HomeMy WebLinkAbout - Chapter 4.0 - Section 4.9 - Soils and GeologyAerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental
4.9 SOILS AND GEOLOGY
Section 4,9 - Soils and
The information and analysis presented in this section of the Draft EIR is based on the "Conceptual Grading
Plan Review Report — Condominium Project, TTM 16882," prepared by Neblett & Associates, Inc., and the
"Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis for the Proposed Aerie Dock Replacement,"
prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc. A "third party' review of both technical studies was conducted by
Goffman, McCormick & Urban, LLC (GMU). The findings and recommendations of these most recent studies
as well as prior studies referenced in those reports are presented below.
4.9.1 Existing Conditions
Agricultural Soils
The subject property is located in a residential area of Corona del Mar. Based on the National
Cooperative Soil Survey for Orange County, the soils on the site encompasses an area classified as
"beaches" and Myford sandy loam (2 to 9 percent slopes). The site and adjacent areas are designated as
"Urban and Built -up Land" and "Other Land" on the Orange County Important Farmland Map. No Prime
Farmland, Farmland of State or Local Importance, or Unique Farmland occurs within or in the vicinity of
the site. Further, neither the site nor the adjacent areas are designated as prime, unique or important
farmlands by the State Resources Agency or by the Newport Beach General Plan.
Geologic Setting /Conditions
The geologic units underlying the subject property and environs include artificial fill (afu), marine and non -
marine terrace deposits (Qt), and bedrock units assigned to the upper - middle Miocene Monterey Formation
(Tm). These units are described below.
Artificial Fill (afu)
Local fill is primarily derived from the underlying terrace deposits and contain broken shell fragments of
marine fossils. The fill soils encountered in previous borings and tests are generally comprised of reddish
brown silty sands and extend to maximum depths on the order to 13 feet.
Terrace Deposits (Qt)
Isolated, older marine terrace deposits with frequent mollusk shells and shell fragments indicative of a near
shore depositional environmental cap the wave -cut terrace. These older marine terrace deposits are
approximately 80,000 to 120,000 years old and are slightly moist to moist, medium dense to dense and have
occasional secondary carbonate mineralization in fractures. Non - marine terrace deposits that capped the
marine terrace represent continental deposits that have accumulated since uplift of the terrace bench and
contain sediments ranging in age from upper Pleistocene to Recent age. The depth of terrace deposits
encountered in the prior borings ranges from approximately 26 to 29 feet below the existing grades.
Monterey Formation (Tm)
The bedrock consists of sandstones and shales, which are assigned to the upper - middle Miocene Monterey
Formation. Most of the site is underlain by locally hard to very hard with occasional (i.e., less than five
percent) fissile sandstone, siltstone interbeds and siltstone inclusions. The bedrock onsite is largely west
striking, moderate to steeply northeast dipping with localized moderate southwest dip.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005-196 - Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -1
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental
Faulting and Seismicity
Section 4.9 — Soils and
The site is located in the Corona del Mar area of the City, which is near the intersection of the
Southwestern Block and the Central Block of the Los Angeles Basin. The Southwestern Block is the
westerly seaward portion of the Los Angeles Basin, which includes Palos Verdes Peninsula and Long
Beach, and is bounded on the east by the Newport- Inglewood Fault Zone (NIFZ). The Central Block
extends easterly from the NIFZ to the Whittier Fault (WFZ). The main structural features in the area are
the NIFZ and the WFZ. The landward part of the NIFZ is a northwesterly- trending zone that extends from
Beverly Hills on the north to Newport Bay on the south, where it continues offshore to the south; however,
it eventually returns ashore again near La Jolla, where it is expressed by the Rose Canyon Fault. The
main trace of the NIFZ is approximately 1.7 miles offshore to the south - southwest, and has documented
surface or near - surface rupture within the past 11,000 years. It is, therefore, "active" according to the
State of California. The WFZ extends from the Chino /Corona area in the south to the Whittier Narrows
area in the north. Historical earthquakes have occurred on both faults with the 1933, 6.14M Long Beach
Earthquake on the NIFZ' and the 1987 6.1M Whittier Narrows Earthquake on the WFZ. The NIFZ within
the project environs is not included on the State - published Alquist - Priolo Special Studies zonation map.
The subject property is located within a seismically active area. Based on a literature review, photo
interpretation and a site - specific fault investigation conducted by Neblett & Associates, Inc., in 2003, two
faults were identified on the subject property, consisting of sheared bedrock zones. One small fault,
which had been previously mapped in 1994, was located southerly adjacent to the 201 -205 Carnation
Avenue apartment building. The second (northerly) fault, which was very well exposed and had been
mapped, was identified as a buried fault trace beneath the single - family residence at 207 Carnation
Avenue. Trenching undertaken to evaluate the faults indicated that the rock within the trenches have not
been displaced for at least the last 80,000 to 120,000 years. Based on the findings of the 2003 fault
investigation, both faults were classified as "inactive." According to CDMG Special Publications 42,
"active" faults are defined as those faults that have displaced during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene
age). Therefore, the faults identified on the site are not considered "active."
Although a literature review conducted for the preliminary geologic/geotechnical investigation indicated
that a fault was mapped on the site, site mapping, aerial photo analysis, fault trenching, and age dating
conducted for the proposed project concluded that no active faults are present on the subject property.
There are no known local or regional active earthquake faults on or in close proximity to the site, and the
site is not within an Alquist - Priolo Zone. The Newport- Inglewood Fault is located approximately 1.7 miles
to the west of and off -shore from the site, the Whittier - Elsinore Fault is located approximately 25 miles to
the northeast, and the San Andreas Fault is located more than 50 miles to the northeast. Although
episodes on those faults could cause ground shaking at the project site, it is highly unlikely that the site
would experience surface rupture. Even though the project site and surrounding areas could be subject
to strong ground movements, adherence to current building standards of the City of Newport Beach
would reduce ground movement hazards to a less than significant level.
Liquefaction
Liquefaction is the loss of strength of cohesionless soils when the pore water pressure in the soil
becomes equal to the confining pressure. Liquefaction generally occurs as a "quicksand" type of ground
failure caused by strong groundshaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include
groundwater, soil type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and
duration of groundshaking. The majority of the liquefaction hazards are associated with uncompacted,
saturated or nearly saturated, non - cohesive sandy and silty soils. Based on the field mapping and
subsurface exploration conducted for the proposed project, the artificial fill and terrace materials occurring
' The actual epicenter of the 1933 Long Beach Earthquake was located offshore in the Huntington Beach, Newport Beach area.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005- 196 — Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -2
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 4.9 — Soils and
on the subject property are very shallow, unsaturated, fine -to- coarse - grained, silty sand with abundant
gravels, cobbles and boulders.
Tsunami and Seiche
The subject property is located at the coastal margin of the Pacific Ocean, at the southern end of Newport
Beach, within the Newport Harbor area. While this area is protected by jetty emplacement at the harbor
mouth, long water waves generated by offshore mechanisms such as tectonic displacement present a
potential for tsunamis. Recent tsunamis include the 1957 tsunami, which originated from the Aleutians
and the 1964 tsunami, which originated from the Gulf of Alaska. These events resulted in recorded
maximum wave heights of 0.9 feet and 1.8 feet, respectively in Newport Bay.
Seiche is defined as a standing wave oscillation effect generated in a closed or semi - closed body of water
caused by wind, tidal current, and earthquake. Seiche potential is highest in large, deep, steep -sided
reservoirs or water bodies. Newport Bay lacks significant potential for damaging Seiche because it is very
shallow.
Groundwater
Subsurface water was not observed during the Feld investigation.
4.9.2 Significance Criteria
Implementation of the proposed project would result in a significant adverse environmental impact if any of
the following occurs as a result of project implementation.
Loss or elimination of "prime" agricultural lands as designated by the State of California
and /or County of Orange and such designated soils are capable of sustained, viable
agricultural production.
Ground shaking and /or secondary seismic effects (i.e., liquefaction, slope failure, etc.)
could cause substantial structural damage and /or an unmitigated risk to human safety,
even after implementation of the recommended geotechnical measures, required local
and State seismic design parameters, and common engineering practices for seismic
hazard abatement.
Adverse soil conditions such as compressible, expansive, or corrosive soils are not
mitigated and present a damage hazard to occupied structures or infrastructure facilities.
4.9.3 Standard Conditions
SC 4.9 -1 All activities associated with the implementation of the proposed residential development
shall comply with the City s Excavation and Grading Ordinance.
SC 4.9 -2 The project shall comply with all applicable City and 2007 California Building Code
requirements.
SC 4.9 -3 The property owner(s) shall execute and record a waiver of future shoreline protection for
the project prior to the issuance of a building permit. Said waiver shall be subject to the
review and approval of the City Attorney.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196— Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -3
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental
SC 4.9 -4 Accessory structures
Accessory structures
structures is permitted.
4.9.4 Potential Impacts
Section 4.9 — Soils and
shall be relocated or removed if threatened by coastal erosion.
shall not be expanded and routine maintenance of accessory
4.9.4.1 Short-Term Construction Impacts
Although the terraced deposits on the site extend approximately 16 to 19 feet below existing grades, they can
be excavated using conventional earthmoving equipment. However, the underlying bedrock consists of
sandstones and shales. The sandstone is generally dense and massive, and includes hard and more
resistant sandstone dikes. Generally, rock masses displaying seismic shear wave velocities of up to
approximately 5,500 feet per second (fps) are considered economically rippable using conventional
mechanical grading equipment. Rock masses displaying seismic shear wave velocities ranging from 5,500 to
7,000 fps are considered marginally rippable. Rock masses with seismic shear wave velocities greater than
about 7,000 fps may require special excavation techniques. The shallow seismic profile velocities for the
adjacent property at 2494 Ocean Avenue ranged from 4,000 to 8,350 fps; similar velocities can be anticipated
for the subject property. Although the majority of the bedrock at the site is considered rippable; however,
localized areas (i.e., those with seismic profile velocities greater than 7,000 fps) may require special
excavation techniques.
4.9.4.2 Long -Term Operational Impacts
Agricultural Soils
Development of the subject property with Aerie residential structures as proposed will not result in the
conversion of any designated prime agricultural soils or otherwise significant farmland. The site is located
within a developed and urbanized area of the City of Newport Beach. As previously indicated, the project
site and surrounding area are designated as "Urban and Built Up Land." Therefore, project
implementation will not result in any impacts to agricultural soils or important farmland. No significant
impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.
Faulting and Seismicity
Surface Rupture and Strong Ground Motion
Based on the site - specific fault investigation conducted for the proposed project, fault activity levels have
not displaced terrace deposits for at least 80,000 to 120,000 years before present. According to Special
Publication 42 prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), "active faults are
defined as those faults that have displaced during the last 11,000 years (i.e., Holocene age). Therefore,
the faults identified on the subject property are not considered "active" and it is unlikely that the subject
site will experience fault - related surface rupture. Nonetheless, the subject property may experience
ground motion as a result of regional seismic activity
As indicated in Section 4.9.1, the subject property is located in the seismically active southern California
region; several active faults are responsible for generating moderate to strong earthquakes throughout
the region. Table 4.9 -1 identifies the active regional faults that are capable of generating seismic ground
shaking in the region. The maximum magnitude for each of the faults is also presented in that table.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005-196 —Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -4
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental
Table 4.9 -1
Regional Active Fault Parameters
Section 4.9- Soils and
Fault Name
Approx.
Distance
km
Source
Type
AIB/C)
Max.
Magnitude
(Mw)
Slip
Rate
(mm/ r
Fault
Typel
Newport-Inglewood Offshore
2.8
B
6.9
1.50
SS
Newport-Inglewood LA Basin
4.2
B
6.9
1.00
SS
Palos Verdes
22.3
B
7.1
3.00
SS
Chino - Central Avenue
33.7
B
6.7
1.00
DS
Elsinore - Whittier
34.8
B
6.8
2.50
SS
Elsinore -Glen Ivy
36.1
B
5.8
5.00
SS
Coronado Bank
37.0
B
7.4
3.00
SS
San Jose
49.0
B
6.5
0.50
DS
Elsinore - Temecula
49.3
B
6.8
5.00
SS
Sierra Madre Central
59.6
B
7.0
3.00
DS
Cucamonga
60.2
A
7.0
5.00
DS
Raymond
62.9
B
6.5
0.50
DS
Verdu o
64.5
B
6.7
0.50
DS
Clamshell -Saw it
65.4
B
1 6.5
1.00
DS
Hollywood
66.5
B
6.5
1.00
DS
Rose Canyon
66.9
B
6.9
1.50
SS
Santa Monica
72.8
B
6.6
1.00
DS
San Jacinto -San Bernardino
74.2
B
6.7
12.00
SS
San Jacinto -San Jacinto Valley
75.4
B
6.9
12.00
SS
Malibu Coast
77.4
B
6.7
0.30
DS
Elsinore - Julian
83.8
A
7.1
5.00
SS
San Andreas Southern
84.6
A
7.4
24.00
SS
Sierra Madre San Fernando
84.8
B
6.7
2.00
DS
San Andreas 1857 Rupture)
85.5
A
7.8
34.0
SS
Anaca a -Dume
87.0
B
7.3
3.00
DS
Cle horn
88.0
B
6.5
3.00
SS
San Gabriel
88.2
B
7.0
1.00
SS
San Jacinto -Anza
90.4
A
7.2
12.00
SS
North Frontal Fault Zone West
96.1
B
7.0
1.00
DS
Santa Susana
98.9
B
6.6
5.00
DS
'SS - strike -slip; DS - dip -slip; BT - blind thrust.
SOURCE: Neblett & Associates, Inc. March 28, 2003
As indicated above, the nearest Type A fault is the Cucamonga Fault, which is located approximately
60.2 miles from the site. This fault is capable of generating a 7.0 magnitude earthquake. The nearest
Type B fault is the offshore Newport- Inglewood fault (2.8 km from the subject property), which is capable
of generating a maximum magnitude of 6.9. In addition, peak ground acceleration values were also
calculated for the proposed project. Those values should be utilized for the design and construction of the
residential structures. These values represent ground motions that, at a minimum, have a 10 percent
probability of being exceeded in 50 years. The estimated mean peak ground acceleration at the site is
0.345g. As indicated above, the preliminary geologic /geotechnical investigation report identifies the
appropriate CBC seismic coefficients for structural design. Implementation of the recommendations
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196- Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -5
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 4.9 — Soils and Geology
prescribed in the preliminary geologic/geotechnical investigation, Conceptual Grading Plan Review
Report, and compliance with CBC structure design parameters will ensure that potential impacts
associated with ground shaking associated with a seismic event on one of the causative faults are
reduced to an acceptable level (i.e., minimize loss of life and /or property).
Secondary Seismic Effects
Liquefaction
According to the conceptual grading plan prepared for the proposed project, excavation necessary to
implement the proposed project will extend to an ultimate elevation of approximately 30 feet NAVD88 in
order to accommodate the subterranean levels of the proposed structure. The proposed excavation will
effectively remove the artificial fill and terrace materials and will expose bedrock throughout the
excavation. The removal of these materials, combined with the lack of subsurface water, effectively
eliminates the potential for liquefaction to occur. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated and no
mitigation measures are required.
Compressible, Expansive and Corrosive Soils
The project site and the surrounding area are not known to be located within an unstable geologic area and,
therefore, are not expected to be exposed to or create on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse hazards. A representative soil sample was tested for expansion potential in
accordance with Table 18 -1 -B, which concluded that existing site soils have a "very low" potential for
expansion and, therefore, are not a significant issue given on -site soil conditions. A final geotechnical
analysis will be completed as part of the final building permit review process, and strict adherence to the
design recommendations are mandatory with building permit issuance. As required in SC 4.9 -2, the project
must comply with the applicable design parameters prescribed in the 2007 CBC as well as those required by
the City of Newport Beach.
Soluble sulfate and corrosivity testing on representative samples of the on -site soils conducted for the project
indicate a negligible sulfate concentration; however, because the project is located in a coastal environment,
the potential for severe sulfate exposure to concrete exists. As a result, the type of concrete utilized should
be consistent with the requirements of the 2007 CBC and City of Newport Beach.
Bluff Erosion
The major lithologic bedrock unit currently exposed and which will be exposed post - construction along the
bluff face is generally moderately -to -well- cemented petroliferous sandstone cut by frequent sandstone dikes.
The dikes are hard and more resistant to weathering than the host sandstone. This bedrock bluff is resistant
to weathering and degradation, based on the aerial photo analysis conducted for the project, which
establishes that the bluff has maintained its existing configuration for at least the past 80 years. No open
fractures or adverse bedding planes were observed during the geologic investigation that could jeopardize
the integrity and stability of the bluff (Neblett & Associates, Inc., 2008).
The results of the diamond core samples (refer to Appendix A of the Conceptual Grading Plan Review
Report) indicate that rock quality designation (RQD) averages approximately 80 percent, which indicates low
fracture index and a relatively high quality of rock. Excavations for and construction of planned subterranean
levels, which will remove existing fill soils as well as a majority of the terrace deposits capping the bedrock
and daylighting on the bluff face, will leave a trapezoidal (i.e., pillar) section of intact rock as part of the
exposed bluff face to approximately Elevation 52.8 NAVD. With the removal of these materials, the bluff face
will be less vulnerable to bluff erosion. Considering the both the lithologic bedrock unit exposed and the rock
quality, the remaining trapezoidal section of intact rock will have sufficient strength to remain in place during
the economic life of the structure (i.e., 75 years). Furthermore, the Coastal Hazard Study prepared by
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -996 — Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -6
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 4.9 — Soils and Geology
GeoSoils, Inc., concluded that the proposed improvements will neither create nor contribute significantly to
erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or adjacent area.
The proposed grading plan indicates that excavation will daylight on the bluff face at approximately 52.8
NAVD, resulting in the removal of existing fill soils as well as a majority of the terrace deposits capping the
bedrock and daylighting on the bluff face. The removal of these materials as well as the incorporation of site
drainage measures recommended by the geotechnical consultant in the conceptual Grading Plan Review
Report will also further reduce the potential for future bluff erosion. Based on the analysis conducted for the
proposed project, bluff erosion is not considered a factor in design over the life of the structure.
Slope Stability
A slope stability analysis was included in the Conceptual Grading Plan Review Report prepared by Neblett &
Associates, Inc. The excavation slope was analyzed by calculating the factors of safety for a circular -type
failure and near the toe and along the base of excavation. The results of the slope stability analyses are
summarized in Table 4.9 -2.
Table 4.9 -2
Results of Stability Analyses
The computed factor of safety for the temporary excavation under static conditions is greater than the
minimum required 1.25. Therefore, based on the results of the stability analyses, the project geotechnical
consultant concluded that the temporary excavation with soldier pile shoring system is acceptable, provided
the recommendations prescribed in the Conceptual Grading Plan Review Report are implemented during
construction, including temporary shoring during excavation and construction of the deeper excavations, tie-
back anchors or internal bracing, etc. In addition, the structural design would also include provisions to
accommodate basement wall water - proofing, drain installation, etc.
Earthquake - Induced Landsliding/Rocksliding
The slopes descending from the proposed development expose very resistant sandstone of the Monterey
formation. Literature reviews, site mapping, aerial photo analysis, and subsurface exploration conducted for
the project during the preparation of the Conceptual Grading Plan Review Report ( Neblett & Associates, Inc.,
2008) revealed that landslides do not exist on or adjacent to the subject property. The lack of landslide
features indicates that the area has been relatively stable in the recent geologic past (i.e., Holocene) and has
not been subject to earthquake - induced large -scale landsliding. Therefore, the potential for earthquake -
induced landsliding is considered low.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005-196 —Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -7
Computed Minimum
Static
File
Cross-Section
Method of Analysis
Factor of Safety
Reference
Circular -type failure near toe of
Typical
excavation
1.93
416 -1
Circular -type failure through base of
excavation
3 .63
416 -2
SOURCE: Neblett & Associates, Inc. (September 2008
The computed factor of safety for the temporary excavation under static conditions is greater than the
minimum required 1.25. Therefore, based on the results of the stability analyses, the project geotechnical
consultant concluded that the temporary excavation with soldier pile shoring system is acceptable, provided
the recommendations prescribed in the Conceptual Grading Plan Review Report are implemented during
construction, including temporary shoring during excavation and construction of the deeper excavations, tie-
back anchors or internal bracing, etc. In addition, the structural design would also include provisions to
accommodate basement wall water - proofing, drain installation, etc.
Earthquake - Induced Landsliding/Rocksliding
The slopes descending from the proposed development expose very resistant sandstone of the Monterey
formation. Literature reviews, site mapping, aerial photo analysis, and subsurface exploration conducted for
the project during the preparation of the Conceptual Grading Plan Review Report ( Neblett & Associates, Inc.,
2008) revealed that landslides do not exist on or adjacent to the subject property. The lack of landslide
features indicates that the area has been relatively stable in the recent geologic past (i.e., Holocene) and has
not been subject to earthquake - induced large -scale landsliding. Therefore, the potential for earthquake -
induced landsliding is considered low.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005-196 —Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -7
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental
Tsunamis and Seiches
Section 4.9 — Soils and
A Coastal Hazard Study was prepared by GeoSoils, Inc., (October 2006), which includes an analysis of wave
run -up, including that generated from a tsunami. The potential surface gravity waves that arrive at the subject
property are small (i.e., less than 1.0 foot) waves and boat wakes, both of which are dampened by the
moored vessels and dock systems that are located in front of and adjacent to the site. The maximum
possible waves that can be generated at the site are those from ocean swells propagating down the entrance
channel. As revealed in that report, the analysis was conservative and based on the open ocean wave
height instead of the expected lower tsunami wave height inside Newport Bay. A 1.5 -foot high wave was
used as the basis for the analysis with a water level of +8.0 feet NAVD 88, which represents an
approximately 100 -year recurrence interval oceanographic conditions. Based on that analysis, the study
concluded that there is no potential hazard from surface gravity waves or boat wakes to the proposed
development.
Tsunami are waves generated by submarine earthquakes, landslides, or volcanic action. The maximum
tsunami runup in the Newport Harbor area is less than two meters in height. Any wave, including a tsunami,
that approaches the site in Corona del Mar will be refracted, modified, and reduced in height by the Newport
jetties. Based on the same methodology that was used to estimate the surface gravity wave and boat wakes,
the 6 foot high tsunami would yield a runup to elevation +16.2 feet NAVD 88 (i.e., six feet runup + 10 feet
NAVD 88 water elevation). The basement elevation of the proposed structure is proposed to be
approximately 30 feet NAVD88, with the lowermost exposed face of the structure daylighting on the slope at
approximately 52.8 feet NAVD88. In addition, the dock access /emergency exit is located at elevation 40.5
feet NAVD88 and would also be located above the potential tsunami /wave runup limits discussed above.
The tsunami, like the design extreme wave /wake, will not reach the proposed improvements. The analysis is
conservative because the open ocean tsunami wave height was used instead of the expected lower tsunami
wave height inside Newport Bay. Due to the infrequent nature and the relatively low 500 -year recurrence
interval tsunami wave height, combined with the elevation of the proposed improvements, the site is
reasonably safe from tsunami hazards. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated during the 75 -year
economic life of the proposed project and no mitigation measures are required. Further, considering the
proposed finish pad elevation, the potential for seiche effects to the project site is considered remote due to
the shallow depth of Newport Harbor; no significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are
required.
Coastal Erosion
Because the proposed project includes the replacement of the existing dock and landing facilities, an
engineering study (Coastal Engineering Assessment for the "Aerie" Dock Project) was prepared by Noble
Consultants, Inc. (May 9, 2008) to evaluate the potential effects of high winds and sand transport
associated with these facilities. The findings and recommendations of this study are summarized below.
Wave Conditions and Potential Impacts
Wind stations derived from measurements at Long Beach Airport and San Clemente Island were
analyzed to define typical and extreme wind conditions for the prediction of wind waves at the project site.
Based on the data from the Long Beach Airport, approximately 25 percent of the time, the wind blows
from the WNW -NNW sector at an average speed of approximately six knots. In addition, the one -hour
average wind speed from this sector never exceeded 40 knots. Winds from the SSE -S sector have a
relatively low probability of occurrence (i.e., less than 10 percent) and would typically blow at about six
knots but would not exceed 27 knots. Wind data from San Clemente Island indicated that the WNW -
NNW wind section would also blow at approximately the same speeds as shown for the Long Beach
Airport. Winds from the SSE -S sector typically blow at about four knots; however, extreme winds from
this sector could blow above 56 knots, significantly higher than this wind probability at Long Beach
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196— Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -8
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 4.9— Soils and
Airport. Extreme wind speeds and fetches for the project site were calculated SSE -S sector (refer to
Table 4.9 -3) based on the data available at both Long Beach Airport and San Clemente Island.
Table 4.9 -3
Selected Wind Conditions for Wind Wave Predictions
Condition
Direction
Seed
Significant
Fetch
Typical
WNW -NNW
6 Knots
3 m /sec
Newport Bay, 4,300 Feet
1.3 km
Direction
SSE -S
6 Knots
3 m /sec
Pacific Ocean, 60 miles
110 km
Extreme
0.13
WNW -NNW
36 knots
19 m /sec
Newport Bay, 4,300 Feet
1.3 km
SSE -S
48 knots
24 m /sec
Pacific Ocean, 60 miles
110 km
SOURCE:
Noble Consultants, Inc. (May 9, 2008
Extreme
WNW -NNW
Based on the wind conditions identified in Table 4.9 -3, wind wave conditions at the project site have been
estimated and are summarized in Table 4.9 -4. Based on that information, it can be concluded that wind -
induced wave conditions at the project site would be typically mild. For about 65 percent of the time,
there would be no wind waves. For the remainder of the time, significant wave heights would be 0.5 foot
or less. On less frequent occasions, wind - induced significant wave heights would be higher than one foot
and up to 2.5 feet, as indicated in Table 4.94.
Table 4.9 -4
Wind Wave Conditions at the Project Site Resulting from
Typical and Extreme WNW -NNW and SSE -S Winds
Typical and extreme swell conditions for offshore Newport Beach were also calculated and presented in
the Noble study. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 4.9 -5. Based on that information, it
can be concluded that wave conditions at the project site would, in general, be mild for approximately 65
percent of the time with either no wind waves or waves of negligible relevance at the project site. For
about 25 percent of the time, winds from the WNW -NNW would generate a short 0.13 -foot significant
height, less than 1- second period wind wave; and for 10 percent of the time, the offshore SSE -S sea
breeze would generate a 0.5 -foot significant height, 1.7 period wind wave. On less frequent occasions,
WNW -NNW winds within Newport Bay could generate 1.3 foot significant height, 1.5- second period wind
waves. Similarly less frequent local storms from the SSE -S could generate 2.5 -foot significant height, 9 —
10- second significant wind waves at the project site.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196 — Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -9
Significant
Wave Height
Wave
Frequency of
Condition
Direction
Feet
Period (sec)
Occurrence
Typical
WNW -NNW
0.13
<1,0
25% of the time
SSE -S
0.5
1.7
10% of the time
Extreme
WNW -NNW
1.3
1.5
Less frequent'
SSE -S
2.5
9 to 10
Less frequent
'A detailed wave hindcast, beyond the scope of the study prepared for
the project, would be required to
determine the frequency of occurrence (or return period) of this event.
SOURCE: Noble Consultants, Inc.
(May 9, 2008
Typical and extreme swell conditions for offshore Newport Beach were also calculated and presented in
the Noble study. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 4.9 -5. Based on that information, it
can be concluded that wave conditions at the project site would, in general, be mild for approximately 65
percent of the time with either no wind waves or waves of negligible relevance at the project site. For
about 25 percent of the time, winds from the WNW -NNW would generate a short 0.13 -foot significant
height, less than 1- second period wind wave; and for 10 percent of the time, the offshore SSE -S sea
breeze would generate a 0.5 -foot significant height, 1.7 period wind wave. On less frequent occasions,
WNW -NNW winds within Newport Bay could generate 1.3 foot significant height, 1.5- second period wind
waves. Similarly less frequent local storms from the SSE -S could generate 2.5 -foot significant height, 9 —
10- second significant wind waves at the project site.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196 — Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -9
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 4.9 — Soils and Geology
The particular orientation of the Newport Beach jetties and the presence of the Santa Catalina and San
Clemente Islands prevent the predominant swell conditions, which approach the Southern California Bight
from the W -NW sector for approximately 86 percent of the time, from affecting the site. With a frequency
of occurrence of less than two percent, typical SSE -SW, 12 to 16- second swell would reach the project
site with a significant height of 0.5 foot. On less frequent occasions, extreme SSE -SSW swell generated
by distant storms could reach the project site with significant heights of approximately 1.5 feet and
periods in the 12 to 14- second range. Table 4.9 -5 summarizes the wave conditions at the project site
resulting from typical and extreme SSE -SSW swell conditions offshore.
Based on the dock plan proposed for the project wave conditions from the WNW -NNW will approach
moored vessels at the proposed facility approximately from the beam, whereas wave conditions from the
SSE -SSW would be entering through the entrance channel and approach the moored vessels from the
bow (head seas). Under typical WNW -NNW wave, and SSE -SSW wave and swell conditions, wave
heights would be below the recommended one -foot Iimit,2 regardless of the recurrence intervals
recommended for wave conditions in small craft harbors.
Table 4.9 -5
Wave Conditions at the Project Site Resulting from
Typical and Extreme SSE -SSW Swell Conditions Offshore
The project site is exposed to impinging waves from either wind - generated period waves in the bay or
ocean swells that will propagate through the entrance channel. For about 65 percent of the time, there
would be no wind waves. For the remainder of the time, significant wave heights would be 0.5 foot or
less. On less frequent occasions, wind - induced significant wave heights would be higher than one foot
and up to 2.5 feet. Extreme SSE -SSW swell generated by distant storms could reach the project site with
significant heights of approximately 1.5 feet and periods in the 12 to 14- second range. Because of the
orientation of the harbor entrance channel, the study concluded that the site will be more exposed to
storm waves generated associated with passage of winter pre - frontal storm winds and southern
hemisphere swell that typically occurs in the summary months. As a result, the design of the proposed
dock should be based on the extreme wave conditions where the structures will be most susceptible to
damage from wave - induced forces and motion.
'Mercer, A.G., Isaacson, M. and Mulcahy, M. (198). 'Design Wave Climate in Small Craft Harbours," 18" Conference on Coastal
Engineering, Cape Town, South Africa.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196— Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -f0
Frequency of
Condition
Offshore
Project Site
Occurrence
Hs = 5 Feet
Hs = 0.5 Feet
Typical
T = 12 — 16 Seconds
T = 12 — 16 Seconds
Less than 2%
From SSE -SSW
Parallel to entrance channel
H = 15 Feet
H = 1.5 Feet
Extreme
T = 12 — 14 Seconds
T = 12 — 14 Seconds
Less Frequent'
From SSE -SSW
I Parallel to entrance channel
Hs = significant wave height; T = period.
'A detailed wave hindcast, beyond the scope of the study conducted for the project, would be required to
determine the frequency of occurrence (or return period) of this event.
SOURCE: Noble Consultants, Inc. (May
9, 2008
The project site is exposed to impinging waves from either wind - generated period waves in the bay or
ocean swells that will propagate through the entrance channel. For about 65 percent of the time, there
would be no wind waves. For the remainder of the time, significant wave heights would be 0.5 foot or
less. On less frequent occasions, wind - induced significant wave heights would be higher than one foot
and up to 2.5 feet. Extreme SSE -SSW swell generated by distant storms could reach the project site with
significant heights of approximately 1.5 feet and periods in the 12 to 14- second range. Because of the
orientation of the harbor entrance channel, the study concluded that the site will be more exposed to
storm waves generated associated with passage of winter pre - frontal storm winds and southern
hemisphere swell that typically occurs in the summary months. As a result, the design of the proposed
dock should be based on the extreme wave conditions where the structures will be most susceptible to
damage from wave - induced forces and motion.
'Mercer, A.G., Isaacson, M. and Mulcahy, M. (198). 'Design Wave Climate in Small Craft Harbours," 18" Conference on Coastal
Engineering, Cape Town, South Africa.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196— Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -f0
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental Impact Report Section 4.9 — Soils and
The Noble Consultants study concluded that from a wave climate perspective, the proposed docking
facility is feasible in a wide range of conditions. However, extreme wind waves from the SSE -SSW are
expected to exceed the recommended maximum wave heights and, therefore, damage to the moored
vessels and /or docking facilities may occur. In these less frequent conditions, vessels should be moved
and sheltered in a less exposed location.
Sediment Processes and Flow Patterns
In the coastal /harbor zone, sediment typically moves in accordance with the impinging wave direction.
Thus, sediment movement in the Newport Harbor entrance area depends strongly on the two
distinguished wave patterns, winter north or northwest swells and southerly swells, that are typically
observed in the region. The north and northwest swells occurring in the winter months have a deep water
approach direction of between 2751 and 2850 toward Southern California. Sediment movement along the
Newport Beach shoreline would, therefore, be toward the southeast (i.e., toward Newport Harbor). At
The Wedge, the beach adjacent to the harbor entrance area, sands are partially pushed through the
riprap jetty as well as moved around the jetty. The transported sands deposit in the harbor entrance
adjacent to the jetty area during the winter months.
Based on information provided by the City of Newport Beach (Chris Miller, Harbor Resource Division), an
annual total of approximately 5,000 cubic yards of sands are transported by waves into cove beaches in
the area, resulting in a need for dredging from some dock facilities in order to maintain an adequate depth
for boat berthing. The vast majority of sand depositing in the cove areas is coastal littoral sediment
transported through the entrance channel. Sediment discharged either from the Upper Newport Bay or
storm drains in the adjacent area would be fine silt, which is not beach - quality material.
The project site's waterfront area is characterized by various rock outcrops that form a cove beach, which
appears to be stable because little change has occurred over the years based on a review of aerial
photographs between 2001 and 2006. The bottom gradient where the proposed replacement dock will be
constructed is approximately 9:1 (horizontal to vertical). A patch of sand along the channel side of the
site's rock outcrop that is parallel to the navigational channel was observed at the time the study was
conducted by Noble Consultants, Inc. The patch of sand, which is located in the depth shallower than 5
feet at the MLLW line, appears to be stable.
Exhibit 4.9 -1 illustrates the flow patterns that characterize the channel in the vicinity of the project during
the flood /ebb tide cycle. The flood tide water flows somewhat parallel to the depth contours at the site
and splits either into Carnation Cove or along the main navigational channel. These two flow fields would
eventually converge and continue toward the upper bay. During the ebb tide, the reverse flow patterns
were observed, except for an eddy zone located 100 feet oceanward from the existing pier. The
occurrence of this eddy zone may be attributed to the abrupt deepening of water depth, which not only
slows down the flow rate but also alters the flow direction.
Based on the findings presented in the coastal engineering assessment prepared for the project,
sediment deposited along the east side of the entrance channel at Newport Harbor is due to the
uniqueness of sequential sediment transport patters that are typically observed in the harbor entrance
area. Coastal alongshore drifted sands are transported either through the east jetty or via the entrance
channel during the winter months and moved further into the bay by southerly swells primarily occurring in
the following summer season.
Sand - quality sediment movement within the project region is typically in the along - channel direction from
the harbor entrance to the inner bay. A stable bayshore condition is observed at the project site. Regular
sedimentation observed at China Reef located in the updrift area is primarily due to the groin -like outcrop
feature that entraps the along - channel transported sediment.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196— Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -11
Existing
Dock
Flaw
Path
11 C
f I
� \ 1
2
7 U
O
Pierhesd ne
Bulkhe Line >`
. Guide Pile / \
Note: Contours In feet MLLW
Flood -Tide Flow F
\ Existing
Dock
Line
Z
j o
a
• Guide Pile
Note: Conmrs in feel MLLW
SOURCE: Noble Consultants
Line — I
i\
]dw
Ebb -Tide Flow Patterns
Ca
�C
ore
9e
�M
Cd
Op0
— e0
d�
I AL
Exhibit 4.9 -1
Flood -Tide and Ebb -Tide Flow Patterns
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196 — Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
Page 4.9 -12
Aerie PA2005 -196
Draft Environmental
Section 4.9 — Soils and
With a small percentage (approximately six percent) of the along - channel blockage area resulting from
the proposed new dock facility, the potential impact to this unique sediment movement process in the
entrance channel is insignificant, although localized sand deposit resulting from the presence of the
proposed guide piles within the sand - moving path may occur. In addition, the project is located in the
downdrift direction of the neighboring China Reef, the project's potential impact on sedimentation at the
updrift location such as China Reef is inconsequential. No significant impacts to sand transport resulting
from project implement are anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.
4.9.5 Mitigation Measures
Impact 4.9 -1 Although the site is suitable for the proposed development, construction of the
proposed residential structure may be affected by the existing geologic and
geotechnical engineering factors, including regional seismicity, bedrock, corrosive
soils, erosion, etc.
MM 4.9 -1a Project implementation shall adhere to the engineering recommendations for site grading
and foundation design and construction presented in the Conceptual Grading Plan
Review Report prepared by Nebeltt & Associates, Inc., and subsequent detailed
geotechnical engineering analyses.
MM 4.9 -1b Accessory structures shall be relocated or removed if threatened by coastal erosion.
Accessory structures shall not be expanded and routine maintenance of accessory
structures is permitted.
Impact 4.9 -2 The site (i.e., proposed dock) will be exposed to storm waves generated associated
with passage of winter pre- frontal storm winds and southern hemisphere swell that
typically occurs in the summary months. Extreme wind waves from the SSE -SSW are
expected to exceed the recommended maximum wave heights, which may result in
damage to the moored vessels and /or docking facilities.
MM 4.9 -2a During periods when boats would be exposed to excessive wave - induced motions, boats
should be sheltered at mooring can locations that are available inside Newport Harbor to
avoid damage.
MM 4.9 -2b The dock design shall be based on the extreme wave conditions identified in the coastal
engineering study (Noble Consultants, Inc., 2008).
4.9.6 Level of Significance After Mitigation
Implementation of the standard conditions prescribed in Section 4.9.3 and proposed mitigation measures will
ensure that potential soils and geologic and related wave - induced impacts identified in Section 4.9.4 will be
reduced to a less than significant level. No significant unavoidable adverse impacts will remain.
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Aerie PA2005 -196 — Newport Beach, CA
March 2009
4.9 -13