Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
S29 - San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor Toll Rate Study
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. S29 April 22, 2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Homer Bludau, City Manager 949 - 644 -3000 or hbludau @city.newport- beach.ca.us SUBJECT: San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SJHTC) Toll Rate Study Comments ISSUE: Does the City Council, at Council Member Webb's request, want to send a letter to the Chairman of the SJHTC Board requesting that future toll rates at the Newport Coast Drive ramp increase at the same rate as the rates for the Aliso Creek ramp? RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Mayor to send a letter to the Chairman of the SJHTC Board requesting that future toll rates at the Newport Coast Drive ramp increase at the same rate as the rates for the Aliso Creek ramp. BACKGROUND: On May 8th, both Transportation Agency Boards will receive and consider the recommendations in the "Final Traffic and Revenue Report, Transportation Corridor System, Including the San Joaquin Hills, Foothill and Eastern Transportation Corridors" dated April 10, 2008, prepared by Stantec Consulting Inc. The TCA board members were given a copy of the report to review in advance of it being presented to the representative Boards. On March 31, 2008, Council Member Webb submitted the attached letter to TCA CEO Tom Margro. The letter was discussed by the TCA Joint Financial Options Finance Committee on April 10th. It was the consensus of the meeting, with Webb being the only dissenter, that the report's recommended future toll rates were appropriate and should not be adjusted. As stated in the letter, the proposed toll rate at Newport Coast Drive Ramp increases by a much greater percentage than at any other location along the corridor. The proposal is for a 25 cent increase every two years. The 2008 rate of $1.50 increases to $4.25 by 2031. The tolled distance of road used is 1.8 miles. San Joaquin Hilts Transportation Corridor (SJHTC) Toll Rate Study Comments April 22, 2008 Page 2 By comparison, at the southerly end of the corridor the Aliso Creek Ramp has a proposed rate increase of 25 cents in 7 years and then every five years after that. The 2008 rate of $1.25 increases to $2.50 by 2031. The tolled distance of road used is 2.2 miles. It is Council Member Webb's position, since both of these locations are roughly the same distance from each end of the toll road, they should pay approximately the same toll for the use of the toll road. The future ramp volumes are projected to be about the same, so if the proposed rates for Newport Coast Drive go down by the same amount Aliso Creek rates go up, there is no loss of revenue. If the rates are adopted as proposed, the Newport Coast Drive Ramp users will pay about $66 million more than Aliso Creek Ramp users between now and 2031 for traveling roughly the same distance on the toll road. This staff report was done at the request of Councilman Webb Environmental Review: The City Council's approval of this Agenda Item does not require environmental review. Public Notice: This agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the Council considers the item). Prepared & Submitted by: o� Homer L. Bludau, ity Manager Attachments: Letter to Tom Margro Mayor �% Edward D. Selich Mayor Pro Tern Lestic J. Daigle Council Members Kcilh D. Curry Nancy Gardner Michael F. Henn Steven Rosansky Don Webb Dear Tom, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL March 31, 2008 Toni Margro, CEO Transportation Corridor Agencies 125 Pacifica, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Subject: Santee Traffic and Revenue Report I have completed my review of the Stantec Final Traffic and Revenue Report and find that the issue I raised at the last board meeting and that I brought up during at least two Joint Financial Options Ad Hoc Committee meetings has not been addressed. It appears to me that the Newport Coast Drive (NCD) Toll Plaza future rates are too high when you consider the distance traveled on the tolled portion of the SJHTC and compare the rate to the southern end of the corridor for an equal distance traveled. The 2031 NCD rate of $4.25 is 2.83 times the 2007 rate. No other ramp increases by this percentage. The report says on page VI -2 "The toll schedule results in average toll rates that will roughly double at all toll plazas between 2008 to 2031." The NCD rate is almost tripled. The attached Exhibit I utilizes the information in the Stantec Report Table VI -1 to show a Toll Increase Comparison. For the years shown, either NCD (3 of 5) or Bonita Canyon (2 of 5) have the highest period percentage increases. In 2031, the La Paz ramp has the highest cost per tolled miles traveled at $2.74 /mile, followed by NCD at $2.43 /mile and Bonita Canyon $1.65 /mile. While Aliso Creek and .El Toro are $1.18 /mile and $1.19 /111ile respectively. Page VI -3 in the report indicates the average cost - per -mile for interchange -to- interchange trips for 2030 is 127 cents. NCD is 1.9 times this amount and Aliso Creek is 0.93 this amount for a 0.4 mile longer trip and the.same projected volume. For the years listed, NCD is from 54% to 91% higher than the average and Bonita Canyon is f om 21 % to 79% higher than the average. Why? The annotated Figure VI -7 shows the distances from or to a toll plaza from closest free ramp. For the NCD ramp the tolled distance traveled averages 1.8 miles. For the Aliso Creek ramp the tolled distance traveled averages 2.2 miles, yet the 2031 toll is $1.75 less than the $4.25 NCD toll. The tolled distance traveled for the El Toro ramp averages 3.8 miles which is 2 miles longer than the NCD distance yet the 2031 toll is only $0.25 greater than the NCD toll. City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard • Post Office .Box 1768 Newport Beach California 92658 -8915 • www.city.newport- beach.ca.us The recommended toll rates put a disproportionate share of the rate increase on the northern end of the SJHTC. I am particularly concerned because as rates increase, more traffic will use Coast Highway through Corona del Mar and on to MacArthur Boulevard. The Santec Report Table III -6 shows that the 2000 NCD ramp toll increase caused a 22% reduction in those using the ramp. Mainline toll increases show up to a 10% increase in traffic using the NCD ramp. These are significant numbers of trips that are diverted onto Newport Beach's arterial system. Between the Pacific Ocean and the Corridor, Coast Highway is the only parallel route. A reduction of trips on the Corridor means an increase of trips on Coast Highway, Newport Coast Drive is supposed to divert traffic from Corona del Mar, but if the rates for this ramp are too high, as they appear to be, this diversion will not occur. Attached Figure 111 -13 shows that for the last two years the NCD tolled ramp volumes are the highest on the corridor. Exhibit 3 shows future ramp projections indicate this will be the case until 2030. The rates today are only $0.25 higher than Aliso Creek. That difference increases to $1.75 by 2031 and appears to cause a 20% reduction in the NCD ramp volume. Again I ask, please adjust the rates so that those using the northerly end of the SJHTC are paying equal to, or at least close to, the rates per mile of toll road used as those on the southerly end. I suggest that the Bonita Canyon (0.8 tolled miles used) and the La Paz (1 tolled mile used) have the same rate. The Newport Coast Drive (1.8 tolled miles used) and the Aliso Creek (2.2 tolled miles used) should also be the same rate. There is a very easy bypass around the NCD ramp. In the northbound direction it is 0.1 mile longer and adds about 2 1/2 minutes to a trip. In the southbound direction it is 0.5 miles longer and adds about 2 minutes to a trip. See Exhibit 2, Time Runs for the NCD Bypass. If the recommended disproportionately high toll rates are implemented, we could educate our drivers with the following sign which by 2031 would read: Use Bypass Save $3.00 Lose 3 Minutes In this letter, I have focused on the 2031 toll rates as an example. The inequities for the northerly end of the SJ.HTC are there in all of the toll assignments. If an equitable adjustment can't be made on the proposed rate structure, please provide a copy of this letter with attachments to the Board, so that a public discussion of this issue can be had. Very truly,` yours, Don Webb Council Member SJHTC Director Attachments: Exhibit 1, SJHTC Toll Increase Comparison Table VI -1, Proposed Toll Schedule, Passenger Car Toll Rates Figures VI -7 to 10, 2007 -2030 Average Weekday Traffic Table III -6, San Joaquin Toll Increase Effects Figure III -13, SJHTC Average Weekday Volume Comparison: 2005 -2007 Exhibit 2, Tolled Ramp Volume Projections Exhibit 3, Newport Coast Drive/Bonita Canyon Bypass SJHTC NB NCD BYPASS SJHTC SB NCD BYPASS Exhibit 1 SJHTC TOLL INCREASE COMPARISON 3/302008 2008 2071 2016 1 1 2021 2026 20311 1 Location rtec lion lance TWI i$M1ile Toll %Incr $/Mlle Toll %Incr $ /Mile Toil %Ina $Mole ToN %Ina $/Mile Tall %Incr Total [nor $MhYe Sincrease La Paz J_ _ IS NB �3 I .0 1 $167i $077 $i 25 _ 25 1_$2.08 $0,96 $7.501 _- 17 Ji $292 1 $135 _$2.00 _ _ +14 $225 13 -- $7.25 - -, „20 _., .. `_$7.75 $250 $115 Avera a Diat. $333 - $154 $1_73 Average $/Mile 1 $1.22 $1.52 i $1.83 $2.13 $2.44 $2.74 Aliso Creek ,�- _ Average Dlst T i $1.25 20 _ $0.79 .$0_63 . _ _ $1.75 ._ .._ �.__ y- 14 _ _ $1,05 $2.25 13 _.... $2.50 it ... 200 i� $1.25 - I _$1.50 __ "_ 17 $2.00. 59 1.9 NB ' 2.4 ! 2.2 , $0.66 $0.52 $0.92 $0.73 $118 _ $0.83 �.. Average $/Mile i $0.59 1 $0.71 1 $0.83 1 $0.94 1 $1.06 $1.18 El Toro f- $1 7 $2.00 14 $4.00_ 23_ I $114 $098 $4.5D _73 - $129 $2.75 $2.75 18 $093 $0.79 257 $0.57 $0.49 ...$0.79 50.87 $1Avera P25 .. a $/Mlle $0.46 $0.53 $0.73 $086 $1.06 $1.19 Catallne View y Peak i 135 Pk 13.5 $4.25 - $032 $3.50 -� 26 ... $5.00 18 $0.37 $8.75 9 208 $0.5$4.Off $6.00 20 $0.45 $037 $0.52 $800 14 17 $059 $0 52 $4.00 14 $0.30 $5.00 25 -0 20 $0.44 §7.00 $7.75 11 221 $0.57 $4.25 Newport Ost Dr Average Dist. 121 S6 _ $1.50 .. $071 $2.75 --. .. _ 7 §2.75 ^ --^- $2.50 $4.25 $2.00 . -_ .. �_ ._ ._........_ _ $0.95 $1.33..... ...... $3.00 9 $3.75 $1.31 ._ $143 .. ..... _� -..... - 1.5 T 1.8 _ $1,00 ....- _ $1.83 . - $2,00 -_ $2_83 .. ._ .. ..L. - Average $/Mile $0.88 $1.14 $1.57 i $1.71 $2.14 $2.43 Bonita Can �'onJ.-'I X50 NB 1 $075': $075 $1 25 0 0 _ ..- $100 §1.87.. $1,25 167 $1.25 $2.08._ $075 0 $(05 $1.00 .$1.00 ly 10 06 _ $0.75 x.75 $700 ....... ._ .. ... -.._ . Avera a Dist. $1.25 -- _._ $1.25 $167 0.8 . ._ .. ._ .. Average $/Mile $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.33 $1.33 $1.67 This ezhibR is compiled ed fmm the numbers in Table Tolls shown are for the AVI (Pasha-) cate � I gory _L.. Far CalaGna Plaza, 13.5 miles iTS the distance between Distance =Mlles from the tolled on,rsmp to the .- _I ... . -T.._ VI 1 in the SaMec Tall eM Revenue Study l._. �I the Bison and Gmenfield off - ._.. - ._. .._ Bret free off mmp (ENher Bison of Green ( ield1 _... .... -... _.._. _r _.._. . �.. ._ . _. _. ._� .... ... -_ _. _ ._....... _ .. ..... 3/302008 TABLE VIA Proposed Toll Schedule Passenger Car Toll Rates FOCAL YEAR JOLYJNNE 1 2006 =9 2010 ,2011 3012 2013 2014 2013 016 2017 2018 2018 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2023 2020 2027 202b 2020 2030 2031 FCOTHLL �L ROAD -- TomeleSaimg Ceeh Off-Peek AVI CV-Peak Ceeh Peek AVI Peek 3 1.26 S 3 1.76 3 3 2.60 3 3 2.00 3 2.26 E 1.75 3 2W 3 200 2.60 3 2.00 3 100 3 230 Y' 2W 3 2W 3 3.00 3 250 3 2W 3 2.00 3 3.00 3 ISO 3 2W 3 2,00 3 3.00 3 2,W f '1.W 213 3 223 3 3.23 3 2)f E 2.73 S 233 3 323 2: 231 f 213 S i.25 3 323 S 2,75 f 213 3 233 3 325 3 2)f f IN 3 2.30 3 3.75 3 3]6 f 3,00 S 2.50 S 3.73 3 325 f 3.0 3 Lee 3 3,73 3 33B f. -2.0 3 -2,00 3 3.78 3 3.26 f 3.26 3 US S 4.00 3 1W f 323 3 LYS 3 400 3 3.1 f 325 3 3.73 3 4.00 3 3.W f 326 3' 2.75 3 4.00 3 9.W 3.30 S 3.00 S '423 3 3,)f f 3W 3 3.00 3 425 3 335 f 360 3 3.00 3 425 3 3.16 f iW 3 3.00 $ 425 3 31f f 3 .73 3' 323 3 4.30 3 4.00 f 3.76 316 '4A0 4.00 Pw I. Mh Pllan Pwlde Baulk Loe A3me MONO • Ce.h Off Peak AVI OBPeak Ceeh Peak AVIPask Ceah AVI Ceo AVI Cash AVI CBah AVI 3 1.28 S S 1.00 3 3 IM S , 1.26 S f 0.16 f 3 O.W 3 3 ON S f 0.25 3 3' ON 3 f' 0.28 f 3 'O.W 3 f US $ 1.25 3 1.00 3 IN 3 1.23 $ 0.75 f OW 3 0.50 3 0]3 3 OM 3 036 f O.W f 0.26 $ 1.26 S 1.00 S 1.76 s IM : 013 f OW 6: O.W 3 025 3': -:023 DMs, 0.23 3'0.28 OS , 0.25 S.d2B 125 S 1.W S 1,75 3 LW 3 O:iB 3 O.W 3 0.80 3 3 Om 3 f 0B f 3 123 3 1.00 3 1 .75 3 1.% S 0.)6 3 090 3 050 3 026 3 OED 3 033 3 O.W 3 023 3 193 f 1.00 3 1 .73 3 181 3 0.)5 3 O.W ON 3 0.23 3 ON S 0.26 3 O.W 3 OM S 3 1.23 3 2.00 3 1-75 3 1.00 S 0.73 3 ON 3 0.25 3 0.80 3 0.25 S O.W 3 CS 5 IE0 3 125 3 2,00 3 I'M 3. 1.00 3' 0.75 3'.0.)5 050 S 025 3 am 3 025 3 OW 3 023 '.O.SD '160 3 1.26 3 LOG 3 I'M S 1.00 3 S 023 3 ON 3 .0,76 3 :0,60 3 - .73 3 6' 1.50 3 1.23 3 2.00 3 1 73 3 1.00 3 035 3 093 3 D.SD 3 DJS S 090 3 0.73 S 0.30 3 I W 9 125 3 200 3 126 3 1.00 S 03 f 033 3 0.W S 035 3 0.60 3 093 3 DID S 1.30 3 1.26 3 2.00 3 1.7$ 6 100 3 0)6 f 036 3 OW 3 0 .73 3 ON 3 033 3 DOG 3 1M S 126 3 ?W 3 1.75 f 1.00 3 0.)f f.. On 3. ON 3. 035 ; ON 3'' 0.75 `3 ON 4.050 1.60 S 1.8 3 190 3 1.75 S "100 3 0.15 3 O10 3 Ca6 S :060 f _ 0]6 3 3 ISO 3 1.23 3 2.W 3 195 3 123 3 033 3 O.W S a. f O.W f 036 3 OW 3 1.W 3 1.25 3 2O0 3 123 3 133 3 100 3 023 3 O.W 3 CIS 3 CA f 5.)3 3 0.0 3 1.76 3 1.W 3 226 S 200 S 1,25 3 100 3 093 3 ON 3 0.75 3 090 3 0.)3 3 O.50 3 123 f 1.0 3 2.25 3 2.00 3 1]3 3 1.00 3 0 .75 3 090 3 C93 3 0,30 S 036 3; 090 $1,0,)3 .t.75 3 1,60 3 233 S '200 3 133 6 1.00 S 1.00 3 0 .73 3 100 3 -0.)S 3 100 3 3 193 3 130 3 2.23 3 2.00 $ 1.25 3 1.00 3 100 S 0.75 3 1.00 3 033 3 1.00 f 0.75 S 195 3 150 3 2.26 3 3.00 3 13S 3 1.00 3 100 3 0.73 S 1.00 3 023 3 100 f O .75 3 1.73 3 1.30 3 233 3 200 3 125 3 1.00 3 1.00 S 023 3 1.00 3 0 .79 3 1.00 S C.)3 3 123 3 1.50 3 233 3 2.0 3. 1.25 3 1.00 3 1.00'3 0.76 3 1.00 3' 023 3 LW 3 023 3 1.78 1.60 US 200 IAO :138 100 026 100 0.76 100 US Gee Pkwy Ceeh AVI 3:,126 3 3 I. 3 126 S 1.W 3 1.25 S. 1.W :.100 JIS 3 3 123 3 1.00 $ 125 3 100 3 1.25 3 100 3 123 S IGO ;_.123 1.0 3 S I W 3 1]9 S 1.60 3 123 3 I W 3 1.25 3 1.W 3 1.25 S - 1A0 3 "123 S 1.W 3 1 3 110 3 133 3 1.W 3 1.8 3 123 3 1.W 3 1.)8 6 ' 1.50 S 135 f 1.30 3 1]f S 130 3 t3f f 170 E t2f f 1.50 3 2A0 1.73 EASTERN TOLL ROAD VSntly RISOe ML Cash 05 -Peak AVI OihPOel, Ceeh Peak AVI Pak Orange Gm. ML Cash CM-PA AVI ORFeek Ceah Peek qVl Peek 3 2)5 3 3 326 3 3'„2)8 3 3 '2.26 3 3 1:)& S f 133 f f '1:)6 S f: 1.0 f 213 3 225 3 2 .73 3 215 3 1.75 3 1.25 3 1.76 f 1.23 f 2 .75 /28 3 226 3'.3.26 S 333 3,;236 S 276 '.'2:)f 3 tM 3.4,]6. S 1.23 "f' 129' 3 223 3' 223 3 113 f>'1,1tl S 275 S 2.25 3 313 3 2.13 3 1.)3 3 125 3 228 3 1,7f f 233 3 223 f 3,60 3 9.W 3 Vf f 1.25 3 223 3 i.75 3 213 3 2.25 3 3.60 3 3.00 3 Vfi 3 123 3 236 3 1.)5 E 2.75 S 3.00 S 22fi f 2A0 f ISO f Y)3 3 300 3 3 5 175 1 12-90j 123 3 1.50' 3 2]3 f '215 3 1Y6 "2,21 300 3 2.50 f 3.75 3 3 2.00 3 IW 3 2 .73 3 2.21 f 323 S 213 $ 4.00 3 ISO 3 200 S 150 3 2 .78 3 2.25 f 323 3 2.13 3 400 3 3.W 3 2.00 3 I f0 3 213 3 229 f ISO 3' 310 3 3.00 'f 9,00 3 436 3 433 3 3.)6 �S� b1 3 225 ;;: q3" 3 t .73 f: },)5 3 100 S -3 AS 3 2W :f'' S0 f 333 3 3.23 S 4.W E 4.W 3 2.23 3 1.)5 f 3.0 3 2.W f 3,73 3 333 3 4.W 3 490 3 233 3 193 3 3.00 3 2.W f 4A0 3 10 3 4L73 3 419 3 230 3 290 3 128 3 215 f 4.00 3 3M 3 ..3:76 4.76 3,.!6.00 425 2.W 200 f 323 3 2.)f i.; 420 3 3 $ (4W 3 '2.60 f 2.00 S '2.53 5 2:)8 S 423 3 3.75 3 6.00 f 430 S 2.50 3 2.00 f 3.23 3 239 f 4.50 f 4A0 3 3.23 3 4.73 3 2.73 3 US, f MO 3 8.00 f 4.0 3 4A0 $ 525 3 4,75 3 213 3 235 f 3.0 3 3.00 E 4.73 S 423 3 $.30 S, 5.00 S 2.)5 $ 2]3 f ISO $'- 3.00 f 4 .76 415 SEO ' 00 :2b5' - 296 US AO qWm RarNn ML CaM OHAeek AVI g4Peak COO Peak AVI Peak f .1.60' S 3 1,00 3 S'a .73 3 3. -1126 3 1.W f 1.W 3 1.73 3 126 f 1.)f f: 1.)B f 1.23 f � :IIS S 243 3':285 3 1.)f i.75' S 1)5 f 123 3 223 3 t .7f 6 123 f 125 3 226 3 1 .75 f 1.13 f 12S S 2.26 3 I n 3 1.76 -2.W S 1]3 3' 1;60 S 235 3 :2,76 3 US . "2.26 3 2.00 f 1.30 3 233 3 223 3 2.00 f 1.W 3 2 .75 3 233 3 2.00 f 1.50 3 2.73 3 225 3 223 3'229 1.73 S 3.W '3'.3,00. ISO :` f 11.16 3 3 J &2 3 22fi f 1.75 3 300 3 2,W 3 225 f US 3 3.00 3 2.W 3 LW f 2a0 3 US 3 2)3 3 2.W f .2.60 2A0 3.'2.00 325 S, 2 .73 . f S 393 S ', s,16 3 2.50 f 2.00 3 123 3 2.73 3 2.)f f 226 3 IN 3 3.00 6 2.16 f 225 S 350 3 3.00 f 2.13 f 223 3'��US 3,30 $ 3.00 3,13 ,010 PoOde Wen Ceah AVI 6'1126 f �: i.aD S 125 f 100 f t2b: ' L00' 'Yi90 136. f 8 1.23 f 1A0 3 1.21 3 1.00 3 125 3 IN 3 133 3'1.W 100 ',AIS 8 S 1.W 3 1]3 3 1.W 3 123 3 130 3 123 S 1.50 S1 125 A.. I.W 3 1.26 3 IW 3 1.8 3 1.W 3 123 3 1.13 3 LW 3 1.73 3- 1.W c.'ISo 1.79 S 3 1.)3 3 LW 3 2.00 3 1 .73 3 2.00 3 135 S 2.W f L)5 3:'.1.16 "2,00 uvme nrve lEasO Ceeh AVI 3' 023 3 s�: O.SO' 8 0 .75 f O.W 8 0 .7f f;._ O.W f. :78. f 61fi0 f I" 3 O.73 3 1.00 3 033 S 1.00 3 036 3 IM VA" OR S S am 3 100 3 Ulf S 1.W 3 O)3 3 1.00 3 0 75 f 1.W S''I.W 0 .7f ;Yn176 3 f 1.29 3 1.00 f 125 3 LW f 125 3 LW 3 1.25 3 -:1.25 .Do 3'.'C S 3 133 3 1.00 3 193 3 1M 3 125 S 1.00 3 196';.1.136 1.0 3 IMna 014 M.so Cash AVI f {0 .76 3 S. 0160 f 0.75 3 O.W f 0.75 f, :0.15. 3 O.W Y- ,;4601. 3 1,00 S 023 S 1.W 3 0.75 3 1.W S 0.)3 $ IRS S% 076 3:: LBO 3 0. 3 1.00 3 C.7S 3 1.0 3 100 f 0.73 3 0.13 3 1.00 3`:1.00 0 .76 3 f "0:75 3 13b f im 3 126 f 1.W f 1.26 f 1.00 f 125 f. }: LOO 5.4. isf f f 133 f 1.00 3 135 f 1.00 3 t3f f I= 3 133 f 1.W S..iAO ':138 O to Paz Cash AVI f- 1.26 f f -:1.00 f 1.W f 113 f 1,W 'f -�1M 133 - fr5is8' S f LW f t3f f 1.W 3 123 S 1.W 3 116 3 1.W 3 125 1. }9 3 . -1:50 S 1.73 3 130 f 1)3 3 IN 3 1.)3 3 IE0 3 1.73 f I W '290 S _ -,7i. 3 2.00 3 175 S 2.0 3 1 .73 3 2.W f 116 S 2.W f' 113 2.29 f .2.00 5 225 f 2.00 3 2]f f 2.0 3 226 f 2.00 3 216 f��2.60 2A0' 115 MW Creak Cash S 060 $ 1.75 3 1.75 3),11.75 3 113 3 1.75 3 123 3 1)3 3.200 3 2A0 3 200 3 ZOO 3 2W 3:12.23 3 223 3 223 3 223 S 2.26 $, :2U* 3 2.0 S 230 S 210 3 2.W 4',27f AVI f' t2tl f 1.W f 190 ":LW' S 1.W 8 1.60 f uW f 181 i, f. S L)5 8 1.35 f 123 $ 195 f '9;oo S 2.00 S 2.00 3 3.00 f 2.W -2M$ S 2.25 3 22fi $ 223 f 223 3 ElTwa CeM 3 -2,03 $ 2 W 3 2S Sj US, 3 2W 3 260 3 2)3 3 2 .73 f 'IM S 300 3 133 S 323 f 1W .f' aAO. f 3,)6 f 3 .73 3 4W S 4.W � 4,33 3 423 f 430 8 460 f 4 .7f f '. 4pf AVI f 1.16 S t .7f f YAO :f'<200 3 223 S 28 $ 2W 3 250 3 '1,)6' 3 2.13 3 390 3 3.00 3 US 3 .326 3 0.W $ 3.W 3 176 3 3 .73 3..490 3 4.00 S US 6 435 4W 6 CaleOm Vgw NL Ceeh OttPeek f:': 4.43 3 4W 3 4.76 474.76 3 6A0 f $29 3 SAO 3 330 3'f 6,75 3 6A0 f &23 3 623 3 B.W 3: 3:75' 3 ).W'3 I'm f 713 3 )A0 3'.17.76 3 ).)3 3 4W 3 625 3 Om S ,6 AVI Of~ Cash Peak f afo 3 Sy400 f 3.75 3 3.50 3 400 3 $.73,3,':6,76 '4.00 3 3 433 3 400 3 4A0 3 306 3 473 3 460 3 475 C`6)00, &W 3'a)S 3 3 $26 3 740 3 BAD 3 733 3 SSD 3 733 3 473 4,� I'M 3 Sm 3 -7.76 3 &S 3 6.W f 423 3 &W 3 BAO 3 935 3 0.15 3 S.W f 7.00 3 40.76 3 7.00 3 9 .73 3 715 3 LOS 3 AW 3 538 3 7.73 3.W f ,4.66 AM Peak 3 j443 3 4.75 3 4W 316.00 3 326 3 f.W 3 5.15 $ f.76 31 `3.00 3 033 3 B.SO 3 650 3 496 3 -7.0 ' 3 )]f 3 13B 3 730 $ ).)S 3 '3.00 3 6.00 3 036 3 3.W 3 0.7f $";e WeekenO Cekh f 4A0 3 496 3 4W $1:460 3 4 .73 3 4W 3 $Is 3 BIG 3 A60, 3 $.16 3 0.0 3 BAn 3 423 3 UM 3 478 3 6.76 3 ).00 f )28 S._),6f f ),W 3 ).)6 3 6.00 3 62B 3, 426 WeekkWAVI f�. , 6: f 3.60 f 1)f =:3176 f 4.W f 413 f 490 f O.W .f -.1.15 $ SAO f Off f 928 f 4W ..'�f.7 f 0.00 4 8.00 f 315 f 6.30 f.'OAf f fi.lf ).DO f 728 f 7m .3).60 Nawpwl COeal Ceak f` }•1 f 176 f 2Aa' ;' -,0p, f 22B f 226 f 2W $ 250 'f; ;2ID f 2)f f 3,W f 3.00 f 236 b2f. f 290 f 3.50 f 1)f 3 3.13 4,00 3 4.00 3 C25 3 416 3 430 3 =4 0 AVI :,1:60 3 1W f 1.7b. . 5 S 2W 3 2A0 3 226 3 226 - -L"6 2W f 218 2.75 3 MO $,�.3:W' S 316 5 325 3 IN 3 3.W ': :571 f 3.13 f 4.00 f 4,W f 423 & Canyon Ceeh :0.16 f 1GO 3 100 :1:00' S tA0 f 1,00 f LW S tAp L 1A0 S 1.W S LW f 1.00 f 1.W "f -1A0 6 I W 3 1.W 3 100 3 135 S' 1.25 S 1.28 3 135 3 1.25 3 123 3 :1A 0 AVI :� :0.l0 3 M75 3 023 3 :OA S 0.76 3 0.15 3 0.15 3 Ols 3 '0.15 3 0.75 3 0.13 3 D.75 3 093 .0.13 3 Ol6 S 013 3 CIS 3 1.80 S '.1.00 S 1.00 S 1.W 6 1.00 3 1. FIGURE 2007 Average Weekday Traffic 1 ti Volm. m Thousands ....... .. ....... — -- ---------- ....... .. 1 L L S rT' 0 L R 3t S A IN J 0 A Q U I N H L 0 A 0 1-5 Jamboree Rd. El Two Rd. Glenwood Dr. ...... Bonita .071d Canyon Dr. Carryon Bison Ave.! �Orryn Rd. ?No as 39 36 24 -1 26 231 21 a 6 6 3 36 33 271 25 21 19 >t 17 17 Dream h4wflun Too pm. Allen Creek P". Pacific . . ........ .......... Nowporl Perk D, Coast Dr. MacArotnur Blvd. L FIGURE V1-8 2015 Average Weekday Traffic Volumes In Thousands S A N J 0 A Q U I N H I L L S T 0 L L R 0 A D El To. R& Glenwood Dr. Bonita Laguna G.ocf,.Id Bison Ave. Canyon Dr. Canyon Rd. Dr. 39 39 37, ,dh� 24 29 25 20 21 37 38 3V 22 77 23 23 cataure Moulton )Mlso Creek Ta� Rd. La Paz Rd. Newport Parh 0, Coast Dr. MacArthur Blvd. FIGURE VI -9 2020 Average Weekday Traffic Volumes in Thousands 5 A Jamboree ftU. Bonita Bison Ave. Canyon Dr. 38 N 38 J O A O B I N H I L L S T El Toro Rd. Laguna Canyon Rd. 11' J 35 23 26 O L L GNnwood Or. 25 R O A D 4 25 J 21 Greanpeld or 6 9 I5 19 35 36 33- 21 26 22 23 9 21 21 3 e S ti 2 4 h S 5 4 6 6 Fro -- MouBOn Al- Creak Pkwy. PadSc Rd. Le Paz Rd. Newport Park Dr. Coast Dr. MacArthur Blvd. FIGURE VI -10 2030 Average Weekday Traffic Volumes In Thousands S A N J O A O B I N H I L L S T O L L R O A D 1 -5 Jamboree Rd. El Tom Rd. Glenwood Dr. Bonita La9une GreanSetd Bison Ave. Canyon Dr. Canyon Rd. pr. —4\3d 34 32- 19 2B 25 25 -' -Z: 21 19 31 � 41 32 .. 30 - -:.1 18 25 21 21 .'gig = ` 19 20 -J b 4�, 1 12 1 4 S Gbhllnr Moutwo jb� Np1° Ails. Creek Pkwy. aH %ue PflciSC Rd. Le Paz Rd. Newport Perk Dr. Goast Dr. MacArthur Blvd. Table 111-6 San Joaquin Toll Increase Effects 111 -15 Average Weekday Vo umes Catalina Ramps Total View la Paz Aliso Crk EI Toro Newprt Cst Bonita Cyn I Ramps Ramp roil Increase, July 2000 July'99- end Jan '00 55,476 2,591 4,784 6,179 8,504 2,729 1 24,787 July '00 -end Jan '01 58,578 2,310 4,255 5,330 6,646 2,338 1 20,879 incre ase -11%1 -14% -22% -14% j -160% Mainline Toll Increase, July 2001 July '00 -end Jan '01 58,578 2,310 4,255 5,330 6,646 2,338 20,879 July'01- endJan'02 58,655 2,315 4,425 5,434 7,298 2,543 1 22,114 increase 0% 0% 4% 2%j 10% 13%1 6.0 Mainline Toll Increase, February 2002 Feb'01 -end June '01 r 60,590 2,353 4,486 r 5,538 r 7,204 r 2,4821 22,064 Feb '02 -end June '02 58,370 2,278 4,449 5,460 r 7,555 f 2,769 1 22,511 510 increase -4% -3% -1% -1 °/, 1 5% 12% 2% Mainline Toll Increase, October 2003 Oct '02 - end Feb '03 r 58,515 r 2,283 r 4,385 r 5,517 7,872 3,067 23,124 Oct'03- endFeb'04 61,648 2,565 4,758 6,069 8,476 4,1761 26,045 increase 5% 12% 9%1 1056 1 8%1 36•- 13% Mainline and Ramp Toll Increase, July 2004 July'03- endJan'04 r 62,550 r 2,517 4,659 6,088 r 8,501 3,936 25,701 July '04 - end Jan '05 63,558 2,261 4,910 6,061 8,254 4,521 26,007 increase 2% -10% 5% 0% -3% 1 15% 1% Mainline Toll increase, July 2005 July '04 • end Jan'05 63,558 2,261 4,910 6,061 8,254 4,521 26,007 July'OS- end Jan '06 66,047 2,241 5,231 6,239 8,299 4,9121 26,921 increase 1 47. -1% 1 7% 3% 1% 9% 4% Mainline 'roll increase, July 2006 July '05 - end Jan '06 66,0471 2,2411 5,2311 6,239 8,299 4,912 26,921 July'06- endJan'07 66,200 2,281 5,370 6,643 8,651 4,927 27,673 increase 4% Mainline and Ramp Toll Increase, July 2007 jJuly'06- end Oct'06 67,452 2,263 5,374 6,525 8,687 4,952 27,801 !July '07 -end OWN 66,134 2,262 5,416 7,697 9,228 5,067 1 29,671 %increase -2%1 0% 1 1%1 18%j 2% 7% 111 -15 Figure 111.19 SJHTC Average Weekday Volume Comparison: 2005.2007 S A N J 0 A 0 V I N H I L L 8 T 0 L L R 0 A D clew dDr 1.6 Jambome Rd. El Toro Rd. 1176 \ fLaguna J�J1216 0roenfieW Blear Awe. on a, 792 i' B_Canyon Rtl. 2 B 1208 2678 J L 31391 ` 9 e1 2721 4686 39246 3700 2786 Maukon 4931 423 AIISO crack Pkwy. Rd. La Paz Rd. N"POd Cal o Or. Pacific Perk Dr G4am Vrw MacArthur Blvd. rarw,e JI;A,� ra9a Waekday Vdume foJufy'06JOfy vs wmge Wakday VolumeforThkdw k01JUM,200a mge ofJune 121h end 13th, 2007 (1'waWed) Exhibit 2 Tolled Ramp Volume Projections Toll Plaza 2007 2015 2020 2030 La Paz 2,000 5,000 6,000 6,000 Aliso Creek 6,000 10,000 9,000 8,000 i EI Toro 8,000 10,000 10,000 13,000 Catalina View 69,000 72,000 68,000 1 62,000 Nev port Coast Drive 10,000 j 9,000 10,000 8,000 Bonita Canyon 5,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Exhibit 3 Newport Coast Drive /Bonita Canyon Bypass Time Runs 4/1/2008 Mid -Day Afternoon Peak hour Morning Peak Hour Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time NB Bypass, D = 1,5 Miles Red Line 3/28/2008 10:20 2m 41s 3/28/2008 10:35 2m 49s 3/28/2008 17:05 3m 13s 312812008 17:25 3m 42s 3/3112008 4m 38s 7:40 3/3112008 3m 15s 7:50 NB Toll Road, D = 1.4 miles Yellow Line 3/28/2008 10:30 1m 20s 3/2812008 10:45 1m 24s 3/28/2008 17:15 1m 23s 3/28/2008 17:35 1m 24s Estimate 1 1m 23s 3/31/2008 1m 23s 8:00 Time Diference Avearage Run Time 1m 21s 1m 28s 1m 35s 1m 50s 2m 4s 2m 18s 3m 155 2m 34s 1m 52s SB Bypass, D = 2.0 Miles Blue Line 3/28/2008 10:15 2m 55s 3/28/2008 1 10:30 2m 56s 3128/2008 17:00 2m 56s 3/28/2008 17:20 3m 13s 3/31/2008 3m 29 7:35 3/31/2008 3m 13s 7:45 SBToll Road, D= 1.5 Miles Green Line 3/2812008 10:25 1m 21s 3128/2008 10:40 1m 21s 3128/2008 17:10 1m 22s 3128/2008 17:30 1m 25s Estimate 1m 21s 3/3112008 1m 19s 7:55 Time Diference Avearage Run Time 1m 34s 1m 35s 1m 35s 1m 34s 1m 41s 1m 48s 2m 8$ 2m 1s 1m 54s 4/1/2008 SJHTC SB BYPASS Irvine Spa �� Y pdhyo 1 S� � or Federation Way - d d � ae Tree f m 4 $4 Ambroise Aerrb 'Sy Ch p eryr On `a0o. @. i a�bord m a Ford Rd o� oo�. �S° G pN �. o� vo Q z Port. Lerwick PI yJd` BanBd15 MILES tt . port Cat�l'lste t?I Aberdeen PI tJeNa� <�r d 2 o MILES V yam AZ Z P a .. < Qornass PI o .. Qom` Co- rn �o �o4e2 5` San Vivel Newport Beach NEXT TIME ' 'l. Park x rivi USE BYPASS SAVE $3.00 1 1 LOSE 2 MINUTES vtM i 0 mi 0.2 o4 O.f Copyright ® and (P) 1988 -2007 Microsoft Corporation andlor its suppliers. All rights reserved. httiowwaw.microsdl.comrslrests/ Certain mapping and direction data ® 2007 NAVrEO. All rights reserved. The Data for areas of Canada includes Information taken with permission from Canadian authorities, including: ® Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, ® Queen's printer for Ontario. NAVTEQ and NAVrEQ ON BOARD are trademarks of NAVrEQ. 0 2007 Tole Atlas North America, Inc. AN rights reserved. Tole Atlas and Tole Atlas North America are trademarks of Tole Ages, Inc. SHAD $12.00 S10.00 se.00 $B.00 S4.00 v .I SOHO San Joaquin Mills Tramportation CadcW Pno)mctbd Fntrak Pm& PtaAod Toll Rata April 2000 UR Roport Fbed Yar Tolled Miles Traveled w 13.5 Mi. n 3.8 Mi. ad 1.8 Mi. L2 MI. 1.0 Mi. on 0.8 Mi. � •rT III gym. \<i FonNj Mayor Edward D. Selich Mayor Pro Tern Leslic J. Daiglc Council Members Keith D. Curry Nancy Gardner Michael F. Henn Steven Rosansk,. Don Webb CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE MAYOR May 7, 2008 Tom Margro, CEO and Board Members Transportation Corridor Agencies 125 Pacifica, Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92618 Subject: Santec Traffic and Revenue Report Dear Mr. Margro and Members of the Board of Directors: The Newport Beach City Council has reviewed the Stantec Final Traffic and Revenue Report and is concerned about the apparent lack of fiscal equity involved in a recommendation of the toll rate for a certain sector of the toll road. It appears to our City Council that the Newport Coast Drive (NCD) Toll Plaza future proposed rates are priced too high when considering the distance traveled on the tolled portion of the SJHTC, when compared to the rates recommended towards the southern end of the corridor for an equal distance traveled. The 2031 NCD rate of $4.25 is 2.83 times the 2007 rate. No other ramp increases by such a large percentage. The report states on page VI -2 "The toll schedule results in average toll -ates that will roughly double at all toll plazas between 2008 to 2031." Yet, the NCD rate is almost tripled. Why? The attached Exhibit 1 utilizes the information in the Stantec Report Table VI -1 to show a Toll Increase Comparison. For the years shown, either NCD (3 of 5) or Bonita Canyon (2 of 5) have the highest period percentage increases. In 2031, the La Paz ramp has the highest cost per tolled miles traveled at $2.74 /mile, followed by NCD at S2.43 /mile and Bonita Canyon 51.65 /mile, while Aliso Creek and El Toro are $1.18 /mile and $1.19 /mile respectively. Page VI -3 in the report indicates the average cost - per -mile for interchange -to- interchange trips for 2030 is 127 cents. NCD is 1.9 times this amount and Aliso Creek is 0.93 this amount for a 0.4 mile longer trip with the same projected volume. For the years listed, NCD is from 54% to 91% higher than the average, and Bonita Canyon is from City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard • Post Office Box 1768 Newport Beach California 92658 -8915 • www.citynewport- beach.ca.u, (949) 644 -3004 May 7, 2008 Page 2 21% to 79% higher than the average. We do not understand the thinking behind this discrepancy. Can you explain it on an equity basis to us? The annotated Figure VI-7 shows the distances from or to a toll plaza from the closest free ramp. For the NCD ramp the tolled distance traveled averages 1.8 miles. For the Aliso Creek ramp the tolled distance traveled averages 2.2 miles, yet the 2031 toll is $1.75 less than the $4.25 NCD toll. The tolled distance traveled for the El Toro ramp averages 3.8 miles which is 2 miles longer than the NCD distance yet the 2031 toll is only $0.25 greater than the NCD toll. The recommended toll rates put a disproportionate share of the rate increase on the northern end of the SJHTC. Our City Council is particularly concerned because as rates increase, more traffic will use Coast Highway through Corona del Mar and on to MacArthur Boulevard. This is not acceptable to our community. The Santec Report Table III -6 shows that the 2000 NCD ramp toll increase caused a 22% reduction in those using the ramp. Mainline toll increases show up to a 10% increase in traffic using the NCD ramp. These are significant numbers of trips that are diverted onto Newport Beach's arterial system. Between the Pacific Ocean and the Corridor, Coast Highway is the only parallel route. A reduction of trips on the Corridor means an increase of trips on Coast Highway. Newport Coast Drive is intended to divert traffic from Corona del Mar, but if the rates for this ramp are too high, as they appear to us to be, this diversion will not occur. Attached Figure III -13 shows that for the last two years the NCD tolled ramp volumes are the highest on the corridor. Exhibit 3 reflecting future ramp projections indicates this will be the case until 2030. The rates today are only $0.25 higher than Aliso Creek. This difference increases to $1.75 by 2031 and appears to cause a 20% reduction in the NCD ramp volume. Our City Council is requesting the rates be adjusted so those using the northerly end of the S]HTC are paying equal to, or at least close to, the rates per mile of toll road used as those on the southerly end. We suggest that the Bonita Canyon (0.8 tolled miles used) and the La Paz (1 tolled mile used) have the same rate. The Newport Coast Drive (1.8 tolled miles used) and the Aliso Creek (2.2 tolled miles used) should also be the same rate. There currently exists a very easy bypass around the NCD ramp. In the northbound direction it is 0.1 mile longer and adds about 2.5 minutes to a trip. In the southbound direction it is 0.5 miles longer and adds about 2 minutes to a trip. (See Exhibit 2, Time Runs for the NCD Bypass.) If the recommended disproportionately high toll rates are implemented, by 2031 drivers using the bypass could save $3.00 and only add 3-4 minutes to their trips. This is poor fiscal planning on the part of the Toll Agency and could have dire unintended consequences for the fiscal model used in the study. May 7, 2008 Page 3 In this letter, I have focused on the 2031 toll rates as an example. The inequities for the northerly end of the SIHTC exist in all of the toll assignments. The Newport Beach City Council's position Is there should not be one segment of the toll road singled out for disproportional higher rates just because it appears to be "what the traffic will bear." Equity for all riders using the toll road should be a core principle on which toll rates are based. We do not believe that is the case with the recommendation from the study, and we have thus far failed to receive an adequate explanation for it. We look forward to the discussion we hope this letter stimulates. Thank you for your consideration. Very try your EDWARD �. SELICH Mayor Attachments: Exhibit 1, SJHTC Toll Increase Comparison Table VI -1, Proposed Toll Schedule, Passenger Car Toll Rates Figures VI -7 to 10, 2007 -2030 Average Weekday Traffic Table III -6, San Joaquin Toil Increase Effects Figure III -13, SJHTC Average Weekday Volume Comparison: 2005 -2007 Exhibit 2, Tolled Ramp Volume Projections Exhibit 3, Newport Coast Drive /Bonita Canyon Bypass SIHTC NB NCD BYPASS SIHTC SB NCD BYPASS Exhibit 1 SJHTC TOLL INCREASE COMPARISON f�';��� rEZF� ��t� �_�E3 ©��E3E)• �_�_E3.7 ���_E3L � I�<E7 �E3E3 � rli- '^•� "7�� �Eib:] ��E�7 ��ESb�7 ��ES>r:1 ��t�)• ���t3Ea1 � TABLE VI -1 Proposed Toll Schedule Passenger Car Toll Rates - - - -- - - -- lPmeto boMO. Cwn OXPeek AVIOYPeM CeeM1 PneF AVI P.. PpMe NOM Crn OBPUA AVI OnP.M Gen Peek AN Pesk Cun A POmIe6MM AM AN lw Ap4w CeM AVI No 4M AVI ee PMy CeM AN - -- S 220 i 2.36 S S 1:1! 1 t.16 f f 130 f x.W f 6 2W 1 { LSe 0 1.$ S ! 1.00 6 1M 5 3 1.60 6 IN 1 5.1.16 3 136 S 3 076 S ON S O.W S 0.W b f 0.W 3 0.W b 1 D.7e. b OSS l 0" S ON 9 { OR6 f 026 ! 0,60 S 060 5 0.26 5 0% 5 1 1,26 S 1.26 3 f tA0 6 1.Po 3 - -•- ••• 3.W {. ]AO 6 3W { -Y.W ( 3.00 5 (0.00 S 2A0.{ 2.W J 116 3 1.16 G 100 f 1.W 6 1.76 t 1.75 3 1.W {. 160 S 076 { 076 i 0. 3. .W 6 0.W / O.W S 035 0.26 5 D.Go S O.W i D.25 1 036 0IS t OW S 125 036 S 116 S 136 8 1.W 1 7 .••.. 2.W 3 2M f 3.00 f 2.50 S 125 S 100 S 1.16 1 160 { Oi5 { O.W { 0.50 3 036 S ON t 026 O.W S 036 L 136 3 1.W E me zero 2W i 3A f 2.Po 1 323 f 3.0 i 3. 25 3 2W i II f 1% { 1% E 1W 6 120 1 115 S Im f 1W f 116 6 016 i 1A0 1 122 am S O.W E OW f O% 8 On ON S D.60 1 % 6 016 S O.W f OW 3 036 025 b 136 f 1% ! 1W i l.W 6 sale 2.16 { 215 { 325 6 2.76 1.60 6 t% t 200 3 75 6 1DU 3 0.16 i 0.60 {. an 0611 t 035 t 060 { D% { 126 { FAD sore M11 1016 2.76 f 2.16 S ].W { 225 S 236 8 3.10 { 3,76 S 336 I 3.18 S 276 3 2.16 S 6 LW 1 1W S 15: i 125 1 135 f 1.29 t IN f 2.00 f 2.1 S 176 3 116 6 5 i 1W i 1AU f III f 0.16 { 0.16 { 0.)6 086 f 075 S 038 S ON 050 S ON f 0.6 S 075 f 0.)5 S O.W 6 050 i 0. .10 t 076 3 0l6 S O.W S 1N S IW 6 1.W 8 160 5 1W S III i 125 6 1.26 5 ]016 D.W f IN 1 0.15 8 335 5 160 { 136 6 2.00 S )5 5 1A0 6 0.18 { 076 f on S 075 5 050 076 3 0.50 6 1.60 E 1.26 8 }Op0 f0f1 }022 SW "f 1]6 6 2.fi0 1X260 t 215 f 376 1 1A6 f On 6 3.25 f 3.25 3 3.10 t 1.W 1 1.W 6 1.W S In S J.0b f rte f 2M S 2.0 S 2W 6 175 f 1. ib 175 3 1.W S 1.W { 1% f 0.75 1 016 t 160 8 073 1 0.76 t 076 f 1W S O.W S 0W S 015 3 0.16 S 075 i 0.50 8 O.W G O.W f 0.76 a 76 S 076 S O.W 0.50 5 D.W t 1.W f IAO S 1.W S 1.8 1] [ 126 4 Sp23 9.26 f 215 f 4.M f 130 E 1.W 1 125 t 2.W I 175 1 in S 1.0 E 0.15 f O.W 3 0.6 1 O.W 3 075 f O.W 1.W S 1.25 5 1024 D% S 2.16 ( 4.W 6 IN S rte S In ( 1% S SAO 6 136 1 1.0 3 0]6 3 O.W 5 076 S O.W 6 0.15 3 ON S IE0 f "1 t 2023 975 { 375 { 400 t S1p 176 1 1A0 233 S 2.W 1 1.25 3 1.W 6 075 { 050 { 0.15 3 ON { 016 { 050 { 170 f in 2 p0 A {0 1 SAO 1 6,20 f IAb { 1,18 3 3 326 6 2W t III { 1." 8 110 S e.re 8 As 6 0.16 S 100 i 0116 5 Its 1 1.50 f 214 3W f 3.00 3 1.25 5 376 6 1.16 3 1.50 f 2.25 f 2.W 115 III 1,W 1.W S 0.16 E 1M 3 0)fi 6 1.W 3 0.76 f 1.16 5 1.60 S 3W6 3W f SDO t 415 f J.)5 f VD f 140 5 RX 6 IN ! S LW 1.00 1 015 f 1W f O.id a 1.W 3 0.75 t 1,75 S 110 f 3020 IN { 3D0 3 426 f 476 S t15 S t10 5 225 3 SAO S 125 3 1.W $ In 1 0.76 1 tW S 076 3 1.00 3 0.76 i I.T6 [ 150 { 2030 ).>i 1 31, f O.W 1 4A0 3 tA5 i Y.W { 2% S 2M 1% 1 1. IN 3 0.18 t 1W ( 0.16 t In S O.M ! 17fi 1 1.W a 201 8.16 an 4.60 4W 1.78 130 2.18 ].p0 212 in LW 016 tA0 OA6 1.W 016 YA0 1,13 VArkly Nepe Ml G7M1 "Peek AVI MPUk CeM Peek AVI Peek e &mw MI CUM1 00PUk AM 0"..k No CuM1 P.M AVI Peek IMne WrcAt IIL C6M ON.PUk AkehPe"A Cun Pe" AN wk •WW Pro AM 1Mm6M lFap CON AVI NMneBMOgeN CUM1 AN 3 Y.T6 3 276 j rib 6 1.16 S 2,26 S 2.25 E 216 t 225 5 S.2.78 3 275 1 1]e 3 1.26 6 { .26 S 226 1 L76 , 9.76 S !'tA{ 5 176 S VS i 1.70 E S 126 b 175 S 115 • 126 f i :176 $ VS ! x.26 i R.41 $ 6 5 126 t "IS 1.1 1,60 S 1.W S US 1 1.16 5 S' 100 S IN 6 116 t .136 S f 1]0 5 176 { iI3 i 246 5 a '1.26 6 In 1,10 1.6 5 { 1.]6 6 tt6 S 1.x6 3 1.26 6 fA0 1.Po f 1.0) S IN 6 i 0,16 9 O]{ t 076 { .0.16 -stab .0.60 8 0.50 2 - {'O,W f 3 0,16 f 0.16 f 076 4 0.66 S t.AW S O. W 3 0.0 4 0.60 f T--F16 i 215 S 21b S 211 i 3.M 1.25 S 215 f p% S 735 1 2.60 3 336 1 0Ap 6 S.W S 3.W 1 1.15 S 2.75 f ].W f b.W 6 3M 1 S.2e 6 115 3 176 1 1.. 3 176 i L00 5 135 S 1te { 1.26 3 130 1 1.W i 3.16 S 216 i Y% 3 293 1'2.18 5 V 8 t.T6 176 S 176 }t0 6 125 S 116 f In S 1.75 I 2W 6 136 S 135 S In S 215 { 1.W 3 276 S 336 3 2R6 S YA i 2.76 3 1.1E S tA6 S in 6 176 2.M 135 S NLI S In 5 115 { 1,60 S I,W S IN 5 I. I 1W 1% 5 S tAO 3 tPo S 1W { LW S Ai5 026 3 075 S 016 0.16 3 160 S 1.W S tW S 1W 7 J,W 3 t/1 f 016 6 0.16 ! 0)6 01 S 250 IS 2A5 S 376 t AW 3 ]36 DA0 i 2W t YW S 1W $ 1.W 3 215 S 2.75 5 121 3 116 S 200 S 2M f 1.60 5 LW S 275 t 276 S 225 S 225 G 160 6 LW 5 126 t 1% 1Po f tW S O7fi t 0.16 9 tA0 f 1W f O.le S 0.76 4 9.16 { 4.0 S 830 2.00 { 150 I 2)fi { 336 2A0 { 1.W 6 276 t 2% { 1.W ! 125 [ LW { 076 S 1.W S 075 3 140 t 4@6 S Ate 2x6 / 1tf / LW 70.00 LW 2.28 { 1.71 { 3.04 & LW t 1W {.1.W t% I tW 6 076 ! tPo i 0.76 3.0 S 42e i ,3. S 1A1 t 1.16 i S 230 5 ,226 i Li6 5 3 G S 2.0 S 6 126 S J.W t 0. { 1A0 i ,6 f 3,25 S 40 S 4.W 2x6 i 116 5 3 5 IN 1 225 f 176 S 300 S 2W f LW f 135 i 1% { 1.W i 1% { IA0 ]. >5 S 315 t 1.W { LW { 313 { 1.75 i D.W { ]4U an [ 175 9 10 E 9.W S 1.50 1 US i 1.8 f 1.W f 1.tD f 1.00 f OAO 3 LW f Al[ S E LW S }40 f am t 7! $ !.W 5 LW I 39 S L73 "76 S I" 1 t% S LW { 1% S 1.W 5 4M 3.50 { 0.16 1. 4% 2.W 1 2W 3 3.x5 { 21 2W f 20 { a% S .1 17$ 3 1.W S. 135 j 1.W 3 136 f 1.W f /1e f 3.11 1 {,W t '4,GO f 1% 1 LW t :B.Re S }A6 d ! 0 1 .4A0 f Ste 1 4,5 1.76 3 IM { 1.W 7 1.M i 1.09 S 435 f 376 f 6.0 i 4.W t 1,W ( 2.0 3 ]% i 2)5 1 2W f 2.0 i ]% { 2T5 f 1,75 S 1. 8 1.Po f 1M 3 1.0 t 4.W f 4A0 f f% 3 471 1 },)! S In f 3.00 i i.W { 116 3 L21 5 AN f iM B LGO f 1.71 E 1A0 8 1% 3 IAO 6 450 1 400 S 536 t 476 i x75 S x% 3 960 f 9Do 6 2.18 S 226 S M S S.W f IN f 1.15 S 1A0 t 136 i 1,W E 4M I 421 1 {.1D E SAO iA6 E 315 1 D.W 6 ].W S T7E y 2.25 5- IN S' 3. 20) { 116 3 1.Po S 126 E IN S 1.76 498 .6.60 OD x36 .216 2.W SM 276 116 6.60 .W 200 1.16 1.16 L00 1.15 1.00 IAPU GM AN Mae C. CeM AVI rt.. Cun AN Du UeONL AM 06PUh AN CRPeM CeM Feet AN Pert IVeekom CeM WUkMO AVI Car CeM AN BmIYCenlen OeM AN 1.26 6 IM f 1.50 S IN 5 in i 1.60 5 IN S 160 { i.1e [ 'tA0 { 1tG I 126 i.le S I. 3 1% t Its 110 f { 1.W 1 1.1 t 176 1 1.76 6 LTS S 1.16 5 V5 { 1.16 { !q0 f 126 f 1N ! 1.W t -0W f 1.50 110 6 1.60 3 1b0 rtie 3 { l,00 i 2W { LSf j 4.f6 i LW i 2A0 ! 273 S v6 8 iA0 S 1,16 3 L)6 i 200 { R.Op i R.L f 216 f a% 6 260 t.i8 i { 4AE { 4.W { 415 t 1.10 1 4W i ltd { 680 1 S10 { "6.18 { 1 0,40 f SAO { MO 3'4.W 1 4% i 6.10 i 415 1 4.5 /, LW f 1 "I00 E fA f 1.15 f 6.76 { &W i 1,14 { &W { ON 1 4.78 { t', 4.29 y 4.11 1 &W S 800 1 8.0 6 &Po 6 &75 { 5.26 3 In / S' 4,00 1 4.M 9 MO 1 4.0 6 4.16 1 &M S 523 f 626 1 1.0 f Al 3 Lp t 176 i -3A6 440 { 433 1 4A0 f 4W { 4.11 1 { 1A8 S 1.N t 3.W f R.W GO S 2W 1 2,16 f 1.W S I.W 1.IS 1.16 t 3.W 3 2.W f 2t3 i 225 3A0 E { D.16 t 106 S 1Q0 7 1.Po f 1.M f tA0 6 LW S 1W S LW S S O.W f O.ib S U.15 ! 0.16 S 076 3 0.16 t 076 { 016 b 0.16 S 1]b { L)5 t 140 LW f RW f S.OD S LM 8 1.76 b 3.W t 828 S 1.76 i 3.0 f tq0 [ 126 f 8% f &.W 6 TAO S 126 f 625 i am 3 6.A j 111 t 5A0 0% 216 i ].W S 2W { 1,18 i 1W S IW f O.i6 f 0.13 { 1. >6 S 140 2W f 1.75 f am S 3A0 4 829 f 8A0 1 138 S ON i LW { 8.28 { 9M { 276 1.W 3 076 f 1.16 { 1 2W 1 1t6 &-- 7 Std 3 AW { LTS { LW 1 &" S am f AW 128 { 1W 3 1M S 815 S ,W 3 2W f .H f 176 p% j 236 S 2.0 6 2.W f BAO { ]. >e 6 3IS f AW S 0,76 i IW 3 6A0 { SID S 7.75 6 AW f IAO I I% f an { On I LT6 t S.W f 316 f SAO f e.W t 128 f IW f 1.W S Olp i 0.15 i 2.W f ]2fi f 9. 3)6 f 3.W S 7.W t &n f &W f 1.26 i 6.76 S &W i 3.W { 115 f 1.Po 5 015 6 IM E A% j 2A0 S 4m [ 3.16 S 131 f SAO f IS t 710 t 1.0 { U6 i 311 S 3.W S LW { 015 { 200 t 1.76 230 { 2W 4.Po { 1)e t 110 1 &70 6 1.W S 1.70 {:. 720 S fA0 t 375 d.W 1.1f t, 1.W 2.29 5 f.W }.e6 f f.16 i 4.te 4.00 3 1.16 y LW f 676 f S.00 t 1.60 f 4W 5 V. .3.1E S 138 3 1.W 6 225 S ,W 3.W f 3% 1 4.W 8 1.16 i 1.W i &75 6 0.00 { 7.W f 8AJ i 1.M f A76 133 3 1.00 3 226 { LW 6 2W f 225 f 438 6 &W TM 8 11 i S% 1 1.13 { L01 f 4ti 5 4W { 1% f 1.Po 6 225 1 2.00 I 260 6 2% IS f 426 { et! f 110 t 028 S 810 t 1 0 S Tte t 4% i 4A0 IIII f tA0 f 3% {'IA0 200 2W { 2% { 411 { 4.W 5 e.W S 1]6 3 IM { 6.76 5 at5 5 7.30 3 4A0 [ 1.26 { 1.W { 6 #A6 t.d0 475 4A0 p60 ): >6 0.60 8.10 616 15D 4.60 616 11D 1 6 Rd. Rd. ►eSM; FIGURE VF7 2007 Average Weekday TMk j .� VwunetF ThwuMe 40► Mlu Mfr 3 A N J O A O U I N H I L L S T O L L R O A D EI Tero Ra. Gknnoed Dr. ew8e Lapuno ;Dr va Canyan Or Calpm Re. �. M 3B % ' 36 26 28 23 27 18 78 38 33 21 n ki 19 „� 17 17 s '7. 3 Orb x.. klwebn taePow Allen peen Pkwy. Pfid Le P" Rd. 7VUn Newpod r. Coap Dr. 3e5 M. kYrJ40ar BM1. - I FIGURE VI-8 2015 Average Weekday Traffic Vokma In ThwmMe S A N J O A O U I N H I L L S T O L L R O A 0 F5 EI Two Rd. GNweood Dr. ' eeNa (Apron Greenfield i n Ave. ;Cwrjm Dr Cmym Rd. p. 39 'sl: 39 29 26 28 21 19 97 38 38 22 27 23 23 .3 21 21 J.., kawr klaulkm TYMm Alko peak Pkwy. Padfic Rd V Par Rd. Nw4Md Perk p. Coed Dr- /.irA~ BM. 8 FIGURE V14 2020 Average Weekday Traffic vokums h 7laras,6 6 A N J O A O U I N N I L L 6 T O L L R O A D MwArWN eNa. FIGURE W10 2030 Average Weekday Tragic vuhms In TlwwwM 6 A N J O A g U i N N I L L 6 T O L L R O A 0 Table 111-6 San Joaquin Toll Increase Effects 111 -15 Figure III -13 SJHTC Average Weekday Volume Comparlpon: 2005.2007 8 A N J 0 A 0 U I N H I L L S T 0 L L R 0 A D Dlawwd Dr MaeAAhur Blvd. .ate L 1.100 Avempa Weakdsy W.M. W JW1y'OaJWy tle 18TS Average Weekday Volume !Wr TTlyd week M June, 2 WB 75U AI a W of JUM 121h and 18M, 2007 (Toes -Wad) Exhibit 2 Tolled Ramp Volume Projections WMT Exhibit 3 Newport Coast Drive /Bonita Canyon Bypass Time Runs 4/1/2008 Mid -Day Afternoon Peak hour Morning Peek Hour Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Date/Time Run Time Daterfime Run Time NB Bypass, D = 1.5 Miles Red Line 3/28/2008 1020 2m 41s 3/28/2008 10:35 2m 49s 3/28/2008 17:05 3m 13s 3/28/2008 17:25 3m 42s 3/3112008 4m 38s 7:40 3/31/2008 3m 15s 7:50 NB Toll Road, D = 1.4 miles Yellow Line 3/28/2008 1030 1m 20s 3/28/2008 1045 1m 24s 3/28/2008 1715 1m 23s 3/28/2008 17 :35 1m 24s Estimate 1m 23s 3/31/2008 1m 23s 8:00 Time Diference Avearage Run Time 1m 21s 1m 28s 1m 35s tm 50s 2m 4s 2m 18s 3m 15s 2m 34s 1m 52s SB Bypass, D = 2.0 Miles Blue Line 3/28/2008 10:15 2m 55s 3/28/2008 10:30 2m 56s 3/28/2008 17.00 2m 56s 3/28/2008 1720 3m 13s 3/31/2008 3m 29 7:35 3/31/2008 3m 13s 7:45 SB Toll Road, D= 1.5 Miles Green Line 3128/2008 1025 1m 21s 3/28/2008 1040 1m 21s 3/28/2008 17:10 1m 22s 3128/2008 17:30 tm 25s Estimate 1m 21s 3/31/2008 1m 19s 7:55 Time Diference Avearage Run Time 1m 34s 1m 35s 1m 35s 1m 34s 1m 41s 1m 48s 2m Bs 2m is 1m 54s 4/1/2008 yr pOTCVetwlck PI poa at to a pt p60�;Abea6een PI pa,t bbrness PI SJHTC NB BYPASS 1 �1 5. i • FBdBietWn V q/) Ambroisa Na�Na\ F° 'land 1A WLes �c M � 1.5 ►m.ES L� 00� t rD Qp �� T r' Darden Newport Beach i V r Mi ,, Q0 I USE BYPASS •` SAVE $3 00 LOSE 3 MINUTES C.Nnght0and (P)1988- 2007INC,o Cerpoat .n .I its eapplkM All rights reserved. hl�JMV.w mkrosofl wrNStreomr Certain mapping and direction date 02007 NAVTEQ. All rghb reserved. The Defy for area. of Canada Includes information taken rwhh I »menion from Canadian aulhor . ircluding. Q Wje* the Quoan in RgM of Canada.0 Queens Printer la Ontario NAVTEO aM NAWEQ ON 80A are tradamarke of NAVTEQ. 0 2007 Tole Ades NoM America, Inc. All rgh6 msnrvod. Tap Atlas and Tele Adas NoM Amer are asdamenks 0 Tole A , I =, 1� j L. m �11 i3y ick PI r f pot,Cerllale PI Jl P �y pperd�n PI b _ , t SJHTC SB BYPASS Ambrolse c6a "n bord 0� �acA � Bandon Ner,a\ Fetrand 4%&Gf MI Uel Newport Beach 1.5 MIliS 2A MIlES ay Federation Way aye Tae 4 i NEXT TIME USE BYPASS SAYE $3.00 LOSE 2 MINUTES q4, mi Cap"rigM t end (P) tell 2W7 Microsoa Corporeaon endlor as suppl , NI dpMS reserved. heplAw.w.microsofl.comrstroab/ Cermin mappng aW deadion dale C 2007 WTEO. Al ngM reserved. The Dale for areas of Canada Includes infomratlon taken wM permissmn from Canadian zW orkies, Including 0 Her Meje* ee Ouean In RlgM of Ceneds.0 Oueeri s PMder fm Ontario. MWEO and NAV QE BOARD eie aedb,,emU N NAVTED. ®200] Tale Atlas NoM Amerke, km. All rlghs rozorved. TNa Atlas aM Talo Atlas NOdll Amadq ere tredemarks of Tek Ades, lam.