HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-01-1994 - Agendai•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
• REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 1, 1994
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7 :00 P.M.
I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. City Manager - Overview of City Budget for 1994/95
4. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of February 1, 1994
5. Communications
II. INFORMATIONAL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
6. Park and Street Tree Division (Report Attached)
7. Recreation Division (Report Attached)
• 8. Recreation Program Committee - Commissioner Schonlau
9. Park and Open Space Committee - Commissioner Vandervort
10. Budget Committee - Commissioner Grant
11 . Tree Committee - Commissioner Herberts
12. -Oasis Liaison - Commissioner Demmer
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
IV. ACTION ITEMS
13. Arts Commission Proposal (Report Attached)
14. Bench Donations (Reports Attached)
15. Council Policy G -1, Retention or Removal of Park and
Parkway Trees
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
16. Review of Commission Goals (Report Attached)
17. Ford /Loral Development ('Report Attached)
• VI. EMERGENCY ITEMS
IVII. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT E EACH Item No. 3
Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission
•
- 0
o �y ��6 February 1, 1994
City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
it of
id
Tree
>n
:ion
in
Staff Present: LaDonna Kienitz, Community
Services Director
David E. Niederhaus, General
Services Director
Marcelino Lomeli, Park and
Tree Maintenance
Superintendent
Nancy Beard, Recreation
Superintendent
Dottie Flohr, Secretary
I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
Item #1 - Call to order
Call ti
Order
The meeting of the Parks, Beaches and
Recreation Commission was called to order at
7:00 P.M.
Item #2 - Roll Call
Roll Ci
Roll call was taken. Commissioners Compton,
Demmer, Glasgow, Grant, Herberts, Schonlau and
•
Vandervort were present.
Item #3 - Approval of Minutes - Meeting of
Approvi
January 4, 1994
Minute:
Director Niederhaus reported that under Item
#7, Capital Improvement Projects for 94/95
Fiscal Year, the date referring to the
submittal of the capital improvement projects
should be changed to December 28.
Motion
X
Commissioner Vandervort motioned the minutes
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
be approved as corrected. Unanimous.
II. INFORMATIONAL AND COMMITTEE REPORTS
Item #4 - Park and Street Tree Division
Park al
Street
Marcy Lomeli reported that West Coast
Divisil
Arborists are on schedule and have trimmed 655
trees in January, their first month of
service.
Item #5 - Recreation Division
Recrew
Divisic
In response to a question from Commissioner
Vandervort concerning the new Rollerhockey
Birthday Party Service, Nancy Beard explained
that a portable rink is set up and that
skates, safety equipment, birthday cake and
party favors are provided. The cost is $150
for two hours. There is a similar Gymnastics
Birthday Party package which is also very
popular.
Commissioner Glasgow reported he received a
letter from John Vargas, Water Polo Coach for
Corona del Mar High School, commending Ted
I
�
i
Bandaruk on the job he and his staff have done
it of
id
Tree
>n
:ion
in
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks. Beaches & Recreation commission
• o _ ��� February 1, 1994
° � Page 2
q�oh °s ns °o 0 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
r�
U
I
3
Recreation
Program
Committee
Park and Open
Space
Committee
Budget
Committee
Tree
Committee
Oasis
Liaison
.Dog Park
Recommenda-
tion
with the Newport Beach Swim Team.
Item #6 - Recreation Program Committee
Commissioner Schonlau reported the committee
met to discuss budget requests and endorsed
the following recommendations: (1) Playground
Equipment Replacement Fund - $55,000, which is
$20,000 higher than last year; (2) Athletic
Field Maintenance Fund - $40,000, which is the
same as last year; (3) Backflow Prevention
Program - $40,000, which is the same as last
year; and (4) Park Facility Improvement Fund -
$50,000, which is the same as last year. The
total is $185,000 compared to $165,000 last
year.
Item #7 - Park and Open Space Committee
No report,
Item #8 - Budget Committee
No report.
Item #9 - Tree Committee
Commissioner Herberts reported Marcy Lomeli,
John Conway and she visited 8 different sites
and agreed on all retention and replacement
decisions.
Commissioner Herberts invited the
Commissioners to view the excellent trimming
done on 4th Street. She stated the neighbors
are also impressed.
Item #10 - Oasis Liaison
Commissioner Demmer reported the membership of
the Friends of Oasis has increased to 5,143.
As of January 31, there is help for seniors on
their income tax preparation. In addition,
there is still discussion on an Adult Day
Health Care Center.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
IV. ACTION ITEMS
Item #11 - Dog Park Recommendation
Chair Grant reported that the site for a
proposed dog park was discussed at a previous
meeting and that the issue was postponed so
that further research could be done at
committee level.
Nancy Beard passed out an updated staff report
reviewed by the City Attorney based upon a
thorough review of the ground lease held by
the Newport Aquatic Center. Ms. Beard also
Recreation
Program
Committee
Park and Open
Space
Committee
Budget
Committee
Tree
Committee
Oasis
Liaison
.Dog Park
Recommenda-
tion
Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission
• y d�� February 1, 1994
o�6�r�o'cCOLn City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
passed out a letter which was received from
Kathleen Lehman in support of a dog park at
North Star Beach. In addition, she received a
call from Mrs. Henderson who is opposed to a
dog park at this location due to noise,
parking problems, etc.
Commissioner Compton, Chair of the Ad Hoc
Committee, explained that 3 months ago the
City Council asked this Commission to review
the feasibility of a dog park. The
Commission's Park and Open Space Committee .did
considerable research and determined there was
no suitable site. An Ad Hoc Committee was
then formed to further research this subject
and they recommended North Star Beach as the
only site currently available for a temporary
dog park. However, since the lease with the
Newport Aquatic Center has been reviewed, it
is now the recommendation of the Ad Hoc
Committee that the idea of a dog park should
be kept open but that there are too many
restrictions to the North Star Beach site.
Nancy Beard summarized the major points of the
.
recent report on the Newport Aquatic Center's
ground lease which was also made available to
the public. The ground lease has specific
language identifying the use of North Star
Beach for sports involving human powered
watercraft, therefore, a dog park would be
inconsistent use of this land. The use of the
Aquatic Center was voted upon and approved by
Newport Beach residents in June, 1982.
Furthermore, the Center is limited to 250
people per day and this would undoubtedly be
exceeded if a dog park were implemented. The
Newport Aquatic Center is also concerned about
the increased use of the public restroom which
they supply and maintain. Finally, should a
dog park be .proposed at this site, approvals
would be required by the Coastal Commission,
County of Orange and the Newport Aquatic
Center Board.
Commissioner Compton pointed out that both
committees feel a dog park is needed, however,
a proper site needs to be found and North Star
Beach would not be a suitable site based upon
the lease agreement. He recommended the
subcommittee remain active and review any
proposed acceptable sites.
Commissioner Compton pointed out that other
parcels, such as the one at MacArthur and
•
Jamboree and the Castaways, may become
available when The Irvine Company turns them
over to the City at a future date.
Commissioner Herberts noted that the land at
North Star Beach is one of the largest pieces
of property available and is sitting dormant.
i ` All
:� Ss•I ( . �,
6
Parks, BeGaches & Recreation Commission
• ti P 9�a February 1, 1994
o �0, Page 4
City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
She urged other uses be sought for public use
of this land.
In response to a question from Commissioner
Vandervort, Nancy Beard explained that 3.98
acres of the total it acres at North Star
Beach are leased to the Newport Aquatic
Center, which includes the proposed dog site
location. The entire area is designated
Tidelands and is owned jointly by the City
and the County of Orange.
Chair Grant opened the meeting to public
hearing.
Seth Oberg, President of the Dover Shores
Community Association, addressed the
Commission. Mr. Oberg stated he is not
opposed to dog parks, however, he opposes a
location at North Star Beach since it is in
the middle of a residential area and would
result in increased traffic, litter, noise and
odor. He also was concerned over possible
damage to the slopes and that there is no
formal organization responsible for the dog
.
park.
Mr. Oberg summarized historical concerns and
conditions of use, such as the size and uses
of the facility, landscape maintenance, clean
up, access to roads, etc.
Nora Seager, Director of the Newport Aquatic
Center, addressed the Commission and thanked
those involved for all the work they have
done. Ms. Seager emphasized the important and
cooperative relationship they have with the
Dover Shores Community, which they want to
continue. The Center's major concerns include
the mechanics of the lease, Conditional Use
Permit, and the impacts that a dog park would
have, such as extra Costs, road access, future
expansion and liability.
Commissioner Glasgow pointed out that the
Commission's committees thoroughly researched
all potential concerns and issues, and that
there would not be any additional costs to the
Center.
Joe Sanchez, 306 Narcissus, addressed the
Commission and stated he is disappointed to
learn that there may be no dog park at this
site, however, he understands the legalities
.
of the lease that have been raised. He stated
that when a dog park is considered that the
"not in my backyard" syndrome not be the
problem. Mr. Sanchez urged that the idea of a
dog park continue to be pursued since a large
portion of the community want one.
Jacquelyn Dillman, 1200 Polaris, addressed the
N
1
• j � rr'. r� 4
Parks. Beaches & Recreation Commission
• y February 1, 1994
CA
66 m Page 5
90 w�, 6�0-s bJ o
City Council Chambprs 7 p.m. INDEX
Communication,
Commission. Ms. Dillman stated she lives at
the - corner of North Star and Polaris, and that
a dog park at North Star Beach would impact
her family the most. Although she would like
a dog park, she does not want one in a
residential area.
Commissioner Herberts commented that she
observed dogs running loose in this area and
that there are more dog nuisances here than in
the Laguna Beach and Long Beach Dog Parks.
Ed Benson, 728 Westwind Way, addressed the
Commission. Mr. Benson stated that although
he is not opposed to a dog park, he is
concerned over whose legal responsibility it
would be. He recommended the Castaways site
where people already take their dogs.
Sean McGowan, 900 Sea Lane, addressed the
Commission and stated it was he who first
brought up the idea of a dog park. There are
many who have worked hard over the past six
months to find an appropriate site, however,
no identified location will be totally
•
unaffected.
Commissioner Compton thanked Mr. McGowan for
all the work he has done and pointed out that
Mr. McGowan has secured sponsors who will
donate their time and money towards signage,
fencing, water, costs, etc. He also noted the
large number of people who have indicated
their interest and are desirous of a dog park.
He suggested private land be pursued.
There being no further public testimony, Chair
Grant closed the meeting to public hearing.
Motion
X
Commissioner Compton motioned that this
Ayes
x
x
X
x
x
X
x
Commission transmit to the City Council that
North Star Beach is not a viable location for
a dog park; however, if a viable location can
be found, the subcommittee thinks a dog park
is a good idea. Unanimous.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Item #12 - Communications
Received and filed.
VI. SPECIAL. URGENT OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS
Chair Grant passed out the Commission's 94/95
•
Calendar and asked that any changes be
transmitted to Nancy Beard.
Commissioner Demmer inquired if the Harbor
View Nature Park should be added to the
Commission's facility inspections list. Chair
Grant requested the park be added.
Communication,
CITY ®F NEWPORT BEACH
Parks. Beaches & Recreation commission
ti w� February 1, 1994
Page 6
o> j o
City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
Commissioner Schonlau reported he received a
call concerning funding assistance in the
amount of $2,500 for the Newport Harbor High
School softball field. He advised the
requestor to first raise $1,500 from private
sources so that the request for public funding
would be reduced to $1,000.
Commissioner Vandervort reported two T- shirts
were donated to the California Park and
Recreation Society Conference booth, and that
she has two extra tickets to the conference
dinner on February 4.
Chair Grant reported the Commission's goals
will be reviewed at their March meeting.
Commissioner Grant stated Frank Robinson and
he discussed the Coastal Commission's
conditions of approval at North Star Beach and
he requested staff clarify the beach
improvements that were to coincide with the
development of the Newport Aquatic Center.
•
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission adjourned at
8:30 P.M. '
The agenda for this meeting was posted on
January 25, 1994 at 2000 P.M. outside the City
Hall Administration Building.
•
I
�
�
Item No.5
0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 15, 1994
TO: Ken Delino, Assistant'City Manager
FROM: LaDonna Kienitz, Conummity Services Director
RE. MARGUERITE AND 5TH AVENUE SITE
The site, referenced in the February 4, 1994 letter from Lee Johnson, forms an
integral part of the City's open space and the senior services. It serves as both a
passive park and as essential overflow parking for the full program of services
provided at the Oasis Senior Center. There has not been any consideration that
this was an excess City property which did not meet the need for which it was
intended.
• The site was purchased with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds. It is my understanding that if at any time in the future it is not needed for
City purposes, any money realized from the sale would have to be used for other
eligible activities.
I recommend that this site not be considered for sale to a private party at this time.
Attachments
cc: Kevin J. Murphy, City Manager
Taylor Grant, Chair, Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
Norma Gilchrist, President, Friends of Oasis
��5t-�z�_7**N
CASAPALMERA.
.........
February 4, 1994
�i
Mr. Kenneth J. Delino
Deputy City Manager
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
3300 Newport Boulevard
P. 0. Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658-8915
Be: NWC of 5th Avenue and Marguerite
Corona del Mar, California
Dear Mr. Delino:
X00
As a follow up to a conversation you recently had with
Howard Wells regarding the above referenced site, this
letter will confirm that I am interested in purchasing
the parcel for the express purpose of building and oper-
ating a 59 bed convalescent hospital.
I envision the project having a Spanish motif very similar
to Casa Palmera, the facility I built and currently operate
in Del Mar. Howard and /or John Pierce will show you pictures
and hopefully a similarly designed project would be pleasing
to the members of your community.
Howard mentioned that you may be interested in relocating
the parking for your Oasis Senior Center. Perhaps we could
structure a deal where I picked up all or a portion of
this in exchange for the property. It is my opinion that
the project would support a purchase price of $750,000.00
and if this meets your objective I will look forward to
meeting with you.
Thank you for your time and attention.
Sincerely yours,
• q LEE JOH N
LJ /chb
Enclosures
Casa Paimera Care Center
I Cill El Giminn Real. hol M.ir. CA 920bi (091 ill
f�
u A, d
Item No.6,
General Services Department
Park & Street Tree Divisions
February 1994 Progress Report
In addition to normal duties, the Parks Maintenance crews performed the
following activities in the month of February:
1. City Hall rose garden was renovated with new drip irrigation
and planted with seasonal color.
2. City Yard perimeter wall landscape was refurbished with new
shrub and groundcover plantings.
3. Geranium replanting of the footbridge on Goldenrod Avenue was
completed.
4. Dethatching of turf grass was completed at various parks in the
City.
5. Renovating of all City baseball infield areas was completed.
• 6. Park Division sheds were painted by a painting contractor at
the City Yard.
The following projects will be scheduled for the month of March:
1. Continue with City wide turfgrass dethatching program at
various City facilities
2. Install railroad ties with chain fencing at West Newport Park
per homeowners request.
3. Replacement planting at Cliff Drive Park will be completed.
The Tree Division activity report is as follows:
In February 711 trees were trimmed (597 by West Coast Arborists,
114 by City Staff), 60 trees planted, 23 trees were removed, 24
trees were root pruned, 79 work requests were completed and 46
individual responses to fallen limbs and trees due to a severe
storm Monday night February 7, 1994.
1.
Twenty three trees were
removed as detailed
below;
308
Heliotrope
Approved removal
by Tree Committee
915
Tiller Way
Approved removal
by Tree Committee
432
•
Avocado Avenue
Hazard and diseased,
1972 & 2028 Port Bristol
Approved removal
by Tree Committee
_.
• #8 Monterey Circle
#29 Goleta Point
Approved
Approved
removal
removal
by
by
Tree
Tree
Committee
Committee
2100 Coral Place
Dead
1101 White Sails Way
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
2801 Seaview Avenue
Dead
209 Dahlia Avenue
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
3615 Surfview Lane
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
2615 Buckeye Street
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
20 Point Loma Dr.
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
Newport Island Park
Dead
317 Poppy Avenue
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
2045 Shipway
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
528 Redlands Avenue
Dead
2328 Arbutus Street
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
2032 Port Bristol
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
1748 Port Manleigh Circle
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
230 Heliotrope
Dead
900 Celtis Place
Approved
removal
by
Tree
Committee
•
•
2. 60 Trees were planted at the following locations:
20 Drakes Bay Drive
2018 Centella Place
301 Orchid
411 Poinsettia
425 Fernleaf
3825 Birch Street
Anacapa & Farralon
1948 Port Bristol Circle
1960 Port Chelsea Place
1954 Port Lockleigh
1972, 2028, 2032 Port Bristol
1801 Port Barmouth Place
1701 Marlin Way
1524 Galaxy Drive
713 Poppy Avenue
301 Poppy Avenue
1748 Port Manleigh
311 Heliotrope
605, 611 Carnation
8 Rocky Point Road
29 Goleta Point
8 Monterey Circle
47 Cambria Drive
15 Rocky Point Road
Eastbluff Park
20 Point Loma
3615 Surfview
2615 Buckeye
209 Dahlia
1101 White Sails Way
317 Poppy Avenue
2801 Seaview
2045 Shipway Lane
3. The aforementioned 60 plantings will complet e
vacant sites of trees that were removed since July
replacement planting will be mode within 30 days
planting of all
1, 1993. Future
of removals.
0
Item No. 7
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 18, 1994
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Recreation Superintendent
RE. NORTH STAR BEACH
Additional time is needed for a full and complete staff report requested by the
Commission Chair on the North Star Beach improvements. The report will be
available for discussion at the April Commission meeting.
Item No. 7
• CONEUUI`IITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
RECREATION DIVISION
FEBRUARY, 1994 PROGRESS REPORT
Senior Services
The annual Oasis "Over 80's Birthday Party" took place last week with '100
guests, all over 80 years of age in attendance, and, yes, I.D. was required.
As part of the regular on -going monthly support programs, the Elder Care nurse
from the Orange County Health Department visited Oasis this month for scheduled
appointments with seniors for basic health screening and overall heath assessment.
The health insurance counseling and advocacy program counselor also met with
the seniors to provide Medicare assistance for those with Medicare or health
insurance problems. This program is part of the visiting Nurse Association
Foundation and is sponsored by the California Department of Aging.
Youth Services
. Staff facilitated an Institute at the California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and
Park Conference this past month, entitled "Hot Tips for a Cool Summer." ,Eighty
recreation professionals working with youth got a jump on their summer programs
with the assistance of experts in the fields of arts and crafts; sports, games and
nature projects. Boy, are we ready for summer!!!
The youth basketball program is nearing completion. The City championships are
scheduled for March 5 and 12.
The Special Olympics Basketball Tournament will be held at 9:00 A.M. on
Saturday, March 19, at the Corona del Mar Gymnasium. We'd love for you to
join us.
Revenue Programs
AA ug atics
The Newport Beach Aquatic Club has a winter roster of over 70 swimmers. The
NBAC President, Randy Parole, and the parent board were successful in gaining
entry into the South Coast Swim Conference. This summer, NBAC will be
• competing against swim teams such as Harbor View, Newport Hills, Pacific
Sands, Lake Forest, College Park, Greenbrook and Green Valley.
The United States National H2O Polo Team continued to use the Marian Bergeson
Aquatic Center pool for eight more practice dates in February.
The lap swim program currently has over 160 people registered with annual swim
passes. Benches were installed in each restroom and signs have been constructed
to help lap swimmers with directions and procedures.
Adult Sports
The winter softball program began January 31 and will hopefully be completed
May 6, weather permitting. 111 teams of brave men and women are slogging
through this unpredictable season.
We fielded another successful grass volleyball doubles tournament last month at
Mariners Park. Peninsula Park will host the March 19 tourney.
Classes
The winter quarter classes are in their final weeks. 1,950 participants signed up
• for many life enriching courses.
Despite the bad weather, our tennis program is doing very well. We have initiated
new maximums on the class sizes. We generally supported classes of 8
participants. We now hold many classes with just 4 students. The response is
very favorable.
0
The spring brochure is out. Registration begins March 4th and classes begin the
week of March 21st.
I A
0
u
OASIS SENIOR CENTER
JANUARY 1994
MONTHLY ACTIVITIES /UTILIZATION REPORT
CLASSES /GROUP
3427
LONG TRIPS
40
HUMAN SERVICES
287
Las Vegas
42
Royal Caribbean
Another Passage
18
Ensenda, Cataline
27
Blood Pressure
99
DAY TRIPS
Braille
125
Case Management
57
Rose Parade
22
Chair Exercise
56
Santa Anita
15
Counseling
30
TV Sitcom "Nurses"
38
Eldercare
3
Mission Inn
25
Employment
50
Whale Watching
22
Information /Rental
853
"Camelot"
20
Legal Assistance
12
Goodwill Industries
18
Life On Your Own
26
Medicare Assistance
2
Shared Housing
35
MEETINGS
Telephone Reassurance
357
Visual Screening
6
Board of Directors
20
Executive Committee
8
VOLUNTEER HOURS
3212
Long Range Planning
6
Human Services Comm.
10
Fund - raising
1'5
VAN TRANSPORTATION
Newsletter
18
Newsletter Collating
36
Care -A -Van
468
General Membership
87
Shuttle
389
SPECIAL EVENTS
Sunday Movies
60
Breakfast at OASIS
40
Pancake Breakfast
287
I�
NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY
856 San Clemente Drive • Newport Beach, CA 92660 •714 -644 -3177
FAX 714 - 644-5717
February 18, 1994
Ms. Phyllis Drayton, Chair
The Arts Commission
302 Kings Road
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Dear Phyllis and Members of The Arts Commission:
The Board of Library Trustees has asked me to thank you for researching a
possible site to which the Brett Price sculpture could 'be relocated and where
it can continue to be viewed and appreciated by the public.
As you are aware, the current library site reverts to the new owner, The
• Irvine Company, after the library relocates. And unfortunately the new
library site at 1000 Avocado Avenue cannot accommodate the work.
•
If the relocation is approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission and the City Council, the Library staff will work with the
appropriate City staff to effect the transfer.
Cordially yours,
LaDonna T. Kienitz
Community Services Director / City Librarian
cc: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
•
0
Item No. 13
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 18, 1994
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Recreation Superintendent
RE. ARTS COMMISSION REQUEST
The Commission is being requested to approve the relocation of one of the City's
Art in Public Places pieces.
The City's Arts Commission would like to relocate the Brett Price sculpture
currently located outside the City's Central Library to the corner of Superior and
Pacific Coast Highway within the turf area of the parking lot. This area is most
commonly known as Cal Trans East (picture attached).
The art piece must be relocated when the current Central Library moves to the new
site. The new Central Library has no appropriate location for the sculpture.
The Arts Commission reviewed many possible locations for the sculpture. They
have found, and staff concurs, that the proposed location is an excellent site. The
Planning Department was consulted as the site is in a coastal zone and anticipates
no problems in the location. The Building Department has assured staff that no
permits will be required and have offered their services if a new footing for the
sculpture must be designed.
Coordination must be secured with the General Services Department as the present
site will need to be abandoned, the sculpture transported and set into place.
A visit to t he site will greatly assist you in making this recommendation.
Iv
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
January 19, 1994
Taylor Grant, Chair
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport-Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Dear Taylor:
�3
During a meeting of the Arts Commission Thursday, January 1.3, 1994,
the Arts Commissioners unanimously voted to request that the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission approve relocation of the Brett
• Price sculpture currently located at the main library to a park
location.
The proposed site for th'e sculpture is in the park area surrounded
by the public parking lot at the corner of Pacific Coast Highway
and Superior Road. this is the end of the Hoag linear park.
Commissioner Anderson met with the artist, Brett Price, who
indicated that he would be pleased with the proposed location. The
artist sketched a design of a concrete base and pedestal that would
provide seating and position the sculpture at a height that cannot
be accessed by children for future consideration.
Again, our request is your approval of. the use of this location for
the display of the city's art piece. The relocation of the piece
may be completed by city torces who installed the piece in its
current location. In addition, we hope for future consideration of
the seating design when budgeting may permit.
Nancy Beard will work with this Commission on this project and is
available to you for questions.
Sincerely,
• Phyllis Drayton, Chair
Arts Commission
Arts Commission
1 3300 Newport Blvd. - P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach. Californi5 92658-8915
'7I1 1�II 3 1 ,,
J
I �:d
N�N
zf
Y�
v
�I
i
Item #14
• GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 16, 1994
TO: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
FROM: General Service Director
SUBJECT: BENCH DONATION
ACTION:
To accept recommendation of Park & Tree Superintendent of
acceptance of one bench donation from Mr. Bill Coley.
DISCUSSION:
• Staff has received correspondence from Mr. John Rapillo who
represents the Coley family for donation of one bench. Staff will
purchase the bench from donation and place in �'L" Street Park.
Donor will provide plaque per City policy and staff will install
the plaque on the bench.
L J
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
BHSK &R LAW OFFICES TEL No.714- 675 -4087 Feb 16,94 10:05 No.002 P.01
.eater 00I&W C/
• 13L�r.TUN, UALLORAN, :SCHWART-Z, KUZhLKA & RAL'IL].o
RCrOCRT L. NALLORAN, INC.
ROOCR'i I. 6CIIWARIC„ INC.
TIMCITIIY C. KV>CLKA, INC.
,1OHN MAP,,,,, INC.
MARVIN O. OVRTON
Or CC,VNSeL
February 16, 1994
Marcelino Lomeli
Park and Tree Superintendent
General Services Dept,
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768
Dear Mr. Lomeli,
3=+Y 6AYSInC OR,,,
NEwrORT BeACII, CALIFORNIA 020OC -7206
17111 O75 -%*O1
FAX 17111 6Y0-4087 •—
Thank you for speaking with me on February 15, 1994.
As I indicated, the Coley family is requesting the donation of one
new park bench at L Street park in Balboa, California, The bench
is to be donated in the memory of Annie'Coley, a long time Balboa
• resident who recently passed away.
•
It is our understanding that the amount of the bench is $240.00 for
Purchase and installation. The family has agreed to pay this
amount. Further, the family will provide and pay for a two inch by
six inch plaque with conforming inscription.
Thank you, Mr. Lomeli, for your extreme courtesy and cooperation.
It is my understanding you will submit this matter and contact me
at the earliest possible time:
sincerely,
JOHN RAPILLO
JR:lb
cc: Bill Coley
500 S.8, 21st Avenue, #502
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441
M'
i
Marcelino Lomeli
Park and Tree Superintendent
General Services Dept.
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768
Dear Mr. Lomeli,
Thank you for speaking with me on February 15, 1994.
As I indicated, the Coley family is requesting the donation of one
new park bench at L Street Park in Balboa, California. The bench
is to be donated in the memory of Annie Coley, a long time Balboa
• resident who recently passed away.
It is our understanding that the amount of the bench is $240.00 for
purchase and installation. The family has agreed to pay this
amount. Further, the family will provide and pay for a two inch by
six inch plaque with conforming inscription.
Thank you, Mr. Lomeli, for your extreme courtesy and cooperation.
It is my understanding you will submit this matter and contact me
at the earliest possible time.
ncerely,
c
rOHN RAPILL0
JR:lb
cc: Bill Coley
500 S.E. 21st Avenue, ##502
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441
C�
-&awG
0/
•
BURTON,
HALLORAN, SCHWARTZ,
KUZELKA & RAPILLO
ROBERT L. HALLORAN, INC.
333 SAYSIDE DRIVE
ROBERT 1. SCHWARTZ, INC
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92 6 6 0 -72 9 0
TIMOTHY C. KUZELKA, INC
(714) 675 -9501
JOHN RAPILLO, INC.
MARVIN O. BURTON
FAX (714) 675 -4067
OF COUNSEL
February 16,
1994
Marcelino Lomeli
Park and Tree Superintendent
General Services Dept.
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768
Dear Mr. Lomeli,
Thank you for speaking with me on February 15, 1994.
As I indicated, the Coley family is requesting the donation of one
new park bench at L Street Park in Balboa, California. The bench
is to be donated in the memory of Annie Coley, a long time Balboa
• resident who recently passed away.
It is our understanding that the amount of the bench is $240.00 for
purchase and installation. The family has agreed to pay this
amount. Further, the family will provide and pay for a two inch by
six inch plaque with conforming inscription.
Thank you, Mr. Lomeli, for your extreme courtesy and cooperation.
It is my understanding you will submit this matter and contact me
at the earliest possible time.
ncerely,
c
rOHN RAPILL0
JR:lb
cc: Bill Coley
500 S.E. 21st Avenue, ##502
Deerfield Beach, Florida 33441
C�
• GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
•
DATE: February 16, 1994
TO: Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
FROM: General Service Director
SUBJECT: BENCH DONATION
ACTION:
To accept recommendation of Park & Tree Superintendent of
acceptance of one bench donation from Mr. & Mrs. Manning Green.
DISCUSSION:
Staff has received correspondence from
Green for donation of one bench. Staff will
from donation and place along Ocean Boulevard
Donor will provide plaque per City policy and
the plaque on the bench.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
Mr. & Mrs. Manning
purchase the bench
in Corona del Mar.
'staff will install
n
U
February 15, 1994
Marcelino G. Lomeli
Park & Tree Superintendent
General Services Department
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, Ca. 92658 -8915
Dear Mr. Lomeli:
We are donating $240.00 for the purchase by the City of one
park bench to be located on the bluffs at the beach in Corona del
Mar.
•Additionally we would provide a 2" X 6" plaque to be installed
on the bench.
r�
U
We look forward to hearing from you.
al)--�
Sincerely, p�
XiCt�
Manning Green
2900 Park Newport
Apt. 230
Newport Beach, Ca., 92660
r11
r
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PARK AND STREET TREE DIVISIONS
P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915
(714) 644 -3162
February 15, 1994
Mr. & Mrs. Manning Green
2900 Park Newport
Apt. 230
Newport Beach, Ca., 92660
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Green:
Thank you for your inquiry into a park bench donation. A park
bench would cost $240.00 and the donation must be approved by the
City's Park, Beaches & Recreation Commission.
• Additionally, per attached policy you may provide a plaque at
the time of the bench donation.
E
Please contact me if I may be of any further assistance.
Park & Tree Superintendent
3300 Newport' Boulevard, Newport Beach
FA
LJ
•
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Discussion:
Item No. 15
Agenda Item No.
March 8,1994
Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Commission
General Services Director
Council Policy
During August 1993, the City Manager and Department Directors began a
comprehensive review of the Council Policy Manual. One of the policies under
review was Policy I -9 (Retention or Removal of Park and Parkway Trees).
Staff amended the orignal Policy as noted by Attachment 1 and added a Tree
Hazard Evaluation form.
On September 7,1993, the Commission approved 3 recommendations for change
as noted by Attachment 2. These changes were made and the policy was
submitted to the City Manager.
During the restructuring of the Policy Manual, Policy I -9 was.redesignated Policy
G -1 to signify a General Services Department administered policy.
On December 13, 1993, the new -Policy G -1 was submitted for Council review.
Councilperson Hedges recommended the deletion of the word "extreme" in the
phrase "special trees of xtreme beauty" and Councilperson Hart recommended
rewording of paragraph 5 of page 1. Because of these changes, Policy G -1 was
returned to the Commission for further review.
At the January 4, 1994 Commission meeting, the two Council recommended
changes were approved or modified (see Attachment 3) and six additional
locations were added to the Preservation of Special Trees list.
Subsequently, Commissioner Herberts correctly noted 'that there was an
amendment to paragraph 1, page 2 that had not been previously approved by the
Commission. Attachment 4 is the G -1 Policy as amended by the Commission on
September 7, 1993 and January 4, 1994. Staff has no objection to further deleting
the second sentence of paragraph 1 of page 2. (See area highlighted with *)
0 Recommendation:
Approve Council Policy G -1 as amended by the Commission on January 4, 1993
and with deletion of the second sentence of paragraph 1 of page 2.
Respectfully submitted,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /es
Attachments 1 -4
LJ
I -9
RETENTION OR REMOVAL OF PARK AND PARKWAY TREES
It shall be the responsibility of the Parks, •Beaches and Recreation Commission
to develop and maintain a rather restricted list of trees in the community
• (attaehed) (Attachment 1) vahich should be retained to the exclusion of all
normal problems. T is ist will contain landmark trees, special trees of
extreme beauty, stately trees which contribute to an entire neighborhood,
dedicated trees, etc. These .trees will be identified, mapped and recorded.
Subsequent to this they will be given all- types -e€ special treatment to
retain them, 4Relud4ng- the - use -of- asphalt- s4dewalks ;- real4gRed- eurb4ng, -ete-
•
Whenever it is necessary to prune tree roots in parkways or other public
areas in order to correct or prevent damage being caused by the subject
tree, every reasonable effort shall be made to save the tree$ inelud4ng -the
use - a € -h4gh- grade - asphalt - s4dewa4k- seet4eRs. It will still be necessary to
meet the City's standards relative to grades and alighments, with the ex-
ception of those special trees discussed in Paragraph 1 of this policy statement.
If it is necessary for a tree other than that included in Paragraph 1 to be
given special treatment, each tree shall be considered individually on its
own merits to determine whether the tree should be retained or replaced.
All parkway trees included in this category must be subjected to and meet
the following criteria:
Have- su € €4e4ent -rest- system- te- susta4n -l4 €e- and - remain- in- a -sa €e
eenditien -after- Peet- prun4Rg; Have a tree hazard evaluation
Performed bv'the Ci.tv arborist. fattanhmpnt
2. Have- su€€ 4e4ent- l4fe- expeetaRey- te- mer4t- speeial- eensiderat4eR;
Have adjacent property owners be desirous of retaining the tree iR
if special treatment is necessar. to retain it. l4ght- e€„rpatehy
sidewalk - a € €eet ='- at-weuld-be- created - Rest- te- the4r- hemes -4 €-
asphalt - sidewalk -4s- to -be- used -te- save - the -tree;
4. Net -be- a €- aR- uRdes4xable- spee4es- that - has - been- remeved- €rem -the
e € €4e4a4- street - tree - lost -by- the - Parks; - Beaehes- and- Reereat4en
Gemm4ss4en;
3. Not have had a consistent history of damaging ut4l4Ues items such as
sewers, water mains,Aetc. as indicated per City records.
4. Not interfere with acceptable drainage if alternate methods of
curb repair are utilized.
Application of the criteria on parkway trees will be conducted by the
Parks; - Beaches- and- Reerea"eR General Services Department in coordination with
the Parks, Beaches and'Recreation Commission. In applying the criteria, other
departments of the City will be consulted as necessary. If there is any
conflict between the application of the criteria and established standards
of the City which cannot .be resolved at staff and Commission level, final
resolution will be determined by the City Council.
E,
Attachment 1.
E
•
I -9
RETENTION OR REMOVAL OF PARKWAY AND PARKWAY TREES - Palge 2
The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission is required to establish a
standing Street Tree Committee to assist the Commission in developing a
community awareness program and provide input to the total street tree
program. Objectives of this Street Tree Committee will be:
ohtaiA
o
1. To �� rw vide representation for each situatio as it arises in a
community and /or neighborhood,
2. To develep- 4nnevat4ve recommend practical techniques that will enable
trees to be saved when eenerete- 4s- removed- and -rep laeed improvements
are performed around them.
3. To provide recommendations to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission when tree removal requests are reee$ved denied by the
City'arborist'and appealed to the full Commission.
4. To inform the public and further the philosophy of the value of
trees in a community.
5. To pursue procedures whereby larger replacement trees can be used
when trees are removed.
6. To assure that no community has a mass removal effect as projects
occur.
7. Annually review landmark tree locations for inclusion in Council
Policy I -9.
When a tree is removed from the parkway for the sole benefit of the
adjacent property owner, the property owner will be responsible for the
cost of removal. Removal must still be done in accordance with City
approvals.
Note: ( See Attached List - Preservation of Special Trees)
('See Attached - Tree Hazard Evaluation Form)
Adopted - May 9, 1966
Amended - August 14, 1967
Amended - November 9, 1976
Amended - November 12, 1985
Amended - November 28, 1988
11
Attachment 1.
0
(Attachment 1)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PRESERVATION OF SPECIAL TREES
Location Species
LANDMARK Balboa Library
TREES Balboa Library
West Jetty (near Historical
Marker)
Dover Drive at Westcliff
400 block Poinsettia
Ocean Blvd. Corona del Mar
Westcliff & Dover (Groves)
In Arches Overpass
DEDICATED No. Mariners Park
TREES (Marcie Schrouder)
Mariners Park
(Frank Tallman)
No. City Hall grounds
(Bill Covert)
City Hall grounds
(Walter Knott)
City Hall grounds
(Calif. Bicentennial)
Las Arenas Park
(Ed Healy)
Mariners Park
(Isy Pease)
City Hall grounds
I -9
Eucalyptus globulus
Phoenix canariensis
Phoenix canariensis
Liquidambar styraciflua
Eucalyptus corynocalyx
Phoenix canariensis
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus lehmannii
Pinus radiata
Pinus radiata
Ficus benjamina
Pinus halepensis
Pinus halepensis
Melaleuca linarifolia
Pinus halepensis
(U.S. Bicentennial Freedom Tree) Harpephyllum caffrum
NEIGHBOR- Parkway in Shorecliffs
HOOD
Marguerite Avenue
TREES
Goldenrod Avenue
Dover Dr. (Mariners to Irvine)
15th Street (Newport Heights)
Irvine Avenue traffic island
Holiday between Irvine & Tustin
Surrounding Old Reservoir
Along Avon Avenue
Via Lido bridge
Marine Avenue (Balboa Island)
Seaview Avenue (Corona del Mar)
Poppy Avenue (Corona del Mar)
Heliotrope Avenue (Corona del Mar)
Candlestick Lane, etc. (Dover
Shores)
Adopted
- May 9, 1966
Amended
- November 9, 1976
Amended
- November 28, 1988
N
- Erythrina caffra
Phoenix canariensis
Washingtonia robusta
Eucalyptus globulus
'Eucalyptus cladocalyx
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus varieties
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus rudis
Pinus radiata
Eucalyptus rudis
Pinus radiata
Eucalyptus citriodora
Attachment 1.
A Photographic Guide to the Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas
TREE HAZARD EVALUATION FORM
10 /Address:
Map /Location:
Owner public _ private ___ unknown _.. other
Dale: Inspector:
Dale of last inspection
TREE CHARACTERISTICS
HAZARD RATING:
Failure + Size + Target Hazard
Potential of part Rating Rating
Immediate action needed
_ Needs further inspection
_ Dead tree
Tree N: Species:
DBH: If of trunks: Height: Spread;
Form: 0 generally symmetric Ominorasymmetry []major asymmetry ❑slumpsprout Ostag- headed
Crownclass: Udominant Uco- clommant Llintermediate 'Usuppressed,
Live crown ratio: % Age class: O young O mature O over - mature
Pruning hislcry: O crown cleaned ❑ excessively thinned C] tapped ❑ crown raised ❑ pollarded O crown reduced O none
Special Value: U specimen U heritage /historic U wildlife O unusual O street tree ❑ screen ❑ shade ❑ indigenous ❑ other
TREE HEALTH
Foliage color: O normal O chlorotic O necrotic Epicormics? Y N
10 gedensity: O normal ❑ sparse Leal size: O normal O small
a
Cual shoot growth: 0 excellent ❑ average ❑ poor Twig Dieback? Y N
Callus development: [] excellent CJaverage f-1 poor O none
Vigorclass: ❑ excelleht CJaverage ❑fair 0poor
Major pests /diseases:
SITE CONDITIONS
891
Site Character: I d residence
I -I commercial
r1 industrial
I —I park
n open space t7l natural C 1
Landscape type: O parkway
❑ raised bed
❑ container
O open
❑
Irrigation: Unone I-ladequate
Uinadequale
Uexcessive Utrunkwetted
%driplinepaved:
0%
10 -25%
25.50%
50 -75% 75.100% Lifted? Y N
%driplinew /fill soil:.
0%
10 -25%
25.50%
50.75% 75 -100%
%dripiine grade lowered:
0%
10.25%
25 -50%
50 -75% 75.100%
Soil problems: O drainage r-] shallow O compacted U droughty O saline O alkaline O acidic O small volume ❑ disease center ❑ history of fail
Obstructions: O lights ❑ signage O line -of -sight O view ❑ overhead lines O underground utilities O traffic ❑ adjacent veg O
Wind (Iree position): O single tree O below canopy O above canopy O recently exposed ❑ whidward, canopy edge O area prone to wine throw
TARGET
Use Under Tree: D building O parking 'O tralfic [ U pedestrian ❑ recreation O landscape 0 hardscape O small features
•r target be moved? Y N
Occupancy: C] occasional use 0 medium, intermittent use ❑ frequent use
The International Society of Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendalions derived from use of this form.
AAttachment 1.
i"
TREE DEFECTS
Rate defect severity: S severe detect, high potentialdor failure
M defect of moderate severity
L defect of low severity
LEAN: deg. from vertical ❑ natural ❑ unnatural Soil heaving: Y N
Decay in plane of lean: Y N Roots exposed: Y N Soil cracking: Y N
Compounding factors:
ROOT DEFECTS:
Suspect root rot: Y N Mushroom /conk present: Y N ID: .
Exposed roots: S M L Undermined: S M L
Root pruned: it from trunk Root area affected:
Restricted root area: S M L Potential for root failure: S M L
CROWN DEFECTS:
Lean severity: S M L
% Buttress wounded: Y N When:
DEFECT
Poor taper
ROOT CROWN
TRUNK
SCAFFOLDS
BRANCHES
Codominanls /forks
Multi le attachments
Included bark
Excessive end weight
Cracks/Splits
Hangers
Girdling
-
ounds
ca
avil
Conks /Mushrooms
—
Bleeding
Loose /cracked bark
Nesting hole /bee hive
Deadwood /stubs _
Burers/le unites /aats
Cankers/ alts
Previous failure
HAZARD RATING
Part most likely to fail:
Failure Potential: 1 2 3 Size of Part: 1 2 3 Target: 1 2 3 Hazard Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
HAZARD ABATEMENT
Prune: CJ remove defective part ❑ reduce end weight ❑ crown clean ❑ thin ❑ raise canopy ❑ crown reduce ❑ restructure ❑ shape
Cable/Brace: _ Inspect further: ❑ root crown ❑ decay ❑ aerial ❑ monitor
Remove tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move target: Y N Other:
Effect on adjacent trees: ❑ none ❑ evaluate
COMMENTS
0.
Attachment 1.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches 8 Recreation commission
s
Page 10i
City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDDC
0
Bob Patterson, 615 Larkspur, addressed the
Commission. He urged this site not be chosen
due to the close proximity of children at the
'
school and Youth Center, and that safety
factors due to increased traffic would also
negate the site.
Chair Grant pointed out that if dog owners
abuse the situation, which he doubted, the dog
park would close.
Chris Crosson, 610 Newport Center Drive,
addressed the Commission. Mr. Crosson stated
he is a Doggie Walk Park supplier and
presented an odorless neutralized bag used to
pick up dog nuisances. He reported Balboa
Island has installed six of his machines and
usage is high during this 3 month trial
period. He stated the Laguna Beach Dog Park
is very successful and recommended a larger
area be pursued with ample parking and
restrooms.
Commissioner Vandervort recommended the matter
be referred to committee in order to develop
criteria before selecting appropriate sites.
Motion
x
Commissioner Demmer motioned to have a non-
Ayes
X
X
binding straw vote to not recommend the area
Nays
X
X
X
X
X
behind•CYC for a dog park. Motion fails.
Motion
Commissioner Compton motioned to send the
X
matter to the Park and open Space Committee
and that they report back within 3 months with
a recommendation on the concept of a dog park
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
and a possible location. Unanimous.
Item #16 - Final Approval of the Recreation
Final
Mission Statement
Approval 01
the Recrea-
Commissioner Glasgow recommended the second
tion Missic
and third sentences be deleted and added to
Goals and objectives.
Statement
Nancy Beard explained that the statement is
specific as to staff's mission and how it is
carried out. She would, however, not be
opposed to deleting the two sentences.
Motion
X
Commissioner Demmer moved to approve and adopt
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
the Recreation Mission Statement. Motion
Nay
X
passes.
Director Whitley introduced LaDonna Kienitz,
who will 'become the Director of Community
.
\
Services on January 1, 1994.
Item 017 - City Council Policies Review
City Counci
3 ,
Policies
Director Whitle y reported that those policies
Re vie
which reflect no change will be reworded when
referencing the appropriate Director and /or
'
CITY ®F N C�RI" 6EACH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation commission
s d,
Page 11 S'S'T 7- q 3
City Council Chambers 7 p.m. IMDC
Department.
Director Niederhaus reported each Director has
been assigned policies for review and that the
City Manager's goal is to have all those that
will be rewritten addressed by the City
Council in October.
LaDonna Kienitz reported that Council Policy
I -5, Use, Priorities and Fees for Facilities
and Equipment, is being reviewed by the City
Attorney's office. All Community Services
policies will be in the I- series.
Director Whitley reviewed the policies
assigned to him as submitted in Item #17(a).
Following discussion, Commissioner Vandervort
Motion
X
moved the policies as submitted in 017(a) be
approved and that should I -4, Cost - Sharing on
Undeveloped Land, be deleted that the
Commission would review the developer
agreements which incorporate this policy.
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Unanimous.
•
Director Niederhaus reviewed the proposed
changes for those policies assigned to him as
submitted in Item #17(b). The Commission made
the following changes:
Policy I -9, Retention or Removal of Park and
Parkway Trees, page 1, first paragraph, add
"If said special treatment is not determined
to be adequate to retain the identified tree,
a full report shall be made to the Commission
before any other action is taken."
Retain Item #2.
Reword Item #4 for a more positive approach.
Page 2, Item #2 - Reword to state... "recommend
innovative and practical techniques..."
Policy I -12, Preservation of Views, Delete
Item #2.
Item 02 (new) - Add to the last
sentence... "unless deemed necessary by the
General Services Director. Exceptions to this
will be referred to the Parks, Beaches and
. Recreation Commission."
n
Policy I -15, Park Improvement Donations,
•
\
Delete the underlined second sentence.
Policy I -19, Maintenance and Planting of
Parkway Trees.
/
V
Under Maintenance of Parkway Trees, second
sentence, add... "on a less than a three year
cycle. "...
�
Attarhmant
�_
• CITY OF NEWPORT REACH
Parks, Beaches 8 Recreation commission
,P a;
o ci � `l$ Page 12
q 03 ws -s � 4f o
City Council Chambers 7 p. ;m. INDEX
w
Motion
Ayes
•
Motion
Ayes
�7
Basic Assess
ment of the
Street Trees
Maintenance
Division
Commission
Stuff Report
:nt 2.
;K
Under Tree List, delete California Pepper.
Under Established Parkways, Item #2, reword
the sentence to state "Applicant must accept
responsibility for watering and fertilizing
new trees" and move to above the newly added
paragraph beginning "If you have any
questions..."
Policy I -22, Naming of City Parks
Add Item 2(e) to state "Common names already
used in the area."
X
Commissioner Compton moved to accept the I
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Policies submitted in Item #17(b) as
corrected. Unanimous.
Item #18 - Basic Assessment of the Street
Trees Maintenance ,Division of the General
Services Department
Item #18 was addressed under Item #5.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Item #19 - Commission Staff Report
Director Whitley explained that the report
submitted defines the Commission and staff
roles which will be implemented January 1,
1994.
X
Chair Grant motioned to postpone the report to
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
the October 5, 1993 meeting for further
review. Unanimous.
VI. SPECIAL. URGENT OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commissioh adjourned„at
11:07 P.M.
The agenda for this meeting was posted on
August 31, 1993 at 11:00 A.M. outside the City
Hall Administration Building.
\
/
1
ottie�Firo Secretary
!
Attachm
Basic Assess
ment of the
Street Trees
Maintenance
Division
Commission
Stuff Report
:nt 2.
;K
CITY OF
Parks, Beaches
NEWPORT BEACH
& Recreation commission
Page 7 ]j„� \3 -C13
nit.v Cnuncil Chambers 7 p.m. IrDDC
/G
Y
I
%J
U'
August. At the December 21 Study Session the
City Council requested Policies G -1 and I -9 be
reviewed by this Commission. Director
Niederhaus explained that the G series is a
new designation for the General Services
policies.
CL
Director Niederhaus reviewed and answered
questions on the proposed modifications
F�9 dp
suggested for each policy.
4
Director Kienitz also pointed out that the I
series is assigned to Community Services and,
�t
therefore, encompasses not only Recreation,
but also the Library and Arts Commission
policies. Policies can also'be reviewed after
they are drafted.
Following discussion, the Commission made
their recommendations on the paragraphs
presented for review as follows:
RE. G -1
"This list will contain landmark trees,
op
special trees of beauty, stately trees which
contribute to an, entire neighborhood,
dedicated trees, etc."
"5. Not have a consistent history of damaging
items sach as City sewers, water mains,
sidewalks, curbs, walls, fences, foundations,
etc., as indicated per City records."
Attachment 1 - Neighborhood Trees
Add the following: 40
op
"Candlestick Lane etc. (Ba'ycrest) Eucalyptus
citriodora
Commodore
Eucalyptus citriodora
Starlight
Eucalyptus citriodora
Glenwood
Eucalyptus citriodora
Candlestick Eucalyptus
citriodora
Sandlewood Eucalyptus
citriodora"
RE. I -9
Delete Item 3 since a similar statement is
part of Policy G -5, Park improvement
Donations.
"4. Prior to the dedication or naming of a
n
park or public recreational facility for a
(o/
deceased person(s), there should be a passage
of six montho from death before the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission acts upon
Attackuttent
3.
/G
Y
I
11 1
s
Parks. Beaches Recreation Commission
J, d
Page 8
City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
r
the request and makes a recommendation to the
City council."
Concerning a request for a new policy
encouraging contributions from new
individuals, the Commission determined that
this issue is also covered in Policy 6-5.
Motion
X
Commissioner Compton motioned to accept the
recommendations as corrected and transmit them
to the City Council as this Commission's
recommendations for new City policies.
Ayes
X
x
X
X
X
x
X
Unanimous.
Commissioner Herberta brought to the attentJ
of the Commission that Page 2 of Policy
had changes made by staff that were
reviewed by the Commission. The Commissthen
It
determined that due to their concerns
Policy G -1, they would like to review it ag
at their next meeting.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Item .. #17 - Capital Improvement Projects for
Capita
94/95 Fiscal Year
Improv t
Projects fc
Nancy Beard reported these items are for the
94/95 FY
Commission's information and review.
Director Niederhaus reported that a list of
parks and recreation areas and capital•
improvement projects was submitted to the
Public Works Department on December 28.
Although the City Manager requested a
preliminary list be turned in by December 31,
the review and approval process is not
complete and additional projects can by
submitted.
During discussion Chair Grant voiced his
concern that procedures were not followed as
in the past whereby the Commission has
submitted their prioritized list for review
with staff.
Director Niederhaus explained that this is a
starting point and that he would like the
/
Commission's input in order to generate an
updated list for the Commission's February
meeting. The budget is due February 18 and
3
there is still work to be researched on cost
estimates, etc.
Chair Grant suggested the Commissioners
provide their recommendations to the Directors
by January 17. He also requested Nancy Beard
provide last year's list.
Director Kienitz suggested the budget process
begins in August or September so that there is
ample time for private surveys. Nancy Beard
I
r
..
•
G -1
RETENTION OR REMOVAL OF PARK AND PARKWAY TREES
It shall be the responsibility of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation•Commission to
develop and maintain a rather restricted list of trees in the community (attacked
(Attachment 1) which should be retained to the exclusion of all normal problems.
This list will contain landmark trees, special trees of eat beauty, stately trees
which contribute to an entire neighborhood, dedicated trees, etc. These trees will
be identified, mapped and recorded. Subsequent to this they will be given all
types of special treatment to retain them, inelu ing the use of asphalt a't side eE
ken.
Whenever it is necessary to prune tree ,roots in parkways or other public areas in
order to correct or prevent damage being caused by the subject tree, every
reasonable effort shall be made to save the tree. i
..sp =.a== s=eivalk seeo =- . It will still be necessary to meet the City's standards
relative to grades and alignments, with the exception of those special trees
• discussed in Paragraph 1 of this policy statement.
If it is necessary for a tree other than that included in Paragraph 1 to be given
special treatment, each tree shall be considered individually on its own merits to
determine whether the tree should be retained or replaced. all parkway trees
included in this category must be subjected to and meet the following criteria:
1. Have s ffieient feet syst. to sustain life A femain in a F
^d°t'^^ after =va Fe t Have a tree hazard
s -_ evaluation
performed by the City arborist (Attachment 2)_
2. Have sufficient life expectancy to merit special consideration,
3. Have adjacent property owners be desirous of retaining the tree in
light of "patchy si Fiei. alk eff t" that wetild be ereated next to ther
..:dewa::, is to be used } save the trees,- if special
treatment is necessary to retain it.
4. Be of a desirable species, on Not be of an undesirable speeies that
has been removed frern the official street tree list by the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission,
5. Not have had a consistent history of damaging utilities items such
as sewers, water mains, sidewalks, curbs, walls, fences,
• foundations, etc. as indicated p r City records.
�Y
Attachment 4
6. Not interfere with acceptable drainage if alternate methods of curb
repair are utilized.
Application of the criteria on parkway trees will be conducted by the Parks,
Bear -hes and eereation General Services Department in coordination with the
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. In applying the criteria; other
departments of the City will be consulted as necessary. If there is any conflict
between the application of the criteria and established standards of the City
which cannot be resolved at staff and Commission level, final resolution will be
determined by the City Council.
The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission is required to establish a
standing Street Tree Committee to assist the Commission in developing a
community awareness program and provide input to the total street tree
program. Objectives of this Street Tree Committee will be:
1. To obtain/12rovide representation for each situation as it arises in a
community and /or neighborhood. However. the Committee
removal.
• 2. To develop^ vt recommend innovative and practical
techniques that will enable trees to be saved when ear =«rete is
eed improvements are performed around them.
3. To provide recommendations to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission when tree removal requests are receiv d denied by the
City arborist and appealed to the full Commission.
4. To inform the public and further the philosophy of the value of
trees in a community.
5. To pursue procedures whereby larger replacement trees can be
used when trees are removed.
6. To assure that no community has a mass removal effect as projects
occur.
7. Annually review landmark tree locations for inclusion in Council
Policy G1.
When a tree is removed from the parkway for the sole benefit of the adjacent
property owner, the property owner will be responsible for the cost of removal.
Removal must still be done in accordance with City approval.
3 1 Attachment 4
0
P xr —V _ o" .a t a .rn.
Note: (See Attached List - Preservation of Special Trees)
(See Attached - Tree Hazard Evaluation Form)
Adopted 9/9/66
Amended 8/14/67
Amended 11/9/76
Amended 11/12/85
Amended 11/28/88
Amended 10/93
Formerly I -9
Attachment 4
•
•
.. ..... • - ...rn �.., n .. !'! rf" . • �'+nn.w.n �..d +.n ru+. �.+ rn�fPRGR2nnn .ttny.nCn�h.�+rtig4p.Jromnn wF,n. ..rP.� . • non.
(Attachment 1)
CITY OF'NEWPORT BEACH
PRESERVATION OF SPECIAL TREE
G -1
Location
Species
LANDMARK 'Balboa Library
Eucalyptus globulus
TREES Balboa Library
Phoenix canariensis
West Jetty (near Historical Marker)
Phoenix canariensis
Dover Drive at Westcliff
Liquid'ambar
City Hall grounds
styraciflua' `
400 block Poinsettia
Eucalyptus
City Hall grounds
corynocalyx
Ocean Blvd. Corona del Mar
Phoneix canariensis
Westcliff & Dover (Groves)'
Eucalyptus globulus
In Arches Overpass
Eucalyptus
Mariners Park
lehmannii
DEDICATED No. Mariners Park
TREES (Marcie Schrouder)
Pinus radiata
Mariners Park
(Frank Tallman)
Pinus radiata
No. City Hall grounds
(Billy Covert)
Ficus benjamina
City Hall grounds
(Walter Knott)
Pinus halepensis
City Hall grounds
(Calif. Bicentennial)
Pinus halepensis
Las Arenas Park
(Ed Healy)
Melaleuca linarifolia
Mariners Park
(Isy Pease)
Pinus halepensis
City Hall grounds
(U.S. Bicentennial Freedom Tree)
Harpephyllum
caffrum
NEIGHBORHOOD
TREES Parkway in'Shorecliffs
Marguerite Avenue
Goldenrod Avenue
Dover Dr. (Mariners to Irvine)
15th Street (Newport Heights)
3� Irvine Avenue traffic island
Erythrina caffra
Phoenix canariensis
Washington robusta
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus
cladocalyx
Eucalyptus globulus
Attachment 4.
Holiday between Irvine & Tustin
Surrounding Old Reservoir
Along Avon Avenue
Via Lido bridge
Marine Avenue (Balboa Island)
Seaview Avenue (Corona del Mar)
Poppy Avenue (Corona del Mar)
Heliotrope Avenue (Corona del Mar)
Candlestick Lane, etc. (Bay rC est)
n
U
Adopted 5/9/66
Amended 11/9/76
Amended 11/28/88
• Amended 10/93
Formerly I -9
40
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus varieties
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus globulus
Eucalyptus rudis
Pinus radiata
Eucalyptus rudis
Pinus radiata
Eucalyptus
citriodora
Attachment 4.
Att:achrnent 2
(9 TREE rHt4,2i46 D EVALUATION FORM roan Areas
dress:
Map/Location:
Owner: public _ private ___ unknown other
Date: Inspector
Dale of last inspection:
TREE CHARACTERISTICS
Tree 9:
HAZARD RATING:
+ + -
Failure + Size + Target Hazard
Potential of part Rating Rating
_ Immediate action needed
Needs further inspection
_ Dead tree
DOH: 0 of trunks: . Height: Spread;
Farm: O generally symmetric CI minor asymmetry r-I major asymmetry ❑'slump sprout O stag- headed
Crown class: U dominant Ll co- dominant 1.1 inlermediate U suppressed
Live crown ratio:__ % Age class: ❑ young ❑ mature O over - mature
Pruning hisicry: O crown cleaned ❑ excessively thinned O topped ❑ crown raised O pollarded ❑ crown reduced ❑ none
Special Value: Laspecimen LJhenlage/historic Clwddhfe Ounusual Ostreettree ❑screen Oshade ❑indigenous Oother
TREE HEALTH
Foliagecoior. Claormal ❑chlorotic ❑necrotic Epleormics? Y N
Ft density: ❑ normal ❑ sparse Leaf size: O normal O small
Annual shoot growth: O excellent O average 17 poor Twig Dieback? Y N
Callus development: (]excellent ❑average (:!poor f7none
Vigorclass: ❑excellent L-Iaverage Ofair ❑poor
Major pests /diseases:
SITE CONDITIONS
691
Site Character. f 1 residence [-]commercial I:1 industrial I -I park n open space ❑ natural U
Landscape type: ❑ parkway Cl raised bed Cl container ❑ open ❑
Irrigation: U none 1.1 adequate U inadequate U excessive U trunk welted
• dripline paved: 0% 10.25% 25 -50% 50 -75% 75.100% Lifted? Y N
•dripiinew /fill soil: 0% 10.25% 25 -50% 50.75% 75 -100/4
%dripline grade lowered: 0% 10 -25% 25.50% 50.75% 75 -100 °o
Soil problems: ❑ drainage 0 shallow ❑ compacted O droughty ❑ saline ❑ alkaline ❑ acidic O small volume ❑ disease center ❑ history of fail
Obstructions: O lights O slgnage O line -of -sight O view O overhead lines O underground utilities O traffic ❑ adjacentveg. O
Wind (tree position): O single tree ❑ below canopy u above canopy ❑ recently expused O wwrlward, canopy edge O area prone to wlndlhrow
TARGET
U; rJ building O parking ❑ traffic [-]pedestrian ❑ recreation ❑landscape L7 hardscape ❑ small features
L rget be moved? Y N
Occupancy: O occasional use r1 medium, intermittent use O frequent use
The International Society or Arboriculture assumes no responsibility for conclusions or recommendations derived from use of this form.
�� Attachment
TREE DEFECTS
Rate defect severity: S severe defect, high potential for failure
• M defect of moderate severity
L defect of low severity
LEAN: deg from vertical O natural ❑ unnatural Soil heaving: Y N
Decay In plane of lean: Y N Raols exposed: Y N Soil cracking: Y N
Compounding factors:
ROOT DEFECTS: -
Lean severity: S M L
Suspect root rot: Y N Mushroom /conk present: Y N to:
Exposed roots: S M L Undermined: S M L ,
Root pruned: 11 from trunk Root area affected: % Buttress wounded: Y N When:
Restricted root area: S M L Potential for root failure: S M L
CROWN DEFECTS:
DEFECT
Poor taper
BOOTCROWN
TRUNK
SCAFFOLDS
BRANCHES
Codominanls4orks
Multiple allachmi:nts
Included bark
Excessive end weight
Cracks/Splits
_
Hangers
_
--
Girdlin
Waods
— —
—
Caw
Conks /Mushrooms
—
Bleeding
Looselcracked bark
Nesting hole/bee hive I
-
Deadwood/stubs _
Bcrers/lermilesMals
Cankers/ alts
Previous failure
HAL AHU HAI INH
Part most likely to fail;
Failure Potential: 1 2 3 Size of Part: 1 2 3 Target: 1 2 3 Hazard Rating: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
HAZARD ABATEMENT — —
Prune: EJ remove defective part O reduce end weight D crown clean O thin O raise canopy ❑ crown reduce O restructure ❑ shape
Cable/Brace: _ Inspect further: ❑ root crown O decay O aenal ❑ monftor
Remove Tree: Y N Replace? Y N Move target: Y N Other:
Effect on adjacent trees: ❑ none ❑ evaluate
COMMENTS
0
Attachment 4.
1
1
1
.1
1
1
I
I
L'
r
i
I
i
.1
1
1
1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ANNUAL TREE
MAINTENANCE CONTRACT
PROGRESS REPORT - FIRST 2 MONTHS
WEST COAST ARBORISTS
LI
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
11
SPECIES FREQUENCY
City of Newport Beach
Annual Tree Maintenance Contract
' Species Frequency List for Trees Trimmed Jan - Feb
' Page 1
BOTANICALNAME
Washingtonia robusta
COMMONNAME
MEXICAN FAN PALM
COUNT
400
Trachycarpus fortunei
WINDMILL PALM
230
Ficus rubiginosa
RUSTY -LEAF FIG
129
'
Eucalyptus sideroxylon
RED IRONBARK
121
Washingtonia filifera
CALIFORNIA FAN PALM
82
'
Schinus terebinthifolius
BRAZILIAN PEPPER
78
Ficus benjamina
WEEPING FIG
69
'
Eucalyptus globulus
Ceratonia siliqua
BLUE GUM
CAROB
63
52
Pinus radiata
MONTEREY PINE
51
Alnus rhombifolia
WHITE ALDER
45
'
Ficus,microcarpa'Nitida'
INDIAN LAUREL FIG
44
Eucalyptus citriodora
LEMON - SCENTED GUM
38
Metrosideros excelsus
NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE
29
Pinus halepensis
ALEPPO PINE
28
Liquidambar styraciflua
AMERICAN SWEETGUM
27
'
Cedrus deodara
DEODAR CEDAR
25
Eriobot .rya deflexa
BRONZE LOQUAT
24
'
Arecastrum romanzoffianum
Pyrus kawakamii
QUEEN PALM
EVERGREEN PEAR
22
22
Magnolia grandiflora
SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA
20
Nerium oleander
OLEANDER
20
'
Myoporum laetum
MYOPORUM
19
Brahea edulis
GUADALUPE PALM
18
Jacaranda mimosifolia
JACARANDA
17
Casuarina cunninghamiana
RIVER SHE -OAK
15
Eucalyptus ficifolia
RED FLOWERING GUM
15
Pinus canariensis
CANARY ISLAND PINE
15
Eucalyptus polyanthemos
SILVER DOLLAR GUM
14
Pinus torreyana
TORREY PINE
13
Chamaerops humilis
MEDITERRANEAN FAN PALM
12
Eucalyptus maculata
SPOTTED GUM
12
Eucalyptus spp.
EUCALYPTUS SPECIES
11
Fraxinus uhdei
SHAMEL ASH
11
Eucalyptus rudis
DESERT GUM
10
Koelreuteria bipinnata
CHINESE FLAME TREE
10
Eucalyptus camaldulensis
RED GUM
9
Bauhinia variegata
PURPLE ORCHID TREE
6
'
Eucalyptus cladocalyx
SUGAR GUM
5
' Page 1
City of Newport Beach
Annual Tree Maintenance Contract
' Species Frequency List for Trees Trimmed Jan - Feb
' Page 2
BOTANICAL NAME
Melaleuca quinquenervia
COMMON NAME
CAJEPUT TREE
COUNT
5
Cupaniopsis anacardioides
CARROTWOOD
4
'
Ligustrum lucidum
GLOSSY PRIVET
4
Other tree
OTHER TREE
4
Phoenix reclinata
SENEGAL PALM
4
'
Pittosporum undulatum
VICTORIAN BOX
4
Acacia baileyana
BAILEY ACACIA
3
'
Acacia spp.
Erythrina caffra
ACACIA
KAFFIRBOOM CORAL TREE
3
3
Erythrina spp.
CORAL TREE
3
Prunus cerasifera
PURPLE -LEAF PLUM
3
'
Schinus molle
CALIFORNIA PEPPER
3
Harpephyllum caffrum
KAFFIR PLUM
2
'
Lagunaria patersonii-
PRIMROSE TREE
2
Olea europaea
OLIVE
2
Palm spp.
PALM SPECIES
2
'
Phoenix canariensis
CANARY ISLAND DATE PALM
2
Pittosporum rhombifolium
QUEENSLAND PITTOSPORUM
2
Prunus lyonii
CATALINA CHERRY
2
'
Tristania conferta
BRISBANE BOX
2
Ulmus parvifolia
CHINESE ELM
2
Yucca gloriosa
SPANISH DAGGER
2
'
Acacia decurrens
GREEN WATTLE
1
Chorisia speciosa
SILK -FLOSS TREE
1
'
Cinnamomum camphora
CAMPHOR TREE
1
Citrus limon
LEMON
1
'
Eucalyptus lehmannii
Hymenosporum flavum
BUSHY YATE
SWEETSHADE
1
1
Melia azedarach
CHINABERRY
1
Morus alba
WHITE MULBERRY
1
Pinus pinea
ITALIAN STONE PINE
1
Pinus spp.
PINE SPECIES
1
Strelitzia nicolai
GIANT BIRD OF PARADISE
1
Tupidanthus calyptratus
TUPIDANTHUS
1
1906
' Page 2
COMPUTERIZED COMPLETION REPORT
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
Fl
I
I
I
I
11'
' M
W
Q
' a
M
0
o
0
0
0
0
w
i
N
W
W
LM
1
G
�Y>
N
N
co
N
lSL
0
No
m
�
N
�
N
m
�
N
m
N
01
N
m
N
N
�
N
m
V
T
V
�
V
Ol
m
m
N
�
V
�
m
�
V
�
m
�
V
�
m
m
m
�
V'
m
m
OI
m
T
M
O
m
N
m
N
T
N
Ol
N
O
W
N
O
�
N
O
m
N
O
�
N
O
W
O.
\
``\
=`N
��````N
``�`�`N
``
`N
000000000000000000000000000000000
0
0
O U
2 C
m O
M O
O
O N
M O
N
O
M O
O
N
O
M
O
M
O
M
N
M
O
N
O
N
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
m
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
co
O
N
O
N
m
N
w
W v
S
WCO
N
i.
N
N
m
m
N
m
M
M
m
N
m
N
r
N
r
N
r
N
N
t�
N
m
m
m
M
h
N
h
N
N
r
m
m
m
m
to
m
m
LO
M
2 U
m Z
O c
3
m
O
N
O
OV
O
N.
.
V)
N
V)
N
N
N
M
N
O
r
O
N
O
M
M
M
O
M
0
M
0
r
N
r
O,
r
O
N
N
r
O
M
O
N
O
N
N
0 lFL-
W
W
O
U ..
�
W
z
w
W
zaQ
az
W
¢zazzzzzzQ
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
zzzWOan
W
W
-L
W
LU
n
Q
Q
D
Q
z
n.
IL
a
w
a
a
IL
as
mma
WaaE
uu
�ii�EL�iiwwaw�ww�W�ii�ii�i�ii�i�iiwa�ii�ii�ii�www��0
����Q¢¢¢�¢¢�¢������
-ra
::
dms¢zz°�mWm
p
0
0
p
O
M>
�
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
w
w�u
o�C
2
a¢¢¢
U
i�h�QQh¢0
FO
M000000o:r�is?
l?i
iii
Gi
mm
-»(7U
ro
C
ro
G
ro
C
ro
G
ro
C
ro
G
ro
C
E
a
E
ro
E
E
E
Z
m
m
Lij
c
c
c
c
c
c
c
0--
.—
x
°1
x
°1
o
E
o
c
m
z
J
r�
r
�..-
V
V
T
U
.%
w�
.�-
.�
V
T
r�
.�
.�-
U
Y
ro
Y
ro
Y
ro
D
V
E
;E
E
N
Q
0
ro
m
y
ro
ro
R
W
N
ro
10
R
N
IV
ro
ro
16
10
O
o
9%%
ro
ro
ro
D
ro
a
O
ro
ro
2
L°
L�
°
.
E
F
>>>>
G
C
C
C
N
ry
N
ry
C
N
ry
C
N
N
tq
C
y
�p
C
7>
C
C
>>
C
C
>
C
y
>>>>>
C
C
C
C
U
2
T
2
T
2
T
O
C
O
•C
ro
ro
U
m
m
0.a'a'aUUatiac
tia0aaaan.acio
aaaiiaaaww
,¢o
w
N
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
N
M
r
r
N
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
N
M
N
r
r
r
¢W
F
a
I
I
N
co
N
N
N
co
N
M
N
>
aaaa¢aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
wwwWwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
O.
0000000000000000000000000
O.
O
O
O
0
a
0000000000000000000000000
R
w
¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢¢
NNfA
NNNNN
N
N
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
mm
W
W
S
W
2
W
2
W
2
W
2
W
==I=
W
W
W
S
W
S
W
S
W
2
W
2
W
2
W
2
W
=IX
W---
�
m¢¢¢
-
-
-
2
-
2
--
Q
Q
N
W'
m
n
m
0
N
c+l
d
N
N
IA
N
N
N
M
V
co
f�
co
N
N
O
N
I�
t�
t�
O
O
N
C
f0
O
N
Q
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
M
M
M
M
M
W
M
W
W
W
tO
M
h
N
N
N
N
N
N
1A
N
N
a
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
D
r
r
r
c
0
N
ro
U
N
G
I
WEST COAST ARBORISTS, INC.
KEY FOR COMPUTERIZED COMPLETION REPORT
1 District
F
1
1
C
1
u
Represents the geographic part of the city.
Address The numeric address where the tree is located.
"X" extension accompanies the address if it is fictitious.
(There is no house or building occupying the site)
Street The actual name of the street including the direction.
Side Represents the physical location of the tree at the
address. (Blank for Front, "S" for Side, or "M" for Median).
Tree Represents the tree number at the location. Every tree at
an address gets an individual number. Numbers increase
in the same direction as the addresses on the block.
Botanical Name Lists the botanical- name of each species.
Common Name Lists the common name of each species.
Crown Lists the approximate width of the crown (spread) in feet.
DBH Lists the approximate diameter of the tree (at breast
height) in inches.
Height Lists the approximate height of the tree in feet.
Date Completed Is the date that the tree was trimmed.
Sidewalk Damage Reflects damage (lifts, rises, deflections or cracks) on the
sidewalk at the given address.
(Blank or "N" for none, "Y" if greater than % inch)
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
WORK FORCE
.�s4��'
—. •, ,'; i+^ r ,..s•'r,>rT «ljgvw,was',�
✓i`;',
„� „a;E.
}5
r, :, .��, y f,`, s;lsy r'F,,; ✓(,ff/Sj�G ray'+,Sis�,;! ��
•, rj;e r � „'i ��;t,!, 1,';; j <,, "gib:,
,f$j
r i+
3i,
shy / u /✓ !9 s , :.
.i�• }�'!'�•
.: Si' /�ry,�C %a,% ,s:
ter,
IV 4
' f
,s y
„3•
.r, p., •i
oys
`��'; ;', �,�` ?,'la'; �„ 1 pit
;• /
;iar t
r
Y
"'. ti ��
'" ',y,�p
'r
• 5'l `'% 3,. +jar, Er?�y5'Hn
•
i)j�1✓• .,:%'' f's'
•fir ",i;!,
s °,....q
; ,J%?,; / r}".
sv ^J.'*,'J,d -G
„r •Usi�I%�/',s,'i,
£� �sh• %.'
Fri i t4` ,,t,rt
Asa' ✓ %n %�i'Y/ n #”
'i.`! •°t” 4,
r , / "s: "u•,.;,.r ys,. ,: �ra... ",
y` j' „�
�",bt », tt f
� //,
Zip W o,” "
W ri
s
,r +� rKh,fs
YtN��
s «:
A
.i�• }�'!'�•
.: Si' /�ry,�C %a,% ,s:
ter,
' f
„3•
W ri
s
,r +� rKh,fs
YtN��
s «:
A
OKA
lit
Al.:��yy
♦, ' � , � j �I�A; 1� � � �� task- { J�
1 91.
All •Yr �` �f7t
er
xr
r a _ •y t 3F s.�
" rt i�, � Cj av •4 alS.�,� +p+'' �:�..., s F+ -d � r,.t .9.�1 � ♦�,
"x 1y Ywi.X SF
�w
Al. � �,.r� ♦ '. T � w two � [��" t
y
• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
I. Mission
Item No. 16
Maintain and enhance recreation, both active and passive,
opportunities for residents and guests of the City of
Newport Beach by creating a quality recreation and open
space system and ensuring its use through active
interface and encouragement of the system users.
II. Responsibilities of Commission
1. To advise the Council on matters of budget,
planning, parks, parkway trees and recreation
programs, and establish acquisition policies
for development and improvement of facilities.
2. Encourage the facilities to be used to
capacity when demand exists.
III. Goals of Commission
• 1. Use subcommittee to interact with the public
on specific issues and formulate
recommendations to Commission.
El
2. Create a meaningful agenda for our joint
meetings with the City Council.
3. Encourage a positive working relationship
between the School District and the City at
all levels.
4. Be available to City Council for advice when
asked.
5. Assist in a smooth transition to a new depart-
mental reporting process.
IV. Objectives of Commission
L4--�
1. Review procedure for implementing Parks,
Beaches and Recreation expertise into facility
planning process given the new departmental
reporting procedures.
2. Annual meeting with Costa Mesa.
-2-
COMMITTEES
I. Recreation Program Committee
Goals:
1. Monitor and work with Recreation Division
regarding scheduling and recreation programs.
2. Ensure quarterly recreation brochures are
reviewed by Parks, Beaches and Recreation;
articles written and presented to Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commissioners on time.
Objectives:
1. Review usage of two pools to ensure maximum
usage.
II. Tree Committee
mission:
Continue to provide and encourage an atmosphere and
method to enhance the overall tree environment in the
• City of Newport Beach.
Goals:
1. Improve communication with Newport Beach
citizens as related to tree matters.
2. Ensure preservation of trees when possible.
3. Plant trees where needed.
4. Cooperate with community associations in their
efforts to beautify their parkways.
5. Award or give recognition for particularly
beautiful use of trees.
6. Continue review of designated street scapes.
7. Review, again, possibility of a City Arborist.
And, or, encourage certification of existing
staff.
8. Continue to recommend and support staff in
their efforts to preserve existing trees,
i.e., root pruning, root barriers, pruning for
. safety, etc.
` 9. Encourage staff to try new pilot programs, for
-3-
instance, for growth retardant of Ficus Nitida
trees by use of "Clipper" or "Maintain" after
trimming.
10. Replace trees in timely manner when removed.
11. Every home should have a tree in front of it.
Objectives:
1. Review Policy I -9 and define criteria for
retention of individual trees. Sept. 9 -30.
2. Rewrite Notice of Denial form.
3. Continue to secure signed agreement from
adjacent property owner for acceptance and
care of new tree when removal and replacement
are recommended.
4.. Develop awards ,program for beautification to
city street trees.
5. Encourage community associations help in
• promoting a "Tree Per Lot" program to re-
establish street scapes.
III Park and Open Space Committee
Mission:
Review the Recreation and Open Space Element of the
General Plan to evaluate current needs assessment; review
site plans for park development; review park facility
plans for implementation; assist staff in maintenance
recommendations of park and park facilities.
Objectives:
1. Complete annual review of parks and park
facilities by 1993.
a. Each Commissioner will be delegated
park and facility inspection
assignments to report to the Park
and Open Space Committee. Committee
will review with staff and report to
the Commission by March, 1993.
2. Review preliminary design ideas., review plans
• and conduct citizen committee meetings for
/ newly acquired park, park facilities and open
�/, space.
-4-
• a. Park and Open Space Dedication -
Irvine Co.
b. Each Commissioner will have one
Ride Along.
C. Hoag Hospital Wetland Mitigation
d. Hoag Hosptial Semeniuk Slough
Improvement
3. Assess the need for recreation facilities for
youth and adult programs.
IV. Oasis Liaison
Goals and Objectives:
1. Inform the Commission of the needs of senior
citizens at the Center.
2. Inform the Commission of legislative issues
that will affect the needs of seniors in our
community.
3. Contribute to the monthly staff report to the
Commission information pertaining to the
Senior Center.
• V. Budget Committee
Objectives:
1. Provide assistance to Department Heads as
requested.
2. Prioritize capital needs as money is made
available.
August, 1993
4�
0
Item No.17
• COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 18, 1994
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Recreation Superintendent
RE. BACKGROUND INFORMATION -
FORD/LORAL DEVELOPMENT
The local news media has contained articles regarding the potential development
of the Ford/Loral property. This is the current Loral site located in Newport
Beach, north of Ford Road, east of Jamboree, west of MacArthur and the Belcourt
development, and south- of Bison. As currently planned, the development will be
comprised of 450 homes in a style much like the Belcourt development. The
community will be gated with no public access.
• City Ordinance 19.50.010 states the requirements for Park Dedication in the City.
As a result of this Ordinance, the City of Newport Beach was divided into four
development zones. A map outlining these zones is attached, When development
occurs, developers must either dedicate usable land for a park or incur in lieu fees.
If the Park and Open Space Element of the General Plan does not call for park
development within the new buildout, the developer normally makes the in lieu
payment. The funds are utilized within the same zone in which the development
occurred. The current accepted ratios for dedication purposes, as established by
the City Council, are five acres of land for every 1,000 persons, or $6.894 per
dwelling unit.
The residents of Newport Beach will greatly benefit from the amount of in lieu
fees which this project will generate for future park development.
The City Council will shortly be considering the draft for an In Lieu Land
Dedication Policy to establish criteria for the use of in lieu fees. It is also
anticipated that the Recreation and Open Space Element of the General Plan, last
approved in 1984, can be developed in the next fiscal year. A review of available
open space and potential development of the parcels identified in the Circulation
Improvement and Open Space Agreement will be a critical part of that plan.
/ 7// :. -���' i /
,.:
�� .
� ^,
/ �'..
��� �� � r
�� �' " �
�' ��
l'�
��ir
• •
�J
z
0
a
K 0
m
O= II �
0 w ? ❑ w
m � ❑
_ 3.4 G� — ❑
Om
F � ❑
N ❑ rx
� Z Ow ❑ ❑
!=R ❑
w � ❑
r W=
O Q
�W
�J
G1
G1
0
0
r�
u
N
U
0
z
•
,0
cd
t4°
U
U
cd
U
PQ
O
z
cu
U
O
O
O
o �
.� E ' C ° � °•D�
9
Y o55 .r3
W O .e � . ° C, L' S •p
IL
0
s ° >.•eb
ea 3 E
s$O-8
ao
°q E =u•5 v o �
S e met a
ebb `s8
R-oa°.v.Eti �•' 8 �v m
y 7.
e
O
i
12 11 � E �• �•9�
0
a> v
E -a •a ,.
I 1J'
J
�2 o
W Ei 8 = a•
W ow a.0 is S
a
� y
O
O
ao to
O
n
a" �J
O JO
^ n
y
o
o" ~
t+
a'
0 0
0 z
3
S
R
a
G
a
a
O O O O N
-
zxdn:
E to
r rn ry f'1
G O
Be
n
0� 0 (off
o ° n
Ea°
ry �t ry ry d H_
<` w
o w o w O o O i.H tia W W N O
O O O O O o W O o O O O O m
K1
O O O In V� u• C
O O
O
.0 by ,lv z ., �' •�� 3 C 2 GA )
0
L7 a❑ o 0 Cro d p^,• ° °' �— n 0^r°o C� y 0 O xn7
r-F
�
y a
g, '°^ �.b ��•G)�� �� a� oyy
w o a V oc ^' oa �` a n o• o � TJ � a o °3 � � -°n C 7 ^ � �• � �C- �' °
p" ° n �v �� ,°o 0 o L,o ' �• 7, y �° �' 5„ o e
" °k N h '� ° o o h '� '--i Li o o °• by �'..o
° 'e E• s e c vFi =. r of A
b a c C y n = z rTi rC °^ w C ❑� �°o' ^. -`°^�i o
FS
to 'ny •"ai pI O
A S h o 1
^ 9 14
w r '+''
o °z o o o S o z
0 3 0 3
• •
fy
y
1 O
O O m W w
W O
O O
�o �d�°5-xg� c�sb 0V> b"ryy0
R� .�, "Zryi ai O O y N% rt a D• n- O G.
r O A C. ^O b0°O ^O C �. O iQ'
ff 0 ' '+ vJ w .� 9' a
^n o
4 An
T r r n
3 � o �• z � o
0 a �
N r�J
W
1
O
d�a
°
K
"o Ci
Y
°z
0
°01
z
ok
� V
H �
ro
°z
0
0
P d
O
zz
0
O
O
• � m 'mil
F+
N
C�O1
R
0
p.,
V/N
\
V
N
o �
O �
0
to C rp. O G W O N N �-�• �--• O O
O O V• O O O O 'O O O O
N N L. O o
u, O O ll1 O
E o o L. °
o5g n a a. o
�•� S" S•y•°a 5 0.0 �'On S"o R
cro �
o � Q
.,•,mmC) �, ten^ �n�n n �nr
5• � p• � P• �• ? 7• pCS., �• S � �• r^O� Et
0 0 °0 0 °0 °0 0 0 0 .v o 0 0 0 z
00030 03 �B�o o 0
n
lid
O
9
H
�yy�y
M
tv
tv
T
r
O O
O O
O O
O O
Vii O
11 ;b.
W W
W N
O O
O
V
l�l�
O O
O
VNi Vii
07
0y 9 oz
"y
•...
0 '
o c
� c
^. E,
o
� o
o"y
o
ffi
7
�+
n
n0
—y E
o.. ❑
F ^y
o
R ^y
io �-
r"d �'
�• is
e+"' °�•'
a n
�
O 1
�p %y
3
° 0
^
0
0
0
0
o
O O O O N
-
zxdn:
E to
r rn ry f'1
G O
Be
n
0� 0 (off
o ° n
Ea°
ry �t ry ry d H_
<` w
o w o w O o O i.H tia W W N O
O O O O O o W O o O O O O m
K1
O O O In V� u• C
O O
O
.0 by ,lv z ., �' •�� 3 C 2 GA )
0
L7 a❑ o 0 Cro d p^,• ° °' �— n 0^r°o C� y 0 O xn7
r-F
�
y a
g, '°^ �.b ��•G)�� �� a� oyy
w o a V oc ^' oa �` a n o• o � TJ � a o °3 � � -°n C 7 ^ � �• � �C- �' °
p" ° n �v �� ,°o 0 o L,o ' �• 7, y �° �' 5„ o e
" °k N h '� ° o o h '� '--i Li o o °• by �'..o
° 'e E• s e c vFi =. r of A
b a c C y n = z rTi rC °^ w C ❑� �°o' ^. -`°^�i o
FS
to 'ny •"ai pI O
A S h o 1
^ 9 14
w r '+''
o °z o o o S o z
0 3 0 3
• •
fy
y
1 O
O O m W w
W O
O O
�o �d�°5-xg� c�sb 0V> b"ryy0
R� .�, "Zryi ai O O y N% rt a D• n- O G.
r O A C. ^O b0°O ^O C �. O iQ'
ff 0 ' '+ vJ w .� 9' a
^n o
4 An
T r r n
3 � o �• z � o
0 a �
N r�J
W
1
O
d�a
°
K
"o Ci
Y
°z
0
°01
z
ok
� V
H �
ro
°z
0
0
P d
O
zz
0
O
O
• � m 'mil
F+
N
C�O1
R
0
p.,
V/N
\
V
N
o �
O �
0
to C rp. O G W O N N �-�• �--• O O
O O V• O O O O 'O O O O
N N L. O o
u, O O ll1 O
E o o L. °
o5g n a a. o
�•� S" S•y•°a 5 0.0 �'On S"o R
cro �
o � Q
.,•,mmC) �, ten^ �n�n n �nr
5• � p• � P• �• ? 7• pCS., �• S � �• r^O� Et
0 0 °0 0 °0 °0 0 0 0 .v o 0 0 0 z
00030 03 �B�o o 0
n
lid
O
9
H
�yy�y
M
tv
tv
T
r
J994 Ul _ I2
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO.
CITY COUNCIL/PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Monday, July 11, 1994
AGENDA
1. Need for the revision of the Recreation and Open Space
Element of the General Plan in regards to Future Park
Development.
2. Capital Improvement Project Expenditures
(FY 1992 -93 to 1994 -95)
3. Recreation as an economic force in the community.
Taylor Grant Chair
Phil Glasgow Vice Chair
Pete Compton _
Gale Demmer
Virginia Herberts
Bill Schonlau
Jo Vandervort
•l_ !! x-05 K'.•
LaDonna Kienitz Director
Nancy Beard Recreation Superintendent
f/ General Services Department
David E. Niederhaus Director
Marcelino Lomeli Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent