El ❑ ❑ 11 0 ❑ Potentially ❑ ❑ Significant ❑ Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS — Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Ctty of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3 -12 ❑ ❑ U 0 0 El El El El El El ❑ ❑ 11 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ® ❑ El El El ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ► H Out Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2(x16 Issues: h) Include a new or retrofitted storm water treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g. water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetland), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g. increased vectors and odors ?) XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SICaNIFICANCE 3. Environmental Checklist Form a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ❑ ® ❑ ❑ of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? . b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ® ❑ ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of . probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑ ® ❑ ❑ cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? City of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3.13 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2006 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality ❑ ® ❑ ❑ of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? . b) Does the project have impacts that are individually ❑ ® ❑ ❑ limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of . probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will ❑ ® ❑ ❑ cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? City of Newport Beach PCR Services Corporation Page 3.13 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project July 2006 4. EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST DETERMINATION s 5 4. EXPLANATION OF CHECKLIST DETERMINATION I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. The project site and surrounding area are developed with institutional and residential uses and are located in an urbanized area with relatively flat topography. The project site does not contain any resources that might be considered scenic, nor can scenic views be experienced from the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcrops, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The project site is developed with institutional uses and is located in an urbanized area within the City of Newport Beach. Other than planted ornamentals (some of which will be preserved in place), there are no natural or notable scenic resources on the project site. There are no buildings that are considered to be visually or historically significant and none of the roadways that border the project site are designated as state or city scenic highways. No impact. No mitigation required. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. The following response regarding potential impacts to the visual character and quality of the project site and its surroundings is discussed separately for each property (the new church site on St. Mark and the new school facilities on OLQA). New Church Site The proposed project would demolish the entire 15,324 square feet of existing buildings. and associated parking lot located on St. Mark and replace it with a new 22,336 -square foot church and associated parking lot. The layout of the new church site would be similar to the existing St. Mark layout with the church on the eastern portion and the parking lot on the western City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -1 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination portion. Therefore, the proposed project would not introduce new visual elements on the project site. However, the massing and height of the new church facility would be greater than the existing facilities on the site. The existing buildings are approximately 20 feet in height. The design of the new church building is tiered and ranges in height from approximately 12 feet to 55 feet, 4 inches. The cross on the church tower would top the building at 90 feet. Although some of the existing trees located on the perimeter of the property would be preserved in place, a reduction in the overall amount of landscaping would occur. Nevertheless, the new church would include amenities that would enhance the visual character of the project site and surrounding area including a circular pedestrian plaza with a water fountain, a tree courtyard, and colored concrete accents located near the main entrance of the church. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. New School Facilities The new school facilities within the existing OLQA property would include the expansion of two existing school buildings, as well as the construction of a new school building, a gymnasium, a parking lot, and other general improvements. All the improvements are designed to blend with the architectural style of the existing school and parish center. They would be similar in height, materials, and color. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site and surrounding area are developed and therefore contain existing sources of lighting. The existing lighting sources on the project site include security lighting within the parking lots as well as on or near structures. Existing light sources in the surrounding area include street lighting along the adjoining streets, lighting associated with adjacent institutional and residential uses, and transient vehicular lighting from cars traveling on adjacent roadways. The lighting proposed for the new church site would be comparable to existing uses with security lighting within the parking lot as well as on or near the proposed structures. Although the new school facilities within the existing OLQA property would slightly alter the existing layout of the site, lighting would also be comparable to existing uses with security lighting within the new parking lots as well as on or near the proposed structures. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach - Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -2 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use is assessing impacts on. agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non - agricultural uses? No Impact. According to the 2002 Important Farmland Maps, the project site is designated as "D — Urban and Built -Up Land ". No impact. No mitigation required. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The project site is zoned Government, Education, and Institutional Facilities (GEIF) by the City of Newport Beach. The project site is not used for agricultural purposes nor is it under a Williamson Act contract. No impact. No mitigation required. c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non - agricultural use? No Impact. No agricultural resources or operations currently exist on or near the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district maybe relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The project site is located within the 6,600 square mile South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is required, pursuant to the Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the Basin is in City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -3 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination non - attainment (i.e., ozone, carbon monoxide, and PM10). The proposed project would be subject to the SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The AQMP contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducing emissions and achieving ambient air quality standards. These strategies are developed, in part, based on regional population, housing, and employment projections prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and serves as a forum for regional issues relating to transportation, the economy, community development, and the environment. SCAG serves as the federally designated metropolitan planning organization (MPO) for the southern California region. With regard to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG) which includes Growth Management and Regional Mobility chapters that form the basis for the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP, and are utilized in the preparation of air quality forecasts and consistency analysis included in the AQMP. Both the RCPG and AQMP strategy incorporate projections from local planning documents. As discussed in Section IX below (Land Use and Planning), upon approval of the necessary Use Permit, the proposed project would be consistent with the land use designation and zoning set forth by the City of Newport Beach for the project sits. Therefore, the proposed project would also be consistent with the region's air quality plans and would not conflict with the SCAQMD's AQMP. With regard to the Congestion Management Plan (CMP), the closest CMP monitoring location is the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road which is located immediately east of the project site. As discussed in Section XV below (Transportation and Circulation), the proposed project would not add 50 or more trips during the A.M. or P.M. weekday peak hours to the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road or to any other CMP intersection. As such, the project would not exceed any CMP thresholds. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. As indicated above, the project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin. The Basin is characterized by relatively poor air quality. State and federal air quality standards are often exceeded in many parts of the Basin. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PC2 services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -4 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Construction Construction of the proposed project would occur over a period of approximately three years as demonstrated in Table 2 -5 on page 2 -23 in Section 2 (Project Description) of this Initial Study. As shown in Table 2 -5, construction activities would begin with the school improvements within the existing OLQA property. During the first year of construction, Parking Lot 3 would be removed and replaced with the new school building, and the existing school buildings would be expanded. After completion of these improvements, construction of the new church and parking lot at the St. Mark property would begin and proceed for approximately twenty months. The first few months of construction on the St. Mark site would focus on partial construction of the parking lot to help offset the parking spaces lost from demolition of Parking Lot No. 3, as well as the parking to be lost from the construction of the new gymnasium within Parking Lot. No.l. Once additional parking has been secured, construction of the new gymnasium at the OLQA property would commence. As shown in Table 2 -5, construction of the gymnasium would overlap for a period of approximately eight months with continuing construction of the new church. Upon completion of the new church, the existing church on the OLQA property would be demolished and converted into a surface parking lot during the last four months of the project construction. SCAQMD has established regional and local daily significance thresholds that address pollution sources associated with general construction activities such as the operation of on -site construction equipment, fugitive dust from demolition and site gradingtexcavation activities, and travel by haul trucks and construction workers. Emission levels for construction activities vary with the type of equipment, duration of use, operation schedules, and the number of construction workers.' PCR Services Corporation calculated project construction emissions using the URBEMIS2002 emissions inventory model, originally developed by the California Air Resources Board. Construction emissions were estimated using calculation formulas and emissions factors prescribed by SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook and the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Compilation of Air Pollutant Emissions Factors (AP- 42) document. The air quality analysis worksheets are contained in Appendix A of this document. The maximum daily construction emissions are presented in Table 4 -1 on page 4 -6.z As indicated in Table 4 -1, under conservative assumptions, regional burden and localized emissions from project construction activities would fall below SCAQMD significance thresholds. Recommend mitigation for compliance with SCAQMD 403. A maximum of 50 truck trips per day was utilized in the calculations for the proposed project. z Construction emission estimates assume compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding the control of fugitive dust. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Protect PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -5 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -1 Estimated Maximum Construction Emissions PM10 emissions estimates are based on compliance with SCAQMD Rude 403 requirements for fugitive dust control. b Localized thresholds were taken from tables provided in SCAQMD's Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology guidance document based on the following criteria. (t) the proposed project site is located ire SCAQMD Sensitive Source Receptor Area (SPA) No. 18, (2) a maximum of 5 acres of the project site would be disturbed per day, and (3) the nearest sensitive receptors are located approximately 25 meters from major construction activity. Localized thresholds exist for CO, NO, and PMto only. Source: PCR Services Corporation, February 2006. AQ -1 The Project Applicant shall comply with SCAQNM Rule 403 requirements during construction activities as follows: Land Clearing/Earth- Moving — Exposed pits (i.e., gravel, soil, dirt) with 5 percent or greater silt content shall be watered twice daily, enclosed, covered, or treated with non -toxic soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications. — All other active sites shall be watered twice daily. — All grading activities shall cease during second stage smog alerts and periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 25 mph) if soil is being transported to off -site locations and cannot be controlled by watering. — All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials off -site shall be covered or wetted or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between the top of the load and the top of the trailer). City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -6 . Pollutant Emissions (Pounds per Day) CO ROG NOx sox PMtae Regional Emissions 44 23 94 0 54 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 550 75 100 150 150 Over (Under) (506) (52) (6) (150) (96) Exceed Threshold? No No No No No Localized Emissions 35 22 27 0 12 SCAQMD Daily Threshold" 950 - 335 - 14 Over (Under) (915) (308) (2) Exceed Threshold? No No No PM10 emissions estimates are based on compliance with SCAQMD Rude 403 requirements for fugitive dust control. b Localized thresholds were taken from tables provided in SCAQMD's Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology guidance document based on the following criteria. (t) the proposed project site is located ire SCAQMD Sensitive Source Receptor Area (SPA) No. 18, (2) a maximum of 5 acres of the project site would be disturbed per day, and (3) the nearest sensitive receptors are located approximately 25 meters from major construction activity. Localized thresholds exist for CO, NO, and PMto only. Source: PCR Services Corporation, February 2006. AQ -1 The Project Applicant shall comply with SCAQNM Rule 403 requirements during construction activities as follows: Land Clearing/Earth- Moving — Exposed pits (i.e., gravel, soil, dirt) with 5 percent or greater silt content shall be watered twice daily, enclosed, covered, or treated with non -toxic soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications. — All other active sites shall be watered twice daily. — All grading activities shall cease during second stage smog alerts and periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 25 mph) if soil is being transported to off -site locations and cannot be controlled by watering. — All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials off -site shall be covered or wetted or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between the top of the load and the top of the trailer). City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -6 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination — Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months shall be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized in a manner acceptable to the City. — All vehicles on the construction site shall travel at speeds less than 15 mph. — All diesel- powered vehicles and equipment shall be properly operated and maintained. — All diesel- powered vehicles and gasoline - powered equipment shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. — The construction contractor shall utilize electric or natural gas - powered equipment instead of gasoline or diesel - powered engines, where feasible. Paved Roads — All construction roads internal to the construction site that have a traffic volume of more than 50 daily trips by construction equipment, or 150 total daily trips for all vehicles, shall be surfaced with base material or decomposed granite, or shall be paved. — Streets shall be swept hourly if visible soil material has been carried onto adjacent public paved roads. — Construction equipment shall be visually inspected prior to leaving the site and loose dirt shall be washed off with wheel washers as necessary. Unpaved Staging Areas or Roads — Water or non -toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied, according to manufacturers' specifications, as needed to reduce off -site transport of fugitive dust from all unpaved staging areas and unpaved road surfaces. Operation SCAQMD has also established significance thresholds to evaluate potential impacts associated with long -term project operations. Long -term air pollutant emissions come from two types of sources: mobile source and stationary source. Mobile source emissions are associated with vehicular travel, and are a function of the number of vehicle miles traveled (VMT). There is a direct relationship between mobile emissions and VMT. As VMT increases or decreases, so do related air pollutant emissions. Stationary source emissions for this project are primarily related to combustion emissions associated with energy consumption (i.e., electricity). City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -7 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination According to the Traffic Analysis prepared for the proposed project by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., the proposed expansion would result in a net increase of 19 trips per day over existing daily trips. Mobile source emissions related to project - generated trips were computed using the LTRBEMIS2002 emissions inventory model as recommended by SCAQMD. These worksheets are included in Appendix A of this document. The estimated emissions are summarized in Table 4 -2 on page 4 -9. As shown in Table 4 -2, regional emissions associated with the proposed project would be below the SCAQMD significance thresholds for all criteria pollutants. Therefore, project emissions associated with operation of the proposed project would not have a significant impact on air quality. No mitigation measures are required. SCAQMD recommends a hot -spot evaluation of potential localized CO impacts when vehicle to capacity (V /C) ratios are increased by two percent or more at intersections with a level of service (LOS) of D or worse. As further discussed in Section XV below (Transportation and Circulation), during the weekday A.M. peak hour the proposed project would generate 27 new trips compared with the trip generation of the existing uses, whereas during the weekday P.M. peak hour there would be a reduction in net trips generated compared with the existing uses. Section XV also indicates that the only intersection that could potentially be impacted by the implementation of the proposed project is the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road. A comparison of critical vehicular movements for the Future 2010 Without Project and Future 2010 With Project shows that the studied intersection would continue operating at LOS B or better. Furthermore, the V/C ratio would not increase by two percent or more at this intersection. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant Impact. The regional burden emissions calculated for the project and presented in Table 4 -2 are less than the applicable SCAQMD daily significance thresholds, which are designed to assist the region in attaining the applicable State and national ambient air quality standards. The established State and federal standards apply to both primary (criteria and precursor) and secondary pollutants (ozone). Although the project site is located in a region that is in non - attainment for ozone and PMID, the emissions associated with the project would not be cumulatively considerable as the emissions would fall below SCAQMD daily significance thresholds. Furthermore, as discussed previously in Response No. III. a) above, the project would be consistent with the AQMP which is intended to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria pollutants. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Projttt PCR Services Corporation July 20D6 Page 4 -8 Existing Uses Mobile Sources Area Sources Stationary Sources" Total Emissions Proposed Project Mobile Sources Area Sources Stationary Sources " Total Emissions Proposed Project Less Existing Uses SCAQMD Daily Threshold Over (Under) Exceed Threshold? 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -2 Operational Emissions Pollutant Emissions (Pounds per Day)' CO NOx PMra ROC sox 75 11 10 10 <1 1 1 <1 2 <1 1 3 <1 <1 <1 77 15 10 12 <1 75 9 10 13 <1 1 1 <1 2 <1 1 6 <1 <1 1 77 16 10 15 1 <1 1 <1 3 <1 550 55 150 55 150 (550) (54) (150) (52) (150) No No No No No Emissions quantities are rounded to "whole number" values. As such, the "total" values presented herein may be one unit more or less than actual values. Exact values (i.e., non - rounded) are provided in the URBEMIS model printout sheets and/or calculation worksheets which can be found in Appendix A. These emissions account for off -site electricity generation, on -site natural gas combustion, and on -site emergency generator testing. Source: PCR Services Corporation, February 2006. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. Certain population groups are especially sensitive to air pollution and should be given special consideration when evaluating potential air quality impacts. These population groups include children, the elderly, persons with pre- existing respiratory or cardiovascular illness, and athletes and others who engage in frequent exercise. As defined in the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, a sensitive receptor to air quality is defined as any of the following land use categories: (1) long -term health care facilities; (2) rehabilitation centers; (3) convalescent centers; (4) retirement homes; (5) residences; (6) schools; (7) parks and playgrounds; (8) child care centers; and (9) athletic fields. Existing sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project site include single - family and multi - family residences adjacent to the east, south, and west. In addition, Corona Del Mar High City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corpmadon July 2006 Page 4 -9 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination School is located north of the project site across Mar Vista Drive. As described in Response No. III. b) above, construction and operation of the project would not result in any substantial localized or regional air pollution impacts and therefore would not expose any nearby sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Furthermore, all construction activities would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding the control of fugitive dust and other specified dust control measures (Mitigation Measure AQ -1). Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Impact. No objectionable odors are expected as a result of either construction or operation of the proposed project. The proposed project would use conventional. building materials. It is not anticipated that odiferous building materials would be used. No impact. No mitigation required. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The project site and surrounding area have been developed with institutional and residential uses for over 35 years. The vegetation located in the area consists largely of non - native, ornamental landscaping. Because of the urbanized nature and high levels of activity on and surrounding the project site, it is not a location that supports habitat for candidate, sensitive, or special status species. Furthermore, no sensitive biological resources are noted on the project site. However, the project site (particularly the St. Mark property) does have the potential to support both raptor and songbird nests due to the presence of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Disturbing or destroying active nests is a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Moreover, nests and eggs are protected under Fish and Game Code Section 3503. Removal of the trees during the breeding season is considered a potentially significant impact. Mitigation required to reduce impacts to less than significant level. BR -1 The Project Applicant shall make efforts to schedule all vegetation removal activities (i.e., tree removal and grading) outside the nesting season (the City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -10 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination nesting season is February 15a' to August 150) to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, all suitable habitat shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement of clearing. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 100 feet (300 feet for raptors) shall be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete as determined by the biological monitor. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The vegetation located in the area consists largely of non - native, ornamental landscaping. The project site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities. No impact. No mitigation required. c), Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. The project site does not contain any wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. No impact. No mitigation required. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native nursery sites? No Impact. The vegetation located in the area consists largely of non - native, ornamental landscaping. Because of the urbanized nature and high levels of activity on and surrounding the project site, the project site does not contain substantial habitat for native resident or migratory species, or native nursery sites. The Upper Newport Bay Ecological Preserve (a.k.a. Upper Newport Bay Marine Park) is located half a mile west of the project site. However, construction and operation of the proposed project would not interfere with wildlife at this location. No impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 7006 Page 4 -11 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The project site and surrounding area have been developed for over 35 years. As a result, the project site does not contain significant biological resources such as heritage trees protected by local policies or ordinances. No impact. No mitigation required. f) Conflict with the provisions, of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is not located within an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved habitat conservation plan. No impact. No mitigation required. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? No Impact. The buildings located at the project site were originally constructed in the early 1960s. The buildings lack sufficient integrity and significant historical and/or architectural importance to merit recognition as a historical resource. The buildings are less than fifty years of age and, therefore, do not meet federal, state, or local minimum age criteria and exceptional historical and/or architectural significance necessary for determination as a historical resource. No impact. No mitigation required. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The project site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized area where extensive grading and landform alteration has occurred. The project site was developed with existing uses in the early 1960s. Due to previous ground disturbing activities on the project site (grading for construction of the existing buildings and parking lots), any surficial archaeological resources, which may have existed at one time, have likely been removed. However, the project site is located less than half City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -12 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination a mile from Upper Newport Bay where numerous archaeological sites have been recorded.' Construction activities may have the potential to encounter archaeological resources. Mitigation retired to reduce impacts to less than significant level. CR -1 Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall submit written evidence to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning that a certified archaeologist has been retained to observe grading activities and salvage and .catalogue artifacts as necessary. The archaeologist shall be present at the pre- grade conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource surveillance and shall establish, in cooperation with the City, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the findings. If major archaeological resources are discovered, which require long -term halting or redirecting of grading, the archaeologist shall report such findings to the City and the Project Applicant. The archaeologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the Project Applicant, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City, or its designee, on a first - refusal basis. The Project Applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of a special significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and/or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Response No. V. b) above, the project site and surrounding area are located in an urbanized area where extensive grading and landform alteration has occurred. Due to previous ground disturbing activities on the project site, any surficial paleontological resources, which may have existed at one time, have likely been removed. However, the project site is located less than half a mile from Upper Newport Bay where numerous unique paleontological localities have been discovered.' Construction activities may have the potential to encounter paleontological resources. Mitigation required to reduce impacts to less than significant level. CR -2 . Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant shall submit written evidence to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning that a certified paleontologist has been retained to observe grading activities and salvage and J City of Newport Beach General Plan, Conservation of Natural Resources Element, page 34, January 14, 1974. City of Newport Beach General Plan, Conservation of Natural Resources Element, page 35, January 14, 1974. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -13 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination catalogue fossils as necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre - grade conference, shall establish procedures for paleontological resource surveillance and shall establish, in cooperation with the City, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the findings. If major paleontological resources are discovered, which require long -term halting or redirecting of grading, the paleontologist shall report such findings to the City and the Project Applicant. The paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the Project Applicant, which ensure proper exploration and/or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City, or its designee, on a first- refusal basis. The Project Applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of a special significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and/or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. There are no known burial sites located on the project site. Therefore, the potential for encountering human remains is minimal. Nonetheless, mitigation recommended to ensure that in the event human remains are discovered impacts would be reduced to a less than significant level. CR -3 In accordance with Public Resources Code 5097.94, if human remains are found, the Orange County Coroner must be notified within 24 hours of the discovery. If the coroner determines that the remains are not recent, the coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento to determine the most likely descendent for the area. The designated Native American representative shall then determine in consultation with the property owner the disposition of the human remains. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -14 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact. Fault rupture is the surface displacement that occurs along the surface of a fault during an earthquake. Based on current available geologic information, no known active or potentially active faults have been identified within the project site. Furthermore, the project site is not located within a designated Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault .Zone. No impact. No mitigation required. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Several active or potentially active faults are located within close proximity to the project site. The closest active fault is the Newport- Inglewood Fault which is located approximately 5.7 miles southwest of the project site. This fault, which is located offshore, parallels the coastline. Given the proximity of this fault to the project site, it is highly likely that the project site would be subject to seismic ground shaking. The level of ground shaking that would be experienced at the project site from this fault or any other active faults in the region would be a function of several factors including earthquake magnitude, type of faulting, rupture propagation path, distance from the epicenter, earthquake depth, duration of shaking, site topography, and site geology. As with any new project in the State of California, construction would conform to the current seismic design provisions of the 2001 California Building Code (CBC). In addition to the seismic design provisions of the CBC, construction should conform to the recommendations contained in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Geotechnical Solutions which specifically address the geologic conditions of the project site. Mitigation required to reduce impacts to less than significant level. GS -1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a qualified geotechnical engineer shall be retained by the Project Applicant to be present on the project site during excavation, grading, and general site preparation activities to monitor the implementation of the recommendations as specified in the Geotechnical City of Newport Beach Our lady Queen of Angels Expansion Projeci PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -15 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Engineering Report prepared by Geotechnical Solutions dated July 8, 2004. Whenever appropriate, the geotechnical engineer shall provide structure specific geologic and geotechnical recommendations that shall be documented in a report to be appended to the project's Geotechnical Engineering Report. iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Impact. The subsurface investigation conducted as part of the Geotechnical Engineering Report revealed that the project site consists of competent silty sandy terrace deposits, overlaying Monterey Formation bedrock. Groundwater is just above the bedrock at approximately 20 feet. Due to the competent soil conditions (dense terrace and stiff clayey bedrock) and the depth to groundwater, the potential for liquefaction at the project site is low. No impact. No mitigation required. iv) Landslides? No Impact. The project site and surrounding area are relatively flat. There are no significant slopes on or surrounding the project site. Furthermore, the project site and surrounding area are not located within an earthquake- induced landslide zone.' No impact. No mitigation required. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. The majority of the project site is currently developed with impervious surfaces (buildings and parking lots) while the remaining areas are developed with pervious surfaces (landscaping and an athletic field). Although implementation of the proposed project would involve minor changes to the existing layout of each property (St. Mark and OLQA), the amount of impervious and pervious surfaces would remain relatively the same. Furthermore, compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Program as discussed in Section VIII (Hydrology and Water Quality) would be required. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. ' California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Seismic Hazard Zones Map, Newport Beach Quadrangle, April 15, 1998. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 21)06 Page 4 -16 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? No Impact. As discussed in Response Nos. VI. a) -iii) and a) -iv) above, due to the competent soil conditions (dense terrace and stiff clayey bedrock), depth to groundwater, and absence of significant slopes on or surrounding the project site, the potential for landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse is low. No impact. No mitigation required. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18 -1 -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? No Impact. An Expansion Index Test was conducted on two soil samples from the project site. The results revealed that the soils located at the project site have low expansion potential. No impact. No mitigation required. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The project site is located in an urbanized area where wastewater infrastructure is currently in place. The proposed project would connect to existing infrastructure and would not use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. No impact. No mitigation required. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? No Impact. The proposed project consists of the expansion of an existing school and church facility. Such uses do not utilize hazardous materials other than small amounts of cleaning products and maintenance materials (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides). No impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beacb Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -17 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Due to the time frame in which the buildings located at the project site were constructed (early 1960s), it is likely that some of the building materials contain asbestos. The project proposes to demolish several buildings including the church and school facility at St. Mark and the church at OLQA. If asbestos is present within these buildings, demolition activities would have the potential to release asbestos fibers into the atmosphere if they are not properly stabilized or removed prior to demolition activities. Mitigation required to reduce impacts to less than significant level. HM -1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant shall submit verification to the City of Newport Beach that an asbestos survey has been conducted within the existing buildings proposed for demolition or renovation. If asbestos is found, the Project Applicant shall follow all procedural requirements and regulations of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1403. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site itself is an existing school and church facility. Other schools within a one - quarter mile radius include Corona Del Mar High School which is located north of the project site across Mar Vista Drive. As discussed in Response No. VII. b) above, construction of the proposed project may have the potential to release asbestos fibers (if present) into the atmosphere if the asbestos is not properly stabilized or removed prior to demolition activities. However, since the removal of asbestos - containing materials is regulated, asbestos (if present) would be removed by a certified asbestos containment contractor in accordance with applicable regulations. Therefore, hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous materials, substances, or waste during construction of the proposed project would be less than significant with the incorporation of Mitigation Measure HM -1 above. As discussed in Response No. VII, a) above, no hazardous materials other than small quantities of cleaning products and maintenance materials (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides) are utilized during day -to- day operation of the school and church facilities. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. City or Newport Beach Our Lady Queen or Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -18 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. The project site is not included on any list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. No impact. No mitigation required. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The project site, which is located approximately two and a half miles south of the John Wayne Airport, is within the limits of its Airport Environs Land Use Plan ( AELUP) as established by the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC). The John Wayne Airport AELUP has established various zones surrounding the airport including a Noise Impact Zone, Runway Protection Zone, Building Height Restriction Zone, and Imaginary Surface Zone. The Noise Impact Zone establishes land uses that are "normally acceptable ", "conditionally acceptable ", and "normally unacceptable" within each noise impact zone delineated by the respective Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)6 noise contour derived from studies of aircraft flight operations into and out of the John Wayne Airport. The project site does not fall within the Noise Impact Zone. Therefore, noise from airport operations would be less than significant at the project site. The Runway Protection Zone (also known as the Clear Zone) identifies areas within the direct pathway of the runways that should remain relatively clear of development. The project site does not fall within the Runway Protection Zone as the project site is located approximately two and a half miles south of the southernmost runway. The Building Height Restriction Zone and Imaginary Surface Zone establish the maximum permissible heights of structures based on their distance from the airport. The cross on the church .tower would reach 90 feet in height thus penetrating the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notification Surface (100:1 Slope) for John Wayne Airport at the 100:1 Slope. Therefore, the project requires the filing of FAA Form 7460 -1 and must be reviewed by 6 CNEL is defined as rite 24 -hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 -10 P.M.) penalized by S dBA and nighttime !tours (10 P.M. -7 A.M.) penalized by 10 dBA prior to averaging. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -19 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination the ALUC per Section 21676.5 of the Public Utilities Code. The City has reviewed similar Newport Beach projects that have been processed through ALUC and that were found consistent with the John Wayne Airport AELUP. Such projects were also determined by the FAA not to be a hazard or obstruction to air navigation. Therefore, based on the existing topography, surrounding buildings, and mature trees of the East Bluff area, the proposed church tower would not have a significant impact on airport operations. However, the following mitigation measure is required to ensure the project's consistency with the John Wayne Airport AELUP's Building Height Restriction Zone and Imaginary Surface Zone. HM -2 Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the church building, the Project Applicant shall file Form 7460 -1 with the Federal Aviation Administrative (FAA). Upon receiving the FAA determination, the project shall be submitted to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for a determination of consistency. The project may be subject to additional conditions as required by the FAA and/or ALUC in order to be found in compliance with the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for the people residing or working in the area? No Impact. The project site is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip. No impact. No mitigation required. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less Than Significant Impact. According to the General Plan Public Safety Element's Major Evacuation Routes Map, Jamboree Road, located east of the project site, is a City - designated evacuation route. However, construction activities would generally be confined to the project site and would not physically impair access to and around the project site including Jamboree Road. Additionally, any change in emergency vehicle access to the project site would be reviewed by and provided in accordance with the requirements of the City of Newport Beach Fire Department. Furthermore, it is assumed that OLQA would reassess their emergency evacuation routes in light of the new buildings to be constructed throughout the site. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Ezpaffiion Project PCR services CaTmation July 20% Page 4 -20 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. No natural vegetation and/or habitat exists on the project site or surrounding area that would result in a potential risk for wildland fires. Furthermore, according to the General Plan Public Safety Element's Potential Fire Hazard Area Map, the project site is not located within a potential fire hazard area. No impact. No mitigation required. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The City of Newport Beach is located within Region 8 (the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board [ RWQCB]). The City of Newport Beach is a co- permittee with Orange County in the NPDES Program. Accordingly, the Project Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, regional, and local regulations to protect water quality during construction and operation of the proposed project as described in further detail below. Construction Construction activities associated with the proposed project may have the potential to impact water quality. Demolition and grading activities would expose surface soils which may result in soil erosion and subsequent deposition of particles in drainage areas. Additionally, the temporary use of hazardous materials in the form of paint, adhesives, surface coatings and other finishing materials may result in the subsequent deposition of these pollutants in drainage areas and ultimately the degradation of downstream receiving water bodies. However, prior to construction, the Project Applicant will be required to develop and submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity. The SWPPP will include Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented during construction that would minimize impacts to local receiving water from pollutants in storm water runoff. To ensure compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity, mitigation recommended. Impacts less than significant with mitigation. City of Newport Beach Our lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -21 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination WQ -1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall develop and submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity. The SWPPP shall contain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented during construction to minimize impacts to local receiving water from pollutants in storm water runoff. The Project Applicant shall provide the City of Newport Beach with a copy of the NOI and their application check as proof of filing with RWQCB. Operation The proposed project would maintain the existing land uses at the project site (school and church facility). Therefore, the type of runoff generated by the proposed project would not be altered. A Continuous Deflective Separation storm water filtering unit is proposed to be constructed near the easterly intersection of Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive to filter storm water from the new church facility (St. Mark site). However, in accordance with City and NPDES requirements, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be prepared for the proposed project.' The WQMP will include BMPs to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would occur. Mitigation recommended. Impacts less than significant with mitigation. WQ -2 Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall prepare and submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the proposed project, subject to the approval of the Building Department and Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division. The WQMP shall provide appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre - existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned land uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the overall amount of impervious surface at the project site by approximately five percent. This amount is nominal. The City and NPDES require significant redevelopment projects to prepare and submit a WQMP for review and approval. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -22 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Furthermore, the project would not deplete groundwater supplies as no groundwater extractions are occurring or proposed. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required., c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Construction of the proposed project would temporarily alter existing drainage patterns as there would be areas of exposed soil particularly during grading activities for the new church facility. If a storm event were to occur during these activities, exposed sediments may be carried off -site and into the local storm drain system increasing siltation. However, as discussed in Response No. VIII. a), the Project Applicant would be required to develop and submit a SWPPP to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity (see Mitigation Measure WQ -I above). Operation of the proposed project would generally maintain the existing drainage pattern (via sheet flow to the storm drain system) with some minor modifications. Nevertheless, as discussed in Response No. VIII. a), the Project Applicant would be required to prepare and submit a WQMP for the proposed project to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur post - construction (see Mitigation Measure WQ -2 above). Less than significant with mitigation. No additional mitigation required. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the overall amount of impervious surface at the project site by approximately five percent. Therefore, the amount of runoff generated by the proposed project would not significantly increase. Furthermore, as discussed in Response No. VIII. c) above, the proposed project would generally maintain the existing drainage system. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response Nos. VIII. a) and d) above, the proposed project would not significantly alter the amount of runoff or type of runoff currently generated at the project site as impervious surfaces would only increase by five percent and the land uses would remain the same. Therefore, the proposed project would not City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen or Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -23 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination substantially increase stormwater surface runoff or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Nevertheless, in accordance with City and NPDES requirements, a WQMP will be prepared for the proposed project to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would occur (see Mitigation Measure WQ -2 above). Less than significant impact. No additional mitigation required. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response No. VIII. a) above, the proposed project would maintain the existing land uses at the project site (school and church facility). Therefore, the type of runoff generated by the proposed project would not be altered. However, in accordance with City and NPDES requirements, a WQMP will be prepared for the proposed project (see Mitigation Measure WQ -2 above). The WQMP will ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements would occur. Less than significant impact. No additional mitigation required. g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood plain as mapped on federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance hate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood plain' nor does the proposed project involve the construction of housing. No impact. No mitigation required. h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood plain. No impact. No mitigation required. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact. The project site is not located within a 100 -year flood plain. Furthermore, no dams or levees are present on or near the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. 8 ESRYFEMA Project Impact, Hazard Information and Awareness Site, Flood Hazard Map, based on FEMA Digital Q3 Flood Data, http: //www.esri.com/hazards, November 28, 2005. City of Newport Beach our Lady Queen of Angels Expamlon Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -24 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. The project site is not located in the immediate vicinity of a reservoir, harbor, lake, or storage tank capable of creating a seiche. The closest body of water is located approximately half a mile west of the project site (Upper Newport Bay). Due to the distance and relatively small surface area of the Upper Newport Bay as well as the difference in elevation between the Bay and project site, inundation of the project site by seiche is highly unlikely. The project site is located approximately three miles north of the Pacific Ocean. Therefore, inundation of the project site by tsunami is also unlikely. The project site is located in a relatively flat area. It is not positioned downslope from an area of potential mudflow. No impact. No mitigation required. k) Result in significant alteration of receiving water quality during or following construction? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response No. VIII. a) above, the Project Applicant would be required to develop and submit a SWPPP to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff (see Mitigation Measure WQ -I above). Additionally, the Project Applicant would be required to prepare and submit a WQMP to ensure that no violations of water quality standards would occur post- construction (see Mitigation Measure WQ -2 above). Less than significant impact. No additional mitigation required. 1) Result in a potential for discharge of stormwater pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? No Impact. The proposed project consists of the expansion of an existing school and church facility. Such uses do not utilize hazardous materials other than small amounts of cleaning products and maintenance materials (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides). The proposed project would not involve vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas typical of industrial uses. No impact. No mitigation required. City or Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Paa 4 -25 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination m) Result in the potential for discharge of stormwater to affect the beneficial uses of the receiving waters? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response No. VIII. a) above, the Project Applicant would be required to develop and submit a SWPPP to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity to eliminate or reduce erosion and polluted runoff (see Mitigation Measure WQ -1 above). Additionally, the Project Applicant would be required to prepare and submit a WQMP to ensure that no violations of water quality standards would occur post - construction (see Mitigation Measure WQ -2 above). Less than significant impact. No additional mitigation required. n) Create the potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of stormwater runoff to cause environmental harm? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the overall amount of impervious surface at the project site by approximately five percent. As such, the volume of stormwater runoff generated at the project site would not significantly increase. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. o) Create significant increases in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Construction of the proposed project would temporarily expose soils particularly during demolition and grading activities. If a storm event were to occur during these activities, exposed sediments may be carried off -site and into the local storm drain system. However, as discussed in Response No. VIII. a), the Project Applicant would be required to develop and submit a SWPPP to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity (see Mitigation Measure WQ -1 above). Furthermore, because the proposed project would not significantly increase the amount of impervious surfaces at the project site post - construction, the potential for erosion during operation would be less than significant. Less than significant with mitigation. No additional mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2106 Page 4 -26 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project site is comprised of two separate properties (OLQA and St. Mark) with similar land uses (school and church facilities) that are bisected by Domingo Drive. The area surrounding the project site consists primarily of residential uses except for Corona Del Mar High School located to the north. The proposed project would allow OLQA to expand its facilities by relocating its church to the St. Mark property and expanding its school within its existing boundaries. All the development being proposed would occur on the project site itself. No impact. No mitigation required. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The Land Use Element of the City's General Plan identifies the general locations and intensities of land uses in the City. The project site, which is located in the Eastbluff GEIF section of Statistical Area K2 (The Bluffs Area) of the General Plan Land Use Element, has a General Plan land use designation of Government, Education, and Institutional Facilities (GEIF). This land use designation is intended for government, education, and institutional facilities including but not limited to churches and schools. As designated by the City of Newport Beach Municipal Code, the project site is also zoned GEIF. The existing/proposed uses are permitted under this land use designation and zoning. However, in order to accommodate on -going school operations during construction activities, ten 24 by 60 triple -wide temporary portable classrooms and one 12 by 40 portable boys and girls restroom would be required. The portables would be removed from the project site once construction is complete. In compliance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 20.60.015 C, a Use Permit to allow the temporary use of portable classrooms would be required. Additionally, a height limit (per the 32/50 Foot Height Limitation Zone) and maximum permitted floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.17 are applicable to the project site under the existing zoning and land use designation. All structures within the 32/50 Foot Height Limitation Zone shall be 32 feet. Structures may exceed 32 feet up at a maximum of 50 feet (1) through the adoption of a Planned Community, (2) through the adoption of a Specific Plan, or (3) through the approval of a Use Permit provided the required findings within Section 20.65.055 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code are met. Church structures used for church purposes are exempt from these height restrictions provided a Use Permit is approved. The cross on the church tower City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -27 4. Explanation OF Checklist Determination would exceed the permitted height limit for churches by 55 feet. Therefore, a Use Permit would be required. Additionally, upon completion of the proposed project, the FAR for the new church site and the school site would be 0.12 and 0.20, respectively. Because the former exceeds the allowable FAR (0.17), the proposed project would also require approval of a Use Permit to allow the transfer of density from the new church site to the school site. The overall FAR for the two properties combined would be 0.17 which is consistent with the General Plan. Accordingly, the Project Applicant is requesting the approval of a Use Permit (1) to allow the expansion of the school and church; (2) to allow the temporary use of portable classrooms; (3) to allow the new church facility to exceed the height limitation; and (4) to allow for the transfer of development intensity between the two sites. Upon approval of the Use Permit, the proposed project would not conflict with City of Newport Beach General Plan and zoning designations. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. The project site is located within the John Wayne Airport AELUP. As discussed in Response No. VII. e) above, the John Wayne Airport AELUP has established various zones surrounding the airport including a Noise Impact Zone, Runway Protection Zone, Building Height Restriction Zone, and Imaginary Surface Zone. The Noise Impact Zone establishes land uses that are "normally acceptable ", "conditionally acceptable ", and "normally unacceptable" within each noise impact zone delineated by the respective Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL)' noise contour derived from studies of aircraft flight operations into and out of the John Wayne Airport. The project site does not fall within the Noise Impact Zone. Therefore, noise from airport operations would be less than significant at the project site. The Runway Protection Zone (also known as the Clear Zone) identifies areas within the direct pathway of the runways that should remain relatively clear of development. The project site does not fall within the Runway Protection Zone as the project site is located approximately two and a half miles south of the southernmost runway. The Building Height Restriction Zone and Imaginary Surface Zone establish the maximum permissible heights of structures based on their distance from the airport. The cross on the church tower would reach 90 feet in height thus penetrating the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notification Surface (100:1 Slope) for John Wayne Airport at the 100:1 Slope. Therefore, the project requires the filing of FAA Form 7460 -1 and must be reviewed by the ALUC per Section 21676.5 of the Public Utilities Code. The City has reviewed similar Newport Beach projects that have been processed through ALUC and that were found consistent with the John Wayne Airport AELUP. Such projects were also determined by the FAA not to be a hazard or obstruction to air navigation. Therefore, based on the existing topography, surrounding buildings, and mature trees of the East Bluff area, the proposed church tower would not have a significant impact on airport operations. However, Mitigation Measure ' CNEL is defined as the 24 -hour average noise level with noise occurring during evening hours (7 -10 P.M.) penalized by 5 dBA and nighttime hours (10 P.M. -7 A.M.) penalized by 10 dBA prior to averaging. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 428 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination HM -2 above is required to ensure the project's consistency with the John Wayne Airport AELUP's Building Height Restriction Zone and Imaginary Surface Zone. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. As discussed in Section IV (Biological Resources) above, the project site does not support habitat for candidate, sensitive, or special status species and is not located within an approved habitat or natural community conservation plan. No impact. No mitigation required. X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. No mineral resources are known to exist on the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? No Impact. The project site is not delineated on the City of Newport Beach General Plan or any other local plan as having locally- important mineral resources. No impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -29 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination XI. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Section 10.26 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code (NBMC) establishes acceptable ambient sound levels to regulate intrusive noises within specific land use zones. In accordance with the NBMC, it is unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the City to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or otherwise controlled by such person, which causes the noise level when measured on any other property, to exceed either of the following: (1) the noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen - minute period; or (2) a maximum instantaneous noise level equal to the value of the noise standard plus twenty (20) dBA for any period of time (measured using A- weighted slow response). In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard, the maximum allowable noise level under said category shall be increased to reflect the maximum ambient noise level. This standard applies to all noise sources except vehicles traveling on public streets and construction noise. Section 10.28.040 of the NBMC also limits noise levels generated by construction activities. Section 10.28.040 states that any construction activities which produce loud noise that disturb, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, shall be limited to the weekdays between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:30 P.M., and Saturdays between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. No such noise occurrences shall occur at anytime on Sundays or federal holidays. In addition to the previously described NBMC provisions, the City has also established noise guidelines that are used for planning purposes. These guidelines are based in part on the community noise compatibility guidelines established by the State Department of Health Services and are intended for use in assessing the compatibility of various land use types with a range of noise levels. CNEL noise levels for specific land uses are classified into four categories: (1) "normally acceptable," (2) "conditionally acceptable," (3) "normally unacceptable," and (4) "clearly unacceptable" A CNEL or Ldo value of 70 dBA is considered the dividing line between a "conditionally acceptable" and "normally unacceptable" noise environment for noise sensitive land uses, including residences, parks, schools, and playgrounds. CNEL increases of less than 3 dBA are not considered a significant change in the environment, while an increase of between 3 and 5 dBA is generally considered a slightly significant impact, and a CNEL increase of greater than 5 dBA is considered a significant impact. City of Newport Beach Our lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Cmporation July 2006 Page 4 -30 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Construction Construction noise impacts are discussed in Response No. XI. d) below. As demonstrated, noise generated by on -site construction activities would have a less than significant impact on nearby noise sensitive uses with the incorporation of mitigation measures. Operation Project operations would affect the noise environment via motor vehicle travel and on- site stationary noise sources. As discussed in Response No. XI. c) below, motor vehicle travel on local roadways, attributable to the proposed project, would have a less than significant impact on community noise levels. Noise levels associated with on -site operations (e.g., rooftop mechanical equipment) are also considered less than significant as discussed in Response No. XI. c) below. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would be constructed using typical construction techniques, and vibration intensive activities such as pile driving would not be required. As such, it is anticipated that the equipment to be used during construction would not cause excessive groundborne noise or vibration. Post - construction on -site activities would be limited to urban land uses that do not generate excessive groundborne vibration or noise. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. The noise environment in the project area is dominated by traffic noise from nearby roadways such as Jamboree Road, Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road, as well as nearby residential and school noise sources (e.g., passenger vehicles, pets, and landscape maintenance operations). Long -term continuous noise measurements were conducted at four different locations within or near the project site from February 15 to 21, 2006, to quantify existing conditions on the site, using Larson -Davis Model 820 Type I sound level meters. These monitoring locations were selected to determine the general ambient noise level in the project area. Table 4 -3 on page 4 -32 summarizes the noise monitoring results and Figure 4 -1 on page 4- 33 shows the existing noise sources, receivers, and monitoring positions. As Table 4 -3 shows, the CNEL noise level at the residential uses to the south of the project site and the school north of the project site were 58.7 dBA and 62.7 dBA, respectively. These noise levels are within the acceptable range in the City's Community Compatibility Matrix. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -31 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -3 Summary of Ambient Noise Measurement Data (dBA) Location Number b Measurement Location" Long -Term (24 -Hour) Monitoring Data Daytime Hourly Le„_ Nighttime Hourly Leg Avg. Min- Max. Avg. Min. Max. CNEL Northwest corner of baseball 1 field, 50 feet from the edge of 62.3 58.2 67.9 51.8 41.7 57.5 62.7 Mar Vista Drive 2 Northeast corner of the existing OLQA site 58.7 55.3 63.2 46.6 39.3 51.9 58.9 3 South of St. Mark property, across from existing residences 55.8 54.2 57.1 49.7 40.6 55.1 58.3 South of the existing OLQA 4 property, by residences along 58.0 55.1 60.0 47.1 37.8 52.0 58.7 Domingo Drive Based on ambient sound measurements conducted from February 15'* to February 21", 2006, using Larson -Davis 820 Type 1 Integrating Sound Level Meters. Noise measurement data is provided in Appendix A of this Initial Study. ° Noise measurement locations are depicted in Figure 4 -1 on page 4 -33. Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2006. Long -term operations of the project would have a negligible effect on the community noise environment in proximity of the project site. The existing noise environment in the project area is dominated by traffic noise from Jamboree Road, Eastbluff Drive, and adjacent roadways. As shown in Table 4 -4 on page 4 -34, roadway traffic associated with cumulative development would result in a maximum increase of 1.4 dBA CNEL along Ford Road, east of Jamboree Road of which project - generated traffic would have a negligible contribution to this increment. Regardless, this increase in noise level would be well below the 5 dBA significant impact threshold. The project would increase permitted student enrollment by 180 (from 420 to 600 students) over a period of seven years. The total number of parking spaces would be increased by 89, however, the number of school parking spaces would be reduced, whereas the total church parking spaces would be increased; furthermore, the church capacity would be reduced from 1,222 to 1,170 seats. As a result, noise from on -site vehicle circulation activity would likely be reduced or remain unchanged during weekdays, and would increase by up to 14 percent during weekends. Since a doubling of sound energy (i.e., 100 percent increase) is required to achieve a 3 -dBA noise level increase, weekend noise from on -site vehicle circulation would be anticipated to increase by 14 percent or approximately 0.6 dBA. City of Newport Beach our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corpmation July 2006 Page 4 -32 PROJECT - -� O Representative Sensitive Receptor Locations =,ter Noise Measurement Locations 0 Sensitive Receptors • • Project Site P Pr I - _ ,fag y.opg�y •p1� � rw T 1 � ' :� •���� r L . .fin— :•J0�54�'1�7�. ^' f r l.ga.�y " %: \.� r' I / L` r •� '�' ,� a k? � - j� Figure Noise Measurement and 0 200 400 1100 Peet Sensitive Receptor Locations Source: Eagle Aerial. 2001. 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -4 Projected Traffic Noise Levels From Nearby Roadways Increase relative to traffic noise levels associated with ambient growth without the project compared with ambient growth plus project development. ° Cumulative increase relative to existing traffic noise levels, resultin g f rom ambient growth p lus project development. Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2006. On -site activity associated with the project would generally remain the same as existing activity. New buildings (e.g., classrooms and the administration building) would generally be located in the same location as their predecessors, with the exception of the proposed gymnasium which would be located further north and would replace the existing Parking Lot No. 1. As the gymnasium would be enclosed, noise created from gymnasium activity would be inaudible at the closest noise sensitive uses (i.e., Corona Del Mar High School located north of the project site). On -site activities associated with project operations would be similar to existing activities. The new buildings and surface parking areas would generally serve the same community and conduct similar services as the existing properties. Therefore, there would be no measurable long -term change in the noise characteristics of the area as a result of implementation of the project. Based on the ambient noise measurement data and the relatively small (less than 1.0 dBA) increase in noise levels for stationary, mobile and operational uses .discussed above, project noise level increases would be well below the significance threshold of 5 dBA. The ambient noise levels with the proposed project would also remain in the acceptable range. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -34 Calculated CNEL (dBA) at 50 Feet from Roadway Right -of -Way Change in CNEL (dBA) Future (2010) Existing Without With Project Cumulative Roadway Segment (2006) Project Project Increment' Increment" Jamboree Road North of Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road 68.5 69.3 69.3 0.0 0.8 South of Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road 69.2 70.0 70.0 0.0 0.8 Eastbluff Drive West of Jamboree Road 62.1 62.7 62.7 0.0 0.6 Ford Road East of Jamboree Road 60.4 61.8 61.8 0.0 1.4 Increase relative to traffic noise levels associated with ambient growth without the project compared with ambient growth plus project development. ° Cumulative increase relative to existing traffic noise levels, resultin g f rom ambient growth p lus project development. Source: PCR Services Corporation, 2006. On -site activity associated with the project would generally remain the same as existing activity. New buildings (e.g., classrooms and the administration building) would generally be located in the same location as their predecessors, with the exception of the proposed gymnasium which would be located further north and would replace the existing Parking Lot No. 1. As the gymnasium would be enclosed, noise created from gymnasium activity would be inaudible at the closest noise sensitive uses (i.e., Corona Del Mar High School located north of the project site). On -site activities associated with project operations would be similar to existing activities. The new buildings and surface parking areas would generally serve the same community and conduct similar services as the existing properties. Therefore, there would be no measurable long -term change in the noise characteristics of the area as a result of implementation of the project. Based on the ambient noise measurement data and the relatively small (less than 1.0 dBA) increase in noise levels for stationary, mobile and operational uses .discussed above, project noise level increases would be well below the significance threshold of 5 dBA. The ambient noise levels with the proposed project would also remain in the acceptable range. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -34 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The residential uses located along the southern and western boundaries of the project site across Domingo Drive (approximately 70 feet from the project boundary) would represent the closest noise - sensitive uses to the project site. The nearest building of the Corona Del Mar High School is approximately 120 feet from the northern boundary of the project site, across Mar Vista Drive. Construction -period noise impacts were evaluated at the three locations: Receiver Location No. 1 (south of project site, across Domingo Drive) represents the closest residence to the initial phase of construction activity, and as such, would experience the worst -case noise impacts during this phase of construction. Similarly, Receiver Location Nos. 2 and 3 (north of project site, across Mar Vista Drive; and south of St. Mark property, by the residential uses, respectively) represent the closest sensitive receptors to the remaining development within the north and southeast portion of the site, and therefore, would experience the worst -case noise impacts during construction of these areas of the project site. Maximum noise levels (L,,,ax) for most of the equipment that would be used during project construction would range from 70 to 95 dBA at a 50 -foot reference distance. These maximum noise levels would occur when equipment is operating under full power conditions or during "impact' activities such as jack hammering or sawing. However, the equipment used on construction sites often operate under less than full power condition or partial power. Actual measurements taken while equipment is operating indicate that shift -long equivalent sound levels (Ley) are typically 2 dBA to 15 dBA less than maximum noise levels. For project -long (i.e., total duration of construction activity) equivalent Ley levels, these values can be further reduced to account for the percentage of time that equipment actually operate on the construction site.1° The average (L.ey) noise level generated by construction activity generally ranges from 77 to 86 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. Typically, noise levels at receptor locations would be less, because the noisiest equipment is not used continuously. Noise levels diminish at a rate of approximately 6 dBA per doubling of distance. Thus, a noise level of 86 dBA at a reference distance of 50 feet would be about 80 dBA at 100 feet, and 74 dBA at 200 feet. As heavy equipment passes near project site boundaries, the peak construction noise level could reach 90 dBA or more for brief periods in areas immediately adjacent to the 'project site. As construction equipment travels toward the center of the project site, peak noise levels would diminish as described above. However, construction activities would be conducted in a manner consistent with the City Noise Ordinance (any weekday ro Beranek and Ver, Noise and Vibration: Control Engineering, Principles and Applications, 1992, p. 652. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -35 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:30 P.M. and on any Saturday between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M.). Therefore, short-term noise from construction activities would be less than significant. Nevertheless, construction noise levels would substantially exceed existing ambient noise levels for nearby land uses, and, therefore, the following mitigation measures are recommended. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures N -1 and N -2, construction noise impacts would be less than significant. N -1 Construction activities which produce loud noise that disturb, or could disturb, a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the vicinity, shall be limited to the weekdays between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:30 P.M., and Saturdays between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. No such noise occurrences shall occur at anytime on Sundays or federal holidays. N -2 Noise - generating equipment operated at the project site shall be equipped with effective noise control devices (i.e., mufflers, lagging, and/or motor enclosures). All equipment shall be properly maintained to assure that no additional noise, due to wom or improperly maintained parts, would be generated. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project site is located approximately 2.5 miles from John Wayne Airport. The project site is located outside the 60 dBA CNEL Noise Contour of the John Wayne AELUP as established by the Orange County ALUC. No impact. No mitigation required. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no private airstrips within at least five miles of the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation Jury 2006 Page 4 -36 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is only intended to expand OLQA's existing school and church capacity to meet the projected enrollment and congregation needs of the surrounding area. It is not intended to draw new students or parishioners to the area. Although the projected increase in enrollment would incrementally increase the need for additional members of faculty and staff, the large labor force available in Orange County and surrounding areas is expected to readily accommodate these needs. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. No housing is located on the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. No housing is located on the project site. No impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen or Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corpmsiion July 2006 Page 4 -37 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Fire protection is provided to the project site by the City of Newport Beach Fire Department (NBFD). Station No. 3 (Newport Center), located at 868 Santa Barbara Drive, is the fire station closest to the project site (approximately one mile south). In addition to the NBFD, the City maintains an automatic aid agreement with the Orange County Fire Authority (OCFA) and neighboring municipal fire departments to facilitate fire protection in the City should the need arise. The project site is currently developed with institutional uses that require fire protection services from the NBFD. The proposed project would result in the intensification of the project site with the net increase of 18,146 square feet of building space. However, the uses would remain unchanged (school and church facility). This slight increase in square footage would not create a substantial need for additional fire protection services. Furthermore, the proposed project would comply with applicable City codes, ordinances, and requirements so as to reduce the potential for fire hazards (i.e., installation of fire sprinklers and an alarm system). Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. ii) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Police protection to the project site is provided by the City of Newport Beach Police Department (NBPD). The NBPD headquarters is located at 870 Santa Barbara Drive, approximately one mile south of the project site. The project site is developed with uses that require police protection services from the NBPD. As previously mentioned, the proposed project would result in the intensification of the project site with the net increase of 18,146 square feet of building space. However, the uses would remain unchanged (school and church facility). The increase in square footage would allow the student enrollment of the school to increase by 180 students. This increase in enrollment would occur gradually over the course of approximately six years. The increase in the square footage and number of students would not create a substantial need for additional police protection services. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. City or Newport Beach our Lady Queen or Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -38 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination iii) Schools? No Impact. The proposed project would expand the K -8 school facilities at OLQA so as to allow for the enrollment of 180 additional students. Although OLQA School is a private, parochial school, public schools in the area would benefit from its expansion. No impact. No mitigation required. iv) Other public facilities? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is only intended to expand OLQA's existing school and church capacity to meet the projected enrollment and congregation needs of the surrounding area. It is not intended to draw new students or parishioners to the area. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The project proposes to expand OLQA's existing school and church capacity to meet the projected enrollment and congregation needs of the surrounding area. It is not intended to draw new students or parishioners to the area. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any substantial increases in demands on existing recreational facilities. Furthermore, the proposed project includes the construction of a gymnasium which would include a basketball court. Hence, the proposed project would be beneficial as it is providing additional recreational opportunities to existing and proposed students. No impact. No mitigation required. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The proposed project includes the construction of a gymnasium on the northern portion of Parking Lot No. 1. Because the site of the proposed gymnasium is already developed, its construction would not have an adverse physical effect on the environment. No impact. No mitigation required. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -39 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination XV. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. Construction of the proposed project would result in the short-term addition of construction vehicles to the existing traffic load of the area, particularly during export of the estimated 3,759 cubic yards of soil off - site. A maximum of 50 truck trips per day would be allowed to export the soil. Construction activities would generally occur on the weekdays between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:30 P.M. and on Saturdays between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. To ensure that construction vehicles do not disrupt student drop -off and pick -up procedures at the project site as well as the adjoining Corona Del Mar High School, the following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce any potential traffic impacts to a less than significant level. T -1 During a school day, heavy construction vehicle travel on adjoining streets shall be limited on weekdays to non -peak school hours, which are generally 8:30 A.M. to 2:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M. Operation Based on the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance guidelines, the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road was selected for analysis. Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology was used to assess the operation of the study intersection. ICU values are calculated based on the volume of traffic using the intersection compared to the capacity of the intersection. A Level of Service (LOS) rating (A through F) is then assigned to the intersection based on the ICU value. The City of Newport Beach considers LOS A through D to be operating satisfactorily while LOS E and F are considered unsatisfactory. According to the City's established significance threshold criteria, a significant impact would occur if project - generated traffic would cause an intersection to deteriorate from LOS D to LOS E or F. For intersections operating at LOS E or F under existing conditions (i.e., pre- project), a significant impact would occur if project - generated traffic would increase the ICU value by 0.01 or more. Existing (2005) weekday morning (A.M.) and afternoon (P.M.) peak hour traffic volumes for the study intersection were provided by the City of Newport Beach. Table 4 -5 on page 4-41 summarizes the results of the existing A.M. and P.M. peak hour ICU analysis and corresponding City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corpmtion July 2006 Page 4 -40 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -5 Existing (2005) Level of Service at Study Intersection ICU LOS Intersection A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road 0.540 0.615 A B Source: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., April 2006. LOS for the study intersection. As shown in Table 4 -5, the study intersection currently operates at a satisfactory level (LOS D or better) during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. To determine future traffic volumes on the study intersection without the proposed project, three variables were considered including ambient growth, approved projects in the vicinity, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the vicinity. The new church site is expected to be complete and operational by 2009. The increase in student enrollment to 600 students is expected to be complete by the 2012 -2013 school year per the school enrollment phasing plan (refer to Section 2., Project Description of this Initial Study). To present a worst - case scenario, the new church facility and 600 student enrollment capacity were both assumed to be complete by 2010. Therefore, ambient growth at a rate of one percent per year was added through 2010 to the study intersection as specified by the City of Newport Beach. Additionally, traffic volumes from twenty approved projects and seven reasonably foreseeable future projects were added to the future 2010 traffic scenario. Table 4 -6 on page 4 -42 summarizes the results of the future 2010 A.M. and P.M. peak hour ICU analysis and corresponding LOS for the study intersection without the proposed project. As shown in Table 4 -6, at the project's opening year, the study intersection would operate at a satisfactory level (LOS D or better) during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. Trip generation rates for the proposed project were obtained from the Newport Beach Traffic Analysis Model. To estimate the number of trips generated by the proposed project, first the number of trips generated by the overall gross build -out of the proposed project were calculated using the City's trip generation rates. Second, the number of trips generated by existing uses at the project site were calculated using the same trip generation rates. The number of trips estimated to be generated by existing uses were then subtracted from number of trips estimated to be generated by the overall gross build -out of the proposed project. The resulting numbers are the net number of trips estimated to be generated by the proposed project, which are approximately 19 additional trips per day, including 27 trips in the A.M. peak hours and a City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -41 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -6 Future 2010 Level of Service at Study Intersection without Proposed Project ICU LOS Intersection A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road 0.662 0.735 g C Source: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., April 2006. decrease of 56 trips in the P.M. peak hours over existing uses." Table 4 -7 on page 4 -43 presents the trip generation rates'as well as the trip generation calculations. The distribution of these trips was determined from current student enrollment in relation to the project site as well as from observed travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site. Table 4 -8 on page 4 -44 summarizes the results of the future 2010 A.M. and P.M. peak hour ICU analysis and corresponding LOS for the study intersection with the proposed project. As shown in Table 4 -8, the study intersection would continue to operate at a satisfactory level of service with the proposed project during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The proposed project would not cause the intersection to deteriorate from LOS D to LOS E or F. It is important to note that the traffic generated by Corona Del Mar High School located opposite the project site is concentrated in a 20 to 30 minute period during the A.M. peak hour and results in considerable delays at the study intersection during that time as it is the peak high school arrival period. The ICU value is determined based on an hourly volume assuming a random arrival rate spread out over the entire hour. Therefore, the full impact of the high school arrival is not reflected in the A.M. peak hour ICU value. However, although the ICU value does not completely reflect the impact of the high school traffic on the study intersection during the A.M. peak hour, the proposed project's impacts are determined based on the incremental increase in ICU value over the background condition. As Table 4 -8 indicates, the proposed project would not cause a 0.01 or greater increase in the ICU value at the study intersection during the A.M. peak hour. Therefore, the proposed project would not cause a significant impact at the study intersection. The decrease in trips during the P.M. peak hour is attributed to the fact that there are no P.M. peak hour trips associated with Elementary/Private Schools where as the P.M. peak hour trips associated with Preschools/Day Care is very high. The proposed project would eliminate both preschools at the project site and expand the elementary school. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -42 Land Use Trip Rates Church Preschool/Day Care Elementary/Private School 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4 -7 Trip Generation Summary A.M. Peak Hour Units In Out Total TSF° 0.08 0.03 0.11 TSF" 6.90 6.12 13.02 STU` 0.18 0.12 0.30 P.M. Peak Hour In Out Total ADT 0.34 0.30 0.64 7.70 6.40 7.22 13.62 79.26 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.09 Proposed Project Trip Generation Church 55.53 TSF 4 2 6 19 17 36 428 Elementary/Private School 600 STU 108 72 180 0 0 0 654 Total 112 74 186 19 17 36 1,082 Existing Use Trip Generation (Credits) Our Lady Queen of Angels Church 34.31 TSF 3 1 4 12 10 22 264 Preschool/Day Care 1.63 TSF I I 10 21 10 12 22 129 Elementary/Private School 315 STU 57 38 95 0 0 0 343 St. Mark Church 12.39 TSF 1 0 1 4 4 8 95 Preschool /Day Care 2.93 TSF 20 18 38 19 21 40 232 Total 92 67 159 45 47 92 1,063 Net Change +20 +7 +27 -26 -30 -56 +19 " Average daily traffic. ° Thousand square feet. Students. Source: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., April 2006. In addition to the quantitative ICU/LOS analysis above, a qualitative analysis of the proposed project's potential impacts on the residential neighborhood west of Eastbluff Drive was conducted. Project traffic, both weekday and Sunday, will access the project site from Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive. However, an existing left -turn restriction is located northbound on Eastbluff Drive at Mar Vista Drive during the A.M. peak period on school days (7:30 to 9:00 A.M.) to prevent the back up of vehicles to the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the peak high school arrival time. As a result of this turn restriction, weekday morning traffic approaching the project site from Jamboree Road south of Eastbluff Drive or from Ford Road east of Jamboree Road during these hours must continue north on Eastbluff Drive past Mar Vista Drive to Vista Del Oro before making a left turn, then travel City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4.43 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Table 4.8 Future 2010 Level of Service at Study Intersection with Proposed Project ICU LOS Change in ICU' Intersection A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road 0.663 0.735 B C 0.001 0.000 Change in ICU value from future 2010 without the proposed project (Table 4 -6). Source: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc., April 2006. around the high school to the west end of Mar Vista Drive, and approach the project site from eastbound Mar Vista Drive. This turn restriction does not affect project traffic approaching from the north on Eastbluff Drive. In addition, this turn restriction only applies to school days and has no impact on the weekend traffic approaching the project site. The proposed project will add 27 new trips during the weekday A.M. peak hour to the circulation system. In reality, the majority of these trips will occur within a half -hour period during the peak hour (as opposed to the full hour). Of these new trips, 20 are inbound and 7 are outbound. Distribution of the new trips on the surrounding street system is based on the existing school enrollment, as discussed above. Approximately 10 percent of the student enrollment comes from the residential area west of Eastbluff Drive. Trips from this area are expected to travel on the residential streets to Vista Del Oro and approach the project site from eastbound Mar Vista Drive. These trips will total approximately 2 new trips during the A.M. peak 30 minutes. New trips from the residential neighborhood between Eastbluff Drive and Jamboree Road and approaching from the north on Eastbluff Drive will total approximately 3 new trips. The remaining new trips are expected to come from south and east of the project site. The school day begins at 7:50 A.M. Therefore, the majority of trips from south and east of the project site will be subject to the turn restriction on northbound Eastbluff Drive at Mar Vista Drive. Of these trips from the south and east, approximately 30 percent will arrive before the turn restriction on Eastbluff Drive begins at 7:30 A.M. Therefore, approximately 4 new trips will turn left from northbound Eastbluff Drive to westbound Mar Vista Drive, and 11 new trips will travel north on Eastbluff Drive and west on Vista Del Oro to the west end of Mar Vista Drive during the A.M. peak 30 minutes. A total of 13 new inbound A.M. peak hour trips will be added to Mar Vista Drive west of the project site and 7 new inbound trips will be added to Mar Vista Drive east of the project site. The new weekday A.M. peak hour trips generated by the proposed project are not expected to create a significant impact on the surrounding residential streets. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -44 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination As discussed previously, the proposed project will result in a reduction of 56 trips in the P.M. peak hour. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a significant impact on the surrounding residential streets during the P.M. peak hour. OLQA Church currently has four Sunday morning services (7:00 A.M., 8:30 A.M., 10:00 A.M., and 11:30 A.M.) with a capacity of 872 seats and St. Mark has one Sunday morning service (9:30 A.M.) with a capacity of 350 seats. The proposed project would result in 1,170 seats which is 52 seats less than the existing number of seats between the two churches combined (1,222 seats). The number of Sunday morning services at OLQA Church would remain the same. The average Sunday morning attendance at OLQA Church is 207, 589, 607, and 330 persons for the 7:00 A.M., 8:30 A.M., 10:00 A.M., and 11:30 A.M. masses, respectively. As indicated, the 10:00 A.M. service is currently the most popular service with an average attendance of 607 persons. The 8:30 A.M. service is the second most popular with an average attendance of 589 persons. The average attendance at the 10:00 A.M. service is approximately 70 percent of the seating capacity. The proposed project would result in a 34 percent increase in seating capacity in the sanctuary. Assuming that the average attendance at the 10:00 A.M. Service increases proportionately with the expansion of the church, the proposed project would result in an average attendance of 813 persons (an increase of 206 persons) at the 10:00 A.M. service. Similarly, the average attendance at the 8:30 A.M. service would increase to 789 persons (an increase of 200 persons). Traffic from the increase in attendance at the 8:30 A.M. Service would increase while the increase in traffic from the 10:00 A.M. service would be offset by the elimination of traffic from the 9:30 A.M. service at St. Mark. It is recognized that the elimination of the 9:30 A.M. service at St. Mark would seem to mostly affect the existing traffic for the 10:00 A.M. Service at OLQA. However, this would also reduce the traffic for the 8:30 A.M. service at OLQA as they leave. There is the possibility that the increase in seating capacity at OLQA Church would result in an increase in attendance at the less popular services. However, since the 7:00 A.M. and 11:30 A.M. services are currently lightly attended, there is no reason to expect a significant increase in attendance at these services due to the proposed project. On the contrary, it may occur that with additional seating available at the popular 8:30 A.M. and 10:00 A.M. services as a result of the proposed expansion, some people who currently attend the 7:00 A.M. or 11:30 A.M. service would choose to attend the 8:30 A.M. or 10:00 A.M. Services instead. As previously stated, despite the increase in seating capacity at OLQA Church, the increase would be offset by the elimination of the St. Mark service. Therefore, there would be no significant difference in the amount of Sunday morning traffic on the surrounding residential streets. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 445 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not exceed, or contribute to a cumulative exceedance of a level of service standard established by the County Congestion Management Agency for designated roads or highways. As shown above in Table 4 -8, the project's greatest contribution to a change in ICU is 0.001 which is minimal and would not cause the particular intersection to operate at an unacceptable LOS. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is located within the John Wayne Airport AELUP. As discussed in Response No. VII. e) above, the Building Height Restriction Zone and Imaginary Surface Zone establish the maximum permissible heights of structures based on their distance from the airport. The cross on the church tower would reach 90 feet in height thus penetrating the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Notification Surface (100:1 Slope) for John Wayne Airport at the 100:1 Slope. Therefore, the project requires the filing of FAA Form 7460 -1 and must be reviewed by the ALUC per Section 21676.5 of the Public Utilities Code. The City has reviewed similar Newport Beach projects that have been processed through ALUC and that were found consistent with the John Wayne Airport AELUP. Such projects were also determined by the FAA not to be a hazard or obstruction to air navigation. Therefore, based on the existing topography, surrounding buildings, and mature trees of the East Bluff area, the proposed church tower would not have a significant impact on airport operations. However, Mitigation Measure HM -2 above is required to ensure the project's consistency with the John Wayne Airport AELUP's Building Height Restriction Zone and Imaginary Surface Zone. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. Vehicular access to the project site would be simplified with the proposed project. Vehicular access to the existing OLQA property would be reduced from four driveways along Mar Vista Drive to two driveways. Both driveways currently providing access to Parking Lot No. 2 would be eliminated. Vehicular access along Domingo Drive would still be provided via two driveways; however, the location of one of the driveways would be altered. The existing driveway which provides access to Parking Lot No. 3 would be eliminated and a new driveway City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 4 -46 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination would be constructed directly across from the existing driveway at the new church. The alignment of these two driveways would allow vehicles to traverse the two properties. Additionally, the project proposes to implement a new student drop- off /pick -up procedure (refer to Section 2., Project Description). The student drop- off /pick -up procedure would involve a one -way counter - clockwise circulation pattern with traffic entering at the westerly driveway on Mar Vista Drive and exiting the easterly driveway. The school would conduct periodic review of the proposed student drop- off /pick -up procedure and modify it as needed to ensure that no stacking of vehicles occurs off -site. Counts of the existing student drop- off /pick -up procedure were conducted in December 2005 and March 2006. The count data indicates that 85 percent of the students are dropped off during a 25- minute period in the morning, and 85 to 90 percent are picked up in a 25- minute period in the afternoon. A queue of six or seven vehicles backs onto Mar Vista Drive briefly during the morning drop -off period; however, no vehicles were observed to back onto Mar Vista Drive during the afternoon pick -up period. The current drop -off procedure involves three rows of vehicles dropping off students in the parking lot. To reduce the impact of queues on Mar Vista Drive, the new drop -off procedure would include a minimum of four rows of vehicles during the peak drop -off period which would clear vehicles off of Mar Vista Drive faster. Based on the counts of the existing student drop - off /pick -up procedure, the average vehicle occupancy during the morning drop -off period is 1.83 students per vehicle. The proposed project would increase enrollment by 250 students. However, because one kindergarten class of 33 students would not start school until 10:00 A.M., this number would be reduced to 217 students for purposes of the morning drop -off period analysis. Based on the average vehicle occupancy rate, this would result in 119 additional vehicles during the morning drop -off period, 85 percent of which are expected to arrive during the 25- minute peak period (approximately 7:25 to 7:50 A.M.). This increase in vehicles averages four new vehicles per minute during the 25- minute peak period. The new drop -off procedure, which would include a minimum of four rows of vehicles during the peak drop -off period, is expected to adequately accommodate this increase. Conclusion — no impact. No mitigation required. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The proposed project would not result in the closure or blockage of any street, or impair access to and around the surrounding areas. Additionally, any change in emergency vehicle access to the project site would be reviewed by and provided in accordance with the requirements of the City of Newport Beach Fire Department. Furthermore, it is City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporffion July 2006 Page 4 -47 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination assumed that OLQA would reassess their emergency evacuation routes in light of the new buildings to be constructed throughout the site. No impact. No mitigation required. f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Newport Beach Parking Code requires one parking stall for every 3 church seats. Based on these parking requirements, the proposed project would require 390 parking spaces. The project proposes to provide a total of 439 on -site parking spaces, 163 of which will be on the church's school campus (north of Domingo Drive) and 276 will be on the church campus (east of Domingo Drive), thereby satisfying the City Code requirement. However, in order to determine a more accurate average vehicle occupancy rate for the project, vehicle occupancy counts were performed by Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. on a Sunday morning in March 2006. The survey revealed a maximum average vehicle occupancy rate of 1.70 persons per vehicle prior to the 10:00 a.m. service as the 10:00 a.m. Sunday morning service has the highest average attendance and the highest vehicle occupancy rate. Forecasting the average attendance for an 1,170 sanctuary results in a peak parking demand of approximately 478 parking spaces (439 provided) on a typical Sunday during the 10:00 a.m. service exceeds the total on -site parking. Furthermore, if the proposed 1,170 -seat sanctuary were filled to capacity, then the proposed project would require approximately 688 parking spaces; however, this would likely only happen on major religious holidays, large funerals or memorial services where the average vehicle occupancy may be higher. To address these potential short term parking shortage, the applicant submitted a draft parking management plan, as described in Section 2, Project Description and as a part of the Use Permit application package for the approval of the City Traffic Engineer. No mitigation required. g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Impact. The proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. The project does not propose to alter any existing bus turnouts or established alternative transportation programs within the City. Moreover, the proposed project would provide additional bicycle racks on the project site for the expanded school. No impact. No mitigation required. XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 48 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response No. VIII. a) above, the City of Newport Beach is located within the Santa Ana RWQCB (Region 8) and is a co- petmittee with Orange County in the NPDES Program. Accordingly, the Project Applicant would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, regional, and local regulations to protect water quality during construction and operation of the proposed project including the preparation of a SWPPP and WQMP. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Newport Beach currently provides water service to the project site. A 12 -inch and 8 -inch water line are located along Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive, respectively. The proposed project would increase school uses by 19,254 square feet whereas church uses would decrease by 1,108 square feet. To estimate the future water demand of the additional school uses, a generation factor of 14.25 gallons per 1,000 square feet per day was utilized.12 Based on this generation factor, the increase in school uses would require an additional 274 gallons of water per day. This amount does not take into account the decrease in church uses. Nor does it take into consideration the overall reduction in landscaping that would occur as a result of the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project may in fact result in a smaller increase in water uses than the estimated 274 gallons per day over existing uses. The existing water supply and water distribution system would be adequate to accommodate project. No improvements to existing off -site water lines would be required. The City also provides wastewater service to the project site. An 8 -inch sewer main is located at the westerly intersection of Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive. The sewer main continues in an easterly direction along Mar Vista Drive to the center of the OLQA property where it terminates. The sewer main continues in a southerly direction along Domingo Drive to the first bend where it terminates. The treatment of wastewater generated within the City is conducted by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). The proposed project would increase school uses by 19,254 square feet whereas church uses would decrease by 1,108 square feet. To estimate the future wastewater generation of the additional school uses, a generation 12 Based on Irvine Ranch Water District's 2003 Water Resources Master Plan, Table 3 -1, Land Use and Water Use Factors (Commercial - School). City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 49 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination factor of 12.11 gallons per 1,000 square feet per day was utilized." Based on this generation factor, the increase in school uses would generate an additional 233 gallons of wastewater per day. This amount does not take into account the decrease in church uses. Therefore, the proposed project may in fact result in a smaller increase in wastewater generation than the estimated 233 gallons per day over existing uses. The existing sewer system would be adequate to accommodate project. No improvements to existing off -site sewer lines would be required. Similarly, the wastewater treatment facilities maintained by OCSD would be adequate to accommodate the additional wastewater that would be generated by the proposed project. Conclusion — less than significant. No mitigation required. c) Require or result in. the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the overall amount of impervious surface at the project site by approximately five percent. As such, the volume of stormwater runoff generated at the project site would not significantly increase. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Response No. XVI. b) above, the water demand for the proposed project would be less than significant. Although the City has sufficient water supply available to serve the proposed project, implementation of the water conservation measures listed below in Mitigation Measures U -1 through U -6 are recommended as they would help reduce the demand for groundwater, surface water, and imported water supplies. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures U -1 through U -6, potential impacts to water supplies would be less than significant. U -1 New landscaping shall incorporate drought - tolerant plant materials and drip irrigation systems where possible. U -2 Water leaving the project site due to over - irrigation of landscape shall be minimized. If an incident such as this is reported, a representative from the Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division of the City Manager's Office " Wastewater generation is generally estimated as 85 percent of water consumption. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 50 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination shall visit the location, investigate, inform the property owner if possible, leave a note, and in some cases shut off the water. U -3 Watering shall be done during the early morning or evening hours to minimize evaporation (between 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 A.M. the following morning). U -4 All leaks shall be investigated by a representative from the Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division of the City Manager's Office and the Project Applicant shall complete all required repairs. U -5 Water should not be used to clean paved surfaces such as sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, etc. except to alleviate immediate safety or sanitation hazards. U -6 Reclaimed water shall be used whenever available, assuming it is economically feasible. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response No. XVI. b) above, the OCSD has the available capacity to serve the proposed project. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. Orange County has three landfills the Frank Bowerman Landfill in Irvine, the Prima Deshecha Landfill in San Juan Capistrano, and the Olinda Alpha Landfill in Brea. The solid waste generated by the proposed project would likely be taken to the Frank Bowerman Landfill in Irvine. The facility has a maximum daily tonnage capacity of 8,500 tons and is scheduled to close in 2022.16 If for some reason the Frank Bowerman Landfill cannot accept the solid waste (i.e., it reaches its daily tonnage limit), waste haulers would be diverted to one of the other two landfills in the County. The Prima Deshecha Landfill has a maximum daily tonnage capacity of 4,000 tons and is scheduled to close in 2067. The Olinda Alpha Landfill has a maximum daily tonnage capacity of 8,000 tons and is scheduled to close in 2013, although a study is currently underway that may extend the life and disposal capacity of the landfill. " County of Orange, Integrated Waste Management website, www.oclandflls.com. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 51 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Construction of the proposed project would involve the generation of construction and demolition debris. To estimate the construction- related solid waste generation of the proposed project, a generation factor of 4 pounds per square feet was utilized.16 The proposed project would demolish approximately 26,374 square feet. Therefore, based on the generation factor, construction of the proposed project would generate approximately 105,496 pounds (or 53 tons) of construction- related solid waste over the duration of the three year construction period. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. The project site is currently occupied and generating solid waste. The proposed project would increase school uses by 19,254 square feet whereas church uses would decrease by 1,108 square feet. To estimate the future solid waste generation of the additional school uses, a generation factor of 0.007 pounds per square feet per day was utilized.16 Based on this generation factor, the increase in school uses would generate an additional 135 pounds of solid waste per day. This amount does not take into account the decrease in church uses. Therefore, the proposed project may in fact result in a smaller increase in solid waste generation than the estimated 135 pounds per day over existing uses. Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would be subject to AB 939 which requires cities to participate in countywide programs and to implement site - specific source reduction, recycling, and reuse programs to reduce their waste streams by 50 percent. The City of Newport Beach has an approved list of solid waste haulers for construction, demolition, and commercial waste. These City- approved haulers are responsible for meeting the requirements of AB 939 (i.e., meeting specific diversion rates, recycling, etc.). Less than significant impact. No mitigation required. h) Include a new or retrofitted storm water treatment control Best Management Practice (BMP), (e.g. water quality treatment basin, constructed treatment wetland), the operation of which could result in significant environmental effects (e.g. increased vectors and odors ?) No Impact. Although the proposed project would require the approval of a WQMP which would include BMPs (Mitigation Measure WQ -2), the BMPs would not result in rs Based on California Integrated Waste Management Board's generation factor for residential construction- related waste. No generation factor for schools or church facil ities was found. 16 California Integrated Waste Management Board website, www.ciwmb.ca.gov. City or Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR services Corporation July 2006 Page 52 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination significant environmental effects such as increased vectors or odors. No impact. No mitigation required. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The preceding analysis does not reveal any significant unmitigable impacts to the environment. Based on these findings, the proposed project is not expected to degrade the quality of the environment. As discussed previously in Section IV, Biological Resources, the proposed project would not substantially reduce the habitat of fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. However, the project site (particularly the St. Mark property) does have the potential to support both raptor and songbird nests due to the presence of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Disturbing or destroying active nests is a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BR- 1 has been incorporated to reduce impacts to nesting birds to a less than significant level. As discussed in Section V, Cultural Resources, the project site may contain archaeological and paleontological resources. Resources may be encountered during grading activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measures CR -1 through CR -2, potential impacts related to cultural resources would be reduced to a less than significant level. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects). Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The potential for cumulative impacts occurs when the independent impacts of the proposed project are combined with the impacts of related projects in proximity to the project site such that impacts occur that are greater than the impacts of the project alone. As discussed in the preceding analysis, for the majority of the environmental topics covered in this Initial Study it has been determined that the proposed project would have no impact or less than significant impacts. With respect to Air City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 53 4. Explanation Of Checklist Determination Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use and Planning, Noise, Transportation and Circulation, and Utilities and Service Systems, implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would ensure that the effects of the proposed project would be reduced to a less than significant level. Because the mitigation measures for these topics are project - specific and would reduce the project's potential impacts to less than significant levels, no cumulative impacts would occur. Furthermore, any similar impacts from development of related projects also would implement similar mitigation measures such that impacts would not be cumulatively considerable. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact Unless Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would not result in environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. As discussed in the preceding analysis, all potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels with the incorporation of mitigation measures. City of Newport Beach Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Project PCR Services Corporation July 2006 Page 54 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of Newport Beach prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Initial Study for the proposed Our Lady Queen of Angels Church Expansion project located in the City of Newport Beach. The MND indicated that the potential adverse environmental impacts of the project, in terms of Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology /Soils, Hazards /Hazardous Materials, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use /Planning, Noise, Transportation/Traffic and Utilities /Service System could be mitigated to below levels of significance. The mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and the MND is scheduled for adoption by the City of Newport Beach, in conjunction with the approval of the project. Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code (PCR) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097 require the Lead Agency for each project which is subject to the CEQA to monitor performance of the mitigation measures included in any environmental document to ensure that implementation does, in fact, take place. The PCR requires the Lead Agency to adopt a monitoring and reporting program that is designed to ensure compliance during the project implementation. In accordance with PCR Section 21081.6 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15097, this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been developed for Our Lady Queen of Angels Church Expansion project. MITIGATION MEASURES The mitigation measures which are required to reduce or avoid the potentially significant adverse impacts of future development on the project site are listed in Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring Program. Responsible parties, the time frame for implementation, and the monitoring parties are also identified for each measure. In order to determine if the responsible party has implemented these measures, the method of verification is also identified, along with the City of Newport Beach department or agency responsible for monitoring /verifying that the responsible party has completed each mitigation measure. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 1 of 8 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring Program Mitigation Measures Responsible Party Time Frame for Implementation Department or Agency Responsible for Monitoring Air Quality AQ -1: The project applicant shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 Construction During construction Site inspection by Building or requirements as follows: Contractor /Project activities Public Works Department Applicant Land Clearing /Earth - Moving — Exposed pits (i.e., gravel, soil, dirt) with 5 percent or greater silt content shall be watered twice daily, enclosed, covered, or treated with non -toxic soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications. — All other active sites shall be watered twice daily. —All grading activities shall cease during second stage smog alerts and periods of high winds (i.e., greater than 25 mph) if soil is being transported to off -site locations and cannot be controlled by watering. —AII trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials off -site shall be covered or wetted or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between the top of the load and the top of the trailer). — Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three months shall be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized in a manner acceptable to the City. — All vehicles on the construction site shall travel at speeds less than 15 mph. — All diesel - powered vehicles and equipment shall be properly operated and maintained. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 2 of 8 — All diesel - powered vehicles and gasoline - powered equipment shall be turned off when not in use for more than 5 minutes. — The construction contractor shall utilize electric or natural gas - powered equipment instead of gasoline or diesel - powered engines, where feasible. Paved Roads — All construction roads internal to the construction site that have a traffic volume of more than 50 daily trips by construction equipment, or 150 total daily trips for all vehicles, shall be surfaced with base material or decomposed granite, or shall be paved. — Streets shall be swept hourly if visible soil material has been carried onto adjacent public paved roads. — Construction equipment shall be visually inspected prior to leaving the site and loose dirt shall be washed off with wheel washers as necessary. Unpaved Staging Areas or Roads —Water or non -toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied, according to manufacturers' specifications, as needed to reduce off -site transport of fugitive dust from all unpaved staging areas and unpaved road surfaces. Biological Resources BR -1: The Project Applicant shall make efforts to schedule all Project Applicant During Building or Planning vegetation removal activities (i.e., tree removal and grading) outside the Construction Department nesting season (the nesting season is February 15th to August 15th) to activities avoid potential impacts to nesting birds. If initial vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, all suitable habitats shall be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement of clearing. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of at least 100 feet 300 feet for raptors) shall be Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program . Page 3 of 8 delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete as determined by the biological monitor. Cultural Resources CR -1: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant Construction Prior to issuance of Planning Department shall submit written evidence to the satisfaction of the Director of Contractor /Project grading permit and Planning that a certified archaeologist has been retained to observe Applicant and during construction grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils and artifacts as Archaeologist (if activities necessary. The archaeologist shall be present at the pre -grade resources conference, shall establish procedures for archaeological resource encountered) surveillance and shall establish, in cooperation with the City, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the findings. If major archaeological resources are discovered, which require long -term halting or redirecting of grading, the archaeologist shall report such findings to the City and the Project Applicant. The archaeologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the Project Applicant, which ensure proper exploration and /or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City, or its designee, on a first- refusal basis. The Project Applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of a special significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and /or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. CR -2: Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Project Applicant Construction Prior to issuance of Planning Department shall submit written evidence to the satisfaction of the Director of Contractor /Project grading permit and Planning that a certified paleontologist has been retained to observe Applicant and during construction grading activities and salvage and catalogue fossils and artifacts as Paleontologist (if activities necessary. The paleontologist shall be present at the pre -grade resources conference, shall establish procedures for paleontological resource encountered) surveillance and shall establish, in cooperation with the City, procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit sampling, identification, and evaluation of the findings. If major paleontological resources are discovered which require long-term Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 4 of 8 halting or redirecting of grading, the paleontologist shall report such findings to the City and the Project Applicant. The paleontologist shall determine appropriate actions, in cooperation with the Project Applicant, which ensure proper exploration and /or salvage. Excavated finds shall be offered to the City, or its designee, on a first- refusal basis. The Project Applicant may retain said finds if written assurance is provided that they will be properly preserved in Orange County, unless said finds are of a special significance, or a museum in Orange County indicates a desire to study and /or display them at the time, in which case items shall be donated to the City, or designee. CR -3: In accordance with Public Resources Code 5097.94, if human Construction During Planning Department remains are found, the Orange County Coroner must be notified within Contractor /Project Construction 24 hours of the discovery. If the coroner determines that the remains Applicant are not recent, the coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento to determine the most likely descendent for the area. The designated Native American representative shall then determine in consultation with the property owner the disposition of the human remains. Geology /Soils GS -1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, a qualified geotechnical Construction Prior to issuance of Building or Planning engineer shall be retained by the Project Applicant to be present on the Contractor /Project grading permit and Department project site during excavation, grading, and general site preparation Applicant during construction activities to monitor the implementation of the recommendations as activities specified in the Geotechnical Engineering Report prepared by Geotechnical Solutions dated July 8, 2004. Whenever appropriate, the geotechnical engineer shall provide structure specific geologic and geotechnical recommendations which shall be documented in a report to be appended to the project's Geotechnical Engineering Report. Hazards and Hazardous Materials HM -1: Prior to issuance of building permits, the Project Applicant shall Construction Prior to issuance of Building Department submit verification to the City of Newport Beach that an asbestos Contractor /Project building ermit Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 5 of 8 survey has been conducted within the existing buildings proposed for Applicant demolition or renovation. If asbestos is found, the Project Applicant shall follow all procedural requirements and regulations of South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1403. HM -2: Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the church building, Project Applicant Prior to issuance of Planning Department the Project Applicant shall file Form 7460 -1 with the Federal Aviation building permit Administration (FAA). Upon receiving the FAA determination, the project shall be submitted to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for a determination of consistency. The project may be subject to additional conditions as required by the FAA and /or ALUC in order to be found in compliance with the John Wayne Airport Environs Land Use Plan. Hydrology and Water Quality WQ -1: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall Project Applicant Prior to issuance of Building Department and develop and submit a Notice of Intent (NOI) and Storm Water Pollution grading permit Code and Water Quality Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to the Santa Ana RWQCB for compliance Enforcement Division with the Statewide NPDES permit for construction activity. The SWPPP shall contain Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be implemented during construction to minimize impacts to local receiving water from pollutants in storm water runoff. The Project Applicant shall provide the City of Newport Beach with a copy of the NOI and their application check as proof of filing with RWQCB. WQ -2: Prior to issuance of grading permits, the Project Applicant shall Project Applicant Prior to issuance of Building Department and prepare and submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the grading permit Code and Water Quality proposed project, subject to the approval of the Building Department Enforcement Division and Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division. The WQMP shall provide appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 6of8 Land Use and Planning See HM -2 Noise N -1: Construction activities which produce loud noise that disturb, or Construction During Planning Department and could disturb a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in the Contractor /Project Construction Code and Water Quality vicinity, shall be limited to the weekdays between the hours of 7:00 Applicant Activities Enforcement Division A.M. and 6:30 P.M., and Saturdays between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. No such noise occurrences shall occur at anytime on Sundays or federal holidays. N -2: Noise - generating equipment operated at the project site shall be Construction During Planning Department and equipped with effective noise control devices (i.e., mufflers, lagging, Contractor /Project Construction Code and Water Quality and/or motor enclosures). All equipment shall be properly maintained to Applicant Activities Enforcement Division assure that no additional noise, due to worn or improperly maintained parts, would be generated. Transportation and Circulation T -1: During the school year, heavy construction vehicle travel on Construction During Planning Department and adjoining streets shall be limited on weekdays to non -peak school Contractor /Project Construction Code and Water Quality hours which are generally 8:30 A.M. to 2:00 P.M and 3:00 P.M to 6:00 Applicant Activities Enforcement Division P.M. Utilities and Service Systems U -1: New landscaping shall incorporate drought- tolerant plant materials Contractor /Project Prior to issuance of Planning Department and drip irrigation systems where possible. Applicant building permit U -2: Water leaving the project site due to over - irrigation of landscape Contractor /Project During Planning Department and shall be minimized. If an incident such as this is reported, a Applicant Construction Code and Water Quality representative from the Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division Activities Enforcement Division of the City Manager's Office shall visit the location investigate, inform Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 7 of 8 .J the tenant if possible, leave a note, and in some cases shut off the water. U -3: Watering shall be done during the early morning or evening hours Contractor/Project On -going Planning Department and to minimize evaporation {between 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 A.M. the Applicant Code and Water Quality following morning U-4: All leaks shall be investigated by a Enforcement Division representative from the Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division of the City Manager's Office and the Project Applicant shall complete all required repairs. U -5: Water should not be used to clean paved surfaces such as Contractor/Project On -going Planning Department and sidewalks, driveways, parking areas, etc. except to alleviate immediate Applicant Code and Water Quality safety or sanitation hazards. Enforcement. Division U-6: Reclaimed water shall be used whenever available, assuming it is Contractor/Project On -going Planning Department and economically feasible. Applicant Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Page 8 of 8 0 9 APPENDIX A. AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS m `14o ` r e d � f Our Lady Queen of Angels Mitigated Negative Declaration Air Quality Assessment Files Provided by PCR Services Corporation May 2006 A -1 Project Construction Emissions A -2 SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Control Requirements A -3 Project Operation Emissions Appendix A -1 • Construction Schedule (Number of Equipment) • Construction Emissions Summary Spreadsheet • Construction Emissions Spreadsheets (Detailed) ■ CO ■ NO ■ VOC 0 PM To Our Lady Queen of Angels Construction Schedule Number of Equipment 11 OLQA Construction Soludul. (062806L.la Page 1 of 3 12:07 PM W2812006 ;2006-112006-�,}20064.p2606 2006;,;'1006, „20061,12001_ ;2007 '200 Hours aHPli iLoadL111rilkilliellok Month i,if Ukr ..21. EZ3 A�— 5 6, 10., .!1_,11, z -02 !1-1� 2. 3 Teacher Parking Lot Demolition + Compress R 8 50 0.62 1 Existing OLQA Remove .�4_Jakhgmmera I MCIDIL0 prj�,.c . a 79 0.435 1444.143 1 CompressoisJGenerators 8 50 0.62 New Classroom Construction Forklift I Chem Picker 4,Z 8 94 0.475 1 1 1 1 1 1 TrTcTolxoa oe a — 8 79 OL�5 1 1 1 1 1 1 Demolition of St. Mark's CompressorstGenamtors(Jackhammers 8 50 0.62 (4-aefe Sit.) Excavator 8 180 0.58 Rubber Tired Loader a 165 0.435 ComaressoneGenerattors a 50 0.62 Crane 2 190 0.43 New Church Construction Gym + Forklift l Cherry Picker 8 94 0.475 New Parking (St. Marks Site) Paving Equipment a fit 053 Roller a -Tv 743 Tneittell.p.donl3ackh.. a 79 DAM 1 4 o, Creepretruesi.l..khruppre... 8 so 0.62 Existing Church Demolition Forklift I cherry Picker 8 94 0.475 Parking Lot Construction Paving Equipment a 111 0.53 Roller a 114 0.43 iAtiNit, TracloVi-oaderffurckhoer 8 79 0.465 Oltenia Aggregate?Conerele Trucks jRouhdlrqps) 20 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Off -site Truck Trips Offsee Delive q, Trucks (Rounderips) 20 4�t�, Ofisite, Haul Tracks s� 20 3 UH i =e ,.in ou on trips) 20 , Worker Trips Work., Trips - Calculated Total 20 lls,athtl I I 1 3 1 4 1 4 1 4 4 4 4 4 41 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coatings - Commercial Square F , 0 lh WaPR�h. 4.750 4.750 s pre.ruffil Fugitive Dust (acres per day) - Normal Fugitive Dust Fugitive Dust (square footage per month) -Demo 1 91504 ETE 11 OLQA Construction Soludul. (062806L.la Page 1 of 3 12:07 PM W2812006 Our Lady Queen Of A.9018 Constnactsm Schedule Number of Equipment Mkollyw1ah Uoiwbblq� - �1'067'ih 11*0, tou—C-1—MU a Mato n -22 4;w 4, pr—X i-P'N --HfRlhk!iqfdl;� W-1 Teacher Parking Lot Jernollbon + Compose. 8 50 0.62 w EMU xe Existing OLQA Removal lraaorn-OBMM 8 79 0A65 Compressors enarators a 50 0.62 N. Cla.aroon, Construction Forl teker., a 94 0.475 a ar J� TrT.TFX- w 8 79 0.465 NA ii_ Demolition St. Marks ComWessoreCeneratorsiJacIdnammm a 50 0.62 of (4-acre Site) Excavator 8 180 0.58 Rubber I red Loader a 165 0.465 1 CompressoralGenerstors 8 50 0.62 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Crane 2 190 0.43 Now Church Construction + Gym + Forklift I Cherry Picker 8 N 0.475 iifliiPiiiii 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nerm Parking (St. Marks Sila) r- Paying quipment 8 111 0.53 1 1 Roller 8 114 0.43 fil44fIiI16, 1 1 TraAwIloader/Backhoe 8 79 0.465 1 1 1 1 1 Compressors/ Jackharrurners 8 50 0.62 R7517 Existing Church Demolition- Forldin I Cherry Picker 8 94 0.475 c;;Umi Parking Construction Pa—vtna Equipment 8 111 0.53 Hr-t.Pj� Lot Roller 8 114 0.43 Tracloril-ower/Backhoa 8 79 0.465 31 Off t A ate/Concrabs, Trucks (Roundtrips) 20 1 1 1 1 Off-.Re Trucl, Trips �e 0 It. -IL4 Trucks (Rounctrips) 20 Offide, Had Trucks ' 20 50 — "mdtrrp, IDTFIfeTrasE irLr un 20 1 1 1 1 MrIasrTrins Worker Top. - Calculated Total 1 20 4 5 5 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coatings- Commercial Square F. lAsphaft As2p;Mlriapl-6nlh� 2 2 Fugitive Dust (acres par day) - Normal 1 0.5 OH Fugitive Dust Fugitive Dust (square, footage per month) - Demo "NUT 1 3 1 2,0711 OLQA Consto,clion Schedule (062906).xi. Page 2 of 3 12:07 Ply 626120D5 Our Lady Queen of Angels Construction Schedule Number of EQuirmimt I eacner r2nong WE DerbOlthEm !�T IM 8 50 0.62 Existing OLQA R....! a_ _ :mamn,ers 8 79 79 0.465 8 50 So 0.62 New Classroom Construction FOMIR I Cher VICKK a 94 94 0.475 unit .aWs........ a a 79 79 0.465 CompressorfuGeneratorIEF.Jackhammers 8 50 50 0.62 D.Moldion of St. Marks (4 -acre Excavator 8 : So 180 0.58 Site) Rubber TIM LE Me, 8 8 165 65 0.465 Bill= Compressors/Genaradons 50 So 0.62 Crane 2 21 190 I" 0.43 Now Church Construction + Gym + Forklift I Cheary Picker 8 94 0.475 New Parking (St. Metro, She) Vw—mg Equipment a III 0.53 I Roller 8 114 DA3 TractonfWader/Bac),hoe a 79 0.465 Compressond,lacidiammers a so QU . FortIffli I Ch a 94 0.475 Exjsb Church Demoli tron + ant Par 9 rd 8 111 0.53 Painting W Cal .... . ...... Roller 8 114 0.43 T2 OrkoadefflIHIC1,11M 8 79 0.465 mete Trucks (Rounditrips) 20 wav 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 011,11MI-M—Hpa) 26 7 1 1 t 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Off-sits Truck Trips Offsile Haul Trucks ns, --- 20 4 4 Wriuse, an nE,c 'e 'si m 20 1 1 1 1 '"Ir 5 Call- Total 20 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 7 8 4 4 3 3 I=Gouflings rehttaeWral quire Fool a 4,725 4.725 7,445 7.445 7.44 lAsphaft l6m2 Is P.�R.nth) 2 Fugitive Dust Fugithre Dust (acres per day) - Normal Fu Give Dust (square, 100189a, Per month) - Debb- 7,025 7.025 OLOA Construction Schedule (062806)AS Page 3 of 3 12:07 PM MBQ006 0", 0fiv ...... I A,,N C-g-tip Em Mm. l-, figfi, pq, dfig.g, -fi... pm-r-. e. 'g. .pA gpalp 11 E OWA Og4U Si. E...l.. Pap 1 all 11:56 . 6,2-QOQ6 Fl. O- ; 2008- - -1 -A. 110-1�""A- 35 15 1 - 1 Ot, r5 I ]fi -Ilt I D., 3.2 DO �4,114 I DO t1l �lltl- 1 1 r. 10� I�A DO 3.7 3.7 '4 - v� It 12 - 12 D� -1-J, �;ifil - - - -, - W. '-'I �. �2- -4-- S 6.�` 29 Ig D. it 2.9 , I 1 7 2,9 t .. , , . �. L� '11, k,g. .!AO 2.9 2D �D I'll t" 1 1 -2.g.1- - � , 44 DD D.3 DD ,,. lanx 1D., co ,I.. fig.. sm Tniel M. omill T.Da .M,I� T.g. Mg. rmN I - 1..' 49 ic. t Z3 =. - DO 1.2 1.5 0 1..7 44 iiti 01 06 -F-- - .5 20 24 IV 6. 01 .. 01 I'S 2 D 2.4 I. 153 11.7 4,� 0.1 Dfi 0.7 ..5 - I'D 264 Do ;5.2 a,7 a, D U-7 O's 1.D 2.4 = -T--.- 152: 167 I 1. -.7 g 20 ZI DO D2 tS 4.4 1�.� 2 �i, ID 2.4 DO DO I I M IDD VA 'D ,l 22 DO DO 104 a DO -IL5 4.1 . I 1719 0.11 DO 066 iou IUA - T-o 0.0 .. 0, I DOI 0.0 D D lio 0.0 -TF --o-o DO 0.0 F,- TO = 0.0 0.0 00 DO D D D D D D D D DO DO OD 1 31.2 i"*D i 1 0 a 00 0 0 D D DO 0 0 Do DO Do DO -TS-T 27.6 -0. F 2S3 O+i I. ;60 00 D 1 -DO -DO --21. 21D I a-F a., D�9 Ix D 5 03 D . 00 -7Tf.l- 790- , 7-3-8- 17A =I 0.6 066 ..4 =0 2.4 0.. a, 15.5 m, 4., 3.8 17.9 0.6 0.0 2g Ifis D, , 11g 17.R .6 1 1 a. DA ZD a, DO M... TT-TS-9 -T. -. l 757 - _77- .0 11.5 06 0 � 264 A -To-a l -=2 - 17,0 0.1 15 ofi- D 4 24 DO D a -rrT 7=3 3D -1 S 4 -7F. -1 fi 0,6 D,4 � I 2A 00 77T 22.3 3 jDg IS � 19 1 .,6 0 111 0.0 DO M., 22.] 2 3.0 t5 1 19.1 j DO gg '%.4 10 3 1 11&70 7 0.0 OD DO ... ;s.g -T,.F 3 7 112 170 Q, 0 06 0.1 ZO OA 0.0 .. -,fi, -ifi, 3 7 112 17D 01 DO Q, 2.D 2, ..D ... I,8 M8 .7 U.1 17.0 0.1 D5 06 D � - 2.0 11 DO .D g Ifi, 3.7 -TI-.I 17,D 0.1 05 On D � -TO- D'. Ig. D.1 112 17.0 1 0 1 05 .6 04 0 2.0 1, D isq 1g. �.7 132 170 .., 0.5 0 1.15 K. D Do 3i�z DO 5 3,9 zs g �3 D., I'D l.. .5 5 �lfi 21.2 ... D DO . 0 � 393 36 72 M- 30.6 0.1 .D 11 162 ID, fig -T, -. IR7 .., 1.fi 2.0 DO I D -o-.- D. 76-2- 195 69 124 19.1 0,1 I:g 20 - 05 2,. -s- -F. - ... 1 .. 1,., 1 7- 3,4 1Z2 15.5 1 0.5 O'D 1 61, 7. 0.0 158 1110 14 12.2 15.5 Ol 05 1 0.3 1.1 7.5 0.0 DIO 443 71.5 3I.0 fill 1.3' 11.6 3.9 - �7 2Z. 23.6 .1 pq, dfig.g, -fi... pm-r-. e. 'g. .pA gpalp 11 E OWA Og4U Si. E...l.. Pap 1 all 11:56 . 6,2-QOQ6 Our Lady of Arals Ccuolmmo. Em.si.. Oboldov) CO - UorWtVWd OL C.rolruol.o E..4o. DoUdw.b Puff. I or I Im m B*W= d Ylwl 20"M=&Inew 2, QU!W94�M=W IT- 9mk , -if Lm .. " lo Mw MMDr�i INMI;T-6 ." . lrWZLWW 4 iw Teacher P*:M, . uroorm,n - orrpr ... . ... . 3.9 3.9 31 3.9 3.9 3.9 32 3.9 4.0 4.0 4.0 New MssmOm CanotmWon Forkhft I Cherry Picker 6.Z S.Z 6.1 6.1 6.Z 6.7 6.7 6.1 6-7 TrmbtlWetl.IBekMa -'O! 4.6 4.6 4.6 4B 4.6 4.6 4.8 4A 4.9 U 4.0 DerooM of SL W (4acm Site) Rubber Tired Low. Pi " -75 _7 11.5 11.5 ,01W.osuoo�uru..o, 60 4.0 4.0 WO 4.0 42 4.2 4.2 4.2 42 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 42 42 4.2 42 T3 C. 3 3 3 3.1 3.1 New Como CorstrucMan + Cwm + Fo" I CWff Picker 6.1 6.7 6.7 6) 51 67 ..? ..Z G.Z G.? 6.1 611 V 6.Z 61 61 67 New PgMV (SL Nlaft Sital PQAWEqWrooM 4M.M Z.? 7.1 &0 82 82 Roper 1.3 7.3 1.3 1.3 73 lro.MdUuuf.dBMkho. 4.8 4.8 4.8 4A 4.8 1 5.0 5.0 5.0 S.D 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 52 1-2 Go�W.facknrrm. 4�1 ::3 4.3 �oflMCnumnDaourld..+ �Rft I Co., Pik. 6.7 8.2 P.M,LotCooAruot, . on Pwmg EWipmrmurl 3.2 82 Roller Z.3 1.3 73 TratodWaderleacMOe 52 5.2 52 Offafte Puok Tops Oftouto Agqweb .rote T.ft (R.U.dolp) 02 02 0.2 0.2 OT 0-2 0.2 0.2 02 02 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 9.2 02 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 9.2 0.2 02 0.2 OfRsia DeWw Trucics (ROUruflif.) F. 0.2 02 0.2 0.2 02 U U 0.2 02 02 02 02 0.2 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0+2 0.2 02 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 (Rcurvitul,r) 11.0 0.8 0.e i.. OftN, Toon Trooku urM,loO 0.8 0A 0.0 0.8 QA 0.8 Gr 0.1 O.? 0.7 O.Z 0.7 0.1 0.6 GB OA 0.6 0.6 0A OA 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0, 0.6 0.6 .6 0.6 .6 0.6 .6 OB 0.8 Mrker TMM ruo,. -i 1, 22, 2_2 2 22 ZI 2.1 2.1 2A 2.6 2.1 2.1 11 1.9 I M M 1.1 1.9 1.. 33 M 1.1 1.1 1.3 1. 3. l000 TI_j _2.2? 7 13 .. .... .... 18.9 1" 134 13.8 18.6 18.0 3U 314 194 19.5 17.9 17.9 M.3 OL C.rolruol.o E..4o. DoUdw.b Puff. I or I Im m B*W= Our Lady of Ar,,,cla CarruI,dr.n E...l.. 00.4CaiO NM - UranaR,axted Dl.QA L9n.0 url.. Em 4. Mta5lads4 Poor, 1 of 1 12:01 PM G/9 MM Dj.AO C=rr. 4.4 4A UAMOL�R W 5.2 52 Comer 4.4 4A 4.4 4.4 4A 4A 4.2 42 4A �Claaara.m�.W.Wr �llft/Cfr.,PmMr 4.8 4A 16 18 44 4A 4.7 4.7 -7-8 5.2 52 5.2 5.2 52 5.2 4A 4.9 5.2 N.U.nollA.M.W. (e .Sital corrpraa.. G.IararfawjacMuurraraa. R.bblIMrQd LoW.1 f 4.2 10.7 4.2 10.7 0.0 -80 c ....... an...W. crar. 4.2 4.2 42 4.2 4.2 4.0 4D 4.0 2.1 4.0 2.1 4.0 2.1 4.0 41) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.6 2.1 42 2.1 New Ch.0 C.nafrur.tarr - (3IM • F. Milt I Cherry P i I k a I'll", 4.] 4.7 4.7 4k 4A 4.6 4.6 4.6 44 44 4.0 4.6 4.6 4k 4A 415 4.7 Nwv P.IHV (M. M.Ilra sk) PaMng Equi,orent 7.2 7.9 7.5 7.1 7.9 Froller li SA 5.1 RA sm Tra r"adlaald..M.. 44 4.9 4.9 4.0 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 C7 4.5 4 Compress a Jalk 3.8 3.8 3.8 U0, Church D..1fia. F. I Che" Roarer M 4.6 4.6 4.6 7-1 Para, Lol Can.Arudb.. P",E,W,.nt 7.1 7.1 Rollo, 5.0 5.0 5.0 TmctorhmdGdE3aCkM1Oe 4.5 4.5 45 C)ff.lta T,uok TO, OMMAMWWe .7raaa Trucks R.uNtrip.) 1.6 1.8 1 A 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.4 jA 1A 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 11 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 U 1.3 2 1-6 OMM Deftaq Tox*a <R.uo,Jblpj I's IS A A �A 1.4 A A 'A IA IA 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 13 1.2 1.1f 1.1f 13 13 1.3 �.2 .2 1.2 1.2 22 �2 -lZ 4.7 �A �A �A :A ]l.3 4.7 4.7 71.3 O"a"" .1 1.1 .1 .1 .1 1.1 IS ill IS 1.0 1.0 1.0 IS 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 OA 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 01 01 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.1 mulou"Tri �a io' 02 0.2 9.2 0.2 02 U.2 9.2 1 02 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 02-0.2 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 0.31 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0-4 T..T- �.4 14A 184 154 14.5 15.5 10.3 16A 1].9 ITS 94A 26.3 25.3 17.9 17.9 1 17.0 17.0 19.1 1%1 19.1 17.0 17M "m lix lix ll.0 aa.1 I 30.0 11.1 19., I.S I... 94A Dl.QA L9n.0 url.. Em 4. Mta5lads4 Poor, 1 of 1 12:01 PM G/9 MM Our Lady or Angels Cii.struarx,ri Enninswin, (Itardsr) PMIO - UnintRograturd OLOA COntrafte Snowstorm, Derideci page 1 or 1 12:02P`A6Q6V2006 '20OW2 Lms 7-,V. -,In 'fA j� 7 :1 1. a-I.T.- MAR m ��2i :", ;: .° Toaster Parking ut Dam lmon ranecursurroilegrommusirs, 0.2 0.2 SAM, OLUN Renewal TractorUP1.08.1khou y 02 0.2 La nnounsiGunwashork 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 012 02 New Classroom ConsalructJon froddil, I Chains Piston 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 TarchnUoukefilkaukh.a. 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 9.2 012 0.2 0.2 02 ComperamossOorearstoodJaCklessurrours 0.2 0.2 DomWen o1 6L Ma Ws 4"cre Seal Rubber Tired Loader 013 0.3 Tracloal-NoderigriCkinse 0.3 0.3 02 02 02 0.2 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 0.2 0.2 02 02 02 02 02 0.2 Creak 0 0� O'� 0.1 Now Church Construction . Grant . Farkkft/�Mleimasr u 0A 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0� 0 I . 01 0 0.1 0.1 0,1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 011 New Pinklool (St. Marks Site) Pieffig Equipment 0.4 0.4 0.3 U 2.4 0. 2 Ratios 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 FoactorkwaidualB.M.. 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 x2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 02 02 02 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 CtarePuresureM.M."knous iqni� 0.2 0.2 0.2 Biskin, Church Dionallike . F.Afift I Chary Met 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 P.Wn, Let Conalukhan Pawing EqulPmM v 0.3 0.3 Rog. 0.1 0.1 0.1 Torclonfit-oukriBaCkle. 02 0.2 02 Off.,ne Track True Offul. Aon,aloCcueselis Trucks Raiinclffi,.) go 0.0 0.0 OT OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 01 0.a 0.0 01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ox, 04 ag 11.0 0.0 04 OA 010 Offalto misirs, Tweak ftenchu.) 0.0 0A 010 010 0.0 0.0 og 0 0 OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 :.o og 0.0 0.0 og 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OD 04 0.0 0.0 og 04 04 ob 04 0.0 Olken, Haul Takeo, (Rkendtflims) 0.1 1.3 01 0.1 MUT.hT.Cft CagradlrW M - u-' 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 22 92 22 20-,o ON , 0 00 , .0 og 0.0 ou 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ob ob -1.3 04 w7r-G-MR-MalcerTnes-Ciflaudatie"total ij 0 .0 0.0 04 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 o:, 00 0�0 0!0 6':20 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 04 04 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 04 04 04 um F.,likee Dust Dust (a... per day) - Nannal 4.8 4.8 IFookines ftflikkii Dead Notion, fie song. Per onandr) 'not, 1.8 6.1 1.3 U at Tend v; 0.7 a.7 a.7 a.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 12.9 " 1.0 m F-60.6 " 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 CA DA 0.6 1.0 1.1 z.a m 0.5 0.5 OLOA COntrafte Snowstorm, Derideci page 1 or 1 12:02P`A6Q6V2006 Our Lady 01 A.961. Cbn%axtm. Env^rdon6 M e,) VOC-Unraftattel OI Combtu*n Embslome NWW,66 Pa'. I d 1 12:01 PM MUlaam azalln 7 " i llsaM, 12 � -.;.I aae4lZI oa�- p Belo -3¢ Via � .1 lb P.Mil Lot D� ... n a* 0 Lo. M 0.0 Oh Cbmpaee0mlGemMrom `.%s :- 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 05 0.5 0.5 0.5 NMCWsmOmCOnslwdcn Forkill I CMrq PkWr 0.9 OA 0.8 O.B 0.8 as OA 0.0 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.6 00 06 as 0.6 0.5 rIC'm 01 Ru�rTiieelOaclw T.t*or4.oadlerM.CM-, 1.4 1.4 0.5 0.5 V,b 0.5 5.5 as as 0.5 0.5 03 as as 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 C.. 0.4 0.� 0.4 OA 0-4 !,Ieer�umh�O.,GY.- F.a,UR/CNr,Rcls, u, 0.8 0.0 0.6 as as 0.0 0.8 0.6 as 0.8 as 0.8 0.0 0.6 0,6 as 0.6 Patient, (St. Met" site) PtedW Eqdp.nt -IM 1.0 1.0 1.0 IS, -T-6- �r 0.9 as 09 0.9 0.9 ,Tr,tm�.�kh.s 0.� 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 as as 0.6 0.6 as as 0.0 0.0 0.8 as 0.6 as 0.0 -i.H 0.5 0.5 0.5 -Ts aledle, Ch.h I%ekleft I Cherry Picker tirl OA as 1.0 - P.M, W CanMra�. Pa,rin, �I�M I 1.0 1.0 Raller 0.9 0,9 0.9 OA as as CXICift,e T.0 Tel, 08wN P09mpN.l0arcmro RUMa lRauntlMly) 0.1 v 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 00 D, 0.0 0.0 0.0 OD 0.0 OA 0.0 as 04 0.0 0.0 as 0.0 as ox, W as 0.0 0.0 0.1 Mae D. .q T.kl (Fitaundlnp) 0.1 0.1 OA 0.1 0.1 O'l 0.0 on ag as OA OA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 as OD 0.0 as UD as 0,o as as as as as 0.0 0.0 0.1 (Aeft. Heel Tr.Clce (RateefflMN) 0.2 Is OZ! 02 T.hl let TM. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 all 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 OA 0.1 O'l 0.1 OA 0.1 0.1 OA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 al 0.1 Obkw .rearTAN C-E'Roual""I I., ll.� 0.2 0.2 02 0.2 0.2 02-7-2- 02 0.2 0.2 VI 0.3 02 02 02 0.2 0.2 03 0.5 0.3 U 0.2 0.2 02 02 02 0.4 -r4 0.2 02-0.1 0.1 OA A.M.M.1 Fa a m 810 7.9 7.9 125 12.5 12.5 123 Mpholt Mm ON Fete, Mh) 5KE S�Z 52 :u:�j 52 52 52 52 Rc4hel 1.5 L4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 10.1 10.4 6.4 0.6 6.6 ZA 2.4 2.41 2.4 14 2A IM 10.7 2A 2.4 2.4 L4 22.6 2.5 2. l.5 y. zis OI Combtu*n Embslome NWW,66 Pa'. I d 1 12:01 PM MUlaam Appendix A -2 • SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) Control Requirements • SCAQMD Rule 403 Measures For High Wind Conditions • SCAQMD Rule 403 Measures For Normal Wind Conditions (Adopted May 7, 1976) (Amended November 6, 1992) (Amended July 9, 1993) (Amended February 14, 1997) (Amended December 11, 1998)(Amended April 2, 2004) (Amended June 3, 2005) RULE 403. FUGITIVE DUST (a) Purpose The purpose of this Rule is to reduce the amount of particulate matter entrained in the ambient air as a result of anthropogenic (man -made) fugitive dust sources by requiring actions to prevent, reduce or mitigate fugitive dust emissions. (b) Applicability The provisions of this Rule shall apply to any activity or man -made condition capable of generating fugitive dust. (c) Definitions (1) ACTIVE OPERATIONS means any source capable of generating fugitive dust, including, but not limited to, earth - moving activities, construction/demolition activities, disturbed surface area, or heavy - and light -duty vehicular movement. (2) AGGREGATE - RELATED PLANTS are defined as facilities that produce and / or mix sand and gravel and crushed stone. (3) AGRICULTURAL HANDBOOK means the region - specific guidance document that has been approved by the Governing Board or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA. For the South Coast Air Basin, the Board- approved region- specific guidance document is the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook dated December 1998. For the Coachella Valley, the Board- approved region - specific guidance document is the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook dated April 2, 2004. (4) ANEMOMETERS are devices used to measure wind speed and direction in accordance with the performance standards, and maintenance and calibration criteria as contained in the most recent Rule 403 Implementation Handbook. (5) BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES means fugitive dust control actions that are set forth in Table I of this Rule. 403-1 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (6) BULK MATERIAL is sand, gravel, soil, aggregate material less than two inches in length or diameter, and other organic or inorganic particulate matter. (7) CEMENT MANUFACTURING FACILITY is any facility that has a cement kiln at the facility. (8) CHEMICAL STABILIZERS are any non -toxic chemical dust suppressant which must not be used if prohibited for use by the Regional Water Quality Control Boards, the California Air Resources Board, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), or any applicable law, rule or regulation. The chemical stabilizers shall meet any specifications, criteria, or tests required by any federal, state, or local water agency. Unless otherwise indicated, the use of a non -toxic chemical stabilizer shall -be of sufficient concentration and application frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. (9) COMMERCIAL POULTRY RANCH means any building, structure, enclosure, or premises where more than 100 fowl are kept or maintained for the primary purpose of producing eggs or meat for sale or other distribution. (10) CONFINED ANIMAL FACILITY means a source or group of sources of air pollution at an agricultural source for the raising of 3,360 or more fowl or 50 or more animals, including but not limited to, any structure, building, installation, farm, corral, coop, feed storage area, milking parlor, or system for the collection, storage, or distribution of solid and liquid manure; if domesticated animals, including horses, sheep, goats, swine, beef cattle, rabbits, chickens, turkeys, or ducks are corralled, penned, or otherwise caused to remain in restricted areas for commercial agricultural purposes and feeding is by means other than grazing. (11) CONSTRUCTION/DEMOLITION ACTIVITIES means any on -site mechanical activities conducted in preparation of, or related to, the building, alteration, rehabilitation, demolition or improvement of property, including, but not limited to the following activities: grading, excavation, loading, crushing, cutting, planing, shaping or ground breaking. (12) CONTRACTOR means any person who has a contractual arrangement to conduct an active operation for another person. (13) DAIRY FARM is an operation on a property, or set of properties that are contiguous or separated only by a public right -of -way, that raises cows or 403 -2 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) produces milk from cows for the purpose of making a profit or for a livelihood. Heifer and calf farms are dairy farms. (14) DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means a portion of the earth's surface which has been physically moved, uncovered, destabilized, or otherwise modified from its undisturbed natural soil condition, thereby increasing the potential for emission of fugitive dust. This definition excludes those areas which have: (A) been restored to a natural state, such that the vegetative ground cover and soil characteristics are similar to adjacent or nearby natural conditions; (B) been paved or otherwise covered by a permanent structure; or (C) sustained a vegetative ground cover of at least 70 percent of the native cover for a particular area for at least 30 days. (15) DUST SUPPRESSANTS are water, hygroscopic materials, or non -toxic chemical stabilizers used as a treatment material to reduce fugitive dust emissions. (16) EARTH -MOVING ACTIVITIES means the use of any equipment for any activity where soil is being moved or uncovered, and shall include, but not be limited to the following: grading, earth cutting and filling operations, loading or unloading of dirt or bulk materials, adding to or removing from open storage piles of bulk materials, landfill operations, weed abatement through disking, and soil mulching. (17) DUST CONTROL SUPERVISOR means a person with the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule 403 requirements at an active operation. (18) FUGITIVE DUST means any solid particulate matter that becomes airborne, other than that emitted from an exhaust stack, directly or indirectly as a result of the activities of any person. (19) HIGH WIND CONDITIONS means that instantaneous wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour, (20) INACTIVE DISTURBED SURFACE AREA means any disturbed surface area upon which active operations have not occurred or are not expected to occur for a period of 20 consecutive days. (21) LARGE OPERATIONS means any active operations on property which contains 50 or more acres of disturbed surface area; or any earth- moving operation with a daily earth - moving or throughput volume of 3,850 cubic 403-3 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) meters (5,000 cubic yards) or more three times during the most recent 365 -day period. (22) OPEN STORAGE PILE is any accumulation of bulk material, which is not fully enclosed, covered or chemically stabilized, and which attains a height of three feet or more and a total surface area of 150 or more square feet. (23) PARTICULATE MATTER means any material, except uncombined water, which exists in a finely divided form as a liquid or solid at standard conditions. (24) PAVED ROAD means a public or private improved street, highway, alley, public way, or easement that is covered by typical roadway materials, but excluding access roadways that connect a facility with a public paved roadway and are not open to through traffic. Public paved roads are those open to public access and that are owned by any federal, state, county, municipal or any other governmental or quasi - governmental agencies. Private paved roads are any paved roads not defined as public. (25) PM 10 means particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than or equal to 10 microns as measured by the applicable State and Federal reference test methods. (26) PROPERTY LINE means the boundaries of an area in which either a person causing the emission or a person allowing the emission has the legal use or possession of the property. Where such property is divided into one or more sub - tenancies, the property line(s) shall refer to the boundaries dividing the areas of all sub - tenancies. (27) RULE 403 IMPLEMENTATION HANDBOOK means a guidance document that has been approved by the Governing Board on April 2, 2004 or hereafter approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA. (28) SERVICE ROADS are paved or unpaved roads that are used by one or more public agencies for inspection or maintenance of infrastructure and which are not typically used for construction- related activity. (29) SIMULTANEOUS SAMPLING means the operation of two PMIO samplers in such a manner that one sampler is started within five minutes of the other, and each sampler is operated for a consecutive period which must be not less than 290 minutes and not more than 310 minutes. (30) SOUTH COAST AIR BASIN means the non -desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties and all of Orange 403-4 Rule 403 (cent.) (Amended June 3, 2005) County as defined in California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section 60104. The area is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the north and east by the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto Mountains, and on the south by the San Diego county line. (31) STABILIZED SURFACE means any previously disturbed surface area or open storage pile which, through the application of dust suppressants, shows visual or other evidence of surface crusting and is resistant to wind - driven fugitive dust and is demonstrated to be stabilized. Stabilization can be demonstrated by one or more of the applicable test methods contained in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook. (32) TRACK -OUT means any bulk material that adheres to and agglomerates on the exterior surface of motor vehicles, haul trucks, and equipment (including tires) that have been released onto a paved road and can be removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal operating conditions. (33) TYPICAL ROADWAY MATERIALS means concrete, asphaltic concrete, recycled asphalt, asphalt, or any other material of equivalent performance as determined by the Executive Officer, and the U.S. EPA. (34) UNPAVED ROADS means any unsealed or unpaved roads, equipment paths, or travel ways that are not covered by typical roadway materials. Public unpaved roads are any unpaved roadway owned by federal, state, county, municipal or other governmental or quasi - governmental agencies. Private unpaved roads are all other unpaved roadways not defined as public. (35) VISIBLE ROADWAY DUST means any sand, soil, dirt, or other solid particulate matter which is visible upon paved road surfaces and which can be removed by a vacuum sweeper or a broom sweeper under normal operating conditions. (36) WIND- DRIVEN FUGITIVE DUST means visible emissions from any disturbed surface area which is generated by wind action alone. (37) WIND GUST is the maximum instantaneous wind speed as measured by an anemometer. (d) Requirements (1) No person shall cause or allow the emissions of fugitive dust from any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area such that: 403 -5 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (A) the dust remains visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source; or (B) the dust emission exceeds 20 percent opacity (as determined by the appropriate test method included in the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook), if the dust emission is the result of movement of a motorized vehicle. (2) No person shall conduct active operations without utilizing the applicable best available control measures included in Table 1 of this Rule to minimize fugitive dust emissions from each fugitive dust source type within the active operation. (3) No person shall cause or allow PM 10 levels to exceed 50 micrograms per cubic meter when determined, by simultaneous sampling, as the difference between upwind and downwind samples collected on high- volume particulate matter samplers or other U.S. EPA - approved equivalent method for PM10 monitoring. If sampling is conducted, samplers shall be: (A) Operated, maintained, and calibrated in accordance with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 50, Appendix J, or appropriate U.S. EPA - published documents for U.S. EPA - approved equivalent method(s) for PM 10. (B) Reasonably placed upwind and downwind of key activity areas and as close to the property line as feasible, such that other sources of fugitive dust between the sampler and the property line are minimized. (4) No person shall allow track -out to extend 25 feet or more in cumulative length from the point of origin from an active operation. Notwithstanding the preceding, all track -out from an active operation shall be removed at the conclusion of each workday or evening shift. (5) No person shall conduct an active operation with a disturbed surface area of five or more acres, or with a daily import or export of 100 cubic yards or more of bulk material without utilizing at least one of the measures listed in subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(E) at each vehicle egress from the site to a paved public road. (A) Install a pad consisting of washed gravel (minimum -size: one inch) maintained in a clean condition to a depth of at least six inches and extending at least 30 feet wide and at least 50 feet long. 403-6 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (B) Pave the surface extending at least 100 feet and at least 20 feet wide. (C) Utilize a wheel shaker /wheel spreading device consisting of raised dividers (rails, pipe, or grates) at least 24 feet long and 10 feet wide to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site. (D) Install and utilize a wheel washing system to remove bulk material from tires and vehicle undercarriages before vehicles exit the site. (E) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the actions specified in subparagraphs (d)(5)(A) through (d)(5)(D). (6) Beginning January 1, 2006, any person who operates or authorizes the operation of a confined animal facility subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable conservation management practices specified in Table 4 of this Rule. (e) Additional Requirements for Large Operations (1) Any person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large operation subject to this Rule shall implement the applicable actions specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable performance standards can not be met through use of Table 2 actions; and shall: (A) submit a fully executed Large Operation Notification (Form 403 N) to the Executive Officer within 7 days of qualifying as a large operation; (B) include, as part of the notification, the name(s), address(es), and phone number(s) of the person(s) responsible for the submittal, and a description of the operation(s), including a map depicting the location of the site; (C) maintain daily records to document the specific dust control actions taken, maintain such records for a period of not less than three years; and make such records available to the Executive Officer upon request; 403-7 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (D) install and maintain project signage with project contact signage that meets the minimum standards of the Rule 403 Implementation Handbook, prior to initiating any earthmoving activities; (E) identify a dust control supervisor that: (i) is employed by or contracted with the property owner or developer; (ii) is on the site or available on -site within 30 minutes during working hours; (iii) has the authority to expeditiously employ sufficient dust mitigation measures to ensure compliance with all Rule requirements; (iv) has completed the AQMD Fugitive Dust Control Class and has been issued a valid Certificate of Completion for the class; and (F) notify the Executive Officer in writing within 30 days after the site no longer qualifies as a large operation as defined by paragraph (c)(18). (2) Any Large Operation Notification submitted to the Executive Officer or AQMD- approved dust control plan shall be valid for a period of one year from the date of written acceptance by the Executive Officer. Any Large Operation Notification accepted pursuant to paragraph (e)(1), excluding those submitted by aggregate- related plants and cement manufacturing facilities must be resubmitted annually by the person who conducts or authorizes the conducting of a large operation, at least 30 days prior to the expiration date, or the submittal shall no longer be valid as of the expiration date. If all fugitive dust sources and corresponding control measures or special circumstances remain identical to those identified in the previously accepted submittal or in an AQMD- approved dust control plan, the resubmittal may be a simple statement of no -change (Form 403NC). (f) Compliance Schedule The newly amended provisions of this Rule shall become effective upon adoption. Pursuant to subdivision (e), any existing site that qualifies as a large operation will have 60 days from the date of Rule adoption to comply with the notification and recordkeeping requirements for large operations. Any Large Operation 403-8 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) Notification or AQMD- approved dust control plan which has been accepted prior to the date of adoption of these amendments shall remain in effect and the Large Operation Notification or AQMD- approved dust control plan annual resubmittal date shall be one year from adoption of this Rule amendment. (g) Exemptions (1) The provisions of this Rule shall not apply to: (A) Dairy farms. (B) Confined animal facilities provided that the combined disturbed surface area within one continuous property line is one acre or less. (C) Agricultural vegetative crop operations provided that the combined disturbed surface area within one continuous property line and not separated by a paved public road is 10 acres or less. (D) . Agricultural vegetative crop operations within the South Coast Air Basin, whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than 10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations: (i) voluntarily implements the conservation management practices contained in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook; (ii) completes and maintains the self - monitoring form documenting sufficient conservation management practices, as described in the Rule 403 Agricultural Handbook; and (iii) makes the completed self - monitoring form available to the Executive Officer upon request. (E) Agricultural vegetative crop operations outside the South Coast Air Basin whose combined disturbed surface area includes more than 10 acres provided that the person responsible for such operations: (i) voluntarily implements the conservation management practices contained in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook; and (ii) completes and maintains the self - monitoring form documenting sufficient conservation management practices, as described in the Rule 403 Coachella Valley Agricultural Handbook; and (iii) makes the completed self - monitoring form available to the Executive Officer upon request. 403-9 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (F) Active operations conducted during emergency life - threatening situations, or in conjunction with any officially declared disaster or state of emergency. (G) Active operations conducted by essential service utilities to provide electricity, natural gas, telephone, water and sewer during periods of service outages and emergency disruptions. (H) Any contractor subsequent to the time the contract ends, provided that such contractor implemented the required control measures during the contractual period. (I) Any grading contractor, for a phase of active operations, subsequent to the contractual completion of that phase of earth - moving activities, provided that the required control measures have been implemented during the entire phase of earth- moving activities, through and including five days after the final grading inspection. (J) Weed abatement operations ordered by a county agricultural commissioner or any state, county, or municipal fire department, provided that: (i) mowing, cutting or other similar process is used which maintains weed stubble at least three inches above the soil; and (ii) any discing or similar operation which cuts into and disturbs the soil, where watering is used prior to initiation of these activities, and a determination is made by the agency issuing the weed abatement order that, due to fire hazard conditions, rocks, or other physical obstructions, it is not practical to meet the conditions specified in clause (g)(1)(H)(i). The provisions this clause shall not exempt the owner of any property from stabilizing, in accordance with paragraph (d)(2), disturbed surface areas which have been created as a result of the weed abatement actions. (K) sandblasting operations. (2) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) shall not apply: (A) When wind gusts exceed 25 miles per hour, provided that: 403-10 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) (i) The required Table 3 contingency measures in this Rule are implemented for each applicable fugitive dust source type, and; (ii) records are maintained in accordance with subparagraph (B) To unpaved roads, provided such roads: (i) are used solely for the maintenance of wind - generating equipment; or (ii) are unpaved public alleys as defined in Rule 1186; or (iii) are service roads that meet all of the following criteria: (a) are less than 50 feet in width at all points along the road; (b) are within 25 feet of the property line; and (c) have a traffic volume less than 20 vehicle -hips per day. (C) To any active operation, open storage pile, or disturbed surface area for which necessary fugitive dust preventive or mitigative actions are in conflict with the federal Endangered Species Act, as detennined in writing by the State or federal agency responsible for making such deterniinations. (3) The provisions of (d)(2) shall not apply to any aggregate- related plant or cement manufacturing facility that implements the applicable actions specified in Table 2 of this Rule at all times and shall implement the applicable actions specified in Table 3 of this Rule when the applicable performance standards of paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(3) can not be met through use of Table 2 actions. (4) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) shall not apply to: (A) Blasting operations which have been permitted by the California Division of Industrial Safety; and (B) Motion picture, television, and video production activities when dust emissions are required for visual effects. In order to obtain this exemption, the Executive Officer must receive notification in writing at least 72 hours in advance of any such activity and no nuisance results from such activity. (5) The provisions of paragraph (d)(3) shall not apply if the dust control actions, as specified in Table 2, are implemented on a routine basis for 403 -11 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) each applicable fugitive dust source type. To qualify for this exemption, a person must maintain records in accordance with subparagraph (e)(l)(C). (6) The provisions of paragraph (d)(4) shall not apply to earth coverings of public paved roadways where such coverings are approved by a !ocal government agency for the protection of the roadway, and where such coverings are used as roadway crossings for haul vehicles provided that such roadway is closed to through traffic and visible roadway dust is removed within one day following the cessation of activities. (7) The provisions of subdivision (e) shall not apply to: (A) officially- designated public parks and recreational areas, including national parks, national monuments, national forests, state parks, state recreational areas, and county regional parks. (B) any large operation which is required to submit a dust control plan to any city or county government which has adopted a District - approved dust control ordinance. (C) any large operation subject to Rule 1158, which has an approved dust control plan pursuant to Rule 1158, provided that all sources of fugitive dust are included in the Rule 1158 plan. (8) The provisions of subparagraph (e)(1)(A) through (e)(1)(C) shall not apply to any large operation with an AQMD - approved fugitive dust control plan provided that there is no change to the sources and controls as identified in the AQMD - approved fugitive dust control plan. (h) Fees Any person conducting active operations for which the Executive Officer conducts upwind/downwind monitoring for PM 10 pursuant to paragraph (d)(3) shall be assessed applicable Ambient Air Analysis Fees pursuant to Rule 304.1. Applicable fees shall be waived for any facility which is exempted from paragraph (d)(3) or meets the requirements of paragraph (d)(3). 403 -12 Rule 403 (cont.) TABLE 1 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources) Source Category Control Measure (Amended June 3, 2005) Guidance Backfilling 01 -1 Stabilize backfill material when not actively ✓ Mix backfill soil with water prior to moving handling; and ✓ Dedicate water truck or high capacity hose to 01 -2 Stabilize backfill material during handling; and backfilling equipment 01 -3 Stabilize soil at completion of activity. ✓ Empty loader bucket slowly so that no dust plumes are generated ✓ Minimize drop height from loader bucket Clearing and 02 -1 Maintain stability of soil through pre- watering of ✓ Maintain live perennial vegetation where grubbing site prior to clearing and grubbing; and possible 02 -2 Stabilize soil during clearing and grubbing ✓ Apply water in sufficient quantity to prevent activities; and generation of dust plumes 02 -3 Stabilize soil immediately after clearing and grubbing activities. Clearing forms 03 -1 Use water spray to clear forms; or ✓ Use of high pressure air to clear forms may cause 03 -2 Use sweeping and water spray to clear forms; or exceedance of Rule requirements 03 -3 Use vacuums stem -to clear forms. Crushing 04 -1 Stabilize surface soils prior to operation of ✓ Follow permit conditions for crushing equipment support equipment; and ✓ Pre -water material prior to loading into crusher 04 -2 Stabilize material after crushing. ✓ Monitor crusher emissions opacity ✓ Apply water to crushed material to prevent dust plumes 403 -13 Rule 403 (cont.) TABLE 1 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources) (Amended June 3, 2005) Source Category Control Measure Guidance Cut and fill 05 -1 Pre -water soils prior to cut and fill activities; and ✓ For large sites, pre -water with sprinklers or water trucks and allow time fe penetration 05 -2 Stabilize soil during and after cut and fill activities. ✓ Use water trucks /pulls to water soils to depth of cut prior to subsequent cuts Demolition — 06 -1 Stabilize wind erodible surfaces to reduce dust; and ✓ Apply water in sufficient quantities to mechanical /manual prevent the generation of visible dust plumes 06 -2 Stabilize surface soil where support equipment and vehicles will operate; and 06 -3 Stabilize loose soil and demolition debris; and 06 -4 Comply with AQMD Rule 1403. Disturbed soil 07 -1 Stabilize disturbed soil throughout the construction ✓ Limit vehicular traffic and disturbances on site; and soils where possible 07 -2 Stabilize disturbed soil between structures ✓ If interior block walls are planned, install as early as possible ✓ Apply water or a stabilizing agent in sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes Earth- moving 08 -1 Pre -apply water to depth of proposed cuts; and ✓ Grade each project phase separately, timed activities 08 -2 Re -apply water as necessary to maintain soils in a to coincide with construction phase damp condition and to ensure that visible emissions V Upwind fencing can prevent material do not exceed 100 feet in any direction; and movement site 08 -3 Stabilize soils once earth - moving activities are ✓ Apply water or a stabilizing agent in complete. sufficient quantities to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes 403-14 Rule 403 (cont.) TABLE 1 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources) Source Category Control Measure (Amended June 3, 2005) Guidance Importing /exporting 09 -1 Stabilize material while loading to reduce fugitive ✓ Use tarps or other suitable enclosures on of bulk materials dust emissions; and haul trucks 09 -2 Maintain at least six inches of freeboard on haul ✓ Check belly -dump truck seals regularly and vehicles; and remove any trapped rocks to prevent spillage 09 -3 Stabilize material while transporting to reduce ✓ Comply with track -out fugitive dust emissions; and prevention/mitigation requirements 09 -4 Stabilize material while unloading to reduce fugitive ✓ Provide water while loading and unloading dust emissions; and to reduce visible dust plumes 09 -5 Comply with Vehicle Code Section 23114. Landscaping 10 -1 Stabilize soils, materials, slopes ✓ Apply water to materials to stabilize ✓ Maintain materials in a crusted condition ✓ Maintain effective cover over materials ✓ Stabilize sloping surfaces using soil binders unti l vegetation or ground cover can effectively stabilize the slopes ✓ Hydroseed prior to rain season Road shoulder 11 -1 Apply water to unpaved shoulders prior to clearing; ✓ Installation of curbing and/or paving of road maintenance and shoulders can reduce recurring maintenance 11 -2 Apply chemical dust suppressants and/or washed costs `/ Use of chemical dust suppressants can gravel to maintain a stabilized surface after inhibit vegetation growth and reduce future completing road shoulder maintenance. road shoulder maintenance costs 403-15 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) TABLE 1 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources) Source Cate¢ory Control Measure Guidance Screening 12 -1 Pre -water material prior to screening; and ✓ Dedicate water truck or high capacity hose 12 -2 Limit fugitive dust emissions to opacity and plume to screening operation length standards; and ✓ Drop material through the screen slowly and 12 -3 Stabilize material immediately after screening. minimize drop height ✓ Install wind barrier with a porosity of no more than 50% upwind of screen to the height of the drop point Staging areas 13 -1 Stabilize staging areas during use; and ✓ Limit size of staging area 13 -2 Stabilize staging area soils at project completion. ✓ Limit vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour ✓ Limit number and size of staging area entrances /exists Stockpiles/ 14 -1 Stabilize stockpiled materials. ✓ Add or remove material from the downwind Bulk Material 14 -2 Stockpiles within 100 yards of off -site occupied portion of the storage pile buildings must not be greater than eight feet in ✓ Maintain storage piles to avoid steep sides Handling height; or must have a road bladed to the top to allow or faces water truck access or must have an operational water irrigation system that is capable of complete stockpile coverage. 403-16 Rule 403 (cont.) TABLE 1 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources) (Amended June 3, 2005) Source Category Control Measure Guidance Traffic areas for 15 -1 Stabilize all off -road traffic and parking areas; and ✓ Apply gravel /paving to all haul routes as construction 15 -2 Stabilize all haul routes; and soon as possible to all future roadway areas activities 15 -3 Direct construction traffic over established haul ✓ Barriers can be used to ensure vehicles are routes. only used on established parking areas /haul routes Trenching 16 -1 Stabilize surface soils where trencher or excavator ✓ Pre - watering of soils prior to trenching is an and support equipment will operate; and effective preventive measure. For deep 16 -2 Stabilize soils at the completion of trenching trenching activities, pre- trench to 18 inches activities. soak soils via the pre - trench and resuming trenching ✓ Washing mud and soils from equipment at the conclusion of trenching activities can prevent crusting and drying of soil on equipment Truck loading 17 -1 Pre -water material prior to loading; and ✓ Empty loader bucket such that no visible 17 -2 Ensure that freeboard exceeds six inches (CVC dust plumes are created ✓ 23114) Ensure that the loader bucket is close to the truck to minimize drop height while loading Turf Overseeding 18 -1 Apply sufficient water immediately prior to ✓ Haul waste material immediately off -site conducting turf vacuuming activities to meet opacity and plume length standards; and 18 -2 Cover haul vehicles prior to exiting the site. 403-17 Rule 403 (cont.) TABLE 1 BEST AVAILABLE CONTROL MEASURES (Applicable to All Construction Activity Sources) (Amended June 3, 2005) Source Category Control Measure Guidance Unpaved 19 -1 Stabilize soils to meet the applicable performance ✓ Restricting vehicular access to established roads /parking lots standards; and unpaved travel paths and parking lots can 19 -2 Limit vehicular travel to established unpaved roads reduce stabilization requirements haul routes and unpaved parking lots. Vacant land 20 -1 In instances where vacant lots are 0.10 acre or larger and have a cumulative area of 500 square feet or more that are driven over and/or used by motor vehicles and/or off -road vehicles, prevent motor vehicle and/or off -road vehicle trespassing, parking and/or access by installing barriers, curbs, fences, gates, posts, signs, shrubs, trees or other effective control measures. 403-18 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) Table 2 DUST CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS Earth - moving (except (la) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of construction cutting and 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D- filling areas, and mining 2216, or other equivalent method approved by operations) the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations each subsequent four -hour period of active operations; OR (la -1) For any earth- moving which is more than 100 feet from all property lines, conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible dust emissions from exceeding 100 feet in length in any direction. Earth - moving: (lb) Maintain soil moisture content at a minimum of Construction fill areas: 12 percent, as determined by ASTM method D- 2216, or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer, the California Air Resources Board, and the U.S. EPA. For areas which have an optimum moisture content for compaction of less than 12 percent, as determined by ASTM Method 1557 or other equivalent method approved by the Executive Officer and the California Air Resources Board and the U.S. EPA, complete the compaction process as expeditiously as possible after achieving at least 70 percent of the optimum soil moisture content. Two soil moisture evaluations must be conducted during the first three hours of active operations during a calendar day, and two such evaluations during each subsequent four - hour period of active operations. 403-19 Rule 403 (cont.) Table 2 (Continued) (Amended June 3, 2005) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS Earth - moving: (I c) Conduct watering as necessary to prevent visible Construction cut areas emissions from extending more than 100 feet and mining operations: beyond the active cut or mining area unless the area is inaccessible to watering vehicles due to slope conditions or other safety factors. Disturbed surface areas (2a/b) Apply dust suppression in sufficient quantity and (except completed frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Any grading areas) areas which cannot be stabilized, as evidenced by wind driven fugitive dust must have an application of water at least twice per day to at least 80 percent of the unstabilized area. Disturbed surface (2c) Apply chemical stabilizers within five working days areas: Completed of grading completion; OR grading areas (2d) Take actions (3a) or (3c) specified for inactive disturbed surface areas. Inactive disturbed (3a) Apply water to at least 80 percent of all inactive surface areas disturbed surface areas on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, excluding any areas which are inaccessible to watering vehicles due to excessive slope or other safety conditions; OR (3b) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface; OR (3c) Establish a vegetative ground cover within 21 days after active operations have ceased. Ground cover must be of sufficient density to expose less than 30 percent of unstabilized ground within 90 days of planting, and at all times thereafter; OR (3d) Utilize any combination of control actions (3a), (3b), and (3c) such that, in total, these actions apply to all inactive disturbed surface areas. 403 -20 Rule 403 (cont.) Table 2 (Continued) 1 (Amended June 3, 2005) FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CATEGORY CONTROL ACTIONS Unpaved Roads (4a) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic at least once per every two hours of active operations [3 times per normal 8 hour work day]; OR (4b) Water all roads used for any vehicular traffic once daily and restrict vehicle speeds to 15 miles per hour; OR (4c) Apply a chemical stabilizer to all unpaved road surfaces in sufficient quantity and frequency to maintain a stabilized surface. Open storage piles (5a) Apply chemical stabilizers; OR (5b) Apply water to at least 80 percent of the surface area of all open storage piles on a daily basis when there is evidence of wind driven fugitive dust; OR (5c) Install temporary coverings; OR (5d) Install a three -sided enclosure with walls with no more than 50 percent porosity which extend, at a minimum, to the top of the pile. This option may only be used at aggregate- related plants or at cement manufacturing facilities. All Categories (6a) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 2 may be used. 403 -21 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) TABLE 3 CONTINGENCY CONTROL MEASURES FOR LARGE OPERATIONS FUGITIVE DUST SOURCE CONTROL MEASURES CATEGORY Earth - moving (IA) Cease all active operations; OR (2A) Apply water to soil not more than 15 minutes prior to moving such soil. Disturbed surface (013) On the last day of active operations prior to a areas weekend, holiday, or any other period when active operations will not occur for not more than four consecutive days: apply water with a mixture of chemical stabilizer diluted to not less than 1/20 of the concentration required to maintain a stabilized surface for a period of six months; OR (1B) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (213) Apply water to all unstabilized disturbed areas 3 times per day. If there is any evidence of wind driven fugitive dust, watering frequency is increased to a minimum of four times per day; OR (313) Take the actions specified in Table 2, Item (3c); OR (413) Utilize any combination of control actions (1B), (213), and (313) such that, in total, these actions apply to all disturbed surface areas. Unpaved roads (1 C) Apply chemical stabilizers prior to wind event; OR (2C) Apply water twice per hour during active operation; OR 3C Stop all vehicular traffic. Open storage piles (1D) Apply water twice per hour; OR 213 Install temporary coverings. Paved road track -out (1E) Cover all haul vehicles; OR (2E) Comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads. All Categories (1F) Any other control measures approved by the Executive Officer and the U.S. EPA as equivalent to the methods specified in Table 3 may be used. 403 -22 Rule 403 (cont.) (Amended June 3, 2005) Table 4 (Conservation Management Practices for Confined Animal Facilities) SOURCE CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PRACTICES CATEGORY Manure (la) Cover manure prior to removing material off -site; AND Handling (lb) Spread the manure before 11:00 AM and when wind conditions are less than 25 miles per hour; AND (Only (lc) Utilize coning and drying manure management by removing applicable to manure at laying hen houses at least twice per year and maintain Commercial a base of no less than 6 inches of dry manure after clean out; or Poultry in lieu of complying with conservation management practice Ranches) (1c), comply with conservation management practice (1 d). (ld) Utilize frequent manure removal by removing the manure from laying hen houses at least every seven days and immediately thin bed dry the material. Feedstock (2a) Utilize a sock or boot on the feed truck auger when filling feed Handling storage bins. Disturbed (3a) Maintain at least 70 percent vegetative cover on vacant portions Surfaces of the facility; OR (3b) Utilize conservation tillage practices to manage the amount, orientation and distribution of crop and other plant residues on the soil surface year -round, while growing crops (if applicable) in narrow slots or tilled strips; OR (3c) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient concentrations and frequencies to maintain a stabilized surface. Unpaved (4a) Restrict access to private unpaved roads either through signage Roads or physical access restrictions and control vehicular speeds to no more than 15 miles per hour through worker notifications, signage, or any other necessary means; OR (4b) Cover frequently traveled unpaved roads with low silt content material (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a minimum depth of four inches); OR (40 Treat unpaved roads with water, mulch, chemical dust suppressants or other cover to maintain a stabilized surface. Equipment (5a) Apply dust suppressants in sufficient quantity and frequency to Parking Areas maintain a stabilized surface; OR (5b) Apply material with low silt content (i.e., asphalt, concrete, recycled road base, or gravel to a depth of four inches). 403 -23 Appendix A -3 • Operation Emissions Inventory Regional Operation Emissions o Regional Emission Summary Sheet • Stationary Source Emissions • Area Source Emissions • URBEMIS2002 Output Sheets Local Operation Emissions o CO Hotspot Screening Analysis (LOS Analysis) Our Lady Queen of Angels (Newport Beach) No Project Mobile Area Stationary Total Existing Project Mobile Area Stationary Total Project Net Project Net Mobile Net Stationary Total Net SCAQMD Significance Threshold Difference Significant? Regional Emission Calculations (lbs /day) CO NOx PM10 ROC sox 74.5 10.6 10.1 9.9 0.1 0.8 1.0 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.0 0.3 76 15 10 12 0 75 9 10 13 0 1 1.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 1 6 0 0 1 76 16 10 15 1 0.0 -1.5 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.4 2.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.4 1.0 0.1 3.0 0.2 550 55 150 55 150 (550) (54) (150) (52) (150) No No No No No 5!17/2006 1:44 PM Regional Emissions-As Regional Our Lady Queen of Angels (Newport Beach) Electricity Usage Land Use Existing Elementary School Miscellaneous Project Elementary School Miscellaneous Electricity Usage Rate' 1.000 Snfl (kWhlsa.ftivrl 100.0 5.90 35.9 10.50 Total Existing ^i Electricity Usage 2000 . 5.9 1.180,000 3.233 Emission Factors (lbs /MWh) b 0.032 Total Electricity Usage CO ROC NOx PM10 Sox IKWhlvear) IMWh1Dav1 9_2 0.01 1.15 Q,QF 0.12 0.192 Total Project Emissions from Electricity Consumption (lbslday) 590,000 1.616 0.323 0.016 1.859 0.065 0.194 377.370 1.034 0.207 0.010 1.189 0.041 0.124 967,370 2.650 0.53 0.03 3.05 0.11 0.32 2000 . 5.9 1.180,000 3.233 0.647 0.032 3.718 0.129 0.388 55.5 10.5 583,065 1.597 0.319 0.016 1.837 0.064 0.192 Total Project 1,763,065 4.830 0.97 0.05 5.56 0.19 0.56 Net Emissions From Electricity Usage 0.44 0.02 2.51 0.09 0.25 Summary of Stationary Emissions CQ 2 Lift PM10 sox Total Existing Emissions (lbsrday) Total Project Emissions (lbs /day) Total Net Emissions (lbslday) ° Electricity Usage Rates from Table A9 -11 -A, CEQA Air Quality Handbook SCAQMD .1993. ° Emission Factors from Table A9 -11 -8, CEQA Air QnaliN Handbook SOAQMD, 1993. 0.53 0.03 3.05 0.11 0.32 0.97 0.05 5.56 0.19 0.58 0.44 0.02 2.51 0.09 0.26 5/17/2006 1:44 PM Regional Emissions.xls Stationary Existing - CO.cxc 03/10/3006 10:53 AN URBENIS 3003 Fee WINEOVS E.1.0 File Name: V: \AONOISE OIVIEION \A.tluN vro]ec[s \Our Latly of Angel. Ixevporc) \oper¢clono \opera[lms Project Name: Our Lady of Angele fWaxpOrc1 - Operations ,Existing) Project Location, South Coact Air Basin „AS Angeles areal On -Road Noco. Vehicle Rel.Slon¢ Based on EMFAC2002 version 3.3 DETAIL REPORT ,Pounds /Day - Winter) MFF EWRCE EMISSION MTINAT69 (Winter Pounds per Day. Unelclgacedl Source RCG CU S03 PM10 Na [oral Gaa 0.05 Pll 0.60 0 D.O. xaa rch 0.00 ..Do D.00 O.00 D.aa LMdscaptng - Ne Mincer emtaai one Con aYnmr Pcdc[S 0.00 - - - Architectural coatings 1.0i TOTALS (1b5 /da Y. unalclgaced) 3.0E 0.]l D.6D 0.00 0.00 UNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS ROD NOx CO 503 Re Wy -care center 3.]5 9.60 33.95 D.03 3.16 El rnen[ary school 3. 5] 6.66 39.37 0,03 3.36 Place of Worship 3.]9 6.50 31.19 0.03 3.D] 9DTAL EMI EEIONS I1b6 /day) 9.09 13.97 96.61 O. D9 9.56 Nee not 1M lude correction for pa by trip.. Wes no Include double Counting ad j us Want for Internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year: 3006 remparscure IF): 60 Sea. on: Winer EMPAC Ver"ca: ..8003 19/30.3) Rusher, of Land ...a. No . Total uric Type Acreage Trip Race Gait. Trip. Day -care c ]9.1] trips/1000 s9. ft. 9.56 361.00 Ele. t." school 1.09 [rips /.cudenca 315.00 393.00 Place of worship 1.69 [ripe /1000 .q. Lt. 96.]0 359.00 Sum of Total Trips 1.063..0 Total Vehlcle Mlles Traveled 6.319.13 Fleet mix: venue Type c Type er55n60 NmCatalyst catalyst m e eel Llghc AY CO 3.30 97.30 0.50 Llgh[ TIYCk < 3,]50 lb¢ 13.10 6.00 93.90 3.60 Ll Shot Truck 3.]51- 5.]50 15.90 1.90 96.90 I.30 MM Truck 5.751 E.500 7.00 I.90 95.70 3.90 Ll ce -Neery B. SOI -10, o00 3.10 B3.SO 33.30 Ll [e -Neery 10.003 -19. oD0 1,30 0.00 66.]0 33.J0 Mad -X¢avy 19.001-33.000 1.00 10.00 30.00 ]0.00 NeaVy.Neavy 33.0.3 -60. s00 0.90 0.00 11.10 5..90 Line Xa.1 a 60..0. Its 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0. Urban B" o.10 O.OD 0.00 100... Mo[orc ycle l.]0 e3.90 17.60 0.10 SCMOI Bub 0 .10 0.00 O.00 100.01 Motor No 1.30 0.00 91.10 •.]1 Travel Conditions Resident lal Cc Onerclal Xoma- ..¢- Work Steep Other Coconuts Non-Work Customer Urban Trlp Length Ion 11 e¢1 11.5 9.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural iilp Leng [I, Imlle¢1 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds (In; 35.0 91.0 10.0 90.0 90.0 9..0 I Of Trips - Residential 30.0 3].0 63.0 \ of TTIp¢ - Comserclal 0y 1. vael day-care c 5.0 3.5 93.5 Element a rye ¢onaol 30.0 10.0 ]0.0 Pl ac¢ of Worship 3.0 1.5 95.5 Changes made to the default values for Land Use Trip Bercencage¢ charges made to the default values for Area changes made to the default values for Operations The opera clonal eml¢al On year changetl f[dn 3005 to 3006. The Decentlshe Wlnc¢r cemp¢ra cMmJetl Ir" 50 CO 60. TM operacloraI s tempera chatyed frwn 90 to 75. The operational ¢mmaer Sales tied Item ch.ng.d floor E to 5. page I Exl¢[1ng..M Dz /1D /a DOS iD: Sa An Existing - NOx.cxc u NBEMIS 2002 For Wind- B. ).D F11e Name: V: \PCMOI66 DI VIejMN Active Praj acts \put LA., of Mgus (NevpD[q \Ope[a[lons \ppeYaclona [o)ec W[ Lady of ANgelo (Ne'rya[t) - Ope[atl one Iexl s[ingl [o]ec �[I an: 6ou th Co sot A1[ 9a51n ILao Angm s areal On -Road Moto[ Vehicle Cmlaeiona Bleed on 6MFACZ00) ve[elon 2.2 .11AIL .11eBI I PoUntla /Day Bummer, ::.G SOURCE EMISSION ESa1MATE5 E-.1 FwNds per Day. Unelrl9atedl Source NDa 20 SC2 PN10 Heart1 he. C..S 0.11 C.I. D C..0 h - No summer emissions Land, cap Ing um ..I, o.E3 :.aa O.N. 0.01 Consume[ P[ticts 0.00 - - - A[chlIoctI'll Coatings 1.03 TtlFAL611ha/tlay. unmltlgatedl 1.46 D.J] 2.e4 0.00 0.01 UNMITIGATED EPERATIONAL GMI.HICHIS ROG upx CO SLC 6N10 Day -,,,, cen 2.16 3.95 3..31 0.03 .16 Elementary achml 5.14 a.16 32.11 0.0] ],1s Pla ca of worship z.6a 3,Ea 29.64 ..2 ]'. 01 TOTAL EMISSIONS Ilbo /dayl 10,1, 11.99 93.3, D.10 I.S. Wes ns t include c eclon for pasahy trips. Wea not include double model., adjustment let Internal trip,. OPERATIONAL IVehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis yea[: 3006 ,eryy[acu[e (FI: 15 Else..; ...at FMFAC Version: EMMC2002 (9 /20Da1 sunmary of Land Use.: N. Unit Iype Acreage Trip Rate Lei t, TAI". my -care center 19.11 [tips 11DD0 a9. ft. a.56 bl .Do Elementary¢ scllWl L09 trips /st Udencs 315..D a9 ].Do Place of w[shlp 1169 [[l pa /IO DO 69. ft, 16.,D 359.OD a1m of Io tai I[1 pa 1.06 ].OD Total Vehl [le Nll es Traveled 6.311.13 Vehlue As.umprlem. Flee, MI.: ' hide Type Po[ t Type ..- Catalyst Catalyst pl e..I Light Auto SS.s0 2.20 9,.30 0.50 Light Truck . ),]SC be 15.10 4.Op 93.40 Light Truck 3.751- 5.750 15.90 1.90 96. 9D 1 .30 Med TNCA S.,S1. B.S.0 ).00 1.10 95.)D Ll to -Heavy 8.501-10.000 l.]0 V.00 tl1, BV Ia.2' LI [e.Me avy IO. DOI- 11 . OOD p.)0 .00 66.]0 )3.3C Had- Meavy )a, o01 - 33.000 1.00 11 00 )0..1 Xe aI -Xeavy 33.001- 60,000 0,9. O. DO .10 BB.9, Li ne Haul a 60.000 the E.pO 0.00 ID.00 100.00 than Eub 0.10 0.00 O.DO ID..OA MOto[c yele ,,0 83.10 ,,60 0.00 School Sua o.10 D,DD ID.oD 100.00 Motor ..: I,zp I.Co 91.,D B.3o Tavm C- BleLcen Ma,ldCnt].1 Conme.cial Be,. Home. Home. Mork Shop ocher M-so Non -Wrk NsCmeI orb- Trip Length Will) 11.5 ,9 6.0 104 5.5 5.5 kul'al T[Ip Length Iml)eb) 11.5 a.9 s.0 10.3 5.5 5.5 TY IN Speed, Impl:l 15,0 40.D 10.0 4o.. 10.0 10.1 a Of Trip0 De0ldencla 20.0 31.c 13.0 a of Trips - Cgavercla) Icy land Bell Soy'Cara C 5.0 ].5 93.5 Glemeneary e 4Cnoo1 20.0 10,0 ,o.e ,,see of warship 1.0 1.5 95.5 thaD9e, -do co she defame value^. for Land Use ttlp Perce cages Changes made co Cut default value¢ for "an Changes made to I" default values for ops.ecloBe The ape [aQlmlal poll eel on year CAahJed Erse ]005 c0 TTe Ope[scl weal winter QemperacY[e thangQd from 50 co 60. The OPeI: Mel Suamer camr racu.e CW9ed frwa 90 co The DPe.ecl Mal tu-at .election Item Changed fr. a cC S. W9. 1 Gxlacin9.u[h Existing - Roo.cxt 03/10/3006 10:5] AM ORSBMls 3003 For Rlndawo 8.7.0 File Name: V: \AQNCISE DIVISION \ACt IVe Prm)ecta \Our Lady of Angela (Nex,ort) \opecatlM S\Ope[at Ions Project Name: OUT Lady Of Angela (Ne'ryortl - Operations (Existing) Project Location: SouN COast AI[ Basin ILOR Angeles area) On -Road Motor Vehicle 6misaiona Based on 6MFAC3Q03 Version 3.3 DETAIL REPORT (pourpa /Day - Summer) AREA St'�RCS EMIsslud ¢STiNAi84 (summer Pound¢ per DAY. Unmitigatadl sou :e RW sox CO S.2 Fels Natura: Gas 0.05 0.71 O.bo O O.os Hearth - NO a mar emisoim. Land6caping s.]] 0.01 3.39 O.DD 0.01 Consume[ ?Met. 0.00 - - - Architectural Coatltgs 1.03 forcL611Ea /day. unmltfgatedl 1.96 0.73 1.99 O.D. 0.01 GNMITIGATED OPERATIONAL EMISSIONS RW N0. to 5p1 FEUD Day -care center 1.51 3.64 ]9.]0 0.03 3.19 Elementary school 6.90 3,45 36.50 0.03 ].]6 Place Of Wrshlp 3.D9 3.57 33.SJ o.03 ].OT TOTAL SMIS"ONS (ILS /day) Il.46 11.06 109.79 ..1. I.E. Meant Include c [ation for passby trips. Nee not Include double Counting aa)ustmmt for Internal trips. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle l EMlssloM RSTIMATBB Analysis Yea[: 1006 Temperature IF), 45 Seaman: summer EMFAC Version! EMFAC1001 19/30011 summary of Land Uses: .It Type Acrenge Trip Rate Un its Trips Day -care cen ter )9.{T t[IP9 /1000 sq. ft. 4.56 361.00 Elementary school 1.09 t[I P9 /students ]IS .00 36].00 Place of sersbiP 7.69 trips /1000 9q, ft. 96.10 399.0. ", Of Total Trip. 1.063.00 Total Vehicle Ml lac Traveled 6.314.11 Vehicle Ass ump tlona: Fleet Mix: Vehicle Type Percent rYpe Non - Catalyst Catalyst Dleael Light Auto 5s.sp 1.1. 91.10 a: Ea Light Truck 1 3,750 IES 15.10 4.00 93.90 1.6. Light Truck 3.151 5.750 l..so 1.90 96.90 1.10 mad Truck 5,151- S,SDO 1.00 1.90 95.70 L l to -Heavy 9,501 - 10.000 I.I. 0.00 I.E. 6 U.,. L l te_NCavy I.. p01- 19.000 0.30 0.0. 66.70 33.30 Ned.Meavy 19,OD1 33..0D I.00 lo... 10.00 70.09 Has" _Has" 33,ODl- 60.000 0.90 a.0. 11.10 66.90 Line all . 60,.00 mz 0.00 O.D. o.to l0o.D0 urban We o,l. 0900 0900 IDD. oo MOCOrc ycm Imo 61.90 0960 D.I. school RUE 0.10 Q.10 U.m 100.00 Motor nand 1.10 ...a 91 1. 9.30 Travel Crna ItIons ea la. ntlal cona¢rc ml Nome- ..op ND [k Shop other C. -.,C Nmxo[k Custom G[Wl Trip Lengtb Imlles) 11.5 4.9 6.0 10.3 Rural Trip Lengtb Imlleal 11.5 0.9 6.D 40.3 T[fP sPPade Imphl 35.0 90.0 90.0 4090 90.0 9090 9 of T[I pe - ReB ldm[1.1 10.0 37.0 63.D 9 Of Trips - Commercial Orr land =6 Day -ce re c S.D 1.5 01.5 Element ¢" school I... m.o 70.0 Place of so-hip 3.0 1.5 95.5 CAR nges made to tM dafaelt values for Land Use Trip Pero al.q.. Mangos made to the default values for Area Menges made to the default values for Dperatlona TAe ope [¢[1¢171 enl aeion year cis. - flea, 2005 t0 1006. The ope ra tlmal uln ter tamper changed from 50 to 60. Thin Operational o temper changed from 90 to 45. The operational chase[ selection r item changed from 0 to C. Page 1 Exizting -rid 02/10/20D6 10457 AN .F.P..S ]I. For WnOOVa .,7.1 Pile Name: V: \APNOISE DIVISIGN\AC[lve P[O$ec[s \OU[ Lady of angels (Neapo[[1 \Ope [a[tonc \Ope[a[lona - putur -ris Project Our Lady of Angels (NWepartl - Operations (Future) Project (cation: South Coast AI[ Basin (LoS Angeles area) On -Road Moto[ Vehicle 61::1 e¢lona Sawed on EMFAC2002 Version 2.2 TAIL REPORT (round. /Day - winter) AREA SGURCE ENi55,LN ESTIIMTES (Winter Pounds Per Day. Unmitigated) Source R. NO, CO 502 PMIO Natural Gas 0.95 O.BD 0 0.00 Has [th 0 0.00 0.00 D.00 O.OD Landscaping - NO winter emissions Nnsumer Prdcts 0... - - - - Archl[tttural Copings I.I. TOTALS Ilesiday, uMnl[lga[edl 1.11 0.95 O.BD D.D. 0.00 DNNITIGAT80 OPERATIONAL M155ION5 Ele:en[ary school 1B. 9w6 6N93 97.2222 V D .:Place of w[shlp ].90 3.90 27.30 0.02 3.66 TOTAL 6MISSI0N5 (lhs/day) 7.35 10.63 79.53 0.05 10.06 Was not include correction for paaaby tripe. Wes not include double Counting adjustment for Internal [rips. OPBPAYI OVAL IVehlcle) EMI65ION ESTIMATES Analysis Yea[: 2010 Temperature (PI: 60 Season winter 691FAC Version: ENF..D2 (9 /2102) 5ummarY of land Uses: No. Total Dnl[ T ype Ac reage Trip Rate Unit. Trips Elementary school 1,09 trips /students 0.00 659.00 Place of worship 7.71 trlps /1000 sq. ft. 655.53 939.00 Sum of Total Trip. 1.O.2 00 Total VeM Gis Mlles Traveled 6.690.97 Vehicle Aaseeptlov. Flee[ MIS: Vehicle Type Percent Type Nan -Catal YSr Catalyst Dl ... I L1$[:[ Auto 54.70 1.10 98.70 0.20 Light T31Ck a 3,750 be 15.20 2.D0 96.00 2.00 Light Truck 3.151- 5.750 16.20 1.20 S.I. 9 .70 Mad Truck 5.751. 8.500 7.30 1.<0 95.90 2.70 Lit a -Xe avy B. 501 .1 D. 000 1.10 0.00 91.80 10.20 LI Ce -Ne a vy 10..a1 -1 <, 000 0.]0 66.70 ]3.30 wand-Fe. vy 1 {,001 -]], OOa 1.00 20.00 00.10 avy -Heavy 3],011- 6D,OOa 0.90 11.10 RB.90 Line Daul a 6D, 000 lbe 0.00 ..OD 1.00 100.a0 Urban 9 a.2a s1A0 50. a0 Put orcycle 1.Ia 69.90 51.20 0.10 5c hood Bus 0.11 1.oD 1 100.a0 Motor x0- 1.90 7.10 es.'lo 1.2. Travel Conditions Residential pm[WrcI.I xome- xame- Mo:ae- No[k Shop Other Own. U[e N9: -pork Custom.[ Urban T[lp Lelg[h (m(l esl 11.5 6.0 10.] 5,5 5.5 Rural T[lp Leng[A Imllesl 13.5 6.0 lo,] 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds Imp Al 35.0 90.0 0.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 t of Tripe - Res ldentlal 20.0 17.0 43.0 9 of Trips - [dal (by land usel Elementary school 20.0 10.0 70.0 Place of worship 3.0 1.5 95.5 Changes made to the default Values for Land Use Trip Percentages CAangea wad, to the default Values for Area Changes rude to the default Values for Operations Th rpera[lonal emission Year changed (roan 2005 to 2010. The Opera [l one winter temperature changed tram 50 to 60. The cpe[e[lonal su CNW![a Curie e chang ad from 90 to B5. The ep¢ra[lanet asew r selection am change] ft- 8 [0 6- Page 1 Fu[u [e N3x.tx[ 02/10/3006 1X:56 AA1 NNB6n IS 2003 For Wind- I,. File Name: VAJUROISC GIVISION \Aetive P[ojecta \put Lady of Angels INesport) \Operations \OFCratl WS - Future.urb Project Name: Our Lady of Angela (Newport) Operations IFUturel Project location: South Coast os Air Basin (L Angeles areal On -Road Rotor Vehicle End scions Based on EMFAC2002 verolM 2.2 DETAIL REPORT (PauORIGAY Suvmerj AREA SOURCE EMISSION EBTURATE.1 (Summer Pounds Per Day, Unmitigated) Scrum RW NOx CO S02 Failo Natural Gas ..OT 0.95 0.80 0 I.D. No or th - No summer emis.lor a Lanaseaping 0.25 0.01 I.s6 0.00 O.OI consumer P[dets 0.00 - - - ArchltecCU[al Coatings 1.28 TOTALS(lbs /day. unmitigated) 1.69 0.96 3.26 0.00 0.01 UNNITIWT80 OPRIATI09AL ENISSIONS R. NOx Go Sc2 Win Elementary school T. 55 S.'9 4.72 .00 1... Pi ace of worAsiP 2.22 2.56 25.55 D.02 2.66 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lbs /dayl I.e. 9.16 10.27 D.06 10.06 Me not include corraction, for paacby trips, Wee not include double counting adjustment for 1ntVrnal tripe. OPEFATIGUR6 (vehicle) BMISSION BBOURAT95 Analysis year: 2010 Temperature IF1: 75 Season: Summer PJ6PAC Ver510T: SMPAC2002 19{20021 Summary of Land Use$: Vehicle AOOUmpClome Fleet Nix: Vehicle Type Percent Type NOn -Ce Calyat catalyst D106e1 Light Auto 59.70 1.10 9p,TD 0.x0 Lx g h[ Truck . J.750 IM 15.20 x.o0 96.00 x,00 Light Truck 1.751- 5.750 16.20 .2D 98.10 0.70 Bad TCk 5.751- 9.500 7.) 0 1.90 95.90 2.70 L1 La.Naavy D. 501. 10.000 1.10 0.00 OI. BO 19.20 N.d-e Be avy 10. OJ1 .1 q. 000 e.)0 0.D1 Ned -XCivy 1q. eJl- )].000 1.00 0.00 30.00 I. DO Ne DV y -XO avy )).OD1.6o.000 ..90 0.1D 11.10 Lima nevi > WORD line 0.00 O.DO O.OD .00.00 Urban Due O.21 0.00 SO.DO SO.00 Rotor C YCla 1.11 fib. 90 51.x0 U.S. So .I Eus o.If O.DO o. oo )oo.Oo .IOr game, I.ao zlo es nD ..xD Travel COnefe)ens Reofden[fal Cemmerelal Nonw- Dome. e. Work She, O[Mr CMneIa NM -N OfN ..I-aI U[b an Trip Length Im heel 11.5 q.9 6.0 IJ.) 5.5 5.5 kural Rip Length Imll ev) 11.5 q.9 6.0 10 J 5.5 5.5 T[fP SP Me (mphl I5.0 60.0 90.0 qO.D IS .0 qD.o 9 Of TrfPF - Reafden[lel 30.0 )..0 914 I of Traps - Com arclel IbY )and use) clmx n[.sC n00) xo.D )o.o To.O Pl sec o[ nnlp ].o l.s 95.5 Che.gea made [O the default values for land Uce lip Pnroamrt. ca Gangea made co she default valucv for Area Cnangc•. made co she defnmc values far OPera[fona The mooraclonel mtaalon year eh.ged from x..A [a 2010. The Poor acfanal vinc at cempe return eh. Dead fche So to 60. The Up ."..1 =or tempera cu re ehvlged fcun 90 to .S. The Operational summer S.Plcfon Item changed from 0 [0 A. Page 1 Re. Total UOIC Type Ac ceage Trip Sate Unit. Trips Elementary 6CAOOl ].09 Crl pe /cLUtlenCS 600.00 659.00 Fl ece of wrs111p T.TI Cr(p0 /l0oo a,. ft. SS.SJ 999.00 Sum Df otll Trip. 1,082.00 TOC aI VO�11 cle Mll an Raveled 61698,6] Vehicle AOOUmpClome Fleet Nix: Vehicle Type Percent Type NOn -Ce Calyat catalyst D106e1 Light Auto 59.70 1.10 9p,TD 0.x0 Lx g h[ Truck . J.750 IM 15.20 x.o0 96.00 x,00 Light Truck 1.751- 5.750 16.20 .2D 98.10 0.70 Bad TCk 5.751- 9.500 7.) 0 1.90 95.90 2.70 L1 La.Naavy D. 501. 10.000 1.10 0.00 OI. BO 19.20 N.d-e Be avy 10. OJ1 .1 q. 000 e.)0 0.D1 Ned -XCivy 1q. eJl- )].000 1.00 0.00 30.00 I. DO Ne DV y -XO avy )).OD1.6o.000 ..90 0.1D 11.10 Lima nevi > WORD line 0.00 O.DO O.OD .00.00 Urban Due O.21 0.00 SO.DO SO.00 Rotor C YCla 1.11 fib. 90 51.x0 U.S. So .I Eus o.If O.DO o. oo )oo.Oo .IOr game, I.ao zlo es nD ..xD Travel COnefe)ens Reofden[fal Cemmerelal Nonw- Dome. e. Work She, O[Mr CMneIa NM -N OfN ..I-aI U[b an Trip Length Im heel 11.5 q.9 6.0 IJ.) 5.5 5.5 kural Rip Length Imll ev) 11.5 q.9 6.0 10 J 5.5 5.5 T[fP SP Me (mphl I5.0 60.0 90.0 qO.D IS .0 qD.o 9 Of TrfPF - Reafden[lel 30.0 )..0 914 I of Traps - Com arclel IbY )and use) clmx n[.sC n00) xo.D )o.o To.O Pl sec o[ nnlp ].o l.s 95.5 Che.gea made [O the default values for land Uce lip Pnroamrt. ca Gangea made co she default valucv for Area Cnangc•. made co she defnmc values far OPera[fona The mooraclonel mtaalon year eh.ged from x..A [a 2010. The Poor acfanal vinc at cempe return eh. Dead fche So to 60. The Up ."..1 =or tempera cu re ehvlged fcun 90 to .S. The Operational summer S.Plcfon Item changed from 0 [0 A. Page 1 RW.c[i 03/10/3006 ID:SJ AM URSEMIS 2002 For WIodovs B.J.O F.. Base: V: \A0001SE DSVSBSOP\Accive Prolects %Our Lady of Angela INeVPorJ\OPeraclons \Operatlals Fucure.urb Project Name, Our Lady of Angela INesporcl - Operations (Future) Project lauclon: Scuch Coast Air Basin (We Angeles aura) On -Road Motor Vehicle Emleclonc Based on EMFAC2002 version 2.2 DETAIL REPORT - (POUnd. /Day - Bummer) AREA SOURCE EMISSION ESTIMATES (Summer t \uxndc per Day. Urvolclgatar) Source ROD Uto Ctl 602 PMID Na cu Is Gsc O.OJ ..Is O..P 0 O.Oo ,:,u t, - No s saver emlesfone La M.Colo., V.DC ...I 3.56 .00 0.03 Consumer ROdccc Architectural Coatings D.D. TDTALSOIDS /daY.UnmlclgacM) 1.69 0.96 3.36 D. 00 0.03 UNMITS GAT E. OPEMTI ONAL CRISSIONS no" xCx Co W2 FM to Elemcncary school 10.19 5.35 SO.SJ 0.09 6.60 Place of vorchlp 2.67 3,11 29.79 D.02 3.66 TOTAL EMISSIONS (lba /dayl 13.66 9.15 79.36 0 -06 10.06 Was Mt Include Correction for passby trips. Wes not Include double counting adjustment, for Internal trip,. OPERATIONAL (Vehicle) EMISSION ESTIMATES Analysis Year, 2010 Temperature (F): IS Beaton: Summer ENFAC V-11- 6MFAC3002 (9/30031 summary of Land uses: ocel Unit Type Ac Ce tg! Trip Rate Voice T(l p, El ems n[a ryoccMal 1.09 [[Ip4 /9 [Ydtn [s 600.00 659 .OD Pl ACe of rahlp ). Jl [[]ps /1000 t0. [[. SS. SI 928.00 Sum a( Total Tr1ps 3. OB3.Op Total Vehicle Mlles Traveled 6.690.17 Venue Assumption S: Vehicle Typ, Percent Type Non - ,...Iles catalyst Diesel L lgh[ Auto 56.70 l.Id 99.70 0.20 L14hc Szuck c ],750 lbs 15.30 2..D 96.00 3.Oo Ll9h[ TNCk 3. 753 5.750 16.30 l.]0 90.10 D.7D Red Truck 5.751- 8,5DO 7.30 95.90 2.70 Ll c¢ -Heavy 8.503 -10. ODo 1.30 83.00 IB.3D Ll.e -N=avy IOM DOI -l6. O D0 0.30 D.00 66.70 33.30 MDd-NBavy l6. ppl -]3. O D0 1.00 20.00 BD.OD Newry -N eavy 33.001- 60.000 0.90 D... ..I. t.9D Line Bell' - 60.000 its O. pO 0.00 D.no IOD. 00 Urban A. D.xa 0.00 SD .OD sD .OD .rc ycle 1.60 60.80 33.20 O.OD .2 B.a D.3D 0.00 0.00 10D. D0 Motor Rose 1.50 7.10 8S . 70 7.20 Travel Cmdluona Recldencfal Consvrclal Be-- .-a- Name - ork IWIP Ocher 0smauce Non-Mork NStM r Urban TrIP Len 9th (.heal 11.5 5.9 10.3 5.5 5.5 Rural TrW 1RngIh Imp=s, 11.5 10.3 5.5 5.5 Trip Speeds lWhl ]S.O 9D.D 50.0 90.0 50.0 90.0 I of TrlP - Reg ldenclal 20.0 37.D 53.0 6 of Tnpa - relal Iby land use) n.-t., .semi 20.D 10.0 70.0 Place of Vorshlp 3.0 l.5 95.5 Changes made to the default values for Land Us, Trip percentages Changes made to the default values for Area Change: =tide to the default value. for Operations The ope nclW m al emission year chaog,d fro 2005 to 201%. The operacl oval winter taoWracure charged from S% to Me aparaclmal c emper charged it= Be a5. Ma apar=t ion al summer selections lcen changed free t0 to 6. - P.9. 3 Our Lady of Angels Church Expansion LOS Analysis �G �M i,, n Rai, FitureNoIPtaWsithj ILijP, alY�n '-11-M , �.,,IHourl NIC�6ILOS; „. ICUdf1,L`rOS wICUn `LOS rease:>_- C��Regmred? Jamboree and Eastbluff /Ford AM 0.540 A 0.662 B 0.663 B 0.15% No No PM O.fi15 B 0.735 C 0.735 C 0.00% Yes No CO Hotspot Analysis Criteria (Must meet both conditions) 1. LOS >= C 2. ICU Increase >= 2% LOS Analysis.xls Page 1 of 1 1:47 PM 5/17/2006 APPENDIX B. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT k I� Mm w COPY FOR REPRODUCTION GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CATHOLIC CHURCH LOCATED AT 2046 MAR VISTA DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA FOR DIOCESE OF ORANGE MARYWOOD CENTER 2811 E VILLA REAL DRIVE ORANGE, CALIFORNIA 92867 PROJECT NO: D- 2569 -06 JULY 8, 2004 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. GEOTECHNICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. = Geotechnical, Structural & Environmental Engineering July 8, 2004 Project: D- 2569 -06 Diocese of Orange 2811 E. Villa Real Drive Orange, California 92867 Attention: Mr. Joe Novoa Construction Director Re: Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church 2046 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, California `gentlemen: As authorized, submitted herewith is a geotechnical engineering study report conducted by this office for the above referenced development consisting of the demolition of two existing church buildings and the construction of a new church building and parking lot, in the East Bluff region of Newport Beach, California. The Newport- Inglewood Fault (offshore) is the closest active fault to the site and will have the greatest effect on the project with respect to the earthquake ground motions. The project site does not lie within the Alquist Priolo Fault Zone, therefore potential for direct surface fault rupture is considered unlikely. Site subsurface conditions consist of competent silty sandy terrace deposits, overlying Monterey formation bedrock. Groundwater is just above the bedrock at approximately 20 feet (varies) and should not be encountered during construction. Due to competent soil conditions (dense terrace or stiff clayey bedrock), liquefaction is not judged to be a constraint for this development. Consequently, the site is considered suitable for the proposed structures utilizing conventional spread footings and slab -on -grade construction. Phone: (949) 453 -0406 27 Mauchly, Suite 210, Irvine, CA 92618 Fax: (949) 453 -0409 �rojectNo. D- 2559 -0E Our Lady Queer. of Angels Catholic Church In addition to foundation and pavement recommendations, as requested, our report also includes a site - specific elastic design response spectra. This investigation was made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering procedures and included such field and laboratory tests considered necessary under the circumstances. In the opinion of the undersigned, the accompanying report has been substantiated by mathematical data in conformity with generally accepted engineering principles and presents fairly the design information requested by your organization. Respectfully Submitted, Geotee/cc�hnicall Solutions, Inc. Osman Pekin, PhD, PE, GE Principal Geotechnical Engineerl;'< Abraham S. Baha, P.E. ;r gig, Principal MD/07 C. Marsha I Payne Sr. Engineering Geologist C.E.G. # 367 Distribution: (1) Diocese of Orange (3) Scott S. Barnard - Barnard Ventures, LLC 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I NTRODUCTI ON.............................................................................. ..............................1 Purposeand Scope of Work .......................................................... ............................... l SiteDescription ............................................................................. ..............................2 Proposed Development .................................................................. ..............................3 DocumentReview .......................................................................... ..............................3 GEOLOGICCONDITIONS ............................................................. ............................... 4 GeologicSetting ........................................................................... ............................... 4 SlopeStability ............................................................................... ............................... 5 FA LILTING AND SEI SMI CI TY ........................................................ ............................... 5 Faulting......................................................................................... ..............................5 Probabilistic Risk Analysis ........................................................... ............................... 6 LiquefactionEvaluation ................................................................ ..............................6 Other Secondary Seismic Hazards ............................................... ............................... 8 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ................................................... ............................... 8 Field Exploration Methods ........................................................... ............................... 8 FieldTesting .................................................................................. ..............................9 Logs........................................................................................... ............................... 9 Standard Penetration Resistance ............................................... ..............................9 Groundwater Measurements ..................................................... ............................... 9 FieldResistivity ......................................................................... ............................... 9 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ......................................................... .............................10 Soil and Bedrock Stratigraphy ................................................... ............................... 10 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Groundwater............................................................................................................... 10 LABORATORY TESTING .............................................................. ............................... 10 MoistureDensit y ........................................................................... .............................10 MechanicalAnalysis ................................................................... ............................... 10 DirectShear ................................................................................ ............................... 11 Consolidation.............................................................................. ............................... 11 ChemicalAnalysis ...................................................................... ............................... I 1 Expansion..................................................................................... .............................12 SubgradeR - Value ....................................................................... .............................12 DESIGNVAL UES .......................................................................... ............................... 12 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................. .............................13 GRADING AND DEMOLITION RECOMMENDATI ONS ............. ............................... 14 Demolition and Site Grading ....................... :............................................................. 14 General Grading Procedures ..................................................... ............................... 14 TemporaryExcavations .............................................................. ............................... 15 SEISMIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATI ONS .................................. ............................... 16 Seismic Design Parameters .......................................................... .............................16 ResponseSpectra .......................................................................... .............................17 FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATI ONS ........................ ............................... 18 Allowable Bearing Capacity ....................................................... ............................... 18 FoundationSettl ement ................................................................ ............................... 18 LateralResistance ........................................................................ .............................19 Minimum Footing and Floor Slab Recommendations ................ ............................... 19 2 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Corrosivity.................................................................................. ............................... 20 RETAINING WALL RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................21 Lateral Earth Pressures .............................................................. ............................... 21 Backfill Recommendations ........................................................... .............................22 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAVEMENT AND FLATWORK .... ............................... 22 Pavement Recommendations ...................................................... ............................... 22 Exterior Concrete Flatwork .......................................................... .............................23 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DRAINAGE .................................... ............................... 23 SurfaceDrainage .......................................................................... .............................23 SubdrainSystem ........................................................................... .............................23 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTI ON .......................... ............................... 24 PreconstructionMeeting .............................................................. .............................24 Surveying.................................................................................... ............................... 24 SiteDrainage ................................................................................ .............................24 FootingObservation ..................................................................... .............................24 UtilityTrench Backfill .................................................................. .............................24 LIMI TATI ONS................................................................................ ............................... 25 REMARKS...................................................................................... ............................... 25 APPENDIX I - PLATES ................................................................ ............................... 27 APPENDIX Il — SEISMIC EVAL UATION DATA .......................... ............................... 28 APPENDIX III — FIELD RESISTIVITY TEST ............................... ............................... 29 APPENDIX IV — RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPEC IFICATIONS .................... 32 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church INTRODUCTION The primary objectives of this study were to explore subsurface conditions beneath the project site and to evaluate the existing earth materials relative to foundation support, lateral pressure design factors, seismic conditions and liquefaction potential. Specifically the purpose of this study was to investigate underlying soils condition in order to evaluate geotechnical conditions of the site for construction of a new church building, and paved parking lots and driveways. The study objectives were met by site reconnaissance, exploratory drilling and sampling of earth materials, laboratory testing, seismic study, and engineering analysis. The general scope and objectives of the study were established in collaboration with the project architect. Purpose and Scope of Work The purpose of the geotechnical investigation leading to this report was to evaluate subsurface soil conditions at the site with respect to the proposed construction. Items considered in our study relevant to this site included the following: - Near surface and subsurface soil types, - Expansion potential, - Settlement and hydro - collapse potential, - Bearing capacity, - Lateral earth pressures, - Drainage considerations, - Corrosion potential, - Groundwater conditions, - Likely excavation conditions, Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church - Seismicity, - Earthquake induced liquefaction potential, - Grading considerations, and - Construction observation and testing considerations. To address these, the following scope of work was executed: 1. Review of preliminary project plans, available geotechnical reports, and coordination with the owner's representatives and project design professionals. 2. Site reconnaissance. 3. Investigation of seismicity for the subject location. 4. Drilling, sampling and logging of test borings to investigate subsurface conditions. 5. Field resistivity testing. 6. Laboratory testing of soil samples obtained from subsurface explorations, to determine their physical and engineering properties. 7. Geotechnical analysis of the data obtained. 8. Developing conclusions and recommendations for foundation design and site grading. 9. Preparation of this report. Site Description The project site is essentially a level ground area covering two existing, adjacent church properties, west of East Bluff Drive and south of Mar Vista Drive, in Newport Beach. Domingo Drive separates the two church properties, with the existing St. Mark OAF .---I Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Presbyterian (SMP) Church to the east, and the existing Our Lady Queen of Angels (OLQA) Church to the west. The current OLQA site includes a church, various church and school buildings, and paved parking. Likewise, the current SMP site includes church and ancillary structures and paved parking. Drainage is generally to the southwest by sheet flow. Proposed Development We understand the project involves the demolition of the existing OLQA church building, the demolition of the SNIP church building and its ancillary structures, the construction of a new OLQA church on the current SNIP site, the construction of new school and gymnasium buildings in the existing OLQA school parking lot, and the construction of new parking lots. Document Review Review of relevant documents available in the City of Newport Beach Building Department provided information on previous geotechnical work for the existing OLQA Church (by Soils International, 1990), and the existing SNIP Church (by Pacific Soils Engineering, 1977). Both of these studies showed subsurface conditions to be generally consistent with our current findings, in terms of soil stratigraphy, depth of layers, and groundwater depths. Review of relevant documents available in the City of Newport Beach Public Works Department provided information on an existing retaining wall which wraps around the northwest corner of Jamboree Road and East Bluff Drive, and extends west for approximately 500 -feet along the north side of Jamboree Road. Available plans (by Tetra Tech Infrastructure Southwest Group, 1999) indicate that parts of this wall was built using tiebacks extending towards the St. Mark Church property, but the proposed development in this area is limited to a paved parking area, setback by 20 to 3 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church 30 feet behind the wall. The ends of the existing tiebacks may be located beneath the southernmost line of parking stalls in this area, however, since the tiebacks are relatively deeper (more than 5 feet) than the proposed shallow pavement construction and since there are no proposed structures in this area, there would not be any impact. The same plans also indicate that the closest approach of the proposed church structure to the existing wall is over 30 feet and in this area, the wall is a conventional wall on spread footings, with an approximate height of 6 feet and a relatively minor (8 -foot high) 2h:ly sloping backfill behind the wall, which indicates there would not be any impact. GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS Geologic Setting The project site is situated roughly 3000 -feet to the east of Upper Newport Bay on a broad and low relief elevated marine surface. This surface or terrace is a geomorphically detached remnant of Newport Mesa located to the west. Upper Newport Bay is a drowned river (San Diego Creek) mouth which is now inundated by ocean water. Perhaps a quarter of a million years ago regional uplift along the Newport Inglewood Structural Zone slowly elevated the region and subsequently was incised by erosion along San Diego Creek which resulted in the apparent detachment of the mesa. The terrace surface, locally referred to as Terrace No. 2 (elevation 32 to 36 meters), on which the property lies has been dated and is approximately 122,000 years old. This marine terrace surface is mantled by marine near -shore or beach deposits, which locally are composed of slightly indurated silty fine- grained sand. Twenty boring drilled on the subject property were advanced into this deposits and can be described as reddish to yellowish brown, moist, dense and quite massive though some bedding is evident and lies nearly horizontal. Underlying the terrace deposits is bedrock assigned to the Miocene age Monterey formation and lies at an average depth of 18 -feet below the existing ground surface. Samples collected from the borings indicate the rock consists of a dark gray rd Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church clayey siltstone that is un- weathered, slightly cemented, generally soft (rock) and well bedded. Regional geologic maps indicate the bedrock strikes east -west and dips north at 28 to 34 degree. Groundwater was reported in five of the borings drilled on the site. The groundwater measured lies at depth ranging between 18 and 26 feet and probably is perched on the bedrock surface. The underlying bedrock did not appear saturated and is usually considered non -water bearing due to its fine - grained nature. Slope Stability There are no existing significant slopes on the property and no high or steep graded slopes are planned for this project. For this reason slope stability is not considered to be a constraint. FAULTING AND SEISMICITY Faulting The rather broad Newport- Inglewood Structural Zone trend to the northwest and project through Newport Harbor and Newport Mesa. Several, mostly inferred, fault traces have been mapped projecting through the region none of which if projected would influence the site. The major active fault closest to the site is the offshore Newport- Inglewood fault. This fault parallels the coastline, displays right lateral displacement and lies about 5.7 -miles to the southwest of the site. The known active trace of the Newport- Inglewood fault projects to the northwest close to the beach near Pacific Coast Highway and Balboa Boulevard, where it continues offshore. In 1933 this fault ruptured just off the coastline and produced the destructive Long Beach Earthquake. This magnitude 6.3 event caused many deaths and considerable structural Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church damage. The Newport- Inglewood (offshore) Fault is capable of generating a maximum earthquake event of M6.9 with a slip rate of 1.5 mm/yr. The site does not lie within an Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone as designated by the California Geological Survey. For this reason the site is not likely to experience surface fault rupture during a major regional earthquake. Probabilistic Risk Analysis Probabilistic risk analyses were performed using the computer program FRISKSP, 2000 Edition, by Thomas Blake. The fault database was provided from the California Geologic Survey (CGS). FRISKSP models earthquake sources as three dimensional planes and computes site specific probabilities of exceedance of given acceleration levels or pseudo- relative velocity levels for each earthquake source. The cumulative effects from all modeled earthquake sources are tabulated and graphically plotted. The program offers a choice of attenuation relationships by various persons to evaluate the attenuation of earthquake energy with source distance. For this study the attenuation relationship developed by Campbell & Bozorgnia (1997 Rev.) was used for soft rock. The calculated peak ground acceleration using the attenuation relationship for a ten percent chance of exceedance in 50 -years or a return period of 475 -years was 0.35 g and 10 percent chance in 100 years or a return period of 949 years was 0.438. According to UBC, the Newport Inglewood Fault is considered to be a "seismic source type `B ". The site is located within "seismic zone" 4 with a "seismic zone factor" of 0.4 (Table 16 -I). Field observations and blow counts indicate that the underlying material to be "soil profile type" "SD" (Table 16 -7). Liquefaction Evaluation Earthquake- induced vibrations can be the cause of several significant phenomena, including liquefaction in fine silt and sands. Liquefaction results in a complete loss of 0 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church strength and can cause structures to settle or even overturn, if it occurs in the bearing zone. If liquefaction occurs beneath sloping ground, phenomena known as Lateral Spreading can occur. Liquefaction is typically limited to the upper (50) feet of the subsurface of the soils. Four items are generally considered to have the most significance in liquefaction: I. Poorly graded fine and silty sands are the types of soils most susceptible to liquefaction. Soils that contain a wide range of soil particle sizes and coarse soils that drain freely are not generally susceptible to liquefaction. 2. The water table perched or otherwise, usually must be within the upper fifty (50) feet of soils, for liquefaction to occur. Soils above the water table do not liquefy. 3. Liquefaction has been shown to be unlikely where the relative density of the soils is greater than seventy (70 %) percent. A soil that has relative density of less than seventy (70 %) percent, may liquefy depending on a number of factors. The two most important of which are the strength and duration of the seismic shaking and the percentage of the soil particles that are silt and clay sized. 4. If the clay content (determined by the percent finer than 0.005 mm) is greater than fifteen (15 %) percent, the soil is usually considered non - liquefiable, unless it is extremely sensitive. According to current Seismic Hazard Zones maps published by the California Geological Survey (CGS) (formerly California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG)), the subject site is not located within potential liquefaction zone. Based on the evaluation and subsurface conditions, it is our opinion that potential for earthquake induced liquefaction is low at this site. 7 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Other Secondary Seismic Hazards In addition to possible strong earthquake ground motions and potential for liquefaction at the site, other secondary effects of a major nearby event were considered and include: induced flooding, landsliding, and subsidence. These are discussed below. Induced Flooding: The proposed structure site lies far and/or high enough from the coast or large inland body of water to preclude the dangers of tsunami and seiche waves. Induced Landsliding: The proposed structure site lies far enough form steep or high slopes to preclude the hazards of induced landsliding. Induced. Subsidence: The absence of soft or compressible soils beneath the site preclude induced differential subsidence across the property. SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION Field Exploration Methods Field explorations consisted of subsurface explorations by means of test borings. Based on available information regarding general conditions in the area and the information provided to us, we performed nine (9) borings for the school, eight (8) borings for the church, and three (3) borings for the parking lot, for a total of twenty (20) borings. Boring performed in the current OLQA site are labeled as B - #, and the borings performed in the current SNIP site are labeled as M - #. Borings were drilled by means of an 8" hollow stem drill rig at the locations shown on Plate B. A continuous record of the materials encountered during the drilling was made by our field representative and is presented on Log of Test Holes in Appendix I. The lines designating the interface between soil strata on the log of Test Holes represents approximate boundaries. The transition between strata may be gradual. Undisturbed samples were secured at frequent intervals from various locations for laboratory testing. 0 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church The relative sampler penetration resistance exhibited by the soil types encountered is tabulated in the blows per foot column of the Log of Test Holes. Field Testing Logs: The test hole was examined and logged in the field. Representative samples were obtained to classify the soils. In addition, relatively undisturbed samples were obtained for laboratory testing. The attached logs tabulate data based on laboratory classification tests and visual observation by the field geologist at the site. Standard Penetration Resistance: The number of blows necessary to drive a standard sampler (I %" I.D.) -12 inches into the individual stratum is a measurement of a specific property that has been correlated to relative density. The sampling (penetration) resistance offered by sediment from successive blows delivered by a 140 -pound hammer falling 30 inches is counted. The number of blows to drive the standard sampler penetrated 18 inches and last 12 inches is recorded as the N- Value. The standard penetration resistances of the on -site materials at 5 feet intervals are presented on the boring logs (Appendix I). Groundwater Measurements: When encountered, groundwater depths were measured by a water level indicator, at the end of boring, and after some time (same day), and are reported in the Log of Test Holes. Field Resistivity: Resistivity tests were performed at the field using NILSSON Model 400 Soil Resistance Meter by driving 4 test rods 12 inches deep into the ground in a straight line with a uniform distance of 5 and 10 feet in the same line. Test results and the field engineer's report are enclosed in Appendix III. E Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Soil and Bedrock Stratigraphy No artificial fill was encountered in the test borings, except for the asphalt and base or topsoil, which were typically limited to the upper one -foot and are to be removed. The underlying natural soils at the site consisted of silty sand (terrace), below which is clayey bedrock (Monterey Formation). In general, subsurface conditions were moderately dense to very dense, or stiff to very stiff. Groundwater Groundwater was reported in five of the borings drilled on the site. The groundwater measured lies at depth ranging between 18 and 26 feet and probably is perched on the bedrock surface. The underlying bedrock did not appear saturated and is usually considered non -water bearing due to its fine- grained nature. LABORATORY TESTING Laboratory testing was programmed following a review of the field investigation data to be evaluated. Tests included physical testing to determine foundation load bearing characteristics and selective classification tests. Test results are presented in Appendix I. A. Moisture Density In -Place density and moisture content values were determined at the laboratory and test results are shown on Plates E -1 through E -20 in Appendix I. B. Mechanical Analysis Mechanical analysis by the hydrometer test method was performed to confirm field classifications. Test results are as follows: W ProjectNo. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Test Hole Sample Sand Silt Clay No. Depth (ft) Percent Percent Percent B -1 1 -2 71 18 11 B -2 1 -2 80 14 6 M -1 1 -3 67 21 12 M -2 1 -2 73 17 10 C. Direct Shear Direct shear test was performed on selected typical soil samples under various normal loads. Tests were performed in the saturated - drained conditions. A cumulative plot of test results is presented on Plate F. D. Consolidation Consolidation (load deformation) tests were performed on selected undisturbed samples. Plotted test results are presented on Plates G through J. E. Chemical Analysis Chemical tests were performed on near surface soil. Test results are as follows: Soil Soluble Sulfate 140 parts per million PH 7.2 Soluble Chloride 247 Parts per million Minimum Resistivity 2298 ohm -cm Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church F. Expansion Expansion characteristics were determined by the Expansion Index test on a typical bulk sample considered to be generally representative of the near subgrade soils. Test results were as follows: Boring No. Moisture Content Dry Density Expansion (percent) (pct) Index B- I 10.9 1 06.3 0 M -1 11.4 104.2 0 According to the Uniform Building Code, Table 18 -I -13, the underlying soils generally has low expansion potential. G. Subgrade R -Value "R" Value test was performed on a representative subgrade sample for pavement section determination. The test results are as follows: Test Moisture @ Dry Unit Exudation Stabilometer No. Compaction (%) Wt. c Pressure (psi) 'R" Value a 10.5 1 16.1 270 23 b 10.0 112.7 405 43 c 11.6 116.4 360 34 28* *Interpolated 300 psi by exudation. DESIGN VALUES Representative values were selected from the test data and other sources for design and is tabulated below: 12 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Field Density 115 pcf Expansion Index 0 Angle of Internal Friction (In Situ) 25 -27 deg. Cohesion (n Situ) 200 psf Friction Angle (Remold 90 %) 30 deg. Cohesion (Remold 90 %) 250 psf Subgrade R -Value 28 Subgrade K -Value 100 pci CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based upon results of the field explorations, laboratory testing and engineering analysis, it is concluded that the site is suitable for the proposed development, namely construction of a church building, parking lot and driveway at the subject site. The site is subject to ground shaking typical of the Southern California area, any construction should conform to the current seismic design provisions of the California Building Code (2001), information provided in this report, and applicable requirements of the City of Newport Beach, for design and construction. Following are our recommendations pertaining to: - Grading and Demolition - Seismic Design - Foundations and Slab - Walls 13 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church - Pavement and Flatwork Drainage Construction Observation GRADING AND DEMOLITION RECOMMENDATIONS Demolition and Site Grading The site should be graded to reduce differential settlement and provide a uniform subgrade for proposed structures. The following minimum over - excavation and recompaction is recommended. 1. Building At Existing Grade Level: Excavate 12 inches below bottom of footing and below bottom of slab and scarify an additional 6 inches and recompact to minimum 90 percent of the current ASTM D -1557 laboratory test standard to required subgrade elevation. 2. Flatwork and Paving Areas: Remove 12 inches below existing grade and scarify additional 6 inches and recompact to minimum 90 percent of the current ASTM D- 1557 laboratory test standard to required subgrade elevation. 3. Existing Foundation or Utility Removal Areas: Remove all concrete, pipes, and other substructures, remove all disturbed soil and clean to undisturbed, competent native material and backfill with either 90 percent compacted soil or with 2 -sack cement slurry (if desired, to avoid compaction difficulties in smaller pockets). General Grading Procedures Following are our general recommendations related to site grading. Suggested input for more detailed earthwork specifications is provided in Appendix IV of this report. 14 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church a. Prior to grading, existing pavement, grass, concrete slab and other surface and sub surface structures shall be entirely removed and hauled off site. b. The bottom of the excavation shall be inspected by the soil engineer. c. Building and non - building areas shall be over excavated per grading recommendations of this report. d. On -site material is acceptable for backfill if moisture conditioned. If required, import fill should consist of clean, granular, non - expansive soils free from vegetation, debris or rocks larger than three inches in size. The Expansion Index value should not exceed a maximum of 20. e. All re- compacted native and import soil should be spread, watered or aerated, mixed and compacted by mechanical means of approximately six -inch thick lifts. The minimum degree of compaction obtained should be at least 90 percent of the ASTM D- 1557 -00 Laboratory test standard. f. Backfill placed in narrow, restricted areas such as along utility trenches, may be placed in 12 to 18 inch thick lifts, provided; the minimum required degree of compaction is obtained. g. Observation and testing of all compaction should be under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. The Engineer should be notified at least two days in advance of the start of the grading. Temporary Excavations The depth of excavation is anticipated to be minimal. Since the site has adequate room to lay back temporary excavation slopes, need for shoring is not anticipated, but this should be evaluated based on field conditions. 15 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church If temporary shoring is to be used, the Contractor should submit for our review, a temporary excavation support plan, if applicable. Earth pressure values for regular retaining walls provided in this report are applicable for shoring design. The Contractor should be made fully responsible for adequate support of the excavation at all times. Temporary support of excavation structures plans should be designed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of California and experienced in such work and these plans should be reviewed and approved by agencies having jurisdiction. Following is our temporary excavation recommendations, subject to field verification by the geotechnical consultant. Excavations up to 5 feet Near Vertical Excavations over 5 feet 1H: 1V SEISMIC DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Seismic Design Parameters The proposed structures should be designed and constructed to resist the effects of seismic ground motions in accordance with design guidelines provided in California Building Code (2001). The method of design will be dependent on the seismic zoning, site characteristics, occupancy category, building configuration, type of structural system, and on the building height. The seismic design coefficients presented below should be used for the proposed structure. 16 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS VALUES Seismic Zone Factor Z 0.40 Soil Profile Type So Seismic Coefficient Ca 0.40 Na Seismic Coefficient C„ 0.64 Nv Near - Source Factor Na 1.0 Near - Source Factor N„ 1.2 Seismic Source Type B Slip Rate 1.5 Magnitude 6.9 Fault Distance 3.2 miles (5.1 km) Probabilistic Acceleration (50 years) 0.35g Probabilistic Acceleration (100 years) 0.43g Response Spectra Site specific elastic design response spectra was developed r ground motions having a 10% probability of being exceeded in 50 years and 100 years for damping ratios of 2 %, 5 %, 7% and 10% critical damping, and for periods of 0.01 second to 4 seconds. Results are provided in Appendix I1. 17 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS Foundation Type Considering the relatively uniform stratigraphy of site soils and the magnitude of seismically induced differential settlement, it is our opinion that the proposed building may be supported on conventional shallow spread (isolated column or continuous wall) footings. The structural design procedures outlined in Chapter 18 and other applicable sections of the California Building Code (CBC, 2001) should be followed wherever appropriate. Pertinent recommendations for design and construction of the proposed foundation systems are presented in the following paragraphs. Allowable Bearing Capacity For footings founded in undisturbed native material or on approved compacted fill, an allowable soil bearing capacity of 2,500 pounds per square foot may be used for minimum 36- inch - square column footings or minimum 18- inch -wide continuous wall footings, founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the lowest final grade. This value may be increased by 15 percent for each additional foot of depth, to a maximum value of 3,500 pounds per square foot. These allowable bearing capacity values include both dead and live loads, and may be increased by one -third for short duration wind and seismic forces. Foundation Settlement Foundation static settlement will occur primarily due to the compression of the near - surface soils due to the application of new footing loads. Under the above recommended allowable bearing pressures, the maximum total settlement under the footing loads is estimated to be less than 1/2 -inch, and the maximum differential settlement is estimated to be less than 1/3 -inch over a span of 40 feet. A portion of this estimated footing U Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church settlement will occur instantaneously during construction or shortly thereafter, as footing loads are applied. Lateral Resistance For footings founded in natural or certified compacted fill, a passive earth pressure of 250 pounds per square foot per foot of depth, to a maximum value of 3,500 pounds per square foot may be used to determine lateral bearing resistance for footings. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 times the dead load forces may be used between concrete and the support- ing soils to determine lateral sliding resistance for the building footings. The above lateral resistance values are based on footings placed directly against soil. In the case where footing sides are formed, all backfill placed against the footings should be compacted to at least 90 percent of maximum dry density. Friction and lateral pressure may be combined, but not to exceed two- thirds of the allowable lateral pressure. Minimum Footing and Floor Slab Recommendations Site soils are likely to exhibit a low expansion potential (i.e., an expansion index of below 20) as classified in accordance with Table 18 -I -B of the 2001 CBC. It is recommended that, the design of slab -on- ground foundations procedures outlined in CBC Section 1815 shall be followed. The footings and floors should be constructed and reinforced in accordance with the following minimum criteria; however, additional slab thickness, footing sizes and /or reinforcement should be provided as required by the project design team. Footings a. Interior and exterior continuous footings may be founded at the minimum depth of 18 -inch below the adjacent lowest ground surface. All continuous footings 19 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church should have a minimum width of 18 inches, and should be reinforced with a minimum of two No. 5 bars at top and two at the bottom. b. Interior and exterior isolated column footings should be a minimum of 36 inches square and founded at a minimum depth of 18 inches below the bottoms of the adjacent floor slabs. The column footings should be reinforced with No. 5 bars spaced a maximum of 12 inches on centers, both ways, near the bottoms of the footings. Floor Slabs a. Interior concrete floor slabs should be 4 inches thick, and reinforced with No. 3 bars spaced a maximum of 12 inches on centers, both ways. All slab reinforce- ment should be supported on concrete chairs or brick to ensure the desired placement near mid depth. b. Interior concrete floors should be underlain with a moisture vapor barrier consisting of a polyvinyl chloride membrane such as 10 -mil Visqueen, or equivalent. All laps within the membrane should be sealed, and at least 1 to 2 inches of clean sand should be placed over and under the membrane to promote uniform curing of the concrete. c. Prior to placing concrete, the subgrade soils should be pre- watered to promote uniform curing of the concrete and minimize the development of shrinkage cracks. Corrosivity A major factor in determining soil corrosivity is electrical resistivity. The electrical resistivity of a soil is a measure of its resistance to the flow of electrical current. Corrosion of buried metal is an electrochemical process in which the amount of metal loss io Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church due to .corrosion is directly proportional to the flow of electrical current (DC) from the metal into the soil. Corrosion currents, following Ohm's Law, are inversely proportional to soil resistivity. Lower electrical resistivities result from higher moisture and chemical contents and indicate corrosive soil. Other soil characteristics that can influence corrosivity toward metals are pH, chemical content, soil types and site drainage. Based on the test results the soils are classified as corrosive to ferrous metals and low corrosive to Portland cement concrete. Therefore it is recommended to use Type 11 Portland cement for all concrete elements in contact with soil. Ferrous metals and pipes shall be properly coated and wrapped. Please be advised that this firm does not practice corrosion engineering; therefore, we recommend that upon completion of precise grading onsite soils be analyzed by a qualified corrosion engineer to evaluate the impact of chemical activity of these soils on buried metallic pipes and other underground structures. RETAINING WALL RECOMMENDATIONS Lateral Earth Pressures Any retaining structure should be designed for the following active pressures. Level 35 pcf of equivalent fluid pressure 3:1 Slope 40 pcf of equivalent fluid pressure 2:1 Slope 45 pcf of equivalent fluid pressure For building basement areas, an at -rest earth pressure of minimum 60 psf /ft should be used for design. This value assumes proper drainage conditions have been constructed, as recommended under "Subdrain System ". 21 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Backlill Recommendations All retaining walls should be backfilled with free - draining materials and compacted to 90% relative density. Care should be exercised when compacting behind a wall and hand tampers should be used if necessary. All retaining walls should be provided with a subdrain. The wall subdrain system should consist of a minimum 4" diameter perforated PVC pipe in a minimum 1 ft3 per LF of free draining material and wrapped with filter fabric. This pipe should be close to the bottom of the wall and should discharge to a suitable drainage system. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PAVEMENT AND FLATWORK Pavement Recommendations: Subject to our review and testing of subgrade 'R" values during grading, we recommend the following pavement section for the driveway and parking areas. Assumed A.0 A.B. Traffic Condition Traffic Index in in Parking stalls and 5.0 3 8 driveways Driveway for heavy 6.0 3 10 Trash & fire trucks. At the parking and driveway areas, the top 12 inches of subgrade should be excavated; moisture conditioned and recompacted immediately prior to placing the rock base and asphalt concrete. Rock -base material shall be class II aggregate base and to be compacted to 95 percent minimum. 22 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Exterior Concrete Flatwork In order to reduce the potential for unsightly cracking, concrete sidewalks, deck and patio slabs and concrete sub -slabs to be covered with decorative pavers should be at least 3.5 inches thick and provided with construction joints or expansion joints every 6 feet or less. Concrete driveway slabs should be at least 4 inches thick and provided with construction joints or expansion joints every 10 feet or less. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DRAINAGE Surface Drainage It is recommended to provide positive surface drainage systems consisting of a combination of sloped concrete flatwork, sheet flow gradients, swales, surface area drains (where needed) around the building structure and within the deck areas to collect and direct all surface water to the adjacent streets. Ground surfaces should have at a minimum gradient of 2 percent away from building foundations and similar structures. Surface waters should not be allowed to collect or pond against building foundations and within the level areas of the site. Buildings should be provided with gutters and downspouts. Downspouts should be connected to the area drain system by pipes. Subdrain System Currently, no groundwater has been encountered within the proposed construction zone. However, as is typical of most developments in this area, once the site and its surrounding areas are fully developed, there will be a substantial increase in water introduced by irrigation. Therefore, if any of the structures would have basements or depressed sections, such walls should be designed with a subdrain system typical of retaining walls and all subterranean walls should be properly waterproofed. 23 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church The basement wall subdrain system should consist of a minimum 4" diameter perforated PVC pipe in a minimum 1 ft3 per LF of free draining material and wrapped with filter fabric. This pipe should be close to the bottom of the basement and would therefore require either a sump pump system for discharge or other means for gravity drain, if possible. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION Preconstruction Meeting: A meeting between representatives of the contractor, the governmental agencies, the soil engineer, the architect, and the owner should be held at the job site at the time equipment are at the site and work is about to commence. The purpose of the meeting is to review the responsibilities of each member of the team. Surveying: The contractor shall set necessary stakes to verify lines and grades as shown on the plan. The owner or his representative shall monitor the work to verify that the depth of fill and footing embedment is correct. Site Drainage: The site should be sloped to direct water away from the structures and divert to a positive drainage system. Footing Observation All footing trenches for the proposed structure should be observed by a representative of this firm to verify that they were excavated into competent bearing soils per the recommendations of this report as well as to the minimum depths recommended above. These observations should be performed prior to the placement of forms or reinforcement. The excavations should be trimmed neat, level and square. All loose, sloughed or moisture softened soil should be removed prior to placing concrete. Utility Trench Backiill Utility trench excavations and backfill should be observed by a representative of Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. prior to the placement of utilities and during backfill. OW Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church LIMITATIONS This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or his representative to see that the information and recommendations contained herein are called to the attention of the other members of the design team for the project and that the applicable information is incorporated into the plans, and that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractors and the subcontractors carry out such recommendations. The findings of this report are valid as of the present date. However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or to the works of man, on this or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. The validity of the recommendations of this report assumes that Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. will be retained to provide these services. The scope of our services did not include any investigation for the presence or absence of hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater or air, on or below or around this site. The Conclusions and recommendations contained herein are based on the findings and observations made at the test boring locations. It is not unusual to find conditions between and beyond such locations, which differ from the conditions encountered. If conditions are encountered during construction, which appear to differ from those previously disclosed, this office should be notified so as to consider the need for modifications. On -site construction observations and wherever appropriate, tests should be performed during the course of construction by a representative of this office to evaluate compliance with the design concepts, specifications, and recommendations contained herein. 25 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church This report has been compiled for the exclusive use of our client, it shall not be transferred to, or used by, other parties, or applied to any project on this site other than described herein without consent and /or thorough review by this office. Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. 26 i Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church APPENDIX I Plates: • Vicinity Map • Plot Plan and Test Hole Location — School • Plot Plan and Test Hole Location — Church • Topo Map • Log of Test Holes • Direct Shear Tests • Consolidation Tests 27 a a TOPO MAP TOPOI map printed on 07/07/04 from "Gaftfomla.tpo" and "Undaed.tpg" 117 °S4'00" W 117 °53'00" W 117 °52'00" W WGS84117 °51'00" W Y: of IH .r � y^ :'I :, ♦ Ab r\ w • °".. I � 1, 'v.n _:_ e` yy% ci �(// C ` oo2K -�wo3, 3.�� m �v 5 "1e'� 'Y ��' _ y.�v" \ ���_— E.°ex° ✓- a> ��`. � o I.+�1 I "%iv. ���y wr Jbf y y •� e i �� �. �.A .. klpr "'PEI 2^ FSM1 a• i JIke.h�j' J ., e ' � /,. °+vim., �• I' \ ��l- /�J s. � . IXYIrI[' •• \ f 1 i IY� _ L I n. ( •..L Y 'II — M.J.' .• S �. / - + `� >n . 7 e .� iii: � - •icy, r �!. 117 ^54'00" W 317 °53'00" w 117 °52'00" w WG584 117 °51'00" w u s ,Iwlr .t.N =I tax° goon rEei ° � +000 vrrlu t3 Plmt.d from YOMI C= NYVeel 0.aµ.v H.I&r r(www.t°m.mW OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Project No. D- 2569 -06 Plate: D 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport beach, California Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B-1 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, Calffomia LOG OF TEST HOLE IPage Plate No. E -1 Project Number: D- 2569.06 t of 1 Date(s)Dtllled: June 24. 200A Logged Sy: OP Checked Sy: ABahe Drilling Method: Hoeow -Stem Auger Drill ant Size Nnch -0Drppkbit ToW Depth of 16.5 Type: 9orehge, lem: DNI Rg Type: Mobile 8-61 Drilling CAL PAC DRILLING Appros. Surface feet MSL Comractor. Elevadon.feet: UM aler Level No Gd' N2U encountered within boring depth Sampling SPT, California (ring), bulk Hammer Downhole wire DaW : d Dale Measured; Method : M(I lbs f 30+ncrl prop relwle Saddle Oda culengs Commeas'. Rdw b site plan mr locabuo SAMPLES z � OTHER TESTS m m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION `a �, •m 3 05 AND REMARKS c c @ or 0. y$ m d r mm o a r and w o I- z arc z m IS nz D Asphalt Surface Reddish broom silty fine SAND Bag 01 HD: 77%- 15 %.8% 2 EI =O R -1 22.10-11 21 Reddish brown silty fine SAND, dry, fine grained 7 109 dace SILTY CLAY 5 11-2 21 -28-28 56 Same 8 116 10 R-3 25-30,32 62 grayishlbmwn• Molded, Red streaks of medium sand, little 6 115 Silly clay. moist to wet, dense 15 R4 27.31 -33 64 Brown Clayey SAND, mottled with gray send, occasional rust 5 112 streaks, dense End of Boring at 16.5' 20 No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Backi6led wilh soil cuttings 25 30 35 40 GEOTECNNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. ( Project : OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B-2 Project Location: 2646 Mar vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE 113age Plate No. E -2 P ct Number : D- 2569 -06 1 of 1 Dates) Ddkd : June 24, 2004 Logged By; DP ClwckM By: A. Baha ling Method: HdlowStem AUger Ddr BIl Sae/ Nm,1r00 rock bit Towl No Si DepMd 35.5 Bprehda. ted : mg Type: Malik 8-61 Drlllrs CAL PAC DRILLING Approa. Cawsmit, Elevation, Surface rest 41St fen : Growdxakr Level Gd. H2O encountered @ 26 feel depth Sampling SPT. California (mo). Wit Hammer Dpwdiole ww Dala: ntl Date Meawred: Method: 140 l3p4nch drop orehole Backfill : No pmiige Commems : Retar W site plan far lada0pn SAMPLES a w OTHER TESTS d m' i, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a. m 3 IN AND REMARKS p W o z' n W z° to i a zo 0 Asphalt over Fell over Concrete Bag 91 HD: 8D 1V.-14 %b% 2 R -1 2.7 -23 30 Reddish brown story fine SAND, damp, I Teneca Deposit) 10 111 DS: r 250psf Phi -30 deg medium dense (Remolded to 90 %RC) 5 R -2 10-10 -12 22 Same as above 14 113 10 R -3 2330 -50/6" 80 Same as above, slightly more sift, moist 14 120 grayistdUrown, mottletl, N51 streaks of m¢diurn salts, INIe silty Clay, moist to wet, dense 15 S4 16.23 -21 44 Brown Clayey SAND, molded with gray sand, occasional rust 23 102 streaks, dense 20 R-S 28 -33-40 73 Light greenl9my Clayey SILT, ride fire SAND, wet, mottled wpd! 30 86 darker grayish brown SILTY CLAY, plastic, very stiff 25 R-6 10- 30.5016" 80 Grey Silly plastic CLAY, stiff, mottled with yellow to rust fine 29 90 SAND, moist, layered (Apparent marine deposdL__ - V GD 8 f ?s BEDROCK: A1locene age Monterey Formaflon. 30 S-7 1940-40 80 dark gray, clayey StLTSTONE, unweathered, slightly, converted, 28 91 soft rock bedded 35 R-8 30 -5012' 100• Same, very stff grayish CLAY, sandy sift, occasional black and 'N NW End of Boring at 35.5 feet Groundwater encountered @26 feet depth L140 No Cooing aackfilled with soil Cuttings GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B -3 Project Location : 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I IPage Plate No. E -3a Pro ect Number: D- 2569 -06 1 of 2 atelsl Odled: June 24, 2004 Log9ed By: OP Checked By: A. Baha Drilling Mmhotl : Hod -Sk m Auger oral Bit Size I llJnch 40 rock EN Total Type: Borehole. o%mh a 50.5 feet: 'Y Me Type: Md>ae 861 Dmkng CAL PAC DA&LwG Apm.11Vdace fen MSL Cmtrar: dp Elevarion. last: Level Gd. H2O encoumered @26 feet depth rd Due Same SPT, California lrN), We, Hammer Data Da'ah°k was Mr ntl Date Measured: Med,od: W Its 131)-irvL d= rehde B.cMil: D4II outWgs Comments: Refert"mpanf,rlom6on SAMPLES b Q 2f m OTHER TESTS m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m 'a V c m t i AND REMARKS o E 5 E m_m m W F 2 mm z m i a °z° 0 AsphaN Surface Reddish brown silty fire SAND, damp, I Terrace deposit I ;! Bag fit HD: 73 %- 14 % -13% 2 R1 14 -1510 25 Reddish brown silly fine SAND. damp. medium dense 7 110 DS: c= 200psf Ph[-25 deg 5 R2 11- 2830 58 Same as above 6 113 DS: c- 2000f Phi =27 deg 10 R3 2430 -50/6' 60 9iW. Nbmwn, modled, rust streaks of matlium sand, little 14 116 silty clay, moist to wet. dense 15 S-1 25- 3035 65 Light brovm Silly fine SAND, moist, dense 20 S -2 24,3238 70 Olive Clayey SAND, moat, dense 25 S -3 22-35 -40 75 Same as above �__GD Water 21;'— _ t� 6EDROC : Miocene age Monterey Fomlation. 30 RO 4438 -40 78 dark gray clayey SILTSTONE, unweathered, %(ghtly cemented, soft rock bedded 26 97 38 42 46 Bag a2 Bag p3 Olive siltyf sandy CLAY, fine grained, plastic Same as above GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B-3 Project Location 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport beach, Califomia LOG OF TEST HOLE I iPaoe Plate No. E -3b Project Number : D- 2568 -06 1 of 2 ale(s)DdIled: Aune24.2004 LOgged By: OP Checked ay: A. Wha Drilling Method: Hollow-Stern Auger unit Bit size i 84nch -0D rook b4 Total Type: Bwellole. Dept of 515 feet: Drill Rig Type: Mobile 8.61 DrAng CAL PAC DRILLING Approx. Contractor: Elevation. Soda® feet MSL feet: ouadaater Level �_N20 anw mered @26 feel depth S°mphng SM. CaI mma, lring). bdk HamdRr Dab: DD"nhde wire nd Data Measured: Method : 140lbs 130 -inO drop rehde BackfiW: Drill ctaings Comments: Refer t are, plan fur 1pcalion SAMPLES Z' m OTHER TESTS m m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION T 'm AND REMARKS m s` ey Mu o Of i m Ii ai 46 Bag #4 Mottled Clayay SAND, w/ pccas. rounded gravel. (dark bluwNgreylsh/olive rust yellowish) Stiff and hard 50 RS 4438-40 78 No Recovery. Otve SRry sandy C Ay End of Boring at 51.5' Groundwaler encountered at 26 feel depth No Caving Sackfilled with soil cutfirgs GEOTECHNI CAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No- B-4 Project Location : 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate No. E4 Project Number: D- 2569-06 Page 7 of 7 ateis)Drilled: June24,2004 Logged Sy: DP Cl ketl By: A. Baha rillmg Method: Horow -Stem Auger Doll ad Soot I $�h D rack bit Type : Total Depth M 11.5 BOmhole, feet: Dria Rig Type: Mobile 861 a, CA PAC DRUING Cnaegar: A 56a feet MSL n Grow 2ke ma Level NO Gd. H2O enewmemJ within boring depth ' M Date ert.etat Mimi SPT, Caldomia (mg), OUa Metlpd: Hemmer Data : COwnhl Xo c Doafsole ehNDp Borehole BoOfill: Onllwitani5 Comments: Refit b site pkn for lobalnn SAMPLES a OTHER TESTS m r MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS Sc im n 5 m E a W �— Its c Lo L' W a s- z' c arc z° m o 2 Z a az 0 hall 3' over 2' of base Fine Silty SAND [TERRACE DEPOSIT) Bag #1 2 R -1 4-13-15 28 Reddish brown silty fine SAND. medium dense 7 113 5 R -2 6 -18-20 38 Same 8 112 10 R-3 7 -2D-40 60 Sameasabove, dense 6 110 End of Boring at 11.5' No Groundwater eneoumered within boring depth 15 No Caving Backritled with soil Cuttings 20 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project : OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. 8-5 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate No. E -5 1page P ect Number, D- 2569 -06 ro 1 of 1 atew Wiled: June 24, 2!104 Logged By GP Cl n,RW By: A. Bah. Drilling Method: NdbwStem Auger Ora Be s" / &inLh -0Drpck dt Tout Depm d 11.5 Type: Bcrehcle. foot: Dml Rig Typo : Modb "i Wiling CAL PAC DRILLING Appro.. Surlxe feet M''L Conumot. Eleva4on.%at: GrounQnater Level No Gd. H2O encountered wiNin being depth Sanyling SPT, C.Y nna (rmg). buAt Hammer WI&: o."e wine M Date Measured: Named: 140 fbs /30+rch drop rehde Bedell: Dra wm� Comments: Refertu sue plan lvrlocauon SAMPLES � x _ o z m onit OTHER TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION u 3 v1 AND REMARKS c m q d a m 5 E Kc c 'g Y w O t� Z 1K Z m g OO 6Z 0 Asphalt Surface Fine Silty SAND I TERRACE DEPOSIT Bag 91 2 ' R -1 7 -7 -12 19 Reddish brown silty fine SAND, loose to medium dense B 105 5 R -2 6-9-14 23 medium dense 7 108 10 R3 B -10 -20 30 Same as above 5 109 End of Boring at 11.5' 15 No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Backfilled with soil Cuttings 20 25 30 35 I 40 ;EOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B -6 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, Catlfornla LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate No- E -6 Project Number: 0- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 Daefs)Uided: .June 24.20N4 Lagged By: OP - Cuedred By: A.8sho Win, Method: Holb Stem Auger We an Site / a -oo rock NI Taal Depth of 11.5 Type: Bomhoe.feel: rill Rig Type: M WBEt CanVmacmr; CAL PAC DRILLING �a �tm feel MSL rounewater Level No Go. H2O encountered within bpdng deed, d Dam Measure6 sampmg SPT. Caspmo tdngl. Wk Method: Hammer Oats : Downhde w'K 10 EW 1304nch drop orehdeamaftu: Ora uAEngs Commerva i Rome b see Pon lar larmbon SAMPLES to X z OTHER TESTS no m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION 3 m a N AND REMARKS ^ c O _ e o n E c'Ha 0C 10: eu w o F z' 0 th o 2 m° i p Ro 0 As haft Surface Fire S11y SAND I TERRACE DEPOSIT I Bag #1 2 R -1 15-17 -22 39 Reddish brown silty fire SAND, medium dense, occas. rootlets 3 103 5 R -2 1619 -24 43 medium dense 5 105 10 R-3 &15-29 44 Sameasabove 6 107 End of Boring at 11.5' 15 No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving 8ackfilled with snit cuttings 20 25 30 35 I 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project : OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole ND. B -7 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate ND. E -7 P t Number D- 2569 -06 Pa e 1 of 1 Dads) Wed June 24, 2004 Logged By: OP CherAed By: A. Gana riling hlemotl: Hollpv -Stem Auger DOI Bil Size I &inrJl -OD roG bit TOW Depth M 11.5 Tym: Brea e. feat: rl Rip Type : Mobie "I p41Mg CAL PAC DRILLING ARmaa. Surface feel M$L Com,actor : Elevamm. fen mundmer Level No GE. H2O enwumered within baring depth Sampmo SFT, CaNVnia fling), pulk Hammer Dam: Downbde Date Measured: Method: 140Ita I3 Ch drop mande BaCkall: DOI Lumnge Comments: Reterm site pmntIX bcegon SAMPLES m � x g Z. MATERIAL DESCRIPTION OTHER TESTS S 4a 3 a w AND REMARKS O P 1 Y Q mo3j Z m E 0 11 2 D Asphan Surface Fine Silty SAND (TERRACE DEPOSIT) 3 Bag p1 2 R -1 11 -11 -10 21 Reddish brown silty fine SAND, medium dense, occas. WWI; 7 103 5 R -2 12 -17 -20 37 medium dense 6 105 10 R -3 7 -16-25 41 Same as above 4 104 End of Boring at 11.5 15 No Groundwater encountered within bodng depth No Caving BacdAWwah soil WMmgs 20 25 30 35 ( 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B -8 Project Location : 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate No- E -8 Pro' ct Number: D- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 te(s) On9ed : Nice 24. 2004 Logged By: OP cl eJ By: A. Bahe lling Me#xd: Hdl"w tern Auger wueft Btred &inch00 rock bit TOW DepM Of 11.5 Type: Borehole. feet: Drdl Rip TyW Wwle"I MOM CAL PAC DRILLING Canaeemr : Approx. Surface feel Mss Efwea n, feet: owdwater Level No Gd. X20 erK evered MMin bo deph d Oate Measured: r^g S—P" SM. Calffomb (d Meewd: rg1•hWk DoOn�'Mf8 Hammer Data: 140100- 13DinrJl drop nelale BackBl: O,ia wwM Commons: Refer tR site pan fm McUan SAMPLES � K s ? OTHER TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION oz• 3 N AND REMARKS a a n Eru 3 = Pw 2 mK Z m 1 G 62 D Asphae Surface Fine Slily SAND (TERRACE DEPOSIT I >: Bag #1 2 R -1 10-12 -14 26 Reddish brown silty fine SAND. medium dense. ocgs. rootlets 6 105 5 R -2 13 -18-21 39 medium dense 4 103 10 R -3 &19-27 46 Same as above 3 102 End of Boring at 11.5' 15 No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Back6lled with sod cuttings 20 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Pro ject : OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. B -9 Project Location : 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE IPape plate No. E -9 Pro ect Number: D- 2569 -06 1 of 1 Dates) Dr41ed : June 24, 2014 Logged By: OP Checked BY: A. Ban. Drilling Method: H.e .Sum Auger Dnll Bit Size! 8rrcM1 -0D rock bit Type: T�1 Depa, m 11.5 eorehme,l W: Dfill Rig Type: Mobee"I Ddaing CAL PAC DR411NG Contractor: Approz. Swlam feet MSL FJevabon. feel: roundwater Level No Gd. H2O encountered within n Dole Measured: borF9 tlepm SamNmg McMoe: $PT, Calaomie lringl. bulk Dnlmle. Hammtt Data: 4401bs/3WMhdbop Borehole Sackfia: Ddl wrongs Comments: Refer to sue plan ier buMon SAMPLES w � � 'g m = m OTHER TESTS r MATERIAL DESCRI PTION .m o g 3 N AND REMARKS o. g m d cc r a a 2 D Asphalt wtface Fire Sity SAND [TERRACE DEPOSIT] <: Bag k1 2 RI 11 -11 -10 21 Reddish brown silty fine SAND, loose to medium dense, 6 109 occasional rootlets 5 R -2 1132 -26 48 Same as above 7 113 10 R,3 18- 5016 - 68 Same as above 9 118 End of Bonng at 11.5 No Groundwater encountered within poring depth t5 No Caving Backfilled with snit cuttings 20 25 30 35 I 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC- Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -1 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E-10 Project Number: D- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 Deuisianaed'. aae24.m Lpguel By OF Checked By: A. Barra Dnllirp wth%i; Hdl. -Stem Auger orb Bit Sce I 8inh-0D rok bi Total Type: Borehole, DepM 365 feet: D.11 Rg Type : Mobile B-61 ails CAL PAC DRILLING Approx. Conbanor: ElEVa Slulace feet MSL .feet: rwndwater Lavd Gd. H2O erlcoumere0 @29.5 feet OepM Samging SPT. Cal4anialdlgk Mak Hammer Data: DorVwle sire M Date Measured: memod: 14d Ibs1304nd drop orMde Bad,fill: DN wrongs Commemc: Rder W sba plan for loomon SAMPLES F a? OTHERTESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o m T.z a AND REMARKS -sE-.2i-- zo o s '�-' E� z° m � o li z 0 Grass. Topsoil Bag pt HD: 67%- 21 % -02% 2 R -1 27 -5016' 100 Ug1Y brown silty Ina SAND. moist I Terrace Deposit ] 27 114 El 0 dense to very dense 5 R -2 5016' 100 Same as above, damp. dace clay 7 95 10 R3 19 -20-40 60 Gray & brown mottled, silly clayey fine SAND, damp. 7 111 " very compact 15 R4 18.24 -41 65 Brown Clayey SAND, mottled with grey sand, occasional nmt 17 114 streaks, dense 20 _____ ______ _ ________________ R -5 16.1630 46 Gray /Orange silly CLAY, ofivelorange little fine SAND, wet, 23 101 Plastic, vary SO 25 ___________________________ R£ 23.2433 57 Same as above 31 rig _2_9 ' 30 R -7 8 -10.29 39 BEDROCK: Miocene age Monterey Formation. 33 86 dark gray clayey SILTSTONE, umveatltered, slighdy cemented, soft rock bedded 35 R-8 18 -50/6- 100. Same, very stiff grayish CLAY, sandy sift, occasional black and 31 88 NSt End of Boring at 36.5 feat 40 Groundwater encountered 029.5 last depth No Caving Backfilled with still Cuttings GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project : OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS orehole No. M -2 Project Location : 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE late No. E -11 fage Project Number: D- 2569.06 1 of 1 Ie(sl Driued: June 24, 2004 Logged By OP Cha0ed Bv: A. Bane Dr111ire Medal : HokmSlem Auger Drill ad Sae l B -Nft1 DD rOCk bd Twat De" W 11.5 Type: Bo atale-too: Drel Mq Type: Mobaea{f Cueing CAL PAC DRILLING Appdx. Surface test h"SL Contractor- Eleavwd, fee: roun"mw Level No Gd. H2O enmuntered wflbin boring depth Oats Measured: Sampling SPT, Ca4brnia (dnel•1aa Method: Hemmer Dau: �Anok wire 1401bs;SDirn drop ordn0a Bacsge: Dellonings Comments: Refer m site pan for brawn SAMPLES e � X y3 z A -- € OTHER TESTS m z MATERIAL DESCRIPTION N AND REMARKS Y o i o m o E c m '" w r z' a i 0 Asphalt surface Rne Silly SAND I TERRACE DEPOSIT I Bag ai r-6 73 %- 17eb -10% 2 R1 18 -25-22 47 Reddish brown silty fine SAND, mediium dense, 4 116 occasional mallets 5 S-2 11 -22 -26 48 Same as above, dense d - 10 5-3 18 -50;6- 68 Same as above 3 End of Boring at 11.5 No Groundwater encoumered w4hln boring depth 15 No Caving SWlifilled with Will dNlings zD z5 30 35 I 4D GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole NO. M -3 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E -12 Project Number : D- 2569-06 Page 1 of 1 Dae(s)dilled: Jov 26, 2W Logged By OP Checked By: A.&he Drnlnrg WOW; H .Stem Auger dg & Sce l 8a rm m Toal Depm of M_5 Type . Bamhde, feet: Wit Rig Type: Motile %t OnIlmg App.. Cmaaaa: CAL PAC DRILLING Eleva Surface n, feet: feet fASL roun"am, Level Gd H2O ercau Mt @23 feet depN Sampglg SPT, CaHomia(nW), hWk Hammer Data: D Mom airs nd Date Measure¢ Medvd: fa0 bs / 30irch clop orehole 8a fill: one wt,mla Comments:. Refer to she plan for bceum SAMPLES 10 s ? a OTHER TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION a m AND REMARKS m t m a d E e j > n E g K w o 0- ° m E o a 0 Grass, Topsoil Bag a1 2 R -1 5016- 100 Light brown silly fine SAND, damp, I Terrace Deposit j 5 109 dense to very derma, cemented Sin & send s R -2 508- 100 Same as above, trace clay 6 115 0 R3 30 -38-39 60 Same, coarser, dry 3 115 15 Rd 30 -5016- 65 brown Clayey SAND, mottled whh gray sand, occasional nut 5 110 streaks, dense 20 R -5 22 -27 -25 46 Gray silly fine SAND, very moist, 23 104 B�DR ;Miocene age Mahterey Formation. _ �_ _ _ _ ate Q 23_ _ v 25 R-6 13 -20-20 57 dark gray clayey SILTSTONE, umneattiered, slightly cemented, 29 82 soft rock bedded End of Bodrig at 26.5 feet 30 Groundwater encourdemd @23 feet depth No Caving Backfllled with son cuNngs 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. t Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M4 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, Califomia LOG OF TEST HOLE I 1page Plate No. E -13 Pro'act Number : D- 2569 -06 1 of 1 aw(s)Griped: June 24, 2004 Logged By: op Checked By: A. Baba 'fling Meawd: Hollow -Stem Auger Dolan Suo l e h-OD ror ba to�osptAd TyW : Borehde, 26.5 feet: oil Rg Type: Motile BE1 DAN, aactor: CAL PAC DRILLING Elev on,faec fool MSL Groundwater Level G6 H2O enCpumered @22 fed depth nd Dale Measured: Sampling SPT. Celiforela(raw), bulk Mellwtl: Hammy Data: � ,ske WpB 118Ibe 1 304r drop refwle Ba Udil: Dre Collings conntente: feefer to she plan for brafion SAMPLES ar t m z _ OTHER TESTS MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m AND REMARKS T °O 3 V a > a S `m E L ^yG 0 @ 1;° 0 °o mN e w o ti = m� 0 o m i o ni 0 Grass, Topsoil Bag a1 2 S -1 25-23 -34 57 Light brown silly fine SAND, damp, f Terrace Deposit 1 2 very dense. cemented sift 8 sand 5 S -2 12 -17-30 47 Same as above, trace day 7 10 S-3 15-25 -30 55 Same, coarser, dry 6 15 S4 15 -30-38 68 brown Silly fine SAND, occasional rust streaks. very dense 19 - wry moist 20 55 8.9 -15 24 Gray silly fine SAND, very moist, 14 - -------- --------- - ----- - D Wat read 22 -- B OF ROCK: Miocene age Monterey Formfion 25 S-6 11 -12 -13 25 dare gray clayey SILTSTONE, umveatheled, slightly compiled, 16 soft rode bedded End of Boring at 26.5 feet 30 Groundwater encountered @22 feet depth No Caving Bawiined viM WA cuttings 3S 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No- M -5 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, CalHomia LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate No. E -14 Project Number: D- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 Date(s) Drilled: June 25.20114 Logged By: DP Checked By: ABahe j Drilling Method: Hdl"Slem Auger Drill at size/ -0DroG be Total Dean 6.5 Type: Bmelgle, feet: Drill Rig Tyne: Mobile 6-61 Drilling CAL PAC DRILLING Lpnhapor: Elevation, Prot Su m feet MSL feet: rn,ndwater Level No Gad- H2o encountered within boring depth sampling Si cAfornm king). bua Hammel Data: Dovola wire M Dale Meas rred: Method : 1401bs 130.1 drop Bonehole Barlkfiti: off pAGngs Carnnanta: Refer b site plan far Imadw SAMPLES a � n Z� f OTHER TESTS m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m m i ? a AND REMARKS S o 0 m o'� °'¢ o o Z d w o z z m M o o. z 0 Asphalt Surface Reddish brown silty fine SAND ITERRACE DEPOSIT ] Bag #1 2 S -1 2 -1 -2 3 Brown silty fine SAND, moist, fine grabted, motfied with SILT 11 and CLAY. Occassional black specks 5 S -2 1045-20 35 Light brownisNgray SILTY CLAY, moat, little SAND, very 8 - IT to hard 70 End of Boring at 6.5' No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Backfilled with sal muings 15 90 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -6 Project Location; 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E -15 Project Number: D- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 Date(s)DrtleO: June 25. 2004 Logged By: OP Checked By: Aeaha Drillirvt MsNpd . H -stem Auger Drill ed Size / 6- inch -0D rot: bit TOW Depth of 6.5 Type: Borehole, feet: Drill P6g Type: Moore &61 CAL PAC DRILLING fret M5L �� ContrecYpr: � le� pund our level No Gd. H2O snob nr emd within boring deem g sampling SPT. Califomia td tiring). bulk Dor nhole wne Hemmer Date: d Dale Measured: Metptl: 1 a0 lbs/ W4nch drop Bonehole eackfia'. DMI cuNngs Comments: Role, u, site plan I. location SAMPLES n Z to OTHER TESTS Sr m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION o+ m 1? m o 3 n N AND REMARKS s` c o g 'r m c EF me w v ' arc Z i o ag D Grassi planter area Dark broom topsoil [TERRACE DEPOSIT] Bag ai 2 S -1 6-4-3 7 Brown Clayey SILT, and fine grained sand. moist, soft 17 5 S -2 14 -15-16 31 Same, Drown monfed si ty fine SAND, moist, dense 9 10 End of Boring at 6.5' No Groundwater encountered within bating dept No Caving Backfilled with sod cutfirgs 15 xo 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -7 Project Location : 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E -16 Project Number: D- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 Date(s) Drilled : June 25.200E Logged By : op Checked By: A. Bata Drilling Method : HNlow -Slam Auger Dell Bit Site I B -ikTOD rock Total Type: Borerde. Depth W 6.5 fart: ell Rig Type: Motile 841 Omer, CAL PAC DRILUNG APPM. Cermr c : Etav Sudace feel M5L Wo,,. feet: roundwaler Level No Gd. H2O encountered within born depth and Date Measured'. g Sampling SPT, California (e Wouxi: rgl. bull Hammer pownhole wka polo: 140IbeI30.inGl rkPo onehole BaWil: Oei Wings Comments: Rafe, to see plan for location SAMPLES 6 OTHER TESTS Z m �, MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m—c�`pp o � i N AND REMARKS n E j arc z9 m i o a z° D Glass Light brown Silly SAND [ TERRACE DEPOSIT I 4 Bag #1 2 R -1 27.30-5016' 80 Brown Clayey SILT. and One grained sand, moist, sob 7 116 5 R -2 SOW 100 Brown Clayey fine SAND, dense to very dense. moral. 9 118 10 R-3 27.501V 77 Same as above, dense 7 110 15 R4 245016' 74 Brown Clayey medium SAND, dense, moist, fine grained 7 112 End of Boring at 6.5' No Groundwater encountered within boring depth 20 No Caving Backfilbd with soil cuttings 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -8 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E -17 Project Number D- 2569 -06 page 1 of 1 Datewo,raed: June 25.2004 Logged! By: OP Checked By: ABaha rising Method: HollowStem Auger Ddll Bit See/ a.inrn -0Drock bit Total Type: Borehole. Depth of 6.5 feet: 1 Rig Type: Mobile Bat UMbg CAL PAC DRRLMG Cmtraaor : Elevation, rac Sudace feet MBL feet G d Date ter Level No Gd af20 er,countered within boring depth and Date Measured: w1hod g SPT. California (dng), bulk Hammer Metod : Data: Dowmhwe wire 1401ps / 304nph drop Bwebeb BZCrtll: Dill cuttings Comments: Referbsile plan far loWtian SAMPLES ? = E w a OTHER TESTS m m m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ca AND REMARKS d o 8 3 a N a g B er �S w c° m w o i- z' °¢ z° 0 Grass [TERRACE DEPOSIT[ eaggl 2 R -1 5015' 100E Brown SILTY fine SAND, occasional rootlets, moist. very theme 6 112 5 R -2 SW5' 100+ Same as above 7 102 10 End of Bodng at 6.5- No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Backfifted with soil cuttings 15 20 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -9 7 Project Location 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E -18 Project Number D- 2569 -06 Paqe t of 1 Date(s)Drdled: June 25.2004 Lagged By OP Checked By: ASaha Drilling Metla d : Hdlow -Stem Auger Drfll at S.I B.nch-0D KKk bit Total Depol of 6.5 Type: Borehole. feet: Drill Me Type: Mobile Bat Dnllmg CAL PAC DRILLING Aapm.. Contedor: Elevation, Surface feet: tear MSL Groundwater Level No GE. H2O encdunterad v #vn bong dePM Sampling SPr, Califomia (ring). bulk Hammar Data : Downlwla wire and Date Measured: Method : 1401tk5 / 3Nnch drop Bonvide Backfill: pill mffings Civurn : Rater to ails plan for loan. SAMPLES 3 aE OTHER TESTS m z MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m m s ° N ° r1 AND REMARKS q Lt 0 L € to yCy 8 ° o N a z° 0 Gress I TERRACE DEPOSIT < Bag #1 2 R-1 5015' 100+ Brown SILTY fine SAND, occasional naodets. moist, very dense 11 110 5 R -2 5015' 100- Same as above 9 108 10 End of Boring at 6.5' No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Backfilled with soil cuttings 15 20 25 30 35 a0 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -10 ect Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE Plate No. E -19 act Number ., D- 2569 -06 Page 1 of 1 s) Drilled June 25.20D4 Logged By OP Checked Sy: A Bans g Method : Hollpv.Stem Auger Drip at Size l Sinop -0D rock bit Total Type: eonphole. Depth of 6.5 teatRig Type: Mobile B61 Conv�: CAL PAC DRILLING E��e. Sfae�t' reef MSL w+dwaler Level No Gd. H2O encountered within boring depth Sampling SPT. CaMpmia (mg). bulk Hammer Data: Do We wine d Date Meaawed. Method : 140 ths 130 -IaO drw Borehole Backfill: Dril wdings Comments: Refer to site plan far loraum SAMPLES O aE s ? n €'e OTHER TESTS d MATERIAL DESCRIPTION AND REMARKS ° E a C� ¢ 3 .>2 m$ e W o ' arc zp m M a s z° 0 Grass [TERRACE DEPOSIT] Bag M1 2 R -1 25 -3035 65 Brown SILTY fine SAND, occasional miles. moist, dense 10 107 5 R -2 30-3238 70 Same as above 7 105 10 End of Boring at 6S' No Groundwater encountered within boring depth No Caving Backfilled with soil cuttings 15 20 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Project : OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Borehole No. M -11 Project Location: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California LOG OF TEST HOLE I Plate No. E -20 Project Number: D- 2569416 Page 1 of 1 Date(a) Doled: June 25.2004 Logged BY: op CheMed B,: A. esha Draping Method: HollowStem /wger Onll ea Size f Total 8+ncnOD leak bit oep of 8t 6.5 Type: Borehole les: Drill fog Type: Mobile B-61 Dral'mg CAL PAC DRILLING Approa. Surface feet MSL Convector: Elevation. feet: r odwama tsvel No W. H2O encountered within bOnng death SampM1ng SPT. Cal6umla Wngl. bulk Hammer Data : �"'nAo1e wine and Data Measured: McNod : 140lbs I3Pi drop BaMhple 8etlrRl: Drill ortings Comments: Refer a Ste plan for location SAMPLES z $ OTHER TESTS d m MATERIAL DESCRIPTION m vi AND REMARKS m W a o r ' ats ° m g 6 az 0 Grass [ TERRACE DEPOSIT I Bag 81 2 - R -1 25.3545 80 Brown SILTY fine SAND. omasional raoBefs. moist. dense 9 108 5 R -2 32.38 -39 77 Same as abiwe 6 106 10 End of Boring at 6.5' No Groundwater encountemd within baling depth No Caving Backfilled with soil cuttings t5 20 25 30 35 40 GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Lz. va x v G O a a w 0 61 4 3 2 1 V DIRECT SHEAR 1 2 3 4 5 NORMAL LOAD (KSF) OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS lProject No. D- 2569 -06 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California Plate: F Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. DEPTH COHESION FRICTION LOCATION (FT) TEST CONDITION (PSF) (DEG) Boring B -3 2' Saturated - Drained 200 25 Boring B -3 5' Saturated - Drained 200 27 Boring B -2 1' -3' Remolded to 90 % RC 300 30 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS lProject No. D- 2569 -06 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California Plate: F Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church APPENDIX II SEISMIC EVALUATION DATA • UBCSEIS • FRISKSP • Response Spectra W. CALIFORNIA FAULT MAP Our Lady of Queen of Angels; D- 2569 -06; 1100 1000 Fis. :I8 700 500 400 [cis 200 100 U -100 -400 -300 -200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 ' U B C S E I S ' # # ' Version 1.03 ' # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # ## COMPUTATION OF 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE SEISMIC DESIGN PARAMETERS JOB NUMBER: D- 2569 -06 JOB NAME: Our Lady Queen of Angels FAULT - DATA -FILE NAME: CDMGUBCR.DAT SITE COORDINATES: SITE LATITUDE: 33.6316 SITE LONGITUDE: 117.8164 UBC SEISMIC ZONE: 0.4 UBC SOIL PROFILE TYPE: SD NEAREST TYPE A FAULT: NAME: CUCAMONGA DISTANCE: 56.6 km NEAREST TYPE B FAULT: NAME: NEWPORT - INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) DISTANCE: 5.1 km SELECTED UBC SEISMIC COEFFICIENTS: Na: 1.0 Nv: 1.2 Ca: 0.44 Cv: 0.77 Ts: 0.696 To: 0.139 DATE: 07 -06 -2004 ' CAUTION: The digitized data points used to model faults are + ' limited in number and have been digitized from small- ' ' scale maps (e.g., 1:750,000 scale). Consequently, ' ' the estimated fault- site - distances may be in error by ' ' several kilometers. Therefore, it is important that ' ' the distances be carefully checked for accuracy and " ' adjusted as needed, before they are used in design. + SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS -------------- ------------- Our lady Queen of Angels, Page 2 ABBREVIATED FAULT NAME NEWPORT - INGLEWOOD (L.A.Basin) NEWPORT - INGLEWOOD (Offshore) PALOS VERDES CHINO- CENTRAL AVE. (Elsinore) ELSINORE - WHITTIER ELSINORE -GLEN IVY CORONADO BANK SAN JOSE ELSINORE - TEMECULA SIERRA MADRE (Central) CUCAMONGA RAYMOND VERDUGO CLAMSHELL - SAWPIT HOLLYWOOD ROSE CANYON SANTA MONICA SAN JACINTO -SAN BERNARDINO SAN JACINTO -SAN JACINTO VALLEY MALIBU COAST SAN ANDREAS - Southern SIERRA MADRE (San Fernando) SAN ANDREAS - 1857 Rupture CLEGHORN ELSINORE- JULIAN SAN GABRIEL ANACAPA -DUME SAN JACINTO -ANZA NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (West) SANTA SUSANA HOLSER SIMI -SANTA ROSA OAK RIDGE (Onshore) PINTO MOUNTAIN NORTH FRONTAL FAULT ZONE (East) SAN CAYETANO HELENDALE - S. LOCKHARDT SAN JACINTO- COYOTE CREEK EARTHQUAKE VALLEY LENWOOD - LOCKHART -OLD WOMAN SPRGS SANTA YNEZ (East) VENTURA - PITAS POINT BURNT MTN. EUREKA PEAK LANDERS JOHNSON VALLEY (Northern) 1 APPROX.ISOURCE I MAX. I SLIP I FAULT IDISTANCEI TYPE I MAG. I RATE I TYPE I (km) I(A,B,C)I (Mw) I (mm /yr) I(SS,DS,BT) 1 5.1 1 B 1 6.9 1 1.00 1 SS 1 5.7 1 B 1 6.9 I 1.50 1 SS 1 24.3 1 B 1 7.1 1 3.00 1 SS 1 31.2 1 B 1 6.7 1 1.00 1 DS 1 31.3 1 B 1 6.8 1 2.50 1 SS 1 33.2 1 B 1 6.8 1 5.00 1 SS 1 40.6 1 B 1 7.4 1 3.00 1 SS 1 45.3 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.50 1 DS 1 48.9 1 B 1 6.8 1 5.00 1 SS 1 55.9 1 B 1 7.0 1 3.00 1 DS 1 56.6 1 A 1 7.0 1 5.00 1 DS 1 59.4 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.50 1 DS 1 61.2 I B 1 6.7 1 0.50 1 DS 1 61.6 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.50 1 DS 1 63.3 1 B 1 6.5 1. 1.00 1 DS 1 69.7 1 B 1 6.9 1 1.50 1 SS 1 70.2 1 B 1 6.6 1 1.00 1 DS 1 71.6 1 B 1 6.7 ( 12.00 1 SS 1 73.1 1 B 1 6.9 1 12.00 1 SS 1 75.2 1 B 1 6.7 1 0.30 1 DS 1 81.3 1 A 1 7.4 1 24.00 1 SS 1 81.6 1 B 1 6.7 1 2.00 1 DS 1 82.0 1 A 1 7.8 1 34.00 1 SS 1 89.7 1 B 1 6.5 1 3.00 1 SS 1 84.8 1 A 1 7.1 1 5.00 1 SS 1 85.0 1 B 1 7,0 1 1.00 1 SS 1 85.3 1 B 1 7,3 1 3.00 1 DS 1 89.6 1 A 1 7.2 1 12.00 1 SS 1 93.1 1 B 1 7.0 1 1.00 1 DS 1 96.0 1 B 1 6.6 1 5.00 1 DS 1 104.8 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.40 1 DS 1 112.4 1 B 1 6.7 1 1.00 1 DS 1 113.0 1 B 1 6.9 1 4.00 1 DS 1 116.9 1 B 1 7.0 1 2.50 1 SS 1 120.3 1 B 1 6.7 1 0.50 1 DS 1 121.4 1 B 1 6.8 1 6.00 I DS 1 124.2 1 B 1 7.1 1 0.60 1 SS 1 128.2 1 B 1 6.8 1 4.00 1 SS 1 129.9 1 B 1 6.5 1 2.00 1 SS 1 140.2 1 B 1 7.3 ( 0.60 1 SS 1 141.1 1 B 1 7.0 1 2.00 1 SS 1 141.4 1 B 1 6.8 1 1.00 1 DS 1 143.2 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.60 1 SS 1 147.5 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.60 1 SS 1 147.5 1 B 1 7.3 1 0.60 1 SS 1 148.6 1 B 1 6.7 1 0.60 1 SS SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS -- --------- ---------------- Our lady Queen of Angels, Page 3 I APPROX.ISOURCE I MAX. I SLIP I FAULT ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI TYPE I MAG. I RATE I TYPE FAULT NAME I (km) I(A,B,C)I (Mw) I (mm /yr) I(SS,DS,BT) M.RIDGE- ARROYO PARIDA -SANTA ANA I 151.5 1 B 1 6.7 I 0.40 I DS RED MOUNTAIN 1 155.6 1 B 1 6.8 1 2.00 1 DS SANTA CRUZ ISLAND 1 156.9 1 B 1 6.8 1 1.00 1 DS ELSINORE- COYOTE MOUNTAIN 1 158.6 1 B 1 6.8 1 4.00 1 SS EMERSON So. - COPPER MTN. 1 159.4 1 B 1 6.9 1 0.60 1 SS GARLOCK (West) 1 161.4 1 A 1 7.1 1 6.00 1 SS SAN JACINTO - BORREGO 1 163.0 1 B 1 6.6 1 4.00 1 SS PLEITO THRUST 1 163.4 1 B 1 6.8 1 2.00 1 DS GRAVEL HILLS - HARPER LAKE 1 163.4 1 B 1 6.9 1 0.60 1 SS BIG PINE 1 168.5 1 B 1 6.7 1 0.80 I SS CALICO - HIDALGO 1 169.1 1 B 1 7.1 1 0.60 1 SS BLACKWATER 1 174.1 1 B 1 6.9 1 0.60 1 SS PISGAH - BULLION MTN.- MESQUITE LK 1 176.4 1 B 1 7.1 1 0.60 1 SS GARLOCK (East) 1 184.4 1 A 1 7.3 1 7.00 1 SS WHITE WOLF 1 186.5 1 B 1 7.2 1 2.00 1 DS SANTA YNEZ (West) 1 188.3 1 B 1 6.9 1 2.00 1 SS SANTA ROSA ISLAND 1 192.9 1 B 1 6.9 1 1.00 1 DS SUPERSTITION MTN. (San Jacinto) 1 194.4 1 B 1 6.6 1 5.00 1 SS ELMORE RANCH 1 198.8 1 B 1 6.6 1 1.00 1 SS SUPERSTITION HILLS (San Jacinto) 1 200.9 1 B 1 6.6 1 4.00 1 SS BRAWLEY SEISMIC ZONE 1 203.3 1 B 1 6.5 1 25.00 1 SS ELSINORE - LAGUNA SALADA 1 210.4 1 B 1 7.0 1 3.50 I SS So. SIERRA NEVADA 1 210.6 1 B 1 7.1 1 0.10 1 DS LITTLE LAKE 1 220.9 1 B 1 6.7 1 0.70 1 SS IMPERIAL 1 227.9 1 A 1 7.0 1 20.00 1 SS TANK CANYON 1 230.8 1 B 1 6.5 1 1.00 1 DS LOS ALAMOS -W. BASELINE 1 231.1 1 B 1 6.8 1 0.70 1 DS PANAMINT VALLEY 1 238.0 1 B 1 7.2 1 2.50 1 SS OWL LAKE 1 238.3 1 B 1 6.5 1 2.00 1 SS LIONS HEAD 1 248.5 1 B 1 6.6 1 0.02 1 DS SAN JUAN 1 256.2 1 B 1 7.0 1 1.00 1 SS SAN LUIS RANGE (S. Margin) 1 257.2 1 B 1 7.0 1 0.20 1 DS DEATH VALLEY (South) 1 258.5 1 B 1 6.9 1 4.00 1 SS CASMALIA (Orcutt Frontal Fault) 1 266.1 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.25 1 DS OWENS VALLEY 1 284.7 1 B 1 7.6 1 1.50 1 SS LOS OSOS 1 286.9 1 B 1 6.8 1 0.50 1 DS DEATH VALLEY (Graben) 1 287.2 1 B 1 6.9 1 4.00 1 DS HOSGRI 1 294.4 1 B 1 7.3 1 2.50 1 SS RINCONADA 1 306.8 1 B 1 7.3 1 1.00 1 SS HUNTER MTN. - SALINE VALLEY 1 318.9 1 B 1 7.0 1 2.50 1 SS INDEPENDENCE 1 319.8 1 B 1 6.9 1 0.20 1 DS DEATH VALLEY (Northern) 1 337.0 1 A 1 7.2 1 5.00 1 SS SAN ANDREAS (Creeping) 1 362.2 1 B 1 5.0 1 34.00 1 SS BIRCH CREEK 1 374.3 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.70 1 DS WHITE MOUNTAINS 1 380.6 1 B 1 7.1 1 1.00 1 SS DEEP SPRINGS 1 400.5 1 B 1 6.6 1 0.80 1 DS --------------------------- SUMMARY OF FAULT PARAMETERS --------------- ------------ Our lady Queen of Angels, Page 4 I APPROX.ISOURCE I MAX. I SLIP I FAULT ABBREVIATED IDISTANCEI TYPE I MAG. I RATE I TYPE FAULT NAME I (km) I(A,B,C)1 (Mw) I (mm /yr) I(SS,DS,BT) ROUND VALLEY (E. of S.N.Mtns.) I 407.6 1 B I 6.8 I 1.00 I DS DEATH VALLEY (N. of Cucamongo) I 409.8 1 A I 7.0 I 5.00 I SS FISH SLOUGH I 417.4 1 B 1 6.6 I 0.20 1 DS HILTON CREEK 1 433.1 1 B 1 6.7 1 2.50 1 DS ORTIGALITA 1 446.7 1 B 1 6.9 1 1.00 1 SS CALAVERAS (So.of Calaveras Res) 1 451.9 1 B 1 6.2 1 15.00 1 SS MONTEREY BAY - TULARCITOS 1 454.7 1 B 1 7.1 1 0.50 1 DS PALO COLORADO - SUR 1 456.0 1 B 1 7.0 1 3.00 1 SS HARTLEY SPRINGS 1 456.3 1 B 1 6.6 1 0.50 1 DS QUIEN SASE 1 465.2 1 B 1 6.5 1 1.00 1 SS ZAYANTE - VERGELES 1 483.6 1 B 1 6.8 1 0.10 1 SS SAN ANDREAS (1906) 1 488.8 1 A 1 7.9 1 24.00 1 SS SARGENT 1 488.9 1 B 1 6.8 1 3.00 1 SS MONO LAKE 1 491.8 1 B 1 6.6 1 2.50 1 DS ROBINSON CREEK 1 522.6 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.50 1 DS SAN GREGORIO 1 529.8 1 A 1 7.3 1 5.00 1 SS GREENVILLE 1 538.9 1 B 1 6.9 1 2.00 1 SS MONTE VISTA - SHANNON 1 538.9 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.40 1 DS HAYWARD (SE Extension) 1 539.1 ( B I 6.5 1 3.00 1 SS CALAVERAS (No.of Calaveras Res) 1 558.8 1 B 1 6.8 1 6.00 1 SS HAYWARD (Total Length) 1 558.8 1 A 1 7.1 1 9.00 1 SS ANTELOPE VALLEY 1 562.3 1 B 1 6.7 1 0.80 1 DS GENOA I 586.7 1 B 1 6.9 1 1.00 1 DS CONCORD - GREEN VALLEY I 606.6 1 B 1 6.9 1 6.00 1 SS RODGERS CREEK 1 645.2 1 A 1 7.0 1 9.00 1 SS WEST NAPA 1 646.2 1 B 1 6.5 1 1.00 1 SS POINT REYES 1 663.7 1 B 1 6.8 1 0.30 1 DS HUNTING CREEK - BERRYESSA 1 669.0 1 B 1 6.9 1 6.00 1 SS MAACAMA (South) 1 707.9 1 B 1 6.9 1 9.00 1 SS COLLAYOMI 1 724.9 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.60 1 SS BARTLETT SPRINGS 1 728.8 1 A 1 7.1 1 6.00 1 SS MAACAMA (Central) 1 749.4 1 A 1 7.1 1 9.00 1 SS MAACAMA (North) 1 806.9 1 A 1 7.1 1 9.00 1 SS ROUND VALLEY (N. S.F.Bay) 1 815.5 1 B 1 6.8 1 6.00 1 SS BATTLE CREEK 1 842.2 1 B 1 6.5 1 0.50 1 DS LAKE MOUNTAIN 1 873.8 1 B 1 6.7 1 6.00 1 SS GARBERVILLE - BRICELAND 1 890.6 1 B 1 6.9 1 9.00 1 SS MENDOCINO FAULT ZONE 1 946.5 1 A 1 7.4 1 35.00 1 DS LITTLE SALMON (Onshore) 1 953.6 1 A 1 7.0 1 5.00 1 DS MAD RIVER 1 956.8 1 B 1 7.1 1 0.70 1 DS CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE 1 959.9 1 A 1 8.3 1 35.00 1 DS McKINLEYVILLE 1 967.1 1 B 1 7.0 1 0.60 1 DS TRINIDAD I 968.8 I B 1 7.3 1 2.50 1 DS FICKLE HILL 1 969.1 1 B 1 6.9 1 0.60 1 DS TABLE BLUFF 1 974.1 1 B 1 7.0 1 0.60 1 DS LITTLE SALMON (Offshore) 1 987.5 1 B 1 7.1 1 1.00 1 DS BIG LAGOON - BALD MTN.FLT.ZONE 1 1005.7 1 B 1 7.3 1 0.50 1 DS ................................................ ............................... RETURN PERIOD vs. ACCELERATION CAMP. & BOZ. (1997 Rev.) AL 1; Lady of Queen of Angels; D- 2569 -06; 1 1 1 11111 -- - -r� -• ---- - - - - -- 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 r PROBABILITY OF EXCEEDANCE CAMP. & BOZ. (1997 Rev.) AL 1; Our Lady of Queen of Angels; D- 2569 -06; Iff .e 80 0 70 60 ° 50 n 40 c a30 ) a) X 20 w 10 0 25 yrs 50 yrs 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 Acceleration (g) 1.4 12 0�0 Ca 1.0 C9 y 0.8 r 61 U U Q Ob y 0.4 C. 02 OA � 0.0 ACCELERATION SPECTRA FOR HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION WITH 949 YEAR AVERAGE RETURN PERIOD ' 2 %Damping ...-- ............. .........y. " 5 %Damping • _ - - - 7 %Damping - i 05 1.0 15 2.0 25 3.0 Period (See) AVERAGE SPECTRA COORDINATES Period DAMPING ( %) (see) 2 5 7 10 0.000 0.39780 0.39780 0.39780 0.39780 0.030 0.39355 0.39355 0.39355 0.39355 0.100 0.87066 0.68021 0.61024 0.55772 0.150 1.18820 0.89339 0.78518 0.70125 0.200 1.28978 0.95538 0.83258 0.73564 0.300 1.22931 0.91058 0.79354 0.70115 0.400 1.18961 0.88779 0.77688 0.69244 0.500 1.02907 0.77390 0.67956 0.60747 0.750 0.81372 0.62832 0.56034 0.49788 1.000 0.66193 0.52123 0.46950 0.41704 1.500 0.43020 0.34416 0.31258 0.27536 2.000 0.29448 0.23747 0.21656 0.19000 3.000 0.16837 0.13688 0.12533 0.10952 4.000 0.12286 0.09989 0.09145 0.07992 35 4.0 SPECTRA ACCELERATIONS Project:.D- 2569 -06 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Date: 7 -7 -204 NEWPORT REACH, CALIFORNIA Eng/Geo: DXS Spectra Damping Cotwmion 949- ycanxls 1.2 1.0 OVA b O 0.8 w O L V 0.6 u ♦s. OA W Ti 0.2 0.0 � OA ACCELERATION SPECTRA FOR HORIZONTAL GROUND MOTION WITH 475 YEAR AVERAGE RETURN PERIOD ----- 2% Damping ------ _______________ A____ _________. --------------- .------ 5% Damping - - - 7% Damping 10 %Dampin \ OS 1.0 15 2.0 2S 3.0 Period (See) AVERAGE SPECTRA COORDINATES Period DAMPING ( %) (sec) 2 5 7 10 0.000 0.30840 0.30840 0.30840 0.30840 0.030 0.30886 0.30886 0.30886 0.30886 0.100 0.66013 0.51573 0.46268 0.42286 0.150 0.94311 0.70911 0.62322 0.55661 0.200 1.02291 0.75770 0.66031 0.58343 0.300 0.97418 0.72161 0.62885 0.55564 0.400 0.93277 0.69611 0.60915 0.54294 0.500 0.80531 0.60562 0.53180 0.47538 0.750 0.63127 0.48744 0.43470 0.38625 1.000 0.51210 0.40325 0.36322 0.32264 1.500 0.33059 0.26447 0.24020 0.21160 2.000 0.22480 0.18128 0.16532 0.14504 3.000 0.12815 0.10419 0.09539 0.08336 4.000 0.09445 0.07679 0.07031 0.06144 35 4.0 SPECTRA ACCELERATIONS Project_D- 2569 -06 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS Date: 7 -7 -2004 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA Eng/Geo : DXS Spectra Damping Conversion 475- year.xis Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church APPENDIX III FIELD RESISTIVITY TEST • Resistivity Data • Test Report i4, Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Project Name: Our Lady of Angles Catholic Church Date: 6 -24 -04 Project No: D- 2569 -06 Site Address:2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California. RESISTIVITY DATA A= (ft) 5 10 20 30 40 Formula = (Ohm -cm) 957.5 *R 1915 *11 3830 *R 5745 *R 7660 *R Area 1 2.4 1.3 Measured R Area 1 2,298 2,489 Calc Ohm -cm Ohm -cm Area 2 Measured R Area 2 Calc Area 3 Measured R Area 3 Calc Area 4 Measured R Area 4 Calc Date of Calibration: 3/2004 Field Engineer: Mo 30 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church Field Resistivity Test Report Site Name: Our Lady Queen of Angles Catholic Church Site Address: 2046 Mar Vista Drive, Newport Beach, California. Report Prepared by: Geotechnical Solutions, Inc. Give two or three sentences description of the soil as seen at the site: Fine, Silty Sand (Terrace Deposits) Soil Condition: ❑ Wet N Damp ❑ Dry Choose one and only one of the following descriptions that best describe the earth conditions: ❑ Good clay earth ❑ Solid rock NSandy soil ❑ High -Rise site If high -rise site was checked, verify the location of the main water line entering the building and give the following information: ❑ The line was located and verified as copper and is ` inches in circumference. ❑ The line was located and verified as iron and is inches in circumference. ❑ I was unable to locate the water main and recommend further engineering study for the grounding of this site. Provide the following information: Date of resistivity test: 6 -24 -04 Weather for the seven days preceding the test: Sunny and moderately warm (The last three days must have been clear and sunny.) Model number of test instrument: NILSON MODEL 400 Serial number of test instrument: 4 -7368 31 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church APPENDIX IV RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 32 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church RECOMMENDED EARTHWORK SPECIFICATIONS 1.0 General 1.1 Description 1.1.1 These specifications cover preparation of the subject site to receive fills, the type of soils suitable for use in fills, the compaction standards, and the methods of testing compacted fills. 1.1.2 The Contractor shall furnish all labor, supervision, equipment, operations, and materials to excavate to the required grade, support existing underground facilities, stockpile material, compact fill and backfill, and fine grade. The work of the Contractor shall include all clearing and grubbing, removing existing unsatisfactory material, preparing areas to be filled, spreading and compacting of fill in the areas to be filled, and all other work necessary to complete the grading of the filled areas. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to place, spread, moisten or dry, and compact the fill in strict accordance with these specifications to the lines and grades indicated on project plans or as directed in writing by the Civil Engineer. 1.1.3 Deviations from these specifications will be permitted only upon written authorization from the Owner or his representative. 1.2 Role of the Geotechnical Engineer 1.2.1 Construction - The Owner will employ a Geotechnical Consultant to observe and test this work as it is being performed. The Contractor shall cooperate with the Geotechnical Consultant and allow his unrestricted access to the site as required for the performance of his duties. 33 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church The Contractor shall provide a minimum notice of 48 hours to the Geotechnical Engineer before beginning or restarting earthwork operations that will require the presence of the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative on site. 1.2.2 Subsurface Investigations - A geotechnical engineering report for design purposes was prepared by Geotechnical Solutions, Inc., Irvine, California. Any recommendations made in the geotechnical report or subsequent reports are made part of these specifications. These reports are available for review upon request to the Owner. 1.2.3 Observation and Testing - The Geotechnical Engineer's representative shall observe the clearing and grubbing, excavation, filling and compacting operations and shall take density tests in the fill material so that he can state his opinion as to whether or not the fill was constructed in accordance with the specifications. All fill will be tested shortly after its placement to ascertain that the required compaction is achieved. A minimum of one density test will be made on each 500 cubic yards of fill placed, with a minimum of at least one test per every 2 feet of vertical height of fill. If the surface is disturbed, the density tests shall be made in the compacted materials below the disturbed zone. When these tests indicate that the density or water content of any layer of fill or portion thereof does not meet the specified density or water content, the particular layer or portions thereof shall be reworked until the specified density and water content have been obtained. After the completion of grading, the Geotechnical Engineer will prepare a written opinion of grading. Neither the testing performed by the Geotechnical Consultant nor his opinion as to whether or not the fill was constructed in accordance with these Specifications shall relieve the Contractor of his responsibility to construct the fills in accordance with the Contract Documents. 34 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church 1.3 Reference Standards The following ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) codes and standards shall be used to the extent indicated by references herein. The most recent revision of the standards shall be used. D422 - "Standard Test Method for Particle -Size Analysis of Soils" D 1556 - "Standard Test Method for Density of Soil in Place by the Sand -Cone Method" D1557 - "Standard Test Methods for Moisture - Density Relations of Soils and Soil Aggregate Mixtures Using I0 -]b (4.54 kg) and 18 -inch (457 -mm) Drop" D2216 - "Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil, Rock, and Soil- Aggregate Mixtures" D2922 - "Standard Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil- Aggregate in Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)" D3017 - "Standard Test Method for Water Content of Soil and Rock in Place by Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)" D4318 - "Standard Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils" D4718 - "Standard Practice for Correction of Unit Weight and Water Content for Soils Containing Oversize Particles" D4829 - "Standard Test Method for Expansion Index of Soils" D4944 - "Standard Test Method for Field Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil by the Calcium Carbide Gas Pressure Tester Method." 35 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church 1.4 Degree of Fill Compaction The degree to which fill is to be compacted is expressed in terms of "relative compaction." Relative compaction is defined as the ratio; expressed in percent, of the in -place dry density of the compacted fill to the reference maximum dry density. The reference maximum dry density shall be obtained following ASTM D1557. Optimum water content shall be obtained in the same test used to obtain the reference maximum dry density. Correction of the maximum dry density and optimum water content for oversize particles of gravel and cobbles shall be made following ASTM D4718 when, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, such correction is appropriate. The in -place density shall be obtained following ASTM D 1556 (sand cone method) or ASTM D2922 (nuclear method - shallow depth) test method. The in -place water content shall be obtained following ASTM D4944 (calcium carbide gas pressure meter), ASTM D3017 (nuclear method - shallow depth), or ASTM D2216 (oven drying). Correction of the in -place density and water content for oversize particles of gravel and cobbles shall be made following ASTM D4718 when, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, such correction is appropriate. If any of the test methods specified in this section are judged by the Geotechnical Engineer to be impractical or unreliable because the material has a coarse particle size distribution, . or for other reasons, the Geotechnical Engineer shall establish other procedures to obtain the required soil characteristics. 2.0 Products 2.1 Materials 2.1.1 General - During grading operations, soil types other than those identified in the geotechnical investigation report may be encountered by the Contractor. Consult the Geotechnical Consultant for his evaluation of the suitability of using these soils a fill material prior to placement or disposal. 36 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church 2.1.2 General Fill - Materials for compacted fill shall consist of material imported from outside the site or excavated from the site that, in the opinion of the Geotechnical Engineer, are suitable for use in constructing engineered fills. The material shall not contain rocks or hard lumps greater than 6 inches in maximum dimension, and at least 70 percent (by weight) of its particles shall pass through a U.S. Standard 3/8 inch sieve. Material greater than 3 inches, but less than 6 inches in maximum dimension, shall be placed by the Contractor so that it is completely surrounded by compacted, finer material; no nesting of rocks shall be permitted. Do not use any perishable, spongy, hazardous, or other undesirable materials as fill. 2.1.3 Select Fill - Select fill shall meet all criteria for general fill but shall also contain no rocks or hard lumps greater than 3 inches in maximum dimension, and at least 80 percent (by weight) shall pass through a U.S. Standard 3/8 -inch sieve. The expansion index of select material shall be less than 50 (i.e., 5.0 percent swell) when tested in accordance with ASTM D4829. 3.0 Execution 3.1 Clearing and Grubbing Within the project limits, tile Contractor shall demolish structures as specified on the Drawings. Unless otherwise indicated on the Drawings or by the Owner in writing, the Contractor shall clear and grub all trees, stumps, roots, brush, grass, and other vegetation within construction, fill and stockpile areas to a minimum depth of 3 feet below the existing ground surface or below finished grade, whichever is deeper, unless otherwise recommended by the Geotechnical Engineer's Field Representative. Remove cleared and grubbed materials from the site and dispose of them legally. No onsite burning or burying of cleared and grubbed materials is permitted. No placement of 37 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church cleared and grubbed materials in topsoil stockpiles is permitted. No mulching of branches or roots is permitted. Incorporating vegetative matter into stockpiled materials, which are to be used in fill, is not permitted. Stockpile organic -laden topsoil separate from other fill materials. Remove any remaining vegetative matter from the deeper excavated soils, which may result from roots deeper than those encountered during clearing and grubbing operations. All material thereby removed shall be piled at a location away from the immediate work area so as to avoid burying of piled material. 3.2 Compacted Fills 3.2.1 Preparing Areas to be Filled - Brush, grass, and other objectionable materials shall be collected, piled, and disposed of as indicated in Section 3.1 by the Contractor so as to leave the areas that have been cleared with a neat and finished appearance, free from unsightly debris. Remove all loose soil, uncertified fill, landslide debris, and weathered bedrock to firm material or in -situ bedrock, as approved by the Geotechnical Consultant. The Contractor shall obtain approval from the Geotechnical Engineer or his representative of stripping and site preparation before the compaction of any fill subgrade begins. The surface shall then be scarified to a minimum depth of 6 inches until the surface is free from uneven features that would tend to prevent uniform compaction by the equipment used, and shall be brought to the specified water content and relative compaction. Compact scarified materials to a minimum relative compaction of 90 percent, relative to ASTM D1557, prior to placement of any fill material. 3.2.2 Placing, Spreading, and Compacting, Fill Material - Onsite soil obtained from removals, borrow, or cut areas may be reused as compacted fill provided it is free from W Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church deleterious debris and meets the other requirements of the "Materials" portion of this Specification Section. Use of soil containing deleterious debris from the clearing and grubbing operation or from other sources is not permitted. The fill materials shall be placed by the Contractor in horizontal layers not greater than 8 inches thick, measured before compaction. Each layer shall be spread evenly and shall be thoroughly mixed during the spreading to obtain uniformity of material and moisture in each layer. The moisture content of material used for compacted fill should be adjusted to be at or above optimum water content as determined by ASTM D 1557. When the water content of the fill material is too high, the fill materials shall be aerated by the Contractor by blading, mixing, or other satisfactory methods until the water content is as specified. After each layer has been placed, mixed, and spread evenly, it shall be thoroughly compacted by the Contractor to a relative compaction of at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557 for general fill, and 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D1557 for select fill, compacted fill pads, and the upper 1 foot of pavement subgrade. Compaction shall be accomplished by: sheepsfoot rollers; vibratory rollers; multiple - wheel, pneumatic -tired rollers; or other types of acceptable compacting equipment. Equipment shall be of such design that it is able to compact the fill to the specified density. Compaction shall be continuous over the entire area, and the equipment shall make sufficient passes to obtain the desired density uniformly. All fill placed on site shall be treated in like manner until finished grades are attained. Jetting, puddling, and hydro consolidation techniques shall not be used, including backfill of utility trenches. The placement of topsoil is subject to the approval of the Geotechnical Engineer. Topsoil shall not be placed beneath concrete flatwork, beneath or behind retaining walls, or within structural fill. All topsoil material is subject to the same moisture conditioning, 39 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church placement, and compaction requirements as General Fill. Roots, branches and other organic debris are not permitted within the compacted topsoil layer. When backfilling around footings and compacting behind retaining walls and flexible retaining structures, the Contractor shall use lightweight compaction equipment such as hand - operated equipment, shoring, or other means to avoid over - stressing structural walls. When using lightweight compaction equipment, the fill materials shall be spread in horizontal layers not greater than 6 inches thick, measured before compaction. As an alternative, sand - cement slurry may be used to backfill trenches. The slurry shall have minimum cement content of 3 sacks per cubic yard within the zone of influence of foundations and other settlement sensitive structures. A minimum of 2 sacks per cubic yard of slurry shall be used elsewhere within building limits, and a minimum of one sack per cubic yard of slurry shall be used elsewhere. Slurry shall not be used in those areas where such placement would result in the obstruction of water flow, and is subject to the approval of the Geotechnical Engineer. 3.3 Protection of Work and Adjacent Properties 3.3.1 During Construction - The Contractor shall grade all excavated surfaces to provide good drainage away from construction slopes and prevent ponding of water. He shall control surface water and the transport of silt and sediment to avoid damage to adjoining properties or to finished work on the site. The Contractor shall take remedial measures to prevent erosion of freshly graded areas until such time as permanent drainage and erosion control measures have been installed. Dispose of all water resulting from dewatering operations legally and in ways that will not cause damage to public or private property, or constitute a nuisance or menace to the public, in accordance with municipal requirements. 40 Project No. D- 2569 -06 Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church The Contractor shall make every effort to minimize the amount of dust raised in excavating, on haul roads and access roads, and all other work areas in the course of construction activities. Protect benchmarks, monuments, and other reference points against displacement or damage. Repair or replace benchmarks, monuments, and other permanent survey data that become displaced or damaged due to the performance of this work. 3.3.2 After Completion - After earthwork is completed and the, Geotechnical Engineer has finished his observations of the work, no further excavation, filling or backfilling shall be performed except under the observation of the Geotechnical Engineer. 41 0 0 APPENDIX C. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REYNOLDS GROUP o Colifornia corporation PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property 2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, California MAY 49 2005 TRG Project #6725 Tel 714-730-5397 PO Box 1996, Tustin, California 92761-1996 Fax 71 -0- 730.6476 250 El Camino Real, Suite 204, Tustin, Coli(omia 927$03656 w .reynolds- groupxom TABLE OF CONTENTS PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT St. Mark Presbyterian Church 2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, California 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 2.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ ..............................1 2.1 Purpose .............................................. ............................... .......... ..............................1 2.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................... ..............................2 2.3 involved Parties ......................................................................... ..............................2 3.0 GENERAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS ............................. ..............................3 3.1 Location ..................................................................................... ..............................3 3.2 Adjacent Properties .................................................................... ..............................3 3.3 Property Description .................................................................. ..............................4 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................ ..............................4 i4.1 Regional Physiography.and Geology ......................................... ..............................4 4.2 Regional Soil Conditions ........................................................... ..............................5 4.3 Groundwater Conditions... ..................................................................... ................. 5 5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION ............................ ................. ...................................... 5 5.1 Property Inspection Observations .............................................. ..............................5 5.2 Adjacent Property and Vicinity Observations ........................... ..............................6 5.3 Results of Regulatory Agency List Review and File Research . ..............................7 5.4 Property HistoryfLand Use Review .. ............................... .................. ....................1 I 5.5 Synopsis of Previous Environmental Investigations ................. .........................:...16 5.6 Interviews .................................................................................. .............................16 6.0 CONCLUSIONS & OPINIONS ........................................................ .............................17 7.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................... ...............:.............17 8.0 PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS ................................................. .............................18 9.0 REFERENCES .................................................................................... .............................19 FIGURES Figure l - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Plot Plan of Property and Area Figure 3 - Historical Topographic Maps Figure 4 - Historical Aerial Photographs APPENDICES Appendix A - Photographs of Property & Vicinity Appendix B - EDR Environmental Disclosure Report Appendix C - List of Aerial Photographs Reviewed Appendix D - Sanborn Map and City Directory Search Findings PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property 2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, California 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In April 2005, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, consistent with American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard E1527 -00, was performed for the property located at 2100 Mar Vista Drive in Newport Beach, California (the Property). The Property consists of 4.3t acres of land developed with two buildings, walkways, a large parking area and mature landscape. Legally identified as Assessor's Parcel Number (APN) 440- 092 -13, the Property has been occupied by St. Mark Presbyterian Church for use as a church, preschool and counseling center since first developed in the early 1960's. Adjacent sites in the area include residential housing tracts to the north, south and east, Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church and School to the west, and Corona Del Mar High School to the northwest. Based on historical research, the Property reconnaissance, and interviews performed during this investigation, no recognized environmental conditions XCs) exist at the Property or in the Property vicinity. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose This study was designed to evaluate whether RECs are present at or in the vicinity of the Property located at 2100 Mar Vista Drive in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California (see Figure 1 - Site Location Map). THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA I 2.2 Scope of Work The scope of work conformed to the requirements of Phase I Environmental Site Assessments as specified by the ASTM Standard E1527 -00 and included: A Property inspection by a qualified environmental assessor to observe and assess Property characteristics of potential environmental concern; • Observation of adjacent properties and the Property vicinity by a qualified environmental assessor to identify and assess Property characteristics of potential concern; j • Review of regulatory agency files; + Review of Property history /land use to identify potential uses that may have contributed to the presence of environmental concerns at the Property; i • Review of previous environmental investigations (if any); • Development of this report. 2.3 Involved Parties The Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange (the Client and potential buyer) contracted with The Reynolds Group (the Consultant) to conduct this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment as due diligence for a pending real estate transaction. Property access was provided by Pastor Gary Collins and Bob Smith, St. Mark's Business Manager. According to Pastor Collins, St. Mark Presbyterian Church is the legal owner of the subject Property and has been for greater than 40 years. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100.Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 2 3.0 GENERAL PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS Figure 1 shows the Property location, Figures 2 is a Plot Plan of the Property and Area, Figure 3 includes historical topographic maps of the area, and Figure 4 contains historical aerial photographs. Appendix A includes photographs taken of the Property and the adjacent properties by the Consultant in April, 2005. 3.1 Location The Property is situated at the southwest comer of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive in a predominantly residential neighborhood of Newport Beach, California. Notable points of interest in the area include Upper Newport Bay located Yz mile west and north of the Property, University of California at Irvine approximately one mile northeast of the Property, and Fashion Island Shopping Center and the Pacific Ocean located one mile and three miles south of the Property, respectively. The Foothill Transportation Corridor (Interstate 73) runs northeast- southwest approximately one mile northeast of the Property. 3.2 Adiacent Properties The immediate vicinity can be characterized as predominantly residential with most commercial businesses operating further out (greater than one mile) in all directions. Adjacent north of the Property, north of Eastbluff Drive, are single family homes developed in the 1960's. East of the Property, across Jamboree Road, and adjacent south of the Property is multi- tenant residential housing, all developed between the mid- 1960'.s and the mid- 1980's. Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church, Rectory and School. occupy a large area adjacent west of the Property, across Domingo Drive, as does Corona Del Mar High School, adjacent northwest of the Property, across Mar Vista Drive, Figure 2 — Plot Plan of Property and Area, shows the location of adjacent sites relative to the Property. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 3 3.3 Property Description The subject Property consists of 4.3f acres of land developed with two steel -framed wood buildings, one near its north side and one near its south side. A concrete walkway joins the two buildings. The north side building serves as the main church, with annexed administrative offices south of the church, and a pre - school occupies the south side building. Building interiors are improved with carpeting, linoleum, drywall partitions and drop ceiling tiles. Outdoor playgrounds exist at the pre- school's south and west sides and two portable buildings near the Property's center serve as counseling centers. An s asphalt paved parking area is developed along the Property's entire west side, while the east side is improved with lush grasses, trees and shrubs. An electrical transformer ( #5153811) operated by Southern California Edison as well as.. Other utility boxes are located in a cluster at the Property's northeast side. Access to the Property is gained via Domingo Drive at the west side of the Property. 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 4.1 Re ional . hvsiographv and Geology The Property is situated at approximately 115 feet above mean sea level and is located in the vicinity of the Newport- Inglewood Fault that parallels the coastline. This Fault has been estimated to produce earthquakes of magnitude 6.0 or greater and is believed to be the source of uplift that formed the Mesas in the vicinity of the Property. The Newport Mesa in which the Property falls generally lies un- conformably over Miocene and Pliocene units of the Niguel, Capistrano, and Monterey formations. The sediments in the area are generally composed of alluvium and associated deposits of recent or Pleistocene age. The soil lithology can be described as marine, grayish - white, fine sand with coarse grains and lenses of pebbly sandstone. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA d 4.2 Soil Conditions Soil surveys of Orange County have classified the soils in the Property vicinity as members of the Myford Series which formed from Sandy sediments. Myford series soils consists of moderately well drained sandy loam to loam with limey zones. 4.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater bearing strata are likely to occur in the Pleistocene formations north of the Newport- Inglewood Fault zone. Shallow groundwater conditions, including depth to groundwater and direction of groundwater flow, are dependent on site specific groundwater recharge factors influenced by recent precipitation and local lithology. Groundwater flow in the area is generally to the southwest and depth to groundwater is likely to be between 10 and 20 feet below ground surface. 5.0 RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION 5.1 Property Inspection Observations On April 21, 2005, a representative of The Reynolds Group conducted an inspection of the Property. Property photographs are included in Appendix A. The inspection was performed around the Property perimeter and then from the north side to the south side. The subject Property is described in detail in section 33 of this report. The Property buildings, parking areas, and landscape appeared in excellent condition. Only small amounts of household cleaners and maintenance materials such as paint and spray oil were observed during the Property visit. The aforementioned chemicals were safely stored in a locked bin at the east side of the pre - school. No spilling or staining was observed in the storage bin. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 5 Other than small amounts of cleaning products and maintenance materials; no chemical storage was observed at the Property. No evidence of underground storage tanks, clarifiers or degreasers was detected within the Property during the inspection. One electrical transformer was observed near the Property's northeast corner (45153811). No leaks or staining was observed on or around the transformer and it appeared in generally good condition. No pungent or noxious air emissions were noted during the Property inspection. No standing water was observed at the subject Property. No adverse environmental conditions were observed during the Property inspection. 5.2 Adiacent Property and Vicinity Observations Adjacent properties are described in Section 3.2 of this report. Visually, no issues of environmental concern were noted at adjacent sites or in the neighborhood during the investigation. A Unocal Station and a Ford Aerospace facility, formerly located i approximately `/3 mile north and '/< mile east of the Property, respectively, are listed in the Environmental Data Resources (EDR) environmental disclosure report (see section 5.3 and Appendix B). Each of the sites had reported contamination from leaking underground storage tanks, however, both were issued regulatory closure more than seven years ago, and neither site still exists. For these reasons, the former Unocal and former Ford facility are not issues of environmental concern to the Property. THE.REYNOLDS.GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Properly, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beseb, CA 6 5.3 Results of Ret?ulatory Agency List Review and File Research The Reynolds Group retained Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), to provide a list of facilities within the Property vicinity that are currently under review, management, or notification by a regulatory agency as indicated in an "Environmental Disclosure Report." The full "Environmental Disclosure Report" is included in Appendix B. The following presents the regulatory files reviewed as well as any referenced properties within these regulatory files. Depending on the database, and in compliance with ASTM Standard E1527 -00, the approximate search distance is between 0.25 and 1.0 miles from the subject. The subject Property is not listed in any of the databases as reported by EDR. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), National Priority List (NPL) and Proposed NPLst a listing of hazardous waste generators which are, or proposed to be, EPA- enforced Superfund sites. No cases were identified on the NPL or Proposed NPL within a one -mile search distance of the Property. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS): contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the CERCLA. CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the NPL and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. No cases were identified on the CERCLIS list within a '/2-mile search distance of the subject Property. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source, No Further Action Planned (CERCLIS- NFRAP)-. As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. No cases were identified on the CERCLIS -NFRAP within a %< -mile search distance from the subject Property. Corrective Action Report ( CORRACTS): identifies hazardous waste handlers with Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action activity. No cases were identified on the CORRACTS list within a one -mile search distance from the subject Property. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRIS TSD, SQG and LQG): is a database which includes selected information on sites that generate, store, treat, or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Act. The list is developed and maintained by the EPA. The purpose of this listing is to summarize registration information and does. not imply that contamination has occurred on the property, but does identify potential sources of contamination. No RCRIS sites were identified within a ''A mile search distance of the subject Property. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS): This listing is a database of incident notification information regarding incidents of reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. The search includes only the subject property /target property (TP). The subject property was not listed on the ERNS list. Annual Workplan (AWP): formerly BEP, identities known hazardous substance sites targeted for cleanup. No cases were identified on the AWP within a one -mile search distance of the subject Property. Cal-Sites (ASPIS): contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Cal -Sites database. No cases were identified in. the Cal -Site database within a one -mile search distance of the subject Property. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2.100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 8 California Hazardous Material Incident Report System (CHMIRS): contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). No cases were identified in the CI MIRS database within a one -mile search distance of the subject Property. Cortese List: This database identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with USTs having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration. The source is the California Environmental Protection Agency /Office of Emergency Information. A review of the Cortese list, as provided by ED.R, revealed one Cortese case within a one mile radius of the Property: a former Ford Aerospace facility located east of the Property, across Jamboree. The Ford facility (aka: Loral Aeronotronic) was included in the Cortese list due to former leaking underground storage tanks discovered in 1991. The case was identified as "soil only" and was granted regulatory closure in 1996. As such, the former Ford Aerospace/Loral Aeronotronic site is not an issue of environmental concern to the subject Property. Proposition 65 (Notify 65): contains facility notifications about any release which could impact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. No cases were identified in the Notify 65 database within a one -mile search distance of the subject. Toxic Pits: identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. No Toxic Pit cases were identified within a one -mile search distance of the subject Property. Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites (SWF/LF): records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. The data comes from the Integrated Waste Management Board's (IWMB) Solid Waste Information System (SWIS) database. No facilities were identified on the SWF/LF list within a V2-mile search distance of the subject Property. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar vista, Newport Beach, CA - 9 Waste Management Unit Database (WMUDS /SWAT): is composed of a number of databases and is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. No WMUDS /SWAT cases were identified within a' /2 -mile search distance of the subject Property. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) list: This is a list that compiles the State Water Resources Control Boatel (SWRCB) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) identified facilities that have had unauthorized releases from underground storage tanks (USTs) and non -tank spills in the area. Four LUST sites were listed within a '/z-mile search distance of the subject Property, however, two are duplicate addresses, netting two actual LUST sites. As discussed earlier in the Cortese paragraph above, the Ford Aerospace/Loral Aeronotronic site, case was "soils only" contamination and the case was granted regulatory closure in 1996. In the second LUST listing, a Unocal Station located approximately '/2 mile north of the Property, groundwater was reportedly affected from leaking underground storage tanks. The Unocal site, however, was granted regulatory closure in 1998 after presumably cleaning up any contamination. Since each of the aforementioned LUST sites have been given regulatory closure, neither are an issue of environmental concern to the subject Property. Underground Storage Tanks (UST): is a list of registered underground storage tanks. No sites operating USTs were identified in the EDR report within '/a mile of the Property. California Bond Expenditure Plan (CA -BEP): Department of Health Services developed a site - specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. No CA -BEP cases were identified within a one -mile search distance of the subject Property. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 10 Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP): This database contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have requested that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities. There are no VCP cases identified within %z mile of the subject Property. Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land (INDIAN UST): This database is a list of registered underground storage tanks on Indian Land. No sites were identified in the Indian UST database within %4 mile of the Property. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land (INDIAN LUST): This is a list that compiles the EPA identified Indian LUST sites within Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada. No Indian LUST sites were identified within %2 mile of the subject Property. California Facility Inventory Database (CA -FID UST): contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. No sites are listed in the CA -FID database within a 'l4 mile search distance of the subject Property: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database (MIST UST): is a historical listing of UST sites provided by the State Water Resources Control. Board. No sites are listed in the HIST UST within a Y4 mile search distance from the subject Property. The aforementioned databases and search distances are required by Federal and State ASTM standards. Other supplemental database information is available in the full environmental disclosure report provided in Appendix B. 5.4 Property History/Land Use Review Aerial photographs of the Property and vicinity were reviewed in order to ascertain historical land uses that may have been responsible for the generation /or storage of THE REYNOLDS GROtJP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 11 potentially hazardous materials. Figure 4 includes representative aerial photograph reprints provided by EDR from 1927 to 2002 and Appendix C lists the specific- photographs reviewed at Continental Aerial Photo, Inc., in Los Alamitos, Calfornia. Photographs were available for review at Continental from 1952 to 1999. The photographs available from EDR and Continental Aerial are discussed below in at least 5 -year intervals as required by ASTM Standard E1527 -00, and more frequently when notable changes were observed. Aerial Photography Collection: 1927 and 1938 LEDR -see Figure 4) The subject Property and entire area are undeveloped land. Upper Newport Bay is visible west of the Property. 1947 and 1953 (EDR - see Figure 4) November 18, 1952 (Continental Aerial) The Property and adjacent sites remain vacant, as does most of the area. One small and one very large man -made clearing appear west and northwest of the Property, respectively. In the Continental photo, MacArthur Boulevard has been developed east of the Property and small patches of residential housing are visible north of the Property, north of Upper Newport Bay, and south of the Property near the Pacific Coast. March 25. 1959 (Continental Aerial) There are no visible changes to the subject Property or adjacent sites. The area remains primarily undeveloped land, except two new commercial (large) buildings east of the Property, east of newly developed Jamboree Road. Eastbluff Drive, adjacent north of the Property appears as a dirt road. THF.REYNOLDSGROUP w St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA .. 12 March 1. 1967 (Continental Aerial) 1968 (EDR — see Figure 4) The subject Property has been developed with one building at its south side and a small parking lot west of the building. Significant development has taken place in the entire area, including adjacent sites. A very large residential housing tract exists north of the Property, north of Eastbluff, Corona Del Mar High School now appears northwest of the Property; north of Mar Vista, Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church and School is present west of the Property, across Domingo Drive, and apartments are under construction adjacent south of the Property. Major residential development has occurred in the areas north and west of the Property, while areas east and south of the Property remain fairly undeveloped except the two large commercial buildings east of the Property, east of Jamboree (former Ford Aerospace facility). January 31, 1970 (Continential Aerial) The parking lot at the subject Property has been extended to the north. Only one building still exists at the south side of the Property. Residential housing in areas north of the Property continues to increase. October 29, 1973 (Continental Aerial) January 13, 1975 (Continental Aerial) December 28, 1976 (Continental Aerial) 1977 WDR — see Figure 4) No changes are visible at the subject Property or adjacent sites, except that construction has now been completed at the adjacent south apartment complex. Overall, residential housing development continues. A new tract and a new school appear approximately % mile northwest of the Property. Adjacent southeast of the Property, at the southeast corner of Jamboree and Ford Road, a large apartment complex has been developed. THE.REYNOLAS CROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach; CA 13 December 10, 1978 (Continental Aerial) February 26,3 980 (Continental Aerial) JanLiary 31, 1981 (Continental Aerial) ME 1.8, 1983 (Continental Aerial) The north building at the subject Property has been developed (1978 photo) and. the Property now appears much like today with two buildings, a large parking lot and landscape. Areas at the northeast corner of Jamboree and Ford Road, have been cleared and graded for development (1981 photo). January 9, 1987 (Continental Aerial) 1989 (EM - see Fig_tue 4) February 2, 1993 (Continental Aerial) 1994 (EDR - see Figure 4) b-11-um 28, 1995 (Continental Aerial There are no visible changes to the subject Property or adjacent sites. A large residential tract has been developed at the northeast corner of Jamboree and Ford Road. Fashion Island Shopping Center, approximately one mile south of the site appears to be undergoing expansion (1993 photo). All else appears generally unchanged. $-eptember 11 1997 (,Continental Aerial) The subject Property and adjacent sites appear the same. The two commercial buildings that once existed near the northeast corner of Jamboree and Ford Road are gone and the area is graded for development. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 14 February 24, 1999 (Continental Aerial) 2002 (EDR —see Figure 4) There are no visible changes to the subject Property or adjacent sites. The immediate vicinity and general area appear much like today. The Property exists with two buildings, a parking lot and landscape. The vicinity can be characterized as predominantly residential in all directions, except for Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church and School, adjacent west of the Property and Corona Del Mar High School, adjacent northwest of the Property. Upper Newport Bay occupies large areas approximately 1/z mile west and two miles north of the Property. Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard and the Foothill Transportation Corridor, all located east of the Property, are major thoroughfares in the area. Sanborn Mans No Sanborn Map coverage exists for the subject Property. A printout showing no coverage is included in Appendix D of this report. City Directory Search The subject Property first appears in the City Directory provided by EDR in 1975 as "St. Mark Presbyterian Church" and "UCI Laboratory Pre- School ". Its listing as a church and preschool continue through the most recent date of 2002. In addition to Our Lady Queen of Angels Catholic Church and Corona Del Mar high School, listings for surrounding street addresses are predominantly residential names with only a few businesses listed such as an insurance company, an interior design firm, and a chemical awareness training company. None of the listings in the City Directory search were reason for environmental concern to the subject Property. THE REYNOLDS GROUP SL Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 15 A copy of the complete City Directory as provided by EDR is included as Appendix D of this report. Building Department Records Review A representative of The Reynolds Group visited the City of Newport Beach Building Department on April 21, 2005, to request and review records for the subject Property. Records on file were minimal dating from 1978 to 1996 and included tenant improvements, heating and air, plumbing, electrical, roofing and signage. The Property owner identified on all permits was St. Mark Presbyterian Church. None of the City of Newport Beach Building Department records reviewed indicated reason for environmental concern. 5.5 Synopsis of Previous Environmental Investigations No known previous environmental investigations have been performed at the Property 5.6 Interviews A representative of The Reynolds Croup interviewed Pastor Gary Collins, Pastor at St Mark's for approximately 15 years, and Mr. Bob Smith, St. Mark's Business Manager, during the Property inspection on April 21, 2005. Both gentlemen confirmed that no 1 environmentally hazardous operations took place on the Property, past or present, that no previous environmental investigations had been performed at the Property, and that St. Mark's was the only occupant since the Property was first developed in 1961. Mr. Smith further stated that refuse disposal for the Property is handled by Rainbow Disposal, and that water and sewer services are provided through the City of Newport Beach. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 16 Nothing discussed during the interviews indicated cause for environmental concern at the subject Property. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS & OPINIONS TRG has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with ASTM Practice E 1527 at the Property .located at 2100 Mar Vista Drive in Newport Beach, California. The investigation revealed no evidence of recognized environmental concerns (RECs) in connection with the Property or in the immediate vicinity of the Property. It is the opinion of The Reynolds Group that no further environmental investigation is necessary at this time. 7.0 LIMITATIONS The conclusions and recommendations presented above are based upon the scope of work outlined in the above report. Although The Reynolds Group believes they are not an issue of concern at the subject Property, evaluation of asbestos - containing materials, radon, lead -based paint, lead in drinking water and wetlands were not included in the scope of services. The Reynolds Group makes no warranties or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of information obtained from, or compiled by others. It is possible that information exists beyond the scope of this investigation. Also, changes in Property use may have occurred sometime in the past due to variations in rainfall, temperature, water usage, economic, agricultural or other factors. Additional information not found or available to The Reynolds Group at the time of report writing may result in a modification of the conclusions and recommendations presented. This report is not a legal opinion. THE REYNOLDS GROUP ,St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 17 8.0 PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS All work associated with this Environmental Site Assessment was performed by or under the direct supervision of F. Edward Reynolds, Jr. Mr. Reynolds has worked in the environmental industry for more than 20 years and holds several credentials including those of a California Registered Environmental Assessor (No. 02955) and California Registered Civil Engineer (No. 38677). The Reynolds Group was established in 1989 and provides environmental consulting and contracting services. Rosanne Fischer has worked in the environmental industry for more than 12 years. Ms. Fischer is a California Registered Environmental Assessor (No. 07730 - Expires 6130105) and performs numerous Phase I Environmental Site Assessments each year. _ THE REYNOLDS GROUP a C91fornia corporation by: . Edward Reynolds, r. aJifomia Registered Ci 1 Engineer #39 REA I #02955 Rosanne Fischer, REA I #07730 Project Manager THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA IB 9.0 REFERENCES 1. Thomas Guide, Orange County Street Guide & Directory, 2004. 2. Southern California Geology Field Guide Series, Robert Sharp, 1975. 3. Environmental Data Resources, Millford, Connecticut. 4. Continental Aerial Photo, Los Alamitos, California. 5. City of Newport Beach Building Department. THE REYNOLDS GROUP St. Mark Presbyterian Church Property, 2100 Mar Vista, Newport Beach, CA 19 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES CORONA DEL MAR45�[ HIGH SCHOOL FvRly� SINGLE FAMILY HOMES q 4 �Q cxusrn oprim WET0.A.I mxwg PAWINO d ; mum ml. OUR LADY QUEEN OF Fd 0r MULTI-TENANT ANGELS CHURCH L �4' RESIDENTIAL 0 O rurovwno �� 1Q tttsss"��� O OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS SCHOOL MULTI- TENANT 1� ) RESIDENTIAL NOT TO SCALE Re Ne St. Mark Prosbyte =ChLMe 2100 Ma Vine Dsivc PLOTPLANANUAREA M Note: Ncwport Bcecfi, CA M $- Propccty Line P"p or NoiwNP: 5T25 FIGURE 2 !%f �P TM Reynolds Cmw p Wm Apri12005 RDR Historical Topographic Map Report OLQA 2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Inquiry Number: 1399626.4 April 14, 2005 r Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1- 800 - 352 -0050 Fax: 1- 800 - 231 -6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com FIGURE 3 EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property, and its surrounding area, resulting from past activities. ASTM E 1527.00, Section 7.3 on Historical Use information, identifies the prior use requirements for a Phase I environmental site assessment. The ASTM standard requires a review of reasonably ascertainable standard historical sources. Reasonably ascertainable is defined as information that is publicly available, obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost constraints, and practically reviewable. To meet the prior use requirements of ASTM E 1527 -00, Section 7.3.4, the following standard historical sources may be used: aerial photographs, city directories, fire insurance maps, topographic maps, property tax files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole historical source consulted), building department records, or zoning/and use records. ASTM E 1527 -00 requires 'All obvious uses of the property shall be identified from the present, back to the property's obvious first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. This task requires reviewing only as many of the standard historical sources as are necessary, and that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful. "(ASTM E 1527 -00, Section 7.3.2 page 12.) EDR's Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of available public and private color historical topographic map collections. Topographic Maps A topographic map (topo) is a Dolor coded line- and - symbol representation of natural and selected artificial features plotted to a scale. Topos show the shape, elevation, and development of the terrain in precise detail by using contour lines and color coded symbols. Many features are shown by lines that may be straight, curved, solid, dashed, dotted, or in any combination. The colors of the lines usually Indicate similar classes of information. For example, topographic contours (brown); lakes, streams, irrigation ditches, etc. (blue); land grids and important roads (red); secondary roads and trails, railroads, boundaries, etc. (black); and features that have been updated using aerial photography, but not field verified, such as disturbed land areas (e.g., gravel pits) and newly developed water bodies (purple). For more than a century, the USGS has been creating and revising topographic maps for the entire country at a variety of scales. There are about 60,000 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) produced topo maps covering the United States. Each map covers a specific quadrangle (quad) defined as a four -sided area bounded by latitude and longitude. Historical topographic maps are a valuable historical resource for documenting the prior use of a property and its surrounding area, and due to their frequent availability can be particularly helpful when other standard historical sources (such as city directories, fire insurance maps, Or aerial photographs) are not reasonably ascertainable. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain Information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be conckided from this Report that coverage Information lof the target and surrounding properties does not exist atom other sourest. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNTPAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS ". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any properly. Only a Phase I Enviroomerdal Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the Information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright (D 2005 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved Reproduction in any media or format, in whole Or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or gs affiliates, is prohibited wilhout prior written permission. EDR and its logos (Including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 TARGET QUAD: NEWPORTBEACH PHOTOREVISED: 1965 -1981 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:24,000 N ^ EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 TARGET QUAD: NEWPORTBEACH PHOTOREVISED: 1965-1972 Series: 7b' Scale: 1:24,000 i .r I I AS. ,6�, Y 372 r S 37' & VT "Vila 3.1 ey, f - 377A N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 TARGET QUAD: NEW PORTBEACH YEAR: 1965 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:24,000 rVWA !�A, .... .. . ....... .. w 4t ®r o -7 V, Marrows A lit- - 713, s . . . . . . . . . . . -A 55 R.10W. U7*52-S N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 TARGET QUAD: NEW PORTBEACH YEAR: 1935 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:31.680 1I s SY.• :rarin. . c i^ A6a R N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 TARGET QUAD: CORONA YEAR: 1902 Series: 30' Scale: 1:125,000 N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 TARGET QUAD: SANTAANA YEAR: 1901 Series: 15' Scale: 1:62,500 V, Mir Wei 4*4' all, x, Iq 49,�& r 3126 "V aw 1 416 f 40 -.wely F,y 4 1*,#* IF J 11 'i it elu RE of v g rte: .1 It Salt a. I Fff O T :�A if AC M IT V. CA 16 �!, 1\4 7 j 1, "14W V. )44 �4 it 41 "go 'Kvlj , - S-�dd Cree k .1 SPILL WAY EL AY EL U 1721 -7. N V, sInnM FFFT '4?3 NA EDR INQUIRY# 1399626,4 ADJOINING QUAD: TUSTIN PHOTOREVISED: 1965-1981 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:24,000 All 2. � y el All r ' i' am 64 14 OVt ♦ y' .;.y x /r a n a�iNn .�n snn a� anin„. ! •,� I h'UM O�, E ■S9 Z wiz, n RaY w ( bpn'Club ra 'asap° �, • / p' �Seq t�� .Ci$ Y+afeF`�+. i, hry 4Arrne Ufa r is i N •'+ x: "[Snk i fgVlWR as :3 a 4 \ � 22 " � � ;' � � / "• �Fe volt ..:Z sl'LLWAV ELit_'yY� •i \ v N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 ADJOINING QUAD: TUSTIN PHOTOREVISED: 1965 -1972 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:24,000 :1 f / ♦ S 9 . r ai, i /" ati � v ; /14I1 f �„l' / �.. •. �;y � � ��gai°d °�# �I v _ d t 40 :11 tiF� 3126 n e`�l iiport tt 40' - -Wei. �q. AA; x m R < 7 ofTx'G!�'PON+�1$ - j/ �.I"DRIVE IVA e I '�,r �� sue, rF'�� >Y"'^ °�� `,,�•,� /�. 3124 tp� s II, o It arr� i ; i , �' 313 7 LAVlla j. fat jVa[e�{(•�''' OR'. 1 Y.. 122 Res4mr Y ! � 1'i /� / n � d'"ti � � • � SPILLWAY 7v1 I� �i r'^u�..l�^- I �•: F) � P ( (" i k " i fC� �+. Po � � -�`�� j f � "'+� � x ��• f j t�c 11 e��.. ,. is Mr m rai �r �,,, ��� . -� �.' o �.�d.. . --.... •. � t (- . N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 ADJOINING QUAD: TUSTIN YEAR: 1965 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:24,000 A v ORANGE Aill 4(Y is u.- su. -7�rx San joequm wwo lm- Son Jo v u lo-f 1\N' ' 40, "InW91 Ilk V.. JJ 1. f ,ET :0 !4 rons. 9 M-1 . 4,1 gexerua+ x .... .... . ... N ^ E - DR INCUIRY# 1399626.4 ADJoiNING QUAD: TUSTIN YEAR: 1948 Series: 7.5 Scale., 124,OW .. ... . ...... �.... v ✓�99 :' I Jf a '� f... L 10 AN 0 y rid '�;, >" I i:' a• / %°dr. S ` NC � Z � . • ✓ 1 \ 1 ` 'igyYRiT � ..... \r., -.•^t° � � .1� -.. �Q � �\I � l� �/ y�ON^l ifT tP f �.1 '•ir r 4 1 e ��,\ f x .i � -:'\. ✓ �'"-� ti, 3f�C - 1. i 'n'" N A EDR INQUIRY# 1399626.4 ADJOINING QUAD: TUSTIN YEAR: 1935 Series: 7.5' Scale: 1:31,680 The EDR- Aerial Photography Print Service OLQA 2100 Mar. Vista. Drive Newport Beach; GA 92660 April 15,2005 Inquiry Number: 1399626 -5 V Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard In Environmental. Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1- 800 -352 -0050 Fax: 1- 800 - 231 -6802 FIGUREE 4 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Aerial Photography Print Service Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) Aerial Photography Print Service is a screening tool designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past. activities. AS'M E 1527 -00, Section 7.3 on Historical Use information, identifies the prior use requirements for a Phase I environmental site assessment. The ASTM standard requires a review of reasonably ascertainable standard hWorical sources. Reasonably ascertainable means information that is publicly available, obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost constraints, and practically reviewable. To meet the prior use requirements of ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.3.4, the following standard historical sources may be used: aerial photographs; fire insurance maps, property tax files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole historical source consulted), topographic maps, city directories, building department records, or zoningdand use records. ASTM E 1527 -00 requires "All obvious uses of the property shall be identified from the present, back to the property's obvious first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever .is earlier. This task requires reviewing only as many of the standard historical' sources as are necessary, and that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful." (ASTIM E. 1527 =00, Section 7.3.2, page 12.) Aerial Photographs When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with ibis report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without.permiWon from EDR For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Aerial photographs area valuable historical resource for docurnenting past land use and can be particularly helpful whets other historical sources (such as city directories or fine insurance maps) are not reasonably ascertainable. The EDR Aerial Photograph Print Service includes a search of local aerial photograph collections flown by public and private agencies. EDR's professional field -based researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs at ten year intervals. ' Please call . Enviromri@ntal Data Resources,; Inc. Nationwide Customer Service. at 1- 300 - 352 -0050 (Iiam -8pm ET) with questions or comments about your report. Thank you for your business? Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice Copyngb 2DO5 by iinvimmnental Data Resources. Inc. Atl rights reserved. Reproducuun in my mediabr tornp4 in whoh:Orin part, of any fepon or MV of F rvMrm=fttatr)ata Resaurcc>. inc. 9r itS dMimus, is prohibited without prior wdaen permission. are tr- demarlotor rsvkm nmuu pata Resources: Inc. or im uffiliams. MI odt r tidemarks I- IP 'r� 5 AN h- 1 APPENDIX A PHOTOGRAPHS OF PROPERTY «� \� ) w J� .. �- z rtzC J7f::1P Y '8nl. n n q. n 4 " ifs Y,rtt� "�tE�p4 rt• ik! � _ R ec ,. Y. ADMINISMTIVF OFFYCES NEAR CJUNTER OF PROPERTV. 3s VIM z A�Q g In it I �' F Y . , .MR A .S ✓� s �'Sl�y'r' �E` �; 9r. �a� } mX F 'F.Ri ryi'3�Rrr...H#SR t 3tY.` . 7f - � av S. PLAYGROUND AT SOUTH:SIDE OF PRESCHOOL BUILDING. 6. PARKING LOT AT SOUTH SIDE OF PROPERTY. St. Mark Presbyterian Church, Newport Beach, CA S.: :. _� ^�'. :' ... adl DISCLOSURE REPORT i i i I , i The EDR Radius Map w.ith.GeoCheek® OLQA 2190 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 Inquiry Number: 1399626.,2s April 13, 2005 R'" Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service I Telephone: 1-800 -352 -0050 Fax: 1- 800 -231 -6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ----------------------- ---- ---------------- ---- - -- - -- ES1 Overview Map ----------------------------------------------------------- 2 DetailMap-- -- --- ----- ----- -- --- --- -- - --- — --- --- -- --- -=-- -- -- ---- -- --- 3 Map Findings Summary ----------------- -- --- ------ --- ----- ---- -- - -- - -- d MapFindings ------------------------------------------------------------ B EAR Proprietary Historical Map Findings- - - - - - -------------------------- - - - - -. 11 OrphanSummary- ------ ----------- --- --- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------- 12 Government RecordsSearchedi DataCurencyTracking -------------------- - - - - -- GRA GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendurn- ----------------------------------- - -- - -. A -1 Ph IcalSettingSourceSummary ------------ --------- -- -------- ------ - -- --- A•2 Physical Setting Source Map----------------- -------- ---- ----- --- ---- -- - - -- A -7 Physical Setting Source Map Findings ----------------------------------------- A-$ Physical Setting Source Records Searched ------------------------------------ A -10 Thank you for your business. Please, contact EDR at 1 -800- 352 -0450 with any questions or comments. i ;14 JWOC me l Extani1 � - hi -�st1 Y A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527 -00. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 2100 MAR VISTA DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 COORDINATES Latitude (North): Longitude (Westj. Universal Tranven UTM X (Meters): UTM Y (Meters): Elevation: 31634500 - 33.38' 4.2" 117.850900 -.117'52'51.20 ;e Mercator. Zone 11 418301.0 3721786.0 112 ft. above sea level USGS.TOPOGRAPHIC MAPASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY Target Property: 33117-F$ NEWPORT BEACH (DIGITAL), CA Source: USGS T.5 min quad Index TARGET PROPERTY. SEARCH RESULTS' The target property was not fisted in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( `reasonably ascertainable ";government records either on the target property or Within the ASTM E 11527 -00 search radios. around the target property -for the following databases; FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL ......................... National PrioAty List Proposed NPL ___ ----------- Proposed National Priority List Sites CERCLIS. _._ _ __ ___ _ _ _ _ __ Comprehensive EnvironmentatResponse, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC<NERAP --------------- CERCI:IS No Further Remedial Action Planned CORRACTS____ ___ ___ ____ _ __ Corrective Action Report RCRA- TSDF ------- _...... ___ .Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information RCRA-LQCx ----------------- Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information RCRA- $46------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information ERNS ------------------------- F nergenoyResponse Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD AWP ------------ _..------- . Annual.Workplan Sites TC13e9626.2s .EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 'I y� /+ EXECU'17Y'E' iIy�7Y/iirS i t: rt ` sY. Cal•S" "rtes_____ ---------- _---- Calsites Database CHMtRS--------------------- California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Notify 65_ . _ __ _ _ _. _ __ _ _ _. --- . Proposition 66 Records Toxic Pits----- _ -------------- Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites SWFILF---------------------- Solid Waste Information System WMUDS /SWAT______________ Waste Management Unit Database CA BOND EXP_ PLAN ------- Bond Expenditure Plan UST ------ _------------------- List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities VCP________________________ Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN UST __ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land INDIAN LUST_--------------- Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CA FID UST-------- -_ _ _ _ __. Facility Inventory Database HIST UST-------------------- Hazardous substance Storage Container Database FEDERAL Awm supptrmENTAL CONSENT _____ ___ ___ ____ ___ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD_____ ____________________ Records Of Decision Delisted NPL --- ------------ National Priority List Deletions FINDS ------ __________------- . Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report HMIRS----------------------- Hazardous Materials Inforhnation Reporting System MLTS ----------------- -_ _ _ _ _ Material. Licensing Tracking System MINES_______________ ________ Mines Master index File NPL Liens __________________ Federal Superfund Liens PADS__ _ ----------- --_ __ _ __ PCB Activity Database.System UMTRiL___ ----------- _------ Uranium Mdl Tailings Sikes ODL------------------------- Open Dump Inventory FUDS --- -- -- ----- --- --- --- ---.Former y Used Defense Sites DOD- --- --`------------------ Department of Defense Sites INDIAN RESERV------------- Indian Reservations RAATS---------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TRIS_ ________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA._ ------ _ --------------- Toxic Substances Control Act SSTS_______ ____ ___ __ ______ __ Section 7 Tracking.Systema FITS INSP____ __ __ __ --- FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking system - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide. Pungicide, . Rodenticide Adt)[TSCA (fo7jc8ubstances Control Act) STATE. OR LOCAL AM SUPPLEMENTAL AST_ „_____ ___ ------------ _ —Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities CLEANERS_ ___ ___ ___ __ _____ Cleaner Facilities CAWDS___ ------ __ __ Waste Discharge System DEED _ ___ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ _ ____ Deed Restricwn Listing SCFL__--_, ------- --,-_ —,__ School Property Evaluation Program REF_ _ __ __ _____ __ _,_ _ _ _ __ _ ___ _.'Unconfirmetl Properties Referred to Another Agency WIP-------------------------- Well In lbstigattort Program Case List EMI------ ": --, ---------------- Emissions Inventory hate NFA_ ------------ __ ------ __ No Further Action Determination NFE. _ _ _ ___ _ _ __--------------- Properties Needing Further Evaluation CA SLIC___ ____-------------- Statewide. SUC Cases HAZNET-------------- __ _ _ __ _ Facility and Manifest Data Orange Co. Industrial Site__ List:of Industrial Site Cleanups BROWNFIELD$ DATABASE$ US BROWNFIELDS ----------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites TCISS$626.2s EXECUTNE SUMMARY 2 : t0 _ f{r{ry� Np�� US INST CONTROL... _ _.. _ _. Sites with Institutional Controls VCP ------------------------- Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES See the EDR Proprietary Historical Database Section for details SURROUNDING SITES; .SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher men the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower men the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed, Sites listed In bold Rallos are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites we not considered in the foregoing analysis. STATE ASTM STANDARD CORTESE: This database Identifies public drinking water wells with detectable levels of contamination, hazardous substance sites selected for remedial action, sites with known toxic material Identified through the abandoned site assessment program, sites with LISTS having a reportable release and all solid waste disposal facilities from which there is known migration_ The source is the California Environmental Protection AgencylOffice of Emergency Information. A review of the Cortese list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 Cortese site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. EquaitHigherrElevation Address Dist I Div_ Map ID Page FORD AEROSPACE CORP. BLD 1 FORD` 114.112ESE 4 8 LUST,. The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reporfs.contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control . Board Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by -EDR, and dated 0111012005 has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles.of the target property. Equal /Higher Elevation Address_ Dist 1 Dir Map ID Page' LORAL AERONOTRONIC 1FORDRD - -1/4 -112 ESE 3 8 FORD AEROSPACE CORP. BLD 1 FORD 114 - 112ESE 4 8 Lower Elevation Address A DistI Dir Map ID -Page UNOCAL #5762 530 VISTA DEL SOL 114.412NE Al 6 UNOCAL #5762 550 VISTA DEL SOL - 114 - 112.NE A2 8 TC1389826.2s EXECUTIVE WIMAARY 3 i EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES .See the EDR Praprietary Historical Database Section for details pwt Y' TC13996282S EMCUTIVE$UMMAFZYC y � So Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name Database(s) LORAL AEROSPACE AERONUTRONIC PADS, FINDS, RCRA -LOG, RCRA -TSDF, CORRACTS, CERC -NFRAP UNOCAL #5762 LUST, Cortese NEWPORT TERRACELF SWFILF COYOTE CANYON SANITARY LANDFILL SWFILF 'MOBIL #98 -HND UST WARD RANCH HIST UST TEXACO HIST UST TC13M26.26 EXECUTIVESUMMARYS OVERVIEW MAP - 1399626.2s - The Reynolds Group : Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property + Sites at elevations loner Dian the target property A Coal Gasification Sites National Priority List Site& Landfill Sites Dept. Defense Sites TARGET PROPERTY: QLQA ADDRESS: 2100 Mar Vista Drive CITYISTATE /ZIP; Newport Beach GA 92660 LAT/LONG: 3a63451117,8809 UMian Reservafwns rNA ;'r Areasol Concern .f Oil 8 Gas: pipelines 100-Year flood Zone 500 -year flood zone Federal Wetlands ER: The Reynolds Group T: Rosanne Fischer N: 1309625.2s April 13, 2005 4:19 p a arias at eleva0ons nlgner Ulan W equal to the target property `^ Indian Reservations BlA Areas.olconcem fi s Site" elevations lower than u oil &Gaspipelines do lGasiipationS 'Ciao 100 -year flood zone tip" 1 Gasification Silas �. 5M- yesrfleodzone i P Cleaners; lane See, the EDR P ary Hstofical n Sea the EDRPtaptietary Fdstorscal Map PlrMings Peden! Wetlands C Sensitive RecepthTs National Priority List sites Landfill Sites . T In. De Defense Srtes TARGET PROPERTY: OLOA CUSTOMfEA: The Reynolds Group ADDRESS: 2100 Agar Vista Drive CONTACT: her Rosanne Fischer Newport Beach CA 92660 INQUIRY 8: 13996262s LATILONG: 33.6345! 117:8809 DATE: April 13, 2005 4:20 pm . i }t. J IIII`!P FEfEiY�liF4}`,kA`�illAl'l'f r �1 t I Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Mites) c 118 VS - 114 114-1/2 112 -1 > 1 Plotted FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 6 NR 0 I CERCLIS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ! CERC -NFRAP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 CORRACTS 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRA TSD 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RCRA Lg. Ouan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRA SM. Ouan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ERNS. TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 i j STATE ASTM STANDARD AWP 1.000 0 0 0 6 NR 0 Cat -Sites 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CHMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 Cortese 0.500 0 0 1. MR NR 1 Notify 65 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR . 0 Toxic Pits 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 State Landfill 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 WMUDSISWAT 0:500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 LUST 0.500 0 0 4 NR NR 4 CA Bond Exp. Plan 1.0,00 0 0 0 0 NR 0 UST 0.260 0 0 NR NR NR .. 0 VCP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 7 INDIAN UST 0:250 0 0 MR NR NR' 0 INDIAN LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 CA FID UST 0250 6 0 NR NR NR 0 HIST UST 0250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL i CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR. 0 ROD 1.000 0 0 0 0 MR Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 FINDS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 HMIRS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MILTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MINES 0.260 0 0 MR NR NR 0 NPL Liens TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR' NR 0 UMTRA 0:500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 ODi 0.500 0 0 0 NR' NR 0 1 FUDS 1.000 0 0 '0 0 NR 0' DOD 1.000 '0 0 0 0 NR 0 INDIAN RESERV 1.006 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RAATS TP 'NR NR NR NR NR 0 ' TRIS TP NR NR NR' 'NR NR 0 TC13996262a Page 4 � Search NR x� F*- 0 141 &P113C>�� TP NR Target Distance TP NR SCH 0.250 0 Total STATE. OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST Search NR CLEANERS 0.250 0 CA WDS TP NR Target Distance TP NR SCH 0.250 0 Total Database Property (Miles) < 118 118-114 114-1.12 V2 - 1 > 1 Platted TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 SSTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FTTS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE. OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST TP NR CLEANERS 0.250 0 CA WDS TP NR DEED TP NR SCH 0.250 0 REF 0:250 0 WIP 0.250 Q EMI TP NR NFA 0.250 0 NFE 0.250 0 SLIC 0.500 0 HAZNET TP NR Orange Co. Industrial Site TP NR EORPROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES 0 0 Gas Stations/Dry' Cleaners 0.250. 0 Coal Gas 1.000 '0 BRO WNFIELDS. DATABASES NR NR US.BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 US INST CONTROL 0.500 0 VCP 0.500 0 NOTES: See the EDR Proprietary Historical Database Section for details TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NR NR, NR. NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0 0 NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 T01399626.2s Page 5 Map 10 r �..: MAP FINDINGS Direction Distance Distance (k) Elevation Site All UNOCAL#8T62 NE 550 VISTA DEL SOL iwim NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9266o 2301 fL Site t of 2 in cluster A Relative: Lower Stale LU5T: Cross Street: Not reported Actual: Qty Leaked: 0 106 R Case Number 0830019657 Reg Board: 8 ChemlcaF Not reported Land Agency:. Local Agency Local Agency: 30000L Case Type: Oltrer ground water affected Status: Case Closed Review Date: Not reported Workplan: NM reported PaUution Cher: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Monitorkrg: Not reported Close Date: 1998 -03- 1900:00:00 Release Date: Not reported Cleanup Furl ld.: Not reported Discover Onto: Not reported Enforcement .Dt: Not reported EnfType: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Funding: Not reported Staff Initials: JK How Discovered: Tank Closure How Stopped: Close Tank Interim: Not reported Leek Cause: Unknown Leak. Source: Unknown' INTSE Oats,: Hot reported Max MTBE GW c .Nat reported MTSE Tested: Not Required to be Tested. Priority: Not reported Local Case #: Not reported' Ber"cia: MUN Staff: NOM GIN QuallBer: Not reported Max MTBE Soil : Not reported Soil Qua00er: Not reported Hydr Basin #: Not reported Operetor: Not reported Ovenu6itt Prgm: LUST Review Date: Not reported Stop Date': Not reported Work Suspended.Not reported Responsible PartyGERRY MACH3, SKI RP Address: 3790 VIA DE LA VALLE SIM TE 30 Global Id: 70805901468 Org Name: Not reported Contact Person: Not reported MTBE Conc: 6 Me Fuel: 0 Water System Name: OUTPOST, THE .EDR ID Number Ostabase(s) EPA 10 Number Confirm Leak: Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Remed Plan: Not reported LUST 0003982032 UST NIA TC1399626.26 Page 6 Map ID Diretiton Distance Distance (rt.) Elevation Siie UNOCAL #5762 (Continued) MAP.FINDINGS' Well Name: Not reported Distance To Lust. 0 Waste Discharge Global ID: W0608900228 Waste Diseh Assigned Name: 4500228.001GEN Summary: 11114 EDR;12/12WP; MTBE DATE 4120/98. LUST Region 8: Region; 8 Regional Board: 08 . Local Case Num: 91UT137 Facility Status: Case Closed Stan. NOM Faciflry Contact Not reported Lead Agency: Local Agency Local Agency: 3W00L Qty Leaked: 0 County: Orange Cleanup Fund Id: Not reported Review Date. Not reported Wokplan: Not reported Pollution Cher: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Close Date: 311611998 Discover Date : 11112/1991 Enforcement Dt: Not reported EnFType: Not reported Enter Date: Not reported Funding: Not reported Stab Initials; JK How Discovered: Tank Cosure How Stopped: Close Tank Interim: Not reported LaULon: 33.63593611- 117.876406 Leak Cause: Unknown Leak source: Unknown Beneficial: MUN MTBE Date: Not reported MTBE Tested: NRQ Max MTBE GW : Not reported GW Qualities: Not reported Max MTBE W: Not reported Soil Qualifies : Not reported Hydr Basin #i Not reported Oversight Prgm : LUST Global ID: 10605901468 Organrzallon Name: Not reported Priority : Not reported Work Suspended Not reported MTBE Class: Case Type: D How Stopped Date: 9/919999 MTBE Concentration: 0 ' MTBE Fuel:. 0 Case Nurroer. 08300196ST Substance: 12035,800561 Start. NOM Summary: Not reported Cross Street:' Confirm Leak Prelim Assess: RernadPlan: Monitoriil9: Database(s) Not reported Not*repoded. Not reported Not reported Not reported EDR 10 Number EPA ID Number ti9039828i2 TC1399826.2s Page 7 Map ID Direction Distance Distance (ft) Elevation Site A2 NE 11*112 2301 11. Relative: Lower ActuaE to$ ft. 8 ESE 114.112 2385 ft. Relative: Higher Actual: 134 ft. 4 ESE' 114112 2591 t. Relative: Higher Actual: 149: It UNOCAL 65762 (Continued) State UST: Facility 10: 2190 Total Tanks: 1 .Region: STATE Local Agency: 30000 UNOCAL 65762 560 VISTA DEL SOL NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92650 MAP FINDING`,.a' EDR ID Number Datebase(s) EPA ID Number Site 2 of 2 in cluster A. LUST Region OR: DIUT073 Facility Id: 91UT137 Record ID: ROODUS62 Region: ORANGE Case Type: Other Ground Water Date Closed: 03/16/1998 Current Status: 8 Released Substance: GaWhie-Automotive (motor gasoline and additives), landed &unleaded Facility Id: 91UT137 Record 10: R00002662 Region: ORANGE Case Type: Other Ground Water Data Closed: 0311611988 Current Status: 9 Released Substance : Waste oiVUftd'd9 LORAL AERONOTRONIC 1 FORD RD NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 0003962032 LUST $106176654 NIA LUST 5102432739 NIA LUST "Im OR: Facility ld: DIUT073 Record 10: ROM2678 Region: ORANGE Case Type: Soil Only Date Closed: 1211OM996 Current Status; 8 RalesndSubstance: Gasoline- Autonative,(motor gasoline and additives), leaded unleaded FORD AEROSPACE CORP. BLO LUST $101299867 '1 FCRI) Cortese NIA NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 Orange Co, Industrial SRO LUST Region 8: Region: 8 Cross Sheet: MACARTHUR Regional Board: 08 Local Case Num: 9510008 Facility Status: Pollution Characterrzailon Staff. CAB Facility Contact: Not reported Lead Agency. Local Agency Local Agency: Orange County Health Care Agency TC1399626.2s Pagae Mop 10 Direction Distance Distance (g.) Elevation Site .MAP FINDINGS FORD AEROSPACE CORP. BLD (Continued) 4y Leaked: Not reported County: Orange Cleanup Fund Id :Not reported Review Date: Not reported Workplan: Not reported Pollution Char: Not reported Remed Action: Not reported Close Data: Not reported Discover Dale : 1016!1988 Enforcement Of : Not reported Ent Typw Not reported Enter Date: 11/2/1988 'Funding: State Funds Staff tniliaw Not reported How Discovered: Not reported How Stopped: Not reported Interim: Not reported Latkon : 33.63974911-117.8647337 leak Cause: Not reported Leak Source: Notraported Beneficial: Not reported MTBE Date: Not reported WSETesled: N90 Ma% MTBE GW : Not reported GW Qualifies: Not reported Max MTBE Sell: Not reported Bog Qualifies : Not reported Hydr Basin #: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORA Oversight.Prgm : LUST �Gbbafff): T0605900841 Organization Name: Not Priority: Not raported Work Suspended Not reported MTBE Class: Casa Type: 5 How Stopped Date: Not reported MTBE Concentration: 0 MTBE Fuel: 0 Case 'Number: 08300106BT Substance: 12034 Staff: CAB Summary: Not reported CORTESE: Region: CORTESE .Fac Address 2: Not reported Region: CORTESE Fac Address 2: Not reported Region: CORTESE Fac Address 2: Not reported .Region: CORTESE Fac Address 2: Not reported FOR ID Number Databases) EPA ID Number Confirm Leak Not reported Prelim Assess: Not reported Reared Plan: Not reported Monitoring: Not reported S101299e67 TC1399826.2s Page 9 Map ID f 'MAP FINDINt}3,`: Direction ., Distance Distance (n.) Elevation Site FORD AEROSPACE CORP:BLD (Continued) industrial Site Case ID: 951CO06 Record ID: ROOD00527 Region: ORANGE Released Chem"t ORGAMICCOMPOUNDS Currant Status: CLOSED Closure Type: 511!1997 EDR ID Number Databases) EPA iD Number S10129966T TCIS996M2s Page 10 AL YEAR NAME Aoonsoo onv mTo|R. o'srsLeV, rYps Coal Gas Site Search: mo site visa found mo search orReal Property Sun's avv|mpnxzdatabase. Wit Historical orx Cleaner nwarm`,wmmumpeovlosswwmmundmEnFr�*oarm`mmesbe*emxmalenuowtivxaannwn"w,,ommwnn within 0.250 mile of the Target Property- Tc,#mv2*.2o Page 11 Ctty AGUANGO NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT 15EACFI NEWPORT BEACH ORPHAN SUMMARY EDR 10 Site Name 0001577658 WARD RANCH 5105247948 NEWPORT TERRACE LF U0394WN MOBIL R18 -I419D 1000474496 LORAL AEROSPACE AERONUTROWC U01575481 TEXACO 5706884593 COYOTE CANYON SANITARY LANDFILL $10476701 UNOCAL 06762 SIte Address HWY. 79 WEST 10TH ST. DEAD END 1000ECOASTHWY•I"ND FORD RD 1600 JAMBOREE I SAN JOAQUIN 20861 NEWPORT COAST DRIVE. 650 VISTA DEL ORO TC1399626,2a Page 12 Lp Database(s) 07.660 HIST UST SWFLF 92660 LIST 92660 PADS, FINDS. RCRA -LOO, RCRA,TSDF, CORRACTS. CERCNFI 92660 HIST USf SWF6.F 92660 LUST, Cortese To maintain currency of the following, federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis; s9 required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that ibis EDR report meets or exceeds the 90ifay updating requirement of the ASTM standatd. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Te"orie: NIA National Priorities List (Supeifuhd). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program, NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As Such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Data of Government Version: 12/14104 Date Made Active at EDR: 0210=5 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Soundades Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202564 -7333 EPA Region i Telephone 617518.1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215= 814.5416 EPA Region 4 Telephone 484662 -8033 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sties. Source: EPA , Telephone;. NIA . Date of Govemment Version: 12114/D4 . Dais Made Active at'EDR;D2/o3h15 Database Release Frequency:. Quarterly Date of Date Arrival at EDR: U2f6IM5 Elapsed ASTM days: 2 Data of Last EDR Contact: 87!01!05 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 2145558659 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 303 - 3125774 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: D2101/05 Elapsed ASTM days: 2 Date of last EDR Copiaot::02101105 CERCUS: Comprehensive Envhonrnantal Response, Compensation, and Liability INdirrmatton System Source: EPA Telephof: 703413 -0223 CERCLIS contains date on potentially hazardous waste sites Ira have been reported to the USEPA.by states, murdcipalittes, private compantes and private persons; persi arit to Section 103 of the.Comprehensive Environmental Responie, Compensation. and Liability Act (CERCLq). CERCUS eonta ns sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL} and sltev,which are in thescreenng and assessment phose for possible Inclusion on the NPL Date of Government Version: 02/15/05 Date Made Active at EDR: b4106/OS Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR:'awmi!i Elapsed ASTM days: 15 Dateof Last EDR Contact. 03722!85 CERCLI6-NFRAP;. CERCLIS Nofurther Remedial Action Planned Source:. EPA Telephone: 703413-0223 As of February 1095, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial. Action Planned" ( NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP'siiss may be saes where, following an initirll lnvastigati;m, no contamination Was found, contambtatlon was removed quleW without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to'require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25;000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment ofthese ompedies and has archived them as historical resonls so EPA does not needlessly, repast the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA's 8rownfields Redevetopmem Program to help dies; states, private imastors and affected cifeens to promote econon®c redevelopment of.unproducdve urban sites, TC1399626.2s Page GR -1 GOVEFZMtME[i REOR[ SEARCH EQ 1QATA tUFiEIdCk t#2AIi'G { Date of Govemment Version: 03!22/05 Date Made Active at EDR: 04106 +175 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Date Arrival at EDR: 04/01105 Elapsed ASTM days: 5 Date of Last EDR Comact D4101M CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800 -424 -9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Govemmem Version: 12!15/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 02125105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01107105 Elapsed ASTM days: 49 Date of last EDR Contact 12/07/04 RCRA: Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information Source: EPA Telephone: 800424 -9346 RCRAlnfo is EPA's comprehensive Information system, providing access to date supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRAInfo replaces The data recording and reporting abilliles of the Resource . Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS). The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). CrxdNonaliy exempt small quantity generators (CESOGs) generate less than i UO kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quardity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quenthy generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are indrviduats or amities that move hazardous waste from the generator off -site to a faclity that can recycle, treaL store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat store, OF dispose: of the waste. Oa" Government Version: 01710105 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 0125/05. Date Made Active at EDR: 04/01105 Elapsed ASTM days; 66 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Data of Last EDR- Comact 03123/05 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: Nations! Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone:. 202.260-2342 Emergency Response NotOCation System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releasas of all and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12FIV04 Dais of Data Arrival at EDR: 01127105 Date Made Active at.EDR: 03124105 Elapsed ASTM days: 56 Database Release Frequency: Aniwatty Data of Last EDR CmNact 01127)05 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS BRS: Biennial Reporting %System Sours: EPAA4Tt6 Telephoner 8OD424.9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data M the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS.captures detailed data tram two groups: t.arge Ouamtly Getceiato(a (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12)01)01 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Date of Last EDR.Cdntact; 12113/04 Date dfNext Scheduled EDR Contact: 03114105 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Source: Department of Jusfica, Consent Decree Library Telophone: Varies Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfuml) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. TC1309826,2s Page GR -2 �0VERN TAE ;S�kR � EU / l� tf k `tf L 2RfilaL TFZkCF<flV Date of Government Version: 03105104 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 10/25104 Date of Next Scheduled FOR Contact: 01/24/05 ROD: Records Of Decision Source: EPA Telephone: 703 -4160223 Record of Oeasioh. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health Information to aid In the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/10105 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 07105105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04104105 DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: NIA The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be daletad -from the NPL where.no other response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12114104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: "02101/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Conrad: 05!02!05 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report Source:. EPA 'Telephone: NIA Facility index System. FINDS contains both lagiiiy tafonnaticn arM'pokdera'to other soun;esihat cmtalh meta detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval Systam), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track Information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental steMeaL FURS.(Federai Underground Injection Control), C- DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track crfmfitsl enforcement aeons for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Inigmtaro System), STATE (State Environmental taws and Statutes); and PADS (PCS Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 01/12105 Database. Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Conrad: 01/03105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: C4104M HMIRS: Hazardous Materials information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transponnfion Telephone: 202.3864555 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT, Date of Govemment Version: 11116104 Database Release Frequency ;Annually Date of Last EDR Contact' 01/19105 Data of Next Scheduled FOR Contact: 04118705 MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Soa*oe: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301415.7160 .MI:TSis maintained by thoNUdear Regulatory. Commission :and contains a list of approximately 8,10O sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which ate subject to NRCicenskkg requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 0111 W05 Database Release-Frequency: Quarterly. Date of Last EDR Contact: 04104MS Date of Nwd.Scheduled'EDR Conrad: 07!04105 MINES: Nines Mauer Index File Source: Department of1abor. Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303231-5950 Containsall mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. TC1390626:2s PegsGR -3 , RECOR T. 0 G,, o Date of Government Version: 11115/D4 Database Release Frequency 3emi- Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/28104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/28105 NPL LIENS: Federal Superrund Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 2025644267 Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Corrgtensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compass a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10115!81 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned PADS: PCS Activity Database System Date of Cast EDR Contact: 02/22105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: M3105 Source: EPA Telephone: 202- 5643887 PCB Activity Database, PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storm andtor brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 12I2f/04 Database Release Frequency. Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/23/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact OW9105 DOD: Deparboerd of Defense Sites Source: USGS Telephone: 703 - 892 -8$01 This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, adnuntstered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal toot greater than 640 some of the United States, Puerto Rion, and the U.S, Virgin Islands. Data of Government Version: 10103103 Database Release-Frequenq: Semi- Annually Data of Last EDR Contact: 0210=5 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Confect 05109/05 UMTRA: Uranium k181 Tailings Sites Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mils shut down, Faroe piles of the sand4ike material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels Of human exposure to radioactive materials from the plies are tow, however, in some uses tailings were used as construction materials before the potentiathealth :hazards of the tailings weje.recpgnlZed- M 1078, 24 tractive uranium mill tailings sites to Oregon. Idaho. Wyoming; Utah, Colorado. New Mexico, Texas, North Dakota, South Dakota, PemnsyWanta, and on Navajo and Hopf tribal lands; wem targeted for cleanup by the Department of Energy. Date o3 Covemmml Version: 12129104 Database Roldow Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 12121104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03111/05 ODI: Open Dump Inventory Source: Environmental Protet8bn Agency Telephane: 800424 -9346 An open dump is defined as a disposal faa6Ty that does not comply with one or more of the Pan 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Dote of Government Version: 06130185 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 05123195 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: NIA FUDS: Formerly Used Defense 5ime Source: U.S. Army Corps at Englnaem Telephone: 202 - 5284285 The listing Includes locations of Formedy Used Defense Me properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively woddrg or will take hiscossary cleanup actions. TC1399626.2s Page GR-4 Date of Government Version: 12131103 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 01103105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04104105 INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations Source: USGS Telephone: 202 - 208 -3710 This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 840 sues. Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/0SM Date of Next Scheduled EDR Colitact:.05109105 RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 2025644104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30,1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the Database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decreaw in agency resources made it impossible to continue W update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of last EDR Contact 12106ID4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/67/05 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 2025660250 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS Identities facilities which release toxic: chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Govemment Version: 12131102 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact. 1220!04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03121x05 TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone: 202 -260 -5521 Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list.lt includes data on the production volume of these substances by plarit site. Date ofGovemment Version: 12f311102 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years Date of Last EDR Contact: 12108))4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR - Contaofi 03MI05 FTTS INSP: FIFRA1 TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal insecticide, Fungickk; 8 Rcdentiide A A)i TSCA (toxic Substances OM W AO Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 584 -2501 Date of Government Version: 0411 =4 Database Ratease:Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR.Coritact 12/01104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Coiitack. O3 h105: SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Source: EPA Telephone: 202 - 5615008 Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide- producing establishments to submit a report to die :Enviroranental Protection Agency by March 13t each year. Each establishment must report the typesand amounts of pesticides, active Ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12131103 Date of Last EDR Contact 71129)04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Naxt Sdtedutad EDR Contact: D4118ro5' TC130626.2s Page GR-5 ��EI i ECORi3 f cNEar:aAraclSRF La MS: NFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, 8 Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202.569 -2501 FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right- to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts. the Agency on a quarterly basis. Data of Government Version: 09113/D4 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASTM STANDARD RECORDS Data of Last EDR Contact 12/01104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: gmiffis AWP: Annual:Workplan Sites Source:. California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916323 -34DO Known Hazardous Waste Sites. California DTSC's Annual Workplan (AWP), formerly BEP, identifies known hazardous substance sites; targeted for cleanup. Date of Government Version: 02/07/05 Date Made Active at EDR: 04105405 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03 /0170S Elapsed ASTM days: 35 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03!01106 CAL-SITES: Calsites Database Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916. 323 -3400 The Caisites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. M 1996, Cafifurnia EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Catsites database. Date of Government Version: 02107105 Date Made ACtive'.ebEDR: 04)05/05 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Anival'.at EDR:.03101/05 Elapsed ASTM days: 35 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03101/05 CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System Source: Office of.Emorgency Services Telephone: 916 - 095.5400 Caftmia Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (acrildental releases or spills). Date of Govarnrnent Veislon: 1MV03 Date Made AOWe.at EDR:'OWS104 Dufabase:Rafesay. frequency: Varies Data of Data ArrWal at EDR: 05 118104 Elapsed ASTM days: 38 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02!23/05 CORTESEm "Cortese" Hazardous Waste 6 Substances Sites List Source: CAL EPAIOffice of Emergency Information Telephone: 81b- 329 -9100. The sfteg for (t a lot ire designated by the State Water Resource Control 8wrd (LUST), the Integrated Waste. Board (BWF.AS); and the Depedmem of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). This llstleg is no longer updated by the state:'egerroy. Date of Government Versiom 04101101 Data Made Active at EDR: 07(28701 Doabase'Release Frequency: No Update, . Planned NOTIFY 65: Proposition 66 Remade Date of Data Arrival at EDR: o5P19/01 Elapsed ASTM days: 58: Date of Last FOR Contact: 01101405 Source: state Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916 - 4453846 Proposition 65'Notifidation Records, NOTIFY 66 contains facility notifications about . any release which could knpact drinking water and thereby expose the public to a potential health risk. TC13996262s Page GR-6 GO k 1�11111AEN rRECfiR EARGNED i DATA CUkk NCY GKING Date at Government Version: IM1103 Date Made Active at EDR: 11119193 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11101/93 Elapsed ASTM days: l6 Date a Last EDR Contact: 01117/05 TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Sour: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916 - 2274364 Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS Identities sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01195 Date Made Active at EDR: 09126!95 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 08/30795 Elapsed ASTM days: 27 Date 01 Last EDR Contact 02101105 SWFfLF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Source: Integrated Waste :Management Board Telephone; 916-341-6320 Active,. Closed and inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landkis. These may beaoWe or t nacitve facilities, or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for sow waste landfills or disposal sites_ Date of Government Version: 03114/65 Date Made Active at EDR: 04/05105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/15/05 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03115/ 05 WMUDSISWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 918 - 227.4448 Waste Management Unit Dotae9se System.' WMUDS is mad by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Beanie for program hacking and inventory of waste management units. W MUD$ i9 composed of the following databases: Facilitylnformatlnh, Scheduled Inspections information, Waste Management Witt Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (10ft rly Subchapter 15) information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Gosure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/W Date, Made Active at EDR: 05110MO Database Release.Frequency: Quarterly Data of Data Arrival at EDR: 04!10100 Elapsed ASTM days: 30 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/06/04 LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System Source State Water Resources ControlBoard Telephone: 910341 -5752 .Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LOST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground stomge1ank ineiderta: Not all states mamtafn these records; and the Information stored varies by state. Date. of Govemment VerstoW 01 /10/(15 Data Me& Active at EDR: 02/21/06 Database Release: Frequency: quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenddura.Plan Date of Dole at EDR: 61110/05 Elapsed ASTM days: 42' Date of Last EDR Contact: 01110/05 Sauce: Department of H"th Services Telephone: 916-255 -2116 Department of Health Services developed a site - specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. 11 is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01101/89 Date MedeActive.aLEDR: 08/02/94 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 07127/94 Elapsed ASTM days: 6 Data of Last EDR Co rated: 05/31/94 'TC1399626.2a. Page GR -7 GOB �CORt)� ED1 "DATA CUf�REM�SCTR�11t CA UST: UST: Active UST Facilities Source: SwacB Telephone: 916 -341 -5851 Active USTtacllitles gathered kom the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 01/10/05 Date Made Active at EDR: 02121/05 Database Release Frequency: SamiAnnuagy Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/10/05 Elapsed ASTM days: 42 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01114105 VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Smma: Department of Toxic Substances Control .. Telephone: 9 i 83233400 Contains low threat level properties with either continned or utconfkmed releases and the pmjact.proponegln have request that DTSC oversee investigation andlor cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. Date of Government Version: .02 07105 Date Made Active at EDR: 03131/0.5 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly, INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on b4la.nland Source: Emilronmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415- 972.3372 LUSTS. on Indian land in Arizona, California. New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 03/10/05 Date Made.Active at-EDR: D4/13105 Database Release Frequency: Varies. INDIAN LUST: Leaking Underground. Storage Tanks on Indian Land Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 20"53 -2857 LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Data of Government Versiow,, 02102!05 Date Made Active at EDR: 0.3/28!05 Database Release: Frequency: Varies INDIAN, UST: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Saarce:. EPAROgionit Telephone: 415 =972 -3388 Dote 61 Government Version: 11/02/04 Date Made Activem EDR: 12113104 Database Release frequency: Varies Date of Data Ardval.atEDR: 03101105 Elapsed ASTM days: 30 Date of Last EDR Conlach 03/01105 Date of Data-Arrival at FAR: 03/21/05 Elapsed ASTM days: 23' Date of Last EDR-Contact: OV92/05 Date of Defy Arrival at EDR: 0=105 Elapsed ASTM days: 54 Date of Lost EOR Contact: 0 V3 VDS Data of Data.Airival at:EDft: II/D3/04 Elapsed ASTM days:.40 bete of Last EDR Comm..021=5 .CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database Shone: CaMornls Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 9163413851 The Facility Inventory Database. (FID) contains a historical lieting.of active and Inactive undergrourrd.abrege tank locatlons from d1e State Water Resowce Coninal Board- Refer ro ioca*auruy source for current data. Data Of Government Version: 10131794 Date of Data ArtNal at EDR: 00/05!95 Date Made Active at EDR 09/29/95 Elapead:ASiM days: 24 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR COntact: 1228198 HIST UST: Hazardous Substance.Storage Container Database. Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 91"1 -5651 The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical fisting of UST sites. Refer to Iocalfcounty source for current data- TC1399826.29 Page GR-8 Gf idi tit t s SEARCHED 1 DATA Ci7 ENCY. °t t� Date of Government Version: 10/15/90 Date Made Active at EDR: 02+12191 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned STATE OF CALIFORNIA ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Faciites Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 816.3+145712 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Govemment Vetsion: 02101!0.5 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01115/91 Elapsed ASTM days: 18 Date of Lass EDR Contact: 07726/01 Date of Last EDR Contact: OW24105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/02105 CLEANERS: Cteaner Facilities Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916 - 327-4498 A Ask of dryeteaner related facifitlea that have EPA ID numbers. These arefaeilibas with certain SIC miles: power laundries, family and Commercial; garment pressing and cleaners agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and Clearing; drycteaning plants, except rugs; Carpet and upholster dean'rng; Industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of GovenlmontVersion: 11/29/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually CA WDS: Waste Discharge System Source: Stake Water Resources Conlrol Board Telephone: 616341 -5227 181tes which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 03(21105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01104MS Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04104/05 Date of Last EDR Corfta- 031=65 Data of Next Scheduled EDR:Contact 06120/05 DEED: Dead Resbial on Using Source: Depari rent of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916 +323+3400 She Mitigation and Brownfietds Rouse Program Facility Sites with Dead Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites:with Dead i Ladd Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Midgadon and Siownfields Reuse Program (SMSRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program's oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste fadldies that required a hazardous wastefsc permit. The Hsi represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (fkMP) has developed a 1W of wmant or former hazardous Waste facilities that have a recorded use restriction at the local County moorders once. The land use resWu ions on this list were required by .the DTSCMMP as 0 result of the presence of hazardous substances fhat ramam on site after the facility (or . part of the facility) has been.doseo.or cleaned up. The types of land use- restdcHon include deed notice, deed restrctton, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Detect Government Version: 02122105 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Last EDR Contact 01/04!05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 04/04105 NFA: No Further Action Determination Source; Department of Toxic Substances Control Talephone: 95&3233400 This category contains properties at which DTSC has made a clear determination that the property does no pose a problem to the erwironmeM:or to public health. Dete.of Gwernment Version: 02107105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 03/01105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 05130105 TC1399626,2s Page GR-9 GbUERMMENT RECORD SEARCHED / D,4TA l EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Source: Cali/onia Air Resources Board Tefephone: 916- 322 -2990 Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the APB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12131102 Database Release Frequency: Varies WIP: Weil Investigation Program Case List Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213.576 -6726 Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Govemment Version: 01WI05 Database ReleaseTraquency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contacb.01/21105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: W16/05 Date of Last EDR Contact 01126105 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 04125105 REF: Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Agency Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telaphone: 916. 323.3400 This category contains properties where contamination has not been confirmed and which were determined as nol requiring direct DTSC Site Mitigation Program action or oversight Accordingly, these sites have been referred to another state or local regulatory agency. Dafe.of Govemment Version: 02/07105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 03f01/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact. 05730/05 SCH: School Property Evaluation Program Source: Department of Toxic Substan-cas Control Telephone:. 918323.3400 . This, category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contaminalion. In some cases, these properties may be listed In the CalSRes category depending on the level of threat to public heats and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 02/07105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 03101JOS Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05130105 ROE: Properties Needing Further Evaluation Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 9163233490 This category contains properties that are suspected of being contaminated These are unconfirmed contaminated properties that need to be assessed using the PEA process. PEA in Progress indicates properties where DTSC is currently conducting a PEA. PEA Required indicates properties where DTSC has determined a PEA is required, but not currently underway. Date of Government Version: OZO7105 Databsse.Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last.EDR Confact: 03MIM5 Date ofNext Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/30/05 SLIC: Statewide $LIC Cases Source: State Water Resources Control:Board Telephone: 918341 -5752 The Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups (SLIC) lisfings includes unauthorized discharges from aphis and leaks, other than from underground storage tanks or other regulated sites_ Date. of Government Version: 01/10M Database Release Frequency: Varies Data of Last EDR Contact: 01 /10105 Date of -Ne&t Scheduled EDR Contact 04/11/05 HAZNET: Facilhyand Manifest Date Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 91&255-1`36 Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the OTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000.1,00O,M10 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the mantlests submitted without correction. and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. TC1399626.2s Page GR -10 GD S a �4"F3ftD RCHEDf DAi/ L'l� tEfi1CY :�� s Date of Covemmem Version: 12/31/02 Database Release Frequency: Annually LOCALRECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Local Oversight Program Listing of UGT Cleanup Sites Source: Alameda. County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Date of Government Version: 02114105 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Undergnound Tanks Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567 767.00 Date of Government Version: 02115/05 Database Reuse Frequency: Semi- Annualty CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Date of last EDR Contact: 0ti17l35 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05109705 Date of Last EDR Contact: OV24105 Date of Neat Scheduled EDR Contact: 0485/95 Date of Last FOR Contact 01124!05 Date of Nezt Scheduled .EDR Contact: 04125/05 Site List Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925 -646 -2286 List includes sites from the underground tank, hazanious waste generator and business pianf2186 programs. Date of Government Verson: 0301/05 Date of Last EDR Contact.. 92'28105 Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 05130/05 FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Soured: Dept of Community Health Telephone: 659 -4453271 Codified Unified Program Agency. CUPA's are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version., 91/79/05 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01119PJ5 Database Release Frequency: 5erni- Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05109105 KERN COUNTY Underground Storage Tank Sites &Tank Listing Source: Kam County Envirornron Health Services Department Telephone: 681.862 -8700 Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Verson: 12113/04 Database Release Frequency. Quarterly Date of last EDR Contact 1210SM4 Date of Nett Scheduled EDR Contact 03107105 TC13996202s Page GR -11 ;i -, i30alERN�+I WT RECORDS SEARCHED f,DATA3 11RRENCY T 4C LOS ANGELES COUNTY: List of Solid Waste FacNt0es Source: La County Department M Public Works Telephone: 8184585185 Date of Govemmol Version: 02/01/05 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/18105 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Naxt Scheduled EDR Contact: 05116105 City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Source: City of El Segundo Fre, Department Telephone: 310- 524 -2236 Dale of Government Version: 02114/05 Date of last EDR C,amact: 02114/05 Database Release Frequency:.Seml- Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05116105 City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562 - 570.2543 Date ofGovernmehtVarsion: 03/28/03 Date of Last EDR.Contact: 02123705 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23105 City of Torranee.Undeaground Storage Tank Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310+618 -2973 Date of Govomment Version: 03124{05 Date of Last EDR Comer 02128105 Database Release Frequency: Semi Annually Date of Next Schedufed.F-0R Contact: O5n6105 City of Los Angeles Landfgls Source: Engineering 8:Construetion Division Telephone: 213473 -7869 Date of Governmant VersWn:03i81p55 Date of Last EDR Contaot.0311IRM Darabase.Ralease Frequency: Varies Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06113105 HMS: Street Number List Source:. Department of Public Works Telephone: 62tr458:3517 Indushjal Wama and, Undergiound.Storage Tank Sftw. Date.oF GoverimentVera'i8n: 09/90/04 Date of Last EDR Contact 02/14/05 Database ReleeaeFmquency ::Semi - Annually Data of Na d Scheduled EDR Contact M161115 Site Mitlgotbn List Source: Community Health Services Telephone:. 323.890 -7W8 Industrial sites that have had some sort of 901 or complaint Date of GOVerrenent Version: 82±26104 Date. of Last EDR Contact 07J14105 Database Release Frequarny Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Conloct 05116/05 .San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern Source: EPA Ragton8 Telephone: -015972 -3178 San Gabrlel Valleyereas where VOC contamination is at or above Ste MCL as designated by region 8 EPA office. Date cd Gave w Versrorc 12131{98 Date of Last EDR Contact 07106799 Database Release: Frequency: No Update Planned Data of Nerd 66odulad EDR Contact: NIA TC1399626.2s Page GR -12 (i€VERNt�ENT R£ORDS SE #RCHED t DM� !?1st, EN MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Public Works Depanment Waste Management Telephone: 415-499 -6647 Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 0=8rt1S Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination Source. Napa Comfy Department of Emiro:mental Management Telephone: 707 -259 -4269 Date of Government version: 1227!04 Database Release Frequency: SembAnnualiy Ctosed and. Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Napa County Department of EmYonmental Management Telephone: 707- 253 -4269 Date of Government Version: 12/27/04 Database Release Frequency: Annualy 5139iCi3�tir71pfYt� List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714 - 8343446 Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Data of Government Version: 02/01/05 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714- 834.3446 Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facitilies fUST). Date of Government. Version:.03/01105 Database Release Frequency: Ouadony List of Industrial She Cleanups Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714 - &343446 Petroleum and non- petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 03 101/05 Database Release Frequency: Annually PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities Source: Plover County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-689.7312 List inchides,abovegroun6 tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Last EDR Contact 01131105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05102105 Date of Last EDR Contact: 1228104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0328105 Date of Last EDR Contact 1227104 Date of Next:Scheduled EDR Contact. C328M Date of last EDR Cordact: 03/11105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: OUAW06 Date of Last EDR Centactr03 /19105 Date of Nod. Scheduled EDR Contact: 06106105 Date of Last EDR Contact; 03h Iffis Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: OWDIA15 TC1399626.2s Page GR -13 Date of Government Version: 01113!05 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 9093583055 Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Data of Government: Version: 0014105 Database Release Frequency: Ouarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Source: Health Services Agency Telephone: 9093585055 Date of Govemmaot Version: D2r14105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: CS - Cordami natedSites Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916- 8758406 Date of Government Version: 12130104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 12720104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03721105 Date of Last EDR Contact 01/17/05 Date of Next. Scheduled FAR Contact: 04M8105 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/17/04 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/18/05 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02f04MS . Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05102/05' ML- Regulatory Compliance Master List - Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 918875-8408 Any business that hag hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date or Government Version: 12/30104 Database Release Frequency..b4sitedy SAN 6ERNARDINO COUNTY: Dale of Last EDR Contact 0204105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 05102105 Hazardous. Material Permits Source: San Bemardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Taleplxma: 909387 -3041. - This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlenYgenerators, hazardous. materials handiEns, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil genenetondhandlers. Data of Government Version: 03125105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly .SAN. DINGO COUNTY: Solid Waste Facilhks Source:' Department of Healh Services Telephom 619338 -2209 San Diego County Solid Waste FacifiBes- Date of Lost EDR Contact: 0£407105 Data of.Neiif Scheduled -EDR Contact: 08106105 TC13996262s Page GR -14 �d €r�cca�s, s�ADriza civ " t Dale of Government Version: 0801100 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 02122105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0523/05 HazardousMaterfals Management Division Database Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619- 336 -2268 The database includes: HE58 -This report contains the business name, site address. business phone number, establishment 'H' permit number, We of permit, and the business status. ME17 - in addition to providing the same information provided in the HE56 fisting, HE17 provides inspection defies, vtolatons received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatmenVdisposel of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List- Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non -tank cases, groundwater contamination, and son? contamination areInctuded.) Date of Governamot Version: 06/291D4 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Overrate Facilttles Source: Deparin nA.Of PDMMx 4 atth 5-m V mds County Telephone: 415 -252 -3920 Date of Govemrrerd Version: 03/09/05 Database Raiease. Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage tank Infcrmadon Source:. Department of Public Health Talephone: 415452 -3920 Date of Government Version: 03109/05 Database. Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN MATEO COUNTY: Fuel Leak List Source: San Mateo County Environmental Heafth.Services Division Telephone: 650 - 3631921 Date of Government Version: 0211+4105 Database Release Frequency, Semf- Anrualfy Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/10/05 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04104/05 Date of Last EDR Contact 03/07/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 06106/05 Date of Last EDR Contact:' 03107/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/05 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01110105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/05 Business Inventory Source: San Mateo County Environmental Hearth Services Division Telephone: 850 - 363.1921 . Llst.includes Hazardous. Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 0228.+05 Database, Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Fuel Leak Site Activity Report Source_ Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 40&265-2600 Date of last EDR Contact 01/10/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/05 TC1399626.2s Page GR -15 Date of Government Version: 06/30104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/28/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Cants& 0312SMS Hazardous Material Facilities Source: City of SanJose Fire Department Telephone: 408 - 277.4659 Date of Government Version: 01114M Dale of Last EDR Contact: 03/07105 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/05 SOLAN0 COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source: Solana County Department of Environmental Management .Telephone: 707- 421.0770 Date of Govemmant Version: 12114/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/13/04 Database Release Frequency Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled FDR Contact: 03/14106 Underground Storage Tanks Source: Selene County Department of Environmental Management Telephone' 707 -421 -6770 Date of Government Verson: 12 /14/D4 Date of Last EDR Contact 12113104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03114105 SONOMA COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tank :Sites Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707.565 -6565 Date of Government Version: 01;27/05 Date of Last EDR Contact OV24105 DatabaswIReIlease Frequency: Quarterly Dale of NeA Scheduled EDR Conact: 04125/05 SUTTER- COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Source: Sutter'CWnty Department of Agriculture . Telephone. S30822 -7500 Date of Govemmant'Version; 01128104 pate of Last EDR Contact 01103MS Database Release Frequency: Serif- Annually Dade of Next Scheduled EDR Comaa 04tD4105 VENTURA COUNTY: Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive site a Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805854.2813 Ventura County Inventory Of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Site& Date of Government Version: 08101104 Date of Last: EDR Contact, (023tbS Database Release. Frequency: Annually Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: OS/23I06 Listing of Underground .Tank 'Cleanup Sites Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Venture County Underground Storage Tank.CleanupSites (LUST). 7C13996"25 1`090 (311-16 --(;0V/LRNMFNT RECORDS EA CHED / DAT- -A CU,'R- EN'z TR'"KING : Date of Government Version: 03101105. Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 03118/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06113105 Underground Tank Closed Sites List Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805.054 -2813 Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sties (UST)JUnderground Tank Closed Sites List Date of Government Version: 1=1104 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact 01114/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11/05 Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-6542813 The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (8), Waste Producer (W), andlor Underground Teak (T) informeftm. Data of Government Vemlom 03101105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Compreitatlalve Facility Report Source: Yob County Deparbnem of Health Telephone: 530 -886 -8646 Date: of Guvernnrent Version: 01/10105 Database Release Frequency: Annually Data of Last FAR Contact: OW18MS Date of Next Scheduled. EDR Contact 06/13105 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/17/05 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04118105 California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) LUST Records LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Dal Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou. Sonoma, Trinity countes. For mm current hrformallon, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Data of Government Version: 02101101 Database Release Frequency: No Update' Plumed Data of Last EDR Contact 02123185 Doted NOR Scheduled EDR Contact: 8523105. LUST REG 2: Fuel leak List Source California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 5l t) -286 -0457 Date of Government Version: 09/30104 Deft of Last FOR Contact 01/10/05 Database. Release Frequency: Quarterly " ' Data of Nam Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/11105 LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Datobase. Source: Catifomis Regional Water Quality Co ntrol Board Central Cabal Region (3) Telephone: 855549 -3147 Date of Government Version:. 05119/03 Database. Release Frequency. No Update Planned Date of Last.EDR Contact: 02114105 Dateof,Neoa Scheduled FOR Contact: 05118/05 LUST REG Alt Underground Storage Tank. Leak List Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Boar Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213. 576.6600 Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current'infonnatlon, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. TC1399626.2s Page GR -11 Qf�bP1+1R1T RGOF2DSSEAi6 <l tJ: MEIsFil ,z Date of Government Version: 09107104 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valtey Region (5) Telephone: 916-464 -3291 Date of Government Version: 01/01/05 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Daft of Last EDR Contact: 12/27104 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 0312&05 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/07105 Date of Next .Scheduled EDR Contact: 04104M LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 916- 542 -5424 For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date or Government Version: 09109/03 Database Release Frarproncy: No Update Planned Date oi.Last EDR Contact: 1210&04' Data of Nted.Scheduled EDR Contact; 03107175 LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cese Listing Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Viotoruille Branch Office (6) Toophoner 760-34 6-7491 Date of Government Version: 08709704 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 01103105 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 04104105 LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Source: California Regional Water Qwlity Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760348 -7491 Dateof Government Version: 02/26104 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date. of Lost EDR Contact: 12/27/04 Date of Nero Scheduled. EDR ContacL 0328/05 LUST REG e: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source: Caffomia Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951 - 7824130 Califomla Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board's LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/05 Database Release Frequency. Varies Date of Last EDR Contact. 02!08!05 Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05109105 LUST REG9: Looking Underground Storage Tank Report Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858467.2980 Orange, RNealde. San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resouroes Control Board's LUST database. Data of Govemrdant Version: 03101101 Database Release. Frequency. No Update Planned Date of Lastwo Contact: 041171(15 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 041180' Caift mia Regional Water Quality Coritrol Board (RWQCB) SL{C Records SLJC REG 1: Active Toxic Site invesltgatlons Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (f } Telephone: 707- 5762220 Date of Government Version: 04(03163 Database Release Frequency Semi:Annually Data of Last FOR Contact: 02/23115 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Comaot. 06/23105 TC1399626.2s Page.GR -18 G V'&' N . � <►�c� �,�t�c iEO � n�r� cu€����c� rr�c�rr�� n SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks,: Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Lasting .Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510.288-0457 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. .. Date of Government Version: 09/30104 _ Date of Last EDR Contact: 01110105 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 0411 IMS. SllC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805.549 -3147 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03121/05 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/14/05 Database Release Frequency: Sami- Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/23/05 SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listirg Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213.576 -6600 Any contaminated site that impacts groundwater or has the potential to impact groundwater. Date of Government Version: /1117104 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/24105 Database Release Frequency: Varies Data of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26106 SLIC REG 5: Spins, Leaks. Investigation & Clearwp Cost Recovery Listing Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 91$-484 -3291 Unr"waned:Once that hnpactgtoundwater or have ft potential to Impact groundwater. Date of Government Version: 16/01104 Date of Last EDR Contact; 01104105 Database Release Frequency: Semi - Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04!94105 SUC REG 5L: SLIC $Res Source: Caftnue Regional Water Qualify Control Board; Lahonten Region Telephoner 530.542.5574 Deter Government Version: 09107/04 Datalaas&Release; Frequency: Varies SLIC. REGBV: Spins. Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing Soutar Regional: Water Qwlity Control Board, Victorvills Branch Telephone: 619 -241 -8583 Datwot Government Version: 01!25105 DaribeseRelease Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 7: SLIC List Source.' California Regional Quality Control Beard. Colorado River Basin Region Telephoner 760- 346.7491 Date of Government Version: 11/24/04 Dafabase-Rulease Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/OM4 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 031077.15 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12717/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact 04704/05 Date of Last EDR Contact 0222705 Date of Next :Scheduled EDR Contact: 95/23105 SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation 8 Cleanup Cost Recovery tktlng Source: Ca8[ornia Region Water quality Control Goats Santa Ana Region (8), Telephone: 951- 782 -329B Date of Government Varsign: 0779110d Date of Last EDR Contact: MAIM Database Release Frequency: Sami -Artn iany Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04A34Ai5 TC 1399B28.2a Page GR -19 t 1 r a M ca s s cHED i oAri u IVCY T4 4,B SLIC REG 9: Spills. Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing .Source: CaRomia Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 656467.2960 Date of Government Version: 09/10/04 Database Release Frequency: Annuafiy. FOR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL. DATABASES Date of Last FOR Contact: 03101105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact; 05!30105 EDR Historical Gas Station and Dry Cleaners: EDR has searched select national collections of business directories and has collected Ratings of potential dry cleaner and gas sts0on/filling station/sarvice station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR's review was firtdted to those categories of sources that might, in EDR's opinion, include dry cleaning and gas datfon/filsng sta6ontservice station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not fnnfted to: gas, gas slefion, gasoline standoo, Wing station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, sarvlce station, dry dearer, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, dem011ffaurdry, wash B dry, do. This information is meant,lo assist and complement environmental professionals in their conduct of environmental site assessments, and is not meam jo be a substibile for a full historical investigation as defined in ASTM El 527, The inton atlon provided In this Valpootory database may or may not be complete; Le„ the absence of a dry cleaner or gas atalchOiliing statioNservce station site does not necessarily mean that such a site did not exist in the area covered by this report. (A note on "dry deanJng'skes: d is not possible for EDR (o ddferen6ste between establishments that use PERC M-SRO as a dooming soWrA and sftestbaf function simply as drop -oft and plok -up locutions or that are trathtienal wet damingNeundry fadlr7es 7herefom, n'ts:asserrtiaffor environrnentel prolesstonsls to incorporate professkinal)udgmant in rile evahrsdon oy eacft site.) .. Fortner Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites; The existence and location of Coal Gas saes is provided exclusively to FOR by Rem Property Scan, Inc. ®Copyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc. For a technical description of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representable. Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Ina The edormation contained In this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by emiges other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to Insure the accuracy of this report, Real Property Scan does not guarantee the ecsurdcyof this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Seen Is strictly limited to a refund 61 the amount paid. No claim Is made for the actual exktence of toxins at any site. This report does not conslaule a legal opinion. BROWNFIELDS DATABASES VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Boone: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916323 -3400 Contains low threat kwel piopeitles with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have requast that DTSCoversee investigation andtor cleanup actLWfles and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC's costs. Date of Government Version: 02107105 Database Reissue Frequency: Quarterly Dale of Last EDR Contact: 03101105 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05130105 US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfiekis Sites Source: Emrironmenlel Protection Agency Telephone: 202 -W6-2777 Included In the Hating are brown fidds propeitles addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted.Brawufields Assessmer s. Targeted Brownfietds Assessments -EPA's Targeted Brovmfields Assessments (TBA) prograrn is designed to help states, tribes, and municiparities— especially Nose without EPA Brownfreids Assessment Dernon"jon Plots— minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownflelds. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or tachrical assistance for' environmental assessments at brewrf6elds saes throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Browrdelds initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfietds. Cooperative Agreement Recipients- Staters, poetical subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes beoome Brownfieles Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund (BCRLF) cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfiekls- related deamrp aclivi ies. 7C I39962623 P890 GR -20 GoGERiVI€#Vi Ei?RiSiC.liEt7 aAl IjokY'7 G? Date of Government Version: NIA Database Release Frequency: Semi- Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: NIA Date of Next scheduled EDR Contact: NIA 05 INST CONTROL: Sires with Institutional. Controls Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703- 603 -8867 A listing of aces with institutional controls in place. institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions; property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposum to confamironis remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASES} Date of Last EDR Contact: NIA Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: MA Depending on the geographic area covered by this reporL the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands Information data in a specific report does not mean that all wellandain the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetly ids intonation does net necessarily mean Matwettands do not exist in the wee covered by the report. Off/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by FOR horn the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:106,009 -Scala Maps. It was extracted from thelrensportation category hrcluding some oil, hie iNmmnly gas pipelines: Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: Pennwe0 Corporation Telephone: (800) 883 -8277 This map includes information copyrightedhy Penn Well Corporation. This Information Is provided on a best effort bests and PemWe4 Corporation dean not guarantee Its accuracy nor warrant As fitness far any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the Permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: Then: are individuals doomed sensitive inceptors due to theirloV19 immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. Theeasensuive receptors typically include the elderly. the SW and children. While the location of air sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR Indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares; hospitals; medical centers, and nursing homes: - where Individuals who we sensitive receptors am rikeiy to be located. ANA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 812 - 2805991 The database includes a fisting of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annualeurvey, of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services- Listing Source: Cemers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone; 410- 7863000 A fisting of hospitals with Medicare : provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federat agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Numing Homes Source: National lnsthutesof Health Telephone: 301. 594 -6246 Information on Medicare and Medicaid cavilled nursing homes in the United Status. PublICSch'ools Souse: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone; 202502 -7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. his a comprehensive. annual; national stalistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that ate comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202.502 -7360 The National Center for Education Statistics' prtmary database on private school locations in the United Stah m. TC13998262s Page GR -21 f3f3 �fi4 1t€h" tC(DF2[fSMARCHED: /DATA:GII Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 9166574047 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtaired by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency tFEMA). Data depicts 100 -year and 500 -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: Nations! Wetlands inventory. This data, avallable in select counties across the country, "a obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION ®2004 Geographic Data Technology, Inc., Rai. 0712004. This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic Data Tectmotogy, Inc. Unauthorized use, kT*jdfng copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures, of this product is ezprosslyprohtbded. TC139962625 PegeGR -22 GEOCHEK PHYSICAL SE 17ING SOURCE ADDEK9@{iJtiA ' z .a:.«� _ _ as • _ - ~1�:4 u'�s TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS OLOA 2100 MAR VISTA DRIVE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660 TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES Latitude (North): 33.634499 - 33' 38'4.2" Longitude (West): 117.880898- 117' 52'51.Z' Universal Trarwerse Mercator: Zone 11 UTM X- (Meters): 498301.0 UTM Y (Meters): 3721786.0 Elevation: 112 fl. above sea level EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum has been developed to assist the environmental professional with the collection of physical setting source information in accordance with ASTM 1527 -00,- Section 7.2.3. Section 7.2.3 requires that a current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent, such as the USGS Digital Elevation Model) be reviewed. h also requires that one or more additional physical setting sources be sought when (1) conditions have been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely to migrate to or from the property,. and (2) more information than is provided in the current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent) is generally obtained, pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice, to assess the impact of migration of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Such additional physical setting sources generally Include information about the topographic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic, and geologic characteristics of a site, end wells in the area. Assessment of the Impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: 1. Groundwater flow direction, and 2. Groundwater flow velocity. Groundwater flaw direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeotogy, characteristics of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata. EDR's GeoChack. Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional In forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. TC1398526:2s Page A -1 GROUNDWATER FLOW DIfkEOT1DH INFOR.MATit)N Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site - specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such essurface topographic Information, hydrologic Information, hydrogeologic date collected on nearby properties, and regional' groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography Maybe indicative of the direction of surflciai groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinlon about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY USGS Topographic,Map: 33117 -FB NEWPORT BEACH (DIGITAL), CA General Topographic.Gradient: General SW Source: USES 7.5 min quad index SURROUNDING.70POGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES i C O P W J V V 4 Target PropeT1y E1evaAon: 112'% 0 it2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Dlgitel Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites ofclose proximity should be field varffle& . TC13996262s Pegs A -2 '�I �i Lr'/ lif�1�/' fL' w7 �,' 1�t�urriiil��Wi%IWIYfF'{r�S�4gY � i}�ket }�LfF �t 4( vti GROUNDWATER FLOW DIfkEOT1DH INFOR.MATit)N Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional using site - specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, such essurface topographic Information, hydrologic Information, hydrogeologic date collected on nearby properties, and regional' groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION Surface topography Maybe indicative of the direction of surflciai groundwater flow. This information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinlon about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY USGS Topographic,Map: 33117 -FB NEWPORT BEACH (DIGITAL), CA General Topographic.Gradient: General SW Source: USES 7.5 min quad index SURROUNDING.70POGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES i C O P W J V V 4 Target PropeT1y E1evaAon: 112'% 0 it2 1 Miles Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5' Dlgitel Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites ofclose proximity should be field varffle& . TC13996262s Pegs A -2 HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater florae. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradientsites might be impacted. Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic Information (major waterways and bodes of water). FEMA. FLOOD ZONE Target Property County ORANGE, CA Flood Plain Panel at Target Property: Additional Panels in search area: NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI quad. at Target.Property COSTA MESA FEMA Flood Electronic Data YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map 06069CW65E 0805900047E NWi Electronic Data Coverage ESY refer to the overview Map and Detail Map WDROGEOLOGiC INFORMATION Hydrogeomgic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be: an indicator of groundwater flow direction in the Immediate: area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the environmental professionatin formtog an opinion about the 'WOW of nearby contaminated properties or, should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradlent sites might be impacted. Sho- SpeciRe Hydrogeologica7 Data° Search Radius: 1.25 miles Status: Not found. AQUIFLOM Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW inforraation:System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR -teas reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the hate of the report, groundwater flow dirrection as determined hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. LOCATION GENERAL DIRECTION MAP 10 FROM.TP GROUNDWATER FLOW 1 12 -1 Mile South NE 2 172 -1 MOO South NW For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. •CfYB35la- WeGfietnmegeopn Yuen gaYiaraC by CFRCC6 NCR Yb`IXV n[Mkr h S/wm BagpiJp=lGEUCIJSf�mea4BaBm WA." rryoq marv¢A FFOr,M1x Ifm aNepnkruF� e+eP�a +��ha af,MEPA rgimgay. anv?'xvemrptrAVdmtkF CwMma'IeM EV.iwim,.wl Re- eFOnFe BnR+Mear�e%E Lrobn TC1399626.2s Page A-3 Y CFS� Pjj 0,yu SETTING SOUR err= 3UfyRMAit f GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION Groundwater flow velocity information fora particular site is beat deterrnined by a qualified environmental professional using site speck geologic and soil strata data. if such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional sal information. In general, contaminant plumes move more quickly through sandy - gravelly types of soils then silty — clayey types of soils.. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed at which contaminant migration may occurring. - ROCK STRATICRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Era: - Cenozoic Category: Stratified Sequence System: Tertiary Series: Miocene Code: Tm (decoded above as Era, System & Series) Geologic Age and Rock Slwatigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, -R. E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and N.M. Beckman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1894). DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Sal Survey (NCSS) and Is responsiblo for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey Information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a.representation of soil pattems in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. The following information is based on Socl Conservation Service STATSGO data. Soil Component Name: URBAN LAND i Soil Surface Texture: variable Hydrologic Group: Not reported Soil Drainage Class: Not reported - Hydric'Status; Soil does not meet the requirements for a hydric soil. Corrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Not Reported Depth to Bedrock Min: > 10 inches Depth to Bedrock Max: > 10 Inches Soil Layer Information Boundary ClassHication Layer Upper Lower Sail Texture Class AASHTO Group Uniflad Soil Permeaticl Rata SON Reaction (PH) 1 O inches Sinches variable Not reported Not reported - -MU: 0.00 Min: OAO Max: 0.00 Min: 0.00 TC1399626.2s Page A-4 dt-OM EC10 PHY51CAL 8ETTIMG WUF#C SUMMARY OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may appear within the general area of target property. SON Surface Textures: sandy loam gravelly - sandy loam silt foam clay sand gravelly - sand fine sandy loam fine sand Sur icial Soil Types: sandy foam gravelly - sandy.lo'am silt loam clay sand gravelly - sand fine sandy loam fine sand Shallow Soil Types: 'fine sandy loam gravelly - loam sandy Clay ` -sandy day loam day sand silly day Deeper Soil Types: ,gravelly - sandy loam sandy loam stunned - very gravelly - sandy loam weathered bedrock silty clay loam gravelly -fine sandy loam clay loam sand very fine sandy loam ADIMONAL EMMONMENTAL RECORO SOURCES According to ASTM.E'4527 -00, Section 7.2.2, "one or more additional state or local sources of environmental records may be checked, in the discretion of the environmental professional, to enhance and supplement federal and state sources... Factors to consider in determining which local or additional state- recprds, if any, should be checked indude (1) whether they are' reasonably ascertainable, (2) whether they are sufficiently useful, accurate; and complete in fight of the objective of the records revfow (see 7. t,1 ), and (3) whether they are obtained, pursuant to local, good commercial or customary practice." one of the record sources listedin Sectidn 72.2 is water well Information; Waterman information can be used to assist the environmental professional in assessing sources that may impact groundwater flow direction, and In forming an opinion - about: the impact of- contaminant migraabn on nearby dribRing'water wells. TC1399e20.2s Pegs A,5 SUMMA E 5e, PHYSICAL $Ei (t)_ 6C kc, WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION DATABASE SEARCH DISTANCE (mibas]i Federal USGS 1.000 Federal FRGS PINS Nearest PWS within I mile State Database 1-000 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL 0 FROM TP No -Welft Found FEDERAL ORDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No PINS SyStOM Found Note,. PWS System locafth is not always the tame as well ftwin. STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION MAP ID WELL ID FROM TP No Wells Found TC1399626.2a Page A-6 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 1399626.2s IR y r'e a i- ° " %"•i —r1r ; � �Y`'_ tt/' f,I .fit 1 J A6r . t V. vii 1 al l_y p fsourkwaet Flew Owe a en . J War Roads i ' Contour Enures q Earthquake Fault Ums Airport © EaringUI epicenter, Rlohtr 5: or greater 0 Were, viame Q Public Water supply Wells R 0111'of Multiple Icons TARGET PROPERTY: OLQA ADDRESS: 2100 Mar Vista Drive CITYISTATEIZIP: Ntiwppry BoaCh CA 92660 LAT&ONG: 3&6345/117.8809 p fsourkwaet Flew Owe a en irk Indetermkirde Groundwater Flow at location i Lei Groundwater FlCWVerbawiccafon Closest Hydrogeulogical Data f DI sac of related welts CUSTOMER: The Reynolds Group CONTACT: Rosanne Fiscner INOI 0: 1399626.2•& DATE: April 13, 2005 4:20 pm ' Map ID Direction Distance Elevation Database EDR ID Number I Site ID: 0830478837 south Groundwater Flow: NE AQUIFLOW 66482 112.1 Mile Shallow Water Depth: 4.66 Nigher Deep Water Depth: 934 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Date: OSAW6 2 Site ID: 063000097T South. Groundwater Flow: NW At1U1FLOW 37878 Higher i.M71e Fligher Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth: Not Reported Average Water Depth: 9.86 Date: 0912411998 9 TC13996262s Page A-8 GFECK PHYuICAL SfTTIFIG xlPNDII�IGB �` ads;4. v � l2A�.0.t+� wk �. �� �.56�` 5 4�,�� `�.i��f•'� AREA RADON INFORMATION State Database: CA Radon Radon Test Results Zip Total Sites > 4 Pct /L Pct. > 4 PoilL 92660 11 0 0.00 Federal EPA Radon Zone far ORANGE County: 3 Note: Zone I Indoor average level > 4 pCVL. Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCVL and -= 4 pCVL, Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCVL. Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA Number of sites tested: 30 Area Average Activity % <4 pCVL %.4.20 pCVL % >20 pCVL Living Area - Sst Floor D.793 pCVL 500% 0% 01b Living Area- 2nd Floor Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Basement Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported Not Reported TC1399626.2s Page A-9 i if .ISIV L SETTING SOURCE REG43F 1 . E ►1 Fs 1E l ; TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USES 7,5' Digital Elevation Model (OEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7:5' Digdai Elevation Model in 2002. 7.5- Minute DEMs coneapond to the USGS 1:24;000- and 1:25,000 -scale topographic quadrangle maps. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in Select counties, across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 109 -year and SOD -year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands inventory. This data, evadable in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S. Fith and VOW111b Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOWR information System Source., FOR proprietary database. of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQU1FLOW Wommatton System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the dale of the report, hydrogeotogically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water tattle information. G£OLO04CINFORMATION Geabgk.h4ga'and Rork Stretigraphto.Umt Source: P.G. Sdiruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Comermino s U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale -- A digital represeritoti x of tie 1974 P.B. Khng and H.M. Beckman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS -I V(1994). STATSGO: State $oil.Geographic Database. 'Source: Departmentof Agriar@ lie,. Natumi.Readtecea Conservation Services The U.S.-Department of Agr+cuituro's (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) leads the national Consarvaton Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey.Wohmatton for privetey owned farads In the Urlted States. A soil map in a so%survey is a representation of soli patterns ina landscape. Soil maps for'STATSGO are eomp9ed by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) ss9 shsysy mega AODTnONA4 ENVIRONMENTAL REDORD.SOURCES FEDERAL WATER' WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA)Otiipo.of Drinking Water Telophoruz 202-554.3760 Publo Weber System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least26peo0eforatloa6t6D�day 's6nnualN. PWSs provldewalar from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violatton'and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Dffice of Drinking Water Telephone: 202504 -3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SOWIS) after August 1 89,5. Prior to August 1995, Uhe data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (PROS). USGS:Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (ions) This database.ewhtsms descriptive inionnatbnon slles where the USGS oalbets'or has collected data on surface "for andforgrpundwafer. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. TC1399M.2s Page A -10 P IU L `'JETFt t.+' S�i{J�tCiE REC-0 LYS. SEI�R'_ MEfl. , -- > STATE RECORDS California Drinking Water Quality Database Somw Department of Heakh Services - Telephone: 916 -324 -2319 The database Includes ail drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with welt and water system information. California Oil and Gas Well locations for District 2, 3, 6 an d 6 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916323 -1719 RADON State.Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 91 &324 -2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source; USGS Telephone: 7034564020 The NaliarmMadon Database has been developed by the U.S.. Environmental Protection Agency (USFPA) and is a compilation of the EPAlState. Residential Radon Surrey and the National Restdential Radon Sunrey- The.study coves the years 1986 -1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by Information collected at pdvate- sources such as urwerstties and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703366.4020 Section& My 6 809 of IRAA directed EPA to EM and identify areas of U.S. with the patemial far etevated ind= -melon levets. OTHER Airport landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Fedeml Avlaticn Adminstmtioit, 800+457 -6656 Epicenters: World eard*akeepicentera, Richter 5 or greater 'Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Calffomiatartirquake _Fault lines:- Thefault lines displayed on EOR's Topographic map- amdigifted quatemory fauh linea, prepared in 1975 by the United. State Geological Survey.. Additions[ information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault Knee comes from California's . Preliminary Fault Ac*Aty Map - prepared by the California Ohdsion of Mines and Geology; TC159962623 Page Mi APPENDIX C j LIST OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS REVIEWED CONTINENTAL AERIAL PHOTO, ItiC. LOS ALAMITOS, CALIFORNIA 90720 (714) 236-9084 FAX (714) 236-9233 FAX DATE LIBRARY ORDER JOB # VIEW DATE TIME TIME IN TIME OUT TOTAL CS i ADDRESS �EVIEWED BY ORDERED BY R Po # PROD. INVOICE SEARCH leo 44 157,9- Z)f PRINT SIZE PHOTO SCALE ENL. FAC SHIP. INSTR. UPS FED EX OTHER S & H cos-- & -7 `3 _ZS -z- C./I 4-!y o' ISS -i cin -L -410 ) &-96 -2-6— —_ —7 f * c7 -7 Z 2 -- V 11.---1 2-1 --Z-?- X6033 -1"77 ;2-03-7-2Z,Z7 V 3 APPENDIX D SANBORN. MAP AND CITY DIRECTORY FINDINGS EDR Environmental Data Resmarces Inc "Linking technology with Tradition "O Sanborn@ Map Report Ship To: Rosanne Fischer Order Date: 411312005 Completion Date: 4/13/2005 The Reynolds Group Inquiry #: 1399626.3 250 El Camino Real P.O. #: 6725 Tustin, CA 92780 Site Name: OLQA Address: 2100 Mar Vista Drive Customer Project: 6725 OLQA City /State: Newport Beach, CA 92660 1014105TIM 714730 -5397 Cross Streets: This document reports that the largest and most complete collection of Sanborn fire insurance maps has been reviewed based on client supplied information, and fire insurance maps depicting the target property at the specified address were not identified. NO-COVERAGE Do)fyright 2005 by Environmental Date Resources, . Ina AN rights reserved. Reproduction in any media o, format In -d Ie or in W, of any repot or map of Env6o Mr" Data Resources, Inc., or its aWkAes, is prohibited without prW written fiermissibn. FAR and its logos (ircgMng Sanborn and Sanborn Map) dre tiademaft of EnMronmenlal Dala Resources, Ina or ti atliliaias. All o#w eademarks usad herein are the property of Moir respective owners. The EDR -City Directory Abstract oLQA .2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660 April A, 2006 Inquiry Number: 13996264 EDR' Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard In Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1 -800 -352 -0050 Fax: 1- 800 -231 -6802 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. City Directory Abstract Environmental Data Resources, Ine.'s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. ASTM E 1527 -00, Section 73 on Historical Use Infenirtabon, idenlidiesthe poor use nrnhforaPhase I enviminnmW site assessanau. The ASTM standard iequims a review of �tiabMyascertainable mom his torical sow r-- j Rea swnalily asceria inable mams information that is publicly ava ilable, obtainable from a source with reasonable time and Post constra this, and practically reviewable. To meet the prior use requirements of ASTM E 1 may be used: aerial photographs, fire insurance maps historical source consulter, topographic maps, city ASTM E 1527 -00 requires "AM obvious uses ofthe o8viaierJirstdeieloped im or back to 1940, whichevers Section 7.3.4, the fnitowingstondard historical sources tau files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole a% Wilding department records, or zoninggtIl1and use records. shall be ideritii*d from the present: back to thepropeny's sourcesas arenececarry andthatare reasonablyascezfau Neand ytobeuseful "(ASLME 1527-00,Sevvon732,page 11) £DR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data.. City Directories City directories have been published for cities and towns across the U.S. since the 1700x. Originally a list of residents, the city directory developed into a sophisticated tool for locating individuals and businesses in a particular urban or suburban area Twentieth century directories are generally divided into three'sections: a business index, a list of resident mares and addresses, and a street index. With each address, the directory lists the name of die resident or, if a business is operated from this address, the name and type of business (if unclear from the name). While city directory coverage is comprehensive for major cities, it maybe spotty for twat areas and small towns. ASTM E 1527 -00, specifies that a "review of city directories (standard historical sources) at less than approxinieir4yfrve year intervals is not required by rhispracriee. "MSTME 1327 -00, Section 7.3.2.1, page 12.) NAICS (North American. Industry Classification System) Codes NAICS is a unique, all-new system for classifying business establishments.. Adopted in 1997 to replace the prior Standard Industry Classification (SIC) system; it is the system used by the statistical agencies of the United States: It is the first economic classification system to be constructed based on a single.economic concept. To learn more about the background, the development and. difference between NAICS and SIC, visit the following. Census websiter http:Qwww.census.g6v /eped /wow /fiaicadev :htni. Please call EDR Nationwide Customer Service at 1 -800- 352 -0050 (Sam -Spat EST) with questions or comments about your report. Thank you for your business! Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice Coyyiight 20Di by Environmental Dale Raowees, Inc. All rigbts. reamed. Reproduction is wy melt wfoimal „in whole el in pari, ofmy rcpon w map of Euvhvnmcntal Data Resources, lnc or its affiliaw� is pmhibitad without prior wrineri permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) ale na*rnaft of Enviromnmtsl Data Resources, Inc: or its afliliaita. All other vademaris used herein bre into property of their respective owners. d. SUMMARY • City bireclories. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2002. (These years are not necessarily inclusive.) A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report This report compiles information by geocoding the subject properties (that is, plotting the latitude :and longitude for such subject properties and obtaining data concerning properties within 1/8 of a mile of the subject properties). There is no warranty or guarantee that geocoding will report or list all properties within the specified radius of the subject properties and any such warranty or guarantee is expressly disclaimed. Accordingly, some properties within the aforementioned radius and the information concerning those properties may not be referenced in this report. 1399626 -7 1 Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: City Directories Apr 13, 2005 Target Property: 2100 Mar Vista Drive Newport . Beach, CA 92660 PUR ID Year Uses NAILS Source 7920 Address notL sW in Resemsh Some WA Saab Am Din,owy Co. 1921 AdcI v, m Listn in Reeeereh Some NIA Wert . Directory Co. 1972 AMms not Listed is Rewon a Smerce WA Rosen Oawc Co. 1925 Ad*. not Lured In Research Source NIA Weuere Diraiory Co. 1936 Addmas net LWM is Remmdh Some WA PACIFIC TELEPHONE 1930 Add. eat LkAed in Research Somee WA Westemottewy Co. 1936 Addrem me Lined. Roseetch Some WA Wesanv Dieeaory CO. 3991 Address not Liskd'i. Research Some NIA Soudrcm CaGkmia Tekpdone CO. 1995 Address not Llated in Rexmeh Some MA m cetcheon& enesoator 1996 Adireen not Listed id mmASoume NIA Sanhem CaiitomiaTelephox Co. 1950 Addice, edt Lnledm Reaemch Soon, NIA Tim Pacific Ttephoee and Telegraph Co. 1952 Addrt oca Listed in Reseamii'Some NIA Lus"Dhoetorysmi"Co. 1955 AiWrem mtLtsmdin ReseymA Source NtA The Pacific Ttl -phone and Tekgseph Co. 1956 Ad d. nm.Lined In Reomh Some MA Lofty Bmfenes &C.,I e.. 1969 Addabmt'WiUdIn.Re hSomce MA Lusl¢y Brothma &Co., 1961 Addrearna Listed 'in RCseaicli Some N1A LtWlrey BrbNvs &Co., 1965 Addme not Liseap'm Reeemb Stnnce WA R. Pulelivduru, Inc.. 1966 Adb m'do LiaKd.in Rcseamh Swore MA PACIFIC TELEPHONE Me Add. nor Lifted I. Ream it Some WA R. PUhRatians 1975 SrM ]UCPRESSYTEMA.NCH Lu cys Brothers &Co. ST MARK PRESEY`rERIAN CHURCH U C I LABORATORY PRE SCHOOL UCI LABORATORY PRESCHOOL ST MARK PRESBYTISMAN CH ST MARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH U C I LABORATORY PRE SCHOOL UCILA'BORATORY PRE SCHOOL 1980 ST MARK PRESCHOOL Pacife Telephone 1399626 -7 2 PUR ID Year Uses —` NAICS Somme ••-- 1980 (contiwrdj Tr MARK PRESCHOOL 1996 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH NEWPORT PnciE9.Bell ST MURK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH STt6ARKPRLSCHO0L 1991 COMMUNITY PRESCHOOL Pmifie'RCII PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH NEWPORT BEACH ST MARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 1992 Addlers oW Liskd in Rcs.Ab$M= NIA rtzirm Bal 1995 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH NEWPORT BEACH Puific Bdl ST MARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 1 _ 1997 Addra9nM L'nndinlicsaalcb Sonlm NIA 4aciad Rall 2001 Addn=AML'nicdin.RttemAS.. NiA PACIFIC TEUEMME I 2002 COMLMUNTTY PACIFIC TELEPHONE Adjoining Properties SURROTJ"LNG • MWtiple Addresses Newport Beach, CA 92660 PUR ID Year Uses' NAICS Source 1920 NIA Senn Am Dire wy CA. t921 Addrees hd.LeelM in ReiwNp Svolhn. MA Wesnm Dimctmy C6. I9U Addnnn nW Lis M' in'R«smcb SMiaie NIA Ka=R Direnny Co. 1925 Ad&eb trot Liakd in Hmdnna'SOitiet NIA 'Wmkel Dimvry Co. 1926 AddAms W L.W InRM uuQ, 5o ' NIA. PACIFIC TELEPHONE 1970 Address m# Llekd in Resemeh SOmm NIA Wk Dirmmry Co. 1956 Add. ss natLiuedin Resea+[M1 Bonren WA WesmnTSimy Cu 1961 Addns mtustea R Rasaaieli Sane& WA 50AM CAPOUA3 TelephoacCo. 1945 Add not Liskd n Ra M, Source. NIA htcCnsrAeMV &' 8ngpnim 1946 Addm}sna Liskd in Resmmh Same NIA Swdum Celildrnia Telephone Ca 1 1950 Ad AM Lawd in RuxnAch Seuue NIA The Pacific TOphoneand T.Ie Wb Co. 1399626-7 PUR ID year Uses NAICS Source 1952 Address na Lnwd in Rw.hSwrxe N!A L.keys MmWry Serino Co. 1955 Addreae nor Lts din R.n,h Santo N/A The Patine Telephone and TSlegraph Co- 1936 Address na Lisrad in Research Soorm WA I.urkey Brahen &'Ca., )nv. ]960 Add.. 7)a Li xd in Rnsvarch Swr WA LOskey BrdAw & Cv., 1961 Address.a L" d in Researcb Sm we WA L.Ak yBiali & Co_. 1%3 AdAess nvi Lister in Re .h S.. NIA Rose Pobhcation€ I ., 1%6 " "ALTAVISTA DR Addr¢ses •• PACIFIC TELEPHONE BRISCOE JOHN W SR (2201) JOLLY PRANKLiN M (221 d) WHITE DENNIS L (M 1) FRAZIER B(2226) GREY ARTHUR R (2227) BLANPIED LLOYD E )R (2232) • *ARAUA ST Addresres *" TERRY BERNARD (2100) PENN DOUG JR (2107) OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CONVENT . (2 103) MAC MILLIN PAUL G.(2121) LEECH ROBT G (2126) LEMING HORACE W MD (2126) HEWI9T FRED E(2131) LANE P M (213 7) CALLRGLY DON F L:4612 9UN3 W Pr (RUARUEN (2200) YECKEL MARJORIE MRS (M)D) WOODWORTH JAS K (2206) LOP1ZfCH HOWARD (220'!) DALES DAVID J DR (2212) SHULTZ LYLE (2215) WILISON RICHARD E (221 B) MARKS WM D (2221) MURARE JAS (224) RHOADS PORREST A (2230) VEERKAMP WUIS J (2233) NOROIAN NISH (2239) NORMAN PATTY SI (2259) ROBINSON PHILIP B INS AGCY (2242) SECORD EDGAR M (2245) 1399626 -7 4 PUR ID Year Uses NAILS Source -- 1966(co0tinuid) '• DOMINGO DR Aild". •* MESA LAND CO (851) "•JAMBOREE RD Add.,. IF NO A.NS CALL (2055) 1970 AddM5 not Listed in Rcee bSou= NIA Pws POblioadons 1915 • "ALTA VISTA DR Addre. "• Lwkeys Brofias &Co. BRISCOE IOHN W IR(2201) KROSSE GEO T (n09) LUSE JAS D CAPT USCG 0209) BESHORE KENTON REV (2214) F1.LIOTT F M )R (2215) HAFFERKAMP RUSSELL (2220) HOLMEN RICHARD E(2223) f FRAMER LESLIE (22261 KINZIC FREEMAN X (2226) GREY ROSE (2227) A4CHAELSC C C (2229) MICHAEIS DONN.O ('2229) ••AMIGOS WAY Addrg •` PHILLIPS NORVAL (50) HOfR)ERC C W IlVD (56r) VOTA W WM H (869 WNDEKE ARTHUR ALAN (IT 1), —ARALU STAddrecaa•- BRIM LAWRENCE E(2100) FENN DOUG JR 0107) OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CONVENT (2 .108) SF.MONSEN ROSTM DR (212 1) ANDERSON MICHAEL (2126) NOTT BRUCE R (2131) 13RDCE K (213'7) BRUCE WM D (2137) ALLEGAERT BURR(22011) . (7RIIJ,O MIKE 0201) WOODWbRTH )AS is (2206) WOODWORTH SUSAN (22%) LIGHT SUSAN FIELD (2212) WIL SON RICHARD E(2218) CLARKE WM D (2221) MURAREJASj7U4) 1399626-7 5 PUN Ib Year Uses NAILS 1975 (c4nlieved) _ MERRYMAN ROST W (2227) MERRYMAN MET W (=I) RHOADS FORREST A (Z230) VEERRAMP LOUIS 1 (2233) OHARA FORT O (2276) NOROIAN NISH (295) ROBINSON BRIAN (2242) ROBINSON LORI (2242) ROBIN NPHILIP 0(2242) SECORD EDGAR M(2245) "DOM GO DR Addrtttes" AYOOB D (851) BRADY:THELMA (851) BR[OGS f W W ART) MRS (85l) CAISSE M B(351) CRYSTAL ROBINSON INTERIOR DESIGN (951) FERN R K (851) FRASER CAROLL (951) HANSEN STEINER -E (IS 1) HOPE O (851) MAHONEYM(851) MATHERJ(851) MCCAFFREYMICHABL (851) MCLARRYSALLY(m) MCNANEY JUDY (851) MELKONJAN V (85Y) MONOER MARGARET E (851) R11LEY AM kS51) MEY GLORYA1(831) ROSLNSON CRYSTAL INTERIOR DESIGN (851) SINES BR.L (85l) STILLZOPAT(851) TONNESEN RK (M) TURNER PHILIP E MRS '(951) "£ASTBLUFF DRAddilams" CORONA DEL'MAR HIGH SCHDOL(2 IUI) CORONA DEL MAR INSURANCE AGENCY 'P O BO (2101) 1980 --ALTA VISTA CAB Add m. BIGALKE DONALD (2229) " ALTA VISTA DR Addcevas" BRISCOE JOHN W & ASSOCIATES INS (MI) 1399626 -7 6 Source Pacirz T<lephrsc PURID Year Uses 11AKS Source 1980 BRISCOE JOHN W ILL FVY (220 1) BRISCOE JOHN W JR (2201) L KROSSE GEO T (2208) L USE JAS H CAPS US CO (2209) HUBBARD ANDREW S R2 (2215) OLEMR LEE P'(2223) OLR MEN RICHARD E (2223) RONSACK ROBERT (8228) GREYROSE(2127) "AMFGOS WAYAdOm.— TUCKERGRANLN(E67) •' ARAU& ST AdRS . -- ONRJXEY LAWRENCE E (2 100) PENN DWIO JR (2107) OUR LADY QUEEN Of ANGELS CONVENT (2 108) SEMONSEN ROBT M DR (2121) BRUGF. W MND (213'1) CIRILLO AM (2101) NADLER SWNEV (1212) W 1SON RICHARD 9 (2218) CLARYE WMD(2221) CSIOI L(237A) 1 MILES H(2224) MERRYMAN.RODT W (2227) MERRYMAN ROBT W (7227) BROADS FORREST A (2230) VEHRKA41HP LOU13'B J.(2233) NORO WAN. EOrMM ATYY(2239) MORRIS JOS RICHARD (2242) "DOMINGO AVSAddrian" APLNND PRANCIS'J (851) "DOMINGO DR:AAdrruee'" BOQAARDSLH(85.1).. BRLOGS HOWARD MRS (951) BRLGGS.IF (851) CRYSTAL RDBmoN mrRIOR DESIGN (R51) FRANKLINRURKE (SSI) FRANKLTNCL(8Si) FRASER CAROL L 0511 FRASER CECIL I ODYSSEY CT ®NEWPORT BEA (851) GORBR RA WUN (881) NAMRICKP W (831) 1399626 -7 7 PLJR ID Year uses JVAICS t 99a t�om;imc� H.ANSEN MARY STEINER (85 1) HOPE G (851) JONES'BARRIE (831) RISER MARK (851) LEE tlEAECK [851) LISTER E A (851) MALLORY G D (851) MALLORYPA(851) MALLS MHSLE (851) MON MARGARET B aST) RABOSKY STEVE (95 1) RILEY GLORYA J(851) ROBINSON CRYSTAL INMIOR DESIGN ($S1) SEMLER S(85l) SMRH BURKE (85.1) SWEENEY PEGGY.(851) WOODRUFF VERNONE (85t) EASnLUFF DRAihlr u, `* :CORONA DEL MAR 68GH SCHOOL (2100) ADMINISTRKHON(210t) ATTENDANCE OFFICE (2101) CORONA DEL MAR INSURANCE AGENCY (2101) COUNSELING 15EPARTMENT(2 t6l) STUDENT ACT1VMES (2101) 1986 `+ ALTA VISTA DR Addrstw.'• FRYER STEPHENJ(2201) LUSE JAS D CAP US CG (22091 MEDLINJAS(2MI ) MADISON WEST (2223) BONSACKROBERT(2226) GREY ROSE {1227) ROWE JOHN CARLOS (2232) "* AM1IIGOS. WAY A4&n. •" HIGGINS CALLAH (871) "ARALIA STAddnsw• *. BRXEY LAWRENCE Ef2100) FRNN DOUG JR(2tuT) OUR LA DY QUEEN OF ANGELS CON VENT (2108) SBMONSEN RobT MDR (2121) ANDERSON MICHAEL (2 IN) PATTERSON JOHN R R SUSAN (2127) 1399626-1 8 source P.Ule ul PUR ID Year Uses NAILS Source i 1986 (. t m d) MILLER RICHARD A (213 1) BRUCE WM D(2137) CREDIT BOWS INC (2212) NADLER SIDNEY (2212) CLAMS WM D (2221) COHEN RONALD .L (2224) MURaR R D (222+) _ MERRYMAN ROBT W (2227) MERRYMAN ROBT W (2327) NOROIANP(2239) ROBERTSLARRY %(2245) "DOMINGO DR Addreswx•' BBRG GOROOTI P (861) BORDANOSD(851) BROCK'H (857) CASEY V A (93 1) CRYSTAL ROBU43ON INTERIOR DESIGN (85 1) DIAMOND MARY I(85l) HANSEN -MARY STEINER(951) LE DESMA M (85 1) I:BSTER E A (S51) . MALF ORY GD (851) MARSHALL C M (SS1) FYRONJOHN(m) AOBERTSCD(S51) ROBDJSON CRYSTAL INTERIOR DESRIN (831) SMITHi1(851) .MENEY PEGGY(851) TM. EASTBLUFP DR'Ad&efles s• CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL (2101) CORONA. DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL ;(3101) 1991 MALTA VISTA CDR AAdieius'^' BM GORSPJ MARK (2226) FeeiR4 "ALTAVISTA DRA46.s 't LHSEIASD CAPTUSCO (2209) GREY. ROSE (222'1) GREY SHANE (2227) GREY TOM (2m) ROWS JOHN CARLOS,(2232) `•AMIGOS WAY Add.. j . GREGG SHARON (9651 13"62&7 PUR ID Year Uses 199t (cdnCnuedI /OH \SON C'(w) +. ARALIA ST Addhadm BRIXEY IA WRENCE E (2100) PENN DOUG JR (2101) VIETHJSPFf 2120) RUDINICA MICHAfiL & ELIZABETH (2127) RU➢MSKY C (2127) DRUMW RIGHT DOUG {2137) CREATION CAPTURED (2206) WOODWORTH J A (2206) WOODWORTH KEN (2206) WOODWORTH PIANO SERVICE (2206) WOODWORTH WOODY PHOTURPHR (2206) NADLER SIDNEY (?212) LAIRD PETER & SUSAN (22) 3) CLARKE WM D (2711) MURAR R D (2224) ROHERTS.LARRY K (2245) •i DOMINGO AVE Adds •• BORDANO3 D (85U "• DOMINGO BE Add.. "* BROCK H (851) FERNANDEZ EUGENIO (851) MALLORY G D'(851) MCGRNTYGERAD(831) PAEZ ANA MARIA (831) PYRON JOHN (851) nffTHTI(851) TURNER ESTHER M A PHILIP E (851) 1972 Add .0 li. da Renach Sm. 1995 ••ALTAVISTA DRAddPo"xe FRYER STEPHEN J(2201) LURE JAS D CAPT US CO (TM) D(XMO DXN W, (2226) ROWE JOHN:CARLOS (2232) •• AMIGOS: WAY Addeeawe •' PANDHOH SUBASH (867) CHEM [CAL AW ARENIISS TRAINING'. SERVICE (S69) NISHLMURA JULIA (871) •" ARALIA ST Addroaus.•• N9ICS WA 1399626 -7 10 Source PeciRc Bell ?h I is Bell PUR ID Year Uses 14AICS f993 ican0nued) BRIXEY LAWRENCE E (2 100) FENN DOUG M (21M) EASTON JAKE ID (2121) CREATION CAPTURED (2206) LAIRD PETER & SUSAN (22 15) CLARKE WM.D(2221) MORRIS JOS RICHARD (2242) ••DDMiNGO DRAddreaden'• CLARK MM t95 I) DELRAEDJ(851) FERNANDEE'EVGENLO (851) MARGARIT OIN&05I) PYRQN JOHN (Sil) SNEENEY 51VART d R[TRtS51) RASTELUFF DR Addrepµz ^' CORONA DEL MAR FOOTBALL (2 160) CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL (2 101) CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOQL(2101) GARDEN' GROVEWESTMLNSTERSMBEACH (2101) 1997 Addrergnot USU4 In Rtftw Sgece. tY "A 2001 AddtavwtLkmimRtslwaA:Sauiao NSA 2602 •> ALTA VISTA DR AdMr .—* OFRYER.SLBPHENI (22DI) KROSS£GEORGS(2208). LOSWAS DC APT (22M) C19AMCUMEE (2214). MYCDRN BARRY (2215) SWIESANTHONY 70220)' EMERSON ROY (21H) HUBBARDC(222T)' 0WRTYZOLAN(2226) MEAECIIDONALD(2227) 00I NREJOHN(2229) ROWRIOHH CARLOS am) "ARALIA STAddr o-- BENNETT ROBIN (2101) OMMOWMEDW (2705) FEHNDOUG.JR (2107) DALLAWMIUDANN SR OHIS) BURKS12"ARD(2114) 1399626 -7 11 Source Paci&B41 . PACIFIC TELEPHONE PACIFSC TELEPHONE PLR ID Year uses JU Source 2do2 (omnmvea> DYNARYTEMCLNMS (2115) GARRETTYURLA C 120) OEASTON)ARE(2121) GARREITOFOR13E (2126) OLFFEBM ECHANN RIG (2127) STUARTKEN (2131) L11 GOABOELLE (2(37,1 SLAUGHTER DON.41D (2200) CIRILLOEILEEN 0 U (22M) CREATION CA_PTUMD (2208) OWEISMANFRED(22M) LtRBYSHL IA (2212) PETTYA YNN W15) PRYCHALES (2218) OCI.A.RKE WfLMAM (2221) MURAR (2224) OHW'HESLOWIZY (2227) RHOADSFORREST (2230) HARGRA V ESTNMOAS (2233) 0 VNDTKENNELH (2236) WYSOPALDIAA'E (219) 'SATZSLEVEN (2242)' ORRUX MM ITATUCK (2245) •" DOMINGO OR Addre , "• APARTMENTS (851) BEAN MARK D (831) Oldmo"(SSI) •` £ASTBLUFR..DR Addressg.*'+ CORONA'DELMAR (2101) - -1349626 -7 12 APPENDIX D. NOISE MEASUREMENT DATA Our Lady Queen of Angels Mitigated Negative Declaration Noise Assessment Files Provided by PCR Services Corporation May 2006 D -1 TENS Analysis D -2 Noise Monitoring Sheets Appendix D -1 • TENS Analysis Our Lady of Angels Church Expansion TENS Analysis " Roadway/Segment Traffic Volumes AM PM ADT Lea w5Tg1! AVROWa7h Xrff CNEL ROW 50 Feet 100 Feet ROW 50 Feet 100 Feet Jamboree Road, North of Eastbluff Drive I Ford Road Jamboree Road, South of Eastbluff Drive IFord'Road Eastbluff Drive, West of Jamboree Road Ford Road. East of Jamboree Road Project 31.46 3706 665 567 Traffic AM 3744 4430 873 583 "... Volumes PM 0 0 0 0 4 " ADT 70.8 71.5 64.5 62.7 �. 67.3 68,0 60.9 59.2 .: r Lea 65.3 66.1 59.0 57.2 99M MM 72.0 68.5 72.8 692 65,7 62.1 64.0 60:4 ` 5 ,: si CNEL 66.5 67.3 60.2 58.5 ! �e RoadwaviSetiment ROW 50 Feet 100 Feat ROW 1 50 Feet 100 Feet Jamboree Road, North of Eastbluff Drive I Ford Road Jamboree Road, South of Eastbluff Drive I Ford Road Eastbluff Drive, West of Jamboree Road Ford Road East of Jamboree Road .FFUt.,.l'rr'e 4VitMProlac4! ... J`. ... . t .... Roadwa 7Segment Jamboree Road, North of Eastbluff Drive I Ford Road Jamboree Road,. South of Eastbluff Drive I Ford Road Eastbluff Drive, West of Jamboree Road Ford Road, East of Jamboree Road .. _t� Sw 3768 4498 4389 5267 754 984 749 807 u' iN },` • . _.' ..:. Traffic Volumes AM PM 3771 4498 4392 5267 777 984 766 807 0 0 0. 0 NSI a °v u `•;i?xN" ADT 0 0 0 0 71.6 72.3 65.0 64.2 JS +i ti9 fi8.1 66:1 68.7 66.8 61.5 59.5 60.6 58.7 .%;f 14 5d'd.S krff t?*rr`. P" i'L31 Lea 72.6 69.3 73.5 70.0 66.2 62.7 65 4 61,8 i88 r.,, CNEL 67.3 68.0 60.7 59.9 ROW 71.6 72.3 65.0 64.2 50 Feet 100 Feet 68.1 66.1 68.7 66.8 61.5 59.5 60.6 58'.7 ROW 72:8 73.5 66.2 65.4 50 Feet 100 Feet 69.3 .67.3 70.0 '68.0 62.7 '60.7 61.8 59.9 CNEI TENS Anslysis.xls Page 1 of 1 1 :47 PM 511712006 n5Ttt;€froRROW gJl w5Tg1! AVROWa7h Xrff - Project Cumulative Project Cumulative Roadway/Segment Increment Increment Increment Increment Jamboree Road; North pf Eastbluff Drivel Ford Road 0.0 0:8 0.0 0.8 Jamboree Road, South of Eastbluff Drive 1 Ford Road 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.7 Eastbluff Drive, West of Jamboree Road 0.0 016 0.0 0.5 Ford Road, East of Jamboree Road '0:0 1.4 0.0 1.4 TENS Anslysis.xls Page 1 of 1 1 :47 PM 511712006 Appendix D -2 • Noise Monitoring Sheets Noise Measurement Data 02115/06 02/16/06 02/17106 02/18/06 Start Date and Time 12 :00:00 AM 49.7 49.74 53 1:00:00 AM 46.64 49.35 51.98 2:00:00 AM 42.81 43.46 49.57 3:00:00 AM 47.46 41.67 46.35 4:00:00 AM 48.03 44.65 44.67 5:00:00 AM 49.43 49.5 52.25 6:00:00 AM 61.76 57.51 54.42 7:00:00 AM 61.6 63.77 59.86 8:00:00 AM 61.48 60.37 60.51 9:00:00 AM 67.09 60.29 61.82 10:00:00 AM 64.2 61.96 58.92 11:00:00 AM 62.35 61.14 61.92 12:00:00 PM 62.7 63.18 67.93 1:00:00 PM 67.9 61.32 61.56 2:00:00 PM ' 63.51 63.02 3:00:00 PM 41.7 61.53 62.37 4:00:00 PM �.' 61.09 62.07 5:00:00 PM v 60.46 61.14 6:00:00 PM 60.88 59.49 61.83 7:00:00 PM 60.78 59.96 60.43 8:00:00 PM 58.72 65.14 58.16 9:00:00 PM 58.93 59.41 58.86 10:00:00 PM 56 55.65 54.75 11:00:00 PM 54.34 52.11 52.44 2:00:00 AM 62.7 Ldr, 2/17/06 12:00 AM 2:00:00 AM 67.9 24 -hr Min. 41.7 3:00:00 AM ' 24 -hr Nighttime Max '.End AM 5i00;00 :00:00 41.7 24 -hr Daytime Averages 2/18/06 12:00 AM S AM �.' 24 -hr Daytime Min 58.2 6-00:00 AM v Total Period Max 67.9 CNEL 62.7 Ldr, 62.2 24 -hr Max. 67.9 24 -hr Min. 41.7 24 -hr Nighttime Averagea 51.8 24 -hr Nighttime Max 57.5 24 -hr Nighttime Min 41.7 24 -hr Daytime Averages 62.3 24 -hr Daytime Max 67.9 24 -hr Daytime Min 58.2 Total Period Average" 60;2 Total Period Max 67.9 Total Period Min 41.7 Total Period Daytime Average 62.1 Total Period Daytime Max 67.9 Total Period Daytime Min 58.9 Total Period Nighttime Average 53.0 Total Period Nighttime Max 65.1 Total Period Nighttime Min 41.7 Daytime hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and nighttime hours are from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 1:48 PM 5/17/2006 CJ Noise Measurement Data ,P�otacf- " u. x�" d. den of [ s {N�evfpo'rt ®chi) � a „I�a�atldnF �� �o"rr,°t�ea�'�rne`�"r�af�Q� g,�•I�nsQ� `;�'»,� 02/15106 02/16/06 02/17106 02/18106 02/19/06 02120106 02121/06 8:00:00 AM I 52.93 57.75 65.9 58.68 56.95 60.58 9:00:00 AM 46.6 58.4 56.82 63.58 58.83 58.03 60.72 10:00:00 AM l�i 72 56.77 61.07 55.05 58.02 57.33 11:00:00 AM 37.2 61.94 63.16 59.61 55.44 59.9 56.69 12:00:00 PM 46.0 70.04 60.65 56.76 57.6 61.89 58.14 1:00:00 PM 56.62 59.07 57,49 57.26 60.17 58.16 2:00:00 PM 58.01 58.56 57.62 55.42 59.91 57.34 3:00:00 PM 57.33 58.97 55.88 56.83 59.28 58.41 4:00:00 PM 57.68 58.02 56.14 55.84 59.19 57.46 5:00:00 PM 56.56 55.37 57.03 55.41 56:79 56.87 5T.23 6:00:00 PM 59.62 56.44 55.26 53.35 54.44 57.41 56.88 7:00:00 PM 57.75 57.69 59.23 55.95 55.07 56.47 57:65 8 :00 :00 PM 54.44 53.58 55:28 51.72 55:72 54:86 53.88 9.00100 PM 53.55 54.98 56.72 51.46 .54.5.1 54(09 52:41 ',Daytime hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., and nighttime hours are from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. Start Date and Time lZZ Ain I Lda 2117106 12:00 AM 2:00:00 AM tilt 24 -hr Min. 39.3 3:0o:ooaM 46.6 24 -hr Nighttime Max End 4:00:a0 AM r 24 -hr Daytime Averagea 2/18/06 12:00 AM 5:00:00 AM l�i 24 -hr Daytime Min 55.3 6:00:00 AM 58.9 Total Period Max 72.0 CNEL 58.9 Lda 58.0 24 -hr Max, 63.2 24 -hr Min. 39.3 24 -hr Nighttime Averagea 46.6 24 -hr Nighttime Max 51.9 24 -hr Nighttime Min 39.3 24 -hr Daytime Averagea 58.7 24 -hr Daytime Max 63.2 24 -hr Daytime Min 55.3 Total Period Average 58.9 Total Period Max 72.0 Total Period Min 37.2 Total Period Daytime Average 59.6 Total Period Daytime Max 72.0 Total Period Daytime Min 48:6 Total Period Nighttime Average 46.0 Total Period Nighttime Max 59.2 Total Period Nighttime Min 37.2 1:48 PM 5/17 /2006 E 0 Communi f Noise Equivalent LevelkNEL. Project: Our Lady Queen of Angles (Newport Bch) Location: 2 - Northeast corner of existing OLQA Sources: Traffic Volumes Date: Februan� 15 -21, 2006 HNL, TIME dB(A) 12:00 AM 1:00 AM —4UT- 2:00 AM :0o AM — 4:00 A: A 6:00 AM 519 7:00 AM 59.7 8:00 AM 57.8 9:00 AM 56.8 0:00 A 11:00 AM 12:00 1:00 PM 2:00 P: 1 3:00 P: 4:00 PM :o PM 757,7- :0 PM1 10:00 11:00 rM CNEL, dB(A): 58.9 (eldcnel. xls :1 Q 70.0 Co V 60.0 w LU 50.0 w rn p 40.0 z 0 F 30.0 2 C7 M 20.0 Q 10.0 1 1 ¢Q¢Q¢¢ <<<<<<MG- a.aaan.aaaaa 000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 tn�1�66 M V 6�6 nc6 6i 0� TIME Noise Measurement Data Protect 9 ;.0'ur'Lady�Qu, n,ofgAt�gle`�ewpoitB h)'k-� i�„ ^� ��Lo tlDn.3 , 5o�ui�i,` o�; sM�rk, �; rgpe ,y,�acr��ss`�f�omdres�d�ence 02/16106 02/17/06 02118106 02119/06 02120/06 ,02/21106 02122/06 7:00:00 AM 56.32 61.37 57.89 49.89 59.59 59.17 57.68 8:00:00 AM 55.7 56.98 56.3 57.59 55.83 64.37 53.18 9:00:00 AM 55.3 56.77 58.66 57.27 55.63 57.78 54.02 10:00:00 AM 56.44 57.31 53.77 54.7 55.05 54.48 56.41' 11:00 :00 AM 57.08 57.31 56.41 56.01 55.48 55.32 58.83 12:00:00 PM 56.39 58.17 54.11 56.55 56.68 56.04 1:00:00 PM 56.47 57.19 55.01 55.94 56.64 56.31 2:00:00 PM 55.37 56.99 56,47 54.38 54.41 55.34 3:00:00 PM 54.87 66.02 54.9 54.82 55.22 55.05 4:00:00 PM 56.47 61.1 55.52 55.41 56.85 56.05' 5:00:00 PM 54.24 58.94 54.06 55.69 54.42 56.15 6:00:00 PM 55.48 62.34 52.91 54.08 56.16 56.06 7:00:00 PM 56.91 58:63 55.87 54.62 55.7 56:52 8 :00 :00 PM 54.36 54,25 52.12 55:52 54.55 53.18 9:00:00 PM 54.27 55:61 52:49 54.32 54.66 53.,17 ' Daytime hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p:m., and nighttime hours are from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m -. Start Date and Time AM AM AM AM 2/16/06 12:00 AM End 2/17/06 12:00 AM CNEL 58.3 Ldn 57.7 24 -hr Max. 57.1 24 -hr Min. 40.6 24 -hr Nighttime Averagea 49,7 24 -hr Nighttime Max 55.1 24 -hr Nighttime Min 40.6 24 -hr Daytime Average 55.8 24 -hr Daytime Max 57.1 24 -hr Daytime Min 54.2 Total Period Average 55.4 Total Period Max 66.0 Total Period Min 40.6 Total Period Daytime Average 57.0 Total Period Daytime Max 66.0 Total Period Daytime Min 49.9 Total Period Nighttime Average 48.6 Total Period Nighttime Max 58.6 Total Period Nighttime Min 40.6 1:49 PM 5/17/2006 CommunliNoise Equivalent Levei*CNEL. Project: Our Lady Queen of Angles (Newport Bch) Location: 3 - South of Shark property, across from residences Sources: Traffic Volumes Date: February 16 -22, 2006 HNL, TIME dB(A) 12:00 AM 1:00 Aff 2:00 A :0-AM A 6:00 AM 55.1 7:00 AM 56.3 8:00 AM 55.7 9:00 AM 55.3 :0 11:00 AN z:00 PW W217 1:00 Ph 2:00 3:00 PM :00 :00 7:00 PM 8:00 PM— -75T2F- :00 PM SUIF 1:00 P CNEL, dB(A): 58.3 :1 1 a 70.0 m 9 60.0 W W 50.0 W y p 40.0 z 0 F 30.0 x M 20.0 Q 10.0 1 1 222222222222222222222222 ¢¢QQQ¢¢¢QQ¢¢aao- o- MCLa-o_MMo.a. 000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000 N NM41n 6 n 66 6i O N"N M 46 f0 n X666 TIME Noise Measurement Data 02115/06 02116106 02117106 02118106 02/19106 02120106 02121106 7:00:00 AM 55.79 59.87 58:62 49.97 59.07 8:00:00 AM 59.35 57.97 57.42 58.81 57.92 9:00:00 AM 53.94 56.11 60.37 58.22 57.26 10:00:00 AM 57.3 57.12 54:04 55.58 55.97 19:00 :00 AM 57.97 56.87 59.23 56.88 56:94 12:00:00 PM 58 59.39 55.07 58.09 57.87 1:00:00 PM 78.85 58.49 56.49 57.04 59.06 2:00:00 PM 60.67 58.54 58.14 54.8 57.18 3:00:00 PM 55.79 58.51 55.76 55.83 57.3 4:00:00 PM 59.62 86.95 60.14 55.92 59.71 5:00:00 PM 55.8 58.34 56.09 57.19 56.27 6:00:00 PM 56.85 56.35 54.04 55.62 57.27 7 :00:00 PM 59.22 59.39 59.95 56.58 55:62 56.11 8:00:00 PM 54.76 55.71 55.12 52.35 56.33 58..16 9:00:00 PM 53.93 54.83 56.52 52.44 54.39 54.29 58.51 58.81 58.29 58.51 Daytime hours are from 7:00 a.m.. to 10:00 p.m., and nighttime hours are from 10:00 p.m. to 7 :00 a.m. Start Date 2/18/2006 a:oo:00AM 2/17/06 12:00 AM 2/19/2006 .._ 2:0000 AM 2 L20 2006 v 3:00:00 AM`'i End 4 :oo:00 AM 2/18/06 12:00 AM 5:00:00 AM 6 :00:00 AM v I CNEL 58.7 Ltl„ 57.7 24 -hr Max. 60.0 24 -hr Min. 37.8 24-hr Nighttime Averagea 47.1 24 -hr Nighttime Max 52.0 24 -hr Nighttime Min 37.8 24 -hr Daytime Averagea 58.0 24 -hr Daytime Max 60.0 24 -hr Daytime Min 55.1 Total Period Average 61.4 Total Period Max 78.9 Total Period Min 36.8 Total'Period Daytime. Average 61.6 Total Period Daytime Max 78.9 Total Period Daytime Min 50.0 Total Period Nighttime Average 49.1 Total Period Nighttime Max 60.2 Total Period' Nighttime Min 36.8 1:49 PM 5/17/2006 C C APPENDIX E. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS EXPANSION Traffic Study April 2006 WS OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS EXPANSION TRAFFIC STUDY Prepared by: Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. 2223 Wellington Avenue, Suite 300 Santa Ana, California 92701 -3161 (714) 667 -0496 April 27, 2006 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS EXPANSION TRAFFIC STUDY This report summarizes an analysis performed for Our Lady Queen of Angels Church in Newport Beach based on the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) methodology, summarizes the results of an analysis of cumulative conditions in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements, and evaluates local circulation and on -site parking issues. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The existing Our Lady Queen of Angels Church is located at 2046 Mar Vista Drive on an eight acre parcel of land bounded by Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive, across from Corona Del Mar High School. Our Lady Queen of Angels Church is purchasing a 4.37 -acre parcel from Saint Mark Presbyterian Church located at 2100 Mar Vista Drive that is easterly across Domingo Drive. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the proposed project. The proposed project consists of anew sanctuary (2100 Mar Vista Drive) and additional classrooms and a gymnasium for the school (2046 Mar_ Vista Drive). The proposed expansion will result in a net reduction of sanctuary seats compared with the existing capacity in the two existing sanctuaries, elimination of the two pre- schools, and an increase of 180 students in grades K -8. The proposed site plan is illustrated in Figure 2. TRIP GENERATION AND The proposed sanctuary consists of 1,170 'central assembly seats, a net reduction of 52 seats from the 1,222 seat permitted capacity in the two existing sanctuaries. The proposed school enrollment will be 600 students, an increase of 180 students over the existing enrollment at the two schools. However, the proposed school will eliminate the pre - school at both existing schools (approximately 105 pre- school students) and replace them with K -8 students at a rate of approximately 30 students per year. All of the K -8 classes will start school together each day, except for one of the two kindergarten classes (approximately 33 students) which will start at approximately 10:00 AM. For this analysis, the total enrollment is assumed to be complete by the analysis year' 2010. Traffic generated by the existing, uses was subtracted from the trips generated by the proposed project to obtain the net new trips being added to the surrounding circulation system. Weekday trip generation for the existing uses and the proposed project is summarized *in Table 1. As this table indicates, the proposed project generates a total of 1,082 weekday trips daily, 19 more trips Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion I Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc Figure 1 PROIECTLOCATION Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 2 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rptFigl.dwg Figure 2 PROPOSED SITE PLAN Our Lady Queen Of Angels.Expansion 3 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic. Study 017077rp[Fig2.dwg ' LAND USE Table 1 TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY AM PEAK HOUR UNITS IN OUT TOTAL IN PM PEAK HOUR OUT TOTAL ADT TRIP RATES(NBTAM) Church TSF .08 .03 .11 .34 .30 .64 7.70 Pre- School/Day Care TSF 6.90 6.12 13.02 6.40 7.22 13.62 79.26 Elementary/Private School STU .18 .12 .30 .00 0.00 0.00 1.09 TRIP GENERATION Existing Credits Our Lady Queen of Angels Church 34.31 TSF 3 1 4 12 10 22 264 Pre- School/Day Care 1.63 TSF it 10 21 10 12 22 129 Elementary/Private School 315 STU 57 38 95 0 0 0 343 Sub -Total 71 49 120 22 22 44 736 Saint Mark Church Church 12.39 TSF 1 0 1 4 4 8 95 Pre- School/Day Care 2.93 TSF 20 18 38 19 21 40 232 Sub -Total 21 18 39 23 25 48 327 TOTAL CREDITS 92 67 159 45 47 92 1,063 Proposed Project Our Lady Queen of Angels Church 55.53 TSF 4 2 6 19 17 36 428 Elementary/Private School 600 STU 108 72 180 0 0 0 654 TOTAL 112 74 186 19 17 36 1,082 NET NEW TRIPS 20 7 27 -26 -30 -56 19 NBTAM- Newport Beach Traffic Analysis Model TSF - Thousand square feet STU - Students Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 4 Austin -Foust Associates, I w Traffic Study _ 017077rpt.doc than are currently generated. During the weekday AM peak hour the proposed project generates 27 new trips compared with the trip generation of the existing uses. During the weekday PM peak hour there is a reduction in trips, generated compared with the trip generation of the existing uses. Trip distribution of project- generated traffic onto the surrounding circulation system was determined from current student enrollment in relation to the subject property as well as from observed travel patterns in the vicinity of the project site. The general distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. Approximately 20 percent of project traffic is oriented toward the neighborhoods west of Jamboree Road, approximately 10 percent of school traffic is oriented toward the north, 10 percent is oriented toward the south, and 60 percent is oriented toward the east. Project - generated trips were distributed to the circulation system according to these distribution patterns. TPO TRAFFIC IMPACTS The City of Newport Beach identified the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road for analysis to determine the impact of the proposed church/school expansion. Existing (2005) peak hour intersection volumes were provided by City Staff. An ambient growth rate of 1.0 percent per year was added to the existing volumes on Jamboree Road. The Church is expected to be completed in 2009; therefore, the analysis year is 2010. Expansion of the elementary school is expected to occur beginning with the 2007/2008 school year and continue until the 2012/2013 school year at a rate of approximately 30 students per year. To analyze a worst -case condition, the entire school expansion is assumed by the analysis year (2010). Traffrc, generated by approved projects in the study area, obtained from City Staff, were added to the existing peak hour volumes to obtain year 2010 background peak hour volumes for the study intersection prior to the addition of project- generated traffic. Table 2 summarizes the approved projects included in this analysis. Background- plus - project peak hour volumes were obtained by adding the project - generated peak hour intersection volumes presented above to the existing -plus- regional growth- plus- approved projects peak hour volumes. The TPO analysis consists of a one percent analysis and an ICU analysis at the study intersection. The one percent analysis compares the proposed project traffic with projected background peak hour volumes. To pass the one percent analysis, peak hour traffic from the proposed project must be less than Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 5 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpidoc Figure 3 GENERAL PROJECT DISTRIBLMON Our lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 6 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rptFW.dwg Table 2 APPROVED PROJECTS SUMMARY LOCATION PERCENT COMPLETE Fashion Island Expansion 36 Temple Bat Yahm Expansion 65 Ford Redevelopment 95 Cannery Lofts Village 0 Hoag Hospital Phase 11 0 CIOSA — Irvine Project 91 Newport Danes 0 1401 Dove Street 0 Newport Auto Center Expansion 0 Olsen Townhome Project 0 Bayview Landing Senior Housing 0 Birch Bayview Plaza B 0 494/496 Old Newport Blvd 0 401 Old Newport Blvd 0 Newport Technology Center 0 1901 Westcliff Surgical Center 0 Hoag Hospital Phase 111 0 Newport Lexus 0 Birch Street Medical Office 0 Saafar Fine Indian Cuisine 0 Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 7 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.d« one percent of the projected background peak hour traffic on each leg of the intersection. If the proposed project passes the one percent analysis, then the ICU analysis is not required and no further analysis is necessary. If the proposed project does not pass the one percent analysis, then the ICU analysis must be performed for the intersection which fails to pass the one percent test. Table 3 summarizes the results of the one percent analysis (the one percent analysis sheets are included in the appendix). As this table indicates, the proposed project does not pass the one percent analysis at the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the AM peak hour, therefore, an ICU analysis is required for the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road. The ICU analysis for the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road assumes existing lane configurations and a capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour per lane with no clearance factor. The existing, background, and background- plus - project ICU values are summarized in Table 4 (actual ICU calculation sheets are included in the appendix). This table indicates that the intersection operates at LOS `B" or better. The traffic generated by Corona De] Mar High School opposite.the project is concentrated in a 20 to 30 minute period during the AM peak hour and results in considerable delay at the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the peak high school arrival period; however, the ICU value is determined based on the hourly volume assuming a random arrival rate spread out over the entire hour. Therefore the full impact of the high school arrival is not reflected m the AM peak hour ICU value> .Intersection improvements which would be necessary to mitigate: the Corona Del Mar High School. traffic impacts during the peak 30 minutes at this location are not feasible. Although the ICU value does not completely reflect the impact of the high school traffic on the intersection, of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the AM-peak hour, the proposed project's impacts aid determined'based on the incremental increase in the ICU over the background condition. As the ICU summary table indicates, the project will cause less than .01 increase in the ICU value.at Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during.the peak hours. Therefore, the project has no significant impact on the study intersection, and no mitigation is required. CUMULATIVE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS City Staff provided '.a list. of seven known but not approved projects for use in a: cumulative conditions analysis. .These cumulative projects are summarized in Table 5. Trip generation and Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 8 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpLdw Table 4 Table 3 ICU ANALYSIS SUMMARY SUMMARY OF ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS BACKGROUND EXISTING -- AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES - - -- LESS THAN 1% OF INTERSECTION NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1. Jamboree & Eastblutf/Ford 2 1 12 6 No Level of service ranges: -.000 — .600 A - -- PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES - - -- LESS THAN I% OF INTERSECTION NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1. Jamboree & EastblufflFord 0 0 0 0 Yes Table 4 ICU ANALYSIS SUMMARY BACKGROUND EXISTING BACKGROUND +PROJECT INTERSECTION AM PM - AM PM AM PM 1. Jamboree & Eastbluffford .540 .615 .574 .658 .576 .659 Level of service ranges: -.000 — .600 A _601— .700 B - - .701— .800 C .801— .900 D - .901 -1.000 E -- -Above 1.000 F Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 9 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study - 017077ipt.doc Table 5 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS SUMMARY Saint Mark Presbyterian Church Church - 34.80 -TSF - Day Care 4.72 TSF Saint Andrews Cbuch Church 32.00 TSF Monson Temple Temple 17.46 TSF Bonita CanyonfNewport Coast Residential Project Multi - Family Attached -436 DU South Coast Shipyard Multi - Family Attached 28 DU Commercial Retail 19.6 TSF - - Commercial Office - 10.4 TSF Newport Coast TAZ I — 4 Single Family Detached - 954 DU Condominium/Townhouse 389 DU Multi - Family Attached 175 DU Newport Ridge TAZ I — 3 Single Family Detached - 632 DU Multi - Family Attached 384 DU Commercial 102.96 TSF TSF — thousand square feet DU— dwelling units Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion - 10 - Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study - 017077tptdoc distribution for each cumulative project was also provided by City Staff. The peak hour cumulative intersection volumes were added to the background volumes presented earlier, then project- generated traffic was compared to one percent of the background -plus- cumulative traffic. The results of the cumulative one percent analysis are summarized in Table 6. The proposed project does not pass the one percent test at the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the AM peak hour; therefore, an ICU analysis is required for the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road. The results of the cumulative ICU analysis are summarized in Table 7 (actual ICU calculation sheets are included in the appendix). As the cumulative ICU summary table indicates, the proposed project will cause less than .01 increase in the ICU value at Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the peak hours. The project has no significant impact on the study intersection, and no mitigation is required. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACTS ANALYSIS The proposed project's potential impacts on the residential neighborhood west of Eastbluff Drive were investigated. Project traffic, both weekday and Sunday, will access the project site from Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive. However, an existing left -turn restriction is located northbound on Eastbluff Drive at Mar Vista Drive during the AM peak period on school days (7:30 — 9:00 AM) to prevent the back up of vehicles to the Jamboree Road/Eastbluff Drive intersection during the peak high school arrival time. Therefore, as a result of this turn restriction, weekday morning traffic approaching the project site from Jamboree Road south of Eastbluff Drive or from Ford Road east of Jamboree Road between 7:30 and 9:00 AM must continue north on Eastbluff Drive past Mar Vista Drive to Vista Del Oro before making a left turn, then travel around the high school to the west end of Mar Vista Drive and approach the project site from eastbound Mar Vista Drive. This turn restriction does not affect project traffic approaching from the north on Eastbluff Drive. In addition, this turn restriction only applies to school days and has no impact on the weekend traffic approaching the project site. Existing weekday and Sunday average daily traffic (ADT) volumes on the key local streets are illustrated in Figure, 4. These volumes include the traffic currently being generated by the Our Lady Queen of Angels facility and the Saint Mark Presbyterian Church facility. The proposed project includes the elimination of two pre - schools with a total of 105 students, which results in a reduction of 59 trips during the weekday AM peak hour. Therefore, the proposed Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 11 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 12 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077gx.doc Table 7 Table 6 CUMULATIVE ICU ANALYSIS SUMMARY SUMMARY OF CUMULATIVE ONE PERCENT ANALYSIS - - -- AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES - - - -- LESS THAN 1% OF INTERSECTION NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1. Jamboree & Eastblufi/Ford 2 1 12 6 No AM. PM - - - -- PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES - - -- LESS THAN 1% OF INTERSECTION NB SB EB WB PEAK HOUR VOLUMES 1. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford 0 0 0 0 Yes Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 12 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077gx.doc Table 7 CUMULATIVE ICU ANALYSIS SUMMARY BACKGROUND BACKGROUND +CUMULATIVE 'EXISTING BACKGROUND +CUMULATIVE +PROJECT INTERSECTION AM PM AM. PM AM PM AM PM 1. Jamboree & Eastbluf lFord .540 .615 .574 .658 .662 .735 .663 .735 Level of service ranges .000— ..600 A .601.—.700 B .701— .900 C .801 — .900 D .901 -1.000 E Above 1.000 F Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 12 Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077gx.doc Figure 4 EXISTING ADT VOLUMES Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 13 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc, Traffic Study 017077rptFig4.dwg project will add 27 new trips during the weekday AM peak hour to the circulation system. In reality, the majority of these trips will occur within a half- -hour period 'during the peak hour. Of these new trips, 20 trips are inbound and seven trips are outbound. Distribution of the new trips on the surrounding street system is based on the existing school enrollment, as discussed above. Approximately ten percent of the student enrollment comes from the residential area west of Easbluff Drive. Trips from this area are expected to travel on the residential streets to Vista Del Oro and approach the project site from eastbound Mar Vista Drive. These trips will total approximately two new trips during the AM peak 30 minutes. New trips from the residential neighborhood between Eastbluff Drive and Jamboree Road and approaching from the north on Eastbluff Drive will total approximately three new trips. The remaining new trips are expected to come from south and east of the project site. The school day begins at 7:50 AM; therefore, the majority of trips from south and east of the site will be subject to the turn restriction on northbound Eastbluff Drive at Mar Vista Drive. Of the trips from the south and east, approximately 30 percent are estimated to arrive before the turn restriction on Eastbluff Drive begins at 7:30 AM. Therefore, approximately four new trips will turn left from northbound Eastbluff Drive to westbound Mar Vista Drive, and I I new trips will travel north on Eastbluff Drive and west on Vista Del Oro to the west end of Mar Vista Drive during the AM peak 30 minutes. Figure 5 illustrates the existing AM peak hour volumes on the Surrounding street system and the new trips generated by this project. A total of 13 new inbound AM peak hour trips will be added to Mar Vista Drive west of the project site and seven new inbound trips will be added to Mar Vista Drive east of the site. The new weekday AM peak hour trips generated by the proposed project are. not expected to create a significant impact on the surrounding local streets. The Our, Lady Queen of Angels school day begins at 7:50 AM. The adjacent Corona Del Mar High School has some classes beginning at 6 :55 AM, but the majority.of high school students arrive for classes beginning at 7:55 AM. To minimize the effects of the proposed expansion on the adjacent street system, the Our Lady Queen of Angels school day could begin. earlier to increase the offset between Our Lady Queen of Angels School and Corona Del Mar High School start times. If the Our Lady Queen of Angels school day began earlier, more vehicles from the south and east would arrive before the start of the left -turn restriction on Eastbluff Drive; thereforejewer vehicles would travel along Vista Del Oro to get to the school. Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 14 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study _ - 017077rptdoc Legend Figure 5 Vehicles that turn before the start of the weekday WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES morning left -turn restriction Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 15 Austin -Foust Associates, inc. Traffic Study 017077rptFig5.dwg The afternoon school pick -up period occurs in the middle of the afternoon, between 2:30 and 3:00 PM weekdays. During the typical PM peak hour (5:00 — 6:00 PM) there will be a net reduction of 56 trips generated by the site as a result of elimination of the two pre- schools. On Sundays, Our Lady Queen of Angels Church currently has four services in the morning (7:00 AM, 8:30 AM, 10:00 AM, and 11:30 AM) with a capacity of 872 seats, and Saint Mark Presbyterian Church has one service (9:30 AM) with a capacity of 350 seats. The number of seats in the proposed sanctuary (1,170 seats) will be reduced from the existing number of seats in the two churches combined (1,222 seats), and the number of Sunday morning services at Our Lady Queen of Angels Church will remain at four. Table 8 summarizes the average Sunday morning attendance at Our Lady Queen of Angels Church for the month of October for the past three years. As this table shows, the 10:00 AM service is currently the most popular service with an average attendance of 607 persons, with the 8:30 AM service slightly less popular with an average attendance of 589 persons. The average attendance at the 10:00 AM service is approximately 70 percent of the seating capacity, and the proposed expansion will result in.a 34 . percent increase in seating capacity in the sanctuary. Assuming that the attendance at the 10:00 AM service increases proportionately with the expansion, then the proposed expansion will result in an average attendance of 813 persons (an increase of 206 persons). Similarly, the average attendance at the 8:30 AM service will increase to 789 persons. Traffic from the increase in attendance at the 8:30 AM service will increase, while the increase in traffic from the 10 :00 AM service at Our Lady Queen of Angels Church will be approximately offset by the elimination of traffic from the 9:30 AM service at Saint Mark. Presbyterian Church. It is recognized that the elimination of the single 9 :30 AM Saint Mark Presbyterian Church service would seem to mostly affect the existing traffic for the 10:00 AM Our Lady Queen of Angels service; however, this would also reduce the traffic for the 8:30 AM Our Lady Queen of Angels service as they leave. There is the possibility that the increase in seating capacity at Our Lady Queen of Angels Church will result in an increase in attendance at the less popular services; however, since the 7:00 AM and 11:30 AM services are currently lightly attended, there is no reason to expect a significant increase in attendance at the 7:00 AM and 11:30 AM services due to the church expansion. On the contrary, it may occur that with additional seating available at the popular 8 :30 AM and 10:00 AM services as a result of the proposed expansion, some people who currentlyattend the 7:00 AM or 11:30 AM service will choose to attend the 8:30 AM or 10:00 AM service instead. Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 16 Austin -Foust Associates, Ise- Traffic Study 017077rpttdoc Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 17 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc Table 8 OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH SUNDAY ATTENDANCE SUNDAY MORNING SERVICE SUNDAY DATE 7:00 AM 8:30 AM 10:00 AM 11:30 AM 10/05103 185 608 636 263 10/12103 240 624 566 290 10119/03 215 601 553 301 10/26103 290 635 536 331 10/03/04 230 384 810 318 10/10/04 210 602 689 354 10/17/04 150 427 685 315 10/24/04 180 731 .626 321 10/31/04 285 748 620 303 10102/05 165 566 544 351 10/09/05 180 632 626 368 10/16/05 160 579 468 320 10/23/05 195 515 532 452 . Average 207 589 607 330 Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 17 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc SITE ACCESS AND CIRCULATION The revised site plan for the new church calls for removal of the existing buildings on the Saint Mark Presbyterian Church site (2100 Mar Vista Drive) east of Domingo Drive and construction of an entirely new 55,527 square foot building housing the sanctuary, nursery, meeting rooms, and ancillary facilities. The existing Our Lady Queen of Angels site (2046 Mar Vista Drive) north of Domingo Drive would contain the existing Parish Center, existing Rectory, two existing school buildings with extensions, one new school building, and a new gymnasium. Vehicular access to the entire site will be simplified through the removal of two of four existing driveways on Mar.Vista Drive and alignment of a new main driveway on Domingo Drive to parking lots on both sides of the street. A second existing driveway on Domingo Drive will provide access to a small parking lot behind the existing rectory on the site north of Domingo Drive. A total of four driveways will provide access to the site north of Domingo Drive (two driveways on Mar Vista Drive and two on Domingo Drive), and one driveway will provide access to the site east of Domingo Drive. The student drop - off/pick -up procedure will remain the same as existing and will involve a one -way counterclockwise circulation pattern withtraffic entering at the westerly driveway on Mar Vista Drive and exiting the easterly driveway. The proposed drop - off/pick -up circulation is. illustrated in Figure 6. Counts of the existing drop- off/pick -up procedure were conducted on one day in December 2005 and two days in March 2006 (actual count data is included in the appendix). The count data indicates that 85 percent of the students are dropped.off during a 25 -minute-period in the morning, and 85 to 90 percent are picked up in a 25- minute period.in the afternoon. During the morning drop -off period, approximately 30 percent of the vehicles arrive before the 7:30 to 9:00 AM left -turn restriction on Eastbluff Drive. Of these vehicles that arrive prior to the morning turn restriction; approximately ten percent arrive before the peak 25- minute drop -off period and approximately 20 percent arrive during the peak 25- minute period. A queue of six or seven vehicles was observed backed onto Mar Vista Drive briefly during the morning drop -off period; however, no vehicles were observed to back onto Mar Vista Drive during the afternoon pick -up period. The current drop -off procedure involves three rows of vehicles dropping off students in the parking lot. To reduce the impact of queues on Mar Vista Drive, the parking lot has sufficient space to allow a fourth row of vehicles during the peak drop -off period which will clear vehicles off of Mar Vista Drive faster. Ow Lady Queen Or Angels Expansion - 1s - Austin -Foust Associates, Tue. Traffic Study 0170771ptdoc Figure 6 PROPOSED SCHOOL DROP- OFFIPICK -UP PROCEDURE Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 19 Austin -Foust Associates, Inu Traffic Study 017077rptFig6.dwg 0 0 On both count days in March 2006, the actual school attendance was 302 students. The number of vehicles observed dropping off students in the main school parking lot or behind the school on Domingo Drive was 166 vehicles on one day and 164 vehicles on the second day. The average vehicle occupancy based on the actual school attendance is 1.83 students per vehicle during the morning drop -off period. During the afternoon pick -up period, 133 vehicles picked up students on one day and 138 vehicles picked up students on the second day in March 2006. Based on the actual school attendance on the count days (302 students), the. average afternoon vehicle occupancy rate of 2.23 students per vehicle is approximately 20 percent higher than the morning vehicle occupancy rate. Since the vehicle occupancy rate was based on student attendance figures rather than the number of students who were actually picked up by vehicle during the counts, the afternoon pick -up occupancy rate may be higher than the morning drop -off rate partly due to after, school activities (such as sports, tutoring, etc.) that keep some students on the site until later in the afternoon. However, observations conducted at the main school parking lot in December 2005 in which the number of students per vehicle were actually counted confirms that the vehicle occupancy rate during the aftemoon pick -up period is higher than the morning drop -off vehicle occupancy rate. The proposed expansion will increase the enrollment at Our Lady Queen of Angels from 350 students (including 35 pre - school students) to 600 students, 33 of which are, kindergarten students who would not start school until approximately 10:00 AM; therefore, there is a net increase of 217 new students being dropped off in the Our Lady Queen of Angels parking lot for class at the same time as the existing students. Based on the observed vehicle occupancy rate of 1.83 students per vehicle during the, doming drop -off period and assuming 100 percent attendance by the students, the proposed expansion would increase the number of drop -off vehicles by 119 vehicles; 85-percent of which (101 vehicles) are expected . to arrive during the peak 25 minutes (approximately 7:25 to 7:50 AM). This increase in vehicles averages four new vehicles per minute during the peak 25- minute drop -off period. The current drop -off procedure involves three rows of vehicles dropping off students in the parking lot: To accommodate the proposed school. expansion, the drop -off procedure should be expanded to four rows of vehicles during the peak drop -off period. The school: shall conduct periodic reviews of the drop -off and. pick -up procedures and make modifications when necessary. Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 20 Austin -Foust Associates, lnc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc PARKING ANALYSIS The existing parking was observed on a Sunday in November 2005 and again in March 2006 (actual count data is included in the appendix). The maximum parking observed for both the Our Lady Queen of Angels Church services and Saint Mark Presbyterian Church services was 549 spaces and occurred on both count days during the 10:00 AM service. In November, approximately 210 of these vehicles were parked in the Corona Del Mar High School parking lots, 36 were parked on Domingo Drive, and 32 were parked on Mar Vista Drive. In March, 162 vehicles were parked in the Corona Del Mar High School parking lots, 67 were parked on Domingo Drive, and 18 vehicles were parked on Mar Vista Drive. Several of the vehicles parked on Domingo Drive appeared to be residents' vehicles unrelated to the church activities. The on -site parking for Our Lady Queen of Angels Church can currently accommodate 124 vehicles while the parking lot for Saint Mark Presbyterian Church can accommodate 150 vehicles for a total of 274 spaces. The proposed project will provide a total of 439 parking spaces on -site, 163 of which will be on the site north of Domingo Drive and 276 will be on the site east of Domingo Drive, thereby satisfying the City code requirement of 390 spaces for the 1,170 -seat sanctuary (i.e., one space per three seats). Vehicle occupancy counts were performed on the Sunday morning in March 2006 and revealed a maximum average vehicle occupancy rate of 1.70 persons per vehicle prior to the 10:00 AM service. This average vehicle occupancy rate is a little lower than a sample vehicle occupancy rate observed in February.2006 (1.85 persons per vehicle). The 10:00 AM Sunday morning service has the highest average attendance and the highest vehicle occupancy rate. The proposed expansion will result in a 34 percent increase in seating capacity in the sanctuary. Based on an historical average attendance of 607 people at the 10:00 service at the existing Our Lady . Queen of Angels Church, the proposed expansion will result in an average attendance of 813 persons during the 10:00 AM service. Applying the average vehicle occupancy rate (1.70 persons per vehicle) to the future average attendance (813 persons) results in a peak parking demand of approximately 478 Spaces on a typical Sunday during the 10:00 AM service, 39 spaces more than provided and 88 more than required by Code. 'If the proposed 1,170 -seat sanctuary were filled to capacity, then the proposed project would require approximately 688 spaces; however, this would likely only happen on religious holidays when the average vehicle occupancy may be higher. Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 21 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc To prevent the overflow of typical Sunday morning and religious holiday parking into the residential area near Our Lady Queen of Angels Church, a parking management plan shall be prepared that demonstrates how the church will provide additional parking spaces. This plan should consider a valet parking arrangement, parking on the sports field, or an off -site parking arrangement. Saint Mark Presbyterian Church currently has one Sunday morning service at 9:30. Our Lady Queen of Angels Church has a 10:00 service which overlaps with the Saint Mark Presbyterian Church service so that both church services end at roughly the same time. The parking lots for both churches were observed to clear out within 30 minutes. The recommended time between the end and the beginning of the two most populated. services is 45 minutes. This will allow time for the parking lots to partially clear after one service before vehicles begin arriving for the next service. As more vehicles arrive for the later service, more parking spaces will become available. The parking management plan should consider 45 minutes between all services on religious holidays. The net effect of these changes is to concentrate the weekday school activity, onto the. site north of Domingo Drive (2046 Mar Vista Drive) while the majority of the Sunday activity. is placed on the site east of Domingo Drive (2 100 Mar Vista Drive). In total, both sites will have five driveways, two each on Mar Vista Drive and Domingo Drive to the site north of Domingo Drive and one driveway to the site east of Domingo Drive, thereby eliminating two driveways on Mar Vista Drive. In all, the site access and circulation will; be significantly improved through the consolidation and reduction in existing access locations. RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed, project has no significant impact on the study intersection under background or cumulative. conditions; therefore no. off-site .mitigati on meas ures are required at Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road. To minimize the impacts of the proposed expansion on the local. streets surrounding the project site, it is recommended that the project add a fourth.drop -off lane in the school parking lot during the morning drop -off procedure, increase the off -set of the. school start time with the Corona Del Mar High School start thee, and provide a 45- minute gap between the two largest Sunday-services (8:30 AM and Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 22 Austin-Foust Associates, rm. Traffic Study 017077rpt.doc 10:00 AM) and a minimum 30- minute gap between other Sunday morning services. The school shall conduct periodic reviews of the drop -off and pick -up procedures and make modifications when necessary. A parking management plan is recommended to identify how the Church can provide additional parking spaces on typical Sunday mornings and religious holidays. CONCLUSIONS The proposed project; consisting of a 1,170- seat..church and 600 K -S students, will generate 19 more daily trips than is currently being generated by the site, and 27 more AM peak hour trips than existing uses. The intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road in the vicinity of the project site was checked to determine the marginal impact of project traffic on the street system. The study intersection does not pass the City's one percent analysis; therefore, an ICU analysis for this intersection was performed. The ICU analysis indicates that the intersection will operate at LOS `B" or better with the proposed project. Traffic generated by Corona Del Mar.Higb School opposite the project is concentrated in a 20 to 30 minute period during the AM peak hour and results in considerable delay at the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the peak high school arrival period; however, the ICU value is determined based on the hourly volume assuming a random arrival rate spread out over the entire hour. Therefore the full impact of the high school arrival is not reflected in the AM peak hour ICU value. Intersection improvements which would be necessary to mitigate the Corona Del Mar High School traffic impacts during the peak 30 minutes at this location are not feasible. Although the ICU value does not completely reflect the impact of the high school traffic on the intersection of Jamboree Road.and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the AM peak hour, the project will cause less than .01 increase in the ICU value at Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the peak hours. Therefore, the project has no significant impact on the study intersection, and no additional intersection improvements•are required. The impact of traffic from known but not approved projects was included in a cumulative conditions analysis. Under cumulative conditions, the project did not pass the City's one percent test at the intersection of Jamboree Road and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road. Therefore, an ICU analysis was performed for this intersection. The project will cause less.than .01 increase in the ICU value at Jamboree Road.and Eastbluff Drive/Ford Road during the peak hours under cumulative conditions. Therefore; the project has no significant impact on the study intersection, and no intersection mitigation measures are required. Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 23 Aug Foust Associates, Inc. Tmffic Study - 017077tpt.doc Impacts to the surrounding local streets will be minimal. The weekday AM peak hour traffic on Mar Vista Drive west of the project site will increase by approximately 13 inbound trips, and Vista Del Oro west of Eastbluff Drive will increase by approximately 11 inbound trips. Increases to the morning drop -off operation will average approximately four trips per minute which can be accommodated within the proposed parking lot. The current drop -off procedure involves three rows of vehicles dropping off students in the parking lot. To reduce the impact of queues on Mar Vista Drive, the parking lot has sufficient space to allow a fourth row of vehicles during the peak drop -off period which will clear vehicles off of Mar Vista Drive faster. Access and on -site circulation have been reviewed. The proposed parking will satisfy the City code requirement; however, a parking management plan shall be developed which demonstrates how the Church can provide additional parking spaces on typical Sunday mornings and religious holidays. Access to the combined site will be consolidated through the elimination of two existing driveways on Mar Vista Drive and one existing driveway on Domingo Drive. DEFINITIONS Certain terms used throughout this report are defined below to clarify their intended meaning: ADT Average Daily Traffic. Generally used to measure the total two= directional traffic volumes passing a given point on a roadway. DU Dwelling Unit. Used in quantifying residential land use. ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization. A measure of the volume to capacity ratio for an intersection. Typically used to determine the peak hour level of service for a given set of intersection volumes. LOS Level of Service. A scale used to evaluate circulation system performance - based on intersection ICU values or volume/capacity ratios of arterial segments. Peak Hour This refers to the hour during the AM peak period (typically 7 AM 9 AM) or the PM peak period (typically 3 PM - 6 PM) in which the greatest number of vehicle trips are generated by a given land use or are traveling on a given roadway. TSF Thousand Square Feet. Used in quantifying non- residential land uses, and refers to building floor area. Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion 24 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Study 017077tpt.doc V/C Volume to Capacity Ratio. This is typically used to describe the percentage of capacity utilized by existing or projected traffic on a segment of an arterial or intersection. VPH Vehicles Per Hour. Used for roadway volumes (counts or forecasts) and trip generation estimates. Measures the number of vehicles in a one hour period,. typically the AM or PM peak hour. Austin -Foust Associates, lac. 017077rpt.doc APPENDIX Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion A -1 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Tmftic Swdy 017077rptdoe I% Traffic Volume Analysis PROJECT: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Traffic Analysis FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 2010, Austin -Foust Asoociates, Inc- A-2 017077rptAPp lx1f Intersection: 1. Jamboree & Eastbluff/Ford Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter /Spring 2005 Peak 1 Hour Approved Cumulative Existing Regional Projects Projects Projected 1% of Projected Project Approach Peak 1 Hour Growth Peak 1 Hour Peak 1 Hour Peak 1 Hour Peak 1 Hour Peak 1 Hour Direction Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume AM PEAK PERIOD Northbound 1933 97 75 0 2105 21 2 Southbound 1383 69 105 0 1557 16 1 Eastbound 365 0 1 0 366 4 6 Westbound 361 0 3 0 364 4 12 Project AM Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected AM Peak i Hour Traffic Volume. Project AM Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected AM Peak 1 Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Is required. PM. PEAK PERIOD Northbound 2097 105 113 0 2315 23 0 Southbound 2057 103 95 U 2255 23 0 Eastbound 360. 0 2 0� 362 4 0 Westbound 281 0 4 0 285 3 0. Project PM Traffic is estimated to be less than i% of Projected PM Peak 1 Hour Traffic Volume. Project PM Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected PM Peak 1 Hour Traffic Volume, Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required. . PROJECT: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Traffic Analysis FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 2010, Austin -Foust Asoociates, Inc- A-2 017077rptAPp lx1f I% Traffic Volume Analysis Intersecton: 1. Jamboree & EastMUff(Ford Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Winter /Spring 2005 AM PEAK PERIOD Northbound Peak 1 Hour Approved Cumulative Southbound 1383 69 105 71 1628 16 Existing Regional Projects Projects Projected I% of Projected Project Approach Peak 1 Hour Growth Peak 1 Hour Peak 1 Hour Peak I Hour Peak 1 Hour Peak 1 Hour Direction Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume Volume AM PEAK PERIOD Northbound 1933 97 75 226 2331 23 2 Southbound 1383 69 105 71 1628 16 1 Eastbound 365 0 1 18 384 4 6 Westbound 361 0 3 139 503 5 12 Project AM Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected AM Peak 1 Hour Traffic Volume. Project AM Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected AM Peak 1. Hour Traffic Volume. Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis Is required. Northbound 2097 105 113 197 2512 25 0 Southbound 2057 103 95 230 2485 25 0 Eastbound ,380 0 2 66 ,448 4 0 Westbound 281 0 4 79 364 4 0 Project PM Traffic Is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected PM Peak 1 Hour Traffic Volume.. Project PM Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected PM Peak 1 Hour Traffic Volume. . Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required. PROJECT: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion Ow Ludy Queen of Angels Expansion Traffic Analysis FULL OCCUPANCY YEAR: 2010 Aastln -Foust Asoociates, Inc. A -3 017077rptApp.pdf 1. Jamboree 6 Eastbluff/Ford Existing TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .540 .615 Existing + Growth + Approved + Project AM PK HOUR IN PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 167 .052 301 .094* NBT 3 4800 1816 .401* 1825 .415 NBR 0 0 110 166 SBL 1 1600 29 .018* 64 .040 SET 3 4800 1502 .313 2076 .433* SBR 1 1600 25 .016 107 '.067 EBL 0 0 60 27 'EBT 3 4800 72 .028* 78 .022* EBR f 240 211 WBL 0 0 207 (.129)* 175 1.1091* WBT 3 4800 123 .069 88 .055' WBR 1 1600 46 .029 22 .014 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .576 .658 Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion Traffic Study Existing + Regional Growth + Approved Projects AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR AM PK LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 165 .052 298 .093* NBT 3 4800 1659 .368* 1638 .375 NBR 0 0 109 NBR 161 0 SBL 1 1600 29 .018* 63 .039 SET 3 4800 1330 .211 1887 .393* SEN. 1 1600 24 .015 107 .067 EBL 0 0 59 EBL 21 '. EBT 3 4800 68 .026* 78 .022* EBR f 78 238 EBR 275 WEL 0 0 205 {,128)* 171 I.107f+ WBT 3 4800 111 .066 88 .054 WBA 1 1600 45 .028 22 .014 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .540 .615 Existing + Growth + Approved + Project AM PK HOUR IN PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 167 .052 301 .094* NBT 3 4800 1816 .401* 1825 .415 NBR 0 0 110 166 SBL 1 1600 29 .018* 64 .040 SET 3 4800 1502 .313 2076 .433* SBR 1 1600 25 .016 107 '.067 EBL 0 0 60 27 'EBT 3 4800 72 .028* 78 .022* EBR f 240 211 WBL 0 0 207 (.129)* 175 1.1091* WBT 3 4800 123 .069 88 .055' WBR 1 1600 46 .029 22 .014 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .576 .658 Our Lady Queen Of Angels Expansion Traffic Study Existing + Regional Growth + Approved Projects AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 165 .052 301 .094* NBT 3 4800 1816 .401* 1825 .415 NBR 0 0 110 166 SBL 1 1600 29 .018* 64 .040 SET 3 4800 1502 .313 2076 .433* SBA 1 1600 24 .015 107 .067 EBL 0 0 59 27 EBT 3 4800 68 .026* 78 .022* EBR f 239 211 WBL 0 0 207 {.129]* 175 1.1091* WHY 3 4800 111 .066 88 .055 WEN 1 1600 46 .029 22 .014 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .574 .658 Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative Projects. AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR. LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 174 .054 301' .096* . NBT 3 4800 2015 .446* 1959 .455 NBR 0 0 128 223 SBL 1 1600 35 .022* 86 .054 SET 3 4800 1567 .326 2284 .416 *" SEA 1 1600 24 .015 107 .067 EBL 0 0 59 27 EBT 3 4800 83 .030* 134 :034 *.. EBR f 242 281' WBL 0 0 263 1,164)* 207 1:1291' WBT 3 4800 172 .091 " 122 .069 ABA 1 1600 68 .043 -35 '.022 TOTAL CAPACITY UTILIZATION .662 .735 A -4 Austin•FOUst Associates, Inc. 017077rptApp.pdf 1. Jamboree 6 Eastbluff /Ford Existing + Growth + Approved + Cumulative + Project AM PK HOUR PM PK HOUR LANES CAPACITY VOL V/C VOL V/C NBL 2 3200 116 .055 301 .096* NBT 3 4800 2015 .946* 1959 .455 NBR 0 0 128 223 SBL 1 1600 35 .022` 86 .054 SBT 3 4800 1567 .326 2284 .476* SBR 1 1600 25 .016 107 .067 EBL 0 0 60 21 EBT 3 4800 89 .031* 134 .034* EBR f 243 287 WBL 0 0 263 1.1641* 207 (.129(* WBT 3 4800 184 .093 122 .069 WBR 1 1600 68 .043 35 .022 TOTAL CAPACITf UTILIZATION .663 .735 Our Lady Queen 0f Angels Expansion A -5 Austin -Foust Associates, Ise. Traffic Study 017077rptApp.P" q i' TOTALOWK 82 21 9 1 0 0 113 0 0 TOTAL STUDENTS: 82 42 27 4 0 0 155 0 0 o � AVG. VEH. PICKUP = 1.37 � VG. VEH. PICKUP= COMMENTS: 0 0 FILENAME: 1251401 P DATE: 12/19/2005 DAY: MONDAY TOTAL FNE SWOR+ VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. VEHICLE PICK UP SUMMARY LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGEL CITY: NEWPORT BEACH PICK UP PICK UP 15 Min TOTAL A Period ONE TWO THREE. FOUR FIVE SIX OR* VEHICLES ONE TWO THREE FOUR Beginning STUDENT STUDENTS STUDENTS STUDENTS STUDENTS STUDENTS PICKUP STUDENT STUDENTS STUDENTS STUDENTS 1:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :50 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 :55 PM 1 0.' 0 0 0 0 1 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 :05 PM 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 :10 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 :15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :20 PM 1 0 0. 0 0 0 1 :25 PM 15 1- 1 0 0 0 17 :30 PM 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 :35 PM 15 5 5 1 0. 0 26 :40 PM 24 7 0 0 0 0 31. :45 PM 11 1 0 .0 0 0 12 :50 PM 3. 0 .2 0 0 0 5 a :55 PM 5 2 1, 0 0 0 6 q i' TOTALOWK 82 21 9 1 0 0 113 0 0 TOTAL STUDENTS: 82 42 27 4 0 0 155 0 0 o � AVG. VEH. PICKUP = 1.37 � VG. VEH. PICKUP= COMMENTS: 0 0 FILENAME: 1251401 P DATE: 12/19/2005 DAY: MONDAY TOTAL FNE SWOR+ VEHICLES 0 0 0 0 0 0 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES; INC. VEHICLE DROP OFF SUMMARY LOCATION:. OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGEL CITY: NEWPORT BEACH w DROP OFF e " 15 Min Period. ONE .TWO THREE Beginning STUDENT STUDENTS STUDENTS 7:00 AM 1 0 0 $ :05 AM 0 0 0 :10 AM 0 0 0 :15 AM 0 0 0 :20 AM 6 0 0 :25 AM 5 3 0 :30 AM 6 6 1' :35 AM 7 5 5 :40 AM 9 9 8 :45 AM 15 9 1 :50 AM 9 10 2 :55 AM 3 2 0 a a 1261401A DATE: TOTAL$ VEH, 61 DAY: TOTAL STUDENTS: 61 AVG. VEH. DROP OFF = FNE SXOR• VEHICLES COMMENTS: gs TOTAL FOUR FIVE SIX OR+ VEHICLES STUDENTS STUDENTS STUDENTS DROP OFF 0 0 0 1 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 13 1 0 0 18 2 0 0 28 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 21 0 0 0 5 a 1261401A DATE: TOTAL$ VEH, 61 DAY: TOTAL STUDENTS: 61 AVG. VEH. DROP OFF = FNE SXOR• VEHICLES COMMENTS: gs ONE TWO THREE FOUR FILENAME: . 1261401A DATE: 12/20/2005 DAY: TUESDAY TOTAL FNE SXOR• VEHICLES 44 17 3 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 es 51 12 0 0 212 0 0 0 0 0 0 110 AVG. VEH. DROP OFF =- i 9 TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC 1714) 541 -2228 `DROP- OFRPICK -UP LOCAWN: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS FILENAME: 03615DO1 750 DOMINGO DR (NORTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3127/06 CITY; NEWPORT BEACH DAY; MONDAY DROP -OFF PERIOD LOT STREET TOTAL BEGINS LOT MEET- 6:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 7:00 AM 3 0 3 0 :TSAM 21 0 21 0 :30 AM 93 0 93 0 :45 AM 44 0 44 0 8:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM. 9:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 10:00 AM :16 AM :30 AM :45 AM 11:00 AM :15 AM :30'AM ASAM 12;00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM TOTAL: 161 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 0 COMMENTS: Our Lady Queen of Angels ]:.'anion TPO Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -S 017077rptAPp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES; INC (714) 641 -2228 DROP- OFFIPICK -UP LOCA11ON: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS FILENAME: 03615DO2 750 DOMINGO DR (SOUTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3/27/06 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: MONDAY Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO I I Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -9 017077rptApp.pdf . DROP -OFF PERIOD LOT STREET TOTAL BEGINS -LOT STREET 6 :00 AM :15AM :30 AM :46 AM 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 :15AM 0 0 0 0 :30 AM 0 0 0 0 :45 AM 0 6 0 5 8:00 AM :16AM :30 AM :45 AM 9:00 AM . :15AM :30 AM :45 AM 10:00AM :16 AM :30 AM :46 AM 11 :00 AM :16 AM :30 AM :45 AM 12:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 5 0 0. 6 COMMENTS: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO I I Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -9 017077rptApp.pdf . TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC (714) 541.2228 DROP- OFF/PICK -UP LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS PLENAME: 03616PUI 750 DOMINGO DR (NOTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3/27/06 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: MONDAY PICK -UP PERIOD LOT STREET TOTAL BEGINS LOT STREET 1:00 PM :05 PM :10 PM :15 PM :20 PM :25 PM :3D PM :35 PM :40 PM :45 PM :60 PM :55 PM 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 :05 PM 0 0 0 0 :10 PM 0 0 0 0 :15 PM 1 0 1 0 :20 PM 0 0 0 0 ;25 PM 3 0 3 0 :30 PM 28 0 28 0 :35 PM 28. 0 28 0 :40 PM 31 0 31 0 :45 PM 15 0 15 0 :50 PM 4 0 4 0 :55 PM 5 0 5 0 3:00 PM 10 0 10 0. :05 PM :10 PM .. . :15 PM TOTAL: 125 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0. 0 125 0 COMMENTS: Ow Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -10 017077rptApp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC (714) 541 -2228 DROP- OFF/PICK UP LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS FILENAME: 03615PU2 750 DOMINGO DR (SOUTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3127/06 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: MONDAY :05 PM :10 PM :15 PM TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 .8 COMMENTS Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO AustO Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -11 017077rptApp.pdf - PICK -UP PERK LOT STREET TOTAL BEGIM LOT STREET 1:00 PM :05 PM :10 PM :15 PM :20 PM :25 PM :30 PM :35 PM :40 PM :45 PM :50 PM :55 PM 2:00 PM 0 1 0 1 :05 PM 0 0 0 0 :10 PM 0 0 0 0 :15PM 0 - 0- - 0 -0 :20 PM 0 0 0 0 :25 PM 0 0 0 0' . :30 PM 0 7 0 7 :35 PM 0 0 0 0 AO PM 0 - - 0 _ 0- _0 :45 PM 0 0 0 0 :50 PM 0 0 0 0' :55 PM 0 0 0 0 3:00 PM 0 0 0 0 :05 PM :10 PM :15 PM TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 .8 COMMENTS Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO AustO Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -11 017077rptApp.pdf - TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC (714) 541.2228 DROP-OFF/PACK-UP LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS FILENAME: 03615DO3 750 DOMINGO DR (NORTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3/28/063 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: TUESDAY DROP -OFF PERIOD LOT STREET TOTAL BEGINS LOT STREET 6:00 AM :05 AM :LOAM :15AM :20 AM :25 AM :30 AM :36 AM :40 AM :45 AM :56 AM :55 AM 7:00 AM :05 AM :10 AM :15 AM :20 AM :25 AM :30 AM ;X AM :40 AM :45 AM 50 AM :55 AM 8:00 AM :05 AM :10 AM :15 AM TOTAL: COMMENTS 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1. 0 8 0 8. 0 14 0 14 0 19 0 19 0 30 0 30 0 40 0 40 0 33 .. . 0 33 0 11 0 11 : 0 2 0 2 0 161 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 161 0 Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -12 017077rptApp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC (714) 641 -2228 DROP-OFF/PICK-UP LOCATION:, OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS FILENAME: 03615/304 750 DOMINGO DR (SOUTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3/28/063 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: TUESDAY DROP -OFF PERIOD LOT STREET TOTAL BEGINS LOT STREET 6:00 AM :05 AM ,LOAM :15 AM :20 AM :25 AM :30 AM :35 AM :40 AM :45 AM :60 AM :55 AM, 7:O0 AM 0 0 0 0 :05 AM 0 0 0 0 a0 AM 0 0 0 0 :15AM 0 0 0 0 :20 AM 0 0 0 0 :25AM 0 0 0 0 :30 AM 0 0 0 0 :35 AM 0 0 0 0 :40 AM . ' 0 1 0 . 1. :45 AM 0 2 0 2 :50AM 0 0 0 0 :55 AM 0 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 :05 AM :10 AM :15 AM TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 COMMENTS: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -13 017077rytApp.pdf, TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC (714) 541 -2228 DROP-OFF/PICK -UP. LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS FILENAME: 03615PU3 750 DOMINGO DR (NORTHERN LOCATION) DATE: 3(28/06 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: TUESDAY- ' PICK -UP PERIOD LOT STREET TOTAL BEGINS LOT STREET 1:00 PM :05 PM :10 PM 1613M :20 PM :26 PM :30 PM :35 PM :40 PM :45 PM :50 PM :55 PM 2:00 PM 0 0 0 0 :05 PM 0 0 0 0 ❑OPM 0 0 0 0. :15 PM 1 0 1 0 :20 PM 0 - - -0 0 0- :25 PM 4 - 0 4 0 :30 PM 30 - 0 30 0- :35 PM 29 - - - - -0 29 -0 :40 PM 27 0 27 0 :45 PM 14 0 14 -0 :60 PM 3 - 0 3 0- :65 PM 7 0 7' 0 3:00 PM 9 - - 0 - 9 0 :05 PM :10 PM :15 PM TOTAL: 124 0 0 0' -0 0 0 0' .0 0 124 0 COMMENTS Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -14 017077rptApp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC FILENAME: 03615PU4 DATE: 3/28/06 DAY; TUESDAY STREET TOTAL LOT STREET 2:00 PM . (714) 541 -2228 0 DROP -OFF /PICK -UP LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS :10PM 750 DOMINGO DR (SOUTHERN LOCATION) CITY: NEWPORT BEACH 0 0 PICK -UP PERIOD LOT BEGM 0 3 1;00 PM 0 :05 PM :36 PM :10 PM 5 :16 PM 0 :20 PM :46 PM ;26 PM 0 :30 PM 0.: :35 PM :55 PM :40 PM .0 :45 PM 0 :50 PM :05 PM :55 PM FILENAME: 03615PU4 DATE: 3/28/06 DAY; TUESDAY STREET TOTAL LOT STREET 2:00 PM 0 0 :05 PM 0 0 :10PM 0 0 15 PM 0 0 :20 PM '0 0 i25 PM 0 3 :30 PM 0 6 :36 PM 5 :40 PM 0 1 :46 PM 0: 0 :60 PM 0.: 0 :55 PM 0 .0 300 PM, 0 0 :05 PM :10 PM . . :15 PM TOTAL: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 COMMENTS: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Traffic Analysis A -15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. 017077rptApp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. MAX QUEUE LOCATION: CITY: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGEL 760 DOMINGO DR NEWPORT BEACH FILENAME: DATE: DAY: 1251401P 12119105 MONDAY Time AREA# AREA# Period Beginning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL 1:45 PM 8 0 8 :50 PM 9 0. 9 :55 PM 12 0 12 2:00 PM 16 0 16 :05 PM 17 0 17 :10 PM 19 0 19 :15 Pm 34 0 34 :20 PM 34 0 34 :25 PM 33 0 33 :30 PM 27 0 27 :35 PM 24 0 24 :40 PM 13 0 13 :45 PM 8 0 8 :50 PM 3 0 3 :55 PM 1 0 1 COMMENTS: AREA #1 = MAX QUEUE IN DROP OFF AREA AREA #2.= MAX QUEUE ON MAR VISTA DR Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO AustiMFoust Associates, Inc, Traffic Analysis A -16 017077`ptAPpdiff TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. MAX QUEUE LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGEL FILENAME: 12514QIA :05 AM 750 DOMINGO DR DATE: 12/20/05 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: TUESDAY Time AREA # AREA # 0 Period 1 0 1 Beginning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 10 11 12 TOTAL 7:00 AM 0 0 0 :05 AM 0 0 0 :10 AM 0 0 0 :15 AM 0 0 0 :20 AM 1 0 1 :25 AM 6 0 6 :30 AM 11 0 11 :35 AM 25 0 25 :40 AM 28 7 35 :45 AM 25 6 31 :50 AM _ 21 0 21 -:55 AM 5 0 - 5 COMMENTS: AREA 01 = MAX QUEUE IN DROP OFF AREA AREA #2 = MAX QUEUE ON MAR; VISTA DR Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin -Foust Associates, Ira. Traffic Analysis A -17 017077rytAFp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. .VEHICLE OCCUPANCY SUMMARY ti O LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS (ZONE 6). 2046 MAR VISTA DR CITY: NEWPORT BEAM 12 ARRIVING VEHICI FILENAME: 02607VOI DATE: 2/54006 DAY: SUNDAY c I<' 8:00 AM :15 AM g :30 AM :45 AM 9:00 AM :16 AM :30 AM 45 19 3 1 :45 AM 10:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 11:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM AS AM 12:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM 1:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM 2:00 PM :16 PM :30 PM :46 PM 3:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM y :yo rwl La. TOTAMVEH, 45 19 .3 1 s�s TOTALOCC. 45 $8 9 '4. AVG. VEH. OCCUPANCY ARRIVING - 1.84 a OOMMENTS: I. 7 76 30 16 8 64 0 17 75 1 30 16 0 0 0 8 0 42 138 30 32 0 0 0 48 AVG. VEH. OCCUPANCY DEPARTING : 2.04 10 TWO THREE - FOUR FIVE TWO THREE FOUR FIVE 15 Min PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE NUMBER TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE NUMBER TOTAL Period DRIVER INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG OF VEHICLES DRIVER INCLDG I INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG OF VEHICLES w Beginning ONLY DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER CHILDREN ARRIVING ONLY DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVERCHILDREN DEPARTING I<' 8:00 AM :15 AM g :30 AM :45 AM 9:00 AM :16 AM :30 AM 45 19 3 1 :45 AM 10:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 11:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM AS AM 12:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM 1:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM 2:00 PM :16 PM :30 PM :46 PM 3:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM y :yo rwl La. TOTAMVEH, 45 19 .3 1 s�s TOTALOCC. 45 $8 9 '4. AVG. VEH. OCCUPANCY ARRIVING - 1.84 a OOMMENTS: I. 7 76 30 16 8 64 0 17 75 1 30 16 0 0 0 8 0 42 138 30 32 0 0 0 48 AVG. VEH. OCCUPANCY DEPARTING : 2.04 10 TRAFFIC -DATA SERVICES; INC. VEHICLE OCCUPANCY SUMMARY LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS (ZONE 3) . r 2046 MAR VISTA DR y�1 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH ARRIVING VEHICLES w 9 TWO THREE. FOUR FIVE 15 Min PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE NUMBER TOTAL P64pd DRIVER INCLDG, INCLDG. lNCLDG INCLDG OF VEHICLES h Be9innina ONLY DRIVER DRIVER- DRIVER- 8: :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 9:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 2 2 1 10:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 11:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM ? :45 AM. 12:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM 1:00 PM :15 PM. :30 PM :45 PM 2:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM AS PM 3:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM a :45 PM TOTALS.VEN. 2 2 1 0 '+ TOTALOCC: 2 2n AVG. VEH.ACCUPANCYARRIVINGo 3.00 < g > COMMENTS . s V '0 2 7 FILENAME: 02607VO2 DATE: 2/5/2006 DAY: SUNDAY PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE NUMBER TOTAL DRIVER INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG OF VEHICLES ONLY DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVERCHILDREN DEPARTING 0 2 7 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 0 0 D 0 0 0 AVG. VEH. OCCUPANCY DEPARTING = �LOCATION: CITY: w 15 Min 9 Period "68 IanI OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH (ZONES) 750 DOMINGO DR NEWPORT BEACH, ARRPANG VEHICLES.. TVIO THREE FOUR FIVE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPlEPEOPLE DRIVER INCLOG INbLDG . INCLDG INCLD6 ONLY DRIVER " DRIVER . DRIVER DRIVER, TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. VEHICLE OCCUPANCY SUMMARY SIXOR+ TOTAL MC = VEHICLES DRIVER DRIVER ARRMNG ONLY TWO PEOPLE INCLDG ORIVER DROP -OFFS THREE FOUR PEOPLE PEOPLE INCLDG INCLDG DRIVER DRIVER FILENAME: DATE: DAY: FIVE SIXOR+ .PEOPLE PEOPLE INCLDG INCLOG DRIVER DRIVER 03615V03 3/12!2006 SUNDAY TOTAL VEHICLES DEPARTING 5:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM o :45 AM 6:00 AM . :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM TOO AM :16AM 16 7 1 0 0 0 24 :30 AM :46 AM 16 14 3 0 0 0 33 8:00 AM 1.38 :15 AM a :30 AM c :45 AM 67 51 14 1 1 1 135 9:00 AM :15 AAA 67 102 42 4 5 6 226 :30 AM 1.67 :45 AM 1omo AM :15AM 56 62 AD 2 2 0 132 :30 AM :46 AM 56 124 30 8 10 0 228 11:ODAM 1.73 :15 AM :3D AM 25 18 2 0 0 0 45 :45 AM 12:00 PM 25 36 6 0 0 0 67 :15 PM 1.49 a :30 PM :46 PM oG CommENT6s . 9 g COMMENTS:, TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. VEHICLE OCCUPANCY SUMMARY �LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH (ZONE 1) FILENAME: 03615VO4 r 750 DOMINGO DR DATE: 3/1212006 >g CITY: E NEWPORT BEACH DAY: SUNDAY ARRIVING VEHICLES DROP -OFFS THREE FOUR -- - FIVE SIX OR+ TWO THREE FOUR FIVE SIXOR+ y 15 min PEOPLE - PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE - PEOPLE TOTAL PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE TOTAL " Period DRIVER INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG INCLDG INCUR VEHICLES DRIVER INCLDG INCLDG iNCLDG INCLDG INCLDG VEHICLES �36gjnnlng ONLY DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER ARRIVING ONLY DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DRIVER DEPARTING g 3:00 AM d :15 AM _ :30 AM :45 AM 6:00 AM :15 AM .30 AM :45 AM TOO AM ASAM 16. 9 0, 0 0 0 25 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 :30 AM :45 AM 16 18 0 0 0 0 34 8:00 AM 1.36 :15 AM :30 AM :46 AM 11 2.,. 1 0 1 0 15 1 0, D 1 0 0 2 9:00 AM :15 AM 11 4 3 0 8: 0 23 :30 AM 1.53 :45 AM 10 :00 AM :15 AM 14 10, 1 2 0 0 27 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 :30 AM .46 AM 14 20 3 8 0 . 0 45 11.:00 AM 1.67 :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 13 10 1 1 0 0 25 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 12:00 PM :15 PM 13 20 3 4 0 0 40 :30 PM 1.60 .45 PM q. g COMMENTS:, TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH FILENAME: 10524PKI 2046 MAR VISTA DR DATE: 10/26/05 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: WEDNESDAY Time ZONES ZONES Period Beginning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL SPACES: 28 36 290 128 49 96 150 777 6:00 AM :30 AM 7:00 AM :30 AM 8:00 AM :30 AM 9:00 AM 24 19 271 101 25 74 44 558 :30 AM' 10:00 AM 28 31 277 115 32 94 57 634 :30 AM 28 34 279 119 34 96 59 649 11:00 AM 30 32 280 117 36 96 62 653 6,5�..... ...... 12:00 PM 11 13 281 110 41 2 28 486 :30 PM 1:00 PM :30 PM 2:00 PM :30 PM 3:00 PM :30 PM 4:00 PM :30 PM 5:00 PM :30 PM 6:00 PM :30 PM 7:00 PM :30 PM 8:00 PM :30 PM 9:00 PM :30 PM COMMENTS: ZONE 1= OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGLES CHURCH PARKING LOT ZONE 2 = DOMINGO DR ON STREET PARKING ( SPACES ARE ESTIMATED) ZONE 3 = CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT (FAR WEST PARKING LOT) ZONE 4 = CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT (FAR EAST PARKING LOT) ZONE 5 = MAR VISTA DR ON STREET PARKINGAFRONT OF CHURCH: SPACES ARE ESTIMATED) ZONE 6 = OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGLES SCHOOL PARKING LOT ZONE 7 =SAINT MARK PRESBYTER, AN CHURCH PARKING LOT Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin -Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -22 017077rptApp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: OUR LADY.QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH FILENAME: 10524PK2 2046 MAR VISTA DR DATE: 11113/05 .CITY., NEWPORT BEACH DAY: SUNDAY Time ZONES ZONES Period Beginreng 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL SPACES: 28 36 290 128 49 96 150 6:00 AM .30 AM 4 27 1 0 0 7 2 7:00 AM 28 36 1 32 8 22 8 :30 AM 28 36 1 36 10 24 8 6:00 AM 5 20 1 8 4 11 3 :30 AM 28 34 7 92 12 93 20 9'00 AM 28 36 9 118 15 95 82 :30 AM 28 33 10 120 16 90 140 10:00 AM ._......_. _.28_........38...._ 82 _ 128.... 32 96.._..147......__ :30 AM 28 34 80 128 30 94 147 11:00 AM 12 29 74 96 21 58 120 :30 AM 25 33 72 42 18 65 39 12 :00 PM 22 27 72 47 12 76 36 :30 PM 1:00 PM .30 PM 2:00 PM :30 PM 3:00 PM :30 PM 4:00 PM :30 PM 5:00 PM :30 PM 6:00 PM :30 PM 7:00 PM :30 PM 8:00 PM :30 PM 9:00 PM :30 PM COMMENTS: 777 41. 135 143 50 286 383 439 541 410 292 292 ZONE 1 = OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGLES CHURCH PARKING LOT ZONE 2 = DOMINGO DR ON STREET PARKING ( SPACES ARC ESTIMATED) ZONE 3 = CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT (FAR WEST PARKING LOT) ZONE 4 = CORONA DEL MAR HIGH'SCWOOL PARKING LOT (FAR EAST PARKING LOT) ZONE 5 = MAR VISTA DR ON STREET PARKING (FRONT OF CHURCH, SPACES ARE ESTIMATED) ZONE 6 = OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGLES SCHOOL PARKING LOT ZONE 7 =SAINT MARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH PARKING LOT Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO Austin-Foust Associates, Inc. Traffic Analysis A -23 017077tptAPRpdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: OUR'.LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH FILENAME: 02607PKI 2046 MAR VISTA DR DATE: 2!05106 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY. SUNDAY Time ZONES ZONES Period Beginning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12, TOTAL SPACES: 28 36 290 128 49 96 150 777 6:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 8:00 AM :16 AM :30 AM :45'Aw $00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 31 50 6 91 30 164 148 510 10:00 AM .16 AM :30 AM .46 AM.. . 11:00 AM' :16 AM :36 AM c46.AM .. 12:00 PM .... :16 PM :36 PM :45 PM 1:00 PM :16 PM :30 PM :46 PM' COMMENTS:.: ZONE 1 = OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGLES CHURCH PARKING LOT ZONE 2 = DOMINGO DR ON STREET PARKING ( SPACES ARE ESTIMATED) ZONE 3 = CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT (FAR WEST PARKING LOT) ZONE 4 = CORONA DEL MAR HIGH SCHOOL PARKING LOT (FAR EAST PARKING LOT) ZONES = MAR VISTA DR ON STREET PARKING (FRONT OF CHURCH, SPACES ARE ESTIMATED) ZONE 6 = OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGLES SCHOOL PARKING LOT ZONE 7 = SAINT MARK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH PARKING LOT Ow lady Queen of Angels Fxpansion TPO Austin -Foust Associates; Inc. TrafficAnalysis A -24- 017077tptApp.pdf Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO - Austin -Foust Associates, Im. Traffic Analysis A -25 017077rptApp.pdf TRAFFIC DATA SERVICES, INC. PARKING STUDY LOCATION: OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH FILENAME: 03615PKI 750 DOMINGO DR. DATE: 3112/06 CITY: NEWPORT BEACH DAY: SUNDAY Time ZONES ZONES Period Beginning 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL SPACES: 28 36 290 128 49 96 150 777 6:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 7:00 AM :15 AM 22 52 1 63 7 21 9 175 :30 AM :46 AM 8:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM 28 60 5 103 $ 147 48 399 9:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM moll AM :15 AM 29 67 38 - 124 18 - 177 96 .549 :30 AM :45 AM 11:00APA :15 AM. - - - :30 AM :45 AM - 26 50 13 91 10 61 44 295 12:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM AS PM - 1:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM - :45 PM - COMMENTS: Our Lady Queen of Angels Expansion TPO - Austin -Foust Associates, Im. Traffic Analysis A -25 017077rptApp.pdf PCR IRVINE ONE VENTURE, SUITE 150 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 TEi 949.753.7001 FAx 949.753.7002 Con ,solidation of the Two Church Campuses tltl 'E� y W� - rys\ • E JOINING THE ST. MARK CHURCH PROPERTY WITH THE OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS PROPERTY INTO ONE CAMPUS RESULTS IN: • Consistent with City's General Plan (0.17 FAR on combined properties) • Reduction in total church seating (52 less seats) • 27 additional weekday AM peak hour trips • Increased parking (49 in excess of code) • Consolidated school operations (2 preschools removed, K -8 enrollment increased) N 0 0 CHURCH SEATING CONSOLIDATED AND REDUCED: St. Mark 350 seats OLOA 872 seats OLQA Total 1,222 seats Total St. Mark -350 seats 1,170 seats OLQA +298 seats 1,170 seats Total -52 seats SCHOOL OPERATIONS CONSOLIDATED AND DEDICATED PRESCHOOL TRIPS ELIMINATED: -70 children St. Mark preschool St. Mark preschool 70 children OLQA preschool 35 children OLQA preschool -35 children • OLQA K -8 315 children OLQA K -8 600 children OLQA K -8 +285 children Total 420 children Total 600 children Total +180 children Note: Preschool has limited ridesharing while K -8 grammar school has extensive ridesharing. i I. • WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS (in trips + out trips): St. Mark 39 trips St. Mark -39 trips OLQA 120 trilas OLQA 186 trips OLQA +66 trips Total 159 trips Total 186 trips Total +27 trips Note: Existing OLQA and St. Mark uses are 3% of the weekday AM peak hour trips at the Jamboree /Eastbluff intersection, and the proposed project would increase this by 0.5% to 3.5 %. WEEKDAY AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS (ADT's): • St. Mark 327 trips St. Mark -327 trips OLQA 736 trips OLQA 1,082 trips OLQA +346 trips Total 1,063 trips Total 1,082 trips Total +19 trips 0. 0..0.0...000•••••••••••••••••••!•• *00000* QUANTITY OF PARKING STALLS IS INCREASED: St. Mark 137 stalls OLGA 213 stalls OLQA Total 350 stalls Total St. Mark -137 stalls 439 stalls OLOA +226 stalls 439 stalls Total +89 stalls Note: City code requires 390 stalls for OLQA. The 439 stalls provided exceeds code by 49 stalls. PARKING RATIO IS INCREASED: St. Mark 2.6 seats /stall OLGA 4.1 seats /stall OLQA 2.7 seats /stall OLQA Total 3.5 seats /stall Total 2.7 seats /stall Total Note: OLGA seating increases by 34% (from 872 seats to 1,170), while parking increases by 106% (from 213 stalls to 439). 52% increase 30% increase 0 11 0... 00000..0.0000000000•0000000000000000000 I� 0 BETTER TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT AND CIRCULATION School: 1. Consolidation facilitates ridesharing. 2. Elimination of preschools facilitates ridesharing. 3. OLOA commencement and dismissal times can be staggered with CDMHS times. 4. All drop -off and pick -up queuing occurs on -site. Church: 1. City parking requirement (390) is exceeded (49) with all parking (439) provided onsite. • 2. Parking management plan will resolve peak demand periods. P OTHER PROJECT ELEMENTS Gym: • Location away from residential and nearest to similar educational /recreational uses at the high school. • Uses of gym are restricted to OLQA. Landscaping: • Large existing trees at site of new church will be retained. • Landscaping at school will match existing specimens. Church Height: Cross Tower Roof . • Existing (OLOA) 65' 57' 45' • Proposed 90' 75' 55' Project Phasing: • • 2007 School enrollment expands in kindergarten and first grade. • 2008 Church construction starts. • 2010 Church construction complete. • 2012 Expanded school enrollment reaches 8th grade. • [ov 0 0 •••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 0 0 W a • • 1 � ij ,. G 0 0 O aI W BP 1MI IN Our Lady Queen of Angeles Catholic Church City Submittal MI Legend July 2006 gi+tl T. Bag L Tree N' Box Speclnen Tree W Baa 66 lY ExbWq Trees Ex M, We n Pe — LquaWm� r-M- A—. l =J Pavement Ty Om PavareM Typo T. FU Pe� Type Teme I— Becompo ranee Nwarer Pexe.e July 2006 13 -