The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSS2 - Lido Village Conceptual PlanCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. January 11, 2011 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Planning Department James Campbell, Acting Planning Director 949 - 644 -3210, Icampbell(a)newportbeachca.gov SUBJECT: Lido Village Conceptual Planning ISSUE The City has been participating in a conceptual planning effort for the Lido Village area that consists of the current City Hall site, Lido Marina Village and Via Lido Plaza. The City Council considered two alternative draft concept plans at the November 23, 2010, study session. The design team has focused on addressing comments from the Council and public and there has been additional outreach with adjacent property owners and the community at large. RECOMMENDATION Provide input and direction to the design team for the preparation of the final concept plans to be presented at the January 25, 2011, City Council meeting. DISCUSSION On November 23, 2010, the design team presented two alternative draft concept plans. Since that meeting, the design team has been working to address comments received during the study session and they have focused on re -use opportunities for the current City Hall site. Major changes to the concept plans are summarized within the attached letter from the project manager, Tim Collins (Attachment 1). The design team has also prepared a narrative summarizing the various opportunities, constraints and terms used within the conceptual planning effort (Attachment 2). Two alternative designs that build upon the earlier canal concept are contained within in the attached presentation (Attachment 3). Lido Village Conceptual Planning January 11, 2011 Page 2 The primary purpose of this study session is to provide a forum to discuss re -use options for the current City Hall site and how those potential options might be planned to integrate with the anticipated redevelopment of surrounding properties. The design team will take all input offered by the City Council and the public during the study session and they will continue to refine the concept plans. The schedule anticipates a final comprehensive presentation of the full study to the City Council on January 25, 2011. Environmental Review Lido Village Conceptual Planning Project is only a planning and /or feasibility study for possible future actions that the City has not approved, adopted or funded. The concept plans are not regulatory documents and would not have a legally binding effect. This activity is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15262 of the California Code of Regulations. Public Notice This agenda item has been noticed in accordance with the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the public meeting). The item appeared upon the agenda for this meeting which was posted at City Hall and on the City website. Funding Availability Funding for this continued effort has been equally shared between the three major stakeholders: the City and the owners of Lido Marina Village and Via Lido Plaza. No additional funding is requested. Prepared and submitted by: James Campbell, Acting Planning Director Attachment 1 Page Blank H-CA- DATE: DECEMBER 23, 2010 TO: JIM CAMPBELL FROM: TIMOTHY C. COLLINS RE: LIDO VILLAGE CONCEPTUAL PLANNING — UPDATE FOR JANUARY 11, 2011 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION For the advance package to the Council, attached are the following. Project Brief Revised Site Plan for Village (dated 12- 22 -10) and 2 hand rendering overlays. Current Status of Study— Subsequent to the Studv Session on November 23, 2010, the design team has focused on response to Council and public comments. There has been added outreach to the adjacent property owners and community at large. The major changes to the village site plan are as follow: Integrating of the neighborhood shopping center (Via Lido Plaza) with the City Hall site to maximize the connectivity of and access to the parcels and show potential benefits of lot line adjustment. Priori tized the alternative land uses for the City Hall site to include a mix of public use (Fire Station and a Community Services Center) with added public spaces (corner plaza, greenbelt, and future canal right of way), plus a senior housing element. Movement of the district parking structure to the South side of 32nd Street to land currently owned by two of the major private land owners (Olen and Marshall). Incorporation of a more advanced plan for redevelopment of the shopping center by the Fritz Duda Company, including their "self parked" configuration to meet the coverage demands of prospective tenants and phasing schedule demands. Addition of a sky bridge pedestrian feature to maximize the Ocean to Bay connection Added images to convey the design intent of the plan features and landscaping enhancements. Minimization of intensity of use and respect for current general plan and zoning compliance. Note: Due to the urgency of focus on the City Hall site and integration with the Via Lido Plaza re -use planning, there have been no changes to the prior options considered for Lido Marina Village not the potential changes to vehicular circulation on Via Lido Dr. and 32nd Street. Recommendations Council to provide feedback that: a. The conceptual plan is evolving in a positive direction toward consensus with adequate mitigation of the observed negative impacts of prior options considered; T. C. Collins & Associates 3600 Birch Street, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 863 -9099 www.tccoUins.com b. Offers more programmatic direction on the preferred alternate uses for the Communiry Service Center; c. Recognizes the need to accommodate adjacent property owners by granting incentives to achieve integration of their properties into the public improvements and rights of way; input possibilities of jurisdictional solutions (land swaps, easements, joint use, etc.) d. Give the planning team and staff direction on required deliverables and data for the January 25, 2011 City Council meeting. The planning team will continue to refine the site plan, expand to some vertical depiction /massing illustrations, develop the market demand and financial feasibility analytics for the meeting presentation, and expand outreach to potential senior housing design experts and the adjacent property owners impacted by the canal system. Results of such efforts will be covered in a supplemental report to be issued on or about January 6, . 2011. 12/23/10 Attachment 2 Page Blank Lido Village DATE: September 22, 2010 Community Serving Strategies The city hall site has a general plan designation of public Facilities. "The'PF' designation is intended to provide public facilities, including cultural institutions, government facilities, libraries, community centers, public hospitals, schools, and public utilities. " In order to provide uses not on this list, commuity support would have to be obtained because of all likelihood any major land uses change would require voters approval. Cultural Institutional and or Community center designations may give us some latitude to provide community uses that fall within these designations. Private vendors may be able to operate certain portions of the services within the centers. An example would be the snack bar at CDM State Beach - which is owned by the city but operated by a private company. A community center could include a gymnasium, demonstration venues and classroom facilities. Providing public benefit is a key component for project success. Land Use/ Zoning Opportunities The following is a list of specially designated land uses and programming elements that could be incorporated into the Lido Village Master Plan. There is a distinct difference between approved zoning and land use designation and program elements. One facilitates approvals and jurisdictional control and the other is a direct interface between the users and the experience of the place. • Drop in the current land use • Mixed Use Overlay • Develop opportunities for landowners to maximize their property value and long -term goals. • Allow for Flexibility within zoning to allow landowners to adapt to market conditions. • Establish a special district zoning - Lido Village District Zone • Unique to the project site - Contextual just to Lido Village study area • Use existing and future studies to lay the foundation for zoning • Opportunity for specific plan implementation • Components of the current zoning that could restrict creativity and out of the box thinking. • Height restrictions - Provide Flexibility for landowners that allow them to participate in land swaps while maximizing their SF yield. • Allowable square footage - This is in conjunction with current parking agreements and standards. Look at opportunities to create a win -win for all parties. • Joint use - parking programming - Use other jurisdictional project examples/ analogues. • Existing traffic pattern - Look into opportunities for modification • Newport Harbor and marina interface - Allow zoning to maximize yield with slip spaces without sacrificing needed pedestrian energy. • Traffic and Circulation and Public Realm • Widening of pedestrian sidewalks and elimination of medians, or re striping to facilitate on- street activity. • Spill over uses from tenants: Sidewalk cafes, kiosks, portable sales racks etc. Project programming elements: Lido Village Lido Village DATE: September 22, 2010 This is a list of specific program elements that could be beneficial to the stakeholders and the residents. These elements represent the physical attributes of a sites configuration and environment. • Size and Scale • Shade and shadow experiences. • Day and night complimentary uses • Signage, branding and way- finding • Accessibility; Streets, parks, plazas, parking, sidewalks, promenades, uses on sidewalks. • Outdoor Living Rooms: Use for residents and a place to call their own o Holidays and celebrations • Places to take friends and visitors • Outside entertainment; music, movies on the quad, art walks. • Community Bike Opportunities: Lido Village to 32nd street beach — PCH — Newport Harbor Community Based Programming • Community Center — This was one of the initial program opportunities discussed • Conference Center— City owned and maintained regional conference facility. • Fire Station Relocation — Create an iconographic building at key intersection • Civic Plaza or Common gathering space — Designate a space for the public that can have dual use a passive and active event space. • Transit Station — Bus transfer station, park & ride, connections to regional transportation. • Active Programming Opportunities — Amphitheater, Skate Park, Gymnasium/ Multi purpose facility. Retail/ Entertainment • Community Serving Market — Local or boutique user that provides high quality service Lido Village Lido Village DATE: September 22, 2010 • Destination Dining - Larger tenant dining experience that creates a regional draw • Boutique Dining - Small local based restaurateur who want to expand and grow within the city. • Theater - Complimentary uses for the theater that keep people after the movie. Expansion of the theater to more than ? Is there a market? • Support Retail - Pharmacy, small format urban solutions for national stores. • Small shop retail - Encourage local shops to stay and help anchor the area as a local and regional draw. • Mixed Use office - Office over retail, jobs/ housing balance. • Hospitality - Boutique hotel or conference facility. Is there a market? • Education - Is there a market for destination educational use: culinary institute, art institute or continuing education. • Fitness Center - Private operator for workout facility. La Fitness, Equinox, Sports Club etc.. Marina Entertainment • Incorporate better capture strategies with party boat users. • Think like theme parks and street the people through an experience to enter and exit the park. Disneyland Universal Studios City Walk, Duty Free shops in international airports. Residential Opportunities • Limited amount of Live Work - Use a modified application of Cannery Village • High Density Residential - Encourage alternative residential program and patterns. Create enough critical mass to generate a captive user group for the village. View oriented units • Shop Keeper Units - Integrated 'B' occupancy for mixed use. Similar to Cannery Village but with different programming and use permitting. • Affordable Housing - Incorporate newer models of affordable housing that benefit the local community. Signature opportunity that would set the tone for the village. • Seniors housing - Opportunity for age qualified living as well as Congregate Care Retirement Community (CCRC) • Assisted medical living -re- habilitation facilities, etc.. Lido Village Page Blank Attachment 3 Page Blank r� n x LIDO VILLAGE CONCEPT PLAN CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION CITY HALL RE -USE DRAFT WA I 1 -11 -11 Tim Collins TC Collins & Associates WAI �[icowM� I GUIDING PRINCIPLES Provide thoughtful yet creative design solutions that are appropriate for the City of Newport Beach. • Retain boutique quality of retail experience. • Incorporate more verticality into the village encouraging a broader diversity of uses. • Joint Use Parking Program • Encourage public use and revenue opportunities for city hall site. • Respecting General Plan zoning and intensity of uses. Balance local service needs and maximize regional draw opportunities without sacrificing one for the other. • Tap into the sub - regional draw opportunities for the village. Avoid pitfalls of trying to over -reach our audience. • Enhance our greatest assets -The Beach and the Bay. • New opportunities for marina improvements. Highlight Lido Village as a "Gateway Village" for the City of Newport Beach. • Incorporate thoughtful branding, signage and monumentation programs for the village. • Develop a "Smart Streets" program to frame and define the character of the village. • Altering street patterns to make them more intuitive. • Incorporating framework elements that define character Respect the local desire for strong aesthetic value for each unique city village. • Create an architectural theme and style that is appropriate and thoughtful for Lido Village. Use historic materials, colors and styles in a crafted application. • Weave Newport's great maritime and resort history into an implementable vision. • Visioning and architectural styling Insure all land use concepts are thoroughly tested from a market standpoint as well as revenue generation while incorporating stakeholder and public perspective. • Ensure that the project is economically, socially and environmentally sustainable. • Checking the plan during design: CNB, Duda, Marshall Olen. Develop a dynamic plan that is approvable by Newport Beach public officials & key staff, stakeholders, citizens and the California Coastal Commission. • Provide a workable mix of uses that will stand the test of time and provide greater public benefit. • Draw on community outreach to help provide authorship in crafting program, theme and vision for the village. • Consensus building with key stakeholders to ensure future implementation miiiii Recap 11 /23 meeting comments /direction • What have we learned since 11.23. 10 meeting? • Comments from council and residents Present summary of major changes on concept • Alternative Plans: SA and 5B • Image analogues with programming • Vertical element - rough massing model Program Options for Community Service Center (C.S.C.) Update Market Demand and Fiscal Analysis • Estimated property values and potential revenue Stakeholders Input Public Comments and Feedback Council Action/ Direction on Next Steps Q J F �i .fir mcov Ma p Comments from 11.23.10 Presentation • "Disappointed " - Plan lacks a sense of place and cohesion • "Lack of Imagination"- Looks like a drab run of the mill commercial center. • "Needs a centralized open space " - Plaza, park, gathering place. • "Important to have the marinas create a sense of place" • "Do we need a parking structure ? " - Need to define parking deficit vs. permitted uses and conditional approvals. • "Canal plan and Alt 3 provide a good sense of place" • "Needs to be a Hook" create a local and regional draw to the site. • "There is a need for increased public safety" -Police sub - station • "Allow for a Destination Anchor " - Boutique Hotel, Restaurants, Upscale shops. • "There needs to be further analysis with Charter Vessels and their impacts" • "Reach out to second tier land owners."- To further the collaborative process Q J .fir mcov Ma p Further Explanation of Program and Uses • "Life Long Learning Center " -An education / skills facility that is to be used for multi generational programs. • "Wellness Center" - An extension facility of a regional health care provider that educates and assists residents in preventative health management. This is a multi generational center that is a compliment to city programs and classes. "Education Village " - Extension campus facility with classrooms and seminar J facilities. Tenants would provide advanced testing, secondary education, and graduate level curriculum. Non and for profit universities. "Community Service Center" (C.S.C.) -Multipurpose facility that would serve the residents of the Peninsula Point, Lido Island, Cannery Village, and West Newport. Facility could include classrooms, entertainment/ catering kitchen, fitness center, public safety center etc. "Senior Housing" -Age qualified housing with support facilities. "Workforce Housing" - Market rate housing opportunity that is accessible and affordable for residents of Newport Beach. �L /CpI.M� Further Explanation of Program and Uses "Canal System " - An open air water conveyance system that would provide public open space while alleviating water quality issues associated with the Finley Tract. "Boutique Hotel"- Small format hotel with 80 - 120 keys. Facilities would include upscale restaurant, meeting facilities, entertainment venue etc. "Parking Inventory " - To inventory the total amount of parking spaces within the study area. Then determine the entitled amount of parking per existing J conditional uses vs. city parking code requirements based upon potential land owner improvements. Team Recommendations: Council to provide feedback that: Q • Endorses a conceptual plan as it is evolving in a positive direction towards consensus and mitigation of observed impacts; takes the best of each considered option. J • Offer more programmatic direction on the preferred alternative uses for the City Hall Site and Community Service Center. %%� • Recognize the need to accommodate adjacent property owners by granting incentives to integrate properties in public improvement areas. • Give the planning team and staff direction on required deliverables and data for the January 25th 2011 City Council Meeting. Todd Larner WHA Architecture and Planning WAI �L /CpI�M� "Disappointed" "Lack of Imagination" "Needs to be a Hook" via, s "No Sense of Place" By focusing on the details and constraints of the village, we deviated from the "Big Picture "of establishing a framework for place making. Q J J M r - 1e1 MCONCOINCAOUP 16 Establishing the Concept Plan Create a "Framework Plan" vs. "Technical Plan" • Provide future flexibility for stakeholders and landowner participants. Q • Allow public improvements to set the stage for future development. j J Components in Creating a Sense of Place • "Definable Edges" - Where do we begin and end? • "Circulation" -Critical to define pathway of circulation for pedestrians and vehicles. Circulation elements provide connectivity and link various components together. • "Activity Nodes"- definable spaces that people gather and interact to help create identity to a space. • ""Landmarks"- Iconic features that can be architectural or landscape elements that help define theme and character. • Monumentation, Fountains, Sinage, Bridges, Civic Buildings, etc.. avtli w V, A F BUILDING BLOCKS: EDGES gar MCONCOINCAOUP n 11 1 ''�+ ,.:� 9�' ■A $rim o O J Y' BUILDING BLOCKS: CIRCULATION J 0 �r MCONCOINCAOUP 1 ''�+ ,.:� 9�' ■A $rim • M' � R tit , offiNr.yiiinow- R BUILDING BLOCKS: ACTIVITY NODES J �.7 �r MCONCOINCAOUP JA I& mI :A- iN BUILDING BLOCKS: LANDMARKS J �r MCONCOINCAOUP Proposed CITY HALL LAND SWAP 1 ~J sir MCOUCUNCAg1P � J J JJ JJ� J J JJ 5 J J J J J JJ�V J J JJ J J J ,\` \mot' , \_ /F • �•� J w wzum vats .J r. Lljj�i �r � J Vii i'l,J1 t' J ALTERNATIVE j =mr r. wklj ;,, ALTERNATIVE 5A MASSING .j.�CC p S!� .:J s � Ls � wlu, rG 0- n ALTERNATIVE 5A MASSING N' AW -v 1 J + MCONCOINCAOUP ■ ° - �� ►�� / o i MARSHALL DEV. MIXED-USE: OFF/ RES J J r r J r rr J \ / _ J J _ OLEN - CORP. MID- ;J J J �- - ' �� JJJ MID -R6E RESIDENTW J J �J W J J J 'I v J J J J J J JJ3'J'J"3�•l�FiwFJ J "J� J r r J JJ J t i ALTERNATIVE s® J ALTERNATIVE 5B MASSING �r MCONCOINCAOUP i f. ALTERNATIVE 5B MASSING �r MCONCOINCAOUP NINOMAA Io Gf- &&A"aN'r 70 8✓ 14CE p,�Pt /NBLnT 11e^AI&N AW6. 9Ec�N0 Ilam l MOZ44MIN6 jCW - BVENI- V /BW/NG Fowtiep owvp WANG V /EM5 r &,w &/XffNMH6Ni R-✓+Ti1 Nit?AeE Y&- WAML-WWWr D M117077E IV&O& erloee � - VVYIX jV /yql✓ K�vV /N7HIAO77V6 nW776h ft- /h ✓/f ✓ANOUb OGU6W itif°- A°-6. /Nl4'+t�7J�/v M 7W 44y AP W AV B � 0 e CANAL PROMENADE/ PLAZA ., � Considered program options for • Public Meeting/ Classroom Space (free to non -profit organizations; all others pay rental) Recreation Activities • Training rooms for low intensity, floor exercise (mommy & me and seniors i.e. yoga- multi - generational classes) • Catering kitchen/ foodservice facility to support Village special events, charity events utilizing the adjacent open place/ plaza • Registration and orientation- youth sports • Arts center for physical and performing arts • Social gatherings • Indoor basketball/ volleyball court for adult club /team sports Public Safety • Police sub - station • Base for bicycle officers • Command center for 4th of July enforcement • Alternative location for Harbor Resources/ Harbor Commission facility • Information Center on Emergency Response /Tsunami Warning Education • University extension classes (for free) • Wellness/ Dietary care- including culinary and �':. nutrition classes/ demonstrations • Overflow- lifeguard training classes 44 Healthcare and Fitness • Physician speakers- Program Series (for free- rental) • Hoag Community Outreach/ Education: Physical fitness, mental health, preventative medicine education and presentation of preventative care options and practices Other • Visitor information/ services resource center (maps, calendars, rental info, etc.) • Payment center (for residents accustomed to paying tickets, utility bills) Other Considerations • Don't duplicate or compete with Marina Park or Oasis Senior Center • Minimize intensity of use �Ewro,� • �L /ip1•M� ¢Q� Q W 6�sr .I/�J� E %CIfAAGE � iena'+BF. F �iil m 4y i PROPOSED CITY HALL SITE s4 mcoucrna<wr ■ IBWSF 91E4 Ob9f 14.1'4 0 AM sa PROPOSED CITY HALL SITE MLI4 a:] /I',- 1, MCOUCUNCAg1P I- Y. IXCI IKON S.SF 44 f // tj.t U t 'C11N.lbF r I[/�y/f S.NIIW ) M'i' 1 Sint, A {c 1JT1 J ¢ iE J M I J PROPOSED CITY HALL SITE ,,cgw, p EICI -ANG IBWSF Iwn'U f %CBIANGF i0.co:f60, R I I I yl y >,°nE z f� �J J PROPOSED CITY HALL SITE \I if iMU�p JAN J F Y i PARKING INVENTORY ;, R , PARKING INVENTORY W J J The Concord Group Material Will Be Provided at a Later Time. Prior To 1 -11 -11 �§ 00".. 71 MCONCOINCAOUP J J J J .J j J J J ,J J J J J _ MIXED -USE: OFF/ RE ,a..N *9so aOFfK J ♦. r '�T J dJ \� J y �� J • , • OLEN CORP. • J ♦,i , • • MID -RISE RESIDENTIAL I J J I ) a LMa FWS J l J J T � � -J`JJJ � +i- i • J /• 1 J J Jr ♦ J J• J� J� J� J r J ALTERNATIVES 5A & 5B ! J U ♦J F J J h J J J �' \ Y"'bt' J � • I ��jI'3J .! J`•-I J ^� l� I I.rir ,y,�J��rJJJr�WJJ, � J�•,L I J , r •' + TMCJVCONQON --•* J - Public outreach 1.25.11 5/es? MEMO Date: January 10, 2011 To: Mayor Henn, Members of the City Council asPl� CiVi..V AFTER A14L. ?t4 NKIdED: " �SS� From: Louise Fundenberg, President Central Newport Beach Community Association Subject: Council Study Session — January 11, 2011 — Lido Village Conceptual Plan At a regular meeting held today, the Board of Directors of the Central Newport Beach Community Association (CNBCA) had the opportunity to discuss the subject agenda item. Our major concern is with the reuse of the City Hall site. A discussion of our concerns follows: Review time inadequate — The staff report was not available on -line until late on Friday with a hard copy available on Monday for a Tuesday afternoon study session. Both forms of communication were difficult to read due to small type size. If public /stakeholder input is truly desired, then more adequate review time and more legible formatting are necessary. 2. Public outreach — While we are sure that adjacent property owners have been consulted, as they should be, we feel that inclusion of other stakeholders such as residents of the peninsula has been inadequate. The City Hall site is property owned by all the citizens of the City of Newport Beach. Members of the CNBC are not only stakeholders in this sense but are also impacted by the traffic and public services generated by the site yet there has been no outreach to receive specific ideas or concerns. 3. Rush to decision making — From the tone of the report, it appears that the goal is a Council decision by the next meeting on January 25. This time frame seems inadequate to solidify future use of valuable public property inasmuch as there are alternative uses to be considered and little public input. While the private sector is anxious to move ahead with its investment decisions, more modest cooperative decisions, e.g. land swap, can be made regarding the City Hall site without finalizing land uses. 4. Land use — The overall plan intensifies uses and consequently traffic. Careful attention must be paid to traffic flow from and to the peninsula and its approximately 5,000 residents plus thousands of seasonal visitors both for safety and convenience. A police substation is supported as a much needed public safety service. The placement of a fire station adjacent to senior housing is questionable. While the immediacy of service would be of benefit to residents, the noise generated would be a detriment. The potential amphitheater is very questionable in a location next to Newport Boulevard with its noise and activity. There are also questions about a proposed Community Service Center being redundant with the Propose Community Center in Marina Park. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We look forward to be able to provide input as this plan progresses. cc: Tim Collins January 10, 2011 City of Newport Beach City Council 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: LETTER OF SUPPORT FOR LIDO VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to show my support for the proposed development and comprehensive plan of the Lido Village. l have lived and owned businesses in Newport Beach, namely the Lido Village area, for many years. I believe the area is under utilized and both business and residents alike would greatly benefit from the proposed development I would like to see this happen expediently as it is my belief that any _ development in the Lido Village would greatly enhance the quality of life for tenants and residents. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at 949- 375 -4131. Res ctfully, Mu#6y a resident LUPUS INTFRJN'A11,0NA1, 1-1985 Shy° Park Cirdc. Suitc J ILVinc. Califn-uia 92614 PHONE: (9d9! 83S -9 121 FAX: i9 +9' FL ":i -1 183 1,X"Vaupusinrrrnati'a mIxom ' January 7, 2011 ( l zrefri zd INTERIM CHAIR Dear City Council, Mar, A. %V vsnd BOARD MEMBERS We have been supported by the Fritz Duda Company for the past t.al of n J I ;oo lc twelve years. Most recently they hosted an event at the Lido Meyer Cua6d> Plaza to benefit the estimated 100,000 Southern Californian's .`O0l L"" diagnosed with lupus. These men, women and children count on 13111 Mat( \Ion' N this fundraiser to assist them living with his life threatening EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR illness. Christina M. Kclly, IMMEDIATE PAST CHAIR By expeditiously approving the redevelopment project for Lido Robert G. r nni t,, MI), Ph,D Plaza, you will also be supporting the thousands of families here in Orange County affected by lupus. Lupus International has a CHAIR EMERITUS long standing relationship with the Fritz Duda Company. They Rudnc��- Bluestnnr MB have continued to give back to their community and remain u�icrc�.S✓cl«aan committed to doing so. On behalf of the Board of Directors, I assure you, Lupus Co- CHAIRS International fully supports the comprehensive plan to revitalize Berra H. Hahn, M.D. Lido Village. We ask you to please approve the plan as quickly as Tammy tit.t,t, M. n. possible, so that the owners of Via Lido Plaza can move forward Susan Baker, M.D. with their plans to redevelop. Rpdnev Bluestone, 1\1.13. cith j Brno: M.D. If you have an additional questions I can be reached at 949/278- .. Keith Colbtun, M.D. S' y q Rohm L. Fox. RID. 1646. Deborah K. McCurdy, M.D. _ ,9tla„ L.Mctz,, - I.D. Best wishes, Kenneth -N1 Ni M.D. Robcn H PhtILPs, MD. Richard J / � Jt ✓Li 0 Andrtas Rtitt M D. C �ristina M. Kelly Renee Z. Rin; ldi. M.D. l✓ .Haar W Saperstvm, M.D. Executive Director Ricltw'd N. Shaw, M.D. Daniel). Wallace- M.D. Sean FVtdl:vston, M.D. c�-%!.r /sz1N hrnQ _S1 icri(1 t.erov Baca Donna Crcan Kathy Vara Bobby Hatfield i 19 -10 -loos; - Unda Hatfield 1195E '20 W0 SM StrategicRetaiItldvisors BLAINE BOSH CA L[C: 01175854 TEL 949.640.6678 EXT. 18 January It, 2011 Newport Beach City Council C/O City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 RE: PROPOSED LIDO VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Dear Council: I would like to express my earnest support of the most current proposal to redevelop the Lido Village trade area. I am a native of Newport Beach and a current resident of the Balboa Peninsula and believe a revitalization of Lido Village is long overdue and is necessary for all the residents of Lido Isle, West Newport, and the Peninsula. The timing of the proposed redevelopment seems especially ideal, considering the redevelopment Catellus is performing to the Newport Beach Shopping Center at the intersection of Newport Blvd. and 32 "a St. The Lido Village area serves as a very visible threshold for all the residents of Newport Beach, as well as the hundreds of thousands of tourists, that visit our wonderful beaches each year. The Lido Village area has languished with chronic vacancy for far too long, which is a shame given its proximity to the bay and the ocean. It is an area that, if properly redeveloped, should be a jewel in the City's crown. The proposed revitalization is well deserved of such a special, yet underutilized area. Best Regards, STRATEGIC RETAIL ADVISORS Blaine Bush 3990 WESTERLY PLACE � SUITE 230 - NEWPORT BEACH - CALIFORNIA 92660 W W W.STRATEGICRETAILADVISOR.COM �t1;n'I Ti IPC' IPC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION M Investigative and Protection Company January 10, 2011 City Council, As part of the business community of Newport Beach and in particular Via Lido Plaza, I would like to encourage the immediate approval for the revitalization of Lido Village. It is an active part of the retail and business community which is an essential for future growth and current stability.. e With redevelopment we bring new life to the area, a higher quality of tenant, and better services to the people that work and live in our community. It is our desire to make this a healthy, safe and enjoyable place for our residence, tenants and visitors. Should you have any questions please contact me. .� - r" S Joe Zderadicka Regional Manager IPC International Corporation 310 - 628 -2108 January 7, 2011 To: Newport Beach City Council Newport Beach, CA Ref: Support for the Redevelopment of the Via Lido Village area Dear Mdme /Sirs, As long time residents of Newport Beach and as equally long -time practicing business professionals in the city, we are writing to give support to the approval of a master plan for redevelopment of lido Village. We feel strongly this will benefit the community as well as business owners and will create a fresh beginning and a new, much needed aesthetic to this specific area, which now looks tired and not too enticing to consumers. We feel strongly as practicing real estate brokers and long standing advocates of this beautiful community that this revitalization will be a positive boost to our local economy and a very pleasant, attractive change to a most valuable area on the Bay. Sincerely, Marcia Brashier Jim Brashier Senior Broker Associate Vice President, Branch Manager GRUBB & ELLM From Insight to Results January 6, 20 t I Newport Beach City Council RE: Redevelopment of Via Lido Village To Whom It May Concern, Grubb & Ellis Company 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 949.608.2000 main 949 608 2003 fax , A L,r n,c U pl81 JJ.11 As a resident of Newport Beach and a Grubb & Ellis broker specializing in the leasing of space in the area, I fully support the redevelopment of the Via Lido Village. That being said, I would highly recommend that you approve the master plan as quickly as possible so that the owners of Via Lido Plaza can move forward with their plans to redevelop. Best Regards, i Matt Moore Transaction Services Grubb & Ellis Company 949.608.2094 CA Salespe r von License #017.58663 SOL&.� - ° Lido Village Redevelopment Area Summary of Values Alternatives #5A, #5B -1, #513-2 TB--DIE CONCORD GROUP January 7, 2011 W Redevelopment Area Programs Land Owner/Land -Use City Hall Site Senior Rentals Workforce Housing Live-Work/Residential Commercial Vornado Retail - Main Boutique Hotel Marina SUDS - Lineal Footage 40' Slip 60' Slip 80' Slip Miscellaneous Duda Commercial - Lido Plaza Marshall Commercial - Office Residential - Apartments Residential - Mixed Use Olen Residential - Mid -rise Alternative #5A SF /LF /Units Alternative #513-1 SF/LF /Units /Rooms 100 units - - 60 units - (LW) 20 units 89,472 sf 105,550 sf - 80 rooms 640 If 1,120 If 900 If - 400 If 880 If 60 If 450 If 2,000 If 2,450 If 105,724 sf 105,724 sf 9,500 sf 9,500 sf 60 units 60 units 2 units 2 units 20 units 20 units Alternative #5B -2 SF /LF /Units /Rooms 60 units (Resi) 20 units 4,000 sf 105,550 sf 80 rooms 1,120 If 880 If 450 If 2,450 If 105,724 sf 9,500 sf 60 units 2 units 20 units 2 THE CONCORD GROUP W Redevelopment Area Values Land Owner /Land -Use City Hall Site Seniors Workforce housing Live -Work Residential Commercial Vornado Retail - Main Boutique Hotel Marina SlinS - Lineal Footage 40' Slip 60' Slip 80' Slip Miscellaneous Vornado Total Duda Commercial - Lido Plaza Marshall Commercial - Office Residential - Apartments Residential - Mixed Use Olen Residential - Mid -rise Redevelopment Area Total 3 Alternative #5A Alternative #513-1 Alternative #5B-2 Built Value Value (SMMs) Value ($MMs) Value ($MMs) $400,000 du 38.0 - 42.0 - - - - $325,000 /du - - 18.5 - 20.5 18.5 - 20.5 $800,000 /du - - 15.2 - 16.8 - - $600,000 /do - - - - 11.4 - 12.6 $400 /sf 1.5 - 1.7 38.0 - 42.0 33.7 - 37.3 31.4 - 34.8 $400 /sf 34.0 - 37.6 40.1 - 44.3 40.1 - 44.3 $600,000 /room 45.6 - 50.4 45.6 - 50.4 34.0 - 37.6 85.7 - 94.7 85.7 - 94.7 $25 of 1.1 - 1.3 2.0 - 2.2 2.0 - 2.2 $30 of 1.9 - 2.1 - - - - $38nf 1.0- 1.2 2.4- 2.6 2.4- 2.6 $38 of 0.2 - 0.2 1.2 - 1.4 1.2 - 1.4 4.2 - 4.8 5.6 - 6.2 5.6 - 6.2 38.2 - 42.4 91.3 - 100.9 91.3 - 100.9 $400 /sf 40.2 - 44.4 40.2 - 44.4 40.2 - 44.4 $400 /sf 3.6 - 4.0 3.6 - 4.0 3.6 - 4.0 $400,000 /du 22.8 - 25.2 22.8 - 25.2 22.8 - 25.2 $1,500,000 /du 2.9 - 3.2 2.9 - 3.2 2.9 - 3.2 29.3 - 32.4 29.3 - 32.4 29.3 - 32.4 $1,500,000 /du 28.5 - 31.5 28.5 - 31.5 28.5 - 31.5 $174.2 - $192.7 $223.0 - $246.5 $220.7 - $244.0 THE CONCORD GPOUP W City Hall Site Values Prooertv Tax (1.01 %x 18 %) Retail Sales Tax Total Recurring Revenue Estimated Land Value City Hall Ground Lease 0.18% 0.07 - 0.08 1.00% $0.07 - $0.08 20% of total value 10% of land value $7.6 - $8.4 $0.8 - $0.8 0.06 - 0.07 $0.06 - $0.07 $6.7 - $7.5 $0.7 - $0.7 0.06 - 0.06 Alternative #5A Alternative 4513-1 Alternative 45B -2 City Hall Land-Use Built Value SF/Units Value(SMMs) SF/Units Value($MMs) SF/llnits Value($MIMS) Seniors $400,000 /do 100 38.0 - 42.0 - - - Workforce housing $325,000 /du - - 60 18.5 - 20.5 60 18.5 - 20.5 Live -Work $800,000 /do 20 15.2 - 16.8 - - Residential Flats $600,000 /do - - - - 20 11.4 12.6 Commercial $400 /sf - - - - - 4,000 1.5 - 1.7 Total 100 $38.0 - $42.0 80 $33.7 - $37.3 $31.4 - $34.8 Prooertv Tax (1.01 %x 18 %) Retail Sales Tax Total Recurring Revenue Estimated Land Value City Hall Ground Lease 0.18% 0.07 - 0.08 1.00% $0.07 - $0.08 20% of total value 10% of land value $7.6 - $8.4 $0.8 - $0.8 0.06 - 0.07 $0.06 - $0.07 $6.7 - $7.5 $0.7 - $0.7 0.06 - 0.06 0.01 - 0.01 $0.07 - $0.08 $6.3 - $7.0 $0.6 - $0.7 4 THE CONCORD GROUP 6 °t f Yll � Yrt. r! s t e ' �ssZ- 1 4"'.:;w•rh tl ' •F q+ v �(� fr�'�1Mf !r r�t1�y, rtT 'i,} tV � _$�,tnji�iid ,tr �.F�3+A+"�(Jrf.4�3nr1 yl Sr1 yj � �:N?MdT r :.� �f i� l/ ��i ..`�ltafn � r T j% s✓ f *> r. ', ! .,15.1 T � ____ Y " '�.1 •, 1, /r' 13 �� t fi LL t r, > : r. "�1 t yt• r t i��,cF. t1�i` f iii /y A00 SA s t e a r n s ARCHITECTURE 500 BroaAVay Upm Bulb, CA9i651 9493]69160 Residential Study for Newport Beach City Hall Site January 5, 2011 eJ f� r SA s t e a r n s ARCHITECTURE 500 BroaAVay Upm Bulb, CA9i651 9493]69160 Residential Study for Newport Beach City Hall Site January 5, 2011 ,e is 1 e® q A/ A AI U A/ II 1 to neighborhood retail & ocean {A3 ;Y 32nd Street r , I A i to Lido Village & bay OA is Yap., t north Stearns scale 1" W -0" ARCHITECTURE t ta,m Be.h,a92651 949 3]6 7160 Residential Study for Newport Beach City Hall Site January 5, 2011 % I Finley retail entry Y Ave. single story relates to retail so B. B. oil :11 ie u J_- . ■ all � 1. 1 fflA leasing officee /�'��-�.. community area j / h, k ----------------- l� neighborhood & & ocean 32nd Street ""r 177' � P� ,✓ GROUND I / / II i to Lido Village & hay / /1 1 I � potential live /work units at ground level vest pocket park, typ. @ corners TOTAL UNITS ground level 22 2nd level 28 3rd level 28 4th level 21 total 99 north scale 1"= 40'4' Stearns ARCHITECTURE 500 6m q Laguna Bea(h,C 93651 9493767160 Residential Study for Newport Beach City Hall Site January 5, 2011 north scale 1 "= 40' -0" TYP. UPPER LEVEL plan A = 20 units plan B = 8 units Total =28 units V L V I I V I Y ry residential typ. s t e a r n s ARCHITECTURE 500 BmaAvay Laguna Bex6,U 92651 949 376 2160 Residential Study for Newport Beach City Hall Site January 5, 2011