HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 - Attachment CC6Attachment No. CC 6
Letters in Opposition
133
i34
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Lori Morris [lorirmorris @gmail.com]
Sent:
Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:29 PM
To:
Earl McDaniel; Susan /Barry Eaton; Michael Toerge; ameri @rbf.com; Robert Hawkins;
cwunsworth @cox.net; bhillgren @highrhodes.com
Cc:
Kiff, Dave; Rosansky, Steven; Selich, Edward; Mike Henn; Hill, Rush; Gardner, Nancy; Curry,
Keith; Daigle, Leslie; Brown, Leilani; Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
Malarky's Bar Expansion Application
March 3, 2011
Please enter into the public record
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
Attention: Planning Commission
City Clerk
City Council
Jaime Murillo
Reference: Malarky's Application up 2010 -039
Planning Commission, City Council and Staff:
I would like to echo Cindy Koller's request to deny the Malarky's Bar expansion application.
As a resident of the Peninsula I am appalled that the staff report submitted does not go into greater detail
regarding the impacts to residents this expansion would most certainly impose.
The Peninsula zone has a far greater burden than any where else in the City of Newport Beach in regard to
alcohol establishments.
As we have been involved with the (hopefully) better use of the old City Hall site ... it would seem at this point
the city staff would look at the entire impact of adding even more space for drinking alcohol in such close
proximity to the future use of that site.
Residents of the Peninsula should not continue to bear the burden of even ONE MORE bar or expansion and we
would expect our city leaders to be looking for ways to mitigate the problems we have now with over crowded
bars, not enough parking and the general crime that goes along with that.
Our City Council just voted to give our Police Chief and his Dept. more latitude in dealing with the problem we
now have with alcohol establishments ... yet City staff seems to be ignoring the letters of request to deny this
application written by our very own Police Dept. detectives. I find that troubling and of great concern.
As was reported, we had a death recently in our city directly attributed to the intoxication and drowning of a
young man who had frequented the very same bars in and around the area in question. I do not wish to use his
horrible death to remind our city employees of the dangers that come with being complacent in regards to too
many bars in such a dense area and close proximity to a LARGE body of water but it cannot be ignored.
135
PLEASE... residents are looking to you to help end the over saturation of bars and drinking establishments in the
Peninsula zone.
I am asking you to deny this request and in the future please be mindful of the already established burden that
the Peninsula resident must endure.
Thank You,
Lori Morris
West Newport
ISO
Murillo, Jaime
From: cynthia koller [gracenbl @yahoo.comj
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 2:38 PM
To: Earl McDaniel; Susan /Barry Eaton; Michael Toerge; ameri @rbf.com; Robert Hawkins;
cwunsworth @cox.net; bhillgren @highrhodes.com
Cc: Kiff, Dave; Rosansky, Steven; Selich, Edward; Mike Henn; Hill, Rush; Gardner, Nancy; Curry,
Keith; Daigle, Leslie; Brown, Leilani; Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarky's use permit application 2010 -039
March 3, 2011
Please enter into the public record
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
Attention: Planning Commission
City Clerk
City Council
Jaime Murillo
Reference: Malarky's Application up 2010 -039
Gentlemen:
After reviewing the entire staff report on the Malarky's use permit application I would like to express my concerns with the
'expansion' and staff findings.
It seems the city planning staff has penciled a standard response to the applicant but has not performed due diligence
when it comes to representing the factual concerns of the residents who live on the Peninsula and near this project.
It is commendable and the community is very pleased that Mr. Marovic would like to further improve what has long been
an eyesore in this area and yes he has made substantial beautification improvements and we are grateful but
the residents concerns of I increases of noise, nuisances, foot traffic, vehicle traffic and crime associated with an
increased drinking clientele seems to be overlooked.
No one in the community is against Mr. Marovic trying to improve his business especially in these economic times but
a request to double the inside occupant load from 91 to 198 then adding an additional 49 patrons on the patio at a
drinking establishment, any bar /restaurant in such a high density area is going to cause a considerable added undue
burden on the residents who live in close proximity to this property, a huge strain on resident parking (patrons using
Albertson's parking lot), an added impact on Hoag's already impacted ER (per the physicians who work there) and a
overload on our city services(PD,Fire and Paramedic).
Mr. Marovic has outlined a well thought -out security plan to try to reduce the impacts he knows will come with a large
jump in clientele but we all are painfully aware that no matter how well intentioned and implemented his plan is, it is only
as good as the area he can apply it to, once these clients leave the property the burden and impacts fall directly on the
residents and the Newport Beach Police Department.
As one resident my police logs represent a small look into the late night impacts suffered by residents who live in such a
dense mixed -use area near these bars on the Peninsula (fighting, crude loud language, public urination, vomiting on our
properties, public sex, increase vehicle traffic using side streets to avoid Police units and a barrage of vehicle hit and
runs).
I sincerely wish Mr. Marovic continued business success and applaud him for the positive changes he has made thus far
but would respectfully ask the planning commission to consider the facts the NBPD submitted and deny his request for
expansion of an outside patio area.
i37
Sincerely,
Cindy Koller
West Newport Resident
ISO
Murillo, Jaime
From: Terry Martin [terry@caliberint.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 1:18 PM
To: emcdaniel @sunwestbank,com; Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarkey's Expansion
Gentlemen,
I am writing to request that you please vote against the proposed expansion of Malarkey's. I fail to see how
permitting the expansion would be in the best interest of our community.
As I understand it, the plan is to increase the capacity of Malarkey's by around 100 patrons. Where will these
additional patrons park? Parking on the peninsula is already a nightmare. It is also fair to expect that a number
of these additional cars' drivers will be intoxicated after leaving Malarkey's. The last thing we need is an
increase in the number of drunk drivers on our roads.
In addition, it is no secret that the party atmosphere of bars such as Malarkey's tends to spill out into the streets
after 2:OOAM causing headaches for residents in the immediate vicinity. I can not imagine how much worse the
problem would get if 100 more patrons are added to the mix.
I am confident that after taking the time to engage in a cost - benefit analysis of the situation, you will come to
the conclusion that allowing Malarkey's to expand would be detrimental to our community. Please do not
approve the Malarkey's expansion. I thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Terry Martin
122 Via Palermo, Lido
139
Murillo, Jaime
From: iaglass @aol.com
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 11:25 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Cc: iaglass @aol.com
Subject: City of Newport Beach Project File No: PA2010 -172, Malarky's Bar (3011 Newport Blvd.)
Dear Planning Commission,
As property owners of 215 30'h Street, we join in the concerns of the Newport Peninsula community and want
to express our opposition to the expansion of Malarky's Bar.
As the Planning Commission, you are quite aware of the data that many in the community are raising such the
over concentration of ABC licenses in the Newport peninsula. Of course, you are also quite aware of the
associated problems such as the high police activities with DUIs, and public intoxication, property damage to
private properties in the area, as well as other public nuisances as vandalism, noise, brawls, trash and
unruliness. The recklessness occurs during times well into the night and early morning when local residents —
families, children, the elderly -- should also be assured of their own right to peace and safety.
The sad fact that the Planning Commission should also consider are the consequences to Public Safety and
Liability. With budgetary problems, can the city afford to enforce its laws on public safety? Can the city afford
to place police officers on every ABC licensee on the peninsula during the operating hours of these ABC
licensees and into the morning hours?
Sincerely,
Irena and Richard Glassman
1-40
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Wetherholt, Drew [ Drew. Wetherholt @marcusmillichap.com]
Sent:
Thursday, March 03, 2011 9:18 AM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
Malarkeys Expansion
Planning Commissioners:
I DO NOT WISH TO SEE MALARKYS EXPAND AS THIS WILL ONLY HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO OUR
COMMUNITY. MALARKYS APPLICATION SHOULD BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
• The peninsula area (District 15) already has an over - concentration of ABC establishments. According the Alcohol
Beverage Control and Newport Beach Police, this small area has in excess of 78 ABC licenses. The most ABC
licenses not only in the city but in all of Orange County!
• According to the Newport Beach Police, there is 1 ABC license per every 38 residents in District 15! This is
extremely excessive and illustrates that there is NO NEED to increase drinking establishments in this area.
• Reporting District 15 has the highest crime rate in the city by far. According to the Newport Beach Police
Department, this reporting district (RD) had a total of 946 reported crimes as compared to a city -wide reporting
district average of 162 reported crimes (483.95 % above the city -wide RD average). These statistics would tend to
indicate that there is a strong correlation between the over- concentration of ABC establishments and police
related activity. It should also be noted that the majority of these calls for service occurred between the hours of
6PM and 2AM. Not a very productive use of City, Police or taxpayers resources /money.
• The Newport Beach Police Department has also recommended AGAINST the Malarky's expansion to the
Planning Department.
• The area does NOT need an additional 100+ intoxicated individuals roaming our neighborhoods at 2AM with the
related problems of yelling /screaming, puking, public urination, sex, vandalism, fights, property damage, and
drunk - driving etc. Residents are constantly being disturbed, woken -up and having to deal with these alcohol
related problems. Intoxicated individuals have even tried breaking into nearby homes.
• Often residents get to start their weekends cleaning -up puke, broken bottles, and even condoms on the streets,
sidewalks and even their front porches. Bras and panties are also found.
• Intoxicated people are constantly running across Newport Blvd and going against the traffic lights especially
during the hours of 11 PM -2AM. Individuals have nearly been hit by cars and traffic gets obstructed. Cabs often
double - parked and create cab lines that also obstruct traffic.
• The surrounding area cannot handle the increased parking even if the applicant has met "zoning" parking
requirements. Let's say there is an increase of 100 patrons and let's say only 30% of these patrons drive to the
bar, there is simply nowhere for them to park. The municipal lots are full and we already have patrons parking all
over our neighborhood. This is not acceptable as the area is already significantly under - parked and this provides
no benefit to the community.
• Malarkey's is NOT a restaurant; it is a BAR! Malarky's hosts events such as the Zombie Pub Crawl featuring
cheap drink specials.
• The patios of Rudy's bar and the Newport Beach Brewing Company are already too noisy with the related yelling
and screaming both during the day and the evening. There is no need to add a patio to Malarky's bar as this will
only contribute more noise and problems to the area. There is no logical place to put a patio area on the
Malarky's property. All possible locations will have a negative impact on the surrounding community because the
excessive sound from the patio will carry throughout the neighborhood. The proposed location is like an enclosed
alley and the sound will only echo throughout the area.
1-'1
• PUBLIC SAFETY is a real concern due to the continued increase of ABC establishments. Doubling the size of
this bar will only increase the alcohol related problems within this district and the public safety is further
endangered.
WHEN IS TOO MUCH, ENOUGH? PLEASE DENY MARLARKY'S APPLICATION.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Drew Wetherholt
301h Street Resident
142
Murillo, Jaime
From:
BILLEDPAM @aol.com
Sent:
Wednesday, March 02, 20118:51 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
Malarky's Bar Expansion
Hello - my husband and I built our home on the 200 block of 30th Street in 1991 and have lived here since that time
We love living here and adjust to the summer visitors and renters that come and go. But the bar situation seems to be
getting out of hand. We have the Brew Co. at the end of our street on Newport Blvd., Rudy's on 31st and Newport,
Malarky's across the street from Rudy's and the new Pavillions Center will have at least 2 establishments "that we are
aware of that will serve liquor and have patios right next to Malarky's.
A prudent person would agree that enough is enough in this bar congested area we know as "home ".
I am personally against an expansion of the "restaurant" bar that is closest to my home that impacts all of my neighbors.
And I am against their obtaining a Parking Waiver. This will just impact our street all the more. For such a short street, we
have a large number of owner /residents that really "know each other" and rally when an issue impacts us. And we have 5
children living on the 200 block.
I have been a Street Captain for Neighborhood Watch for a number of years and have gone to bat for my neighbor friends
who have come to me with issues that they did not know how to handle. And the only thing I feel I can do concerning this
issue is to advise you that I am one of many that does not want 100 more people packed into our local pub on our street
causing traffic, taking up parking spaces and causing issues late at night as these drinkers try to find their vehicles and
the loud talking and screaming that accompanies late night drinking, and then police involvement to assist us.
Thank you for your consideration.
Pamela J. Garrett
209 30th Street
143
Murillo, Jaime
From: Louise Fundenberg [Ifundy @sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 12:19 PM
To: Michael Toerge; Barry Eaton; Earl McDaniel; Charles Unsworth; Robert Hawkins; Bradley
Hillgren; Fred Ameri; Campbell, James; Murillo, Jaime
Cc: Curry, Keith; Mike Henn; Daigle, Leslie; Rosansky, Steven; Selich, Edward; Gardner, Nancy;
Kiff, Dave
Subject: Malarky's Bar
To the Planning Commission of Newport Beach;
I am sending this as a personal email. Malarky's is not CNBCA's area. It is in
West Newport's area.
I feel very strongly that you should not grant the conditional use permit nor
give a waiver for parking. This area is over parked now.
There the problem of taxis standing waiting for fares, double parked or circling
around the area. This makes for much congestion on Newport Blvd.
You can stand at Malarky's front door and see two other bars across the street.
The bar goers seem to go from one to the other.
They cross against the light or in the middle of the street. There is no regard
for drivers. One of these days someone will get killed.
Putting a bar in the remake of the market on 32nd Street between Newport
Blvd. and Balboa Blvd. should not be granted either.
If adding more bar space on the peninsula is some - body's idea of REDEVELOPMENT
then bring back the one arm bandits.
Thank you all for the work you do for the city.
Sincerely,
Louise Fundenberg
1-44
Murillo, Jaime
From: Campbell, James
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 7:47 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Fw deny any expansion permits to Malarky's
Jim Campbell
Acting Planning Director
Community Development Department
- - - -- Original message---- -
From: Stuermerk001 <stuermerk001 @aol.com>
To: jampbell@newportbeachca.gov, mcosylion @newportbeachca.gov, palford @newportbeachca.gov,
jgarcia @newportbeachca.gov, gramirez @newportbeachca.gov, LDesantis @newportbeachca.gov
Sent: Wed, Mar 2, 201106:43:45 GMT +00:00
Subject: deny any expansion permits to Malarky's
Hello,
I've been a resident on 30th St. for over 10 years. I have wonderful neighbors who genuinely care about this city. Over
the years, we put up with a lot of issues with drunk/intoxicated individuals due to the bars being around the corner. I do
visit them myself, but are very respectful of my neighbors and don't come home late, loud or behave in inappropriate ways
in front of the children on our street. Our street almost nightly already has issues with the patrons of these bars, being
extremely loud at all our of the night and early morning. These patrons, are known to leave trash on our patios, vomit on
our sidewalks, pass out on our patios and scream loud inappropriate profanities during all hours of the day. Also we
already have difficulty parking from Memorial Day -Labor Day. Adding capacity to Malarky's Irish Pub would only escalate
all of these issues. The honest citizens who love this city would like to keep it a nice place to live and raise a family.
Please support your residents and deny any expansions of Malarky's Irish pub. The commission hearing is on 3/3/11 and
as a long time resident, please help keep it nice for my neighbors and the other residents that surround this
establishment.
Thank you for your time.
Katie Stuermer
145
Murillo, Jaime
From: STACY NIELSEN [stacynazl3 @hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 10:00 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject: Malarky's Petition to Expand
To Whom It May Concern:
Recently it has come to my attention that Malarky's Bar and Grill located at 3011 Newport Blvd. is requesting a use permit
that would not only allow for an outdoor patio area but also more than double its occupancy. While I respect Malarky's as
a staple of Newport Beach, I do not enjoy the bulk of patrons leaving the facility.
First, Malarky's is primarily a bar and I have seen too many individuals leaving who are extremely intoxicated. This level
of intoxication leads to an unacceptable levels of noise, unnecessary physical and verbal fights, individuals relieving
themselves in alleyways and garages, an excessive level of inappropriate trash (bottles, cans, miscellaneous clothing
items, left over/ uneaten pizza), and vomit. A beautiful new facility is being built just behind Malarky's complete with
more restaurants and conveniences for vacationers and residents alike. I do not think that any of us want this new
facility defaced by these late night antics.
Second, we are already having trouble with the late night noise at the Newport Beach Brewing Company (Brew Co.).
Besides the noise of those leaving Malarky's increasing with an increased capacity, adding an outdoor patio to Malarky's
directly accross the street will only raise this noise level exponentially all while the City of Newport Beach uses our tax
dollars trying to control it.
In conclusion, while outdoor seating would be a nice addition to many restaurants in Newport Beach, Malarky's is not one
of these locations. The noise that the patio will produce as well as increased number of drunk guests wondering the
streets after hours will only further hurt the areas struggling housing market it will stifle the reputation for which Newport
Beach strives. Malarky's should not be granted a permit to expand its facility.
Thank you for your time and concern in this matter. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact
me at stacvnaz13(alhotmail.com,
Sincerely,
Stacy Nielsen Turek
220 1/2 30th St.
140
Murillo, Jaime
From: Linda Formuzis [Ikleinl4 @me.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 3:38 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarky's expansion - NO NO NO!
Gentlemen;
The absolute last thing the Peninsula zone needs is an expanded Malarky's!! We have a total over concentration
of rehab clients roaming all over the place and now a bigger drinking bar? Just count the drinking bars we
already have!!
The policing issues, parking issues and the hugely undesirable addition to a business that is already a negative
in our conummity! Our quality of life is so compromised in this area already by bars and rehab business that
have proliferated in this part of Newport Beach! All of this is counter productive to our efforts to remake the
nearby Lido Village area into a quality tourist and visitor zone.
Allowing Malarky's to expand is out of the question. It's a no brainer.
Thanks for your support of me and my fellow property owners,
Linda Klein
14j
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Neal and Lamia Shehab [starmountain @roadrunner.coml
Sent:
Tuesday, March 01, 20114:34 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Cc:
emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject:
Malarkeys
To Whom it May Concern,
Please do not approve the expansion of Malarkeys. The last thing we need on the peninsula is more drunks looking for
parking. Unless they can increase their own parking this expansion does not make sense.
Thank you,
Neal Shehab
1-42
Murillo, Jaime
From: Sarah Zielsdorf Calvert (scalvert@xavor.com)
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 10:43 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject: Malarkey's expansion
Hello Jaime and Earl,
I'm writing to let you know that my husband and I oppose the expansion of Malarkey's. We live on 30th street with two
young children and fear that an expansion would create additional problems and noise for the residents of this area.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Sarah B. Z. Calvert
Director, Management Consulting
scalvert @xavor.com
949.231.9304
Murillo, Jaime
From: Dean Roberts [deanandann @verizon.net)
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2011 9:29 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Cc: pier2pier @yahoo.com; drew.wetherhoit @marcusmillichap.com
Subject: Malarkey's Bar Expansion
We recently learned that the Planning Dept. has recommended that Malarky's has been given approval to significantly
expand its operation. We find this incomprehensible that this will, in any way, improve the city and in significant way, lead
to its detriment. 'Please reconsider this matter.
Dean & Ann Roberts,
313 Anade
Balboa, CA
Cell: (626) 221 -2297
deanandann(o.verizon. net
150
Murillo, Jaime
From: Mary K. Drennan Umkdren @gmail.comj
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 5:59 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarkey's Bar
Please deny expansion of Malarkey's Bar. The new owners have made great improvements seen from the
outside and I commend them for their attractive exterior. However, allowing an additional 100 occupants will
greatly impact parking in the area. This would be unfair to the existing businesses.
Thank you for your consideration.
Mary K. & Jim Drennan.
1151
Murillo, Jaime
From: Bob Klar [theklars @yahoo.comj
Sent: Monday, February 28, 20118:11 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarky's Bar
live at 413 East Edgewater, and I do not support the expansion of Malarky's
Bar. There are enough
bars in the area. Please no more bars.
Robert W. Klar
152
Murillo, Jaime .
From:
Marie Pierotti [pierottifamily @yahoo.com]
Sent:
Monday, February 28, 20114:28 PM
To:
emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com; Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
Expansion of Malarky's Bar
Chairman McDaniel and Ms. Murillo -
We are writing to express our opposition to the potential expansion of Malarky's Bar. It is difficult to
understand why the City would favor a major expansion of a drinking establishment on the Balboa Peninsula
when there are already so many such places. The additional parking and traffic that will be generated as well as
the noise and difficulites attendant to a bar like this are problems that the property owners should not be
required to bear.
Thank you.
Tony and Marie Pierotti
314 Alvarado Place
Newport Beach, CA
1155
Murillo, Jaime
From: Martin Carol [candwmartin @sbcglobal.net)
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:27 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarkey's expansion
As a resident of the central peninsula, I beg you to do all you can to
deter the expansion of Malarky's, their addition of patio service, and
increased signage. One of the good things about Malarky's has been
their tasteful outside appearance and it would be sad for that to
become a tacky sign center. Regarding expansion -NOM Currently we
drive through that section of bars very cautiously hoping to prevent
the car being hit by a drunk falling off the curb. More bar capacity
equals more patrons at risk of impeding traffic in their unique ways.
Just last weekend I screached to a halt as a Cassidy's patron decided
to follow two lovely ladies who had earlier crossed Newport Blvd. As
these three stood arm in arm in the center of Newport Blvd. with all
lanes of incoming traffic stopped, there could be no question that
they had stayed in the bar too long. Current bar capacity is more than
adequate.
Carol Martin
Newport resident
154
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Rick Cunningham [rick @highlandroof.comj
Sent:
Monday, February 28, 2011 1:55 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime; 'emcdaniel @sunweslbank.com'
Subject:
Conditional Use Permit for Malarky's Bar Expansion - 3011 Newport Blvd
February 28, 2011
Jamie Murillo / Earl McDaniel
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
RE: Conditional Use Permit for Malarky's Bar Expansion - 3011 Newport Blvd
Dear Sirs:
I was recently informed that the new owners of Malarky's Bar (3011 Newport Blvd) have applied to
the Planning Commission for a Conditional Use Permit to expand the facility and add an outdoor
patio. I further understand that this expansion would increase their occupancy by about double the
current number.
I can't tell you how upsetting this is to me as a local resident living on Marcus Avenue in Newport
Beach since 2003. I have already suffered through the aftermath of the expansion of Rudy's bar
where we were assured by the ownership and the Commission that there would be "no real impact"
on the local residents.., this has proven to be a complete farce. I have personally called the Newport
Beach Police Department over ten times since that expansion to have them come break up fights,
pick up patrons that were passed out in the bushes in front of my house, and to report drunken
vandalism to my Marcus Avenue property. Further, I have been awakened by drunks making their
way into my back yard, urinating on my bedroom window, yelling and screaming as they make their
way home, and my car was severely damaged by a shopping carts being used for go -cart racing at
1:30am.
I realized that when I bought my house in the beach area that parking would be tough, but I did not
plan on having Rudy's employees taking up all the street parking between 32nd and 35"' streets. It is
hard enough to find a spot now with Rudy's "plaid -clad bar girls" and patrons parking on our streets,
with the additional draw of the new Crow Bar in the soon to be completed Pavilion's center and
another 100 people nightly at Malarky's, there will never be a spare space for residents or their
friends in our neighborhood.
We are living with one Planning Commission mistake already. I implore you not to make another by
allowing the Malarky's expansion that will deposit yet more cars, drunks and disorderly patrons onto
the surrounding streets.
155
The neighborhood just west of Malarky's used to be comprised mostly of low dollar rental units with
absentee owners but over the last decade more and more people have purchased duplexes and
converted them to single family dwellings to live in with their young families. With the increase of
owner occupied "family" dwellings the need and tolerance for expanded drinking establishments has
exceeded the limit. Our neighborhood has changed into a nice place for families to live and for kids
to play. Please don't bring back the seedy element that our neighborhood has tried so hard to clean
up by adding capacity for yet another drinking establishment.
Please help us keep our neighborhood safe and family oriented.
Respectfully yours,
MeA Cauu :2.. gAa,ft
President
Highland Commercial Roofing
626 -856 -2076 Office
310- 388 -1740 Fax
5105 Heintz Street
Baldwin Park, G4 91706
A
�twecP
•
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — ARIZONA — NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
High - Performance Commercial Roofing Solutions Since 1991
Specialists in Sustainable Seamless "Cool -Root' Systems
"Cool before it was Green... Green before it was Cool!"
150
Murillo, Jaime
From: Mike Deschenes [miked @rampageproducts.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 20113:24 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarkys Expansion request
Jamie Murillo
Planning Department, Newport Beach, CA
Dear Jamie,
I am aware of a proposed expansion petition on behalf of Malarky's and subsequent planning commission hearing
scheduled for March 3rd. As I have business obligations that has me out of town, I am unable to attend and share my
thoughts as a homeowner, concerned citizen and Newport Beach Tax payer —so I'm asking you to consider my thoughts
in your position on this matter.
What in God's name could be the upside to our community? I have a family and we often walk past some of the
inebriated, non - resident, guests who frequent the area — at times they are merely disgusting, often they are rude or
indecent and disruptive to my simply walking the streets in my own neighborhood — rarely are they polite or sensitive to
the appearance or safety of our community. Could you, or anyone on the planning commission, actually believe that we
have a shortage of drinking or eating establishments in the area?
This specific establishment has operated in the same location for quite some time - now all of sudden we have an
ownership change and for some reason the new owner is looking to our community to enhance his investment —vote no
on this petition.... maybe Mario should consider building another bar in his own back yard! 11
Regards,
Mike Deschenes
Resident of 36th Street
157
Murillo, Jaime
From: lennymark @roadrunner.com
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 10:42 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarky's
Please do not let Malarky's increase the size of their location. We have more than enough area in this city for
people to drink. We do not need more people coming to the peninsula to get drunk.
Thank you for your consideration.
Leonard Applebaum
Newport Beach, CA
1152
Murillo, Jaime
From: Pat Klingensmith [patklingensmith @yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 10:43 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malark'ys Bar
We wish to go on record as being against the enlargement of Malarky's Bar. There are too many bars in that
area now and the resulting problems caused by excessive drinking are very prevelant in that area.
159
Muritlo, Jaime
From: Tom O'Loughlin (BalboaTom @att.net)
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 12:32 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject: MALARKYS Newport Beach Project File No:PA2010 -172
Importance: High
We strongly disapprove of permitting the bar to expand. It is already a very dangerous area with intoxicated
patrons crossing the streets there to roam from one bar to another. It just does not make any sense
whatsoever!
Tom O'Loughlin
Balboa Peninsula
949 -374 -2171
100
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Irwin Goldring [idgoldring @gmail.coml
Sent:
Sunday, February 27, 2011 1:23 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
Malarky's Expansion
Please deny the request to expand Malarky's. I am a homeowner on Lindo. Thank you.
101
Murillo, Jaime
From: Kris and Marcus (lidowilson @aim.com)
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 20112:06 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject: Malarky's bar (3011 Newport Blvd.)
Planning Department,
Please do not approve any expansion of Malarky's bar (3011 Newport Blvd.)
There are too many bars and drunks and not enough parking. The city should be planning projects that improve the
neighborhood and not expanding businesses that destroy it.
Thank you,
Marcus & Kristin Wilson
102
Murillo, Jaime
From:
phocken @cox.net
Sent:
Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:07 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Cc:
emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject:
Expansion of Malarky's Bar
We have just read with some amazement that the Planning Commission is actually
recomending the expansion of Malarky's. If there is one thing that the Lido Isle and
Penninsula residents do NOT need is another bar and more associated drinking problems
such as drunk drivers, broken bottles, and rather nasty litter, let alone the noise factor of a
patio bar, Please do not allow our wonderful Newport/Balboa area to invite further
problems for us and the police.
Paula and Roger Hocken
205 E. Bay Ave., Balboa
phocken @cox.net
i
1o3
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Joseph R. Stack jjoe @stackcpa.corn)
Sent:
Sunday, February 27, 20112:31 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Cc:
emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject:
opposed to Malarky's expansion
Gentlemen,
I am strongly opposed to Malarky's proposed expansion. I have lived and worked on the peninsula for over 20 years
within a few blocks of Malarky's. As a younger man, I spent my share of time inside Malarky's as well as every other bar
on the peninsula, so I am not opposed to drinking or drinking establishments in general. However, I remain strongly
opposed to any expansion, or establishment of new drinking' facilities. We have more than enough we don't need
more! I am also particularly opposed to any outdoor /patio expansion due to the increase in late night noise which is
already at unacceptable levels in the area.
I urge you to deny the request for conditional use permit.
Thank you,
Joe Stack
Joseph R. Stack, CPA, MST
Residence: 3810 Marcus Ave
Stack & Jagiello, LLP
430 32nd Street, Suite 100
Newport Beach, CA 92663
tel 949.723.1829. x315
fax 949.723.6129
www.sicpas.com
104
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Kevin Finn (kevinfinn @sbcglobal. net]
Sent:
Sunday, February 27, 2011 2:57 PM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
Marlarky's request for expanxion
I AM REQUESTING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION FULLY DENY MARLARKY'S APPLICATION FOR
EXPANSION. THE PENISULA IS ALREADY OVER CROWDED WITH BARS THAT BRING MANY ASSOCIATED
BURDENS TO THE RESIDENTS AND POLICE WHO LIVE AND WORK HERE.
KEVIN FINN
105
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Larry Mathena [mathenaesq @aol.com]
Sent:
Sunday, February 27, 2011 3:11 PM
To:
emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com; Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
PA2010 -172 Reject it
Malarky's bar (3011 Newport Blvd.) on the Newport Beach peninsula is requesting a conditional use permit to significantly
expand the capacity of the bar and add a 782 square foot outdoor patio. This expansion would over double the occupancy
from approximately 91 people to over 200 people. We do NOT need to see an additional 100+ intoxicated individuals
roaming our neighborhoods. The application also requests to allow more than 3 signs on a single- tenant building. (City of
Newport Beach Project File No: PA2010 -172)
WE DO NOT WISH TO SEE MALARKYS EXPAND AS THIS WILL ONLY HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT TO OUR
COMMUNITY, MALARKYS APPLICATION SHOULD BE DENIED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:
The peninsula area (District 15) already has an over - concentration of ABC establishments. According the Alcohol
Beverage Control and Newport Beach Police, this small area has in excess of 78 ABC licenses. The most ABC
licenses not only in the city but in all of Orange County!
According to the Newport Beach Police, there is 1 ABC license per every 38 residents in District 15! This is
extremely excessive and illustrates that there is NO NEED to increase drinking establishments in this area.
Reporting District 15 has the highest crime rate in the city by far. According to the Newport Beach Police
Department, this reporting district (RD) had a total of 946 reported crimes as compared to a city -wide reporting
district average of 162 reported crimes (483.95% above the city -wide RD average). These statistics would tend to
indicate that there is a strong correlation between the over - concentration of ABC establishments and police
related activity. It should also be noted that the majority of these calls for service occurred between the hours of
6PM and 2AM. Not a very productive use of City, Police or taxpayers resources /money.
• The Newport Beach Police Department has also recommended AGAINST the Malarky's expansion to the
Planning Department.
• The new owner was advised by the old owner that the surrounding community is against ANY expansion of the
existing bar. He KNEW what he was buying and bought it anyway. Also the property does NOT need to have
more than 3 signs when the rest of the surrounding businesses do not. This would be tacky and create an
additional eyesore.
• The area does NOT need an additional 100+ intoxicated individuals roaming our neighborhoods at 2AM with the
related problems of yelling /screaming, puking, public urination, sex, vandalism, fights, property damage, and
drunk - driving etc. Residents are constantly being disturbed, woken -up and having to deal with these alcohol
related problems. Intoxicated individuals have even tried breaking into nearby homes.
100
• PUKE, PUKE and MORE PUKE! Often residents get to start their weekends cleaning -up puke, broken bottles,
and even condoms on the streets, sidewalks and even their front porches. Bras and panties are also found.
• Intoxicated people are constantly running across Newport Blvd and going against the traffic lights especially
during the hours of 11 PM -2AM. Individuals have nearly been hit by cars and traffic gets obstructed. Cabs often
double- parked and create cab lines that also obstruct traffic.
• City staff has also indicated that Malarkey's will need to request a parking waiver to meet the proposed
occupancy expansion. This is not acceptable as the area is already significantly under- parked and this provides
no benefit to the community.
• Malarkey's is NOT a restaurant; it is a BAR! Malarky's hosts events such as the Zombie Pub Crawl featuring
cheap drink specials.
• The patios of Rudy's bar and the Newport Beach Brewing Company are already too noisy with the related yelling
and screaming both during the day and the evening. There is no need to add a patio to Malarky's bar as this will
only contribute more noise and problems to the area. There is no logical place to put a patio area on the
Malarky's property. All possible locations will have a negative impact on the surrounding community because the
excessive sound from the patio will carry throughout the neighborhood. The proposed location is like an enclosed
alley and the sound will only echo throughout the area.
• The peninsula has the highest incidents of DUls and drunk - driving. PUBLIC SAFETY is a real concern.
Deny thus application.
Larry Mathena
107
Murillo, Jaime
From: Rick & Shelley Clewett (rrciewett @sbcglobal.net)
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 20114:08 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Malarkys Expansion request
Jamie Murillo
Planning Department, Newport Beach, Ca.
Dear Jamie,
I understand there is a proposed expansion petition on behalf of a bar called Malarkys scheduled for March P . As a
concerned citizen and a Newport Beach Tax payer, I will definitely be attending the hearing. I want to see for myself if
anyone on the Planning Commission has any common sense. Don't we already have enough bars in the area of 30'h
street, you can't stumble out of one without going into another. For Malarkys to try to expand their bar with the sole
purpose of getting more people drunk is absurd. For the Planning Commission's information, there are a lot of us
residents that would like to see Newport Beach become more family oriented. Please vote "no" on Malarky's petition
to expand their bar area.
Thank you for your consideration,
Rick and Shelley Clewett
Resident of 36'h Street
102
Murillo, Jaime
From: JUSTINE HURRY Oustinehurry@yahoo.coml
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 2:17 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject: Malarky's Bar
I DO NOT support the expansion of Malarkey's bar! We bought a place and business down there so we and our
4 kids could enjoy it. There are so many issues with noice, drur eking people and bar fights where we are now its
terrible. Please do not let them add on! Thanks Justine Hurry
1 o9
Murillo, Jaime
From:
Glenell Parker [glenellp @msn.comj
Sent:
Monday, February 28, 2011 8:20 AM
To:
Murillo, Jaime
Subject:
MSN.com
I am the owner of 1221 West Balboa and 1219 West Balboa properties. As a 40 year resident, I want to say I do NOT
support the expansion of Malarkys bar. There are too many bars already in Neewport Beach. I have experienced many
DUI accidents in front of my property abd do not park on Balboa Blvd, overnight in order to protect my car.
I also do not support a parking varience or or the sign policy for Malarkys.
Frankk J. Bruder
760/325 -4091
170
Murillo, Jaime
From: Sonja Kramer [sonjak20 @gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 4:23 PM
To: Munllo, Jaime; emcdaniel @sunwestbank.com
Subject: Stopping Malarky's Bar from expanding
To whom it may concern:
My husband, two children, and myself love living in Newport Beach on 30th street, the same street that
Malarky's bar is on. We are not in favor of the outdoor patio and of the expansion of the bar for many reasons.
Please take the time to consider the residents who have spent millions of dollars on their home before you make
this critical decision. Thank you for your time.
Sonja Bums
949 -769 -4312
17-1
Burns, Marlene
From: Murillo, Jaime
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:15 AM
To: Burns, Marlene
Subject: FW: Malarky's Bar Expansion Application
I received this one late last night.
From: marlyne diamond [mailto:marlyned @live.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 20117:38 PM
To: 'Lori Morris'; 'Earl McDaniel'; 'Susan /Barry Eaton'; 'Michael Toerge'; ameri @rbf.com; 'Robert Hawkins';
cwunsworth @cox.net; bhillgren @highrhodes.com
Cc: Kiff, Dave; Rosansky, Steven; Selich, Edward; 'Mike Henn'; Hill, Rush; Gardner, Nancy; Curry, Keith; Daigle, Leslie;
Brown, Leilani; Murillo, Jaime
Subject: RE: Malarky's Bar Expansion Application
I agree with Cindy Kohller and Lori Morris. Please don't approve of the expansion of Malarky's
Bar.
Marlyne Diamond
From: Lori Morris [mailto:lorirmorris @gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 20113:29 PM
To: Earl McDaniel; Susan /Barry Eaton; Michael Toerge; ameri @rbf.com; Robert Hawkins; cwunsworth @cox.net;
bhillgren @highrhodes.com
Cc: Dave' 'Kill; parandigm @aol.com; Ed Selich; Mike Henn; rush hill; Nancy Gardner; curryk @pfm.com;
lesliejdaigle @aol.com; (brown @city.newport - beach.ca.us; jmurillo @newportbeachca.gov
Subject: Malarky's Bar Expansion Application
March 3, 2011
Please enter into the public record
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
Attention: Planning Commission
City Clerk
City Council
Jaime Murillo
Reference: Malarky's Application up 2010 -039
Planning Commission, City Council and Staff:
I would like to echo Cindy Koller's request to deny the Malarky's Bar expansion application.
As a resident of the Peninsula I am appalled that the staff report submitted does not go into greater detail
regarding the impacts to residents this expansion would most certainly impose.
272
The Peninsula zone has a far greater burden than any where else in the City of Newport Beach in regard to
alcohol establishments.
As we have been involved with the (hopefully) better use of the old City Hall site ... it would seem at this point
the city staff would look at the entire impact of adding even more space for drinking alcohol in such close
proximity to the future use of that site.
Residents of the Peninsula should not continue to bear the burden of even ONE MORE bar or expansion and we
would expect our city leaders to be looking for ways to mitigate the problems we have now with over crowded
bars, not enough parking and the general crime that goes along with that.
Our City Council just voted to give our Police Chief and his Dept. more latitude in dealing with the problem we
now have with alcohol establishments ... yet City staff seems to be ignoring the letters of request to deny this
application written by our very own Police Dept. detectives. I find that troubling and of great concern.
As was reported, we had a death recently in our city directly attributed to the intoxication and drowning of a
young man who had frequented the very same bars in and around the area in question. I do not wish to use his
horrible death to remind our city employees of the dangers that come with being complacent in regards to too
many bars in such a dense area and close proximity to a LARGE body of water but it cannot be ignored.
PLEASE... residents are looking to you to help end the over saturation of bars and drinking establishments in the
Peninsula zone.
I am asking you to deny this request and in the future please be mindful of the already established burden that
the Peninsula resident must endure.
Thank You,
Lori Morris
West Newport
1�3
Burns, Marlene
From:
Murillo, Jaime
Sent:
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:06 AM
To:
Burns, Marlene
Subject:
FW: stop malarkys
From: Dan Ralsky [ mailto:tboneoct @roadrunner.com]
Sent: Friday, March 04, 20118:24 PM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: stop malarkys
stop malarkys
174
Burns, Marlene
From:
Murillo, Jaime
Sent:
Wednesday, March 09, 2011 10:06 AM
To:
Burns, Marlene
Subject:
FW: Marlarky's
From: Helen McCleeary [maiito:helenmccleeary@att.netj
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 10:49 AM
To: Murillo, Jaime
Subject: Marlarky's
To Jaime Murillo, Associate Planner,
I do not wish to see Malarky's Expand, as this will only have a negative impact to our
community. Malarky's application should be denied.
There are enough "Bar's" in the Newport Beach area as it is.
I do not like being disturbed at early hours of the morning with people yelling, arguing,
and getting sick on my property!! I have to do the cleaning up and I do not appreciate
it.
Drunk drivers have been known to have accidents along Balboa Blvd. and cars have
been damaged. There doesn't need to be another bar in Newport Beach.
Thank you,
Helen McCleeary
I
1715
170