HomeMy WebLinkAbout18 - Public Hearing Notice & CorrespondenceNOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church Expansion
(PA2005 -092)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public
hearing on an appeal of the Planning Commission's approval of a Use Permit for the expansion of
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church. The project site is located at 2046 and 2100 Mar Vista Drive
and is zoned Government, Educational and Institutional Facilities (GEIF).
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church requests to expand their existing church and school facilities
by relocating its church to the adjacent property located at 2100 Mar Vista Drive (presently used
by St. Mark Presbyterian Church) and expanding its school within the existing boundaries at
2046 Mar Vista Drive. The expansion includes the construction of a 1,170 -seat sanctuary,
additional classrooms, and a 9,450 square foot gymnasium. When combined, the new Our Lady
Queen of Angels Church campus will be approximately 12.17 acres in size. The project, as
proposed, requires approval of a Use Permit to allow the expansion of the existing church and
school facility; to allow the church building to exceed the permitted building height of 35 feet
(90 feet proposed for the steeple); to allow the transfer of development intensity from the new
church site (2100 Mar Vista Dr.) to the school site (2046 Mar Vista Dr.) so as the square footage
for the two properties when combined results in an overall FAR (floor area ratio) of 0.17 consistent
with the General Plan; and to allow a total of ten portable classrooms to be located on the school
site during the construction period. A traffic study is also required pursuant to the Traffic Phasing
Ordinance.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by
the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. The Mitigated Negative
Declaration states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the
environment. It is the present intention of the City to accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of
the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and
comment on this documentation. Copies of the Negative Declaration and supporting documents
are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department, City of Newport Beach,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92658 -8915, (949) 6443200.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held on November 14.
2006, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Newport Beach City Hall,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons
interested may appear and be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in
this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For
information call (949) 644 -3200.
��U .
LaVonne M. Harkless, City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church Expansion
(PA2005-092)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Ore City Council of the City of Newport Beach will hold a public hearing on an appeal of the Planning Commission's
approval of a Use Permit for the expansion of Our Lady Queen of Angels Church. The project site is located at 2046 and 2100 Mar Vista Delve and is zoned
Government Educational and Institutional Facilities (CEIF).
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church requests to expand their existing church and school facilities by relocating its church to the adjacent property located
at 2100 Mar Vista Drive (presently used by St. Mark Presbyterian Church) and expanding its school within the existing boundaries at 2046 Mar Vista
Drive. The expansion includes the oonstrvdion of a 1,170 -seat sanctuary, additional classrooms, and a 9,450 square foot gymnasium. When combined, the
new Our Lady Queen of Angels Church campus will be approximately 12.17 acres in size. The project, as proposed, requires approval of a Use Permit to
allow the expansion of the existing church and school facility; to allow the church building to exceed the permitted building height of 35 feet (90 feet proposed
for the steeple); to allow the transfer of development intensity from the new church site (2100 Mar Vista Dr.) to the school site (2046 Mar Vista Dr.) so as the
square footage for the two properties when combined results in an overall FAR (floor area ratio) of 0.17 consistent with the General Plan; and to allow a total
of ten portable classrooms to be located on the school she during the construction period. A traffic study is also required pursuant to the Traffic Phasing
Ordinance.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application
noted above. The Mitigated Negative Declaration states that, the subject development will not result In a significant effect on the environment. It is the
present intention of the City to accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial
by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the
Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for public review and Inspection at the Planning Department. City of Newport Beach,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, Califomia, 92656 -8915, (949) 644 -3200.
NOTICE 13 HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held on November 14. 2006 at the hour of :07 0 P.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and
be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to, the public hearing. For Information call (949) 644 -3200.
62ca? M �
LaVonne M. Harkless, City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church Expansion
(PA 00 -092)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach well hold a public hearing on an appeal of the Planning Commission's
approval of a Use Permit for the expansion of Our Lady Queen of Angels Church. The project site is located at 2046 and 2100 Mar Vista Drive and Is zoned
Government Educational and Institutional Facilities (GEIF).
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church requests to expand their existing church and school facilities by relocating its church to the adjacent property located
at 2100 Mar Vista Drive (presently used by SL Mark Presbyterian Church) and expanding is school within the existing boundaries at 2046 Mar Vista
Drive. The expansion includes the construction of a 1,170 -seat sanctuary, additional classrooms, and a 9,450 square foot gymnasium. When combined, the
new Our Lady Queen of Angels Church campus will be approximately 12.17 acres in size. The project, as proposed, requires approval of a Use Permit to
allow the expansion of the existing church and school facility; to allow the church building to exceed the permitted building height of 35 feet (90 feet proposed
for the steeple); to allow the transfer of development intensity from the new church site (2100 Mar Vista Dr.) to the school site (2046 Mar Vista Dr.) so as the
square footage for the two properties when combined results in an overall FAR (floor area ratio) of 0.17 consistent with the General Plan; and to allow a total
of ten portable classrooms to be located on the school site during the construction period. A traffic study is also required pursuant to the Traffic Phasing
Ordinance.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Newport Beach In connection with the application
noted above. The Mitigated Negative Declaration states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the environment. It is the
present intention of the City to accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial
by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the
Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Department. qty of Newport Beach,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, Califcmia, 9265&6915, (949) 644 -3200.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held on November 14. 2006, at the hour of 7: 0 P.M. In the Council Chambers of
the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons Interested may appear and
be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising only Corse issues you or someone else rased at the public hearing
described in this notice or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (949) 6443200.
Qvy
Udr.c 0. da&-y
LaVonne M. Harkless. City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church Expansion
(PA2005.092)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Newport Beach will told a public hearing on an appeal of the Planning Commission's
approval of a Use Permit for the expansion of Our Lady Queen of Angels Church. The project site is located at 2046 and 2100 Mar Vista Drive and is zoned
GovemmeM, Educational and Institutional Fatties (GEIF).
Our Lady Queen of Angels Church requests to expand their existing church and school facilities by relocating its church to the adjacent property located
at 2100 Mar Vista Drive (presently used by St. Mark Presbyterian Church) and expanding its school within the existing boundaries at 2046 Mar Vista
Drive. The expansion includes the construction of a 1,170�sea1 sanctuary. additional classrooms, and a 9,450 square fool gymnasium. When combined, the
new Our Lady Queen of Angels Church campus will be approximately 12.17 acres In size. The project, as proposed, requires approval of a Use Permit to
allow the expansion of the existing church and school facility, to allow the church bulkfrng to exceed the permitted building height of 35 feet (90 feet proposed
for the steeple); to allow the transfer of development Intensity from the new church site (2100 Mar Vista Dr.) to the school site (2046 Mar Vista Dr.) so as the
square footage for the two properties wdhen combined results in an overall FAR (floor area ratio) of 0.17 consistent with the General Plan; and to allow a total
of ten portable classrooms to be located on the school site during the construction period. A traffic study is also required pursuant to the Traffic Phasing
Ordinance.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application
noted above. The Mitigated Negative Declaration states that the subject development will not result In a significant effect on the environment It Is the
present intention of the City to accept the Mitigated Negative Declaration and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial
by the City of the subject application. The City encourages members of the general public to review and comment on this documentation. Copies of the
Negative Declaration and supporting documents are available for public review and inspection at the Planning Deparbnent City of Newport Beach,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. California, 92658 -8915, (949) 644 -3200.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that said public hearing will be held on November 14. 2008, at the hour of 7.00 P.M. In the Council Chambers of
the Newport Beach City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, at which time and place any and all persons interested may appear and
be heard thereon. If you challenge this project in court you may be limited to raising only tense issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing
described in this notice or in mitten correspondence delivered to the (Sty at or prior to, the public hearing. For information call (949) 6443200.
LaVonne M. Harldess, City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
Office of the City Clerk
CITY HALL
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92663 -3884
IMPORTANT
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
yam ud a Free Printin 9
Use 960'".
10 �w wwb6". om
E�?=
2046 and
_ x..._
....1
DATE OF ETIN6:— ..........._
440 012 07
440 012 08
440 012 09
Fred Weisman
Eileen Cirillo I
Maryam Samini
2207 Aralia St
2201 Aralia St
2137 Aralia St
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
440 01210
440 01211
440 012 12
Patrick & Lisa Senske
George & Mary Mix Jr.
Jake Easton III
2131 Aralia St
2127 Araba St
2121 Aralia St
:
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660 1
Newport Beach CA 92660
440 01213
440 01214
440 012 15
McInnis
IRVINE COMPANY
Lu Ella May Bennett
2115 Aralia St
i 2107 Aralia St
2101 Aralia St
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660 I
440 012 16
440 01217 i
440 012 18
Thomas & Kristin Casey
Eric Little
Leonard Burke
2100 Aralia St
2108 Aralia St
2114 Aralia St
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
440 01219
440 012 20
440 092 04
Garrett
Robert & Mary Kinney
SCHOOL NEWPORT HARBOR j
2120 Aralia St
2126 Aralia St
PO Box 1368
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92659
{
440 092 79
440101 01 i
440 101 02
CITY OF NE T BEACH
Residential Js
Caro" Melstrom
PO Box
4525 Macarthur Blvd #A
9562 Drumbeat Dr
New Beach CA 92658
Newport Beach CA 92660
Huntington Beach CA 92646
440' 10103
44010104
44010105
GRACELAND APARTMENTS
ASHBY ENTERPRISES
George Woods Jr.
9562 Drumbeat Dr
PO Box 17809
115 Apolena Ave
Huntington Beach CA 92646
Irvine CA 92623
Newport Beach CA 92662
i
440101.06
440101 10
440102 01
A & B Miller
BERGEN EASTBLUFF PROP LLC
Jkc
1935 Windward Ln
23045 Stoneridge
17 Teramo Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
Mission Vlejo CA 92692
Newport Coast CA 92657
440 102 02
440102 03
440102 04
Larry Petersen
DOMINGO VILLAS INC
Robert Chui
20951 Brookhurst St
757 Domingo Dr
1000 Avondale Rd
Huntington Beach CA 92646
Newport Beach CA 92660
San Marino CA 91108
440102 05
440102 09
44010210
T James Durkin
RMC OF TRACY LLC
IRVINE CO OF VA
PO Box 4308
2804 Lafayette Rd !
PO Box 4708
Fullerton CA 92834
Newport Beach CA 92663
3
Irvine CA 92616
Aa3A119oA1NO66ips t
009ts 3WqdWKq§6&
®091b9�R���
.4n
wadWi1166NMMYwnn aP1dej e6eyPs V le eBeARK4.4wo"Muq
jam rree rrr mg
�e rmting+�
vvvvw.r
1
1J4 .Av .._ _TEMPL E 516pTP . . _ .
��
44010211
44010212
Beach Manhattan
1001 Dove St #225
Project 22
Newport Beach CA 92660
N rt Beach CA
i
... .......... .. ... .. ...
440121 05
44012506
Kevin 8 Cherie Sharp
Lawrence Brannon
601 Vista Bonita
677 Vista Bonita
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
440125 08
44012509
Sandra Kessler
Wayne Lim
681 Vista Bonita
683 Vista Bonita
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
44012511
44012512
HESS PARTNERSHIP
Donald Mersch
2348 Roscomare Rd
689 Vista Bonita
Los Angeles CA 90077
Newport Beach CA 92660
440126 09
44012610
Jeremy Lang
Mark & Anat Lyon
1956 San Bruno
3 Sharon Ln
Newport Beach CA 92660
Coto De Caza CA 92679
44012612
442 251 01
Mary Jane Rumbley
1950 San Bruno
Project 9 3
Newport Beach CA 92660
Ne Beach CA
933 220 01 -
933 220 02
Hossein Tabrizi
Penelope Rae Wilton
835 Amigos Way #1
835 Amigos Way #2
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 220 04
933 220 05
Patricia Krone
Kevin Sullivan
835 Amigos Way #4
835 Amigos Way 95
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 220 07
933 220 08
Manuel Mendoza
Linda Cs4i
PO Box 25384
835 Amigos Way 98
Anaheim CA 92825
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 22010
933 22011
Michael Coppin
Lucinda Hardman
835 Amigos Way #10
835 Amigos Way #11
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
'ff
r
ifCr`m 960TI
440121 04
BLUFFS HOMEOWNERS
PO Box 8167
Newport Beach CA 92658
440125 07
Robert Walsh
679 Vista Bonita
Newport Beach CA 92660
l.l'.
I.
44012510
Nicholas Hartog
685 Vista Bonita
Newport Beach CA 92660
44012513
Diane Geffen
691 Vista Bonita
Newport Beach CA 92660
44012611
Connie Kelly
1952 San Bruno
Newport Beach CA 92660
442 351 OS
Projea 23
N rt Beach CA
933 22003
Eric Slice
. j 220 Nate
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 22006
Robert Wentz
3820 Cadillac Ave #B
Costa Mesa CA 92626
933 220 09
Tracy Nguyen
835 Amigos Way #7
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 22012
George Kanelas
835 Amigos Way #12
Newport Beach CA 92660
��,,�Q u IRtI
aPtdereberj�5@'i I dD
jam rive rnnun
"ntIn
-Use se ve.._.— .LATE 5960TH
' 933 22013
Gregory Steinmann
' 835 Amigos Way #13
tNewport Beach CA 92660
i y 933 22016
Morton
29211 Alfied St
Laguna Niguel CA 92677
934 830 01
Beverly Cleveland
1 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 22014
Lawrence Vescera
835 Amigos Way #14
Newport Beach CA 92660
. 933 22017
!' Gordon Newell
3674 Barham Blvd #1.310
Los Angeles CA 90068
934 830 02
Christopher & Deborah Santoro
2 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83004 934 830 05 n
Melanie Groper " Warren Heeg Jr. 1K
4 Sea Island Dr 5 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660, Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 07
93483008
Gaughan
Ronald Grant
17291 Irvine Blvd #41
8 Sea Island Dr
Tustin CA 92780
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83010
934 83011
Sandra Stanger
Peter 7arquinio
10 Sea Island Dr
11 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83013
934 83014
Wilber Shaffer
Michael Bret Leeper
226 Via San Remo
14 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92663
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83016
John Varga
16 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83019
Nancy Gill
19 Sea island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83022
Isabel Fontao
22 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83017
James & Janice Gandy
17 Sea island Dr #17
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 20
Megan Barth
20 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 23
Julie Perry
23 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
IRFAdANI^"
AVERY® 5160®
AVERYO ss6on
933 22015
William Doremus
835 Amigos Way #15
Newport Beach CA 92660
933 220 18
�� �pidei a6eyops®ja 96eun6gW*44li +I
Martha Haley
3721 Inlet Isle Dr
Corona Del Mar CA 92625
'
934 830 03
p
Noleen Kutash
ytC.
3 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660 -
934 830 06
Marcia Long
Yosemite National Park
Ca 95389
934 830 09
Alan Lamble
9 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83012
jJohn
& Carla Blom
12 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 15
William Cool
719 Poinsettia Ave
Corona Del Mar CA 92625
934 83018
Marilu Brown
PO Box 2451
Newport Beach CA 92659
934 830 21 n
Craig Hendrickson (.
6436 Lake Washington Blvd NE
Kirkland WA 98033
934 830 24
Matthew Stewart
15 Villeneuve
Newport Coast CA 92657
�� �pidei a6eyops®ja 96eun6gW*44li +I
jam rree rnming
Use A��J" §q%oGrinting
eAvemy TEPMRAIPLATIES96orm
934 830 25
Ray & Shama Biggerstaft III
25 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 28
Joseph Elias
28 Sea Island Dr
Newport Reach CA 92660
934 830 31
John Affeldt
31 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 34
LIONHEAD CORP
12735 San Vicente Blvd
i Los Angeles CA 90049
934 830 37
James Charalambous
37 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
93483040
Robert Bevaoqua
40 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 43
Kathy Shen-Shane
43 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 46
Darrell & Lynn Pash
1207 Goldenrod Ave
Corona Del Mar CA 92625
934 830 49
Vito Nicasslo
49 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 52
-George Keeling
52 Sea Island Or
Newport Beach CA 92660
www.avery.com
60
%WAVE@-
A =59(60TI
1_800= G0.AVEP!
i 934 830 26
934 830 27
Rowan Melbon
Shane Shafer
26 Sea Island Dr tC
24001 Oak Vale Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Valencia CA 91355
9348309
934 830 30
Ruth Ble2
ignani
NATHAN LA MOURE CORP
29 Sea Island Dr
41 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 32
934 830 33
John & Linda Schueler
MGL PROPERTIES LLC
32 Sea Island Dr
1200 Quail St #140
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
93483035
934 830 36
,
Nancy Gardner
Mary Cartell
I�
35 Sea Island Dr
ju sea island Or
1 Newport Beach CA 92660 1 1
Newport Beach CA 92660
93483038
934 830 39
Leslie Kramer
Alexander Callglud
38 Sea Island Dr
39 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 411
934 WU 42
D Lamoure Nathan D
Sanders Gorelick
PO Box 50
42 Sea Island Dr
Lake Arrowhead CA 92352
Newport Beach CA 92660
93483044
934 830 45
Eileen Ney
William McCook
4929 Wilshire Blvd
45 Sea Island Dr
Los Angeles CA 90010
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 47
934 830 48
Aida Dagort
Paul Miller
910 Island Dr#113
2 Fawn Run
Rancho Mirage CA 92270
Pittsford NY 14534
93483060
934 830 51
Debra Chandler
Eden Ryl
27271 Las Ramblas
51 Sea Island Dr
Mission Velo CA 92691
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 53
93483054
Michelle Loveall
Gina Gold
121 S Palm Dr #404
54 Sea Island Dr
Beverly Hills CA 90212
Newport Beach CA 92660
uW*VLW*AVAm ep!dej a5e4-39s q is aftiriftIIIIINdNWdMI
'jam; not
PLItTE 596 ing
0.M
934 830 55
Stephanie Huerta
55 Sea Island Or
Newport Beads CA 92660
is
934 830 58
Stanley Ordway
58 Sea Island Or
Newport Beads CA 92660
i 934 830 61
Juliette Hamilton
1 61 Sea Island Or
Newport Beach CA 92660
I
934 83064
Eric Bezkomwayny
2505 W Pch #202
I Newport Beady CA 92663
934 830 67
Eric Bergman
67 Sea Island Or
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 70
Kristin Erin Olson
70 Sea Island Dr
j Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 73
Jefrrey Gill
73 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 76
Todd Godfrey
I 76 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
I'
934 830 79
Lorene Gonia
79 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 82
Richard Mead
82 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
009`yNO�Y'
=.MPNM www.averywm
VERY
corn
AVERY® 5960*
1$1w,,
.. 934 83056
934 830 57
Ronald Martel
Kenneth Rogers
56 Sea Island Dr R !
944 La Muada St
Newport Beach CA 92660
Laguna Beach CA 92651
.._ ...... .......1
934 830 59
934 830 60
Mark James Platte
Larry Diskin
1806 Kumakani PI
BO Sea Island Dr
Honolulu HI 96821
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 62
i
934 830 63
Jeffrey Goodman
B M Moskowitz
62 Sea Island Dr
18325 Chariton Ln
Newport Beach CA 92660 i
Northridge CA 91326 1
I.
934 83065
i
934 830 66
John Murphy I
James Paulus
65 Sea Island Dr
66 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
f ,
934 830 68
934 83069
Joanne Jacobs
Timothy Wilson
68 Sea Island Dr #68
69 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 71
93483072
Raymond Acosta
Roberta Kem
82 El Morro Vlg
72 Sea Island Dr
Laguna Beach CA 92651
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 74
934 830 75
Ross & Sandra Halstead
Willy DeBoer
74 Sea Island Dr
75 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
. __......._..._............
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 83077
934 830 78
Andrea Young
George Kotzeff
77 Sea Island Dr
78 Sea Island Dr
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
934 830 80
934 830 81
Carolyn Bollman
Wilber Shaffer
. 80 Sea Island Dr
226 Via San Remo
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92663
934 830 83
939 230 01
Fletcher
Howard Herzog
83 Sea Island Dr
1 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
;a BeLy�j
U�ro S apldej
aBeysg9 @ a-
jam A rintfng
5960TM
.939 230 02
Alfred Schnell
3 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 05
William 8 J M Purves
9 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 08
W C Graves
1921 Port Bristol Cir
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 11
Robert 8 Marie Marble
23 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 23014
Larry 8 Laura Ainsworth
29 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 17
Harrell Kloke
37 Northampton Ct #117
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 20
Jones
41'Northampton Ct
gewport Beach CA 92660
939 230 23
Wolistein
47 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 26
View Land & Busn Sea
3419 Via Lido #405
Newport Beach CA 92663
939 230 29
James Hoote
320 23rd St S #1528
Arrington VA 22202
=0\3
wviwaverycom , AVERVOSI &D -.
�r 1- 8pp�frQyt�1<{� com
........_.1=800- GO -AVF -. ® AVERY® 596or
939 230 03
939 23004
Kareem Habeeb
Patricia Reilly
5 Northampton Ct
7 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660 _..
; New Beach CA Q2660
939 230 06
939 230 071
Ronald Chez
,p
! Richard Wendt Il.
11 Northampton CI
15 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 09
939 23010
Gail Scherer
Roger Miller
4 1528 Galloway or
1121 Granville Dr
Barrington IL 60010
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 12
939 239 13
Lucy Al Shu Tzen Chou
BUDOO ASSOCIATES LLC
25 Northampton Ct
6005 Lake Geneva Or
Newport Beach CA 92660
Reno NV 89511
939 23015
939 230 16
Sidney Wasserman
Henrietta Gospns
31 Northampton Ct
33 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
i Newport Beach CA 92660
939 23018
939 23019
MisB Kessler
Myron Bander
35 Northampton Ct #118
39 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 21
939 230 22
Laszlo Kaveggia
Thoma%Volden
43 Northampton Ct
45 Northampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
i Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 24
939 230 25
James McGrew
Sutherland
49 Northampton Ct
53 Northampton
Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
i,
939 230 27
939 230 28
Alban Ann Stem
W J & A M Wilson
49 Southampton Ct
:.47 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 30
939 230 31
Harlan Erickson
! Kimberley Parker
3300 Irvine Ave #270
41 Southampton Ct #131
Newport Beach CA 92660
Newport Beach CA 92660
esn
rUTA� !HilPIMOrdrP �
aptdej aBerues a ie a6e�i���nnNH� ••
jam V, nn,
Use
r
Ave.. LATE.5960—
939 230 32
Richard Ayres
39 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 35
Thomas Thorkelson
33 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
93923038
Clifford Meyer L
27 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 41
Robert Ctler
19 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
93923044
Donna Hall
15 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 47
Francisco Santos
7 Southampton Ct #147
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 50
Edward D10do
I Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
ZI
www.avery.com
1-800-GO-AVE'..
93923033
Paul Liener
35 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 36
Paul Johnson
31 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
93923039
Mad Palash
25 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
A
939 230 42
Mark Anderson
21 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
93923045
Linda Kaye Martin
11 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 48
Leigh Umnarco
5 Southampton Ct
Newport ach CA 92660
Our Lady Queen of Angeles Church
i Attn: Father Kerry Beaulieu
12046 Mar Vista Drive
i Newport Beach, CA 92660
Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange Roman Catholic D* e of Orange
Attn: Joe Novoa Attn: Joe N a
2811 East Villa Real Drive
..;2811 illa Real Drive
Orange, CA 92863
ge, CA 92863
Our Lady Queen of es Church Barnard Ventures, Lj.0
Attn: Father A Scott B,
PrrfBeaufieu tin.
2046 Bi Itreet
.4�ista Drive 5100
Ne4p-ort Beach, CA 92660
NOrt beach, CA 92660
,Roman Catholic Di e of Orange St Mark Pre'sbyte urch
Attn:: Joe Nov Attn: John er
Ull Illa Real Drive t 10 ista Drive
Or ,CA 92863 rt Beach, C CA 92660
AMV-09-WIl,
ON @AUW rttlllll
AVER0 $-1600
AVERY0 50601;
93923034
Randolph & Paula Goodman
W Howell Rd
BqIhosda4dD.20817 -
939 230 37
Larry Tucker
29 Southampton Ct
Newport Bdach CA.92660
939 230 40
Michael Mudd
23 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660 .
939 230 43
Dorothy Made Smith
17 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 46
j George Mural
9 Southampton Ct
Newport Beach CA 92660
939 230 49
Linda Favreau
3 Southampton Ct #149
i Newport Belch CA 92660
Barnard Ventures, LLC
!Attn: Scott Barnard
5100 Birch Street
Newport beach, CA 92660
:St. Mark Presbyterian Church
'Attn: John Benner
2100 Mar Vista Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Barnard Ventures, LLC
Attn: ScotLBAntarcr
Wr�uch Street
Newport beach, CA 92660
8t. Mark erlan Church
Mar Vi:Zve
ewport Beach, CA 92660
6V%§~V asn
a
jam raw rnrrmg
-Use AvW TEMPLATE 51600
Mary Kay and Steve Dugan
851 Domingo
Unit 1
Newport Beach, CA 92660
i
LS ®A AV AMA"9.00g-L gORS VIdW31�+owesn
wm tiane Mnnen Buquud Owl Ulef
CITY OF NEWf Rff"
2WSEP20 M045
Application No.
Name of Appellant OFFICE OF
f THE CITY CLERK �
or person filing: UNT`k 6f
Address:
Date of Planning Commission decision: �S-?PE - 20
Regarding application of-. 6b &f,",f o c S(C Ikucclti iforV
(Description of application filed with Planning Commission) (FA-2, x -CszZ
��� {. �caZGu� 1 0,-\, ax,
-,C% Ace/L�
Reasons for Appeal:
«U�s yC(
Appellant
Date '5) �,,L 301 a Ll
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY p
Date Appeal filed and Administrative Fee received: / f o1.C7 LO (a 20
Hearing Date. An appeal shall be scheduled for a hearing before the City Council within thirty (30) days of the
filing of the appeal unless both applicant and appellant or reviewing body consent to a later date (NBMC Sec.
20.95.060)
cc: Appellant
Planning (fumish one set of mailing labels for mailing)
File
APPEALS: Municipal Code Sec. 20.95.050(B)
Appeal Fee: $340 pursuant to Resolution No. 2006 -4 adopted on 1- 10-06.
(Deposit funds with Cashier in Account #2700 -5000)
2
w: l(
cey�cas2
a L7
W VIAL v` Wt l,lLU S �„�. 'C fM RAC-u,,
��e 1� �Mq� U �� F� �vn uv� [�, (fit t`�oS �► � qtr 0�, cv-1.341L
�Cw cjam
1�Cl �7 p ��4 So agat (T
G�� ^ y �`^� (AU Mj fCU,, CYzKc F
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
'PLANNING DEPARTMENT
P.O.BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
1 1 (949) 644-3200
FEE RECEIPT
Date: Check No.: %, Received by.
a4
Received from Job Address
Zoning Plan Check ....................... ........................................ 2700-5003 $
Overtime Plan Check ....................................................... ..... 2700-5003
Park Dedication Fee ................................
Planning Activity Deposit ........................................................ 029--$
$
Ji6b-
Planning Activity Fees wV) 5000
................................................... I ......... . ..............................
Records Management Fee (# of sheets—) .................1........... — $
Sale of Maps & Publications (Planning) ........... ......................2700 -5812 $
-Sale of GIS maps ................................................................... 0630-5810
Other(Specify) ............................................. .......... .............. — $
Fee Receipt No.
F:IUSERSIPLNtShare(ATMPLTSIFEERCPT.doe
P
TOTAL
SEP?%020 r
..Sep 21 06 12:14p Doremus
The Doremus Family Trust
Post Office Box 69149
West Hollywood, California, 90069.0149
Telephone 323 650-4501
Facsimile 3223 650 -1065
Email pddoremus@gmail.com
IF AX TRANSMITTAL 1=0RM
message:
323 650 -1085 p.1
}DECEIVED
7M6 SEP 21 PM 2: 33
GFR E OF
THE CITY CLERK
CITY OF NIINIPORT BEACH
To: W. Cathy Malkemus From: The Doremus Family Trust
Date Sent: September 21, 2006
CC: Y6a Granada homeowners Association
Phone: 949 6443309
Fax 949 644 -3039
Number of Pales Two ,(2) u A
inease forward the covitewts of this faeam&il.eto Ms. MaLleew+.irs awd or the City
CLeriz's o f fi.ceto be docu.vu.ewted as the trace awd accurate wordLwe as tke - peasovis for
Appeals filed Uesterda8 bd the villa c.,ra"ola Hvwceowmrs AssocLatiow Lw refere"e to tine
proposed expav+siow of our f..adte auueew of AweeLs Church awd SchooL (I>A- 2005 -092)
Lvwwr.ed't.ateL0 upow real -pt. IwcL"Eve of this cover paee there are Two (2) pages.
Thawle, Oou..
Paul D. Dorevx.us, Trustee
The norewn.us f=avu,Uu Trust
The information contained herein is confidential and intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If you receive this information f
correspondence and you are not the person for whom it was intended, or the legal agent of the person for whom it was intended andfor for the
purpose it was Intended, disclosure of this information may be a violation of the law and you are instructed to return this Correspondence to the
undersigned. Know that retention of any had copies is punishable by law. No claim of ownership is made to third party materials cited herein. You
are hereby on notice, that divulging, forwarding or oticerwise sharing any portion of this communication with a third party not specifically named in the
"Addressed To" section may subject the addressee(s) andfor its agents, to charges of libel, slander, and breach of confidentiality. This
communication is copyright and may not be reproduced, sold or circulated without the authors prior written consent
Sao 21 06 12:14p Doremus 323 650 -1085 p.2
APPLICATION TO APPEAL DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
Original Applicant: Our Lady Queen of Angels Church (PA- 2005-092)
Appeal Applicant's Information
Filed: September 20, 2006
Villa Granada Homeowners Association
Reasons for Appeal: Appellant Applicant requests a minimum of One Hundred and Twenty
(120) days to be heard by the City Council regarding this matter, as to consider conducting new
Studies (Traffic & otherwise) as well as to fully review all documentation pertaining to the
proposed project and permits granted (PA- 2005 -092).
Appellant also requests that OLQA immediately cease and desist any and all attempts to install
any `New' classrooms which are either of a temporary and or permanent nature.
Appellant firmly believes that the new findings will validate our serious concern(s) as to any and
all increase of students to the Our Lady Queen of Angels Church / School as well as the proposed
enlarged seating capacity of One Thousand, One Hundred and Seventy (1170) parishioners in a
Church which conducts Six (6) services per weekend - with the very real potential of
approximately Seven Thousand (7000) attendees per weekend. Our Lady Queen of Angel's
proposal equates to an increase of Two Thousand (2000) people per weekend, not to mention the
hundreds of additional vehicles that will bring said attendees into the direct vicinity of the Church
and onto our already overcrowded residential streets.
Appeal Applicant intends to consider the possibility of conducting a new `Traffic Study', one
which will focus on the germane intersections of Eastbluff / Mar Vista / Domingo and Amigos
Street(s) - the streets that actually surround the OLQA Church and OLQA School - instead of
relying on the currant study (funded by OLQA) which wrongly focused on the intersection of
Jamboree and Eastbluff ONLY.
Appellant firmly believes that the new, forthcoming information will shed new light on the very
complicated equation of the ongoing and dangerous traffic jams and congestion as well as
validate our concerns as to the currently proposed and approved expansion of both the size, height
and seating capacity of the new church, and the proposed and approved increased capacity of One
Hundred and Eighty (180) students of the Church's school and their direct and numerous adverse
effects they would have on the adjacent neighboring communities.
"RE QED AFTER AGENDA Page 1 of 5
i PRNTED; ' I
Brown, Leilani
From: Harkless, LaVonne
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:54 PM
To: Brown, Leilani
Subject: FW: URGENT November 14, City Council Hearing Pleae Forward to City Council Members
Please Print this for Tuesday's meeting. Thanks.
From: Ung, Rosalinh
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:28 PM
To: Harkless, LaVonne
Subject: FW: URGENT November 14, City Council Hearing Pleae Forward to City Council Members
Please forward. Thanks.
From: PD Doremus [mallto:pddoremus @gmail.rom]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:54 PM
To: Ung, Rosalinh; KingandKrone @aol.com; rebeccagouin @yahoo.com
Subject: URGENT November 14, City Council Hearing Pleae Forward to City Council Members
November 13, 2006
Honorable City Council Members
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
RE: Application to appeal decision of the Planning Commission
Our Lady Queen of Angels proposed expansion
(PA02005 -092)
Dear Council Members:
I am the applicant in the above entitled application, filed on September 20, 2006, to appeal the decision of the
Planning Commission.
The purpose of this letter is to advise the Council Members of the following:
1. I am currently out of the country on a previously arranged trip and cannot attend the hearing presently
scheduled for Tuesday, November 14, 2006.
2. In my application to appeal this matter I made it specifically clear that I would be unavailable the entire
month of November and requested that the hearing be set for a minimum of 120 days from the filing of
my application for the reasons contained within and those included in my application.
3. For reasons unknown to me the hearing has been scheduled for a time when I, the applicant, cannot
attend, which I believe to be prejudicial to me. As the petitioning party I believe I have the right to
attend and participate in any hearing regarding my application and feel that my rights have been ignored.
11/13/2006
Page 2 of 5
4. For the record I have the %t to have a hearing scheduled with9thirty (30) days as stated on the
application filing form. And I believe I made my position quite clear in filing the application that in the
event the hearing would be scheduled during the month of November that I would exercise my right to
insist on a hearing within thirty (30) days.
5. Despite my attempts to advise Our Lady Queen of Angles of said petition I have yet to hear from them or
any of their representatives and therefore, in the interest of fairness ask that the hearing, scheduled for
November 15, 2006, be rescheduled to insure the participation of all interested parties. Further, insofar as
Our Lady Queen of Angels has been mulling this proposal around since 2000 I don't see how a one or two
month continuance would cause them any unnecessary inconvenience.
However, should the Council continue with the hearing, despite my objections, I will take this opportunity to
briefly outline my objections regarding the proposed expansion plans of Our Lady Queen of Angels. There are
several aggravating facts that I believe the Planning Commission failed to seriously consider in reviewing the
proposed expansion plans for Our Lady Queen of Angels. They are as follows:
First and foremost, while Our Lady Queen of Angel's purports that the new sanctuary seating capacity
will be marginally smaller in size than the two (2) combined churches (St. Mark's and Our Lady Queen of
Angels) the fact remains that St. Mark's only had one (1) service a week, wherein Our Lady Queen of
Angels has a total of six (6) services a week. Therefore, the five (5) additional services that Our Lady
Queen of Angels conducts every weekend combined with the additional of the soon to be former St.
Mark's increases the proposed capacity by an estimated seating capacity of One Thousand, One Hundred and
Seventy (1170) parishioners in a Church which conducts Six (6) services per weekend — with the potential of
approximately Seven Thousand (7000) attendees per weekend. Our Lady Queen of Angel's proposal equates to an
increase of Two Thousand (2000) people per weekend, not to mention the hundreds of additional vehicles that will
bring said attendees into the direct vicinity of the Church and onto our already overcrowded residential streets.
And even by the conservative traffic study presented by Our Lady Queen of Angel's statistics, which I
disagree with, will bring an additional seven hundred (700) plus cars per weekend into the neighborhood,
a number that I argue will be more in the vicinity of seven hundred and fifty (750) cars, which is
unacceptable. And while statements from the church itself suggest that there would not be any '
significant impact on the traffic' all evidence suggests otherwise. The numbers simply don't add up. We
are not talking math, this is simple arithmetic. The addition of another five to seven hundred plus cars a
weekend is a substantial impact on those who live in the neighborhood. Furthermore, our Lady Queen of
Angles suggestions that posting " parking dot fell" signs and or "parking attendants" is laughable since
many of Our Lady Queen of Angels parishioners have and continue to reckless disregard to both the
neighborhood by double parking, parking in No Parking Zones, jaywalking and by blocking intersection
of Mar Vista and Domingo by dropping off and picking up family members and friends, suggests to me
that they will disregard any such notices stating "lot full" and or any attendants that I don't sincerely
believe that Our Lady Queen of Angels has any intention of spending funds on since they never have
before. This equation does not even address the many special events held on site, inclusive of but not
limited to weddings, funerals or other such events that Our Lady Queen of Angels promises to limit to no
more than one thousand (1000) people and respective vehicles.
More specifically, directing the Councils attention to an article published in 1990 addressing the traffic
and proposed traffic study in and around Our Lady Queen of Angels wherein Councilman John C. Cox
Jr. stated " that funding a study would be a 'waste of money' when the council is already aware of the
traffic problems" further exacerbated by Councilman Clarence J. Turner who stated that, " he was
previously unaware of how clogged the traffic is around the school between 7:30 and 8:05 each
morning ". Turner said "solutions must be found to reduce the congestion before the Newport a ch
11/13/2006
Page 3 of 5
coast is devalop which�eVected to_cause...fs_juin in enrolont at the high school". For the
record, nothing whatsoever has been done to reduce the 'congestion' expect the closure of Bison and
restricting access to public streets (Mar Vista and Alba) which has only exacerbated the situation and put
additional stress onto Eastbluff. Further, the 'new and improved drop off plan' instituted last year
hardly addresses the problem, only moved it to the other side of the street, and in doing so eliminated
bike lanes creating even more of a potential hazard to students, residents alike. Equally egregious is the
fact that despite the steady development of the city, especially the home developments (inclusive of but
not limited to Newport Coast) the fact that no high school as been constructed since 1960 constitutes, at
the very least, negligence on the part of the Planning Commission in allowing hundreds, maybe
thousands of four and five bedroom homes to be built without the foresight of furnishing the necessary
schools to facilitate the ever increasing student body, which presently is increasing by one hundred
(100) students per year it will only get increase expedientially.
2. While representatives from Our Lady Queen of Angels have, in fact, represented that they have' reached
out to their neighbors' during the Planning Commission hearing it appears to me that all evidence
suggests the contrary especially considering that Our Lady Queen of Angels proposal calls to relocate the
two (2) main driveways that will serve as the major thoroughfares for both the sanctuary and school on
Domingo, a residential street, suggests to me that neither the church nor its architects have demonstrated
little, if any, respect for the neighborhood or those who reside within, by bringing traffic farther into the
neighborhood rather than away from it. Upon fiuther review the Council will note that there are one
driveways, and or entrances or exits on either Eastbluff and or Mar Vista, directing all the traffic to
Domingo, farther into the neighborhood that Our Lady Queen of Angels purports to have claimed to
"reach out too ". Furthermore, upon closer inspection you will can see for yourselves that the two (2)
proposed driveways are located at the farther possible point on the property from the major intersection,
Jamboree and Eastbluff, and will have an enormous negative impact on the hundreds of homeowners and
residents who reside on Domingo and or Amigos Way. Furthermore, insofar as the two (2) proposed
driveways serve as both ingress and egress I believe this will only exacerbate the unresolved traffic issues
that compromise the quality of lives of those who live in the neighborhood, and given the similar
situation at Corona del Mar Plaza wherein only one (1) driveway serves as the primary and only ingress
and egress to the shopping complex and Public Library, should serve as a reminder of such poor planning.
3. In reviewing the voluminous report, prepared and paid for and submitted by Our Lady Queen of Angels, I
believe there are several misrepresentations by Our Lady Queen of Angels that I feel compelled to
address, they are as follows: First and foremost, notwithstanding the fact that the report attempts to
argue that the low attendance of certain 'morning services' as mitigating issues to argue any potential
traffic issues, the fact that Our Lady Queen of Angels has substantiated its request to expand both its
sanctuary and school to accommodate the' growing needs of the church and its school or words to that
effect, there is every reason to believe that expect to fill both to full capacity. Secondly, I don't feel that
the traffic study presented by the Church is unrealistic in suggesting that by doubling the size of the
schools enrollment will only add an estimated seventeen (17) cars on school days especially considering
that there is no evidence of a bussing system and or car pooling program to make a concerted effort on the
churches part to eliminate any excess traffic. Thirdly, no one on the Planning Commission even
questioned the fact that the proposed gymnasium will remain open till 9:00 P.M. seven nights a week and
or the extra traffic that brings into the equation. Fourthly, contrary to the sutmnary's claims that there will
be' no aesthetic impact' by more than doubling the height of the proposed roof from twenty (20) feet to
fifty -five (55) feet I suggest that the 'aesthetic impact' will be quite significant, since that and the
proposed ninety (90) foot steeple both exceed the thirty -five (35) foot height restriction that the City has
set as both excessive and particular insulting to the neighborhood.
11/13/2006
Page 4 of 5
4. Lastly, and most troubling is the aggravating fact is that both the Planning Commission and just about
everyone else, including Our Lady Queen of Angels, seems to be ignoring the virtual ' elephant in the
room' so to speak, Corona del Mar and the traffic issues that that, in and of itself, presents to the equation.
Notwithstanding the fact that it has been over forty (40) years since a high school has been built, the
student body enrollment is increasing exponentially, by at least one hundred (100) students a year, which
seems to be of little, or no concern to the Planning Commission or Traffic Commission. Neither Corona
del Mar High School itself nor the neighboring streets were designed to accommodate the overcrowding
enrollment and or traffic burden especially considering that when the high school was built a majority of
the student body traveled to and from via school buses. By closing off access to Bison and other such
residential streets the City has only exacerbated an already out of control situation.
In closing, I would ask that the Council give serious consideration to the oversights of the Planning
Commissions decision wherein it did not in fact act in the City's best interests in properly investigating the
proposed expansion. The Summary report prepared on behalf of Our Lady Queen of Angels is littered with
gross misrepresentations from the true and actual numbers of parishioners to the traffic situation, I believe that
that in and of itself speaks volumes of the Churches lack of veracity. The proposed expansion is far too large
for a neighborhood and or streets that were never designed, nor have ever been redesigned to handle the number
of vehicles that the Church, its school and C.D.M. high school bring into our neighborhood. For the Church
and or its appointed representatives to misrepresent that the traffic will not be impacted is particularly insulting
to those of us who reside here.
Therefore, I am respectfully requesting that the hearing be postponed and or Our Lady Queen of Angels
proposed expansion plans be denied for their less than forthright manner in misrepresenting the true and actual
ramifications that the oversized proportions will have on the neighborhood and its residents.
Respectfully,
Paul Drake Doremus
835 Amigos Way
Villa Fifteen
Newport Beach, CA
PDD:kbd
The information contained herein is confidential and intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If
you receive this information / correspondence and you are not the person for whom it was intended, or the legal
agent of the person for whom it was intended and/or for the purpose it was intended, disclosure of this
information may be a violation of the law and you are instructed to return this correspondence to the
undersigned. Know that retention of any hard copies is punishable by law. No claim of ownership is made to
third party materials cited herein. You are hereby on notice, that divulging, forwarding or otherwise sharing
any portion of this communication with a third party not specifically named in the "Addressed To" section may
11/13/2006
Page 5 of 5
subject the addressee(s) and/or its Wts, to charges of libel, slander, and bl*h of confidentiality. This
communication is copyright and may not be reproduced, sold or circulated without the author's prior written
consent.
11/13/2006
Authorized to Publish Advertisements of all kindsltdmg public notices by
Decree of the Superior Court of Orange County, California. Number A -6214,
September 29, 1961, and A -24831 June 11, 1963.
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
am a Citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am
over the age of eighteen years, and not a
party to or interested in the below entitled
matter. I am a principal clerk of the
NEWPORT BEACH - COSTA MESA
DAILY PILOT, a newspaper of general
circulation, printed and published in the
City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange,
State of California, and that attached
Notice is a true and complete copy as
was printed and published on the
following dates:
November 4, 2006
I declare, under penalty of perjury, that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on November 6, 2006 at
Costa Mesa, California.
e
Signature
•
RECEIVED
2�'S 10 13 AM I1. 07
__ Fi" OF
r, TV rI EF,
(90 feet proposed to.
the steeple); to allow
the transfer of develop
NONE OF PUBLIC PEARING newtchuchnyffeo(210C
Oer Ludy O. en Mar Vista Dr.) to the
of Angels Church school site (2046 Mar
Expansion Vista Dr.) so as the
(PA2005 -092) square footage for the
NOTICE 15 HEREBY two properties when
GIVEN that the City combined results in an
Council of the City of overall FAR (floor area
Newport Beach will hold ratio) of 0.17 consistent
a public hearing on an with the General Plan;
appeal of the Planning and to allow a total of
Commission's approval ten portable classrooms
of a Use Permit for the to be located on the
expansion of Our Lady school site during the
Queen of Angels Church. construction period. A
The project site is local- traffic study is also re-
ed at 2046 and 2100 quired pursuant to the
Mar Vista Drive and is Traffic Phasing Ordi-
zoned Government, Edu- nance.
cational and Institution. NOTICE IS HEREBY
al Facilities (GEIF). FURTHER GIVEN that a
Our Lady Queen of Mitigated Negative Dec.
Angels Church requests laration was prepared
to expand their existing by the City of Newport
church and school facili- Beach in connection
ties by relocating its with the application
church to the adjacent noted above. The Miti-
property located at 2100 gated Negative Declara-
Mar Vista Drive (pres- tion states that, the
ently used by St. Mark subject development will
Presbyterian Church) not result in a signifi-
and expanding its cant effect on the envi-
school within the exist- ronment. It is the pres-
ing boundaries at 2046 ent intention of the City
Mar Vista Drive. The to accept the Mitigated
expansion includes the Negative Declaration
construction of a 1,170- and supporting doc.
seat sanctuary, addi- uments. This is not to
tional classrooms, and a be construed as either
9,450 square foot gym- approval or denial by
nasium. When cam- the City of the subject
bined, the new Our Lady application. The City en-
Queen' of Angels Church courages members of
campus will be approx- the general public to
imately 12.17 acres in - --
size. The project, as
Proposed. requires ap-
proval of a Use Permit
to allow the expansion
of the existing church
and school acility; to
allow the church
building to exceed the
Permitted building
height of 35 feet
O
review and comment on
this documentation.
Copies of the Negative
Declaration and sup-
porting documents are
available for public re-
view and inspection at
the Planning Depart-
ment, City of Newport
Beach, 3300 Newport
Boulevard, Newport
Beach, California,
92658 -8915, (949) 644-
3200.
NOTICE IS HEREBY
FURTHER GIVEN that
said Public hearing will
be held on Novomfaor
14, 2006, at the hour
Of 1:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the
Newport Beach City'
Hall,
3300 Newport Boule-
vard, Newport Beach,
California. at which time
and place any and all
persons interested may
appear and be heard
th2reun. If you challenge
this project in court,
you may be limited to
raising only those issues
YOU or someone else
raised at the public
hearing described in this
notice or in written cor-
respondence delivered
to the City at, or prior
to, the public hearing.
For information call
(949) 644 -3200.
LaVonne M. Harkless,
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
Published Newport
3each /Costa Mesa Daily
'ilot Nov. 4, 2006 Sa604
O OLQOA Project Approval Appeal Hearing
Vtila Granada CommuftAssociation Homeowners
Easlbluff Apartment Owners Association
Amigoa Properties LP
November 14,2006
01111y1o6— -#Ie
2 0 Scope of Project vs.Community
• Future Growth.
• Traffic & parking problems already exist & acknowledged by City Staff.
• Problem ignored in OLQOA Neg. Dec, & Traffic Study.
• City lacks adequate data/analysts to warrant pemdl approval at this time.
• City has opportunity to act on entities it has control over to mitigate current & future impacts.
s D Significant Impact
• Any growth by the Church or Public School - Is 1 or 27 vehides significant?
• Project Neg Dec fails to address threshold of proper significance.
• City resources used to manage existing traffic indicates significant problem requiring
mitigation.
• Can't assess significance without adequate traffic study.
40 Flawed Traffic Study
• Current. study does not consider impact of public & public school an local ftftic.
• combined Use N city stream is CIVe =cam.
• Inadequate study of vehicular traffic an Mar VistatDomingo.
• Sadly is responsibility of agency approving use permit, rot the private party.
• Use of obscure traffic models rather than actual Waft count.
• Removal & reinstatement of bike lane not analyzed.
s O Mitigation Measures with Significant Impact
• Minimal measures proposed by Neg Dec are Inadequate & non- krrictlonnt.
• 2nutlpatlwn nreewseaakd me mml adtrews baflk.
• More functional mitigation measures needed:
• Removeeweag public parkegm MarM mend Domingwdu"peek boumtvi mwafictlay.
• flmrnerMZa➢ �dwMaAertrallhmawM�aMMeri *�aWl.wapes6l
Review & review parkeg mr wgessl*"m
SOW ftp ff end pick up pademe acme AMrPM
s O Neg Dec vs. Public Records
• The Neg Dec does not acknowledge traffic andfor parking problems.
• City Staff & Public observe problems.
• Records show acknowledgement
• Hearings
• City Expenses
• Need for Parking Management Plans; School Drop Off Schedules
70 In Conclusion
• City should postpone approval of the use permit wrtil the completion of an EIR to Include a
comprehensive battle study.
• Take advantage of the existing opportunity to improve the existing traffic and parking conditions.
• Taking this time now will insure that the City has fully explored the problem and made improvements
that will b9rr01lit this community and support continued growth.
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-99
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING
AND AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF USE PERMIT NO. 2005 -020
AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 2006 -002 FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2046 AND 2100 MAR VISTA DRIVE (PA2005 -092)
WHEREAS, an application was filed by Our Lady Queen of Angels (OLQA)
Church for properties identified as 2046 and 2100 Mar Vista Drive located on the
south side of Mar Vista Drive, west of Eastbluff Drive and Jamboree Road. The
application requests the approval of a Use Permit to allow the expansion of the
existing church and school facilities; to allow a proposed church building to exceed
the permitted building height of 35 feet (90 feet proposed for the steeple); to allow
the transfer of development intensity between the two sites in accordance with
Section 20.63.080 of the Municipal Code; and to allow ten (10) portable classrooms
to be located on the school site during the construction period. Traffic Study
approval pursuant to the Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) is also requested. The
expansion includes the construction of a 1,170 -seat santuary, ten (10) additional
classrooms, and a 9,450 square foot gymnasium; and
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2006, the Planning Commission held a noticed
public hearing in the City Hall Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, California at which time the project applications, the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and comments received thereon were considered. The
Planning Commission considered the environmental document and associated
technical reports during the consideration of the project. Notice of time, place and
purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with law and testimony
was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at the hearing,
and
WHEREAS, at the September 7, 2006 hearing, the Planning Commission,
with a vote of 6 ayes (one absent). adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and approved Use Permit No. 2005 -020 and Traffic Study No. 2006 -002; and
WHEREAS, on September.20, 2006, an appeal was duly filed by Paul
Doremus, representing Villa Granada Homeowners Association in accordance
with Code Section 20.95.040; and.
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2006, the City Council held a noticed. public
hearing in the City Hall Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport
Beach, California at which time the appeal was considered. The appeal presented
no new information that would call into question the validity of the environmental
analysis in the record.
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City
of Newport Beach hereby denies the appeal and upholds and affirms the
Planning Commission's approval of Use Permit No. 2005 -020 and Traffic Study
No. 2006 -002, set forth in the Planning Commission Resolution No. 1696 with
amended Condition No. 3 to state as follow:
3. The maximum school enrollment capacity shall be 600 students, Kindergarten
through 8t' grade.
This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption. Passed and adopted by
the City Council of Newport Beach at a regular meeting held on the November 14,
2006 by the following vote to wit:
0
CITY CLERK
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS Curry_, Selic_h, Rosanskv Daigle,
Nichols, Mayor Webb
NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS None
ABSTAIN, COUNCIL MEMBERS Ridgeway
ABSENT COUNCIL MEUBERS N
MAYOR
• •
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH }
I, LaVonne M. Harkless, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do
hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; that the foregoing
resolution, being Resolution No. 2006 -99 was duly and regularly introduced before and adopted by
the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said Council, duly and regularly held on the
14th day of November 2006, and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to
wit:
Ayes: Curry, Selich, Rosansky, Daigle, Nichols, Mayor Webb
Noes: None
Absent: None
Abstain: Ridgeway
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name .and affixed the
official seal of said City this 15th day of November 2006.
City Clerk
Newport Beach, California