Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-01-1994 - Agendai• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION • REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 1994 CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7 :00 P.M. I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. City Manager - Overview of City Budget for 1994/95 4. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of February 1, 1994 5. Communications II. INFORMATIONAL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS 6. Park and Street Tree Division (Report Attached) 7. Recreation Division (Report Attached) • 8. Recreation Program Committee - Commissioner Schonlau 9. Park and Open Space Committee - Commissioner Vandervort 10. Budget Committee - Commissioner Grant 11 . Tree Committee - Commissioner Herberts 12. -Oasis Liaison - Commissioner Demmer III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IV. ACTION ITEMS 13. Arts Commission Proposal (Report Attached) 14. Bench Donations (Reports Attached) 15. Council Policy G -1, Retention or Removal of Park and Parkway Trees V. DISCUSSION ITEMS 16. Review of Commission Goals (Report Attached) 17. Ford /Loral Development ('Report Attached) • VI. EMERGENCY ITEMS IVII. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF NEWPORT E EACH Item No. 3 Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission • - 0 o �y ��6 February 1, 1994 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX it of id Tree >n :ion in Staff Present: LaDonna Kienitz, Community Services Director David E. Niederhaus, General Services Director Marcelino Lomeli, Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent Nancy Beard, Recreation Superintendent Dottie Flohr, Secretary I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Item #1 - Call to order Call ti Order The meeting of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:00 P.M. Item #2 - Roll Call Roll Ci Roll call was taken. Commissioners Compton, Demmer, Glasgow, Grant, Herberts, Schonlau and • Vandervort were present. Item #3 - Approval of Minutes - Meeting of Approvi January 4, 1994 Minute: Director Niederhaus reported that under Item #7, Capital Improvement Projects for 94/95 Fiscal Year, the date referring to the submittal of the capital improvement projects should be changed to December 28. Motion X Commissioner Vandervort motioned the minutes Ayes X X X X X X X be approved as corrected. Unanimous. II. INFORMATIONAL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS Item #4 - Park and Street Tree Division Park al Street Marcy Lomeli reported that West Coast Divisil Arborists are on schedule and have trimmed 655 trees in January, their first month of service. Item #5 - Recreation Division Recrew Divisic In response to a question from Commissioner Vandervort concerning the new Rollerhockey Birthday Party Service, Nancy Beard explained that a portable rink is set up and that skates, safety equipment, birthday cake and party favors are provided. The cost is $150 for two hours. There is a similar Gymnastics Birthday Party package which is also very popular. Commissioner Glasgow reported he received a letter from John Vargas, Water Polo Coach for Corona del Mar High School, commending Ted I � i Bandaruk on the job he and his staff have done it of id Tree >n :ion in CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Parks. Beaches & Recreation commission • o _ ��� February 1, 1994 ° � Page 2 q�oh °s ns °o 0 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX r� U I 3 Recreation Program Committee Park and Open Space Committee Budget Committee Tree Committee Oasis Liaison .Dog Park Recommenda- tion with the Newport Beach Swim Team. Item #6 - Recreation Program Committee Commissioner Schonlau reported the committee met to discuss budget requests and endorsed the following recommendations: (1) Playground Equipment Replacement Fund - $55,000, which is $20,000 higher than last year; (2) Athletic Field Maintenance Fund - $40,000, which is the same as last year; (3) Backflow Prevention Program - $40,000, which is the same as last year; and (4) Park Facility Improvement Fund - $50,000, which is the same as last year. The total is $185,000 compared to $165,000 last year. Item #7 - Park and Open Space Committee No report, Item #8 - Budget Committee No report. Item #9 - Tree Committee Commissioner Herberts reported Marcy Lomeli, John Conway and she visited 8 different sites and agreed on all retention and replacement decisions. Commissioner Herberts invited the Commissioners to view the excellent trimming done on 4th Street. She stated the neighbors are also impressed. Item #10 - Oasis Liaison Commissioner Demmer reported the membership of the Friends of Oasis has increased to 5,143. As of January 31, there is help for seniors on their income tax preparation. In addition, there is still discussion on an Adult Day Health Care Center. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IV. ACTION ITEMS Item #11 - Dog Park Recommendation Chair Grant reported that the site for a proposed dog park was discussed at a previous meeting and that the issue was postponed so that further research could be done at committee level. Nancy Beard passed out an updated staff report reviewed by the City Attorney based upon a thorough review of the ground lease held by the Newport Aquatic Center. Ms. Beard also Recreation Program Committee Park and Open Space Committee Budget Committee Tree Committee Oasis Liaison .Dog Park Recommenda- tion Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission • y d�� February 1, 1994 o�6�r�o'cCOLn City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX passed out a letter which was received from Kathleen Lehman in support of a dog park at North Star Beach. In addition, she received a call from Mrs. Henderson who is opposed to a dog park at this location due to noise, parking problems, etc. Commissioner Compton, Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee, explained that 3 months ago the City Council asked this Commission to review the feasibility of a dog park. The Commission's Park and Open Space Committee .did considerable research and determined there was no suitable site. An Ad Hoc Committee was then formed to further research this subject and they recommended North Star Beach as the only site currently available for a temporary dog park. However, since the lease with the Newport Aquatic Center has been reviewed, it is now the recommendation of the Ad Hoc Committee that the idea of a dog park should be kept open but that there are too many restrictions to the North Star Beach site. Nancy Beard summarized the major points of the . recent report on the Newport Aquatic Center's ground lease which was also made available to the public. The ground lease has specific language identifying the use of North Star Beach for sports involving human powered watercraft, therefore, a dog park would be inconsistent use of this land. The use of the Aquatic Center was voted upon and approved by Newport Beach residents in June, 1982. Furthermore, the Center is limited to 250 people per day and this would undoubtedly be exceeded if a dog park were implemented. The Newport Aquatic Center is also concerned about the increased use of the public restroom which they supply and maintain. Finally, should a dog park be .proposed at this site, approvals would be required by the Coastal Commission, County of Orange and the Newport Aquatic Center Board. Commissioner Compton pointed out that both committees feel a dog park is needed, however, a proper site needs to be found and North Star Beach would not be a suitable site based upon the lease agreement. He recommended the subcommittee remain active and review any proposed acceptable sites. Commissioner Compton pointed out that other parcels, such as the one at MacArthur and • Jamboree and the Castaways, may become available when The Irvine Company turns them over to the City at a future date. Commissioner Herberts noted that the land at North Star Beach is one of the largest pieces of property available and is sitting dormant. i ` All :� Ss•I ( . �, 6 Parks, BeGaches & Recreation Commission • ti P 9�a February 1, 1994 o �0, Page 4 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX She urged other uses be sought for public use of this land. In response to a question from Commissioner Vandervort, Nancy Beard explained that 3.98 acres of the total it acres at North Star Beach are leased to the Newport Aquatic Center, which includes the proposed dog site location. The entire area is designated Tidelands and is owned jointly by the City and the County of Orange. Chair Grant opened the meeting to public hearing. Seth Oberg, President of the Dover Shores Community Association, addressed the Commission. Mr. Oberg stated he is not opposed to dog parks, however, he opposes a location at North Star Beach since it is in the middle of a residential area and would result in increased traffic, litter, noise and odor. He also was concerned over possible damage to the slopes and that there is no formal organization responsible for the dog . park. Mr. Oberg summarized historical concerns and conditions of use, such as the size and uses of the facility, landscape maintenance, clean up, access to roads, etc. Nora Seager, Director of the Newport Aquatic Center, addressed the Commission and thanked those involved for all the work they have done. Ms. Seager emphasized the important and cooperative relationship they have with the Dover Shores Community, which they want to continue. The Center's major concerns include the mechanics of the lease, Conditional Use Permit, and the impacts that a dog park would have, such as extra Costs, road access, future expansion and liability. Commissioner Glasgow pointed out that the Commission's committees thoroughly researched all potential concerns and issues, and that there would not be any additional costs to the Center. Joe Sanchez, 306 Narcissus, addressed the Commission and stated he is disappointed to learn that there may be no dog park at this site, however, he understands the legalities . of the lease that have been raised. He stated that when a dog park is considered that the "not in my backyard" syndrome not be the problem. Mr. Sanchez urged that the idea of a dog park continue to be pursued since a large portion of the community want one. Jacquelyn Dillman, 1200 Polaris, addressed the N 1 • j � rr'. r� 4 Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission • y February 1, 1994 CA 66 m Page 5 90 w�, 6�0-s bJ o City Council Chambprs 7 p.m. INDEX Communication, Commission. Ms. Dillman stated she lives at the - corner of North Star and Polaris, and that a dog park at North Star Beach would impact her family the most. Although she would like a dog park, she does not want one in a residential area. Commissioner Herberts commented that she observed dogs running loose in this area and that there are more dog nuisances here than in the Laguna Beach and Long Beach Dog Parks. Ed Benson, 728 Westwind Way, addressed the Commission. Mr. Benson stated that although he is not opposed to a dog park, he is concerned over whose legal responsibility it would be. He recommended the Castaways site where people already take their dogs. Sean McGowan, 900 Sea Lane, addressed the Commission and stated it was he who first brought up the idea of a dog park. There are many who have worked hard over the past six months to find an appropriate site, however, no identified location will be totally • unaffected. Commissioner Compton thanked Mr. McGowan for all the work he has done and pointed out that Mr. McGowan has secured sponsors who will donate their time and money towards signage, fencing, water, costs, etc. He also noted the large number of people who have indicated their interest and are desirous of a dog park. He suggested private land be pursued. There being no further public testimony, Chair Grant closed the meeting to public hearing. Motion X Commissioner Compton motioned that this Ayes x x X x x X x Commission transmit to the City Council that North Star Beach is not a viable location for a dog park; however, if a viable location can be found, the subcommittee thinks a dog park is a good idea. Unanimous. V. DISCUSSION ITEMS Item #12 - Communications Received and filed. VI. SPECIAL. URGENT OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS Chair Grant passed out the Commission's 94/95 • Calendar and asked that any changes be transmitted to Nancy Beard. Commissioner Demmer inquired if the Harbor View Nature Park should be added to the Commission's facility inspections list. Chair Grant requested the park be added. Communication, CITY ®F NEWPORT BEACH Parks. Beaches & Recreation commission ti w� February 1, 1994 Page 6 o> j o City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Commissioner Schonlau reported he received a call concerning funding assistance in the amount of $2,500 for the Newport Harbor High School softball field. He advised the requestor to first raise $1,500 from private sources so that the request for public funding would be reduced to $1,000. Commissioner Vandervort reported two T- shirts were donated to the California Park and Recreation Society Conference booth, and that she has two extra tickets to the conference dinner on February 4. Chair Grant reported the Commission's goals will be reviewed at their March meeting. Commissioner Grant stated Frank Robinson and he discussed the Coastal Commission's conditions of approval at North Star Beach and he requested staff clarify the beach improvements that were to coincide with the development of the Newport Aquatic Center. • VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission adjourned at 8:30 P.M. ' The agenda for this meeting was posted on January 25, 1994 at 2000 P.M. outside the City Hall Administration Building. • I � � Item No.5 0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: February 15, 1994 TO: Ken Delino, Assistant'City Manager FROM: LaDonna Kienitz, Conummity Services Director RE. MARGUERITE AND 5TH AVENUE SITE The site, referenced in the February 4, 1994 letter from Lee Johnson, forms an integral part of the City's open space and the senior services. It serves as both a passive park and as essential overflow parking for the full program of services provided at the Oasis Senior Center. There has not been any consideration that this was an excess City property which did not meet the need for which it was intended. • The site was purchased with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. It is my understanding that if at any time in the future it is not needed for City purposes, any money realized from the sale would have to be used for other eligible activities. I recommend that this site not be considered for sale to a private party at this time. Attachments cc: Kevin J. Murphy, City Manager Taylor Grant, Chair, Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission Norma Gilchrist, President, Friends of Oasis ��5t-�z�_7**N CASAPALMERA. ......... February 4, 1994 �i Mr. Kenneth J. Delino Deputy City Manager CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard P. 0. Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 Be: NWC of 5th Avenue and Marguerite Corona del Mar, California Dear Mr. Delino: X00 As a follow up to a conversation you recently had with Howard Wells regarding the above referenced site, this letter will confirm that I am interested in purchasing the parcel for the express purpose of building and oper- ating a 59 bed convalescent hospital. I envision the project having a Spanish motif very similar to Casa Palmera, the facility I built and currently operate in Del Mar. Howard and /or John Pierce will show you pictures and hopefully a similarly designed project would be pleasing to the members of your community. Howard mentioned that you may be interested in relocating the parking for your Oasis Senior Center. Perhaps we could structure a deal where I picked up all or a portion of this in exchange for the property. It is my opinion that the project would support a purchase price of $750,000.00 and if this meets your objective I will look forward to meeting with you. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely yours, • q LEE JOH N LJ /chb Enclosures Casa Paimera Care Center I Cill El Giminn Real. hol M.ir. CA 920bi (091 ill f� u A, d Item No.6, General Services Department Park & Street Tree Divisions February 1994 Progress Report In addition to normal duties, the Parks Maintenance crews performed the following activities in the month of February: 1. City Hall rose garden was renovated with new drip irrigation and planted with seasonal color. 2. City Yard perimeter wall landscape was refurbished with new shrub and groundcover plantings. 3. Geranium replanting of the footbridge on Goldenrod Avenue was completed. 4. Dethatching of turf grass was completed at various parks in the City. 5. Renovating of all City baseball infield areas was completed. • 6. Park Division sheds were painted by a painting contractor at the City Yard. The following projects will be scheduled for the month of March: 1. Continue with City wide turfgrass dethatching program at various City facilities 2. Install railroad ties with chain fencing at West Newport Park per homeowners request. 3. Replacement planting at Cliff Drive Park will be completed. The Tree Division activity report is as follows: In February 711 trees were trimmed (597 by West Coast Arborists, 114 by City Staff), 60 trees planted, 23 trees were removed, 24 trees were root pruned, 79 work requests were completed and 46 individual responses to fallen limbs and trees due to a severe storm Monday night February 7, 1994. 1. Twenty three trees were removed as detailed below; 308 Heliotrope Approved removal by Tree Committee 915 Tiller Way Approved removal by Tree Committee 432 • Avocado Avenue Hazard and diseased, 1972 & 2028 Port Bristol Approved removal by Tree Committee _. • #8 Monterey Circle #29 Goleta Point Approved Approved removal removal by by Tree Tree Committee Committee 2100 Coral Place Dead 1101 White Sails Way Approved removal by Tree Committee 2801 Seaview Avenue Dead 209 Dahlia Avenue Approved removal by Tree Committee 3615 Surfview Lane Approved removal by Tree Committee 2615 Buckeye Street Approved removal by Tree Committee 20 Point Loma Dr. Approved removal by Tree Committee Newport Island Park Dead 317 Poppy Avenue Approved removal by Tree Committee 2045 Shipway Approved removal by Tree Committee 528 Redlands Avenue Dead 2328 Arbutus Street Approved removal by Tree Committee 2032 Port Bristol Approved removal by Tree Committee 1748 Port Manleigh Circle Approved removal by Tree Committee 230 Heliotrope Dead 900 Celtis Place Approved removal by Tree Committee • • 2. 60 Trees were planted at the following locations: 20 Drakes Bay Drive 2018 Centella Place 301 Orchid 411 Poinsettia 425 Fernleaf 3825 Birch Street Anacapa & Farralon 1948 Port Bristol Circle 1960 Port Chelsea Place 1954 Port Lockleigh 1972, 2028, 2032 Port Bristol 1801 Port Barmouth Place 1701 Marlin Way 1524 Galaxy Drive 713 Poppy Avenue 301 Poppy Avenue 1748 Port Manleigh 311 Heliotrope 605, 611 Carnation 8 Rocky Point Road 29 Goleta Point 8 Monterey Circle 47 Cambria Drive 15 Rocky Point Road Eastbluff Park 20 Point Loma 3615 Surfview 2615 Buckeye 209 Dahlia 1101 White Sails Way 317 Poppy Avenue 2801 Seaview 2045 Shipway Lane 3. The aforementioned 60 plantings will complet e vacant sites of trees that were removed since July replacement planting will be mode within 30 days planting of all 1, 1993. Future of removals. 0 Item No. 7 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: February 18, 1994 TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission FROM: Recreation Superintendent RE. NORTH STAR BEACH Additional time is needed for a full and complete staff report requested by the Commission Chair on the North Star Beach improvements. The report will be available for discussion at the April Commission meeting. Item No. 7 • CONEUUI`IITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT RECREATION DIVISION FEBRUARY, 1994 PROGRESS REPORT Senior Services The annual Oasis "Over 80's Birthday Party" took place last week with '100 guests, all over 80 years of age in attendance, and, yes, I.D. was required. As part of the regular on -going monthly support programs, the Elder Care nurse from the Orange County Health Department visited Oasis this month for scheduled appointments with seniors for basic health screening and overall heath assessment. The health insurance counseling and advocacy program counselor also met with the seniors to provide Medicare assistance for those with Medicare or health insurance problems. This program is part of the visiting Nurse Association Foundation and is sponsored by the California Department of Aging. Youth Services . Staff facilitated an Institute at the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Conference this past month, entitled "Hot Tips for a Cool Summer." ,Eighty recreation professionals working with youth got a jump on their summer programs with the assistance of experts in the fields of arts and crafts; sports, games and nature projects. Boy, are we ready for summer!!! The youth basketball program is nearing completion. The City championships are scheduled for March 5 and 12. The Special Olympics Basketball Tournament will be held at 9:00 A.M. on Saturday, March 19, at the Corona del Mar Gymnasium. We'd love for you to join us. Revenue Programs AA ug atics The Newport Beach Aquatic Club has a winter roster of over 70 swimmers. The NBAC President, Randy Parole, and the parent board were successful in gaining entry into the South Coast Swim Conference. This summer, NBAC will be • competing against swim teams such as Harbor View, Newport Hills, Pacific Sands, Lake Forest, College Park, Greenbrook and Green Valley. The United States National H2O Polo Team continued to use the Marian Bergeson Aquatic Center pool for eight more practice dates in February. The lap swim program currently has over 160 people registered with annual swim passes. Benches were installed in each restroom and signs have been constructed to help lap swimmers with directions and procedures. Adult Sports The winter softball program began January 31 and will hopefully be completed May 6, weather permitting. 111 teams of brave men and women are slogging through this unpredictable season. We fielded another successful grass volleyball doubles tournament last month at Mariners Park. Peninsula Park will host the March 19 tourney. Classes The winter quarter classes are in their final weeks. 1,950 participants signed up • for many life enriching courses. Despite the bad weather, our tennis program is doing very well. We have initiated new maximums on the class sizes. We generally supported classes of 8 participants. We now hold many classes with just 4 students. The response is very favorable. 0 The spring brochure is out. Registration begins March 4th and classes begin the week of March 21st. I A 0 u OASIS SENIOR CENTER JANUARY 1994 MONTHLY ACTIVITIES /UTILIZATION REPORT CLASSES /GROUP 3427 LONG TRIPS 40 HUMAN SERVICES 287 Las Vegas 42 Royal Caribbean Another Passage 18 Ensenda, Cataline 27 Blood Pressure 99 DAY TRIPS Braille 125 Case Management 57 Rose Parade 22 Chair Exercise 56 Santa Anita 15 Counseling 30 TV Sitcom "Nurses" 38 Eldercare 3 Mission Inn 25 Employment 50 Whale Watching 22 Information /Rental 853 "Camelot" 20 Legal Assistance 12 Goodwill Industries 18 Life On Your Own 26 Medicare Assistance 2 Shared Housing 35 MEETINGS Telephone Reassurance 357 Visual Screening 6 Board of Directors 20 Executive Committee 8 VOLUNTEER HOURS 3212 Long Range Planning 6 Human Services Comm. 10 Fund - raising 1'5 VAN TRANSPORTATION Newsletter 18 Newsletter Collating 36 Care -A -Van 468 General Membership 87 Shuttle 389 SPECIAL EVENTS Sunday Movies 60 Breakfast at OASIS 40 Pancake Breakfast 287 I� NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY 856 San Clemente Drive • Newport Beach, CA 92660 •714 -644 -3177 FAX 714 - 644-5717 February 18, 1994 Ms. Phyllis Drayton, Chair The Arts Commission 302 Kings Road Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Phyllis and Members of The Arts Commission: The Board of Library Trustees has asked me to thank you for researching a possible site to which the Brett Price sculpture could 'be relocated and where it can continue to be viewed and appreciated by the public. As you are aware, the current library site reverts to the new owner, The • Irvine Company, after the library relocates. And unfortunately the new library site at 1000 Avocado Avenue cannot accommodate the work. • If the relocation is approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission and the City Council, the Library staff will work with the appropriate City staff to effect the transfer. Cordially yours, LaDonna T. Kienitz Community Services Director / City Librarian cc: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission • 0 Item No. 13 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: February 18, 1994 TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission FROM: Recreation Superintendent RE. ARTS COMMISSION REQUEST The Commission is being requested to approve the relocation of one of the City's Art in Public Places pieces. The City's Arts Commission would like to relocate the Brett Price sculpture currently located outside the City's Central Library to the corner of Superior and Pacific Coast Highway within the turf area of the parking lot. This area is most commonly known as Cal Trans East (picture attached). The art piece must be relocated when the current Central Library moves to the new site. The new Central Library has no appropriate location for the sculpture. The Arts Commission reviewed many possible locations for the sculpture. They have found, and staff concurs, that the proposed location is an excellent site. The Planning Department was consulted as the site is in a coastal zone and anticipates no problems in the location. The Building Department has assured staff that no permits will be required and have offered their services if a new footing for the sculpture must be designed. Coordination must be secured with the General Services Department as the present site will need to be abandoned, the sculpture transported and set into place. A visit to t he site will greatly assist you in making this recommendation. Iv CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH January 19, 1994 Taylor Grant, Chair Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport-Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Taylor: �3 During a meeting of the Arts Commission Thursday, January 1.3, 1994, the Arts Commissioners unanimously voted to request that the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission approve relocation of the Brett • Price sculpture currently located at the main library to a park location. The proposed site for th'e sculpture is in the park area surrounded by the public parking lot at the corner of Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Road. this is the end of the Hoag linear park. Commissioner Anderson met with the artist, Brett Price, who indicated that he would be pleased with the proposed location. The artist sketched a design of a concrete base and pedestal that would provide seating and position the sculpture at a height that cannot be accessed by children for future consideration. Again, our request is your approval of. the use of this location for the display of the city's art piece. The relocation of the piece may be completed by city torces who installed the piece in its current location. In addition, we hope for future consideration of the seating design when budgeting may permit. Nancy Beard will work with this Commission on this project and is available to you for questions. Sincerely, • Phyllis Drayton, Chair Arts Commission Arts Commission 1 3300 Newport Blvd. - P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach. Californi5 92658-8915 '7I1 1�II 3 1 ,, J I �:d N�N zf Y� v �I i Item #14 • GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: February 16, 1994 TO: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission FROM: General Service Director SUBJECT: BENCH DONATION ACTION: To accept recommendation of Park & Tree Superintendent of acceptance of one bench donation from Mr. Bill Coley. DISCUSSION: • Staff has received correspondence from Mr. John Rapillo who represents the Coley family for donation of one bench. Staff will purchase the bench from donation and place in �'L" Street Park. Donor will provide plaque per City policy and staff will install the plaque on the bench. L J Very respectfully, David E. Niederhaus BHSK &R LAW OFFICES TEL No.714- 675 -4087 Feb 16,94 10:05 No.002 P.01 .eater 00I&W C/ • 13L�r.TUN, UALLORAN, :SCHWART-Z, KUZhLKA & RAL'IL].o RCrOCRT L. NALLORAN, INC. ROOCR'i I. 6CIIWARIC„ INC. TIMCITIIY C. KV>CLKA, INC. ,1OHN MAP,,,,, INC. MARVIN O. OVRTON Or CC,VNSeL February 16, 1994 Marcelino Lomeli Park and Tree Superintendent General Services Dept, 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768 Dear Mr. Lomeli, 3=+Y 6AYSInC OR,,, NEwrORT BeACII, CALIFORNIA 020OC -7206 17111 O75 -%*O1 FAX 17111 6Y0-4087 •— Thank you for speaking with me on February 15, 1994. As I indicated, the Coley family is requesting the donation of one new park bench at L Street park in Balboa, California, The bench is to be donated in the memory of Annie'Coley, a long time Balboa • resident who recently passed away. • It is our understanding that the amount of the bench is $240.00 for Purchase and installation. The family has agreed to pay this amount. Further, the family will provide and pay for a two inch by six inch plaque with conforming inscription. Thank you, Mr. Lomeli, for your extreme courtesy and cooperation. It is my understanding you will submit this matter and contact me at the earliest possible time: sincerely, JOHN RAPILLO JR:lb cc: Bill Coley 500 S.8, 21st Avenue, #502 Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441 M' i Marcelino Lomeli Park and Tree Superintendent General Services Dept. 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768 Dear Mr. Lomeli, Thank you for speaking with me on February 15, 1994. As I indicated, the Coley family is requesting the donation of one new park bench at L Street Park in Balboa, California. The bench is to be donated in the memory of Annie Coley, a long time Balboa • resident who recently passed away. It is our understanding that the amount of the bench is $240.00 for purchase and installation. The family has agreed to pay this amount. Further, the family will provide and pay for a two inch by six inch plaque with conforming inscription. Thank you, Mr. Lomeli, for your extreme courtesy and cooperation. It is my understanding you will submit this matter and contact me at the earliest possible time. ncerely, c rOHN RAPILL0 JR:lb cc: Bill Coley 500 S.E. 21st Avenue, ##502 Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441 C� -&awG 0/ • BURTON, HALLORAN, SCHWARTZ, KUZELKA & RAPILLO ROBERT L. HALLORAN, INC. 333 SAYSIDE DRIVE ROBERT 1. SCHWARTZ, INC NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92 6 6 0 -72 9 0 TIMOTHY C. KUZELKA, INC (714) 675 -9501 JOHN RAPILLO, INC. MARVIN O. BURTON FAX (714) 675 -4067 OF COUNSEL February 16, 1994 Marcelino Lomeli Park and Tree Superintendent General Services Dept. 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768 Dear Mr. Lomeli, Thank you for speaking with me on February 15, 1994. As I indicated, the Coley family is requesting the donation of one new park bench at L Street Park in Balboa, California. The bench is to be donated in the memory of Annie Coley, a long time Balboa • resident who recently passed away. It is our understanding that the amount of the bench is $240.00 for purchase and installation. The family has agreed to pay this amount. Further, the family will provide and pay for a two inch by six inch plaque with conforming inscription. Thank you, Mr. Lomeli, for your extreme courtesy and cooperation. It is my understanding you will submit this matter and contact me at the earliest possible time. ncerely, c rOHN RAPILL0 JR:lb cc: Bill Coley 500 S.E. 21st Avenue, ##502 Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441 C� • GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT • DATE: February 16, 1994 TO: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission FROM: General Service Director SUBJECT: BENCH DONATION ACTION: To accept recommendation of Park & Tree Superintendent of acceptance of one bench donation from Mr. & Mrs. Manning Green. DISCUSSION: Staff has received correspondence from Green for donation of one bench. Staff will from donation and place along Ocean Boulevard Donor will provide plaque per City policy and the plaque on the bench. Very respectfully, David E. Niederhaus Mr. & Mrs. Manning purchase the bench in Corona del Mar. 'staff will install n U February 15, 1994 Marcelino G. Lomeli Park & Tree Superintendent General Services Department 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Ca. 92658 -8915 Dear Mr. Lomeli: We are donating $240.00 for the purchase by the City of one park bench to be located on the bluffs at the beach in Corona del Mar. •Additionally we would provide a 2" X 6" plaque to be installed on the bench. r� U We look forward to hearing from you. al)--� Sincerely, p� XiCt� Manning Green 2900 Park Newport Apt. 230 Newport Beach, Ca., 92660 r11 r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT PARK AND STREET TREE DIVISIONS P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915 (714) 644 -3162 February 15, 1994 Mr. & Mrs. Manning Green 2900 Park Newport Apt. 230 Newport Beach, Ca., 92660 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Green: Thank you for your inquiry into a park bench donation. A park bench would cost $240.00 and the donation must be approved by the City's Park, Beaches & Recreation Commission. • Additionally, per attached policy you may provide a plaque at the time of the bench donation. E Please contact me if I may be of any further assistance. Park & Tree Superintendent 3300 Newport' Boulevard, Newport Beach FA LJ • TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Discussion: Item No. 15 Agenda Item No. March 8,1994 Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission General Services Director Council Policy During August 1993, the City Manager and Department Directors began a comprehensive review of the Council Policy Manual. One of the policies under review was Policy I -9 (Retention or Removal of Park and Parkway Trees). Staff amended the orignal Policy as noted by Attachment 1 and added a Tree Hazard Evaluation form. On September 7,1993, the Commission approved 3 recommendations for change as noted by Attachment 2. These changes were made and the policy was submitted to the City Manager. During the restructuring of the Policy Manual, Policy I -9 was.redesignated Policy G -1 to signify a General Services Department administered policy. On December 13, 1993, the new -Policy G -1 was submitted for Council review. Councilperson Hedges recommended the deletion of the word "extreme" in the phrase "special trees of xtreme beauty" and Councilperson Hart recommended rewording of paragraph 5 of page 1. Because of these changes, Policy G -1 was returned to the Commission for further review. At the January 4, 1994 Commission meeting, the two Council recommended changes were approved or modified (see Attachment 3) and six additional locations were added to the Preservation of Special Trees list. Subsequently, Commissioner Herberts correctly noted 'that there was an amendment to paragraph 1, page 2 that had not been previously approved by the Commission. Attachment 4 is the G -1 Policy as amended by the Commission on September 7, 1993 and January 4, 1994. Staff has no objection to further deleting the second sentence of paragraph 1 of page 2. (See area highlighted with *) 0 Recommendation: Approve Council Policy G -1 as amended by the Commission on January 4, 1993 and with deletion of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of page 2. Respectfully submitted, David E. Niederhaus DEN /es Attachments 1 -4 LJ I -9 RETENTION OR REMOVAL OF PARK AND PARKWAY TREES It shall be the responsibility of the Parks, •Beaches and Recreation Commission to develop and maintain a rather restricted list of trees in the community • (attaehed) (Attachment 1) vahich should be retained to the exclusion of all normal problems. T is ist will contain landmark trees, special trees of extreme beauty, stately trees which contribute to an entire neighborhood, dedicated trees, etc. These .trees will be identified, mapped and recorded. Subsequent to this they will be given all- types -e€ special treatment to retain them, 4Relud4ng- the - use -of- asphalt- s4dewalks ;- real4gRed- eurb4ng, -ete- • Whenever it is necessary to prune tree roots in parkways or other public areas in order to correct or prevent damage being caused by the subject tree, every reasonable effort shall be made to save the tree$ inelud4ng -the use - a € -h4gh- grade - asphalt - s4dewa4k- seet4eRs. It will still be necessary to meet the City's standards relative to grades and alighments, with the ex- ception of those special trees discussed in Paragraph 1 of this policy statement. If it is necessary for a tree other than that included in Paragraph 1 to be given special treatment, each tree shall be considered individually on its own merits to determine whether the tree should be retained or replaced. All parkway trees included in this category must be subjected to and meet the following criteria: Have- su € €4e4ent -rest- system- te- susta4n -l4 €e- and - remain- in- a -sa €e eenditien -after- Peet- prun4Rg; Have a tree hazard evaluation Performed bv'the Ci.tv arborist. fattanhmpnt 2. Have- su€€ 4e4ent- l4fe- expeetaRey- te- mer4t- speeial- eensiderat4eR; Have adjacent property owners be desirous of retaining the tree iR if special treatment is necessar. to retain it. l4ght- e€„rpatehy sidewalk - a € €eet ='- at-weuld-be- created - Rest- te- the4r- hemes -4 €- asphalt - sidewalk -4s- to -be- used -te- save - the -tree; 4. Net -be- a €- aR- uRdes4xable- spee4es- that - has - been- remeved- €rem -the e € €4e4a4- street - tree - lost -by- the - Parks; - Beaehes- and- Reereat4en Gemm4ss4en; 3. Not have had a consistent history of damaging ut4l4Ues items such as sewers, water mains,Aetc. as indicated per City records. 4. Not interfere with acceptable drainage if alternate methods of curb repair are utilized. Application of the criteria on parkway trees will be conducted by the Parks; - Beaches- and- Reerea"eR General Services Department in coordination with the Parks, Beaches and'Recreation Commission. In applying the criteria, other departments of the City will be consulted as necessary. If there is any conflict between the application of the criteria and established standards of the City which cannot .be resolved at staff and Commission level, final resolution will be determined by the City Council. E, Attachment 1. E • I -9 RETENTION OR REMOVAL OF PARKWAY AND PARKWAY TREES - Palge 2 The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission is required to establish a standing Street Tree Committee to assist the Commission in developing a community awareness program and provide input to the total street tree program. Objectives of this Street Tree Committee will be: ohtaiA o 1. To �� rw vide representation for each situatio as it arises in a community and /or neighborhood, 2. To develep- 4nnevat4ve recommend practical techniques that will enable trees to be saved when eenerete- 4s- removed- and -rep laeed improvements are performed around them. 3. To provide recommendations to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission when tree removal requests are reee$ved denied by the City'arborist'and appealed to the full Commission. 4. To inform the public and further the philosophy of the value of trees in a community. 5. To pursue procedures whereby larger replacement trees can be used when trees are removed. 6. To assure that no community has a mass removal effect as projects occur. 7. Annually review landmark tree locations for inclusion in Council Policy I -9. When a tree is removed from the parkway for the sole benefit of the adjacent property owner, the property owner will be responsible for the cost of removal. Removal must still be done in accordance with City approvals. Note: ( See Attached List - Preservation of Special Trees) ('See Attached - Tree Hazard Evaluation Form) Adopted - May 9, 1966 Amended - August 14, 1967 Amended - November 9, 1976 Amended - November 12, 1985 Amended - November 28, 1988 11 Attachment 1. 0 (Attachment 1) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PRESERVATION OF SPECIAL TREES Location Species LANDMARK Balboa Library TREES Balboa Library West Jetty (near Historical Marker) Dover Drive at Westcliff 400 block Poinsettia Ocean Blvd. Corona del Mar Westcliff & Dover (Groves) In Arches Overpass DEDICATED No. Mariners Park TREES (Marcie Schrouder) Mariners Park (Frank Tallman) No. City Hall grounds (Bill Covert) City Hall grounds (Walter Knott) City Hall grounds (Calif. Bicentennial) Las Arenas Park (Ed Healy) Mariners Park (Isy Pease) City Hall grounds I -9 Eucalyptus globulus Phoenix canariensis Phoenix canariensis Liquidambar styraciflua Eucalyptus corynocalyx Phoenix canariensis Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus lehmannii Pinus radiata Pinus radiata Ficus benjamina Pinus halepensis Pinus halepensis Melaleuca linarifolia Pinus halepensis (U.S. Bicentennial Freedom Tree) Harpephyllum caffrum NEIGHBOR- Parkway in Shorecliffs HOOD Marguerite Avenue TREES Goldenrod Avenue Dover Dr. (Mariners to Irvine) 15th Street (Newport Heights) Irvine Avenue traffic island Holiday between Irvine & Tustin Surrounding Old Reservoir Along Avon Avenue Via Lido bridge Marine Avenue (Balboa Island) Seaview Avenue (Corona del Mar) Poppy Avenue (Corona del Mar) Heliotrope Avenue (Corona del Mar) Candlestick Lane, etc. (Dover Shores) Adopted - May 9, 1966 Amended - November 9, 1976 Amended - November 28, 1988 N - Erythrina caffra Phoenix canariensis Washingtonia robusta Eucalyptus globulus 'Eucalyptus cladocalyx Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus varieties Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus rudis Pinus radiata Eucalyptus rudis Pinus radiata Eucalyptus citriodora Attachment 1. A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM 10 /Address: Map /Location: Owner public _ private ___ unknown _.. other Dale: Inspector: Dale of last inspection TREE CHARACTERISTICS HAZARD RATING: Failure + Size + Target Hazard Potential of part Rating Rating Immediate action needed _ Needs further inspection _ Dead tree Tree N: Species: DBH: If of trunks: Height: Spread; Form: 0 generally symmetric Ominorasymmetry []major asymmetry ❑slumpsprout Ostag- headed Crownclass: Udominant Uco- clommant Llintermediate 'Usuppressed, Live crown ratio: % Age class: O young O mature O over - mature Pruning hislcry: O crown cleaned ❑ excessively thinned C] tapped ❑ crown raised ❑ pollarded O crown reduced O none Special Value: U specimen U heritage /historic U wildlife O unusual O street tree ❑ screen ❑ shade ❑ indigenous ❑ other TREE HEALTH Foliage color: O normal O chlorotic O necrotic Epicormics? Y N 10 gedensity: O normal ❑ sparse Leal size: O normal O small a Cual shoot growth: 0 excellent ❑ average ❑ poor Twig Dieback? Y N Callus development: [] excellent CJaverage f-1 poor O none Vigorclass: ❑ excelleht CJaverage ❑fair 0poor Major pests /diseases: SITE CONDITIONS 891 Site Character: I d residence I -I commercial r1 industrial I —I park n open space t7l natural C 1 Landscape type: O parkway ❑ raised bed ❑ container O open ❑ Irrigation: Unone I-ladequate Uinadequale Uexcessive Utrunkwetted %driplinepaved: 0% 10 -25% 25.50% 50 -75% 75.100% Lifted? Y N %driplinew /fill soil:. 0% 10 -25% 25.50% 50.75% 75 -100% %dripiine grade lowered: 0% 10.25% 25 -50% 50 -75% 75.100% Soil problems: O drainage r-] shallow O compacted U droughty O saline O alkaline O acidic O small volume ❑ disease center ❑ history of fail Obstructions: O lights ❑ signage O line -of -sight O view ❑ overhead lines O underground utilities O traffic ❑ adjacent veg O Wind (Iree position): O single tree O below canopy O above canopy O recently exposed ❑ whidward, canopy edge O area prone to wine throw TARGET Use Under Tree: D building O parking 'O tralfic [ U pedestrian ❑ recreation O landscape 0 hardscape O small features •r target be moved? Y N Occupancy: C] occasional use 0 medium, intermittent use ❑ frequent use The International Society of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendalions derived from use of this form. AAttachment 1. i" TREE DEFECTS Rate defect severity: S severe detect, high potentialdor failure M defect of moderate severity L defect of low severity LEAN: deg. from vertical ❑ natural ❑ unnatural Soil heaving: Y N Decay in plane of lean: Y N Roots exposed: Y N Soil cracking: Y N Compounding factors: ROOT DEFECTS: Suspect root rot: Y N Mushroom /conk present: Y N ID: . Exposed roots: S M L Undermined: S M L Root pruned: it from trunk Root area affected: Restricted root area: S M L Potential for root failure: S M L CROWN DEFECTS: Lean severity: S M L % Buttress wounded: Y N When: DEFECT Poor taper ROOT CROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Codominanls /forks Multi le attachments Included bark Excessive end weight Cracks/Splits Hangers Girdling - ounds ca avil Conks /Mushrooms — Bleeding Loose /cracked bark Nesting hole /bee hive Deadwood /stubs _ Burers/le unites /aats Cankers/ alts Previous failure HAZARD RATING Part most likely to fail: Failure Potential: 1 2 3 Size of Part: 1 2 3 Target: 1 2 3 Hazard Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAZARD ABATEMENT Prune: CJ remove defective part ❑ reduce end weight ❑ crown clean ❑ thin ❑ raise canopy ❑ crown reduce ❑ restructure ❑ shape Cable/Brace: _ Inspect further: ❑ root crown ❑ decay ❑ aerial ❑ monitor Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move target: Y N Other: Effect on adjacent trees: ❑ none ❑ evaluate COMMENTS 0. Attachment 1. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Parks, Beaches 8 Recreation commission s Page 10i City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDDC 0 Bob Patterson, 615 Larkspur, addressed the Commission. He urged this site not be chosen due to the close proximity of children at the ' school and Youth Center, and that safety factors due to increased traffic would also negate the site. Chair Grant pointed out that if dog owners abuse the situation, which he doubted, the dog park would close. Chris Crosson, 610 Newport Center Drive, addressed the Commission. Mr. Crosson stated he is a Doggie Walk Park supplier and presented an odorless neutralized bag used to pick up dog nuisances. He reported Balboa Island has installed six of his machines and usage is high during this 3 month trial period. He stated the Laguna Beach Dog Park is very successful and recommended a larger area be pursued with ample parking and restrooms. Commissioner Vandervort recommended the matter be referred to committee in order to develop criteria before selecting appropriate sites. Motion x Commissioner Demmer motioned to have a non- Ayes X X binding straw vote to not recommend the area Nays X X X X X behind•CYC for a dog park. Motion fails. Motion Commissioner Compton motioned to send the X matter to the Park and open Space Committee and that they report back within 3 months with a recommendation on the concept of a dog park Ayes X X X X X X X and a possible location. Unanimous. Item #16 - Final Approval of the Recreation Final Mission Statement Approval 01 the Recrea- Commissioner Glasgow recommended the second tion Missic and third sentences be deleted and added to Goals and objectives. Statement Nancy Beard explained that the statement is specific as to staff's mission and how it is carried out. She would, however, not be opposed to deleting the two sentences. Motion X Commissioner Demmer moved to approve and adopt Ayes X X X X X X the Recreation Mission Statement. Motion Nay X passes. Director Whitley introduced LaDonna Kienitz, who will 'become the Director of Community . \ Services on January 1, 1994. Item 017 - City Council Policies Review City Counci 3 , Policies Director Whitle y reported that those policies Re vie which reflect no change will be reworded when referencing the appropriate Director and /or ' CITY ®F N C�RI" 6EACH Parks, Beaches & Recreation commission s d, Page 11 S'S'T 7- q 3 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. IMDC Department. Director Niederhaus reported each Director has been assigned policies for review and that the City Manager's goal is to have all those that will be rewritten addressed by the City Council in October. LaDonna Kienitz reported that Council Policy I -5, Use, Priorities and Fees for Facilities and Equipment, is being reviewed by the City Attorney's office. All Community Services policies will be in the I- series. Director Whitley reviewed the policies assigned to him as submitted in Item #17(a). Following discussion, Commissioner Vandervort Motion X moved the policies as submitted in 017(a) be approved and that should I -4, Cost - Sharing on Undeveloped Land, be deleted that the Commission would review the developer agreements which incorporate this policy. Ayes X X X X X X X Unanimous. • Director Niederhaus reviewed the proposed changes for those policies assigned to him as submitted in Item #17(b). The Commission made the following changes: Policy I -9, Retention or Removal of Park and Parkway Trees, page 1, first paragraph, add "If said special treatment is not determined to be adequate to retain the identified tree, a full report shall be made to the Commission before any other action is taken." Retain Item #2. Reword Item #4 for a more positive approach. Page 2, Item #2 - Reword to state... "recommend innovative and practical techniques..." Policy I -12, Preservation of Views, Delete Item #2. Item 02 (new) - Add to the last sentence... "unless deemed necessary by the General Services Director. Exceptions to this will be referred to the Parks, Beaches and . Recreation Commission." n Policy I -15, Park Improvement Donations, • \ Delete the underlined second sentence. Policy I -19, Maintenance and Planting of Parkway Trees. / V Under Maintenance of Parkway Trees, second sentence, add... "on a less than a three year cycle. "... � Attarhmant �_ • CITY OF NEWPORT REACH Parks, Beaches 8 Recreation commission ,P a; o ci � `l$ Page 12 q 03 ws -s � 4f o City Council Chambers 7 p. ;m. INDEX w Motion Ayes • Motion Ayes �7 Basic Assess ment of the Street Trees Maintenance Division Commission Stuff Report :nt 2. ;K Under Tree List, delete California Pepper. Under Established Parkways, Item #2, reword the sentence to state "Applicant must accept responsibility for watering and fertilizing new trees" and move to above the newly added paragraph beginning "If you have any questions..." Policy I -22, Naming of City Parks Add Item 2(e) to state "Common names already used in the area." X Commissioner Compton moved to accept the I X X X X X X X Policies submitted in Item #17(b) as corrected. Unanimous. Item #18 - Basic Assessment of the Street Trees Maintenance ,Division of the General Services Department Item #18 was addressed under Item #5. V. DISCUSSION ITEMS Item #19 - Commission Staff Report Director Whitley explained that the report submitted defines the Commission and staff roles which will be implemented January 1, 1994. X Chair Grant motioned to postpone the report to X X X X X X X the October 5, 1993 meeting for further review. Unanimous. VI. SPECIAL. URGENT OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commissioh adjourned„at 11:07 P.M. The agenda for this meeting was posted on August 31, 1993 at 11:00 A.M. outside the City Hall Administration Building. \ / 1 ottie�Firo Secretary ! Attachm Basic Assess ment of the Street Trees Maintenance Division Commission Stuff Report :nt 2. ;K CITY OF Parks, Beaches NEWPORT BEACH & Recreation commission Page 7 ]j„� \3 -C13 nit.v Cnuncil Chambers 7 p.m. IrDDC /G Y I %J U' August. At the December 21 Study Session the City Council requested Policies G -1 and I -9 be reviewed by this Commission. Director Niederhaus explained that the G series is a new designation for the General Services policies. CL Director Niederhaus reviewed and answered questions on the proposed modifications F�9 dp suggested for each policy. 4 Director Kienitz also pointed out that the I series is assigned to Community Services and, �t therefore, encompasses not only Recreation, but also the Library and Arts Commission policies. Policies can also'be reviewed after they are drafted. Following discussion, the Commission made their recommendations on the paragraphs presented for review as follows: RE. G -1 "This list will contain landmark trees, op special trees of beauty, stately trees which contribute to an, entire neighborhood, dedicated trees, etc." "5. Not have a consistent history of damaging items sach as City sewers, water mains, sidewalks, curbs, walls, fences, foundations, etc., as indicated per City records." Attachment 1 - Neighborhood Trees Add the following: 40 op "Candlestick Lane etc. (Ba'ycrest) Eucalyptus citriodora Commodore Eucalyptus citriodora Starlight Eucalyptus citriodora Glenwood Eucalyptus citriodora Candlestick Eucalyptus citriodora Sandlewood Eucalyptus citriodora" RE. I -9 Delete Item 3 since a similar statement is part of Policy G -5, Park improvement Donations. "4. Prior to the dedication or naming of a n park or public recreational facility for a (o/ deceased person(s), there should be a passage of six montho from death before the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission acts upon Attackuttent 3. /G Y I 11 1 s Parks. Beaches Recreation Commission J, d Page 8 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX r the request and makes a recommendation to the City council." Concerning a request for a new policy encouraging contributions from new individuals, the Commission determined that this issue is also covered in Policy 6-5. Motion X Commissioner Compton motioned to accept the recommendations as corrected and transmit them to the City Council as this Commission's recommendations for new City policies. Ayes X x X X X x X Unanimous. Commissioner Herberta brought to the attentJ of the Commission that Page 2 of Policy had changes made by staff that were reviewed by the Commission. The Commissthen It determined that due to their concerns Policy G -1, they would like to review it ag at their next meeting. V. DISCUSSION ITEMS Item .. #17 - Capital Improvement Projects for Capita 94/95 Fiscal Year Improv t Projects fc Nancy Beard reported these items are for the 94/95 FY Commission's information and review. Director Niederhaus reported that a list of parks and recreation areas and capital• improvement projects was submitted to the Public Works Department on December 28. Although the City Manager requested a preliminary list be turned in by December 31, the review and approval process is not complete and additional projects can by submitted. During discussion Chair Grant voiced his concern that procedures were not followed as in the past whereby the Commission has submitted their prioritized list for review with staff. Director Niederhaus explained that this is a starting point and that he would like the / Commission's input in order to generate an updated list for the Commission's February meeting. The budget is due February 18 and 3 there is still work to be researched on cost estimates, etc. Chair Grant suggested the Commissioners provide their recommendations to the Directors by January 17. He also requested Nancy Beard provide last year's list. Director Kienitz suggested the budget process begins in August or September so that there is ample time for private surveys. Nancy Beard I r .. • G -1 RETENTION OR REMOVAL OF PARK AND PARKWAY TREES It shall be the responsibility of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation•Commission to develop and maintain a rather restricted list of trees in the community (attacked (Attachment 1) which should be retained to the exclusion of all normal problems. This list will contain landmark trees, special trees of eat beauty, stately trees which contribute to an entire neighborhood, dedicated trees, etc. These trees will be identified, mapped and recorded. Subsequent to this they will be given all types of special treatment to retain them, inelu ing the use of asphalt a't side eE ken. Whenever it is necessary to prune tree ,roots in parkways or other public areas in order to correct or prevent damage being caused by the subject tree, every reasonable effort shall be made to save the tree. i ..sp =.a== s=eivalk seeo =- . It will still be necessary to meet the City's standards relative to grades and alignments, with the exception of those special trees • discussed in Paragraph 1 of this policy statement. If it is necessary for a tree other than that included in Paragraph 1 to be given special treatment, each tree shall be considered individually on its own merits to determine whether the tree should be retained or replaced. all parkway trees included in this category must be subjected to and meet the following criteria: 1. Have s ffieient feet syst. to sustain life A femain in a F ^d°t'^^ after =va Fe t Have a tree hazard s -_ evaluation performed by the City arborist (Attachment 2)_ 2. Have sufficient life expectancy to merit special consideration, 3. Have adjacent property owners be desirous of retaining the tree in light of "patchy si Fiei. alk eff t" that wetild be ereated next to ther ..:dewa::, is to be used } save the trees,- if special treatment is necessary to retain it. 4. Be of a desirable species, on Not be of an undesirable speeies that has been removed frern the official street tree list by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, 5. Not have had a consistent history of damaging utilities items such as sewers, water mains, sidewalks, curbs, walls, fences, • foundations, etc. as indicated p r City records. �Y Attachment 4 6. Not interfere with acceptable drainage if alternate methods of curb repair are utilized. Application of the criteria on parkway trees will be conducted by the Parks, Bear -hes and eereation General Services Department in coordination with the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. In applying the criteria; other departments of the City will be consulted as necessary. If there is any conflict between the application of the criteria and established standards of the City which cannot be resolved at staff and Commission level, final resolution will be determined by the City Council. The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission is required to establish a standing Street Tree Committee to assist the Commission in developing a community awareness program and provide input to the total street tree program. Objectives of this Street Tree Committee will be: 1. To obtain/12rovide representation for each situation as it arises in a community and /or neighborhood. However. the Committee removal. • 2. To develop^ vt recommend innovative and practical techniques that will enable trees to be saved when ear =«rete is eed improvements are performed around them. 3. To provide recommendations to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission when tree removal requests are receiv d denied by the City arborist and appealed to the full Commission. 4. To inform the public and further the philosophy of the value of trees in a community. 5. To pursue procedures whereby larger replacement trees can be used when trees are removed. 6. To assure that no community has a mass removal effect as projects occur. 7. Annually review landmark tree locations for inclusion in Council Policy G1. When a tree is removed from the parkway for the sole benefit of the adjacent property owner, the property owner will be responsible for the cost of removal. Removal must still be done in accordance with City approval. 3 1 Attachment 4 0 P xr —V _ o" .a t a .rn. Note: (See Attached List - Preservation of Special Trees) (See Attached - Tree Hazard Evaluation Form) Adopted 9/9/66 Amended 8/14/67 Amended 11/9/76 Amended 11/12/85 Amended 11/28/88 Amended 10/93 Formerly I -9 Attachment 4 • • .. ..... • - ...rn �.., n .. !'! rf" . • �'+nn.w.n �..d +.n ru+. �.+ rn�fPRGR2nnn .ttny.nCn�h.�+rtig4p.Jromnn wF,n. ..rP.� . • non. (Attachment 1) CITY OF'NEWPORT BEACH PRESERVATION OF SPECIAL TREE G -1 Location Species LANDMARK 'Balboa Library Eucalyptus globulus TREES Balboa Library Phoenix canariensis West Jetty (near Historical Marker) Phoenix canariensis Dover Drive at Westcliff Liquid'ambar City Hall grounds styraciflua' ` 400 block Poinsettia Eucalyptus City Hall grounds corynocalyx Ocean Blvd. Corona del Mar Phoneix canariensis Westcliff & Dover (Groves)' Eucalyptus globulus In Arches Overpass Eucalyptus Mariners Park lehmannii DEDICATED No. Mariners Park TREES (Marcie Schrouder) Pinus radiata Mariners Park (Frank Tallman) Pinus radiata No. City Hall grounds (Billy Covert) Ficus benjamina City Hall grounds (Walter Knott) Pinus halepensis City Hall grounds (Calif. Bicentennial) Pinus halepensis Las Arenas Park (Ed Healy) Melaleuca linarifolia Mariners Park (Isy Pease) Pinus halepensis City Hall grounds (U.S. Bicentennial Freedom Tree) Harpephyllum caffrum NEIGHBORHOOD TREES Parkway in'Shorecliffs Marguerite Avenue Goldenrod Avenue Dover Dr. (Mariners to Irvine) 15th Street (Newport Heights) 3� Irvine Avenue traffic island Erythrina caffra Phoenix canariensis Washington robusta Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus cladocalyx Eucalyptus globulus Attachment 4. Holiday between Irvine & Tustin Surrounding Old Reservoir Along Avon Avenue Via Lido bridge Marine Avenue (Balboa Island) Seaview Avenue (Corona del Mar) Poppy Avenue (Corona del Mar) Heliotrope Avenue (Corona del Mar) Candlestick Lane, etc. (Bay rC est) n U Adopted 5/9/66 Amended 11/9/76 Amended 11/28/88 • Amended 10/93 Formerly I -9 40 Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus varieties Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus globulus Eucalyptus rudis Pinus radiata Eucalyptus rudis Pinus radiata Eucalyptus citriodora Attachment 4. Att:achrnent 2 (9 TREE rHt4,2i46 D EVALUATION FORM roan Areas dress: Map/Location: Owner: public _ private ___ unknown other Date: Inspector Dale of last inspection: TREE CHARACTERISTICS Tree 9: HAZARD RATING: + + - Failure + Size + Target Hazard Potential of part Rating Rating _ Immediate action needed Needs further inspection _ Dead tree DOH: 0 of trunks: . Height: Spread; Farm: O generally symmetric CI minor asymmetry r-I major asymmetry ❑'slump sprout O stag- headed Crown class: U dominant Ll co- dominant 1.1 inlermediate U suppressed Live crown ratio:__ % Age class: ❑ young ❑ mature O over - mature Pruning hisicry: O crown cleaned ❑ excessively thinned O topped ❑ crown raised O pollarded ❑ crown reduced ❑ none Special Value: Laspecimen LJhenlage/historic Clwddhfe Ounusual Ostreettree ❑screen Oshade ❑indigenous Oother TREE HEALTH Foliagecoior. Claormal ❑chlorotic ❑necrotic Epleormics? Y N Ft density: ❑ normal ❑ sparse Leaf size: O normal O small Annual shoot growth: O excellent O average 17 poor Twig Dieback? Y N Callus development: (]excellent ❑average (:!poor f7none Vigorclass: ❑excellent L-Iaverage Ofair ❑poor Major pests /diseases: SITE CONDITIONS 691 Site Character. f 1 residence [-]commercial I:1 industrial I -I park n open space ❑ natural U Landscape type: ❑ parkway Cl raised bed Cl container ❑ open ❑ Irrigation: U none 1.1 adequate U inadequate U excessive U trunk welted • dripline paved: 0% 10.25% 25 -50% 50 -75% 75.100% Lifted? Y N •dripiinew /fill soil: 0% 10.25% 25 -50% 50.75% 75 -100/4 %dripline grade lowered: 0% 10 -25% 25.50% 50.75% 75 -100 °o Soil problems: ❑ drainage 0 shallow ❑ compacted O droughty ❑ saline ❑ alkaline ❑ acidic O small volume ❑ disease center ❑ history of fail Obstructions: O lights O slgnage O line -of -sight O view O overhead lines O underground utilities O traffic ❑ adjacentveg. O Wind (tree position): O single tree ❑ below canopy u above canopy ❑ recently expused O wwrlward, canopy edge O area prone to wlndlhrow TARGET U; rJ building O parking ❑ traffic [-]pedestrian ❑ recreation ❑landscape L7 hardscape ❑ small features L rget be moved? Y N Occupancy: O occasional use r1 medium, intermittent use O frequent use The International Society or Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form. �� Attachment TREE DEFECTS Rate defect severity: S severe defect, high potential for failure • M defect of moderate severity L defect of low severity LEAN: deg from vertical O natural ❑ unnatural Soil heaving: Y N Decay In plane of lean: Y N Raols exposed: Y N Soil cracking: Y N Compounding factors: ROOT DEFECTS: - Lean severity: S M L Suspect root rot: Y N Mushroom /conk present: Y N to: Exposed roots: S M L Undermined: S M L , Root pruned: 11 from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wounded: Y N When: Restricted root area: S M L Potential for root failure: S M L CROWN DEFECTS: DEFECT Poor taper BOOTCROWN TRUNK SCAFFOLDS BRANCHES Codominanls4orks Multiple allachmi:nts Included bark Excessive end weight Cracks/Splits _ Hangers _ -- Girdlin Waods — — — Caw Conks /Mushrooms — Bleeding Looselcracked bark Nesting hole/bee hive I - Deadwood/stubs _ Bcrers/lermilesMals Cankers/ alts Previous failure HAL AHU HAI INH Part most likely to fail; Failure Potential: 1 2 3 Size of Part: 1 2 3 Target: 1 2 3 Hazard Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 HAZARD ABATEMENT — — Prune: EJ remove defective part O reduce end weight D crown clean O thin O raise canopy ❑ crown reduce O restructure ❑ shape Cable/Brace: _ Inspect further: ❑ root crown O decay O aenal ❑ monftor Remove Tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move target: Y N Other: Effect on adjacent trees: ❑ none ❑ evaluate COMMENTS 0 Attachment 4. 1 1 1 .1 1 1 I I L' r i I i .1 1 1 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ANNUAL TREE MAINTENANCE CONTRACT PROGRESS REPORT - FIRST 2 MONTHS WEST COAST ARBORISTS LI I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I 11 SPECIES FREQUENCY City of Newport Beach Annual Tree Maintenance Contract ' Species Frequency List for Trees Trimmed Jan - Feb ' Page 1 BOTANICALNAME Washingtonia robusta COMMONNAME MEXICAN FAN PALM COUNT 400 Trachycarpus fortunei WINDMILL PALM 230 Ficus rubiginosa RUSTY -LEAF FIG 129 ' Eucalyptus sideroxylon RED IRONBARK 121 Washingtonia filifera CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 82 ' Schinus terebinthifolius BRAZILIAN PEPPER 78 Ficus benjamina WEEPING FIG 69 ' Eucalyptus globulus Ceratonia siliqua BLUE GUM CAROB 63 52 Pinus radiata MONTEREY PINE 51 Alnus rhombifolia WHITE ALDER 45 ' Ficus,microcarpa'Nitida' INDIAN LAUREL FIG 44 Eucalyptus citriodora LEMON - SCENTED GUM 38 Metrosideros excelsus NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE 29 Pinus halepensis ALEPPO PINE 28 Liquidambar styraciflua AMERICAN SWEETGUM 27 ' Cedrus deodara DEODAR CEDAR 25 Eriobot .rya deflexa BRONZE LOQUAT 24 ' Arecastrum romanzoffianum Pyrus kawakamii QUEEN PALM EVERGREEN PEAR 22 22 Magnolia grandiflora SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 20 Nerium oleander OLEANDER 20 ' Myoporum laetum MYOPORUM 19 Brahea edulis GUADALUPE PALM 18 Jacaranda mimosifolia JACARANDA 17 Casuarina cunninghamiana RIVER SHE -OAK 15 Eucalyptus ficifolia RED FLOWERING GUM 15 Pinus canariensis CANARY ISLAND PINE 15 Eucalyptus polyanthemos SILVER DOLLAR GUM 14 Pinus torreyana TORREY PINE 13 Chamaerops humilis MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM 12 Eucalyptus maculata SPOTTED GUM 12 Eucalyptus spp. EUCALYPTUS SPECIES 11 Fraxinus uhdei SHAMEL ASH 11 Eucalyptus rudis DESERT GUM 10 Koelreuteria bipinnata CHINESE FLAME TREE 10 Eucalyptus camaldulensis RED GUM 9 Bauhinia variegata PURPLE ORCHID TREE 6 ' Eucalyptus cladocalyx SUGAR GUM 5 ' Page 1 City of Newport Beach Annual Tree Maintenance Contract ' Species Frequency List for Trees Trimmed Jan - Feb ' Page 2 BOTANICAL NAME Melaleuca quinquenervia COMMON NAME CAJEPUT TREE COUNT 5 Cupaniopsis anacardioides CARROTWOOD 4 ' Ligustrum lucidum GLOSSY PRIVET 4 Other tree OTHER TREE 4 Phoenix reclinata SENEGAL PALM 4 ' Pittosporum undulatum VICTORIAN BOX 4 Acacia baileyana BAILEY ACACIA 3 ' Acacia spp. Erythrina caffra ACACIA KAFFIRBOOM CORAL TREE 3 3 Erythrina spp. CORAL TREE 3 Prunus cerasifera PURPLE -LEAF PLUM 3 ' Schinus molle CALIFORNIA PEPPER 3 Harpephyllum caffrum KAFFIR PLUM 2 ' Lagunaria patersonii- PRIMROSE TREE 2 Olea europaea OLIVE 2 Palm spp. PALM SPECIES 2 ' Phoenix canariensis CANARY ISLAND DATE PALM 2 Pittosporum rhombifolium QUEENSLAND PITTOSPORUM 2 Prunus lyonii CATALINA CHERRY 2 ' Tristania conferta BRISBANE BOX 2 Ulmus parvifolia CHINESE ELM 2 Yucca gloriosa SPANISH DAGGER 2 ' Acacia decurrens GREEN WATTLE 1 Chorisia speciosa SILK -FLOSS TREE 1 ' Cinnamomum camphora CAMPHOR TREE 1 Citrus limon LEMON 1 ' Eucalyptus lehmannii Hymenosporum flavum BUSHY YATE SWEETSHADE 1 1 Melia azedarach CHINABERRY 1 Morus alba WHITE MULBERRY 1 Pinus pinea ITALIAN STONE PINE 1 Pinus spp. PINE SPECIES 1 Strelitzia nicolai GIANT BIRD OF PARADISE 1 Tupidanthus calyptratus TUPIDANTHUS 1 1906 ' Page 2 COMPUTERIZED COMPLETION REPORT I I I 1 I I I I I I Fl I I I I 11' ' M W Q ' a M 0 o 0 0 0 0 w i N W W LM 1 G �Y> N N co N lSL 0 No m � N � N m � N m N 01 N m N N � N m V T V � V Ol m m N � V � m � V � m � V � m m m � V' m m OI m T M O m N m N T N Ol N O W N O � N O m N O � N O W O. \ ``\ =`N ��````N ``�`�`N `` `N 000000000000000000000000000000000 0 0 O U 2 C m O M O O O N M O N O M O O N O M O M O M N M O N O N O m O m O m O m O N O N O N O N O N O co O N O N m N w W v S WCO N i. N N m m N m M M m N m N r N r N r N N t� N m m m M h N h N N r m m m m to m m LO M 2 U m Z O c 3 m O N O OV O N. . V) N V) N N N M N O r O N O M M M O M 0 M 0 r N r O, r O N N r O M O N O N N 0 lFL- W W O U .. � W z w W zaQ az W ¢zazzzzzzQ W W W W W W W W zzzWOan W W -L W LU n Q Q D Q z n. IL a w a a IL as mma WaaE uu �ii�EL�iiwwaw�ww�W�ii�ii�i�ii�i�iiwa�ii�ii�ii�www��0 ����Q¢¢¢�¢¢�¢������ -ra :: dms¢zz°�mWm p 0 0 p O M> � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w�u o�C 2 a¢¢¢ U i�h�QQh¢0 FO M000000o:r�is? l?i iii Gi mm -»(7U ro C ro G ro C ro G ro C ro G ro C E a E ro E E E Z m m Lij c c c c c c c 0-- .— x °1 x °1 o E o c m z J r� r �..- V V T U .% w� .�- .� V T r� .� .�- U Y ro Y ro Y ro D V E ;E E N Q 0 ro m y ro ro R W N ro 10 R N IV ro ro 16 10 O o 9%% ro ro ro D ro a O ro ro 2 L° L� ° . E F >>>> G C C C N ry N ry C N ry C N N tq C y �p C 7> C C >> C C > C y >>>>> C C C C U 2 T 2 T 2 T O C O •C ro ro U m m 0.a'a'aUUatiac tia0aaaan.acio aaaiiaaaww ,¢o w N r r r r r r r r r N M r r N r r r r r r r r r r N M N r r r ¢W F a I I N co N N N co N M N > aaaa¢aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wwwWwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww O. 0000000000000000000000000 O. O O O 0 a 0000000000000000000000000 R w ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ NNfA NNNNN N N W S W S W S W S W S W S W mm W W S W 2 W 2 W 2 W 2 W ==I= W W W S W S W S W 2 W 2 W 2 W 2 W =IX W--- � m¢¢¢ - - - 2 - 2 -- Q Q N W' m n m 0 N c+l d N N IA N N N M V co f� co N N O N I� t� t� O O N C f0 O N Q N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M M M W M W W W tO M h N N N N N N 1A N N a N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N D r r r c 0 N ro U N G I WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC. KEY FOR COMPUTERIZED COMPLETION REPORT 1 District F 1 1 C 1 u Represents the geographic part of the city. Address The numeric address where the tree is located. "X" extension accompanies the address if it is fictitious. (There is no house or building occupying the site) Street The actual name of the street including the direction. Side Represents the physical location of the tree at the address. (Blank for Front, "S" for Side, or "M" for Median). Tree Represents the tree number at the location. Every tree at an address gets an individual number. Numbers increase in the same direction as the addresses on the block. Botanical Name Lists the botanical- name of each species. Common Name Lists the common name of each species. Crown Lists the approximate width of the crown (spread) in feet. DBH Lists the approximate diameter of the tree (at breast height) in inches. Height Lists the approximate height of the tree in feet. Date Completed Is the date that the tree was trimmed. Sidewalk Damage Reflects damage (lifts, rises, deflections or cracks) on the sidewalk at the given address. (Blank or "N" for none, "Y" if greater than % inch) I I i I I I I I j I I I I 1 I I I WORK FORCE .�s4��' —. •, ,'; i+^ r ,..s•'r,>rT «ljgvw,was',� ✓i`;', „� „a;E. }5 r, :, .��, y f,`, s;lsy r'F,,; ✓(,ff/Sj�G ray'+,Sis�,;! �� •, rj;e r � „'i ��;t,!, 1,';; j <,, "gib:, ,f$j r i+ 3i, shy / u /✓ !9 s , :. .i�• }�'!'�• .: Si' /�ry,�C %a,% ,s: ter, IV 4 ' f ,s y „3• .r, p., •i oys `��'; ;', �,�` ?,'la'; �„ 1 pit ;• / ;iar t r Y "'. ti �� '" ',y,�p 'r • 5'l `'% 3,. +jar, Er?�y5'Hn • i)j�1✓• .,:%'' f's' •fir ",i;!, s °,....q ; ,J%?,; / r}". sv ^J.'*,'J,d -G „r •Usi�I%�/',s,'i, £� �sh• %.' Fri i t4` ,,t,rt Asa' ✓ %n %�i'Y/ n #” 'i.`! •°t” 4, r , / "s: "u•,.;,.r ys,. ,: �ra... ", y` j' „� �",bt », tt f � //, Zip W o,” " W ri s ,r +� rKh,fs YtN�� s «: A .i�• }�'!'�• .: Si' /�ry,�C %a,% ,s: ter, ' f „3• W ri s ,r +� rKh,fs YtN�� s «: A OKA lit Al.:��yy ♦, ' � , � j �I�A; 1� � � �� task- { J� 1 91. All •Yr �` �f7t er xr r a _ •y t 3F s.� " rt i�, � Cj av •4 alS.�,� +p+'' �:�..., s F+ -d � r,.t .9.�1 � ♦�, "x 1y Ywi.X SF �w Al. � �,.r� ♦ '. T � w two � [��" t y • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION I. Mission Item No. 16 Maintain and enhance recreation, both active and passive, opportunities for residents and guests of the City of Newport Beach by creating a quality recreation and open space system and ensuring its use through active interface and encouragement of the system users. II. Responsibilities of Commission 1. To advise the Council on matters of budget, planning, parks, parkway trees and recreation programs, and establish acquisition policies for development and improvement of facilities. 2. Encourage the facilities to be used to capacity when demand exists. III. Goals of Commission • 1. Use subcommittee to interact with the public on specific issues and formulate recommendations to Commission. El 2. Create a meaningful agenda for our joint meetings with the City Council. 3. Encourage a positive working relationship between the School District and the City at all levels. 4. Be available to City Council for advice when asked. 5. Assist in a smooth transition to a new depart- mental reporting process. IV. Objectives of Commission L4--� 1. Review procedure for implementing Parks, Beaches and Recreation expertise into facility planning process given the new departmental reporting procedures. 2. Annual meeting with Costa Mesa. -2- COMMITTEES I. Recreation Program Committee Goals: 1. Monitor and work with Recreation Division regarding scheduling and recreation programs. 2. Ensure quarterly recreation brochures are reviewed by Parks, Beaches and Recreation; articles written and presented to Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commissioners on time. Objectives: 1. Review usage of two pools to ensure maximum usage. II. Tree Committee mission: Continue to provide and encourage an atmosphere and method to enhance the overall tree environment in the • City of Newport Beach. Goals: 1. Improve communication with Newport Beach citizens as related to tree matters. 2. Ensure preservation of trees when possible. 3. Plant trees where needed. 4. Cooperate with community associations in their efforts to beautify their parkways. 5. Award or give recognition for particularly beautiful use of trees. 6. Continue review of designated street scapes. 7. Review, again, possibility of a City Arborist. And, or, encourage certification of existing staff. 8. Continue to recommend and support staff in their efforts to preserve existing trees, i.e., root pruning, root barriers, pruning for . safety, etc. ` 9. Encourage staff to try new pilot programs, for -3- instance, for growth retardant of Ficus Nitida trees by use of "Clipper" or "Maintain" after trimming. 10. Replace trees in timely manner when removed. 11. Every home should have a tree in front of it. Objectives: 1. Review Policy I -9 and define criteria for retention of individual trees. Sept. 9 -30. 2. Rewrite Notice of Denial form. 3. Continue to secure signed agreement from adjacent property owner for acceptance and care of new tree when removal and replacement are recommended. 4.. Develop awards ,program for beautification to city street trees. 5. Encourage community associations help in • promoting a "Tree Per Lot" program to re- establish street scapes. III Park and Open Space Committee Mission: Review the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan to evaluate current needs assessment; review site plans for park development; review park facility plans for implementation; assist staff in maintenance recommendations of park and park facilities. Objectives: 1. Complete annual review of parks and park facilities by 1993. a. Each Commissioner will be delegated park and facility inspection assignments to report to the Park and Open Space Committee. Committee will review with staff and report to the Commission by March, 1993. 2. Review preliminary design ideas., review plans • and conduct citizen committee meetings for / newly acquired park, park facilities and open �/, space. -4- • a. Park and Open Space Dedication - Irvine Co. b. Each Commissioner will have one Ride Along. C. Hoag Hospital Wetland Mitigation d. Hoag Hosptial Semeniuk Slough Improvement 3. Assess the need for recreation facilities for youth and adult programs. IV. Oasis Liaison Goals and Objectives: 1. Inform the Commission of the needs of senior citizens at the Center. 2. Inform the Commission of legislative issues that will affect the needs of seniors in our community. 3. Contribute to the monthly staff report to the Commission information pertaining to the Senior Center. • V. Budget Committee Objectives: 1. Provide assistance to Department Heads as requested. 2. Prioritize capital needs as money is made available. August, 1993 4� 0 Item No.17 • COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT DATE: February 18, 1994 TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission FROM: Recreation Superintendent RE. BACKGROUND INFORMATION - FORD/LORAL DEVELOPMENT The local news media has contained articles regarding the potential development of the Ford/Loral property. This is the current Loral site located in Newport Beach, north of Ford Road, east of Jamboree, west of MacArthur and the Belcourt development, and south- of Bison. As currently planned, the development will be comprised of 450 homes in a style much like the Belcourt development. The community will be gated with no public access. • City Ordinance 19.50.010 states the requirements for Park Dedication in the City. As a result of this Ordinance, the City of Newport Beach was divided into four development zones. A map outlining these zones is attached, When development occurs, developers must either dedicate usable land for a park or incur in lieu fees. If the Park and Open Space Element of the General Plan does not call for park development within the new buildout, the developer normally makes the in lieu payment. The funds are utilized within the same zone in which the development occurred. The current accepted ratios for dedication purposes, as established by the City Council, are five acres of land for every 1,000 persons, or $6.894 per dwelling unit. The residents of Newport Beach will greatly benefit from the amount of in lieu fees which this project will generate for future park development. The City Council will shortly be considering the draft for an In Lieu Land Dedication Policy to establish criteria for the use of in lieu fees. It is also anticipated that the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan, last approved in 1984, can be developed in the next fiscal year. A review of available open space and potential development of the parcels identified in the Circulation Improvement and Open Space Agreement will be a critical part of that plan. / 7// :. -���' i / ,.: �� . � ^, / �'.. ��� �� � r �� �' " � �' �� l'� ��ir • • �J z 0 a K 0 m O= II � 0 w ? ❑ w m � ❑ _ 3.4 G� — ❑ Om F � ❑ N ❑ rx � Z Ow ❑ ❑ !=R ❑ w � ❑ r W= O Q �W �J G1 G1 0 0 r� u N U 0 z • ,0 cd t4° U U cd U PQ O z cu U O O O o � .� E ' C ° � °•D� 9 Y o55 .r3 W O .e � . ° C, L' S •p IL 0 s ° >.•eb ea 3 E s$O-8 ao °q E =u•5 v o � S e met a ebb `s8 R-oa°.v.Eti �•' 8 �v m y 7. e O i 12 11 � E �• �•9� 0 a> v E -a •a ,. I 1J' J �2 o W Ei 8 = a• W ow a.0 is S a � y O O ao to O n a" �J O JO ^ n y o o" ~ t+ a' 0 0 0 z 3 S R a G a a O O O O N - zxdn: E to r rn ry f'1 G O Be n 0� 0 (off o ° n Ea° ry �t ry ry d H_ <` w o w o w O o O i.H tia W W N O O O O O O o W O o O O O O m K1 O O O In V� u• C O O O .0 by ,lv z ., �' •�� 3 C 2 GA ) 0 L7 a❑ o 0 Cro d p^,• ° °' �— n 0^r°o C� y 0 O xn7 r-F � y a g, '°^ �.b ��•G)�� �� a� oyy w o a V oc ^' oa �` a n o• o � TJ � a o °3 � � -°n C 7 ^ � �• � �C- �' ° p" ° n �v �� ,°o 0 o L,o ' �• 7, y �° �' 5„ o e " °k N h '� ° o o h '� '--i Li o o °• by �'..o ° 'e E• s e c vFi =. r of A b a c C y n = z rTi rC °^ w C ❑� �°o' ^. -`°^�i o FS to 'ny •"ai pI O A S h o 1 ^ 9 14 w r '+'' o °z o o o S o z 0 3 0 3 • • fy y 1 O O O m W w W O O O �o �d�°5-xg� c�sb 0V> b"ryy0 R� .�, "Zryi ai O O y N% rt a D• n- O G. r O A C. ^O b0°O ^O C �. O iQ' ff 0 ' '+ vJ w .� 9' a ^n o 4 An T r r n 3 � o �• z � o 0 a � N r�J W 1 O d�a ° K "o Ci Y °z 0 °01 z ok � V H � ro °z 0 0 P d O zz 0 O O • � m 'mil F+ N C�O1 R 0 p., V/N \ V N o � O � 0 to C rp. O G W O N N �-�• �--• O O O O V• O O O O 'O O O O N N L. O o u, O O ll1 O E o o L. ° o5g n a a. o �•� S" S•y•°a 5 0.0 �'On S"o R cro � o � Q .,•,mmC) �, ten^ �n�n n �nr 5• � p• � P• �• ? 7• pCS., �• S � �• r^O� Et 0 0 °0 0 °0 °0 0 0 0 .v o 0 0 0 z 00030 03 �B�o o 0 n lid O 9 H �yy�y M tv tv T r O O O O O O O O Vii O 11 ;b. W W W N O O O V l�l� O O O VNi Vii 07 0y 9 oz "y •... 0 ' o c � c ^. E, o � o o"y o ffi 7 �+ n n0 —y E o.. ❑ F ^y o R ^y io �- r"d �' �• is e+"' °�•' a n � O 1 �p %y 3 ° 0 ^ 0 0 0 0 o O O O O N - zxdn: E to r rn ry f'1 G O Be n 0� 0 (off o ° n Ea° ry �t ry ry d H_ <` w o w o w O o O i.H tia W W N O O O O O O o W O o O O O O m K1 O O O In V� u• C O O O .0 by ,lv z ., �' •�� 3 C 2 GA ) 0 L7 a❑ o 0 Cro d p^,• ° °' �— n 0^r°o C� y 0 O xn7 r-F � y a g, '°^ �.b ��•G)�� �� a� oyy w o a V oc ^' oa �` a n o• o � TJ � a o °3 � � -°n C 7 ^ � �• � �C- �' ° p" ° n �v �� ,°o 0 o L,o ' �• 7, y �° �' 5„ o e " °k N h '� ° o o h '� '--i Li o o °• by �'..o ° 'e E• s e c vFi =. r of A b a c C y n = z rTi rC °^ w C ❑� �°o' ^. -`°^�i o FS to 'ny •"ai pI O A S h o 1 ^ 9 14 w r '+'' o °z o o o S o z 0 3 0 3 • • fy y 1 O O O m W w W O O O �o �d�°5-xg� c�sb 0V> b"ryy0 R� .�, "Zryi ai O O y N% rt a D• n- O G. r O A C. ^O b0°O ^O C �. O iQ' ff 0 ' '+ vJ w .� 9' a ^n o 4 An T r r n 3 � o �• z � o 0 a � N r�J W 1 O d�a ° K "o Ci Y °z 0 °01 z ok � V H � ro °z 0 0 P d O zz 0 O O • � m 'mil F+ N C�O1 R 0 p., V/N \ V N o � O � 0 to C rp. O G W O N N �-�• �--• O O O O V• O O O O 'O O O O N N L. O o u, O O ll1 O E o o L. ° o5g n a a. o �•� S" S•y•°a 5 0.0 �'On S"o R cro � o � Q .,•,mmC) �, ten^ �n�n n �nr 5• � p• � P• �• ? 7• pCS., �• S � �• r^O� Et 0 0 °0 0 °0 °0 0 0 0 .v o 0 0 0 z 00030 03 �B�o o 0 n lid O 9 H �yy�y M tv tv T r J994 Ul _ I2 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. CITY COUNCIL/PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION Monday, July 11, 1994 AGENDA 1. Need for the revision of the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan in regards to Future Park Development. 2. Capital Improvement Project Expenditures (FY 1992 -93 to 1994 -95) 3. Recreation as an economic force in the community. Taylor Grant Chair Phil Glasgow Vice Chair Pete Compton _ Gale Demmer Virginia Herberts Bill Schonlau Jo Vandervort •l_ !! x-05 K'.• LaDonna Kienitz Director Nancy Beard Recreation Superintendent f/ General Services Department David E. Niederhaus Director Marcelino Lomeli Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent