HomeMy WebLinkAbout12 - MacArthur at Dolphin Striker (PA2010-135)�EWPOR CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
09�oP City Council Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 12
October 25, 2011
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Community Development Department
Kimberly Brandt, AICP, Director
949 - 644 -3226, kbrandtCcDnewportbeachca.00v
PREPARED BY: Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner
APPROVED: A ��
TITLE: Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
L1:TM:LGi9
An appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the entitlement request to
allow a development of two, single -story commercial buildings of 13,525 square feet
total. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's action on the project, the applicant has
modified the project by reducing the gross floor area from 13,525 to 12,351 square feet
and eliminating the additional off -site parking request.
RECOMMENDATION:
Uphold or reverse the Planning Commission's decision by either
1. Adopting the draft resolution for denial without prejudice (Attachment No. CC1);
or
2. Adopting the draft resolution approving the revised project (Attachment No. CC2)
by:
a. Adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including the Errata and
Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program; and
b. Finding that, based on the weigh of evidence in the administrative record,
including Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002, that the project complies with the
Traffic Phasing Ordinance; and
c. Approving Transfer of Development Rights No. TD2010 -002, Conditional
Use Permit No. UP2011 -026, Modification Permit No. Mn2011 -014; and
Waiver of Development Agreement, subject to findings and conditions;
and
1
2
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 2
d. Introduce Ordinance No. 2011- 25 (Attachment No. CC4) approving
Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PD2010 -007,
and pass to second reading on November 22, 2011 (contingent on the
Airport Land Use Commission action which tentatively scheduled on
November 17, 2011).
3
VICINITY MAP
m
-
Dr
Classic Q o
Saagar India
Restaurant
m
Subject
Property
3
c
Y N
DOLPHINSTWKERWAV p
GENERAL PLAN
ZONING
Pc 11
�
14
-
LOCATION
GENERAL PLAN
ZONING
CURRENT USE
ON -SITE
Mixed Use Horizontal 2
MU -H2
pC -11, Restaurant Site 1
Restaurant (vacant)
NORTH
MU -H2
PC -11, Pro. & Bus.
Office
Classic Q Sports Club &
Site 6
Restaurant
SOUTH
MU -H2
PC -11, Pro. & Bus.
Office
Glidewell Laboratories
Site 5
EAST
MU -H2
PC -11, Pro. & Bus.
Office
MacArthur Blvd. & Koll Center
Site 7
WEST
MU -H2
MacArthur Blvd. & Koll
Saagar India Restaurant &
Center PC
Dolphin- Striker Way
3
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 3
LAND USE ANOMALY & TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EXHIBIT
AO
PF
Receiver
O -G 12 Site
Donor Site " ; V �'PM MU -H2
Fletcher Jones
z.1 z ,
i
- e �
R i
i
i
Donor Site
CG 0.5 FAR qp 17
Lexus
D
FAR' & r
RS-D
8 C i
T3 X
ti
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
There is no fiscal impact related to this item
DISCUSSION:
Proiect Settin
The subject property is approximately 48,221 square feet (1.11 acres) in size and
located on the west side of MacArthur Boulevard, between Martingale Way and Newport
Place Drive. The property is currently improved with a 7,996 square -foot commercial
building and a 78 -space surface parking lot. In addition to the on -site parking, the
subject property has 16 off -site parking spaces that are currently located at 4100
Newport Place (US Bank's parking structure). These off -site parking spaces are
permanently available pursuant to a recorded off -site parking agreement and are part of
the application.
The property is Parcel 1 of three parcels designated as Restaurant Site 1 in the Newport
Place Planned Community. Parcel 2 is currently improved with a 7,015 square -foot
restaurant (Saagar Fine Cuisine of India Restaurant) and a 59 -space surface parking
lot. Parcel 3 is currently improved with a 7,870 square -foot sports club and restaurant
(Classic Q Sports Club and Restaurant) and has a 74 -space surface parking lot. The
parking lots of these parcels are shared and the total combined parking spaces is 211
(78 +59 +74) parking spaces. Vehicular access to all three parcels is from Dolphin- Striker
Way and Martingale Way. Parcels 2 and 3 are not a part of the proposed development.
21
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 4
Project Description — Original Request
The project, as originally proposed and reviewed by the Planning Commission, included
the demolition of the existing 7,996 square -foot, single -story commercial building and
construction of two, single -story commercial buildings with a total of 13,525 square feet.
The following applications were requested:
1. An amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development
Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject property from "Restaurant
Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ", pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned
Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the Municipal Code.
2. Transfer of Development Rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units from
Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and
1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901
MacArthur Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet to the subject site, pursuant
to Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights) of the Municipal Code.
3. Traffic Study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as
the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
4. Conditional Use Permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for
the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the
site, pursuant to Chapter 20.40 (Off- Street Parking) of the Municipal Code.
5. Waiver of the requirement for a Development Agreement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the Municipal Code.
6. Modification Permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the Newport
Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, pursuant to Section
20.52.050 of the Municipal Code.
Please refer to the attached September 22, 2011, Planning Commission Staff Report for
a detailed discussion and analysis of the proposed project, related application requests,
and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Attachment No. CC5).
Planning Commission Action
The Planning Commission reviewed the project application on September 22, 2011, and
voted 4 -3 to deny the applicant's request without prejudice. The draft Planning
Commission minutes are included as Attachment No. CC7. The Planning Commission
was unable to make the required findings based upon the following:
J
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 5
1. The purpose and intent of parking standards is to provide adequate parking for
development. The applicant requests a change in the allowable use and an
increase in the intensity of use while inadequately addressing parking through a
waiver and off -site parking.
2. The 1 -year term of the applicant's off -site parking lease does not satisfy the
Zoning Code that requires off -site parking be permanently available.
3. The applicant's justification for the modification permit to allow relief from the
landscaping standards is based upon the applicant's request for increased
intensity of use and proposed design rather than a practical difficulty of the
property and that the project can easily be redesigned to comply with the interior
landscape requirement.
4. The proposed primary access to the subject property is inconsistent with the
existing design of MacArthur Boulevard that does not provide direct access into
commercial parking lots and may interrupt traffic flow along MacArthur
Boulevard.
me
On October 1, 2011, City Councilmember Rush Hill appealed the Planning
Commission's action (Attachment No. CC3). The appeal request states that the project
should be reviewed by the City Council given the importance of addressing the
economic need for the City to support the improvement of the City's underperforming
commercial areas combined with the applicant's willingness to address issues raised by
the Planning Commission.
Pursuant to Section 20.64.030.0 of the Zoning Code, a public hearing on an appeal is
conducted "de novo ", meaning that it is a new hearing and the prior decision to approve
the application by the Planning Commission has no force or effect. The City Council is
also not bound by the Planning Commission's prior decision and it is not limited to the
issues raised on appeal. On review, the City Council may sustain, or reverse the
decision of the Planning Commission. The City Council may also remand the matter to
the Planning Commission for further consideration, which remand shall include either
specific issues to be considered or a direction for a new hearing.
Project Revisions
Based on some of the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission, the applicant
has presented revised plans (Attachment No. CC10). Project modifications include:
a. Reducing the project gross floor area from 13,525 square feet to 12,351
square feet;
NO
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 6
b. Reducing the transfer request from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus
Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) from 1,620 square feet to 400
square feet.
C. Changing the proposed land use mix by reducing general commercial
area from 8,525 to 7,351 square feet and changing the operational
characteristic of the proposed fast -food use to take -out limited use;
d. Increasing the number of on -site parking from 59 to 65 spaces thereby
reducing the parking waiver request from 13 to 3 parking spaces; and
e. Reducing the off -site parking request from 32 to 16 spaces. A long term
reciprocal parking agreement for these spaces has been in effect since
1972 and does not have a termination date.
Kunzman Associates, Inc. has prepared a revised parking analysis and parking
management plan the revised project. Since the on -site surface parking lot is, and
would continue to be, shared by the proposed project, Classic Q Billiards and Sports
Club and Saager Fine Cuisine of India the shared parking analysis is a projection of
future parking demand of all three uses. The analysis concludes that based on the land
uses and mix of tenants, a peak parking demand of 205 spaces is expected to occur,
which is less than the 217 space zoning code requirement and less than the 214 spaces
provided. Additionally, a revised parking management plan was prepared that
recommends all employees use the 16 off -site spaces before parking on -site. The
revised shared parking analysis and parking management plan have been reviewed and
approved by the City's Traffic Engineer and are included as Attachment Nos. CC8 and
CC9.
In summary, the modified plans address some, but not all, of the Planning
Commission's concerns. Although the intensity of the project (reduced gross floor area
and changed land -use mix) reduces the parking waiver from 13 to 3 spaces and
eliminates the need of 16 additional off -site parking spaces, the new drive access and
modification permit for relief from some of the landscaping requirements remain. The
draft planned community development plan has been revised to reflect the project's
modifications (Attachment No. CC4).
Altarnntivas-
1. If the City Council finds the facts do not support the findings required to grant
approval of the application requests, the City Council should adopt the draft
resolution (Attachment No. CC9) upholding the decision of the Planning
Commission and denying the project.
2. If the City Council finds there are facts to support the findings required to grant
approval of the modified application requests, the City Council should adopt the
draft resolution (Attachment No. CC2) and draft ordinance (Attachment No. CC4)
7
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 7
reversing the decision of the Planning Commission and approving the modified
project.
3. If the City Council finds that the applicant's revisions to the project request are
substantial and warrant further consideration by the Planning Commission, the
City Council should refer review of the modified project to the Planning
Commission with direction to review specific issues and conduct a new hearing.
4. If the City Council finds that the revised project does not adequately address
concerns regarding the intensity and overall design of the project, the City
Council may direct the applicant to further reduce the intensity of the project in
order to be in compliance with the development standards (i.e. parking,
landscape setbacks). The City Council should direct the applicant to redesign the
project accordingly and refer the project to the Planning Commission to conduct
a new hearing.
Conclusion
The applicant has revised the project to address many of the Planning Commission's
concerns by reducing the intensity of the project, increasing the on -site parking supply,
and eliminating the request for additional off -site parking. However, a parking
adjustment and modification to the landscape setback are still being requested. The
City Council has the option of either: 1) denying the project; 2) approving the modified
project; or 3) referring review of the modified project back to the Planning Commission
for further consideration.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MIND) has been prepared by planning staff, in
accordance with the implementing guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K -3. The MIND is provided
as Attachment No. CC11. A copy of the MIND was also made available on the City's
website, at each Newport Beach Public Library, and at the Community Development
Department at City Hall.
Please see the September 22, 2011, Planning Commission staff report for a detailed
discussion pertaining to the preparation and conclusions of the MIND, the public review
period and comments received, and an Errata to the MIND.
The modifications proposed by the applicant do not constitute "substantial revisions"
that would warrant recirculation of the MIND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15073.5.
0
Appeal - MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
October 25, 2011
Page 8
NOTICING:
Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to property owners within
300 feet of the property (excluding roads and waterways) and posted at the site a
minimum of 10 days in advance of this hearing consistent with the Municipal Code. The
environmental assessment process has also been noticed consistent with the California
Environmental Quality Act. The Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the MND was mailed to
property owners within 300 feet of the property (excluding roads and waterways), and
posted at the site and at City Hall. Finally, the item appeared upon the agenda for this
meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the city website.
Submitted by:
c
Kimberly Brandt,
Community Development Director
Attachments: CC1 Draft Resolution for Denial
CC2 Draft Resolution for Approval
CC3 Appeal Letter
CC4 Draft Ordinance (Amended PC Development Plan)
CC5 September 22, 2011 Planning Commission Staff Report package
(Pages 109 -580) is available at City Clerk's Office and at City's
website at www.newportbeachca.gov
CC6 Planning Commission Resolution for Denial
CC7 Draft September 22, 2011 Planning Commission Minutes
CC8 Revised Shared Parking Analysis
CC9 Revised Parking Management Plan
CC10 Revised Plans
CC11 Mitigated Negative Declaration, Comment Letters, & Errata
(Distributed Separately)
10
NOTME OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, October 25, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be
conducted in the City Council Chambers (Building A) at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. The City
Council of the City of Newport Beach will consider the following application:
MacArthur at Dolphin - Striker — An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of an application to develop
two, single -story commercial building of 13,525 square feet total. The project requires the approval of the
following applications: A Planned Community Text Amendment to change the zoning designation of the subject
property from "Restaurant Site V to "General Commercial Site 8 "; a Transfer of Development Rights to allow
the transfer of 48 un -built hotel units from Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail
Street) and 1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur
Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet of specialty retail to the subject site; a Traffic Study approval
pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as the project will generate in excess 300 average daily
trips (ADT); a Conditional Use Permit to modify the off - street parking requirements; allow for the use of off -site
parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the site; a waiver of the requirement for a
Development Agreement; and a Modification Permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the
Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared by
the City of Newport Beach in connection with the application noted above. The MND states that, the subject
development will not result in a significant effect on the environment. It is the present intention of the City to
accept the MND and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City
of the subject application. The MND was circulated for a 20 -day public review and comment period that began
on July 15, 2011, and concluded on August 3, 2011.
All interested parties may appear and present testimony in regard to this application. If you challenge this
project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public
hearing (described in this notice) or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or prior to, the public
hearing. The agenda, staff report, and documents may be reviewed at the Planning Division (Building C, 2nd
Floor), 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92663 or at the City of Newport Beach website at
www.newportbeachca.gov on the Friday prior to the hearing.
For questions regarding details of the project please contact Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner, at
(949) 644 -3208, rung @newportbeachca.gov.
Project File No.: PA2010 -135
Zone: Restaurant Site 1 of PC -11 (Newport Place)
Location: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, West side of
MacArthur Blvd at Dolphin Striker -Way
Activity No.: PD2010 -007, TD2010 -002; TS2011-
002, UP2011- 026,ND2011 -001, & MN2011 -014
General Plan: MU -H2 (Mixed Use Horizontal 2)
Applicant: Ridgeway /Whitney, Partnership
4�0eil 1 I. Brown, City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
Harris, Lillian
From: McDonald, Cristal
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 10:31 AM
To: Harris, Lillian; Brown; Leilani
Subject: FW: Call Up of Planning Application PA2010 -135
In the Clerk's inbox for your handling. Thanks.
From: City Clerk's Office
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 20119:31 AM
To: McDonald, Cristal
Subject: FW: Call Up of Planning Application PA2010 -135
From: Hill, Rush
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 9:28:23 AM
To: City Clerk's Office
Cc: Kiff, Dave
Subject: FW: Call Up of Planning Application PA2010 -135
Auto forwarded by a Rule
With Leilani being out of the office until October 3, 1 am forwarding this to the City Clerk's office for
processing to insure the proper time for filling a PC call up is met.
Thanks.
rush
Councilman Rush Hill
City of Newport Beach
District Three
Office: 115 Twenty Second Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949.723.7202 ext 321
For scheduling, please contact Alan Limon at:
Alan(aDNRMservice.com
949.723.7202 ext 327
From: Hill, Rush
Sent: Sat 10/1/20119:26 AM
To: Brown, Leilani
Cc: Henn, Michael; Kiff, Dave; Brandt, Kim; Campbell, James
Subject: Call Up of Planning Application PA2010 -135
Office of City Clerk
City Of Newport Be
October 1, 2011
On September 22, 2011 the Dolphin- Striker Way Commercial Project (the "Project ") came before and was
denied by our Planning Commission (the "PC "). The Project presented an opportunity to revitalize an
underperforming area within our city.
In order to address a higher market driven tenant mix for the site, the applicant requested approval of several
items including improved site access, an increase in development density, changed layout allowing for two
single story buildings and related parking reconfiguration. These requests are identified as:
Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PD2010 -007
Transfer Development Rights No. TD2010 -002
Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002
Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026
Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2011 -001
Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014
Waiver of Development Agreement
City staff evaluated all aspects of the project and recommended approval. The PC took issue however with
some elements and denied the Project. Topics discussed during the PC meeting included site access, building
square footage and parking. Subsequent to the rejection by the PC, the applicant has made changes to the
proposed Project including reducing the square footage and increasing on site parking.
Given the importance of addressing the economic need for our city to support the improvement of our
underperforming commercial areas, combined with the applicant's willingness to address issues raised by the
PC, I request the September 22, 2011 decision of the Planning Commission related to Planning Application
PA2010 -135 be called -up before the City Council for further discussion and consideration at the first available
Council meeting.
Rush Hill
Councilman Rush Hill
City of Newport Beach
District Three
Office: 115 Twenty Second Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949.723.7202 ext 321
For scheduling, please contact Alan Limon at:
AI an (a) N RM se rvice. co m
949.723.7202 ext 327
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, October 25, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be conducted in the City Council Chambers
(Building A) at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach will consider the following application:
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker — An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of an application to develop two, single -story commercial building of
13,525 square feet total. The project requires the approval of the following applications: A Planned Community Text Amendment to change the zoning
designation of the subject property from "Restaurant Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 "; a Transfer of Development Rights to allow the transfer of
48 un -built hotel units from Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and 1,620 square feet from General
Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet of specialty retail to the subject site; a Traffic Study
approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT); a Conditional Use
Permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the site; a
waiver of the requirement fora Development Agreement; and a Modification Permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the Newport Place
(PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection
with the application noted above. The MND states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the environment. It is the
present intention of the City to accept the MND and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of the
subject application. The MND was circulated for a 20 -day public review and comment period that began on July 15, 2011, and concluded on August 3,
2011.
All interested . parties may appear and present testimony in regard to this application. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing (described in this notice) or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or
prior to, the public hearing. The agenda, staff report, and documents may be reviewed at the Planning Division (Building C, 2ntl Floor), 3300 Newport
Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92663 or at the City of Newport Beach website at www.newoortbeachca gov on the Friday prior to the hearing.
For questions regarding details of the project please contact Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner, at (949) 644 -3208, rung @newportbeachca.gov
Project File No.: PA2010 -135
Zone: Restaurant Site 1 of PC -11 (Newport Place)
Location: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, West side of MacArthur Blvd at
Dolphin Striker -Way
Activity No.: PD2010 -007, TD2010 -002, TS2011 -002, UP2011-
026,ND2011 -001, & MN2011 -014
General Plan: MU -H2 (Mixed Use Horizontal 2)
Applicant: Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership
;2 LeLe ani�Clerk
City of Newport Beach
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, October 25, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be conducted in the City Council Chambers
(Building A) at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach will consider the following application:
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker — An appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of an application to develop two, single -story commercial building of
13,525 square feet total. The project requires the approval of the following applications: A Planned Community Text Amendment to change the zoning
designation of the subject property from "Restaurant Site V to "General Commercial Site 8 "; a Transfer of Development Rights to allow the transfer of
48 un -built hotel units from Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and 1,620 square feet from General
Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet of specialty retail to the subject site; a Traffic Study
approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT); a Conditional Use
Permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the site; a
waiver of the requirement for a Development Agreement; and a Modification Permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the Newport Place
(PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan.
NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared by the City of Newport Beach in connection
with the application noted above. The MIND states that, the subject development will not result in a significant effect on the environment. It is the
present intention of the City to accept the MND and supporting documents. This is not to be construed as either approval or denial by the City of the
subject application. The MND was circulated for a 20 -day public review and comment period that began on July 15, 2011, and concluded on August 3,
2011.
All interested parties may appear and present testimony in regard to this application. If you challenge this project in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing (described in this notice) or in written correspondence delivered to the City, at, or
prior to, the public hearing. The agenda, staff report, and documents may be reviewed at the Planning Division (Building C, 2 I Floor), 3300 Newport
.Boulevard, Newport Beach, California, 92663 or at the City of Newport Beach website at www.newportbeachea.gov on the Friday prior to the hearing.
For questions regarding details of the project please contact Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner, at (949) 644 -3208, rung @newportbeachca.gov
Project File No.: PA2010 -135 Activity No.: PD2010 -007, TD2010 -002, TS2011 -002, UP2011-
026,ND2011 -001, & MN2011 -014
Zone: Restaurant Site 1 of PC -11 (Newport Place) General Plan: MU -H2 (Mixed Use Horizontal 2)
Location: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, West side of MacArthur Blvd at
Dolphin Striker -Way applicant: Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership
i��
ila i Brown, City Clerk
Citv of Newport Beach
3
Easy 14elw Labels 0918 /� :;Sj Nanyiaane o wuePq(t U n 8i ao ap ::;nbl.3
Use Avery Template 5160 d � 3n gi1>R "5e, lagpd
16 labels printed.
16 Labels
Bold FontforAction Letters Only ®� _ ��
Owner /Applicant
Ridgeway Development Ridgew�a Dev Iti'pment PA2010 -135 forGP2010 -010,
2804 Lafayette Raod 2804 Lafa a Raod 282010 -007
Newport Beach, CA 92663 Newpor ea , CA 92663 Ridgeway Lafayette Avenue
Ridgeway Development
ti s i peler ; lab l the 1" x 2 5 /8"fr�q p0ble ieWt bAwigW&6a 316'; www.avery.com
Uti t AVERT® 5160® °iguett��W5 mm xOM4tanI�avAAr� - =5; i0/8160 1- 800 -GO -AVERY 6 '
b,
938 941 14 938 941 15 938 941 16
Journey Inside Out LLC Rita Carp Michael Stoll
28611 Rancho Maralena 1101 Dove St #h170 5 Madison
Laguna Niguel Ca 92677 Newport Beach Ca 92660 Newport Beach Ca 92660
938 941 17 938 941 18 938 941 19
Gregory Montagna e S 1101 Dove St
9 Bayview 1101 D e 1101 Dove St #100
Irvine Ca 92614 Newp rt Beach Ca 92660 Newport Beach Ca 92660
938 941 20 938 941 21
938 941 22
Dove Street Condos Inc Do Street ondos Inc ove Stre ndos Inc
4300 Von Karman Ave 4300 Vo an Ave 4 arman Ave
Newport Beach Ca 92660 Newpo Beach Ca 92660 New ort Beach Ca 92660
938 941 23 93 941 24 938 941 25
Do Stree os Inc Dove e C ndos Inc Scott Daniels
4300 Vo Karman Ave 4300 V Karman Ave 1101 Dove St #225
Newpo Beach Ca 92660 Newpo Beach Ca 92660 Newport Beach Ca 92660
938 941 26 938 941 27 8 941 28
D e Str ondos Inc D tr ndos Inc e S dos Inc
4300 V n Karman Ave 4300 V n Karman Ave 4300 on Karman Ave
New rt Beach Ca 92660 Newp rt Beach Ca 92660 Ne port Beach Ca 92660
938 941 29 938 941 30 938 941 31
Lee Professional Yongjin Vada Lee Jones Do Str C 'os Inc
1101 Dove St #v 9550 SW Inverness Way 4300 on Karman Ave
Newport Beach Ca 92660 Beaverton Or 97007 New ort Beach Ca 92660
938 941 32 938 941 3
D ve S Condos Inc ondos Inc
4300 V n Karman Ave 430 on Karman Ave
Newpo Beach Ca 92660 Newport Beach Ca 92660
MacArthur at Dolphir- Striker
�qo! PA2010 -135
427 221 09 427 221 10 427 221 11
Feb Dove Street Partners Sbs Dove Street Partners 1000 Quail LLC
1001 Dove St #106 901 Dove St #270 2235 Faraday Ave #o
Newport Beach Ca 92660 Newport Beach Ca 92660 Carlsbad Ca 92008
427 222 05
Malaguena Trust
1000 Dove St #100
Newport Beach Ca 92660
427 241 04
LSWLtd
1603 Emerald Bay
Laguna Beach Ca 92651
427 241 10
State Of California
3337 Michelson Dr #380
Irvine Ca 92612
42724203
S f Itfornia iv
3337 'che #380
Irvine a 92612
427 242 08
C "Y Of N p Beach
3300 ewport Blvd
Newp rt Beach Ca 92663
445 131 26
Kcn an e nt LLC
4343 V Kerman Ave
Newpo Beach Ca 92660
445 132 16
Cip Centerpoint LLC
19762 Macarthur Blvd #300
Irvine Ca 92612
938 941 08
Shirt Dinning
24945 Huron St
Loma Linda Ca 92354
938 941 11
Edward Moss
1101 Dove St #140
Newport Beach Ca 92660
42722206
Pmc General Partnership
4001 Macarthur Blvd #300
Newport Beach Ca 92660
427 241 05
Elevation Equities LLC
1 Mauchly
Irvine Ca 92618
427 241 13
Newport Plaza Glenborough
400 S El Camino Real #1100
San Mateo Ca 94402
427 242 04
S to Of iro nia
Po 30
OY
Los A geles Ca 90051
427 223 01
Mac Arthur Building LLC
2700 N Main St #780
Santa Ana Ca 92705
427 241 09
Back Bay Court Property
515 Loring Ave '
Los Angeles Ca 90024
® 427 241 14
3901 Mac Arthur.Blvd LLC
1400 N Tustin St
Orange Ca 92867
427 242 05
State Of California
Po Box 2304
Los Angeles Ca 90051
427 242 09
445 131 04
Irvine Co
Kcn Management LLC
550 Newport Center Dr
4343 Von Karmen Ave
Newport Beach Ca 92660
Newport Beach Ca 92660
445 132 09
445 13211
South Coast Thrift & Loan
Bates Johnson Building
1100 Paseo Camarillo
19742 Macarthur Blvd #240
Camarillo Ca 93010
Irvine Ca 92612
445 132 18
5 132 19
Cip Centerpointe 123 LLC
Ci ent ointe 1 .3 LLC
19762 Macarthur Blvd #350
1976 aca ur Blvd #350
Irvine Ca 92612
Irvin Ca 92612
938 941 09 938 941 10
Esther Park Do LLC Watson Tung
Po Box 70180 2865 E Coast Hwy #206
Los Angeles Ca 90070 Corona Del Mar Ca 92625
938 941 12 938 941 13
Barriet Investments LLC Robert & Marsha Hewlett
4 Park Piz #640 1101 Dove St #160
Irvine Ca 92614 Newport Beach Ca 92660
Compatible with Avery ®5160 0 Template
woo 'g/9 3 X'j a4is pqlT
Ffrst States Investors 5000A Lic
PO . BoX 167120
Wing; TX 75016-7129
Pacifi;,- Plaza Associates
Blvd ;1' ?2d
NewPQrt Beach; CA 926.66-0023
.427481-12
James CUdewell
4141 NMacarthUr Blvd
Nlavypq rt,Pea I ch, CA 92600 20`5
445-12243
-The Found Viii
1:301 Ddv'e*st860
Newport Beach, CA 92266&2412.
Whitney Ridgeway
,
8N"taf a y ette Rd
N.pw.pp!t Reach, CA 026�3782
427:181-Gs-
tillill thy,& PhOfWy Flathers
20292 Acee.
Orange �A•92..869 -1700
427A81-1.3
Newport Plabe Corp
18818 Tell& Ave 277
INIffe, CA.926,1271678
427-1:81 -03
16011 Dove . �p
1'600 Dove St480
Niewpor . t:Beach, Q&92860-24k
445-122-06
Craig. Realty Group Mdcarthur LJQ.
. 4 1610 Mace . rthur'S(Vd 4200
Newport ' -8' " il -
. e.aa, CA 92860 -2064
A45-122-17
2N[blfid'club
Affo Mada �� rthur Blvd
Beach, 92660 -2001' ach CA pprt Be ..
427 221 -04
"Palm, Springs Village: -'809'Llar
2922 Daimler St
5anta,AnP,: CA:92705 51853,
427-1,7243
Vab ArthUr Square
17631 Fitch
CA 9261'4 =6021
427 - 221 =01
.Nf Qc"ve LIc
4.425 dambdree Rd
NI-VOOrt Beath, CA 92e60-3024
4.45712246
Mizan tic
4343 Von Karmen Ave
:Newport Beach, CA 92660- 2099
445-122-1:8
Kcti A MsnagernentLte
"3 Von Karman Ave.
ft Beep hj,.12A 92660-2099.
421- 1�81-08
Q9rcharan,& 8aIjeet $a
hdher
17130 Apricot Gir
Fountain Valley; CA 92760= 3.'567
Old Fo.n t.fo.r Action L ett&s On8i
KOA - NA
EE��T-966-00B-T . — -k]6AV OP o09T9 1!1*15 al oaAe 91gpedwoo
-iesej sellarib'13
*e,r L e S ;r MTempl�{p;I . �. • e ve T 7:. P. t £ep�atfi} M* "g �i`�I € 9t:o > O a E .riej j
939- 94-054 e( 935-94 -055
L U ' .G . ULLAS A CALIPOR WARREN L FULMER
LaaS QU . ST 16 VLA DLAMAN1: G
Nlrv'PO3t. EACH CA NIMPO ZT COAST CA
g206o -27 92657 -1624
:.s,
935 -94 -056
LUCAS -GIANT ILMS
1165 QUAIL ST
NEWPORT BEACH CA
9266o-2705
lid 5ak a
Compatl
2 -9q-056
rtiq 9�,a IF OR 9�8
1,11CM-GIANTULIAS
iZT�7
Applicant/Owner
Fle tcher Jones Motors am
330DJarnbome
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Y
lz� -;;
Contact HOA .NIA
VA
Government solutions
Atth., C, McDermottff,.Fetterman
I San Joaquin Plaza Suite 210.
NtWPWI,Seach, CA, 92660.
0-ooT6aieldwaiNE jaded pead aleldwal @OgIS vWAV pmalyledwoo
slacie-1 jese-1
Coiatible with AveAtjAq0tTgnbV�, L
427221.-o6
WESTERN NATL LIFE INS Co
i SUN AMERICA CTR 38TH
LOS ANGELES 'CA
90o6,7 -.610o
Fe/,� rk6fPd0d PJOqOA 01 JOJxAgV
fl oAH3AVlj,ALqt?5
wi
13P O�u aAfl4nq q q 2611dob op suas
4�27-2.21-08
451 DOVE LLC
GM . GORY M MONTAGNA
2235 FARADAYAVE 0
1888i VON KARMAN AVE 155o
CARLSBAD CA
IRVINE. CA
92008-7215
926.12-1557
427722109 427-221-10
FEB DbVE STREET PARTNERS LLC SBSTO 1
VE STREET PARTNERS
lool DOVE ST 106 goi D . OVE ST 270
NEWPORT BEACH CA NEWPORT BEACH CA
9266a-2845, 92660-3039
427=221-13:
1.200 QUAIL.ST LLC
7778 ITIGUEROA-ST 4850
M9 ANGE LES CA
g6017-584
,427-221-16
MIREF 1500,QUAIL LLC
iFRONTS75co
:SAN FRANCISCO CA
04lil-53'27
427-221-12
nooQUAILST
NEWPORT BEACH CA.
9266o-,270.5,
427-33Z-GI
REALTYASSOCIATES FUND -
1301 DOVL_ST 86o .
NEWPORT BEACH CA
gz46(j4!244u
427-332 -04
NEWPORT PLACE iNVESTMENT CO
1401 QUAIL ST 120
NEWPORT BEACH CA
0266o-2744
4277342-02
JONES FLETCHER
7300 W SAHARA A AVE
LAS VEGAS YV
80n7-2756
938-94-051
LUCAS bIANULIAS
1105.QUAILST
NEWPORT BEACH CA
926.60-2705
427-22'1-14
MAA014EY & GRAU LLC
3822 CAMPUS DR 105
NEWPORT BEACH CA
427- 221-17
METROPOLITAN LIFE
alo, S HOPE ST 3650
LOSANGELES CA
9007i`V20
42.7-241-03
LSWLTD
1603 EMERALD BAY
LAGUNA.BEACH CA
9265171236
427-2
GLENBQROU.GH NEWPQRTP.LAZA
LLC,
40,q S EL CAMINO Rr.AL.1-ioa
SAN
MATE , O CA
44442.1706
427-22.1-11
l000 QUAIL LLC
2235 FARADAYAVE. 0
CARLSBAD CA
92008-7215
4197- 221-15
DAVENPORT QUAIL PARTNERS.LLC
1400 QUAIL ST 165
NEWPORT BEACH CA
9266o.-2769
4.27-2.21-18
fiei DOVE-ST 165
NEWPORT. BEACH CA
926-262
60, &
4v7-241-04
W.1 W LTD
L
1603 -14
D BAY
D BAY
�
�A CH�CA
9 92
_ 1_123
2 1.-1986
427- 331 -01
Ol,C<AL 1A DIVISION OF
CA
'.1 Ch
9578-144
427-332-02
427-332-03
1400 BUILDING PARTNERSHIP CROWN . BUILDING
142o BRISTOL , ST ioo PO BOX
NEWPORT BE ' ACH ' CA NEWPORT . BEACH CA
926,60-2914 - 926,58 =9oi8
427-341-01
STATE-OF CALIFORNTADIVISIOYPIF
SACRAMENTO CA
95814
439-024-24
BACK BAY
2675 IRVINF.AVE 2A1
COSTA MESA CA
99627.46513
427-349>01
HILBERT PROPERTIES 11
13oo BRISTOL ST igo
NEWPORT BEACH CA
92660. 291,!
,442-283-05
K.ODAkA ING
500 E 71'P ST
LOS ANGELES CA
900.14-94TO
938-94-052 938-94-053
PRISTINE PROPERTIES CORP LUCAS-GIANULIAS
1103 QUAIL ST 2 PO BOX 2990
NEWPORT BEACH CA NEWP . ORT BEACH GA
92660, 2705 9265f . 3=9018
.,e;5P3dn-d0dasocjAc2T- 'r 01'e'v,poulmooft m#*pan
of edl, BUOIL puoW8qol -ON ; 1
� &-mm 1: 1 W�a
Compmi6 v�0 ®Tem I �'
' i F e a er 41ersd along ttne So
Use Avery Tettipiate51 00 A �eeBPa�ar�_ exposo Pop-up Edge= AVEWOM �
938 -94 -136 938 - 94-,.37 _.. 938- 94-138
PRES -QUAIL STREET LLC ADAM M ROTUNDA BARBARA S`TRAUB
4300 VON KARMANAVE 1401 AVOCADO AVE 1100 QUAIL ST1o3
NEWPORT BEACH CA NEWPORT BEACH CA NEWPORT BEACH CA.
9266o -2004 9266o -7720 9266o -2702
938-94-1139. 933 -94 -140 938 - 94-141...
4�A71L..ST T LZC ARNAD ANCENlY CHIH{A UP . 030AVE 11VENEZIAAISLE 13791 :MAR LGIEU N
ECIR NEWVO CA.
IRVINE CA
92660 -2004 92606 =8296 9262'0 -3222
938-94 -142;. 938-94-143 938-9044
CHTHKAI 'LIU AUD ANCE & ES =QUAIL ST 1 ET LLC
13791 MARGENE'CIR 4300 AVE
IRVINE CA IR NE 1" CH CA
9262o -3222 92606 -8296
926_,_ -2004
938 94.145 938-94 -146 938 94147 .
CONTEXT PROPERTIES LLC STEVEAXENOS R 8- 944'PIZAAN
1100 QUAIL ST u 1 1106 QUAIL ST 114: 33 TUSCANY
NEWPORT 13L':ACII CA NEWPORT BEACH CA LAI3iRA RANCH CA
9266o.2779 9266o -2703; 92694 -1457
938-94 -148 938 -94 7149
P12 -QUAIL REET T.LC 938 -94 -150
NEWPORT INTL MGMT GROUP LLC P -QUAIL ET LLC
430o AVE 24 BLUR SMT
4306 AVE
NEWP EACH CA IRVINE CA IE PO CH CA
92660 -2004 92603 0155 %Mb.-2004.
938794-151 938-94 -152 938-94 -153.
SAN REMb LLC: P QUAIL IIT LLC REM C
YO BOX 17923 4300 AN AVE P 17923
IRVINE CA NEWPO B + CIi CA IR
92623- 7923:; 82660= 004' 92623 -703
938-94-154 938 4 -55 938 94.156
PRES- UAT ET LLC PRE)- AI BEET LI.0 PRES -QUAIL STREET LLC
4300 VO AVE 4300 VO AVE
NEWP0 B + Cii CA 9 SPOdNBILL DR
NEWPO B + CH CA ALISO:VIEJO CA
9266.0- 004 92660 =2oo4
92656 -8877
938-94 -157. 938-94-15$
VADA JONES PRES- U A EET LLC 438 94-159 .
4300VONYARMATq;gVL P QU STREET LLC
4300 V AVE 4300.... MAN AVE
NEWPORT _BEACH CA NEWPO I3 CA NEWP EACH CA
9266o -2oo4 92660= 004 92666 2004
938-94-160 938- 4 -16 938 -�Y4 a62
P "S QUAIL REST LLC PRE U STREET LLC MCA CONSULTANTS INC
4300 RMAN AVE 4$00 V AVE 18010 SKY PARK CIR 245
NEWP r H CA NE VP BEACH CA IRVINE CA
9266o, 004 92660 -2004 92614 -6441
938-94 -163.
MCA CONSULTANTS INC
18o10 SKY PARK CIR
IRVINE CA
92614-6441
Ia A peter / shSaergeA os ndlent R1l i .py,� I
ealgnbdiw11=211 s 0gabad 4AJ[iYo51G41 43 C
CITY CLik `16 ICE
AFFIDj gV11TC1* RP4.TIING
OFFICE OF
��� ,i 1
THE GTYCLERK
On � "� , 20'WYICp6sf6ijfi8EA4blice of Public Hearing regarding:
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
PA2010 -135
Date of City Council Public Hearing: October 25, 2011
� "t
Dolphin Striker
MacArthur Blvd at Dolphin Striker Way, Newport Beach, California
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G N
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 Alin Vista Way, Sui I 100, Laguna B ach, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.sloulenboroug h i ns.com
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
Site Plan Architects and Planners
420 A I V i s I a Way, S u i I a 100, Laguna Banc h, (e 92651
i 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.s l o u l e n h o r o u g h i nc.com
=AA
Striping Plan
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A I I a Vis I Way, Suile IOU, Caguna B ar h, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www. s I o u I e n bo r o u g h in s. c om
1
DIY
y
- �1
.'��. >
man J•
ac N
t/
:o
R
0
pl
vim
rw
J ?Y•i
IOW'
� 1J]�f
I
I
:�u " "'
Striping Plan
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A I I a Vis I Way, Suile IOU, Caguna B ar h, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www. s I o u I e n bo r o u g h in s. c om
n.
;
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
Conceptual Rendering Architects and Planners
420 A to Vis to Way, S u i I a 100, loguno Banc h, (o 92651
i 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 ww w. s to u l e n h or o u g h inc. c ono
EXISTING
PARKING 57RUCTUURE
(lb Cast )
Mflwy vldlwve
In rcewN —
Nciwts
OBYfJe �
a
❑ I , L LL-L
I{L- B•0i
'o sc ru�cnsn� - -I- E
-----------
� ��
o.
------------
Fropeary
u�
i�
1
SP
Ground Level Plan on Site
i
l
IN
Pnalrem' Lhia
EXISTING BuIDING
MI S SGi Fl
r I-I 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 11111 I I "I I I I I I I I 111RU
#a
A R E L 31
FARCEEI -- „+�rre:%',$p�-
- -- n.M son
§+P..lu 9Z Ff —
hWalsrl Ia
i G gi b R
r
A I•tNrr V Ix azc'
bg
e
F. =. A-Q3 '; •
s n ry _ a EXISTING SUILOING
sLGSgF- �rt:,
ammFr
t, IyJi• "• Fl .5 "J
t k 10 Q
4 ei
� O
_ _ alb
P
b PKCd'tV IIM
_ __ Lv 5
--
4•! S r, m
E40M L•rDilnp 3pri
e l p
K 1W4
I _ = r:mc =rbn lYp pl S= Adlcpr{�Iy wtT =taMntl Sf61 LL
—
6 vu awmme DomErm
Nob:
FNtCELIPgeyplargnfMltdwPH w41h aosterd laoNVtl ruenn
SbMarB 5rpdaf.IM'. mtl 516aaSld
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A I V I s I Way, Sui I IOU, Laguna B ac h, Ca 92651
T 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 w w w. s I o u I en b o r o u g h i n s. c o
Conceptual Landscape Plan
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A I I a V i s I a Way, S u i I a 100, Laguna Banc h, (e 92651
T 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.s t o u I e n h o r o u g h i nc.com
Wv 12TH a aT� 217-0- or•rr i
sign Locini n l
Pad £ - Il l €lev4 on
I Alesbr �I well � I I 11
well ss•eler sl:,n Lecadanl --I—I . MY Ianl I r 'I "Ie M1 Laivkn $ye 1
l ,., MM Mde _Igit
65'fi'
d EXIEIIW
6I9n LOwtlrtn [ Pies
2617}'
ROW
H q
_ sL. ia' FIE
Alrs!r
Pads A& E -East Elevation
North and East Elevations
a
RAOi
—_
10'd' 7l'd' ^s%W 4Td'
Palkh9 OtHa+eal' PerBh9
_I.._ - I., L SOe+newl Glass
r5UE'
&ti-0
Meual sereees r 'I3srer r Plla
M ■�■ ■� :: MEN
1=1__- _U__NIN ■ ■ ■ ■
in
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A la Vis la Way, Sui I IOU, Laguna B ar h, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www. s l o u l e n bo r o u g h in s. c o
een Yq
Sun Sdeen � Y
Pad A -South Flewarlon
I
`h PPomoel 1'e1,
Ronl
a
FL +51'x°
Pad A & B - West Elevation
era•
clv '
W
ee•a-
r-
Pad A- North Eleeatlwl
55A' 7a'a^
YI�q CAvmmY o:c4�@
Piste � %wsln
Clear GIM � � SP M-IQee L Oe Vdthsldwlbja
South, North and West Elevations
B5'+B'
Ea rlar Ple
Wdl 5ysasn
Clear Glee � � spr lGleww L sonsrnen
e'er^
I ,c
� g
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A la Vista Way, Sui I IOU, Laguna B ac h, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 w w w. s l o u l e n b o r o u g h i n r. c ora
4T 41' 26' -0' 1T-0' '' u' 12T -0'
P.At., Orl+nrv/ pm , n. -C. 20'1Y 202' 900
I I I
FMo. Ls 11m I F phB
y I
M I
Poep�gt
Roof
h q
K �5t4T _
Pad 0 -South -I"atlon
Pad A & A' -Ronf Plan
South Elevation & Roof Plan
51'2'
I
I r
Sin LecatlSn
� Flamer
1
&.5 em
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P I a n n a r a
420 A I Vista Way, Su i Jo IOU, Logo no Booth, Co 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.sloulenboroughinl.com
TABULATION SUMMARY
Parcel Name
PARCEL 1 48,221 sf
Parking
Building Area Provided
(sf) (cars)
Existing Building to be removed 8,000 at
Proposed Buildings
Pad A 4,000 sf
(Retail Use) 4,000 sf
Pad B 8,351 sf
(Retail Use) 3,351 sf
(Food Use) 5,000 sf
Total Area
12,351 at
Existing Parking to be modified
78 cars
and /or removed
Proposed Parking (On-Site)
65 cars
Existina Off-Site Parkins
16 cars
Total Parking (including Off-Site)
81 cars
PARCEL 2 (not part) 31,364 sf
Existing Building
7,015 sf
Existing Parking (On-Site)
59 cars
PARCEL 3 (not part) 47,205 sf
Existing Building
8,000 sf
Existing Parking (On-Site)
74 cars
Total Building Area
27,366 sf
Total On-Site Parking
198 cars
(Total On -Site & Off -Site Parking For Parcel 1
214 cars)
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G N
Tabulation Architects and Planners
420 A I I a Vista Way, Sui I 100, L a g u no Boach, Ca 92651
T 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.sloulenboroug h i nc.com
=AA
Striping Plan
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A I I a Vis I Way, Suile IOU, Caguna B ar h, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www. s I o u I e n bo r o u g h in s. c om
1
DIY
y
- �1
.'��. >
man J•
ac N
t/
:o
R
0
pl
vim
rw
J ?Y•i
IOW'
� 1J]�f
I
I
:�u " "'
Striping Plan
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 A I I a Vis I Way, Suile IOU, Caguna B ar h, Ca 92651
F 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www. s I o u I e n bo r o u g h in s. c om
n.
;
S T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
Conceptual Rendering Architects and Planners
420 A to Vis to Way, S u i I a 100, loguno Banc h, (o 92651
i 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 ww w. s to u l e n h or o u g h inc. c ono
Agenda Item #12 — Appeal of
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
Ridgeway /Whitney, Partnership
(PA2010 -135)
City Council
Public
Public Hearing
Oc:ber, 25, 2011
Restaurant Site 1 of Newport Place Planned Community
2
Planning Commission considered the
entitlement application:
• Construction:
— 2, single -story buildings with a total of 13,525
square feet
— A 59 -space parking lot
— New landscaping — 8,850 sf.
3
Planning Commission Denial
• Increase in the intensity of use while inadequately
addressing parking through a waiver and off -site
parking
• One -year term of new off -site parking lease does not
satisfy the Zoning Code that requires off -site parking be
permanently available
• Justification for the modification permit to allow relief
from the landscaping standards is not practical
difficulty
• New access from MacArthur Boulevard is not
consistent with the existing design (does not provide
direct access into commercial parking lots) and may
interrupt traffic flow along MacArthur Boulevard
51
Appeal
• Appealed by Councilmember Hill
• Given the importance of addressing the
economic need for the City to support the
improvement of the City's underperforming
commercial areas and the applicant's
willingness to address issues raised by the
Planning Commission
• The applicant has modified the project as
follows:
5
r
I exlsrlraG
wak" 1 / PARKING 5TRUCTURE j
b "nw _ I 145
C�5 f Fros.c•r
. L boCl'1ow . _.r
la roman EXIS111
Meten e. eacldlav
P -tp�
n ]evbe AP
Lry ie
ACCOS
MI •i �,r -.F -_, —Pmt ti; .f ,� —
)=SOFT 6}♦
+r-r
6-05 b lro;�esa 8.05
f i
. _ ; 1 — �. -r a PARCEL 1 --
• ? ►ARCH 1 Lows
1S1pO3 IT
-03 .
13103O Fr- .- g2 r 4d• NY Y w
------- -_
7fi865 DMT 6.C1 FL. -,..
a - - - - -- – s. —I A -01 I
65 r
_f �2y26yI)SOn .'t _1L•!Q�'� •L •s "4' — sin I -- �.ns n
r1'y,
$F V Wore fl
N 12 - +•]' 4 "' F° � - � 12]'x'
TLN {Y
X21
6
Transfer of Development Rights Request
Use Permit Request: parking waiver, off -site parking &
parking management plan
• Project provides: -94 81 spaces
— On -site:
-59
65
spaces
— Off -site:
-32-
16
spaces
• Parking Waiver: 44 3 spaces
• Surplus of 9 spaces under shared parking
arrangement with Saagar & Classic Q
Resta u ra nt
Off -Site Parking Location
Modified Project Summary:
• Reducing the size of project by 1,174 sf., from
13,525 A to 12,351 A
• Reducing the transfer request from Lexus
Dealership site from 1,620 A to 400 A
• Changing the proposed land use mix by reducing
general commercial area from 8,525 to 7,351 sf.,
and changing the proposed fast -food use to take-
out limited use
• Increasing the number of on -site parking from 59
to 65 spaces, thereby reducing the parking waiver
request from 13 to 3 parking spaces; and
• Reducing the off -site parking request from 32 to
16 spaces.
Project Applications
• Planned Community Development Plan Amendment—
change zoning designation from "Restaurant Site 1" to
"General Commercial Site 8"
• Transfer of Development Rights- 48 unbuilt hotel units
from Fletcher Jones site and 400 sf. From Lexus Site
• Conditional Use Permit — 3 -space parking waiver, 16
existing off -site parking and parking management plan
• Waiver of Development Agreement
• Modification Permit — Deviate from interior landscaping
setback requirement (1 tree for 25 linear feet)
11
Project Studies
• Traffic Study
— 942 ADT ( 67 A.M. /55 P.M. peak hour trips)
— Acceptable Level of Service
— No improvements or mitigation required
• Mitigated Negative Decla ratio n /CEQA
— Project would not result in potentially significant
impacts
— 12 Mitigation measures
— 20 -day Public Review (July 15 to August 3, 2011)
— 3 Comment Letters
— Errata to the MND has prepared to address minor
changes and does not warrant recirculation
12
City Council Options
• Deny the project
• Approve the project
• Refer modifications to Planning Commission
• Direct applicant to modify project
13
ewfl p
1211.0' 127• — —
.' —[I .. }I C{
New Loll tun tm
N M:
r'ARCEL I ?5 jIg Wypyl ll.al c rnplo Aln
SMrtlo� 5fobOSLa# aM $IUbLISLB
III
i
/
EXISI G
PARKING SlRUCiU'RE
�
} 5�
f r
I l d �Cvs f
I
pvlll%Yj wplkwjy
IO1°TO~
EXISTING BUlDING
_
so
20d
r
emcrma
-e•1
8
m a
_ _
pu4
rrc.ry .rfl
},
Fmprry ,rte
—
9
Fr_ez
t q w
I
I
I
I�
�I
u
1
1
19
❑
I
I
I
I
I�
ISC+6 c-- Fr
a
n
19
--
}yeti -
ARCEL
a
R -D4
r
x v
PARCEL 1 m
a;?cssorl
IT
1�apmfl
`06LC VCLh HLD
®.0
Is r—�
_'f3
S• ®Z
l
Qr
I N Y
Ap
{•
az.n, §
s
! 6
a
L
I
A -01
P
h'
EXI571NG BUILDING
it ^r
-
--
s
— -
at 'n
1.ti3 n
_
I.cw
iwP
egarg _
L.YM1nG Sg�
ewfl p
1211.0' 127• — —
.' —[I .. }I C{
New Loll tun tm
N M:
r'ARCEL I ?5 jIg Wypyl ll.al c rnplo Aln
SMrtlo� 5fobOSLa# aM $IUbLISLB
Harris, Lillian
From: Sudo, Jenny
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 4:12 PM
To: Brown, Leilani; Harris, Lillian; McDonald, Cristal; Rieff; Kim
Subject: FW: City Council Agenda Item 12. APPEAL - MACARTHUR BOULEVARD AT 4221
DOLPHIN STRIKER WAY (PA2010 -135).
Attachments: Nephew Jay Johnson.jpg
This link and photo were also uploaded onto our laptop. The speakers are also attached and it is working. Thank you-
Jenny S. Sudo I Administrative Assistant to the Assistant City Manager
City of Newport Beach I City Manager's Office
(949) 644 -3003 1 (949) 644 -3020 (FAX) I jsudo@newportbeachca.gov
From: Dan Purcell [mailto:dan5indexstreet.com1
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 1:47 PM
To: Sudo, Jenny
Subject: City Council Agenda Item 12. APPEAL - MACARTHUR BOULEVARD AT 4221 DOLPHIN STRIKER WAY (PA2010-
135).
Hi Jenny:
I appreciate your help on this. I need to make certain the laptop used for presentations during City Council meetings is
properly configured to present, with sound, the KABC 7 video available at the following link:
http : / /abclocal.go.com /kabc /story ?section= news /local /orange countv &id = 7144631
The video is 2 minutes and 31 seconds long with a 15 second advertisement preceding the video.
CJ Hubbard was living in Corona del Mar at the time of his death. The picture shows CJ holding is nephew Jay Johnson.
Thanks,
Dan
PROOF OF
PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County of Los Angeles; I
am over the age of eighteen years, and
not a party to or interested in the notice
published. I am a principal clerk of the
NEWPORT BEACH /COSTA MESA
DAILY PILOT, which was adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation on
September 29, 1961, case A6214, and
June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the
City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange,
and the State of California. Attached to
this Affidavit is a true and complete copy
as was printed and published on the
following date(s):
Saturday, October 15, 2011
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed on October 18, 2011
at Los Angeles, California
rl YI/frlMl� W
Signature
NOTICE Of Pu6uC18111li
NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that on Tues-
day, October 25,
2011, at 7:00 p.m., e
public hearing will be
conducted in the City
Council Chambers
(Building A) at 3300
Newport Boulevard,.i
Newport Beach. The
City Council of the City.
of Newport Beach will
consider the following
application:
MacArthur at Dolphin -
Striker - An appeal of
the Planning Commis-
sion's denial of an ap-
plication to develop
two, single -story com-
mercial building of
13,525 square feet to-
tal. The project requires
the approval of the fol-
lowing applications: A
Planned Community
Text Amendment to
change the zoning des-
ignation of the subject
property from "Restau-
rant Site 1" to "General
Commercial Site 8 "; a
Transfer of Develop-
ment Rights to allow
the transfer of 48 un-
built hotel units from
Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher
Jones Vehicle Storage
Facility at 1301 Quail
Street) and 1,620
square feet from Gen-
eral Commercial Site 7
(Lexus Dealership at
3901 MacArthur Bou-
levard) for a total of
5,529 square feet of
specialty retail to the
subject site; a Traffic
Study approval pursu-
ant to Chapter 15.40
(Traffic Phasing Ordi-
nance) as the project
will generate in excess
300 average daily trips
(ADT); a Conditional
Use Permit to modify
the off - street parking
requirements, allow for
the use of off site park-
ing, and to establish a
parking management
plan for the site; a
waiver of the re-
quirement for a Devel-
opment Agreement; and
a Modification Permit to
deviate from the land-
scaping requirements of
the Newport Place (PC-
11) Planned Community
Development Plan.
NOTICE IS HEREBY
FURTHER GIVEN that a
Mitigated Negative Dec-
laration (MND) has
been prepared by the
City of Newport Beach
in connection with the
application noted
above. The MND states
that, the subject devel-
opment will not result
in a significant effect
on the environment. It
is the present intention
of the City to accept
the MIND and supporting
documents. This is not
I to be construed as ei-
I ther approval or denial
by the City of the sub-
ject ND was application. iculated for
a 20 -day public review
and comment period
that began on July 15,
2011, and concluded on
August 3, 2011.
All interested parties
may appear and present
testimony in regard to
this application.. If you
challenge this project in
court, you may be
limited to raising only
those issues you or
someone else raised at
the public hearing (de-
scribed in this notice)
Or in written corre-
spondence delivered to
the City, at, or prior lo,
the public hearing. The
agenda, staff report,
and documents may be
reviewed at the Plan-
ning Division (Building
C, 2nd Floor), 3300
Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, Califor-
nia, 92663 or at the City
of Newport Beach web -
site at www.newport
beachca.gov on the Fri-
day prior to the hear-
ing.
For questions regarding
details of the project
please contact Rosalinh
Ung, Associate Planner,
at
(949) 644 -3208
rung(.
newportbeachca.gov.
Project File No.
PA2010 -135
Activity No.: PD2010
007, TD2010 -002
TS2011 -002. UP2011
026TND2011 001, !
MN2011 -014
Zen.: Restaurant Site
of PC -11 (Newpor
Place)
General Plan: MU -H'.
RECEIVED
2011 OCT 24 PM 2: 03
OFFRCE OF
TI IE OT( CLERK
CITY 0:= ?OW BEACH
the City, a or prior o,
the City, at, ea prior he
the public hearing. The
agenda, staff report,
and wed at may be
Plan-
ning at the Plan-
ning Division (Building
C, 2nd Floor), 3300
Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, he Cir-
of ewpororatthe City
si Newport Beach web -
site h a.gov on the
day prior to on the Fri-
day prior [o the hear-
ing.
For questions regarding
details of the project
please contact Planner,
Ung, Associate Planner, r,
at
(9a9) 644 -3208,
rung@
newportbeachca.gov.
ProjIect File No.:
PA2610 -135
Activity No.: PD2010-
007, TD2010 -002,
TS2011 -002, UP2011-
026,ND2011.001, &
MN2011 -014
Zone: Restaurant Site I
of PC -11 (Newport
Place)
General Plan: MU -142
(Mixed Use Horizontal
2)
Location: 4221 Dolphin -
Striker Way, West side
of MacArthur Blvd at
Dolphin Striker -Way
AAp fi,ant: Ridgeway/
Wh t.ey, Partnership
Leilani I. Brown, City
Clerk
City of Newport Beach
Published Newport Beach/
Costa Mesa Daily Pilot
October 15, 2011
�OOO
PL = A1C�, fOO P�
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
)SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County of Los Angeles; I
am over the age of eighteen years, and
not a party to or interested in the notice
published. I am a principal clerk of the
NEWPORT BEACH /COSTA MESA
DAILY PILOT,. which was adjudged a
newspaper of general circulation on
September 29, 1961, case A6214, and
June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the
City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange,
and the State of California. Attached to
this Affidavit is a true and complete copy
as was printed and published on the
following date(s):
Saturday, October 29, 2011
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Executed on November 3, 2011
at Los Angeles, California
Signature
RECEIVED
?Oil NOV -7 AM 10: 29
CITY
GrFir
G= Or
Attachment No. CC 1
Draft Resolution for Denial
11
12
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLANNED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT NO.
PD2010 -007, TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS NO.
TD2010 -002; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011 -026,
MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. 2011 -014, AND TRAFFIC STUDY
NO. TS2011 -002 FOR A NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED AT 4221 DOLPHIN - STRIKER WAY (PA2010 -135)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership, with respect to property
located at 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, and legally described as Parcel 1 of Portion of Lot 4
of Tract No. 7770, requesting approval of an amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11)
Planned Community Development Plan to accommodate the development of two new
commercial buildings of 13,525 square feet total. The following applications were
requested or required in order to implement the project as proposed:
a) An amendment to Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development
Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject property from "Restaurant
Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ", pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned
Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the Municipal Code.
b) A transfer of development rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units,
which equates to Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and 400 square feet from
General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) for
a total of 5,529 square feet to the subject site, pursuant to Chapter 20.46
(Transfer of Development Rights) of the Minicipal Code.
c) A traffic study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as
the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
d) A conditional use permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for
the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the
site, pursuant to Chapter 20.40 (Off- Street Parking) of the Municipal Code.
e) A modification permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the
Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, pursuant to
Section 20.52.050 of the Municipal Code.
f) A waiver of the requirement for a development agreement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the Municipal Code.
13
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 2 of 3
2. The subject property has zoning designation of Restaurant Site 1 of the Newport Place
(PC -11) Planned Community Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element
category is Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -H2 ").
3. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone.
4. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2011, in the
City Hall Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A
notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the
Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to,
and considered by, the Planning Commission at this meeting.
5. At the September 22, 2011, Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission
voted 4 -3 to deny the project without prejudice.
6. On October 1, 2011, the Planning Commission's decision to deny the applicant's request
was appealed by City Councilmember Rush Hill. The appeal was filed to allow the City
Council an opportunity to review the project given the importance of addressing the
economic need for the City to support the improvement of the City's underperforming
commercial areas combined with the applicant's willingness to address issues raised
by the Planning Commission.
7. Due to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission at the September 22,
2011, Planning Commission hearing, the applicant modified the application request by:
a. Reducing the project gross floor area from 13,525 square feet to 12,351 square
feet;
b. Reducing the transfer request from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus
Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) from 1,620 square feet to 400 square
feet;
C. Changing the proposed land use mix by reducing general commercial area from
8,525 to 7,351 square feet and changing the operational characteristic of the
proposed fast -food use to take -out limited use;
d. Increasing the number of on -site parking from 59 to 65 spaces thereby reducing
the parking waiver request from 13 to 3 parking spaces; and
e. Reducing the off -site parking request from 32 to 16 spaces. A long term
reciprocal parking agreement for these spaces has been in effect since 1972
and does not have a termination date.
8. A public hearing was held by the City Council on October 25, 2011, in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of
time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and
considered by, the City Council at this meeting.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
14
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 3 of 3
9. Pursuant to Section 20.64.030.C, the public hearing was conducted "de novo,"
meaning that it was a new hearing and the decision being appealed has no force or
effect as of the date the call for review was filed.
SECTION 2. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby deny without prejudice
Planned Community Text Amendment No. PD2010 -007, Transfer of Development
Rights No. TD2010 -002, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026, and Modification
Permit No. MN2011 -014, and Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002.
2. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
3. This resolution was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the 25th day of October, 2011, by the
following vote, to wit:
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS
/_ :1091rK011J►[a]I0uI :INI:]: ICZ1
MAYOR
CITY CLERK
Tmplt: 03/08/11
ZJ�
10
Attachment No. CC 2
Draft Resolution for Approval
17
12
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION NO. MN2011 -001, APPROVING TRANSFER OF
DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS NO. TD2010 -002; CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 2011 -026, MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. 2011 -014,
AND WAIVER OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND FINDING
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. TS2011 -002 IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE, FOR A NEW COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 4221 DOLPHIN - STRIKER WAY
(PA2010 -135)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
An application was filed by Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership, with respect to property
located at 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, and legally described as Parcel 1 of Portion of Lot 4
of Tract No. 7770, requesting approval of an amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11)
Planned Community Development Plan to accommodate the development of two new
commercial buildings of 13,525 square feet total. The following applications were
requested or required in order to implement the project as proposed:
a) An amendment to Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development
Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject property from "Restaurant
Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ", pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned
Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the Municipal Code.
b) A transfer of development rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units,
from Hotel Site 2 -B (Fetcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street)
and 1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at
3901 MacArthur Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet to the subject site,
pursuant to Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights) of the Minicipal
Code.
c) A traffic study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as
the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
d) A conditional use permit to modify the off- street parking requirements, allow for
the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the
site, pursuant to Chapter 20.40 (Off- Street Parking) of the Municipal Code.
e) A modification permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the
Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, pursuant to
Section 20.52.050 of the Municipal Code.
29
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 2 of 26
f) A waiver of the requirement for a development agreement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the Municipal Code.
2. The subject property has zoning designation of Restaurant Site 1 of the Newport Place
(PC -11) Planned Community Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element
category is Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -H2 ").
3. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone.
4. A public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2011, in the
City Hall Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A
notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the
Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to,
and considered by, the Planning Commission at this meeting.
5. At the September 22, 2011, Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission
voted 4 -3 to deny the project without prejudice.
6. On October 1, 2011, the Planning Commission's decision to deny the applicant's request
was appealed by City Councilmember Rush Hill. The appeal was filed to allow the City
Council an opportunity to review the project given the importance of addressing the
economic need for the City to support the improvement of the City's underperforming
commercial areas combined with the applicant's willingness to address issues raised
by the Planning Commission.
7. Due to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission at the September 22,
2011, Planning Commission hearing, the applicant modified the application request by:
a. Reducing the project gross floor area from 13,525 square feet to 12,351 square
feet;
b. Reducing the transfer request from from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus
Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) from 1,620 square feet to 400 square
feet.
c. Changing the proposed land use mix by reducing general commercial area from
8,525 to 7,351 square feet and changing the operational characteristic of the
proposed fast -food use to take -out limited use;
d. Increasing the number of on -site parking from 59 to 65 spaces thereby reducing
the parking waiver request from 13 to 3 parking spaces; and
e. Reducing the off -site parking request from 32 to 16 spaces.
8. A public hearing was held by the City Council on October 25, 2011, in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of
time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and
considered by, the City Council at this meeting.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
20
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 3 of 26
9. Pursuant to Section 20.64.030.C, the public hearing was conducted "de novo,"
meaning that it was a new hearing and the decision being appealed has no force or
effect as of the date the call for review was filed.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines,
and City Council Policy K -3.
2. The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was circulated for a 20 -day public
comment period beginning on July 15, 2011, and ending on August 3, 2011. The
contents of the environmental document and comments on the document were
considered by the Planning Commission in its review of the proposed project.
3. An Errata has been prepared which clarifies and augments data in the document in
responses to comments including the added location of transfer of development rights
to the subject property, and supports the conclusions reached in the draft MND.
Consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5(c), recirculation of the MND is not
required when new information is added to the MND which merely clarifies, amplifies,
or makes insignificant modifications to the MND.
4. On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the proposed project, with
mitigation measures, will have a less than significant impact upon the environment and
there are no known substantial adverse affects on human beings that would be
caused. Additionally, there are no long -term environmental goals that would be
compromised by the project, nor cumulative impacts anticipated in connection with the
project. The mitigation measures identified and incorporated in the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) are feasible and will reduce the potential
environmental impacts to a less than significant level.
5. The MND and MMRP are hereby adopted by the City Council. The document and all
material, which constitute the record upon which this decision for recommendation was
based, are on file with the Planning Department, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, California.
6. The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and
approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project
opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project
applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such
applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge,
and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be
awarded to a successful challenger.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
21-
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 4 of 26
SECTION 3. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
The subject property is located in Statistical Area L4 (Airport Area) and has a General
Plan designation of Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -H2 "). The MU -H2 designation
provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial
office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and
ancillary neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed commercial development
would be allowed as the proposed uses are ancillary and supportive to the existing
nearby office and light industrial developments.
2. Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights) of the Municipal Code requires the
City Council must also make the following findings for the approval of transfer of
development rights:
Finding:
A. The reduced density /intensity on the donor site provides benefits to the City.
Facts in Support of Finding:
A -1. The transfer of 48 hotel rooms from Hotel Site 2 -B and 400 square feet from
General Commercial Site 7 would result in a reduced intensity on the donor
sites which also would result in a reduction of local vehicle trips and traffic
congestion traffic, especially along North Bristol Street and MacArthur
Boulevard.
B -1. The proposed transfer allows the subject property to redevelop and improve
with a mixture of food uses and general commercial uses.
B. The transfer of development rights will not result in any adverse traffic impacts and
would not result in greater intensity than development allowed without the transfer
and the proposed uses and physical improvements would not lend themselves to
conversion to higher traffic generating uses.
C -1. The transfer of development rights onto the receiver site (the subject property)
will not result in adverse traffic impacts as demonstrated in the Traffic Study
prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. The transfer and the proposed uses of
the receiver site would not lend themselves to conversion to higher traffic
generating uses since the subject property is currently approved for 7,996
square feet of food service use which is being reduced to a maximum of 5,000
square feet (4,000 square feet of high turnover restaurant use and 1,000 of
take -out service, limited food use). The remainder of the development will be
allocated for general commercial uses. Furthermore, the donor sites and the
receiver site are located within the same Land Use Statistical Area L4. The
proposed transfer would be trip neutral as any increase in the peak hour
Tmplt: 03/08/11
22
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 5 of 26
generated by the receiver site would be deduced proportionally from the donor
sites.
C. The increased development potential transferred to the receiver site will be
compatible and in scale with surrounding development and will not create abrupt
changes in scale or character.
D -1. The increase development potential transferred to the subject property will be
compatible and in scale with the surrounding development as the proposed
development will be single story, at 29 feet in height. The subject property is
physically suitable for the new development and provides improved vehicular
access to and from the site off of MacArthur Boulevard.
D. The receiver site is physically suitable for the development proposed taking into
consideration adjacent circulation patterns, protection of significant public views
and open space, and site characteristics, including any slopes, submerged areas,
and sensitive resources.
D -1. The subject property will have a direct access to and from MacArthur Boulevard
instead of the existing circuitous route from Dove Street or Corinthian Way. The
site characteristics lend themselves to the development since all building
setbacks are being respected and the overall development scale is in proportion
to the immediate area.
3. Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance, or TPO) of the Municipal Code requires
that a traffic study be prepared and findings be made prior to issuance of building
permits if a proposed project will generate in excess of 300 average daily trips (ADT).
For the purposes of preparing the traffic analysis for this project, the 13,525- square-
foot commercial development was assumed to include 1,000 square feet of fast -food
uses, 4,000 square feet of high turn -over food uses, and 8,525 square feet of general
commercial uses. Combined, this land use mix is forecast to generate a net increase
of 942 trips per day, including 67 a.m. peak hour trips and 55 p.m. peak hour trips.
Pursuant to Section 15.04.030.A, the Project shall not be approved unless certain
findings can be made. The following findings and facts in support of such findings are
set forth:
Finding:
A. That a traffic study for the project has been prepared in compliance with this
chapter and Appendix A.
Facts in Support of Finding:
A -1. A traffic study, entitled "4221 Dolphin Striker Project Traffic Impact Analysis
(Revised)" dated May 31, 2011, was prepared by Kunzman Associated, Inc.
under the supervision of the City Traffic Engineer.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
23
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 6 of 26
Finding:
B. That based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including
the traffic study, one of the findings for approval in subsection (8) can be made:
15.40.030.8.1 Construction of the project will be completed within 60
months of project approval; and
15.40.030.B.1(a) The project will neither cause nor make worse an
unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection.
Facts in Support of Finding:
B -1. Construction of the Project is anticipated to be completed in 2012. If the Project
is not completed within sixty (60) months of this approval, preparation of a new
traffic study will be required.
B -2. The traffic study indicates that the Project will increase traffic on 4 of the 12
study intersections in the City of Newport Beach by one percent (1 %) or more
during peak hour periods one year after the completion of the Project.
B -3. Utilizing the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) analysis specified by the
Traffic Phasing Ordinance, the traffic study determined that the four primary
intersections identified will operate at LOS "C" or better during the AM and PM
peak hours, and no mitigation is required.
B -4. Based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including the
traffic study, the implementation of the Project will neither cause nor make
worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary
intersection within the City of Newport Beach.
Finding:
C. That the project proponent has agreed to make or fund the improvements, or
make the contributions, that are necessary to make the findings for approval
and to comply with all conditions of approval.
Facts in Support of Finding:
C -1. Since implementation of the Project will neither cause nor make worse an
unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection within
the City of Newport Beach, no improvements or mitigations are necessary.
4. Based on the revised application, a total of 84 parking spaces are required for the
proposed development per the Municipal Code. The applicant proposes a total of 81
spaces (16 off -site and 65 on- site), which results in a parking shortage of 3 spaces.
Section 20.40.110.B.2 of the Municipal Code allows required off - street parking to be
Tmplt: 03/08111
24
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 7 of 26
reduced with the approval of a conditional use permit for joint use of parking facilities.
Additionally, Pursuant to Section 20.40.100 of the Municipal Code, approval of a
conditional use permit is required for a portion of required parking that is not located on
the same site it is intended to serve. In accordance with Section 20.40.100.6 (Off -Site
Parking) of the Municipal Code, the following findings and facts in support of such
findings are set forth:
Finding:
A. The parking facility is located within a convenient distance to the use it is intended
to serve.
Facts in Support of Finding:
A -1. The subject property currently has a 16 -space off -site recorded parking
agreement with the adjacent property located at 4100 Newport Place. These off -
site spaces are located on the 5th floor of the US Bank's parking structure.
These spaces will be used solely by the employees of the project and not by
customers. The US Bank's parking structure is located approximately 120 feet
southwest of the property. It would take an employee approximately less than a
minute to walk from the off -site parking structure according to The Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) which suggests four feet per second
as a normal walking speed. Given the location of the parking spaces on the fifth
floor of the parking structure, it would take an additional 3 to 4 minutes of
elevator time, for a total of less than 5 minutes. This is considered a convenient
distance for employee parking.
Finding:
B. On- street parking is not being counted towards meeting parking requirements.
Facts in Support of Finding:
B -1. On- street parking spaces do not exist within close proximity of the project site
and are not being used towards meeting the parking requirements of the
project.
Finding:
C. Use of the parking facility will not create undue traffic hazards or impacts in the
surrounding area.
Facts in Support of Finding:
C -1. The use of the parking lot will not create an undue traffic hazard as the
proposed project and subject off -site parking lot are located next to one
another. This allows employees to walk across the subject property's parking
Tmplt: 03/08/11
25
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 8 of 26
lot, through a pedestrian walkway to the elevator of the parking structure,
without crossing any street intersection. The parking structure is accessed
through a keycard system and the applicant has agreed to provide their
employees with the necessary keycards. Since the off -site parking will be used
by employees only, typical noise disturbances associated with restaurant
patrons loitering in parking lots is not expected.
Finding:
D. The parking facility will be permanently available, marked, and maintained for the
use it is intended to serve.
Facts in Support of Finding:
D -1. The off -site parking spaces will be made available for the use of employees of
the project on a daily basis, with no restriction on the hours of use. In the event
that the applicant loses the ability to provide parking at the off -site location, the
applicant will be required to notify the Community Development Director who
will establish a reasonable time for substitute parking to be provided or reduce
the size of the tenant spaces or change the tenant mix (i.e. less restaurant) in
proportion to the parking spaces lost pursuant to Section 20.40.100.D (Loss of
Off -Site Parking) of the Municipal Code.
5. Pursuant to Sections 20.40.100 (Off -Site Parking) and 20.40.110.6.2 (Reduction of
Required Off - Street Parking) of the Municipal Code, a conditional use permit is
required to allow a portion of required parking that is not located on the same site it is
intended to serve and to modify the off - street parking requirements and to establish a
parking management plan. In accordance with Section 20.52.020.E of the Municipal
Code, the following findings and facts in support of such findings are set forth:
Finding:
A. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan.
Facts in Support of Finding:
A -1. The proposed commercial development and uses are consistent with MU -H2
General Plan land use designation. An amendment to the Newport Place (PC-
11) Planned Community Development Plan to change the zoning designation of
the subject property from Restaurant Site 1 to General Commercial Site 8 would
allow general commercial uses in addition to food service uses.
Finding:
B. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all
other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
20
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 9 of 26
Facts in Support of Finding:
B -1. With the approval an amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11) Planned
Community Development Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject
property from Restaurant Site 1 to General Commercial Site 8, the proposed
general commercial and food service uses would be consistent with the zoning
designation and development standards of General Commercial.
Finding:
C. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are
compatible with the allowed uses in the vicinity.
Facts in Support of Finding:
C -1. The project includes conditions of approval to address potential incompatibles.
As conditions of approval, the proposed development would be restricted to a total
of 5,000 square feet of food service uses. Of that, 1,000 square feet would be
allocated for a take -out service, limited food use. The remaining 7,351 square feet
would be allocated for general commercial uses as allowed for General
Commercial Sites per the Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan.
Furthermore, the hours of general commercial uses would not be allowed during
the 7:00 to 9:00 morning (AM) peak hour, daily.
C -2. The proposed project has a parking shortage of 3 spaces per the Municipal
Code. However, under a shared parking scenario within the project site, there
would be a surplus of 2 spaces during peak demand and a surplus of 9 spaces
during peak demand under a shared parking scenario with the adjoining
restaurant sites. A parking management plan has been prepared to mitigate
impacts associated with the reduction in the number of required parking spaces
per the Municipal Code. This plan has been reviewed and approved by the
City's Traffic Engineer. The off -site parking spaces will be made available for
the use of employees of the project on a daily basis, with no restriction on the
hours of use.
C -3. The project's location, surrounded by existing retail commercial, office and light
industrial developments, is appropriate given the proposed uses are to be
compatible and supportive to the surrounding uses. The proposed development
would not result in negative impacts to adjacent properties as a result of traffic,
parking or noise.
Finding:
D. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size,
operating characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle
(e.g., fire and medical) access and public services and utilities.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
27
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 10 of 26
Facts in Support of Finding:
D -1. Adequate public and emergency vehicle access, public services, and utilities
are provided to the subject property. The proposed development will comply
with all Building, Public Works, and Fire Codes. All ordinances of the City and
all conditions of approval will be complied with.
Findinq:
E. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the
harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or
otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety,
or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the
proposed use.
Facts in Support of Finding:
E -1. The project complies with the development standards prescribed for General
Commercial developments, with the exceptions of parking and landscaping
requirements.
E -2. The proposed development has been reviewed and includes conditions of
approval to ensure that potential conflicts with the surrounding land uses are
minimized to the greatest extent possible.
6. In accordance with Section 20.52.050 (Modification Permits), the Planning
Commission must make the following findings for approval of a modification permit:
Finding:
A. The requested modification will be compatible with existing development in the
neighborhood.
Facts in Support of Finding:
A -1. The proposed landscaping to be provided at the project site will be compatible
with the adjacent properties and surrounding office and light industrial
developments. The proposed ground cover, shrubs, and trees will be provided
to enhance the aesthetics of the newly proposed development and seamlessly
connect the property boundaries with adjoining sites.
Finding:
B. The granting of the modification is necessary due to the unique physical
characteristic(s) of the property and /or structure, and /or characteristics of the use.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
22
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 11 of 26
Facts in Support of Finding:
B -1. One tree per 25 lineal feet of the interior south property line is not provided due
to the existing lot configuration. It is logical for the proposed development to be
designed and located along the south property line and the needs of providing
secondary exits along the back side of this building prevent the provisions of
required landscaping.
Finding:
C. The granting of the modification is necessary due to practical difficulties associated
with the property and that the strict application of the Zoning Code results in
physical hardships that are inconsistent with the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Code.
Facts in Support of Finding:
C -1. Sufficient landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees are being
proposed in conjunction with the new development that meets the intent of the
Planned Community Development Standards. The strict application of the
Planning Community Development Standards would require reconfiguration of
the project and result in physical hardships to the proposed development in
terms of site design and building placement.
Finding:
D. There are no alternatives to the Modification Permit that could provide similar
benefits to the applicant with less potential detriment to surrounding owners and
occupants, the neighborhood, or to the general public.
Facts in Support of Finding:
D -1. The provision of the required trees per the landscape development standards of
PC -11 (Newport Place Planned Community) would result in a much narrower
and less desirable building size and shape and would also reduce the length of
the parking stalls and prevent the drive aisle to align with the driveway
approaches.
E. The granting of the modification would not be detrimental to public health, safety, or
welfare to the occupants of the property, nearby properties, the neighborhood, or
the City, or result in a change in density or intensity that would be inconsistent with
the provisions of this Zoning Code.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
29
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 12 of 26
Facts in Support of Finding:
E -1. The deviation from the landscape development standards will not result in any
detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. The landscaping deviation will not
change the density or intensity of the proposed development.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby find, on the basis of the
whole record, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City
Council's independent judgment and analysis. The City Council does hereby adopts
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Errata, including the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program attached as Exhibit "A ". The document and all material, which
constitute the record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning
Department, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California.
2. The proposed development complies with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, based on the
weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including Traffic Study No.
TS2011 -002.
3. The City Council of the City of Newport Beach does hereby approve Planned
Community Text Amendment No. PD2010 -007, Transfer of Development Rights No.
TD2010 -002, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026, and Modification Permit No.
MN2011 -014, and waive the requirement for a Development Agreement, subject to the
conditions set forth in Exhibit B.
4. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
5. This approval was based on the particulars of the individual case and does not in and
of itself or in combination with other approvals in the vicinity or Citywide constitute a
precedent for future approvals or decisions.
6. This resolution was approved, passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City
Council of the City of Newport Beach, held on the 25th day of October, 2011, by the
following vote, to wit:
Tmplt: 03/08/11
30
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 13 of 26
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES, COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
Tmplt: 03/08/11
31
City Council Resolution No. _
Page 14 of 26
EXHIBIT "A"
MACARTHUR AT DOLPHIN - STRIKER PROJECT
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Mitigation Measure
Phase of
Responsible
Completion
Implementation
Monitoring
Date /Initials
Party
Cultural Resources
5.1. The project applicant shall have a qualified
During
City of Newport
professional archaeologist on site to monitor for any
construction
Beach
potential impacts to archaeological or historic
Community
resources throughout the duration of any demolition
Development
and ground disturbing activities. The professional
Department
archeologist shall have the authority to halt any
activities adversely impacting potentially significant
cultural resources until the resources can be
formally evaluated. The archaeologist must have
knowledge of both prehistoric and historical
archaeology. Additionally, the archaeological
monitoring program shall include the presence of a
local Native American representative (Gabrielino
and /or Juaneno). Resources must be recovered,
analyzed in accordance with CEQA guidelines, and
curated. Suspension of ground disturbance in the
vicinity of the discoveries shall not be lifted until the
archaeologist has evaluated discoveries to assess
whether they are classified as historical resources or
unique archaeological sites, pursuant to CEQA.
5.2. The project applicant shall retain a qualified
During
City of Newport
professional paleontologist for periodic monitoring
construction
Beach
for any potential impacts to paleontological
Community
resources throughout the duration of ground
Development
disturbing activities. In the event paleontological
Department
resources are uncovered, the professional
paleontologist shall have the authority to halt any
activities adversely impacting potentially significant
fossil resources until the resources can be formally
evaluated. If potentially significant fossils are
uncovered they must be recovered, analyzed in
accordance with CEQA guidelines, and curated at
facilities at the Natural History Museum of Los
Angeles County, or other scientific institution
accredited for curation and collection of fossil
specimens. Suspension of ground disturbances in
the vicinity of the discoveries shall not be lifted until
the paleontologist has evaluated the significance of
the resources pursuant to CEQA.
Geology And Soils
6.1. Prior to issuance of grading permits, a detailed
Prior to issuance
City of Newport
design- engineering -level geotechnical investigation
of grading permits
Beach
report shall be prepared and submitted with
Community
engineered grading plans to further evaluate
Development
Tmplt: 03/08/11
32
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 15 of 26
expansive soils, soil corrosivity, settlement,
Department
foundations, grading constraints, and other soil
engineering design conditions, and to provide site -
specific recommendations to address these
conditions, if determined necessary. The
engineering -level report shall include and address
each of the recommendations included in the
geotechnical reports prepared by Strata -Tech, Inc.
(Appendix B). The geotechnical reports shall be
prepared and signed /stamped by a Registered Civil
Engineer specializing in geotechnical engineering
and a Certified Engineering Geologist. Geotechnical
rough grading plan review reports shall be prepared
in accordance with the City of Newport Beach
Grading Ordinance.
Noise
12.1. All noise - producing project equipment and
During
City of Newport
vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be
Construction
Beach
equipped with mufflers, air -inlet silencers where
Community
appropriate, and any other shrouds, shields, or other
Development
noise - reducing features in good operating condition
Department
that meet or exceed original factory specification.
Mobile or fixed "package" equipment (e.g., arc
welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with
shrouds and noise control features that are readily
available for that type of equipment.
12.2. All mobile and fixed noise - producing
During
City of Newport
equipment used on the proposed project that is
Construction
Beach
regulated for noise output by a local, state, or
Community
federal agency shall comply with such regulation
Development
while in the course of project activity.
Department
12.3. Electrically powered equipment shall be used
During
City of Newport
instead of pneumatic or internal combustion-
Construction
Beach
powered equipment, where feasible.
Community
Development
Department
12.4. Mobile noise - generating equipment and
During
City of Newport
machinery shall be shut off when not in use.
Construction
Beach
Community
Development
Department
12.5. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment
During
City of Newport
staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be
Construction
Beach
located as far as practical from noise - sensitive
Community
receptors.
Development
Department
12.6. Construction site and access road speed limits
During
City of Newport
shall be established and enforced during the
Construction
Beach
construction period.
Community
Development
Department
12.7. The use of noise - producing signals, including
During
City of Newport
horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety
Construction
Beach
warning purposes only.
Community
Development
Department
Tmplt: 03/08/11
33
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 16 of 26
12.8. No project - related public address or music
During
City of Newport
system shall be audible at any adjacent receptor.
Construction
Beach
Community
Development
Department
12.9. The on -site construction supervisor shall have
During
City of Newport
the responsibility and authority to receive and
Construction
Beach
resolve noise complaints. A clear appeal process to
Community
the project proponent shall be established prior to
Development
construction commencement that shall allow for
Department
resolution of noise problems that cannot be
immediately solved by the site supervisor.
Tmplt: 03/08/11 /'
ST
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 17 of 26
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(Project- specific conditions are in italics)
PLANNING
The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan, floor
plans and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval. (Except
as modified by applicable conditions of approval.)
2. A covenant or other legally binding agreement approved by the City Attorney shall be
recorded against the donor sites located at 1301 Quail Street and 3901 MacArthur
Boulevard assuring that all of the requirements of the transfer of development rights
shall be met by the current and future property owners.
3. Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026 and Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014 shall
expire unless exercised within 24 months from the date of approval as specified in
Section 20.91.050 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, unless an extension is
otherwise granted.
4. Uses shall be permitted, or conditionally permitted, within the project consistent with the
provisions of the Zoning Code, so long as they do not increase the approved traffic
generation for the project (TS2011 -002).
5. Required parking for this project has been determined based on documentation and a
number of assumptions, including:
a. The shared parking analysis as a part of the Traffic Impact Analysis, prepared by
Kunzman Associates, Inc., dated October 4, 2011 and the Addendum dated
October 7, 2011;
b. A limitation that the maximum Net Public Area (NPA) of the 4,000 square feet high
tum -over eating and drinking uses shall be limited to 2,000 square feet with a
parking demand of 1 space per 40 square feet of NPA;
c. The take -out service, limited food use shall be limited to 1,000 gross square feet
with a parking demand of 1 space per 250 gross square feet and a maximum of 6
seats;
d. The general commercial uses shall be limited to 7,351 net square feet proposed
floor area with a parking demand of 1 space per 250 net square feet; and
e. The allowed hours of operation for general commercial uses are from 9:00 a.m.
to 7:00 p.m., daily.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
35
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 18 of 26
Any changes to the assumed tenant mix or changes in the type of food use that would
increase parking demands may require the preparation of a new shared parking analysis
to ensure that adequate parking can be provided on -site and at the approved off -site
parking location, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Department.
6. A total of 65 parking spaces shall be provided on -site and 16 parking spaces shall be
provided off -site at 4100 Newport Place, for a total of 81 parking spaces, as illustrated on
the approved plans and parking management plan for the project.
7. In the event of loss of off -site parking, the applicant shall be required to notify the
Community Development Director who will establish a reasonable time for substitute
parking to be provided or reduce the size of the tenant spaces or change the tenant
mix (i.e. less restaurant) in proportion to the parking spaces lost, in accordance to
Section 20.40.100.D (Loss of Off -Site Parking) of the Municipal Code.
8. Any minor changes to the parking management plan shall be reviewed and approved by
the Community Development Director and City Traffic Engineer prior to implementation.
Significant changes may require an amendment to this Conditional Use Permit.
9. All employees are required to park off -site at a parking structure located at 4100 Newport
Place at all times, until all 16 spaces are occupied, unless otherwise approved by the
Community Development Director and may require an amendment to this Conditional
Use Permit.
10. The hours of operation for the general commercial uses shall not commence before
9:00 a.m., daily.
11. The project is subject to all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless
specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval.
12. The applicant shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws. Material violation of
any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of
Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026 and Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014.
13. Any change in operational characteristics, hours of operation, expansion in area, or
other modification to the approved plans, shall require an amendment to Conditional
Use Permit No. UP2011 -026, and /or Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014 or the
processing of new permits.
14. All landscape materials and landscaped areas shall be installed and maintained in
accordance with the approved landscape plan. All landscaped areas shall be
maintained in a healthy and growing condition and shall receive regular pruning,
fertilizing, mowing and trimming. All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and
debris. All irrigation systems shall be kept operable, including adjustments,
replacements, repairs, and cleaning as part of regular maintenance.
Tmplt: 03/08111
so
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 19 of 26
15. Should this business be sold or otherwise come under different ownership, any future
owners or assignees shall be notified in writing of the conditions of this approval by the
current owner or leasing company.
16. This Conditional Use Permit and Modification Permit may be modified or revoked by
the City Council or Planning Commission should they determine that the proposed
development, uses, and/ or conditions under which it is being operated or maintained
is detrimental to the public health, welfare or materially injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity or if the property is operated or maintained so as to
constitute a public nuisance.
17. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit a landscape and
irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect. These plans shall
incorporate drought tolerant plantings and water efficient irrigation practices, and the
plans shall be approved by the Planning Division and the Municipal Operations
Department. All planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground
automatic sprinkler irrigation system of a design suitable for the type and arrangement
of the plant materials selected. The irrigation system shall be adjustable based upon
either a signal from a satellite or an on -site moisture - sensor. Planting areas adjacent
to vehicular activity shall be protected by a continuous concrete curb or similar
permanent barrier. Landscaping shall be located so as not to impede vehicular sight
distance to the satisfaction of the Traffic Engineer.
18. Prior to the final inspection of building permits the applicant shall schedule an
inspection by the Planning Division to confirm that all landscaping was installed in
accordance with the approved plan.
19. Reclaimed water shall be used whenever available, assuming it is economically
feasible.
20. Water leaving the project site due to over - irrigation of landscape shall be minimized. If
an incident such as this is reported, a representative from the Code Enforcement
Division shall visit the location, investigate, inform and notice the responsible party,
and, as appropriate, cite the responsible party and /or shut off the irrigation water.
21. Watering shall be done during the early morning or evening hours (between 4:00 p.m.
and 9:00 a.m.) to minimize evaporation the following morning.
22. All leaks shall be investigated by a representative from the Code Enforcement Division
and the property owner or operator shall complete all required repairs.
23. Water shall not be used to clean paved surfaces such as sidewalks, driveways,
parking areas, etc. except to alleviate immediate safety or sanitation hazards.
24. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter
10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal
Tmplt: 03/08/11
37
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 20 of 26
Code. The maximum noise shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the
specified time periods unless the ambient noise level is higher:
25. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall pay any unpaid
administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning
Division.
26. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, which restricts hours of noise - generating construction activities that
produce noise to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday and 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Noise - generating construction
activities are not allowed on Sundays or Holidays.
27. No outside paging system shall be utilized in conjunction with this project.
28. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash
enclosure (three walls and a self - latching gate) or otherwise screened from view of
neighboring properties, except when placed for pick -up by refuse collection agencies.
The trash enclosure shall have a decorative solid roof for aesthetic and screening
purposes.
29. Trash receptacles for patrons shall be conveniently located both inside and outside of
the establishment, however, not located on or within any public property or right -of-
way.
30. The exterior of the business shall be maintained free of litter and graffiti at all times. The
owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris and graffiti from the
premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises.
31. The applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and /or receptacles are maintained
to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self- contained dumpsters
or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters, if deemed necessary by the Planning
Division. Cleaning and maintenance of trash dumpsters shall be done in compliance
with the provisions of Title 14, including all future amendments (including Water
Quality related requirements).
Tmplt: 03/08111
3g
Between the hours of 7:00AM
and 10:00PM
Between the hours of
10:00PM and 7:OOAM
Location
Interior
Exterior
Interior
Exterior
Residential Property
45dBA
55dBA
40dBA
5OdBA
Residential Property located within
100 feet of a commercial property
45dBA
60dBA
45dBA
50dBA
Mixed Use Property
45dBA
60dBA
45dBA
50dBA
Commercial Property
N/A
65dBA
N/A
60dBA
25. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall pay any unpaid
administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning
Division.
26. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code, which restricts hours of noise - generating construction activities that
produce noise to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday and 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Noise - generating construction
activities are not allowed on Sundays or Holidays.
27. No outside paging system shall be utilized in conjunction with this project.
28. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash
enclosure (three walls and a self - latching gate) or otherwise screened from view of
neighboring properties, except when placed for pick -up by refuse collection agencies.
The trash enclosure shall have a decorative solid roof for aesthetic and screening
purposes.
29. Trash receptacles for patrons shall be conveniently located both inside and outside of
the establishment, however, not located on or within any public property or right -of-
way.
30. The exterior of the business shall be maintained free of litter and graffiti at all times. The
owner or operator shall provide for daily removal of trash, litter debris and graffiti from the
premises and on all abutting sidewalks within 20 feet of the premises.
31. The applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and /or receptacles are maintained
to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self- contained dumpsters
or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters, if deemed necessary by the Planning
Division. Cleaning and maintenance of trash dumpsters shall be done in compliance
with the provisions of Title 14, including all future amendments (including Water
Quality related requirements).
Tmplt: 03/08111
3g
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 21 of 26
32. Deliveries and refuse collection for the facility shall be prohibited between the hours of
10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m., daily, unless otherwise approved by the community
Development Director, and may require an amendment to this Conditional Use Permit.
33. Storage outside of the building or within the parking lot of the property shall be
prohibited, with the exception of the required trash container enclosure.
34. A Special Events Permit is required for any event or promotional activity outside the
normal operational characteristics of the approved use, as conditioned, or that would
attract large crowds, involve the sale of alcoholic beverages, include any form of on-
site media broadcast, or any other activities as specified in the Newport Beach
Municipal Code to require such permits.
35. All proposed signs shall be in conformance with the provision of Chapter 20.42 of the
Newport Beach Municipal Code and shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer if
located adjacent to the vehicular ingress and egress.
36. The final location of the signs shall be reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer and shall
conform to City Standard 110 -L to ensure that adequate sight distance is provided.
37. Lighting shall be in compliance with applicable standards of the Zoning Code. Exterior
on -site lighting shall be shielded and confined within site boundaries. No direct rays or
glare are permitted to shine onto public streets or adjacent sites or create a public
nuisance. "Walpak" type fixtures are not permitted. Parking area lighting shall have
zero cut -off fixtures.
38. The site shall not be excessively illuminated based on the outdoor lighting standards
contained within Section 20.30.070 of the Zoning Code, or, if in the opinion of the
Community Development Director, the illumination creates an unacceptable negative
impact on surrounding land uses or environmental resources. The Community
Development Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation
upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated.
39. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant shall prepare photometric study
in conjunction with a final lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division. The
survey shall show that lighting values are "1" or less at all property lines.
40. Prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy or final of building permits the
applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Code Enforcement Division to
confirm control of all lighting sources.
41. A covered wash -out area for refuse containers and kitchen equipment, with minimum
useable area dimensions of 36- inches wide, 36- inches deep and 72- inches high, shall
be provided for all food uses, and the area shall drain directly into the sewer system,
unless otherwise approved by the Building Official and Public Works Director in
conjunction with the approval of an alternate drainage plan.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
39
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 22 of 26
42. Kitchen exhaust fans for all food uses shall be installed /maintained in accordance with
the Uniform Mechanical Code. The issues with regard to the control of smoke and
odor shall be directed to the South Coast Air Quality Management District.
43. The exhaust systems for any food uses shall be installed with pollution control units to
filter and control odors.
44. The construction and equipment staging area shall be located in the least visually
prominent area on the site and shall be properly maintained and /or screened to
minimize potential unsightly conditions.
45. A six- foot -high screen and security fence shall be placed around the construction site
during construction.
46. Construction equipment and materials shall be properly stored on the site when not in
use.
47. To the fullest extent permitted by law, applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold
harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees,
and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages,
actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of
every kind and nature whatsoever which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly
or indirectly) to City's approval of the MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker project including, but
not limited to, Planned Community Text Amendment No. PD2010 -007, Transfer of
Development Rights No. TD2010 -002, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026,
Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014, Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002 and /or the City's
related California Environmental Quality Act determinations, the certification of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and /or the adoption of a Mitigation Monitoring Program
for the project. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages
awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses
incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding
whether incurred by applicant, City, and /or the parties initiating or bringing such
proceeding. The applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees,
and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this
condition. The applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City
pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition.
Fire Department Conditions
48. Automatic fire sprinklers shall be required for any structure that exceeds 5,000 square
feet regardless of occupancy. Additionally, food service uses shall require fire
sprinklers when fire area has an occupant load of 100 or more. The sprinkler system
shall be monitored by a UL certified alarm service company.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
40
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 23 of 26
Building Division Conditions
49. The applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City's Building Division
and Fire Department. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City -
adopted version of the California Building Code. The construction plans must meet all
applicable State Disabilities Access requirements. Approval from the Orange County
Health Department is required prior to the issuance of a building permit.
50. Prior to the issuance of grading permits a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) and Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with the General Permit for
Construction Activities shall be prepared, submitted to the State Water Quality Control
Board for approval and made part of the construction program. The project applicant
will provide the City with a copy of the NOI and their application check as proof of filing
with the State Water Quality Control Board. This plan will detail measures and
practices that will be in effect during construction to minimize the project's impact on
water quality.
51. Prior to issuance of grading permits the applicant shall prepare and submit a Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the proposed project, subject to the approval of
the Building Division and Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division. The WQMP
shall provide appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to ensure that no
violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur.
52. A list of "good house - keeping" practices will be incorporated into the long -term post -
construction operation of the site to minimize the likelihood that pollutants will be used,
stored or spilled on the site that could impair water quality. These may include
frequent parking area vacuum truck sweeping, removal of wastes or spills, limited use
of harmful fertilizers or pesticides, and the diversion of storm water away from potential
sources of pollution (e.g., trash receptacles and parking structures). The Stage 2
WQMP shall list and describe all structural and non - structural BMPs. In addition, the
WQMP must also identify the entity responsible for the long -term inspection,
maintenance, and funding for all structural (and if applicable Treatment Control) BMPs.
53. The applicant shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 requirements as follows:
Land Clearing /Earth - Moving
a. Exposed pits (i.e., gravel, soil, dirt) with five percent or greater silt content shall
be watered twice daily, enclosed, covered, or treated with non -toxic soil
stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications.
b. All other active sites shall be watered twice daily.
C. All grading activities shall cease during second stage smog alerts and periods of
high winds (i.e., greater than 25 mph) if soil is being transported to off -site
locations and cannot be controlled by watering.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
41-
Z
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 24 of 26
d. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials off -site shall be covered
or wetted or shall maintain at least two feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical
distance between the top of the load and the top of the trailer).
e. Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three
months shall be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise
stabilized in a manner acceptable to the City.
f. All vehicles on the construction site shall travel at speeds less than 15 mph.
g. All diesel - powered vehicles and equipment shall be properly operated and
maintained.
h. All diesel - powered vehicles and gasoline - powered equipment shall be turned off
when not in use for more than five minutes.
j. The construction contractor shall utilize electric or natural gas - powered
equipment instead of gasoline or diesel - powered engines, where feasible.
Paved Roads
k. All construction roads internal to the construction site that have a traffic volume
of more than 50 daily trips by construction equipment, or 150 total daily trips for
all vehicles, shall be surfaced with base material or decomposed granite, or shall
be paved.
I. Streets shall be swept hourly if visible soil material has been carried onto
adjacent public paved roads.
M. Construction equipment shall be visually inspected prior to leaving the site and
loose dirt shall be washed off with wheel washers as necessary.
Unpaved Staging Areas or Roads
n. Water or non -toxic soil stabilizers shall be applied, according to manufacturers'
specifications, as needed to reduce off -site transport of fugitive dust from all
unpaved staging areas and unpaved road surfaces.
Public Works Conditions
54. The existing OCSD easement along MacArthur Boulevard frontage shall be shown on
plans. Any encroachment (wall, stairs and ADA ramps) within the existing OCSD
easement requires approval from OCSD. The applicant shall provide said approval as
part of the plan check process.
55. The parking lot layout plan shall be fully dimensioned. All parking spaces within the
project site shall have a minimum of 26 feet of back up area /drive aisle. The parking
Tmplt: 03/08/11
42
City Council Resolution No. _
Page 25 of 26
layout shall comply with City Standard STD - 805 -L -A and STD - 805 -L -B. The
centerlines of the drive aisles that straddle the adjacent properties shall match. If the
entire site (all 3 properties) is planned to be restriped, the entire site shall comply with
City Standard STD - 805 -L -A and STD - 805 -L -B.
56. Prior to issuance of building permits, a signage and striping parking lot plan shall be
submitted for review and approval.
57. The proposed project is required to stripe a 120 -foot minimum dedicated right -turn
lane into the project site along southbound MacArthur Boulevard. The travel lane
adjacent to the new right -turn lane shall be 12 -foot wide minimum. The applicant shall
provide plans showing the proposed striping on MacArthur Boulevard.
58. New sidewalk, curb, gutter and driveway approach shall be installed along the
MacArthur Boulevard and Dolphin Striker Way project frontage per the applicable City
standards. The applicant may be required to provide a sidewalk easement along the
driveway approach along MacArthur Boulevard if an ADA compliant path of travel can
not be accommodate across the driveway approach.
59. The proposed project shall modify the southbound MacArthur Boulevard left turn
pocket at the MacArthur Boulevard /Von Karman Avenue - Newport Place Drive
intersection and restriping MacArthur Boulevard to accommodate the left turn access
into the site. The design shall maintain a minimum left turn pocket length of 270 feet
at the southbound MacArthur Boulevard/Von Karman Avenue - Newport Place Drive
intersection with a transition length of 140 feet minimum. The transition length at the
proposed left turn into the driveway shall be 120 feet minimum. The buffer between
the two left turn pockets shall be a minimum of 50 feet. The applicant shall provide
plans showing the proposed striping on MacArthur Boulevard.
60. All improvements shall be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works
Department.
61. An encroachment permit is required for all work activities within the public right -of -way.
62. In case of damage done to public improvements within the public right -of -way
surrounding the development site by the private construction, additional reconstruction
within the public right -of -way may be required at the discretion of the Public Works
Inspector.
63. All on -site drainage shall comply with the latest City Water Quality requirements.
64. All improvements shall comply with the City's sight distance requirement. See City
Standard 110 -L.
65. Traffic circulation and signage is subject to further review by the City Traffic Engineer.
Tmplt: 03/08111
-43
City Council Resolution No. _
Paqe 26 of 26
66. County Sanitation District fees shall be paid prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
Mitigation Measures
67. The applicant shall comply with all mitigation measures and standard conditions
contained within the approved Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program of the
adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit A) for the project.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
44
Attachment No. CC 3
Appeal Letter
G=
:'lw
From:
Hill_ Rush
To:
Brown, Leilani
Cc:
Henn. Michael; Kiff. Dave; Brandt. Kim; Campbell. James
Subject:
Call Up of Planning Application PA2010 -135
Date:
Saturday, October 01, 20119:26:48 AM
Office of City Clerk
City Of Newport Be
October 1. 2011
On September 22, 2011 the Dolphin- Striker Way Commercial Project (the "Project ")
came before and was denied by our Planning Commission (the "PC "). The Project
presented an opportunity to revitalize an underperforming area within our city.
In order to address a higher market driven tenant mix for the site, the applicant
requested approval of several items including improved site access, an increase in
development density, changed layout allowing for two single story buildings and
related parking reconfiguration. These requests are identified as:
• Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PD2010 -007
• Transfer Development Rights No. TD2010 -002
• Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002
• Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026
• Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2011 -001
• Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014
• Waiver of Development Agreement
City staff evaluated all aspects of the project and recommended approval. The PC
took issue however with some elements and denied the Project. Topics discussed
during the PC meeting included site access, building square footage and parking.
Subsequent to the rejection by the PC, the applicant has made changes to the
proposed Project including reducing the square footage and increasing on site
parking.
Given the importance of addressing the economic need for our city to support the
improvement of our underperforming commercial areas, combined with the
applicant's willingness to address issues raised by the PC, I request the September
22, 2011 decision of the Planning Commission related to Planning Application
PA2010 -135 be called -up before the City Council for further discussion and
consideration at the first available Council meeting.
Rush Hill
Councilman Rush Hill
City of Newport Beach
District Three
Office: 115 Twenty Second Street
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949.723.7202 ext 321
For scheduling, please contact Alan Limon at:
Alanno NRMservice.com
47
42
Attachment No. CC 4
Draft Ordinance (Amended PC
Development Plan)
49
50
ORDINANCE NO. _
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
APPROVING PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. PD2010 -007 TO CHANGE THE ZONING
DESIGNATION FROM RESTAURANT SITE "1" TO GENERAL
COMMERCIAL SITE "8" FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4221
DOLPHIN- STRIKER (PA2010 -135)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership, with respect to property
located at 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, and legally described as Parcel 1 of Portion of Lot 4
of Tract No. 7770, requesting approval of an amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11)
Planned Community Development Plan to accommodate the development of two new
commercial buildings of 13,525 square feet total. The following applications were
requested or required in order to implement the project as proposed:
a) An amendment to Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development
Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject property from "Restaurant
Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ", pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned
Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the Municipal Code.
b) A transfer of development rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units,
which equates to Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and 1,620 square feet
from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur
Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet to the subject site, pursuant to Chapter
20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights) of the Minicipal Code.
c) A traffic study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as
the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
d) A conditional use permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for
the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the
site, pursuant to Chapter 20.40 (Off- Street Parking) of the Municipal Code.
e) A modification permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the
Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, pursuant to
Section 20.52.050 of the Municipal Code.
f) A waiver of the requirement for a development agreement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the Municipal Code.
City Council Ordinance No. _
Paoe 2 of
2. The subject property has zoning designation of Restaurant Site 1 of the Newport Place
(PC -11) Planned Community Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element
category is Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -112 ").
3. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone.
4. A public hearing was held on September 22, 2011, in the City Hall Council Chambers,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the
Planning Commission at this meeting.
5. At the September 22, 2011, Planning Commission hearing, the Planning Commission
voted 4 -3 to deny the project without prejudice.
6. On October 1, 2011, the Planning Commission's decision to deny the applicant's request
was appealed by City Councilmember Rush Hill. The appeal was filed to allow the City
Council an opportunity to review the project given the importance of addressing the
economic need for the City to support the improvement of the City's underperforming
commercial areas combined with the applicant's willingness to address issues raised
by the Planning Commission.
7. Due to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission at the September 22,
2011, Planning Commission hearing, the applicant modified the application request by
reducing the project gross floor area from 13,525 square feet to 12,351square feet,
increased on -site parking supplies, and eliminating the off -site parking request.
8. A public hearing was held by the City Council on October 25, 2011, in the City Hall
Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of
time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport
Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and
considered by, the City Council at this meeting.
9. Pursuant to Section 20.64.030.C, the public hearing was conducted "de novo,"
meaning that it was a new hearing and the decision being appealed has no force or
effect as of the date the call for review was filed.
SECTION 2. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT DETERMINATION.
1. An Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration have been prepared in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines,
and City Council Policy K -3.
2. The draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20 -day comment period
beginning on July 15, 2011, and ending on August 3, 2011. The contents of the
environmental document and comments on the document were considered by the City
Council in its review of the proposed project.
TmpIC 11/23/09 -,�
City Council Ordinance No.
Paae 3
3. An Errata has been prepared which clarifies and augments data in the document in
responses to comments including the added location of transfer of development rights
to the subject property, and supports the conclusions reached in the draft MND.
Consistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15073.5(c), recirculation of the MND is not
required when new information is added to the MND which merely clarifies, amplifies,
or makes insignificant modifications to the MND.
4. On the basis of the entire environmental review record, the proposed project, with
mitigation measures, will have a less than significant impact upon the environment and
there are no known substantial adverse affects on human beings that would be
caused. Additionally, there are no long -term environmental goals that would be
compromised by the project, nor cumulative impacts anticipated in connection with the
project. The mitigation measures identified and incorporated in the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program are feasible and will reduce the potential
environmental impacts to a less than significant level.
5. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
were adopted by City Council Resolution No.2011 -_. The modifications proposed by
the applicant subsequent to the circulation of the Mitigated Negative Declaration do
not constitute "substantial revisions" that would warrant recirculation of the MND
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. The document and all material, which
constitute the record upon which this decision was based, are on file with the Planning
Department, City Hall, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California.
6. The City Council finds that judicial challenges to the City's CEQA determinations and
approvals of land use projects are costly and time consuming. In addition, project
opponents often seek an award of attorneys' fees in such challenges. As project
applicants are the primary beneficiaries of such approvals, it is appropriate that such
applicants should bear the expense of defending against any such judicial challenge,
and bear the responsibility for any costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which may be
awarded to a successful challenger.
SECTION 3. FINDINGS
1. The subject property is located in Statistical Area L4 (Airport Area) and has a General
Plan designation of Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -112 "). The MU -H2 designation
provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial
office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and
ancillary neighborhood commercial uses. The proposed commercial development
would be allowed as the proposed uses are ancillary and supportive to the existing
nearby office and light industrial developments.
2. The subject property has a zoning designation of Restaurant Site 1 of the Newport
Place (PC -11) Planned Community which allows only eating and drinking
establishments. The proposed amendment would change the zoning designation to
Tmplt: 11/23/09 C3
City Council Ordinance No.
General Commercial Site 8, to allow general commercial uses and eating and drinking
establishments, which thereby is consistent with the MU -1-12 General Plan designation.
SECTION 4. DECISION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan (PC -11) shall be revised
as provided in Exhibit "A ", with all other provisions of the existing Planned Community
District Regulations remaining unchanged and in full force and effect.
2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is, for any
reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this ordinance, and each section, subsection,
clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sections,
subsections, sentences, clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional.
3. This action shall become final and effective thirty days after the adoption of this
Ordinance.
4. The Mayor shall sign and the City Clerk shall attest to the passage of this Ordinance.
This Ordinance shall be published once in the official newspaper of the City, and the
same shall become effective thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption.
Tmplt: 11 /23/09 `f
City Council Ordinance No.
This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Newport
Beach held on the 25th of October, 2011, and adopted on the 22nd day of November, 2011,
by the following vote, to wit:
AYES, COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES, COUNCIL MEMB
ABSENT, COUNCIL MEMB
MAYOR
Michael F. Henn
ATTEST:
Leilani Brown, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM,
OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY:
Aaron Harp, City Attot ney ° �3
for the City of Newport Beach
Tmplt 11/23/09
City Council Ordinance No. _
Paqe 6 J 6
EXHIBIT "A"
Newport Place Planned Community Development Plan (PC -11)
Tmpit: 11/23/09 7 (-
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
NEWPORT PLACE
Emkay Development Company, Inc.
Newport Beach, California
57
CONTENTS
General Notes +6
Definitions 27
Statistical Analysis 4- 469 -21
PART I - INDUSTRIAL
Section I Minimum Site Area
4422
Section H Permitted Uses
4-722
Group I. Light Industrial
4-722
A
X22
B
1-923
C
4-823
Group H. Medium hndustrial and Industrial
Service and Support Facilities
41324
A
1-924
B
2825
C
2425
D
2226
Section III General Development Standards for Industry
2327
A. Building Height
2327
B. Setbacks
2427
C. Site Coverage
2428
D. Sign Area
2 -528
E. Sign Standards
2629
F. Parking
2730
G. Landscaping
2830
H. Loading Areas
2432
I. Storage Areas
2432
J. Refuse Collection Areas
2932
K. Telephone and Electrical Services
3832
L. Sidewalks
3832
M. Nuisances
3832
E
M
PART II - COMMERCIAL
Section I Minimum Site Area
34-33
Section II Permitted Uses
433
Group I. Professional and Business Offices
B.
A. Professional Offices
3433
B. Business Offices
3233
C. Support Commercial
3234
Group H. Commercial Uses
3540
A. Automobile Center
3335
B. Hotels and Motels
3335
C. City, County, and State Facilities
3335
D. Service Stations, Car Wash
3335
E. Retail Commercial Uses
3335
F. General Commercial
3436
Section III General Development Standards for
Telephone & Electrical Services
Commerce
3638
A.
Setbacks
3638
B.
Signs
3239
C.
Sign Standards
3540
D.
Parking
3540
E.
Landscaping
4042
F.
Loading Areas
4243
G.
Storage Areas
4243
H.
Refuse Collection Areas
4244
I.
Telephone & Electrical Services
4244
J.
Pedestrian Access
4344
FOOTNOTES 44 5045 -51
ATTACHED EXHIBITS
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E
Exhibit F
Land Use [1,5,8, 36]
Grading & Roads [1_
Storm Drain [ 1 ]
Sewer & Water [1]
Topography [I]
Traffic Analysis [1]
3
159
Planned Community Development Standards for Newport Place
Ordinance No. 1369 adopted by the City of Newport Beach
December 21, 1970
Amendment No. 1 Approved on December 13, 1971 by Resolution No. 7572 (A -305)
Amendment No. 2 Approved on June 12, 1972 by Resolution No. 7706 (A -325)
Amendment No. 3 Approved on October 24, 1972 by Resolution No. 7846 (A -341)
Amendment No. 4 Approved on January 8, 1983 by Resolution No. 7901 (A -349)
Amendment No. 5 Approved on July 23, 1973 by Resolution No. 8054 (A -369)
Amendment No. 6 Approved on June 10, 1974 by Resolution No. 8262 (A -429)
Amendment No. 7 Approved on September 8, 1975 by Resolution No. 8588 (A -450)
Amendment No. 8 Approved on February 9, 1976 by Resolution No. 8693 (A -462)
Amendment No. 9 Approved on April 11, 1977 by Resolution No. 9050 (A -488)
Amendment No. 10 Approved on May 23, 1977 by Resolution No. 9091 (A -490)
Amendment No. 11 Approved on April 10, 1978 by Resolution No. 1003 (A -504)
Amendment No. 12 Approved on July 11, 1978 by Resolution No. 9393 (A -510)
Amendment No. 13 Approved on November 27, 1978 by Resolution No. 9472 (A -514)
Amendment No. 14 Approved on June 11, 1979 by Resolution No. 9563 (A -530)
Amendment No. 15 Approved on March 23, 1982 by Resolution No. 10003 (A -560)
Amendment No. 16 Approved on March 26, 1984 by Resolution No. 84 -22 (A -604)
Amendment No. 17 Approved on April 23, 1984 by Resolution No. 84 -30 (A -597)
Amendment No. 18 Approved on June 25, 1984 by Resolution No. 84 -58 (A -607)
Amendment No. 19 Approved on July 23, 1984 by Resolution No. 84 -79 (A -608)
Amendment No. 20 Approved on January 12, 1987 by Resolution No. 87 -1 (A -637)
E
MO
Amendment No. 21 Approved on March 9, 1987 by Resolution No. 87 -30 (A -638)
Amendment No. 22 Approved on March 14, 1988 by Resolution No. 88 -17 (A -658)
Amendment No. 23 Approved on August 14, 1989 by Resolution No. 89 -94 (A -684)
Amendment No. 24 Approved on July 22, 1991 by Resolution No. 91 -83 (A -740)
Amendment No. 25 Approved on March 9, 1992 by Resolution No. 92 -20 (A -749)
Amendment No. 26 Approved on June 8, 1992 by Resolution No. 92 -58 (A -745)
Amendment No. 27 Approved on September 13, 1993 by Resolution No. 93 -69 (A -783)
Amendment No. 28 Approved on January 22, 1996 by Resolution No. 96 -10 (A -833)
Amendment No. 28.1 Approved on September 9, 1996 by Resolution No. 96 -78 (A849)
Amendment No. 28.2 Approved on March 24, 1997 by Resolution 97 -25 (A858)
Amendment No. 28.3 Approved on July 28, 1997 by Ordinance No. 97 -29 (A861)
Amendment No. 29 Approved on June 18, 1998 by Ordinance No. 98 -16 (A 875)
Amendment No. 30 Approved on January 11, 1999 by Ordinance No. 98 -28 (A -877)
Amendment No. 31 Approved on February 8, 1999 by Ordinance No. 99 -4 (A -880)
Amendment No. 32 Approved on April 12, 1999 by Ordinance No. 99 -11 (A -883)
Amendment No. 33 Approved on March 26, 2002 by Ordinance No. 2002 -6 (PD2001 -002)
Amendment No. 34 Approved on June 14, 2005 by Ordinance No. 2005 -8 (PD2004 -003)
Amendment No. 35 Approved on September 14, 2010 by Ordinance No.2010 -16 (PD2010 -002)
5
01
GENERAL NOTES
1. The Newport Project, a planned community development is a project of Emkay
Development Company, Inc., a subsidiary of Morrison - Knudsen Company, Inc. The area
is most appropriate for commercial and light industrial use because of its central location,
ideal topography, availability to four freeways, accessibility to two railroads and its
relation to the Orange County Airport. Attached drawings indicate land use, grading and
roads, storm drains, water and sewer, topography and traffic analysis.
2. Water within the Planned Community area will be furnished by the City of Newport
Beach.
3. Sewerage Disposal facilities within the Planned Community area are by the City of
Newport Beach.
4. Prior to or coincidental with the filing of any tentative map or use permit, the developer
shall submit a master plan of drainage to the Director of Public Works.
5. The height of all buildings and structures shall comply with FAA criteria.
6. Except as otherwise stated in this ordinance, the requirements of the Zoning Code, City of
Newport Beach, shall apply.
The contents of this supplemental text notwithstanding, no construction shall be proposed
within the boundaries of this Planned Community District except that which shall comply
with all provisions of the Building Code and the various mechanical and electrical codes
related thereto.
Phasing of Development.
1,799,941 sq. ft. of development was existing or under construction as of October 1, 1978.
The additional allowable development in the total approved development plan is 566,423
square feet. Any further development subsequent to October 1, 1978, in excess of 30% of
the additional allowable development, being 169,927 sq. ft. shall be approved only after it
can be demonstrated that adequate traffic facilities will be available to handle that traffic
generated by the project at the time of occupancy of the buildings involved. Such
demonstration may be made by the presentation of a phasing plan consistent with the
Circulation Element of the Newport Beach General Plan. (Phasing Plan approved by City
Council March 12, 1979 for all development subject to this regulation.)[ 13]
02
DEFINITIONS
Advertising Surface:
The total area of the face of the structure, excluding supports.
Area of Elevation:
Total height and length of a building as projected to a vertical plane.
Building Line:
An imaginary line parallel to the street right -of -way line specifying the closest point from this street
right -of -way line that a building structure may be located (except for overhangs, stairs and
sunscreens).
Public Safety Area:
A strip of land twenty (20) feet in width and running parallel with street rights -of -way.
Rip-ht-of-Way
When reference is made to right -of -way line it shall mean the line which is then established on
either the adopted Master Plan of Streets and Highways or the filed Tract Map for Minor Roads as
the ultimate right -of -way line for roads or streets.
Side and Front of Comer Lots:
For the purpose of this ordinance, the narrowest frontage of a lot facing the street is the front, and
the longest frontage facing the intersecting street is the side, irrespective of the direction in which
structures face.
Sign:
Any structure, device or contrivance, electric or non - electric and all parts thereof which are erected
or used for advertising purposes upon or within which any poster, bill, bulletin, printing, lettering,
painting, device or other advertising of any kind whatsoever is used, placed, posted, tacked, nailed,
pasted or otherwise fastened or affixed.
Site Area:
The total land area of the land described in the use or other permit.
Special Landscaped Street:
Special landscaped streets are designated as MacArthur Boulevard, Jamboree Road, Bristol Street
North and Birch Street. The landscaping requirements for special landscaped streets and for the
remaining streets are described in the following text.
03
Streets - Dedicated and Private:
Reference to all streets or rights -of -way within this ordinance shall mean dedicated vehicular
rights -of -way. In the case of private or non - dedicated streets, a minimum setback from the
right -of -way line of said streets of ten (10) feet shall be required for all structures. Except for
sidewalks or access drives, this area shall be landscaped according to the setback area standards
from dedicated streets herein.
=1
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART L INDUSTRIAL*
A. Building Sites
Site 1 2.0 acres [3, 9]
Site 3A 21.3 acres [2.4] ...............23.3 acres [9, 35]
B. Building Area
Site lA 34,130 sq. ft .................0.8 ac. [3,9]
* *Site 3A 297,798 sq. ft ...............6.8 ac. [2, 4, 14, 33]
331,928 sq. ft ............ 7.6 ac. [9, 14, 31, 33, 35]
The following statistics are for information only. Development may include but shall not be limited
to the following.
C. Parking (Criteria: 3 spaces/ 1000 sq. ft. (d), 363 sq. ft/space)
Site IA 102 cars.......... 0.9 acres [3, 9]
Site 3A 894 cars......... 7.5 ac. [2, 4, 14, 33]
996 cars......... 8.4 ac. [9, 14, 31, 33, 35]
D. Landscaped - Open Space
Site IA ..................0.30 acres [3, 9]
Site 3A ..................6.5 acres [2,4,14,33]
6.8 acres [9,14,31, 33, 35] Net Open
-3.8 acres ..............Space.....3.0 ac. *[14,31, 33, 35]
* 3.8 acres have been allotted for service stations exclusive of permitted building acres and
subject to use permit.
** Industrial Site 3A has been reduced by 20,000 sq. ft. with the reduction allocated to the
allowable building area for Parcel No. 3 of Resubdivision 529. The allowable building area
for Parcel No. 3 of Resubdivision 529 is now 61,162 sq. ft. [ 14].
Industrial Site 3A was then increased by 1,590 square feet in 2002 [33].
7
05
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART II. COMMERCIAL/PROFESSIONAL & BUSINESS OFFICES
A. Building Sites
Site 1 & 2........38.5 acres'
Site 2A............3.9
acres [3 1]
Site 4 ..................9.0
acres
Site 5 ..................7.4
acres
Site 6 ..................1.9
acres
Site 7 ..................2.5
acres
Site 8 ..................1.64
acres
Site 9 .............16.9
acres [35]
81.74 acres [20, 35]
B. Building Area
Site 1 &2 ......... 860,884 square feet [5, 14, 17, 30]
Site 2A ............
109,200 square feet [31]
Site 4 .................228,214
square feet [32]
Site 5 .................268,743
square feet [ 16, 19, 21, 24, 25]
Site 6 ....................42,420
square feet
Site 7 ..................
55,860 square feet
Site 8 ..................54,000
square feet [20]
Site 9............
288,264 square feet [35]
1,907,585 square feet [21, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35]
The following statistics are for information only. Development may include, but shall not be
limited to the following.
C. Typical Building Mix/Site Utilization
Typical site areas for buildings of varying heights are provided for purposes of illustration.
Development of any of the Sites indicated may include any number of combinations of building
types, characterized by number of stories, within the range of building types indicated for that site.
'Commercial/Professional and Business Office Site 1 and 2 have been reduced by 36,119 feet with
the reduction allocated to the allowed building area for Parcels 1 & 2 of Resubdivision 585. The
allowable building area for Parcel 1 & 2 of Resubdivision 585 is now 272,711 square feet. [ 14]
2 I commercial uses are constructed on Commercial/Professional and Business Office Site 5 which
are ancillary to and in the same building as office uses, additional development up to a maximum of
294,600 sq. ft. may be developed, so long as office use does not exceed 268,743 sq. ft. [21, 24, 25]
10
Site 1 &2 ................860,884 square feet [5, 14, 17, 30]
a. Two Story ................
8.42 acres
b. Three Story ............
5.61 acres
C. Four Story ...............
4.21 acres
d. Five Story ..............
3.37 acres
e. Six Story .................
2.81 acres
Site 2A ............ 109,200 square feet [31]
a. Two Story ......................1.25
acres
b. Three Story ...................0.84
acres
c. Four Story ....................
0.63 acres
d. Five Story ....................
0.51 acres
Site 4 .................. 228,214 square feet [32]
a. Two Story . ...........................2.31
acres
b. Three Story .........................
1.54 acres
c. Four Story ...........................
1.15 acres
d. Five Story . ...........................0.92
acres
e. Six Story ... ...........................0.77
acres
Site 5 ..................268,743 square feet [16, 19, 21, 25]
a. Two Story ..........................1.90
acres
b. Three Story ........................1.27
acres
c. Four Story ..........................0.95
acres
d. Five Story ..........................0
76 acres
e. Six Story . ...........................0.63
acres
f. Nine Story ..........................0.50
acres
Site 6 .............. 42,420 square feet
a. Two Story ..........................0.49
acres
b. Three Story .......................
0.32 acres
c. Four Story .........................
0.24 acres
d. Five Story ..........................0.19
acres
e. Six Story ..........................
0.16 acres
Site 7 .....................55,860 square feet
a. Two Story ...........................
0.64 acres
b. Three Story ......................
0.43 acres
c. Four Story . ...........................0.32
acres
d. Five Story ...........................0.26
acres
e. Six Story ... ...........................0.21
acres
11
07
Site 8 ..................54,000 square feet [20]
a. Four Story . ...........................0.30 acres
Site 9 .............288,264 square feet [35]
a. Two Story ......................3.31
acres
b. Three Story ....................2.21
acres
c. Four Story .....................
1.65 acres
d. Five Story ......................1.32
acres
e. Six Story ........................1.10
acres
D. Parking (Criteria: 1 space /225 sq. ft. (& 363 sq. ft/space)
Site 1 &2 ..... 3,827 cars......... 31.89 acres [5, 14, 30]
Site 2A .........
474 cars *.......
1.26 acres' [3 1]
Site 4 ..............
905 cars..........
7.54 acres [32]
Site 5 ............
1,234 cars.........
6.13 acres [211
Site 6 ..............
188 cars........
1.57 acres
Site 7 ..............
248 cars..........
2.07 acres
Site 8 ..............
231 cars..........
1.34 acres [20]
Site 9 ...........
1,281 cars.........
10.68 acres [35]
8,388 cars
62.48 acres [21,31, 32, 33, 35]
E. Landscaped - Open Space
Site 1 & 2 [5,14] Gross Site........ 38.5 acres
Parking ........... 27.17 acres
Net .................11.33 acres
Two Story .........
8.42 acres.......
2.91 acres
Three Story .......
5.61 acres.......
5.72 acres
Four Story .........
4.21 acres.......
7.12 acres
Five Story .........
3.37 acres........
7.96 acres
Six Story ...........
2.81 acres........
8.52 acres
Site 2A [311 Gross Site ....... 3.9 acres
Parking .......... 1.26 acres
Net ............... 2.68 acres
Two Story .......
1.25 acres ...
1.43 acres.
Three Story ......
.84 acres ...
1.84 acres
Four Story ........
.63 acres ...
2.05 acres
Five Story .........
.51 acres ...
2.17 acres
3 Includes surface parking and fast floor of existing parking structure only, does not include upper
levels of parking structure. [31].
12
M
Site 4 [32] Gross Site....... 9.00 acres
Parking......... .7.54 acres
Net ...................1.46 acres
Two Story .......... 2.31 acres...... N/A
Three Story ........
1.54 acres.......
0.01 acres
Four Story ..........
1.15 acres......
0.40 acres
Five Story ............
0.92 acres......
0.63 acres
Six Story .............
0.77 acres......
0.78 acres
Site 5 Gross Site........ 7.4 acres
Parking ............ 6.13 acres
Net ..................1.27 acres
Two Story .......... 1.90 acres...... N/A
Three Story ........ 1.27 acres ...... . 00 acres
Four Story .......... 0.95 acres......
0.32 acres
Five Story .........
0.76 acres......
0.51 acres
Six Story ..........
0 .63 acres......
0.64 acres
Nine Story .........
0.50 acres......
0.77 acres [21]
Site 6 Gross Site......... 1.90 acres
Parking .............1.57 acres
Net ...................0.33 acres
Two Story ..........
. 49 acres......
N/A
Three Story ........
.32 acres......
0.01 acres
Four Story ............
24 acres......
0.09 acres
Five Story ..........
.19 acres......
0.14 acres
Six Story .............16
acres.......
0.17 acres
Site 7 Gross Site......... 2.50 acres
Parking .............2.07
acres
Net ....................
0.43
acres
Two Story ...........
0.64 acres......
N/A
Three Story .........
0.43 acres......
00 acres
Four Story ...........
0.32 acres......
0.11 acres
Five Story ............
0.26 acres.......
0.17 acres
Six Story .............
0.21 acres......
0.22 acres
Site 8 Gross Site......... 1.64 acres
Parking .............1.34 acres
Net .....................30 acres
Four Story ......................30 acres...... N/A [20]
Site 9 [35] Gross Site...... 16.90 acres
Parking ......... 10.68 acres
13
i •
Net .............. 6.22 acres
Two Story .........
3.31 acres......
2.91 acres
Three Story ........
2.21 acres.......
4.01 acres
Four Story .........
1.65 acres.......
4.57 acres
Five Story .........
1.32 acres.......
4.90 acres
Six Story ...........
1.10 acres.......
5.12 acres
F. Building Height [5, 12, 15, 21, 31]
Maximum building height shall not exceed six (6) stories above ground level except for
Parcel No. 1 of Resubdivision No. 585 which shall have a maximum building height of ten (10)
stories above ground level, for Parcel No. 2 of Resubdivision No. 585 which shall have a maximum
building height of seven (7) stories above ground level, and for Site 5 which shall have a maximum
of nine (9) stories /167 feet above ground level. Maximum building height for Professional &
Business Office Site 2A shall not exceed 95 feet above ground level.
14
70
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY
BLANK
15
71-
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART II RETAIL COMMERCIAL /PERMITTED USES - Part II, Section II, Group ILE
A. Building Sites
Site 1 1.4 acres
The following statistics are for information only. Development may include but shall not be limited
to the following.
B. Building Area
Site 1 ...... 10,000 sq. ft. .22 acres
C. Parking (Criteria: 5 /spaces /1000 sq. 11.0, 363 sq. ft./ space)
Site 1.......50 cars .41 acres
D. Landscaped - Open Space
Site 1 .77 acres
E. Buildin Hg eight
Building height of structures shall be limited to a height of thirty -five (35) feet.
16
72
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART II COMMERCIAL/RESTAURANTS
A. Building Sites
Site 1 2:9 1.80 acres
2631.80 acres ..............
........2:91.80 acres [5, 20, 36]
The following statistics are for information only. Development may include but shall
not be limited to the following.
B. Building Area
Site 1 .... 15,000 square feet ......34 acres
15,000 square feet ....... 34 acres [5, 20]
C. Parking (Criteria: 300 occupants/ 10,000 sq. ft.)
1 space /3 occupants
363 sq. ft. /space
Site 1 439133 cars .....................431.11 acres
439133 cars .................... 4- 451.11 acres [5, 20, 36]
Restaurant Site 1 and General Commercial Site 8 have shared parking
arrangements per the 1972 Reciprocal Parking & Management Agreement [36]
D. Landscaped - Open Space
Site 1 ... 4-4 0.46 acres
4-4� 0.46 acres ...................... 4-.4 0.46 acres [5, 20, 36]
E. Building Height
Building height of structures shall be limited to a height of thirty -five (35) feet.
17
73
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART 11 COMMERCIAL/HOTEL & MOTEL
A. Building Site [26,31]
Site 1 - 6.35 acres
Site 2B - 3_7 acres [3 1]
10.05 acres [3 1]
B. Hotel Room Limit [18,25,31]
Site 1 - 349 rooms'
Site 2B- 384 256 rooms [31, 36]
The following statistics are for information only. Development may include but
shall not be limited to the following.
C. Building Area (Site 1 - 349 units (a) 400 sq.ft. /unit) (Site 2B — 384 256
units 517 net sq. ft. /unit).[18, 25, 31,361
Site 1 - 3.2 acres 3.2 acres
Site 2B - 3-6 3.0 acres (total enclosed area is 4.5 acres)
D. Parking (Criteria: 1 space /unit A, 363 sq. ft. /space)[18, 26, 31, 361
Site 1 - 349 parking spaces - 2.9 acres
Site 2B - 43-2 128 parking spaceS2 2.5 acres (total)
E. Landscaping -Open Space [ 18]
'Use permits approved as of November 14, 1983, allow 468 hotel rooms with related
restaurant, conference area, and other support facilities. Hotel suites included as part of the
hotel room count may be converted to standard hotel rooms consistent with the specified
hotel room limit, so long as the approved site plan is maintained. Location and size of
restaurant, conference area, and other support facilities may also be revised if the plans meet
the intent of the approved site plan and other conditions of approval. [ 1, 18]
` Based on one space /2 guest rooms per Page 20.66 -8, Off - Street Parking and Loading
Requirements, of the City of Newport Beach Planning and Zoning Code. [31 ]
T
74
The following is intended to show some of the variations possible.
Site 1
One Story Development 0.92 acres
Two Story Development
- 2.98 acres
Three Story Development
- 3.67 acres
Four Story Development
- 4.02 acres
Five Story Development
- 4.22 acres
Six Story Development
4.36 acres
Seven Story Development
- 4.46 acres
Eight Story Development
- 4.53 acres
Nine Story Development
- 4.59 acres
Ten Story Development
- 4.64 acres
Eleven Story Development
- 4.67 acres
Twelve Story Development
- 4.71 acres
Thirteen Story Development
- 4.73 acres
The above analysis does not include support facilities utilized in many hotel
operations. These facilities would also require parking not reflected in
the parking requirement criteria.
F. Buildine Heieht f 3l l
Building height on Site 2B shall not exceed 60 feet. [31]
19
75
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART II GENERAL COMMERCIAL PERMITTED USES [8,91
Part II, Section II, Group II A & F
A. General Commercial Building Sites [8, 26, 28.3, 31, 361
Site 1 -
3.0 acres
Site 2 -
1.0 acres [9]
Site 3 -
3.9 acres [9]
Site 4 -
2.0 acres [9]
Site 5 -
2.45 acres' [26]
Site 6
5.8 acres [25, 28.3]
Site 7
8.2 acres
Site 8
1.11 acres 1361
26.M 27.46
acres [36]
B. Building Area [26, 27, 28.3, 361
Site 1 - 35,000 sq. ft. - 0.80 acres
Site 2' - 11,700 sq. ft. - 0.27 acres [9]
Site 3z - 49,380 sq. ft. - 1.13 acres [27]
Site 43 - 20,870 sq. ft.[19]- 0.57 acres [9]
Site 5' - 31,362 sq. ft. - 0.72 acres [26]
Site 6 50,000 sq. ft 1.14 acres [28.3]
Site 7 141,120139,500sq. ft. 840 3.20 acres 1361
Site 8 12,351 sq. ft.'s [361 0.28 acres [361
339;432 350,163 sq. ft. [36] 12-83 8.11 acres [26, 27, 28.3, 36]
s A recorded reciprocal easement shall be provided for ingress, egress and parking for mutual
benefit between Hotel Site I and General Commercial Site 5
6 Restaurants are permitted uses in Sites 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6, subject to a use permit. [9, 23, 26, 27,
28.3]
Ibid
8 If the development of General Commercial Site 4 is limited solely to Professional and
Business Office use, then the allowable Building Area shall not exceed 30,000 sq. ft. (19)
9 Restaurants are permitted uses in Sites 1,2,3,5
10 257 surface parking spaces; minimum 100 parking spaces in parking structure
11 Of 12,351 square feet, 5,000 square feet shall be allocated for food service uses and
7,351 square feet shall be allocated for general commercial uses. [361
20
70
The following statistics are for information only. Development may include, but shall not be
limited to the following. [8]
D. Parking (Criteria 4 spaces/1,000 sq.ft. @ 363 sq.ft. /space [9, 26, 28.3]
Site 1 -
140 cars
Site 2 -
47 cars
Site 3 -
193 cars
Site 4 -
100 cars
Site 5 -
167 cars
Site 6 -
250 cars
Site 7
357 353 cars
Site 8
81 cars12
- 1.17 acres
- 0.39 acres
- 1.61 acres
- 0.83 acres
- 1.39 acres
- 2.08 acres
- 298 2.94 acres10 [36]
0.54 acres [36]
4-0.45 10.95 acres
E. Landscaping_ - Oven Space [9, 26, 28.3]
Site 1
- 1.03 acres
Site 2
- 0.34 acres
Site 3
- 1.18 acres
Site 4
- 0.60 acres
Site 5 (1 & 2 story)
- 0.24 acres
Site 6
- 2.58 acres
Site 7
- 214 acres
Site 8
0.24 acres [36]
Sub Total 8,418.35 acres [36]
Site 5 (3 story) 0.49 acres
Sub Total 8-60 8.84 acres [36]
Site 5 (4 story) 0.75 acres
Grand Total 9-.3-5 9.59 acres [36]
F. Building Height [8, 9, 26, 31, 28.3, 36]
Building height of structures on General Commercial Site 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6, and 8
shall be limited to a height of thirty-five (35 ft.) and on General Commercial Site 5
shall be limited to a height of fifty feet (50 ft.). Height of buildings on Site 7 shall
be limited to fifty -five (55) feet except that the vertical projection of a building
element intended to provide architectural interest and/or integrate the project
identification sign and not for occupancy may be up to seventy -five (75) feet in
height.
12 65 on -site spaces and 16 off -site spaces [36]
21
77
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
PART II COMMERCIAL /SERVICE STATION"
A. Building Site
Site 1 1.2 acres 1.2 acres
PART I. INDUSTRIAL
Section I. Minimum Site Area
A. Thirty Thousand (30,000) square feet.
B. Exception: f 111
The Planning Commission may authorize an exception to the minimum site area.
Application for any such exception shall be made at the time of the filing of a tentative
map by the applicant. In order for an exception to be granted, the Planning Commission
shall find the following facts with respect thereto:
1. That the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property in the vicinity.
2. That the development considerations and intent of this Planned Community
Development Standards are substantially met.
Section H. Permitted Uses
Group I. Light Industrial
A. To allow uses primarily engaged in research activities, provided that such activities are
confined within a building or buildings that do not contribute excess noise, dust, smoke,
vibration, odor, toxic, or noxious matter to the surrounding environment nor contain a
high hazard potential, due to the matter of the product material or processes involved.
Such activities may include but shall not be limited to research laboratories and
facilities, developmental laboratories and facilities and compatible light manufacturing
related to the following list of examples:
1. Bio- Chemical
Chemical
Film and Photography
Medical and Dental
Metallurgy
Pharmaceutical
X -Ray
"Reference Page 4, Part I, Item D.
22
M
2. Manufacture, research assembly, testing and repair of components, devices,
equipment and systems and parts and components such as but not limited to the
following list of examples:
Coils, Tubes, Semi - Conductors
Communication, Navigation Control, Transmission and Reception Equipment,
Control Equipment and Systems, Guidance Equipment and Systems
Data Processing Equipment and Systems
Glass Edging, Beveling, and Silvering
Graphics, Art Equipment
Metering Instruments
Optical Devices, Equipment and Systems
Phonographs, Audio Units, Radio Equipment and Television Equipment
Photographic Equipment
Radar, infra -red and Ultra- Violet Equipment and Systems
Scientific and Mechanical Instruments
Testing Equipment
B. To allow the location of offices and areas associated with and accessory to the permitted
uses listed under A.
Administrative, professional and business offices.
2. Regional or home offices of industries which are limited to a single use.
Blueprinting, Photostatting, photo engraving, printing, publishing and
bookbinding, provided that no on -site commercial services is associated with said
uses.
4. Cafeteria, cafe, restaurant or auditorium.
Service stations will be permitted, subject to a use permit provided that no on -site
commercial service is associated with said uses.
* & * *6. (Transferred to Part H — Commercial, Section II, Group I) [28.2, 35]
C. Service stations subject to a use permit.
23
�9
Group II. Medium Industrial and Industrial Service and Support Facilities.
A. To allow the location of general manufacturing activities, provided that such activities
are confined within a building or buildings and do not contribute excessive noise, dust,
smoke, vibration, odor, toxic or noxious matter to the surrounding environment nor
contain a high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, material or processes
involved.
1. Manufacture and/or assembly of the following or similar products:
Aircraft and Related Components
Clocks and Watches
Coffins
Ceramic Products
Concrete Products
Electrical Appliances
Farm Equipment
Heating & Ventilating Equipment
Linoleum
Machinery & Machine Tools
Musical Instruments
Neon Signs
Novelties
Oil Well Valves & Repairs
Optical Goods
Refrigeration
Screw Machine Products
Sheet Metal Products
Shoes
Silk Screens
Sporting Goods
Springs
Stencils
Toys
Trailers
Trucks
2. The manufacture of products or products made from the following or similar
materials:
Aluminum Iron
Bags, except Burlap Bags or Linoleum
Sacks
Matches
Batteries
Mattresses
Boxes, Paper
Paper
Brass
Steel
Cans
Tin
Copper
Tools
Glass
Wool
24
la
Grinding Wheels
Yarn
The manufacturing, compounding, processing or treatment of the following or
similar items:
Acids, Non - Corrosive
Candles
Cigarettes & Cigars
Detergents
Disinfectants
Dye
Food Products
Lubricating Oil
Pharmaceutical
Products
Plastics
Toiletries
Vitamin Products
Waxes and Polishes
4. Woodworking Shops, such as: (Provided that, if a planer, router, sticker or moulder
is maintained, all doors and windows in the outside walls of the room in which said
machinery is located shall be kept closed while said machinery is in use.)
Box
Furniture
Wood Products
Distribution and Warehousing Plants
B. To allow the location of general manufacturing activities, service industry and activities
related to contractor and construction industry, provided that such activities are confined
within a building or buildings and do not contribute excessive noise, dust, smoke,
vibration, odor, toxic or noxious matter to the surrounding environment nor contain a
high hazard potential due to the nature of the products, materials or processes involved.
Service industries or those industries providing a service as opposed to the man-
ufacture of a specific product, such as the repair and maintenance of appliances or
component parts, tooling, printers, testing shops, small machine shops, shops
engaged in the repair, maintenance and servicing of items excluding automobile
repair, providing that such industries are not the point of customer delivery or
collection.
2. Contractor and construction industries relating to building industry, such as general
contractors, electrical contractors, plumbing contractors.
C. To allow a combination of general industry, business and professional offices, and
industrial support activities, provided that such activities are confined within a building
or buildings, and do not contribute excessive noise, dust, smoke, vibration, odor, toxic or
noxious matter to the surrounding environment nor contain a high hazard potential due
to the nature of the products, materials or processes involved.
The industrial support activities shall be defined as and limited to the sale of products or
services relating only to the immediate industrial complex. Any activity, which could
25
M
be classified as retail commercial, shall be restricted to activities strictly accessory
and/or supplementary to the industrial community.
1. All uses permitted under A, B, and D.
a. Business and Professional Offices.
b. Industrial Support Facilities, to include activities limited to the sale of
products or services related to only the industrial complex. Activities of a
commercial nature shall be restricted in scope so as to service and to be
accessory and/or supplementary to the industrial complex.
C. Service stations subject to a use permit.
2. Except as herein indicated, the General Development Standards for Industry shall
apply.
a. Sign Area
Industry Support Facilities and Business and Professional Offices.
Only one (1) facia mounted identification sign shall be permitted per street
frontage for each individual business or office.
No sign shall exceed an area equal to one and one -half (1 -1/2) square feet
of sign for each one (1) foot of lineal frontage of the building or store.
However, no sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in area per
face.
b. Site Identification Ground Sign
One (1) site identification sign listing only the name of the site or major
tenant on the site shall be allowed. Said sign shall be limited to a
maximum height of four (4) feet and a width of eight (8) feet and may be
double faced.
C. Pedestrian Access
It is required of all developments in the industrial support facility area to
submit a plan of pedestrian access to the Planning Department prior to the
issuance of building permits. Said plan will detail consideration for
pedestrian access to the subject property and to adjacent properties, and
shall be binding on subsequent development of the property. The plan
shall show all interior walkways and all walkways in the public right of
way, if such walkways are proposed or necessary.
D. To allow for the location of a storage facility for new car inventory. Located within
Industrial Site IA between Quail Street on the east, adjacent to Auto Center Sites 2A
and 2B on the south, and Bristol Street on the west This use shall be subject to a use
permit. [3]
E. (Deleted)[2,4]
26
:.
Section III. General Development Standards for Industry
Maximum building areas shall be as noted in the Statistical Analysis, Part LA and
Part I.B.
A. Building g eight [22]
Building heights of structures shall be limited to a height of thirty-five (35) feet;
provided, however, that on Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 of Parcel Map 86 -33 -34
(Resubdivision No. 529) in Industrial Site 3A, the Planning Commission or the City
Council on review or appeal may approve a structure up to a maximum height of 50
feet after the approval of a use permit.
The Planning Commission or City Council in granting any use permit for structures
in excess of thirty-five (35) feet shall find that each of the following four points have
been complied with:
(a) The increased building height would result in more public visual open space
and views than is required by the basic height limit. Particular attention shall
be given to the location of the structure on the lot, the percentage of ground
cover, and the treatment of all setback and open areas.
(b) The increased building height would result in a more desirable architectural
treatment of the building and a stronger and more appealing visual character
of the area than is required by the basic height limit.
(c) The increased building height would not result in undesirable or abrupt scale
relationships being created between the structure and existing developments
or public spaces. Particular attention shall be given to the total bulk of the
structure including both horizontal and vertical dimensions.
(d) The structure shall have no more floor area than could have been achieved
without the use permit. [22]
B. Setbacks
All setbacks shall be measured from the property line. For the purpose of this
ordinance, a street side property line is that line created by the ultimate right -of -way
line of the frontage street.
Front Yard Setback
Thirty (30) feet minimum, except that unsupported roofs or sunscreens may
project six (6) feet into the setback area.
2. Side Yard Setback
Ten (10) feet, except that unsupported roofs and sunscreens may project
three (3) feet into the setback area.
27
M
In the case of a comer lot, the street side setback shall be thirty (30) feet,
except that unsupported roofs and sunscreens may project six (6) feet into
the setback area. Interior lot lines for a comer lot shall be considered side lot
lines.
3. Rear Yard Setback
No rear yard setback is required except on a through -lot in which case the
required front yard setback shall be observed.
C. Site Coverage
D. Signs
Maximum building coverage of fifty (50) percent is allowed. Parking
structures shall not be calculated as building area, however, said structures
shall be used only for the parking of company vehicles, employee's vehicles,
or vehicles belonging to persons visiting the subject firm.
Sign Area
Only one (1) single faced or double -faced signs shall be permitted per street
frontage. No sign or combination of signs shall exceed one (1) square foot in
area for each six - hundred (600) square feet of total site area. However, no
sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet in area per face. An
additional twenty (20) square feet shall be allowed for each additional
business conducted on the site,
2. Sale or Lease Sign
A sign, advertising the sale, lease, or hire of the site shall be permitted in
addition to the other signs listed in this section. Said sign shall not exceed a
maximum area of thirty -two (32) square feet.
3. Ground Sign
All ground signs shall not exceed four (4) feet above grade in vertical
height. Also, ground signs in excess of one - hundred fifty (150) square feet
in area (single face) shall not be erected in the fast twenty (20) feet, as
measured from the property line, of any street side setback area. However,
the above standards shall not apply to the Community Directional Sign and
Special Purpose Sign.
4. Special Purpose Sign
Signs used to give directions to traffic or pedestrians or give instructions as
to special conditions shall not exceed a total of six (6) square feet (single
face) in area and shall be permitted in addition to the other signs listed in this
section.
W:1
r
5. Wall Signs
Wall signs shall not comprise more than ten (10) percent of the area of the
elevation upon which the sign is located. Said signs shall be fixture signs;
signs painted directly on the surface of the wall shall not be permitted.
In the instance of a multiple tenancy building, each individual industry may
have a wall sign over the entrance to identify the industry. Said sign shall
give only the name of the company and shall be limited to four (4) inch high
letters. Said sign must be oriented toward the parking area for that building.
6. Construction Sign
One (1) construction sign denoting the architects, engineers, contractor, and
other related subjects, shall be permitted upon the commencement of
construction. Said sign shall conform with the requirements of Item 3 above,
Ground Sign, and will be permitted until such time as a final inspection of
the building(s) designates said structure(s) fit for occupancy, or the tenant is
occupying said building(s), whichever occurs first.
Future Tenant Identification Sign
A sign listing the name of the future tenant, responsible agent or realtor, and
identification of the industrial complex shall be permitted. Said sign shall
conform with the requirements of Item 3 above, Ground Sign, and will be
permitted until such time as a final inspection of the building(s) designates
said structure(s) fit for occupancy or tenant is occupying said building(s),
whichever occurs first.
8. Community Directional and/or Identification Sign
Permanent directional and identification signs, not exceeding two- hundred
fifty (250) square feet (single face), shall be permitted but subject to use
permit.
E. Sign Standards
Signs visible from the exterior of any building may be lighted, but no signs
or any other contrivance shall be devised or constructed so as to rotate,
gyrate, blink or move in any animated fashion.
2. Signs shall be restricted to advertising only the person, firm, company or
corporation operating the use conducted on the site or the products or sold
thereon.
3. A wall sign with the individual letters applied directly shalt be measured by a
rectangle around the outside of the lettering and/or the pictorial symbol and
calculating the area enclosed by such line.
4. All signs attached to the building shall be flush mounted.
29
M
F. Parkin¢
Adequate off - street parking shall be provided to accommodate all parking needs for
the site. The intent is to eliminate the need for any on- street parking.
Required off - street parking shall be provided on the site of the use served, or on a
contiguous site or within three hundred (300) feet of the subject site. Where parking
is provided on other than the site concerned, a recorded document shall be approved
by the City Attorney and filed with the Building and Planning Departments and
signed by the owners of the alternate site stipulating to the permanent reservation of
use of the site for said parking.
The following guide shall be used to determine parking requirements:
Office
One (1) space for each 225 square feet of net floor area. The parking requirement
may be lowered to one (1) space for each 250 square feet of net floor area upon
review and approval of the modification committee.
Manufacture, Research and Assembly
Two (2) parking spaces for each three (3) employees, but in no event less than three
(3) spaces for each one thousand (1000) square feet of gross floor area.
Warehouse
Two (2) parking spaces for each three (3) employees, but in no event less than one
(1) space for each one thousand (1000) square feet of gross floor area for the first
twenty thousand (20,000) square feet; one (1) space for each two thousand (2,000)
square feet of gross floor area for the second twenty thousand (20,000) square feet;
one (1) space for each four thousand (4,000) square feet of gross floor area for areas
in excess of the initial forty thousand (40,000) square feet of floor area of the
building.
If there is more than one shift, the number of employees on the largest shift shall be
used in determining parking requirements.
G. Landscanine
Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans, prepared by a landscaping architect,
licensed contractor of architect shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning
Director prior to issuing of building permit and installed prior to issue of Certificate
of Use and Occupancy.
All landscaping referred to in this section shall be maintained in a neat and orderly
fashion.
30
IM
Front Yard Setback Area
a. General Statement
Landscaping in these areas shall consist of an effective combination
of street trees, trees, ground cover and shrubbery. All unpaved areas
not utilized for parking shall be landscaped in a similar manner.
b. Special Landscaped Street
The entire area between the curb and the building setback line shall
be landscaped, except for any access driveway in said area.
C. Other Streets
The entire area between the curb and a point ten (10) feet in back of
the front property line shall be landscaped, except for any access
driveway in said area.
2. Side and Rear Yard Setback Area
a. General Statement
All unpaved areas not utilized for parking and storage, shall be
landscaped utilizing ground cover and/or shrub and tree materials.
b. Undeveloped Areas
Undeveloped areas proposed for future expansion shall be
maintained in a weed free condition but need not be landscaped.
C. Screening
Areas used for parking shall be landscaped and/or fenced in such a
manner as to interrupt or screen said areas from view from access
streets, freeways, and adjacent properties. Plant materials used for
this purpose shall consist of lineal or grouped masses of shrubs
and/or trees.
3. Parking Areas
Trees, equal in number to one (1) per each five (5) parking stalls shall be
provided in the parking area.
4. Sloped Banks
All sloped banks greater than 5 -1 or 6 feet in vertical height and adjacent to
public right -of -way shall be stabilized, planted and irrigated in accordance
with plans submitted and approved by Planning Director.
31
M
H. Loading Areas
1. On other than special landscaped streets street side loading shall be allowed
provided the loading dock is set back a minimum of seventy (70) feet from
the street right -ofway line or one hundred ten (I 10) from the street centerline,
whichever is greater. Said loading area must be screened from view from adjacent
streets.
I. Storage Areas
1. All outdoor storage shall be visually screened from access streets, freeways,
and adjacent property. Said screening shall form a complete opaque screen
up to a point eight (8) feet in vertical height but need not be opaque above
that point.
2. Outdoor storage shall be meant to include all company owned and operated
motor vehicles, with the exception of passenger vehicles.
3. No storage shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line.
I Refuse Collection Areas
1. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be visually screened from access
streets, freeways, and adjacent property by a complete opaque screen.
1. No refuse collection areas shall be permitted between a frontage street and
the building line.
K. Telephone and Electrical Service
All "on- site" electrical lines (excluding lines in excess of 12 KV) and telephone lines
shall be placed underground. Transformers or terminal equipment shall be visually
screened from view from streets and adjacent properties.
L. Sidewalks
The requirement for sidewalks in the Planned Community District may be waived
by the Planning Director if it is demonstrated that such facilities are not needed.
However, the City retains the right to require installations of sidewalks if, in the
future, a need is established by the City.
M. Nuisances
No portion of the property shall be used is such a manner as to create a nuisance to
adjacent sites, such as but not limited to vibration, sound, electro - mechanical
disturbance and radiation, electro- magnetic disturbance, radiation, air or water
pollution, dust, emission of odorous, toxic or noxious matter.
32
::
PART 11. COMMERCIAL
Section I. Minimum Site Area
A. Thirty Thousand (30,000) square feet
B. Exception: [111
The Planning Commission may authorize an exception to the minimum site area.
Application for any such exception shall be made at the time of the filing of a
tentative map by the applicant. In order for an exception to be granted, the Planning
Commission shall find the following facts with respect thereto:
1. That the granting of the exception will not be detrimental to the public
welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity.
2. That the development considerations and intent of this Planned Community
Development Standards are substantially met.
Section H. Permitted Uses
Group I. Professional and Business Offices.
To allow the location of commercial activities engaged in the sale of products or
services relating to and supporting the Development Plan, provided that such
activities are confined within a building or buildings.
A. Professional Offices
1. Accountants
2. Attorneys
3. Doctors, dentists, optometrists, oculists, chiropractors and others licensed by
the State of California to practice the healing arts.
4. Engineers, architects, surveyors and planners.
5. Any other general professional offices. [30]
B. Business Offices
1. Advertising agencies
2. Banks
3. Economic consultants
4. Employment agencies
5. Escrow offices
6. Insurance agencies
7. Laboratories:
a. Dental
b. Medical
c. X -Ray
d. Biochemical
33
NO
e. Film, wholesale only
f. Optometrical
8. Stock Brokers
9. Studios for interior decorators, photographers, artists and draftsmen.
10. Telephone answering services
11. Tourist information and travel agencies and ticket reservation services but
not to include any airline terminal services or facilities for the transport of
passengers, baggage or freight. [2]
12. Business and trade schools subject to the approval of a Director's Use Permit
[29]
13. Any other general business offices. [3 1]
* & ** 14. Remedial driving instruction and counseling facility, subject to a use permit
in each case. [28.2, 35]
*This use shall be limited to Professional and Business Offices Site 9 only. [28.2, 35]
* *That all uses, including remedial driving instruction /counseling facilities, located within
Professional and Business Offices Site 9 shall be limited to providing services to adult
clientele only, any use dedicated to serving school aged and minor children shall be
prohibited.[28.2,35]
C. SUnnOrt Commercial [2 11
1. Retail sales and services, so long as said retail sales are of a convenience
nature ancillary to the operation and use of office facilities including tobacco
stores, card shops, confectionery and newspaper stands, and other uses
which, in the opinion of the Planning Commission are of a similar nature.
Retail uses shall be located in the basement or on the first floor of a
building. Storage for such uses shall be within a building.
2. Service uses which are for building tenants and patrons, such as a car wash
and gyrnnasium/health club facilities. Car washes shall drain into the
sanitary sewer system.
3. Restaurants - outdoor restaurants and take -out restaurants - subject to
securing a use permit in each case.
34
Group H. Commercial Uses
A. Automobile Center, subject to a use permit. [28]
1. Automobile dealership selling only new cars. The sale of used cars,
automobile repair, and automobile detailing may be permitted in conjunction
with the sales of new vehicles but only accessory uses.
2. Service stations subject to the issuance of the use permit and a finding that the
use is supportive of the principal uses permitted in the Newport Place Planned
Community text.
B. Hotels and Motels, subject to a use permit.
C. State. County and Municipal Facilities [2]
D. Service Stations & Mechanical Car Wash within Service Station Site #11 subject to a
use permit. [4]
E. Retail Commercial uses such as:
Restaurants, including outdoor, drive -in or take -out restaurants shall be
permitted subject to the securing of a use permit. except as noted under "a"
and "b" below: [7]
a. Restaurants, other than outdoor, drive -in or take -out restaurants, shall
be permitted in Retail - Commercial Site 1 without a use permit
provided that the net floor area of all restaurant uses does not exceed
20% of the net floor area of the retail - commercial center.
b. Outdoor, drive -in or take -out restaurants shall be designed and
located so as to be an integral element of the retail - commercial center
and shall not be permitted as a free - standing independent use in any
case.
2. Barber shop and beauty parlor
3. Book and stationery store
4. Blueprinting and photostatics
5. Camera shop
6. Delicatessen store
7. Florist
8. Shoe store or repair shop
9. Tailor
10. Tobacco store
11. Office equipment retail and repair
12. Pharmacies
35
91
13. Tourist information and travel agencies and ticket reservation services, but
not to include any airline terminal services or facilities for the transport of
passengers, baggage or freight
14. Instructional dance facility for adults and related retail sales, subject to a
use permit (28.1)
15. Other uses similar to the above list
F. General Commercial [8, 9, 23, 26, 28.3, 36]
1. New car dealership, subject to a use permit, including ancillary uses listed
under Part II, Section 11, Group 11, A.
2. Service stations subject to a use permit.
3. Restaurants, including outdoor, drive -in or take -out restaurants, shall be
subject to a use permit. Restaurant uses are permitted within General
Commercial Sites 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 not permitted within General Commercial
Site 4.
a. Restaurants, consisting 1,000 square feet of take -out service -
limited use, and 4,000 square feet of food service use shall be permitted
in General Commercial Site 8 in accordance to the Municipal Code, for
General Commercial District Site 8. [361.
4. Hobby, Arts and Crafts, including:
a.
Sporting goods store
b.
Camera store
C.
Art gallery
d.
Craft store
e.
Pet store
f.
Bicycle store
g.
Other uses of similar nature
5. Book and Office Support Stores, including:
a.
Book store
b.
Office supplies
C.
Other uses of similar nature
6. Retail
stores and professional service establishments, including:
a.
Pharmacies
b.
Specialty food
C.
Fabric shops
d.
Jewelry shops
e.
Furrier
f.
Formal Wear
g.
Barber and hair styling
h.
Clothing store
i.
Liquor store
j.
Tourist information and travel agencies and ticket reservation
services, but not to include any airline terminal services or facilities
for the transport of passengers, baggage or freight.
k.
Other uses of similar nature
36
92
7. Home and Office Furnishings, including:
a. Home furniture store
b. Office furniture store
C. Interior decorators
d. Home appliances
e. Antique store
f. Other uses of similar nature
8. Athletic Clubs, including:
a. Spa
b. Health club
C. Recreation facility
d. Other uses of similar nature
9. Home improvement stores, including:
a. Hardware store
b. Paint store
C. Wallcovering store
d. Other uses of similar nature
10. Retail nursery subject to a use permit
11. Institutional, instructional and educational uses, subject to a use permit in
each case. (28.3)
*12. Professional and Business Offices - see Part II, Section II, Group I for
permitted uses.
*Office uses are permitted within General Commercial Sites 3, 4, 5, and 6, and 8 and not
permitted within General Commercial Sites I and 2. [9, 26, 28.3, 31, 36]
37
93
Section III. General Development Standards for Commerce
Maximum building areas and building heights shall be noted in the Statistical
Analysis, Part H.A and Part II.B.
A. Setbacks
All setbacks shall be measured from the property line. For the purpose of this
ordinance, a street side property line is that line created by the ultimate right -of -way
line of the frontage street.
1. Front Yard Setback
Thirty (30) feet minimum; except that unsupported roofs or sunscreens may
project six (6) feet into the setback area.
Hotel/Motel uses: Seventeen (17) feet and six (6) inches minimum,
provided that the average setback for all buildings along the linear street
frontage is thirty (30) feet. [31]
2. Side Yard
Side yard setbacks will be required only when any one of the following
conditions exist:
a. Corner lot: Thirty (30) feet (street side setback only), except that
unsupported roofs and sunscreens may project three (3) feet into
setback area.
Hotel/Motel uses: Fourteen (14) feet and six (6) inches minimum,
provided that the average setback for all buildings along the linear
street frontage is twenty-seven (27) feet. [31 ]
b. Where property abuts other than commercially zoned property, a ten
(10) foot setback is required. Unsupported roofs and sunscreens may
project three (3) feet into the setback area.
Hotel/Motel uses: Ten (10) feet minimum setback for all buildings
along the property line. [31]
3. Rear Yard
None required except on a through -lot in which case the required front yard
setback shall be observed.
KI
94
B. Sins
1. Sign Area: General Standard
Building identification shall be limited to a single (1) entity. Building
identification signs shall have an area not to exceed 1 1/2 square feet of
surface for each one (1) foot of lineal frontage of building. However, no
sign shall exceed two hundred (200) square feet per face. Building identi-
fication signs shall be limited to two (2) facades.
2. Pole Sign:
One (1) identification pole sign site will be allowed for the following
commercial businesses:
a. Restaurant
b. Cocktail lounge and/or bar
C. Motel and hotel
If a pole sign is utilized, it shall be in lieu of other identifications signs
allowed by ordinance. Pole signs shall be limited to maximum height of
twenty (20) feet and a maximum area of fifty (50) square feet per face,
double faced.
3. Wall Sign:
In no event shall an identification sign placed on a wall comprise more than
ten (10) percent of the area of the elevation upon which the sign is located.
Said signs shall be fixture signs. Signs painted directly on the surface of the
wall shall not be permitted.
4. Ground Sign:
An identification ground sign shall not exceed four (4) feet above grade in
vertical height. Also, ground signs in excess on one - hundred and fifty (150)
square feet in area (single face) shall not be erected in the first twenty (20)
feet, as measured from the property line, of any street side setback.
However, the above standards shall not apply to the Community Directional
Sign and Special Purpose Sign.
5. Multi -Tenant Directory Sign:
One (1) directory sign listing only the name of the firms or businesses on a
site shall be allowed. Said sign shall be limited to a maximum height of
twenty (20) feet. Panels identifying each individual story shall be no longer
than one (1) foot in width and five (5) feet in length.
39
95
6. Special Purpose Sign:
Subject to the standards established in Part I, Section III, Item DA
7. Construction Sign:
Subject to the standards established in Part I, Section III, Item D.6.
8. Future Tenant Identification:
Subject to the standards established in Part I, Section III, Item D.7.
9. Community Direction and/or Identification Sign:
Subject to the standards established in Part I, Section III, Item C.B.
C. Sign Standards
Except as noted above, the same sign standards as outlined in Sub - Section D,
Section III, Part I of this ordinance, shall prevail for developments in this area.
D. Parkins
1. Medical and Dental
Five (5) spaces for each doctor or one (1) space for each 200 square feet of
gross floor area whichever is greater.
2. Professional Offices
One (1) space for each 225 square feet of net floor area. The parking
requirement may be lowered to one (1) space for each 250 square feet of net
floor area upon review and approval of the modification committee.
Exceptions: [35]
The following parking requirements are applicable to Professional and
Business Office Site No. 9.
• One (1) space for each 281 square feet of net floor area.
• Changes to the on -site parking plans shall be reviewed by the Planning
Director.
3. Lodge, Halls, Private Clubs, Union Headquarters
One (1) space for each 75 square feet of gross floor area plus one (1) space
for each 250 square feet of gross office floor area.
,e
M
4. Restaurants, Outdoor, Drive -In and Take -Out Restaurants. [7]
Restaurant parking shall be in accordance with Section 20.'� �(d)
20.40.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, except as noted under "b"
and "a" below. [361
b. Restaurants other than outdoor, drive -in or take -out restaurants
within Retail - Commercial Sites 1 and 2 shall provide one (1) space
for each 200 square feet of net floor area and one (1) loading space
for each 10,000 square feet of gross floor area; to the extent that the
net floor area of all restaurants does not exceed 20% of the net floor
area of the retail - commercial center. In the event that any restaurant
causes the total of all restaurant uses in the retail - commercial center
to exceed 20% limitation noted above, that entire restaurant and any
subsequent restaurants shall provide parking as noted under "a"
above.
C. Parking for ,,..t,,,.,._ driA...:.. and take ,...t _ ,...t.. . ha4l be
Provided in with sp'otiR4; ?0 �I 060 of the NeMTOFt
restaurants (take -out service - limited use,
food service with/without alcohol, with /without late hour) within
General Commercial Site 8 shall be in accordance with the
Newport Beach Municipal Code [361.
5. Retail Commercial
One (1) space for each 200 square feet of net floor area. One (1) loading
space for each 10,000 square feet of gross floor area.
6. Hotels and Motels [6]
Parking for Hotel and Motel guestrooms; all related restaurants, cocktail
lounges, banquet and meeting rooms, retail shops; and all employees shall be
based on a demonstrated formula to be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Commission.
The parking formula shall contain the minimum parking which would be
required for each of the separate uses evaluated independently. Any
reductions from this minimum parking requirement must be based on the
joint usage of the facilities by hotel and motel patrons. [10]
7. General Commercial [8, 9]
a. One (1) space for each 250 sq.ft. of net floor area. One (1) loading
space for each 10,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area.
b. If the development of General Commercial Site 3 or 4 is limited
solely to Professional and Business Office use, the parking shall be:
One (1) space for each 225 sq.ft. of net floor area.
41
97
The parking requirements may be lowered to one (1) space for each
250 sq.ft. of net floor area upon review and approval of the
modifications committee.
C. Specific parking requirements shall be developed for uses such as
fumiture stores, athletic clubs, theaters, bowling alleys, home
improvement stores, retail nurseries or tire stores based upon
functions and occupancies within these uses. Parking shall be in
conformance to existing City of Newport Beach requirements for
said occupancies, or at a demonstrated formula agreeable to the
Director of Community Development. In the event that any use
described above is converted to another use parking requirements for
the new use shall be subject to review by the Director of Community
Development.
d. For restaurant parking see Part II, Section III, DA
E. Landscapin¢
Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans, prepared by a landscaping architect,
licensed landscaping contractor or architect shall be submitted to and approved by
the Planning Director prior to issuing of Building Permits and installed prior to issue
of Certificate of Use and Occupancy.
All landscaping referred to in this section shall be maintained in a neat and orderly
fashion.
1. Front Yard Setback Area
a. General Statement
Landscaping in these areas shall consist of an effective combination
of street trees, trees, ground cover and shrubbery.
C. Special Landscaped Street
The entire area between the curb and the building setback line shall
be landscaped, except for any driveway in said area.
C. Other Streets
The entire area between the curb and a point ten (10) feet in back of
the front property line shall be landscaped except for any driveway in
said area.
2. Side Yard and Rear Yard
a. General Statement
WA
All unpaved areas not utilized for parking and storage, shall be
landscaped utilizing ground cover and/or shrub and tree materials.
b. Undeveloped Areas
Undeveloped areas proposed for future expansion shall be
maintained in a weed free condition, but need not be landscaped.
C. Screening
Areas used for parking shall be screened from view or have the view
interrupted by landscaping and/or fencing from access streets,
freeways, and adjacent properties. Plant materials used for screening
purposes shall consist of lineal or grouped masses of shrubs and/or
trees.
d. Boundary Areas
Boundary landscaping is required on all interior property lines. Said
areas shall be placed along the entire length of these property lines or
be of sufficient length to accommodate the number of required trees.
Trees, equal in number to one (1) tree per twenty -five (25) lineal feet
of each property line, shall be planted in the above defined areas in
addition to required ground cover and shrub material.
e. All landscaped areas shall be separated from adjacent vehicular areas
by a wall or curb, at least (6) inches higher that the adjacent vehicular
area.
3. Parking Areas
Trees, equal in number to one (1) per each five (5) parking stalls shall be
provided in the surface parking area (31).
F. Loading Areas
Street side loading on other than special landscaped streets, shall be allowed
providing the loading dock is set back a minimum of seventy (70) feet from
the street right -of -way line, or one hundred ten (110) feet from the street
center line, whichever is greater. Said loading area must be screened from
view from adjacent streets.
G. Storage Areas
1. All outdoor storage shall be visually screened from access streets, freeways
and adjacent property. Said screening shall form a complete opaque screen
up to a point eight (8) feet in vertical height but need not be opaque above
that point.
2. Outdoor storage shall be meant to include all company owned and operated
motor vehicles, with the exception of passenger vehicles.
3. No storage shall be permitted between a frontage street and the building line.
43
H. Refuse Collection Areas
1. All outdoor refuse collection areas shall be visually screened from access
streets, freeways and adjacent property. Said screening shall form a
complete opaque screen.
2. No refuse collection area shall be permitted between a frontage street and the
building line.
I. Telephone and Electrical Service
All "on- site" electrical lines (excluding lines in excess of 12KV) and telephone lines
shall be placed underground. Transformer or terminal equipment shall be visually
screened from view from streets and adjacent properties.
I Pedestrian Access
It is required of all developments in the commercial areas to submit a plan of
pedestrian access to the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building
permits. Said plans will detail consideration for pedestrian access to the subject
property and to adjacent properties, and shall be binding on subsequent development
of the property. The plan shall show all interior walkways and all walkways in the
public right -of -way, if such walkways are proposed or necessary.
SE.
100
FOOTNOTES
[1] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 1, dated December 13, 1971, incorporating a revised
land use plan.
[2] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 2, dated June 12, 1972, incorporating the following
changes:
a. Relocation of Fire Station site.
b. Limitation of tourist information, travel agencies and ticket reservations within Retail
Commercial sites.
C. Addition of specific restaurant density within Retail Commercial sites.
[3] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 3, dated October 24, 1972, permitting Auto Centers
as an additional use within Industrial Site 2B.
[4] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 4, dated January 8, 1973, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Provision for a Mechanical Car Wash within Service Station Site No. 1.
b. Eliminate provision for a Fire Station within Industrial Site 3A.
[5] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 5, dated July 23, 1973, incorporating the following
changes:
a. Rearrangement of Office Site 3 and Restaurant Site 2 and reapportionment of land
allotted to each.
b. Reduce allowable building area in Office Sites 1 and 2 and increase allowable building
area in Office Site 3A.
C. Increase allowable building height in Office Site 3A to 8 stories.
[6] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 6, dated June 10, 1974, establishing parking
requirements for Hotels and Motels based on a demonstrated formula.
[7] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 7, dated September 8, 1975, revising off - street
parking requirements for restaurants to conform with existing City Standards.
[8] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 8, dated February 9, 1976, permitting General
Commercial uses on Auto Center Site 1 a and 2b.
45
101
FOOTNOTES (Cont.)
[9] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 9, dated April 11, 1977, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Expand the permitted uses for General Commercial.
b. Re- designate General Commercial Site 1 -A and 2 -B to General Commercial Sites 1,
2 and 3.
C. Expand General Commercial Site 3 to include one half of Industrial Site IA.
d. Convert Industrial Site 2A to General Commercial Site 4.
e. Restrict the allowable building area and the permitted uses for General Commercial
Sites 1, 2, 3 and 4.
[10] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 10, dated May 23, 1977, incorporating the
following change:
a. Delete the provision added by Resolution No. 8261 adopted by the City Council on
June 10, 1974 from Section III, D, 6.
[11] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 11, dated April 10, 1978, incorporating the
following change:
a. Establish guidelines for an exception to the minimum site area.
[12] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 12, dated July 11, 1978, incorporating the
following change:
a. Revised the allowable building height for Parcel No. 1 of Resubdivision No. 585.
[13] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 13, dated November 27, 1978, incorporating the
following change:
a. Requirement that a Phasing Plan be approved by the Planning Commission for
seventy (70) percent of the undeveloped allowable building area existing as of
October 1, 1978.
[14] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 14, dated June 11, 1979, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Reduce the allowable building area of Industrial Site 3A.
b. Reduce the allowable building area of Commercial/Professional and Business Office
Site 1 and 2.
102
FOOTNOTES (Cont.)
[15] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 15, dated March 23, 1981, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Specification of a maximum building height of seven (7) stories on Parcel No. 2 of
Resubdivision No. 585.
[16] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 16, dated March 8, 1984 incorporating the
following change:
a. Increase of 16,154 square feet of office space in Professional and Business Offices
Site 5.
[17] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 17, dated April 23, 1984, incorporating the
following change:
a. Increase of 1,091 square feet of office space in Professional and Business Offices
Sites 1 and 2.
[18] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 18, dated June 25, 1984, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Establish a specific limit on hotel rooms in Hotel Sites IA and 1B.
[19] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 19, dated July 23, 1984, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Transfer of 4,130 square feet of allowable building area from General Commercial
Site 4 to Professional and Business Offices Site 5.
[20] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 20, dated January 12, 1987, incorporating the
following changes:
a. Add Professional and Business Offices Site 8, with 54,000 square feet allowed.
b. Delete Restaurant Site 2A, with 8,400 square feet deleted.
[21] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 21, dated March 9, 1987, incorporating the
following change:
a. Increase allowed development in Professional and Business Offices Site 5 to
241,570 square feet; allow additional support retail uses up to 294,600 square feet
total; add support commercial as permitted land use. (2 1)
NJ
103
FOOTNOTES (Cont.)
[22] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 22, dated February 4, 1988, incorporating the
following change:
a. Allow structures located within a portion of Industrial Site 3A to be constructed in
excess of the 35 -foot height limit up to a maximum of 50 feet, subject to the
approval of a use permit.
[23] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 23, dated July 6, 1989 incorporating the
following change:
a. Allow restaurant uses on General Commercial Site 1, subject to the approval of a use
permit in each case.
[24] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 24, dated June 6, 1991, incorporating the
following change:
a. Increase the allowable office development in Professional Business Offices, Site No.
5 to 257,287 square feet, and reduce the allowable retail development to 37,315
square feet.
[25] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 25, approved by the City Council on March 9,
1992, incorporating the following change:
a. Increase the allowable office development in Professional Business Offices, Site No.
5 to 268,743 square feet, and reduce the allowable retail development to 25,857
square feet.
[26] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 26, approved by the City Council on June 8,
1992, incorporating the following changes:
a. Redesignate the Sheraton Hotel Site from Hotel Site lA and 1B to Hotel Site 1 and
General Commercial Site 5.
b. Reduce the hotel room entitlement on Hotel Site 1 by 119 rooms and establish a
development entitlement of 31,362 square feet for General Commercial Site 5.
C. Establish a height limit of 50 feet within General Commercial Site 5.
d. The Requirement for a reciprocal easement to provide ingress, egress, and parking
for mutual benefit between Hotel Site 1 and General Commercial Site 5.
WOM
1i
FOOTNOTES (Cont.)
[27] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 27, approved by the City Council on September
13, 1993, incorporating the following changes:
a. Increase the allowable commercial development in General Commercial Site 3 from
48,300 square feet to 49,380 square feet.
b. Delete the provision which counts one square foot of floor area devoted to
restaurants as two square feet of permitted commercial floor area in General
Commercial Sites 2, 3, and 5.
C. Delete the provision which restricts the maximum amount of gross floor area
devoted to restaurants to 8,000 square feet each in General Commercial Sites 3 and
5.
[28] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 28, approved by the City Council on
January 22, 1996, incorporating the following changes.
a. Restricting automobile repair and detailing as an accessory use only in conjunction
with sales of new vehicles.
C. Eliminate other permitted uses.
[28.1] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 28.1, approved by the City Council on
September 9, 1996.
a. To add 'Instructional Dance Facility for Adults and Related Retail Uses' to the list of
'Retail Commercial' uses for Newport Place.
[28.2] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 28.2, approved by the City Council on March
24, 1997, incorporating the following changes:
a. Change the list of permitted uses of "Industrial Site No. 4" to allow establishment of
remedial driving instruction and counseling facility.
[28.3] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 28.3, approved by the City Council on August
11, 1997, incorporating the following changes:
a. Redesignate "Retail Commercial Site 1" (MacArthur Square) to "General
Commercial Site No. 6."
b. Redesignate "Retail Commercial Site 2" to "Retail Commercial Site 1"
[29] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 29, approved by the City Council on July 27,
1998, incorporating the following change:
a. Permit Business and Trade Schools within Profession and Business Office Site 3A,
subject to the approval of a Planning Director's Use Permit.
..
105
FOOTNOTES (Cont.)
[30] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 30, approved by the City Council on January 11,
1999, incorporated the following changes:
a. Establish the permitted Gross Floor area for Professional and Business Offices Sites
1 and 2 at 860,884 square feet.
[31] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 31, approved by the City Council on February 8,
1999, incorporating the following changes:
a. Redesignating Auto Center Site 2A to Commercial/Professional & Business
Offices Site 2A.
b. Redesignating Industrial Site 2B to Commercial/Hotel & Motel Site 2B.
C. Expand the permitted uses for Professional & Business Offices to include general
professional and general business offices.
d. Establish a height limit of 95 feet within Professional & Business Office Site 2A.
e. Establish a height limit of 60 feet within Hotel & Motel Site 2B.
f Establish a front yard setback for Hotel/Motel "uses a 17 '/z foot minimum, provided
that the average setback for all buildings along the linear street frontage is 30 feet.
g. Establish a side yard, corner lot setback for Hotel/Motel uses of a 14 1/2 foot
minimum, provided that the average setback for all buildings along the linear street
frontage is 27 feet.
It. Establish a side yard setback for Hotel/Motel uses of a ten (10) foot minimum.
Provide that landscaping in parking areas be provided in surface parking areas.
[32] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 32, approved by the City Council on April 12,
1999, incorporated the following changes:
a. Establish the permitted gross floor area for Professional and Business Offices Site 4
at 228,214 square feet.
[33] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 33, introduced at the City Council meeting on
March 26, 2002 and adopted on the 9th of April 2002:
a. Update The Industrial Statistical Analysis by allowing a 1,590 square foot
building addition at the subject property identified as 1811 Quail Street.
50
100
FOOTNOTES (Cont.)
[34] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 34,adopted on the 14th of June 2005:
a. Revising the Land Use Plan, permitted uses, and development standards of the
Newport Place Planned Community as they relate to the Newport Lexus
Dealership.
[35] Planned Community Text Amendment No. 35, adopted on September 14, 2010:
a. Re- designate Industrial Site 4 to Professional and Business Offices Site 9.
b. Change the parking requirement for office uses within Professional and Business
Offices Site No. 9 to one space per 281 square feet, which allows all of the buildings
to be occupied with office uses.
C. Add a provision that requires Planning Director review of the parking configuration
in Professional and Business Offices Site No. 9.
d. Revising the Land Use Plan, permitted uses and development standards of the
Newport Place Planned Community as they relate to the Newport Commerce 16.9
acre site bounded by Birch Street, Dove Street, Westerly Place and Quail Street.
51
107
Area Summary
Industrial
23.3 ac.
Office
81.7 ac.
Retail /General Commercial
16.5 ac.
Commercial /Restaurant
1.8 ac.
Commercial /Hotel Motel
10.1 ac.
Service Station
1.2 ac.
Total
134.6 ac.
J�
Service
Station
J� Site 1
Industrial
Site 3A
General
Commercial
Site 4
Industrial
Site 1A
Retail Hotel General Commercial
Commercial Site 1 Site 5
Site 1
General Commercial
W „ „ Site 6
Pro. & Bus.
Office Site 6
Restaurant Site 1
Pro. &Bus.
Office
Site 9 Pro. & Bus.
Office Site 7
Pro. & Bus.
Office Sites 1 & 2
DRAFT
General
Land Use Plan CoSitee3ial
Newport Place
Planned Community
PC Text Amendment No. PD2010 -007
(PA2010 -135)
4221 Dolphin- Striker Way
& o,Q�
\2e
A
0
?,9
General
Commercial
Site 2
Pro. &Bus. I \
Office ,l General Commercial
Site 5 Site 8
Pro. & Bus.
Office
Site 4
Pro. & Bus.
Office Site 8
General Commercial
Site 7
General
Commercial
Site 1
\
-y ^^ ��
9 LU Exhibit 2&1q-hf>Td
N
Attachment No. CC 5
September 22, 2011 Planning
Commission Report Package
(Pages 109 -580) is available at the City
Clerk's Office and City's website at
www.newportbeachca.gov
D `'
110
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
September 22, 2011
Agenda Item 5
SUBJECT: MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
4221 Dolphin- Striker Way
• Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PD2010-
007
• Transfer Development Rights No. TD2010 -002
• Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002
• Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026
• Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2011 -001
• Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014
• Waiver of Development Agreement
APPLICANT: Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership
PLANNER: Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner
(949) 644 -3208, rung @newportbeachca.gov
PROJECT SUMMARY
The applicant proposes a planned community development plan amendment to allow
the construction of two, single -story commercial buildings of 13,525 square feet total.
The following approvals are requested or required in order to implement the project as
proposed:
1. An amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development
Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject property from 'Restaurant Site
1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ", pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned Community
District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the Municipal Code.
2. Transfer of Development Rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units, which
equate to 3,909 square feet of specialty retail, from Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher Jones
Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and 1,620 square feet from General
Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) for a total of
5,529 square feet to the subject site, pursuant to Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of
Development Rights) of the Municipal Code.
3. Traffic Study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as the
project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
111
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 2
VICINITY MAP
Q o
JClassic
Saagar India
Restaurant
m J
Subject
e
Property
DOIPHINSTWKER
S
GENERAL PLAN
Z ONING
G n
J �
12
MU -112
srwxLn wnr
PC 11
I pp�FWNarwxfx Wxr 1111\
10
LAND USE ANOMALY & TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS EXHIBIT
AO
fir
PF
i U Receiver
cO -G
Site
Donor Site a
— ..
MU -M2
Fletcher Jones
-
z.1 2
3
i
14
R
i
15 �
i
Donor Site
CG 0.5 FAR aqs" 17
L2XUS
C 0 5FAR
RS -D eye o�s'a
8
r
C I/
CG
112
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 3
LOCATION
GENERAL PLAN
J ZONING
CURRENT USE
ON -SITE
Mixed Use Horizontal 2
pC -11, Restaurant Site 1
Restaurant (vacant)
MU -H2
PC -11, Pro. & Bus. Office
Classic Q Sports Club &
NORTH
MU -H2
Site 6
Restaurant
SOUTH
MU -H2
PC -11, Pro. & Bus. Office
Glidewell Laboratories
Site 5
PC -11, Pro. & Bus. Office
EAST
MU H2
MacArthur Blvd. & Koll Center
Site 7
WEST
MU -H2
MacArthur Blvd. & Koll
Saagar India Restaurant &
Center PC
Dolphin- Striker Way
4. Conditional Use Permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for the
use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the site,
pursuant to Chapter 20.40 (Off- Street Parking) of the Municipal Code.
5. Waiver of the requirement for a Development Agreement pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the Municipal Code.
6. Modification Permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the Newport
Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, pursuant to Section
20.52.050 of the Municipal Code.
RECOMMENDATION
1) Conduct a public hearing; and
2) Adopt Resolution No. _ (Attachment No. PC1) recommending that the City
Council:
a. Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration No. ND2011 -001 and Errata, including
the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program;
b. Find that, based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record,
including Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002, that the project complies with the
Traffic Phasing Ordinance; and
c. Approve Planned Community Text Amendment No. PD2010 -007, Transfer of
Development Rights No. TD2010 -002, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011-
026, and Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014; and
d. Waiver of the requirement for a Development Agreement
113
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 4
INTRODUCTION
Project Setting & Background
The subject property is approximately 48,221 square feet (1.11 acres) in size and
located on the west side of MacArthur Boulevard, between Martingale Way and Newport
Place Drive.
The subject property currently improved with a 7,996 square -foot commercial building
and a 78 -space surface parking lot. Additionally at 4100 Newport Place, 16 off -site
parking spaces are located on the 5th floor of the US Bank's parking structure pursuant
to a recorded off -site parking agreement.
The subject property is Parcel 1 of three parcels designated as Restaurant Site 1 in the
Newport Place Planned Community. Parcel 2 is currently improved with a 7,015 square -
foot restaurant (Saagar Fine Cuisine of India Restaurant) and a 59 -space surface
parking lot. Parcel 3 is currently improved with a 7,870 square -foot sports club and
restaurant (Classic Q Sports Club and Restaurant) and has a 74 -space surface parking
lot. The parking lots of these parcels are shared and the total combined parking spaces
is 211 (78 +59 +74) parking spaces. Vehicular access to all three parcels is from Dolphin -
Striker Way and Martingale Way. Parcels 2 and 3 are not a part of the proposed
development.
Protect Description
The applicant proposes to demolish the existing 7,996 square -foot, single -story
commercial building and to construct two, single -story commercial buildings with a total
of 13,525 square feet. Details of the project components are as follows:
Commercial Buildings
The proposed development consists of two, free - standing buildings. Building A is
approximately 4,000 square feet and would be located on the northern side of the
property. Building B is approximately 9,525 square feet and would be located along the
southernly portion of the property. Each building is single -story and has a maximum
building height of 29 feet. The buildings are a contemporary design. Building materials
are smooth troweled integral tan color plaster, simulated wood composite sidings, glass
and metal.
Approximately 5,000 square feet of Building B is allocated for food service uses. Of that,
1,000 square feet will be allocated for a fast -food service use (i.e. Subway Restaurant).
Anticipated hours of operation for the fast -food service use would be from 7:00 a.m. to
11:00 p.m., daily; and from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. for the high turn -over dining
establishments.
1-14
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 5
The remaining 8,525 square feet (4,525 square feet in Building B and the entire Building
A) will be allocated for general commercial uses such as office /delivery, computer
electronic service and cellular service stores. The hours of operation would be from 9:00
a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily.
The applicant estimates approximately 20 -30 employees to be working at the
development during any of the given shifts.
Site Improvements
A portion of the existing 78 -space parking lot will be demolished to accommodate the
proposed commercial buildings. The remaining surface parking lot will be reconfigured
to provide 59 parking spaces and new landscaping. The applicant is requesting minimal
changes to their parking layout in order to maintain existing on -site circulation with the
adjacent two restaurant parking lots. The proposed development also includes the
creation of a new vehicular access onto MacArthur Boulevard.
Analysis
General Plan
The subject property is located in Statistical Area L4 (Airport Area) and has a General
Plan designation of Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -H2 "). The MU -H2 designation
provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial
office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and
ancillary neighborhood commercial uses.
The applicant seeks no changes to the General Plan designation or development limits.
The proposed commercial development would be allowed as the proposed uses are
ancillary and supportive to the existing nearby office and light industrial developments.
The subject property has a maximum development limit of 7,996 square feet and has no
remaining buildable square footage per Anomaly No. 12 of the General Plan Land Use
Element. Anomaly No. 12 covers the entire block, and is bounded by Corinthian Way to
the north, Newport Place Drive to the south, Scott Drive and Dove Street to the east,
and MacArthur Boulevard to the west.
In order to accommodate the proposed 13,525 square -foot development (7,996 square
feet of existing entitlement plus 5,529 square feet of new development), the applicant is
requesting a transfer of development rights of 48 un -built hotel rooms from Hotel Site 2-
B, which equates to 3,909 square feet of specialty retail, and 1,620 square feet from
215
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 6
General Commercial Site 7 to the subject site. Please refer to the Transfer of
Development Rights Section of this report.
A complete consistency analysis of each of the applicable General Plan policies is
attached to the Mitigated Negative Declaration as Appendix #1 (Attachment No. PC10).
The environmental analysis concludes that the project is consistent with each of the
adopted goals and policies.
Planned Community2oning
The subject property has a zoning designation of Restaurant Site 1 of the Newport
Place (PC -11) Planned Community which allows only eating and drinking
establishments. The proposed amendment would change the zoning designation to
General Commercial Site 8, to allow general commercial uses and eating and drinking
establishments. The redlined draft planned community development plan (Attachment
No. PC3) illustrates the proposed changes.
Transfer of Development Rights
The applicant has proposed a transfer of development rights of 5,529 square feet from
two different locations in order to accommodate the proposed development. The
request includes a transfer of 48 un -built hotel units which equates to 3,909 square feet
of specialty retail presently allocated to Hotel Site 2 -B site (Fletcher Jones Vehicle
Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) by the Land Use Element. Hotel Site 2 -B has a
development limit of 33,292 square feet and 304 hotel rooms, per Anomaly No. 17 and
is currently improved with a 200 square -foot office /security building for the Fletcher
Jones vehicle storage facility.
The applicant also requested a transfer of 1,620 square feet presently allocated to
General Commercial Site 7 ( Lexus Auto Dealership at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard) by
the Land Use Element. General Commercial Site 7 is a part of Anomaly No. 19 that has
an overall development limit of 228,530 square feet for three separate properties. The
Lexus site is allocated with 141,120 square feet and has 23,384 square feet of unbuilt
floor area.
In accordance with Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights), the Planning
Commission must make the following findings for the approval of transfer of
development rights:
1. The reduced density /intensity on the donor site provides benefits to the City, for
example:
a. The provision of extraordinary open space, public view corridor(s),
increased parking, or other amenities,
b. Preservation of an historic building or property, or natural resources;
110
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 7
c. Improvement of the area's scale and development character, -
d. Reduction of local vehicle trips and traffic congestion; and
e. More efficient use of land.
2. The transfer of development rights will not result in any adverse traffic impacts
and would not result in greater intensity than development allowed without the
transfer and the proposed uses and physical improvements would not lend
themselves to conversion to higher traffic generating uses,
3. The increased development potential transferred to the receiver site will be
compatible and in scale with surrounding development and will not create abrupt
changes in scale or character; and
4. The receiver site is physically suitable for the development proposed taking into
consideration adjacent circulation patterns, protection of significant public views
and open space, and site characteristics, including any slopes, submerged
areas, and sensitive resources.
The transfer of 48 hotel rooms from Hotel Site 2 -B and 1,620 square feet from General
Commercial Site 7 would result in a reduced intensity on the donor sites, which also
would result in a reduction of local vehicle trips and traffic congestion, especially along
North Bristol Street and MacArthur Boulevard. The transfer of development rights onto
the subject property will not result in adverse traffic impacts as demonstrated in the
Traffic Study prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. The transfer and the proposed
uses of the receiver site would not lend themselves to a conversion to higher traffic
generating uses, since the subject property is currently approved for 7,996 square feet
of food service use which is being reduced to a maximum of 5,000 square feet (4,000
square feet of high turnover restaurant use and 1,000 square feet of fast food use). The
remainder of the development will be allocated for general commercial uses. The
proposed transfer would be trip neutral as any increase in the peak hour generated by
the receiver site would be deduced proportionally to the donor sites. Furthermore, the
hours of general commercial uses would be restricted not to open during the 7:00 to
9:00 morning (AM) peak hour, daily. This restriction is as a result of using the 4:00 to
6:00 afternoon (PM) peak hour trip which has a lower trip generation rate, in computing
square footage for the transfer of development rights. This rate was also used in the
traffic study and environmental analysis.
The potential increase in development transferred to the subject property will be
compatible and in scale with the surrounding development as the proposed
development will be a single story, at 29 feet in height. The subject property is
physically suitable for the new development and provides improved vehicular access off
of MacArthur Boulevard. Direct access will be available to and from MacArthur
117
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 8
Boulevard instead of the existing circuitous route from Dove Street or Corinthian Way.
Additionally, all building setbacks are being complied with and the overall development
scale is in proportion to the immediate area. Staff, therefore, believes that the findings
for the proposed transfer could be made.
As a condition of approval, a covenant or other legally binding agreement approved by
the City Attorney shall be recorded against the donor sites assuring that all of the
requirements of the transfer of development rights shall be met by the current and future
property owners. The property owners of the donor sites are in agreement with the
proposed transfer (Attachment No. PC4).
Parking Analysis
According to the Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, the
parking requirement for eating and drinking establishments is in accordance to Title 20
of the Municipal Code.
The parking requirement for general commercial uses would be one space for each 250
square feet of net floor area, according to Part II, Section III, Subsection D of the
Newport Place Planned Community Development Standards.
Using the above criteria, approximately 104 parking spaces would be required based on
the following calculations:
Land Use
Gross Square
Net Public
Parking Ratio
Parking
Feet
Area (NPA)'
Required
for Restaurant
Use
Fast -Food
1,000
N/A
1 per 50 gross
20
Service
square feet
(Subway)
Food Service
4,000
2,000
1 per 40 of NPA
50
General
8,325(8,525-
1 per 250 net
34
Commercial
200 of utility
square feet
room
Total
13,525
104
'The total area used to serve customers, including customer sales and display areas, customer seating
areas, service counters, and service queue and waiting areas; but, excluding restrooms and offices,
kitchens, storage and utility areas, and similar areas used by the employees of the establishment.
2Estimated as 50 percent of the gross square feet allocated for food service uses.
The proposed fast -food service use of 1,000 square feet would yield a parking demand
of 20 spaces, with a parking ratio of one space per 50 square feet of gross square feet.
An assumption was made with regard to parking requirements for the remaining 4,000
square feet of food service use (restaurant), given that the specific design (i.e., seating
118
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 9
type, arrangement, bar area) and operational characteristics are not known at this time.
Additionally, since parking requirements for most restaurants (except fast -food) are
based on NPA and not gross floor area, a conservative assumption of 50 percent of
gross floor area was used to determine expected NPA. Pursuant to Section 20.40.060
of the Zoning Code, Food Service uses are required to provide off - street parking within
a range of one space for each 30 to 50 square feet of NPA, depending on the physical
design, operational characteristics, and location of the establishment. It is the
applicant's intent for these restaurants to be occupied by small sit -down boutique dining
establishments, with high turnover. A parking ratio of one space per 40 square feet of
NPA, therefore would be adequate. The physical design and operational characteristics
that would lead to higher parking ratios include uses with higher occupant loads, such
as bars or restaurants with large bar areas, or the operation of live entertainment and /or
dancing.
It should be noted that each of the proposed restaurants will be required to apply for a
minor or conditional use permit, at which time the final parking requirements can be
calculated based on the specific design and operational characteristics.
Parking Strategy
The parking strategy for the proposed project is complex and includes a request to adjust
the parking requirements based on a shared parking analysis, use of a parking
management plan, and use of off -site parking for the employees. Pursuant to Sections
20.40.100.A and 20.40.110.B of the Municipal Code, a conditional use permit is required
for each of these requests. The following sections describe each of the parking related
requests. The Conditional Use Permit Findings Section summarizes whether the findings
can be supported for each of these requests.
Shared Parking Analysis
Based on the parking requirements per the Municipal Code, a total of 104 parking spaces
is required. The project includes 91 spaces (32 off -site and 59' on- site), which results in a
parking shortage of 13 spaces per the Municipal Code.
Section 20.40.110.B.2 (Joint Use of Parking Facilities) of the Municipal Code allows
required off- street parking to be reduced with the approval of a conditional use permit
where two or more distinct uses on the same site have distinct and differing peaking
parking demands. A shared parking analysis has been prepared by Kunzman Associates,
Inc., as a part of the Traffic Impact Analysis (Attachment No. PC5). The shared parking
analysis takes into account the parking demand at peak hour generated by the proposed
project, and the cumulative parking demand for the proposed project combined with the
' According to the latest site plan proposed by the applicant. The latest site plan has been revised to
provide a total of 59 parking spaces, an addition of two spaces after the Shared Parking analysis and
Parking Management Plan were completed.
119
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 10
existing parking demand for all three properties, under the existing shared parking
arrangement.
The analysis concludes on a peak hour demand, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. on Friday
afternoon, a total of 99 spaces are required for the proposed project, which results in a
parking shortage of 8 spaces.
Under the cumulative parking demand analysis for the
existing parking demand for the existing restaurants
Classic Q Sports Club and Restaurant), a total of 22:
the peak hour demand, from 12:30 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. o
pool with the proposed project is 224 parking spaces
for Saagar, and 74 spaces for Classic Q) which result:
by peak demand.
proposed project combined with the
( Saagar Fine Cuisine of India and
parking spaces are needed during
i Friday afternoon. The total parking
(91 spaces for Parcel 1, 59 spaces
in a parking shortage of one space
A parking management plan has been prepared in compliance with Section 20.40.110.C,
in order to mitigate impacts associated with a reduction in the number of required parking
spaces. As a condition of approval, the proposed development would be restricted 5,000
square feet of food service uses. Of that, 1,000 square feet would be allocated for a fast -
food service use. The remaining 8,525 square feet would be allocated for general
commercial uses as allowed for General Commercial Sites per the Newport Place Planned
Community Development Plan. Please see Conditional Use Permit Findings Section
below for a discussion of the required findings for approval.
Parking Management Plan
A parking management plan has been prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. to
illustrate and explain in detail how the on -site and off -site parking spaces will be
managed (Attachment No. PC6). In general, the plan indicates the following:
• The subject property has a high pedestrian potential as it is within a convenient
pedestrian walking distance to and from the nearby businesses (1,000 feet is
considered to be a convenient pedestrian walking distance). Because of the high
pedestrian accessibility, the parking demand is expected to be less than required
by the Municipal Code.
Parking spillover from the adjacent businesses is a significant factor in the
existing parking conditions of the subject property and because of the high
parking spillover that exists during the time of the parking survey; the parking
demand is believed to be overstated by approximately 15 -20 vehicles during the
projected peak period.
• The 32 off -site parking spaces should be used for employee parking.
120
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 11
• The installation and enforcement of parking regulation signs, such as "Customer
Only ", to prevent spillover from adjacent properties. Parking regulation such as
tow -away should be enforced to be effective.
In the event that the parking supply is deficient, the parking management plan also
provides alternatives that could be implemented such as encouraging employees of
Saagar Fine Cuisine of India and Classic Q Restaurants to park at the off -site parking
location; roping off an area of the shared parking lot for tandem parking during the peak
parking periods; and providing a complimentary valet parking during peak parking
periods. The latter two would require consideration and approval from the Traffic
Engineer.
The parking management plan has been reviewed and approved by the City's Traffic
Engineer. Please see Conditional Use Permit Findings Section below for a discussion of
the required findings for approval.
Off -Site Parking for Employees
As mentioned above, the subject property currently has a 16 -space off -site recorded
parking agreement with the adjacent property located at 4100 Newport Place. These off -
site spaces are located on the 5th floor of the US Bank's parking structure (Attachment
No. PC7). The applicant has entered into a separate parking agreement for an
additional 16 spaces at the same property, for a total of 32 spaces (Attachment No.
PC8). These spaces will be used solely by the employees of the project and not by
customers. The bank parking structure currently has approximately 99 surplus parking
spaces that are available for lease. Pursuant to Section 20.40.100 of the Municipal
Code, approval of a conditional use permit is required for a parking facility that is not
located on the same site it is intended to serve. In addition to the standard conditional
use permit findings discussed Conditional Use Permit Findings section of this report, the
Planning Commission must also make each of the following findings:
1. The parking facility is located within a convenient distance to the use it is intended to
serve;
2. On- street parking is not being counted towards meeting parking requirements;
3. Use of the parking facility will not create undue traffic hazards or impacts in the
surrounding area; and
4. The parking facility will be permanently available, marked, and maintained for the use it
is intended to serve.
The US Bank's parking structure is located approximately 120 feet southwest of the
property. It would take an employee approximately less than a minute to walk from the
off -site parking structure according to The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
121
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 12
(MUTCD) which suggests four feet per second as a normal walking speed. Given the
location of the parking spaces on the fifth floor of the parking structure, it would take an
additional 3 to 4 minutes of elevator time, for a total of less than 5 minutes. This is
considered a convenient distance for employee parking.
The use of the parking lot is not expected to create undue traffic hazards since the
proposed project and off -site parking lot are located next to one another. This allows
employees to walk across the subject property's parking lot, through a pedestrian
walkway to the elevator of the parking structure, without crossing any street
intersections. The parking structure is accessed through a keycard system and the
applicant has agreed to provide their employees with the necessary keycards. The off-
site parking spaces will be made available for the use by employees of the project on a
daily basis, with no restriction on the hours of use.
According to the executed parking authorization and license agreement for the
additional 16 spaces, the agreement will expire one year subsequent to the
commencement date (the date in which the applicant receives a certificate of occupancy
for the proposed development) and is subject to a month -to -month basis after the initial
one -year period. It also states that the agreement will be void if the applicant does not
secure the certificate of occupancy by June 1, 2012. If the agreement is not renewed,
the applicant will be required to notify the Community Development Director who will
establish a reasonable time for substitute parking to be provided or reduce the size of
the tenant spaces or change the tenant mix (i.e., less restaurant) in proportion to the
parking spaces lost, in accordance to Section 20.40.100.D (Loss of Off -Site Parking) of
the Municipal Code.
Conditional Use Permit Findings — Parking Structure, Parking Adjustments,
Parking Management Plan, and Off -Site Parking
Pursuant to Sections 20.40.070.6.3, 20.40.110.6.2, and 20.40.100 of the Zoning Code,
a conditional use permit is required to modify the off - street parking requirements and to
establish a parking management plan, and to allow for the use of off -site parking.
Pursuant to Section 20.52.020.E of the Zoning Code, the Planning Commission must
make the following findings in order to approve a conditional use permit:
1. The use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan;
2. The use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other
applicable provisions of this Zoning Code and the Municipal Code;
3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the use are compatible with
the allowed uses in the vicinity;
4. The site is physically suitable in terms of design, location, shape, size, operating
characteristics, and the provision of public and emergency vehicle (e.g., fire and
medical) access and public services and utilities; and
122
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 13
5. Operation of the use at the location proposed would not be detrimental to the
harmonious and orderly growth of the City, or endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise
constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare
of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use.
The proposed project has a parking shortage of 13 spaces per the Municipal Code; 8
spaces by peak demand under a shared parking scenario within the project site or one
space by peak demand under a shared parking scenario with the adjoining restaurant
sites.
The proposed parking waiver is for the 13 -space parking shortage. A parking
management plan has been prepared to mitigate impacts associated with the reduction
of required parking spaces. This plan has been reviewed and approved by the City's
Traffic Engineer. The adjustment in parking requirements is justified as the shared
parking analysis indicated that not all uses within the project will require the full
allotment of parking spaces at the same time. Furthermore, when peak demand for
parking within the shared lot exists, the parking management plan requires all
employees to park off -site so use of the parking lot for patrons is maximized. The Traffic
Engineer and Fire Department have reviewed the parking lot design including the
proposed vehicle access onto MacArthur Boulevard and have determined that the
parking lot design and new drive approach will function safely and will not prevent
emergency vehicle access.
With regard to the off -site parking, the location of the off -site parking is convenient for
the use of employee parking. It is not anticipated that the use of the off -site parking lot
would create an undue traffic hazard. Since the off -site parking will be used by
employees only, typical noise disturbances associated with restaurant patrons loitering
in parking lots is not expected.
Traffic Study - Traffic Phasing Ordinance
Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance, or TPO) of the Municipal Code requires that
a traffic study be prepared and findings be made prior to issuance of building permits if
a proposed project will generate in excess of 300 average daily trips (ADT). For the
purposes of preparing the traffic analysis for this project, the 13,525- square -foot
commercial development was assumed to include 1,000 square feet of fast -food use,
4,000 square feet of high turn -over food uses, and 8,525 square feet of general
commercial uses. Combined, this land use mix is forecast to generate a net increase of
942 trips per day, including 67 A.M. peak hour trips and 55 P.M. peak hour trips.
Pursuant to Section 15.04.030.A, the Planning Commission must make the following
findings in order to approve the project:
12S
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 14
1. That a traffic study for the project has been prepared in compliance with this chapter and
Appendix A.
2. That, based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including the
traffic study, one of the findings for approval in subsection (8) can be made:
15.40.030.8.1 Construction of the project will be completed within 60 months of
project approval; and
15.40.030.8.1(a) The project will neither cause nor make an unsatisfactory level of
traffic service at any impacted intersection.
3. That the project proponent has agreed to make or fund the improvements, or make the
contributions, that are necessary to make the findings for approval and to comply with all
conditions of approval.
A traffic study has been prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. under the supervision of
the City Traffic Engineer pursuant to the TPO and its implementing guidelines
(Attachment No. PC5).
A total of 12 primary intersections in the City were evaluated. The traffic study indicates
that the project will increase traffic on 4 of the 12 study intersections by one percent
(1 %) or more during peak hour periods one year after the completion of the project and,
therefore, these four intersections required further Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)
analysis. Utilizing the ICU analysis specified by the TPO, the traffic study determined
that the four primary intersections identified will continue to operate at satisfactory levels
of service as defined by the Traffic Phasing Ordinance, and no mitigation is required.
Since implementation of the proposed project will neither cause nor make worse an
unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection within the City,
no improvements or mitigation are necessary. Therefore, staff recommends that the
Planning Commission find that the traffic study has been prepared in compliance with
the TPO.
Development Agreement
Chapter 15.45 provides that development agreements shall be required in conjunction
with City approval of a project that requires a Zoning Code amendment or other
legislative act, and includes new non - residential development in Statistical Area L4
(Airport Area). The proposed project meets these parameters.
The development agreement provides a developer a vested right to proceed and
complete a project without the uncertainty of future changes in policies or regulations.
This factor is important with larger or long -term projects. A development agreement also
allows the City greater latitude to advance local planning policies and it provides
��i4r
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 15
flexibility in addressing project - related impacts that may occur in the future or those that
might occur across jurisdiction boundaries.
The applicant requests a waiver of the requirement for a development agreement
pursuant to the provisions of Section 15.45.020.0 of the Municipal Code (Attachment
No. PC9). This section provides that the City Council may waive the requirement for a
development agreement, except for one required by General Plan Policy, if it finds one
of the following:
• The legislative act is of a minor nature; or
• The project provides significant public benefits to the City; or
• The nature of the project is such that neither the City nor the developer would
benefit from a development agreement.
The applicant has provided factors in support of each of the above findings that could
justify a waiver of the requirement for a development agreement.
Is the project a "minor legislative act ?"
The project is minor in nature because it consists of a transfer of 48 un -built hotel units
from Hotel Site 2 -B and 1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 in the
Newport Place Planned Community to be used as an increase of 5,525 in the square
footage to newly created Commercial Site 8. The transfer of development rights onto
the receiver site (the subject property) will not result in adverse traffic impacts. The
donor sites and the receiver site are located within the same Land Use Statistical Area
L4. The proposed transfer would be trip neutral as any increase in the peak hour
generated by the receiver site would be deduced proportionally from the donor sites.
Does the project `provide significant public benefits to the City ?"
The project would provide short-term employment opportunities in construction and
long -term employment opportunities for approximately 20 -30 employees on site.
Further, vendors will be hired to maintain the property and landscaping. Approval of the
project would help to maintain the City's jobs -to- housing balance.
The project would generate additional sales and property tax for the City.
The project would accommodate the patrons that work in close proximity to the site who
can walk to eat and shop and thereby not burden the road system. Further, the ingress
and egress is vastly superior to the original project and will decrease vehicle miles
traveled by lost patrons and vehicular confusion in the area.
125
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 16
The project would be adequately served by existing public facilities, infrastructure and
services.
Under what circumstances would neither the City nor the developer benefit from
a development agreement due to the `nature of the project ?"
This finding can be made given the nature of the project in that it is small, no significant
environmental impacts would be created, and adequate infrastructure presently exists.
Based on the preceding, staff believes neither the City nor the development would
benefit from a development agreement due the nature of the project.
Modification Permit
In accordance with Section 20.52.050 (Modification Permits), the Planning Commission
must also make the following findings for approval of a modification permit for deviations
to the landscape development standards:
1. The requested modification will be compatible with existing development in the
neighborhood;
2. The granting of the modification is necessary due to the unique physical
characteristic(s) of the property and /or structure, and /or characteristics of the
use;
3. The granting of the modification is necessary due to practical difficulties
associated with the property and that the strict application of the Zoning Code
results in physical hardships that are inconsistent with the purpose and intent of
the Zoning Code;
4. There are no alternatives to the Modification Permit that could provide similar
benefits to the applicant with less potential detriment to surrounding owners and
occupants, the neighborhood, or to the general public; and
5. The granting of the modification would not be detrimental to public health, safety,
or welfare to the occupants of the property, nearby properties, the neighborhood,
or the City, or result in a change in density or intensity that would be inconsistent
with the provisions of this Zoning Code.
A modification permit is requested to deviate from the provision of one tree per each 25
linear feet along the south property line. Due to the lot configuration, Building B is
located along the southern property line. The required secondary exits along the back
side of this building prevent the placement of required landscaping. The proposed
landscaping to be provided at the project site will be compatible with the adjacent
properties and surrounding office and light industrial developments. Ground cover,
120
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 17
shrubs, and trees will be provided to enhance the aesthetics of the proposed
development and seamlessly connect the property boundaries with adjoining sites.
Sufficient landscaping consisting of ground cover, shrubs, and trees are being proposed
and the strict application of the Planning Community Development Standards results in
physical hardships to the proposed development in terms of site design and building
placement. The provision of the required trees per the landscape development
standards of PC -11 (Newport Place Planned Community) would result in a much
narrower and less desirable building size and shape and would also reduce the length
of the parking stalls and prevent the drive aisle to align with the driveway approaches.
Staff, therefore, believes the findings for approval of the requested modification permit
can be made.
Airport Land Use Commission
The project site is within the Airport Environs Land Use Plan ( AELUP) Airport Planning
Area. Projects that are located within the AELUP Airport Planning Area and that require
a Zoning Code amendment are referred to the Orange County Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC) for a determination of consistency with AELUP prior to the
adoption by the City. This process will be done in between the Planning Commission
and City Council hearings.
Environmental Review
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared by planning staff, in
accordance with the implementing guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City Council Policy K -3. The MND is attached
as Attachment PC10. A copy of the MND was also made available on the City's website,
at each Newport Beach Public Library, and at the Community Development Department at
City Hall.
The MND does not identify any component of the project that would result in a "potentially
significant impact" on the environment per CEQA guidelines. However, the document does
identify components of the project that would result in effects that are "less than significant
with mitigation incorporated" with regard to the following three environmental categories:
Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, and Noise. Twelve (12) mitigation measures are
identified in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, which is attached as Exhibit
A of Attachment No. PC1.
The MND was made available for public review for a 20 -day comment period from July 15
to August 3, 2011. Staff has received comment letters from the California Cultural
Resource Preservation Alliance, Airport Land Use Commission (Attachment No. PC11),
and City of Irvine.
127
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 18
The California Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance has the following comments: 1)
whether the donor site (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility) is a part of the
environmental analysis; 2) if a literature search of any recorded archaeological sites
located at or near subject site has been conducted; and 3) whether adequate monitoring
and provisions for cessation of work have been included should cultural remains be
encountered. There would be no construction on the donor site as the transfer of
development rights involves in the transfer of un -built hotel units and Section V.b of
Cultural Resources (page 41) discussed the subject property's existing lack of any
unknown archeological resources present and Mitigation Measure 5.1 has been
included to ensure compliance with state historical guidelines.
The Airport Land Use Commission commented on the proposed building height as
compared with the Notification Surface Height, whether the project is within the
Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces for John Wayne Airport, whether the project would
include heliports, and the need for a determination of consistency with AELUP prior to
the adoption by the City.
A clarification to the MND is necessary in order to address whether the proposed project
penetrates the Notification Surface Height and /or the Obstruction Imaginary Surface.
The corrected Notification Surface Height at the subject property is 86 feet above mean
sea level, not 206 feet above mean sea level as stated in the MND. The proposed
building height is an approximately 79 feet above mean sea level (50 feet at the subject
property + 29 feet of building height) and is therefore, below the Notification Surface
Height by 7 feet.
The Obstruction Imaginary Surface height at the subject property is at 116 feet above
mean sea level. The proposed development is at 79 feet at the top of the proposed
building and is therefore, below the Obstruction Imaginary Surface height. In both
cases, the proposed project does not penetrate the Notification Surface Height and /or
the Obstruction Imaginary Surface criteria. The clarification does not alter nor change
the outcome of the environmental analysis as the project does not penetrate the
Notification Surface Height of 86 feet above mean sea level and the Obstruction
Imaginary Surface for JWA of 116 feet above mean sea level.
City of Irvine recommended a built -out traffic analysis be prepared for 4 intersections
that lie partially within the City of Irvine limits to determine if impacts /mitigations result
from the project. The City Traffic Engineer considered the recommendation and
determined such analysis is not required as the project does not include a general plan
amendment request (i.e., to increase development intensity beyond what is being
allowed within the Airport Area Statistical Area); and the Transfer of Development Right
request would be a trip neutral as any increase in the peak hour traffic generated by the
receiver site would be reduced proportionally by the donor sites.
122
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 19
Subsequent to the circulation of the MND, the applicant informed staff that Fletcher
Jones Vehicle Storage Facility property could only honor the transfer of 48 un -built hotel
units and the remaining needed square footage of 1,620 will be transferred from the
Lexus Dealership property. The added donor property for the transfer of development
rights will not result either in the creation of any new impacts or more severe impacts
than those identified and described in the MND as the Lexus Dealership is located
within the same Land Use Statistical Area L4, and there would be no increase in peak
hour trips. Therefore, the analysis presented in the MND remains adequate and
recirculation of the document is not required.
An Errata to the MND (Attachment No. PC12) has been prepared to address the above -
mentioned changes. The Errata also includes changes to the Appendix I as to the
references made regarding a general plan amendment request for the increase of the
development limits for the subject property. A general plan amendment is not required
as the application includes a transfer of development rights to allow for the increase of
the development limits for the subject site.
Summary
The proposed project implements the City's goal of redeveloping underperforming
properties, and will redevelop and improve the property with a mixture of food uses and
general commercial uses. The subject property would be limited to a total of 13,525
square feet of development, under a new zoning designation of General Commercial
Site 8. The project complies with the development standards prescribed for General
Commercial developments, with the exceptions of parking and landscaping
requirements. The proposed transfer of development rights is in accordance to the
Municipal Code.
The parking strategy for the project which requires an adjustment to the parking
standards based on a shared parking arrangement with the adjacent properties and off -
site parking arrangement to function is less than ideal, but within a reasonable solution.
The traffic study prepared in compliance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance concluded
that the implementation of the proposed project will not require any improvements or
mitigation as it will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic
service at any impacted primary intersection within the City.
Staff believes the modification permit request can be supported due to the existing lot
configuration and lay out of the proposed buildings and findings for approval can be
made.
Alternatives
Staff believes the findings for approval can be made and the facts in support of the
required findings are presented in the draft resolution (Attachment No. PC1). The following
129
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 20
alternatives are available to the Planning Commission should they feel the facts are not in
evidence of support for the project application:
1. The Planning Commission may suggest specific operational changes and /or
reduction of square footage of the proposed development that are necessary to
alleviate any concerns. If any additional requested changes are substantial, the
item could be continued to a future meeting. Should the Planning Commission
choose to do so, staff will return with a revised resolution incorporating new
findings and /or conditions.
2. If the Planning Commission believes that there are insufficient facts to support
the findings for approval, the Planning Commission should deny the application
and provide facts in support of denial to be included in the attached draft
resolution for denial (Attachment No. PC 2).
Public Notice
Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to property owners within
300 feet of the property (excluding roads and waterways) and posted at the site a
minimum of 10 days in advance of this hearing consistent with the Municipal Code. The
environmental assessment process has also been noticed consistent with the California
Environmental Quality Act. The Notice of Intent (NOI) to adopt the MND was mailed to
property owners within 300 feet of the property (excluding roads and waterways), and
posted at the site and at City Hall. Finally, the item appeared upon the agenda for this
meeting, which was posted at City Hall and on the city website.
Prepared by: Submitted by:
bA alinh Ung, Associa a fanner Gregg Rami ez, Acting Planner
I Planner anager
ATTACHMENTS ��
PC 4 Letters of Transfer of Development Rights
PC 5 Traffic Impact Analysis (& Shared Parking Analysis) by Kunzman Associates,
Inc.'
1-1 1 g 11-49mageR48M Pie by e.,
PC 7 Reciprocal Parking and Maintenance Agreement for Existing Off -Site Parking
PC 9 Waiver of Development Agreement
P65 414 GOM11448PA
ISO
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
September 22, 2011
Page 21
PG 42 EFF@19 to the Wil;
PC 13 Project plans
Note: 'These attachments are not included in the staff report package due to their size
and bulk. They are available at the City Hall in the offices of the Planning Division and
online at: http:// www .newportbeachea.gov /index.aspx ?pane =1325.
Tmpll: 11/23109
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAs - 2010 \PA2010 - 135 \PC \Staff_Report.docx
131
1S2
Attachment No. PC 13
Project Plans
571-
572
View Along MacArthur Boulevard
Key Plan
AM
7;m
Location Map r msok
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin Striker Way Newport Beach, CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
5 T 0 U T E
_4._OWi 7'1RRQl
I
I III ► I
3
x
PARKING STRUCTURE $
116 Cars I
for e- —J E ISTINGButmiNG
rulonaeock9w. \ 30'YC - ro15508
8-06 § 7 s
171°508
T$ j
tl 131DMR § ww 360
'0 9E °EMO�ED
1965508 �$
605. -- -- - - - - --
B.a,
1160508
`�1 ~50'e&Aer lminl New lCPiur
\V'IJ.,vIJ Ground Level on Site sqn ftrrzlolt
T I
0' ]0' AO' SC' W 106 IIN
faewg 0e�be�g:o ee rtme.ee
6Dlp tl
Farsurq BU�H�ng
PrPOerlt•Lrb 'rg ,e
31.36.SO�
5
Ir10fOp01I
�ra�
I I
I
I I10F�3s1��91r
Fa." B.'"
<,INN
1are-
- v
Pro?crt/
'
x
u.e
PbIPI W) 1515
ly Cm:
^�
Fem UUI 6gPP
L21 I.°t!fr110Q
o�
Topl MCa
l]RS p
Sitb g
WCrW°YZ iAY-
1965508 �$
605. -- -- - - - - --
B.a,
1160508
`�1 ~50'e&Aer lminl New lCPiur
\V'IJ.,vIJ Ground Level on Site sqn ftrrzlolt
T I
0' ]0' AO' SC' W 106 IIN
PARCH 7
I is �6$
IT�I
' J�13 I ft
.�M T §� �.
.__ lila�lllj
TA&1LATgN SUh1AARY
Pskip
vrM vre 9Jbq ARe PryNe.6
ml tv.f
faewg 0e�be�g:o ee rtme.ee
6Dlp tl
Farsurq BU�H�ng
PrPOerlt•Lrb 'rg ,e
31.36.SO�
Faaluig P+ry^910rvS1e1
Ir10fOp01I
�ra�
I I
I
I I10F�3s1��91r
Fa." B.'"
<,INN
PARCH 7
I is �6$
IT�I
' J�13 I ft
.�M T §� �.
.__ lila�lllj
TA&1LATgN SUh1AARY
Pskip
vrM vre 9Jbq ARe PryNe.6
ml tv.f
Jill
I III
PIOPe.N ur —
9�l
to I
PARCELS
a 10550 R
Irora PPr11
10__ I
a 3j1J I E%17TING BUILDING
Ir Ir eooawR
I„
f
I SI
V
nNnaegon urea sn.MlcarvM..nvslmeFo-110a_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
8a
PwlC31P.MpIPI'e.AYd MPKt/'�6w II .. - PPIAMGPwIbn
s1PPeorta sloaasaa Pne smmsaa
P 2(bi�3t.16.1
faewg 0e�be�g:o ee rtme.ee
6Dlp tl
Farsurq BU�H�ng
1P16
Pmo ePm.y.
Faaluig P+ry^910rvS1e1
M .vz
PW
Pm A
mo
Fa." B.'"
<,INN
L � pw" IOi+Ste)
PmB
9527
MSIe .l3[S.e el
PbIPI W) 1515
ly Cm:
.M Ong a0n.:bP agca P✓.Nt
Fem UUI 6gPP
1N ra.I
Topl MCa
l]RS p
WCrW°YZ iAY-
_
i
1' I I I I I
_
I fiNYg P.M1agbYmglf4U
� Il� aWor r.mor.0
]! cr
IPA
M
rk
Faalmg ONSge Perkog
U* Mg
16
He�OrtSUe
16
TO y" (Nk, g Oe3ke1
91 cvc
Jill
I III
PIOPe.N ur —
9�l
to I
PARCELS
a 10550 R
Irora PPr11
10__ I
a 3j1J I E%17TING BUILDING
Ir Ir eooawR
I„
f
I SI
V
nNnaegon urea sn.MlcarvM..nvslmeFo-110a_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
8a
PwlC31P.MpIPI'e.AYd MPKt/'�6w II .. - PPIAMGPwIbn
s1PPeorta sloaasaa Pne smmsaa
P 2(bi�3t.16.1
Farsurq BU�H�ng
1P16
Faaluig P+ry^910rvS1e1
M .vz
PA fwP 47.205 c�
Fa." B.'"
60P0 a
L � pw" IOi+Ste)
7..m
TetalTetL eu�M.
MSIe .l3[S.e el
leulprvSUO PVYng
ly Cm:
.M Ong a0n.:bP agca P✓.Nt
1N ra.I
Location Map NutzosOle
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin Sinker way Newport Sear11. CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT " �:;, =.
. r... 1.a 1. ..c II.... r.
I 5 "'ng Plan
�Ia' Im iw iml
SeaaMer ;301t
i
MRCH3
minn
o�a een
t.+r.d..rwvur.w
S
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin Striker Way Newport Beach, CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
I
3
Y
K \
r
,z
O DUSTING RURDING
O
MacARTXUR RIVD. (�S �`
�^ abm^vY OlwW aurgMM. CwmpSMmrom
••_._-•_•`• —• WaM'QWnYBeN WNM�mP9Ga�(B.M,P)
�
OAOO-
WWl 5We.
m�ar...ra..+.
ti_.aYG
RdpaMaY
Ids. ►r
LCONCE➢
UNlDSCAPE PIhN
LS
1 -4 —
Q
m�oQ
N Q
ry' O
36'-0' 673'
4
i9 Puogcr
4 --
Root
FL •51'-0-
Pad A - North Elevation
1T4- TO
iP-U* (—!
symm
P
_i --- .
Pam ng
Ell 11,
� I
Sun Sorcnn
W4r 61-V
1 6
Clear Goss SPOn Glass '- Dmr ,Rh Side L'gM Chwebss - Spandrel GUIs - Sun Scam
Pad A& B - West Elevation
if11Y
Pad A September2.2011
vf'It
0 tc' 20 ' I30' c0' 50'
Id
a
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin Striker Way Nevpon Beach, CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
673'
w4-
PeAag
D
Erterior
n
a
- P14star -
WaII SY'�am
PiasWr
Qi'4• I
11 Root
—_
i
q!
Suns mn l -
CbrGlass I-
Spats [Glm
Iyi
Pad A - South Elevation
3'3 '
65' A•
4w 1T4'
r _ _ _
- - . —
PatAYg -�
�
I
1 -4 —
Q
m�oQ
N Q
ry' O
36'-0' 673'
4
i9 Puogcr
4 --
Root
FL •51'-0-
Pad A - North Elevation
1T4- TO
iP-U* (—!
symm
P
_i --- .
Pam ng
Ell 11,
� I
Sun Sorcnn
W4r 61-V
1 6
Clear Goss SPOn Glass '- Dmr ,Rh Side L'gM Chwebss - Spandrel GUIs - Sun Scam
Pad A& B - West Elevation
if11Y
Pad A September2.2011
vf'It
0 tc' 20 ' I30' c0' 50'
Id
a
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin Striker Way Nevpon Beach, CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
30'-0' tub' T-67, 2S-0' tr-0- 11-0'
W-6* eP$ 27-V 20'-0' 2W4r 20 -0' ��h+ Y PaM1ing
a Sign l nim - - W San ystom Plasty -, Sign lnmtion , W System I r Pinter - Wan System I I c
Pad B- North Elevation
_ Rog
S-0-
s Location
liS$ r4'$ 65d'
Pakeg um'e.®v 1 Pmeep
EtRartor
I
Plasw - Pamir
4
—Eet O
ti �
4
- - -` 4
— b
4.
P
r
Pads A & B - East Elevation
N PadsA &B
of ,a 129 as
septemEerzmlt
4V Isw
r
Key Plan -- -T '
4
Roofoee,
Roof
� N
4 H
,J,$ '.
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin Striker Way Newport Beach. CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
4
pia Pon
o
m FL
1' -0' 1T -01 26-01 3'$ W4r
l — 1
30%0'
30 -0'
Pad B - South Elevation
in� i�'I l!I!Illlllil ^� ��
B =.L
Pad A & B - Roof Plan
Pad B Secle be 2.2011
D 10 2D' I:D <o Sc
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
r r— ,rrmr.-.i 4221 Dolphin Striker Way Newport Beath. CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
U G H-
Key Plan
c¢rmu� nom
DOLPMN SnOMP. WAY
vV
I
--------- - - - - --
-------------------
----------
- ----- ----- FARCft 7-
.. ..... .... --------
- --- - ------
MAL D.ON
p AR C EL :2
-------------
7
IT
c¢rmu� nom
DOLPMN SnOMP. WAY
vV
I
--------- - - - - --
-------------------
----------
- ----- ----- FARCft 7-
.. ..... .... --------
- --- - ------
MAL D.ON
p AR C EL :2
-------------
,
F.r
-
--- - ------- -------
Attachment No. PC 4
Letters of Transfer Development Rights
13.3
i34
September 6, 2011
Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd,
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: General Commercial Site 7
3901 MacArthur Blvd
Newport Place Planned Community
Dear Ms. Ung
DECEIVED &I,
COMMUNITY
SEP 0 8 2011
O DEVELOPMENT Z'
G
P
OP NEWPORT
As owner of the above referenced site that is entitled for 141,120 square feet of general
commercial usage and the site is currently built out to 117,736 square feet, I hereby consent to
transfer 1,620 square feet of commercial development rights to property located at 4221 Dolphin
Striker Way, Block C of the Newport Place Planned Community. This transfer is contingent
upon approval of the Specialty Retail project proposed by Tod W. Ridgeway. If you should have
any questions regarding this consent, please do not hesitate to call.
3901 MacArthur LLC
Dave Wilson,
Managing Member
135
October 29, 2010
Rosalinh Unp, Associate Planner
City'of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd,
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Hotel Site 2 -B
1301 Quail
Newport Place Planned Community
.Dear Ms. Ung:
Csp
IV 0.1
00 0
As owner of the above referenced site that is entitled for 304 un -built hotel rooms,l
hereby consent to transfer the Development Rights of 48 rooms to property located at
4221 Dolphin Striker Way, Block C of the Newport Place Planned Community, This
transfer is contingent upon approval of the Specialty Retail project proposed by Tod W.
Ridgeway. If you should have any questions regarding this consent, please do not hesitate
to call at the address shown on the letterhead,
777 West 190th Sheet LLC,
ISO
Attachment No. PC 5
Traffic Impact Analysis (& Shared Parking
Analysis) by Kunzman Associates, Inc.
I-S7
ISO
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
4221 DOLPHIN STRIKER PROJECT
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (REVISED)
Prepared by:
Giarcarlo Ganddini, EIT,
Carl Ballard, and
William Kunzman, P.E.
QPpF ESS /o&
A K(�ti �FZ
No. TF0056 Z
o d *
* ?, AFF
CFCAI
May 31, 2011
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
1111 Tovv-N 9- Cou\Tw ROAD. SUITE 34
ORANGE, CA 928(58 -4667
PHONE: (714) 973 -8383
FAx: (714) 973 -8821
EmAIL: \1A[L@FRAFF10-ENG1NEER.CO.vI
\,�IEB: AA'VA'VA.TP,AFFIC-ENOINEER.CO�I
4839c
139
Table of Contents
1. Findings ................................................................................................... ..............................3
Existing Traffic Conditions ..................................................................... ..............................3
TrafficSummary ................................................................................... ...............................
4
Recommended Improvements ............................................................. ..............................5
Required Improvements ....................................................................... ..............................6
2. Project Description .................................................................................. ..............................7
Location................................................................................................ ...............................
7
Proposed Development ........................................................................ ..............................7
Parking................................................................................................. ...............................
7
3. Existing Traffic Conditions .................................................................... ...............................
10
Study Area Intersections ...................................................................... .............................10
Existing Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls .................................. .............................10
Existing Master Plan of Arterial Highways ........................................... .............................10
ExistingTraffic Volumes ....................................................................... .............................11
Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization ............................................ .............................11
4. Project Traffic ......................................................................................... .............................19
TrafficGeneration ................................................................................ .............................19
Traffic Distribution and Assignment .................................................... .............................20
Project - Related Traffic ......................................................................... .............................20
5. Existing (Year 2011) + Project Analysis .................................................... .............................29
Intersection Capacity Utilization .......................................................... .............................29
SignificanceCriteria ............................................................................. .............................29
6. TPO Analysis ......................................................................................... ...............................
33
ApprovedProjects .............................................................................. ...............................
33
RegionalGrowth ................................................................................ ...............................
34
One - Percent Methodology .................................................................. .............................34
Intersection Capacity Utilization .......................................................... .............................34
SignificanceCriteria ............................................................................. .............................35
240
7. CEQA Analysis ...................................................................................... ...............................
45
CumulativeProjects ............................................................................. .............................45
Intersection Capacity Utilization .......................................................... .............................45
SignificanceCriteria ............................................................................. .............................46
8. Orange County Congestion Management Program ............................... ...............................
55
County Congestion Management Program (CMP) .............................. .............................55
SignificanceCriteria ........................................................................... ...............................
55
9. Other Traffic Considerations ................................................................. ...............................
57
Parking............................................................................................... ...............................
57
Access................................................................................................. ...............................
59
SightDistance .................................................................................... ...............................
59
Appendices
Appendix A Glossary of Transportation Terms
Appendix B Year 2008 /2009 Worksheets
Appendix C Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate
Appendix D Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Capacity Utilization
Appendix E Approved Project Data
Appendix F TPO One - Percent Analysis Calculation Worksheets
Appendix G Cumulative Project Data
Appendix H City of Newport Beach Parking Code Requirements
Appendix I Parking Covenant and Agreement
2'4 1-
List of Tables
Table 1.
Existing (Year 2011) Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service ..................12
Table 2.
Traffic Generation Rates .................................................................... .............................21
Table 3.
Project Traffic Generation .................................................................. .............................22
Table 4.
Existing (Year 2011) + Project Analysis Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of
Service............................................................................................. ...............................
30
Table 5.
Approved Project List ......................................................................... .............................36
Table 6.
TPO Analysis One - Percent Threshold ................................................. .............................37
Table 7.
TPO Analysis Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service .............................38
Table 8.
Cumulative Project List ....................................................................... .............................47
Table 9.
CECA Analysis Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service ...........................48
Table 10.
Existing Project Land Uses ................................................................. .............................60
Table 11.
Friday (February 11, 2011) Parking Count ......................................... .............................61
Table 12.
Saturday (February 12, 2011) Parking Count ..................................... .............................62
Table 13.
Parking Spaces Required by City of Newport Beach Parking Code .... .............................63
Table 14.
Parking Code Requirements ............................................................... .............................64
Table 15.
Parking Code Requirements for a Friday With Time -of -Day (TOD) Factors ....................65
Table 16.
Projected Peak Day (Friday) Number of Parked Vehicles .................. .............................66
Table 17.
Parking Demand Summary ................................................................. .............................67
142
List of Figures
Figure 1.
Project Location Map ........................................................................... ..............................8
Figure2.
Site Plan ............................................................................................... ..............................9
Figure 3.
Existing Intersection Controls ............................................................. .............................13
Figure 4.
Existing Through Travel Lanes ............................................................. .............................14
Figure 5.
City of Newport Beach General Plan Circulation Element .................. .............................15
Figure 6.
City of Newport Beach General Plan Roadway Cross - Sections .......... .............................16
Figure 7.
Existing (Year 2011) Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes......
17
Figure 8.
Existing (Year 2011) Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes.......
18
Figure 9.
Project Outbound Traffic Distribution ................................................ .............................23
Figure 10.
Project Inbound Traffic Distribution ................................................... .............................24
Figure 11.
Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ..........................25
Figure 12.
Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ...........................26
Figure 13.
Project (Net Increase) Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes..27
Figure 14.
Project (Net Increase) Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes..28
Figure 15.
Existing (Year 2011) + Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement
Volumes.............................................................................................. .............................31
Figure 16.
Existing (Year 2011) + Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement
Volumes............................................................................................ ...............................
32
Figure 17.
Approved Projects Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .......39
Figure 18.
Approved Projects Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .........
40
Figure 19.
Existing+ Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects Morning Peak Hour Intersection
Turning Movement Volumes .............................................................. .............................41
Figure 20.
Existing+ Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects Evening Peak Hour Intersection
TurningMovement Volumes .............................................................. .............................42
Figure 21.
Existing+ Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project Morning Peak Hour
Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ......................................... .............................43
Figure 22.
Existing+ Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects + Project Evening Peak Hour
Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ......................................... .............................44
Figure 23.
Cumulative Projects Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .....
49
Figure 24.
Cumulative Projects Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes......
50
Figure 25.
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects+ Cumulative Projects Morning
Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ........................ .............................51
Figure 26.
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects+ Cumulative Projects Evening
Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ........................ .............................52
Figure 27.
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects+ Cumulative Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes ......... .............................53
Figure 28.
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects+ Cumulative Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes .......... .............................54
Figure 29.
Circulation Recommendations ........................................................... .............................68
Figure 30.
Parking Zone Boundary Map .............................................................. .............................69
Figure 31.
Parking Survey Summary Graph (Existing Conditions) ....................... .............................70
143
City of Newport Beach
4221 Dolphin Striker Project
Traffic Impact Analysis (Revised)
This report contains the traffic impact analysis for the 4221 Dolphin Striker project in the City of
Newport Beach. The traffic report contains documentation of existing traffic conditions, traffic
generated by the project, distribution of the project generated traffic to the surrounding roadway
network, and an analysis of future traffic conditions. Each of these topics are contained in
separate sections of the report. The first section is "Findings ", and subsequent sections expand
upon the findings. In this way, information on any particular aspect of the study can be easily
located by the reader.
The project site is designed as specialty retail in the heart of the professional office environment
of the John Wayne Airport area. The design includes a new driveway that will allow ingress and
egress from MacArthur Boulevard thereby eliminating the confusion of access to Restaurant Site 1
as provided in the Newport Place Community Text.
The proposed project is a redevelopment of an approximately 48,221 square -foot (1.11 acres)
site. Approximately 13,525 gross square feet of new commercial retail and food uses are
proposed to replace the existing single -story 7,996 square -foot vacant quality restaurant. The
new development will consist of two, free - standing, single -story buildings. Each has a maximum
building height of 29 feet.
19=1
Approximately 5,000 gross square feet of the proposed new development will be allocated for
food service use. Of that, 4,000 square feet will be allocated for high turn -over dining
establishments (i.e. small sit -down boutique restaurants). Anticipated hours of operation will be
daily from 11:00 AM to 10:00 PM for the high turn -over dining establishments. The remaining
1,000 square feet will be allocated for a fast food use (sandwich shop) with the hours of operation
from 7:00 AM until 11:00 PM.
The remaining 8,525 gross square feet of new development will be allocated for general
commercial uses (i.e. financial institutions of 4,000 square feet, computer electronic service, and
cellular service /retail stores). It is anticipated the retail commercial uses would have hours of
operation from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM, daily.
Although this is a technical report, every effort has been made to write the report clearly and
concisely. To assist the reader with those terms unique to transportation engineering, a glossary
of terms is provided in Appendix A.
r]
-1 4'J5
1. Findings
This section summarizes the existing traffic conditions, project traffic impacts, and the proposed
mitigation measures.
Existing Traffic Conditions
The existing site is currently vacant, but was a quality restaurant. The existing building is
approximately 7,996 square feet.
b. The project site currently has access to Dolphin Striker Way and Martingale Way.
C. The study area includes the following study area intersections:
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
Birch Street (EW)
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Jamboree Road (EW)
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
Bristol Street South (EW)
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
Bristol Street South (EW)
Von Karman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
Birch Street (EW)
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South (EW)
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
Birch Street (EW)
Bristol Street North (EW)
Bristol Street South (EW)
d. For existing (Year 2011) traffic conditions, the study area intersections currently operate
at Level of Service C or better during the morning /evening peak hours.
//10
Traffic Summary
a. Approximately 5,000 gross square feet of the proposed new development will be
allocated for food service use. Of that, 4,000 square feet will be allocated for high turn-
over dining establishments (i.e. small sit -down boutique restaurants). Anticipated hours
of operation will be daily from 11:00 AM to 10:00 PM for the high turn -over dining
establishments. The remaining 1,000 square feet will be allocated for a fast food use
(sandwich shop) with the hours of operation from 7:00 AM until 11:00 PM.
The remaining 8,525 gross square feet of new development will be allocated for general
commercial uses (i.e. financial institutions of 4,000 square feet, computer electronic
service, and cellular service /retail stores). It is anticipated the retail commercial uses
would have hours of operation from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM, daily.
b. The existing site development generated a total of approximately 719 daily vehicle trips, 6
of which occur during the morning peak hour and 60 of which occur during the evening
peak hour. The proposed project is projected to generate a total of approximately 2,017
daily vehicle trips, 114 of which would occur during the morning peak hour and 130 of
which would occur during the evening peak hour.
It should be noted that for fast - food /high turn -over sit down restaurants and bank land
uses, a portion of the traffic would come from pass -by trips. Pass -by trips are trips that
are currently on the roadway system. The traffic volumes from the fast -food and high
turn -over sit down restaurants have been reduced by 43% as a result of pass -by trips
obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers and the bank has been reduced
by 23% as a result of pass -by trips obtained from the San Diego Association of
Governments. Based upon the difference in trips generated (less pass -by trips) between
the current approval and proposed project, the proposed project is projected to generate
a total of approximately 942 more daily vehicle trips, 67 more of which would occur
during the morning peak hour and 55 more of which would occur during the evening peak
hour.
C. For existing (Year 2011) + project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are
projected to operate at Level of Service C or better during the morning /evening peak
hours.
d. As shown in Table 4 for the existing (Year 2011) + project analysis, the project - generated
traffic did not result in a significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of
one - percent or more at a study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service
D during the morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no improvements are
recommended at the study area intersections.
e. The City of Newport Beach staff provided the approved and cumulative projects in the
study area. The approved projects consist of development that has been approved but
are not fully completed. Cumulative projects are known, but not approved project
developments that are reasonably expected to be completed or nearly completed at the
same time as the proposed project.
4
:L47
f. The Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) analysis resulted in the following study area
intersections exceeding the one - percent threshold and requiring additional analysis:
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW) — Morning Peak Hour
Von Karman Avenue (EW) — Morning Peak Hour & Evening Peak Hour
Jamboree Road (EW) — Morning Peak Hour & Evening Peak Hour
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW) — Morning Peak Hour
g. For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects traffic conditions, the study area
intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or better during the
morning /evening peak hours.
h. For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + project traffic conditions, the
study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or better during the
morning /evening peak hours.
i. As shown in Table 7 for the TPO analysis, the project - generated traffic did not result in a
significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of one - percent or more at a
study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no improvements are recommended at the
study area intersections.
j. For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects traffic
conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or
better during the morning /evening peak hours.
k. For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects + project
traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service
C or better during the morning /evening peak hours.
I. As shown in Table 9 for the CECA analysis, the project - generated traffic did not result in a
significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of one - percent or more at a
study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no improvements are recommended at the
study area intersections.
Recommended Improvements
a. Site - specific circulation and access recommendations are depicted on Figure 29.
b. The proposed project site plan will reconfigure the surface parking lot layout on Parcel 1
and provide a total of 222 parking spaces for the entire site, including the 32 off -site
parking spaces located in the nearby parking structure. The total maximum parking
demand for the entire site is 225 parking spaces. The site does not provide sufficient
5
142
parking spaces to meet the City of Newport Beach Parking Code requirements and is
deficient by three (3) parking spaces. It is recommended that the project obtain a waiver
to allow for the reduction of the parking spaces required by three (3) parking spaces
pursuant to the supplemental parking management plan prepared by Kunzman
Associates, Inc.
C. To assure smooth traffic operations for vehicles entering and exiting the site, a
northbound left turn pocket on MacArthur Boulevard is recommended to accommodate a
minimum pocket length of 120 feet.
d. Sight distance at the project accesses shall be reviewed with respect to City of Newport
Beach standards in conjunction with the preparation of final grading, landscaping, and
street improvement plans.
e. On -site traffic signing and striping shall be implemented in conjunction with detailed
construction plans for the project and as approved by the City of Newport Beach.
Required Improvements
a. As shown in Table 4 for the existing (Year 2011) + project analysis, the project - generated
traffic did not result in a significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of
one - percent or more at a study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service
D during the morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no improvements are
recommended at the study area intersections.
b. As shown in Table 7 for the TPO analysis, the project - generated traffic did not result in a
significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of one - percent or more at a
study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no improvements are recommended at the
study area intersections.
C. As shown in Table 9 for the CEQA analysis, the project - generated traffic did not result in a
significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of one - percent or more at a
study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no improvements are recommended at the
study area intersections.
6
Z'4'9
2. Project Description
This section discusses the project's location, proposed development, and traffic characteristics of
such a development. Figure 1 shows the project location map. Figure 2 illustrates the site plan.
Location
The project site is located at 4221 Dolphin Striker project in the City of Newport Beach. The
project site currently has access to Dolphin Striker Way and Martingale Way.
Proposed Development
Approximately 5,000 gross square feet of the proposed new development will be allocated for
food service use. Of that, 4,000 square feet will be allocated for high turn -over dining
establishments (i.e. small sit -down boutique restaurants). Anticipated hours of operation will be
daily from 11:00 AM to 10:00 PM for the high turn -over dining establishments. The remaining
1,000 square feet will be allocated for a fast food use (sandwich shop) with the hours of operation
from 7:00 AM until 11:00 PM.
The remaining 8,525 gross square feet of new development will be allocated for general
commercial uses (i.e. financial institutions of 4,000 square feet, computer electronic service, and
cellular service /retail stores). It is anticipated the retail commercial uses would have hours of
operation from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM, daily.
Parking
The proposed project is Parcel 1 of three parcels in Resubdivision 347. The three parcels share a
common surface parking lot. The two other parcels are currently operating as Classic Q Billiards &
Sports Club and Saagar Fine Cuisine of India. In addition, the proposed project has exclusive use
to 32 parking spaces at a nearby parking structure through a Parking Agreement.
7
1150
Figure 1
Project Location Map
rmia
mP �m
0
a�
J °c sec
P
°aa
ea
Je Dolphin. ,aF
QC` Striker Way
5
Y
r
Site
°
0
,�cJe 9��sro
�S
Irvine
�rs°jSrP 0
PS
04
th
�a
m
a
3
v
m �
Legend
® = Study Area Intersection
NTS 4839c/1
KuNZnnnN AssounTes, Inc.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE,
1151-
tl
W 52
8i
9�
sm" rlltRr
I
s
ESTING
K1GSTRU N S \
PAR(16 Cos RE y q wy Uro
wue«ar
t °-emom - EEISIING BLAWING
§ aau )otss9n is
PARCEL�2 § F Pmeenyum T
nxm so (t o Irole P"e1 � c
I rum -poum ' m lu § Iv I
B-05
It
Iv6sort " °° 's I
PARCEL PARCELS
m " �_ §R 47MiMff
MTNG eundvc i talasa�*___ I §e616sso �r - - 9'a, sa: •_•yp b° Iwtewn 10 I
sa' __ -
___ IXISn s B�NIDING f
i
R -01 $$$
mzsort - rt -sro §" el y a to l 9
rrooatn 4
alr
- Sx10�If hqh IeaQ �„r' _.:_` 4so
t'A'tl Rayne Nrot 6ee"R 34e
. __� nHVat�{Yip •_� 1
—m4
eeawcnon ue asrxlol cmprwnmmesm =wa _ _ _ _ —
�r6uaieoa eotnare>meovuve>m
talY
' sOBM4t+N , New laN Mnlare
N
1�J
� — e�VPWINnem,
3. Existing Traffic Conditions
The traffic conditions as they exist today are discussed below and illustrated on Figures 3 to 8.
Study Area Intersections
The study area includes the following study area intersections:
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
Birch Street (EW)
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Jamboree Road (EW)
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
Bristol Street South (EW)
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
Bristol Street South (EW)
Von Karman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
Birch Street (EW)
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South (EW)
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
Birch Street (EW)
Bristol Street North (EW)
Bristol Street South (EW)
Existing Travel Lanes and Intersection Controls
Figure 3 identifies the existing intersection controls and Figure 4 illustrates the existing number of
through lanes for the study area intersections.
Existing Master Plan of Arterial Highways
Figure 5 exhibits the current City of Newport Beach General Plan Circulation Element. Both
existing and future roadways are included in the Circulation Element of the General Plan and are
10
1153
graphically depicted on Figure 5. This figure shows the nature and extent of arterial highways
that are needed to serve adequately the ultimate development depicted by the Land Use Element
of the General Plan. Figure 6 shows the City of Newport Beach General Plan roadway cross -
sections.
Existing Traffic Volumes
The City of Newport Beach provided the Year 2008/2009 morning and evening peak hour
approach volumes at each study area intersection (see Appendix B). To account for regional
growth on roadways, existing (Year 2011) traffic volumes have been calculated based on a 1
percent annual growth rate (see Appendix Q. The 1 percent growth rate factor is for designated
roadways within the City of Newport Beach. Existing (Year 2011) morning and evening peak hour
intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 7 and 8, respectively.
Existing Intersection Capacity Utilization
The City of Newport Beach methodology used to assess the operation of a signalized intersection
is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization. To calculate an Intersection Capacity Utilization
value, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the
intersection. An Intersection Capacity Utilization value is usually expressed as a decimal. The
decimal represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity.
The Levels of Service for existing (Year 2011) traffic conditions have been calculated and are
shown in Table 1. Existing (Year 2011) Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets and the Level
of Service description are provided in Appendix D. For existing (Year 2011) traffic conditions, the
study area intersections currently operate at Level of Service C or better during the
morning /evening peak hours.
11
-154
Table 1
Existing (Year 2011) Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service
ICU -LOS= Intersection Capacity Utilization -Level of Service Isee Appendix O).
L =Left; T= Through; R = Right;» =Tree Right Turn;>= Right Turn Overlap
ITS = Traffic Signal
12
155
Intersection Approach
Lanes'
Peak Hour
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Traffic
ICU -LOS'
Intersection
Contr013
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
Morning
Evening
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
1
4
1
1
4
1
2
2.5
0.5
2
3
1>>
0.44 -A
0.64 -B
Birch Street (EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3.5
0.5
1.5
1
0.5
1
2
1>>
0.38 -A
0.46 -A
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
0.55 -A
0.56 -A
Jamboree Road (EW)
TS
1 2
3
1>
2
3
1>>
2
3
1
1 2
3
1
0.60 -13
0.68 -B
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
2
3
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
1
3.5
0.5
0.49 -A
0.74 -C
Bristol Street South (EW)
TS
0
4.5
0.5
1
3
0
1.5
2.5
2
0
0
0
0.63 -13
0.47 -A
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
2
2
0
0
1.5
2.5
0
0
0
1.5
3
0.5
0.53 -A
0.53 -A
Bristol Street South (EW)
TS
0
2.5
1.5
2
2
0
1.5
3
0.5
0
0
0
0.39 -A
0.44 -A
Von Karman Avenue INS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
1
2
1>>
1
1.5
0.5
1
2
1
1
1.5
0.5
0.46 -A
0.56 -A
Birch Street (EW)
TS
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
0.29 -A
0.3S -A
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South (EW)
TS
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0.42 -A
0.54 -A
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
2
3.5
0.5
2
2.5
0.5
2
2
1>>
2
2
1
0.62 -B
0.58 -A
Birch Street (EW)
TS
1
2.5
0.5
1
3
1>>
1.5
0.5
1>>
0
1
0
0.51 -A
0.42 -A
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
2
1.5
1.5>
0
2.5
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.43 -A
0.49 -A
Bristol Street South (EW)
I TS
1 0
4.5
0.5
0
3
0
1 1.5
1.5
2
1 0
0
0
0.61 -B
0.66 -13
ICU -LOS= Intersection Capacity Utilization -Level of Service Isee Appendix O).
L =Left; T= Through; R = Right;» =Tree Right Turn;>= Right Turn Overlap
ITS = Traffic Signal
12
155
OVER 30 YEARS Or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
13 150
Figure 3
Existing Through Travel
Lanes and Intersection Controls
c a�a
8D
Q0
a°
6D
8D 4D
Jo�P�a4D
6D a O
as
0
4D 4D
4D Q '
4D
��o° 70
JQ' 2D
Dolphin
la
J5
Striker Way 6D
4D
I]
ti
accQ 6D i¢a
�0�� \ 4D
4U a
6D
4D
v 4D
n
Site
4
5
7D
4D�
Ja 4 B s
P�ac rO Sh4
6D
Irvine 6D B��s PP1
l.0/
'VO ?h
4D
4 Po�S
6D
o4t�
3
0
6D
Qaa
4 6D
v 4D
m
`rP
Legend
7D
M = Traffic Signal
OS = AIIWay Stop
5* °1 = Stop Sign
4 = Through Travel Lanes
D = Divided
U = Undivided
NTS
KUNZMAN ASSOUATES, INC.
4839c/3
OVER 30 YEARS Or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
13 150
Figure 4
Existing Through Travel Lanes
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
B
^gyp
9
^�]
1p
^r-1
11
^gyp
]t
4—Z
13
2p
14
2p
�bb.0.�coA
.dr lc
�bb.�ocsN
.dr1
�bb0.�a3A
.drat
dbb.0.�aoA
.�a2
�bb.�lA
sl
�bbasao,p
�a0
�bb0sco,p
�c1,5
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Bayview place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Bristol street south Campus Drive
15 �p
lamboree Road/
B istol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner
d
turn Overlap
ight Turn
4839c/4
movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
14 157
B
^gyp
9
^�]
1p
^r-1
11
^gyp
]t
4—Z
13
2p
14
2p
�bb.0.�coA
�bb.�ocsN
�bb0.�a3A
dbb.0.�aoA
�bb.�lA
�bbasao,p
�bb0sco,p
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Bayview place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Bristol street south Campus Drive
15 �p
lamboree Road/
B istol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner
d
turn Overlap
ight Turn
4839c/4
movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
14 157
ADOPTED INTERCHANGE PRIMARY ROAD
••
•••• (NOT BUILT)
PROPOSED INTERCHANGE 3.05Mi1e8
ROUT ESREQUIRING
MAJORROAD
= = == FURTHER COORDINATION
(SIX LANE DIVIDED)
O.T5 Miles
30.64 Miles
COMMUTER ROADWAY
EIGHT LANE ROAD
(TWO LANE UNDIVIDED)
(DIVIDED)
324 Miles
7.91 Miles
SECONDARY ROAD
SAN JOAQUIN HILLS
(FOUR LANE UNDIVIDED)
TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR
16.10 Miles
5.32 Miles
SECONDARY
(NOT BUILT)
029 Miles
PRIMARY ROAD
(FOUR LANE DIVIDED)
79.62 Miles
ADOPTED FREEWAY
ROUTES
4A9 Miles
FUTURE FREEWAY
EXTENSION
0.75 Miles
152
PRINCIPAL - 144'
(8 LANES DIVIDED)
ti
i
MAJOR • 128'
(8 LANES DIVIDED)
-'r
� 1
PRIMARY - 104'
(4 LANES DIVIDED)
hJ
WEI
SECONDARY -W
(4 LANES UNDIVIDED)
N
tea' L
COMMUTER - SG
(2 LANES UNDIVIDED)
_i �`'
Figure 7
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1295
918
669 0
489
432
385 v
255 0
1 >.
dbiS�c90A4
260
0
2°
�ig
�bb.�c31
253
4-154
29
`V
a
3
`°° ° °'
abbs78
X12
4 -136
a
4
` °' r
�bb.a371
`z185
X687
4
5 m
�bbsa120A
` 138
X902
4
6
abbs0
�0
d-
0
4
7
�bbs403
2237 09
4
D 316
I I
D
158
[b
D 19 �"
dl q
D
4183'
I T r
D
Os'
`h
D
11863'
d p
D
0�
d p
,^., 572 —D
,m„
-.
310
,^�„
96 —D
Mo
m
868-0
w,°�' Sg
dl `t ID
0�
-v o
0
1623 —D
o
D
0—D
o
49 �
°'
73 �
'� —
— 28,
194 —D
48�
=
180 �
0
0
01
"' ='
_ 8 —D
42�
299
—
0 —D
0�
01
562
m 603
1780
547
0 101
1073
0 1477
1060
836
2005
1920
994
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
577 0
445 0
459 0
0 0
2256 0
2083 0
1001 0
B
20
0
9
-'
2112
W
10
222
H
11
20
0
12
2157
e
IS m
26
xv
14 °
20 °
°�'
o-bb�0
C-0
4
abb�7s
4_293
4
�1b
4 -159
43
4
�bb�0
4-0
a
°�'
abbs267
4 -436
m
4
�bb�3
4-6
4
`
o-bb'0
�0
4
> 6763'
p
D
2333'
al p
D
793'
q
D 03
dl `t ID
D
783
d `� ID
D 1233'
a Y
D
03'
alp
.°.� 867 —D
291
o
""'
309 —D
43�
e
"'
194 —D
48�
o
$ 2464 -0
420
0
0
115 —D
10�
g
_ 8 —D
42�
o_ _
`V
0 —D
0�
m
562
m 603
547
0 101
0 1257
0 1477
3078
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
FV-�
lamboree Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/7
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
17 100
Figure 8
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1350
1077
1070 0
1462
1784
1081 v
1227
1 °
X201
4
2
X170
4
3
'
X38
`°
4
`z 158
°
4
5
X74
r
4
6
I °
�0
4-1
4
7
X124
D 1883'
4-689
D
1483'
4-433
"' °
4 -127
D 03
°'
X939
2263
X1867
a Y
D
03
1p
° °°
4-1187
N
. o,
4
b b
su4
a
� b It
6665
4
a b b
x623
4
a b b
x200
4
a b
x392 4
334
p
D
274
p
D 1383'
q (°
D
218 �'
% Y (°
D
Os'
ry Y
D
417
J�o-
D
0-
282 —D
0
182
m
" 195 —D
a
e
986 -0,°„
°
0�
,°
1004
099��^
53�
°
783 �,
°�
38�"'"'�
0�"eo
429
01333
814
772
1227
1061
0 542
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
919 0
932 0
716 0
0 0
1560 0
1528 0
1725 0
e
o-bb°
�p
C-0
�0
4
9 a
abb�52
X65
4-511
4
10
X41
4-235
`V
4
11
S—p
4-0
'0
°
4
12 _
"'
ab�157
v-341
4-233
r
4
IS
° °
b�o
�0
4-1
4
14 a
b'0
�0
4-0 °
4
D 1883'
p
D
1483'
al p
D 03
`t ID
D
2263
d `�
D 2973
a Y
D
03
1p
zS 999 —D
2 174
o
" 12
N
454 —D
50�
H
'
M26
2591-0
142
o
e
271 —D
164
e
4 —D
0 100
e
0
0�'�672
552
� 533
� 433
� 1522
� 1269
� 2829
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
F937�p
4-0
0 1945
lamboree Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/8
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
18 101
4. Project Traffic
The proposed project is a redevelopment of an approximately 48,221 square -foot (1.11 acres)
site. Approximately 13,525 gross square feet of new commercial retail and food uses are
proposed to replace the existing single -story 7,996 square -foot vacant quality restaurant. The
new development will consist of two, free - standing, single -story buildings. Each has a maximum
building height of 29 feet.
Approximately 5,000 gross square feet of the proposed new development will be allocated for
food service use. Of that, 4,000 square feet will be allocated for high turn -over dining
establishments (i.e. small sit -down boutique restaurants). Anticipated hours of operation will be
daily from 11:00 AM to 10:00 PM for the high turn -over dining establishments. The remaining
1,000 square feet will be allocated for a fast food use (sandwich shop) with the hours of operation
from 7:00 AM until 11:00 PM.
The remaining 8,525 gross square feet of new development will be allocated for general
commercial uses (i.e. financial institutions of 4,000 square feet, computer electronic service, and
cellular service /retail stores). It is anticipated the retail commercial uses would have hours of
operation from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM, daily.
Traffic Generation
The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate trip generation
rate by the quantity of land use.
Trip generation rates were determined for daily traffic, morning peak hour inbound and outbound
traffic, and evening peak hour inbound and outbound traffic for the proposed land uses. By
multiplying the traffic generation rates by the land use quantities, the project - generated traffic
volumes are determined. Table 2 exhibits the traffic generation rates. The trip generation rates
are derived from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008.
Table 3 shows the project peak hour volumes and project daily traffic volumes.
The existing site development generated a total of approximately 719 daily vehicle trips, 6 of
which occur during the morning peak hour and 60 of which occur during the evening peak hour.
The proposed project is projected to generate a total of approximately 2,017 daily vehicle trips,
114 of which would occur during the morning peak hour and 130 of which would occur during the
evening peak hour.
It should be noted that for fast - food /high turn -over sit down restaurants and bank land uses, a
portion of the traffic would come from pass -by trips. Pass -by trips are trips that are currently on
the roadway system. The traffic volumes from the fast -food and high turn -over sit down
restaurants have been reduced by 43% as a result of pass -by trips obtained from the Institute of
Transportation Engineers and the bank has been reduced by 23% as a result of pass -by trips
obtained from the San Diego Association of Governments. Based upon the difference in trips
generated (less pass -by trips) between the current approval and proposed project, the proposed
19
102
project is projected to generate a total of approximately 942 more daily vehicle trips, 67 more of
which would occur during the morning peak hour and 55 more of which would occur during the
evening peak hour.
Traffic Distribution and Assignment
Traffic distribution is the determination of the directional orientation of traffic. It is based on the
geographical location of employment centers, commercial centers, recreational areas, or
residential area concentrations. The TPO requires the trip distribution percentages to be in
increments of 5 %. Traffic assignment is the determination of which specific route development
traffic will use, once the generalized traffic distribution is determined. The basic factors affecting
route selection are minimum time path and minimum distance path.
Figures 9 and 10 contain the directional distribution and assignment of the project traffic for the
proposed land uses.
Project- Related Traffic
Based on the identified traffic generation and distributions, project morning and evening peak
hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figures 11 and 12, respectively.
Project (net increase) morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes
are shown on Figures 13 and 14, respectively
20
1('03
Table 2
Traffic Generation Rates'
Land Use
Units
Peak Hour
Daily
Morning
Evening
Inbound
Outbound
I Total
Inbound
I Outbound
Total
Retail
TSF
NOM
NOM
NOM
1.19
1.52
2.71
44.32
Quality Restaurant
TSF
0.66
0.15
0.81
5.02
2.47
7.49
89.95
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant
TSF
5.99
5.53
11.52
6.58
4.57
11.15
127.15
Fast -Food Restaurant
TSF
26.32
17.55
43.87
13.34
12.81
26.15
716.00
Bank
TSF
1 4.20
1.80
6.001
4.80
7.20
12.00
150.00
i Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers,Trip Generation, 8th Edition, 2008, Land Use Categories 814, 931, 932, and 933.
San Diego Association of Governments, (Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates April, 2002.
TSF= Thousand Square Feet
3 NOM =No mina I. It is anticipated the retail commercial uses would have hours of operations from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM, daily.
21 104
Table 3
Project Traffic Generation
Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO)
Peak Hour
Morning E
Evening
Land Use Q
Quantity U
Units I
Inbound O
Outbound T
Total I
Inbound O
Outbound T
Total D
Daily
Existing Use
Quality Restaurant 7
7.996 T
TSF 5
5 1
1 6
6 4
40 2
20 6
60 7
719
Pass -By (43 %) -
-2 -
-1 -
-3 -
-17 -
-9 -
-26 -
-309
Total 3
3 0
0 3
3 2
23 1
11 3
34 4
410
Proposed Uses
Retail 4
4.325 T
TSF N
NOM
NOM N
NOM 5
5 7
7 1
12 1
192
Fast Food Restaurant 1
1.000 T
TSF 2
26 1
18 4
44 1
13 1
13 2
26 7
716
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 4
4.000 T
TSF 2
24 2
22 4
46 2
26 1
18 4
44 5
509
Bank 4
4.000 T
TSF 1
17 7
7 2
24 1
19 2
29 4
48 6
600
Subtotal 1
13.325 T
TSF 6
67 4
47 1
114 6
63 6
67 1
130 2
2,017
Pass -Bya -
-25 -
-19 -
-44 -
-21 -
-20 -
-41 -
-665
Total 4
42 2
28 7
70 4
421 4
471 8
89 1
1,352
Difference 3
39 2
28 6
67 1
191 3
361 5
55 9
942
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Peak Hour
Morning E
Evening
Land Use Q
Quantity U
Units
Inbound O
Outbound T
Total I
Inbound I
I Outbound I
I Total D
Daily
Proposed Uses
Retail 4
4.325 T
TSF N
NOW N
NOM N
NOM 5
5 7
7 1
12 1
192
Fast Food Restaurant 1
1.000 T
TSF 2
26 1
18 4
44 1
13 1
13 2
26 7
716
High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant 4
4.000 T
TSF 2
24 2
22 4
46 2
26 1
18 4
44 5
509
Bank 4
4.000 T
TSF 1
17 7
7 2
24 1
19 2
29 4
48 6
600
Subtotal 1
13.325 T
TSF 6
67 4
47 1
114 6
63 6
67 1
130 2
2,017
Pass -By a -
-25 -
-19 -
-44 -
-21 -
-20 -
-41 -
-665
Total 1
1 421 2
281 7
701 4
421 4
47 8
89 1
1,352
TSF =Thousand Square Feet
t NOM = Nominal. It is anticipated the retail commercial uses would have hours of operations from 9:00 AM to 7:00 PM, daily.
The traffic volumes from the fast -food and high turn -over sit down restaurants have been reduced by 43% as a result of pass -by trips obtained from the Institute of
Transportation Engineers and the bank has been reduced by 23S as a result of pass -by trips obtained from the San Diego Association of Governments.
22 105
Figure 9
Project Outbound Traffic Distribution
10%°
r
�P
�m
5%
ao
�F
�a
o�
J
as 15%
�o
em
o�
F�
Dolphin. la
10% ��o triker Way
1
20% 15%
Y
v
Sit
6;; 80% 10%
i
0
0
5% e.,
0j P2ti0 $$%
stP nth
PtS
0
5% 4th
�a
a
3
v
m �
m NP \
25% (10% To SR -73)
15%
Legend
25 %= Percent From Project
NTS 4839c/9
KuNZnnnN AssounTes, Inc.
OVER 30 YEARS Or GxcEt i ENT SERVICE
23 100
Figure 10
Project Inbound Traffic Distribution
10 °%
m�a
p 5%
J�
e�
P�
15%
20%
Je Dolphin.
QL� Striker Wa
J5 I
ti
10% FQ iee
v e
20% 6;; 10%
v
° 55%
0
ro
�S
Irvine
$% P Bjl2 2~PN
PS
04
th
5%
a
3
v
25% (10% From SR -73)
15%
Legend
2$ %= Percent To Project
NTS 4839c/10
KuNZnnnN AssounTes, Inc.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
24 107
Figure 11
Project Morning Peak Hour
Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
4
0
8
2
�p
22
0
1
10
2
12
�T15 b
0
13
�0
�0
14
o-�Tb
4
o
a
D
0
a
O
a
6
'
a
F-000
�o
D
4
o
o a
D
0
F-U24
03
0
O0�
.
D 0
D
0 -0
D 0
0—
0
0 0—D
0
0—D-
0
o�`�? n
o
0
0�
0
0
0
4
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
I o
0
2 0
0
4 0
B
9
10
II
12
�0
13
�0
0
14
p 0
o-�Tb
�2
aTb
4
o
a
�bb4--0
� o
a
�Tb
'
o
a
l
ab bo
'
a
T
�o
a
J] b
o
o a
D
0
03
0
03
D 0
D
0
D 0
0—
10
0 0—D
0
0
0—D-
0
—�
0 D
o�`�? n
o
0
0
0�
0
0
0
0
4
0 4
0 0
0 4
0 4
0 6
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
4 0
15 �p
4-0
a�bb.�o a
>
0 D��=
0�
6
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/11
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
25 102
Figure 12
Project Evening Peak Hour
Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
0
8
2
�p
38
26
6 0
6 0
p o
p
10
II
12
b4
13
�p
a
p
o
fl-�000
abb4--0
0
a
O
'
o
a
6�
'
a
F-000
�o
D
4
4--0 o
�o a
E2�-
F-U24
0s
O �
D 0
D
0 -0
D 0
0�
0
os2�
0—Do
0
0
23
0
0
7
I
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
70
15 �p
4-0
albb.�o a
>
0 D��=
0�
6
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/12
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
26 ��n
2
0 0
6 0
6 0
7
p
10
II
12
�0
13
�p
0
14
abb4--0
o
a
abb
'
o
a
l
ab bo
'
a
b
�o
a
J]
4--0 o
�o a
E2�-
0s
D 0
D
0
D 0
0�
0
0—Do
0
02
0
0
0
0
0
7
7
0
7
7
0 6
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
70
15 �p
4-0
albb.�o a
>
0 D��=
0�
6
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/12
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
26 ��n
Figure 13
Project (Net Increase)
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
4�
8�
220
15
4�
iv
4 0
I
�0
>
2
�p
o
3
2p
o
4
26
`°
12
2p
o
6
ap
o
14
2p 0
�bb.�4
�0
a
a�bb.�o
d-0
a
"'
a�bb
2
a
�bb.�o
�0
a
al b b
�0
so
a
a�bbso
4-0
a
ql b b
�0
so
D 0�
p
D
0�
p
D Os
0s
D
6�'
% Y (°
D
0
Y
D
4�
p
0�
F-U24
0-D
o�-,o
0—
0�0.
-,0
0-p
oho
0 p—D�
0 -000o
.,
3—D
O�o�o
0 0—D
ono
0-D
ono
ono
0�
o0�
0�
0�
0�
0�,
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�
0 4
21
o 0
o q
2
3
0 3
70
6
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
I o
2 0
2 0
0 0
6 0
6 0
4 0
B
10
2p
o
II
2p
o
12
�0
a
13
�0
0
14
`? p
abbo
4 4
a
�bbo
�0
a
ebb
'o
a
al b b
,o
a
al b b
�o
a
ql b b
�o a
03'
I
D
0s
10
D
0s
01 T 10
D 0�
11T ID
D
0�
I
D 0�
D
0�
0—D
0
0—
�,
0
0—D
ono
0 p—D�
.,
3—D
ono
0 0—D
ono
0
0—D
ono
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�
0 4
o q
o 0
o q
o q
o 6
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
¢ o
15 �p
4-0
ab
b�0 Ua
D Os YI°
6
0�
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/13
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
27 170
Figure 14
Project (Net Increase)
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
2�
^�0
.�
4�
2
�p
o
290
ap
-
19
23
�+
6�
5
2p
o
2v
ap
o
5 0
I
3
4
6
ebb
-
10
abb
o
II
abbso
4-1
a
�bb�o
�0
a
�bbso
�0
a
abbso
4-0
a
D 0�
a
D
0�
a
D Os
q (°
D
3s'
% Y (°
D
Os'
Y
D
2�
p
E2�-
T-1
0-D
o >o
D
0�0
>0
0-p
000
D
0 -0o.r,o
� ID
0�
0�0.
-,0
N
O-D
o -o
o 0
°
0—D
0�
°
0—D
0�
° 0—D
0�,
a
4—D
0�
° 0
0�
p—D
0�
0�
4
0�
0 4
0 10
0�
5
0�
3
1
1
6
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Brirtol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
5-
15 �p
4-0
a�bb.�o a
Os Y I°
° 0�
3
l ddb ,e Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/14
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
28 2��
1 0
1 0
0 0
3 0
3 0
5 0
p
o
�0
-
10
2p
o
II
2p
o
12
�p
13
�0
0
14
�0
a—z
0
a
�bb�0
�0
a
e
�o
a
a
a
a
�o
a
o-
�0
'0 a
E2�-
03
p
D
03
1 q[B
D 0�
11 `t P
D
0
� ID
0�
I T r
D
0-
1 p
o 0
°
0—D
ova
°
0—D
o..ro
° 0—D
000
a
4—D
o.r,o
° 0
°
p—D
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�
1
6
5
0
5
5
0 3
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Brirtol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
5-
15 �p
4-0
a�bb.�o a
Os Y I°
° 0�
3
l ddb ,e Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/14
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
28 2��
5. Existing (Year 2011) + Project Analysis
The existing (Year 2011) + project analysis has been completed for the study area intersections
based upon California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements (this part of the analysis is
consistent with CEQA).
In order to analyze a "conservative' scenario in terms of the assignment of traffic, the Existing
(Year 2011) + project analysis does not credit the existing site development.
Intersection Capacity Utilization
The City of Newport Beach methodology used to assess the operation of a signalized intersection
is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization. To calculate an Intersection Capacity Utilization
value the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the
intersection. An Intersection Capacity Utilization value is usually expressed as a decimal. The
decimal represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity.
The Levels of Service for existing (Year 2011) + project traffic conditions have been calculated and
are shown in Table 4. Existing (Year 2011) + project morning and evening peak hour intersection
turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 15 and 16,
respectively. Existing (Year 2011) + project Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets and the
Level of Service description are provided in Appendix D. For existing (Year 2011) + project traffic
conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or better
during the morning /evening peak hours.
Significance Criteria
The City of Newport Beach intersection significance criteria requires an increase of one - percent or
more at a study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours.
As shown in Table 4 for the existing (Year 2011) + project analysis, the project - generated traffic
did not result in a significant impact at the study area intersections; therefore, no improvements
are recommended at the study area intersections.
29
z72
Table 4
Existing (Year 2011) + Project Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service
'ICU I.Cri= ntervester Capacity Ublivation - Level of Service (see Appendix Di.
' L= Lek; T = Through; R = RigM;»= Free Right Tum;> = Right Turn Overlap
TS =Traffic Signal
30 1-43
Peak Hour ICU -LOS'
Existing (Year 2011
Intersection Approach Lanes'
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Traffic
Existing (Year
2011
+ Project
ICU Increase
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Intersection
Control'
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Driive(EW)
TS
1
4
1
1
4
1
2
2.5
0.5
2
3
1»
0.435 -A
0.635 -B
0.437 -A
0.635 -B
+0002
+0.000
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3.5
0.5
1.5
1
0.5
1
2
1»
0.380 -A
0.457 -A
0380 -A
0.458 -A
+0000
+0.001
Von Karman Avenue(EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
0.552 -A
0.558 -A
0558 -A
0.564 -A
+0006
+0.006
Jamboree Road(EW)
TS
2
3
1>
2
3
1>>
2
3
1
2
3
1
0.601 -B
0.678 -3
0.604 -B
0.680 -B
+0003
+0.002
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue INS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
2
3
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
1
3 5
0 5
0.488 -A
0.742 -C
0.490 -A
0.744 -C
+0002
+0.002
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
4.5
05
1
3
0
1.5
2.5
2
0
0
0
0.634 -B
0.465 -A
0.635 -B
0.466 -A
+0001
+0.001
Birch Street INS) at:
Bristol Street North JEW)
TS
2
2
0
0
1.5
2.5
0
0
0
1.5
3
05
0.532 -A
0.527 -A
0533 -A
0.527 -A
+0001
+0.000
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
2.5
15
2
2
0
1.5
3
0.5
0
0
0
0.391 -A
0.436 -A
0391 -A
0.437 -A
+0000
+0.001
Von Karman Avenue INS) at:
Campus Drive(EW)
TS
1
2
1»
1
1.5
0.5
1
2
1
1
15
05
0.462 -A
0.563 -A
0.463 -A
0.564 -A
+0001
+0.001
Birch Street (EW)
TS
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
0.285 -A
0.351 -A
0287 -A
0.352 -A
+0002
+0.001
BaYview Place INS) at:
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0.417 -A
0.540 -A
0.417 -A
0.540 -A
+0000
+0.000
Jamboree Road INS) at:
Campus Drive(EW)
TS
2
3.5
05
2
2.5
0.5
2
2
1>>
2
2
1
0.615 -B
0.583 -A
0.618 -B
0.584 -A
+0003
+0.001
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
2.5
05
1
3
1>>
1.5
0.5
1»
0
1
0
0.514 -A
0.421 -A
0516 -A
0.423 -A
+0002
+0.002
Bristol Street North(EW)
TS
2
1.51.5>
0
2.5
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.426 -A
0.489 -A
0.427 -A
0.490 -A
+0001
+0.001
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
4.5
05
0
3
0
1.5
1.5
2
0
0
0
1 0.611 -B
I 0.661 -B
0.612 -B
0.662 -B
+0001
+0.001
'ICU I.Cri= ntervester Capacity Ublivation - Level of Service (see Appendix Di.
' L= Lek; T = Through; R = RigM;»= Free Right Tum;> = Right Turn Overlap
TS =Traffic Signal
30 1-43
Figure 15
Existing (Year 2011) + Project
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1299
926
461 0
504
436
386 v
256
1 >.
X60
0
2 ° N
X53
m
10
X12
H
4
`z 191
5
`138
.°0
6
�0
0
7
X237
°
4-191
°
4-154
`V
`°
4 -138
` ° -
X687
=
'� °'
X902
`°
`°
4-0
_
X988
a b b.
94
4
a b b.
31
4
s78
4
a b b
x371
4
a b b
.x120
4
a b b
s0
4
a b b
x403 4
D 316
p
D
158
p
F228
dl q (°
D
424 �'
% Y (°
D
Os'
`h Y
D
11903'
p
D
0�
p
572 -D
,m„
-.
310
„�,
194 —D
o
$ 24fi4-0
868-0
w
118 —D
0�
8—D
o
1623 -D
o
0-D
o m
49�
°'
"'
73�
-
-�
`-
780�
10 �
01•,00
`V
299
°'-
0�1063
607
� 1803
0 1261
z, 1075
3084
839
- 2016
1926
996
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
5
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/15
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
31 1-74
447 0
461 0
0 0
2262 0
2089 0
1005 0
20
0
9
"�
�1I2
10
X22
H
11
12
m
`? 157
.°0
13 m
�6
n
14 0
�0 °
4-0
"
4 -297
`°
4 -159
'� °'
4 -440
`°
`p°°
4-6
`�
�0
�0
4
�79
4
�43
4
abb
dbb
267
4
bb
3
4
o-'o
4
E291
p
D
2333'
al p
D
79D
03
]�:O
D
783
d `� lD
D 1233'
a Y
D
0
o
309 —D
�,�„
194 —D
o
$ 24fi4-0
0
118 —D
e
8—D
o
0
564
43 �
"'
48 �
420
10 �
_
482
`V
0 �
m
564
607
551
0 1261
1481
3084
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
5
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/15
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
31 1-74
Figure 16
Existing (Year 2011) + Project
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1354
1085
1108 0
1488
1791
1534 0
1229 0
1 °
X201
2
X170
3 2
X38
m
4 ,,, ^
`z164
°
5 —
M
`�74
M
IS
°
�o
0
7 .,
X124
b�ms
0-689
°'
4
"'
�b bsu4
4-433
^
4
- `�
�b b6665
4-129
4
`� °'
ab bx623
0-939
�
4
"'
ab bx200
0-1867
`"
4
b�0
4-0
'0
4
ab6x392
1187
4
D 334s�p�
p
D
274s�p�
p
D 1383'(
993'
D
224s
%Y(°
D
0s"ryY�
� T lD
D 2973
F42
�p�
D
0s182
zS
o
N
454 —D
S0�
^
m
'°
" 195 —D
783 �,
a °�
e
986 -0,°„
38�""°°
o"
276 —D
164
0�
0�"`°0
4 —D
0 100
e
—
o
'��
053�
0
614
559
837
540
0 433
0 1529
920
1276
777
1238
1067
544
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
9
934 0
718 0
0 0
1566 0
1534 0
1733 0
20
X65
10
X41
m
11
20
°
12
v-341
M
IS
°
�0
—
14 a
�0 °
0
�0
4
0 -515
52
4
4-235
�,9
4
0-0
�0
4
- "'
ab�157
0 -237
4
b�0
4-1
4
b'0
0-0
4
p
D
1483'
p
D
993'
D 03
01 `t ID
D
226
� T lD
D 2973
Y
D
03
1 p
zS
o
N
454 —D
S0�
^
166
26�
.^., 2591-0
142
o
e
'°
276 —D
164
e
4 —D
0 100
e
—
0
0�'�'—
614
559
540
0 433
0 1529
1276
0 2835
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
�p
°
p
4-0
0 1951
lamboree Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/16
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
32 1715
6. TPO Analysis
The Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) analysis has been performed for the study area intersections.
The existing site development was still occupied at the time the existing intersection turning
movement volumes were obtained. Therefore, the TPO analysis has credited the existing site
development and analyzes the net increase of project traffic generation.
Approved Projects
The City of Newport Beach staff provided the approved projects in the study area for the TPO
analysis. The approved projects consist of development that has been approved but are not fully
completed (see Table 5 and Appendix E). The approved project morning and evening peak hour
intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 17 and
18, respectively.
An approved project is one that has been approved pursuant to the TPO, requires no further
discretionary approval by the City of Newport Beach, and has received, or is entitled to receive, a
building or grading permit for construction of the project or one or more phases of the project.
Trips generated by approved projects shall be included subject to the following:
■ All trips generated by each approved project or that portion or phase of the approved
project for which no certificate of occupancy has been issued shall be included in any
traffic study conducted prior to the expiration date of that approved project.
■ In the event a final certificate of occupancy has been issued for one or more phases of a
approved project, all trips shall be included in subsequent traffic studies until completion
of the first field counts required by Subsection 3(d)(i) subsequent to the date on which
the final certificate of occupancy was issued. Subsequent to completion of the field
counts, those trips generated by phases of the approved project that have received a final
certificate of occupancy shall no longer be included in subsequent traffic studies.
■ The Traffic Manager and Planning Director shall maintain a list of approved projects and,
at least annually, update the list to reflect new approvals pursuant to the TPO as well as
completion of all or a portion of each approved project. An approved project shall not be
removed from the approved project list until a final certificate of occupancy has been
issued for all phases and the field counts required by Subsection 3(d)(i) have been taken
subsequent to issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
■ The total trips generated by approved projects shall be reduced by twenty (20 %) to
account for the interaction of approved project trips.
33
170
Regional Growth
To account for regional growth on roadways, Year 2013 traffic volumes have been calculated
based on a 1 percent annual growth rate over a two -year period (see Appendix C). The regional
growth rate has been obtained from the City of Newport Beach. The project is expected to open
in Year 2012; therefore the traffic analysis is one year after opening year.
One - Percent Methodology
One - percent of the projected peak hour volumes of each approach of each study area
intersection were compared with the peak hour distributed volumes from the proposed project.
A summary of this TPO comparison is shown within Appendix F.
If one - percent of the existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects traffic peak hour volumes
of each approach is greater than the peak hour project generated approach volumes, no further
analysis is required. Existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects morning and evening peak
hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 19
and 20, respectively. Existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + project morning and
evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown
on Figures 21 and 22, respectively. If project generated peak hour approach volumes are higher
than one - percent of the projected peak hour volumes on any approach of an intersection, the
intersection would require analysis utilizing the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology.
Comparison of the one - percent of the existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects traffic
peak hour approach volumes with the project generated peak hour approach volumes resulted in
the following study area intersections exceeding the one - percent threshold and requiring
additional analysis (see Table 6 and Appendix F):
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW) — Morning Peak Hour
Von Karman Avenue (EW) — Morning Peak Hour & Evening Peak Hour
Jamboree Road (EW) — Morning Peak Hour & Evening Peak Hour
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW) — Morning Peak Hour
Intersection Capacity Utilization
The City of Newport Beach methodology used to assess the operation of a signalized intersection
is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization. The Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology
(see Appendix D) is not the only method to analyze a signalized intersection, but the preferred
method per the City of Newport Beach TPO. To calculate an Intersection Capacity Utilization
value the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the
intersection. An Intersection Capacity Utilization value is usually expressed as a decimal. The
decimal represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity.
34
2��
The Levels of Service for existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects traffic conditions have
been calculated and are shown in Table 7. Existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects
Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets and the Level of Service description are provided in
Appendix D. For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects traffic conditions, the study
area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or better during the
morning /evening peak hours.
The Levels of Service for existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + project traffic
conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 7. Existing + growth (Year 2013) +
approved projects + project Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets and the Level of Service
description are provided in Appendix D. For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects +
project traffic conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service
C or better during the morning /evening peak hours.
Significance Criteria
The City of Newport Beach intersection significance criteria requires an increase of one - percent or
more at a study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours.
As shown in Table 7 for the TPO analysis, the project - generated traffic did not result in a
significant impact at the study area intersections; therefore, no improvements are recommended
at the study area intersections.
35
172
Table S
Approved Project List
Project Name
Fashion Island Expansion
Temple Bat Yahm Expansion
Ciosa - Irvine Project
Newport Dunes
Hoag Hospital Phase III
St. Mark Presbyterian Church
OLQA Church Expansion
2300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Executive Court
Hoag Health Center
North Newport Center
Santa Barbara Condo (Marriott)
Newport Beach City Hall
328 Old Newport Medical Office
Coastline Community College
Bayview Medical Office
36 179
Table 6
TPO Analysis One - Percent Threshold
1 Project traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of projected peak hour traffic.
Intersection Capacity Utilization analysis is required.
37 120
Peak
Approach Direction'
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Intersection
Hour
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
AM
No
No
No
Yes
PM
No
No
No
No
Birch Street (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
AM
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
PM
Yes
Yes
No
No
Jamboree Road (EW)
AM
No
Yes
No
No
PM
No
Yes
No
No
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Bristol Street South (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Bristol Street South (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Von Karman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Birch Street (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Jamboree Road INS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
AM
No
No
Yes
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Birch Street (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Bristol Street South (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
Bristol Street South (EW)
AM
No
No
No
No
PM
No
No
No
No
1 Project traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of projected peak hour traffic.
Intersection Capacity Utilization analysis is required.
37 120
Table 7
TPO Analysis Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service
r ICU -LOS = Intersection Capanty Utillaatlan Level of service (see Appendix on.
L= Leh; T= Through; R= Righp»= Free Rlght Turn; o= Right TOm Overlap
'TS = Treffc5lgnal
38 121
Peak Hour
ICU -LOS'
Existing
+Growth
Existing +Growth
(Year 2013) +
Intersection Approach Latest
(Year 2013) +
Approved Projects
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Traffic
Approved
Projects
+Project
ICU Increase
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Intersection
Control'
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive JEW)
TS
1
4
1
1
4
1
2
2.5
0.5
2
3
1»
0.45 -A
0.65 -B
0.45 -A
0.65 -8
+000
+0.00
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3.5
0.5
15
1
0.5
1
2
1»
0.39 -A
0.48 -A
0.39 -A
0.48 -A
+000
+0.00
Von Kerman Avenue(EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
0.56 -A
057 -A
0.57 -A
057 -A
+001
+0.00
Jamboree Road (EW)
TS
2
3
1>
2
3
1»
2
3
1
2
3
1
0.62 -9
0.71 -C
0.63 -13
0]1 -C
+001
+0.00
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at:
Bristol Street North(EW)
TS
2
3
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
1
3.5
05
0.50 -A
0.76 -C
0.50 -A
0.76 -C
+000
+0.00
Bristol Street South (EW)
TS
0
4.5
0.5
1
3
0
15
2.5
2
0
0
0
0.64 -B
0.47 -A
0.64 -B
0.47 -A
1 +000
+0.00
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North(EW)
TS
2
2
0
0
1.5
2.5
0
0
0
1.5
3
05
0.53 -A
054 -A
0.54 -A
054 -A
+001
+0.00
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
2.5
1.5
2
2
0
15
3
0.5
0
0
0
0.40 -A
0.46A
0.40 -A
0.46 -A
+000
+0.00
Van Karman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive(EW)
TS
1
2
1»
1
1.5
0.5
1
2
1
1
1.5
0.5
0.47 -A
057 -A
0.47 -A
057 -A
+000
+0.00
Birch Street EW
TS
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
0.29 -A
035 -A
0.29 -A
035 -A
+000
+0.00
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South JEW)
TS
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0.43 -A
0 55 -A
0.43 -A
0 55 -A
+000
+0.00
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive JEW)
TS
2
3.5
0.5
2
2.5
0.5
2
2
1»
2
2
1
0.61
0.61 -8
0.64 -B
0.61 -B
+000
+0.00
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
2.5
0.5
1
3
1»
15
0.5
1>>
0
1
0
0.54 -A
0.44 -A
0.54 -A
0.44 -A
+000
+0.00
Bristol Street NorthLW)
TS
2
1.51.5>
0
2.5
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.46 -A
052 -A
0.46 -A
052 -A
+000
+0.00
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
4.5
0.5
0
3
0
15
1.5
2
0
0
0
0.65 -B
0.70 -C
0.65 -B
0.70{
+000
+0.00
r ICU -LOS = Intersection Capanty Utillaatlan Level of service (see Appendix on.
L= Leh; T= Through; R= Righp»= Free Rlght Turn; o= Right TOm Overlap
'TS = Treffc5lgnal
38 121
Figure 17
Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
47�
47-
340
420
0�
0
25�
1
2p
o
2
�0
�
3
a0
—
4
=3
m
5
20
°
6
�0
0
7
20
�bbb.�co
�o
1-13
a
�bbs1
4-0
a
b.aO
X66
/
�bbsao
�8
1
abb
�o
1
�bbs50
1-1
1
D 0�
P�l
D
3�
4)
D Os
q
D
11�
I Y
D
Os'
� I
D
0�
R�2
D
0�
p
1—D
0—D°
3��5°
0—D
o�—
a
37 -0
-0—
0-0
Oho
—o
--
26 —D
0—D
0—D
° °o
0�
0�
0�
0�
0�,
1�
0�
1�
0�
0�
0�
m 0
0 15
77
72
0 30
o I
0 93
12
MacArthur Bouleva rd/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Kaman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
$7 0
�0
1-0
D 5s°Y°
4
0 111 �
l ddb ,e Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/17
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
39 122
1 0
1 0
0 0
690
700
990
2p
o
9
20
0
10
�p
r
11
20
0
12
v-0
—
13
�0
0
14
�0 °
�o
a o
o
�bbebb
1 13
'o
1
a b b
��
1
a b b
�o
1
o- b b'0
'o /
E
10
D
0s
10
0
0s
0
0 0�
1 t ID
0�
� I
D 0�
0
D
0—
°
0—D°
3—D°
50-0°
0-0
°M
0-0
--
0—D
0�
0�
1�
1�
0�
0�
27
m 0
1
0 2
29
0 30
0 93
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Karman Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Road/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
$7 0
�0
1-0
D 5s°Y°
4
0 111 �
l ddb ,e Road/
B .are Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/17
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
39 122
Figure 18
Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
00
180
21
0�
2v
15-
�1
—
�o
.0
3
a0
0
4
=1
„
5
^ O
6
a0
0
7
s-0 M
�0
d-8
abbso
4-0
a
l
C-49
4
abbs2
C-39
a
abbso
4-0
a
"'
ol�bs31
�4
a
F
p
D
F
p
D Os
q (°
D
93'
% Y (°
D
Os'
`h Y
D
0�
D
D
0or
�
0—D
ono
0—D
omr.,
r
70 -0em�
0—D
O�oo
0—D
o
17 —D
0
0
0�
0�
0�,
0�
0�
0�
0�
1�
055
m 2
37
40
45
0 68
0
182
1
74
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
F0 177
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/18
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
40 l es
00
00
0 0
410
410
650
10
�p
w
11
2p
o
12
�0
13
�0
0
14
albb�o
'0
a
l
'o
a
al [a
a
b'o
a
J]
'0
'o a
E46
16
D
0s
10
D
0s
16
D 03'
� I
03'
� I
D 03'
6
D
0—
�
0—D
ono
18—
o-o
26—D�
0—D
��
0—D
o
0
0�
0�
0�
0�
I�
0�
150
m 2
0 2
0 23
0 69
0 68
182
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
F0 177
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/18
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
40 l es
Figure 19
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1367
983
716 0
542
441
392 v
280
I m
°
ebb.
261
4-194
4
2
e
�bb.�c31
253
4-167
4
3°
'�
JJ IBs79
X12
4-136
4
4
"'
ebb.a
`z191
4-767
379
'^�'
4
5
�bbsa120
`138
4-910
m
4
6
a bbso
�0
4-0
0
4
7
a bbs453
2237 re
4-989
4
D 322
c91
D
161
4_298
D 19 �"
dl q
D
4373'
I Y
D
Os'
`h
D
1186
d p
D
0�
d p
584 —D
,�,�
p
313�<;
96—
D
e
922�mm�
D 03
dl `t ID
Owe
803
°;
1fi49 —Dom
a Y
D
0—Dg
50�
o r
73�
^—
— 28 �,—
797 —D
48�
"—'
783
—
°
O�
f7,°
8a
— 42,`x—
299
°'—
0o
0�°'—
0�
—m
589
603
1832
548
1103
1096
1535
1099
867
2055
1958
1006
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol street South Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
F1204 2p 4-0 '0 4 4) Y ° o
0 2043
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/19
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
41 ig4
446 0
460 0
0 0
2369 0
2193 0
1120 0
20
°
9
2114
10
222
l;!;
11
20
°
12
�
2160
13 m
26
n
14
20 °
4-0
�0
4
4_298
4
`°
b,43
4-172
`V
4
<1
4-0
0
4
— °
bs273
4-444
4
`°
bb�3
4-6
4
o-]'0
4-0
4
E31
p
D
793'
q
D 03
dl `t ID
D
803
d `� ID
D 1233
a Y
D
0
o r
315 —D
44�
"'
797 —D
48�
o
� 2514-0
421
o
—
°
118 —D
12�
o �,�
—_
8a
— 42,`x—
0o
0�°'—
589
603
548
1103
0 1311
1535
3232
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol street South Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
F1204 2p 4-0 '0 4 4) Y ° o
0 2043
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/19
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
41 ig4
Figure 20
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1403
1124 0
716 0
1512
1819
1104 v
1242 0
1°
X206
0
2 r7 Sh
X170
10
X38
4 m M
`z 162
5 e
X74
e
6 om'
�o
0
7 .,
X124 m
r
4-702
'—
—
4-441
4
4-127
`°
"'
4-1007
`" "'
4-1906
m
°
4-0
4
° °'
4-1191
ebb.
V)3
4
eb b.
M
4
993'
6665
4
�bbs636
D
4
a b bx202
4
a b bs0
03'
4
a bbx423
4
D 340
a p l0
D
292 —
a p 10
F�195
°� p l°
D
232
p I°
D
0°
p l°
D
4173'
a p 10
D
0 —°
p l°
N 288 —D
e
"'
200
535
N
`:
1076 -0
e R g
0
m m
e
1021 —D
o
0 —D
,°„
101
—�
53�
'�
38,
"'°
0�"`°0
430
'�—
0�
870
0 937
1414
0 824
0 1295
1083
0 616
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
974
1095
1262
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/20
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
42 125
932 0
716 0
0 0
1631 0
1599 0
1824 0
�p
9 a
X67
10
�q1
11
12
X348
e
IS
�0
14 a
�O °
�O
4
53
4
bb4
`" "'
4 -238
sl6l
4
`° "`°'
b�o
4-1
4
b'o
4-0
4
E
p 10
D
1513'
p
D
993'
1 p 10
D O3
]416
D
2303
dl � I2973'
a p 10
D
03'
alp 10
o
""
e
463 —D
51�
e =
0
184 —D
26�
2 2617 -0
142
,^,
'°
276 —D
I67�
e
--
4 —D
0
0 —D
0�'�
°'
762
554
535
1621
1361
3067
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
974
1095
1262
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/20
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
42 125
Figure 21
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1371
991
738 0
557
445
393 v
281
I m
X61
n
2 _ e
^^`53
3 °
°
X12
4
'' °
`z 197
'MP'
5
`138
m
6
�0
0
7 °
X237
°
X194
4
4-167
4
'� ^
4 -138
4
"
X767
4
`°'
X910
4
bb�3
4-6
4
o-]'o
re
X989
ebb.
95
4
�bb.�31
a
albbs79
q
4
ebb.
379
4
�bbsQo
D 1233
4
a bbso
0
4
a bbsas3
4
D 322
p
D
161
p
D 193'
dl q (°
D
443 �'
% Y (°
D
Os'
`ry Y
D
1190
p
D
0�
p
584 —D
,°,�
313
<;
96 —D
o
e
922
m o
0�
e
M
1fi49 —D
o
0—D
g
50,
—
73�
'�—
— 28 �,—
"—'
183
—
O�
299
0�
—�
0 1102
870
1853
2065
7964
1098
1008
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
F1204 �0 4-0 .�o 4 4) Y °
0 2049
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/21
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
43 120
448 0
462 0
0 0
2375 0
2199 0
1124 0
�O
°
9
X114
16
X22
71
�O
°
12
`? 160
13 m
—6
N
74
�0 °
4-0
�o
4
abb�eo
4-302
4
°
b,43
4-172
4
<1
4-0
0
4
° °
bs273
4-448
4
bb�3
4-6
4
o-]'o
4-0
4
E316�
p
D
793'
q
D 03
01 `t ID
D
803
`� ID
D 1233
a Y
D
0
o
"`91
315 —D
44�
��
"'
797 —D
48�
o
.�., 2514-0
421
0
—
121—D
12�
o �Sg
--
8—D
— 42�`�
a
0—D
0�°'—
o
591
607
552
1103
015
1539
3238
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
F1204 �0 4-0 .�o 4 4) Y °
0 2049
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/21
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
43 120
Figure 22
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1405
1128
717
1531
1825
1106 v
1244 0
I o
X206
0
2 r7
X170
10
X38
4
`z165
m
5—
`�74
e
6
�o
0
7 .,
X124 m
r
b b
4-702
ems
4
— —
b b.
4-441
iml
a
4 -128
6665
4
"'
a b b
X1007
.x636
4
a b b
X1906
x202
m
4
°^' °
a b b
)-0
s0
4
° °
a b b
X1191 =
sa23 4
D 340s
p
D
292s
p
F�195
4I q (°
D
235 �'
% Y (°
D
0
Y
D
419 —
p
D
0—
p
N 288 —D
101
e
—
"'
200
53�
a
o
N
`°—
`:
1076 -0
38�""°
e g
,^,
0
0�"
m
°
1021 —D
430
o
—
0
0,1418
189
""'
S1
828
880
`
142
0 1300
167
1086
101
938
617
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
967
933
717
0
1634 0
1602
8
�0
0
9 �.
X67
10
X41
II
�p
0
12
X348
e
13
�0
—
�0 o
so
4
4- 523
�53
'°
4
b'19
4-243
4
4-0
so
4
°'
as161
4 -240
4
`°
abs0
4-1
4
s0 4
188 —
p
D
151 —
p
D
99—
p (
0—
Y
D
230 —
p
D
297 —
Y
F14-
1006 —D
o
463 —D
a
o
184 —D
-
°; 2617 —D
o
,^,
280 —D
e
4 —D
189
""'
S1
"'-
26�
`
142
167
—
101
763
560
540
456
1626
1366
3070
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
F1262 �p 4-0 .�o 4 p o
0 2163
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/22
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
44 127
7. CEQA Analysis
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) analysis (this part of the analysis is consistent
with CEQA) included analysis of the study area intersections.
Cumulative Projects
The City of Newport Beach staff provided the cumulative projects in the study area for the CEQA
analysis. Typically, the cumulative projects are known, but not approved project developments
that are reasonably expected to be completed or nearly completed at the same time as the
proposed project. The cumulative projects consist of development that has been approved but
are not fully completed (see Section 5, including Table 5 and Appendix E). The cumulative
projects utilized were ones that added traffic to the study area intersections. The cumulative
project list is shown in Table 8 and the cumulative project traffic generation is included in
Appendix G. Appendix G contains the directional distributions of the cumulative project traffic.
The cumulative project morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement volumes
have been calculated and are shown on Figures 23 and 24, respectively.
The CECA traffic volumes were obtained by adding the cumulative projects traffic volumes to the
TPO traffic volumes. In order to analyze a "conservative" scenario in terms of the assignment of
traffic, the CEQA analysis does not credit the existing site development.
Intersection Capacity Utilization
The City of Newport Beach methodology used to assess the operation of a signalized intersection
is known as Intersection Capacity Utilization. To calculate an Intersection Capacity Utilization
value the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared with the capacity of the
intersection. An Intersection Capacity Utilization value is usually expressed as a decimal. The
decimal represents that portion of the hour required to provide sufficient capacity to
accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity.
The Levels of Service for existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects
traffic conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 9. Existing + growth (Year 2013) +
approved projects + cumulative projects morning and evening peak hour intersection turning
movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 25 and 26, respectively.
Existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects Intersection Capacity
Utilization worksheets and the Level of Service description are provided in Appendix D.
For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects traffic conditions, the
study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or better during the
morning /evening peak hours.
The Levels of Service for existing +growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects +
project traffic conditions have been calculated and are shown in Table 9. Existing +growth (Year
2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects + project morning and evening peak hour
45
122
intersection turning movement volumes have been calculated and are shown on Figures 27 and
28, respectively. Existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects +
project Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheets and the Level of Service description are
provided in Appendix D.
For existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved projects + cumulative projects + project traffic
conditions, the study area intersections are projected to operate at Level of Service C or better
during the morning /evening peak hours.
Significance Criteria
The City of Newport Beach intersection significance criteria requires an increase of one - percent or
more at a study area intersection operating at worse than Level of Service D during the
morning /evening peak hours.
As shown in Table 9 for the CEQA analysis, the project - generated traffic did not result in a
significant impact at the study area intersections; therefore, no improvements are recommended
at the study area intersections.
46
189
Table 8
Cumulative Project List
Project Name
Mariner's Medical Arts
WPI- Newport, LLC
Banning Ranch
Sunset Ridge Park
Marina Park
Pres Office Building B
Koll- Conexant
Mariner's Pointe
Newport Coast - TAZ 1
Newport Coast - TAZ 2
Newport Coast - TAZ 3
Newport Coast - TAZ 4
47 iq0
Table 9
CEQA Analysis Intersection Capacity Utilization and Levels of Service
' ICU-L05= Intersection capatlty OHllzat[on - Level of XNia hee Appendix 0).
L= Leff; T= Through; R = Also;» =Free Right Turn; >= Right Turn Overlap! = Impmvement
'TS = Traffic Signal
48 191
Peak Hour
ICU -LOS'
Existing +Growth
Existing
+Growth
(Year 2013) +
(Year 2013(+
Approved
Projects
Intersection
Approach Lanes'
Approved
Projects 4
Cumulative Projects
Northbound
Southbound
Eastbound
Westbound
Traffic
Cumulative
Projects
+Project
ICU Increase
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
L
T
R
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Intersection
Control'
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive(EW)
TS
1
4
1
1
4
1
2
2.5
0.5
2
3
1»
0.470 -A
0.659 -B
0.471 -A
0.659 -B
+0.001
+0000
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3.5
0.5
15
1
0.5
1
2
1»
0.413 -A
0.495 -A
0.413 -A
0.496 -A
+0.000
+0001
Von Karmen Avenue(EW)
TS
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
0569 -A
0.601 -13
0575 -A
0.606-B
+0.006
+0005
Jamboree Road(EW)
TS
2
3
1>
2
3
1>>
2
3
1
2
3
1
0.682 -B
0.763 -C
0.686 -B
0.765 -C
+0.004
+0002
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at:
Bristol Street North(EW)
TS
2
3
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
1
3.5
0.5
0515 -A
0.773 -C
0516 -A
0.774 -C
+0.001
+0001
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
45
0.5
1
3
0
1.5
2.5
2
0
0
0
0.647 -B
0.486 -A
0.648 -B
0.487 -A
+0.001
+0001
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North(EW)
TS
2
2
0
0
1.5
2.5
0
0
0
1.5
3
0.5
0555 -A
0.549 -A
0556 -A
0.549 -A
+0.001
+0000
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
1 0
25
1.5
2
2
0
1 1.5
3
0.5
0
0
0
1 0.401 -A
I 0.467 -A
0.401 -A
0.467 -A
1 +0.000
+0000
Von Karman Avenue INS) at:
Campus Drive(EW)
TS
1
2
1»
1
1.5
0.5
1
2
1
1
1.5
0.5
0.482 -A
0.578 -A
0.483 -A
0380 -A
+0.001
+0002
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
1
2
1
0295 -A
0.354 -A
0296 -A
0.354 -A
+0.001
+0000
BaYview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South(EW)
TS
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0.430 -A
0.568 -A
0.430 -A
0
+0000
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive(EW)
TS
2
35
0.5
2
25
0.5
2
2
1>>
2
2
1
0.665 -B
0.638 -B
0.667 -B
2
+0001
Birch Street(EW)
TS
1
25
0.5
1
3
1>>
1.5
0.5
1»
0
1
0
0557 -A
0.480 -A
0558 -A
1
aC+00
+0001
Bristol Street North(EW)
TS
2
1515>
0
2.5
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.484 -A
0.539 -A
0.485 -A
1
+0001
Bristol street South (EW)
IS
0
45
0.5
0
3
0
1.5
1.5
2
0
0
0
0.663 -B
0.735 -C
0.664 -B
01
+0001
' ICU-L05= Intersection capatlty OHllzat[on - Level of XNia hee Appendix 0).
L= Leff; T= Through; R = Also;» =Free Right Turn; >= Right Turn Overlap! = Impmvement
'TS = Traffic Signal
48 191
Figure 23
Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
28�
25
280
23
15-
21v
po
I
217
N
2
219
�°27
o
3
21
••�
4
257
�
5
20
m
6
20
0
a
7
20 m
�bb"
X12
�co
a
abb
`�
�bbs1
4-0
a
bas6a
X157
a
bsals
X80
a
abb
0 �
10
�bs0
X97
a
D 1�
29 —D
D
0�
117��-
D Os
q
D
19 �'
I Y
D
Os'
`h
D
29�
R�2
D
029
—D
ono
0�
0 —p„o_e
7pp -0o�o
0�
0�0,
-0
0 �
2—D
00�
0
3�
0�,
0�
0�
0 141
0�
0111
133
63
31
2
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
fib 0
15 VT� 0—D 0�
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/23
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
49 � ^�
10
4b 2
42
76b 0
ll o
b10
9
219
�°27
o
�
a
10
XII
20
3
o
a
b0 b
� o
a
12
b
a
13
20
0
a
14
o-
° a
4--o 2
o
'0
20��
E
Da0
D
D 0�
D
0�
D 0�
" T r
D
0 �
10
O—R
29 —D
0—°
°°
29 —D
29—
—b D
°
02
—b
D
°
0�
0
0�
0�
0�
0 �
0
0
0 141
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
fib 0
15 VT� 0—D 0�
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/23
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
49 � ^�
Figure 24
Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
129
109
109
129
37
5v
146-
I
0
2
�p
,a
3
a6
—
4
2p
5
2p
n
13
=p
7 9
p
a bb�p
33
a bb�p
�0
�bb=
° °
X126
a
�3b7sb'
X3 5
sN 1
a
abb4-6
sp
a
bbo
�-�
3
0 4 a
D
0
0
p
s
D
0 =
P
°
=
P
°
0�
P
25
2
0�
0
1812�
9 -0oAM
os=IoYp
o
O
0
-
0 D
o2XsoY
o
I6
I0�8
0
0
I6
0
"Yo
'
1
4
99
27
0
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
0
0
0
174
206
146-
a
9
,a
10
—
12
,a
13
=p
14
��s°
a bb�p
a bb�p
3
�bb=
o
a
a bb=Yp
s a
a b-bD
p p
a
0 s-
ps
°
p
s
0 =
P
=
P
°
ps
Po
17
-
I03 -bD
os=IoYp
o
22
0
0
0
00
3 2
I6
0,
"Yo
'
1
4
0
200
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
713 0
15 _ R9- 0
lamboree Road/
Brrtol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/24
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
50 �n3
Figure 25
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1395
1008
744 0
565
456
413 v
280
1
°
bb.
X78
X206
91
4
2 ° ° e
b b
X70
4-167
s31
m
`V
4
3 °
'� °'°
0Ib bs80
X13
4-136
4
4
S �
b b.x447
`z242
4-924
"'
e
4
S >.
`� '
b bs08
` 138
4-990
`!
4
6
a b bso
�0
4-0
0
4
7
a bbx453
X237 _
X1086 =
4
D 323
D
161
4- 327
D 19 �"
dl
D
4563'
dl
D
Os'
a
D
1215
d
D
0�
d
m 613 —D
,�,�
u°,
313��
2373'
96 —D
,�„
m1044
-0m,;
,,
dl p
Owe
80�
e1fi51
—po
a p
D
0—Dg
al p
50,
=
"'
76�
°'—
— 28 �,
—^
oM
783
o
—
.°3
0�"�0
W m,�
_ 8—D
42�
299
°'—
0—D
0�
01`�
589
7270
603
978
1965
1103
2178
0 1518
1989
1758
1098
3373
1008
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch Street/
Campus Drive Birch Street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street South Bristol Street North
652 0
447 0
461 0
0 0
2411 0
2235 0
1282 0
e
�0
0
9
X131
ov
10
`=22
,;
71
�0
0
12
`? 160
m
IS
�5
74
�0 °
o-bb�0
4
abb�e0
4- 327
4
`°
�bb,46
4-189
`V
4
<1
4-0
0
a
^ °°M' °
abbs273
4-456
m
4
°'
�bb�3
4-6
4
' °
J]
4-0
'0 4
D 6783'
p
D
2373'
p
D
793'
p
D 0�
dl p
D
80�
d `�
D 123
a p
D
0�
al p
,^0 869 —D
m 316
o r
"'
344 —D
44�
"'
197 —D
48�
oM
e 2543-0
°' 421
o
—
.°3
747 —D
12�
W m,�
_ 8—D
42�
n
H
0—D
0�
o
589
603
548
1103
0 1518
1758
3373
Birch Street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol Street South Campus Drive Birch Street Brirtol Street South Campus Drive
F233 V2155
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/25
KUNZNAAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
51 to /
Figure 26
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1532
1233
1218 0
1641
1856
1109 v
1244
I >.
X206
0
2
X67
3
X44
4
`z162
0
5 °
`�74
°�
6
�0
0
7
X124
°
o-bb�0
4-735
4
r7 0^ r
4 -554
re
4
-
4-127
4
_
"'
4-1133
4
�""'
o-bbs161
4-1941
4
°
4-0
4
° '
4-1225
b"
.�ID3
4
�b It
p
D
JJ1bx670
q
4
�1bs636
D
4
a b bs203
D 3003'
4
s0
4
1023 —D
— 189
x423 4
345s
p
D
292s
J��441
D 1383'
dl q (°
D
244 �'
% Y (°
D
0s'
Y
D
4393'
p
D
0s
310 -D
e
e
200
539
.., 195 -D
N
e
1265-0
e
O�
m
a°,
1021 -D
o
0-D
,�„
101
-�
69�
°' 199 �,
'��
38�""°°
0�"P
430
'"'
0�
1464
918
1394
1110
959
616
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
965 0
948 0
716 0
0 0
1805 0
1805 0
1970 0
8
�0
0
9 a
X67
10
X41
11
�p
0
12
X348
°�
13
�0
14
�0 0
°
o-bb�0
4-0
4
abb�53
4 -554
re
4
abb�20
4- 243
4
�bb�0
4-0
4
�""'
o-bbs161
4-271
4
a1b�o
4-1
4
J]
4-0
'0 4
D 1883'
p
D
1513'
p
D
993'
q
D 03
dl `t 10
D
2303
d `� ID
D 3003'
a Y
D
03'
alp
1023 —D
— 189
o
0
501 —D
51�
e =
u'
200
26�
2720 —D
m 142
o °,S
l^
298 —D
199
e --
4—D
117
i 0
0—D
0�'�
,S;
762
555
539
0 456
1702
1439
3267
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol street South Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
1293
15 Mg-- a b b0 1075 s ,°„ 1097 —D 11262
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/26
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
52 �n�
Figure 27
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Cumulative Projects +
Project Morning Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1400
1017
463 0
581
460
414 v
281
I
278
°
2 ° dR
270
m
10
X3
4
`z248
°'
S ,�
` 138
m
6
�o
0
7 °
237
[Src95
4-206
�'
4
rz dR
�b b.sc31
0-167
`V
a
`°
b,46
4 -138
se0
4
° `° "
eb b.a
L-924
447
=
4
`�"
d bbsa08
0-990
`!
4
a b bso
4-0
4
a bbx453
6
D 323
p
D
161
F28
q
D
4633'
Y
D
03'
`h
D
1219
d p
D
0m
613—
,�,�
u°,
313��
197 —D
48�
,�„
m1044
-0m�
e
150 —D
12�
0�e
8—D
42�
X
1651 —Do
0"`�'
0�
050�
591
=
608
76�
°'—
552
—=
1103
183
1522
0�"°0
1762
"'
299
°'—
07272
980
1988
2128
1995
1100
1011
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol street North Brirtol street south Bristol street North
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
F233 2p 4-0 'o 4 41 p�°
0 2161
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/27
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
53 � n
449 0
463 0
0 0
2417 0
2241 0
1285 0
20
°
2131
10
222
11
20
°
12
°°
2160
m
13
26
n
14
20
4-0
�o
4
4-331
�eo
4
`°
b,46
189
4
<1
4-0
0
4
^ °°M'
4-460
s273
m
4
'
b�3
4-6
4
J] lo'o
4-0
4
E316
p
D
793'
q
D 03'
01 `t ID
D
803'
`� ID
D 1233'
Y
D
0
o
"'
344 —D
44�
�
197 —D
48�
o
e 2543-0
°' 421
o
—
e
150 —D
12�
W o�
8—D
42�
n
H
0"`�'
0�
591
608
552
1103
1522
1762
3379
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol street south Campus Drive
F233 2p 4-0 'o 4 41 p�°
0 2161
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol street North
4839c/27
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
53 � n
Figure 28
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Cumulative Projects +
Project Evening Peak Hour Intersection Turning Movement Volumes
1536
1241
1256 0
1666
1864
1,11 v
1246 0
I <.
"
e b b
5—p
2 _
r7 r
J I It,
X170
4-441
u4
a
3
JJ
X44
4- 129
670
4
4 m _
"' -
b
=168
4-1133
x636
°'
4
5
m
a
`�74
4-1941
s2o3
4
6
° °
a b b
�0
4-0
so
0
4
7
X124
x423 4
345s
J��
D
292s
p
D 138250
" `
abb
4-243
20
�'
% Y r
D
0s
`ry Y
D
4443'
I p
D
0310
abbso
—D
D 1883'
e
200
.., 195 —D
199 �,
N '��
,�
1265-0
38�"'�°
e
dl Y
O�
03
m
"'�0
m
1021 —D
4303
o
'"'
Y
01013693
03
°0 1023 —D
o
0
941
a
°'
200 —D
-
2720 —D
o
961
303 —D
�
—
<
881
1405
1117
619
MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ MacArthur Boulevard/ Campus Drive/ Campus Drive/ Birch street/
Campus Drive Birch street Von Karman Avenue Jamboree Road Brirtol Street North Brirtol Street south Bristol Street North
967
9500
718
0 0
18110
18110
19770
B
5—p
0
9 -
5-67
10
`=47
II
�o
0
12
X348
m
13
�o
—
14 „
�o 0
°
abbso
4-0
4
`� M a
abb�53
4-558
4
" `
abb
4-243
20
4
abbso
4-0
4
°' m "
abbslsl
4-275
-
4
abbs0
4-1
4
abbso
4-0
4
D 1883'
p
D
1513'
p
D
993'
p (°
D 03`
dl Y
D
230 =
p
D
3003'
Y
D
°0 1023 —D
o
0
501 —D
a
°'
200 —D
-
2720 —D
o
Pi
303 —D
�
—
<
4 —D
e g o
513
"'�
263
°
1423
`
1993
1173
03
764
562
0 546
0 456
1709
1446
0 3274
Birch street/ Von Karman Avenue/ Von Kam-an Avenue/ Ba,lew place/ Jamboree Read/
Bristol street south Campus Drive Birch street Brirtol Street south Campus Drive
1300
15 �p
4-0
a�bb.�o 4
D10753dp�
,°„ 1097 —D o
12623 —
0 2265
lamboree Road/
Brstol Street South
Jamboree Read/ Jamboree Road/
Birch Street Bdstol Street North
4839c/28
KUNZ AAN ASSOCIATES, INC. Intersection reference numbers are in upper left corner ofturning movement boxes.
OVER 30 YEARS or Gxca i ENT SERVICE
54 �n�
8. Orange County Congestion Management Program
This section discusses the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). The purpose,
prescribed methodology, and definition of a significant traffic impact are discussed.
County Congestion Management Program (CMP)
The CMP is a result of Proposition 111 which was a statewide initiative approved by the voters in
June, 1990. The proposition allowed for a nine cent per gallon state gasoline tax increase over a
five year period.
Proposition 111 explicitly stated that the new gas tax revenues were to be used to fix existing
traffic problems and was not to be used to promote future development. For a city to get its
share of the Proposition 111 gas tax, it has to follow certain procedures specified by the State
Legislature. The legislation requires that a traffic impact analysis be prepared for new
development. The traffic impact analysis is prepared to monitor and fix traffic problems caused
by new development.
The Legislature requires that adjacent jurisdictions use a standard methodology for conducting a
traffic impact analysis. To assure that adjacent jurisdictions use a standard methodology in
preparing traffic impact analyses, one common procedure is that all cities within a county, and the
county agency itself, adopt and use one standard methodology for conducting traffic impact
analyses.
Although each county has developed standards for preparing traffic impact analyses,
requirements do vary in detail from one county to another, but not in overall intent or concept.
The general approach selected by each county for conducting traffic impact analyses has common
elements.
According to the CMP, those proposed developments which meet the following criteria shall be
evaluated:
■ Development projects that generate more than 2,400 daily trips (The threshold is 1,600
or more trips per day for development projects that will directly access a CMP highway
system link).
■ Projects with a potential to create an impact of more than three percent of Level of
Service E capacity.
Significance Criteria
To determine whether the addition of project generated trips results in a significant impact at the
CMP study facility and thus requires mitigation, the Orange County CMP utilizes the following
thresholds of significance:
55
19g
■ A significant project impact occurs when a proposed project increases traffic demand at
a CMP study facility by more than three percent of capacity (V /C >0.03), causing or
worsening Level of Service F (V /C > 1.00).
Based upon the CMP thresholds above, the project - generated traffic did not result in a significant
impact at the study area intersections; therefore, no improvements are recommended at the
study area intersections.
56 q
19-9
9. Other Traffic Considerations
As the site plan for the project becomes more definitive, the following guidelines should be
incorporated into the project design. Listed below for more detailed planning are recommended
guidelines for the development.
Site - specific circulation and access recommendations are depicted on Figure 29.
Parking
The surface parking lot is shared by three parcels: the proposed site (currently vacant quality
restaurant), Classic Q Billiards and Sports Club, and Saagar Fine Cuisine of India. The surface
parking lot currently provides 211 shared parking spaces. In addition, the project site (Parcel 3)
has obtained 32 off -site parking spaces located at a parking structure southwest of the project
site.
Existing Conditions
The existing quality restaurant (currently vacant) required 105 parking spaces per
UP2008 -043 (at one parking space per 40 square feet of net public area). The existing
Sagaar Fine Cuisine of India requires 54 parking spaces per UP2005 -004 (at one parking
space per 50 square feet of net public area) and the Classic Q Billiards and Sports Club
requires 80 parking spaces per UP3392.
A survey of the surface parking lot was conducted to establish the parking demand for the
existing land uses shown in Table 10. Based upon discussions with the City of Newport
Beach staff, the peak periods for parking at the project site were determined to be 6:00
AM to 12:00 AM on a Friday and 6:00 AM to 12:00 AM on a Saturday. To quantify the
existing parking demand for the project site, the existing parking demand was determined
by surveying the project site at 30- minute intervals on Friday (February 11, 2011) and
Saturday (February 12, 2011).
The project site parking area was divided into eight (8) parking zones as shown on Figure
30. The parking surveys are shown in Tables 11 and 12. The parking survey conducted on
Friday (February 11, 2011) shows the maximum number of occupied parking spaces is 133
parked vehicles from 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM (see Table 11). This is a maximum parking
occupancy of 63 percent. Figure 31 graphically depicts the existing conditions of the
surface parking lot based upon the parking survey.
City of Newport Beach Parking Code
Table 13 shows the parking requirements for the proposed project per the City of
Newport Beach Parking Code. The proposed 4,525 square feet of retail use would require
approximately 18 parking spaces by using the parking ratio of one parking space per 250
57
200
square feet of net floor area [(4,525 sf. — 200 sf. utility room) _ 250 sf. = 17.3 = 18 parking
spaces).
The 4,000 gross square feet of bank use would require approximately 16 parking spaces
by using the parking ratio of one parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area
(4,000 sf. _ 250 sf. = 16 parking spaces).
The 4,000 gross square feet of high turn -over dining establishments would require
approximately 50 parking spaces by using the parking ratio of one parking space per 40
square feet of net public area (4,000 sf. _ 2 (assuming 50% of total gross area is allocated
for net public area) - 40 sf. = 2,000 sf. - 40 sf. = 50 parking spaces).
The fast food restaurant use would generate a parking demand of approximately 20
parking spaces by using the parking ratio of one parking space per 50 square feet of gross
floor area (1,000 sf. - 50 sf. = 20 parking spaces). The total parking demand per City of
Newport Beach Parking Code for the proposed project is 104 parking spaces.
Shared Parking Analysis
The idea of a shared parking analysis is that if the various land uses have peak parking
demands at different points in time, or on different days of the week, then the number of
parking spaces required is not the sum of the parking requirements for each land use, but
rather less. If the peak demands for the various land uses are non - coincidental, then
there is an opportunity for sharing of parking. To determine the degree to which shared
parking can occur, the cumulative hourly parking demand of the land uses is calculated at
all points in time throughout the day for both weekdays and weekends. In this case,
Friday has been determined to be the peak day based upon the existing parking demand
survey.
Kunzman Associates, Inc. has utilized time -of -day factors and the parking rates for
weekday and weekend parking demand for customer /visitor and employee as developed
by the Urban Land Institute Shared Parking (2005). The Urban Land Institute procedures
were utilized in this study to evaluate peak parking demand that would occur for the
project at any point in time when day of week and hourly factors are utilized. Per the
Urban Land Institute, weekend rates and factors are applied to Friday after 5:00 PM.
To conduct a shared parking analysis, it is necessary to disaggregate the parking code into
weekday and weekend as well as customer /visitor /guest and employee /resident parking
space demands. Based on the City of Newport Beach Parking Code and the Urban Land
Institute recommended parking ratios for weekdays and weekends, the disaggregated
parking rates are shown in Table 14.
Table 15 shows the expected hourly peak parking demand of the proposed project land
uses for both a Friday, which has been assumed as the peak day based upon the existing
parking demand survey. Table 16 shows the cumulative parking demand peaks for the
proposed project land uses combined with the existing parking demand for the projected
peak Friday.
58
201
Based upon the shared parking analysis, the maximum parking demand for the entire site
during peak hours is 225 parked vehicles (see Table 16).
The proposed project site plan will reconfigure the surface parking lot layout on Parcel 1
and provide a total of 222 parking spaces for the entire site, including the 32 off -site
parking spaces located in the nearby parking structure. The total maximum parking
demand for the entire site is 225 parking spaces. The site does not provide sufficient
parking spaces to meet the City of Newport Beach Parking Code requirements and is
deficient by three (3) parking spaces. It is recommended that the project obtain a waiver
to allow for the reduction of the parking spaces required by three (3) parking spaces
pursuant to the supplemental parking management plan prepared by Kunzman
Associates, Inc. A summary of the shared parking analysis findings is provided in Table 17.
Included with this submission is a copy of the Reciprocal Parking and Maintenance
Agreement that can be modified by a simple majority of the property owners. A copy of
the Covenant and Agreement Regarding Maintenance of Off- Street Parking Space
Affecting Parcel 1 and the License Agreement for off -site parking spaces is included for
review (see Appendix 1).
Access
To assure smooth traffic operations for vehicles entering and exiting the site, a northbound left
turn pocket on MacArthur Boulevard is recommended to accommodate a minimum pocket length
of 120 feet.
Install appropriate vehicular signage to ensure U -turns and eastbound left turns are prohibited at
the MacArthur Boulevard /Project Driveway.
A STOP sign should be installed to control outbound traffic on all site access roadways.
Sight Distance
The landscape plantings and signs should be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of
project driveways to assure good visibility.
59
202
Table 10
Existing Project Land Uses
Tenant
Parcel
I Land Use
I Quantity
I Unitsl
I Hours of Operation
Quality Restaurant (Vacant)
Parcel 1
N/A
1 7.996
1 TSF
N/A
Saagar
Parcel 2
Restaurant
1 7.015
1 TSF
11:00 AM - 12:00 AM Daily
Classic
Parcel
Restaurant
1 7.870
1 TSF
10:00AM- 2:00AMDaily
' TSF =Thousand Square Feet
60 203
Table 11
Friday (February 11, 2011) Parking Count
133 Maximum number of —pied arkli , aPa2s -. 133veM[Ierfr- 53OPM -SWPM
One veM1l [le waslllegally parked I[mm9WAM 1130 and. besides parked In Zane H fmm600AM -J 00 PM are Ilkelyfor usesofthe offI[e EulltlingtotM1e south ofthe p[ole[tslte.
Ooee nN loelutle Ibe33 otf -Si@ pafkingsparee laatetl In a nearby parking slru[ture; wbeM1 M1ave been a55umad ko beunarupietl tlue [otbeva[anry of Me exi9ingquillty IezGUranton Parcel 1.
61 204
Number of Parked Vehicles and Percentage of Occupied Parking
Spaces
Time Period
Parking Zone A
Parking Zone B
Parking Zone C
Parking Zone D
Parkin Zone E
Parking Zone F
Parking Zone G
Parking Zone H'
Total,
Parking Spa[es Provided
30
32
37
4fi
40
26
13
J
211
600 AM - 6:30AM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
8%
1
14%
3
1%
6:30 AM -700 AM
1
10%
2
6%
1
3%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
3
12%
1
14%
10
5%
700 AM - 7:30AM
1
10%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
5
19%
3
43%
16
8%
7:30 AM - 800 AM
1
10%
2
6%
4
11%
3
7%
3
8%
1
4%
5
19%
3
43%
22
305b
800 AM- 8:30AM
1
10%
4
13%
3
8%
8
17%
3
8%
1
4%
7
27%
J
100%
34
16%
8:30 AM - 9 00 AM
2
20%
5
16%
2
5%
13
28%
4
10%
1
4%
10
38%
7
100%
44
21%
900 AM - 9:30 AM
1
10%
5
Sfi%
3
8%
19
41%
7
18%
1
4%
12
46%
8
114%
56
27%
9:30 AM - 10 00 AM
2
20%
5
16%
3
e%
23
50%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
B
114%
64
3056 .
1000 AM - 10:30 AM
2
20%
7
22%
4
11%
24
52%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
68
32%
10.30 AM - 11MAM
3
30%
7
22%
4
11%
24
52%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
69
33%
1100AM - 11:3DAM
5
50%
7
22%
6
16%
23
50%
8
20%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
71
34%
1130 AM - 1200 PM
8
80%
11
34%
13
35%
24
52%
14
35%
2
8%
13
50%
6
86%
91
43%
12:00 PM 12:30 PM
9
91
20
63%
24
65%
25
54%
16
40%
3
12%
13
50%
6
86%
115
55%
12:30 PM - 100 PM
8
80%
26
81%
22
59%
27
59%
15
38%
B
31%
13
50%
7
100%
125
60 %.
1A0 PM - 1:30 PM
8
80%
14
44%
19
51%
25
54%
11
28%
5
19%
13
50%
7
100%
102
48%
1:30 PM -200 PM
8
80%
10
31%
14
38%
24
52%
10
25%
4
15%
12
46%
7
100%
89
42%
2:00 PM 2:30 PM
8
80%
9
28%
12
32%
2D
43%
10
25%
2
B%
11
42%
7
100%
79
37%
2:30 PM - 3 00 PM
8
80%
9
28%
12
32%
19
41%
9
23%
2
8%
10
38%
7
100%
76
36%
3:00 PM 3:30 PM
7
70%
14
44%
29
78%
18
39%
18
45%
4
15%
10
38%
6
86%
105
50%
3:30 PM -400 PM
8
80%
15
47%
29
78%
19
41%
18
45%
4
15%
SO
38%
J
100%
110
52%
4:00 PM 4:30 PM
9
91
18
56%
27
73%
18
39%
18
45%
4
15%
11
42%
5
71%
110
52%
4:30 PM -500 PM
SO
100%
21
66%
29
78%
21
46%
16
40%
7
27%
11
42%
5
71%
120
57%
5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
10
100%
29
91%
33
89%
17
37%
17
43%
6
23%
11
42%
5
71%
128
61%
5:30 PM -600 PM
10
100%
31
97%
32
86%
19
41%
21
53%
9
35%
8
31%
3
43%
3
63%
6:00 PM - 630 PM
10
100%
25
78%
27
73%
16
35%
21
53%
8
31%
5
19%
1
14%
113
54%
6:30 PM - 7 00 PM
10
100%
16
5D%
29
78%
13
28%
19
48%
7
27%
3
12%
0
0%
97
46%
7:00 PM 7:30 PM
10
100%
23
72%
31
84%
16
35%
17
43%
g
31%
3
12%
0
0%
108
51%
7:30 PM -800 PM
10
100%
29
91%
32
86%
18
39%
15
38%
8
31%
2
8%
0
0%
114
54%
8:00 PM 8:30 PM
9
90%
33
103%
31
84%
15
33%
15
38%
6
23%
4
15%
0
0%
113
54%
8:30 PM -900 PM
7
70%
28
88%
24
65%
16
35%
10
25%
3
12%
4
15%
1
14%
93
44%
9:OOPM- 9:30PM
6
60%
27
84%
25
68%
13
28%
8
20%
2
8%
4
15%
1
14%
86
41%
9:30 PM - 1000 PM
5
50%
27
84%
26
JD%
13
26%
J
18%
2
8%
4
15%
1
14%
85
00%
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
5
50%
21
84%
20
54%
12
26%
5
13%
2
8%
3
12%
1
14%
75
36%
10:30 PM - 1100 PM
4
40%
26
81%
19
51%
12
26%
6
15%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
79
35%
11:OOPM - 1130 PM
6
60%
23
72%
20
54%
12
26%
0
10%
3
SZ%
11:30 PM - 1200AM
7
70%
17
133 Maximum number of —pied arkli , aPa2s -. 133veM[Ierfr- 53OPM -SWPM
One veM1l [le waslllegally parked I[mm9WAM 1130 and. besides parked In Zane H fmm600AM -J 00 PM are Ilkelyfor usesofthe offI[e EulltlingtotM1e south ofthe p[ole[tslte.
Ooee nN loelutle Ibe33 otf -Si@ pafkingsparee laatetl In a nearby parking slru[ture; wbeM1 M1ave been a55umad ko beunarupietl tlue [otbeva[anry of Me exi9ingquillty IezGUranton Parcel 1.
61 204
Table 12
Saturday (February 12, 2011) Parking Count
52 Maximums number of oor.,I.ol parking apaoo- 124'ehI,I. from]. 30 PM- IIWIM.
Does not Ihd.. the 32 Mfalte parking sp.,hs located in a nearby parking structure, which have been assumed W be unacupleb due to the vacanq of the existing qualt"caurant on Parcel 1.
62 205
Number of Parked Vehicles and Percentage of Occupied Parking Spaces
Time Period
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zaner
Parking Zone
Parking Zanotti
Total'
Parking Spaces Provided
30
32
3]
46
40
26
13
]
211
6 W AM - 6:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6'
3%
6:30 AM - 7:00 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
3%
7:00 AM - 7:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
7
3%
7:30 AM - 8:00 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
1
4%
0
0%
1
14%
8
4%
8:00 AM - 8:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
1
3%
0
0%
3
8%
1
4%
1
4%
4
57%
12
6%
8:30 AM -9:00 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
3
8%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
14
7%
990 AM 9:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
6
86%
14
7%
9:30 AM - 10:00 AM
0
0%
2
fi%
2
5%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
12
6%
10:00 AM - 10:30 AM
2
20%
4
13%
2
5%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
7
100%
18
9%
10:30 AM - 11:00 AM
0
0%
2
6%
1
3%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
7
100%
14
7%
1100 AM - 11:30 AM
1
10%
3
9%
3
8%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
7
100%
18
9%
1130 AM - 1290 PM
0
0%
2
6%
3
8%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
7
100%
16
8%
1290 PM - 12'.30 PM
5
50%
4
13%
ID
27%
2
4%
3
8%
1
4%
1
4%
6
Sfi%
32
15%
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
5
50%
3
9%
16
43%
2
4%
2
5%
2
8%
2
8%
6
86%
38
18%
100 PM - 1:30 PM
9
90%
4
13%
20
54%
1
2%
3
8%
2
8%
1
4%
4
57%
44
21%
1:30 PM - 2:00 PM
10
100%
3
9%
13
35%
1
2%
5
13%
2
8%
1
4%
5
71%
40
19%
2:00 PM -2:30 PM
8
80%
3
9%
12
32%
1
2%
4
10%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
34
16%
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
7
70%
2
6%
6
16%
2
4%
3
8%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
26
12%
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
4
40%
2
6%
5
14%
2
4%
3
8%
2
8%
'1
4%
6
86%
25
12%
3:30 PM - 4:00 PM
3
30%
3
9%
5
14%
2
4%
1
3%
2
8%
1
4%
4
57%
21
10%
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
4
40%
4
13%
5.
14%
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
6
86%
24
11%
4:30 PM - 5:00 PM
6
60%
3
9%
4
11%
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
23
11%
590PM -5:30 PM
5
50%
3
9%
6
Sfi%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
17
8%
5:30 PM - 6:00 PM
5
50%
4
13%
14
38%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
26
12%
6 00 PM - 6:30 PM
6
60%
5
16%
14
38%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
27
13%
6 30 PM - 7:00 PM
4
40%
5
16%
13
35%
0
0%
3
8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
25
12%
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
5
50%
4
13%
14
38%
0
0%
2
5%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
26
12%
7:30 PM - 8:00 PM
5
50%
7
22%
12
32%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
29
14%
8:00 PM - 8:30 PM
4
40%
7
22%
19
51%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
35
17%
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
4
40%
5
16%
18
49%
0
0%
4
10%
2
8%
0
0%
0
0%
33
16%
9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
5
50%
8
25%
19
51%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
38
18%
9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
9
90%
10
31%
15
41%
0
0%
6
15%
2
8%
1
4%
0
0%
43
20%
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
10
100%
11
34%
22
59%
0
0%
5
13%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
50
24%
10:30 PM -11:00 PM
10
100%
11
34%
23
62%
0
0%
7
18%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
52
25%
1100 PM- 11:30PM
9
90%
11
34%
18
491
0
0%
fi
15%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
45
21%
1130 PM 12u0AM
10
100%
7
22%
22
59%
2
4%
4
10%
2
8%
0
0%
0
0%
47
22%
52 Maximums number of oor.,I.ol parking apaoo- 124'ehI,I. from]. 30 PM- IIWIM.
Does not Ihd.. the 32 Mfalte parking sp.,hs located in a nearby parking structure, which have been assumed W be unacupleb due to the vacanq of the existing qualt"caurant on Parcel 1.
62 205
Table 13
Parking Spaces Required By City of Newport Beach Parking Code'
' See Appendix H.
TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 TSF based upon net floor area.
TSF based upon net public area.
63 20 0
Parking Code
Land Use
Quantity
Units'
Parking Code
Requirement
Retail3
4.325
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of net floor area
18
Bank
4.000
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area
16
High- Turnover Restaurant°
2.000
TSF
1 parking space per 40 square feet of net public area
50
Fast Food Restaurant
1.000
TSF
1 parking space per 50 square feet of gross floor area
20
Total
I
I
1
1 104
' See Appendix H.
TSF = Thousand Square Feet
3 TSF based upon net floor area.
TSF based upon net public area.
63 20 0
Table 14
Parking Cade Requirements'
r Source: City of Newport Beach and Urban Land Institute Shared Parkin 2nd Edition, 2005. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking provides splits for customers /visitors /guests vs.
employees /residents for weekdays and weekends. These splits were applied to the City Parking Code so that the sum of the splits is equal to the City Parking Code modified per TSF.
' TSF = Thousand Square Feet
s Weekday is defined as 600 AM Monday through 5:00 PM Friday.
4 City Parking Code modified per TSF.
64 2o7
City
Weekday Requirements'
Weekend Requirements
Customer/
Employee/
Customer/
Employee/
Parking
Land Use
Quantity
Units2
Code
Visitor /Guest
Resident
Total
Visitor /Guest
Resident
Total
Parking Rates:
Retail
4.325
TSF
4.00
3.22
0.78
4.00
3.20
0.80
4.00
Bank
4.000
TSF
4.00
2.61
1.39
4.00
2.61
1.39
4.00
High- Turnover Restaurant
2.000
TSF
25.00
21.50
3.50
25.00
21.25
3.75
25.00
Fast Food Restaurant
1.000
TSF
20.00
17.00
3.00
20.00
17.14
2.86
20.00
Parking Required:
Retail
4.325
TSF
18
14
4
18
14
4
18
Bank
4.000
TSF
16
10
6
16
10
6
16
High - Turnover Restaurant
2.000
TSF
50
43
7
50
43
7
50
Fast Food Restaurant
1.000
TSF
20
17
3
20
17
3
20
Total
104
84
20
104
84
20
104
r Source: City of Newport Beach and Urban Land Institute Shared Parkin 2nd Edition, 2005. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parking provides splits for customers /visitors /guests vs.
employees /residents for weekdays and weekends. These splits were applied to the City Parking Code so that the sum of the splits is equal to the City Parking Code modified per TSF.
' TSF = Thousand Square Feet
s Weekday is defined as 600 AM Monday through 5:00 PM Friday.
4 City Parking Code modified per TSF.
64 2o7
Table 15
Parking Code Requirements for a Friday
With Time -of -Day (TOD) Factors
snura. urb,n une mmun 11-a IrA F411nn.
se,Teekla.
PamMingtnlneu2an uMlm�aUre weeWylseennM ec600 Am Moaeay 1. In PM Faevy, Paeking,neerepNremennane�lmw4a,y ITOOlh2nn reileaweekene �ePUeemenn otter g'.00 Pm.
nme�olEey ITO01 Y,waauam ltraan 4nelnau�ve lane we "fummunlry SAOpping Cenna"
nme�nlday lTOnl tiemretaeenn urmn�,nelna0wei,ne USe "Rant"
9 ` 'nm..,re.vl*aol e, mae. a, o., nu. mnunelnauvanne,,. °F,mevg,aw,.nc
(OvM
'mn..nraay l*ool s.m�maeenn wmnunemawmi.ne n,e "F.rerP,e g,.�..,anc
VV
65
Parking Code 9r,1111
meat ?''
Proar
arnica
High- Tuor—r aeReumnof
Fact FOM aeetaunnta
Tlme Period
Customer
TDO Factor
Employee
1700faccor
I Subtotal
Customer
TOO Factor
Empl ee
TOO Factor
6ubtcbl
Customer
700Factor
Employee
TOD Factor
Subtotal
Customer
TOO Factor
Empwee
TOO Factor
Subtotal
Total
fi W AM - F 30 AM
34
1%
4
IOX
1
30
0%
6
0%
0
43
25%
)
50%
15
ll
5%
3
15%
2
38
fi 30 AM - ] OO AM
14
1%
4.
30%
1
10
Q1(
6
0%
0
43
2594
]
50%
15
17
5%
3
15%
2
18
]WAM - ] 30 AM
14
5%
4
35%
2
IO
OM
6
O%
0
43
5G%
]
75%
17
17
30%
3
20%
3
32
)30 AM - 800 AM
14
5%
4
15%
2
10
O%
6
0%
0
43
50%
]
75%
D
17
am
3
20%
3
32
e WAM - 930 AM
34
15%
4
40%
4
10
50%
6
60%
9
43
fi0X
]
90%
33
11
20%
3
30%
5
51
830AM -90OAM
14
15%
4.
40%
4
30
50%
6
WT
9
43
60%
l
90%
33
17
20%
3
30%
5
51
9 W AM - 9 30A
14
35%
4
75%
a
10
90%
6
100%
IS
43
75%
I
90%
39
I]
30%.
3
40%
]
69
aNAM -lO FOAM
14
35%
4
75%
8
IO
am
6
100%
IS
A3
75%
]
90%
39
17
30%
3
40%
]
69
lO COAM - 1030AM
34
65%
4
BS%
13
30
100%
6
300%
16
43
BS%
I
SW%
40
11
55%
3
75%
12
85
3030 AM -I1 WAM
14
65%
4.
85%
13
10
100%
6
1W%
It
0.i
85%
l
1W%
44
17
55%
3
15%
12
95
11 WAM - 1130AM
14
85%
4
95%
It
10
50%
6
10%
Il
43
90%
71
SWX
46
171
FDa,l
3
IWX
19
91
1130 AM - 12 W PM
141
Mr%
41
ac%l
16
1.1
smi
81
Iam
11
43
90%
71
100%
A6
ll
85%
3
100%
18
91
1200PM -1230 PM
14
95%
4
1W%
19
10
50%
6
SW%
11
43
3WX
I
SOON'
50
lI
SW%
3
1W%
20
99
1230 PM -100 PM
14
95%
4
100%
18
Do
50%
6
SW%
11
43
100%
I
1W%
50
17
SW%
3
16064
20
99
100 PM -130 PM
14
SW%
4
IW%
18
10
50%
6
1W%.
11
43
90%
I
SW%
4b
37
1W%.
3
100%
20
95
130 PM -200 PM
14
100%
4
ram
I8
10
50%
6
100%
11
43
90%
I
10%
46
17
1W%
3
IW%
20
95
200 PM -230 PM
34
95%
4
ram
]H
10
70%
6
100%
13
43
50%
I
100%
29
lI
9%v
3
95%
19
79
230 PM -300 PM
14
95%
4.
SW%
18
SO
]O%
6
100%
13
43
50%
l
100%
29
11
90%
3
95%
19
ry
300 PM -330 PM
14
9.
4
1W%
17
10
50%
6
100%
11
43
45%
I
IS%
25
17
60%.
3
IO%
13
E6
330 PM -400 PM
14
90%
4
1W%
lI
10
50%
6
SW%
11
A3
A6%
I
IS%
25
ll
am
3
70%
13
66
4WPM -430 PM
14
90%
4
IW%
17
10
80%
6
INK
14
43
45%
I
75%
25
11
55%
3
60%
12
1 68
430 PM -500 PM
14
90%
4.
SW%
17
10
e0%
6
IW%
141
43
I %
t
15%
251
17
55%
3
1 60%
I2
68
500 PM -530 PM
14
90%
4
95%
i]
30
036
6
O%.
0
43
60%
I
95%
93
ll
60%.
3
]O%.
13
63
530 PM -600 PM
10
90%
0
95%
17
10
O%
6
0%
0
43
60%
I
95%
33
ll
60%
3
ID%
13
63
600 PM -630 PM
14
90%
4
95%
IS
10
O%
6
0%
0
0.3
70%
I
95%
37
11
&6%
3
90%
18
70
F 30 PM - ] 00 PM
14
90%
4.
85%
15
30
036
6
096
0
0.i
]G%
I
95%
37
17
85%
3
am
Ie
70
7 0 PM -]3o PM
14
75%
0
89%
14
10
0%
6
0%
0
43
IO%
]
95%
37
17
8036
3
90M
17
6B
] 30 PM -800 PM
14
IS%
4
80%
14
]0
0%
6
0%
0
43
70%
I
95%
37
17
80%
3
90%
17
68
800 PM -830 PM
34
65%
4
75%
13
Ia
O%
6
0%
0
43
65%
I
95%
35
lI
$0%
3
im
31
$9
830 PM -900 PM
14
65%
4.
75%
13
30
0%
6
0%
0
43
65%
I
95%
35
17
50%
3
60%
Sl
59
900 PM -930 PM
14
50%
4
fi5%
10
10
0%
6
O%
0
43
3096
I
W%
19
17
30%.
3
40%
I
36
930 PM - 30 W PM
14
50%
4
65%
30
10
O%
6
0%
0
A3
30%
I
80X
19
17
30%
3
40%
I
36
1000 PM -1030 PM
14
35%
4
0.6%
I
30
0%
6
0%
0
43
25%
I
65X
it
3I
20%
3
30%
5
28
1030 PM -3300 PM
14
35%
4
0.4%
]
ID
OM
6
0%
0
0.3
25%
l
65%
Ifi
17
20%
3
3P%
5
28
1100 PM -1130 PM
14
15%
4
15%
3
Io
OM
6
IS%
I
65%
]I
17
1m6.
3
20X
3
lI
It 30 PM 12 W AM
34
35%
4
15%
3
10
D16
6
0%
0
43
15%
I
65%
11
3]
30%
3
2G%
3.
lI
snura. urb,n une mmun 11-a IrA F411nn.
se,Teekla.
PamMingtnlneu2an uMlm�aUre weeWylseennM ec600 Am Moaeay 1. In PM Faevy, Paeking,neerepNremennane�lmw4a,y ITOOlh2nn reileaweekene �ePUeemenn otter g'.00 Pm.
nme�olEey ITO01 Y,waauam ltraan 4nelnau�ve lane we "fummunlry SAOpping Cenna"
nme�nlday lTOnl tiemretaeenn urmn�,nelna0wei,ne USe "Rant"
9 ` 'nm..,re.vl*aol e, mae. a, o., nu. mnunelnauvanne,,. °F,mevg,aw,.nc
(OvM
'mn..nraay l*ool s.m�maeenn wmnunemawmi.ne n,e "F.rerP,e g,.�..,anc
VV
65
Table 16
Projected Peak Day (Friday) Number of Parked Vehicles
Time Period
Peak Day Number
of Parked Vehicles
Projected Parking Demand'
Total
Retail
Bank
High- Turnover
Restaurant
Fast Food
Restaurant
6:00 AM - 6:30 AM
3
1
0
15
2
21
6:30 AM - 7:00 AM
10
1
0
15
2
28
7:00 AM - 7:30 AM
16
2
0
27
3
48
7:30 AM - 8:00 AM
22
2
0
27
3
54
8:00 AM - 8:30 AM
34
4
9
33
5
85
8:30 AM - 9:00 AM
44
4
9
33
5
95
9:00 AM - 9:30 AM
56
8
15
39
7
125
9:30 AM - 10:00 AM
64
8
15
39
7
133
10:00 AM - 10:30 AM
68
13
16
44
12
153
10:30 AM - 11:00 AM
69
13
16
44
12
154
11:00 AM - 11:30 AM
71
16
11
46
18
162
11:30 AM - 12:00 PM
91
16
11
46
18
182
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
116
18
11
50
20
215
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
126
18
11
50
20
225
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM
102
18
11
46
20
197
1:30 PM - 2:00 PM
89
18
11
46
20
184
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
79
18
13
29
19
158
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
76
18
13
29
19
155
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
106
17
11
25
13
172
3:30 PM - 4:00 PM
110
17
11
25
13
176
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
110
17
1 14
25
12
1 178
4:30 PM - 5:00 PM
120
17
14
25
12
188
5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
128
17
0
33
13
191
5:30 PM - 6:00 PM
133
17
0
33
13
196
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
113
15
0
37
18
183
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
97
15
0
37
18
167
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
108
1 14
0
37
17
176
7:30 PM - 8:00 PM
114
14
0
37
17
182
8:00 PM - 8:30 PM
113
13
0
35
11
172
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
93
13
0
35
11
152
9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
86
10
0
19
7
122
9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
85
10
0
19
7
121
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
75
7
0
16
5
103
10:30 PM - 11:00 PM
74
7
0
16
5
102
11:00 PM - 11:30 PM
72
3
0
11
3
89
11:30 PM - 12:00 AM
1 56
1 3
1 0
1 11
1 3
1 73
225 =Maximum projected number of occupied parking spaces - 225 vehicles from 12:30 PM -1:00 PM.
I See Table 15.
66 2 0 q
Table 17
Parking Demand Summary
i See Table 16.
2 Includes 32 off -site parking spaces located in a nearby parking structure.
67 �2�
Number of
Descriptor
Parking Spaces
Maximum Projected Parking Demand During Peak Hours'
225
Proposed Parking Spaces Provided
222
Additional Parking Spaces Needed
3
i See Table 16.
2 Includes 32 off -site parking spaces located in a nearby parking structure.
67 �2�
i
I � I
PARKING MIGTURE
116 Cas I °� °1epe"ruro R6 (=Il r6r
lu mmd^ -
EXISTING BUILDING
12 SO'-0' 1015 SO fT
grain
26 bR
9_.. sm Pmw^r l;^em b PAR�CEL2 §e Pmoenr lm
,,Ceara )WO, FI °: Irol a pall
rummm�d c
e- �a 19 I
yw l0 4�
1 R-OSn s. 1,ra isa , — _'• s I I � § c - 19
PARCELS
Y -(sown
PARCEL 9 VW sa � Iro n.xos son
exs *Ina azl,m�rve __- _______ _ �^elamnl to
,D BE DEMIX6MED R� �, 2 § it 5 1? F 8
IF R-02 4 1- ss-} lNa9 2<O
g I
ea 1965 SOR da,m mA • 5 -B EXISTING BUILD ING
-------------
C r ,� +so-6 aoown d�,r�,W$ Ix,^ q amoson
tl
5 _ ,-- -I�Vw' PmCCIY U.- o
} U109,1 2r'iW h.W n...pp: 4 sign m bb so,
aro+ win, s9n
Iwo Iwo
i@ InfpbClbllFl Of 111YNC011WFE�iiantla]$P11111
R YACeR19011 Bomaglm
`y,�:.. 65b EEb
lwv NpC
50`BIASr I^IN) Ne Wl tam Lat9 PWEL I PUM1LIR IaYPrI CPnpl,'„iX1 egaNO Oatiletl rcla n
L�
212
Figure 31
Parking Survey Summary Graph (Existing Conditions)
250 — ° °-
200
M
150
a
par
c
Y
d
0
v
a
100
z
........................................... ...............................
--------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
\ 00""' / / \\ �,n
-------------------- -- ---- \` - - -- f -------------- V ------ \`---- - - - - -'
� , \ "i
- -- - \
- ------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
/
o
Q e Q Q Q Q
0 0 i 0 §i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ti ti M P h to' n' Qi of 6' hti
—Park ni; Spaces Occupied on Friday (February 11, 2011)
Parking Spaces Occupied on Saturday (February 12 2011(
......... Total Parking Spaces Provided- M (not including 32 f,ft. parking spaces)
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
4839C/31
OVER 30 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE
70 213
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Appendix F
Appendix G
Appendix H
Appendix
Glossary of Transportation Terms
Year 2008 /2009 Worksheets
Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate
Explanation and Calculation of Intersection Capacity Utilization
Approved Project Data
TPO One - Percent Analysis Calculation Worksheets
Cumulative Project Data
City of Newport Beach Parking Code Requirements
Parking Covenant and Agreement
Please reference the included CD to view and print the Appendices.
For a printed copy of the Appendices, please contact us at:
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
1111 Toyv'u & Cou\TRv ROAD, SUITE 34
ORANGE, CA 92868 -4667
PHONE (714) 973 -8383
F,vx (714) 973 -8821
Eu.AIL: ateAIL @TRAFFIC— ENCIAEER.COS1
\/\'EB: A A'VA'VA'.TR,\FFIC— ENGINEER.COkI
214
APPENDIX A
Glossary of Transportation Terms
215
GLOSSARY OF TRANSPORTATION TERMS
COMMON ABBREVIATIONS
AC:
Acres
ADT:
Average Daily Traffic
Caltrans:
California Department of Transportation
DU:
Dwelling Unit
ICU:
Intersection Capacity Utilization
LOS:
Level of Service
TSF:
Thousand Square Feet
V/C
Volume /Capacity
VMT:
Vehicle Miles Traveled
TERMS
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC: The total volume during a year divided by the number of
days in a year. Usually only weekdays are included.
BANDWIDTH: The number of seconds of green time available for through traffic in a
signal progression.
BOTTLENECK: A constriction along a travelway that limits the amount of traffic that
can proceed downstream from its location.
CAPACITY: The maximum number of vehicles which can be reasonably expected to
pass over a given section of a lane or a roadway in a given time period.
CHANNELIZATION: The separation or regulation of conflicting traffic movements into
definite paths of travel by the use of pavement markings, raised islands, or other
suitable means to facilitate the safe and orderly movements of both vehicles and
pedestrians.
CLEARANCE INTERVAL: Nearly same as yellow time. If there is an all red interval after
the end of a yellow, then that is also added into the clearance interval.
CORDON: An imaginary line around an area across which vehicles, persons, or other
items are counted (in and out).
CYCLE LENGTH: The time period in seconds required for one complete signal cycle.
CUL -DE -SAC STREET: A local street open at one end only, and with special provisions
for turning around.
210
DAILY CAPACITY: The daily volume of traffic that will result in a volume during the
peak hour equal to the capacity of the roadway.
DAILY TRAFFIC: Same as average daily traffic.
DELAY: The time consumed while traffic is impeded in its movement by some element
over which it has no control, usually expressed in seconds per vehicle.
DEMAND RESPONSIVE SIGNAL: Same as traffic - actuated signal.
DENSITY: The number of vehicles occupying in a unit length of the through traffic
lanes of a roadway at any given instant. Usually expressed in vehicles per mile.
DETECTOR: A device that responds to a physical stimulus and transmits a resulting
impulse to the signal controller.
DESIGN SPEED: A speed selected for purposes of design. Features of a highway, such
as curvature, superelevation, and sight distance (upon which the safe operation of
vehicles is dependent) are correlated to design speed.
DIRECTIONAL SPLIT: The percent of traffic in the peak direction at any point in time.
DIVERSION: The rerouting of peak hour traffic to avoid congestion.
FIXED TIME SIGNAL: Same as pretimed signal.
FORCED FLOW: Opposite off reeflow.
FREE FLOW: Volumes are well below capacity. Vehicles can maneuver freely and
travel is unimpeded by other traffic.
GAP: Time or distance between successive vehicles in a traffic stream, rear bumper to
front bumper.
HEADWAY: Time or distance spacing between successive vehicles in a traffic stream,
front bumper to front bumper.
INTERCONNECTED SIGNAL SYSTEM: A number of intersections that are connected to
achieve signal progression.
LEVEL OF SERVICE: A qualitative measure of a number of factors, which include speed
and travel time, traffic interruptions, freedom to maneuver, safety, driving comfort
and convenience, and operating costs.
�Z�
LOOP DETECTOR: A vehicle detector consisting of a loop of wire embedded in the
roadway, energized by alternating current and producing an output circuit closure
when passed over by a vehicle.
MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE GAP: Smallest time headway between successive vehicles in
a traffic stream into which another vehicle is willing and able to cross or merge.
MULTI - MODAL: More than one mode; such as automobile, bus transit, rail rapid
transit, and bicycle transportation modes.
OFFSET: The time interval in seconds between the beginning of green at one
intersection and the beginning of green at an adjacent intersection.
PLATOON: A closely grouped component of traffic that is composed of several
vehicles moving, or standing ready to move, with clear spaces ahead and behind.
ORIGIN - DESTINATION SURVEY: A survey to determine the point of origin and the
point of destination for a given vehicle trip.
PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS (PCE): One car is one Passenger Car Equivalent. A
truck is equal to 2 or 3 Passenger Car Equivalents in that a truck requires longer to
start, goes slower, and accelerates slower. Loaded trucks have a higher Passenger Car
Equivalent than empty trucks.
PRETIMED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go on a
predetermined time schedule without regard to traffic conditions.
PROGRESSION: A term used to describe the progressive movement of traffic through
several signalized intersections.
SCREEN -LINE: An imaginary line or physical feature across which all trips are counted,
normally to verify the validity of mathematical traffic models.
SIGNAL CYCLE: The time period in seconds required for one complete sequence of
signal indications.
SIGNAL PHASE: The part of the signal cycle allocated to one or more traffic
movements.
STARTING DELAY: The delay experienced in initiating the movement of queued traffic
from a stop to an average running speed through a signalized intersection.
TRAFFIC - ACTUATED SIGNAL: A type of traffic signal that directs traffic to stop and go
in accordance with the demands of traffic, as registered by the actuation of detectors.
212
TRIP: The movement of a person or vehicle from one location (origin) to another
(destination). For example, from home to store to home is two trips, not one.
TRIP -END: One end of a trip at either the origin or destination; i.e. each trip has two
trip -ends. A trip -end occurs when a person, object, or message is transferred to or
from a vehicle.
TRIP GENERATION RATE: The quality of trips produced and /or attracted by a specific
land use stated in terms of units such as per dwelling, per acre, and per 1,000 square
feet of floor space.
TRUCK: A vehicle having dual tires on one or more axles, or having more than two
axles.
UNBALANCED FLOW: Heavier traffic flow in one direction than the other. On a daily
basis, most facilities have balanced flow. During the peak hours, flow is seldom
balanced in an urban area.
VEHICLE MILES OF TRAVEL: A measure of the amount of usage of a section of
highway, obtained by multiplying the average daily traffic by length of facility in miles.
X19
APPENDIX B
Year 2008 /2009 Worksheets
�?J
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
E -W Direction: CAMPUS DRIVE
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
C:rni me Printad_ VFHICI FR
File Name
: H0804094
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
:511412008
Page No
: 1
08:00 AM
MACARTHUR
203
CAMPUS DRIVE
14
MACARTHUR
CAMPUS DRIVE
10
231
13
BOULEVARD
127
Westbcund
861
BOULEVARD
Eastbound
212
46
18
Southbound
251
15
245
Northbound
13
144
77
913
Start Time
Ri ht
I Thru
I
Left
Ri ht
Thru
11
Left
RI ,h1
Thru
Left
Ri ht
Thru
08:45 AM
Left
Int. Total
Factor
1.0
1.0
19
1.0
1.0
1.0
- 11
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0.
1.0
195
1.0
185
07:00 AM
24 139
41
4 28
4
5 112
4
10
68
33
472
07:15 AM
30 130
35
12 25
4
3 94-
10
22
116
71
552
07:30 AM
49 190
48
14 34
15
5 174
- 7
- 11
114
79
740
07:45 AM
44 205
41
17 40
13
8 207
12
15
130
74
•806
Total
147 664
165
47 127
36
21 - 587
-33
58
.428
257
2570
08:00 AM
52
203
50
14
44
231
10
231
13
14
127
80
861
08:15 AM
58
212
46
18
51
251
15
245
9
13
144
77
913
08:30 AM
61
219
52
15
48
20
11
236
8
- 10
151
84
915
08:45 AM
- 56
201
47
11
- 42
19
13
232
- 7
- 11
133
66
838
Total
227
835
195
58
185
87
49
944
37
48
555
307
3527
"' BREAK •.. -
04:30 PM 98 149. 41 39 173 181 5 225 - 211 28 66 761 902
05:00 PM
108
164
9
41
177
261
10
251
30
21
76
69
982
05:15 PM
104
-.182
11
51
166
241
13
272 -.
41
24
74
87
1049
05:30 PM
- 121
204
10
52
182
21
15
288
39
27
57
72
1088
05:45 PM
118
219
13
48
182
27
11
274
34
21
72
88
1087
Total
451
769
43
192
687
981
49
1085
1441
93
279-
3161
4206
06:00 PM
104
- 214
11
44
159
261
10
257 -
40
24
71
77
1037
06:15 PM
88
209
14
37
169
23
11 -
250
39
30
67
68
1005
Grand Total
1233
2997
438
461
1661
309
153
3579
345
304
1527
1170
14177
- Apprch %
26.4
64.2
9.4
19.0
68.3
12.7
3.8
87.8
8.5
- 10.1
50.9
39.0
Total %
8.7
21.1
3.1 -
3.3
11.7
2.2
1.1
25.2
2.4
2.1
10.8
8.3
�m
m
r�
0
cm N2
�a� Q
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue _
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
CAMPUS DRIVE
Thru I
BOULEVARD'
Westbound
Left
Right I
Southbound
Left I
App'
Start Time
Right I Thru
I Left I
App'
<1 of
3.6
Total
11
Total
Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Pei
Intersection
08:00 AM
17.6
Volume
227 835 195
1257
Percent
18.1 66.4 15.5
20
08:30
61 219 52
332
Volume
18
51
Peak Factor
94
Tom
High Int.
08:30 AM
0.878
Volume
61 219 52
332
Peak Factor
910.•'.
0.947
�m
m
r�
0
cm N2
�a� Q
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue _
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
CAMPUS DRIVE
Thru I
Left I
Westbound
Left
Right I
Thru I
Left I
App'
944-
37
1030
Total
<1 of
3.6
Total
11
58
185
87
330
17.6
56.1
26.4
15
15
48
20
83
08:15 AM
0.957
18
51
25
94
Tom
: T
0.878
BOULEVARD
Northbound
Right I
Thru I
Left I
App.
Left
Tlw
Ri ht
37
49
944-
37
1030
4.8
91.7
3.6
Total
11
236 -
8
255
08:15
AM
Eastbound
15
245
9
269
Left
0.957
m IHUKw LtVw
Out In Total
1309 F1 7fi F2566
2271 8351 195
K TM Le
1 '+
NT
142008 8:00:00 AM
14/2008 8:45:00 AM
VEHICLES -
- w
.37 C
N O
rT V O
b
222
R61
F+
Left
Tlw
Ri ht
37
944
49
970
1030
F 20-0-01
Out
In
Total
MACARTHUR
BOULEVARD
- w
.37 C
N O
rT V O
b
222
R61
Site Cdd
Start Date`''
Page No
; F
CAMPUS. DRNE;;j-
Eastbound
..
":
Right
Thru
Left
Tom
: T
48
555 307
910.•'.
-;
5.3
. 61.0 33.7
10
151 84
245,:.
;f
0
08:30
AM
10
151 84
245
0.929
- w
.37 C
N O
rT V O
b
222
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0804094
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 5/14/2008
Page No
:3
reaK nour rrom V4:;7u rM to U1i:1 b rM - Ye<
MACARTHUR
CAMPUS DRIVE
MACARTHUR
CAMPUS DRIVE
Volume
447 819
BOULEVARD
Westbound
BOULEVARD
Eastbound
3.4
52
Southbound -
121 204
Northbound
335
Volume
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left I App'
Right Thru
Left
ApP.
Right Thru
Left
App'
Right
Thru
Left
App.
Int.
Peak Factor
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
reaK nour rrom V4:;7u rM to U1i:1 b rM - Ye<
Intersection
05:15 PM
195
Volume
447 819
45
1311
Percent
34.1 62.5
3.4
52
05:30
121 204
10
335
Volume
52
182
Peak Factor
255
High Int.
05:45 PM
Volume
118 219
13
350
Peak Factor
0.936
K1 Or
195
669
96
962
20.3
69.5
10.2
52
182
21
255
05:30 PM
52
182
21
255
0.943
49 1091 154 1294
3.8 84.3 11.9
15 288- 39 - 342
05:30 PM
15 288 39 342
0.946
96 274 324 694
13.8 39.5 46.7
-27 57 72 156
05:15 PM
24 74 87 185
0.938
Ord In Total - -
1610 1317 2921
44 679 45
Right Thru Left
+' 1 '+
129'ze�:
North 7412006 i 00 142006 &Woo PM O' VEHIC4.ES
Left Thr Right - -
754 1091 49
013 1294 2307
Out In Total
-WCARTEURBMEVARD
223
4261
1088
0.979
rn
D
m
O
C
Z
v
a
v
O
n
x
5
M
Intersection Turning Movement
by:
Pre'pared
n
1 DS
National Data & Surveying Services
TMC Summary of MacArthur Blvd /Birch St
TOTAL AM NOON PM
764 ] 158 332 274
731
7 310 1 239 182
204 73 78 53
00N 01: Signalized
SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
n
F a_3g
Jb�
m � w
z
£ m
M
Project #: 09- 5077 -017
I I
� �r��
NORTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
AM PEAK HOUR
815 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
1245 PM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
224
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: MacArthur Blvd DATE: 03/05/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Birch St
DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -017
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
LANES:
1
3
1
1
4
0
1.5
1.5
0
1
2
1
4566
I
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
5
123
18
22
107
34
28
68
14
7
21
4
451
7:45 AM
4
195
16
23
148
37
25
61
15
5
32
10
571
8:00 AM
13
190
26
22
131
37
31
49
22
5
34
5
565
8:15 AM
7
176
20
19
167
41
31
92
20
11
30
11
625
8:30 AM
7
178
32
14
147
39
37
77
25
4
38
10
608
8:45 AM
11
170
24
34
170
49
44
68 _
11
10
43
11
645
9:00 AM
7
165
22
33
140
47
46
73
17
6
43
21
620
9:15 AM
10
139
22
17
128
40
33
33
7
6
27
19
481
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES=
64
1336
180
184
I
1138
324
275
I
521
131
54
I
268
91
4566
I
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 815 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 32 689 98 1 100 624 176 1 158 310 73 1 31 154 53 1 2498
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 1 0.944
CONTROL: Signalized
W�
225
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: MacArthur Blvd DATE: 03/05/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Birch St
DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -017
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
TOTAL
NL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
LANES:
1
3
1
1
4
0
1.5
1.5
0
1
2
1
1:00
PM
1:15
PM
1:30
PM
1:45
PM
2:00
PM
2:15
PM
2:30
PM
2:45
PM
3:00
PM
3:15
PM
3:30
PM
3:45
PM
4:00
PM
4:15
PM
14
126
5
18
154
42
65
35
9
12
68
22
570
4:30
PM
18
153
6
9
167
28
56
34
9
21
84
36
621
4:45
PM
18
127
4
9
172
46
74
44
18
22
98
31
663
5:00
PM
30
188
9
14
213
37
82
58
16
23
147
48
865
5:15
PM
16
161
5
12
210
37
64
48
16
30
84
35
718
5:30
PM
16
158
7
9
208
36
78
42
11
38
113
48
764
5:45
PM
24
139
4
14
227
39
50
34
10
23
89
39
692
6:00
PM
21
134
4
11
174
38
62
38
7
23
77
39
628
6:15
PM
6:30
PM
6:45
PM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
157
1186
44
96
1525
303
531
333
96
192
760
298
5521
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 86 646 25 1 49 858 149 1 274 182
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: I 0.834 I 0.943 I 0.816
CONTROL: Signalized
53 1 114 433 170 1 3039
r, :- IYEn
220
C
Z
m
Intersection Turning Movement
Pre,nmed by:
NS
National Data & Surveying Services
TMC Swgima MacArthur � qfMacAl LrrBlvd /Von KarmanAve /Newport
Project #: 09-5077-016
TOTAL AM NOON PM
286
19
NOON PEAK HOUR
1245 PM
F-471
96
180
�8
5
IgIl
1 295
28
84
183
CONTROL: Signalized
SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
AM NOON PM TOTAL
12 46 38
136 160 127
78 223 665 966
Z
U
0
rn
a
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
500M. 91'Al lip! MIM
I 1 l g R� w --q
OR I",
(Intersection Name)
lI
Day Date
COUNT PERIODS
am 7,30 AM - 9:30 M
I noon 11,45 AM - 5 PPI
I Pm 4:15 PM - 6;15 PM
AM PEAK HOUR
800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
1245 PM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
M
V1
AM NOON PM TOTAL
12 46 38
136 160 127
78 223 665 966
Z
U
0
rn
a
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
500M. 91'Al lip! MIM
I 1 l g R� w --q
OR I",
(Intersection Name)
lI
Day Date
COUNT PERIODS
am 7,30 AM - 9:30 M
I noon 11,45 AM - 5 PPI
I Pm 4:15 PM - 6;15 PM
AM PEAK HOUR
800 AM
NOON PEAK HOUR
1245 PM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
227
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: MacArthur Blvd DATE: 03/05/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Von Karman Ave /Newport PI DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09- 5077 -016
TOTAL
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
NR
EASTBOUND
ST
WESTBOUND
EL
ET
NIL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
LANES:
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
6:00 AM
6:15 AM
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
19
173
117
12
81
19
2
14
3
7
11
1
459
7:45 AM
25
219
169
17
94
38
10
23
4
19
28
1
647
8:00 AM
14
251
194
18
97
28
5
15
5
15
24
2
668
8:15 AM
27
254
165
17
122
56
8
26
11
17
31
3
737
8:30 AM
30
244
146
10
102
30
1
38
5
24
46
1
677
8:45 AM
30
239
151
13
114
49
5
17
7
22
35
6
688
9:00 AM
27
227
127
13
103
31
6
15
16
29
35
6
635
9:15 AM
21
225
86
16
86
30
6
20
7
25
22
5
549
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
193
1832
1155
116
799
281
43
I
168
58
158
I
232
25
5060
I
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 800 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 101 988 656 1 58 435 163 1 19 96 28 1 78 136 12 1 2770
PEAK HR.
FACTOR:
CONTROL:
0.950
Signalized
0.841
0.794
222
i . ,
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: MacArthur Blvd DATE: 03/05/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Von Karman Ave /NewportPI DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -016
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
TOTAL
NL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
LANES:
1
3
1
1
3
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1:00
PM
1:15
PM
1:30
PM
1:45
PM
2:00
PM
2:15
PM
2:30
PM
2:45
PM
3:00
PM
3:15
PM
3:30
PM
3:45
PM
4:00
PM
4:15
PM
16
126
29
5
178
14
33
26
41
85
25
4
582
4:30
PM
22
127
18
7
194
11
35
30
37
89
25
6
601
4:45
PM
14
139
18
3
189
12
20
34
35
93
29
17
603
5:00
PM
11
186
22
5
239
19
45
55
50
151
35
6
824
5:15
PM
14
155
41
10
267
11
34
46
40
176
35
5
834
5:30
PM
9
139
32
8
244
7
33
52,
51
167
35
7
784
5:45
PM
14
144
31
6
218
15
26
42
42
171
22
20
751
6:00
PM
20
127
18
7
191
6
13
39
31
123
21
7
603
6:15
PM
6:30
PM
6:45
PM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
120
1143
209
51
I
1720
95
239
I
324
327
1 1055
227
72
5582
I
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 48 624 126 1 29 968 52 1 138 195 183 1 665 127 38 1 3193
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 1 0.911
CONTROL: Signalized
0.911
1 :. �
0.961 1 0.957
2�9
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: JAMBOREE ROAD
E -W Direction: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
rirromw Printari_ VFNIr.1 rS
File Name : H0903077
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/26/2009
Page No : 1
08:00 AM
JAMBOREE ROAD
MACARTHUR
751
JAMBOREE ROAD
MACARTHUR
-
38
217
90
32
Southbound
12
BOULEVARD
1222
Northbound
BOULEVARD
42
157
91
125
_
50
51
199
Westbound
24
76
-22
76
Eastbound
1320
08:30 AM
34
204
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
Right Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Left
Right - Thru
Left
1196
I
Ina.
45
148
102
117
306
48
44
149
104
40
94
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Factor
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0 1.01
1.0
71
234
37
07:00 AM
25
132
57
50 166
14
17
128
63
22 44
5
44
679
723
07:15 AM
23
155
82
70 196
20
23
148
72
29 58
14
56
832
888
07:30 AM
37
157
79
105 281
42
44
208
67
28 59
18
59
1066
1125
07:45 AM
45
167
84
99 280
39
54
211
115
35 59
- 17
59
1146
1205
Total
130
611
302
324 923
115
138
695
317
- 114 218
54
218
3723
3941
08:00 AM
60
146
751
117
387
48
38
217
90
32
79
12
79
1222
1301
08:15 AM
42
157
91
125
385
50
51
199
98
24
76
-22
76
1244
1320
08:30 AM
34
204
114
115
1
280
40
33
224
107
- 30
79
- 15
79
1196
1275
08:45 AM
45
148
102
117
306
48
44
149
104
40
94
22
94
1125
1219
"'BREAK "'
230
170
120
04:45 PM
33
236
:1251
115
30I
8
225
37
80
241
231
241
982
1223
_
Total
62
418
2341
174
235
751
15
416
581
146
426
581
426
1921
2347
05:00 PM
23
218
- 140
87
131
551
6
219
521
63
212
46
212
1040
1252
05:15 PM
34
239
151
98
143
581
9
232
491
71
234
37
234
1121
1355
05:30 PM
42
227
147
107
149
55
8
239
56
83
249
41
249
1154
1403
05:45 PM
37
234
163
92
140
61
9
252
51
78
237-
42
237
1159
1396
Total
136
918
601
384
563
2291
32
942
2081
295
932
156
932
4474
5406
06:00 PM
42
221
1501
-100
146
531
1
244
58
80
245
37
245
1142
1387
06:15 PM
36
232
139
89
138
47
8
239
_42
75
237 -
34
237
1079
1316
Grand Total
587
3055
1808
1545
3363
705
370
3325
-1112
836
2386
420
2386
17126
19512
Apprch %
10.8
56.1
33.2
27.5
59.9
12.6
1
7.7
69.2
23.1
-66.6
33.4
Total %
3.4
17.8
10.6
9.0
19.6
4.1
2.2
19.4
6.5
4.9
2.5
12.2
87.8
230
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903077
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/26/2009
Page No
: 2
reaK mour "om ut:uu AM to 116:45 AM - Peak
JAMBOREE ROAD
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
JAMBOREE ROAD
MACARTHUR
BOULEVARD
Volume
181 674
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
29.9
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left App'
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Right
Left App'
Int.
07:45 AM
Volume
34 204
114
Peak Factor
Total
0.866
Total
Total
Total
reaK mour "om ut:uu AM to 116:45 AM - Peak
Intersection
07:45 AM
121 66
456
Volume
181 674
364
1219
Percent
14.8 55.3
29.9
125
08:15
42 157
91
290
Volume
125
385
Peak Factor
560
0.966
07:45 AM
High Int.
08:30 AM
07:45 AM
Volume
34 204
114
352
Peak Factor
52
0.866
I Of 1
410
1437
121 66
456
1332
177
1965
23.2
67.8
9.0
125
385
50
560
08:15 AM
1244
125
385
50
560
0.966
07:45 AM
0.877
176 851
410
1437
121 66
187
4808
12.2 59.2
28.5
64.7 35.3
51 199
98
348
24 22
46
1244
0.966
07:45 AM
07:45 AM
54 211
115
380
35 17
52
0.945
0.899
Out In Total
1373 FI-21-91 F-2-5972
iBi 674 384
It Thm Left
1
TF N O S
North
�m J 7:45:OOAM - -2w m�
N s 009 8:30:00 AM N a
J �CN
+1 r
Left Tluu Rf M
410 B51 176
972 � 17 = 2409J
Out In Total '
2SI
Transportation Studies, Inc
2680 Walnut Avenue
WUJIUMEE ROAD
ON In Total
1527 1667 3206
155 921 611
RI 9M Ttw Left
.� 1 L4
�� or
�w m
� r4rnln
_Cb J
95'15:00 PM < -2m -� ^3
= 9 6:00:00 PM
VEHICLE ^'
-a
o S
a
to
o—
III
h -�
Left T_Iw Ri M
E_219fi7 _ 37
�._T._-
I 14601 ,_1218 i Total
' ' Out In Total
i JAMBOREE ROAD
Suite C
File Name : H0903077
Tustin, CA. 92780
Site Code :00000000
Start Date : 3/26/2009
Page No :3
JAMBOREE ROAD
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
JAMBOREE ROAD
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
BOULEVARD
BOULEVARD
Eastbound
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
Top-
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Left
Total
Total
Total
Total
mk Hour From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM -
Peak 1 of 1
Intersection
05:15 PM
Volume
155 921 611
1687
397
578
227
1202
37
967
214
1218
312 157 469
4576
Percent
9.2 54.6 36.2
33.0
48.1
18.9
3.0
79.4
17.6
66.5 33.5
05:45
37 234 163
434
92
140
61
293
9
252
51
312
78 42 120
1159
Volume
Peak Factor
0.987
High Int.
05:45 PM
05:30 PM
06:00 PM
05:30 PM
Volume
37 234 163
434
107
149
55
311
11
244
58
313
83 41 124
Peak Factor
0.972
0.966
0.973
0.946
WUJIUMEE ROAD
ON In Total
1527 1667 3206
155 921 611
RI 9M Ttw Left
.� 1 L4
�� or
�w m
� r4rnln
_Cb J
95'15:00 PM < -2m -� ^3
= 9 6:00:00 PM
VEHICLE ^'
-a
o S
a
to
o—
III
h -�
Left T_Iw Ri M
E_219fi7 _ 37
�._T._-
I 14601 ,_1218 i Total
' ' Out In Total
i JAMBOREE ROAD
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: CAMPUS DRIVE
E -W Direction: NORTH BRISTOL STREET
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
Groups Printed- VEHICLES
File Name
: H0903060
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/1712009
Page No
: 1
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
_._..._......._ 08:45 AM
Total
"' BREAK "'
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Total
05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
06:00 PM
06:15 PM
Grand Total
Apprch %
Total %
36
60
47
61
204
250
221
471
259
265
250
233
1007
175
191
2209
57.1
14.9
49 0 38
61 0 29
59 0 36
51 0 35
220 0, 138
136 0 21
131 0 20
267 01 41
147 0 20
206 0 14
196 0 19
193 0 21
742 0 74
146 0 12
118 0 15
1662 0 407
42.9 0.0 7.0
11.2 0.0 2.7
240
183
242
237
902
374
393
767
543
518
423
383
1867
403
318
4884
83.7
33.0
30
35
22
33
120
31
39
70
381
59
400 200
45
37
541
9.3
3.7
0 405 82
0 378 80
0 369 89
0 381 98
0 1533 349
0 128 108
0 130 92
0 258 200
0 168 100
0 172 99
0 176 82
0 155 89
0 671 370
0 120 91
0 116 94
0 3737 1374
0.0 73.1 26.9
0.0 25.2 9.3
0 0 01 880
0 0 01 826
0 0 01 864
0 0 0 1 696
0 0 01 3466
0 0 0 1048
0 0 0 1026
0 0 01 2074
0 0 0 1275
0 0 0 1333
0 0 0 1197
0 0 _ 0 1126
0 0 0 4931
0 0 0 992
0 0 0 889
0 0 0 14814
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
233
CAMPUS D RIVE
NORTH BRISTOL
CAMPUS
DRIVE
NORTH BRISTOL
.
j
STREET (ONE -WAY)
STREET (ONE -WAY)
�
j
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound.
Eastbound
Start Time
Ri ht
Thru
1 Left
Right
Thru
Left
R' !lt
Thru
__
Left
Right
_Thru
Left
Int. Total I
Factor
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
07:00 AM
31 38
0
34 100
15
0
191
47
0 0
0
_
456
07:15 AM
39 39
0
25 128
23
0
200
65
0 0
0
519
07:30 AM
40 42
0
40 172
17
0
285
80
0 0
0
676
07:45 AM
51 50
0
28 227
14
0
363
78
0 0
0
811
Total
161 169
0
127 627
69,
0
1039
270
0 0
0
I 2462
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
08:30 AM
_._..._......._ 08:45 AM
Total
"' BREAK "'
04:30 PM
04:45 PM
Total
05:00 PM
05:15 PM
05:30 PM
05:45 PM
Total
06:00 PM
06:15 PM
Grand Total
Apprch %
Total %
36
60
47
61
204
250
221
471
259
265
250
233
1007
175
191
2209
57.1
14.9
49 0 38
61 0 29
59 0 36
51 0 35
220 0, 138
136 0 21
131 0 20
267 01 41
147 0 20
206 0 14
196 0 19
193 0 21
742 0 74
146 0 12
118 0 15
1662 0 407
42.9 0.0 7.0
11.2 0.0 2.7
240
183
242
237
902
374
393
767
543
518
423
383
1867
403
318
4884
83.7
33.0
30
35
22
33
120
31
39
70
381
59
400 200
45
37
541
9.3
3.7
0 405 82
0 378 80
0 369 89
0 381 98
0 1533 349
0 128 108
0 130 92
0 258 200
0 168 100
0 172 99
0 176 82
0 155 89
0 671 370
0 120 91
0 116 94
0 3737 1374
0.0 73.1 26.9
0.0 25.2 9.3
0 0 01 880
0 0 01 826
0 0 01 864
0 0 0 1 696
0 0 01 3466
0 0 0 1048
0 0 0 1026
0 0 01 2074
0 0 0 1275
0 0 0 1333
0 0 0 1197
0 0 _ 0 1126
0 0 0 4931
0 0 0 992
0 0 0 889
0 0 0 14814
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0
233
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C File Name : H0903060
Tustin, CA. 92780 Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/17/2009
Page No : 2
Time
Start Time
�.---
IVVRIrIORIJI VLJIRCCI
CAMPUS DRIVE CAMPUS DRIVE
(ONE -WAY) I
Southbound Northbound
Westbound __ _
Right Thru Left r App' Right Thru Left App ht Thru 1 _ Left
I Total g Total
I i- -- 7__--- .lJ- -;_
IYVRIII ORIJI VL JIRCCI.
(ONE -WAY)
_ —� Eastbound
App' Right I Thru Left App
Total
Total I 9 '��
Int,
Total
Peak Hour From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak
1 of 1
7882
Oul
CAMPUS
North
w o
Intersection
08:00 AM
17!2009 8:00:00 AM
17!2009 8:45:00 AM
05 n
G«
-I -
VEHICLES
m0'
Volume
204 220 0
424
138 902 120
11601
0 - 1533.
349
1882
0 '0 0 0
3466
Percent
48.1 51.9 0.0
11.9 77.8 10.3
1 0.0 81,5
18.5
0.0 0.0 0.0
m
61 51 0
1121
l
35 237 33
3051
0 381
98
479
0 0 0 0
896
Volume
e
Peak Factor
1
0.967
High Int.
08:15 AM
08:00 AM
08:00 AM
6:45:00 AM
Volume
60 61 0
121
38 240 30
306
0 405
82
487
Peak Factor
.0.876
0.942
0.966
Out In To@
1671 424
204 220 D
Right Thru Left
4J I L4
ow__
T r
T
m
_-T
®
7882
Oul
CAMPUS
North
w o
17!2009 8:00:00 AM
17!2009 8:45:00 AM
05 n
G«
-I -
VEHICLES
m0'
4,
T r
LeIt Thru Ri ht
349
1533 0
®
7882
Oul
CAMPUS
In Total
DRIVE
�w o0
=m
r
234
CAMPUS DRIVE
1867
Southbound
2141
•,... Start Time Right', Thru r Left j
87.2
i—
Total
- --'---- -' —�--
Peak .— H—our From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Pet
Intersection 05:00 PM
59
Volume 1007 742 0
1749
Percent 57.6 42.4 0.0
05:15
543
265 206 0
Volume
471
Peak Factor
High Int. 05:15 PM
0.891
Volume 265 206 - 0
471
Peak Factor
0.928
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
(ONE -WAY)
Westbound
Right I Thru Left
74
1867
200
2141
3.5
87.2
9.3
:3
-14
518
59
591
05:00 PM
20
543
38
601
0.891
CAMPUS DRIVE
Northbound
Right-FThru 1 Left
0
671
370
1041
0.0
64.5
35.5
:3
0
172
99
271
05:15 PM
0
172
99
271
0.960
File Name
: H0903060
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/17/2009
Page No
:3
(ONE -WAY)
Eastbound_
Right I Thru Left
0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0
Out In Total
745 F-1-74-91 _2494
1007 742 0
Rigid Thru Left l
1
T a
North
o�
O �P
2 —� 17120095:00:00 PM 1 —� m
1712009 5:45:00 PM 2 m
F o
m O VEHICLES N j y
T f+
Left Thru Ri M
370 671 0
942 1041 1963
Out In Total
CAMPUS DRIVE
01 4931
0 1333
0.925
2S5
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: CAMPUS DRIVE
E -W Direction: SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
f1mi a Printed- VFHICI FS
File Name
: H0903059
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/17/2009
Page No
: 1
08:00 AM 0 65
08:15 AM 0 75
08:30 AM 0 67
_ 08:45 AM 0 74
Total 0 281
BREAK°"
04:30 PM 0 124
04:45 PM 0 168
Total 0 292
05:00 PM 0 146
05:15 PM 0 253
05:30 PM 0 227
_ 05:45 PM _ 0 233
Total 0 859
06:00 PM 0 171
06:15 PM 0 144
Grand Total 0 1910
Apprch % 0.0 76.7
Total % 0.0 13.0
22 0 0 0 22 231
26 0 0 0 38 207
25 0 0 0 50 231
23 0 0 0 _ 42 231
96 0 0 0 152 900
31 0 0 0 I 42 182
41, 0 0 0 46 149
72 0 0 0 88 331
40 0 0 0 50 183
44 0 0 0 43 186
52 0 0 0 45 175
65 0 0 0 42 176
201 0 0 0 180 720
82 3 0 0 60 163
37 0 0 0 34 128
581 3 0 0 592 2810
23.3 100.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6
3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 19.1
0 86
0 85
0 75
0 53
0 299
0 i 113
0l 117
Oi 230
0 111
0 105
0 108
0 105
0 429
0 115
0 121
0 1418
0.0 16.1
0.0 9.6
444
412
400
367
1623
228
257
485
277
268
227
232
1004
213
200
4641
52.6
31.5
325
294
287
280
1186
102
100
202
114
105
110
88
417
110
101
2770
31.4
18.8
2s o
119:
1137
113:
1071
4537
82:
87E
1700
921
1004
944
941
3810
917
76:
1472E
CAMPUS DRIVE
SOUTH BRISTOL
CAMPUS DRIVE
SOUTH BRISTOL
Southbound
STREET (ONE-WAY)
Northbound
STREET (ONE -WAY)
Westbound
Eastbound
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
Int. Total
Factor
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
07:00 AM
0 28
23
0 0
0
9 83
0
53 218
145
559
07:15 AM
0 46
20
0 0
0
21 126
0
52 223
143
631
07:30 AM
0 48
23
0 0
0
23 138
0
56 324
219
831
07:45 AM
0 41
27
0 0
0
25 221
0
63 351
247
975
Total
0 163
93
0 0
0
78 568
0
1 224 1116
754
2996
08:00 AM 0 65
08:15 AM 0 75
08:30 AM 0 67
_ 08:45 AM 0 74
Total 0 281
BREAK°"
04:30 PM 0 124
04:45 PM 0 168
Total 0 292
05:00 PM 0 146
05:15 PM 0 253
05:30 PM 0 227
_ 05:45 PM _ 0 233
Total 0 859
06:00 PM 0 171
06:15 PM 0 144
Grand Total 0 1910
Apprch % 0.0 76.7
Total % 0.0 13.0
22 0 0 0 22 231
26 0 0 0 38 207
25 0 0 0 50 231
23 0 0 0 _ 42 231
96 0 0 0 152 900
31 0 0 0 I 42 182
41, 0 0 0 46 149
72 0 0 0 88 331
40 0 0 0 50 183
44 0 0 0 43 186
52 0 0 0 45 175
65 0 0 0 42 176
201 0 0 0 180 720
82 3 0 0 60 163
37 0 0 0 34 128
581 3 0 0 592 2810
23.3 100.0 0.0 0.0 17.4 82.6
3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 19.1
0 86
0 85
0 75
0 53
0 299
0 i 113
0l 117
Oi 230
0 111
0 105
0 108
0 105
0 429
0 115
0 121
0 1418
0.0 16.1
0.0 9.6
444
412
400
367
1623
228
257
485
277
268
227
232
1004
213
200
4641
52.6
31.5
325
294
287
280
1186
102
100
202
114
105
110
88
417
110
101
2770
31.4
18.8
2s o
119:
1137
113:
1071
4537
82:
87E
1700
921
1004
944
941
3810
917
76:
1472E
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903059
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/17/2009
Page No
: 2
FeaK flour rrom U /:UU AM m UdAt. AM - I eaK
CAMPUS DRIVE
SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
CAMPUS DRIVE
SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
52.2
Southbound
(ONE -WAY)
Northbound
(ONE -WAY)
I
855
Westbound
AM
Eastbound
Start Time
Right Thru I Left Total
Right Thru Left
Right Thru Left Total
_
Right I Thru I Left
0 281
96
TAotal
0
Total
FeaK flour rrom U /:UU AM m UdAt. AM - I eaK
l Of l
1186
3108
9.6
52.2
38.2
Intersection
08:00 AM
325
855
08:00
AM
86
444
325
Volume
0 281
96
377
0
0
0 0
152
900
0
1052
Percent
0.0 74.5
25.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
14.4
85.6
0.0
08:00
0 65
22
87
0
0
0 0
22
231
0
253
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int.
08:15 AM
6:45:00
AM
08:30 AM
Volume
0 75
26
101
0
0
0 0
50
231
0
281
Peak Factor
0.933
0.936
299
1623
1186
3108
9.6
52.2
38.2
86
444
325
855
08:00
AM
86
444
325
855
0.909
GAMPILIS DRIVE
ON In Total
2086 377 2463
01 L81-1 96
Right Thru Left
4J 1 Lp
�a
0� m �
North s
»o
c°
– m � c -1 17/2009 8.00:00 AM
17/2009 8:45:00 AM
on ry VEHICLES
J�
I
rp
/Left Thru Ri ht
0' 900,_152
!i 580 ! 052j 1___16_3T
I Out In Total
RV
2S:7
Int.
Total
4537
1195
0.949
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903059
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/17/2009
Page No
:3
Peak Hour From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak
1 of 1
SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
900
SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
05:00 PM
CAMPUS DRIVE
(ONE -WAY)
CAMPUS DRIVE
(ONE -WAY)
80.0
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
_
Start Time
�.
Right
Thru
Left
To°p�
Right Thru
Lek
TAP
Right
Thru
Left
Tot2I
Rght
Thru
Leff
Total
Peak Hour From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak
1 of 1
0
900
Intersection
05:00 PM
417
1850
3810
20.0
80.0
Volume
0 859
201
1060
0
0
0 0
Percent
0.0 81.0
19.0
229
0.0
0.0
0.0
05:15
0 253
44
297
0
0
0 0
Volume
0.949
05:00 PM
Peak Factor
50
183
0
High Int.
05:45 PM
277
114
502
Volume
0 233
65
298
0
0
0 0
Peak Factor
0.889
Int.
Total
180
720
0
900
429
1004
417
1850
3810
20.0
80.0
0.0
23.2
54.3
22.5
43
186
0
229
105
268
105
478
1004
0.949
05:00 PM
05:00 PM
50
183
0
233
111
277
114
502
0.966
0.921
CAMPUS DPJVE
ON In Total
1137 LjlTQE 1 2197
01 659 201
Rigid Tlru Left
1
o�O f j Lo
North
.� 17/2009 5:00:00 PM I
17/2009 5:45:00 PM 2
n m °
VEHICLES _ �W
x '
Left Thru Right
0 7201_1WI
I�1288; 900! 21881
Out In Total
CAMPUS RI
232
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: BIRCH STREET
E -W Direction: NORTH BRISTOL STREET
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
Groups Printed- VEHICLES
File Name : H0903057
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25!2009
Page No : 1
08:00 AM
BIRCH STREET
NORTH BRISTOL
BIRCH
STREET.
-
NORTH BRISTOL
0
215
20
0
Southbound
STREET (ONE-WAY)
Northbound
STREET (ONE-WAY)
687
687
08:15 AM
22
44
0
56
Westbound
79
0
241
Eastbound
0
0
0
Time
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru Left
Right
Thru
Le
Right
Thru
Left
Exclu.
Total
IncluStart
Total
Total
Factor
1.01
1.01
1.0
1.0
1.0 l 1.0
1.01
1.0
1.0
t.o
1.0
1.0
246
110
0
07:00 AM
7
19
- 0
24 124 31
0
102
- 14
0 0 0
0
321
321
07:15 AM
12
33
0
30 133 49
0
108
19
0 0 0
0
384
384
07:30 AM
20
31
0
31 170 55
0
134
23
- 0 0 - 0
- 0
464
464
07:45 AM
11
36
0
24 248 86
0
191
27
0 0 0
0
621
621
Total
50
119
0�
109- 673 221
0
535
83
- 0 0 0
0
1790
1790
08:00 AM
23
38
0
55
226
110
0
215
20
0
0
0
0
687
687
08:15 AM
22
44
0
56
277
79
0
241
32
0
0
0
0
751
751
08:30 AM
22
33
0
62
239
104
0
243
23
0
0
0
0
726
726
08:45 AM
28
45
0
64
246
110
0
187
33
0
0
0
0
713
713
Total
-95
160
0
237
988
4031
0
886
1081
0
0
ol
0
2877
2877
BREAK' "'
736
736_
04:45 PM
134
84
-0 I
32
267
96
0
87
36 I
0
0
0
I
0
_
Total
256
174 -
- 01
66
500
1731
0
182
731
0
0
01
0
1424
1424
05:00 PM
208
110
0
36
291
991
0
92
52
0
0
0
0
888
888
05:15 PM
213
140
0
28
355
102
0
99
67 -
0
0
0
0
1004
1004
05:30 PM
148
117
0
34
266
96
0
72
42
0
0
0
0
775
775
05:45 PM
174
117
0
26
275
95
0
81
37
- 0
0
- 0
0
805
805
Total
743.
484
0
- 124
1187
3921
0
344
1981
0
0
ol
0
3472
3472
06:00 PM -
135
72
01
24
225
107
0
64
42 -.
0
0
0
.0
669
669
06:15 PM
143
96
0
20
234
76
0
43
33
0
0
0
0
645
645
Grand Total
1422
1105
0
580
3807
1372
0
2054
537
0
0
0
0
10877
10877
Apprch %
56.3
43.7
- 0.0
10.1
66.1
23.8
0.0
79.3
20.7
0.0
- 0.0
Total %
13.1
10.2
0.0
5.3
35.0
12.6
0.0
18.9
4.9
- 0.0
- 0.0
0.0
100.0
239
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903057
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/25/2009
Page No
:2
Peak hour From O /:UU AM tO ua:4b AM - reaK 7 or l
BIRCH STREET
NORTH BRISTOL STREET
BIRCH STREET
NORTH BRISTOL
STREET (ONE -WAY)
-
Southbound
(ONE -WAY)
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
95 160
Start Time
Right
Thru Left App'
Right
Thru
Left
App•
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Total
Right
Left
pp.
-Total
Int.
Total
66
56 277
Total
412
Volume
Total
Peak Factor
Peak hour From O /:UU AM tO ua:4b AM - reaK 7 or l
Intersection
08:00 AM
-
Volume
95 160
0
255
237 988
403
1628
Percent
37.3 62.7.
0.0
14.6 60.7
24.8
08:15
22 44
0
66
56 277
79
412
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int.
08:45 AM
08:45 AM
Volume
28 45
0
73
64 246
110
420
Peak Factor
0.873
0.969
0 886 108 994
0.0 89.1 10.9
0 241 32 273
08:15 AM
0 241 32 273
0.910
ON In Total
1123 255 1378
951 16011 0
RIght Thru Left
Y
0 0 0
0.0 0.0
0 0 0
6:45:00 AM
lam p 5
F'
North ? °
I r�
o J y
° 8:00 A� M o
I20098W 0
5
`VEHICLES
m0.-
m—
t
- ' Left Thru Right ,
i_108 886 — OJ
F 563 EJEE 1557
Out In Total
BIRCH STREET
240
2877
751
0.958
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903057
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/25/2009
Page No
:3
PeaK Hour FTOM U4:30 PM l0 06:15 PM - Peak
BIRCH STREET
NORTH BRISTOL STREET
BIRCH STREET
NORTH BRISTOL
Volume
Southbound
(ONE -WAY)
Northbound
STREET (ONE -WAY)
60.6 39.4
0.0
Westbound
05:15
Eastbound
Start Tima
Right
Thru
Lek App'
Right
Thru
Lek
App'
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Right
Left
App"
213 140
0
353
Total
0.869
Total
Total
Total
PeaK Hour FTOM U4:30 PM l0 06:15 PM - Peak
Intersection
05:00 PM
124 1187
392
Volume
743 484
0
1227
Percent
60.6 39.4
0.0
05:15 PM
05:15
213 140
0
353
Volume
0.878
Peak Factor
High Int.
05:15 PM
Volume
213 140
0
353
Peak Factor
0.869
I Of 1
124 1187
392
1703
7.3 69.7
23.0
28 355
102
485
05:15 PM
28 355
102
485
0.878
0 344 198
0.0 63.5 36.5
0 99 67
05:15 PM
0 99 67
Int.
Total
542 0 0 01 3472
0.0 0.0
166 0 0 O) 1004
0.865
166
0.816
BIRCH STREET
ON In Total
® 1227 1695
743 484 0
Right Thu Leff
4-J 1
N
oL T �a
A
�o hbnh titi
o m�
C
J
..� 'oz 5:00:00 PM 4 -2'm o°
@45:00 PM w
ll�� rc
IT
511 VEHICLES m W
LL11I1 H
On �ZN O�
W�
I
4 ?
Leh Thru Right 1
i L 198' ==344 01
8761 L7_5 42J ! 14181
00 In Total
i
BIRCH STREET
241 1
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
City: NEWPORT BEACH Suite C
N -S Direction: BIRCH STREET Tustin, CA. 92780
E -W Direction: SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
Grouos Printed- VEHICLES
File Name : H0903058
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2009
Page No : 1
08:00 AM
BIRCH STREET
SOUTH BRISTOL
BIRCH
STREET
0
SOUTH BRISTOL
59
90
0
90.
Southbound
STREET (ONE
-WAY)
Northbound
STREET (ONE
-WAY)
0
81
53
0
0
0
60
Westbound
0
78
252
Eastbound
252
556
808
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Left
Exdu.
Inclu.
Int.
AM
0
109
57
0
0
0
- 54
78
0
57
200
152
Total
Total
Total
Factor
1 1.0
1.01
1.0
1.01
1.01
1.0
1.01
1.0
1.0
1.01
1.01
1.0
867
2106
2973
07:00 AM
0
33
- 17
0 0
0
25
34
0
38 108
85
108
232
340
07:15 AM
0
69
27
0 0
0
34
36
0
51 129
86
129
303
432
07:30 AM
0
61
31
0 0
0
60
54
0
_
59 160
106
160
371
531
07_:45 AM
0
78
47
0 0
0
51
75
-0
93 172
160
172
504
676
Total
0
241
122
_ 0 0
6
170
199
0
241 569
437
569
1410
1979
08:00 AM
0
101
49
0
0
0
59
90
0
90.
216
158
216
547
763
08:15 AM
0
81
53
0
0
0
60
83
0
78
252
201
252
556
808
08:30 AM
0
88
39
0
0
0
56
82
0
66
199
165
199
496
695
AM
0
109
57
0
0
0
- 54
78
0
57
200
152
200
507
707
_08:45
Total
0
379
198
0 -
0
01
229
333
01
291
867
676
867
2106
2973
"" BREAK
_ 04:45
1
TOM
0
206
1371
0
0
0
106
122
01
74
432
126
432
771
1203
05:00 PM
0
145
76
0
0
0
89
94
0
42
253
57
253
503
756
05:15 PM
0
170
78
0
0
0
67
87
0
52
261
55
261
509
770
05:30 PM
0
160
fib
0
- 0
0
68
73
0
35
239
28
239
430
669
_ 05:45 PM
0
139
85
0 -
0
0
76
58
0
45
246
481
246
451
697
Total
0
614
305
0
0
01
300
312
01
174-
999
188
999
1893
2892
06:00 PM
0
125
67
0
0
0
71
71-
0
27
229
35
229
396
625
06:15 PM
0
103
52
0
0
0
55
37
0
29
237
30
237
306
543
Grand Total
0
1668
881
0
0
0
931
1074
0
836
3333
1492
3333
6882
10215
Apprch %
0.0
65.4
34.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
46.4
53.6
0.0
35.9
64.1
Total %
0.0
24.2
12.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.5
15.6
0.0
12.1
21.7
32.6
67.4
242
r
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903058
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/2512009
Page No
:2
YeaK Hour Ffom Ut:UU AM TO UdAb AM - YeaK l Or l
BIRCH STREET
SOUTH BRISTOL STREET
BIRCH STREET
SOUTH BRISTOL _.
STREET (ONE -WAY)
2106
40.7 59.3
Southbound
(ONE -WAY)
Westbound
Northbound
— Eastbound
0 379
_
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left App'
Total
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Total
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Total
Right
Lefl
App'
TOtat
Int'
Total
YeaK Hour Ffom Ut:UU AM TO UdAb AM - YeaK l Or l
0
562
Intersection
08:OOAM
2106
40.7 59.3
0.0
30.1 69.9
Volume
0 379
198
577
0
0
0
Percent
0.0 65.7
34.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
08:15
0 81
53
134
0
0
0
Volume
149
78 201
279
Peak Factor
0.866
High Int.
08:45 AM
6:45:00
AM
Volume
0 109
57
166
0
0
0
Peak Factor
0.869
0 229 333
0
562
291 676
967
2106
40.7 59.3
0.0
30.1 69.9
0 60 83
0
143
78 201.
279
556
0.947
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
0 59 90
0
149
78 201
279
0.943
0.866
Out In Total
1009 577 1588
0 379 198
Right Thru Left
41 1 L+
rpr� T
-S
North °
4 J�
=Q
AM M 0 0.022 8:045:00
VEHICLES : F —�
r'z a-qqr
O ° v6
_ J
41
Left TMu Right
� 0 333 229
i
6701. i_.562j 1232 - .I
Out In Total
6IRCH STREET
243
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
SUU I H tlKIJ I UL ,'j I Ktt 1
BIRCH STREET BIRCH STREET
(ONE -WAY)
Southbound Northbound
File Name : H0903058
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/25/2009
Page No :3
SOUTH BRISTOL
STREET (ONE -WAY)
F�efMuM
--
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Lek
0.930
Right
Thru
Lek
Total
Right
Lett
Total
T o
lA'ota-
0 614
305
9191
TOIa-
0
0
0
300 312
0
612
Percent
0.0 66.8
Peak Hour I-rOm 114:su YM to U0:1D Y06 - YeaK
1 or T
48.1 51.9
52 55 107
509
0.930
Intersection
05:00 PM
52 55 107
0.846
Volume
0 614
305
9191
0
0
0
0
300 312
0
612
Percent
0.0 66.8
33.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
49.0 51.0
0.0
05:15
0 170
78
248
0 -
0
0
0
67 87
0
154
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int.
05:15 PM
05:00 PM
Volume
0 170
78
248
0
0
0
0
89 94
0
183
Peak Factor
0.926
0.836
174 188 3621
1893
48.1 51.9
52 55 107
509
0.930
05:15 PM
52 55 107
0.846
OW In Total
® 919 ,419
01 6141 305
Right Tlau LeN
41 1 t�
1 r
�o
~ N
m IJatth � o
CM J y
5!2009 50000 PM 4 -2 �
° 2009 5:45:00 PM
a
on VEHICLES
N
i
1-.
LeN Thru __Right
- _..� -- 31221_. 300
t __I
ON In .Total
BIRCH
244
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: VON KARMAN AVENUE
E -W Direction:.CAMPUS DRIVE
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
adMan- VrHicl ❑c
File Name : H0903061
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date : 3/18/2009
Page No : 1
08:00 AM
VON KARMAN AVENUE
CAMPUS DRIVE
9
VON KARMAN AVENUE
CAMPUS DRIVE
161
13
127
Southbound
Westbound
76
Northbound
Eastbound
518
08:15 AM
Start Time
I RightLThru
7
Left
Right
I Thru I
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
R' ht
I Thru
Left
Int. Total
Factor
1 1.01
1.0
j 1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
08:45 AM
07:00 AM
12 29
7
9 28
9
12 35
0
5
34
10
190
07:15 AM
10 34
8
14 31
8
2 57
2
11
40
15
232
07:30 AM
10 61
8
6 40
13
8 73
0
7
50
23
299
_ 07:45 AM
9 66
8
20 76
13
9 126
2
9
81
44
463
Total
41 190
31
49 175
43
31 291
4
32
205
92
1184
08:00 AM
22
93
9
29
64
161
13
127
4
10
76
55
518
08:15 AM
14
80
7
26
61
20
15
135
3
14
68
53
496
08:30 AM
22
81
12
31
83
21
10
141
7
8
87
63
566
08:45 AM
15
81
9
24
79
20
15
131
2
10
72
57
515
Total
73
335
37
110
287
771
53
534
161
42
303
228
2095
"' BREAK' "'
04:30 PM
41
118
14
16
101
71
17
67
5
8
71
20
1
485
04:45 PM
51
112
34 I
8
96
8
17
80
5
6
76
33
526
_
Total
92
230.
481
24
197
151
34
147
10 l
14
147
531
1011
05:00 PM
65
144
23
17
130
11
36
97
17
15
122
313
715
05:15 PM
63
182
29
17
148
15
23
92
18
14
104
38
743
05:30 PM
59
158
29
10
110
10
36
95
8
10
116
32
673
_ 05:45 PM
37
126
17
20
113
15
27
99
4
10
103
37
608
Total
224
610
98
64
501
51
122
383
47
49
445
1451
2739
06:00 PM
45
'114
15
10
92
101
19
111
4
14
106
24
564
06:15 PM
27
116
20
14
81
4
23
78
4
17
74
25
483
Grand Total
502
1595
249
271
1333
200
282
1544
85
166
1280
567
8076
Apprch %
21.4
68.0
10.6
15.0
73.9
11.1
14.8
80.6
4.4
8.3
63.5
28.1
Total %
6.2
19.7
3.1
3.4
16.5
2.5
3.5
19.1
1.1
2.1
15.8
7.0
245
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name : H0903061
Site Code : 00000000
Start Date :3/18/2009
Page No :2
reaK Hour tlOm U1:UU AM to UtSAb AM - reaK 7 nt l
VON KARMAN AVENUE
Southbound
CAMPUS DRIVE
Westbound
VON KARMAN AVENUE
Northbound
CAMPUS DRIVE
Eastbound
573
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Total
Right Thru
Left
App"
Total
Right
Thru
LeR
App.
Total
Right
Thru
Left
App•
Total
Ina.
Total
reaK Hour tlOm U1:UU AM to UtSAb AM - reaK 7 nt l
16
603
Intersection
08:00 AM
573
2095
8.8 88.6
2.7
Volume
73 335
37
445
110 287
77
474
Percent
16.4 75.3
8.3
566 -
23.2 60.5
16.2
08:30
22 81
12
115
31 83
21
135
Volume
10 141
7
158
Peak Factor
63
158
0.954
High Int.
08:00 AM
0.907
08:30 AM
Volume
22 93
9
124
31 83
21
135
Peak Factor
0.897
0.878
53 534
16
603
42 303
228
573
2095
8.8 88.6
2.7
7.3 52.9
39.8
10 141
7
158
8 87
63
158
566 -
0.925
08:30 AM
08:30 AM
10 141
7
158
8 87
63
158
0.954
0.907
AVENUE
Uut In Total
872 445 1317
73 335 37
Right Thru Left
m T
yg ♦ u
a
NOI
b� N North �SO �
M
cv"i $c —: 18/2000 a: 0000 AM �- -2m �'
1&2009 8:45:00 AM J A
a r
r� r VEHICLES ��
Q � J
N
Ir J
I I
� I
Left Thru Ri hi I -.
1057
out In Total _
VON KARMAN AVrNUE
240
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903061
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/18/2009
Page No
: 3
Peak Hour From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1
VON KARMAN AVENUE
CAMPUS DRIVE
VON KARMAN AVENUE,
CAMPUS DRIVE
05:00 PM
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Start Time
Right
I Thru
I Left
I
Right Thru Left
64
Right
Thru
Left
Total
Right
Thru
Left
Total
81.3
8.3
05:15
Total
29
Total
17
148
15
180
Volume
Peak Hour From 04:30 PM to 06:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1
47
552
22.1 69.4
Intersection
05:00 PM
23 92
18
133
05:00 PM
z
ON
Volume
224 610
98
932
64
501
51
616
Percent
24.0 65.5
10.5
10.4
81.3
8.3
05:15
63 182
29
274
17
148
15
180
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int.
05:15 PM
05:15 PM
Volume
63 182
29
274
17
148
15
180
Peak Factor
0.850
0.856
J
O m °a r —�
o
z
122 383
47
552
22.1 69.4
8.5
Right
23 92
18
133
05:00 PM
z
ON
36 97
17
150
AVENUE
122
0.920
--V�
out In Total
592 932 1524
224 610 96
Right Thru Left
4J 1 Ll,
NOM
116622009 :P5000 M7] M
VEHICLES
49
r
145
Left
Thru
Right
4 3691-
122,
L iT6�
Cssz
z
ON
In
Total
VON KARMAN
AVENUE
122
49
445
145
639
7.7.
69.6
22.7
14
104
38
156
05:00 PM
15
122
38
175
0.913
3>
4-2c�
m
r ar�N a
247
Int.
Total
2739
743
0.922
Intersection Turning Movement
Prreepaa Prepared d \y::
� DS
National Data & Surveying Services
Von Karman Ave and Birch St. City of Newoort Beach
Control: Signalized
Fi!
55
Project M 09- 5077 -018
AM Peak Hour:
815 AM
NOON Peak Hour:
1230 PM
PM Peak Hour:
1500 PM
43
242
E
APM6:15
242
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: Von Karman Ave DATE: 03/05/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Birch St
DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -018
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
6:00 AM
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
6:15 AM
52
922
63
87
I
468
238
135
I
354
84
68
I
269
37
2777
I
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
9
90
3
9
42
21
15
43
9
5
26
7
279
7:45 AM
0
133
8
6
54
30
15
56
11
6
30
4
353
8:00 AM
6
131
12
9
61
33
17
35
12
7
21
1
345
8:15 AM
6
137
9
8
61
25
26
49
10
19
39
4
393
8:30 AM
7
147
10
15
89
33
19
49
13
12
36
8
438
8:45 AM
9
107
4
16
63
39
15
37
7
4
42
3
346
9:00 AM
8
93
10
17
62
31
19
59
18
8
42
7
374
9:15 AM
7
84
7
7
36
26
9
26
4
7
33
3
249
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
52
922
63
87
I
468
238
135
I
354
84
68
I
269
37
2777
I
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 815 AM
11x19
VOLUMES = ( 30 484 33 I 56 275 128 I 79 194 48 143
PEAK HR.
FACTOR 0.834 0.838 0.836 0.903
CONTROL: Signalized
22 1 1551
14.1 -M
2-�9
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: Von Karman Ave DATE: 03/05/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Birch St
DAY: THURSDAY PROJECT# 04 -5077 -018
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES: 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1
1:00 PM
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WR
TOTAL
1:15 PM
135
674
88
52
919
239
158
311
49
35
396
63
3119
1:30 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
15
54
10
5
66
22
11
35
6
4
39
6
273
4:30 PM
19
63
6
4
88
25
16
28
8
4
39
7
307
4:45 PM
17
63
7
5
93
35
18
40
4
6
48
7
343
5:00 PM
15
104
20
5
143
35
30
52
5
5
76
7
497
5:15 PM
26
93
8
11
129
34
32
41
3
5
39
11
432
5:30 PM
14
104
18
10
137
36
14
41
10
5
67
11
467
5:45 PM
16
106
9
8
140
28
23
32
8
4
53
12
439
6:00 PM
13
87
10
4
123
24
14
42
5
2
35
2
361
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
135
674
88
52
919
239
158
311
49
35
396
63
3119
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41 I 1835
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: I 0.954 I 0.978 I 0.836 0.838 0.923
CONTROL: Signalized
2150
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N -S Direction: BAYVIEW PLACE
E -W Direction: BRISTOL STREET
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780 -
na, oriM.rl- VrWIN as
File Name : H0903056
Site Code :00000000
Start Date : 3/18/2009
Page No : 1
08:00 AM
DEAD END
BRISTOL STREET (ONE-
BAYVIEW PLACE
BRISTOL STREET (ONE -
0
0
Southbound
0
-- 0
Northbound
560 -
0
687
08:15 AM
0
0-
0
Westbound
0
0-
Eastbound
0
0
Start Time
R' ht
Thru
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
Ri ht
Thru
0
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
Int Total
Factor
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0
07:00 AM
0 0
0
0 0
0
7 0
0
48
381
0
436
07:15AM
0 0
- 0
0 0
0
14 0-
0
48
457
-0
519
07:30 AM
0 0
0
0 0-
0
27 0
0
88
592
0
707
07:45 AM
0 0
- 0
0 0
0
21 - 0
0
139
675
0
835
Total
- 0 0
- 0
0 0
0
- 69 0
0
323
2105
0
2497
08:00 AM
0
- 0
0
0
0
0
22
0
-- 0
105
560 -
0
687
08:15 AM
0
0-
0
- 0
0
0-
- 31
0
0
88
637
0
756
08:30 AM
0
0-
0.
0
0
0
24
0
0
94
580
0
698
08:45 AM
0
0
- 0
0
0
0
34
0
0
99
656
0
789
Total
0
0
- 0
0
0
0
111
0
-. 01
386
2433
01
2930
"'BREAK -
-
04:45 PM
0
0
0
0
0
01
69
0
0-
17
582
0
668
Total
0
0
01
0
0
01
155
0
01
43
1102
01
1300
05:00 PM
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
136
0
0
311
608
0
782
05:15 PM
0
0
- 0
- 0
0
0
124
0
0
35
634
0
793
05:30 PM
0
0
0
0
0
0
-91
- 0
0
34
657
0
782
05:45 PM
0
0
0
0
0
0
80
0
0
37 -
692
0
809
_
Total
0
0
0
0
0
01
433
0
01
142
2591
0
3166
06:00 PM
0.
0
0
0
0
0
54
0
0
32
586
0
672
06:15 PM
0
0
0
0
- 0
0
43
0
0
26
480
0
549
Grand Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
865
0
0
952
9297
0
11114
Apprch %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100.0
0.0
0.0
9.3
90.7
0.0
Total %
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.8
0.0 -
0.0 -
8.6
83.7
0.0
2151-
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903056
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/1812009
Page No
:2
reaK hour rrom V7:VU AM to uC:4, AM - veaK l Of 1
DEAD END
BRISTOL STREET (ONE-
BAyVIEW PLACE
BRISTOL STREET (ONE -
—_r
—�
Soulhbound
WeWsAY)
Northbound
Eastbound
0 0
i Start Time
Right Thru
Left
APP'
Total
Right Thru
Left
APP'
Total
Right
Thru
Left
App'
Total
Right
Thru
Left
App.
Total
Int.
Total
reaK hour rrom V7:VU AM to uC:4, AM - veaK l Of 1
2464
Left
Uj
Intersection
07:30 AM
—_r
—�
'— OZO1
E� 12
Out
BA1'VIEW
Volume
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Percent
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
07:45
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int.
6:45:00 AM
6:45:00
AM
Volume
0 0
0
0
0
0
0 0
Peak Factor
r
a9� }
W3FN O�J
Z �
CNH 92
O � +
101 0 0 101
100' 0.0 0.0
0
21 0 0 21
08:15 AM
31 0 0 31
0.815
utAli LNU
Out In Total
F-01 F----Ol0
Right Thru Left
,- 1 Li,
1
Nolth
182009 7:30:00 AM
78/2009 8:15:00 AM
VEHICLES
420
2464
Left
Uj
Thru Ri ht
Ol 101
_
—_r
—�
'— OZO1
E� 12
Out
BA1'VIEW
In Total
PLACE
420
2464
0
2884
14.6
85.4
0.0
139
675
0
814
07:45
AM
139
675
0
814
0.886
qN
�G ^O
H _
~2
0 0
m
H
�zo Vg.
2152
2985
835
0.894
■
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0903056
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 3/18/2009
Page No
: 3
DEAD END
BRISTOL STREET (ONE-
BAYVIEW PLACE
BRISTOL STREET (ONE -
Volume
Southbound
WAY)
Westbound
Northbound
WAY)
Eastbound
0.0
Start Time Right
Thru
Left
App'
Right Thru
Leff
App'
Right
Thru Left
App'
Right
Thru
Lett
App.
Total
Int.
Total
Peak Factor
05:45 PM
Total
138 0
Total
138
37 692
Total
729
0.784
Peak Hour From 94:3U PM to U6:15 PM - Pe2
Intersection
05:00 PM
142 2591
Volume
0 0
0 0
Percent
0.0 0.0
0.0
05:45
0 0
0 0
Volume
Peak Factor
80 0
High Int.
80
37 692
Volume
0 0
0 0
Peak Factor
05:45 PM
KI OTI
0 0 0 0
0.0 0.0 0.0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
433 0
0
433
142 2591
0
2733
100. 0.0
0.0
5.2 94.8
0.0
0
80 0
0
80
37 692
0
729
05:00 PM
05:45 PM
138 0
0
138
37 692
0
729
0.784
0.937
Out In Total
0 0
0 0 0
Right Thru Len
I '-1
m T
m
O N o F v S
��
North °
ar
h _
Cr
H O1i - - -� IW20095:00:00 PM 4 -2
78!20095:45:00 PM 2 0 0
vt r
w-� VEHICLES
K P
tt L.
4i n r hru Right
0 0 4I
i i` jgyl 4�J33 ---57-5]
Out In Total
2153
3166
809
0.978
City: NEWPORT BEACH
N-S Direction: JAMBOREE ROAD
E -W Direction: CAMPUS DRIVE
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C File Name
Tustin, CA. 92780 -
Si1e Code "
Start Date
Page No
rirMlnft Printed- VFHICI FS -
-
JAMBOREE ROAD
CAMPUS DRIVE
731
JAMBOREE ROAD
CAMPUS DRIVE
661
8 -
248
- Southbound
-
Westbound
.191
Northbound
Eastbound
41
-=;'t#
Start Time
Right
I Thru
Left
Ri ht
-Thru
37
Left
Right
Thru
left
Right Thru
49
Left
In I.
Factor
1.0
1.0
1.0
t.o
1.01
4
1.0
1.01
1.01
08:45 AM
1.0 I 1.0
I
1.0
- 36
07:00 AM
23 261
44
23 67
32
9
200
21
1 18
15
-
07:15 AM
27 244
42
26 71
33
10
212
_ 27
2 17
17
66
07:30 AM
24 327
51
30 88
51
6
232
31
2 21
15
-
07:45 AM
38 418
67
41 99
62
10
267
31
2 29
51
38
Total
_ 112 1250
204
120 325
178
35
911
- 110
_ 7 85
65
,
08:00 AM
44
- 464 -
731
38
109
661
8 -
248
_361.
1
-
24
.191
.1130:
08:15 AM
41
.424
74
34
111
70
- 10
262.
37
3
32
20
- 1118
08:30 AM
49
426
72
- 39
104
61
6
267
- -39
4
-27
19
({ 1113
08:45 AM
39
411
68
- 36
108
52
10
261
33
2
26
22
1nRR
"' BREAK "'
04:30 PM
40
262
51
85
56
29
29
298
- 12
33
61
51
1007 '
04:45 PM
46
251
58 1
74
53
35
34
316 -
15
38
68
59
1047
- Total
86
513.
1091
159
109
641
63
614
271
71
129
1101
2054
05:00 PM
51
282
52
80
54
34
27 -
313
13
40
63
47
1056 -
05:15 PM
45
286
57-
90
58
39
- 38
326
16
42
72
66
1125
05:30 PM
48
271 -
53
79
63
41
31
323
- -19
40
66
61
1095
05:45 PM
39
269
fit
82
51
38
39
316
17
37
62
55
1067
Total-
183
1108
224
331
226
1521
135
1278
65
-159
263
2191
4343
06:00 PM
42
280
57
72
57
321
33
311
14
37
68 -
52
1055
06:15 PM
40
269
54
78
59
39
34
307
16
35
61
43
1035
Grand Total
636
5145
-935
907
1208
714
334
4459
319
715
569
16318
Apprch %
9.5
76.6
13.9
32.1
42.7
25.2
6.5
86.2
_377
7.3
19.9
44.6
35.5
Total %
3.9
31.5
5.7 -
5.6
7.4
4.4
2.0
27.3 -
2.3
2.0
4.4
3.5
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
: H0804093
Site Code
:00000000
Start Date
: 5/15/2008
Page No
:2
Peak Flour From Ur:UU AM to 08:45 AM - PeaK 1 Ot 1
JAMBOREE ROAD
CAMPUS DRIVE
JAMBOREE ROAD
CAMPUS DRIVE
07:45 AM
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
I Start Time
(Right
Thru
Left
286
Right Thru
Left
423
Right
Thru
Left
I
Right
I Thru
I, Left
I
31.1
08:00
44 464
Total
581
38
Total
66
213
Volume
Total
Total
Peak Flour From Ur:UU AM to 08:45 AM - PeaK 1 Ot 1
1044
143
1221
Intersection
07:45 AM
11.7
8
248
36
292
Volume
172 1732
286
2190
152
423
259
834
Percent
7.9 79.1
13.1
18.2
50.7
31.1
08:00
44 464
73
581
38
109
66
213
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int.
08:00 AM
08:15 AM
Volume
44 464
73
581
34
111
70
215
Peak Factor
0.942
_
0.970
34
1044
143
1221
2.8
85.5
11.7
8
248
36
292
08:30 AM
6
267
39
312
0.978
10 112 76 198
5.1 56.6 38.4
1 24 19 44
08:15 AM
3 32 20 55
0.900
JAMBOREE ROAU
Out In Total
F12721 F21901 3462
1721 1732 286
RI9M to Leek
4� 1 4
m
m w T
OR
J Nonh 3 nNi
0
m —� 1512008 7'45:00 / -2 �°+ �'
15/2(108 6:30:00 AM
o ..
O n ` VEHICLES x H ti
r a�
m
m—
I F
Left Thru Ri h
143 1044 34
2001 1221 3222
out In Total
R AD
2151
Int.
Total
4443
1130
0.983
J
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name
Site Code'
Start Date
Page No
-
JAMBOREE ROAD
CAMPUS DRIVE
JAMBOREE ROAD
CAMPUS DRNE
219
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Start Time
Right
I
I Thru
I Left App
Right Thru
Left
Tots
Right
Thru
Left
05:15 PM
Right
Thrut
Left
App.
Pm4 Nn, ,. C.
nn. an
m. �..
nc.� a rsr
0.943
Total
Total'
Intersection 05:00 PM
Volume 183 1108 224 1515 331 226 152 709
Percent 12.1 73.1 14.8 46.7 31.9 21.4
05:15 45 286 57 388 90 58 39 187
Volume
Peak Factor
High Int. 05:15 PM 05:15 PM
Volume 45 286 57 388 90 58 39 187
Peak Factor 0.976 0.948
135 1278 65 1478
9.1 86.5 4.4
38 326 16 380
05:15 PM
38 ,326 16 380
0.972
SOREE ROAD
oul In Total
1828 1515 1 3343
1831 11081 224
Right Inru Lan
�f 1 Y
_ T
� J NwN
P/15/20085:00:00 M
15/20085
:45:00 PM 2 °m
P
o v fy
EHICLES r ;
N a
w
4, T r
Left Thru R, hl
65 1278 135
1419 1476 2897
Out In Total
JAMBOREE AD
250
159 263
219
641
- $
24.8. 41.0
34.2
42 72
56
170
11
0 965
05:15 PM
42 72
56
170
0.943
SOREE ROAD
oul In Total
1828 1515 1 3343
1831 11081 224
Right Inru Lan
�f 1 Y
_ T
� J NwN
P/15/20085:00:00 M
15/20085
:45:00 PM 2 °m
P
o v fy
EHICLES r ;
N a
w
4, T r
Left Thru R, hl
65 1278 135
1419 1476 2897
Out In Total
JAMBOREE AD
250
City: NEWPORT BEACH.
N -S Direction: JAMBOREE ROAD
E -W Direction: BIRCH STREET
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
nrn„nc or„aon_ VPWIri F.q
File Name : H0804090
Site Code :00000000
Start Date : 5/7/2008
Page No : 1
08:00 AM
JAMBOREE ROAD
349
UCI MAINTENANCE
JAMBOREE ROAD
2
BIRCH STREET
0
301
Southbound
6
YARD
37
Northbound
08:15 AM
Eastbound
416
0
1
2
0
Westbound
1
307
48
11
3
36
Start Time
Ri ht
Thru
j
Left
Ri ht
Thru
Left
Ri hl
Thru
281
Left
Ri ht
Thru
21
Left
Int. Total
Factor
1.0
1.0
3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
11
1.0
1.0
1.0
Total
1.0
1532
07:00 AM
43 198
2
3 1
0
0 170
16
6
1
17
457
07:15 AM
66 237
2
1 0
1
0 217
25
4
2
8
563
07:30 AM
91 348
1
1 2
0
0 221
32
10
1
27
734
07:45 AM
86 403
0
2 0
1
0 339
451
16
1
29
922
Total
2861186
5
7 3
2
0 947
118
36
5
81
2676
08:00 AM
116
349
6
2
2
1
0
301
50
6
0
37
870
08:15 AM
138
416
0
1
2
0
1
307
48
11
3
36
963
08:30 AM
124
383
1
1
2
1
1
281
61
9
4
21
889
08:45 AM
102
384
1
3
1
1
0
239
104
11
4
29
879
Total
480
1532
8
7
7
3
2
1128
2631
37
11123
3601
BREAK "•
I
29
0
2
I
714
04:45 PM
29
322
0
2
0
0
I
0
315
35
26
0
51
780
Total
55
613
1 1
2
0
ol
0
615
50 1
55
0
1031
,1494
05:00 PM
25
302
2
0
0
0
0
271
15
41
3
87
746
05:15 PM
25
350
1
0
0
0
0
355
14
25
0
70
840
05:30 PM
29
283
1
0
1
0
0
262
19
24
3
75
697
05:45 PM
21
416
0
0
0
0
0
274.
8
27
1
68
815
Total
100
1351
4
0
1
01
0
1162
561
117
7
300
3098
06:00 PM
16
341
0
0
0
01
0
297
- 3
24
0
84
765
06:15 PM
18
326
0
0
0
0
0
316
9
19
0
53
741
Grand Total
955 -
5349
18
16
11
5
2
4465
499
288
23
744
12375
Apprch %
15.1
84.6
0.3
50.0
34.4
15.6
0.0
89.9
10.0
27.3
2.2
70.5
Total %
7.7
43.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
36.1
4.0
2.3
0.2
6.0
25j
J Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, CA. 92780
File Name : HQ804
Site Code : OOOtkI�
Start Date : 51t/2ptf `
Page No :2
.Intersection
JAMBOREE ROAD
1 MAINTENANCE YARD
JAMBOREE ROAD
BIRCH STREET
85.6
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Start Time
Right Thru Left Topta.
Right Thru Left App'
Total
Right Thru Left gyp'
RI ht Thru Left App.
9
Peak Hour From
07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak
1 of 1
Total
Total
.Intersection
07:45 AM
204
1434
0.1
85.6
14.2
Volume
464.1551
7
2022
6 6
3
15
Percent
22.9 76.7
0.3
45
40.0 40.0
20.0
36
flm
0.934
0.865
Voluume e
138 416
0
654
1 2
0
3
Peak Factor
High Int.
08:15 AM
08:00 AM
Volume
138 416
0
554
2 2
1
5
Peak Factor
0.912
0.750
2
1228
204
1434
0.1
85.6
14.2
11 3
1
307
48
356
07:45 AM
0.946
0
339
45
384
11 3
36
50
0.934
InL
Total
42 8
123
173 3644
,24.3 4.6
71.1
11 3
36
50
963 .
0.946
08:15 AM
11 3
36
50
0.865
Out In Total
2022 3379
464 1551 7
Ttlw Le
1
a^� 1
th
—�
m p
/07S 4
500 4 —�z i
300 A
w m
H
L
p CLVH �
y
=Th�m 30
OtA In Total
a RFEROAD
2152
■
Transportation Studies, Inc.
2680 Walnut Avenue
Suite C
Tustin, GA. 92780
Fife Name
: H0804090
Site Code
: 00000000
Start Date
: 5/7/2008
Page No
:3
• •�
JAMBOREE ROAD
UCI MAINTENANCE YARD
JAMBOREE ROAD
BIRCH STREET
05:15 PM
Southbound
Westbound
Northbound
Eastbound
Start Time
Right
Thru
Left
1483
Right Thru
Left
0 1
Right
Thru
Left
Right
Thru
Left
24
0
84
108
Total
05:15
Total
Total
Volume
25 350
Tutu
• •�
., rni lV vv. 15 FM - reart I or t
1232
0.0 96.4
Intersection
05:15 PM
0 355
14
369
05:15 PM
25
Volume
91 1390
2
1483
0
1
0 1
Percent
6.1 93.7
0.1
0.0
100.
0.0 '
24
0
84
108
05:15
0.928
Volume
25 350
1
376
0
0
0 0
Peak Factor
High Int.
05:45 PM
05:30 PM
Volume
21 416
0
437
0
1
0 1
Peak Factor
n RAR
n otn
D 1188
44
1232
0.0 96.4
3.6
24.9
0 355
14
369
05:15 PM
25
0
0 355
14
369
0.835
Int.
Total
100
4
297
401
3117
24.9
1.0
74.1
25
0
70
- 95
840
0.928
06:00 PM
24
0
84
108
0.928
Out In Total
1485 I-48-31 F-2081
91 1390 2
Right Tlw Left
4 1 L4
N
a� m �o
w � NoAh m
—� 12008 51500 PM -2
2008 6:00'00 PM
o ..
o � VEHICLES - 'FA y
a�
V
+, T r
Left Tlw
44 1186 0
1490 1232 2722
out In Total
JAMBOREE D
2�9
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
N,
National Data & Surveying Services -
MC Summary
ofJamboree Rd /Bristol St North
Project #:
093077 -002
rsxa.
SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
N3
Z
.Pi
N
m
' G .
3
s
�
n
v
b
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
a
v
ImersecODn Name)
P^
S
N
m
n
fi
Nw-
x
Day
Date
NORTHBOUND
APPROACH LANES
}°
COUNT PERIODS
W
O
C
TOTAL AM NOON PM
AM NOON
PM TOTAL
Z 0 r--O-T 0 1 0
0 0 0 1 0
9
p 0 It 0 0 0
��zaau;o 0000 °
n
S
Z
m
3
s
�
n
v
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
ImersecODn Name)
P^
S
N
m
n
fi
Nw-
x
Day
Date
NORTHBOUND
APPROACH LANES
}°
COUNT PERIODS
n
pmn 4:15 PM
- 6:15 PM
AM PEAK HOUR
800 AM
CON OL: Signalized -
NOON PEAK HOUR
1230 PM
PM PEAK HOUR
500 PM
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: Jamboree Rd DATE: 3/4/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Bristol St North DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -002
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR SL
ST
SR EL
ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES:
2
2
1 0
2.5
1.5 0
0 0 0 0 0
6:00 AM
1523
2785
1327
0
I
1091
737
6:15 AM
0
0
0
0
0
7463
6:30 AM
6:45 AM
7:00 AM
7:15 AM
7:30 AM
153
366
137
135
58
849
7:45 AM
184
370
190
133
85
962
8:00 AM
225
355
175
135
92
982
8:15 AM
232
393
154
145
112
1036
8:30 AM
171
361
171
157
105
965
8:45 AM
218
400
163
133
103
1017
9:00 AM
178
284
146
129
96
833
9:15 AM
162
256
191
124
86
819
9:30 AM
9:45 AM
10:00 AM
10:15 AM
10:30 AM
10:45 AM
11:00 AM
11:15 AM
11:30 AM
11:45 AM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
1523
2785
1327
0
I
1091
737
0
0
0
0
0
0
7463
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 800 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 846 1509 663 1 0 570 412 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4000
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.966 0.937 0.000 0.000 0.965
CONTROL: Signalized
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: Jamboree Rd DATE: 3/4/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Bristol St North
DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -002
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND
LANES:
NL
2
NT
2
NR
1
SL ST
0 2.5
SR EL
1.5 0
ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL
0 0 0 0 0
1:00 PM
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
1:15 PM
1389
2197
1802
0
I
2004
1151
1:30 PM
0
0
0
I
0
0
8543
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:00 PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
187
259
244
205
115
1010
4:30 PM
174
273
226
211
142
1026
4:45 PM
173
272
194
228
128
995
5:00 PM
166
270
278
249
156
1119
5:15 PM
183
324
272
284
145
1208
5:30 PM
177
281
212
261
134
1065
5:45 PM
163
267
180
286
177
1073
6:00 PM
166
251
196
280
154
1047
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
1389
2197
1802
0
I
2004
1151
0
I
0
0
0
I
0
0
8543
PM Peak Hr Begins at: 500 PM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 689 1142 942 1 0 1080 612 1 0 0
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.890 0.914 0.000
CONTROL: Signalized
0 0 0 0 4465
0.000 0.924
202
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepare by:
§, S
National Data & Surveying Services
TMCSummary
ofJamboree Rd /Biisto /St South
1 1030
1 937
L12?L4JI
333
Project #:
09 -5077 -003
.qtr
1150
1 849
11145
Z
rn
SOUTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
3 .
N
R
i
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
ay�
X�il9IDusa
O
t
INN
{$ a
atx -Yg
3
(Intersection Name)
W
x
v'
TOTAL AM NOON PM
AM NOON
PM TOTAL
Z
O 5
D
L
O s
3166
1199
1 1030
1 937
L12?L4JI
333
1 520
110711
3144 11
1150
1 849
11145
xuteaf�"r� reswum �� I I B
nw?^liPBiilu» '.SL"f�TS "���. I
203
O
Z
rn
3 .
R
i
TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT
ay�
X�il9IDusa
(Intersection Name)
x
v'
EII
A-
Day Date
I
NORTHBOUND APPROACH LANES
---
t
c--
am 7:30 AM - 9:30 AM
noon 11:95 AM - 1:45 PM
m 4:15 PM 6:15 PM
AM PEAK HOUR 800 AM
MWFa : Signalized
'
NOON PEAK HOUR .1215 PM
PM PEAK HOUR 500 PM
203
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: Jamboree Rd DATE: 03/04/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Bristol St South DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -003
NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND . WESTBOUND
TOTAL
NL
NL NT
NR
SL ST
SR EL
ET
ER
WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES:
0 4.5
.5
0 3
0 1.5
1.5
2
0 0 0
74
1 0
1089
0
2176
I
598
2206
1 0
0
6:00
AM
6:15
AM
6:30
AM
6:45
AM
7:00
AM
7:15
AM
7:30
AM
422
11
137
235
80
287
1172
7:45
AM
456
8
130
288
62
310
1254
8:00
AM
469
10
138
288
.79
249
1233
8:15
AM
460
8
144
319
98
318
1347
8:30
AM
415
10
158
288
78
287
1236
8:45
AM
473
12
131
304
78
296
1294
9:00
AM
369
9
130
239
62
271
1080
9:15
AM
393
6
121
215
61
188
984
9:30
AM
9:45
AM
10:00
AM
10:15
AM
10:30
AM
10:45
AM
11:00
AM
11:15
AM
11:30
AM
11:45
AM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES=
0
3457
74
1 0
1089
0
2176
I
598
2206
1 0
0
0
9600
I
AM Peak Hr Begins at: 800 AM
PEAK
VOLUMES = 0 1817 40 1 0 571 0 11199 333 1150 1 0 0 0 5110
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.957 0.903 0.912 0.000 0.948
CONTROL: Signalized
204
Intersection Turning Movement
Prepared by:
National Data & Surveying Services
N -S STREET: Jamboree Rd DATE: 03/04/2009 LOCATION: City of Newport Beach
E -W STREET: Bristol St South
DAY: WEDNESDAY PROJECT# 09 -5077 -003
TOTAL
NORTHBOUND
SOUTHBOUND
NR
EASTBOUND
WESTBOUND
SR
NL NT
NR
SL ST SR
EL
ET
ER
WL WT WR TOTAL
LANES:
0 4.5
.5
0 3 0
1.5
1.5
2
0 0 0
1694
2083
0
0
0
11287
1:00 PM
1:15 PM
130 PM
1:45 PM
2:00 PM
2:15 PM
2:30 PM
2:45 PM
3:OO PM
3:15 PM
3:30 PM
3:45 PM
4:00 PM
4:15 PM
454
12
202
235
118
222
1243
4:30 PM
438
10
212
234
161
205
1260
4:45 PM
373
13
226
267
209
315
1403
5:00 PM
427
22
251
287
191
277
1455
5:15 PM
533
20
283
245
329
283
1693
5:30 PM
466
12
262
204
307
325.
1576
5:45 PM
408
19
284
201
244
260
1416
6:00 PM
365
15
281
249
135
196
1241
6:15 PM
6:30 PM
6:45 PM
TOTAL
NL
NT
NR
SL
ST
SR
EL
ET
ER
WL
WT
WR
TOTAL
VOLUMES =
0
3464
123
0
2001
0
1922
1694
2083
0
0
0
11287
PM Peak Hr Begins at:
PEAK
VOLUMES = 0 1834
PEAK HR.
FACTOR: 0.862
CONTROL: Signalized
500 PM
73 1 0 1080 0
0.951
937 1071 1145 1 0 0 . 0 6140
0.920 0.000 0.907
APPENDIX C
Regional Traffic Annual Growth Rate
200
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
REGIONAL TRAFFIC ANNUAL GROWTH RATE
COAST HIGHWA
East City limit to MacArthur Boulevard I%
MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road it
Jamboree Road to Newport Boulevard it
Newport Boulevard to west city limit it
IRVINE AVENUE
All
it
JAMBOREE ROAD
Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills Road it
San Joaquin Hills Road to Bison it
Bison to Bristol it
Bristol to Campus 1%
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD;
Coast Highway to San Joaquin Hills'Road it
San Joaquin Hills Road to north city limit it
NEWPORT BOULEVARD
Coast Highway to north city limit 1$
Street segments not listed are assumed to have 6% regional growth.
20 j
APPENDIX D
Explanation and Calculation of
Intersection Capacity Utilization
202
EXPLANATION AND CALCULATION OF
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
Overview
The ability of a roadway to carry traffic is referred to as capacity. The capacity is
usually greater between intersections and less at intersections because traffic flows
continuously between them and only during the green phase at them. Capacity at
intersections is best defined in terms of vehicles per lane per hour of green. If
capacity is 1,600 vehicles per lane per hour of green, and if the green phase is 50
percent of the cycle and there are three lanes, then the capacity is 1,600 times 50
percent times 3 lanes, or 2,400 vehicles per hour for that approach.
The technique used to compare the volume and capacity at an intersection is known
as Intersection Capacity Utilization. Intersection Capacity Utilization, usually
expressed as a decimal, is the proportion of an hour required to provide sufficient
capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches operate at capacity.
If an intersection is operating at 0.800 of capacity (i.e., an Intersection Capacity
Utilization of 0.800), then 0.200 of the traffic signal cycle is not used. The traffic signal
could show red on all indications 0.200 of the time and the traffic signal would just
accommodate approaching traffic.
Intersection Capacity Utilization analysis consists of (a) determining the proportion of
traffic signal time needed to serve each conflicting movement of traffic, (b) summing
the times for the movements, and (c) comparing the total time required to the total
time available. For example, if for north -south traffic the northbound traffic is 1,600
vehicles per hour, the southbound traffic is 1,200 vehicles per hour, and the capacity
of either direction is 3,200 vehicles per hour, then the northbound traffic is critical and
requires 1,600/3,200 or 0.500 of the traffic signal time. If for east -west traffic, 0.300
of the traffic signal time is required, then it can be seen that the Intersection Capacity
Utilization is 0.500 plus 0.300, or 0.800. When left turn arrows (left turn phasing)
exist, they are incorporated into the analysis. The critical movements are usually the
heavy left turn movements and the opposing through movements.
The Intersection Capacity Utilization technique is an ideal tool to quantify existing as
well as future intersection operation. The impact of adding a lane can be quickly
determined by examining the effect the lane has on the Intersection Capacity
Utilization.
2 o9
Intersection Capacity Utilization Worksheets That Follow This Discussion
The Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheet table contains the following
information:
1. Peak hour turning movement volumes.
2. Number of lanes that serve each movement.
3. For right turn lanes, whether the lane is a free right turn lane, whether it has a
right turn arrow, and the percent of right turns on red that are assumed.
4. Capacity assumed per lane.
S. Capacity available to serve each movement (number of lanes times capacity per
lane).
6. Volume to capacity ratio for each movement.
7. Whether the movement's volume to capacity ratio is critical and adds to the
Intersection Capacity Utilization value.
8. The yellow time or clearance interval assumed.
9. Adjustments for right turn movements.
10. The Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service.
The Intersection Capacity Utilization worksheet also has two graphics on the same
page. These two graphics show the following:
1. Peak hour turning movement volumes.
2. Number of lanes that serve each movement
3. The approach and exit leg volumes.
4. The two -way leg volumes.
5. An estimate of daily traffic volumes that is fairly close to actual counts and is
based strictly on the peak hour leg volumes multiplied by a factor.
270
6. Percent of daily traffic in peak hours.
7. Percent of peak hour leg volume that is inbound versus outbound.
A more detailed discussion of Intersection Capacity Utilization and Level of Service
follows.
Level of Service
Level of Service is used to describe the quality of traffic flow. Levels of Service A to C
operate quite well. Level of Service C is typically the standard to which rural roadways
are designed.
Level of Service D is characterized by fairly restricted traffic flow. Level of Service D is
the standard to which urban roadways are typically designed. Level of Service E is the
maximum volume a facility can accommodate and will result in possible stoppages of
momentary duration. Level of Service F occurs when a facility is overloaded and is
characterized by stop- and -go traffic with stoppages of long duration.
A description of the various Levels of Service appears at the end of the Intersection
Capacity Utilization description, along with the relationship between Intersection
Capacity Utilization and Level of Service.
Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections
Although calculating an Intersection Capacity Utilization value for an unsignalized
intersection is invalid, the presumption is that a traffic signal can be installed and the
calculation shows whether the geometrics are capable of accommodating the
expected volumes with a traffic signal. A traffic signal becomes warranted before
Level of Service D is reached for a signalized intersection.
Traffic Signal Timing
The Intersection Capacity Utilization calculation assumes that a traffic signal is
properly timed. It is possible to have an Intersection Capacity Utilization well below
1.000, yet have severe traffic congestion. This would occur if one or more movements
is not getting sufficient green time to satisfy its demand, and excess green time exists
on other movements. This is an operational problem that should be remedied.
271-
Lane Capacity
Capacity is often defined in terms of roadway width; however, standard lanes have
approximately the same capacity whether they are 11 or 14 feet wide. Our data
indicates a typical lane, whether a through lane or a left turn lane, has a capacity of
approximately 1,750 vehicles per hour of green time, with nearly all locations showing
a capacity greater than 1,600 vehicles per hour of green per lane. Right turn lanes
have a slightly lower capacity; however 1,600 vehicles per hour is a valid capacity
assumption for right turn lanes.
This finding is published in the August 1978 issue of the Institute of Transportation
Engineers Journal in the article entitled, "Another Look at Signalized Intersection
Capacity" by William Kunzman, P.E. A capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour per lane
with no yellow time penalty, or 1,700 vehicles per hour with a 0.030 or 0.050 yellow
time penalty is reasonable.
Yellow Time
The yellow time can either be assumed to be completely used and no penalty applied,
or it can be assumed to be only partially usable. Total yellow time accounts for
approximately 0.100 of a traffic signal cycle, and a penalty of 0.030 to 0.050 is
reasonable.
During peak hour traffic operation the yellow times are nearly completely used. If
there is no left turn phasing, the left turn vehicles completely use the yellow time.
Even if there is left turn phasing, the through traffic continues to enter the
intersection on the yellow until just a split second before the red.
Shared Lanes
Shared lanes occur in many locations. A shared lane is often found at the end of an off
ramp where the ramp forms an intersection with the cross street. Often at a diamond
interchange off ramp, there are three lanes. In the case of a diamond interchange, the
middle lane is sometimes shared, and the driver can turn left, go through, or turn right
from that lane.
If one assumes a three lane off ramp as described above, and if one assumes that each
lane has 1,600 capacity, and if one assumes that there are 1,000 left turns per hour,
500 right turns per hour, and 100 through vehicles per hour, then how should one
assume that the three lanes operate. There are three ways that it is done.
272
One way is to just assume that all 1,600 vehicles (1,000 plus 500 plus 100) are served
simultaneously by three lanes. When this is done, the capacity is 3 times 1,600 or
4,800, and the amount of green time needed to serve the ramp is 1,600 vehicles
divided by 4,800 capacity or 33.3 percent. This assumption effectively assumes
perfect lane distribution between the three lanes that is not realistic. It also means a
left turn can be made from the right lane.
Another way is to equally split the capacity of a shared lane and in this case to assume
there are 1.33 left turn lanes, 1.33 right turn lanes, and 0.33 through lanes. With this
assumption, the critical movement is the left turns and the 1,000 left turns are served
by a capacity of 1.33 times 1,600, or 2,133. The volume to capacity ratio of the critical
move is 1,000 divided by 2,133 or 46.9 percent.
The first method results in a critical move of 33.3 percent and the second method
results in a critical move of 46.9 percent. Neither is very accurate, and the difference
in the calculated Level of Service will be approximately 1.5 Levels of Service (one Level
of Service is 10 percent).
The way Kunzman Associates, Inc. does it is to assign fractional lanes in a reasonable
way. In this example, it would be assumed that there is 1.1 right turn lanes, 0.2
through lanes, and 1.7 left turn lanes. The volume to capacity ratios for each
movement would be 31.3 percent for the through traffic, 28.4 percent for the right
turn movement, and 36.8 percent for the left turn movement. The critical movement
would be the 36.8 percent for the left turns.
Right Turn on Red
Kunzman Associates, Inc. software treats right turn lanes in one of five different ways.
Each right turn lane is classified into one of five cases. The five cases are (1) free right
turn lane, (2) right turn lane with separate right turn arrow, (3) standard right turn
lane with no right turns on red allowed, (4) standard right turn lane with a certain
percentage of right turns on red allowed, and (5) separate right turn arrow and a
certain percentage of right turns on red allowed.
Free Right Turn Lane
If it is a free right turn lane, then it is given a capacity of one full lane with continuous
or 1.000 green time. A free right turn lane occurs when there is a separate approach
lane for right turning vehicles, there is a separate departure lane for the right turning
vehicles after they turn and are exiting the intersection, and the through cross street
traffic does not interfere with the vehicles after they turn right.
� 2
Separate Right Turn Arrow
If there is a separate right turn arrow, then it is assumed that vehicles are given a
green indication and can proceed on what is known as the left turn overlap.
The left turn overlap for a northbound right turn is the westbound left turn. When the
left turn overlap has a green indication, the right turn lane is also given a green arrow
indication. Thus, if there is a northbound right turn arrow, then it can be turned green
for the period of time that the westbound left turns are proceeding.
If there are more right turns than can be accommodated during the northbound
through green and the time that the northbound right turn arrow is on, then an
adjustment is made to the Intersection Capacity Utilization to account for the green
time that needs to be added to the northbound through green to accommodate the
northbound right turns.
Standard Right Turn Lane, No Right Turns on Red
A standard right turn lane, with no right turn on red assumed, proceeds only when
there is a green indication displayed for the adjacent through movement. If additional
green time is needed above that amount of time, then in the Intersection Capacity
Utilization calculation a right turn adjustment green time is added above the green
time that is needed to serve the adjacent through movement.
Standard Right Turn Lane, With Right Turns on Red
A standard right turn lane with say 20 percent of the right turns allowed to turn right
on a red indication is calculated the same as the standard right turn case where there
is no right turn on red allowed, except that the right turn adjustment is reduced to
account for the 20 percent of the right turning vehicles that can logically turn right on
a red light. The right turns on red are never allowed to exceed the time the overlap
left turns take plus the unused part of the green cycle that the cross street traffic
moving from left to right has.
As an example of how 20 percent of the cars are allowed to turn right on a red
indication, assume that the northbound right turn volume needs 40 percent of the
traffic signal cycle to be satisfied. To allow 20 percent of the northbound right turns to
turn right on red, then during 8 percent of the traffic signal cycle (40 percent of traffic
signal cycle times 20 percent that can turn right on red) right turns on red will be
allowed if it is feasible.
274
For this example, assume that 15 percent of the traffic signal cycle is green for the
northbound through traffic, and that means that 15 percent of the traffic signal cycle
is available to satisfy northbound right turns. Afterthe northbound through traffic has
received its green, 25 percent of the traffic signal cycle is still needed to satisfy the
northbound right turns (40 percent of the traffic signal cycle minus the 15 percent of
the traffic signal cycle that the northbound through used).
Assume that the westbound left turns require a green time of 6 percent of the traffic
signal cycle. This 6 percent of the traffic signal cycle is used by northbound right turns
on red. After accounting for the northbound right turns that occur on the westbound
overlap left turn, 19 percent of the traffic signal cycle is still needed for the
northbound right turns (25 percent of the cycle was needed after the northbound
through green time was accounted for [see above paragraph], and 6 percent was
served during the westbound left turn overlap). Also, at this point 6 percent of the
traffic signal cycle has been used for northbound right turns on red, and still 2 percent
more of the right turns will be allowed to occur on the red if there is unused
eastbound through green time.
For purpose of this example, assume that the westbound through green is critical, and
that 15 percent of the traffic signal cycle is unused by eastbound through traffic. Thus,
2 percent more of the traffic signal cycle can be used by the northbound right turns on
red since there is 15 seconds of unused green time being given to the eastbound
through traffic.
At this point, 8 percent of the traffic signal cycle was available to serve northbound
right turning vehicles on red, and 15 percent of the traffic signal cycle was available to
serve right turning vehicles on the northbound through green. So 23 percent of the
traffic signal cycle has been available for northbound right turns.
Because 40 percent of the traffic signal cycle is needed to serve northbound right
turns, there is still a need for 17 percent more of the traffic signal cycle to be available
for northbound right turns. What this means is the northbound through traffic green
time is increased by 17 percent of the cycle length to serve the unserved right turn
volume, and a 17 percent adjustment is added to the Intersection Capacity Utilization
to account for the northbound right turns that were not served on the northbound
through green time or when right turns on red were assumed.
Separate Right Turn Arrow, With Right Turns on Red
A right turn lane with a separate right turn arrow, plus a certain percentage of right
turns allowed on red is calculated the same way as a standard right turn lane with a
certain percentage of right turns allowed on red, except the turns which occur on the
2715
right turn arrow are not counted as part of the percentage of right turns that occur on
red.
Critical Lane Method
Intersection Capacity Utilization parallels another calculation procedure known as the
Critical Lane Method with one exception. Critical Lane Method dimensions capacity in
terms of standardized vehicles per hour per lane. A Critical Lane Method result of 800
vehicles per hour means that the intersection operates as though 800 vehicles were
using a single lane continuously. If one assumes a lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per
hour, then a Critical Lane Method calculation resulting in 800 vehicles per hour is the
same as an Intersection Capacity Utilization calculation of 50 percent since 800/1,600
is 50 percent. It is our opinion that the Critical Lane Method is inferior to the
Intersection Capacity Utilization method simply because a statement such as "The
Critical Lane Method value is 800 vehicles per hour" means little to most persons,
whereas a statement such as "The Intersection Capacity Utilization is 50 percent"
communicates clearly. Critical Lane Method results directly correspond to
Intersection Capacity Utilization results. The correspondence is as follows, assuming a
lane capacity of 1,600 vehicles per hour and no clearance interval.
Critical Lane Method
Result
800 vehicles per hour
960 vehicles per hour
1,120 vehicles per hour
1,280 vehicles per hour
1,440 vehicles per hour
1,600 vehicles per hour
1,760 vehicles per hour
Intersection Capacity
Utilization Result
50 percent
60 percent
70 percent
80 percent
90 percent
100 percent
110 percent
270
INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION
LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTION'
Level of
Service
Description
Volume to
Capacity Ratio
A
Level of Service A occurs when progression is extremely
0.600 and below
favorable and vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most
vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also
contribute to low delay.
B
Level of Service B generally occurs with goad progression
0.601 to 0.700
and /or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for Level
of Service A, causing higher levels of average delay.
C
Level of Service C generally results when there is fair
0.701 to 0.800
progression and /or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle
failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of
vehicles stopping is significant at this level, although many
still pass through the intersection without stopping.
D
Level of Service D generally results in noticeable congestion.
0.801 to 0.900
Longer delays may result from some combination of
unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high volume
to capacity ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of
vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are
noticeable.
E
Level of Service E is considered to be the limit of acceptable
0.901 to 1.000
delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor
progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume to capacity
ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent.
F
Level of Service F is considered to be unacceptable to most
1.001 and up
drivers. This condition often occurs when oversaturation,
i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the
intersection. It may also occur at high volume to capacity
ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor
progression and long cycle lengths may also be major
contributing causes to such delay levels.
'Source: Highway Capacity Manual special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council Washington
D.C., 2000.
Existing (Year 20111
272
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 2 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length e) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
********* k* k*********************#*#*** k********* * * * * * * * * *k *k * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
**********************#* k* k* k* IkI****#***** k*** k* k ** * ** ** ** *k * * * * ** ** * * * * * * # ** **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.435
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (.sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control.: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-------------- -II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 37 944 49 195 835 227 307 555 48 87 185 58
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial B3e: 38 972 50 201 860 234 316 572 49 90 191 60
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Ad3: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 38 972 50 201 860 234 316 572 49 90 191 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 38 972 50 201 860 234 316 572 49 90 191 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Final.VOlume: 38 972 50 201 860 234 316 572 49 90 191 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 4418 382 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------------- --II---------- -- - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.04 0.00
Crit Moves
'1'raffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 2 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour.
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.635
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
*****************#****** W***** W***' 4*' 4*- k##********** * * * * *' * * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West: Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 'I' - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 1091 49 45 819 447 324 274 96 98 669 195
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 159 1124 50 46 844 460 334 282 99 101 689 201
User Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 159 1124 50 46 844 460 334 282 99 101 689 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 1.59 1124 50 46 844 460 334 282 99 101 689 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 159 1124 50 46 844 460 334 282 99 101 689 0
-- - -- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- il---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.22 0.78 2.00 3.00 1.00
E'inal Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 3555 1245 3200 4800 1600
------ - -- ---I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - --1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.10 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.29 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** # * +* * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
220
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 3 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour.
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length `;) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
***- 4************************#***#**************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.380
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - 'T - R .L - T - R L - 'T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II----__--------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Inc.l.ude Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ---- ------- II-- -- ------ - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 689 98 100 624 176 156 310 73 31. 154 53
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 703 100 102 636 180 158 310 73 31 154 53
User.' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
?HE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0100
PHF Volume: 33 703 100 102 636 180 158 310 73 31 154 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 703 100 102 636 180 158 310 73 31 154 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 33 703 100 102 636 180 158 310 73 31 154 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II-- ---- ---- - - -- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1.600 1,600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.12 0.88 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final. Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4992 1.406 1600 2556 644 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.02 0.05 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
221
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 3 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.457
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------------ - - - - -- --------------- II--------- ------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: B6 646 25 49 858 149 274 182 53 114 433 170
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 88 659 26 50 875 152 274 182 53 114 433 170
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 88 659 26 50 875 152 274 182 53 114 433 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 88 659 26 50 875 152 274 182 53 114 433 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
Final-Volume: 88 659 26 50 875 152 274 182 53 1.1.4 433 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.41 0.59 1.61 1.07 0.31 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5453 947 2582 1717 500 1600 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** + * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
222
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length $) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
*# w*************************** w************#***** * * * * * * *W *W * * * * *# # * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.552
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y- FR =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected.
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
--------------------------- 11--------------- II----- ---------- II-------- -- -- - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 101 988 656 58 435 163 19 96 28 78 136 12
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 1008 669 59 444 166 19 96 28 78 136 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 1008 669 59 444 166 19 96 28 78 136 1.2
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 1008 669 59 444 166 19 96 28 78 136 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 1008 669 59 444 166 19 96 28 78 136 12
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- ------------- II----- ----- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I ------ --------- II-------------- -II --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.21 0.42 0.04 0.09 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.01
Cri1t Moves: # * ** * * ** * * ** * # **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
22S
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.558
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R
I --------------- II --------------- II--------- _----- II---------- - -- - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
- - -- I --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 48 624 126 29 968 52 138 195 183 665 127 38
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Ise: 49 636 129 30 987 53 138 1.95 163 665 127 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PINT Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 49 636 129 30 987 53 138 .1.95 183 665 127 38
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 49 636 129 30 987 53 138 195 183 665 127 38
PCP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 49 636 129 30 987 53 138 195 183 665 127 38
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--- ------------ II---------- -- - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 .1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.13 0.08 0.02 0.21 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.11 0.21 0.08 0.02
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
224
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.601
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
******#**#********#****************#*****#*#***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II-----_--------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 ]. 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - -- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 177 1332 456 66 293 121 410 851 176 364 674 181
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 181 1359 465 67 299 123 418 668 180 371 687 185
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 181 1359 465 67 299 0 418 868 180 371 687 1.85
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 1359 465 67 299 0 418 868 180 371 687 185
PCE Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 181 1359 465 67 299 0 418 868 180 371 687 185
Ov1Adj Vol: 279
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- -- ------- -- -- II---------- -- - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I ----------- ---- II----------- ---- II - - - -- ---- ------ - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.28 0.29 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.1.8 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.12
Ov1Adj V /S: 0.17
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
225
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) .
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 7) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 44 MacArthur. Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.678
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-------- - - - -I- - - - -II ------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 ]. 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ -------------- -II - -- -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 227 578 397 157 965 312 214 967 37 611 921 155
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 232 590 405 160 984 318 218 986 38 623 939 158
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 232 590 405 160 984 0 218 986 38 623 939 158
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 232 590 405 160 984 0 218 986 38 623 939 158
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 232 590 405 160 984 0 218 986 38 623 939 158
Ov1AdjVOl: 93
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- tl--- --- -- ------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.12 0.25 0.05 0.21 0.00 0.07 0.21 0.02 0.19 0.20 0.10
OvlAdjV /S: 0.06
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traf£.i.x 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
220
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU Moss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvi.ne Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.488
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - -- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - --
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol.: 349 1533 0 0 220 204 0 0 0 120 902 138
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 356 1564 0 0 224 208 0 0 0 120 902 138
User Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 356 1564 0 0 224 208 0 0 0 120 902 138
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 356 1564 0 0 224 208 0 0 0 120 902 138
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 356 1564 0 0 224 208 0 0 0 120 902 138
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.47 0.53
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 5551 849
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.0'1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
227
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
**** W** W*+*+**** WW+*** W* W* WW*#** W*************#** * * * * * * * * * *k *W * + # *WW *W *W * * * * * * *#
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.742
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: 1, - T - R L - T - R 1, - 'I - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- -- -- ------ II----- ----- --- - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 370 671 0 0 742 1007 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 377 684 0 0 757 1027 0 0 0 200 186 °7 74
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 377 684 0 0 757 1027 0 0 0 200 1.867 74
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 377 684 0 0 757 1027 0 0 0 200 1867 74
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 377 684 0 0 757 1027 0 0 0 200 1867 74
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- -------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat. /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.85 0.15.
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 6156 244
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-- ------------- II------- --- - -- - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: *W ** * ##* * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
222
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Los3 as Cycle Length s) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection *6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.634
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - 1' - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 900 152 96 281 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 916 155 98 287 0 :L186 1623 299 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 918 155 98 287 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 918 155 98 287 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final.VOlume: 0 918 155 98 287 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
--- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.28 0.72 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.69 2.31 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6844 1156 1600 4800 0 2702 3698 3200 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11-- ------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Tra£fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
2 eq
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) .
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length s) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Campus Dr.i.ve /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
*********** ww**********#****************** ww*** wW *W * *w *w * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * *kw*
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.465
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1. 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 720 180 201 859 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial B3e: 0 734 184 205 876 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 734 1.84 205 876 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 734 184 205 876 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 '734 184 205 876 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.17 2.83 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final. Sat.: 0 6400 1.600 1600 4800 0 1878 4522 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-- ------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
;90
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Cri.tical Vol. /Cap. W : 0.532
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East: Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---- ------ - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 986 237
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
User Adj: 1.00 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 108 886 0 0 1.60 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
PCB Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 108 886 0 0 1.60 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
----- --------------- II--------------- II---- ---- --- ---- II- --------- - - - - -
I
Saturation. Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 3.26 0.58
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 3200 3200 0 0 0 1854 5217 929
------------ I ------- -------- II------ ------ - - -II--------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.19 0.26
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
�9
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 1) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection N7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.527
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Round West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R 1, - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II--------- - - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
User. Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
ML.F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 1.24
------------ --------------- LI--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.58 2.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.72 0.28
Final. Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 2525 3875 0 0 0 1600 5946 454
--------- - - - I -- ------ II--------------- II__------- ------ II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.20 0.27
Cr-it Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Tra£fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
;92
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.391
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R
------------ --------------- II-------__------ II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
--------------------------- 11--------------- II------- -------- II---------- - - -- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II------------- - -II --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.37 1.63 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.75 2.49 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3792 2608 3200 3200 0 2804 3990 1206 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II------------- -- II --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
:�9 s
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Los.s as Cycle Length o) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
***** W******** W*+***********#*#*********+*++*+*+ W * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * # #W # # **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.436
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
******************************+***********#****** * * * ** ** ** ** ** ** * * **k * * * * * * * * * *#
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: I, - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --_------------ II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I ------------ - - -II- ------ II--------------- II-------- -- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 312 300 305 614 0 168 999 174 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 1.74 0 0 0
------------ --- - -- -- II--------------- II-- ------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.04 1.96 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 3.56 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3263 3137 3200 3200 0 1600 5688 712 0 0 0
----- ------- I --------- -- ----II ------- II-- ---- --- ------ II------ ---- - -- --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
: 9"T
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
Page 10 -1
---------------- - - - - --
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
*#* W************ WWW******* W***** k***** k********** WWW *W * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *W *W *W **
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.462
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal. Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
--------------------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -1
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 J. 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------ ------ --- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 16 534 53 37 335 73 228 303 42 '77 287 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 16 534 53 37 335 73 233 309 43 79 293 112
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1.6 534 0 37 335 73 233 309 43 79 293 112
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 16 534 0 37 335 73 233 309 43 79 293 112
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 16 534 0 37 335 73 233 309 43 79 '293 112
------------ ------ --------- II--- ---- ---- - - --II ----- II-------- -- -- - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2627 573 1600 3200 1.600 1600 2313 887
---- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.13
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
295
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 10 -1
- -- - - --
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Lo3s as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.563
Loss 'time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (.sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 383 122 98 610 224 145 445 49 51 501 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bee: 47 383 122 98 610 224 148 454 50 52 511 65
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 383 0 98 610 224 148 454 50 52 511 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 383 0 98 610 224 148 454 50 52 511 65
POE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 47 383 0 98 610 224 148 454 50 52 511 65
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- ---- ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1,600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.77 0.23
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2341 859 1600 3200 1600 1600 2838 362
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- -II-- --- ---- - - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.18
Cri't Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * #*
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
;go
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
*+*+******** W************ WW** W* W******###**** W** W * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * *W *W * * * *#
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.285
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1. 1. 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1.
------------ I --------------- II------------ - - -II--------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
----- I--------------- II--------------- II-- --- -- -- ------ II- ---- ----- - -- - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II-------------- -II --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
**#*******+******#*#*#************#*****#*#*#** W* * *W * * * * # * * * # * #* * * * * * * * * * + * * * * **
Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
297
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Projcct
Existing (Year_ 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °.) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
* kW# X**** W* W******************* WW* X#*#* # * * * * * * #W *W *W *W * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *WWW * * * * **
Intersection #10 Von Farman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.351
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
** *WWW * * * * * * * * * * * * ** WWW#********** W*******#*#** W* WW * * * * * # * * * * *# * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1, 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 71 40'7 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
------------ ------ --------- II------------ -- -II--------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 :L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- il---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.03 0.02 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
* * # * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * #W *WWWWW *W * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * # * # ** *WWWWW *W * * * * * * * * * * *W * * *# * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
�9
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 1.2 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level. Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 411 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.417
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II. --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II---------- -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 1.01 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P11F Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- -- -- ------- II------ ---- -----
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 l.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- --- - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cri.t Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KINSMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 411 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.540
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - -- ------ --------- II----- ----- - - - - - H ---- ----------- 11------- --- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min.. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------ ------- --II--------- - - - - --
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
P11F Volume: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
POE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------ -- ------- II------ -- -- - --- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1.600 1.600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
C.rit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
300
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Lo3s as Cycle Length ) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
******#*********** k**************#*************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
** k********************** kk********************** * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *k* **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.615
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: B
*************************************{*#********* * * * * # *k * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------- - - - - -I -------- II --------------- II -_------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II---- ----------- II-- -- ------- - ---II -- - --I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1044 34 286 1732 172 '76 112 10 259 423 152
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 147 1.075 35 295 1784 177 78 115 10 267 436 157
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1.47 1075 35 295 1784 177 78 1.15 0 267 436 157
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 147 1075 35 295 1784 177 78 115 0 267 436 157
PCE Adj: 1.00 1. 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 147 1075 35 295 1784 177 78 115 0 267 436 157
------------ --------------- - II--------------- II--- ----- ------ -II---------- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1.600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.87 0.1.3 2.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 6198 202 3200 4366 434 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- il--------------- II----------- ---- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves'
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
301
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour.
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length a) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.583
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - 'I - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---- ------ - - - --
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 65 1278 135 224 1108 183 219 263 159 152 226 331
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 67 1316 139 231 1141 188 226 271 164 157 233 341
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 67 1316 139 231 1141 188 226 271 0 157 233 341
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 67 1316 139 231 1141 186 226 271 0 157 233 341
PIE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLE' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
F:i.nalVolume: 67 1316 1.39 231 1141 188 226 271 0 157 233 341
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.62 0.38 2.00 2.57 0.43 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 5789 611 3200 4120 680 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------- --- -- -- -II------- --- - - -- -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.28 0.26 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.21
Crit Moves: * * ** + * #* *W *W * * *#
Traffi.x 7.9,0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
302
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker. Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
**** w****#*********************************' k*#*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # # **
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.514
Loss 'Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
--- - I - - -- -- II--------------- II-_---- --------- II------ ---- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1. 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 204 1228 2 7 1551 464 123 8 42 3 6 6
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 1265 2 7 1598 478 123 8 42 3 6 6
User Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 210 1265 2 7 1598 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 210 1.265 2 7 1598 0 1.23 8 0 3 6 6
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 210 1265 2 7 1598 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- -- ------- -- - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 0.20 0.40 0.40
Final Sat.: 1600 4792 8 1600 4800 1600 3005 195 1600 320 640 640
------- -- --- I ------------ -- -II- ------ II----------- - - - -II -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
303
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:39:33 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Flour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection 413 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.421
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: A
*#******************##****#*****##*************** * * * * ** *# ** * * * * * + * * ** * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- It--- ------------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1. 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 44 1188 0 2 1390 91 297 4 100 0 1 0
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 45 1224 0 2 1432 94 297 4 100 0 1 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 45 1224 0 2 1432 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
Reduct. Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 45 1224 0 2 1432 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 45 1224 0 2 1432 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
---------- - -I - -- -- -- 11-------- --- - - - -11- 11---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 0 1600 4800 1600 3157 43 1600 0 1600 0
---------- --I------ -- ------- 11---- - - ---- ---- 11-- ------ ------- 11------ ---- -- - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** # * +* * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
304
MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:22:46 Page 1 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.426
Loss Time (see_): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement.: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
---- --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-------- ----- --II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 846 1509 663 0 570 412 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 663 1539 676 0 581 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 863 1539 0 0 581. 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 863 1539 0 0 581 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 863 1539 0 0 581 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ------ -- ------- II-------- --- ----II --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 .1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 :1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.32 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 3715 2685 0 0 0 0 0 0
------- - - - - -I ------- II-------------- -II - -- ---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.27 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * +*
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
305
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU ],(Loss as Cycle Length 9;) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.489
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: loo Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement:: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
----------_- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 689 1142 942 0 1080 612 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1..02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 703 1.165 961 0 1102 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 703 1165 0 0 1102 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 703 1165 0 0 1102 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 703 1165 0 0 1102 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------------ --- II-------- -- - -- --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.55 1.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 4085 2315 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.22 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.2.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to FUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Soo
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:19 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection $15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.611
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
***#*** W***#*#********+#*******#+**********#***+* * * * * # # * #* # * * * # * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I-------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - -- --
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1.817 40 0 571 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1853 4.1. 0 582 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1853 41 0 582 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1853 41 0 582 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..D0
FinalVolume: 0 1853 41 0 582 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - -- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.89 0.11 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7828 172 0 4800 0 3200 1.600 3200 0 0 0
----- ------- I -------- ------- II - -- -- --II---------------II-
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol. /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.37 0.21 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * *** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
30 j
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 13:38:33 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011)
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length °s) Method (Base Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): loo Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.661
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------- - - - --I ------ II --------------- II---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- -- ------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1834 73 0 1080 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial 8se: 0 1871 74 0 1102 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1871 74 0 1102 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Reduct: Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1871 74 0 1102 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final.Volume: 0 1871 74 0 1102 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.61 0.19 0.00 3.00 0.00 1.40 1.60 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7694 306 0 4800 0 2240 2560 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----------- ---- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * # *#
***********+************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *# * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to FUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
302
Existing (Year 2011 ) + Project
309
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 4 -1
------- ----- --- --- - --
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.437
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ------------ _-- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ------- -------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 37 944 49 195 835 227 307 555 48 87 185 58
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 38 972 50 201 860 234 316 572 49 90 191 60
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 38 975 50 201 864 234 316 572 49 94 191 60
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 38 975 50 201 864 234 316 572 49 94 191 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 38 975 50 201 864 234 316 572 49 94 191 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 38 975 50 201 864 234 316 572 49 94 191 0
------------ I ------------- -- II--------------- II -- - -- I--- ------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 4418 382 3200 4800 1600
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.03 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.04 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
310
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.635
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - -_ -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I--------------- fl--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 1091 49 45 819 447 324 274 96 98 669 195
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 159 1124 50 46 844 460 334 282 99 101 689 201
Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 159 1129 50 46 848 460 334 282 99 105 689 201
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 159 1129 50 46 848 460 334 282 99 105 689 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 159 1129 50 46 848 460 334 282 99 105 689 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 159 1129 50 46 848 460 334 282 99 105 689 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.22 0.78 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 3555 1245 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.10 0.18 0.03 0.03 0.13 0.29 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S11
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.380
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 689 98 100 624 176 158 310 73 31 154 53
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 703 100 102 636 160 158 310 73 31 154 53
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByvol: 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 33 706 100 102 644 180 158 310 73 31 154 53
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0..00
PHF Volume: 33 706 100 102 644 180 158 310 73 31 154 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 33 706. 100 102 644 180 158 310 73 31 154 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 33 706 100 102 644 180 158 310 73 31 154 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.13 0.87 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5006 1394 1600 2556 644 1600 3200 1600
- I --------------- II----- ---------- II- - - - - -- I---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.06 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.02 0.05 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
312
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
+++++++++++++*+ ww+++++++ ww+ www+ www+ wwwwwww+ wwwwww + + + + + + + + +w *ww + + + + + + + + + + +w +www ++
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
wwww+++++++++++++ wwww++++ w+++++++ w+ w+ w++ w+++ w++++ + + + + + +w * + + + + + + + + + + + + + +w *w +w + + *+
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.458
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
+++++++++ wwww++++ w++++ w+ wwwww+ www+ w++++++ w++++ wwwwww +w + + + + + + + +www * + + + + + + +w + + + + ++
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II------- -------- II-- -------- - - - --
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 86 646 25 49 858 149 274 182 53 114 433 170
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 88 659 26 50 875 152 274 182 53 114 433 170
Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 88 664 26 50 883 152 274 182 53 114 433 170
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 88 664 26 50 883 152 274 182 53 114 433 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 88 664 26 50 883 152 274 182 53 114 433 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 88 664 26 50 883 152 274 182 53 114 433 0
-------------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.41 0.59 1.61 1.07 0.31 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5460 940 2582 1717 500 1600 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11------------- -- II--- ------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.14 0.02 0.03 0.16 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves-
+ w++ ww+ w++ ww+ w++ w+ w+ www++++++ w++ www++ w+ ww+ w++ ww+ w + * + + + + +w + + * +wwww + + +w + + + + * + + + + ++
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
SIS
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.558
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------- ------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 101 988 656 58 435 163 19 96 28 78 136 12
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 103 1008 669 59 444 166 19 96 28 78 136 12
Added Vol: 0 23 0 7 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 103 1031 669 66 459 166 19 96 28 78 138 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 103 1031 669 66 459 166 19 96 28 78 138 12
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 103 1031 669 66 459 166 19 96 28 78 138 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 103 1031 669 66 459 166 19 96 28 78 138 12
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--- ------- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.21 0.42 0.04 0.10 0.10 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.01
Crit moves:* * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S14
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.564
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II-- -------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 48 624 126 29 968 52 138 195 183 665 127 38'
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 49 636 129 30 987 53 138 195 183 665 127 38
Added Vol: 0 23 0 12 26 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 49 659 129 42 1013 53 138 195 183 665 129 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 49 659 129 42 1013 53 138 195 183 665 129 38
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 49 659 129 42 1013 53 138 195 183 665 129 38
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 49 659 129 42 1013 53 138 195 183 665 129 38
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.14 0.08 0.03 0.21 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.11 0.21 0.08 0.02
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN. ASSOC, ORANGE CA
31,5
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 7 -1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.604
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II ------_--_----- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 177 1332 456 66 293 121 410 851 176 364 674 181
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 181 1359 465 67 299 123 418 868 180 371 687 185
Added Vol: 0 11 0 4 7 4 6 0 0 0 0 6
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 181 1370 465 71 306 127 424 868 180 371 687 191
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 181 1370 465 71 306 0 424 868 180 371 687 191
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 181 1370 465 71 306 0 424 868 180 371 687 191
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 181 1370 465 71 306 0 424 868 180 371 687 191
OvlAdj VOl: 279
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-- ------------ -II---- ------ - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 .3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
--------------- II--------------- II----------- -- --II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.06 0.00 0.13 0.18 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.12
OvlAdjV /S: 0.17
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
310
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 44 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.680
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y+R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
#*****##****+*********+#*#+#******###*#***#***### # # * # # # * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
---- I--------------- II__------------- II --------------- II ------ ---- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------ - - - - -- --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - - H ---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 227 578 397 157 965 312 214 967 37 611 921 155
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 232 590 405 160 984 318 218 986 38 623 939 158
Added Vol: 0 it 0 7 12 7 6 0 0 0 0 6
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 232 601 405 167 996 325 224 986 38 623 939 164
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 232 601 405 167 996 0 224 986 38 623 939 164
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 232 601 405 167 996 0 224 986 38 623 939 164
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVclume: 232 601 405 167 996 0 224 986 36 623 939 164
OvlAdj Vol: 93 -
---- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.13 0.25 0.05 0.21 0.00 0.07 0.21 0.02 0.19 0.20 0.10
0v1Adj V /S: 0.06 -
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
317
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
*###*#*************#***************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # # * # **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.490
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
-- I --------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 349 1533 0 0 220 204 0 0 0 120 902 138
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 356 1564 0 0 224 208 0 0 0 120 902 138
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 356 1570 0 0 225 211 0 0 0 120 902 136
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 356 1570 0 0 225 211 0 0 0 120 902 138
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 356 1570 0 0 225 211 0 0 0 120 902 138
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 356 1570 0 0 225 211 0 0 0 120 902 138
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.47 0.53
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 5551 849
------------ I --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
SI-2
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour -
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): - 0.744
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ I--------------- il --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 370 671 0 0 742 1007 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 377 684 0 0 757 1027 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 377 690 0 0 759 1032 0 0 0 200 1867 74
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 377 690 0 0 759 1032 0 0 0 200 1667 74
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 377 690 0 0 759 1032 0 0 0 200 1867 74
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 377 690 - 0 0 759 1032 0 0 0 200 1867 74
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ -- -- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.85 0.15
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0- 0 0 1600 6156 244
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ---- --- - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.14 0.00 .0.00 0.12 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.30 0.30
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
319
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*********####***#*#**#***#*****#*****#**#**##*##* * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * # * * * * **
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.635
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- 11---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----- --------- -II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 900 152 96 281 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 918 155 98 267 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 920 155 98 288 0 1190 1623 299 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 920 155 98 286 0 1190 1623 299 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 920 155 98 288 0 1190 1623 299 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 920 155 98 288 0 1190 1623 299 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.28 0.72 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.69 2.31 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6846 1154 1600 4600 0 2707 3693 3200 0 0 0
------------I---------------II--------------11---------------11-------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
320
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project.
Evening Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.466
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I ------------ - - -II- -- II----------- - - - -II --- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 720 180 201 859 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 734 184 205 876 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 736 184 205 878 0 421 1004 429 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 736 184 205 878 0 421 1004 429 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 736 184 205 878 0 421 1004 429 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 736 184 205 878 0 421 1004 429 0 0 0
------------I---------------II---------------II---------------II--------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.18 2.82 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6403 1597 1600 4800 0 1891 4509 3200 0 0 0
------------ I ---- ----------- II - - - -- I--------------- II-------- -- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 .0.11 0.13 0.18 0.00 0.22 0.22 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S21
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 10 -1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 47 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.533
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: -100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II_--------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- il---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0- 0 - 403 988 237
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 686 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 108 888 0 0 161 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: - 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 108 888 0 0 161 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 108 688 0 0 161 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 108 888 0 0 161 95 0 A 0 403 988 237
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.16 3.26 0.58
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 3200 3200 0 0 0 1854 5217 929
------------ I --------------- II--------------- il--------------- II---------------
1
Capacity Analysis Module: -
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.19 0.26
Crit Moves:
*******************+++*********+***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
322
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.527
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 198 346 0 0 486 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 198 346 0 0 486 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 198 346 0 0 486 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 198 346 0 0 486 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
-- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 .0.00 1.58 2.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.72 0.28
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 2531 3869 0 0' 0 1600 5946 454
----- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- -- - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.20 0.27
Crit Moves: * * ** + * ** * * **
**********+*********************+***+************ * * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * *w * + * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
323
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 11 -1
9221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.391
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound .West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II------------- -- II -------------- -II - -- - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 335 229 198 380 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 335 229 198 380 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 335 229 198 380 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 335 229 198 380 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II - - - -- - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.38 1.62 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.75 2.99 0.75 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3801 2599 3200 3200 0 2809 3990 1206 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - -- - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.00 0.29 0.22 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
324
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.437
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11_______ _jj--- -------- ---- 11 -____ ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
-- ------ ---- I - - - - --- II --------------- II----- ---------- II- ---- ----- - - ---
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 314 300 305 616 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 314 300 305 616 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0
Reduced Vol: 0 314 300 305 616 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 314 300 305 616 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
--------- --- I ---- -------- - - -II- ------ II-------- ------- II- --------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.05 .1.95 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 3.56 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3273 3127 3200 3200 0 1600 5688 712 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- I1--------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.19 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.24 0.00 0.00. 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
325
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.463
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-_ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected .Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 16 534 53 37 335 73 228 303 42 77 287 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial Bse: 16 534 53 37 335 73 233 309 43 79 293 112
Added Vol: 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 16 535 56 37 337 73 233 309 43 79 297 112
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 16 535 0 37 337 73 233 309 43 79 297 112
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 16 535 0 37 337 73 233 309 43 79 297 112
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 16 535 0 37 337 73 233 309 43 79 297 112
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------------- -- II---------- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2630 570 1600 3200 1600 1600 2322 878
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.13
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
320
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.564
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- _-- --- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- --- ---- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 363 122 98 610 224 145 445 49 51 501 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02
Initial B3e: 47 363 122 98 610 224 148 454 50. 52 511 65
Added Vol: 0 2 5 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 47 385 127 98 612 224 148 454 50 52 515 65
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 385 0 98 612 224 148 454 50 52 515 65
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 385 0 98 612 224 148 454 50 52 515 65
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 385 0 98 612 224 148 454 50 52 515 65
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00. 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.78 0.23
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2343 857 1600.3200 1600 1600 2840 360
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II-------- -- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed toKUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
327
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 13 -1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project -
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
---------------------------------------------------------- ------------- - - - - --
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.287
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II - - -- --------------- II - _-------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------ -------- -11-------- -- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 30 488 33 56 277 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 488 33 56 277 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 488 33 56 277 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 30 488 33 56 277 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- -- - - -- -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ---- --- 11 - - - - -- - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.02. 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
322
Default Scenario - Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 010 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.352
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: - 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound west Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0. 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Added Vol: 0 7 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 71 414 55 34 551 133 99 166 26 19. 235 41
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 414 55 34 551 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 414 55 34 551 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 414 55 34 551 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.03 0.02 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.07 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S �9
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 411 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.417
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ---------- ----- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
- - --- I --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
- -- I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
330
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
**** FFF*** FF******************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** *EPEE*
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.540
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 C
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 i.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
331
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(L033 as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 412 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.618
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II -------- -- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1044 34 286 1732 172 76 112 10 259 423 152
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 147 1075 35 295 1784 177 78 115 10 267 436 157
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 147 1079 35 295 1790 177 78 118 10 267 440 157
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 i.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 147 1079 35 295 1790 177 78 118 0 267 440 157 -
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 147 1079 35 295 1790 177 78 116 0 267 440 157
POE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00.1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 147 1079 35 295 1790 177 78 118 0 267 440 157
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flaw Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.87 0.13 2.00 2.73 0.27 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 6199 201 3200 4368 432 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- il--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.17 0.17 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.08 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3S2
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leve1 Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
#*#**#+****+**+***##*************#*####****###**+ * * * * * # * # * * * * # * # * * * * * * * + * * * * + + **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.584
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - -R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- _---- II-------- -- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 65 1278 135 224 1108 183 219 263 159 152 226 331
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03
Initial Bse: 67 1316 139 231 1141 168 226 271 164 157 233 341
Added Vol: 0 7 0 0 6 0 0 5 0 0 4 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 67 1323 139 231 1147 188 226 276 164 157 237 341
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 67 1323 139 231 1147 188 226 276 0 157 237 341
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 67 1323 139 231 1147 188 226 276 0 157 237 341
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 67 1323 139 231 1147 188 226 276 0 157 237 341
------------ I ----------- - - - -II -- II------- --- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.62 0.38 2.00 2.58 0.42 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 5791 609 3200 4123 677 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11 - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.28 0.28 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.21
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
333
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 16 -1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
-----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length `}) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 413 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.516
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11 ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 204 1228 2 7 1551 464 123 8 42 3 6 6
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 210 1265 2 7 1598 478 123 8 42 3 6 6
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 210 1269 2 7 1604 478 123 8 42 3 6 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
PHF Volume: 210 1269 2 7 1604 0 123 8- 0 3 6 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 210 1269 2 7 1604 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 210 1269 2 7 1604 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 0.20 0.40 0.40
Final Sat.: 1600 4792 8 1600 4800 1600 3005 195 1600 320 640 640
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.13 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
334
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.423
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- il--------------- II--------------- 11 ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
------------ I --------------- II----------- ---- II----------- - - - -II - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 44 1188 0 2 1390 91 297 4 100 0 1 0
Growth Adj: 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 45 1224 0 2 1432 94 297 4 100 0 1 0
Added Vol: 0 7 0 0 6 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 45 1231 0 2 1438 94 297 4 100 0 1 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 -0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 45 1231 0 2 1438 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 45 1231 0 2 1438 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 45 1231 0 2 1438 0 297 4 0 0. 1 0
------------ I --------------- il------ --------- II------------- - -II -- - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /.Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 0 1600 4800 1600 3157 43 1600 0 1600 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
33,5
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 17 -1
4221 - Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.427
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
--- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- -- ------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 846 1509 663 0 570 412 0 0 0- 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 863 1539 676 0 561 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 863 1545 676 0 585 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 863 1545 0 0 585 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 863 1545 0 0 585 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 863 1545 0 0 585 420 0 0 0 0 0 0
--- ! --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.33 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 3726 2674 0 0 0 0 0 0
--- I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- II---------- - -- - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.27 0.48 -0.00 0.00 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
33o
Default Scenario Inc May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.490
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- I--------------- II--------------- 11---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 689 1142 942 0 1080 612 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 703 1165 961 0 1102 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 703 1171 961 0 1109 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.Co 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 703 1171 0 0 1109 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 703 1171 0 0 1109 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 703 1171 0 0 1109 624 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.56 1.44 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 4094 2306 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- 11 ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.22 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
33:7
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:32 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 415 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.612
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11---------- ----- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1817 40 0 571 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1853 41- 0 582 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial rut: 0 1859 41 0 586 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1859 41 0 586 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1859 41 0 586 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1859 41 0 586 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.89 0.11 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7828 172 0 4800 0 3200 1600 3200 0 0 0
---- 1--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00.0.24 0.24 0.00 0.12 0.00 0.37 0.21 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
332
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 12:53:46 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing (Year 2011) Plus Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.662
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T- R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II -II ________I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------- ----- -- --------- - - - -II -------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1834 73 0 1080 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1871 74 0 1102 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 1877 74 0 1109 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 1877 74 0 1109 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 1877 74 0 1109 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 1877 74 0 1109 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II - - - - -- I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.81 0.19 0.00 3.00 0.00 1.40 1.60 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7695 305 0 4800 0 2240 2560 3200 0 0 0
----- ------- I ------------ - - -II- ----- II-- -- --- -------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.24 0.24, 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.42 0.42 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
339
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
340
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 2 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.446
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--- --- --------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 37 944 49 195 835 227 307 555 48 87 185 58
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bee: 39 991, 51 205 877 238 322 583 50 91 194 61
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserEyVOl: 0 18 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 39 1009 51 205 924 238 322 584 50 91 194 61
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 39 1009 51 205 924 238 322 584 50 91 194 0
Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 39 1009 51 205 924 238 322 584 50 91 194 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 39 1009 51 205 924 238 322 584 50 91 194 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 .1.600 6400 1600 3200 4419 381. 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II---------- --- -- II-- -- ---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.04 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S41
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 3 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** **
Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.648
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: B_
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II-----------_--- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
---- ----------- ---- II-- ---- ---- -----II - -- -- II--------- - - - -- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 1.54 1091 49 45 819 447 324 274 96 98 669 195
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 162 1146 51 47 860 469 340 288 101 103 702 205
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 55 0 0 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Put: 162 1201 51 47 886 470 340 288 101 103 702 206
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 162 1201 51 47 886 470 340 288 101 103 702 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 162 1201 51 47 886 470 340 288 101 103 702 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 162 1201 51. 47 886 470 340 288 101 103 702 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------- -- -- -- - -II -- --- ---- - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.22 0.78 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 3555 1245 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.10 0.19 0.03 0.03 0.14 0.29 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.00
Grit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * *+ * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUN2MAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
342
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 3 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 42 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.392
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L, - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II-----_--------- II_--------- -- --- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1. 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 689 98 100 624 176 158 310 73 31 154 53
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 717 102 104 649 183 156 310 73 31 154 53
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 1 14 0 0 34 13 3 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Fut: 34 731 102 104 683 196 161 313 73 31 167 53
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHE' Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 34 731 1.02 104 683 196 161 313 73 31 167 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 34 731 102 1.04 683 196 161 313 73 31 167 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 34 731 102 104 683 196 161 313 73 31 167 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.11. 0.89 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1.600 4973 1427 1600 2560 640 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- -- --- II----- ---- -- - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.11. 0.02 0.05 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
'Iraffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
343
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 4) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.475
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
1
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II------- ---- - - - -II ------ -II---- ------ - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 86 646 25 49 858 149 274 182 53 114 433 170
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 672 26 51 892 155 274 182 53 114 433 170
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 37 0 0 18 8 18 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 89 709 26 51 97.0 163 292 200 53 114 441 170
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 89 709 26 51 910 163 292 200 53 114 441 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 89 709 2.6 51 910 163 292 200 53 114 441 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 89 709 26 51 910 163 292 200 53 114 441 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- -- ----- --- II------ ---- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.39 0.61 1.60 1.10 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5428 972 2567 1764 469 1600 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II - - -- --- 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.15 0.02 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.1.1 0.11 0.07 0.14 0.00
Crlt Moves: * * ** * * ** * { ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
344
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) -i- Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Farman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.562
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - - -- ---- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - --
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 7. 2 0 1 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- -- -- --------- II--- ----- -- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 101 988 656 58 435 163 19 96 28 78 136 12
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 105 1028 682 60 452 170 19 96 28 78 136 1.2
Added Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 16 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 1.05 1044 683 60 486 170 19 96 28 79 136 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 105 1044 683 60 486 170 19 96 28 79 136 12
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 105 1.044 683 60 486 170 19 96 28 79 136 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVo.l.ume: 105 1044 683 60 486 170 19 96 28 79 136 12
--- -- -- ----- - -------- -- -- - -II ------- II---- ----------- II------ ---- - -- - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1..00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1.600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1.600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.43 0.04 0.10 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.09 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffi.x 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S45
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011. 1.4:35:14 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 4) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Korman Avenue (EW)
w + + *wwwwwww *wwwww + * *ww + * + + + * + + + + +w +w +w+ www**+++ w+ + + + + + + + + + + + + ++wwww + +ww + + +wwwwww
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.567
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
wwwwwww+++ ww +w + + + + +wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww www: tww+ w+ ww +w +w + + + +xw *,rwww +wwf:swwwwwww
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: 1, - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II---------- ----- II - --- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- _____ - - -
Volume Module:
Base Vol.: 48 624 126 29 968 52 138 195 183 665 127 38
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 50 649 131 30 1007 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
Added Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 38 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 50 687 133 30 1025 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 50 687 133 30 1025 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 50 687 133 30 1025 54 138 195 183 665 1.27 38
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finalvolume: 50 687 133 30 1025 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---- ----- ------ II ---------- - - - --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat.: 0.03 0.14 0.08 0.02 0.21 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.11 0.21 0.08 0.02
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
+wwwww +www *wwwwwwwwwwwwwww+ www+ www +w + + + + + + ++ www +w +wwwwww *wwwwwwww +wwwww + ++ +wwwww
Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S40
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Str.i.ker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length `i;) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*+#**************#****************+************** * * * * * + * + * + * * *W *W * * * * * * * * # * * * * **
Intersection #9 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.623
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal. Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - I - R L - T - R L. - T - R L - T - R
- --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ov1 Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II- --------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 177 1332 456 66 293 121 410 851 176 364 674 181
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 184 1385 474 69 395 126 426 885 183 379 701 188
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 1 1.0 1 0 33 9 11 37 0 0 66 3
Initial Put: 185 1395 475 69 338 :1.35 437 922 183 379 767 191
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 185 1395 475 69 338 0 437 922 183 379 767 191
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 185 1395 475 69 338 0 437 922 183 379 767 191
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 185 1395 475 69 338 0 437 922 183 379 767 191
Ov1Adj VOl: 286
------------ 1 - - - - -- -- II--------------- II--------- -- -- -- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1.600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ----- -II------- --- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.29 0.30 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.19 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.12
OvIAdjV /S: 0.18
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S4:7
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU l(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 44 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.711
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 2.00 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
---------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
-------- - - - -I- ------- II------- ----- -- -II- --- ------- - - -- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 227 578 397 157 965 312 214 967 37 611 921 155
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 236 601 413 163 1004 324 223 1006 38 635 958 161
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 6 38 1 0 14 '7 9 70 0 1 49 1
Initial Fut: 242 639 414 163 1018 331 232 1076 38 636 1007 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 242 639 414 163 1018 0 232 1076 38 636 1007 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 242 639 414 163 1018 0 232 1076 38 636 1007 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fina].VOlume: 242 639 41.4 163 1018 0 232 1076 38 636 1007 162
OvlAdjvol: 96
------------ --------------- II------------ - - -II- ---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.13 0.26 0.05 0.21 0.00 0.07 0.22 0.02 0.20 0.21 0.10
Ov1AdjV /S: 0.06
Crit Moves: * * ** * *** * * ** * * **
*****#****++++#***************#*#**#*+*+**##*#*** * * * * * # * # * * * * * # * * * * * * # * * * * * + * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S42
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.496
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I - - - - -- -- II--------------- II------ _-------- II-------- -- - - - --I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---------- ----- II---- ------ - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 349 1533 0 0 220 204 0 0 0 120 902 138
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial. Bse: 363 1594 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 902 138
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 363 1595 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 910 138
User Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 363 1595 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 910 138
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 363 1.595 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 910 138
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final.Volume: 363 1595 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 910 138
--------------------------- II------------ - - -11- II ---------- - - - - - I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.47 0.53
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 5557 843
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11- -- ------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3-x _q
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 45 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.75'7
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
*********#**#*****************#****w* w* w********* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II-----_------_-- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- ---- -- II---------- - - - --
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 370 671 0 0 742 1007 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 0
Initial Fut: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 202 1906 74
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 202 1906 74
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 202 1906 74
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fina.l.Volume: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 202 1906 74
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.85 0.15
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 6161 239
------------ I --------------- II----------- - - - -II ----- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.31
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
************************#*#***#****************** * * * * * * * * * * * *x * * * * * * * * *w * * * *# * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
5150
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 201:1. 1.4:34:54 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report.
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length "o) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irv.ine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.642
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
- ------ - - - - -I -------- II--------------- II--------------- II- --------- -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 900 152 96 281 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 0 936 158 100 292 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial. Fut: 0 938 158 1.00 292 0 1186 1649 299 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 938 158 100 292 0 1186 1649 299 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 938 158 1.00 292 0 1186 1649 299 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Final.VOlume: 0 938 158 1.00 292 0 1186 1649 299 0 0 0
--- ------ - --I-- ---- --II--------- -- -- --II II-- -------- - - - --I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.28 0.72 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.67 2.33 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6846 1154 1600 4800 0 2677 3723 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- -- - II--- ------- - - - - -
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * *** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3151
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:7.4 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length ) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************+****************** k***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection N6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
********+************ k*************#*###********* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + * + * + * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.472
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay '(sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound.
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Inc.l.ude Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 720 180 201 859 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 749 187 209 893 0 417 1.004 429 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 17 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 750 187 209 895 0 417 1021 430 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 750 187 209 895 0 417 1021 430 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 750 187 209 895 0 417 1021 430 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVol.ume: 0 750 187 209 895 0 417 1021 430 0 0 0
---- -------- - - -- -- II--------------- II-------- ----- --II------- --- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.16 2.84 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6402 1598 1600 4800 0 1856 4544 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- -II-- -------- - - -- -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.19 0.00 0.22. 0.22 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
*********************** k* k****** k******#*#******* * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3152
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
-----------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.534
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II----- --------- -II---------- -- - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
----- --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: :1.08 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 986 237
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 6 6 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 50 1 0
Initial Fut: 114 892 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 892 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 892 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 114 892 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 3.16 0.58
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 3200 3200 0 0 0 2011 5062 928
------------ I -- - - - --- II --------------- II--------------- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.20 0.26
Cri.t Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3153
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project.
Existing +- Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.541
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II ---------_----- II-- _--------- --- II---- -- ---- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
--- --------------- II--------------- II------- _------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 37 37 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 31 4 0
Initial Fut: 235 381 0 0 499 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 235 381 0 0 499 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol.: 235 381 0 0 499 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 235 381 0 0 499 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
----- --------------- II--------------- II---- -- ----- ---- II---------- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 3.67 0.28
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 2571 3829 0 0 0 1677 5870 453
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.20 0.27
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
********+**************************** W****** W* W** * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
��"T
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.401
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - -- I -- -- ---- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1, 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II-------- ------- II - - - -- ----- -- --- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 13 14 0 75 0 0 2 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 346 243 198 454 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
?HE Volume: 0 346 243 198 454 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 346 243 198 454 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVolume: 0 346 243 198 454 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
--------- --- --------------- II-- -- - - -- ------ II------ -- ---- ---II-------- -- - - -- -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 :1.600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.35 1.65 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.75 2.45 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final. Sat.: 0 3760 2640 3200 3200 0 2800 3920 1280 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3515
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length i) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 48 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.463
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ -------------- -II------- -- ---- - -II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 312 300 305 614 0 1.88 999 174 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Passer.ByVOl: 0 73 77 0 46 0 0 7 15 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fina.lvolume: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II-------------- -II --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.02 1.98 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 3.53 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3234 3166 3200 3200 0 1600 5641 759 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.1.2 0.12 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
350
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 201.3) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle ,Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 49 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.467
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- --------------- ii ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
--- --- ----- -I - - - - -- - II--------------- II------- ------- -II-------- --- - - --I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 16 534 53 37 335 73 228 303 42 17 287 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial. Bse: 16 534 53 37 335 '73 23'1 31.5 44 80 298 114
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial. Fut: 16 534 53 37 336 73 237 315 44 80 298 114
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 16 534 0 37 336 73 237 315 44 80 298 114
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 16 534 0 37 336 73 237 315 44 80 298 114
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVclume: 16 534 0 37 336 73 237 315 44 80 298 114
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2629 571 1600 3200 1600 1600 2313 887
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II----- --------- -11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.13
Crit Moves: * * ** * + ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S57
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karmen Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vo.l. /Cap.(X): 0.568
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - --
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- ------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 383 122 98 610 224 145 445 49 51 501 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 47 383 122 98 610 224 1.51 463 51 53 521 67
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol.: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 47 385 122 98 610 224 151 463 51 53 521 67
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 385 0 98 610 224 151 463 51 53 521 67
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 385 0 98 610 224 151 463 51 53 521 67
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVO.lume: 47 385 0 98 610 224 151 463 51 53 521 67
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------- ---- -- -- II----- -- --- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.77 0.23
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2341 859 1600 3200 1600 1600 2838 362
------------ I --------------- II--- ---------- - - II -- ---- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.18
Cri.t Moves: * * ** * # ** * * ** * * **
Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KINSMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level. Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Ka.rman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.290
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - - -- I --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II----- _---- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 7, 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 30 484 33 56 275 7.28 79 194 48 43 159 22
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Fut: 30 485 33 56 276 128 79 7.97 48 43 172 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 485 33 56 276 128 79 7.97 48 43 172 22
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 485 33 56 276 128 79 197 48 43 7.72 22
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finalvol.ume: 30 485 33 56 276 128 79 197 48 43 172 22
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 7.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ fl---- ------ - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.01
Crit Moves * } ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
&�q
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:14 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak flour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
#************#*#****** ww * * * * * * * * * * * # * * *k *# * * * * * # * * * ** *www *w * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * # * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.354
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
*************************************#*#****#*#*# * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * * * * * * # # #*
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - - -- --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II-- -------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ ---------- ----- II------- --- - - - - -II ---- II-------- -- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Put: 71 409 55 34 549 133 99 184 26 19 243 41
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 409 55 34 549 1.33 99 184 26 19 243 41
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 409 55 34 549 133 99 184 26 19 243 41
PCE Adj: 1100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 409 55 34 549 1.33 99 184 26 19 243 41
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- -- -- -- ---- II--- --- -- -- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II------ --------- II - - -- 11------ ---- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.03 0.02 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
* * * * # * * * ** www*#***********#*+*+**#****** w* w* w**** * * * * * * * # ** *# * * * * ** * + * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Soo
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
------------- ----- - - - --- --
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.425
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
***#*** k****** k*}* k** k*********#*}*** k******** k* kkkkk # * * * * * * * * * * *k *k *k *k * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - 'P - R L - T - R L - T - R
---- I -------- ------- II----------- - -- -II --- II---------- - - - --I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
- -- -- I --------------- II--------------- II------- ----- -- -II-------- -- ---- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByvol: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
User Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
PCE Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II-_------------- II----------- -- -- II--------- - - - ---
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
k******************** k** k*** k****** k* k*}*}******* * * * * * * * * * * *k * * * * *k * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3C 1
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:15 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 411 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.551
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---------- ---- -II------ -- -- - -- - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial. Bse: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
---- ------- -I - - -- ---- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II------- -------- II - --- I----- ----- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
302
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) . + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection k12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.642
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 1.00 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - P L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - --
I
Control.: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --- --- ---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1044 34 286 1732 172 76 112 10 259 423 152
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 150 1096 36 300 1819 181 80 118 11 272 444 160
Added Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 29 0 0 69 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 150 1125 36 300 1688 181 80 118 12 2 73 444 160
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 150 1.125 36 300 1888 181 80 118 0 273 444 160
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 150 1125 36 300 1888 181 80 118 0 273 444 160
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 150 1125 36 300 1888 181 80 118 0 273 444 160
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.88 0.12 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 6203 197 3200 4381 419 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
---- -------- I - - - - -- -- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
SOS
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:15 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) . + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.605
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II-- -- ------- -- -- II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 65 1278 135 224 1108 163 219 263 159 152 226 331
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial. Bse: 68 1342 142 235 1163 192 230 276 167 160 237 348
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 68 1 0 41 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Initial Put: 68 1410 143 235 1204 192 230 276 167 161 238 348
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 6e 1410 143 235 1204 192 230 276 0 161, 238 348
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 1410 143 235 1204 192 230 276 0 161 238 348
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 1410 143 235 1204 . 1.92 230 276 0 161 238 348
- - - -- --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.63 0.37 2.00 2.59 0.41 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 5812 588 3200 4140 660 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
----- I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.07 0.22
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * # ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
SO4
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour.
_ -_--------- ----------------------- - - - - -'
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length a) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol.. /Cap.(X): 0.538
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
---- --- --- - -I --- -- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- --- ------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 204 1228 2 7 1551 464 123 8 42 3 6 6
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 214 1289 2 7 1629 487 123 8 42 3 6 6
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 30 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 214 1319 2 7 1698 488 123 8 42 3 6 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 214 1319 2 7 1696 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 214 1319 2 7 1698 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
POE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finalvolume: 214 1319 2 7 1698 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ---- -- ----- II----- ---- - -- - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 7.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 0.20 0.40 0.40
Final Sat.: 1600 4792 8 1600 4800 7.600 3005 195 1600 320 640 640
------------ I --------------- II----- -- ------ -- II------ ----- ----II -- - - -- -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.13 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
305
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:15 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.436
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R I. - T - R L - T - R
------------ I -------------- -II-------------- -II - -- ---------- - - -- -I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 :I. 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
------------ I ----- ---------- II--- ------- --- --II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 44 1188 0 2 1390 91. 297 4 100 0 1. 0
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 46 1247 0 2 1460 96 297 4 100 0 1 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 68 0 0 41 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 46 1315 0 2 1501 96 297 4 101 0 1 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 46 1315 0 2 1501 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 46 1315 0 2 1501 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 46 1315 0 2 1501 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
---- --------------- II--_------------ II-------- ------- II------- --- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 0 1600 4800 1600 3157 43 1600 0 1600 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** W * ** * * ** * * **
Tra£fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Soo
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year_ 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
-- -- -------------------- ----- ----
Level. Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Eoss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.459
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - '1' - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ---- II --------------- II ------------- -- II ---------- - - - - - I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 846 1509 663 0 570 412 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 880 1.569 690 0 593 428 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 29 43 21 0 86 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial. Fut: 909 1612 711 0 679 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
THE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 909 1612 0 0 679 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol.: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 909 1612 0 0 679 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 909 1.612 0 0 679 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.42 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 3878 2522 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ---- ----- -- -- -- II---------- -- - --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.28 0.44 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.1.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S07
MITIG8 - Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:48:49 Page 1 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
******** w* ww* w********* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * *w * * * * * * * + + *+ *www * * * * * * # * + * * * * * * * * * * +w*
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.516
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
+w * * + # * * * * * ** www***+*+*++*****************+****** * * * + * * *ww *w *w * * * * *w + * * * * * * * * * *w
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ i--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - -_I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ----------- ---- II- ----- ----- ---- II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 689 1142 942 0 1080 612 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 717 1188 980 0 1123 636 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 22 103 57 0 57 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 739 1291 1037 0 1180 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 739 1291 0 0 1180 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct. Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 739 1291 0 0 1180 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 739 1291 0 0 1180 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II- -------- --- - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.59 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1.600 0 4140 2260 0 0 0 0 0 '0
----- I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II---- ----- - - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
**************** w* ww**+**** * * * * * **+ ** * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * * * * * ** *www * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S02
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:34:54 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length y) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 415 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *** * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.649
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- ------ -- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1817 40 0 571 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1.890 42 0 594 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 111 0 0 87 0 5 4 111 0 0 0
In:i.tial Put: 0 2001 42 0 681 0 1204 337 1261 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHE' Volume: 0 2001 42 0 681 0 1204 337 1.261. 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2001 42 0 681 0 1204 337 1261 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 2001 42 0 681 0 1204 33'7 1261 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------------- --II- -- ------- - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment:: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.90 0.1.0 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7837 163 0 4800 0 3200 1600 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- -- - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module.:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.38 0.21 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
s o9
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:35:15 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.701
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal. Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----------- ---- II-- ------ -- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ---- ------- II---------- -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1834 73 0 1080 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1907 76 0 1123 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 177 0 0 57 0 37 24 117 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 2084 76 0 1.180 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2084 76 0 1180 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2084 76 0 1180 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2084 76 0 1180 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
------------ --------- ------ II-------------- -II --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600
Adjustment.: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.82 0.18 0.00 3.00 0.00 1.41 1.59 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7719 281 0 4800 0 2260 2540 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S70
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
371
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
kkkk******* kk*+***** k***********+ k* k** k*** k*+ k** k * *k * * * *k * * * * * * * * * * * * *k * * *kk * *k*
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.448
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level of Service: A
** kk*********************** kk****** kk**** k******* * * * * * * *k * * *k * * * * * * * *k * * * *k * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 37 944 49 195 835 227 307 555 48 87 185 58
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 39 991 51 205 877 238 322 583 50 91 194 61
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 18 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 39 1012 51 205 928 238 322 584 50 95 194 61
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 39 1012 51 205 928 238 322 584 50 95 194 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 39 1012 51 205 928 238 322 584 50 95 194 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 39 1012 51 205 928 238 322 584 50 95 194 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.76 0.24 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 4419 381 3200 4800 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11------------ --- 11---------- - - -- -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.16 0.03 0.13 0.14 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.03 0.04 .0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S72
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.648
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II ---_----------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected- Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11- --------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 1091 49 45 819 447 324 274 96 98 669 195
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 162 1146 51 47 860 469 340 288 101 103 702 205
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 55 0 0 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Put: 162. 1205 51 47 888 470 340 288 101 105 702 206
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 162 1205 51 47 888 470 340 288 101 105 702 0
Reduct Vol: 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 162 1205 51 47 888 470 340 288 101 105 702 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 162 1205 51 47 888 470 340 288 101 105 702 0
---------- - - I - -- ---- II--------------- II--------------- II-- -------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.22 0.78 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 3555 1245 3200 4800 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---- ------ - - - - -1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.10 0.19. 0.03 0.03 0.14 0.29 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.03 0.15 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
373
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ***
Intersection 42 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.392
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-----_------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 689 98 100 624 176 158 310 73 31 154 53
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 717 102 104 649 183 158 310 73 31 154 53
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 1 14 0 0 34 13 3 3 0 D 13 0
Initial Fut: 34 734 102 104 691 196 161 313 73 31 167 53
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 34 734 102 104 691 196 161 313 73 31 167 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 34 734 102 104 691 196 161 313 73 31 167 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 34 734 102 104 691 196 161 313 73 31 167 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.12 0.88 1.00 1.60 0.40 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4986 1414 1600 2560 640 1600 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II------- --- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.02 0.05 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
T
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 42 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.476
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): _ xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 86 646 25 49 858 149 274 182 53 114 433 170
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 672 26 51 892 155 274 182 53 114 433 170
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 37 0 0 16 8 18 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 89 713 26 51 914 163 292 200 53 114 441 170
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 89 713 26 51 914 163 292 200 53 114 441 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 69 713 26 51 914 163 292 200 53 114 441 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 89 713 26 51 914 163 292 200 53 114 441 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.39 0.61 1.60 1.10 0.29 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5432 968 2567 1764 469 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis .Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.15 0.02. 0.03 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) -2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S7,5
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
+ www+ www+ wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww +w +wwwwww *wwwwwwwww +www + + +wwwwwwww +wwwwww + + + +ww +ww
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.567
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
wwww + +ww +wtw + *wwwwwwwwwwwwww + + +* www * + +wwwwwwwwww * +w +wwwww + +wwwwwww +www * + +wwww + +w
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 101 988 656 58 435 163 19 96 28 78 136 12
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 105 1028 682 60 452 170 19 96 28 78 136 12
Added Vol: 0 21 0 7 15 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
PasserByVOl: 0 16 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 105 1065 683 67 501 170 19 96 28 79 138 12
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHE Volume: 105 1065 683 67 501 170 19 96 28 79 138 12
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 105 1065 683 67 501 170 19 96 28 79 138 12
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 105 1065 683 67 501 170 19 96 28 79 138 12
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 i.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ---------- ----- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.22 0.43 0.04 0.10. 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.02..0.09 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
wwww++ w+ wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww+ w+ wwwwwwwwww+ w +wwwwwwwwwwww +wwwwwwww +wwwwwww +www+
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S70
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.571
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 48 624 126 29 968 52 138 195 183 665 127 38
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 50 649 131 30 1007 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
Added Vol: 0 10 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
PasserByVol: 0 38 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 50 697 133 39 1045 54 138 195 183 665 128 38
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 50 697 133 39 1045 54 138 195 183 665 128 38.
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 50 697 133 39 1045 54 138 195 183 665 128 38
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 50 697 133 39 1045 54 138 195 183 665 128 38
------- -- - - -I -- II--------------- II-------- ------- II--- ----- -- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 ,1600 3200 1600 1600
---- --- - - - - -I -- II --------------- II --- ------------ II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.15 0.08 0.02 0.22 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.11. 0.21 0.0.8 0.02
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
377
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.626
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
1
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - -- - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 177 1332
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 184 1385
Added Vol: 0 10
PasserByvol: 1 10
Initial Fut: 185 1405
User Adj: 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 185 1405
Reduct Vol: 0 0
Reduced Vol: 185 1405
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 185 1405
OvlAdjVol:
------------I---------
Saturation Flow Module
456
1.04
474
0
1
475
1.00
1.00
475
0
475
1.00
1.00
475
286
66 293
1.04 1.04
69 305
4 7
0 33
73 345
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
73 345
0 0
73 345
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
73 345
121 410 851
1.04 1.04 1.04
126 426 885
4 6 0
9 11 37
139 443 922
0.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 1.00 1.00
0 443 922
0 0 0
0 443 922
0.00 1.00 1.00
0.00 1.00 1.00
0 443 922
176
1.04
183
0
0
183
1.00
1.00
183
0
183
1.00
1.00
183
364 674 181
1.04 1.04 1.04
379 701 188
0 0 E
0 66 3
379 767 197
1.00 1.00 1.0C
1.00 1.00 1.0C
379 767 197
0 0 C
379 767 197
1.00 1.00 1.0C
1.00 1.00 1.0C
379 767 191
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I---- ---------- -11 - -- II -------------- - II - -- - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.29 0.30 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.19 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.12
Ov1AdjV /S: 0.18
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S72
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
_____ ____ ______ _ ____
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.713
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II_-- ------------ II---------- -- - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II----------- ---- II ---- -------- --- II - - - - -- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 227 578 397 157 965 312 214 967 37 611 921 155
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 236 601 413 163 1004 324 223 1006 38 635 958 161
Added Vol: 0 5 0 5 9 5 3 0 0 0 0 3
PasserByVol: 6 38 1 0 14 7 9 70 0 1 49 1
Initial Put: .242 644 414 168 1027 336 235 1076 38 636 1007 165
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 242 644 414 168 1027 0 235 1076 38 636 1007 165
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 242 644 414 168 1027 0 235 1076 38 636 1007 165
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 242 644 414 168 1027 0 235 1076 38 636 1007 165
Ov1AdjVol: 96
--------- - - - I -- --- II--------------- II--------------- II- --------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 .2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ --- - - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.13 0.26 .0.05 0.21 0.00 0.07 0.22 0.02 0.20 0.21 0.10
Ov1AdjV /S: 0.06
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S�"
Default Scenario Ina May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project.
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
___ _____________________ ______________ _______ ___ _ _____ _____ ___
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.497
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected - Protected Protected - Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 349 1533 0 0 220 204 0 0 0 120 902 138
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 363 1594 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 902 138
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByvol: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Initial Put: 363 1601 0 0 230 215 0 0 0 120 910 138
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 363 1601 0 0 230 215 0 0 0 120 910 138
Reduct Vol: 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 363 1601 0 0 230 215 0 0 0 120 910 138
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 363 1601 0 0 230 215 0 0 0 120 910 138
---- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.47 0.53
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 5557 843
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11------------- -- II---------- - - - --I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.08 0.16 0.16
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 -(c) -2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN- ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S20
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects -+ Project
Evening Peak Hour
____________ ______ ___ _______ _
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.758
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------------- -- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 370 671 0 0 742 1007 0 0 0 200 1667 74
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 0
Initial Put: 385 701 0 0 774 1051 0 0 0 202 1906 74
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 385 701 0 0 774 1051 0 0 0 202 1906 74
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 365 701 0 0 774 1051 0 0 - 0 202 1906 74
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 385 701 0 0 774 1051 0 0 0 202 1906 74
---- I--------------- II--------------- II--- ------------ II--------- - - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600.1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.85 0.15
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 6161 239
---- I--------------- II--------------- II--- ------------ 11-- ----- --- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.31
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S21-
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04. Page 9 -1
--- -------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 06 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.643
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 900 152 96 281 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 936 158 100 292 0 1186 1623. 299 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 940 156 100 293 0 1190 1649 299 0 0 0
User Adj:. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 940 158 100 293 0 1190 1649 299 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 940 158 100 293 0 1190 1649 299 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 940 158 100 293 0 1190 1649 299 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.28 0.72 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.68 2.32 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 06848 1152 1600 4600 0 2683 3717 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II----------- ---- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
322
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.473
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I----------- - - - -11 - - -II ---- -- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 720 160 201 859 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 749 187 209 893 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 17 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 751 187 209 897 0 419 1021 430 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 751 167 209 897 0 419 1021 430 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 751 187 209 897 0 419 1021 430 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 751 187 209 697 0 419 1021 430 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II-- -- ------ - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.16 2.84 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6403 1597 1600 4800 0 1862 4538 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II-------- ------ - II -- -------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.19 0.00 0.23 0.22 0.13 0.00.0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
s es
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
__ - - -__ -__
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.535
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II-- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------- -------- II-- -------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 6 6 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 50 1 0
Initial Fut: 114 894 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 894 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 894 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 894 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 989 237
------------ I ----------- - -- -II --------------- -- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.26 3.16 0.58
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 3200 3200 0 0 0 2011 5062 928
------------ I------------ --- II--------------- 11 - - - --- 11- - - - - -- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.20 0.26
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC,. ORANGE CA
324
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin - striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.542
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II --------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ------------ --- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 37 37 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 31 4 0
Initial Fut: 235 382 0 0 501 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 235 382 0 0 501 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 235 382 0 0 501 743 0 0 0 423 1191 124
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 235 382 0 0 501 743 0 0 0 423 1191. 124
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- --- --- II--- -- --- ---- -- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.05 3.67 0.28
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 2577 3823 0 0 0 1677 5870 453
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.1.9 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.20 0.27
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S25
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
______________________ __________ __ _______ ______ ______ __ -_
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection ff8 -Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.401
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2- 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
- --- I --------------- II - - - -- --- II--------------- II---------- - - -- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 -0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 13 14 0 75 0 0 2 25 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 348 243 198 455 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRE Volume: 0 348 243 198 455 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 348 243 198 455 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 348 243 198 455 0 676 869 316 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---------- ----- II-- -------- -- - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.36 1.64 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.75 2.45 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3769 2631 3200 3200 0 2800 3920 1280 0 0 0
---- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.09. 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S20
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 48 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
****+*********************** k*** k* k* k*** k******** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + + * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.463
Loss Time (sec): -0 (Y +R =0.0 .sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II-------- -- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------------- -II - -- - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 312. 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 73 77 0 46 0 0 7 15 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 386 377 305 662 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 386 377 305 662 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 386 377 305 662 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 386 377 305 662 0 188 1006 189 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--- -------- ---- II- - - - - -- -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.02 1.98 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 3.53 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3238 3162 3200 3200 0 1600 5641 759 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II------------ --- 11 - - -- --- 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S27
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length `4) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 49 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.469
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II----- ------ - - - -II --- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
--- --------------- II--------------- II------------ --- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 16 534 53 37 335 73 228 303 42 77 287 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 16 534 53 37 335 73 237 315 44 60 298 114
Added Vol: 0 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
PasserByVol: C 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 16 535 56 37 338 73 237 315 44 80 302 114
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 16 535 0 37 338 73 237 315 44 80 302 114
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 16 535 0 37 338 73 237 315 44 80 302 114
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00. 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 16 535 0 37 338 73 237 315 44 80 302 114
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- ------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.45 0.55
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2632 568 1600 3200 1600 1600 2322 878
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---- ---- ------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.10 0.03 0.05 0.13 0.13
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
S22
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Kaman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.569
Loss Time (sec):. 0 (Y+R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11--------------- 11 --------------- II_____----- - - - - -
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 383 122 96 610 224 145 445 49 51 501 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 47 383 122 98 610 224 151 463 51 53 521 67
Added Vol: 0 2 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0
PasserByVol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 47 387 126 98 611 224 151 463 51 53 523 67
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 387 0 98 611 224 151 463 51 53 523 67
Deduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 387 0 98 611 224 151 463 51 53 523 67
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 387 0 98 611 224 151 463 51 53 523 67
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- --- --- II--- ------- - - ---
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.77 0.23
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2342 658 1600 3200 1600 1600 2839 361
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.06 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.14 0.03 0.03 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
s eq
Default Scenario TUe May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak flour
------------------------------------------------------------------`------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Kerman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.291
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound ,East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------------- -- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Put: 30 489 33 56 278 126 79 197 48 43 172 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 489 33 56 278 128 79 197 4B 43 172 22
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 489 33 56 278 128 79 197 48 43 172 22
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 30 489 33 56 278 128 79 197 48 43 172 22
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------------ --- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--- ------------ 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.05. 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
39 D
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.354
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ ------------- -- II--------------- II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Put: 71 414 55 34 550 133 99 184 26 19 243 41
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 414 55 34 550 133 99 184 26 19 243 41
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 414 55 34 550 133 99 184 26 19 243 41
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 414 55 34 550 133 99 184 26 19 243 41
------------ --------------- II----------- - - - -II ------ II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------- ------ II--------- ------ II --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.03 0.02 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
sq j_
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:36:04 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
------------------------------- ----------- - - ----
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
******************#*#*************#************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.425
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights:. Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2514 421 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------------- -- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.551
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L- T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R
------------ I--------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II- --------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2617 142 0 0 0
------------ ------------- -- II------------ - - -II--------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final .Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - -- - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
39 s
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 15 -1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.644
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T R
------------ I------------ --- II-------------- -11 - -- ---- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 '2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I--------------- II----------- -- - -11 -------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1044 34 286 1732 172 76 112 10 259 423 152
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 150 1096 36 300 1819 181 60 118 11 272 444 160
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 3 0 0 4 0
PasserByvol: 0 29 0 0 69 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 150 1129 36 300 1694 181 80 121 12 273 448 160
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD
PHE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 150 1129 36 300 1894 181 80 121 0 273 448 160
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 150 1129 36 300 1894 161 80 121 0 273 448 160
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 150 1129 36 300 1894 181 80 121 0 273 448 160
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.88 0.12 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 6204 196 3200 4382 418 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II -------------- -II --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.05 0.18 0.18 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.09 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
394
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
---------------- ---------- - - - --' - - ---'
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 6) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.606
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
--------- --- 1-------------- -II - - - - -- -- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II- --------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 65 1278
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 68 1342
Added Vol: 0 5
PasserByVal: 0 68
Initial Fut: 68 1415
User Adj: 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 1415
Reduct Vol: 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 1415
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 1415
------------I---------
Saturation Flow Module
135
1.05
142
0
1
143
1.00
1.00
143
0
143
1.00
1.00
143
224 1108
1.05 1.05
235 1163
0 3
0 41
235 1207
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
235 1207
0 0
235 1207
1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00
235 1207
183 219 263 159
1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
192 230 276 167
0 0 4 0
0 0 0 0
192 230 280 167
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
192 230 280 0
0 0 0 0
192 230 280 0
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
192 230 280 0
152 226 331
1.05 1.05 1.05
160 237 348
0 2 0
1 1 0
161 240 348
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
161 240 348
0 0 C
161 240 348
1.00 1.00 1.00
1.00 1.00 1.00
161 240 34E
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.63 0.37 2.00 2.59 0.41 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 5813 587 3200 4141 659 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ------- --- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.29 0.29 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.08 0.22
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
�9
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
-------------------------- ---------
Level of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection 413 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
***********#************************************* * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** # * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.539
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-- I --------------- II - - - -- -- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
------------ I ----------- - - - - II -------- 11-------------- -II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 204 1228 2 7 1551 464 123 8 42 3 6 6
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 214 1289 2 7 1629 487 123 8 42 3 6 6
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 30 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 214 1323 2 7 1704 488 123 8 42 3 6 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 214 1323 2 7 1704 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 214 1323 2 7 1704 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 214 1323 2 7 1704 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
----- ------- I ------------ - - -II- ---- II--------------- II---- ------ - - - --I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 .1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 0.20 0.40 0.40
Final Sat.: 1600 4792 8 1600 4800 1600 3005 195 1600 320 640 640
------------ I--------------- 11- - - - - -- 11--------------- 11---------- - -- - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.13 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
�9
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical VOl. /Cap.(X): 0.437
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
--------- - - - I -- ------------ II--------_------ II---- _---------- II---------- - --- -I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 44 1188 0 2 1390 91 297 4 100 0 1 0
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 46 1247 0 2 1460 96 297 4 100 0 1 0
Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByvol: 0 68 0 0 41 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 46 1320 0 2 1504 96 297 4 101 0 1 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 46 1320 0 2 1504 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 46 1320 0 2 1504 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 46 1320 0 2 1504 0 297 4 0 0 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 0 1600 4800 1600 3157 43 1600 0 1600 0
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- -- - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.28 '0.00 0.00 0.31 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed toKUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
___________ ______________ __ _______________
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.460
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 846 1509 663 0 570 412 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: .1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 880 1569 690 0 593 428 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 29 43 21 0 86 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 909 1618 711 0 683 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 909 1618 0 0 683 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 909 1618 0 0 683 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 909 1618 0 0 683 441 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.43 1.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 3887 2513 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.28 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KONZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
3q2
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
____ ---- --- --------- - - - - --
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.517
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- 11 ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------- -------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 689 1142 942 0 1080 612 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 717 1188 980 0 1123 636 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 22 103 57 0 57 8 0 0 0. 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 739 1294 1037 0 1185 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 739 1294 0 0 1185 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 739 1294 0 0 1165 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 739 1294 0 0 1185 644 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.59 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 4146 2254 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- II-- -------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.23 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
399
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:04 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Morning Peak Hour
`----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- - - - - --
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
*****************#*#***************#******* W***** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.650
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - --- --------------- II-------_--_---- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1817 - 40 0 571 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1890 42 0 594 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 6 0 0 4 C 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 111 0 0 87 0 5 4 111 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 2007 42 0 685 0 1204 337 1261 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2007 42 0 685 0 1204 337 1261 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2007 42 0 685 0 1204 337 1261 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 2007 42 0 685 0 1204 337 1261 0 0 0
---- ----- - -- I -- ------ II--------------- II--------- ------ II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.90 0.10 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7838 162 0 4800 0 3200 1600 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II------- -- -- - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.38 0.21 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215. (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
400
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:16 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects + Project
Evening Peak Hour
_________ ____ ______________ _____________ _
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*#***#**}*****}*#******}******}*#*#}#*##********* # * * * * * * * * * * * # # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection 815 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
#*}*#**#*#}}***#*#*#*#*#***#*#**#**}************* * * * * * * * * * * * # } * * * * * * * * * * } * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.701
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- I -- - - - --I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II-------- ------- II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1834 73 0 1080 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1907 76 0 1123 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVal: 0 177 0 0 57 0 37 24 117 0 C 0
Initial Fut: 0 2087 76 0 1185 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2087 76 0 1185 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2087 76 0 1185 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2087 76 0 1185 0 974 1095 1262 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------------ - - -II- -- - - - --I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.82 0.18 0.00 3.00 0.00. 1.41 1.59 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7719 281 0 4800 0 2260 2540 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - -- -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traf£ix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
401
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
+ Cumulative Projects
402
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker ProjecL
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.470
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
*******}************+********************}******* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + + *W * * * * * * * * * * * *}
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
-- ----- - --- -I -------- II--------------- II-------------- -II---------- - - - --
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 37 944 49 195 835 227 307 555 48 87 185 58
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 39 99.1. 51 205 877 238 322 583 50 91 194 61
Added Vol: 0 111 0 0 25 3 1 29 0 0 12 17
PasserByVol: 0 18 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 39 1120 51 205 949 241 323 613 50 91 206 78
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 39 1120 51 205 949 241 323 613 50 91 206 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 39 1120 51 205 949 241 323 613 50 91 206 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 39 1120 51 205 949 241 323 613 50 91 206 0
--------- - - -I -- ------ II--------------- II---- ----------- II- --------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.77 0.23 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 4435 365 3200 4800 1.600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.18 0.03 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.04 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
403
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
W+ w+ wwwWWwwww+++ WwwwW+ W+ W+*+* Ww+ wwwwwwwwwwwW+++ wwwwww * + + + +w + * +W + + + + +wwWwW *W +W +w+
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
ww+ w+++*+ w+ wwww+ W+ W* WwW* W+++ W+ W+ w+*++**++*+ w+++** * *ww + * + * +W +W * + *wwwW + +W +W +WWW +ww
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.659
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
W+ W* wwww+ Www; t+ w+:++ wwwwW+ W+*+++*+*+* www wWwWwW+++++ wwww *w *Wf:w + * + * + + + + +WwWwwwWwWw **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II----------- - - -- II II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 1091 49 45 819 447 324 274 96 98 669 195
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 162 1146 51 47 860 469 340 288 101 103 702 205
Added Vol: 0 50 0 16 109 4 5 22 0 0 33 0
PasserByVOl: 0 55 0 0 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Fut: 162 1251 51 63 995 474 345 310 101 103 735 206
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 162 1251 51 63 995 474 345 310 101 103 735 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 162 1251 51. 63 995 474 345 310 101 103 735 0
POE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 162 1251 51 63 995 474 345 310 101 103 735 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---- ------ - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.26 0.74 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 3621 1179 3200 4800 1600
------ -- ---- I -- - - - --- II--------------- II---------- -- -- -II------- --- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.10 0.20 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.30 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.15 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
w********** W+ W****************** w** W* W*+**+ wk* wwW *W *w +w * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
G"a"r
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 . 14:53:55 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 's) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
************#*+#***************#*#*******+******* * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 1.00 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.413
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--- ----- ------- II-- -- ------ -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 689 98 100 624 176 158 310 73 31 154 53
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 717 102 104 649 183 158 310 73 31 154 53
Added Vol: 17 94 0 0 25 0 0 0 3 0 0 17
PasserByVOl: 1 14 0 0 34 13 3 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Fut: 51 825 102 104 708 196 161 313 76 31 167 70
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 51 825 102 104 708 196 161 31.3 76 31 167 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 825 102 104 708 196 161 313 76 31 167 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 51 825 102 104 708 196 161 313 76 31 167 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- -- --------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.13 0.87 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5012 1388 1600 2533 667 1600 3200 1600
----------- - I - - -- ---- II--------------- II------------- -- II-- -------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.17 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.02 0.05 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
405
Default Scenario
Existing +Growth
Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 5 -1
---------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
(Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour.
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.495
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------- - - - --I ------ II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - - I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------- ---- --11-------- -- - --- -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 86 646 25 49 858 149 274 182 53 114 433 170
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 89 672 26 51 892 1.55 274 182 53 114 433 170
Added Vol.: 3 50 0 16 93 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 37 0 0 18 8 18 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 92 759 26 67 1003 163 292 200 69 114 441 170
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 92 759 26 67 1003 163 292 200 69 114 441 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 92 759 26 67 1003 163 292 200 69 114 441 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 92 759 26 67 1003 163 292 200 69 114 441 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.44 0.56 1.56 1.07 0.37 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5506 894 2498 1711 590 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.16 0.02 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.07 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
««********«««.*«««««««««**««««««««.««.««««««««««+ « « «* « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « « * « « ««
Traf£i.x 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
400
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
********************+*****************+***+****** * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * #*
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.569
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- -------- -- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
- - - -- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 101 986 656 58 435 163 1.9 96 28 78 136 12
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 105 1028 682 60 452 170 19 96 28 78 136 12
Added Vol: 17 110 6 6 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
PasserByVol: 0 16 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 7. 0 0
Initial Fut: 122 1154 689 66 508 170 19 96 28 80 136 13
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 122 1154 689 66 508 170 19 96 28 80 136 13
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 122 1154 689 66 508 170 19 96 28 80 136 13
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 122 1154 689 66 508 170 19 96 28 80 136 13
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------ ----- --- -II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1.600 7.600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--- -- ---------- II------ --- -- - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.24 0.43 0.04 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour.
________________________ _ -_
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*#*** k**************************** k* k* k******** k* k *k * * * * * * * * # * * *k *k * * * * * * * * * # * #*
Intersec:ti.on #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
************** k*********************#************ # ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap. M : 0.601
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
--------------- --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--- ------------ II-- --- ----- - -- - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 48 624 126 29 968 52 7.38 195 183 665 127 38
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 50 649 131 30 1007 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
Added Vol: 0 47 1 1 108 0 0 0 16 5 0 6
PasserByVol: 0 38 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 50 734 134 31 1133 54 138 195 199 670 127 44
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 50 734 134 31 1133 54 138 195 199 670 127 44
Redur_t Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 50 734 134 31 1133 54 138 195 199 670 127 44
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 50 734 134 31 1133 54 138 195 199 670 127 44
----- --- ---- -- -- - --- II--------------- II---- ---- ----- -- II---------- - ----
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final. Sat.: 1600 4800 7.600 1600 4600 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.15 0.08 0.02 0.24 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.21 0.08 0.03
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
402
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project -
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
------------------------' - - - - ---
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Lo5s as Cycle Length `s) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.682
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y{ -R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R 1, - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II----_----_----- II--------------- II------ -- -- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ ------------ -- -II--------- -- --- -II - -- II--- ------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 177 1332 456 66 293 121 410 851 176 364 674 181
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 184 1385 474 69 305 126 426 885 183 379 701 188
Added Vol: 0 63 0 0 18 5 19 122 0 68 157 51
Passer.ByVOl: 1 10 1 0 33 9 11 37 0 0 66 3
Initial Put: 185 1458 475 69 356 140 456 1044 183 447 924 242
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 185 1458 475 69 356 0 456 1044 183 447 924 242
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 185 1458 475 69 356 0 456 1044 183 447 924 242
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 185 1458 475 69 356 0 456 1044 183 447 924 242
OvIAdj VOl: 252
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
I --------------- II--------------- II---------- ----- II---------- -- - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.30 0.30 0.02 0.07 0.00 0.14 0.22 0.11 0.14 0.19 0.15
Ov1AdjV /S: 0.16
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
-409
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + + * * * * * * **
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.763
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
******************+****************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * + * + * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I ------------ --- II------- ----- -- -II- -- II- ---- ----- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 227 578 397 157 965 312 214 967 37 611 921 155
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 236 601 413 163 1004 324 223 1006 38 635 958 161
Added Vol: 0 36 63 47 62 20 12 189 0 0 126 0
PasserByVol: 6 38 1 0 14 7 9 70 0 1 49 1
Initial Fut: 242 675 477 210 1080 351 244 1265 38 636 1133 162
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 242 675 477 210 1080 0 244 1265 38 636 1133 162
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 242 675 477 210 1080 0 244 1265 38 636 1133 162
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 242 675 477 210 1080 0 244 1265 38 636 1133 162
OvlAdjVol: 159
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------ ----- ---- II---------- -- - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ --------------- --------------- H --------------- 11 --------------- I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.14 0.30 0.07 0.22 0.00 0.08 0.26 0.02 0.20 0.24 0.10
Ov1Adj V /S: 0.10
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
410
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.515
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
----_--_---- I --------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 349 1533 0 0 220 204 0 0 0 120 902 138
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 363 1594 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 902 138
Added Vol: 0 31 0 0 3 12 0 0 0 18 80 0
PasserByVol: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 363 1626 0 0 232 224 0 0 0 138 990 138
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 ]..00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 363 1626 0 0 232 224 0 0 0 138 990 138
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 363 1626 0 0 232 224 0 0 0 1.38 990 138
PCE Ad-j: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 363 1626 0 0 232 224 0 0 0 138 990 138
------------ --- -- -- -------- II--- -- --- -- - -- - -II --- II------ ---- -- ---I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.51 0.49
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 5617 783
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
**************++****************+**************+* + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KONZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
41-1
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.773
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
--- --------- I-- - --- II--------------- II-------- -- -- --- II------ ---- -- - --
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 370 671 0 0 742 1007 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Added Vol: 0 27 0 0 4 33 0 0 0 1 35 0
PasserByVOl: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 0
Initial Fut: 385 725 0 0 776 1080 0 0 0 203 1941 74
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 385 725 0 0 776 1080 0 0 0 203 1941 74
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 385 725 0 0 776 1080 0 0 0 203 1941 74
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 385 725 0 0 776 1080 0 0 0 203 1941 74
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.85 0.15
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 6165 235
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----------- ---- II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.31
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
412
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour.
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*** www#***** w** w#*#*##******** w+ w+##*****#******+ # *w * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * * * **
Intersection N6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
#*#**** ww* w#*#*** w***#+***#*********** w+*** w*** w* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * *ww * * * * * * * * * #w
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.647
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
*******#****** w*##******* w*****+**#* w******#***** * * * # # # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-- --------------- II-_------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
-------------- - - -- -- --------------- II---- ----------- II--- -- ----- - --- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 900 152 96 281 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial. B3e: 0 936 158 100 292 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 21 0 29 2 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 940 158 100 313 0 1.21.5 1651 299 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 940 158 100 313 0 1215 1.651 299 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 940 158 100 313 0 1215 1651 299 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 940 158 100 313 0 1215 1651 299 0 0 0
-------- ---- - - - - -- -- II--------------- II--------------- II- --------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.28 0.72 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.70 2.30 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6848 1152 1600 4800 0 2713 3687 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cri.t Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
41-3
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
---- --- ---- ------------------ - ----'
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.486
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II-- -------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 720 180 .201 859 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 749 187 209 893 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 5 17 0 5 0 22 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 17 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 755 204 209 900 0 439 1021 430 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 755 204 209 900 0 439 1021 430 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 755 204 209 900 0 439 1021 430 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 755 204 209 900 0 439 1021 430 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.20 2.80 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6400 1600 1600 4800 0 1924 4476 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-- -------- - - - --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
414
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length s) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.555
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
**##*******#*#*#************#*****************#** * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * #*
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- ------ -- -- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- -- - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 1.08 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0
PasserByVol: 6 6 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 50 1 0
Initial Fut: 114 894 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 894 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 894 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 114 894 0 0 185 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
------ ------ - - - - - -- - II--------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - --- -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 3.29 0.54
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 3200 3200 0 0 0 1884 5256 860
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-------- -- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.21 0.28
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Tra£fix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
415
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.549
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ ----- --- ------- II-------- ---- - - -II--------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 34 0
PasserByVol: 37 37 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 31 4 0
Initial Fut: 235 381 0 0 499 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 235 381 0 0 499 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 235 381. 0 0 499 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 235 381 0 0 499 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II- --- ------ - - - --
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.60 2.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 3.70 0.28
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 2567 3833 0 0 0 1643 5916 441
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----------- ---- II---------- - - -- -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.21 0.28
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
410
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.401
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1. 0 0 0 0 0 0
----- --- --- -I - - -- ---------- II--------------- II--- ---- -------- II--- ------- --- - -1
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 13 14 0 75 0 0 2 25 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 346 243 198 454 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 346 243 198 454 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 346 243 198 454 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 0 346 243 198 454 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-------- ------- II-- ----- --- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.35 1.65 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.75 2.45 0.80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3760 2640 3200 3200 0 2805 3915 1280 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----- -- -------- II--- --- --- --- - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix "7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
417
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
---------------- ------ ---
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection R8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.467
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
** k****** k*********+ k* k* k* k*******+*+**** k******* k * + * * *Y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - - - I - ------- II_______________ II__------------- II---------- - - -- -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - - -- -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 73 77 0 46 0 0 7 15 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 385 377 305 660 0 1.88 1023 189 0 - 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1023 169 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1023 189 0 0 0
PCP Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVolume: 0 385 377 305 660 0 188 1023 189 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.02 1.98 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 3.53 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3234 3166 3200 3200 0 1600 5651 749 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
************** X********************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *k *k*
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
41-2
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project.
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Farman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Cr.iti. cal Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.482
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
***************** W****************************** W * ** * *W *W * * * * * * * * * * * *W * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II----- ------ - - --II -- - - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ --------- ------ II---- ----------- II - - -- - --------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 16 534 53 37 335 73 228 303 42 77 287 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial B3e: 16 534 53 37 335 73 237 315 44 80 298 114
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 29 0 0 29 17
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 16 534 53 37 337 '73 237 344 44 80 327 131
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 16 534 0 37 337 73 237 344 44 80 327 131
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 16 534 0 37 337 73 237 344 44 80 327 131
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 16 534 0 37 337 73 237 344 44 80 327 131
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.64 0.36 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.43 0.57
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2630 570 1600 3200 1600 1600 2284 916
--------- --- I -- ------ II--------------- II-- -------- ----- II-- --- ----- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.03 0.05 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves * * ** *W ** * * ** * * **
Traffi.x 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
T19
Default. Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 . 1.4:54:31 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.578
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
********* w+************* W************** w** w****** *w * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II-----_--------- II-_-------- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 383 122 98 610 224 145 445 49 51 501 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 47 383 122 98 610 224 151 463 51 53 521 67
Added Vol: 0 1 0 16 0 0 0 38 0 0 33 0
PasserByVol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 47 386 122 114 610 224 151 501 51 53 554 67
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 386 0 114 610 224 151 501 51 53 554 67
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 386 0 124 610 224 151 501 51 53 554 67
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 47 386 0 114 610 224 151 501 51 53 554 67
--- ------ - - -I -- --- --- II------------ --- II - - --- ---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.79 0.21
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2341 859 1600 3200 1600 1600 2857 343
------------ I --------------- II-------- ------- II -- -- ---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.19 0.19
Crit Moves: * * ** + * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling ASSOC. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
420
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 13 -1
--------------- ------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 207.3) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.295
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- -- -- I --------------- II__------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- -- - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 17 0
PasserByVol: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Ent: 30 485 33 56 27'7 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 485 33 56 277 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 485 33 56 277 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 30 465 33 56 277 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II------ -- -- ----- II---- --- --- - ----
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.01
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
421
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length �) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 410 Von Farman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.354
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ L--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II-------- -- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1. 1 0 2 0 1
------------ i--------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II- --- ---- --- - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 1.33 99 166 26 19 235 41
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 1.9 235 41
Added Vol: 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 71 410 58 34 549 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 410 58 34 549 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 410 58 34 549 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 410 58 34 549 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------ --------- II------- -- - - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat..: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.08 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** + * +* * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to FUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
422
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level. Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection All Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.430
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II--- ------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---- -- - - - - -- - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
423
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 411 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.568
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
************#*********+**+**************#******** * * * * * * * * * * * + * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # *#
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- -------- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PRE Volume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Finalvolume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---------- .----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0'6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * + **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
424
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
***************++******************************** * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * **
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.665
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II--- --- ---- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1044 34 286 1.732 172 76 112 10 259 423 152
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 150 1096 36 300 1819 181 80 118 11 272 444 160
Added Vol: 34 173 0 0 42 0 0 29 0 0 12 0
PasserByVol: 0 29 0 0 69 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Initial Fut: 184 1298 36 300 1930 181 80 147 12 273 456 160
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 1.84 1298 36 300 1930 181 80 147 0 273 456 160
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 184 1298 36 300 1930 181 80 147 0 273 456 160
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fina.lVolume: 184 1298 36 300 1930 181 80 147 0 273 456 160
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.89 0.11 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 6229 171 3200 4389 411 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
-------- ---- I - -- - - -- - II--------------- II----------- ---- II-------- -- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /5at: 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.09 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves- * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.021.5 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
425
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
_______ ____________________ ___ ________ -_
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 3) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*#**# w{ w##*#{#*# w*****#** w**#*##**** w***{****## w* w *w * * * *w *w * * * * * * * * * * # # # # # # # # # *w
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
wxw#*******#*#**** w*#*****#*** w****##*****# w* w* w* * #w # # # * * * * * * * * * * # * # * * * * * * * * * * *w
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.638
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
*#****#**##**##***** w* w**#*#** w**##*#####*#* w***# * # * # # * * * * * *w *www *w #w * # * * # * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I ---------------II---------------II---------------II---
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 65 1278 .135 224 1108 183 219 263 159 152 226 331
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 68 1342 142 235 11.63 192 230 276 167 160 237 348
Added Vol: 0 81 0 0 174 0 0 22 32 0 33 0
PasserByVOl: 0 68 1 0 41 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Initial Fut: . 68 1491 143 235 1378 192 230 298 199 161 271 348
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 1491 143 235 1378 192 230 298 0 161 271 348
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 1491 143 235 1378 192 230 298 0 161 271 348
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 68 1491 143 235 1378 192 230 298 0 161 271 348
------ ------ - -- ------------ II - -- - -- -II-- -- ----- -- -- --II I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.65 0.35 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 5841 559 3200 4213 587 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- il---------- - - -- -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.08 0.22
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2006 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
IBM
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011. 7.4:53:55 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulati.ve Projects
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 413 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.557
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -
i
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1! 0 0
--------- - - - I -- ------ II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 204 1228 2 7 1551 464 123 8 42 3 6 6
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 214 1289 2 7 1629 487 123 8 42 3 6 6
Added Vol: 17 206 0 0 39 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 30 0 0 69 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 231 1525 2 7 1737 491 123 8 42 3 6 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 231 1525 2 7 1737 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 231 1525 2 7 1737 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 231 1525 2 7 1737 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
----------- -I - - -- ---- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 0.20 0.40 0.40
Final Sat.: 1600 4793 7 1600 4800 1600 3005 195 1600 320 640 640
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.14 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * # *# * * #* * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
427
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length o) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.480
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
******##******* W#*******#*****#**********###*# W#* # # # # * *W * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * # # **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - - -- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 ]. 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---- ------ - - - - - I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 44 1188 0 2 1390 91 297 4 100 0 1 0
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 46 1247 0 2 1460 96 297 4 100 0 ]. 0
Added Vol: 0 78 0 0 205 1 3 0 16 0 0 0
Passer.Byvol: 0 68 0 0 41 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 46 1.393 0 2 1706 97 300 4 117 0 1 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 46 1393 0 2 1706 0 300 4 0 0 1 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 46 1393 0 2 1706 0 300 4 0 0 1 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 46 1393 0 2 1706 0 300 4 0 0 1 0
------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II--------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 0 1600 4800 1600 3158 42 1600 0 1600 0
------ ------ I ------ --------- II - - --- II-- ------------- II------ --- - - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.09 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
422
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level. Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length °s) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
* w*}******* w}+* w*}}**}* w* w******+ w+*+}**+*** w+ w** + * * * * * * * * * * * * *w *w +w * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW) -
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical. Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.484
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level. Of Service: A
ww*}}* ww**}******}********* w* w*** wwx}+++**}* w+ www *w * * * * * * * * *+ * + * * * * * * * * * * } * } * } }*
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II----------- - - - -11 ---- II---------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min.. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 846 1509 663 0 570 412 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 880 1569 690 0 593 428 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 141 0 0 66 96 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 29 43 21 0 86 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 909 1.753 711 0 745 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 909 1753 0 0 745 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol.: U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 909 1753 0 0 745 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 909 1753 0 0 745 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--- ---- --- ----- II- -- -- II---------- - -- - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1.600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.32 1.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 3717 2683 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----- --- ------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.28 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
*}** w***+*********** w********}*}***} 4}*}##**+**** * * * * * * * * * * * } * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4 29
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:31 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
----------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection 414 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.539
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach:. North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-- --- ------- --------- ---- - -II -- --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 689 1142 942 0 1080 612 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 717 1188 980 0 1123 636 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 200 0 0 113 33 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 22 103 57 0 57 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 739 1491 1037 0 1.293 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 739 1491 0 0 1293 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 739 1491 0 0 1293 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Fi.nalVOlume: 739 1491 0 0 1293 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ ---------------II---------------II---------------II-------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 .1.600 1.600 1.600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.62 1.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 4200 2200 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.23 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
430
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:53:55 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Morning Peak Hour
Level. Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 2) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
wxw # # * * * # * #* wxw**#**** w* xxw* xx##**#******** w* w*** * * * * * * # * *wxwwx * * * * # * * * # #xwxw * #*
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
* # * * * * *w #x *x * *w *wxwx *x *x #x * *w* wxw* w*«* xxxxxxxwww* w * * * *w #w # * * # * #xxxx #ww * * * * * * # *wx
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.663
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
*w *xx *x * * * * * ## wxw#**#*##****** xwxxxxx** x****** x* x *xxwxxxx * * * * * * * * * * * *xxxw # * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ ------- II--------------- II--------------- II- --------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1817 40 0 571 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial 133e: 0 1890 42 0 594 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 7.12 0 0 66 0 29 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 111 0 0 87 0 5 4 111 0 0 0
Initial Fut.: 0 2113 42 0 747 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2113 42 0 747 0 1.233 337 1261 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2113 42 0 747 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2113 42 0 747 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-- --- ---------- II---- -- ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.90 0.10 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7846 154 0 4800 0 3200 1600 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--- ---- -- ------ II---- --- --- -----
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.39 0.21 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
* * * * * * * * * # ** wxw********************* w* wxxxxxxxxxww *ww * *w * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
431
Default Scenario Sun May 22, 2011 14:54:32 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects
Evening Peak Hour
---------- --- --------------- ---- ---- -- _
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.735
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound Fast Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
- - -- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ------ ---- -II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1834 73 0 1080 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1907 76 0 1123 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 99 0 0 113 0 101 2 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 177 0 0 57 0 37 24 117 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 2183 76 0 1293 0 1.075 1097 1262 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2183 76 0 1293 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2183 76 0 1293 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2183 76 0 1293 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II-------- --- ---- II- ----- -- ------- II -- -- I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.83 0.17 0.00 3.00 0.00 1.48 1.52 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7731 269 0 4800 0 2376 2424 3200 0 0 0
--------- --- I -------------- -II - -- --- II------- -------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4S2
Existing + Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects
+ Cumulative Projects + Proiect
-433
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 4 -1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Morning Peak Hour -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Lcss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.471
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: -100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R L - T - R
------- - - - - -I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11 ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 37 944 49 195 835 227 307. 555 - 48 87 185 58
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 39 991 51 205 877 238 322 583 50 91 194 61
Added Vol: 0 113 0 0 30 3 1 29 0 4 12 17
PasserByvol: 0 18 0 0 47 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 39 1122 51 205 954 241 323 613 50 95 206 78
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0100
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 39 1122 51 205 954 241 323 613 50 95 206 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 39 1122 51 205 954 241- 323 613 50 95 206 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 39 1122 51 205 954 241 323 613 50 95 206 0
--- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.77 0.23 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 4435 365 3200 4800 1600
------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.18 0.03 0.13 0.15 0.15 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.04 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to- KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4S4
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:10 Page 4 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
_ ---------------------- ------ - - - --'
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #1 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.659
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II---- -------- --- II-------- -- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 0 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 154 1091 - 49 45 819 447 324 274 96 96 669 195
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 162 1146 51 47 860 469 340 288 101 103 702 205
Added Vol: 0 54 0 16 113 4 5 22 C 4 33 0
PasserByVo1: 0 55 0 0 26 1 0 0 0 0 0 1
Initial Fut: 162 1255 51 63 999 474 345 310 101 107 735 206
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 162 1255 51 63 999 474 345 310 101 107 735 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 162 1255 51 63 999 474 345 310 101 107 735 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 162 1255 51 63 999 474 345 310 101 107 735 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 2.00 2.26 0.74 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 6400 1600 1600 6400 1600 3200 3621 1179 3200 4800 1600
-------- - - - - I --------------- 11 ----- 11---------- ----- 11----- ----- - - - --I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.10 0.20 0.03 0.04 0.16 0.30 0.11 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.15 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed toKUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4S,5
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 - Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.413
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II --------------- If- --------- - - - - - H ---------- - -- - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 32 689 98 100 624 176 158 310 73 31 154 53
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 33 717 .102 104 649 183 158 310 73 31 154 53
Added Vol: 17 96 0 0 34 0 0 0 3 0 0 17
PasserByVol: 1 14 0 0 34 13 3 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Fut: 51 827 102 104 717 196 161 313 76 31 167 70
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 51 827 102 104 717 196 161 313 76 31 167 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 51 827 102 104 717 196 161 313 76 31 167 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVolume: 51 827 102 104 717 196 161 313 76 31. 167 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600. 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
.Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.14 0.86 1.00 1.58 0.42 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5026 1374 1600 2533 667 1600 3200 1600
------------ I ----------- ---- II--- ------------ II- - - - - -- I---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.17 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.02 0.05. 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
T so
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:10 Page 5 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
------------------------------- -- - -----
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #2 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
************************+ w*********************** *w * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *w
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.496
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase.
Rights: Include Include Include Ignore
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 1
----- ---- --- I ------------- - -II -- ------ II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 86 646 25 49 858 149 274 182 53 114 433 170
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 69 672 26 51 892 155 274 182 53 114 433 170
Added Vol: 3 54 0 16 101 0 0 0 16 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 37 0 0 18 8 18 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 92 763 26 67 1011 163 292 200 69 114 441 170
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
PHF Volume: 92 763 26 67 1011 163 292 200 69 114 441 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 92 763 26 67 1011 163 292 200 69 114 441 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00
FinalVOlume: 92 763 26 67 1011 163 292 200 69 114 441 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.44 0.56 1.56 1.07 0.37 1.00.2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 5512 888 2498 1711 590 1600 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II----- ---------- 11---------- - - - --I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.16 0.02 0.04 0.18 0.18 0.12 0.12 0.1.2 0.07 0.14 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUN2MAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4S:7
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): .100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.575
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100. Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
----------- I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 101 988 656 58 435 163 19 96 28 78 136 12
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 105.1028 682 60 452 170 19 96 28 78 136 12
Added Vol: 17 133 6 13 38 0 0 0 0 1 2 1
PasserByVol: 0 16 1 0 34 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Initial Put: 122 1177 689 73 524 170 19 96 28 80 138 13
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 122 1177 689 73 524 170 19 96 28 80 138 13
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 122 1177 689 73 524 170 19 96 28 80 138 13
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 122 1177 689 73 524 170 19 96 28 80 138 13
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--- ------------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600.1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.25 0.43 0.05 0.11 0.11 0.01 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.09 0.01.
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4S2
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 6 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #3 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Von Karman Avenue (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.606
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II-------- ------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 3 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 1 0 1
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 48 624 126 29 968 52 138 195 183 665 127 38
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 50 649 131 30 1007 54 138 195 183 665 127 38
Added Vol: 0 70 1 13 134 0 0 0 16 5 2 6
PasserByVol: 0 38 2 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 50 757 134 43 1159 54 138 195 199 670 129 44
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 50 757 134 43 1159 54 138 195 199 670 129 44
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 50 757 134 43 1159 54 138 195 199 670 129 44
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 50 757 134 43 1159 54 138 195 199 670 129 44
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 1600 1600 4800 1600 1600 3200 1600 3200 1600 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.16 0.08 0.03 0.24 0.03 0.09 0.06 0.12 0.21 0.08 0.03
Crit Moves * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
439
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 - Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
_ Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
++#++++++##++++++##+####++*##+##++++###+++###+#+# + # # + + + # + + + + # + + + * # # + + + + # + + # # # + ##
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): - 0.686
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound - West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include - Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II---------- - - - - -
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 177 1332 456 66 -293 121 410 851 176 364 674 181
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 184 1385 474 69 305 126 426 885 183 379 701 188
Added Vol: 0 73 0 4 25 10 26 -122 0 68 157 57
PasserByVol: 1 10- 1 0 33 9 it 37 0 0 66 3
Initial Fut: 185 1468 475 73 363 145 463 1044 183 447 924 248
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 185 1468 475 73 363 0 463 1044 183 447 924 248
Reduct Vol: 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 185 1468 475 - 73 363 0 463 1044 183 - 447 924 248
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: -185 1468 475 73 363 0 463 1044 183 447 924 248
0v1AdjVO1: 252
------------ --------------- II--------------- II-------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.31 0.30 0.02 0.08 0.00 0.14.0.22 0.11 0.14 0.19 0.16
OvlAdjV /S: 0.16
Crit Moves' * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
G"fiU
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 7 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Evening Peak Hour
------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #4 MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at Jamboree Road (EW)
*** k*#******************************************* * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.765
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------
I
Control:. Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ovl Ignore Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 1
------------ I--------------- II------- -------- II-------------- -11 - -- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 227 578 397 157 965 312 214 967 37 611 921 155
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 236 601 413 163 1004 324 223 1006 38 635 958 161
Added Vol: 0 47 63 54 73 27 18 189 0 0 126 6
PasserByvol: 6 38 1 0 14 7 9 70 0 1 49 1
Initial Put: 242 686 477 217 1091 358 250 1265 38 636 1133 168
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 242 686 477 217 1091 0 250 1265 38 636 1133 168
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 242 686 477 217 1091 0 250 1265 38 636 1133 168
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 242 686 477 217 1091 0 250 1265 38 636 1133 168
OvlAdjVol: 159
------------ I -------- ------- II-- - - - - -- I------------ --- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00'3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600 3200 4800 1600
------------ I --------------- II----------- ---- II--------------- II - - -- --I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.08 0.14 0.30 0.07 0.23 0.00 0.08 0.26 0.02 0.20 0.24 0.11
ovlAajv /S: 0.10
Crit Moves:
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN.ASSOC, ORANGE CA
441
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects+Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.516
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II-- ------------ -II - -- --------- - - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------- --- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 349 1533 0 0 220 204 0 0 0 120 902 138
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 363 1594 0 0 229 212 0 0 0 120 902 138
Added Vol: 0 37 0 0 4 15 0 0 0 18 80 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 363 1632 0 0 233 227 0 0 0 138 990 138
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 363 1632 0 0 233 227 0 0 0 138 990 138
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: .363 1632 0 0 233 227 0 0 0 138 990 138
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 363 1632 0 0 233 227 0 0 0 138 990 138
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.51 0.49.
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 5617 783
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.11 0.34. 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.18 0.18
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
442
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 8 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #5 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.774
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L- T- R L- T- R L - T- R L- T- R
------------ --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- ---------------
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 D 3 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 1 0
----- --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 370 671 0 0 742 1007 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 385 698 0 0 772 1047 0 0 0 200 1867 74
Added Vol: 0 34 0 0 7 38 0 0 0 1 35 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 39 0
Initial Fut: 385 732 0 0 779 1085 0 0 0 203 1941 74
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 385 732 0 0 779 1085 0 0 0 203 1941 74
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 385 732 0 0 779 1085 0 0 0 203 1941 74
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 385 732 0 0 779 1085 0 0 0 203 1941 74
- - -- I --------------- II--------------- II---------- ----- II-------- -- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00' 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 3.85 0.15
Final Sat.: 3200 4800 0 0 6400 3200 0 0 0 1600 6165 235
---- I --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.12 0.15 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.31 0.31
Crit .Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
443
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 9 -1
-- ----------------- ---- - - -- -- ------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.648
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II -----------_--- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 900 152 96 261 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 936 158 100 292 0 1186 1623 299 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 22 0 33 2 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 942 158 100 314 0 1219 1651 299 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 942 158 100 314 0 1219 1651 299 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 942 158 100 314 0 1219 1651 299 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 942 158 100 314 0 1219 1651 299 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II----- ------ ---- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600. 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.28 0.72 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.70 2.30 2.00 '0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6850 1150 1600 4800 0 2718 3682 3200 0 0 0
------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.14 0.14 0.06 0.07 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
444
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 9 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour -
------------ - - - - -- ---------- -------- - - - - -_
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #6 Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue (NS) at Bristol Street South (F.W)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.487
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 1 0 3 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
- - - -- I--------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 720 180 201 859 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 749 187 209 893 0 417 1004 429 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 7 17 0 7 0 27 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 17 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 757 204 209 902 0 444 1021 430 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 757 204 209 902 0 444 1021 430 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 757 204 209 902 0 444 1021 430 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7..00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 757 204 209 902 0 444 1021 430 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 0..00 1.21 2.79 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 6400 1600 1600 4800 0 1940 4460 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ---------- ----- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.00 0.23 0.23 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
445
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.556
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
************************************************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II--- ------- - - - --I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: '108 886 0 C 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bee: 108 886 0 0 160 95 0 0 0 403 988 237
Added Vol: 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 97 0
PasserByVol: 6 6 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 50 1 0
Initial Fut: 114 897 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 114 897 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 114 897 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 114 897 0 0 186 95 0 0 0 453 1086 237
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - -- - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.18 3.29 0.54
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 3200 3200 0 0 0 1884 5256 860
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II-- ------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.21 0.28
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
r191M
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 _ Page 10 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #7 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.M : 0.549
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound _West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
-
------------I---------------II--------_------ II --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected - Protected Protected
Rights: - Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 196 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 -392 1167 124
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 198 344 0 0 484 743 0 0 0 392 1187 124
Added Vol: 0- 3 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 34 0
PasserByVol: 37 37 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 31 4 0
Initial Put: 235 384 0 0 501 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 235 384 0 0 501 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 235 384 0 0 501 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 235 384 0 0 501 745 0 0 0 423 1225 124
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 1.61 2.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.03 3.70 0.28
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 0 0 2573 3827 0 0 0 1643 5916 441
------------ I --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.07 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.21 0.28
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC -,. ORANGE CA
-4 4j
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.401
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - --
I
Control: - Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867- 291 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1._00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 333 229 198 379 0 676 867 291 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 13 14 0 75 0 0 2 25 0- 0 0
Initial Put: 0 348 243 198 455 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 348 243 198 455 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 348 243 198 455 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00.1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 348 243 198 455 0 678 869 316 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--- ------------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.36 1.64 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.75 2.45 0..80 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3769 2631 3200 3200 0 2805 3915 1280 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module: -
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.14 0.00 0.24 0.22 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
442
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:_11 Page 11 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project _
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects+Project-
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #8 Birch Street (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.467
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
************#************************************ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T -- R
--_--------- I --------------- il--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected - Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 312 300 305 614 0 188 999 174 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 17 0 0 0 0
PasserByVOl: 0 73 77 0 46 0 0 7 15 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 387 377 305 662 0 188 1023 189 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 387 377 305 662 0 188 1023 189 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 387 377 305 662 0 188 1023 189 '0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 387. 377 305 662 0 188 1023- 189 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------- --- ---- -II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 2.03 1.97. 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 3.53 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 3242 3158 3200 3200 0 1600 5651 749 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - --
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.12 0.18 0.25 _0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE, CA
T T9
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
-- --- ---- ------------ -- ---- - -_
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.483
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I--------------- II --------------- II --------------- II---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 '0 1 1 0 1 1 0
-------------------------- II--------------- 11--------------- II---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 16 534 53 37 335 73 228 303 42 77 287 110
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 16 534 53 37 335 73 237 315 44 80 298 114
Added Vol: 0 2 3 0 3 0 0 29 0 0 33 17
PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 16 536 56 37 339 73 237 344 44 80 331 131
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 16 536 0 37 339 73 237 344 44 80 331 131
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 16 536 0 37 339 73 237 344 44 80 331 131
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 '0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 16 536 0 37 339 73 237 344 44 80 331 131
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---- ------ - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.65 0.35 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.43 0.57
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2633 567 1600 3200 1600 1600 2292. 908
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------- -------- 11-- -------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.01 0.17 0.00 0.02 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.11, 0.03 0.05 0.14 0.14
Crit Moves:
*+** x+++ o-+ . t+*++: t+**+*** o-*******+*+ * + * + + + * + * * * * * * *• * * * * * * * * + * + + * ** *:to- * + + + * ** * * * +*
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
-4150
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 12 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #9 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.580
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L- T - R
------------ I --------------- II --_------------ II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore. Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 47 383 122 98 610 224 145 445 49 51 501 64
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Initial Bse: 47 383 122 98 610 224 .151 463 51 53 521 67
Added Vol: 0 3 5 16 2 0 0 38 0 C 37 0
PasserByVol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0
Initial Fut: 47 388 127 114 612 224 151 501 51 53 558 67
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 47 388 0 114 612 224 151 501 51 53 558 67
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 47 388 0 114 612 224 151 501 51 53 558 67
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: -1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 47 388 0 114 612 224 151 501 51 53 558 67
------------ --------------- II------------ - - -II--------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.46 0.54 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.79 0.21
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 2343 857 1600 3200 1600 1600 2859 341
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------- ------ II---- ------ - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.12 0.00 0.07 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.20 0.20
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4151-
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:38:59 Page 13 -1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.296
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II --------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I -------------- II--------------- II -- ------------ -II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 30 484 33 56 275 128 79 194 48 43 159 22
Added Vol: 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 17 0
PasserByVOl: 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 13 0
Initial Put: 30 489 33. 56 279 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 30 489 33 56 279 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 30 489 33 56 279 128 79 197 4B 46 189 22
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 30 489 33 56 279 128 79 197 48 46 189 22
------------ --------------- II--------------- II---- ----------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00' 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 .1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II---- -- --------- II ------ ---- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.02 0.15 0.02 '0.04 0.09 0.08 0.05 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.06 0.01
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4152
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 13 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #10 Von Karman Avenue (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.354
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- 11 --------------- 11 ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: .Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II --------------- II---------- --- - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19. 235 41
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 71 407 55 34 549 133 99 166 26 19 235 41
Added Vol: 0 8 3 0 2 0 0 16 0 1 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 8 0
Initial Fut: 71 417 58 34 551 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 71 417 58 34 551 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 71 417 58 34 551 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 71 417 58 34 551 133 99 200 26 20 243 41
------------ I ----------- -- - -II II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600 1600 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.04 0.13 0.04 0.02 0.17 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.02. 0.01 0.08 0.03
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4153
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:00 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #11 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.430
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T- R
--------- - - - I -- - II--------------- II---------- _---- II--- ---- _-- - - -_ -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 101 0 0 0 0 2464 420 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 50 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: ,1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 103 0 0 0 0 2543 421 0 0 0
------------ I ----------- - - - -II- ------- II--------- ------ II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 .0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
----------- - I - --- II --------------- II --------------- II ------ ---- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 14 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
*##*******#*#####*********##******#*#************ * * * * * * * * # * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * # * * * *#
Intersection #11 Bayview Place (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
********#*********######*******#*******#********* * * * * * * # * * * * # # * * * * # # # * * # # * * * * # **
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.568
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay .(sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: - A
Approach: North Bound South Bound .East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R- L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II------- -------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591. 142 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 0 433 0 0 0 0 2591 142 0 -0 0
Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 103 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 26 0 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 0 456 0 0 0 0 2720 142 0 0 0
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:.
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600. 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0. 0 3200 0 0 0 0 6400 1600 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.14. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4515
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:00 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year- 2013)+Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.667
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 143 1044 34 286 1732 172 76 112 10 - 259 423 152
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 150 1096 36 300 1819 181 80 118 11 272 444 160
Added Vol: 34 177 0 0 48 0 0 32 0 0 16 0
PasserByVol: 0 29 0 0 69 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
Initial Fut: '184 1302 36 300 1936 181 80 150 12 273 460 160
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 184 1302 36 300 1936 181 80 150 0 273 460 160
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 184 1302 36 300 1936 181 80 150 0 273 460 160
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 184 1302 36 300 1936 181 80 150 0 273 460 160
------------ --------------- II--------------- II------------- -- II---------- -- - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.89 0.11 2.00 2.74 0.26 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 6229 171 3200 4390 410 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I --------------- II- -------------- II------ - - - - -- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.06 0.21 0.21 0.09 0.44 0.44 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.09 0.14 0.10
Crit Moves:
******************#****************************** * # * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
450
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 15 -1
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
_ ------ ______ -_ - - -__
Level Of Service Computation Report
'ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #12 Jamboree Road (NS) at Campus Drive (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.639
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- 11 --------------- II-_ ___------ _--- II___--- _--- - - - - -I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 3 1 0 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 2 0 1 2 0 2 0 1
-- I--------------- 11--------------- II------ --------- fl---- ------ - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 65 1278 135 224 1108 183 219 263 159 152 226 331
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05
Initial Bse: 68 1342 142 235 1163 192 230 276 167 160 237 348
Added Vol: 0 88 0 0 180 0 0 27 32 0 37 0
PasserByVol: 0 68 1 0 41 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
Initial Put: 68 1498 143 235 1384 192 230 303 199 161 275 348
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 68 1498 143 235 1384 192 230 303 0 161 275 348
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 68 1498. 143 235 1384 192 230 303 0 161 275 348
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 68 1498 143 235 1384 192 230 303 0 161 275 348
------- - - - - -I - - - -II -------- II-- ------ ------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 3.65 0.35 2.00 2.63 0.37 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00
Final Sat.: 3200 5843 557 3200 4215 585 3200 3200 1600 3200 3200 1600
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11--------- - - - - - -1
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: .0.02 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.09 0.00 0.05 0.09 0.22
Crit Moves:
Traffix. 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
457
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:00 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13 Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 - Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.558
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 - Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R- L - T - R L - T - R L - T- - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- 11 --------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 - 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 11 0 0
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 204 1228 2 7 1551 464 123 8 42 3 6 - - 6
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 214 1289 2 7 1629 487 123 8 42 3 6 6
Added Vol: - 17 210 0 0 45 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 30 0 0 69 1 0 0 0- 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 231 1529 2 7 1743 491 123 8 42 3 6 6
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF - Volume: 231 1529 2 7 1743 0 123 8 0. 3 6 6
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 231 1529 2 7 1743 0 123 8 0 3 6. 6
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 11.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 231 1529 2 7 1743 0 123 8 0 3 6 6
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II-------- ------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.88 0.12 1.00 0.20 0.40 0.40
Final Sat.: 1600 4793 7 1600 4800 1600 3005 195 1600 320 640 640
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.14 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
'T Jig
Default Scenario. Ins May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 16 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Evening Peak Hour
____ ___________ ____ _ _____ _____ ___
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #13. Jamboree Road (NS) at Birch Street (EW)
Cycle (sec): - 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.481
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: - A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
----------- - I - - -- ---- II--------------- II---- __--------- II_--------- - - - - -I
Control: Protected - Protected Split Phase Split Phase
Rights: Include Ignore Ignore Include
Min. Green: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- II--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 44 1188 0 2 1390 91 297 4 100 - 0 1 0
Growth Adj: 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 46 1247 0 2 1460 96 297. 4 100 0 1 0
Added Vol: 0 85 0 0 211 1 3 0 16 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 68 0 0 41 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
Initial Fut: 46 1400 0 2 1712 97 300 4 117 0 1 0
User Adj: L.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 46 1400 0 2 1712 0 300 4 0 0 1 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.
Reduced Vol: 46 1400 0 2 1712 0 300 4 0 0 1 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 46 1400 0 2 1712 0 300 4 0 0 1 0
--- --------------- II--------------- il--------------- II--------- - - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module: -
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00. 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 1.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 1.97 0.03 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 1600 4800 0 1600 4800 1600 3158 42 1600 0 1600 0
--- I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.09 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves:
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
T �9
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:00 Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Morning Peak Hour
______ _______________ ____ _
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.485
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------ - - - - -- I --------------- II--------------- 11 _-------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II ------------- -- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 846 1509 663 0 570 412 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 880 1569 690 0 593 428 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 147 0 0 70 96 0 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 29 43 21 0 86 13 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 909 1759 711 0 749 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 909 1759 0 0 749 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 909 1759 0 0 749 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 909 1759 0 0 749 537 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II- ----------- - - -II- - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.33 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00.
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 3726 2674 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- 11--------------- 11--------------- 11---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.28 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
Iwo]
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 - Page 17 -1
4221 Dolphin- Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Evening Peak Hour
__________ ___ __________________________
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss as Cycle Length 8) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #14 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street North (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.540
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: A
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II--_----_------- II --------------- II ----- ----- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Ignore Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II- ------------ - -II -- - - - - -I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 689 1142 942 0 1080 612 0 0 0 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 717 1188 980 0 1123 636 0 0 0 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 207 0 0 120 33 0 0 0 0 0 0.
PasserByVol: 22 103 57 0 57 8 0 0 0 0 0 0
Initial Put: 739 1498 1037 0 1300 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 739 1498 0 0 1300 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 739 1498 0 0 1300 677 0 0 0 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1100 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 739 1498 0 0 1300 677 0 0 0 0' 0 0
------------ I --------------- II-------------- -II --------------- ---------------
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 '1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.63 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 3200 3200 1600 0 4208 2192 0 0 0 0 0 0
------------ 1--------------- II--------------- II--------- -- ---- II---------- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.23 0.47 0.00 0.00 0.31 0.31 .0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) - 2008 - Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
401
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:00 Page 18 -1
4221 Dolphin-Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +project
Morning Peak Hour
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(LOSS as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.664
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: B
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II--------------- II ---------------
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 '0 0
------------ I --------------- II ------------- - -II --------------- ---------------
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1817 40 0 571 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 .1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1890 42 0 594 0 1199 333 1150 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 118 0 0 70 0 29 0 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 111 0 0 87 0 5 4 111 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 2119 42 0 751 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2119 42 0 751 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2119 42 0 751 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 .1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVOlume: 0 2119 42 0 751 0 1233 337 1261 0 0 0
------------ --------------- FI--------------- II--------------- II------ ---- - - - - -
I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.90 0.10 0.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7846 154 0 4800 0 3200 1600 3200 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -
I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.27 0.27 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.39 0.21 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
402
Default Scenario Tue May 31, 2011 13:39:11 Page 18 -1
------ ---------- --------------- -
4221 Dolphin - Striker Project
Existing +Growth (Year 2013) +Approved Projects +Cumulative Projects +Project
Evening Peak Hour
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- - - - - --
Level Of Service Computation Report
ICU 1(Loss, as Cycle Length %) Method (Future Volume Alternative)
Intersection #15 Jamboree Road (NS) at Bristol Street South (EW)
Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol. /Cap.(X): 0.736
Loss Time (sec): 0 (Y +R =0.0 sec) Average Delay (sec /veh): xxxxxx
Optimal Cycle: 100 Level Of Service: C
Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound
Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R
------------ I --------------- II --------------- II ------------- -- II ---------- - - - - -
I
Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected
Rights: Include Include Include Include
Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lanes: 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 3 0 '0 1 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0
------------ I --------------- II--------------- II--------------- II---------- - - - - -
I
Volume Module:
Base Vol: 0 1834 73 0 1080 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Growth Adj: 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Initial Bse: 0 1907 76 0 1123 0 937 1071 1145 0 0 0
Added Vol: 0 105 0 0 120 0 101 2 0 0 0 0
PasserByVol: 0 177 0 0 57 0 37 24 117 0 0 0
Initial Put: 0 2189 76 0 1300 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PEF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
PHF Volume: 0 2189 76 0 1300 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Vol: 0 2189 76 0 1300 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
FinalVolume: 0 2189 76 0 1300 0 1075 1097 1262 0 0 0
------------ I--------------- II--------------- 11------ --------- II---------- - - - - -I
Saturation Flow Module:
Sat /Lane: 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600 1600
Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Lanes: 0.00 4.83 0.17 0.00 3.00 0.00 1.48 1.52 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Final Sat.: 0 7732 268 0 4800 0 2376 2424 3200 0 0 0
---------- -- I----------- - ---11 ----- 11--------------- II----- ----- - - - - -I
Capacity Analysis Module:
Vol /Sat: 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00'
Crit Moves: * * ** * * ** * * **
Traffix 7.9.0215 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to KUNZMAN ASSOC, ORANGE CA
4 O3
APPENDIX E
Approved Project Data
404
Traffic Phasing Data
28- JAN -11
Projects Less Than 100% Complete
page: 1
Project Number
Project Name
Percent
148
FASHION ISLAND EXPANSION
40%
154
TEMPLE BAT YAHM EXPANSION
65%
555
CIOSA - IRVINE PROJECT
91%
910
NEWPORT DUNES
0%
945
HOAG HOSPITAL PHASE III
0%
949
ST. MARK PRESBYTERIAN CHU
77%
954
OLQA CHURCH EXPANSION
0%
955
2300 NEWPORT BLVD
0%
957
NEWPORT EXECUTIVE COURT
0%
958
HOAG HEALTH CENTER
75%
959
NORTH NEWPORT CENTER
0%
960
SANTA BARBARA CONDO (MARR
0%
961
NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL$
0%
962
328 OLD NEWPORT MEDICAL O
0%
963
COASTLINE COMMUNITY COLLE
0%
964
BAYVIEW MEDICAL OFFICE -
0%
405
28- JAN -11 Traffic Phasing Ordinance page 1
Approved Projects 80% Volume Summary
Intersection Report
Int. Number Int. Name
41 90 JAMBOREE RD / BRISTOL ST N
1 Hr Peak Totals 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
- ------ -------- ---- ---- --- --- ---- -------- ----- ------- ---------- ---- ---------- ------ -- - --- -- - --------------- -- -- ---
AM 93 99 29 43 21 86 13
PM 183 65 22 103 57 57 8
Int. Number Int. Name
.. 4275 JAMBOREE RD / MACARTHUR BLVD
1 Hr Peak Totals
NB SB EB WB NIL NT NR
- - ---- - ---- ---.._-----------------
AM 11 42 48 70 1 10 1
PM 45 21 79 50 6 38 1
1 Hr Peak
SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
--------------- -------- - -- ------ - - ------ - -- -----------------------
33 9 11 37 66 3
14 7 9 70 1 49 1
Int. Number Int. Name
4285 MACARTHUR BLVD / NEWPORT PLACE DR VON KARMAN AVE
1 Hr Peak Totals - 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NIL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER
....- ...-- --- ------------ -----. _-- ---•------- " °--- ----. - ------------ --------- ----- - ---- - ----- --
AM 16 34 1 16 1 34
PM 39 18 38 2 18
Int. Number Int. Name
4295 BIRCH ST / MACARTHUR BLVD
1 Hr Peak Totals T - -� -- "`` 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER
-- ---- -- ----- --------- - -- ------ --- ----- - - --- -- - -- --- -------- -- --- ----------------------
AM 15 47 6 13 1 14 34 13 3 3
PM 37 26 37 8 37 18 8 18 18.
WL WT WR
- -------------
1
WL WT WR
-- ---- - - - - ..
13
8
28- JAN -11 Traffic Phasing Ordinance page 2
Approved Projects 80% Volume Summary
Intersection Report
Int. Number Int. Name
4300 CAMPUS DR! MACARTHUR BLVD
1 Hr Peak Totals 1 Hr Peak
N_ B --- SB--- _-EB - - - -WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL --ET-- - - - -ER WL WT
---- ------- - - -- -- - - --
AM 18 47 1 18 47 1
PM 55 26 1 55 26 1 1
Int. Number Int. Name
4302 CAMPUS DR / VON KARMAN AVE
1 Hr Peak Totals 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
..- .. ---- --- - - --- ----- ------
AM 1
PM 2
Int. Number Int. Name
4305 JAMBOREE RD / CAMPUS DR
1 Hr Peak Totals 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL -ST SR EL ET ER WL WT - -WR
--- -------------- - - ----------- --------
AM 29 69 1 1 29 69 1 1
PM 69 41 1 68 1 41 1 1
Int. Number Int. Name - -
4308 BIRCH ST / JAMBOREE RD
1 Hr Peak Totals
1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
- -- ..- . ... -- ----- - - ---- -- ------
AM 30 69 30 69 1
PM 68 41 1 68 41 1
7�
28- JAN -11 _ _ Traffic Phasing Ordinance - - page 3
Approved Projects 80% Volume Summary
Intersection Report
Int. Number Int. Name
4155 IRVINE AVE /CAMPUS DR BRISTOL ST
1 Hr Peak Totals - 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
AM 2 - -- .26 - -. ...
- ----- -- ----- -- ---- - ----- - --- -------- - - .. ....
2 26
PM 1 2 18 1 2 17 1
Int. Number Int. Name -
4160 BRISTOL ST / BIRCH ST
1 Hr Peak Totals /S) -- --- - 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
- -- ------ -- ------
- - ------- ------- - --- --- -- - --- ---- ---- ------
AM 26 75 27 13 14 75 2 25
PM 149 46 22 73 77 46 7 15
Int. Number Int. Name
4167 BRISTOL ST / BAYVIEW PL
1 Hr Peak Totals - -1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL. - NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
----- -- - - ----- ------ -- -- --
AM 2 50 - 2 - 50 1 -
PM 23 26 23 26
Int. Number Int. Name
4170 JAMBQREE RD / BRISTOL ST
1 Hr Peak Totals 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
- ----- ------------ - -----------------
AM 111 87 120 111 87 5 4 111
PM 177 57 178 177 57 37 24 117
28-JAN -11 Traffic Phasing Ordinance page 4
Approved Projects 80% Volume Summary
Intersection Report
Int. Number Int. Name
4172 CAMPUS DR /BRISTOL ST N
1 Hr Peak Totals u 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
----- --- ----- - --- - -- -------- -- --- --- -------- -- - ----- ----- -- -- ----- .
AM 1 8 1 8
PM 41 2 39
Int. Number Int. Name
4175 BRISTOL ST N / BIRCH ST
1 Hr Peak Totals 1 Hr Peak
NB SB EB WB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR
- .... -- - - --- - --
--- ------ - - --- -- -- ---- - --- ------ - -
AM 13 25 51 6 6 25 50 1
PM 74 15 35 37 37 15 31 4
Count Maker 2007
AM
Northbound Peak Hour Volume 1
Southbound Peak Hour Volume
PM
Northbound Peak Hour Volume 2
Southbound Peak Hour Volume 0
NS Street: Von Karman Avenue
EW Street: Birch Street
AM
Eastbound Peak Hour Volume B
Westbound Peak Hour Volume 13
PM
Eastbound Peak Hour Volume 18
Westbound Peak Hour Volume 8
NS Street: Von Karman Avenue
EW Street: Birch Street
Southbound
=o
®oo
ooEastbound
ooiruii■r•�
®
®
'fi.
AIN
RYt'.�Y
m
m
�o
®000000■o�o��vo
AM
Northbound Peak Hour Volume 1
Southbound Peak Hour Volume
PM
Northbound Peak Hour Volume 2
Southbound Peak Hour Volume 0
NS Street: Von Karman Avenue
EW Street: Birch Street
AM
Eastbound Peak Hour Volume B
Westbound Peak Hour Volume 13
PM
Eastbound Peak Hour Volume 18
Westbound Peak Hour Volume 8
NS Street: Von Karman Avenue
EW Street: Birch Street
APPENDIX F
TPO One - Percent Analysis
Calculation Worksheets
471-
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & CAMPUS DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1030
52
18
1100
11
3
Southbound
1257
63
47
1367
14
4
Eastbound
910
46
1
957
10
0
Westbound
330
17
0
347
3
4
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffc Is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & CAMPUS DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1294
65
55
1414
14
4
Southbound
1311
66
27
1404
- 14
2
Eastbound
694
35
0
729
7
0
Westbound
962
48
1
1011
10
2
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 %of Prolected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin - Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
472
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & BIRCH STREET
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
819
33
15
867
9
3
Southbound
900
36
47
983
10
8
Eastbound
541
0
6
547
5
0
Westbound
238
1 0
1 13
251
3
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
IIProject Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required,
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & BIRCH STREET
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
757
30
37
824
8
4
Southbound
1056
42
26
1124
11
4
Eastbound
509
0
36
545
5
- 0
Westbound
1 717
1 0
1 8
725
7
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
47S
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & VON KARMAN AVENUE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1745
70
17
1832
18
21
Southbound
656
26
1 34
716
- 7
22
Eastbound
143
0
0
143
1
0
Westbound
226
0
1
227
2
2
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Tragic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & VON KARMAN AVENUE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
i %OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
798
32
40
870
9
10
Southbound
1049
42
18
1109
11
29
Eastbound
516
0
0
516
5
0
Westbound
1 830
1 0
0
830
1 8
1
Project Tragc is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 11A of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project - DATE: . 512 212 01 1
T
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & JAMBOREE ROAD
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1965
79
12
2056
21
10
Southbound
480
1 19
42
541
5
15
Eastbound
1437
57
48
1542
15
6
Westbound
1219
49
69
1337
13
6
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: MACARTHUR BOULEVARD & JAMBOREE ROAD
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1202
48
45
1295
13
5
Southbound
1434
57
21
1512
15
19
Eastbound
1218
49
79
1346
13
3
Westbound
1687
67
51
1805
18
3
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater (ban 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
47,5
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: CAMPUS DRIVE /IRVINE AVENUE & BRISTOL STREET NORTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1882
75
1
1958
20
6
Southbound
424
17
0
441
4
4
Eastbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Westbound
1160
0
8
1168
12
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less then 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to a greater than 1% of Projectetl Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: CAMPUS DRIVE /IRVINE AVENUE & BRISTOL STREET NORTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily TiaKc 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1041
42
0
1083
11
3
Southbound
1749
70
0
1819
18
6
Eastbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Westbound
2141
0
41
2182
22
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to a greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin - Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
-4.70
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: CAMPUS DRIVE/IRVINE AVENUE & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME -
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1052
42
2
1096
- 11
2
Southbound
377
15
0
392
4
1
Eastbound
3108
0
26
3134
31
4
Westbound
0
1 0
1 0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: CAMPUS DRIVE /IRVINE AVENUE & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
900
36
1
937
9
1
Southbound
1060
42
2
1104
11
2
Eastbound
1850
0
18
1868
19
2
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: -4221 Dolphin - Striker Project DATE: 512 212 01 1
477
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: BIRCH STREET & BRISTOL STREET NORTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1°/ OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
994
0
12
1006
10
2
Southbound
255
0
25
280
3
1
Eastbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Westbound
1628
1 0
51
1 1679
17
0
Project Traffic is estimated W be less than 1 % of Protected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Pmjected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: BIRCH STREET & BRISTOL STREET NORTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
542
0
74
616
6
1
Southbound
1227
0
15
1242
12
2
Eastbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Westbound
1703
1 0
1 35
1 1730
1 17
1 0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 %of Projected Peak Hoar Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
fnlersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin - Striker Project DATE: 5/2 212 01 1
472
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. BIRCH STREET & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
562
0
27
589
6
2
Southbound
1 577
0
1 75
652
f
1
Eastbound
1834
0
27
1861
19
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
IX JProjecl Traffic is estimated to be less then 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Vobm es.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION. BIRCH STREET & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
612
0
150
762
8
1
Southbound
919
0
46
965
10
2
Eastbound
1361
0
22
1383
14
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
IX 1Pmiect Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Pmjected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
] Pmject Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greeter then 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
4�"
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: VON KARMAN AVENUE & CAMPUS DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
_ 603
0
0
603
6
4
Southbound
445
0
1
446
4
2
Eastbound
573
23
0
596
6
0
Westbound
474
19
0
493
5
4
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: VON KARMAN AVENUE & CAMPUS DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR -
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
552
0
2
554
6
6
Southbound
932
0
0
- 932
9 -
1
Eastbound
639
26
0
665 -
7
0
Westbound
616
25
0
641
6-
2
C� Project Traffic is estimated to be less than l % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required. -
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin - Striker Project - - DATE: 5/2212011
420
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: VON KARMAN AVENUE & BIRCH STREET
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
547
0
1
548 -
5
4
Southbound
459
0
1
460
5
2
Eastbound
321
1
3
324
3
0
Westbound
224
0
13
237
1 2
1 0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Uthimtion(ICU) Analysis is required.
I% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: VON KARMAN AVENUE & BIRCH STREET
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING-
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
533
0
2
535
5
5
Southbound
716
0
0
716
7
1
Eastbound
291
0
18
- 309
3
0
Westbound
295
1 0
1 8
303
3
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
�Pmjeot Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volum as.
Intersection Capacity Util¢ation (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
421
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: BAYVIEW STREET & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
-1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
101 -
0
2
103
1
0
Southbound
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
Eastbound
2884
0
51
2935
29
0
Westbound
0
0
0
1 0
0
0
IProject Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
IProject Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes,
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: BAYVIEW STREET & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
433
0
23
456
5
0
Southbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Eastbound
2733
0
26
2759
28
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to he less than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic 6 estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin - Striker Project DATE: 5/22/2011
422
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & CAMPUS DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1221
61
29
1311
13
4
Southbound
2190
110
69
2369
24
6
Eastbound
198
10
1
209
2
3
Westbound
834
42
1
877
9
4
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
�ProjeG Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic. Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
I% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION; JAMBOREE ROAD & CAMPUS DRIVE
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1478
74
69
1621
16
5
Southbountl
1515
76
41
1632
16
3
Eastbound
641
32
0
673
1 7
4
Westboundt
7
1 35
2
746
7
2
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater Nan 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Imemection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project DATE: 5/2 212 01 1
42S
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BIRCH STREET
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1434
72
30
1536
15
- 4
Southbound
2022
101
70
2193-
22
6
Eastbound
173
0
0
173
2
0
Westbound
15
0
0
15
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 %of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required,
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BIRCH STREET
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR -
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
- VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1232
62
68
1362
14
5
Southbound
1483
74
41
1598
- 16
3
Eastbound
401
0
1
402
4 -
0
Westbound
1
0
0
1 1
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project _ DATE: 5/22/2011
424
1 % TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BRISTOL STREET NORTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
_
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
3018
121
93
3232
32
6
Southbound
982
39
99
1120
11
4
Eastbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than i % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BRISTOL STREET NORTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
2773
111
182
3066
31
3
Southbound
1692
68
65
1825
18
5
Eastbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Westbound
1 0
1 0
1 0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin - Striker Project - DATE:- 512212011
425
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
AM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
EXISTING
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PEAKHOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAKHOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1857
74
111
2042
20
6
Southbound
571
23
1 87
1 681
7
4
Eastbound
2682
0
120
2802
28
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Tref a Volumes.
�Pmjed Tragic is estimated to be equal to or greater than I% of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) Analysis is required.
1% TRAFFIC VOLUME ANALYSIS
INTERSECTION: JAMBOREE ROAD & BRISTOL STREET SOUTH
(Existing Traffic Volumes Based on Average Daily Traffic 2011 AM)
PM PEAK HOUR
APPROACH
DIRECTION
.EXISTING
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PEAK HOUR
REGIONAL
GROWTH
VOLUME
APPROVED
PROJECTS
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
1% OF
PROJECTED
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
PROJECT
PEAK HOUR
VOLUME
Northbound
1907
76
177
2160
22
3
Southbound
1080
43
1 57
1180
1 12
5
Eastbound
3153
0
178
3331
33
0
Westbound
0
0
0
0
0
1 0
Project Traffic is estimated to be less than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volumes.
Project Traffic is estimated to be equal to or greater than 1 % of Projected Peak Hour Traffic Volume,
Intersection Capacity Utili=ion(ICU) Analysis is required.
PROJECT: 4221 Dolphin- Striker Project DATE: 512212011
420
APPENDIX G
Cumulative Project Data
427
Table G -1
Cumulative Project Traffic Generation'
Project
Peak Hour
Daily
Morning
Evening
Inbound
I Outbound
Total
Inbound
Outbound
I Total
Mariner's Medical Arts
22
6
28
11
31
42
442
WPI- Newport, LLC
0
-28
-28
-72
-42
-114
-577
Banning Ranch
236
581
817
659
447
1,106
13,327
Sunset Ridge Park
1
1
2
29
13
42
165
Marina Park
15
0
15
7
19
26
352
Pres Office Building B
161
2
18
3
15
18
132
Koll - Conexant
-348
338
-10
316
-222
94
2,764
Mariner's Pointe
13
3
16
48
36
84
1,533
Newport Coast -TAZ1
Newport Coast -TAZ2
Newport Coast -TAZ3
Newport Coast -TAZ4
74
91
51
1 56
244
327
178
186
318
418
229
242
238
327
178
184
159
183
102
113
397
510
280
297
3,928
5,105
2,794
2,960
Total
1 2271
1,838
2,065
1,9281
8541
2,782
32,925
1 Negative trips were not assigned to traffic analysis.
422
Cumulative Proiect List - November 2010
Projects of significant size to have a potential cumulative impact
Note: Highlighted projects do not result in an increase in traffic generation; however, may have other
cumulative impacts to consider (i.e. construction, noise, air quality).
gu�t�S't"iC,t�rW
fghu
_ *� tf tat�����, v €tfi3�at.
gtie
Mariner's Medical
1901 Westcliff Dr.
12,245 g.s.f. medical office addition
Arts
WPI- Newport, LLC
4699 Jamboree Rd/
New office building and remodel of existing office and
5190 Campus Drive
bank buildings to accommodate office space, bank,
retail, and restaurant uses:
Existing (To be demolished): 21,023 g.s.f.
• Office: 10,800 g.s.f.
• Bank:10,221 g.s.f.
New: 46,044 g.s.f.
• Office: 39,212 n.s.f./42,041 g.s.f.
• Bank: 3,434 n.s.f. 14,003 g.s.f.
Banning Ranch
4520 W. Coast Hwy
1,375 d.u., 75,000 g.s.f. commercial retail, 75 -room
accommodations, parks, and open space.
Sunset Ridge Park
4850 W. Coast Hwy
13.67 ac. active park
Marina Park
1700 Balboa Blvd
10.45 ac. public marina, beach, park with recreational
facilities as follows:
• Balboa Center Complex: 26,990 g.s.f.
• Visiting Vessel Marina: 23 Slips
• Marina Services Building (laundry, offices,
etc.): 1,328 g.s.f.
• Girl Scout House: 5,500 g.s.f.
• Parking 153 spaces
Pres Office
4300 Von Karmen
11,960 g.s.f. office
Building B
(9,917 n.s.f.)
Conexant
4311 Jamboree Rd
New:
•- 1,244 residential d.0
• 11,500 g.s.f. commercial
Existing (to be demolished):
• 167,000 g.s.f. office
• 269,000 g.s.f. industrial
Koll
4343 Von Karmen Ave
New:
• 260 residential d.u.
• 3,400 g.s.f. commercial
0 move, WSA0006ANW-16-9-
'4' e q
Do p
4221 Dolphin Striker
New: 15,000 g.s.f. commercial retail development-
MacArthur
-- – --
`_
— stktgjtc be demolished): 7,996 g.s.f. restaurant
building " --
Mariner's Pointe
100 -300 West Coast
New: 23,015 g.s.f commercial development and 3 -story
Highway
parking structure
12,722 g.s.f. restaurant
• 7,293 g.s.f. retail
• 3,000 g.s.f. medical
Existing (to be demolished): 5,447 g.s.f. officelretail
Newport Coast
See David Keely in Public Works for update.
\ \cnb \data \users\PBW\DKeely \dkeely \Traffic Phasing Ordinance \Cumulative Project List\20101118 Cumulative Project List .docx
-T9O
S U N5ET 14U0&e IIAPY-
Sunset Ridge Park May, 2009
Traffic Impact Study
qj-
Table 5
Project Trip Generation
Sunset Ridge Park
Land Use
ITE
Code
Unit
Trip Generation Rates
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
t
Total
In I Out Total
City Park
411
Acre
1.59
Soccer Complex
488
Field
71.33
0.70 0.70
1.40
14.26
1 6.41
20.67
Land Use
Quantity
Trip Generation Estimates
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
t
Total
In
Out
Total
City Park
13.67 Acres
22
N/A
I N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Soccer Complex
2 Fields
143
1
1
2
29
13
42
TOTAL
165
1
1
2
29
13
42
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers publication "Trip Generation ", 8th Edition
* No peak hour tri p generation rates given for this land use.
Sunset Ridge Park May, 2009
Traffic Impact Study
qj-
20%
20% 20%
a
a
u
?
$
5
16TH ST
mJ
$p�
15TH 57
iO
�
2
PROJECT SITE
1p WEST - \ 0 �p COAST
HIGHWgy y
HOSPITAL RD
e
t.
O
2
O
O
LEGEND
X% TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE -
10 %p
20%
SUNSET RIDGE PARK
TRIP DISTRIBUTION
MAIZ40 A )PAn-K.
Table I
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
LAND USE UNITS IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL ADT
TRIP RATES
Park' Acre
.28
.20
.48 -.38
.92
1.30
15.70
Recreational Community Center (ITE 495)' TSF
.99
.63 -
1.62 .48
1.16
1.64
22.88
Marina (ITE 420) - Berth
.03
- .05
.08 .11
.08
.19
2.96
TRIP GENERATION
Proposed Project
Park 4.89 Acres
1
1
2 2
4
6
77
Comnumity Cu /Sailing Ctr /Cafe 21.3 TSF
21
13
34 10
25
35
487
Visitor Marina - 23 Berths
I
1
2 3-
2
5
68
Sub -Total
23
15
38 15 -
31
46
632
Existing Use
-
Mobile Home Park 57 DU
-5 -
-13
-18 -7
-7
-14
- -194
Park 1.2 Acres
0
0
0 0 -
-1
-1
-19
Community Ctr 2.9 TSF
-3
- -2
-5 -1
-4
-5
-67
NET NEW TRIPS -
15
0
15 7
19
26
352
Notes:
Park AM and PM trip rates from ITE City Park (411) rate /acre,
ADT rate averaged from City (411) and Beach (415)
Park
ADT rate/acre. -
-
x ITE Recreational Community Center (495) trip rates applied to Community
Center, Sailing Center, and
Cafe.
The Girl Scout House will be relocated on -site and results in no net change
in project trips.
Marina Park TPO - 5 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Traffic Analysis - - - - 029033tpo.doc
�9 3
Figure 3
GENERAL PROJECT DISTRIBUTION
Marina Park TPO 7 Austin -Foust Associates, Inc.
Traffic Analysis 029033tpoFig3.dwg
T_94
TABLE2 -
SUMMARY OF PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
- NEWPORT BANNING RANCIf
TRIP
RATES
-
Land Use
ITE
Coda
Trips
per
Trip Generation Rates
AM Peak Hour
PMPeak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In I
Out
Total
Single-Family Detached Housing
210
DU
9.57
0.19
0.56
0.75
0.64
0.37
1.01
Residential Condominiurnrrownhouse
230
- DU
5.81
0.07
0.37
0.44
0.35.
0.17
0.52
High -Rise Residential CondominiuMlownhouse
232
4.18
0.06
0.28
0.34
0.24
0.14
0.38
Resor[ Hotel
330
4.90
0.22
0.09
0.31
0.18
0.24
0.42
Park a
412
i[75.10
2.28
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.04
0.06
Shopping Center a
820
Equation • See Below
PROJECT
TRIP GENERATION
Project
Area
Land Use
Units
Trip Generation Estimates
Dail
AM Peak Hour
PM
Peak Hour
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
South Family
Single -Famil Detached Housing
141 DU
1,349
27
79
106
90
52
142
Village
Park
28 Acres
64
0
0
0
1
1
2
Subtotal
1,413
27
79
106
91
53
144
Resort
Residential Condominium/fownhouse
87
DU
505
6
32
38
30
15
45
Colony
Resort Hotel
75
Rooms
368
17
7
24
14
18
32
Subtotal
873
23
39
62
44
33
77
North Funnily
Single-Family Detached Housing
282
DU
2,699
54
158
212
180
104
284
Village
Residential Condominium/Townhouse
135
DU
784
9
50
59
47
23
70
Subtotal
3,483
63
208
1 271
227
127
354
Urban Colony
High-Rise Residential Condominiumlfownhome
730
DU
3,051
44
204
248
175
102
277
Shopping Center
75.0
KSF
5,633
79
51
130
257
267
524
Subtotal
8,684
123
255
378
432
369
801
Total Before Internal Capture/Pass -by
Internal Capture'
Pass -By Redaction for Retail (34 %) s
Total Project Tri
14 & 3
236
1 581
1 817
794
582
11,376
1 126
REW
55
55
110
IBM
80
80
160
13 27
236
581
- 817
659
447
1,106
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trip Generation ", 8th Edition
DU =Dwelling Unit, KSF ° 1,000 Square Feet
'ITE Land Use Category 330 Resort Hazel does not provide a daily trip rate. ITE Land Use Category 311 -All Suites Hatel was used for daily trips.
2 Trip generation is based on ITE land Use County Park (land Use 412) because this category includes peek hour trip rates.
a Trip rates for Shopping Center are derived from the following regression equations: T =Trip Ends, X =units in KSF
ADT: Ln(1) =0.65 Ln(X) +5.83
AM Peak How. Ln(T) -0.59 Ln(X) +2.32 -
- PM Peak Hour. LaM -0.67 Ln(X) +3.37
° Sources Institute of Transportation Engineers OM publication Trip Generation Handbook". See Internal Capture Worksheets in Appendix C.
s Source: ITE publication "Trip Generation Handbook ". P reduction is taken on balance of mail in after internal Capture reduction
TratBc Impact Study - _ 25 - December, 2009
Newport Banning Ranch - 4_95
(A) ° 10% 40%
5% 5% 5 %
NOT TO SCALE victoria St
5% Hamilton Ave t Costa
m ` >
Hun mesa
'_+°
o Beach `m __ x o $ ° t x S Q °r omP a°
m \ 2 °� pia°
a caP
Banning Ave m \ 19th St
10% ymC `cP
C� tJm IF
5% y� j / 18th St
ro`� Project \\ N
® ���� Site 17th at ryrhsr
r zs% e.
R °
18th st °ware ady
10%
15th St rs 5 %sr
Q`omQ" i 10% - 0 °o rysr ma0
tP 2b Ch001 Oad
mro Hospital Rd t P
rs gJQ ° tea° ,m Newport
Beach
0A 10
Ey GEND= _ - - SON W. Coast Hwy
'al O - Study Intersection _ _ , 5% - -
1IX% = Trip Distribution Percentage - - - o
- -- = City Boundary 5% 0 5 /O
-
-- =Future Road - °+
T
** N
\y
FIGURE 8
PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION Con
rntHruE. ow m• an°s - +osrrm Kimsey -Horn and Associates,
Kali- Conexant
4311 Jamboree Road
Trio Generation Rates
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
167
TSF
1.36
0.19
1.55
0.25
1.24
1.49
11.01
General Light Industrial
ITE -8th
269
TSF
0.81
0.11
0.92
0.12
0.85
0.97
6.97
Apartments
ITE -8th
DU
0.1
0.41
0.51
0.4
0.22
0.62
6.65
ITE -8th
TSF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
445
61
506
74
436
510
3714
Existinst Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
167
TSF
227
32
259
42
207
249
1839
Industrial
ITE -8th
269
TSF
218
30
247
32
229
261
1875
ITE -8th
TSF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ITE -8th
TSF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
445
61
506
74
436
510
3714
Proposed Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Apartment
ITE -8th
974
DU
97
399
497
390
214
604
6477
ITE -8th
TSF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ITE -8th
TSF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ITE -8th
TSF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
97
399
497
390
214
604
6477
x\91
7�
Mariner's Medical Arts
1901 Westcliff Drive
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
Rate T pe
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Medical Office
ITE -8th
12.245
TSF
1.82
0.48
2.30
0.93
2.53
3.46
36.13
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
ITE -8th
0
0
0
Total
22
6
28
11
31
42
442
Existing Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Medical Office
ITE -8th
12.245
TSF
22
6
28
11
31
42
442
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
ITE -8th
0
0
0
Proposed Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Medical Office
ITE -8th
12.245
TSF
22
6
28
11
31
42
442
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
22
6
28
11
31
42
442
Not Increase I I 1 1 221 61 281 ill 311 42 442
� mm � � � � " = m = " " M m m M M
1901 WestcliSurgical Center TPO Traffic Analysis Report
1
M lhna Company
NEWPORT BEACH FIGURE
1901 WESTCLIFF DRIVE TRAFFIC PHASING ORDINANCE Project Trip Distribution Percentages
Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc.
11
WPI- Newport, LLC
4699 Jamboree Road - 5190 Campus Drive
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
10.8
TSF
1.36
0.19
1.55
0.25
124
1.49
11.01
Bank -Drive In
ITE -8th
10.221
TSF
6.92
5.43
12.35
12.91
12.91
25.82
148.15
Specialty Retail Center'
ITE -8th
TSF
0.61
0.39
1.00
1.19
1.52
2.71
44.32
Quality Restaurant"
ITE -8th
TSF
0.66
0.15
0.81
5.02
2.47
7.49
89.95
Total
21.021
85
58
143
135
145
280
1633
Note' - Specialty Retail AM trip generation rate is unavailable. Shopping Center AM peak hour trip generation rate used.
" - AM distribution for AM peak hour of generator used.
Existing Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
10.8
TSF
15
2
17
3
13
16
119
Bank
ITE -8th
10.221
TSF
71
56
126
132
132
264
1514
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
21.021
85
58
143
135
145
280
1633
Proposed Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
42.041
TSF
57
8
65
11
52
63
463
Bank
ITE -8th
4.003
TSF
28
22
49
52
52
103
593
Total
46.044
85
30
115
62
104
166
1056
lNetlncrease I I I 1 -11 -261 -281 -721 -421 -1141 -5771
Note: Do not assign negative trips to the circulation system.
2 %
�P45%
1�P
O�
J
15% 20%
sR�3
S�. T
-I
S
C
A
A
r
PROJECT SITE
o� o
oP�aJ� QGgi� sr
�
ay isTO �P
5%
R�Sr
o�
sr
yO LEGEND
A X% TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE _
10% WPI- NEWPORT, LLC
10% 15% TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Pres Office Building B
4300 Von Karman
Trip Generation Rates
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
11.96
TSF
1.36
0.19
1.55
0.25
1.24
1.49
11.01
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
ITE -8th
0
0
0
Total
16
2
19
3
15
18M
Existing Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Dail
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
11.96
TSF
16
2
19
3
15
18
132
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
ITE -8th
0
0
0
Proposed Use
Land Use
Rate Type
Size
Unit
AM Peak Hour
PM Peak Hour
Daily
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Total
Office
ITE -8th
11.96
TSF
16
2
19
3
15
18
132
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
ITE -8th
Total
16
2
19
3
15
18M
Net Increase I I 1 1 161 21 191 31 151 18 132
O
W
2 %
5%
�P
�e
O�
J
15% 20%
T3
3
OOLF n
`rT P
c PROJECT SITE
P
m
r
O�
4P�J9 QG4i� ST ����0
�o
0� Sp
N
' SRS
S�
O<
y.T
OLEGEND
X% TRIP DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE
10% PRES OFFICE BUILDING B
10% 15% TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Table 5
Proposed Project Trip Rates
Land Use
Units
AM Peak Hour Rates
PM Peak Hour Rates
Daily
Trip
Rate
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
Specialty Retail
tsf
0.0
0.0
0.0
119
1.52
2.71
44.32
Quality Restaurant
tsf
0.66
0.15
0.81
5.02.
2.47
7.49
89.95
Medical Office
tsf
1.82
0.48
2.30
0.93
2.53
3.46
36.13
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, Edition
Note: tsf = thousand square feet
Table 6 summarizes the trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project utilizing the ITE
trip rates shown in Table 5.
Table 6
Proposed Project Trip Generation
Land use
AM Peak Hour Trips
PM Peak Hour Trips
Daily
Trips
In
Out
Total
In
Out
Total
7.293 tsf - Specialty Retail
0
0
0
- 9
11 - -
20
323
12.722 tsf- Quality Restaurant
a
2
10
64
31
95
1,144
Pass -by Discount (44% in p.m.)
0
0
0
-28
-14
-42
-42
3.000 tsf - Medical Office
5
1
6
3
8
11
108
TOTAL
13
3
16
1 48
36
84
1,533
Source: Pass -by discount determined using ITE Trip Generation Manual, 2atl Edition
Note: tsf = thousand square feet
As shown in Table 6, the proposed project is forecast to generate approximately 1,533 daily
trips, which includes approximately 48 a.m. peak hour trips and approximately 84 p.m. peak
hour trips.
Since the project site is currently occupied by 5,447 square feet of specialty retail planned to be
displaced by the proposed project, trips associated with the displaced land use are subtracted
from the project site trip generation forecast shown in Table 6 to determine the number of net
new trips forecast to be generated by the proposed project. In accordance with City analysis
methodology, the net trip generation accounting for the displaced land use is only utilized for the
TPO traffic analysis, not for the forecast cumulative traffic analysis (contained in the next section
of this report).
Table 7 summarizes the existing project site trips forecast to be displaced by the proposed
project utilizing the ITE trip rates shown in Table 5.
11
" - XX% Trip Percent Distribution
Not to Scale
...... Project Site Boundary
H :"MI1010)8OnT.f W EWb ts\ EM08Ai
DEC1201
M
Project Trip Distribution
TABLE 12 -1
TRIP GENERATION RATES'
NEwpmr COA16T
LAND USE
UNITSZ
PEAK HOUR
DAILY
AM
PM
IN
OUT
IN
OUT
Condominium/Townhouse
DU
0.17
0.49
0.47
0.36
8.10
Multi Family Dwelling
DU
/ .90.`
0.42
0.43
0.20
6.47
Single Family Detached Residential
DU
0.20
0.70
0.70
0.40
11.00
State Park (gross acres)
AC
0.21
0.90
0.29
0.31
19.15
' Source: City of Newport Beach Trip Generation Rates
2 DU = Dwelling Units
AC = Acres
U: \Uciobs \00636\Excel \[00636- 02.xls]T 12 -1
12 -2 1507
TABLE 12 -2
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
TAZ
PLANNING
AREA
LAND USE
QUANTIJUNITS'l
PEAK HOUR
DAILY
1 AM
PM
IN
I OUT
IN
OUT
1A
Condominium/Townhouse
121
DU
21
59
57
44
980
1B
Single Family Detached Residential
36
DU
7
25
25
14
396
1C
CondominiumlTownhouse
888
DU
151
435
417
320
7,193
1
2A
Single Family Detached Residential
206
DU
41
144
144
82
2,266
13C
Multi Family Dwelling
116
DU
104
49
50
23
751
13D
Multi Family Dwelling
116
DU
104
49
50
23
751
13E
Multi Family Dwelling
116
DU
104
49
50
23
751
TOTAL FOR
TAZ 1
I
I 532
810
793
529
13,088
3A -
Single Family Detached Residential
Single Family Detached Residential
347
DU
69
243
243
139
3,817
3B
450
DU
90
315
315
180
4,950
46
Single Family Detached Residential
587
DU
117
411
411
235
6,457
2
13A -
Multi Family Dwelling
117
DU
105
49
50
23
757
13B
Multi Family Dwelling
117
DU
105
49
50
23
757
14
Single Family Detached Residential
26
DU
5 -
18
18
10
286
17
State Park (gross acres
2,807
AC
589
2,526
814
870
53,754
TOTAL FOR
TAZ 2
1
1 1,080
1 3,611
1,901
1,480
70,778
3
211
Single Family Detached Residential
62
DU
12
43
43
25
682
4A
Sin le Famil Detached Residential
784
DU
157
1 549
549
1 314
1 8,624
TOTAL FOR
TAZ 3
169
592
592
1 339
1 9,306
2C
ISingle Family Detached Residential
307
2 15 215
215
123
3,377
4
5
Single Family Detached Residential
300
DU
60
210
210
120
3,300
6
ISingle Family Detached Residential
75
DU
15
1 53
53
30
825
.8
Condominium/Townhouse
289
DU
49
142
136
104
2,341
TOTAL FOR
TAZ 4
1
185
1 620
1 614
377
9,843
TOTAL FOR ALL ZONES
1,966
1 5,633
1 3,900
2,725
103,015
DU =Dwelling � Units
AC = Acres
U:tllcJobs1006361EXMA [00636 -02.xls]T 12 -2
fib'1, of Durs
ON„-4 30
i 2 Luµu Svc aQ T
41e
12 -3 1502
J
N
V1
Q)
m m m ME F-En �
10
NEWPORT COAST TRAFFIC ANALY`
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PA r
,z
110 \� i �� / /
l
1
\O / v
\ 9 /
51
B
,E.
es° 10 5
B
5
q
TAZ 1
SOURCE: NEWPORT COAST PHASES IV -3 & IV-4
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS PREPARED BY
AUSTIN•FOUST ASSOCIATES, INC.
NEWPORT BEACH CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Newport Beach Callfomia• 00636.09 UF#BAN
EXHIBI 12 -B
NEWPORT COAST TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE 2
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS
all ayPJt tP\ - ISD�y4 Z O I1ND ST. '\� o T TF 5'llS R
10
48
AZ 2
Lll 5 B4"OAB B<
C
\TR
NEWPORT BEACH CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, Newport Beach, California • 00636:17 URBAN
o
TURTLE OR• s
16
f
z
cyy<
rpNYON
BRISTOLST.
10
all ayPJt tP\ - ISD�y4 Z O I1ND ST. '\� o T TF 5'llS R
10
48
AZ 2
Lll 5 B4"OAB B<
C
\TR
NEWPORT BEACH CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS, Newport Beach, California • 00636:17 URBAN
■
10
N
J
5
10 , , 110
NEWPORT COAST TRAFFIC AN r1f,
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PA
12
18
t
/
/ c
C"
60
1
\ btir �
vI
Mee, y�$
R
�a
10 sacs q at B<
NEWPORT BEACH CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Newport Beach Califomia•00636:11
N
00
10
10
E
EXHIBIT 12 -C
NEWPORT COAST TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONE 4
TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS
yam.
1U aAIaOA$ et
NEWPORT BEACH CUMULATIVE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Newport Beach, Califomia • 00636:12 - - -
K
TAZ 4
1
APPENDIX H
City of Newport Beach Parking Code Requirements
513
Chapter 20.40 — Off- Street Parking
Sections:
20.40.010 — Purpose
20.40.020 —Applicability
20.40:030 — Requirements for Off - Street Parking
20.40.040 — Off - Street Parking Spaces Required
20.40.050 — Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers
20.40.060 — Parking Requirements for f=ood Service Uses
20.40.070 — Development Standards for Parking Areas
20.40.080 — Parking for Nonresidential Uses in Residential Zoning Districts
20.40.090 — Parking Standards for Residential Uses
20.40. 100 — Off -Site Parking
20.40.110 — Adjustments to Off - Street Parking Requirements
20.40.120 — Parking Management Districts
20.40.130 — In -lieu Parking Fee
20.40.010 -- Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide off - street parking and loading standards to:
A. Provide for the general welfare and convenience of persons within the City by ensuring
that sufficient parking facilities are available to meet the needs generated by specific
uses and that adequate parking is provided, to the extent feasible;
B Provide accessible, attractive, secure, and well - maintained off - street parking and loading
facilities;
C. Increase public safety by reducing congestion on public streets and to minimize impacts
to public street parking available for coastal access and recreation;
D. Ensure access and maneuverability for emergency vehicles; and
E. Provide loading and delivery facilities in proportion to the needs of allowed uses.
20.40.020 — Applicability
A. Off - street parking required. Each use, including a change or expansion of a use or
structure, except as otherwise provided for in Chapter 20.38 (Nonconforming Uses and
Structures) shall have appropriately maintained off - street parking and loading areas in
compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. A use shall not be commenced and
structures shall not be occupied until improvements required by this Chapter are
satisfactorily completed.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Off - Street
B. Change, enlargement, or intensification of use. Changes in use and enlargement or
intensification of an existing use shall require compliance with the off - street parking
requirements of this Chapter, except as allowed in Chapter 20.38 (Nonconforming Uses
and Structures).
20.40.030 — Requirements for Off- Street Parking
A. Parking required to be on -site. Parking shall be located on the same lot or
development site as the uses served, except for the following:
1. Townhouses and multi- tenant uses. Where parking is provided on another lot
within the same development site, the parking shall be located within 200 feet of
the units they are intended to serve.
2. Off -site parking agreement. Parking may be located off -site with the approval
of an off -site parking agreement in compliance with Subsection 20.52.080.0
(Parking agreement).
B. Permanent availability required. Each parking . and loading space shall be
permanently available and maintained for parking purposes for the use it is intended to
serve. The Director may authorize the temporary use of parking or loading spaces for
other than parking or loading in conjunction with a seasonal or intermittent use allowed
in compliance with Section 20.52.040 (Limited Term Permit).
C. Maintenance. Parking spaces, driveways, maneuvering aisles, turnaround areas, and
landscaping areas shall be kept free of dust, graffiti, and lifter. Striping, paving, walls,
light standards, and all other facilities shall be permanently maintained in good condition.
D. Vehicles for sale. Vehicles, trailers, or other personal property shall not be parked
upon a private street, parking lot, or private property for the primary purpose of
displaying the vehicle, trailer, or other personal property for sale, hire, or rental, unless
the property is appropriately zoned, and the vendor is licensed to transact a vehicle
sales business at that location.
E. Calculation of spaces required.
Fractional spaces. Fractional parking space requirements shall be rounded up
to the next whole space.
2. Bench seating. Where bench seating or pews are provided, 18 linear inches of
seating shall be considered to constitute a separate or individual seat.
3. Gross floor area. References to spaces per square foot are to be calculated on
the basis of gross floor area unless otherwise specified.
4. Net public area. "Net Public Area" shall be defined as the total area accessible
to the public within an eating and/or drinking establishment, excluding kitchens,
restrooms, offices pertaining to the use, and storage areas.
5. Spaces per occupant. References to spaces per occupant are to be calculated
on the basis of maximum occupancy approved by the City of Newport Beach Fire
Department.
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 October 26, 2010
Off- Street Parking . 20.40
6. Spaces required for multiple uses. If more than one use is located on a site,
the number of required off -street parking spaces shall be equal to the sum of the
requirements prescribed for each use.
F. Nonconforming parking and loading. Land uses and structures that are non-
conforming due solely to the lack of off - street parking or loading facilities required by this
Chapter, shall be subject to the provisions of Section 20.38.060 (Nonconforming
Parking).
20.40.040 -- Off- Street Parking Spaces Required
Off- street parking spaces shall be provided in compliance with Table 3.11, below. These
standards shall be considered the minimum required to preserve the public health, safety, and
welfare, and more extensive parking provisions may be required by the review authority in
particular circumstances. Unless otherwise noted parking requirements are calculated based on
gross floor area.
Industry
Small - 5,000 sq. ft. or less
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Large - Over 5,000 sq. ft.
1 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Industry, Marine Related
1 per 750 sq. ft.
Personal Storage (Mini Storage)
2 for resident manager, plus additional for office as
required by Minor Use Permit
Research and Development
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Warehousing and Storage 1 per 2,000 sq. ft., plus 1 per 350 sq. ft. for offices.
9 g nn; .,ren,....,.
Assembly /Meeting Facilities
1,000 sq. ft.
1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sq. ft. used for assembly
Commercial Recreation and Entertainment As required by Conditional Use Permit
Cultural Institutions 1 per 300 sq. ft.
Schools, Public and Private As required by Conditional /Minor Use Permit
Accessory Dwelling Units 1 per unit; a minimum of 2 covered per site.
Single -Unit Dwellings - Attached 2 per unit in a garage
Single -Unit Dwellings - Detached and less than
A nnn -- a -. n--- ---- - 2 per unit in a garage
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40 Off-Street Parking
Parking Spaces Required
Single -Unit Dwellings - etached andn S,Oed
3 per unit in a garage
sq are ft. or greater of floor area
Single -Unit Dwellings - Balboa Island
2 per unit in a garage
Mulb -Unit Dwellings - 3 units
2 per unit covered, plus guest parking;
1 - 2 units, no guest parking required
3 units, 1 guest parking space
Multi -Unit Dwellings - 4 units or more
2 per unit covered, plus 0.5 space per unit for guest
parking
Two -Unit Dwellings
2 per unit; 1 in a garage and 1 covered or in a garage
Livelwork units
2 per unit in a garage, plus 2 for guest/customer
parking
Senior Housing - market rate
1.2 per unit
Senior Housin - affordable
1 er unit
.-
Appliances, Building Materials, Home Electronics,
1 st 10,000 sq. ft. - 1 space per 300 sq. ft.
Furniture, Nurseries, and Similar Large Warehouse-
Over 10,000 sq. ft, - 1 space per 500 sq. ft.
type Retail Sales and Bulk Merchandise Facilities
Plus 1 per 1,000 s .ft. of outdoor merchandise areas
Food and Beverage Sales
1 per 200 sq. ft.
Marine Rentals and Sales
Boat Rentals and Sales
1 per 1,000 sq. ft. of lot area, plus 1 per 350 sq. ft of
Marine Retail Sales 1 per 25D sq. ft.
Retail Sales 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Shopping Centers 1 per 200 sq. ft.
See Section 20.40.050
Convalescent Facilities 1 per 3 beds or as required by Conditional Use Permit
Emergency Health Facilities f per 200 sq. ft.
Financial Institutions and Related Services 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Hospitals 1 per bed; plus 1 per resident doctor and 1 per
emDiovee.
Offices* - Business, Corporate, General,
Governmental
First 50,000 sq. ft.
Next 75,000 sq. ft.
Floor area above 125,001 sq. ft.
1 per 250 sq. ft. net floor area
1 per 300 sq. ft. net floor area
1 per 350 sq. ft. net floor area
* Not more than 20% medical office uses.
Offices - Medical and Dental Offices 1 1 Der 200 sq -ft-
Newnnrf Roach 7nninn Cnela Tifla 9A nPtnhor 9R 9n10
Off - Street
R�
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Adult -Oriented Businesses 1 per 1.5 occupants or
as required by Conditional Use Permit
Ambulance Services 1 1 Der 500 so. ft.: plus 2 storaqe spaces.
Animal Sales and Services
Animal Boarding /Kennels
1 per 400 sq. ft.
Animal Grooming
1 per 400 sq. ft.
Animal Hospitals /Clinics
1 per 400 sq. ft.
Animal Retail Sales
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Artists' Studios
1 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Catering Services
1 per 400 sq. ft.
Care Uses
Adult Day Care — Small (6 or fewer) Spaces required for dwelling unit only.
Adult Day Care -Large (7 or, more)
2 per site for drop -off and pick -up purposes (in addition
to the spaces required for the dwellin unit).
Child Day Care — Small (6 or fewer)
Spaces required for dwelling unit only.
Child Day Care - Large (9 to 14)
2 per site for drop -off and pick -up purposes (in addition
to the spaces required for the dwelling unit
Day Care - General
1 per 7 occupants based on maximum occupancy
late hours
allowed per license.
Residential Care - General (7 to 14)
1 per 3 beds
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Accessory (open to public)
I per each 3 seats or 1 per each 75 sq. ft. of net public
area., whichever is greater
Bars, Lounges, and Nightclubs
1 per each 4 persons based on allowed occupancy
load or as required by Conditional Use Permit
1 per 30 -50 sq. ft. of net public area, including outdoor
Food Service wfth/without alcohol, with /without
dining areas, but excluding the first 25% or 1,000 sq. ft
late hours
of outdoor dining area, whichever is less.
See Section *6-: 8 20, qO- 060
Food Service - Fast food
1 per 50 sq. ft., and 1 per 100 sq. ft. for outdoor dining
areas
Take -Out Service - Limited
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Emergency Shelter
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Funeral Homes and Mortuaries
1 per 35 sq. ft. of assembly area
Health /Fitness Facilities
Small - 2,000 sq. ft or less 1 per 250 sq. fL
Larqe - Over 2,000 sq. ft. 1 per 200 sq. ft.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Off - Street
Laboratories (medical, dental, and similar) 1 per 500 sq. ft
Maintenance and Repair Services 1 per 500 sq. ft.
Marine Services
Boat Storage - Dry
0.33 per storage space or as required by Conditional
Use Permit
Boat Yards
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Dry Docks
2 per dry dock
Entertainment and Excursion Services
1 per each 3 passengers and crew members
Marine Service Stations
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Sport Fishing Charters
1 per each 2 passengers and crew members
Water Transportation Services - Office
1 per 100 sq. ft., minimum 2 spaces
Personal Services
Massage Establishments
1 per 200 sq. ft. or as required by Conditional Use
Permit
Nail Salons
1 per 80 sq. ft.
Personal Services, General
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Studio (dance, music, and similar)
1 per 250 sq. Ft.
Postal Services
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Printing and Duplicating Services
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Recycling Facilities
Collection Facility - Large
4 spaces minimum, but more may be required by the
review authority
Collection Facility - Small
As required by the review authority
Visitor Accommodations
Bed and Breakfast Inns
1 per guest room, plus 2 spaces
Hotels and accessory uses
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Motels
1 per guest room or unit
Recreational Vehicle Parks
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Time Shares
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Communication Facilities 1 per 500 sq. ft..
Heliports and Helistops As required by Conditional use Permit
Marinas 0.75 per slip or 0.75 per 25 feet of mooring space
Office Only 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Limited 1 per 300 sq., ft., plus 1 per rental vehicle (not including
Newport Beach Zoning.Code, Title 20 October 26, 2010
Off-Street Parking 20.40
Vehicles for hire I 1 per 300 sq. ft., plus 1 per each vehicle associated
with the use and stored on the same site
Vehicle /Equipment Repair (General and Limited) I 1 Der 300 sa. ft. or 5 Der service bav whichever is more
Vehicle /Equipment Services
Automobile Washing
1 per 200 sq. ft. of office or lounge area; plus queue for
5 cars per washin station
Service Station
1 per 300 sq. ft. or 5 per service bay whichever is
more; minimum of 4
Service Station with Convenience Market
1 per 200 sq. ft., in addition to 5 per service bay
Vehicle Storage
1 per 500 sq. ft.
e -
Caretaker Residence
1 per unit
Special Events
As required by Municipal Code Chapter 11.03
Temporary Uses
As required by the Limited Term Permit in compliance
with Section 20.52.040
20.40.050 - Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers
A. An off - street parking space requirement of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross
floor area may be used for shopping centers meeting the following criteria.
1. The gross floor area of the shopping center does not exceed 100,000 square feet;
and
2. The gross floor area of all eating and drinking establishments does not exceed 15
percent of the gross floor area of the shopping center.
B. Individual tenants with a gross floor area of 10,000 square feet or more shall meet the
parking space requirement for the applicable use in compliance with Section 20.40.040
(Off- street Parking Spaces Required), above.
C. Shopping centers with a gross floor areas in excess of 100,000 square feet or with
eating and drinking establishments occupying more than 15 percent of the gross floor
area of the center shall use a parking requirement equal to the sum of the requirements
prescribed for each use in the shopping center.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Off- Street
20.40.060 — Parking Requirements for Food Service Uses
A. Establishment of parking requirement. The applicable review authority shall establish
the off - street parking requirement for food service uses within a range of one space for
each 30 to 50 square feet of net public area based upon the following considerations:
The physical design characteristics:
a. The gross floor area of the building or tenant space;
d. The number of tables or seats and their arrangement;
e. Other areas that should logically be excluded from the determination of
net public area;
f. The parking lot design, including the use of small car spaces, tandem and
valet parking and loading areas;
g. Availability of guest dock space for boats; and
h. Extent of outdoor dining.
2. Operational characteristics:
a. The amount of floor area devoted to live entertainment or dancing;
b. The amount of floor area devoted to the sale of alcoholic beverages;
C. The presence of pool tables, big screen televisions or other attractions;
d. The hours of operation; and
e. The expected turn over rate.
3. Location of the establishment:
a. In relation to other uses and the waterfront;
b. Availability of off -site parking nearby;
C. Amount of walk -in trade; and
Parking problems in the area at times of peak demand.
B. Conditions of approval. If during the review of the application, the review authority
uses any of the preceding considerations as a basis for establishing the parking
requirement, the substance of the considerations shall become conditions of the permit
application approval and a change to any of the conditions will require an amendment to
the permit application, which may be amended to establish parking requirements within
the range as noted above.
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 October26, 2010
APPENDIX I
Parking Covenant and Agreement
�R
PARKING AUTHORIZATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT
This PARKING AUTHORIZATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT (this
"License Agreement ") is made as of this April 13, 2011 by and between Ridgeway
Development Company (the "Licensee ") and Ampco System Parking (the "Licensor "),
pursuant to which Licensor grants Licensee the right to use certain parking spaces located
at 4100 Newport Place in Newport Beach, California (the "Parking Structure")-
1. PARKING SPACES: Licensor hereby grants to Licensee a license to use on a
nonexclusive basis, during the License Term (defined herein), up to SIXTEEN
(16) unreserved parking spaces in the parking structure (the "Parking Spaces ").
The location will be the top level of the parking structure.
2. LICENSE TERM: The term of this License Agreement (the "License Term ")
shall Commence on or about May 01, 2011 and will expire on April 30, 2012.
Upon Expiration of the Initial Term, the License Agreement shall continue on a
month-to -month basis subject to termination by either party upon by providing a
thirty (30) day written notice.
3. USE: The Parking Spaces are only to be used by the Licensee and its employees
and agents. Spaces are not intended for use by Licensee's visitors, invitees,
contractors, or subcontractors. Licensee acknowledges that the Parking Spaces
are only to be occupied by passenger vehicles.
4. LICENSE/PARKING FEE: For the Licensee Term, Licensee shall pay to
Ampco System Parking on a monthly basis $72.50 for each parking space
requested by Licensee and for which a keycard is issued by Licensor ( "Licensee
Spaces ") during any month. At Licensor's sole discretion, the monthly rate shall
be subject to adjustment upon expiration of the initial License Term. The total
parking used by Licensee will not exceed Sixteen (16) spaces. Licensee shall pay
Licensor, on or before the commencement date of the License Term, Licensee's
first (?) month's license /parking fee in an amount equal to $72.50 times the
number of Licensee Spaces
5. KEYCARD FEES: Licensee shall pay to Licensor, concurrently with the
commencement of the License Term, a non- refundable fee of Ten Dollars
($10.00) per keycard requested. Licensee acknowledges that it shall be charged a
Ten Dollar ($10.00) fee by Licensor for each new or replace keycard .
523
6. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY: Upon receipt of the keycards, Licensee
acknowledges that it shall be permitted to park one (1) vehicle within one (1)
unreserved parking space in the Parking Structure for each parking space leased
provided the use of all such Parking Spaces shall be at the risk of the Licensee.
Licensor does not assume care, custody, or control of any vehicle or its contents.
7. INDEMNIFICATION: Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Licensor and its partners and affiliated entities and their employees, partners,
directors, agents, representatives, and professional consultants and its and their
respective successors and assigns (collectively, the "Indemnities ") from and
against any loss, damage, injury, death, accident, fire of other casualty, liability,
claim, cost or expense (including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees) of
any kind or character to any person or property, including the property of the
Indemnities (collectively, the "Claims "), arising, in whole or in part, from or
relating to: (a) the use of the Parking Structure and the real property upon which
the Parking Structure is situated (the "Property ") by Licensee or its employees,
(b) any act or omission of Licensee or any of its employees relative to the
Property, (c) any bodily injury, property damage, accident, fire or other casualty
to or involving Licensee or its employees and its or their property on the Property,
(d) any loss of theft whatsoever of any property of anything placed or stored by
Licensee or its employees on or about the Property, (e) any breach by Licensee of
its obligation under this License Agreement, (f) any violation of any rule,
ordinance, regulation or law, and (h) any bodily injury or property damage
resulting from Licensee's access to the Property. In Addition to, and not in
limitation of, Licensor's other rights and remedies under this License Agreement,
should Licensee fail within thirty (30) days of written request from Licensor to
acknowledge its indemnity obligation and obligation to assume the defense of the
Indemnities from and against any Claim as provided in this Paragraph 7, then in
any such case Licensor may, at its option, pay any such Claim or settle or
discharge any action therefore or satisfy any judgment thereon, and all costs,
expenses and other sums incurred by Licensor in connection therewith (including
but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees) shall be maximum contract rate
permitted by law from the date incurred or paid until repaid and any default either
in such initial failure to pay or subsequent repayment to Licensor shall, at
Licensor's option, constitute a breach under this License Agreement. Except for
Licensor's sole negligence or willful misconduct.
8. RULES AND REGULATION: Licensee shall provide to Licensor the license
plate number or Vehicle Identification Number ( "VIN") and /or stock number of
any and all vehicles to be parked within the Parking Structure. The use of the
Parking Spaces shall be subject to the Parking Rules and Regulations contained in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and any other reasonable, non - discriminatory rules
and regulations adopted by Licensor and/or Licensor's parking operators from
time to time, including any system for controlled ingress and egress and charging
524
visitors and invitees, with appropriate provision for validation of such charges.
Licensee shall not use more parking privileges than its allotment and shall not use
any parking spaces specifically assigned by Licensor to tenants of the building
situated upon the Property (the "Building ") or the project or for such other uses as
visitor parking. Licensee's parking privileges shall be used only for parking by
vehicles no larger than normally sized passenger automobiles or pick -up trucks.
Licensee shall not permit or allow any vehicles that belong to or are controlled by
Licensee or Licensee's employees to be parked in areas other than those
designated by Licensor for such loading or unloading or unloading activities. If
Licensee permits or allows any of the prohibited activities described herein, then
Licensor shall have the right, without notice, in addition to such other rights and
remedies that it may have, to remove or tow away the vehicle involved and charge
the cost thereof Licensee, which cost shall be immediately payable by Licensee
upon demand by Licensor.
9. ASSIGNABILITY: This license is personal to Licensee and Licensee shall not
assign its rights under this License Agreement, whether voluntarily or by
operation of law, and Licensee shall not permit the use of the Parking Spaces, or
any part thereof, except in strict compliance with the provisions hereof, and any
attempt to do so shall be null and void.
10. GOVERMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF
LICENSEE: Licensee's use of the Parking Structure shall comply with all
applicable governmental ordinances, rules, laws, and regulations. All persons
who enter upon the Property pursuant to this License Agreement do so at their
own risk, and shall comply with any and all instructions and directions of
Licensor or Licensor's authorized representatives. Licensee shall not bring, store
or use any hazardous or toxic materials or substances on the Property.
11. GOVERNING LAW: The terms of this License Agreement shall be governed
by and construed according to the laws of the State of California.
12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence as to each term, provision,
condition and requirement contained in the License Agreement.
13. MISCELLANEOUS: This License Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and all prior and
contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties
hereto, oral or written, are herby superseded and merged herein. The headings of
this License Agreement are for purpose of reference only and shall not limit or
define the meaning of the provisions hereof. This License Agreement may be
1525
In
Date:
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all
of which shall constitute the same instrument. Neither this License Agreement
nor a short form memorandum or assignment hereof shall be filed or recorded in
any public office. Any attorneys' fees or other costs incurred in clearing such
cloud on title to the Property will be Licensee's sole cost and responsibility.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of these terms with your signature
below.
Ridgeway Development Company Ampco System Parking
Date:
1520
PARKING RULES AND REGULATIONS
In addition to the parking provisions contained in the License Agreement to which
this Exhibit "A" is attached, the following rules and regulations shall apply with respect
to the use of the Building's parking facilities.
1. Every parker is required to park and lock his/her own vehicle. All responsibility
for damage to or loss of vehicles is assumed by the parker and Licensor shall not
be responsible for any such damage or loss by water, fire, defective brakes, the
act or omissions of others, theft, or for any other cause.
2. Licensee shall not park any vehicles in the Parking Structure other than
automobiles, motorcycles, motor driven or non -motor driven bicycles or four
wheeled trucks.
Parking stickers, keycards or any other device or form of identification supplied
by Licensor as a condition of use of the parking facilities shall remain the
property of Licensor. The serial number of the parking identification device may
not be obliterated. Devices are not transferable and any device in the possession
of an unauthorized holder will be void.
4. Intentionally deleted
5. Vehicles must be parked entirely within painted stall lines of a single parking
stall.
6. All directional signs and arrows must be observed.
7. The speed limit within all parking areas shall be five (5) miles per hour.
8. Parking is prohibited: (a) in areas not striped for parking; (b) in aisles; (c) where
"no parking" signs are posted; (d) on ramps; (e) in cross - hatched areas; and (f) in
reserved spaces and in such other areas as may be designated by Licensor or
Licensor's parking operator.
9. Loss or theft of parking identification devices must be reported to the
management office immediately, and a lost or stolen report must be filed by the
Licensee or user of such parking identification device at that time. Licensor has
the right to exclude any vehicle from the parking facilities that does not have an
identification device.
1527
10. Any parking identification devices reported lost or stolen found on any
unauthorized car will be confiscated and the illegal holder will be subject to
prosecution.
11. Washing, waxing, cleaning, or servicing of any vehicle in any are not specifically
reserved for such purpose is prohibited.
12. The parking operators, managers or attendants are not authorized to make or
allow any exceptions to these rules and regulations.
13. Licensee's continued right to park in the parking facilities is conditioned upon
Licensee abiding by these rules and regulations and those contained in this
License Agreement.
14. Licensor reserves the right to establish and change parking fees, only in
accordance with Section 4 of the License Agreement, and to modify and /or adopt
such other reasonable and non - discriminatory rules and regulations for the
parking facilities as it deems necessary for the operation of the parking facilities,
and any violation of the rules shall subject the vehicle to removal, at such vehicle
owner's expense.
522
dhen *recorded Return Tot
the Newport Project
4101 MacArthur Blvd.
tiewport Beach, CA. 92660 '.'- :'; %;r; ;.G` r`'�; ZA11044371LC r 77
• At�i
RECIPROCAL PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this _ day of •� r :
1972, by. and between THE NEWPO T P 0 GT, a joint venture
composed of Emkay Development Company, Inc, and Atlas Realty.
Company (hereinafter called "The Newport Project "), and- EMKAY
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (hereinafter called "Emkay ").
;t 7 RECITALS
A. The Newport Project is the owner of Lot 4 of
I.y�/ jgJ1,`ti Track 7770, recorded in book 299, pages 15 -16 of Miscellaneous
Maps, Records of Orange County, outlined in red on the parcel
analysis attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated berein
by this reference (the "Development!'),
B. Concurrently with the recording of this Agree-
ment The_Newport Project is deeding to Emkay the portion of
the Development denominated Parcel 1 and outlined in green on
Exhibit "A." The ,Newport Project intends to deed to others
the portions of the Development delineated Parcels- 2 and 3,
outlined in yellow and in blue, respectively, on Exhibit "A."
C. The Newport Project and Emkay desire to establish
integrated.parkin facilities and Za dscaped areas in the
Development, and to provide for the maintenance of same,
for the benefit of all of the Development, and for the comrggn
use and benefit of the present and, future_ovmers and Lessees
of Parcels within the Development, all as more specifically
hereinafter set forth. , V. tz:n m t:IR'J" +T OF V
I tttcs c;a. s� li:ua� Gd.
f In U.- I.'.ML r: ' -6% OF
tCV:!: , CAW.
13SCtid l i•iii:' r !, 1972
LS+1::; C.i..G7LF, tacnry ��cnrGCr
PA2010.135 fur GP20.10.010 P02010 -007
4221 Dolphin 8hiker'Nay
R,dOeway Development ��q
KV ) 06,43 FwT77
associated facilities. Each of the Parcel owners, their
lessees, assigns and successors in interest, and their
respective employees and invitees,shall be entitled to
use the Common Areas, subject to such reasonable rules
and regulations relating to such'use as a majbritX of the
Parcel oc3ners may from time to time establish, including
validation requirements.
3. Improvement. Each Parcel owner, or its
successor in interest, shall, at its own expense, im- �P�rove,
those portions of the Common Parking Areas and Landscaped
Areas on its respective premises. Such work of improvement
shall be performed pursuant to plans and specifications
approved by Emkay and the Parcel owner.
fA." 4. Maintenance. From and after the Effectit,
Date as to the first restaurant to be constructe Em%a
•� � `, shall, subject to the directign 9-A majors of the Parcel
owners, operate, managa,,police, light, repair_ and maintain
the Common Areas.
S. Control. Subject to the.8irection of a
f` majority of the - Parcl o gr Emkay� hall at all times
during the Term hereof Lo_n.Lrol the automobile parking areas,
driveways, entrances and exits, landscaped.areaa, and the
sidewalks and pedestrian passageways within the Common Areas,
and may at any time and from time to time during the Term
hereof restrain any use or occupancy thereof except as autho-
rized by the rules and regulations for the use of such areas
established by a majority of the Parcel owners from time to
time. Emkay may temporarily close all or portions of the
Common Areas for repairs or alterations, to prevent a dedi-
cation thereof or the accrual of prescriptive rights therein,
-3-
1530
EfUr 10443 PuE779
(b) The proportionate share of the
Common Area costs of each Parcel owner shall be
as follows:
(i) Upon the Effective Date
as to the first owner to open for business,
such owner shall pay 100% of the cost of
maintaining and operating the Common Areas
located on such party's Parcel.
(ii) Upon the Effective Date.as
to the second owner to open for business,
the two owners so opened shall share the
cos L- of operating and maintaining the
Common Areas located on their two Parcels,
in the proportion which the respective
gross square footages of their two Parcels
bear`to each other.
(iii) Upon the Effective Date as
to the third owner to open for business,
and for the balance of the Term, the three
Parcel owners shall share the cost of op-
erating and maintaining all of the Common
Areas located in the Development in the
following percentages:
Owner of Parcel 1 38%
Owner of Parcel 2 25%
Owner of Parcel 3 37%
(c) Prior to the commencement of�eech
calendar period of six (6,),_months_during the Term,
Emkay shall give each Parcel owner a written
-5-
1531
e;tr 1 C4 43 rlri jBa
estimate of their respective shares of such Common
Area costs for.the ensuing six (6) month period. Such
estimated amount shall not exceed 110% of the actual
share of such Parcel owner for the then current six (6)
month period. Each Parcel owner shall pay such esti-
mated amount to Emkay in equal, monthly- indtallments,,
in _advance. Within ninety (90) days after the end of
each such six (6) month period, Emkay shall furnish to
each Parcel owner a statement showing in reasonable
detail the costs and expenses incurred by Emkay
for the operation and maintenance of the Common Areas
during such period, and each Parcel owner shall promptly
make any payment or allowance necessary to adjust each
such party's estimated payment to such party's actual
proportionate share of Common Area costs as shown by
=such annual statement.
7. Enforcement of Assessments,
(a) Failure to pay the estimated share
of Common Area cost or any installment thereof, in-
cluding any semi - annual adjustment, promptly and in
any event within ten (10) days after written notice
from Emkay of nonpayment, shall constitute a delin-
quency and default with respect to the Parcel to
which such share relates. A majori Parcel
owners i9,authoriznd..and empowered, t4„oceed in
the event of any such default to collect each such
delinquent individual assessment, together with
interest upon the unpaid amount thereof at ten
percent (10%) per annum from the date of such
notice, until the same is fully paid, together
-6-
15S2
But I CAM PG«781.
with recording fees, title costs, court costs,
and reasonable attorney's fees.
(b) If and whenever a default occurs,
as provided above, the non - defaulting Parcel owners
shall be entitled to alien against the Parcel to
which such default relates, for' the unpaid amount
of such share of Common Area costs and the cost
and expenses described above. In.the event of
any such default, then any non - defaulting Parcel
owner may file for record in the office of the
County Recorder of Orange County, California, a
claim of lien, which shall contain at least:
(i) A statement of the unpaid,
amount of the share of Common Area cost;
(ii) A description sufficient for
identification of the Parcel to'which the
default relates; and
(iii) The name of the owner or
reputed owner of the property described
in (ii) above.
Such claim of lien shall be effective to establish
a lien against the real property described in such
claim, in the amount specified therein, together
with interest at ten percent (10 %) per annum from
the date of notice of nonpayment; together with
recording fees and reasonable costs of any title
search or title policy before or after made or
obtained in connection with such claim of lien or
the foreclosure of the claim of lien, together
with court costs and reasonable attorney's fees
which may accrue in the enforcement of such lien.
-7-
533
ar 10443 FwN?
(c) Such lien, when so established
against the real property described in said claim,.
shall be prior and superior to any right, title, in-
terest, lien, or claim which may be or may have been
acquired in or attached to said real property sub-
sequent to the time of filing such claim, except that
such lien' shall in any event be' subordinate to the lien
of any bona fide first trust deed upon such property.
Such lien shall be for the use and benefit of the non-
defaulting Parcel owners and may be enforced and fore-
closed in a suit or action brought by any one or more
of them in any court of competent jurisdiction', if
brought within one year of the filing of such claim,
in the same manner as if the amount of such lien had
been evidenced by the promissory note of the person or
persons who on the date of notice of nonpayment were the
fee owners of the property. subjected to such lien, and
as if such note were secured by a real estate mortgage
upon said real property duly executed by the fee owners
of such property as of the time of recording and
duly recorded 'at 'the time such claim was filed for
record. In any such suit or action the plaintiffs
shall be entitled to a personal judgment in the full
amount of such lien against each person who was such
fee owner on such date of notice of nonpayment. The
net amount received on account of such Lien or from any
judgment with respect to such lien, if received after
the close of the year for which such share was due, shall
be applied against the non - defaulting Parcel owners'
current shares of Common Area costs, until fully expended.
M
1534
8. Binding Upon Successors. This AgTe4ment phall,
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the . p,z�ties.'and
their respective successors, assigns, lessees "d ,sublessees
Upon transfer of the fee title to any Parcel to aj6uccA-ssar
which assumes in writing the obligations impbsed'bry this_
ti . o , as
transferor shall be
all
9. Parag aph Headings. The paragraph headings
used herein are for reference only, and shall not enter
into the interpretation of this Agreement.
EXECUTED this 19 th day of October 1972.
61V
ey
VL
r
EMAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
By
BY
THE NEWPORT PROJECT,
By EMICAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC,
A.4
B 4��.
By ATLAS REALTY COMPANY
By.
By
1555
STATE OF .,•,XA.q,.
COUNTY OF HARRIS
On this 19th day of October , 19_12 , before me; the
undersigned, a Notary Public for said County and State, personally
appeared L. 0. Benson and W. J. Perry, Jr.
known to me to be the vice president and assistant secretary
respectively of Atlas Realty Company
the corporation that executed the within instrument, said persons
being known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument
on behalf of said corporation,- said corporation being known to me to
be one-of the Joint venturers of The Newport Project
the joint venture that executed the within instrument, and acknow-
ledged to me that such corporation executed the same both individually
and as joint venturer of said joint venture and that such toint.venture
also executed the same.
Name Typed or r n. ed
Notary Public in and for said
County and State
My commission expires 6/1173
C
k
V
O
C:
J5s o
181.:149743
accom"
MOXIMF *Mow
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
LATHAN 6 WATKINS
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 -2466
Attn: J. K. Hachigian i $19.00
C6
a ooufrrv, Al
•3HPM MRI5'86
`* a ✓.i"'.4 �
COVENANT AND AGREEMENT
REGARDING MAINTENANCE OF OFF - STREET
PARKING SPACE AFFECTING
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOR 450 PAGE 23 AND
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOK 183 PAGES 14 THROUGH 15 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PA2010 -135 for GP2010 -010 PD2010 -007
4221 Dolphin Striker Way
Ridgeway Development J5s:7
86:.149743
THIS COVENANT AND AGREEMENT FOR OFF +STREET PARKING
SPACE (the "Agreement ") is made as of January 14, 1986,
between STUART MITCHELL KETCHUM, JR. ( "Ketchum ") and THE
DEVIL'S TRIANGLE PARTNERSHIP, a California general partner-
ship ( "Devil's Triangle "), Ketchum owns the property si-
tuated in the State of California, County of Orange, City of
Newport Beach described as follows
Parcel 1 of Parcel Hap 83 -705 as per map
filed in book 183, pages 14 and 15 of
Parcel Maps in the Offica of the Recor-
der of said County (hereinafter the
"Continental Property ") I
and Devil's Triangle owns the adjoining property described
as follows:
Parcel 1 as shown on a Parcel Map filed
in book 45, page 23 of Parcel Mape in
the Office of the Recorder of said
County (hereinafter the "E1 Torito Pro-
perty').
RECITAL
The Planning Co:mnission of the City of Newport
Beach, California (the "City ") has approved, subject to
certain conditions, Devil's Triangle's request to allow the
use of an existingg open courtyard for dining and drinking
purposes in the'El Torito Restaurant (located on the E1
for additional automobile parking spaces be established to
run with the Continental Property for the benefit of the El
Torito Property, and another condition requires a grant of
an easement for and the construction of a sidewalk linking
the covenanted parking spaces on the Continental Property to
the El Torito Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to
satisfy said conditions.
ARTICLE 1. COVENANT AND EASEMENT
Section 1.1 - GRANT OF COVENANT. The owner of the
U0n_fl—n_e_n_t_aT Property hereby covenants and agrees to provide
on the Continental Propertyy for the benefit of the E1
Torito Prop arty, sixteen ,9) automobile parking spaces
together with a nonexclusive easement for access to, ingress
to, egress from, and use and enjoyment of the parking spaces
for (i) passage of vehicles, (ii) passage of pedestrian
traffic, and (iii) other uses incidental to such passages
1532
86:14943
reserving, however, in favor of the owner of the Continental
Property, all riyghatts of access to, ingress to, agrees from
a and a
inconsistent with the parking rights granted herein.
Section 1.2 - GRANT OF EASEMENT. The owner of the Cos-
-t nentTproperty hereby grants a nonexclusive easement for
the passage of pedestrian traffic, and other uses incidental
to such passage, over the Continental Property from the
rito Prop overosuchnportiongoftthe Continental B1
C
Ptoperty as the owner thereof Shall reasonably designate.
The owner of the E1 Torito Property shall have the right,
withheld, to construct a sidewalk along the easement route.
Such sidewalk Shall be constructed and maintained at the
sole expense of the owner of the E1 Torito Pro arty. The
owner of the Continental Property ahall have tha right, at
its sole expense and subject to the approval of the owner of
the E1 Torito Property, which such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld, to relocate the easement and
reconstruct a sidewalk along the relocated easement route.
Section 1.3 - TEMPORARY LOSS OF PARKING SPACES. The owner
- t e ontinental Property Shall have the right from time
to time, in order to accomodate construction or other
activities on the Continental Property, to temporarily
relocate some or all of the covenanted parking spaces to an
off -site location (not on the Continental Property) which,
under the then - present circumstances, will enable the owner
of the E1 Torito Pro pp arty to use the same with as little
inconvenience to auch owner as is practicable under the
circumstances.
Section 1.4 - PARKING CHARGES. The owner of the Continental
xoperty a all have the right to assess and collect from any
person parking on the spaces covenanted in Section 1.1 a
parking fee in the amount as follows!
(a) As long as such parking spaces are
surface parking the fas shall be
FORTY DOLLARS (,640) per month per
space.
(b) if the parking spaces are located
off -site on an interim basis pur-
suant to Section 1.3, the fee Shall
be an amount necessary to reimburse
2
X39
as =149743
the owner of the Continental Pro -
party for its costs of providing
each such interim parking space.
(c) if the parking spaces are located
within a parking structure the fee
shall be the greater of M EIGHTY
DOLLARS ($80) per month por space
or (it) the Chan - prevailing rate
for such parking.
ARTICLE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 2.1 - TERM. This covenant and easement shall con -
t nua n e feat until such time as the El Torito Property is
no longer used as a restaurant. At the expiration of such
term, the owner of the E1 Torito Property shall provide to
the owner of the Continental Property a quitcleft deed or
other documents necessary to eliminate of record the cove-
nant and easement established by this Agreement.
Section 2.2 - COVENANTS To RUN WITH LAND. The covenants and
easements established herein are for the benefit of the E1
Torito Property and are intended to be and shall be con -
atrued as covenants running with the Continental Property
and equitable servitudes upon the Continental Property and
every part thereof. Furthermore, each and all of such
covenants and easements shall be binding upon and burden,
and shall inure to the benefit of, all pperoons having or
acquiring any right, title or interest mth oeither
Continntal
Property, the El Torito Property or any p a
thereof, and their respective successors and assigns, all
upon the terms, provisions and conditions set forth herein.
Section 2.3 - GENERAL INTERPRETATION
(a) If any term, provision or condition contained in this
Agreement (or the application of any such term, provision or
condition) shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable,
the remainder of this Agreement shall be valid and enforce-
able to the 'fullest extent permitted by law.
(b) When the context in which words are used herein indi-
cates that ouch is the intent, words in the singular number
shall include the plural and vice versa. All pronouns and
any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to all ggen-
ders, and the term "person" shall include natural indivi-
duala, corporations, partuarabipe, unincorporated organiza-
tions, associations, trusts, estates and all other forme of
3
MI
86:149743
entities. The captions of the Articles and Sections herein
are for convenience of reference only and shall not be con-
sidered or referred to in resolving questions of interpre-
tation or construction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ketchum and Aevil'e Triangle
have executed this instrument as of the day and year first
above written.
jARLL"RETC110t1;-
THE, OBV"ate QLE P E HIP
Byi
tuart
as a general partner
By% SANTA ASSOCIATES, a California
limited partnership, as
general p rtnnq
gy L(/
uar etc um, to
sole general partner
541
66=149743
STATE OF CALIFOAN A 1
COUNTY OF Lf.L� A f 81
On ' ' fG before roe, the undeni ed, s Noa mobile in and for
said State, personally appeared
- , personally known to me of
proved to me on the basis of sathfaetory evidence to be
the pemn —whose name iS subscribed to the
within instrument and acknowledged that -.&A— exe
cured the same.
WffNBSS mA landdoffidalscaL
Simtaturo -
efl f
ffhb area far off kW ooutol wd)
1542
66:149743
STATIC OPCALIPORNIA
COUNTY OF LOS NLAUA -S
On ^ - yP.'• n7 A -- .?(on Mn p! undersigned, a Nottry Public In end for
Sigeltum
V known to me or
to+y evidence to be
Rhin Instrument u
of the putnershlP
and acknowledged
••
theame.
1_
..
I � RTiKfxAwa[,p:.i�w :, L^SJ J
etelt mster -mm omho wdl
1543
IB i 49743
STATE OR CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF I ne. /1.F�.� S3.
On let�- Ware me, the under ed, a Na
"Id Sone, peMnaUy appearM iuRKY .M. tuy FubUc In end for
M$011 Sy known to me or Plead to me on the hat6 of radtkctoryeddeam robe the petton,:,yvho execatbd
the within lntttumentat.Spr.E�K.IEAAr Av..el..a..:.._....._� V.-. �— I
hih wit "�Pi 'e ;1 " iL�3' ° 1°teibtnt atme on r
Ufd a. LF .•,...:.:. r +t.
—.tHrP ...,� i.r3 C.
WITNESSMY1p�dandopp esewtebthrrame, thae - .. •.
WITMESSmyh dand efOeW tell. �'• ,; �;: i.•1 r.ti cam v
22 �+•: `• arlvgar,.anr.pu�tar,7.17ea3
G. _. .
S)$netnte _
ltbauet foromtlt oetuW «eq
COVERN M CODE 27361.7
certify under penalty of att by that the notaty sea] on the document
to eOf this statement 3s attache reads as follows:
dame of xotar. .. Lt Y&Mi ^(�.
data [oa:Fs: ion kxrires �1,�. � l ��••
:ountl/-t,here bond is s
F'1
_.� Date 15 EL (e
Attachment No. PC 7
Reciprocal Parking & Maintenance
Agreement for Existing Off -Site Parking
545
�4 �
, ,-hen ' recorded Return To,
rhe. Newport Project
4101 MacArthur Blvd. ii Li j) -y
Newport Beach, 6A. 92660 .10j�,43P1,((.715
Bfi
RECIPROCAL PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this _�91,7 day of •� ..: -,, %L'
1972, by.and between THE NE1.7PORT PRO CT, a joint venture
composed of Emkay Development Company, Inc, and Atlas Realty-
company (hereinafter called "The Newport Project "), and EMKAY
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. ( hereinafter called "Emkay").
L RECITALS
A, The Newport Project is the owner of Lot 4 of
Track 7770, recorded in book 299, pages 15 -16 of Miscellaneous
I �)Lir'(y Maps, Records of Orange County, outlined in red on the parcel
!) \ analysis attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein
by this reference (the °Development'•').
B. Concurrently with the recording of this Agree -
ment The Newport Project is deeding to Emkay the portion of
the Development denominated Parcel 1 and outlined in green on
Exhibit "A," The ,Newport Project intends to deed to others
the portions of the Development delineated Parcels-2 and 3,
outlined in yellow and in blue, respectively, on Exhibit "A."
C. The Newport Project and Emkay desire to establish
integrated parking facilities and l.andscape_d areas in the
Development, and to provide for the maintenance of same,
for the benefit of all of the Development, and for the co_mQn
use and benefit _of_ the present .and ,_£uture_ owners and lessees
of Parcels within the Development, all as more specifically
hereinafter set forth. RL�COgOED AT fit'WIEST OF f
Itf t' ?:'I; :AL f,:':!aJs OF i
3.SC re,} f`t0Y ,1972
1. K1St }: i.J,10.'StY, Cu�nry R�smi:r
PA2010 -135 for GP2010 -010 PD2010.007
4221 Dolphin Striker f,'/ay
Ridgeway Developmenl �� L�
AGREEMENT .W.F. 1 0443 pl(( 776
In consideration of the foregoing recitals, the
mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, and the mutual
benefits to be derived by each of the parties therefrom,
it is hereby agreed among the parties as follows;'
1. Definitions,
(a) The "Term" of this Agreement shall commence
on'the date hereof and continue until terminated by
agWk7eement among a ma ority o£ the o -ane�s of the Parcels
in the Development or their respective successors in
:Y
Interest.
'(b) The "Effective Date" of this Agreement
shall be, as to each of the respective Parcels, the
first to occur of the opening for business of the
restaurant to be constructed on such Parcel or
thirty (30) days following the recording of a notice
of completion of the restaurant to be constructed on
such Parcel',
(c) "Common Areas" shall mean those portions
of the Development designated by shading on Exhibit
"A," being composed of Conupgn_,Parking „areas and
Common Landscaped Areas.
2. Use of Common Areas, The Newport Project and Emkay
i
each hereby grant to the other reciprocal easements for
parking purposes and ingress and egress over, across and
upon the Common Areas located upon their respective parcels.
No building or structure shall be erected or maintained
upon the Common Areas other than parking and landscaping
areas and related sidewalks; walkways, lighting and similar
_2-
54 2
E.c.r i Ot.4 3 Fata777
associated facilities. Each of the Parcel owners, their`
lessees, assigns and successors in interest, and their'
respective employees and invitees shall be entitled to
use the Common Areas, subject to such reasonable rules
and regulations relating to such 'use as a majority of the
Parcel owners may from time to time,establish, including
validation requirements,
3. Tmerovement, Each Parcel ormer, or its
successor in interest, shall, at its own expense,. improve
those portions of the Common Parking Areas and landscaped.
Areas on its respective premises. Such work of improvement
shall be performed pursuant to plans and specifications
approved by Emkay and the Parcel owner.
4. Maintenance. From and after. the Effective.
Date as to the first restaurant to be constructe EffiO
sh211, subject to the direct Lo
-n—Qf nip
jor� of the Parcel
owners o�p2rate, mana e olive light, repair and maintain
the Common Areas. ;;•
e 'L. 5. Control. Subject to the.4ir ction of a
majority
of the Par__rcel oc• rs Gmka shall at all times
J Y....._ .. ?'lg Y�
during the Term hereof govt o the automobile parking areas,
driveways, entrances and exits, landscaped. areas, and the
sidewalks and pedestrian passageways within the Common Areas,
and may at any time and from time to time during the Term
hereof restrain any use or occupancy thereof except as autho-
rized by the rules and regulations for the use of such areas
established by a majority of the Parcel owners from time to
time. Emkay may temporarily close all or portions of the
Common Areas for repairs or alterat,•ions, to prevent a dedi-
cation thereof or the accrual of prescriptive rights therein,
-3-
549
I
£;'F 10443 Pitt 778
or for any other reason deemed sufficient by Emkay. The
rights of each of the parties and their successors in
interest in and to the Commoh Areas shall at all times be
nonexclusive and subject 'to the rights of other parties
and their successors in interest from time to time authorized
to use the Common Areas on a nonexclusive basis.
owners. In no event shall any cost or expense
relating to the buildings in the Development be
included in the cost of operation of the Common
Areas.
N
..q..
- 550
6. Costs and Expenses,
s
(a) Eac Parcel owner shat_ 1 pay to
Emkn the manner and at the time provided below,
such party's propoxtionat� earea, as .defined belw,
of all costs and expenses incurred b'y Emkav for the
.operation and maintenance of the Common Areas. Such
costs and expenses shall include, without limiting
the generality of the foregoing, gardening, land-
scaping, cost of public liability, property damage,
r
vandalism and malicious mischief, and other insurance,
j repairs, painting, lighting, cleaning, trash removal,
depreciation of equipment, fire protection, and similar
items, and an amount equal to ten percent
all such costs and expesQr9_cover Emkay's admin-
..
istrative
istrative and overhead eZPenses. It is intended and
agreed that all. taxes and assessments by public
authority relating to real property or the ownership
thereof, including the real property comprising the
Common Areas, shall be paid by the respective Parcel
owners. In no event shall any cost or expense
relating to the buildings in the Development be
included in the cost of operation of the Common
Areas.
N
..q..
- 550
O443 paiRq
(b) The proportionate share of the
Common Area costs of each Parcel owner shall be
as follows:
(i) Upon the Effective Date
as to the first owner to open for business,
such owner shall pay 1.00% of the cost of
maintaining and operating the Common Areas
located on Such party's Parcel,
(ii) Upon the Effective Daee,as
to the second owner to open, for business,
the two owners so opened shall share the
cost of operating and maintaining the
Common Areas located on their two Parcels,
in the proportion which the respective ,
gross square footag'es of their. two Parcels
bear'to each other,
(iii) Upon the Effective Date as
to the third owner to open for business,
and for the balance of the Term, the three
Parcel owners shall share the cost of op-
crating and maintaining all of the Common
Areas located in the Development in the
.Eollowing percentages:
Owner of Parcel 1 38%
Owner of Parcel 2 25%
Owner of Parcel 3
(c) Prior to the commencement of e,C
calendar period of six (6,)._monehs_ during the Term,
Emkay shall give each Parcel owner a written
i•
I
-5-
i
10443r�([r80
estimate of their respective shares of such Common
Area costs for the ensuing six (6) month period, Such
estimated amount shall not exceed 110% of the actual'
share of such Parcel owner for the then current six (6)
month period. Each Parcel owner shall pay such esti-
mated amount to Emkay in_equal monthly installments
in advance. Within ninety (90) days after the end of
each such six (6) month period, Emkay shall furnish to
each Parcel owner a statement showing in.reasonabl.e
detail the costs and expenses incurred by Emkay
for the operation and maintenance of the Common Areas
during such period, and each Parcel owner shall promptly
make any payment or allowance necessary to adjust each
such party's estimated payment to such party's actual
proportionate share of Common Axea costs as shown by
such annual statement.
7. Enforcement of Assessments.
(a) Failure to pay the estimated share
of Common Area cost or any installment thereof, in-
cluding any semi - annual adjustment, promptly and in
any event within ten (10) days after written notice
from Emkay of nonpayment, shall constitute a delin-
quency and default with respect to the Parcel to
which such share relates, A majority of the Parcel
owners is, authorize ,.and em�o�gexea 2xoceed in
the event: of any such default to collect each such
delinquent individual assessment, together witli
interest upon the unpaid amount thereof at ten
percent (10 %) per annum from the date of such
notice, until the same is fully paid, together
-6-
v-v 10443 PALT8 1,
with recording fees, title costs, court costs,
and reasonable attorney's fees,
(b) If and whenever a default occurs,.
as provided above, the non - defaulting Parcel owners
shall be entitled to a lien against the Parcel to
which such default relates, for'the unpaid amount
of such share of Common Area costs and the cost
and expenses described above. In.the event of
any such default, then any non - defaulting Parcel
owner may file for record in the office of the
County Recorder of orange County, California, a
claim of lien, which shall contain at least;'
(l.) A statement of the unpaid.
amount of the share of Common Area cost;
(ii) A description sufficient for
identification of the Parcel to which the
default relates; and
(iii) The name of the owner, or
reputed owner of the property described
in (ii) above.
Such claim of lien shall be effective to establish .
a lien against the real property described in such
claim, in the amount specified therein, together
with interest at ten percent (10 %) per annum from
the date of, notice of nonpayment, together with
recording fees and reasonable costs of any title
search or title policy before or after made or
obtained in connection with such claim of lien or
the foreclosure of the claim of lien, together
with court costs and reasonable attorney's fees
which may accrue in the enforcement of such lien,
-7-
J�JT�
E v:104113 FwM?
(c) Such lien, when so established
against the zeal property described in said claim,•
shall be prior and superior to any right, title, in-
terest, lien, or claim which may be or may have been
acquired in or attached to said real property sub-
sequent to the time of.filing such claim, except: that
such lien'shall in any event be' subordinate to the lien
of any bona fide first trust deed upon such property.
Such lien shall be for the use and benefit of the non-
defaulting Parcel owners and may be enforced and fore-
closed in a suit or action brought by any one or more
of them in any court of competent jurisdiction, if '
brought within one year of the filing of such claim,
in the same manner as if the amount of such lien had
been evidenced by the promissory note of the person or
persons who on the date of notice of nonpayment wiere the
fee owners of the property subjected to such lien, and
as if such note were secured by a real estate mortgage
upon said real property duly executed by the fee owners
of such property as of the time o£ recording and
duly recorded 'at 'the 'time such claim was filed for
record. In any such suit or action the plaintiffs
shall be entitled to a personal judgment in the full
amount of such lien against each person who was such
-fee owner on such date of notice of nonpayment. The
net amount received on account of such lien or from any
judgment with respect to such lien, if received after
the close of the year for which such share was due, shall
be applied against the non - defaulting Parcel owners'
current shares of Common Area costs, until fully expended,
10443 783
S, Binding Upon Successors. This Agreement shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and
their respective successors, assigns, lessees and sublessees,
Upon transfer of the fee title to any Parcel. to a successor
which assumes in writing the obligations impdsed,by this.
Agreement, the transferor shall be relieved from all obliga-
tions accruing hereunder subsequent to the _date of transfer.
9. Paragraph Headings, The paragraph headings
used herein are for reference only, and shall not enter
into the interpretation of this Agreement.
EXECUTED this 19th day of October , 1972.
-e
07"A414' s;�H7ley
r
EMKAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
x% �J /
THE NEWPORT PROJECT.
By EM[AY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
By
By
By ATLAS REALTY COMPANY
By /%;/
STATE OF CALIFORNIA oft) 10443PHfLry
COtf,Wy OF ORANGE / C�4
On 'this 19th day of October 1972 before me, the undersigned, a t(otary
Public for said County and State, personally appeared Robezt A; Alleborn
and Edward J. Ruwaldt known to me to be the president
slid 'vice - president respectively of
Emkay Development CO,j Inc.
the corporation that executed-the within instyument, said persons being known to me
to be the persons who executed the within instrument'on behalf of said corporation,
said corporation being known to be to be one of the joint *venturers of
TJIE NEWPORT PROJECT.
the joint venture that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
such corporation executed the same both individually and as joint venturer of said
joint venture and that such joint venture also executed the same,
(SEAL). Virginia M. White /
Name (Typed or Printed)
Notary Public in and for 104id County and State
STATE OF CALIFORNIA'
COUNTY Or ..... ..O]C,an a S5.
On..00'tObeT, ,,,14th,,_ „1 $, 7, ;,,,,,,,, before tic, Ilse ondersigucd, a Notnry Puilic in and for said Slate, personally appeared
R, A. ,rllleborn known to nit to bo Iht..'.`.T.,:1,C:5:..7...`.'. �. Prc.•ideut, and.... ) P. 6�4 /.a,rSl .... S.. .... RUV.td1C1C,
known to mo l0 5e Ihe.,. ,vice,_ presiden„�,�Nnry of Ilia Cospornuon that excorkd the Millin InSlpmlenl, known to me to
be the persons who executed the within Instrument on behalf of the Corporation fhcrein naincd, and acknowledged to nm that such
Corporation executed the name, and acknowledged to me that auch Corporation executed f is within Instrument pursuant to Its by
lam or a resolution of Its board of director,.
WITNESS my hand And official seal. i'f� - y�� 4• f ��
(Not !..... Public's
(Seal) �• (Notary Pubilei S¢naturc) ,
virgxnia M, White .
�Tyjed tlr Printrdy W
Notary Public In and for said Slate
,soy
situ atll} nue n rary«oih„N,i.dA Mir».hd,naM
f,
STATE OF .,41S,. .
COUNTY of HARRIS
On this 1901 day of October , 19 72 , before me ] the
undersigned, a Notary Public for said County and State, personally
appeared L. 0. Jbenson and W. J. Perry, Jr.
known to me to be the vice president and assistant secretary
respectively of Atlas Realty Company '
the corporation that executed the within instrument, said persons
being known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument
on behalf of said corporation,- said corporation being known to me to
bo, one,of the joint venturers of The Newport Proiect '
the joint venture that executed the within instrument, and acknow-
ledged to me that such corporation executed the same both individually
and as joint venturer of said joint venture and that such joint•venture
also executed the same.
(SEAL)
'Name, .a'�f �� 2 Typed or r= Yn
,tled)
Notary Public in and for said
County and State
My commission expires 6/1/73
1557
C
k
V
O
U
V �.�.� -JCrfl „IJ S�'F3C Jl!!hJ- _ _ _•
•� _ ;*
-y
PARCEL 2
xS
�13 �I—'( ` {. Oil I I i I
_�_.L 1_...L1__f_i.s __.rry,� _
f 11'l:I f 1 t'-a;:!,i; -� E j 1 -� �p'
'€ ` 1 {:!, re - {'{ {�:l {•'1.17 ! i.! /`
I 11F
PARCEL 2 . !_ ��4J It .i- 1 . I'�{ (I =��s• J I- 1 -t I s. /J PARCEL
48263 SO. 'IT F1i395Q.F7,. Q
• J+ / /,// NGY I, IF �I. JO FP %'% > ^�,,(r % 7� 1 ewer• "I•
irJ��Ju- JirGf; B.ryl� I
�€ l
66.149743
46AIFF1F0 �
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN T0s
LATHAM 6 WATKINS
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 -2466
Attn: J. K. Hachigian $iBrUO
CB
0"MWODUMY.CAIWORM
•s HPm Aral5'88
COVENANT AND AGREEMENT
REGARDING MAINTENANCE OF OFF- STREET
PARKING SPACE AFFECTING
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOK 45, PAGE 23 AND
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOK 183 PAGES 14 THROUGH 15 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PA2010 -135 for GP2010.010 PD2010.007
4221 Dolphin Striker Way
Ridgeway Development J�J�9
86.-4149743
THIS COVENANT AND AGREEMENT FOR OFF,STRERT PARKING
SPACE (the "Agreement ") is made as of January 14, 1986,
between STUART MITCHELL KETCHUM, JR. ( "Ketchum ") and THE
DEVIL'S TRIANGLE PARTNERSHIP, a California general partner-
ship ( "Devil's Triangle "). Ketchum owns the property si-
tuated in the State of California, County of Orange, City of
Newport Beach described as follows$
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 83 -705 as per map
filed in book 183, pages 14 and 15 of
Parcel Maps in the Office of the Recor-
der of said County (hereinafter the
"Continental Property ") I
and Devil's Triangle owns the adjoining property described
as followa$
Parcel 1 as shown on a Parcel Map filed
in book 45, page 23 of Parcel Maps in
the Office o£ the Recorder of said
Counter (hereinafter the "E1 Torito Pro-
perty') .
RECITAL
The Planning Commission of the City of Newport
Beach, California (the "City ") has approved, subject to
certain conditions , Devil's Triangle'a request to allow the
use of an existing open courtyard for dining and drinking
purposes in the El Torito Restaurant (located on the E1
Torito Property). One condition requires that it covenant
for additional automobile parking spaces be establishad to
run with the Continental Property for the benefit of the El
Torito Property, and another condition requires a grant of
an easement for and the construction of a sidewalk linking
the covenanted parking spaces on the Continental Property to
the El Torito Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to
satisfy said conditions.
ARTICLE 1. COVENANT AND EASEMENT
Section 1.1 - GRANT OF COVENANT. The owner of the
onnenta'I' Property hereby covenants and agrees to provide
on the Continental Property for the benefit of the E1
Torito Property, sixteen (1A) automobile parking spaces
together with a nonexclusive easement for access to, ingress
to, egress from, and use and enjoyment of the parking spaces
for (i) passage of vehicles, (ii) passage of pedestrian
traffic, and (iii) other uses incidental to such passages
1500
86-0149743
reserving,_ however, in favor of the owner of the Continental
Property, all rights of access to, ingress to, agresa from
and use and enjoyment of the parking spaces not otherwise
inconsistent with the parking rights granted herein.
Section 1,2 - GRANT OF EASEMENT. The owner of the Con-
tinentAl Pr oparty hereby grants a nonexclusive easement for
the passage of pedestrian traffic, and other uses incidental
to such passage, over the Continental Property from the
parking spaces, as covenanted in Section 1.1, to the El
Torito Property over such portion of the Continental
Property as the owner thereof shall reasonably designate.
The owner of the El Torito Property shall have the right,
after obtaining the approval of the Continental Property
owner, which such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, to construct a sidewalk along the easement route.
Such sidewalk shall be constructed and maintained at the
sole expense of the owner of the E1 Torito Property. The
owner of the Continental Property shall have the right, at
its sole expense and subject to the approval of the owner of
the El Torl.to Property, which such approval shall not be
unreasonably withhold, to relocate the easement and
reconstruct a sidewalk along the relocated easement routs.
Section 1.3 - TEMPORARY LOSS OF PARKING SPACES, The owner
o t e ontinental Property shall have the right from time
to time, in order to accomodate construction or other
activities on the Continental Property, to temporarily
relocate some or all of the covenanted parking spaces to an
off -site location (not on the Continental Property) which,
under the then - present circumstances, will enable the owner
of the El Torito Property to use the same with as little
inconvenience to such owner as is practicable under the
circumstances.
Section 1,4 - PARKING CHARGES. The owner of the Continental
Propparty aKall have the right to assess and collect from any
person parking on the spaces eovenanted in Section 1,1 a
perking fee in the amount as followat
(a) As long as such parking spaces are
surface parking the fee shall be
FORTY DOLLARS ( 640) per month per
apace.
(b) If the parking spaces are located
off-site on an interim basis pur-
suant to Section 1.3, the fee shall
be an amount necessary to reimburse
1501
flE�149743
the owner of the Continental Pro-
perty for its costs of providing
each such interim parking space.
(c) If the parking spaces are located
within a parking structure, the fee
shall be the greater of (i) EIGHTY
DOLLARS ($80) per month per space
or (ii) the then - prevailing rate
for such parking.
ARTICLE 2, GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section.2.1 - TFal. This covenant and easement shall con-
tinue in effect until such time as the E1 Torito Property is
no longer used as a restaurant. At the expiration of such
term, the owner of the E1 Torito Property shall provide to
the owner of the Continental Property a quitclaim deed or
other documents necessary to eliminate o£ record the cove-
nant and easement established by this Agreement.
Section 2.2 - COVENANTS TO RUN WITH LAND. The covenants and
easements established herein aro for the benefit of the El
Torito Property and are intended to be and shall be con-
strued ae covenants running with the Continental Property
and equitable servitudes upon the Continental Property and
every part thereof, Furthermore, each and all of such
covenants and easements shall be binding upon and burden,
and shall inure to the benefit of, all persons having or
acquiring any right, title or interest in the Continental
Property, the El Torito Property or any part of either
thereof, and their respective successors and assigns, all
upon the terms, provisions and conditions not forth herein.
Section 2.3 - GENERAL INTERPRETATION
(a) If any term, provision or condition contained in this
Agreement (or the application of any ouch term, provision or
condition) ahAll to any extent be invalid or unenforceable,
the remainder of this Agreement shall be valid and enforce-
able to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(b) when the context in which words are used herein indi-
cates that such is the intent, words in the singular number
shall include the plural and vice versa. All pronouns and
any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to all ggon-
dere, and the term "person" shall include natural indivi-
dual,, corporations, partnerships, unincorporated organiza-
tions, associations, trusts, estates and all other forms of
1502
entities. The captions of the Articles and Sections herein
are for convenience of reference only and shah not be con-
sidered or referred to in resolving questions of interpre-
tation or construction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ketchum and Devil's Triangle
have executed this instrument as of the day and year first
above written.
.
THE AEVI,L'S T12zAN0 LE P E -H-xnP
Bye / �/ /✓+�/.
t� usx-t ete ium
as a general partner
By: SANTA ASSOCIATES, a California
limited partnership, as
general p rtn
By � t
roar Ketchum, to
sole general partner
503
85=149743
STATE OP CALII�ORN A j
COUNTY OF
On e -e1 i'G befom me, the underd ed. a Nou Public in and for
said State, personally appmed - �rlAR"% - MlTCIi fa; ,rl' I&W K,
, pcnontUy known to me or
proved to me on the bull of aatisftetory ovldenoc to be
the pesson_ whom nuha 1.5 subscribed to the
within Innmment and teknowiedged that -L vu,
cuted the same.
WITNSSSmyha danndd�offlelal".
Signature
CfhG vea for offkal oeudrl rral)
1504
a
B&I49743
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNPYOF LOS a 4aj5 —S J 3S.
on . yf'.e boforc mc, the undotslgoed, s Notary vublIc In and for
said State, peisonslly appeared -
Signature
perrondiy known to me or
of sathfactory evidence to be
ncd the whhln instrument as
e partners of the pannershlp
utrument, and acknowlodgcd
exetated the same.
..A
�n�d•Sls..n•�LV
i `i.., w• /ttti.roun Li.:.si'd �. L1aJ..
(T8h am (aofrydJ rronrW cell
1505
MzI49743
STATE OF CAf.7F0M t
COUNTYOP �t)rS•FU% f
On We me, the undenlgned, a Notuy Public In and for
"Id Snte,personallytppeared r (�T' -M. KF :1SNIJtt. _ _
personally known to me or proved tome on the bub of sadsfoctory evidence to be the person_,)vho executed
thewithininstrumentu�ru_e �- 'eJarAt�lAxf <£Iyfshapwsnnsof . +iA,UYA A��!rn7'E__i .
b no f S o • _.._.____ ...- .... cut ..___..._ v
acknowled to ma hat tfi�y a toted the same on
eh ... r V� J pYIAA jiaFc�-
-�78 eedsrm Ip, and that
stid uenamedpattne"hl exeeut the me.
WITNMmyh dsndofftcidsed,
Signttute - -
GOYERN)IFNT CODD 27361.7
i....,. • v 1}.
`�::• � Li }Gmn•�rnon.. r.reF:ar.3.lete�
(Thh ute fat o(fteid not/rbl uel)
.! certify under penalty of perjury that the notary seal on the document
to which this statement is attache reads as foliva%
`;bmo of xotar) ) L t -Y&Mp ( ^�
ante CoLe:i.�sion hxriros 1111_.t -_
count )••where bond is filed2T.ft-y1( /.l�r•G� .
(lascofil:SccutJon
1. Zvi r
a
1500
Attachment No. PC 9
Waiver Request for Development
Agreement
'50:7
502
July 26, 2011
Rosalinh Ung
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: 4221 Dolphin Striker
PD 2010 -007 and TD2010 -002
Request for waiver of Development Agreement
Dear Rosalinh:
Chapter 15.45 provides that development agreements shall be required in conjunction with the
City approval of a project that requires a General Plan Amendment or other legislative act, and
includes non - residential development in Statistical Area L4 (Airport Area). The above referenced
project meets these requirements.
Please accept this letter as a request to waive the requirement for a development agreement
pursuant to the provisions of NBMC Section 15.45.020.C. This section of the NBMC provides
that the City Council may waive the requirement for a development agreement, except for one
required by General Plan Policy, if it finds one of the following:
-The project provides significant public benefits to the City; or
-The nature of the project is such that neither the City nor the developer would benefit
from a development agreement.
Please accept the following factors in support of each of the above findings that could justify a
waiver of the requirement for a development agreement.
The project is minor in nature because it consists of a transfer of usage from Hotel
Site 2 -B of 54 rooms in the Newport Place Planned Community to be used as an increase of
5,525 in the square footage to newly created Commercial Site 8. Because there is a transfer of
development rights, the traffic impacts of the project are mitigated to both the Newport Place
Planned Community and to the City of Newport Beach. Further, because of the transfer the
15'9
project does not exceed the criteria for a major General Plan Amendment as defined in Charter
Section 423.
The project provides significant public benefits to the City as follows:
-The project would provide short-term employment opportunities in construction and long -term
employment opportunities for up to 30 employees on site. Further, vendors will be hired to
maintain the property and landscaping. Approval of the project would help to maintain the City's
jobs -to- housing balance as commercial uses are replaced with mixed -use residential villages.
-The project would generate additional sales and property tax for the City.
-The project would accommodate to patrons that are in close proximity to the site that will walk
to eat and shop and thereby not burden the road system. Further, the ingress and egress is vastly
superior to the original project and will decrease vehicle miles traveled by lost patrons and
vehicular confusion in the area.
-The project would be adequately served by existing public facilities, infrastructure and services.
The increased floor area would not exceed existing service levels for the public services or
facilities.
Neither the City nor the development would benefit from a development agreement due the
nature of the project.
-The development agreement provides a developer a vested right to proceed and complete a
project without the uncertainty of future changes in policies or regulations. This factor is
important with larger or long -term projects. A development agreement also allows the City
greater latitude to advance local planning policies and it provides flexibility in addressing
project- related impacts that may occur in the future or those that might occur across jurisdiction
boundaries.
This finding can be made given the nature of the project in that it is small, no significant
environmental impacts would be created, and adequate infrastructure presently exists. There is a
transfer of development rights and therefore no traffic impacts to the Newport Place Planned
Community and the commercial use is compatible with the surrounding restaurant site and office
buildings. The project is not a long -tern project and would be constructed in a single phase.
For all the reasons expressed in this letter, please waive the requirement for a development
agreement. In the meantime if you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
Tod W. Ridgeway J_
Ridgeway /Whitney Partnership
570
Attachment No. CC 6
Planning Commission Resolution for
Denial
521
��2
RESOLUTION NO. 1856
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. PD2010 -007, TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS NO.
TD2010 -002; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011 -026,
MODIFICATION PERMIT NO. 2011 -014, AND TRAFFIC STUDY
NO. TS2011 -002 FOR A NEW COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
LOCATED AT 4221 DOLPHIN - STRIKER WAY (PA2010 -135)
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HEREBY FINDS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF FACTS.
1. An application was filed by Ridgeway/Whitney, Partnership, with respect to property
located at 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way, and legally described as Parcel 1 of Portion of Lot 4
of Tract No. 7770, requesting approval of an amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11)
Planned Community Development Plan to accommodate the development of two new
commercial buildings of 13,525 square feet total. The following applications are
requested in order to implement the project as proposed:
a) An amendment to Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development
Plan to change the zoning designation of the subject property from "Restaurant
Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ", pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned
Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the Municipal Code.
b) A transfer of development rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units,
which equates to an approximately 3,909 square feet of specialty retail, from
Hotel Site 2 -B (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301 Quail Street) and
1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901
MacArthur Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet to the subject site, pursuant
to Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of Development Rights) of the Minicipal Code.
c) A traffic study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as
the project will generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
d) A conditional use permit to modify the off - street parking requirements, allow for
the use of off -site parking, and to establish a parking management plan for the
site, pursuant to Chapter 20.40 (Off- Street Parking) of the Municipal Code.
e) A modification permit to deviate from the landscaping requirements of the
Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan, pursuant to
Section 20.52.050 of the Municipal Code.
f) A waiver of the requirement for a development agreement pursuant to the
provisions of Chapter 15.45 (Development Agreements) of the Municipal Code.
52S
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1856
Paqe 2 of 3
2. The subject property has zoning designation of Restaurant Site 1 of the Newport Place
(PC -11) Planned Community Zoning District and the General Plan Land Use Element
category is Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 ( "MU -H2 ").
3. The subject property is not located within the coastal zone.
4. A public hearing was held on September 22, 2011, in the City Hall Council Chambers,
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. A notice of time, place and
purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal
Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the
Planning Commission at this meeting.
SECTION 2. REQUIRED FINDINGS.
In accordance with the Traffic Phasing Ordinance and Zoning Code the proposed project can
only be approved after making each of the required findings set forth in Chapter 15.40 (TPO)
and Sections 20.40.100.B (Off -Site Parking), 20.52.050F (Use Permit) and 20.52.050.E
(Modification Permits) of the Zoning Code. In this case, the Planning Commission was unable
to make the required findings based upon the following:
1. The purpose and intent of parking standards is to provide adequate parking for
development. The applicant requests a change in the allowable use and an increase in
the intensity of use while inadequately addressing parking through a waiver and off -
site parking request.
2. The 1 -year term of the applicant's off -site parking lease does not satisfy the Zoning
Code that requires off -site parking be permanently available.
3. The applicant's justification for the modification permit to allow relief from the
landscaping standards is based upon the request for increased intensity of use and
proposed design rather than a practical difficulty of the property and that the project
can be redesigned to comply with the landscape requirement.
4. The proposed primary access to the subject property is inconsistent with the existing
design of MacArthur Boulevard that does not provide direct access into commercial
parking lots and may interrupt traffic flow along MacArthur Boulevard.
SECTION 3. DECISION.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
1. The Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach does hereby deny without
prejudice Planned Community Text Amendment No. PD2010 -007, Transfer of
Development Rights No. TD2010 -002, Conditional Use Permit No. UP2011 -026,
Modification Permit No. MN2011 -014, and Traffic Study No. TS2011 -002.
Tmplt: 03/08/11
524
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1856
Paqe 3 of 3
2. This action shall become final and effective fourteen days after the adoption of this
Resolution unless within such time an appeal is filed with the City Clerk in accordance
with the provisions of Title 20 Planning and Zoning, of the Newport Beach Municipal
Code.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 22 "d DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2011.
AYES: Ameri, Hawkins, Hillgren, and Toerge
NOES: Kramer, Myers, and Unsworth
ABSTAIN: None.
/TA1 04 Rrin
AIN
ISI F77MoSWI.7iii��7iF]IiiF1�
BY:
Bradley Hillgren, Secretary
Tmplt: 03/08111
525
5g�
Attachment No. CC 7
Draft September 22, 2011 PC Minutes
527
egg
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Chair Unsworth closed the Public Hearing.
09/22/2011
Commissioner Ameri inquired as to the methods utilized for the review of the setback requests. Benjamin
Zdeba, Planning Technician, commented that inconsistencies between adjacent Floor Area Ratios (FAR)
and setbacks were considered and stated that maximum floor area is a function of the lot size.
Commissioner Toerge requested that the side yard setbacks be three (3) feet each and the front and rear
yard setback be ten (10) feet each.
Commissioner Hawkins stated he was in support of staff's recommendations as the properties at both
1412 and 1400 are affected by the drive aisle, and that a Resolution was not necessary as he previously
had mentioned. He confirmed his support of the three (3) foot setback and moved to approve this time as
recommended.
Motion made by Commissioner Hawkins and seconded by Commissioner Kramer, to approve staff's
recommendation with the alternative setbacks as presented.
Substitute motion made by Commissioner Toerge and seconded by Hillgren to approve Alternative
Setback No. SA2011 -019 with the attached Alternative Setback Determination letter and modified rear
setback of ten (10) feet with the recommended front setback of ten (10) feet and side setbacks of three (3)
feet on the East and West side. The substitute motion carried (4 — 3).
AYES: Ameri, Hillgren, Myers, and Toerge
NOES: Hawkins, Kramer, and Unsworth
ABSENT(RECUSED): None.
ABSTAIN: None.
Community Development Director Brandt announced that this decision becomes final within fourteen (14)
days unless appealed to the City Council.
ITEM NO. 5 MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker (PA2010 -135)
4221 Dolphin- Striker Way
The applicant proposes a planned community development plan amendment to allow the construction of
two, single -story commercial buildings with 13,525 combined square feet.
The following approvals are requested or required in order to implement the project as proposed
1. An amendment to the Newport Place (PC -11) Planned Community Development Plan to change
the zoning designation of the subject property from "Restaurant Site 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ",
pursuant to Chapters 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures) and 20.66 (Amendments) of the
Municipal Code.
2. Transfer of Development Rights to allow the transfer of 48 unbuilt hotel units, which equate to
3,909 square feet of specialty retail, from Hotel Site 2 -13 (Fletcher Jones Vehicle Storage Facility at 1301
Quail Street) and 1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 (Lexus Dealership at 3901 MacArthur
Boulevard) for a total of 5,529 square feet to the subject site, pursuant to Chapter 20.46 (Transfer of
Development Rights) of the Municipal Code.
3. Traffic Study approval pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) as the project will
generate in excess 300 average daily trips (ADT).
Page 4 of 10
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 09/22/2011
A staff report was presented by James Campbell, Principal Planner, and a PowerPoint Presentation was
displayed.
Commissioner Hawkins confirmed with Mr. Campbell that there are currently two (2) access points, one
(1) driveway off Dolphin Way, and one (1) driveway off Martindale. There is also a cooperative agreement
among three (3) properties for parking and access.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Hawkins related to donor sites, Mr. Campbell stated that
consent is not necessary from the donor sites; however, staff would prefer consent so there would be no
objection. In addition, Mr. Campbell stated that there are three hundred and four (304) units remaining at
the Fletcher Jones site and that these units would generate occupancy tax if built.
Commissioner Hillgren stated that the number of access points to the commercial properties seems small
and that MacArthur was designed such that the abutting properties were not to take direct access from
the highway. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Hillgren relative to the proposed driveway, Mr.
Campbell stated that the applicant's proposal includes retail components that would benefit from having
driveway access to MacArthur. Mr. Campbell went on to note that intent to prohibit direct vehicular access
to MacArthur was not memorialized in the Newport Place Planned Community but it could be inferred that
it was the intent given the current lack of direct access.
Commissioner Hawkins expressed concerns regarding the proposed left turn, stated that he spoke with
applicant and visited the site, and spoke about safety concerns in the parking lot, as well as the backing
up of traffic on MacArthur. Mr. Campbell described the variety of gaps in access on MacArthur that would
allow for a left turn.
City Traffic Engineer Tony Brine responded to a number of questions related to direct access to the project
site from MacArthur Boulevard.
Commissioner Hawkins indicated that the proposed one -year off -site parking agreement is not what the
Zoning Code requires in that it does not provide permanent availability of the parking spaces. In
response, Mr. Campbell indicated that the Conditional Use Permit requires the applicant to permanently
provide the parking spaces. The proposed parking plan would be effective for one (1) year given the term
of the off -site lease, but the applicant would have to provide a new lease, potentially at an alternative site
subject to the review and approval by the Director.
Commissioner Hawkins requested that the Conditions of Approval reflect that this project makes the
parking plan permanently available rather than having a Condition that requires the plan to be reviewed
annually.
Chair Unsworth estimated that a direct path from Dolphin /Striker to MacArthur would result in creating
more of a thoroughfare.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Toerge relative to the permanent parking issue, Mr.
Campbell stated that the applicant would have to advise the City of any loss of off -site parking and how it
would be replaced. In the worst case if the lost off -site parking could not be provided, the applicant could
reduce the intensity of use to comply with minimum parking standards. Commissioner Toerge expressed
concerns relating to how the City would advise an applicant who has invested a significant amount in
developing their property that they must reduce the intensity of use of their property because of a lack of
parking.
Page 5 of 10
59 D
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 09/22/2011
Commissioner Ameri provided comments on his perspective relative to the original concept of MacArthur
Boulevard and that it was intended as an arterial without direct vehicular access to individual parking
areas. He expressed concerns that opening one access point for one project would ruin the intent and
suggested extending Dolphin- Striker through the site creating a new roadway access point at MacArthur.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Hawkins relative to his concerns about the traffic impacts,
Mr. Campbell mentioned that the General Plan does not envision MacArthur to become a pedestrian
friendly street, given the volume of traffic.
Commissioner Hawkins expressed concern over the Director's discretionary authority over the one (1)
year parking agreement, which was not a permanent plan, and that the City would have a series of one (1)
year off site parking agreements not contemplated by the original study.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Myers relative to the differences between the access points
at the nearby Newport Beach Lexus dealer, Mr. Campbell stated that that there are no left turns into that
site and that there is no exiting. He further stated that each driveway request would be considered
independently so that they do not inadvertently create hazards, preclude future requests, or if approved,
there would be no precedents sets for future approvals.
Commissioner Ameri suggested that the access point allow pedestrian access or extend the cul -de -sac to
create another street intersection.
Chair Unsworth stated that without the reciprocal parking agreement the project is eight (8) spaces short,
and with the reciprocal agreement it is only one (1) short.
Chair Unsworth suggested that Condition Number 7, relative to the alternative off -site parking agreement,
should have a requirement of being recorded with the County Recorder and that a finding of substantial
conformance with the permit would have to be made. Community Development Director Brandt stated
that any finding of substantial conformance with the permit would be provided in the weekly Planning
activity report.
Ms. Brandt also stated that in regard to Condition No. 9, any significant changes, would be referred back
to the Planning Commission.
In regard to inquiries made by Chair Unsworth relative to Conditions 10 and 49, Ms. Brandt stated that the
intent of the application was to have all employees parking off site at all times, and that although the
Planning Commission has no jurisdiction over sprinklering those requirements will be reviewed through the
plan check process.
Chair Unsworth opened the Public Hearing.
Tod Ridgeway, applicant, provided a general overview of the project, that the MacArthur arterial has
changed significantly over the past twenty (20) years, the proposed access point was popular and
approved by the Police and Fire representatives, a restaurant presence was required for the project, the
parking structure would be managed by AMCO, and that there is a current deficiency of thirteen (13)
spaces. Mr. Ridgeway mentioned that he will require all employees to park in the structure, that his
insurance requirements state that the project must be sprinklered, and that he is not contemplating a
residential component to this project. In conclusion, he would live within existing community text, will go
immediately to AMCO and have them amend an agreement to be a recordable document, and if
terminated, there would be a notice provision to the City of Newport Beach.
Page 6 of 10
591
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
09/22/2011
In response to an inquiry from Chair Unsworth relative to the massing of the project, Mr. Ridgeway stated
that he does not contemplate building a six story building and that an alternate parking plan would require
him to change his uses of which he is not planning on doing.
In response to inquiries on various aspects of the project made by Commissioner Hawkins, Mr. Ridgeway
noted that he agreed with Condition No. 10 and that he would be comfortable with adding a notice
provision to the City of Newport Beach. He did express that he was not in agreement with restricting the
MacArthur access to a right turn in and right turn out.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Hawkins regarding the waiver of development rights, Mr.
Ridgeway stated that he does not have any intention of building hotel units. Commissioner Hawkins did
state that someone else could use the units as part of a transfer to their project and that the City, if, could
potentially lose this course of occupancy tax since the hotel units would not be built.
Community Development Director Brandt stated that Condition 2 should be deleted as the transfer of
development rights agreement would be more appropriate if there were a vested property right on the
donor properties. Mr. Ridgeway affirmed that this deletion would be acceptable.
Tod Stoutenborough, project architect, made a brief presentation, mentioned that he had worked
significantly with the Traffic Engineer and noted that MacArthur had been designed for four (4) lanes of
traffic. He mentioned a deceleration lane and acceleration lane, could still maintain three (3) lanes, and
there was plenty of visibility and ease of access to the project.
Commissioner Myers, after reviewing the striping of the road exhibit, expressed support for a left hand turn
lane.
Commissioner Ameri stated support for the project, with the exclusion of the driveway. He proposed
widening the drive aisle to create a street, or to extend Dolphin- Striker and connect it to MacArthur.
Commissioner Ameri also envisioned a pedestrian connection.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Hawkins relating to the project design, Mr. Stoutenborough
detailed the modern design elements of the proposed development and indicated they would be
compatible with adjacent projects.
Dan Purcell, resident, requested that the Planning Commission ensure that all aspects of this project and
the applicant's proposal be memorialized in such as way as to avoid any potential for deviation from the
original project as submitted.
Chair Unsworth closed the Public Hearing.
Mr. Ridgeway stated that he believed the public speaker's comments were directed to the previous
owner's nightclub operation and not the proposed project.
Motion made by Commissioner Ameri and seconded by Commissioner Hawkins, for discussion purposes,
to approve the project as submitted with the additional Condition to modify the site plan to either: 1)
Reflect a through street to MacArthur or 2) creating pedestrian access from MacArthur to the project site.
In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Hawkins, Mr. Brine stated that the City did not have the
jurisdiction to require a public roadway through the site.
Page 7 of 10
�9 2
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 09/22/2011
Commissioner Hawkins stated that if the City is conditioning a project to have a road, it is no longer a
private roadway, and that it would be a public roadway for which there would be payment of just
compensation.
Community Development Director Brandt stated that the imposition of this type of condition would require
a significant redesign of the project and would recommend that the Planning Commission make a motion
to deny the project as submitted.
Commissioner Ameri did not withdraw his motion. Second to the motion was withdrawn by Commissioner
Hawkins.
The motion failed due to lack of a second to the motion.
Commissioner Toerge expressed the following concerns with the project: 1) the transfer increases the
development intensity resulting in the need for a parking waiver and modification permit for deviations from
the required 2) the one -year duration of the off -site parking agreement does not comply with the code
requirements that it be available permanently and 3) the proposed access from MacArthur is inconsistent
with the existing design.
Motion to deny based upon inability to make the findings made by Commissioner Toerge and seconded
by Commissioner Hawkins for discussion purposes.
Commissioner Hillgren stated that he does want to encourage redevelopment of the property as long as
the uses are appropriate and right for the area, and that his only concern with the project as presented
was that the uses were just too intense. He stated that the project would create a significant traffic
challenge and danger and that he supports redesign of the project to avoid the access point on MacArthur.
Commissioner Hawkins agreed that the site is underutilized; however, he did state that when "Fury Rock
and Roll" was at this site there was no need for an access point and people found the location easily. He
also stated his concerns with transferring income generating units to this site.
Commissioner Kramer supported the project as presented, as he did not have a problem with the parking,
and could easily make the finding that the MacArthur corridor does not have the same standing as it did
prior. Commissioner Kramer stated that for the overall good of the community /city and for local
businesses /residents, this project should be approved.
Substitute motion made by Commissioner Kramer and seconded by Commissioner Myers to approve the
project, as recommended by staff.
Chair Unsworth agreed with the maker of the alternative motion that the motion language would include
the following amendments to the proposed Conditions as articulated by Community Development Director
Brandt:
• Condition No. 2 — deleted
Condition No. 7 (handwritten page 73) modified to include a notice provision of any termination of
the long term availability of the off -site parking requirements require the require notification to the
Community Development Director
Condition No. 8, corrected to state, "....in the event of loss of off -site parking"
In response to an inquiry from Chair Unsworth regarding clarification of "footnote 36" Commissioner
Hawkins confirmed staff's report that this referred to the number of times the PC text had been amended.
Page 8 of 10
593
NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 09/22/2011
In response to an inquiry from Chair Unsworth regarding matters relative to Conditions 6 through 9,
Community Development Director Brandt stated that if a finding of substantial conformance was made, the
item would be included in the weekly report.
Community Development Director Brandt also noted that if the application was approved and sent forward
to the City Council, the condition language item related to "prior to final" would be corrected to reflect plain
English.
These amendments were acceptable to Commissioner Kramer, the maker of the substitute motion.
The substitute motion failed (4 - 3).
AYES: Kramer, Myers, and Unsworth
NOES: Ameri, Hawkins, Hillgren, and Toerge
ABSENT(RECUSED): None.
ABSTAIN: None.
Motion to deny based upon inability to make the findings made by Commissioner Toerge and seconded
by Commissioner Hawkins, and carried (4 — 3) to deny approval of the project.
AYES: Ameri, Hawkins, Hillgren, and Toerge
NOES: Kramer, Myers, and Unsworth
ABSENT(RECUSED): None.
ABSTAIN: None.
Community Development Director Brandt stated that the approval to deny the project was final subject to a
fourteen (14) day appeal period.
H. NEW BUSINESS: None
Commissioner Hawkins suggested a report in connection with Corona Del Mar bluff conditions.
Commissioner Toerge did not support a study in that location.
Commissioner Ameri suggested writing a letter to the homeowners notifying them of some problems relative
to the slope conditions so that the City could go on record as being aware of the slope conditions; however,
not being responsible for the conditions.
Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill stated that the City's position would not support such a recommendation and
would put the City in the position of evaluating private property rights.
Commissioner Ameri withdrew his recommendation.
Discussion ensued among Commissioner Hillgren, Commissioner Toerge, Commissioner Ameri,
Commissioner Hawkins, and legal counsel relative to the volume of paperwork given to members of the
Commission related to their review of project staff reports and supporting documentation.
Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill stated that as part of the official record all documents must be transmitted to
the legislative body.
I. STAFF AND COMMISSIONER ITEMS
Page 9 of 10
�"4
Attachment No. CC 8
Revised Shared Parking Analysis
595
SJ° 0
October 7, 2011
Mr. David Keely, Senior Civil Engineer
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663 -3884
Dear Mr. Keely:
INTRODUCTION
The firm of Kunzman Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide this parking analysis as an addendum to the
4221 Dolphin Striker Traffic Impact Analysis (May 31, 2011) prepared by Kunzman Associates, Inc. for
the 4221 Dolphin Striker project in the City of Newport Beach. The purpose of this addendum is to
update the parking analysis (Section 9) of the traffic impact analysis due to changes on the site plan.
The project site is located at 4221 Dolphin Striker Way in the City of Newport Beach and the revised site
plan is shown on Figure 1.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The surface parking lot is shared by three parcels: the proposed site (currently vacant quality
restaurant), Classic Q Billiards and Sports Club, and Saagar Fine Cuisine of India. The surface parking lot
currently provides 211 shared parking spaces. In addition, the project site (Parcel 3) has obtained 16 off -
site parking spaces located at a parking structure southwest of the project site. The project proposes to
provide a total of 214 parking spaces (including 16 off -site parking spaces).
The existing quality restaurant (currently vacant) required 105 parking spaces per UP2008 -043 (at one
parking space per 40 square feet of net public area). The existing Sagaar Fine Cuisine of India requires
54 parking spaces per UP2005 -004 (at one parking space per 50 square feet of net public area) and the
Classic Q Billiards and Sports Club requires 80 parking spaces per UP3392.
A survey of the surface parking lot was conducted to establish the parking demand for the existing land
uses shown in Table 1. Based upon discussions with the City of Newport Beach staff, the peak periods
for parking at the project site were determined to be 6:00 AM to 12:00 AM on a Friday and 6:00 AM to
12:00 AM on a Saturday. To quantify the existing parking demand for the project site, the existing
parking demand was determined by surveying the project site at 30- minute intervals on Friday (February
11, 2011) and Saturday (February 12, 2011).
�97
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
October 7, 2011
The project site parking area was divided into eight (8) parking zones as shown on Figure 2. The parking
surveys are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The parking survey conducted on Friday (February 11, 2011) shows
the maximum number of occupied parking spaces is 133 parked vehicles from 5:30 PM to 6:30 PM (see
Table 2). This is a maximum parking occupancy of 63 percent. Figure 3 graphically depicts the existing
conditions of the surface parking lot based upon the parking survey.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CODE
Table 4 shows the parking requirements for the proposed project per the City of Newport Beach Parking
Code. The proposed 3,351 square feet of retail use would require approximately 14 parking spaces by
using the parking ratio of one parking space per 250 square feet of net floor area [ 3,351 _ 250 sf. = 13.4
= 14 parking spaces).
The 4,000 gross square feet of bank use would require approximately 16 parking spaces by using the
parking ratio of one parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area (4,000 sf. _ 250 sf. = 16 parking
spaces).
The 4,000 gross square feet of high turn -over dining establishments would require approximately 50
parking spaces by using the parking ratio of one parking space per 40 square feet of net public area
(4,000 sf. _ 2 (assuming 50% of total gross area is allocated for net public area) = 40 sf. = 2,000 sf. _ 40
sf. = 50 parking spaces).
The take -out service (limited) use would generate a parking demand of approximately 4 parking spaces
by using the parking ratio of one parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area (1,000 sf. _ 250 sf.
= 4 parking spaces).
The total parking demand per City of Newport Beach Parking Code for the proposed project is 84 parking
spaces. Per the City of Newport Beach Parking Code, the proposed parking provided will be deficient
three (3) parking spaces (133 maximum occupied parking spaces on Friday + 84 parking spaces required
per City Parking Code = 217 parking spaces).
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
The idea of a shared parking analysis is that if the various land uses have peak parking demands at
different points in time, or on different days of the week, then the number of parking spaces required is
not the sum of the parking requirements for each land use, but rather less. If the peak demands for the
various land uses are non - coincidental, then there is an opportunity for sharing of parking. To
determine the degree to which shared parking can occur, the cumulative hourly parking demand of the
land uses is calculated at all points in time throughout the day for both weekdays and weekends. In this
case, Friday has been determined to be the peak day based upon the existing parking demand survey.
Kunzman Associates, Inc. has utilized time -of -day factors and the parking rates for weekday and
weekend parking demand for customer /visitor and employee as developed by the Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking (2005). The Urban Land Institute procedures were utilized in this study to evaluate peak
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
I =
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
October 7, 2011
parking demand that would occur for the project at any point in time when day of week and hourly
factors are utilized. Per the Urban Land Institute, weekend rates and factors are applied to Friday after
5:00 PM.
To conduct a shared parking analysis, it is necessary to disaggregate the parking code into weekday and
weekend as well as customer /visitor /guest and employee /resident parking space demands. Based on
the City of Newport Beach Parking Code and the Urban Land Institute recommended parking ratios for
weekdays and weekends, the disaggregated parking rates are shown in Table 5.
Table 6 shows the expected hourly peak parking demand of the proposed project land uses for a Friday,
which has been assumed as the peak day based upon the existing parking demand survey. Table 7
shows the cumulative parking demand peaks for the proposed project land uses combined with the
existing parking demand for the projected peak Friday.
Based upon the shared parking analysis, the maximum parking demand for the entire site during peak
hours is 205 parked vehicles (see Table 7).
The proposed project site plan will reconfigure the surface parking lot layout on Parcel 1 and provide a
total of 214 parking spaces for the entire site, including the 16 off -site parking spaces located in the
nearby parking structure. The total maximum parking demand for the entire site is 205 parking spaces.
Per the shared parking analysis, the total maximum projected parking demand of 205 occupied parking
spaces will allow for parking on -site and provide sufficient additional parking for the existing and
proposed land uses based upon the proposed 198 on -site parking spaces and 16 off -site parking spaces.
It is recommended that the 16 off -site parking spaces be maintained. Although the shared parking
analysis demonstrates there will be sufficient parking as proposed, it is still recommended that a waiver
of the three (3) deficient parking spaces (per City of Newport Beach Parking Code) be required in
conjunction with implementation of the parking management plan prepared by Kunzman Associates,
Inc. A summary of the shared parking analysis findings is provided in Table 8.
Included with this submission is a copy of the Reciprocal Parking and Maintenance Agreement that can
be modified by a simple majority of the property owners. Appendix A contains a copy of all off -site and
shared parking agreements.
CONCLUSIONS
Per the shared parking analysis, the total maximum projected parking demand of 205 occupied parking
spaces will allow for parking on -site and provide sufficient additional parking for the existing and
proposed land uses based upon the proposed 198 on -site parking spaces and 16 off -site parking spaces.
It is recommended that the 16 off -site parking spaces be maintained. Although the shared parking
analysis demonstrates there will be sufficient parking as proposed, it is still recommended that a waiver
of the three (3) deficient parking spaces (per City of Newport Beach Parking Code) be required in
conjunction with implementation of the parking management plan prepared by Kunzman Associates,
Inc. A summary of the shared parking analysis findings is provided in Table 8.
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
3 X99
Mr. David Keely, Senior Civil Engineer
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
October 7, 2011
The City of Newport Beach should periodically review parking operations in the vicinity of the project
once the project is constructed to assure that the parking operations are satisfactory.
It has been a pleasure to service your needs on the 4221 Dolphin Striker project. Should you have any
questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 973 -8383.
Sincerely,
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Q '�J A
Carl Ballard I
Principal Associate
#4839d
jPpFESS /p'V
A. K12,y2 etK`ZC
v z
W 3 No. TR0056 Z
d
* TRAFF\9 \Q*
\NFCAL.
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENCINEER.COM
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
William Kunzman, P.E.
Principal
4 000
Table 1
Existing Project Land Uses
Tenant
Parcel
I Land Use
I Quantity
I Units'
I Hours of Operation
Quality Restaurant (Vacant)
Parcel
N/A
1 7.996
1 TSF
N/A
Saagar Fine Cuisine of India
Parcel 2
Restaurant
1 7.015
1 TSF
11:00 AM - 12:00 AM Daily
Classic Q
Parcel 3
1 Restaurant
1 7.870
1 TSF
10:00 AM - 2:00 AM Daily
1 TSF =Thousand Square Feet
"m
Table 2
Friday (February 31, 2011 ) Parking Count
133 =Maximum numberof ocupied parking spaces -133 vehicles from 5:30 PM -6:00 PM
'One vehicle was illegally parked fmm9g0 AM - 11:30AM. Vehicles parked In Zane H from 6:W AM -]:00 PM are Ilkelyfor users of the office building to the south of the project site.
Don not crude the 32oH-sne parking spans located In a nearhy parking accepted, which haw been auumed to be unoaupled due to Ne vacanrya the cans eg quality restaurant an Parcel 1,
"A
Number of Parked Vehicles and Percentage of Occupied Parking Spaces
Time Period
Parking Zone
TParklngZone B
Parking ZoneC
Parking Zone
Parking ZOneE
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Total'
Parking Spaces Provided
10
32
37
46
40
26
13
]
211
6:00 AM 6:30 AM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
B%
1
14%
3
1%
6:30AM - 7:00 AM
1
10%
2
6%
1
3%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
3
12%
1
14%
10
5%
]:00 AM -]:30 AM
1
10%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
5
19%
3
43%
16
8%
]:30 AM -890 AM
1
10%
2
6%
4
11%
3
]%
3
8%
1
4%
5
19%
3
43%
22
10%
8:110 AM -8:311 AM
1
10%
4
13%
3
8%
8
17%
3
8%
1
4%
]
27%
]
100%
34
16%
8:30 AM 9:W AM
2
20%
5
16%
2
5%
13
28%
4
10%
1
4%
30
38%
7
100%
44
21%
9:DO AM 9:30 AM
1
10%
5
16%
3
B%
19
41%
7
18%
1
4%
12
46%
8
114%
56
27%
9:30 AM - 30:00AM
2
20%
5
16%
3
8%
23
50%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
64
30%
1090 AM - 10:30 AM
2
20%
]
22%
4
11%
24
52%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
68
32%
10:30 AM - 11:00AM
3
30%
7
22%
4
11%
24
52%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
69
33%
1190 AM - 1130 AM
5
50%
]
22%
6
16%
23
50%
8
20%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
71
34%
11:30 AM - 12:00 PM
8
80%
11
34%
13
35%
24
52%
14
35%
2
8%
13
50%
6
86%
91
43%
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
9
90%
20
63%
24
65%
25
54%
16
40%
3
12%
13
50%
6
86%
116
55%
1230 PM - 1:00 PM
8
80%
26
81%
22
59%
27
59%
15
38%
8
31%
13
50%
]
100%
126
60%
1:00 PM - 130 PM
8
80%
14
44%
19
51%
25
54%
11
28%
5
19%
13
50%
7
100%
102
48%
1:30 PM - 2011 PM
8
80%
10
31%
14
38%
24
52%
10
25%
4
15%
12
46%
]
l00%
89
42%
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
8
80%
9
28%
12
32%
20
43%
10
25%
2
8%
11
42%
]
100%
79
37%
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
8
80%
9
28%
12
32%
19
41%
9
23%
2
8%
10
38%
]
100%
76
36%
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
7
70%
14
44%
29
78%
18
39%
18
45%
4
15%
10
38%
6
86%
106
50%
3:30 PM - 4:00 PM
8
80%
15
47%
29
78%
19
41%
18
45%
4
15%
30
38%
]
100%
110
52%
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
9
90%
18
56%
27
73%
18
39%
18
45%
4
15%
11
42%
5
71%
110
52%
4:30 PM - 5:011 PM
10
100%
21
66%
29
78%
21
46%
16
40%
]
27%
11
42%
5
71%
120
57%
5:00 PM - 5:313 PM
10
l00%
29
91%
33
89%
17
37%
17
43%
6
23%
it
42%
5
71%
128
61%
5:30 PM - 6:00 PM
30
100%
31
97%
32
86%
19
41%
21
53%
9
35%
8
31%
3
43%
133
63%
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
10
100%
25
78%
27
73%
16
35%
21
53%
8
31%
5
19%
1
14%
113
54%
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
10
100%
16
50%
29
78%
13
28%
19
48%
7
27%
3
12%
0
0%
97
46%
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
10
100%
23
72%
31
84%
16
35%
17
43%
8
31%
3
12%
0
0%
108
51%
7:30 PM - 8911 PM
10
10G%
29
91%
32
86%
18
39%
15
38%
8
31%
2
8%
0
D%
114
54%
8:00 PM - 8:311 PM
9
90%
33
103%
31
84%
15
33%
15
38%
6
23%
4
15%
0
D%
113
54%
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
]
70%
28
88%
24
65%
16
35%
10
25%
3
12%
4
15%
1
14%
93
44%
9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
6
60%
27
84%
25
68%
13
28%
8
20%
2
8%
4
15%
1
14%
86
41%
9:30 PM - 30:00 PM
5
50%
27
84%
26
70%
13
28%
]
18%
2
8%
4
15%
1
14%
85
40%
30:00 PM - 10:30 PM
5
50%
27
84%
20
54%
12
26%
5
13%
2
8%
3
12%
1
14%
75
36%
1030 PM - 11:00 PM
4
40%
26
81%
19
51%
12
26%
6
15%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
74
35%
1100 PM - 1130 PM
6
60%
23
]2%
20
54%
12
2fi%
4
10%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
72
34%
11:30 PM - 12:00 AM
]
70%
17
53%
16
43%
6
13%
3
8%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
56
27%
133 =Maximum numberof ocupied parking spaces -133 vehicles from 5:30 PM -6:00 PM
'One vehicle was illegally parked fmm9g0 AM - 11:30AM. Vehicles parked In Zane H from 6:W AM -]:00 PM are Ilkelyfor users of the office building to the south of the project site.
Don not crude the 32oH-sne parking spans located In a nearhy parking accepted, which haw been auumed to be unoaupled due to Ne vacanrya the cans eg quality restaurant an Parcel 1,
"A
Table 3
Saturday (February 12, 2012) Parking Count
i2= Maximum numb., of occupied parking spares -32 vehlclesfcom 1630 PM -11'W PMi
s noes not include the 32 off site parkingspaces located in a nearby parking 4ruccure, which have been assum N to be unoccupied due to the varancy Pf the existing quality restaurant on Parcel u.
,/ I
Number of Parked Vehicles and Percentage of Occupied Parking Spaces
Time Period
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Total'
Parking Spaces Provided
10
32
3]
46
4D
26
13
]
211
6:00 AM - 6:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
3%
6:30 AM 7:0 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
3%
7:00 AM - 7:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
]
3%
7:30 AM - 890 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
1
4%
0
0%
1
14%
8
4%
8:00 AM 8:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
1
3%
0
0%
3
8%
1
4%
1
4%
4
57%
12
6%
8:30 AM 9:0 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
3
8%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
14
]%
9:00 AM - 9:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
6
86%
14
]%
9:30 AM - 10:00AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
12
6%
10:00 AM - 10:30AM
2
20%
4
13%
2
5%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
]
100%
18
9%
10:30 AM - 11:00AM
❑
1 0%
1 2
6%
1
3%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
1 1
4%
1 ]
1 100%
14
1 ]%
11:00 AM - 1130 AM
1
10%
3
9%
3
8%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
]
100%
18
9%
1130 AM - 12:00 PM
0
0%
2
6%
3
8%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
]
100%
16
8%
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
5
50%
4
13%
10
27%
2
4%
3
8%
1
4%
1
4%
6
86%
32
15%
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
5
50%
3
9%
16
43%
2
4%
2
5%
2
8%
2
8%
6
86%
38
18%
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM
9
90%
4
13%
20
54%
1
2%
3
8%
2
8%
1
4%
4
57%
44
21%
1:30 PM - 2:❑0PM
10
100%
3
9%
13
35%
1
2%
5
13%
2
8%
1
4%
5
71%
40
19%
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
8
80%
3
9%
12
32%
1
2%
4
10%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
34
16%
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
]
70%
2
6%
6
16%
2
4%
3
8%
0
0%
1
1 4%
5
71%
26
12%
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
4
40%
2
6%
5
14%
2
4%
3
8%
2
8%
1
4%
6
86%
25
12%
3:30 PM 4:W PM
3
30%
3
9%
5
14%
2
4%
1
3%
2
8%
1
4%
4
57%
21
30%
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
4
40%
4
13%
5
14%
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
6
86%
24
11%
4:30 PM - S:GD PM
6
60%
3
9%
4
11%
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
23
11%
5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
5
50%
3
9%
6
16%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
❑
0%
17
8%
5:30 PM - 6 D PM
5
50%
4
13%
14
38%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
26
12%
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
6
60%
5
16%
14
38%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
27
13%
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
4
40%
5
16%
13
35%
0
0%
3
8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
25
12%
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
5
50%
4
13%
14
38%
0
0%
2
5%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
26
12%
7:30 PM - 890 PM
5
50%
]
22%
12
32%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
29
14%
8:00 PM - 8:30 PM
4
40%
]
22%
19
51%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
35
17%
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
4
40%
5
16%
18
49%
0
0%
4
10%
2
8%
0
0%
0
0%
33
16%
9:OOPM- 9:30PM
5
50%
8
25%
19
51%
0
0%
4
30%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
38
18%
9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
9
90%
30
31%
15
41%
0
0%
6
15%
2
8%
1
4%
0
0%
43
20%
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
10
100%
11
34%
22
59%
0
0%
5
13%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
50
24%
10:30 PM - 11:00 PM
10
100%
it
34%
23
62%
0
0%
]
18%
1
4%
0
0%
❑
0%
52
25%
11:00 PM - 11:30 PM
9
90%
11
34%
18
49%
0
0%
6
15%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
45
21%
11:30 PM - 12:00 AM
10
100%
]
22%
22
59%
2
4%
4
10%
2
8%
0
0%
0
0%
47
22%
i2= Maximum numb., of occupied parking spares -32 vehlclesfcom 1630 PM -11'W PMi
s noes not include the 32 off site parkingspaces located in a nearby parking 4ruccure, which have been assum N to be unoccupied due to the varancy Pf the existing quality restaurant on Parcel u.
,/ I
Table 4
Parking Spaces Required By City of Newport Beach Parking Code'
' See Appendix B.
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
' TSF based upon net floor area.
TSF based upon net public area.
5 Limited to a maximum of six seats.
0
Parking Code
Land Use
Quantity
Units'
Parking Code
Requirement
Retail'
3.351
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of net floor area
14
Bank
4.000
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area
16
High- Turnover Restaurant°
2.000
TSF
1 parking space per 40 square feet of net public area
50
Take -Out Service - Limited'
1.000
TSF
1 parking space per 50 square feet of gross floor area
4
Total
F
1
84
' See Appendix B.
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
' TSF based upon net floor area.
TSF based upon net public area.
5 Limited to a maximum of six seats.
0
Table 5
Parking Code Requirements`
' Source: City of Newport Beach and Urban land Institute, Shared Parking. 2nd Edition, 2005. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parkin e provides splits for customers /visitors /guests vs.
employees /residents for weekdays and weekends. These splits were applied to the City Parking Code so thatme sum of the splits is equal to the City Parking Code modified per TSF.
' TSF = Thousand Square Feet
I Weekday is defined as 6:00 AM Monday through 5:00 PM Friday.
' City Parking Code modified per TSF.
Nr, _.
City
Weekday Requirements'
Weekend Requirements
Customer/
Employee/
Customer/
Employee/
Parking
Land Use
Quantity
Units
Cod e4
Visitor /Guest
Resident
Total
Visitor /Guest
Resident
Total
Parking Rates:
Retail
3.351
TSF
4.00
3.22
0.78
4.00
3.20
0.80
4.00
Bank
4.000
TSF
4.00
2.61
1.39
4.00
2.61
1.39
4.00
High- Turnover Restaurant
2.000
T51F
25.00
21.50
3.50
25.00
21.25
3.75
25.00
Take -Out Service - Limited
1.0001
TSF
1 4.00
3.40
0.60
4.00
3.43
0.57
4.00
Parking Required:
Retail
3.351
TSF
14
11
3
14
11
3
14
Bank
4.000
TSF
16
10
6
16
10
6
16
High- Turnover Restaurant
2.000
TSF
50
43
7
50
43
7
50
Take -Out Service - Limited
1.000
TSF
4
3
1
21
21
1
4
Total
84
67
17
84
67
17
84
' Source: City of Newport Beach and Urban land Institute, Shared Parking. 2nd Edition, 2005. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parkin e provides splits for customers /visitors /guests vs.
employees /residents for weekdays and weekends. These splits were applied to the City Parking Code so thatme sum of the splits is equal to the City Parking Code modified per TSF.
' TSF = Thousand Square Feet
I Weekday is defined as 6:00 AM Monday through 5:00 PM Friday.
' City Parking Code modified per TSF.
Nr, _.
O
S
a C
E
s`- 3
y�y
E�
3
°s
C
S
s
3
r
O
N
t4
4oXX
„BaXXXe�XXXao
�o
E�
E
ti
�o
F
fifi
3 °oF
b E
i
O
E
9
o
°o
R R
R a
8 8
8 S
8 8
8 8
8 S
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8'
R
R R
R R.
R R
X R
R R
R X
E
E
o
°o
XX�Xe
Oe��e��g�����voXXX�X��XXXXX���X
E
g
. 8
£ `&
R £
. M
R... `R
'NR N
. M
R'`R
R £
. 8
£ o
'NR N
. M
M .
. X
a _
E
°o
E
S
£
a £
a s
£
£
£ £
£ a
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
S
S
8
8
8
m 8
E
£ £
Q £
£ £
£ £
£ £
£ £
£ E
£ £
£ £
£ 6
£ £
£ s
a 6
£ £
£ s
£ £
£ o
£ £
e A
o
e R
o
m
8 m
8 m
8 A
8
8 m
8 A
8
m
8
8 m
8 m
y�y
E�
3
°s
C
S
s
3
r
O
N
Table 7
Projected Peak Day (Friday) Number of Parked Vehicles
Time Period
Peak Day Number
of Parked Vehicles
Projected Parking Demand'
Total
Retail
Bank
High- Turnover
Restaurant
Fast Food
Restaurant
6:00 AM - 6:30 AM
3
1
0
15
1
20
6:30 AM - 7:00 AM
10
1
0
15
1
27
7:00 AM - 7:30 AM
16
1
0
27
1
45
7:30 AM - 8:00 AM
22
1
0
27
1
51
8:00 AM - 8:30 AM
34
3
9
33
1
80
8:30 AM - 9:00 AM
44
3
9
33
1
90
9:00 AM - 9:30 AM
56
7
15
39
2
119
9:30 AM - 10:00 AM
64
7
15
39
2
127
10:00 AM - 10:30 AM
68
10
16
44
3
141
10:30 AM - 11:00 AM
69
10
16
44
3
142
11:00 AM - 11:30 AM
71
13
11
46
4
145
11:30 AM - 12:00 PM
91
13
11
46
4
165
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
116
14
11
50
4
195
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
126
14
11
50
4
205
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM
102
14
11
46
4
177
1:30 PM - 2:00 PM
89
14
11
46
4
164
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
79
14
13
29
4
139
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
76
14
13
29
4
136
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
106
13
11
25
3
158
3:30 PM - 4:00 PM
110
13
11
25
3
162
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
110
13
14
25
3
165
4:30 PM - 5:00 PM
120
13
14
25
3
175
5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
128
13
0
33
3
177
5:30 PM - 6:00 PM
133
13
0
33
3
182
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
113
12
0
37
4
166
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
97
12
0
37
4
150
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
108
11
0
37
4
160
7:30 PM - 8:00 PM
114
11
0
37
4
166
8:00 PM - 8:30 PM
113
10
0
35
3
161
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
93
10
0
35
3
141
9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
86
8
0
19
2
115
9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
85
8
0
19
2
114
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
75
6
0
16
1
98
10:30 PM - 11:00 PM
74
6
0
16
1
97
11:00 PM - 11:30 PM
72
3
0
11
1
87
1130 PM - 12700 AM
56
3
1 0
1 11
1
71
2Q_5 = Maximum projected number of occupied parking spaces - 205 vehicles from 12:30 PM -1:00 PM.
' See Table 6.
11 OQ7
Table 8
Shared Parking Demand Summary
i See Table 7.
2 Includes 16 off -site parking spaces located in a nearby parking structure.
12 002
Number of
Descriptor
Parking Spaces
Maximum Projected Parking Demand During Peak Hours'
205
Proposed Parking Spaces Provided
214
Additional Parking Spaces Needed
-9
i See Table 7.
2 Includes 16 off -site parking spaces located in a nearby parking structure.
12 002
Figure 1
Site Plan
NTS
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
u—N
PMA+Iw .N�NuGA
10 MEW W.,.1 N.)
3AIW3 dJY MIN
4839d/1
OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCEU ENT SERVICE
13 C9 09
• `` �,
�`
56
LA
`.. _ LW
CUR
1
i
El
• L
-'.
OvER 35 VEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVILE
14
��I.LJ
250
200
N
150
a
m
c
's
a
`o
a
100
z
50
Figure 3
Parking Survey Summary Graph (Existing Conditions)
.......................................................... ...............................
/\ � / /\ \ �
---------------- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- f ------- - - - - -- V------ �
f `1114%, I
------------/--------------------------------------------------------
/
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Parking Spaces Occupied on Friday (February 11, 2011)
Parking Spaces Occupied on Saturday (February 12, 2011)
9—poe— Total Parking Spaces Provided= 211 (not including 16 off-site parking spaces)
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
4839d/3
OVER 35 YEARS Or EXCEU ENT SERVICE
15 021
APPENDIX A
Parking Agreements
/-112
:,'hen Recorded Return Tor
Phe Newport Project -
4101 MacArthur 91vd. , .r /1 ev 1 CC
Newport Beach, 6A. 92660 '.��� r: 'Ir ,;;,� �;}}:,O�,C�3PlCC7�,}
RECIPROCAL PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this z *7 day of
1972, by and between THE` CRT P ", a joint venture
composed of Emkay Development Company, Inc. and Atlas Realty-
company (hereinafter called "The Newport Project "), and EMKAX�
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. ( hereinafter called "Emkay'r).
RECITALS
�..F
1r 1..•,
pi ! r A. The Newport Project is the owner of Lot 4 of
ile.
pages 15 -16 of Miscellaneous
�i Track 7770, recorded in book 299, p g
f 1,;W:4 Maps, Records of Orange County, outlined in red on the parcel
)' analysis attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated hArein
by this reference (the "Development").
B. Concurrently with the recording of this Agree-
ment The Newport Project is deeding to Emkay the portion of
the Development denominated Parcel 1 and outlined in green on
Exhibit "A." The .Newport Project intends to deed to others
the portions of the Development delineated Parcels 2 and 3,
outlined in yellow and in blue, respectively, on Exhibit "A."
C. The Newport Project and Emkay desire to establish
integrated parking facilities and pgd a ea in the
Development, and to provide for the maintenance of same,
for the benefit of all of the Development, and for the commgn
use a.- nd benefit of the present and future owners and leasees
of Parcels within the Development, all as more specifically
hereinafter set forth.
ReCO:t.1EU nT I.i R'JFST OF
m rear ^.;a� r: •sas eF
1972
PA20-10 -135 for GP2010.010 P02010-007
4221 Dolphin Striker Nay
R09eway Developrnenl 013
e;�,1 0443 Fia777
associated facilities. Each of the Parcel owners, their
lessees, assigns and successors in interest, and their
respective employees and invitees shall be entitled to
use the Common Areas, subject to such reasonable rules
and regulations relating to such'use as a majbritrLof the
LFare may from time to time,establish, including
validation requirements.
3, Improvement, Each Parcel owne , or its
successor in interest, shall, at its own expense, im_ 'prove
those portions of the Common Parking Areas and Landscaped
Areas on its respective premises. Such work of improvement
shall be performed pursuant to plans and specifications
approved by Emkay and the Parcel owner.
,,r14 k. Maintenance. From and after the Effecti.,
to `r6Jj
Date as to the first restaurant to be con structe Em &a
shall, subject to the d_irectioR Qf a ma -j01W of the Parcel
Sri °2
owners, operate, manage, p olice, ' light, repair , and maintain
....._.�_.,
the Common Areas.
5. Control. Subject to the.ilirection of a
r ,
L �"N majority of the_Parcel owners Gmkay� hall at all times
t
during the Term hereof So_n.Lrol the automobile parking areas,
;} driveways, entrances and exits, landscaped. area s, and the
f -
sidewalks and pedestrian passageways within the Common Areas,
and may at any time and from time to time during the Term
hereof restrain any use or occupancy thereof except as autho-
rized by the rules and regulations for the use of such areas
established by a majority of the Parcel owners from time to
time. Emkay may temporarily close all or portions of the
Common Areas for repairs or alterations, to prevent a dedi-
cation thereof or the accrual of prescriptive rights therein,
-3-
014
vu 10443 PmM
(b) The proportionate share of the
Common Area costs of each Parcel owner shall be
as follows:
(1) Upon the Effective Date
as to the first owner to open for business,
such owner shall pay 100% of the cost of
maintaining and operating the Common Areas
located on such party's Parcel.
(ii) Upon the Effective Date.,as
to the second owner to open-for business,
the two owners so opened shall share the
cos L- of operating and maintaining the
Common Areas located on their two Parceld,
in the proportion which the respective
gross square footages of their two Parcels
bear,to each other.
(iii) Upon the Effective Date as
to the third owner to open for business,
and for the balance of the Term, the three
Parcel owners shall share the cost of op-
erating and maintaining all of the Common
Areas located in the Development in the
following percentages;
Owner of Parcel 1 38%
Owner of Parcel 2 25%
Owner of Parcel 3 37%
(c) Prior to the commencement of�e�
calendar period of six (6)_months- during the Term,
Emkay shall give each Parcel owner a written
-5-
015
?;4,10443Fi«TSo
estimate of their respective shares of such Common
Area costs for.the ensuing six (6) month period. Such
estimated amount shall not exceed 110% of the actual
share of such Parcel owner for the then current six (6)
month period. Each Parcel owner shall pay such esti-
mated amount to EmkaYin equal „monthly - installments,
in advance. Within ninety (90) days after the end of
each such six (6) month period, Emkay shall furnish to
each Parcel owner a statement showing in reasonable
detail the costs and expenses incurred by Emkay
for the operation and maintenance of the Common Areas
during such period, and each Parcel owner shall promptly
make any payment or allowance necessary to adjust each
such party's estimated payment to such party's actual
Proportionate share of Common Area costs as shown by
-such annual statement.
7. Enforcement of Assessments.
(a) Failure to pay the estimated share
of Common Area cost or any installment thereof, in-
eluding any semi- annual adjustment, promptly and in
any event within ten (10) days after written notice
from Emkay of nonpayment, shall constitute a delin-
quency and default with respect to the Parcel to
*�hich such share relates. A maior&�y of the Parcel
owners is. authorized -and empocueted„�t,�o,Moceed in
the event of any such default to collect_ each such
delinquent individual assessment, together with
interest upon the unpaid amount thereof at ten
percent (10 %) per annum from the date of such
notice, until the same is fully paid, together
-6-
010
8(6I ! C443 P1f781.
with recording fees, title costs, court costs,
and reasonable attorney's fees.
(b) If and whenever a default occurs,
as provided above, the non - defaulting Parcel owners
Ahall be entitled to a Lr i�en against the Parcel to
which such default relates, for' the unpaid amount
of such share of Common Area costs and the cost
and expenses described above. In.the event of
any such default, then any non- defaulting Parcel
owner may file for record in the office of the
County Recorder of orange County, California, a
claim of lien, which shall contain at least;
(ij A statement of the unpaid
amount of the share of Common Area cost;
(ii) A description sufficient for
identification of the Parcel to which the
default relates; and
(iii) The name of the owner or
reputed owner of the property described
in (ii) above.
Such claim of lien shall be effective to establish
a lien against the real property described in such
claim, in the amount specified therein, together
with interest at ten percent (10 %) per annum from
the date of notice of nonpayment, together with
recording fees and reasonable costs of any title
search or title policy before or after made or
obtained in connection with such claim of lien or
the foreclosure of the claim of lien, together
with court costs and reasonable attorney's fees
which may accrue in the enforcement of such lien.
-7-
ar f D443 F.u78Z
(c) Such lien, when so established
against the real property described in said claim,.
shall be prior and superior to any right, title, in-
terest, lien, or claim which may be or may have been
acquired in or attached to said real property sub-
sequent to the time of filing such claim, except that
such lien' shall in any event be' subordinate to the lien
of any bona fide first trust deed upon such property.
Such lien shall be for the use and benefit of the non-
defaulting Parcel owners and may be enforced and fore-
closed in a suit or action brought by any one or more
of them in any court o£ competent jurisdiction, if
brought within one year of the filing of such claim,
in the same manner as if the amount of such lien had
been evidenced by the promissory note of the person or
persons who on the date of notice of nonpayment were the
be owners of the property . subjected to such lien, and
as if such note were secured by a real estate mortgage
upon said real property duly executed by the fee owners'
of such property as of the time of recording and
duly recorded 'at 'the time such claim was filed for
record. In any such suit or action the plaintiffs
shall be entitled to a personal judgment in the full
amount of such lien against each person who was such
fee owner on such date of notice of nonpayment. The
net amount received on account of such lien or from any
judgment with respect to such lien, if received after
the close of the year for which such share was due, shall
be applied against the non - defaulting Parcel owners'
current shares of Common Area costs, until fully expended.
10
01g
10;431 u7 &3
S. Binding Upon Successors. This Agreement phall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the.paltties and
their respective successors, assigns, lessees iiid'publessees
Upon transfer of the fee title _to, any Parcel to a huccdssor
which assumes in writing the obligations impel: -,tbN this.
Agreement,_the_ transferor shall be relieved from all obligA
tions accruing hereunder subsequent Co�the date of transfer.
r 9. Paragraph He The paragraph headings
used herein are for reference only, and shall not enter
into the interpretation of this Agreement.
EXECUTED this _19th day of October , 1972.
Arx Er: >
-t
EMMY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
BY _
WE
THE NEWPORT PROJECT
By EMKAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
f
�1
By ATLAS REALTY COMPANY
B
y
STATE OF .cXAS:
COUNTY OF HARRIS
On this 19th day of October , 19_22 , before mei the
undersigned, a Notary Public for said County and State, personally
appeared L. 0. Henson and w. J. Perry, Jr.
known to me to be the vice president and assistant secretary
respectively of Atlas Realty Company
the corporation that executed the within instrument, said persons
being known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument
on behalf of said corporation,• said corporation being known to me to
be ono-of the Joint venturers of The Newport Project
the joint venture that executed the within instrument, and acknow-
ledged to me that such corporation executed the same both individually
and as ,joint venturer of said joint venture and that such Aoint•venture
also executed the same.
(SEAL) �•'(}Jfit•C�.�` JY7 �lJ....✓, -�•
'Name` (Typed or r n. ed
Notary Public in and for said
County and State
My commission expires 6/1173
C
-F=
V
r
O
C;
020
$x:149743
MCC"
04"FI NY
WHEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
LATHAM 6 WATKINS
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 -2466
Attn: J. K. Hachigien I $19.00
C6
•3�4pM APRIS'86
COVENANT AND AGREEMENT
REGARDING MAINTENANCE OF OFF- STREET
PARKING SPACE AFFECTING
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOR 45, PAGE 23 AND
PARCEL I OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOK 183 PAGES 14 THROUGH 15 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PA2010.135 for GP2010 -010 PD2010.007
4221 Dolphin Striker Way
Ridgeway Development 021
85 :149143
THIS COVENANT AND AGREENENT FOR OFF - STREET PARKING
SPACE (the "Agreement ") is made as of January 14, 1986,
between STUART MITCHELL KETCHUN, JR. ( "Ketchum ") and THE
DEVIL'S TRIANGLE PARTNERSHIP, a California general partner-
ship ( "Devil's Triangle "). Ketchum owns the property si-
tuated in the State of California, County of Orange, City of
Newport Beach described as followas
Parcel 1 of Parcel Nap 83 -705 as per map
filed in book 183, pa es 14 and 15 of
Parcel Maps in the Office of the Recor-
der of said County (hereinafter the
"Continental Property "),
and Devil's Triangle owns the adjoining property described
as follows
Parcel 1 as shown on a Parcel Map filed
in book 45, page 23 of Parcel Nape in
the Off Los o£ the Recorder of said
County (hereinafter the "E1 Torito Pro-
perty') .
RECITAL
The Planning Commission of the City of Newport
Beach, California (the "City ") has a?proved, subject to
certain conditions, Devil's Triangle a request to allow the
use of an existing open courtyard for dining and drinking
purposes in the'El Torito Restaurant (located on the E1
Torito Property). One condition requires that a covenant
for additional automobile parking spaces be established to
run with the Continental Property for the benefit of the El
Torito Property, and another condition requires a grant of
an easement for and the construction of it sidewalk linking
the covenanted parking spaces on the Continental Property to
the E1 Torito Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to
satisfy said conditions.
ARTICLE 1. COVENANT AND BASEMENT
Section 1.1 - GRANT OF COVENANT. The owner of the
055tiffental Property hereby covenants and agrees to provide
on the Continental Propertyp for the benefit of the E1
Torito Property, sixteen M) automobile parking spaces
together with a nonexclusive easement for access to, ingress
to, agrees from, and use and enjoyment of the parkins spaces
for W passage of vehicles, (i ) panes is of pedestrian
traffic, and (iii) other uses incidental to such passages
022
'5.149743
reserving, however, in favor of the owner Of the continental
Property, all rights of access to, ingrase to, egress from
and use and enjoyment paking ganted berein
parkin rezwiee
inconsistent with the r
Section 1.2 - GRANT OF EASEMENT. The owner of the CO"
t ne�lroperty hereby grants a nonexclusive easement for
the passage of pedestrian traffic, and other uses incidental
prito to such passage, over the Continental Property from the
arking spaces, covenanted in Continental BL
Property as the owner thereof shall reasonably designate.
The owner of the E1 Torito Property shall have the right,
withheld, to construct a sidewalk along the easement route.
Such sidewalk shall be constructed and maintained at the
sole expense of the owner of the E1 Torito Pro 811. The
owner of the Continental Property aball have tha right, at
its sole expense and subject to the approval of the owner of
the E1 Torito Property, which such appproval shall not be
unreasonably withheld, to relocate tt�e easement and
reconstruct a sidewalk along the relocated easement route.
Section 1.3 - TEMPORARY LASS OF PARKING SPACES. The owner
o t e ontinental Property shall have the right from time
to time in order to accomodate construction or other
activities on the Continental Property, to temporarily
relocate Boma or all of the covenanted parking spaces to an
off -site location (not on the Continental Property) which,
under the then - present circumstances, will enable the owner
of the E1 Torito Ptogarty to use the same with as little
inconvenience to such owner as is practicable under the
circumstances.
Section 1.4 - PARKING CLIARGES. The owner of the Continental
ropli party fiall have the right to aeaeaa and collect from any
person parking on the spaces covenanted in Section 1.1 a
parking fee in the amount as followes
(a) As long as such parking spaces are
surface parking the fee shell be
FORTY DOLLARS (640) per month per
apace.
(b) If the parking spaces are located
of on an interim basis Pur-
suant to Section 1.3, the fee shall
be an amount necessary to reimburse
2
023
a5 =149743
the owner of the Continental Pro -
party for its costs of providing
each such interim parking apace -
(c) If the Parking spaces are located
within a parking structure the fee
shall be the greater of M RIGRTY
DOLLARS ($80) per month per space
or (ii) the than - prevailing rate
for such parking.
ARTICLE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 2.1 - TERM. This covenant and easement shall con -
nue n e feet until such time as the El Torito Propperty is
no longer used as a restaurant. At the expiration of such
term, the owner of the E1 Torito Property shall provide to
the owner of the Continental Property a quitclaim deed or
other documents neceeeatyy to eliminate of record the cove-
nant and easement established by this Agreement.
Section 2.2 - COVENANTS TO RUN WITH LAND. The covenants and
easements established herein are for the benefit of the El
Torito Property and are intended to be and shall be con-
strued as covenants running with the Continental Property
and equitable servitudes upon the Continental Property and
every part thereof. Furthermore, each and all of such
covenants and easements shall be binding upon and burden,
and shall inure to the benefit of, all parsons having or
acquiring any right, title or interest in the Continental
Property, the El Torito Property or any part of either
thereof, and their respective successors and assigns, all
upon the terms, provisions and conditions eat forth heroin.
Section 2.3 - GENERAL INTERPRETATION
(a) If any term, provision or condition contained in this
Agreement (or the application of any such term, provision or
condition) shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable,
the remainder of this Agreement shall be valid and enforce -
able to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(b) When the context in which words are used herein indi-
cates that such is the intent, words in the singular number
shall include the plural and vice versa. All pronouns and
any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to all ggen-
ders, and the term "person" shall include natural indivi-
duals, corporations, partnerships, unincorporated organisa-
tions, aesociations, trusts, estates and all other forms of
3
024
66:;149743
entities. The captions of the Articles and Sections herein
are for convenience of reference only and shall not be con -
sidered or referred to in rasolving questions of interpre-
tation or construction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Retchum and Devil's Triangle
have executed this instrument as of the day and year first
above written.
'L�ABLL -RETL7
THE DBVOLE P B KIP
By dzL _
Stuart M.-Ketchum
as a general partner
Byi SANTA ASSOCIATES, a California
limited partnexabip, as��
general
�t
wart e c uta, e
sole general partner
025
$3=149743
STATE OF CALIFO_ gNJA
COUNTY OF �GF s � - }
[.CL1 �
On *4-r, iG before roe, the underd ed, a Non Pnblic in and for
sild Suite, penona0y appeared
- - - , penonaUy known to me or
proved to me on the basis of atisfaetory eaidenrc to be
the person —whoa name tubavibed tothe
within instrument and aekno;4d that -AL exr
toted the same.
WfCNBSSmyh danduffietalseaL
S�natum
('fhb am fm ollktY aoudst eN)
020
96.149743
STAT4 OP CALIPORNfA - ))
Collmyor Sq.
.' .
On - - yJ~:rG ))before mq tde undenigeed. a Notuy Public in and far
Sigmtum
penonulp known to m or
Hof sst4hao++yy addenae to be
rated the instrument
within as
o putnen of the pameohip
mtmmmt. and atknowtedged
. .. • ,',;:?
)muted the Scum
- • ...�
liddfell.
T
`i•• ••� 4YtttW.aa.ahR:.s�•.'�,IWJ J
mIs aeara -m-w eemw ad)
027
STATE OF
CODNTVC
On
aid State, l
Sipature
66=149743
undmiSned, a Notary Public in and for
(:Ats"fat o8?tld oetuW sea?)
CoVED44Nf CODE 27361.7
certify under penalty of perjury that the notary seal on the document
to which this statement is attache reads as follows:
1:amr of %otar. t -T L t
.tote Com- .6rdo:t hxrires J
:ounty when bond fs filed
Fla a of i,eOutlon 5 f R b
•`�_,_., Date �J G -
sFC D r. -
022
1 •
• �. W- . ♦A a JSAA
• Y I
11 '
�.
�: e` ..
W: Tgt.Y R'la•T
ty1,1111gtLplt.pgittl.�f,taaa )
(:Ats"fat o8?tld oetuW sea?)
CoVED44Nf CODE 27361.7
certify under penalty of perjury that the notary seal on the document
to which this statement is attache reads as follows:
1:amr of %otar. t -T L t
.tote Com- .6rdo:t hxrires J
:ounty when bond fs filed
Fla a of i,eOutlon 5 f R b
•`�_,_., Date �J G -
sFC D r. -
022
/e\U910111D79
City of Newport Beach Parking Code
0:�9
Chapter 20.40 — Off - Street Parking
Sections:
20.40.010 — Purpose
20.40.020 — Applicability
20.40.030 — Requirements for Off - Street Parking
20.40.040 — Off - Street Parking Spaces Required
20.40.050 — Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers
20.40.060 — Parking Requirements for Food Service Uses
20.40.070 — Development Standards for Parking Areas
20.40.080 — Parking for Nonresidential Uses in Residential Zoning Districts
20.40.090 — Parking Standards for Residential Uses
20.40. 100 — Off -Site Parking
20.40.110 — Adjustments to Off - Street Parking Requirements
20.40.120 — Parking Management Districts
20.40.130 — In -lieu Parking Fee
20.40.010 — Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide off - street parking and loading standards to:
A. Provide for the general welfare and convenience of persons within the City by ensuring
that sufficient parking facilities are available to meet the needs generated by specific
uses and that adequate parking is provided, to the extent feasible;
B Provide accessible, attractive, secure, and well- maintained off - street parking and loading
facilities;
C. Increase public safety by reducing congestion on public streets and to minimize impacts
to public street parking available for coastal access and recreation;
D. Ensure access and maneuverability for emergency vehicles; and
E. Provide loading and delivery facilities in proportion to the needs of allowed uses.
20.40.020 — Applicability
A. Off - street parking required. Each use, including a change or expansion of a use or
structure, except as otherwise provided for in Chapter 20.38 (Nonconforming Uses and
Structures) shall have appropriately maintained off - street parking and loading areas in
compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. A use shall not be commenced and
structures shall not be occupied until improvements required by this Chapter are
satisfactorily completed.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Off - Street
B. Change, enlargement, or intensification of use. Changes in use and enlargement or
intensification of an existing use shall require compliance with the off - street parking
requirements of this Chapter, except as allowed in Chapter 20.38 (Nonconforming Uses
and Structures).
20.40.030 — Requirements for Off - Street Parking
A. Parking required to be on -site. Parking shall be located on the same lot or
development site as the uses served, except for the following:
1. Townhouses and multi- tenant uses. Where parking is provided on another lot
within the same development site, the parking shall be located within 200 feet of
the units they are intended to serve.
2. Off -site parking agreement. Parking may be located off -site with the approval
of an off -site parking agreement in compliance with Subsection 20.52.080.0
(Parking agreement).
B. Permanent availability required. Each parking and loading space shall be
permanently available and maintained for parking purposes for the use it is intended to
serve. The Director may authorize the temporary use of parking or loading spaces for
other than parking or loading in conjunction with a seasonal or intermittent use allowed
in compliance with Section 20.52.040 (Limited Term Permit).
C. Maintenance. Parking spaces, driveways, maneuvering aisles, turnaround areas, and
landscaping areas shall be kept free of dust, graffiti, and litter. Striping, paving, walls,
light standards, and all other facilities shall be permanently maintained in good condition.
D. Vehicles for sale. Vehicles, trailers, or other personal property shall not be parked
upon a private street, parking lot, or private property for the primary purpose of
displaying the vehicle, trailer, or other personal property for sale, hire, or rental, unless
the property is appropriately zoned, and the vendor is licensed to transact a vehicle
sales business at that location.
E. Calculation of spaces required.
1. Fractional spaces. Fractional parking space requirements shall be rounded up
to the next whole space.
2. Bench seating. Where bench seating or pews are provided, 18 linear inches of
seating shall be considered to constitute a separate or individual seat.
3. Gross floor area. References to spaces per square foot are to be calculated on
the basis of gross floor area unless otherwise specified.
4. Net public area. "Net Public Area" shall be defined as the total area accessible
to the public within an eating and /or drinking establishment, excluding kitchens,
restrooms, offices pertaining to the use, and storage areas.
5. Spaces per occupant. References to spaces per occupant are to be calculated
on the basis of maximum occupancy approved by the City of Newport Beach Fire
Department.
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Octobo_gJ2010
Off - Street Parking 20.40
6. Spaces required for multiple uses. If more than one use is located on a site,
the number of required off - street parking spaces shall be equal to the sum of the
requirements prescribed for each use.
F. Nonconforming parking and loading. Land uses and structures that are non-
conforming due solely to the lack of off- street parking or loading facilities required by this
Chapter, shall be subject to the provisions of Section 20.38.060 (Nonconforming
Parking).
20.40.040 — Off - Street Parking Spaces Required
Off- street parking spaces shall be provided in compliance with Table 3.11, below. These
standards shall be considered the minimum required to preserve the public health, safety, and
welfare, and more extensive parking provisions may be required by the review authority in
particular circumstances. Unless otherwise noted parking requirements are calculated based on
gross floor area.
Industry
Small - 5,000 sq. ft. or less
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Large - Over 5,000 sq. ft.
1 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Industry, Marine Related
1 per 750 sq. ft.
Personal Storage (Mini Storage)
2 for resident manager, plus additional for office as
required by Minor Use Permit
Research and Development
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Warehousing and Storage 1 per 2,000 sq. ft., plus 1 per 350 sq. ft. for offices.
Minimum of 10 spaces per use
Wholesaling 1 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Assembly /Meeting Facilities
1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sq. ft. used for assembly
Commercial Recreation and Entertainment As required by Conditional Use Permit
Cultural Institutions 1 per 300 sq. ft.
Schools, Public and Private As required by Conditional /Minor Use Permit
Accessory Dwelling Units 1 per unit; a minimum of 2 covered per site.
Single -Unit Dwellings - Attached 2 per unit in a garage
Single -Unit Dwellings - Detached and less than 2 per unit in a garage
A nnn cn ft of ti= U flnnr.rc.
2DSS
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Land Use
Off - Street
T' U Parking Spaces Required
Single -Unit Dwellings - k7etached and 4,000ya L 3 per unit in a garage
square ft. or greater of floor area }]ASP�m2n 1 a Gmm't
Single -Unit Dwellings - Balboa Island 2 per unit in a garage
Multi -Unit Dwellings - 3 units 2 per unit covered, plus guest parking;
1 - 2 units, no guest parking required
3 units, 1 guest parking space
Multi -Unit Dwellings - 4 units or more
2 per unit covered, plus 0.5 space per unit for guest
parking
Two -Unit Dwellings 2 per unit; 1 in a garage and 1 covered or in a garage
Live /work units 2 per unit in a garage, plus 2 for guest/customer
Senior Housing - market rate
1.2 per unit
Appliances, Building Materials, Home Electronics, 1st 10,000 sq. ft. - 1space per 300 sq. ft.
Furniture, Nurseries, and Similar Large Warehouse- Over 10,000 sq. ft. - 1 space per 500 sq. ft.
type Retail Sales and Bulk Merchandise Facilities Plus 1 per 1,000 s .ft. of outdoor merchandise areas
Food and Beverage Sales 1 per 200 sq. ft.
Marine Rentals and Sales
Boat Rentals and Sales
1 per 1,000 sq. ft. of lot area, plus 1 per 350 sq. ft of
Marine Retail Sales 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Retail Sales 1 Der 250 so. ft.
Shopping Centers
1 per 200 sq. ft.
Convalescent Facilities 1 per 3 beds or as required by Conditional Use Permit
Emergency Health Facilities 1 per 200 sq. ft.
Financial Institutions and Related Services 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Hospitals 1 per bed; plus 1 per resident doctor and 1 per
emDlovee.
Offices* - Business, Corporate, General,
Governmental
First 50,000 sq. ft.
Next 75,000 sq. ft.
Floor area above 125,001 sq. ft.
1 per 250 sq. ft. net floor area
1 per 300 sq. ft. net floor area
1 per 350 sq. ft. net floor area
* Not more than 20% medical office uses.
Offices - Medical and Dental Offices I 1 per 200 sqrft:-
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 October2 , 10
Off- Street
20.40
1 per 250 so. ft.
Adult- Oriented Businesses I 1 per 1.5 occupants or .
as required by Conditional Use Permit
Ambulance Services 1 per 500 sq. ft., plus 2 storage spaces
Animal Sales and Services
Animal Boarding /Kennels
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Animal Grooming
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Animal Hospitals /Clinics
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Animal Retail Sales
1 per 250 sq.
ft.
Artists' Studios
1 per 1,000 sq.
ft.
Catering Services
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Care Uses
Adult Day Care — Small (6 or fewer) Spaces required for dwellina unit onlv.
Adult Day Care - Large (7 or more)
2 per site for drop -off and pick -up purposes (in addition
to the spaces required for the dwelling unit).
Child Day Care — Small (6 or fewer)
Spaces required for dwelling unit only.
Child Day Care - Large (9 to 14)
2 per site for drop -off and pick -up purposes (in addition
to the spaces required for the dwelling unit).
Day Care - General
1 per 7 occupants based on maximum occupancy
allowed per license.
Residential Care - General (7 to 14)
1 per 3 beds
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Accessory (open to public)
1 per each 3 seats or 1 per each 75 sq. ft. of net public
area., whichever is greater
Bars, Lounges, and Nightclubs
1 per each 4 persons based on allowed occupancy
load or as required by Conditional Use Permit
1 per 30 -50 sq. ft. of net public area, including outdoor
Food Service with /without alcohol, with /without
dining areas, but excluding the first 25% or 1,000 sq. ft
late hours
of outdoor dining area, whichever is less.
See Section 20, qo. 0 6
Food Service - Fast food
1 per 50 sq ft., and 1 per 100 sq. ft. for outdoor dining
areas
Take -Out Service - Limited
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Emergency Shelter
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Funeral Homes and Mortuaries
1 per 35 sq. ft. of assembly area
Small - 2,000 sq. ft or less 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Large - Over 2,000 sq. ft. 1 per 200 so. ft.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40 Off- Street
Laboratories (medical, dental, and similar) 1 per 500 sq. ft
Maintenance and Repair Services 1 per 500 sq ft
Marine Services
Boat Storage - Dry
0.33 per storage space or as required by Conditional
Use Permit
Boat Yards
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Dry Docks
2 per dry dock
Entertainment and Excursion Services
1 per each 3 passengers and crew members
Marine Service Stations
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Sport Fishing Charters
1 per each 2 passengers and crew members
Water Transportation Services - Office
1 per 100 sq. ft., minimum 2 spaces
Persol lal Services
Massage Establishments
1 per 200 sq. ft. or as required by Conditional Use
Permit
Nail Salons
1 per 80 sq. ft.
Personal Services, General
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Studio (dance, music, and similar)
1 per 250 sq. Ft.
Postal Services
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Printing and Duplicating Services
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Facilities
Collection Facility - Large
4 spaces minimum, but more may be required by the
review authority
Collection Facility - Small
As required by the review authority
Visitor Accommodations
Bed and Breakfast Inns
1 per guest room, plus 2 spaces
Hotels and accessory uses
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Motels
1 per guest room or unit
Recreational Vehicle Parks
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Time Shares
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Communication Facilities 1 per 500 sq. ft..
Heliports and Helistops As required by Conditional use Permit
Marinas 0.75 per slip or 0.75 per 25 feet of moorina soace
Office
Limited
Rentals
1 per 250 sq. ft.
1 per 300 sq. ft., plus 1 per rental vehicle (not including
Newport Beach Zoning.Code, Title 20 Octobe6e2510
Off - Street
01Q11 IG
Vehicle/Equipment Rentals and Sales
1 per 1,000 sq. ft. of lot area
Vehicles for hire
1 per 300 sq. ft., plus 1 per each vehicle associated
with the use and stored on the same site
Vehicle Sales, Office Only
1 per 250 sq. ft., plus 1 as required by DMV
Vehicle /Equipment Repair (General and Limited)
1 per 300 sq. ft. or 5 per service bay whichever is more
Services
Automobile Washing
1 per 200 sq. ft. of office or lounge area; plus queue for
Service Station 1 per 300 sq. ft. or 5 per service bay whichever is
more; minimum of 4
Service Station with Convenience Market 1 per 200 sq. ft., in addition to 5 per service bay
Vehicle Storage 1 per 500 sq. ft.
er Residence
1 per unit
Special Events As required by Municipal Code Chapter 11.03
Temporary Uses As required by the Limited Term Permit in compliance
with Section 20.52.040
20.40.050 — Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers
A. An off - street parking space requirement of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross
floor area may be used for shopping centers meeting the following criteria:
1. The gross floor area of the shopping center does not exceed 100,000 square feet;
and
2. The gross floor area of all eating and drinking establishments does not exceed 15
percent of the gross floor area of the shopping center.
B. Individual tenants with a gross floor area of 10,000 square feet or more shall meet the
parking space requirement for the applicable use in compliance with Section 20.40.040
(Off- street Parking Spaces Required), above.
C. Shopping centers with a gross floor areas in excess of 100,000 square feet or with
eating and drinking establishments occupying more than 15 percent of the gross floor
area of the center shall use a parking requirement equal to the sum of the requirements
prescribed for each use in the shopping center.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40 Off - Street
20.40.060 — Parking Requirements for Food Service Uses
A. Establishment of parking requirement. The applicable review authority shall establish
the off - street parking requirement for food service uses within a range of one space for
each 30 to 50 square feet of net public area based upon the following considerations:
The physical design characteristics:
a. The gross floor area of the building or tenant space;
d. The number of tables or seats and their arrangement;
e. Other areas that should logically be excluded from the determination of
net public area;
f. The parking lot design, including the use of small car spaces, tandem and
valet parking and loading areas;
g. Availability of guest dock space for boats; and
Extent of outdoor dining.
4. vperationai characteristics:
a. The amount of floor area devoted to live entertainment or dancing;
b. The amount of floor area devoted to the sale of alcoholic beverages;
C. The presence of pool tables, big screen televisions or other attractions;
d. The hours of operation; and
e. The expected turn over rate.
3. Location of the establishment:
a. In relation to other uses and the waterfront;
b. Availability of off -site parking nearby;
C. Amount of walk -in trade; and
d. Parking problems in the area at times of peak demand
B. Conditions of approval. If during the review of the application, the review authority
uses any of the preceding considerations as a basis for establishing the parking
requirement, the substance of the considerations shall become conditions of the permit
application approval and a change to any of the conditions will require an amendment to
the permit application, which may be amended to establish parking requirements within
the range as noted above.
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 OctobeOG`510
OS2
Attachment No. CC 9
Revised Parking Management Plan
O39
Muo
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
OVER 35 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE
October 4, 2011
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
2804 Lafayette Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Dear Mr. Ridgeway:
INTRODUCTION
The firm of Kunzman Associates, Inc. is pleased to provide this parking management plan for the 4221
Dolphin Striker project in the City of Newport Beach. The purpose of this parking management plan is to
determine existing conditions, anticipate peak parking demand, and describe the implementation of a
parking management strategy that will develop optimal parking conditions at the 4221 Dolphin Striker
project site. The project site is located at 4221 Dolphin Striker Way in the City of Newport Beach (see
Figure 1).
This report summarizes our methodology, analysis and findings. We trust that the findings, which are
summarized in the front of the report, will be of immediate as well as continuing value to you and the
City of Newport Beach in evaluating the proposed development.
FINDINGS
1. The project site is located at 4221 Dolphin Striker Way in the City of Newport Beach. The
project proposes to provide a total of 214 parking spaces.
2. A total of 211 on -site shared parking spaces are currently provided for the entire site. The
project site also has obtained an additional 16 off -site parking spaces.
3. The maximum number of occupied parking spaces at the 4221 Dolphin Striker project is 133
parked vehicles on a Friday from 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM.
4. The maximum number of occupied parking spaces at the 4221 Dolphin Striker project is 52
parked vehicles on a Saturday from 10:30 PM to 11:00 PM.
5. Based upon the City of Newport Beach Parking Code requirements, a total of 84 parking
spaces are required for the proposed project land uses. Per the City of Newport Beach
Parking Code, the proposed parking provided will be deficient three (3) parking spaces.
1111 TowN & COUNTRY ROAD, Sum 34
ORANGE. CALIFORNIA 92868
(714) 973 -8383
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
WN
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
October 4, 2011
6. Based upon the shared parking analysis, the total maximum likely parking demand of 205
occupied parking spaces will allow for parking on -site and provide sufficient additional parking
for the existing and proposed land uses based upon the proposed 198 on -site parking spaces
and 16 off -site parking spaces.
7. Employees of the proposed project land uses should be required to park in the off -site parking
structure. Incentives such as a parking cash -out for employees who choose not to drive to
work may help reduce the cost of maintaining off -site parking spaces.
8. Install and enforce parking regulation signs, such as "Customer Only", to prevent spillover
from adjacent land uses. Parking regulation must be enforced to be effective.
9. Based upon the parking management plan, the projected peak parking demand of 174
occupied parking spaces will allow for parking on -site and provide sufficient additional parking
for the existing and proposed land uses based upon the proposed 198 on -site parking spaces
and 16 off -site parking spaces.
10. It is recommended that the 16 off -site parking spaces be maintained as needed and a waiver
of the three (3) deficient parking spaces be allowed in conjunction with implementation of the
parking management plan.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site is located at 4221 Dolphin Striker Way in the City of Newport Beach (see Figure 1). The
proposed project site plan is shown on Figure 2. As shown on Figure 2, the proposed project will consist
of two free - standing, single -story buildings. The approximately 12,351 square foot development will
consist of 3,351 gross square feet of retail, 4,000 gross square feet of bank, 4,000 gross square feet of
high- turnover restaurant, and 1,000 gross square feet of take -out service (limited) land uses. The
project proposes to provide a total of 214 parking spaces (including 16 off -site parking spaces).
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project site is currently developed with a vacant quality restaurant. Parking is provided via a surface
parking lot shared by three parcels:
1) The proposed project site (currently vacant quality restaurant) —78 parking spaces
2) Saagar Fine Cuisine of India — 59 parking spaces
3) Classic Q Billiards and Sports Club — 74 parking spaces
The surface parking lot currently provides a total of 211 shared parking spaces. In addition, the project
site has existing parking agreements for 16 off -site parking spaces located at a parking structure
southwest of the project site. Appendix A contains a copy of all off -site and shared parking agreements.
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
LAG!
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
October 4, 2011
The existing quality restaurant (currently vacant) required 105 parking spaces per UP2008 -043 (at one
space per 40 square feet of net public area). Saagar Fine Cuisine of India requires 54 parking spaces per
UP2005 -004 (at one space per 50 square feet of net public area) and Classic Q Billiards and Sports Club
requires 80 parking spaces per UP3392.
PARKING SURVEY
The surface parking lot is shared by three land uses (see Table 1). A survey of the shared surface parking
lot was conducted to establish the parking demand for the existing land uses. Based upon discussions
with City of Newport Beach staff, the study periods for parking at the project site were determined to be
6:00 AM to 12:00 AM on a Friday and 6:00 AM to 12:00 AM on a Saturday. To quantify the existing
parking demand for the project site, the existing parking demand was determined by surveying the
project site at 30- minute intervals on Friday (February 11, 2011) and Saturday (February 12, 2011). For
purposes of the parking survey, the shared surface project parking lot was divided in eight (8) parking
zones as shown on Figure 3.
The number of existing parking spaces in each parking zone was field inventoried and included within
Tables 2 and 3. Based upon the field inventory, a total of 211 parking spaces are currently provided at
the surface parking lot (not including 16 off -site parking spaces).
The existing parking surveys are shown in Tables 2 and 3. As indicated in Table 2, the parking survey
conducted on Friday (February 11, 2011) shows the maximum number of occupied parking spaces is 133
parked vehicles from 5:30 PM to 6:00 PM. This is a maximum parking occupancy of 63 percent (133/211
= 63 %). As indicated in Table 3, the parking survey conducted on Saturday (February 12, 2011) shows
the maximum number of occupied parking spaces is 52 parked vehicles from 10:30 PM to 11:00 PM.
This is a maximum parking occupancy of 25 percent (52/211 = 25 %). Figure 4 illustrates a graphical
summary of the parking survey.
It should be noted that one vehicle was illegally parked in Zone H from 9:00 AM - 11:30 AM. Vehicles
parked in Zone H from 6:00 AM - 7:00 PM are likely for users of the office building to the south of the
project site.
PARKING CODE
The City of Newport Beach Parking Code requirements are included within Appendix B. Based upon the
City of Newport Beach Parking Code requirements, a total of one (1) parking space for every 250 square
feet of net floor area is required for retail, one (1) parking space for every 250 square feet of gross floor
area is required for financial institutions, one (1) parking space for every 40 square feet of net public
area is required for high- turnover restaurant, and one (1) parking space for every 250 square feet of
gross floor area is required for take -out service (limited).
Table 4 calculates the number of parking spaces required for the project site based upon the City of
Newport Beach Parking Code. The proposed land uses at the project site were calculated utilizing the
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
� 6]
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
October 4, 2011
retail, financial institution, high- turnover restaurant, and take -out service (limited) parking code
requirements.
The proposed 3,351 square feet of retail use would require approximately 14 parking spaces by using
the parking ratio of one space per 250 square feet of net floor area [3,351 s.f. + 250 sf. = 13.4 = 14
spaces). The 4,000 gross square feet of bank use would require approximately 16 parking spaces by
using the parking ratio of one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area (4,000 sf. + 250 sf. = 16
spaces). The 4,000 gross square feet of high turn -over dining establishments would require
approximately 50 parking spaces by using the parking ratio of one space per 40 square feet of net public
area (4,000 sf. + 2 (assuming 50% of total gross area is allocated for net public area) +40 sf. = 2,000 sf. +
40 sf. = 50 spaces). The take -out service (limited) use would generate a parking demand of
approximately 4 spaces by using the parking ratio of one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area
(1,000 sf. + 250 sf. = 4 spaces). The total parking demand per City of Newport Beach Parking Code for
the proposed project is 84 parking spaces.
Per the City of Newport Beach Parking Code, the proposed parking provided will be deficient three (3)
parking spaces (133 maximum occupied spaces on Friday + 84 parking spaces required per City Parking
Code = 217 parking spaces).
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
The idea of a shared parking analysis is that if the various land uses have peak parking demands at
different points in time, or on different days of the week, then the number of parking spaces required is
not the sum of the parking requirements for each land use, but rather less. If the peak demands for the
various land uses are non - coincidental, then there is an opportunity for sharing of parking. To
determine the degree to which shared parking can occur, the cumulative hourly parking demand of the
land uses is calculated at all points in time throughout the day for both weekdays and weekends. In this
case, Friday has been determined to be the peak day based upon the existing parking demand survey.
Kunzman Associates, Inc. has utilized time -of -day factors and the parking rates for weekday and
weekend parking demand for customer /visitor and employee as developed by the Urban Land Institute
Shared Parking (2005). The Urban Land Institute procedures were utilized in this study to evaluate peak
parking demand that would occur for the project at any point in time when day of week and hourly
factors are utilized. Per the Urban Land Institute, weekend rates and factors are applied to Friday after
5:00 PM.
To conduct a shared parking analysis, it is necessary to disaggregate the parking code into weekday and
weekend as well as customer /visitor /guest and employee /resident parking space demands. Based on
the City of Newport Beach Parking Code and the Urban Land Institute recommended parking ratios for
weekdays and weekends, the disaggregated parking rates are shown in Table 5.
Table 6 shows the expected hourly peak parking demand of the proposed project land uses for both a
Friday, which has been assumed as the peak day based upon the existing parking demand survey. Table
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
=1941
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
October 4, 2011
7 shows the cumulative parking demand peaks for the proposed project land uses combined with the
existing parking demand for the projected peak Friday.
Based upon the shared parking analysis, the maximum parking demand for the entire site during peak
hours is 205 parked vehicles.
The proposed project site plan will reconfigure the surface parking lot layout on Parcel 1 to provide 65
on -site parking spaces. The total proposed on -site parking spaces for the entire site is 198 spaces.
Including the 16 off -site parking spaces and the entire surface parking lot, the proposed project will
provide a total of 214 parking spaces for the entire site.
The total maximum likely parking demand of 205 occupied parking spaces will allow for parking on -site
and provide sufficient additional parking for the existing and proposed land uses based upon the
proposed 198 on -site parking spaces and 16 off -site parking spaces.
PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
The goal of any parking management plan is to develop policies or programs that result in more efficient
use of parking resources.
A common misconception is that an abundant parking supply is always desirable. While having too
much parking will guarantee sufficient parking supply, it can also have adverse effects such as
encouraging automobile use when other modes of transportation are available. In this case, many of
the nearby office buildings may choose to drive because there is excess parking supply whereas walking
would be a more viable option under optimal parking conditions. The price to provide additional
parking can also prove costly to developers, tenants, and users. In many cases, the peak parking
demand only occurs once a week, or even a few times per year. The remainder of the time, excess
parking is unused and wasteful. Sufficient parking supply should be provided; however, many of the
standards used to determine parking supply err towards oversupply.
The following paragraphs describe how to make the proposed parking supply most efficient.
Pedestrian Accessibility
Based upon transportation planning experience, 1,000 feet is considered to be a convenient pedestrian
walking distance. Figure 5 highlights the pedestrian walkways and demonstrates that the project site
has a high pedestrian potential. The same requirements in the City of Newport Beach Parking Code
would be applied to a location that has limited pedestrian accessibility. Because of the high pedestrian
accessibility and potential of the project site, the parking demand is expected to be less than required by
the City of Newport Beach Parking Code; however, sufficient parking is expected to be provided with
implementation of the parking management plan and no reductions have been made for high
pedestrian accessibility.
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
5 045
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
October 4, 2011
Spillover From Adiacent Land Uses
The existing parking survey seemed to indicate the possibility that users of the adjacent land uses were
occupying parking spaces at the project site. Specifically, parking zones D, G, and H are closest to the
vacant project, but still showed occupied parking spaces. Furthermore, these parking zones are easily
accessible to the office building located south of the project site. To verify these conditions, spot checks
of the parking conditions at the parking zones in question were conducted on a Friday (June 10, 2011) by
noting the first four digits of parked vehicle license plates (see Appendix Q.
An initial spot check between 7:30 AM and 8:30 AM witnessed at least ten (10) drivers that parked in
zones D, G, or H and entered the adjacent office building. Two more spot checks were taken at 12:30
PM and 5:00 PM and noted several vehicles parked near the adjacent office building during at least two
of the spot checks. It should also be noted that two people who entered the office building walked from
the direction of parking zone B and at least two vehicles were parked in Zone B during all three spot
checks. It is possible that other parking zones may have experienced spillover.
Based upon the spot checks, it can be concluded that spillover from adjacent land uses is a significant
factor in the existing parking conditions of the project site and the existing parking demand is believed
to be overstated by approximately 15 -20 vehicles during the projected peak period.
Parking Management Strategies
The following parking management strategies are recommended to ensure the proposed parking
resources are used efficiently:
1) Employees of the proposed project land uses should be required to park in the off -site parking
structure. Incentives such as a parking cash -out for employees who choose not to drive to work
may help reduce the cost of maintaining off -site parking spaces.
2) Install and enforce parking regulation signs, such as "Customer Only ", to prevent spillover from
adjacent land uses. Parking regulation, such as tow -away, should be enforced to be effective.
Tow -away enforcement of parking regulation will ensure that spillover does not occur upon project
completion. As shown on Table 9, the projected peak parking demand of 174 occupied parking spaces
will allow for parking on -site and provide sufficient additional parking for the existing and proposed land
uses based upon the proposed 198 on -site parking spaces and 16 off -site parking spaces with
implementation of the parking management plan.
Alternatives
The parking supply is not anticipated to be deficient with the above measures; however, one or more of
the following alternatives may be implemented to further manage parking demand should it be
necessary upon project completion:
W W W.TRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
Mr. Tod Ridgeway
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
October 4, 2011
1) Rope off an area of the parking lot for tandem parking during the peak parking periods. This will
require a parking attendant. A tandem parking operation plan shall be provided if this is
proposed.
2) Provide a complimentary valet system during peak parking periods. Valeted vehicles should be
parked off -site. A valet operation plan shall be provided if this is proposed.
CONCLUSIONS
Based upon the parking management plan, the projected peak parking demand of 174 occupied parking
spaces will allow for parking on -site and provide sufficient additional parking for the existing and
proposed land uses based upon the proposed 198 on -site parking spaces and 16 off -site parking spaces.
It is recommended that the 16 off -site parking spaces be maintained as needed and a waiver of the
three (3) deficient parking spaces be allowed in conjunction with implementation of the parking
management plan.
The City of Newport Beach should periodically review parking operations in the vicinity of the project
once the project is constructed to assure that the parking operations are satisfactory. Should it be
deemed necessary upon project completion, one or more of the alternative measures may be
implemented to further manage parking demand at the proposed project site.
It has been a pleasure to service your needs on the 4221 Dolphin Striker project. Should you have any
questions or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call at (714) 973 -8383.
Sincerely,
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Q� '0 A
Carl Ballard I
Principal Associate
#4902b
jPpF ESS/pN\
9
A.KU,y�I�Z
C
w 3 No, TFr0056 Z
d
\�
AAFF�G
OF CA1
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
W W W'FRAFFIC-ENGINEER.COM
William Kunzman, P.E.
Principal
7 047
Table 1
Existing Project Land Uses
Tenant
Parcel
I Land Use
I Quantity
I Units'
I Hours of Operation
Quality Restaurant (Vacant)
Parcel
N/A
1 7.996
1 TSF
N/A
Saagar Fine Cuisine of India
Parcel 2
Restaurant
1 7.015
1 TSF
11:00 AM - 12:00 AM Daily
Classic Q
Parcel 3
1 Restaurant
1 7.870
1 TSF
10:00 AM - 2:00 AM Daily
1 TSF =Thousand Square Feet
i
Table 2
Friday (February 31, 2011 ) Parking Count
133 =Maximum numberof ocupied parking spaces -133 vehicles from 5:30 PM -6:00 PM
'One vehicle was illegally parked fmm9g0 AM - 11:30AM. Vehicles parked In Zane H from 6:W AM -]:00 PM are Ilkelyfor users of the office building to the south of the project site.
Don not crude the 32oH-sne parking spans located In a nearhy parking accepted, which haw been auumed to be unoaupled due to Ne vacanrya the cans eg quality restaurant an Parcel 1,
0-"
Number of Parked Vehicles and Percentage of Occupied Parking Spaces
Time Period
Parking Zone
TParklngZone B
Parking ZoneC
Parking Zone
Parking ZOneE
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Total'
Parking Spaces Provided
10
32
37
46
40
26
13
]
211
6:00 AM 6:30 AM
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
2
B%
1
14%
3
1%
6:30AM - 7:00 AM
1
10%
2
6%
1
3%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
3
12%
1
14%
10
5%
]:00 AM -]:30 AM
1
10%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
5
19%
3
43%
16
8%
]:30 AM -890 AM
1
10%
2
6%
4
11%
3
]%
3
8%
1
4%
5
19%
3
43%
22
10%
8:110 AM -8:311 AM
1
10%
4
13%
3
8%
8
17%
3
8%
1
4%
]
27%
]
100%
34
16%
8:30 AM 9:W AM
2
20%
5
16%
2
5%
13
28%
4
10%
1
4%
30
38%
7
100%
44
21%
9:DO AM 9:30 AM
1
10%
5
16%
3
B%
19
41%
7
18%
1
4%
12
46%
8
114%
56
27%
9:30 AM - 30:00AM
2
20%
5
16%
3
8%
23
50%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
64
30%
1090 AM - 10:30 AM
2
20%
]
22%
4
11%
24
52%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
68
32%
10:30 AM - 11:00AM
3
30%
7
22%
4
11%
24
52%
9
23%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
69
33%
1190 AM - 1130 AM
5
50%
]
22%
6
16%
23
50%
8
20%
1
4%
13
50%
8
114%
71
34%
11:30 AM - 12:00 PM
8
80%
11
34%
13
35%
24
52%
14
35%
2
8%
13
50%
6
86%
91
43%
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
9
90%
20
63%
24
65%
25
54%
16
40%
3
12%
13
50%
6
86%
116
55%
1230 PM - 1:00 PM
8
80%
26
81%
22
59%
27
59%
15
38%
8
31%
13
50%
]
100%
126
60%
1:00 PM - 130 PM
8
80%
14
44%
19
51%
25
54%
11
28%
5
19%
13
50%
7
100%
102
48%
1:30 PM - 2011 PM
8
80%
10
31%
14
38%
24
52%
10
25%
4
15%
12
46%
]
l00%
89
42%
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
8
80%
9
28%
12
32%
20
43%
le
25%
2
8%
11
42%
]
100%
79
37%
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
8
80%
9
28%
12
32%
19
41%
9
23%
2
8%
10
38%
]
100%
76
36%
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
7
70%
14
44%
29
78%
18
39%
18
45%
4
15%
10
38%
6
86%
106
50%
3:30 PM - 4:00 PM
8
80%
15
47%
29
78%
19
41%
18
45%
4
15%
30
38%
]
100%
110
52%
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
9
90%
18
56%
27
73%
18
39%
18
45%
4
15%
11
42%
5
71%
110
52%
4:30 PM - 5:011 PM
10
100%
21
66%
29
78%
21
46%
16
40%
]
27%
11
42%
5
71%
120
57%
5:00 PM - 5:313 PM
10
l00%
29
91%
33
89%
17
37%
17
43%
6
23%
it
42%
5
71%
128
61%
5:30 PM - 6:00 PM
30
100%
31
97%
32
86%
19
41%
21
53%
9
35%
8
31%
3
43%
133
63%
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
19
100%
25
78%
27
73%
16
35%
21
53%
8
31%
5
19%
1
14%
113
54%
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
10
100%
16
50%
29
78%
13
28%
19
48%
7
27%
3
12%
0
0%
97
46%
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
10
100%
23
72%
31
84%
16
35%
17
43%
8
31%
3
12%
0
0%
108
51%
7:30 PM - 8911 PM
le
l00%
29
91%
32
86%
18
39%
15
38%
8
31%
2
8%
0
D%
114
54%
8:00 PM - 8:311 PM
9
90%
33
103%
31
84%
15
33%
15
38%
6
23%
4
15%
0
D%
113
54%
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
]
70%
28
88%
24
65%
16
35%
10
25%
3
12%
4
15%
1
14%
93
44%
9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
6
60%
27
84%
25
68%
13
28%
8
20%
2
8%
4
15%
1
14%
86
41%
9:30 PM - 30:00 PM
5
50%
27
84%
26
70%
13
28%
]
18%
2
8%
4
15%
1
14%
85
40%
30:00 PM - 10:30 PM
5
50%
27
84%
20
54%
12
26%
5
13%
2
8%
3
12%
1
14%
75
36%
1030 PM - 11:00 PM
4
40%
26
81%
19
51%
12
26%
6
15%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
74
35%
1100 PM - 1130 PM
6
60%
23
]2%
20
54%
12
2fi%
4
10%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
72
34%
11:30 PM - 12:00 AM
]
70%
17
53%
16
43%
6
13%
3
8%
3
12%
3
12%
1
14%
56
27%
133 =Maximum numberof ocupied parking spaces -133 vehicles from 5:30 PM -6:00 PM
'One vehicle was illegally parked fmm9g0 AM - 11:30AM. Vehicles parked In Zane H from 6:W AM -]:00 PM are Ilkelyfor users of the office building to the south of the project site.
Don not crude the 32oH-sne parking spans located In a nearhy parking accepted, which haw been auumed to be unoaupled due to Ne vacanrya the cans eg quality restaurant an Parcel 1,
0-"
Table 3
Saturday (February 12, 2011) Parking Count
i2= Maximum numb., of occupied parking spares -32 vehlclesfcom 1630 PM -11'W PMi
s noes not include the 32 off site parking spaces located in a nearby parking 4ruccure, which have been assum N to be unoccupied due to the varancy Pf the existing quality restaurant on Parcel u.
10 050
Number of Parked Vehicles and Percentage of Occupied Parking Spaces
Time Period
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Parking Zone
Total'
Parking Spaces Provided
10
32
3]
46
4D
26
13
]
211
6:00 AM - 6:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
3%
6:30 AM 7:0 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
6
3%
7:00 AM - 7:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
0
0%
0
0%
1
14%
]
3%
7:30 AM - 890 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
0
0%
2
5%
1
4%
0
0%
1
14%
8
4%
8:00 AM 8:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
1
3%
0
0%
3
8%
1
4%
1
4%
4
57%
12
6%
8:30 AM 9:0 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
3
8%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
14
]%
9:00 AM - 9:30 AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
6
86%
14
]%
9:30 AM - 10:00AM
0
0%
2
6%
2
5%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
12
6%
10:00 AM - 10:30AM
2
20%
4
13%
2
5%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
1
4%
]
100%
18
9%
10:30 AM - 11:00AM
❑
1 0%
1 2
6%
1
3%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
1 1
4%
1 ]
1 100%
14
1 ]%
11:00 AM - 1130 AM
1
10%
3
9%
3
8%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
]
100%
18
9%
1130 AM - 12:00 PM
0
0%
2
6%
3
8%
1
2%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
]
100%
16
8%
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
5
50%
4
13%
10
27%
2
4%
3
8%
1
4%
1
4%
6
86%
32
15%
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
5
50%
3
9%
16
43%
2
4%
2
5%
2
8%
2
8%
6
86%
38
18%
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM
9
90%
4
13%
20
54%
1
2%
3
8%
2
8%
1
4%
4
57%
44
21%
1:30 PM - 2:❑0PM
10
100%
3
9%
13
35%
1
2%
5
13%
2
8%
1
4%
5
71%
40
19%
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
8
80%
3
9%
12
32%
1
2%
4
10%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
34
16%
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
]
70%
2
6%
6
16%
2
4%
3
8%
0
0%
1
1 4%
5
71%
26
12%
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
4
40%
2
6%
5
14%
2
4%
3
8%
2
8%
1
4%
6
86%
25
12%
3:30 PM 4:W PM
3
30%
3
9%
5
14%
2
4%
1
3%
2
8%
1
4%
4
57%
21
30%
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
4
40%
4
13%
5
14%
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
6
86%
24
11%
4:30 PM - S:GD PM
6
60%
3
9%
4
11%
2
4%
2
5%
0
0%
1
4%
5
71%
23
11%
5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
5
50%
3
9%
6
16%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
❑
0%
17
8%
5:30 PM - 6 D PM
5
50%
4
13%
14
38%
2
4%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
26
12%
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
6
60%
5
16%
14
38%
1
2%
1
3%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
27
13%
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
4
40%
5
16%
13
35%
0
0%
3
8%
0
0%
0
0%
0
0%
25
12%
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
5
50%
4
13%
14
38%
0
0%
2
5%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
26
12%
7:30 PM - 890 PM
5
50%
]
22%
12
32%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
29
14%
8:00 PM - 8:30 PM
4
40%
]
22%
19
51%
0
0%
4
10%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
35
17%
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
4
40%
5
16%
18
49%
0
0%
4
10%
2
8%
0
0%
0
0%
33
16%
9:OOPM- 9:30PM
5
50%
8
25%
19
51%
0
0%
4
30%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
38
18%
9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
9
90%
30
31%
15
41%
0
0%
6
15%
2
8%
1
4%
0
0%
43
20%
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
10
100%
11
34%
22
59%
0
0%
5
13%
1
4%
1
4%
0
0%
50
24%
10:30 PM - 11:00 PM
10
100%
it
34%
23
62%
0
0%
]
18%
1
4%
0
0%
❑
0%
52
25%
11:00 PM - 11:30 PM
9
90%
11
34%
18
49%
0
0%
6
15%
1
4%
0
0%
0
0%
45
21%
11:30 PM - 12:00 AM
10
100%
]
22%
22
59%
2
4%
4
10%
2
8%
0
0%
0
0%
47
22%
i2= Maximum numb., of occupied parking spares -32 vehlclesfcom 1630 PM -11'W PMi
s noes not include the 32 off site parking spaces located in a nearby parking 4ruccure, which have been assum N to be unoccupied due to the varancy Pf the existing quality restaurant on Parcel u.
10 050
Table 4
Parking Spaces Required By City of Newport Beach Parking Code'
' See Appendix H.
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
' TSF based upon net floor area.
TSF based upon net public area equal to 50 %.
5 Limited to a maximum of six seats.
11 051
Parking Code
Land Use
Quantity
Units'
Parking Code
Requirement
Retail'
3.351
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of net floor area
14
Bank
4.000
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area
16
High- Turnover Restaurant°
2.000
TSF
1 parking space per 40 square feet of net public area
50
Take -Out Service - Limited'
1.000
TSF
1 parking space per 250 square feet of gross floor area
4
Total
F
1
84
' See Appendix H.
2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet
' TSF based upon net floor area.
TSF based upon net public area equal to 50 %.
5 Limited to a maximum of six seats.
11 051
Table 5
Parking Code Requirements`
' Source: City of Newport Beach and Urban land Institute, Shared Parking. 2nd Edition, 2005. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parkin e provides splits for customers /visitors /guests vs.
employees /residents for weekdays and weekends. These splits were applied to the City Parking Code so thatme sum of the splits is equal to the City Parking Code modified per TSF.
' TSF = Thousand Square Feet
I Weekday is defined as 6:00 AM Monday through 5:00 PM Friday.
' City Parking Code modified per TSF.
12 0152
City
Weekday Requirements'
Weekend Requirements
Customer/
Employee/
Customer/
Employee/
Parking
Land Use
Quantity
Units
Cod e4
Visitor /Guest
Resident
Total
Visitor /Guest
Resident
Total
Parking Rates:
Retail
3.351
TSF
4.00
3.22
0.78
4.00
3.20
0.80
4.00
Bank
4.000
TSF
4.00
2.61
1.39
4.00
2.61
1.39
4.00
High- Turnover Restaurant
2.000
T51F
25.00
21.50
3.50
25.00
21.25
3.75
25.00
Take -Out Service - Limited
1.0001
TSF
1 4.00
3.40
0.60
4.00
3.43
0.57
4.00
Parking Required:
Retail
3.351
TSF
14
11
3
14
11
3
14
Bank
4.000
TSF
16
10
6
16
10
6
16
High- Turnover Restaurant
2.000
TSF
50
43
7
50
43
7
50
Take -Out Service - Limited
1.000
TSF
4
3
1
21
21
1
4
Total
84
67
17
84
67
17
84
' Source: City of Newport Beach and Urban land Institute, Shared Parking. 2nd Edition, 2005. The Urban Land Institute's Shared Parkin e provides splits for customers /visitors /guests vs.
employees /residents for weekdays and weekends. These splits were applied to the City Parking Code so thatme sum of the splits is equal to the City Parking Code modified per TSF.
' TSF = Thousand Square Feet
I Weekday is defined as 6:00 AM Monday through 5:00 PM Friday.
' City Parking Code modified per TSF.
12 0152
O
S
� C
E
s 3
y�y
E�
3
°s
C
S
s
3
r
0153
M
N
t4
4oXX
„BaXXXe�XXXao
�o
E�
�E
ti
�o
F
fifi
3 °oF
b E
i
O
E
9
t
6
°o
R a
R o
8 8
8 8
8 8
8 8
S 8
8 8
8 8
BIB
8 8
o R
R R
R R
R R
X R
R R
R X
E
E
oXX�Xe
°o
Oe��e��g�����voXXX�X��XXXXX���X
E
g
. 8
£ `&
R £
. M
R... `R
'NR N
. M
R'`R
R £
. 8
£ o
'NR N
. M
M .
. X
a _
E
e
E
S
£
a £
a s
£
£
£ £
£ a
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
S
S
8
8
8
m 8
8 A
e
8 R
e
m
8 m
8 m
8 A
8
8 m
8 A
8
m
8
8 m
8 m
y�y
E�
3
°s
C
S
s
3
r
0153
M
N
Table 7
Projected Peak Day (Friday) Number of Parked Vehicles
Time Period
Peak Day Number
of Parked Vehicles
Projected Parking Demand
Total
Retail
Bank
High- Turnover
Restaurant
Take -Out
Service - Limited
6:00 AM - 6:30 AM
3
1
0
15
1
20
6:30 AM - 7:00 AM
10
1
0
15
1
27
7:00 AM - 7:30 AM
16
1
0
27
1
45
7:30 AM - 8:00 AM
22
1
0
27
1
51
8:00 AM - 8:30 AM
34
3
9
33
1
80
8:30 AM - 9:00 AM
44
3
9
1 33
1
90
9:00 AM - 9:30 AM
56
7
15
39
2
119
9:30 AM - 10:00 AM
64
7
15
39
2
127
10:00 AM - 10:30 AM
68
10
16
44
3
141
10:30 AM - 11:00 AM
69
10
16
44
3
142
11:00 AM - 11:30 AM
71
13
11
46
4
145
11:30 AM - 12:00 PM
91
13
11
46
4
165
12:00 PM - 12:30 PM
116
14
11
50
4
195
12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
126
14
11
50
4
205
1:00 PM - 1:30 PM
102
14
11
46
4
177
1:30 PM - 2:00 PM
89
14
11
46
4
164
2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
79
14
13
29
4
139
2:30 PM - 3:00 PM
76
14
13
29
4
136
3:00 PM - 3:30 PM
106
13
11
25
3
158
3:30 PM - 4:00 PM
110
13
11
25
3
162
4:00 PM - 4:30 PM
110
13
14
25
3
165
4:30 PM - 5:00 PM
120
13
14
25
3
175
5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
128
13
0
33
3
177
5:30 PM - 6:00 PM
133
13
0
33
3
182
6:00 PM - 6:30 PM
113
12
0
37
4
166
6:30 PM - 7:00 PM
97
12
0
37
4
150
7:00 PM - 7:30 PM
108
11
0
37
4
160
7:30 PM - 8:00 PM
114
11
0
37
4
166
8:00 PM - 8:30 PM
113
10
0
35
3
161
8:30 PM - 9:00 PM
93
10
0
35
3
141
9:00 PM - 9:30 PM
86
8
0
19
2
115
9:30 PM - 10:00 PM
85
8
0
19
2
114
10:00 PM - 10:30 PM
75
6
0
16
1
98
10:30 PM - 11:00 PM
74
6
0
16
1
97
11:00 PM - 1130 PM
72
3
0
11
1
87
11:30 PM - 12:00 AM
56
3
0
11
1
71
M= Maximum projected number of occupied parking spaces - 205 vehicles from 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM.
' See Table 6.
14 054
Table 8
Parking Demand Summary
Descriptor
Number of
Parking Spaces
Maximum Projected Parking Demand During Peak Hours'
205
Proposed Parking Spaces Provided On -Site
198
Proposed Parking Spaces Provided Off -Site
16
Total Proposed Parking Spaces
214
Additional Parking Spaces Needed
-9
i See Table 7.
15 0155
Table 9
Parking Management Plan Demand Summary
Descriptor
Number of
Parking Spaces
Maximum Projected Parking Demand During Peak Hours'
205
Spillover From Adjacent Land Uses
-15
Proposed Project Employees to Park Off -Site
-16
Projected Peak Parking Demand On -Site
174
Proposed Parking Spaces Provided On -Site
198
i See Table 7.
16 050
• . .. � tea'
' ,•T!— [� a '�� �,'`, /f 1 alt
. 4.
' . T
� ` .. {• �- L" i r 1. � ,,�� � �.
it ..
OPER 70 )'E/\RE of EXCELLENT SERVICE
17 057
Figure 2
Site Plan
SAM C:3
� AIY M0IMCCJ
a
F
I
ai
I I
0
.RAIL djit d'91 t l F
I � p
P g
xrY q� Wy�
� r�noa' o � Y '�sti ? �`� .o-e1 ,• Iii�`o-e � _ d _
nYz
a.cz owl 4-se; Jo-a 1 vx
1 � I I
U= C
Gu 8P main .r.¢I d.
WZ:2 88 'O a nia 1�
uroww w
'PMA+ w Now
10 ME 0 W. 1 N.)
iAIWO dJY MIN
NTS 4902b/2
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
OVER 30 YEARS OF EXCELLEM SERVICE
18 052
• `` �, �`
56
LA
`.. _ LW
1
i
El
ID
•
I
0
OVER 30 YEAR, OF FXCELLENT tiERVICE
19 ��^
Figure 4
Parking Survey Summary Graph (Existing Conditions)
250 — ° °-
200
M
150
a
par
c
Y
d
0
v
a
100
z
........................................... ...............................
--------------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
\ 00""' / / \\ �,n
-------------------- -- ---- \` - - -- f -------------- V ------ \`---- - - - - -'
� , \ "i
- -- - \
- ------------------------------------------------- - - - - --
/
o
Q e Q Q Q Q
0 0 i 0 §i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ti ti M P h to' n' Qi of 6' hti
—Park ni; Spaces Occupied on Friday (February 11, 2011)
Parking Spaces Occupied on Saturday (February 12 2011(
......... Total Parking Spaces Provided- M (not including 32 f,ft. parking spaces)
KUNZMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
OVER 30 YEARS OF EXCELLENT SERVICE
20
4902b/4
•� � - ; / / .. i C II 11.,1 r,F a`` .• / •
1 \
Y ,ti 1
\
All4 v /
V
11
Ov "ER SU YE,\RG OE EXCELLENT SERVICE
21 ��2
APPENDIX A
Parking Agreements
002
PARKING AUTHORIZATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT
This PARKING AUTHORIZATION AND LICENSE AGREEMENT (this
"License Agreement ") is made as of this April 13, 2011 by and between Ridgeway
Development Company (the "Licensee ") and Ampco System Parking (the "Licensor "),
pursuant to which Licensor grants Licensee the right to use certain parking spaces located
at 4100 Newport Place in Newport Beach, California (the "Parking Structure ").
1. PARKING SPACES: Licensor hereby grants to Licensee a license to use on a
nonexclusive basis, during the License Term (defined herein), up to SIXTEEN
(16) unreserved parking spaces in the parking structure (the "Parking Spaces ").
The location will be the top level of the parking structure.
2. LICENSE TERM: The term of this License Agreement (the "License Term ")
shall Commence on or about May 01, 2011 and will expire on April 30, 2012.
Upon Expiration of the Initial Tern, the License Agreement shall continue on a
month -to -month basis subject to termination by either party upon by providing a
thirty (30) day written notice.
3. USE: The Parking Spaces are only to be used by the Licensee and its employees
and agents. Spaces are not intended for use by Licensee's visitors, invitees,
contractors, or subcontractors. Licensee acknowledges that the Parking Spaces
are only to be occupied by passenger vehicles.
4. LICENSE/PARKING FEE: For the Licensee Tenn, Licensee shall pay to
Ampco System Parking on a monthly basis $72.50 for each parking space
requested by Licensee and for which a keycard is issued by Licensor ( "Licensee
Spaces ") during any month. At Licensoe's sole discretion, the monthly rate shall
be subject to adjustment upon expiration of the initial License Term. The total
parking used by Licensee will not exceed Sixteen (16) spaces. Licensee shall pay
Licensor, on or before the commencement date of the License Term, Licensee's
first (1St) month's license /parking fee in an amount equal to $72.50 times the
number of Licensee Spaces
5. KEYCARD FEES: Licensee shall pay to Licensor, concurrently with the
commencement of the License Term, a non - refundable fee of Ten Dollars
($10.00) per keycard requested. Licensee acknowledges that it shall be charged a
Ten Dollar ($10.00) fee by Licensor for each new or replace keycard.
003
6. LINIITATION OF LIABILITY: Upon receipt of the keycards, Licensee
acknowledges that it shall be permitted to park one (1) vehicle within one (1)
unreserved parking space in the Parking Structure for each parking space leased
provided the use of all such Parking Spaces shall be at the risk of the Licensee.
Licensor does not assume care, custody, or control of any vehicle or its contents.
7. INDEMNIFICATION: Licensee shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Licensor and its partners and affiliated entities and their employees, partners,
directors, agents, representatives, and professional consultants and its and their
respective successors and assigns (collectively, the "Indemnities "1 from and
against any loss, damage, injury, death, accident, fire of other casualty, liability,
claim, cost or expense (including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees) of
any kind or character to any person or property, including the property of the
Indemnities (collectively, the "Claims "), arising, in whole or in part, from or
relating to: (a) the use of the Parking Structure and the real property upon which
the Parking Structure is situated (the "Property ") by Licensee or its employees,
(b) any act or omission of Licensee or any of its employees relative to the
Property, (c) any bodily injury, property damage, accident, fire or other casualty
to or involving Licensee or its employees and its or their property on the Property,
(d) any loss of theft whatsoever of any property of anything placed or stored by
Licensee or its employees on or about the Property, (e) any breach by Licensee of
its obligation under this License Agreement, (f) any violation of any rule,
ordinance, regulation or law, and (h) any bodily injury or property damage
resulting from Licensee's access to the Property. In Addition to, and not in
limitation of, Licensor's other rights and remedies under this License Agreement,
should Licensee fail within thirty (30) days of written request from Licensor to
acknowledge its indemnity obligation and obligation to assume the defense of the
Indemnities from and against any Claim as provided in this Paragraph 7, then in
any such case Licensor may, at its option, pay any such Claim or settle or
discharge any action therefore or satisfy any judgment thereon, and all costs,
expenses and other sums incurred by Licensor in connection therewith (including
but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees) shall be maximum contract rate
permitted by law from the date incurred or paid until repaid and any default either
in such initial failure to pay or subsequent repayment to Licensor shall, at
Licensor's option, constitute a breach under this License Agreement. Except for
Licensor's sole negligence or willful misconduct.
8. RULES AND REGULATION: Licensee shall provide to Licensor the license
plate number or Vehicle Identification Number ( "VIN") and /or stock number of
any and all vehicles to be parked within the Parking Structure. The use of the
Parking Spaces shall be subject to the Parking Rules and Regulations contained in
Exhibit "A" attached hereto and any other reasonable, non - discriminatory rules
and regulations adopted by Licensor and/or Licensor's parking operators from
time to time, including any system for controlled ingress and egress and charging
004
visitors and invitees, with appropriate provision for validation of such charges.
Licensee shall not use more parking privileges than its allotment and shall not use
any parking spaces specifically assigned by Licensor to tenants of the building
situated upon the Property (the "Building ") or the project or for such other uses as
visitor parking. Licensee's parking privileges shall be used only for parking by
vehicles no larger than normally sized passenger automobiles or pick -up trucks.
Licensee shall not permit or allow any vehicles that belong to or are controlled by
Licensee or Licensee's employees to be parked in areas other than those
designated by Licensor for such loading or unloading or unloading activities. If
Licensee permits or allows any of the prohibited activities described herein, then
Licensor shall have the right, without notice, in addition to such other rights and
remedies that it may have, to remove or tow away the vehicle involved and charge
the cost thereof Licensee, which cost shall be immediately payable by Licensee
upon demand by Licensor.
9. ASSIGNABILITY: This license is personal to Licensee and Licensee shall not
assign its rights under this License Agreement, whether voluntarily or by
operation of law, and Licensee shall not permit the use of the Parking Spaces, or
any part thereof, except in strict compliance with the provisions hereof, and any
attempt to do so shall be null and void.
10. GOVERMENTAL REGULATIONS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF
LICENSEE: Licensee's use of the Parking Structure shall comply with all
applicable governmental ordinances, rules, laws, and regulations. All persons
who enter upon the Property pursuant to this License Agreement do so at their
own risk, and shall comply with any and all instructions and directions of
Licensor or Licensor's authorized representatives. Licensee shall not bring, store
or use any hazardous or toxic materials or substances on the Property.
11. GOVERNING LAW: The terms of this License Agreement shall be governed
by and construed according to the laws of the State of California.
12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence as to each term, provision,
condition and requirement contained in the License Agreement.
13. MISCELLANEOUS: This License Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties hereto pertaining to the subject matter hereof and all prior and
contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties
hereto, oral or written, are herby superseded and merged herein. The headings of
this License Agreement are for purpose of reference only and shall not limit or
define the meaning of the provisions hereof. This License Agreement may be
005
executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all
of which shall constitute the same instrument. Neither this License Agreement
nor a short form memorandum or assignment hereof shall be filed or recorded in
any public office. Any attorneys' fees or other costs incurred in clearing such
cloud on title to the Property will be Licensee's sole cost and responsibility.
Please acknowledge your acceptance of these terms with your signature
below.
Ridgeway Development Company Ampco System Parking
LE
Date:
000
PARKING RULES AND REGULATIONS
In addition to the parking provisions contained in the License Agreement to which
this Exhibit "A" is attached, the following rules and regulations shall apply with respect
to the use of the Building's parking facilities.
1. Every parker is required to park and lock his/her own vehicle. All responsibility
for damage to or loss of vehicles is assumed by the parker and Licensor shall not
be responsible for any such damage or loss by water, fire, defective brakes, the
act or omissions of others, theft, or for any other cause.
2. Licensee shall not park any vehicles in the Parking Structure other than
automobiles, motorcycles, motor driven or non -motor driven bicycles or four
wheeled trucks.
Parking stickers, keycards or any other device or form of identification supplied
by Licensor as a condition of use of the parking facilities shall remain the
property of Licensor. The serial number of the parking identification device may
not be obliterated. Devices are not transferable and any device in the possession
of an unauthorized holder will be void.
4. Intentionally deleted
5. Vehicles must be parked entirely within painted stall lines of a single parking
stall.
6. All directional signs and arrows must be observed.
7. The speed limit within all parking areas shall be five (5) miles per hour.
8. Parking is prohibited: (a) in areas not striped for parking; (b) in aisles; (c) where
"no parking" signs are posted; (d) on ramps; (e) in cross - hatched areas; and (f) in
reserved spaces and in such other areas as may be designated by Licensor or
Licensor's parking operator.
9. Loss or theft of parking identification devices must be reported to the
management office immediately, and a lost or stolen report must be filed by the
Licensee or user of such parking identification device at that time. Licensor has
the right to exclude any vehicle from the parking facilities that does not have an
identification device.
X07
10. Any parking identification devices reported lost or stolen found on any
unauthorized car will be confiscated and the illegal holder will be subject to
prosecution.
11. Washing, waxing, cleaning, or servicing of any vehicle in any are not specifically
reserved for such purpose is prohibited.
12. The parking operators, managers or attendants are not authorized to make or
allow any exceptions to these rules and regulations.
13. Licensee's continued right to park in the parking facilities is conditioned upon
Licensee abiding by these rules and regulations and those contained in this
License Agreement.
14. Licensor reserves the right to establish and change parking fees, only in
accordance with Section 4 of the License Agreement, and to modify and/or adopt
such other reasonable and non - discriminatory rules and regulations for the
parking facilities as it deems necessary for the operation of the parking facilities,
and any violation of the rules shall subject the vehicle to removal, at such vehicle
owner's expense.
06�1g
.lhen *Recorded Return Tor
The Newport Project
4101 MacArthur Blvd.KU C
Newport Beach, CA 92660
RECIPROCAL PARKING AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
This Agreement made this 217 day of
1972, by. and between THE NES•fpCLg P 0 ;r�C�, a joint venture
composed of Emkay Development Company, Inc. and Atlas Realty-
Company (hereinafter called "The Newport Project "), and EMRAY
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. (hereinafter called "Emkay ").
,t '+ RECITALS
Ji' + A. The Newport Project is the owner of Lot 4 of
a
1,7d - Track 7770, recorded in book 299, pages 15 -16 of Miscellaneous
I �1.A'I Maps, Records of Orange County, outlined in red on the parcel
•;)• analysis attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated hArein
by this reference (the "Development!').
B. Concurrently with the recording of this Agree-
ment The .Newport Project is deeding to Emkay the portion of
the Development denominated Parcel 1 and outlined in green on
Exhibit "A," The Newport Project intends to deed to others
the portions of the Development delineated Parcels 2 and 3,
outlined in yellow and in blue, respectively, on Exhibit "A."
C. The Newport Project and Emkay desire to establish
integra ted . parking facilities and 1andcrapji4 areas in the
Development, and to provide for the maintenance of same,
for the benefit of all of the Development, and for the co'mmn
use - and benefit of -the present and future owners and Lessees
of Parcels within the Development, all as more specifically
hereinafter set forth.
R'cGDnDED Al G "'AU-s ur
In. & 1207 1.11
01 f?:Iu:AL l': '::aJu OF
... :n r.:v:'..1CAALY.
J+u LFI Nll� � IJ %4
l.�:n2:T.i,H;'ltF, Cc:nn.•ro:i
PA20'10 -135 for GP2010 -010 P02010 -001
4221001ph1nstfiker'Nay 0 o9
k'dgeway 0evelopmew
AGREMENT
.afire 1 0443 ?4«lr6
In consideration of the foregoing recitals, the
mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, and the mutual
benefits to be derived by each of the parties therefrom,
it is hereby agreed among the parties as follows:
1. Definitions.
(a) The "Term" of this Agreement shall commence
on the date hereof and continue until terminated by
•y agreement among a majority of the owners of the Parcels
�yt in the Development or their respective successors in
interest.
'(b) The "Effective Date" of this Agreement
shall be, as to each of the respective Parcels, the
first to occur of the opening for business of the
restaurant to be constructed on such Parcel or
.shirty (30) days following the recording of a notice
of completion of the restaurant to be constructed on
such Parcel.
(c) "Common Areas" shall mean those portions
of the Development designated oy shading on Exhibit
"A," being composed of Commgn_Parking..Areas, and
Common Landscaped Areas.
2.- Use of Common Areas. The Newport Project and Emkay
each hereby grant to the other reciprocal easements for
parking purposes and ingress and egress over, across and
upon the Common Areas located upon their respective Parcels.
No building or structure shall be erected or maintained
upon the Common Areas other than parking and landscaping
areas and related sidewalks; walkways, lighting and similar
-2-
070
t,U 10443F"-1777
associated facilities. Each of the Parcel owners, their
lessees, assigns and successors in interest, and their
respective employees and invitees,shall be entitled to
use the Common Areas, subject to such reasonable rules
and regulations relating to such'use as a majority of the
Pa`ceeL o�mers may from time to time establish, including
validation requirements.
3. Improvement. Each Pam rcel o mer, or its
successor in interest, shall, at its own expense, improve
those portions of the Common Parking Areas and Landscaped
Areas on its respective premises. Such work of improvement
shall be performed pursuant to plans and specifications
approved by Emkay and the Parcel ovmer.
'A, 4. Maintenance. From and after the EffectiN
Date as to the first restaurant to be constructe EmYca
�'I S shall, subject to the direct3qa—Q9 a nla„joriry of the Parcel
T
owners, operate, manage,, police; light, repair and maintain
the Common Areas.
5. Control. Subject to the.direction of a
r
t, {j majority of the Parcel owned Cmkay� hall at all times
during the Term hereof control the automobile parking areas,
x
driveways, entrances and exits, landscaped. areas, and the
sidewalks and pedestrian passageways within the Common Areas,
and may at any time and from time to time during the Term
hereof restrain any use or occupancy thereof except as autho-
rized by the rules and regulations for the use of such areas
established by a majority of the Parcel owners from time to
time. Emkay may temporarily close all or portions of the
Common Areas for repairs or alterations, to prevent a dedi-
cation thereof or the accrual of prescriptive rights therein,
-3-
071
tw 10443 Fat 778
or for any other reason deemed sufficient by Emkay. The
rights of each of the parties and their successors in
interest in and to the Common Areas shall at all times be
nonexclusive, and subject -to the rights of other parties
and their successors in interest from time to. time authorized
to use the Common Areas on a nonexclusive basis.
6. Costs and Expenses.
3 J (a) Eag.4 Pa_ reel owner shall pay to
n the manner and at the time provided below,
MAGI �SV' L
such party's proportionate share -,, as defined below,
1610 °'
of all costs and expenses incurred b y E for the
.operation and maintenance of the Common Areas. Such
costs and expenses shall include, without limiting
the. generality of the -foregoing, gardening, land-
scaping, cost of public liability, property dainage,
vandalism and malicious mischief, and other insurance,
repairs, painting, lighting, cleaning, trash removal,
depreciation of equipment, fire protection, and similar
items, and an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of
all such costs and e-6 pgngg o cover Emkay's admin-
istrative and overhead a -Uenses_ It is intended and
agreed that all. taxes and assessments by public
authority relating to real property or the ownership
thereof, including the real property comprising the
Common Areas, shall be paid by the respective Parcel
owners. In no event shall any cost or expense
relating to the buildings in the Development be
included in the cost of operation of the Common
Areas.
-4-
072 -2
ME 10443 Pt6E779
(b) The proportionate share of the
Common Area costs of each Parcel owner shall be
as follows:
(i) Upon the Effective Date
as to the first owner to open for business,
such owner shall pay 100% of the cost of
maintaining and operating the Common Areas
located on such party's Parcel.
(ii.) Upon the Effective Date as
to the second owner to open for business,
the two owners so opened shall share the
cost of operating and maintaining the
Common Areas located on their two Parceld,
in the proportion which the respective
gross square footages of their two Parcels
bear•to each other.
(iii) Upon the Effective Date as
to the third owner to open for business,
and for the balance of the Term, the three
Parcel owners shall share the cost of op-
erating and maintaining all of the Common
Areas located in the Development in the
following percentages:
Owner of Parcel 1 38%
Owner of Parcel 2 25%
Owner of Parcel 3 37%
(c) Prior to the commencement of�e3Ch
calendar period of s _(6,)_,moaths..duri.ng the Term,
Emkay shall give each Parcel owner a written
-5-
073
10443 Flu Teo
estimate of their respective shares of such Common
Area costs for.the ensuing six (6) month period. Such
estimated amount shall not exceed 110% of the actual
share of such Parcel owner for the then current six (6)
month period. Each Parcel owner shall pay such esti-
mated amount to Emka.�in_equal_ monthly installments,
in advance. Within ninety (90) days after the end of
each such six (6) month period, Emkay shall furnish to
each Parcel owner a statement showing in reasonable
detail the costs and expenses incurred by Emkay
for the operation and maintenance of the Common Areas
during such period, and each Parcel owner shall promptly
make any payment or allowance necessary to adjust each
such party's estimated payment to such party's actual
proportionate share of Common Area costs as shown by
•such annual statement.
7. Enforcement of Assessments.
(a) Failure to pay the estimated share
of Common Area cost or any installment thereof, in-
cluding any semi - annual adjustment, promptly and in
any event within ten (10) days after written notice
from Emkay of nonpayment, shall constitute a delin-
quency and default with respect to the Parcel to
Which such share relates. A majority of the Parcel
.. owners is authorize¢ „and empowered �g -oceed in
the event of any such default toI collect each such
delinquent individual assessment, together with
interest upon the unpaid amount thereof at ten
percent (10 %) per annum from the date of such
notice, until the same is fully paid, together
-6-
074
Mr.. I 0a43 ?1(E781.
with recording fees, title costs, court costs,
and reasonable attorney's fees.
(b) If and whenever a default occurs,,
as provided above, the non - defaulting Parcel owners
dha11 be entitled to alien against the Parcel to
which such default relates, for' the unpaid amount
of such share of Common Area costs and the cost
and expenses described above. In.the event of
any such default, then any non - defaulting Parcel
owner may file for record in the office of the
County Recorder of Orange County, California, a
claim of lien, which shall contain at least'
(i) A statement of the unpaid
amount of the share of Common Area cost;
(ii) A description sufficient for
identification of the Parcel to which the
default relates; and
(iii) The name of the owner or
reputed owner of the property described
in (ii) above.
Such claim of lien shall be effective to establish
a lien against the real property described in such
claim, in the amount specified therein, together
with interest at ten percent (10 %) per annum from
the date of. notice of nonpayment, together with
recording fees and reasonable costs of any title
dearth or title policy before or after made or
obtained in connection with such claim of lien or
the foreclosure of the claim of lien, together
with court costs and reasonable attorney's fees
which may accrue in the enforcement of such lien.
-7- Cp75
ar f 0443 FaE 782
(c) Such lien, when so established
against the real property described in said claim,.
shall be prior and superior to any right, title, in-
terest, lien, or claim which may be or may have been
acquired in or attached to said real property sub-
sequent to the time of filing such claim, except that
such lien' shall in any event be' subordinate to the lien
of any bona fide first trust deed upon such property.
Such lien shall be for the use and benefit of the non -
defaulting Parcel owners and may be enforced and fore-
closed in a suit or action brought by any one or more
of them in any court of competent jurisdiction, if
brought within one year of the filing of such claim,
in the same manner as if the amount of such lien had
been evidenced by the promissory note of the person or
persons who on the date of notice of nonpayment were the
fee owners of the property subjected to such lien, and
as if such note were secured by a real estate mortgage
upon said real property duly executed by the fee owners
of such property as of the time of recording and
duly recorded 'at 'the 'time such claim was filed for
record. In any such suit or action the plaintiffs
shall be entitled to a personal judgment in the full
amount of such lien against each person who was such
fee owner on such date of notice of nonpayment. The
net amount received on account of such Lien or from any
judgment with respect to such lien, if received after
the close of the year for which such share was due, shall
be applied against the non - defaulting Parcel owners'
current shares of Common Area costs, until fully expended.
M
(�,70
e:q.10143 F.'a783
. -.:. f U
8. Binding Upon Successors. This Agree!merxt phall%
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of thd:'p,at ties. and
their respective successors, assigns, lessees ?Sublessees
Upon transfer of the fee title to any Parcel to dibuccissor
which assumes in writing the obligations i, :bry this
Agreement, the transferor shall be relieved from all ob liga
......... .
tions accruing hereunder subsequent to the date'of transfer.
9. Paragraph Headings. The
used herein are for reference only, and shall ndt'enter
into the interpretation of this Agreement.
EXECUTED this 19th day of October —, 1972.
2�y
EMY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, .INC.
THE NEWPORT PROJECT.
By EMKAY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
By,
B
By ATLAS REALTY COMPANY
6177
STATE OF CALIFORNIA p . 10443 tu(c764
u4d
COUrTY OF ORANGE
On this 19th day of October , 1972 , before me, the undersigned, a notary
Public for said County and State, personally appeared Robert A. Alleborn
and Edward J. Ruwaldt known to we to be the president
and vice- president ieepectively of
Emkay Development CO., Inc.
the corporation that executed -the within instrument, said persons being known to me
to be the persons who executed the within instrument on behalf of said corporation,
said corporation being known to be to be one of the joint'venturers of
THE NEWPORT PROJECT.
the joint venture that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
such corporation executed the came both individually and as joint venturer of said
joint venture and that such joint venture also executed the same,
(gfpL�. Virginia M. White,
Name (Typed or Printed)
Notary Public in and for id County and State
STATE OF CALIPORNIA 1 5S.
COUNTY OF... 2_0..........._._._...._j .
On...00tObEr „19thx_197........ ' fidorense, the nndersigncl,a Notary Pabllc in and forsaitl Stale. Personally apptarcd
.r _•......
R. A. Aileborn knwvn to me to be
known to me to be lhe_..Vl CB•�TeBZden �yay. of rho CorQo atinn that ewaecd the n•116(n Inatnmwnl, known to me to
be Ih< Persons wba exeeumeJ tLC within Dlejrumenl en bd,xif of the Corporation Ihwein nnm<d, and acknowledged to nit that such
Corporation excepted the same, and acknowledged to me that aucb Corporation executed the within Inalmment pursuant to its by-
I.,,, or a resolution of its board of dkedors.
\VITNESSmyhandandomelalaeal. /� y1� L'•/ y %�•
..rf v: Leaks ota,.y Pub /lic -...4L zlulc) .
(Seal) �/ (Notary Public's Signature)
Virginia N. White
(Warne •iytrd or Prinlyd)
Nutary Public In and for said Slate
2407
Hle self wean re Gs«.Ibn Hn,dtl A,lawlylnrM
072
STATE OF .aXA5.
COUNTY OF HARRIS
On this 19th day of October 19 72 , before maj the
undersigned, a Notary Public for said County and State, personally
appeared _ L. 0. Henson and W. J. Perry, Jr.
known to me to be the vice president and assistant secretary
respectively of Atlas Realty Company
the corporation that executed the within instrument, said persons
being known to me to be the persons who executed the within instrument
on behalf of said corporation,, said corporation being known to me to
be one-of the point venturers or The Newport Project
the Joint venture that executed the within instrument, and acknow-
ledged to me that such corporation executed the same both individually
and as Joint venturer of said Joint venture and that such .ioint.venture
also executed the same. )1 (
(SEAL) .C.f'2h -� l77 ��C�•�r..�c+� -
Name Typed or rrxnxeai
Notary Public in and for said
County and State
My commission expires 6/1173
C
.c:
V
O
U
0�"
I MY1721
EXHIBIT "A"
tl
rl
020
I
6:149743
moo"
Amommw
14HEN RECORDED, RETURN TO:
LATHAN & WATKINS
555 South Flower Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 -2466
Attn: J. K. Hachigian i ysig.00
OF Dµ40!000 CAI
I P9PM APAI5166
COVENANT AND AGRREMENT
REGARDING MAINTENANCE OF OFF - STREET
PARKING SPACE AFFECTING
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOK 45, PAGE 23 AND
PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP FILED IN
BOOK 183 PAGES 14 THROUGH 15 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER, ORANGE. COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PA2010 -135 for GP2010 -010 PD2010 -007
4221 Dolphin Stdker Way 021
Ridgeway Development
BE-149743
THIS COVENANT AND AGREEMENT FOR OFF-STREET PARKING
SPACE (the "Agreement ") is made as of January 14, 1986,
between STUART MITCHELL KETCHUN, JR. ( "Ketchum ") and THE
DEVIL'S TRIANGLE PARTNERSHIP, a California general partner-
ship ( "Devil's Triangle "). Ketchum owns the property si-
tuated in the State of California, County of Orange, City of
Newport Beach described as follows:
Parcel 1 of Parcel Hap 83 -705 as per map
filed in book 153, pages 14 and 15 of
Parcel Maps in the Offica of the Recor-
der of said County (hereinafter the
"Continental Property ") j
and Devil's Triangle owns the adjoining property described
as follows:
Parcel 1 as shown on a Parcel Map filed
in book 45, page 23 of Parcel Maps in
the Office of the Recorder of said
County (hereinafter the "E1 Torito Pro-
perty') .
RECITAL
The Planning Commission of the City of Newport
Beach, California (the "City ") has approved, subject to
certain conditions, Devil's Triangle s request to allow the
use of an existingg open courtyard for dining and drinking
puxposee in tha'El Torito Restaurant (located on the E1
Torito Property). One condition requires that a covenant
for additional automobile parking spaces be establiahed to
run with the Continental Property for the benefit of the El
Torito Property, and another condition requires a grant of
an easement for and the construction of a sidewalk linking
the covenanted parking spaces on the Continental Property to
the E1 Torito Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to
satisfy said conditions.
ARTICLE 1. COVENANT AND EASEMENT
Section 1.1 - GRANT OF COVENANT. The owner of the
on nentsr Property hereby covenants and agrees to provide
on the Continental Property for the benefit of the El
Torito Pro arty, sixteen (lb) automobile parking spaces
together w1.th a nonexclusive easement for access to, ingress
to, egress from, and use and enjoyment of the parking spaces
for (i) passage of vehicles, (li) passege of pedestrian
traffic, and (iii) other uses incidental to such passages
022
85:149743
reserving, however, in favor of the owner of the Continental
Property, all rights of access to, ingress to, egress from
and use and ontoyment of the parking spaces not othervioe
inconsistent with the parking rights granted herein.
Section 1.2 - GRANT OF EASSRENT. The owner of the Con -
t nenta roperty hereby grants a nonexclusive easement for
the passage of pedestrian traffic, and other uses incidental
to such passage, over the Continental Property from the
garking spaces, as covenanted in Section 1.1, to the E1
oxit0 Property over ouch portion of the Continental
Property as the owner thereof shall reasonably designate.
The owner of the E1 Torito Property shall have the right,
after obtaining the approval of the Continental Property
owner, which such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, to construct a sidewalk along the easement route.
Such sidewalk shall be constructed and maintained at the
sole expense of the owner of the El Torito Property. The
owner of the Continental Property shall have the right, at
its sole expense and subject to the approval of the owner of
the El Torito Ptoperty, which such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld, to relocate the easement and
reconstruct a sidewalk along the relocated easement route.
Section 1.3 - TEMPORARY LOSS OF PARKING SPACES, The owner
o- £"CFe-Continental Property shall have the right from time
to time, in order to accomodate construction or other
activities on the Continental Property, to temporarily
relocate some or all of the. covenanted parking spaces to an
off -site location (not on the Continental Property) which,
under the then - present circumstances, will enable the owner
of the E1 Torito Property to use the same with as little
inconvenience to such owner as is practicable under the
circumstances.
Section 1.4 - PARKING CHARGES. The owner of the Continental
Property shall have the right to assess and collect from any
person parking on the spaces covenanted in Section 1.1 a
parking fee in the amount as follows:
(a) As long as such parking spaces are
surface parking the fee shall be
FORTY DOLLARS ( 40) per month per
apace.
(b) If the parking spaces are located
off -site on an interim basis pur-
suant to Section 1.3, the fee shall
be an amount necessary to reimburse
023
65.:149743
the owner of the Continental Pro-
perty for its costs of providing
each such interim parking apace.
(c) If the parking spaces are located
within a parking structure the fee
shall be the greater of M EIGHTY
DOLLARS (680) per month par apace
or (ii) the then - prevailing rate
for such parking.
ARTICLE 2. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section,2.I - TERM. This covenant and easement shall can-
e n e feet until such time as the E1 Torito Property is
no longer used as a restaurant. At the expiration of such
term, the owner of the E1 Torito Property shall provide to
the owner of the Continontal Property a quitclaim deed or
other documents necessary to eliminate of record the cove-
nant and easement established by this Agreement.
Section 2.2 - COVENANTS To RUN WITH LAND. The covenants and
easements established herein are for the benefit of the El
Torito Property and are intended to be and shall be con-
strued as covenants running with the Continental Property
and equitable servitudes upon the Continental Property and
every part thereof, Furthermore, each and all of such
covenants and easements shall be binding upon and burden,
and shall inure to the benefit of, all persons having or
acquiring any right, title or interest in the Continental
Property, the E1 Torito Property or any part of either
thereof, and their respective successors and assigns, all
upon the terms, provisions and conditions set forth herein.
Section 2.3 - GENERAL INTERPRETATION
(a) If any term, provision or condition contained in this
Agreement (or the application of any such term, provision or
condition) shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable,
the remainder of this Agreement shall be valid and enforce-
able to the fullest extent permitted by law.
(b) When the context in which words are used herein indi-
totes that such is the intent, words in the singular number
shall include the plural and vice versa. All pronouns and
any variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to all gen-
dera, and the term "person" shall include natural indivi-
duals, corporations, partnerships, unincorporated organize -
tione, associations, Cruets, estates and all other forms of
024
EB:149743
entities. The captions of the Articles and Sections herein
are for convenience of reference only and shall not be con-
sidered or referred to in resolving questions of interpre-
tation or construction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ketchum and Devil' e Triangle
have executed this instrument as of the day and year first
shove written.
THE DEV 'S TRIANGLE P 9E SHIP
tuart ate sum
as a general partner
Sys SANTA ASSOCIATES, a California
limited parcnership, ae
Byne pprtn
ST—uart M. Ketchum, its
sole general partner
025
SOUNT.V CALIFO_ gNIA so. AA)GELF4i
COUNTY OP LCLS � •
On Qom` fG befor
said Stare, personally Appeared _..._.S» f lV rr
personally known to me or
proved to me on the Writ of ntbfaetoryevldena to be
the person —whose nainey- tubrcrlbed to the
within Instrvmant and aeknowledged that —&L exe•
cuted the same.
WITNESS Zce'-L� and offitW teal.
SISnature
efl f
85=149743
Mlle in and for
, 4. 1.11
(76uvn fa oflktd aoudel avp
020
85:149743
STATE OF CALIFOj{NIA
COUNTYOF _ Amt/ FS _ "s-
on -f' bcfom me, the undenipcd, a Notay Public in and for
Gild Stue,personJly tppecred — _
ppeene
nJly knovm to me or
t
to me an e - IMUrcaoty eddente to be
to me thtt
WITNESS
Sivitum
..r
1 w, X1 t .IV,
1 wYttn•r,umbia. s.a :.W.W
ffbls sm fae(gdd m1srW sell
'BBZ149743
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF I ne. iJ, m-af
s
SL
On G
before me, the undm ntd, a Notary FubDc In and for
"Id State, pemalay appeued
- --
personally known to me or proved to me on the bub of udefactory addehce to be the pmon_,Who exeouttd
the within hummenr as Sa:4 -.r6tA
,n debtktfa�nen of .. �A i!} A9We IA7
Signtrute
•\ • IY
�• \ �• Yi I.� i 1.4 efjYll'Y
�1`•.r' ette \ur.1:..alnne;aar,zlOCea
(Thb aln foro(0ebi nombl wd)
COYERNNEN'f CODE 27361.7
certify under penalty of perjury that the notary seal on the document
to which this statement is attach !f reads as follows:
`:ome of sotar. ..�I 9' L a _Y &Mja1_,LQ .
.late Costelsrion l:xrlres WAVe -1 - :2, j IjRj
.ounty•whorr bond Is filed!_1{- teli�Lr•G.
PIageofP, cut loll
- -F�� Date iJ 1 G
"
022
P_1]]IL110D7:
City of Newport Beach Parking Code
Chapter 20.40 — Off - Street Parking
Sections:
20.40.010 — Purpose
20.40.020 — Applicability
20.40.030 — Requirements for Off - Street Parking
20.40.040 — Off - Street Parking Spaces Required
20.40.050 — Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers
20.40.060 — Parking Requirements for Food Service Uses
20.40.070 — Development Standards for Parking Areas
20.40.080 — Parking for Nonresidential Uses in Residential Zoning Districts
20.40.090 — Parking Standards for Residential Uses
20.40. 100 — Off -Site Parking
20.40. 110 — Adjustments to Off - Street Parking Requirements
20.40.120 — Parking Management Districts
20.40.130 — In -lieu Parking Fee
20.40.010 — Purpose
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide off - street parking and loading standards to:
A. Provide for the general welfare and convenience of persons within the City by ensuring
that sufficient parking facilities are available to meet the needs generated by specific
uses and that adequate parking is provided, to the extent feasible;
B Provide accessible, attractive, secure, and well- maintained off- street parking and loading
facilities;
C. Increase public safety by reducing congestion on public streets and to minimize impacts
to public street parking available for coastal access and recreation;
D. Ensure access and maneuverability for emergency vehicles; and
E. Provide loading and delivery facilities in proportion to the needs of allowed uses.
20.40.020 — Applicability
A. Off - street parking required. Each use, including a change or expansion of a use or
structure, except as otherwise provided for in Chapter 20.38 (Nonconforming Uses and
Structures) shall have appropriately maintained off- street parking and loading areas in
compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. A use shall not be commenced and
structures shall not be occupied until improvements required by this Chapter are
satisfactorily completed.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
%l ,1
Off - Street Parki
B. Change, enlargement, or intensification of use. Changes in use and enlargement or
intensification of an existing use shall require compliance with the off - street parking
requirements of this Chapter, except as allowed in Chapter 20.38 (Nonconforming Uses
and Structures).
20.40.030 — Requirements for Off - Street Parking
A. Parking required to be on -site. Parking shall be located on the same lot or
development site as the uses served, except for the following:
Townhouses and multi- tenant uses. Where parking is provided on another lot
within the same development site, the parking shall be located within 200 feet of
the units they are intended to serve.
2. Off -site parking agreement. Parking may be located off -site with the approval
of an off -site parking agreement in compliance with Subsection 20.52.080.0
(Parking agreement).
B. Permanent availability required. Each parking and loading space shall be
permanently available and maintained for parking purposes for the use it is intended to
serve. The Director may authorize the temporary use of parking or loading spaces for
other than parking or loading in conjunction with a seasonal or intermittent use allowed
in compliance with Section 20.52.040 (Limited Term Permit).
C. Maintenance. Parking spaces, driveways, maneuvering aisles, turnaround areas, and
landscaping areas shall be kept free of dust, graffiti, and litter. Striping, paving, walls,
light standards, and all other facilities shall be permanently maintained in good condition.
D. Vehicles for sale. Vehicles, trailers, or other personal property shall not be parked
upon a private street, parking lot, or private property for the primary purpose of
displaying the vehicle, trailer, or other personal property for sale, hire, or rental, unless
the property is appropriately zoned, and the vendor is licensed to transact a vehicle
sales business at that location.
E. Calculation of spaces required.
1. Fractional spaces. Fractional parking space requirements shall be rounded up
to the next whole space.
2. Bench seating. Where bench seating or pews are provided, 18 linear inches of
seating shall be considered to constitute a separate or individual seat.
3. Gross floor area. References to spaces per square foot are to be calculated on
the basis of gross floor area unless otherwise specified.
4. Net public area. "Net Public Area" shall be defined as the total area accessible
to the public within an eating and /or drinking establishment, excluding kitchens,
restrooms, offices pertaining to the use, and storage areas.
5. Spaces per occupant. References to spaces per occupant are to be calculated
on the basis of maximum occupancy approved by the City of Newport Beach Fire
Department.
EMNewport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Octobq rrSO10
Off - Street Parking . 20.40
6. Spaces required for multiple uses. If more than one use is located on a site,
the number of required off - street parking spaces shall be equal to the sum of the
requirements prescribed for each use.
F. Nonconforming parking and loading. Land uses and structures that are non-
conforming due solely to the lack of off - street parking or loading facilities required by this
Chapter, shall be subject to the provisions of Section 20.38.060 (Nonconforming
Parking).
20.40.040 — Off - Street Parking Spaces Required
Off- street parking spaces shall be provided in compliance with Table 3.11, below. These
standards shall be considered the minimum required to preserve the public health, safety, and
welfare, and more extensive parking provisions may be required by the review authority in
particular circumstances. Unless otherwise noted parking requirements are calculated based on
gross floor area.
Industry
Small - 5,000 sq. ft. or less
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Large - Over 5,000 sq. ft.
1 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Industry, Marine Related
1 per 750 sq. ft.
Personal Storage (Mini Storage)
2 for resident manager, plus additional for office as
required by Minor Use Permit
Research and Development
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Warehousing and Storage
1 per 2,000 sq. ft., plus 1 per 350 sq. ft. for offices.
Minimum of 10 spaces peruse
Wholesaling
1 per 1,000 sq. ft.
Assembly /Meeting Facilities
1 per 3 seats or 1 per 35 sq. ft. used for assembly
purposes
Commercial Recreation and Entertainment
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Cultural Institutions
1 per 300 sq. ft.
Schools, Public and Private
As required by Conditional /Minor Use Permit
Accessory Dwelling Units
1 per unit; a minimum of 2 covered per site.
Single -Unit Dwellings - Attached
2 per unit in a garage
Single -Unit Dwellings - Detached and less than
2 per unit in a garage
4,000 sq. ft. of floor area
geoss
October 26, 2010
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Off - Street
T' U Parking Spaces Required
Single -Unit Dwellings - etached and 4,000 e
3 per unit in a garage
s uare ft. or greater of floor area bOnl ri a
Single -Unit Dwellings - Balboa Island
2 per unit in a garage
Multi -Unit Dwellings - 3 units
2 per unit covered, plus guest parking;
1 - 2 units, no guest parking required
3 units, 1 guest parking space
Multi -Unit Dwellings - 4 units or more
2 per unit covered, plus 0.5 space per unit for guest
parking
Two -Unit Dwellings
2 per unit; 1 in a garage and 1 covered or in a garage
Live /work units
2 per unit in a garage, plus 2 for guest/customer
parking
Senior Housing - market rate
1.2 per unit
Senior Housin - affordable
1 Eer unit
Appliances, Building Materials, Home Electronics,
1st 10,000 sq. ft. - 1space per 300 sq. ft.
Furniture, Nurseries, and Similar Large Warehouse-
Over 10,000 sq. ft. - 1 space per 500 sq. ft.
type Retail Sales and Bulk Merchandise Facilities
Plus 1 per 1,000 s .ft. of outdoor merchandise areas
Food and Beverage Sales
1 per 200 sq. ft.
Marine Rentals and Sales
Boat Rentals and Sales 1 per 1,000 sq. ft. of lot area, plus 1 per 350 sq. ft of
office area
Marine Retail Sales 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Retail Sales 1 per 250 sq. ft.
in Centers 1 per 200 sq. ft.
Shopping 9 0-- c a: �n nn ncn
Convalescent Facilities 1 per 3 beds or as required by Conditional Use Permit
Emergency Health Facilities 1 per 200 sq. ft.
Financial Institutions and Related Services 1 per 250 sq. ft.
Hospitals 1 per bed; plus 1 per resident doctor and 1 per
emolovee.
Offices* - Business, Corporate, General,
Governmental
First 50,000 sq. ft.
Next 75,000 sq. ft.
Floor area above 125,001 sq. ft.
1 per 250 sq. ft. net floor area
1 per 300 sq. ft. net floor area
1 per 350 sq. ft. net floor area
* Not more than 20% medical office uses.
Offices - Medical and Dental Offices 1 1 Der 200 so. -ft:-
Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 October
Off- Street
20.40
Outpatient
1 Der 250 so. ft.
Adult- Oriented Businesses 1 per 1.5 occupants or
as required by Conditional Use Permit
Ambulance Services 1 per 500 sq. ft., plus 2 storage spaces.
Animal Sales and Services
Animal Boarding /Kennels
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Animal Grooming
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Animal Hospitals /Clinics
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Animal Retail Sales
1 per 250 sq.
ft.
Artists' Studios
1 per 1,000 sq.
ft.
Catering Services
1 per 400 sq.
ft.
Care Uses
Adult Dav Care — Small (6 or fewer) Spaces required for dwelling unit only.
Adult Day Care - Large (7 or more)
2 per site for drop -off and pick -up purposes (in addition
to the spaces required for the dwelling unit).
Child Day Care — Small (6 or fewer)
Spaces required for dwelling unit only.
Child Day Care - Large (9 to 14)
2 per site for drop -off and pick -up purposes (in addition
to the spaces required for the dwellin unit),
Day Care - General
1 per 7 occupants based on maximum occupancy
late hours
allowed per license.
Residential Care - General (7 to 14)
1 per 3 beds
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Accessory (open to public)
1 per each 3 seats or 1 per each 75 sq. ft. of net public
area., whichever is greater
Bars, Lounges, and Nightclubs
1 per each 4 persons based on allowed occupancy
load or as required by Conditional Use Permit
1 per 30 -50 sq. ft. of net public area, including outdoor
Food Service with /without alcohol, with /without
dining areas, but excluding the first 25% or 1,000 sq. ft
late hours
of outdoor dining area, whichever is less.
See Section *1348- 2a • 'Fo, 0 6
Food Service - Fast food
1 per 50 sq. ft., and 1 per 100 sq. ft. for outdoor dining
areas
Take -Out Service - Limited
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Emergency Shelter
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Funeral Homes and Mortuaries
1 per 35 sq. ft. of assembly area
Health /Fitness Facilities
Small - 2,000 sq. ft or less 1 per 250 sq. ft.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40
Off - Street
Laboratories (medical, dental, and similar) 1 per 500 sq. ft
Maintenance and Repair Services 1 per 500 sq. ft.
Marine Services
Boat Storage - Dry
0.33 per storage space or as required by Conditional
Use Permit
Boat Yards
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Dry Docks
2 per dry dock
Entertainment and Excursion Services
1 per each 3 passengers and crew members
Marine Service Stations
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Sport Fishing Charters
1 per each 2 passengers and crew members
Water Transportation Services - Office
1 per 100 sq. ft., minimum 2 spaces
Personal Services
Massage Establishments
1 per 200 sq. ft. or as required by Conditional Use
Permit
Nail Salons
1 per 80 sq. ft.
Personal Services, General
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Studio (dance, music, and similar)
1 per 250 sq. Ft.
Postal Services
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Printing and Duplicating Services
1 per 250 sq. ft.
Recycling Facilities
Collection Facility - Large 4 spaces minimum, but more may be required by the
review authority
Collection Facility - Small
As required by the review authority
Visitor Accommodations
Bed and Breakfast Inns
1 per guest room, plus 2 spaces
Hotels and accessory uses
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Motels
1 per guest room or unit
Recreational Vehicle Parks
As required by Conditional Use Permit
Time Shares
Communication Facilities
As required by Conditional Use Permit
1 per 500 sq. ft.
Heliports and Helistops
As required by Conditional use Permit
Marinas
0.75 oer slip or 0.75 oer 25 feet of moorina space
Office (
Limited
1,
1 per 300 sq. ft., plus 1 per rental vehicle (not including
Newport Beach Zoning.Code, Title 20 Octob 10
Off - Street Parking 20.40
Vehicle/Equipment Rentals and Sales 1 per 1,000 sq. ft. of lot area
Vehicles for hire 1 per 300 sq. ft., plus 1 per each vehicle associated
with the use and stored on the same site
Vehicle Sales, Office Only 1 per 250 sq. ft., plus 1 as required by DMV
Vehicle /Equipment Repair (General and Limited) 1 per 300 sq. ft. or 5 per service bay whichever is more
nt Services
Automobile Washing
Service Station
1 per 200 sq. ft. of office or lounge area; plus queue for
1 per 300 sq. ft. or 5 per service bay whichever is
Service Station with Convenience Market 1 per 200 sq. ft., in addition to 5 per service bay
Vehicle Storaoe 1 per 500 sq. ft.
Caretaker Residence 1 per unit
Special Events As required by Municipal Code Chapter 11.03
Temporary Uses As required by the Limited Term Permit in compliance
with Section 20.52.040
20.40.050 — Parking Requirements for Shopping Centers
A. An off - street parking space requirement of 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross
floor area may be used for shopping centers meeting the following criteria:
1. The gross floor area of the shopping center does not exceed 100,000 square feet;
and
2. The gross floor area of all eating and drinking establishments does not exceed 15
percent of the gross floor area of the shopping center.
B. Individual tenants with a gross floor area of 10,000 square feet or more shall meet the
parking space requirement for the applicable use in compliance with Section 20.40.040
(Off- street Parking Spaces Required), above.
C. Shopping centers with a gross floor areas in excess of 100,000 square feet or with
eating and drinking establishments occupying more than 15 percent of the gross floor
area of the center shall use a parking requirement equal to the sum of the requirements
prescribed for each use in the shopping center.
October 26, 2010 Newport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20
20.40 Off - Street
20.40.060 — Parking Requirements for Food Service Uses
A. Establishment of parking requirement. The applicable review authority shall establish
the off - street parking requirement for food service uses within a range of one space for
each 30 to 50 square feet of net public area based upon the following considerations:
1. The physical design characteristics:
a. The gross floor area of the building or tenant space;
d. The number of tables or seats and their arrangement;
e. Other areas that should logically be excluded from the determination of
net public area;
f. The parking lot design, including the use of small car spaces, tandem and
valet parking and loading areas;
g. Availability of guest dock space for boats; and
h. Extent of outdoor dining.
L. Operational characteristics:
a. The amount of floor area devoted to live entertainment or dancing;
b. The amount of floor area devoted to the sale of alcoholic beverages;
C. The presence of pool tables, big screen televisions or other attractions;
d. The hours of operation; and
e. The expected turn over rate.
3. Location of the establishment:
a. In relation to other uses and the waterfront;
b. Availability of off -site parking nearby;
C. Amount of walk -in trade; and
d. Parking problems in the area at times of peak demand.
B. Conditions of approval. If during the review of the application, the review authority
uses any of the preceding considerations as a basis for establishing the parking
requirement, the substance of the considerations shall become conditions of the permit
application approval and a change to any of the conditions will require an amendment to
the permit application, which may be amended to establish parking requirements within
the range as noted above.
MNewport Beach Zoning Code, Title 20 Octob " *10
APPENDIX C
Spillover Spot Checks
4�9 2
Spillover Spot Check
6/10/2011
* =Driver of parked vehicle entered adjacent office building
# # # #* = Vehicle belongs to office user and parked during morning, midday, and evening spot check
# # # #= Vehicle parked during at least two of the spot checks
WI
Zone D
Zone G
Zone H
4UGJ
3WOF
4PIL
2ZKT*
8E81*
6MAN
6HRM*
5TFH*
3GZP
5SDS
4KK7*
5VFJ*
7:30 AM -
8:30 AM
3HIT*
4CBY*
3PZC*
6DOC*
4BLB
4ZZP
5KNM
5SDS
6AO6
5VFJ*
3HIT*
6DLU
5HBL
5MXA
3WOF
4PIL
6HRM*
4CBY*
6MAN
12:30 PM
SYCN
8E81*
4VHD
4KK7*
2ZKT*
5TFH*
6HPT
6MIT
6GAU
3HIT*
4CBY*
SVF1*
5MXA
8E81*
5KNM
6HRM*
3SYL
5HBL
4VHD
7Y18
2KQC
5:00 PM
2ZKT*
4DLB
6MHT
5KNM
6GER
3PZC*
STWS
SSFB
5SDS
* =Driver of parked vehicle entered adjacent office building
# # # #* = Vehicle belongs to office user and parked during morning, midday, and evening spot check
# # # #= Vehicle parked during at least two of the spot checks
WI
700
Attachment No. CC 10
Revised Plans
701
702
X
0
a
i
a
'o
g
c
3
W
m U y� ��
� A� _ `
�5` on
°� � s
F
y, a
� � �
� w w
Q � � .
� C Q
� :a 3 � ..
u g w -
re � o
� � � � .._
0
0
1 �
.III(
1 —_ �I
��❑ �`
m
� _ I a
T
a
�O3Y
as
tt
a�
J
g E
m 3
PQ
is
r
i
n m L
(((( I it
tl,
'P't3�a�yyooaryo.u�oy u�,�
io O[L to cvo� mod pad - -
� a
Q w O
N O ^
Q
3
z
;d
2 J,
E8
e
00
3<
3�
o„
�g
0
a�
E --
N
C _
O o
a
a
a
c
'o
—a
Zrp
_
ITV
�y
�
LL
F t]
n m L
(((( I it
tl,
'P't3�a�yyooaryo.u�oy u�,�
io O[L to cvo� mod pad - -
� a
Q w O
N O ^
Q
3
z
;d
2 J,
E8
e
00
3<
3�
o„
�g
0
a�
E --
N
C _
O o
a
a
a
c
'o
n�
M1irl � i 41.
9
L7
N
U
0
I
c
0
v
C
Z
m
6
n
n
T
Q
N O
R n
a
IN
M
vi
z
� a
TO
LNG
LD
a Q o
g w
,yp 0
Te N O
v OC
V
N
Er 1
1
n
T
N
Y
9
l
v�
FIB
IS
I 1
a
0
a
1
PN
a
i
O
N
�
u®
s
n
L7
N
U
0
I
c
0
v
C
Z
m
6
n
n
T
Q
N O
R n
a
IN
M
vi
z
� a
TO
LNG
LD
a Q o
g w
,yp 0
Te N O
v OC
V
N
Er 1
1
n
T
N
Y
9
l
v�
FIB
IS
I
a
m'
L7
N
U
0
I
c
0
v
C
Z
m
6
n
n
T
Q
N O
R n
a
IN
M
vi
z
� a
TO
LNG
LD
a Q o
g w
,yp 0
Te N O
v OC
V
N
Er 1
1
n
T
N
Y
Q
V
R
�D�
PN
i
n
---
y
a
4
o
c
4
A
>y
01111 Rlladmd
LL
A
8I
I.0'.s
.0'.£i .0 zl o.
F
.o-.oz
Q
V
R
�D�
4tC —
FJ
tl
O
N
W
e
O
Z
m
d
L A 1
a
C
0
W
W
m
W
Q
d
N
2
Y
�fiBf _
dm -
c =`
a
_-
® g °
1® p
V�ol7
b
s
K o
m
N' a
6
yT d
/ D� e
i�
itl
11,E
tl
O
N
W
e
O
Z
m
d
L A 1
a
C
0
W
W
m
W
Q
d
N
2
Y
�fiBf _
dm -
c =`
a
_-
® g °
1® p
V�ol7
b
s
K o
m
N' a
6
yT d
/ D� e
m
4
°n
� N
a
'4
tai i LLI
a� o
0
a.11 Syadwd
2
n
..11Apadmd
m
A
�
i
o-.oz
m
4
°n
� N
a
'4
tai i LLI
a� o
0
a.11 Syadwd
2
n
..11Apadmd
m
A
�
r
CL
o-.oz
I
A+ a
TO
r -i-
.6 -.e L6,5i .o-.zl
7
y
y
I
,
3 I�
I
Jv
N
t
=v,
of n
NI
d
v
Y
4
N
In
4
_
I
W�
I
_
Q
y
a
f
1
4
0
.0,64
^ n
L!
ti
N
i
U
m
v.0
r —i
-M Nlad Id - — -
Q �
b
O
v
^ a
a
_N
W
a
a
Y
C
o°
J
b
N
J
c
a
a
w
m
oif
¢ a —
� A =
a a
m
A
�
r
CL
—
c
A+ a
TO
-
7
y
y
I
,
3 I�
n
Jv
N
t
=v,
d
v
Y
Y
C
o°
J
b
N
J
c
a
a
w
m
oif
¢ a —
� A =
a a
�i
1
i-
.0,64
log
Attachment No. CC 11
Mitigated Negative Declaration
(Distributed Separately Due to Bulk)
709
710
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way (PA2010 -135)
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Newport Beach
Planning Department
3300 Newport Boulevard,
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
3. Contact Person and Phone Number:
Rosalinh Ung, Planning Department
Rung(cDnewportbeachca.gov
(949) 644 -3208
4. Project Location:
4221 Dolphin - Striker Way
Newport Beach, CA 92660
5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address:
Tod Ridgeway
Ridgeway Development
2804 Lafayette Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92663
6. General Plan Designation:
MU -H2 (Mixed Use Horizontal)
7. Zoning:
Restaurant Site 1 of PC -11 Newport Place Planned Community District
8. Description of Project:
The proposed project is redevelopment of an approximately 48,221 square -foot
(1.11 acres) site. An approximately 13,525 gross square feet of new general
commercial and food uses are being proposed to replace the existing single -story
7,996 square -foot, vacant restaurant. The new development will consist of two,
free - standing single -story buildings. Building Pad A will be approximately 4,000
square feet in size and Building Pad B will be approximately 9,525 square feet in
size. Each building has a maximum building height of 29 feet. The proposed
development is designed to be compatible with the existing commercial
neighborhood of contemporary structures. The proposed materials for the
project are smooth troweled integral tan color plaster, simulated wood composite
siding, glass and metal.
1
Approximately 5,000 gross square feet of the proposed new development will be
allocated for food service use. Of that, 1,000 gross square feet will be allocated
for a fast -food service use i.e., Subway Restaurant, while the remaining 4,000
square feet will be allocated for high turn -over dining establishments i.e., small
sit -down boutique restaurants. Anticipated hours of operation for the fast -food
service use would be from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m., daily; and from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m.
for the high turn -over dining establishments.
The proposed 1,000 square foot fast -food use would require an approximately 20
parking spaces by using the parking ratio of one space per 50 square feet of
gross floor area. The remaining 4,000 gross square feet of high turn -over dining
establishments would require an approximately 50 parking spaces, by using the
parking ratio of one space per 40 square feet of net public area [(4,000 sf. /2
(assuming 50 percent of total gross area is allocated for net public area) = 2,000
= 40 = 50 spaces]. The total required parking for food service use would be 70
spaces.
The remaining 8,525 gross square feet of new development will be allocated for
general commercial i.e. financial institution (4,000 square feet) and computer
electronic service and cellular service retail stores. It is anticipated the general
commercial uses would have hours of operation from 9:00 a.m. to 7 p.m., daily.
The general commercial uses would generate a parking demand of
approximately 34 spaces, by using the parking ratio of one space per 250 net
square feet [(8,525 sf. — 200 sf. of utility room) _ 250 sf. = 33.3 = 34 spaces].
It is anticipated that a total of 30 employees will be working at the proposed
development.
The total parking requirement for the proposed development would be 104
spaces (70 spaces for food uses and 34 for retail uses). The project provides a
total of 89 spaces (57 on -site and 32 off - site), resulting a parking shortage of 15
spaces per the PC -11 parking standards for the subject site. A use permit is
being requested for the additional of 16 -space off -site parking provision (a total of
32 spaces) and reduction of the required off - street parking in accordance with
Sections 20.40.100 and 20.40.110 of the Municipal Code.
A parking study is required to analyze the existing common parking arrangement
of the Restaurant Site 1 and the proposed new uses and hours of operation of
Parcel 1. Also included is the proposed parking management plan per Section
20.40.110.0 of the Municipal Code.
The project site is located within the PC -11 Newport Place Planned Community
District and has a "Restaurant Site 1" zoning designation. "Restaurant Site 1"
consists of three separate parcels, of which the project site is known as Parcel 1.
Parcel 2 is currently improved with a 7,015 square -foot restaurant (Saagar Indian
Restaurant) and Parcel 3 is currently improved with a 7,870 square foot sports
club and restaurant (Classic Q). Parcels 2 and 3 are not a part of the proposed
project, even though all three parcels have a shared parking arrangement. The
2
project site's common parking lot is currently accessed from Dolphin- Striker Way
and Martingale Way, along the western portion of the site. The proposed
redevelopment includes creation of a new vehicular access onto MacArthur
Boulevard.
The project would introduce new general commercial uses to the subject site
which results in the requirement of an amendment to the Newport Place Planned
Community Development Plan. The amendment would create new statistical
analysis standards, permitted uses and development standards by changing the
subject site (Parcel 1) from "Restaurant 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ". The
proposed project also requires a transfer of development intensity to allow the
transfer of 54 un -built hotel units from Hotel Site 2 -B located at 1301 Quail Street
(donor site) to the subject site to accommodate a net increase of approximately
5,529 square feet of new development.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's
surroundings.)
Current
Development:
7,996 square -foot vacant restaurant
To the north:
7,870 square -foot sports club and restaurant (Classic Q)
To the east:
MacArthur Boulevard
To the south:
Office development Glidewell Laboratories
To the west:
7,015 square -foot restaurant ( Saagar Indian Restaurant)
and Dolphin-Striker Way
The existing 48,221 square -foot (1.11 acres) project site is located on the
westerly side of MacArthur Boulevard, between Martingale Way and Newport Place
Drive, in the Airport Area of the City of Newport Beach. The project site is within
the Newport Place Planned Community; a 135 -acre master planned commercial
and light industrial park and has a zoning designation of "Restaurant Site 1 ".
Restaurant Site 1 is consisted of three separate parcels, of which the project site
is known as Parcel 1. Parcel 1 is currently improved with a 7,996 square -foot
single -story commercial building and a 78 -space surface parking lot. The existing
building was originally constructed in 1972 and last expanded in 1985.
Parcel 2 is currently improved with a 7,015 square -foot restaurant known as
Saagar Indian Restaurant and a surface parking lot of 59 spaces. Parcel 3 is
currently improved with a 7,870 square -foot sports club and restaurant known as
Classic Q and has a surface parking lot of 74 spaces. Parcel and 2 and 3 are not
a part of the proposed project, even though all three parcels have a shared
parking arrangement under a reciprocal parking and maintenance agreement.
Vehicular access to all three parcels is currently from Dolphin- Striker Way and
Martingale Way.
3
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing
approval, or participation agreement.)
- Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Consistency Review
21
0 250 500
Vicinity Map Feet
Project Title: MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way e
4221 Dolphin- Striker Way (PA2010 -135)
PA2010 -135_ Newport _Place.mxd February/2011 .-
ao
�F
S,
o�
J5
as �.
AO�G
0`
0
Q9
sl
9~
6",
O
CO -G
yQ
5�
OI,q(
Sp
MU -H2
QZI
CDRGyrh�N wqV
m
n
5^
ep a`,
e� � sro sTti 40
�Q %R
sr
RS -Dy CG
�G�o y9aR yQ2-P
f�
A
��PJO GS�R
MU-H2sRcysr
PF
Receiver Site (Subject Site)
4221 Dolphin- Striker Way
Mixed -Use Horizontal (MU -H2)
o
m I
� c
NEWPORT PLACE DR
O
MU -H2
MU -H2
Donor Site
1301 Quail Street
Mixed -Use Horizontal (MU -H2)
e�
Fopew +op on General Plan
Project Title: MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way
.ysoc.. 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way (PA2010 -135)
PA2010- 135_Newport_Place.mA February/2011
0
z
0
FO
D�
�P
0 250 500
Feet
e:
OOL1�ST °pRiryrHgN SAY PC 15 �Pp�� 0,9�ApSpR
Gee OA s5 PC 11
Receiver Site (Subject Site)
4221 Dolphin- Striker Way
X09 <S Newport Place Planned Community (PC 11)
JQ
9A
b
o �
i
C
NEWPORT PLACE OR �
PC 11 Q°
PC 15
0°
P�
4
Lq<
S' Donor Site
5^ 1301 Quail Street
eRSr �J° Newport Place Planned Community (PC 11)
�� p s 5Q
0" rev n
SP -7 sr p
0
0 260 520
Zoning Map Feet
Project Title: MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way e
„a 4221 Dolphin- Striker Way (PA2010 -135)
PA2010- 135_Newport_Placenk February/2011
IK DOVE STREET
EXISTING
PARKING STRUCTURE
(16 Cars)
existing
walkway
to remain
EXISTING BUILDING
TO BE DEMOLISHED
6' -0"
50' Buffer (min) New Lett I urn Lane
NORTH Ground Level on Site
0' 20' 40' 60'
May 31, 2011
80' 1 100' 1 120' SCALE: 1" = 20'
a
w
x
z
a
A
I
Property Line
4x6 Sign
new striping
1209-011
Intersection Line of Site shall comply with Standard STD -1 10 -L
CL MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
860'
Note:
PARCEL 1 Parking layout shall comply with existing painted median
Standards STD - 805 -L -A and STD - 805 -L -B.
L / \IJIII I`.1 VVI N
Property Line
TABULATION SUMMARY
Parking
Parcel Name Building Area Provided
(sf) (cars)
PARCEL 1 48,221 sf
Existing Building to be removed
Proposed Buildings
Pad A
(Retail Use)
Pad B
(Retail Use)
(Food Use)
Total Area
MARTINGALE WAY Existing Parking to be modified
and /or removed
7 L \\ _")
Existing Sign
z
x
z
0
I
a111
4,525
5,000
8,000 sf
� 111
9,525
13,525 sf
IWA
Proposed Parking (On -Site) 57 cars
Existing Off -Site Parking 16 cars
New Off -Site Parking 16 cars
Total Parking (including Off -Site) 89 cars
PARCEL 2
31,364 sf
Existing Building 7,015 sf
Existing Parking (On -Site)
PARCEL 3 (not part) 47,205 sf
Existing Building 8,000 sf
Existing Parking (On -Site)
Total Building Area 28,540 sf
Total On -Site Parking
(Total On -Site & Off -Site Parking For Parcel 1, 2 & 3
MacArthur
Location Map
59 cars
74 cars
190 cars
222 cars)
Not to Scale
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin
Property
Newport
Beach, CA
m
Line
S T 0
U B 0
0�
G H
A r c h i t e c t s
50' Buffer (min) New Lett I urn Lane
NORTH Ground Level on Site
0' 20' 40' 60'
May 31, 2011
80' 1 100' 1 120' SCALE: 1" = 20'
a
w
x
z
a
A
I
Property Line
4x6 Sign
new striping
1209-011
Intersection Line of Site shall comply with Standard STD -1 10 -L
CL MACARTHUR BOULEVARD
860'
Note:
PARCEL 1 Parking layout shall comply with existing painted median
Standards STD - 805 -L -A and STD - 805 -L -B.
L / \IJIII I`.1 VVI N
Property Line
TABULATION SUMMARY
Parking
Parcel Name Building Area Provided
(sf) (cars)
PARCEL 1 48,221 sf
Existing Building to be removed
Proposed Buildings
Pad A
(Retail Use)
Pad B
(Retail Use)
(Food Use)
Total Area
MARTINGALE WAY Existing Parking to be modified
and /or removed
7 L \\ _")
Existing Sign
z
x
z
0
I
a111
4,525
5,000
8,000 sf
� 111
9,525
13,525 sf
IWA
Proposed Parking (On -Site) 57 cars
Existing Off -Site Parking 16 cars
New Off -Site Parking 16 cars
Total Parking (including Off -Site) 89 cars
PARCEL 2
31,364 sf
Existing Building 7,015 sf
Existing Parking (On -Site)
PARCEL 3 (not part) 47,205 sf
Existing Building 8,000 sf
Existing Parking (On -Site)
Total Building Area 28,540 sf
Total On -Site Parking
(Total On -Site & Off -Site Parking For Parcel 1, 2 & 3
MacArthur
Location Map
59 cars
74 cars
190 cars
222 cars)
Not to Scale
MacArthur at Dolphin Striker
4221 Dolphin
Striker Way
Newport
Beach, CA
RIDGEWAY DEVELOPMENT
2804LaCA926 3:Tel.1 949)723-5854
S T 0
U B 0
0 U
G H
A r c h i t e c t s
a n d P l a
n n e r s
420 Alta Vista
T 949 715 3257
Way Suite 1 00 Laguna Beach
1 F 949 715 3256 I www.stoulenboroughinc.com
� u 92651
2
S T 0 U
T E N B
0 R
0 U G H
A r c h i t e c t
s a n
d P l a n n e r s
420 Alfa Vista
Way, Suite 100,
La puno
Bea y�. Lo 92651
T 949 715 3257
F 949 715 3256
www.sleule
oroughin c.rom
S T 0 U
T E N B
0 R 0 U
G H
A r c h i t e c t
s a n d P l
a n n e r s
420 Alfa Vista
Way, Suite 100,
La puns Beac .
La 92651
T 949 715 3257
F 949 715 3256
www.sI auI
roughi oc.rom
S T 0 U
T E N B
0 R
0 U
G H
A r c h i t e c t
s a n
d P l
a n n e r s
420 Alfa Vista
Way, Suite 100,
La punn
Beac .
Fa 92651
T 949 715 3257
1 F 949 715 3256
1 www.s
I a ufe o
r o u 9 h i oc.rom
G
�r
7 F ` I.1'
y
iiY 1
r
J
rl
IL ��
Y
a
n
T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h 1 t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 Alta V i s I a W V, Suite 100, Laguna 3 , Co 92651
T 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.sfa or o u g hi n<.ram
IIAW
e
G
�r
7 F ` I.1'
y
iiY 1
r
J
rl
IL ��
Y
a
n
T 0 U T E N B 0 R 0 U G H
A r c h 1 t e c t s a n d P l a n n e r s
420 Alta V i s I a W V, Suite 100, Laguna 3 , Co 92651
T 949 715 3257 1 F 949 715 3256 1 www.sfa or o u g hi n<.ram
I�
PAD B
i
lr
3
W
Y
oC
1-
IZ ;I
1
1 =1
a.
I J
I 1O
I
10
1
tx�
9
1 r 1 1
4
t
PAD A
l
�N�•• r ) yy Ur�F•'A _ -_ - -.''i` h (Y
I T i i: :
�w DY l y
I I -T
MacARTHUR BLVD.
Preliminary Plant Palette
Landscape Documentation Package Note:
F_Swtn_Ilw.f.
Cwr,+n x.w
bi
AYMeMbusY511m Yb.Y. b1'H V1M514WM b14M.EbM
�
WnIIbObH pyPlMwml exN qrw! b..bbn t 1 bH WMw
�� —��F
FIFda.OVlleru &.rtlbb
� ��
xlews.v..wrx.
err
Landscape Areas.
.1... F.P...SPP. 'd
TOTAL SOE ANEA '. 1y.lA SP
.ww
?PY9!P
TMF AREA 1.735 3 F
�I +miler ToA.Ppp.bro Fy.
use Ob.YeM
rawpPrl
aF.
TS...».
On Y.aP.s
b/.
NWRO lAV0.Y WE
��
NiEA TOTa TK '. B.YA eF
MWVbP7WGM M•PnM• FM
file.nllSAwl
p�l'F>•M
..e
W fiF.M15SIB1ECTb
NAMC 17VAE%CEE082.sm
N • 4 C. 1..1 T 1YATEA EFFICMM lA1OHGpE Cf 1pNFNCE'
..µnr O•l�•l• .x5�+w FP
Mni.P
lF.
Preliminay Planting & Irrigation Concept Statement
1. PmMe Prro,e. avn uace plenl,re ceSMI •mice
wnw^^,e
%nw»'me. ..,w
•.v�.e
Fa
I'mP.'.m5m.�y��.�ne.•o.w.br w.•'m...
nNY
E.°•°l,w�`Wwo
fi
2, flwlEe. wMytlpa.mN'Ii YUp....'2n sA m.m'.n.'mta
inu.
. Pw
6r
mbgnrinEamWOY wINHN�Ib 4vY Hm.
]. T room. op. •'N.cena.mwlaa.ybampoweHmm+enwem nF
M'u.ml0 T4rY bQe.b.�b Inrd.bm wM MP 11Y bbtl IWI(igy b
N'M
y/bp Wl..ry.ppn
U.na��b+.••� +pl
V.�Ln
1. ea
.. NIIWraq mpN.MM�b wlvmM NSrpwemenb mSY»in H O,a
4"
rwIPM
SP
IMI.P>iBW
PNUwe•NU pm
Yb. M.Nn
6P
.ww.nm'n+..We
P. ASrn.
Iw
s. T1r Cmao.w tabSUw Fw �e.n p'.M.. h.,yl.MSe L�q.W
•m.len
W.n1"w�eN'IM•w..
/ d.A.rb.YSbsbs
Water Quality. Best Management Practices (B.M.P.)
1. Prlw.r nW.e..'.mpbwmHn.crap. blest ll.le.en
FMl96.b.Ib Hlbll.oM.a. WFww Ws4M.
2 91Nf16WPj.bCFFfY011bHMYCpFYW bTWFIpMyIIYIOu
awwolwF
> rcF1ao+. noblbaao . >�F.berlaSOP....l..l...pwm.
u..abxrPm.mprHI+Hl . wbbwn . blo.E.'I bNelpabY.
a bbmlbleA'ybl'nFSp.mu.IU1M�bW NbFIW..Pb YYIOyrt
RM9
MJSDesign Group.
1dW5 mA'tlIMC11Fe
I.NbWS
r.IWIOFbN
Mx.+rwemn
np.Cr
MacArthur at
Dolphin Striker
4221 adphin Slrr'.r Way
N•wpprl emd. G
Ridgeway
Development
28041okWU Aw,
Nw.ppn 0.6
wary
��ia7 `tE
FF 41.T 1,11 3
leru.
wr NW
bombe
OWMM
NnNr Upl'
4 IIIF'�I'
TN
PREMILINARY
LANDSCAPE PLAN
P..b
LS
�>W
C
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
❑ Aesthetics
• Biological Resources
• Greenhouse Gas
Emissions
• Land Use & Planning
• Population & Housing
• Transportation/
Circulation
❑ Agriculture & Forest
Resources
• Cultural Resources
• Hazards & Hazardous
Materials
❑ Mineral Resources
❑ Public Services
❑ Utilities & Service
Systems
❑ Air Quality
❑ Geology & Soils
❑ Hydrology & Water Quality
❑ Noise
❑ Recreation
❑ Mandatory Findings of
Significance
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
❑ I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on
the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
21 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because
revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the
environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has
been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant
impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze
only the effects that remain to be addressed.
❑ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on
the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to
applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
2�
WI
that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
15
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. AESTHETICS
Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect
on a scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings, and
historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
C) Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the site
and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial
light or glare which would adversely
affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST
RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown
on the maps prepared pursuant to
the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to
non - agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant
Impact with Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than No
Significant Impact
Impact
❑ ❑
❑ 0
❑ ❑
2 ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
10
C) Conflict with existing zoning for, or
cause rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public Resources Code
section 12220(g)), timberland (as
defined by Public Resources Code
section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined
by Government Code section
51104(g))?
d) Result in the loss of forest land or
conversion of forest land to non -
forest use
e) Involve other changes in the
existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result
in conversion of Farmland, to non-
agricultural use or conversion of
forest land to non - forest use?
III. AIR QUALITY
Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
C) Result in a cumulatively
considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the
project region is non - attainment
under an applicable federal or state
ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative
thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting
a substantial number of people?
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑
❑
❑ Z
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑
❑ 2
❑ ❑
Q ❑
❑ ❑ Q ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
17
Would the project:
W
Potentially Less Than Less than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a)
Have a substantial adverse effect,
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive,
or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or
regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b)
Have a substantial adverse effect
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the
California Department of Fish and
Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
C)
Have a substantial adverse effect on
❑ ❑ ❑ 2
federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act (including, but not limited
to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d)
Interfere substantially with the
❑ ❑ ❑ D
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or
with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or
impeded the use of native wildlife
nursery sites?
e)
Conflict with any local policies or
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f)
Conflict with the provisions of an
❑ ❑ ❑
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
V.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
W
19
Potentially
Less Than
Less than
No
Significant
Significant
Significant
Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
a)
Cause a substantial adverse
❑
❑
❑
Q
change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in
§15064.5?
b)
Cause a substantial adverse
❑
Q
❑
❑
change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
C)
Directly or indirectly destroy a
❑
Q
❑
❑
unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
d)
Disturb any human remains,
❑
❑
Q
❑
including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
VI.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Would the project:
a)
Expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss,
injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake
❑
❑
❑
Q
fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist - Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist
for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division of Mines
and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
❑
❑
Q
❑
iii) Seismic - related ground failure,
❑
❑
Q
❑
including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
❑
❑
❑
Q
b)
Result in substantial soil erosion or
❑
❑
Q
❑
the loss of topsoil?
19
C) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the
project and potentially result in on-
or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18- 1 -B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal
systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste
water?
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas
emissions, either directly or
indirectly, that may have a
significant impact on the
environment?
b) Conflict with an applicable plan,
policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases?
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑
❑
Rl ❑
❑ D ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ 2 ❑
❑ ❑ Q ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 21
ME
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards ❑ ❑ Q ❑
or waste discharge requirements?
21
Potentially Less Than Less than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
C)
Emit hazardous emissions or
❑ ❑ ❑
handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances,
or waste within one - quarter mile of
an existing or proposed school?
d)
Be located on a site which is
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
included on a list of hazardous
materials sites which complied
pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard
to the public or the environment?
e)
For a project within an airport land
❑ ❑ D ❑
use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a
safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
f)
For a project within the vicinity of a
❑ ❑ ❑ 2
private airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people
residing or working in the project
area?
g)
Impair implementation of or
❑ ❑ ❑ 2
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h)
Expose people or structures to a
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires,
including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or
where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
IX.
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards ❑ ❑ Q ❑
or waste discharge requirements?
21
22
Potentially Less Than Less than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
b)
Substantially deplete groundwater
❑ ❑ B ❑
supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such
that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre- existing
nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
C)
Substantially alter the existing
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of
the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on-
or off -site?
d)
Substantially alter the existing
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of a
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in
flooding on or off -site?
e)
Create or contribute runoff water
❑ ❑ Q ❑
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater
drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f)
Otherwise substantially degrade
❑ ❑ Q ❑
water quality?
g)
Place housing within a 100 -year
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
flood hazard area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or
Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
h)
Place within a 100 -year flood
❑ ❑ ❑
hazard area structures which would
impede or redirect flood flows?
22
i) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of
a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
mudflow?
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Would the proposal:
a) Physically divide an established
community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land
use plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the
project (including, but not limited to
the general plan, specific plan, local
coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose
of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
C) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would
be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally- important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan, or other
land use plan?
XII. NOISE
Would the project result in:
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑
❑
❑ Z
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ 2
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
23
rr
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
a)
Exposure of persons to or
❑
Q
❑ ❑
generation of noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local
general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other
agencies?
b)
Exposure of persons to or
❑
❑
Q ❑
generation of excessive
groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
C)
A substantial permanent increase in
❑
❑
Q ❑
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without
the project?
d)
A substantial temporary or periodic
❑
❑
Q ❑
increase in ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels
existing without the project?
e)
For a project located within an
❑
❑
Q ❑
airport land use land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been
adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would
the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f)
For a project within the vicinity of a
❑
❑
❑ Q
private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive
noise levels?
XIII.
POPULATION AND HOUSING
Would the project:
a)
Induce substantial population
❑
❑
Q ❑
growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes
and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
b)
Displace substantial numbers of
❑
❑
❑ Q
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
rr
C) Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the
construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the project:
a) Would the project result in
substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically
altered government facilities, need
for new or physically altered
government facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts,
in order to maintain acceptable
service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for
any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Other public facilities?
XV. RECREATION
Would the project:
a) Would the project increase the use
of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility
would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include
recreational facilities or require the
construction of or expansion of
recreational facilities which might
have an adverse physical effect on
the environment? opportunities?
XVI. TRANSPORTATION /TRAFFIC
Would the project:
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑
❑
❑ z
❑ ❑
lz ❑
❑ ❑
lz ❑
❑ ❑
lz ❑
❑ ❑
Q ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
❑ ❑ ❑ z
25
a) Conflict with an applicable plan,
ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the
performance of the circulation
system, taking into account all
modes of transportation including
mass transit and non - motorized
travel and relevant components of
the circulation system, including but
not limited to intersections, streets,
highways and freeways, pedestrian
and bicycle paths, and mass
transit?
b) Conflict with an applicable
congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of
service standard and travel demand
measures, or other standards
established by the county
congestion management agency for
designated roads or highways?
C) Result in a change in air traffic
patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change
in location that results in substantial
safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due
to a design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections)
or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency
access.
f) Conflict with adopted policies,
plans, or programs regarding public
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian
facilities?
XVII. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑
❑
Q ❑
❑ ❑ Q ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ Q
❑ ❑ Q ❑
Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment ❑ ❑ Q ❑
requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control
Board?
20
b) Require or result in the construction
of new water or wastewater
Potentially
treatment facilities or expansion of
Less than No
existing facilities, the construction of
Significant
which could cause significant
Impact
environmental effects?
C)
Require or result in the construction
Incorporated
of new storm water drainage
❑
facilities or expansion of existing
B ❑
facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant
environmental effects?
d)
Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources,
or are new or expanded
entitlements needed?
e)
Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider,
which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity
to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's
existing commitments?
f)
Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate
the project's solid waste disposal
needs?
g)
Comply with federal, state, and
local statutes and regulation related
to solid waste?
XVIII.
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE.
Potentially
Less Than
Less than No
Significant
Significant
Significant Impact
Impact
with Mitigation
Impact
Incorporated
❑
❑
B ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 0
27
This section of the Initial Study evaluates the potential environmental impacts of
the proposed project and provides explanations of the responses to the
Environmental Checklist. The environmental analysis in this section is patterned
after the questions in the Environmental Checklist. Under each issue area, a
general discussion of the existing conditions is provided according to the
environmental analysis of the proposed Project's impacts. To each question,
there are four possible responses:
No Impact. The proposed project will not have any measurable environmental
impact on the environment.
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have the potential for
impacting the environment, although this impact will be below thresholds that
may be considered significant.
Mod
Potentially Less Than Less than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Mitigation Impact
Incorporated
a) Does the project have the potential
❑ ❑ ❑ z
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self -
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the
major period of California history or
prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable?
( "Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
C) Does the project have
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
This section of the Initial Study evaluates the potential environmental impacts of
the proposed project and provides explanations of the responses to the
Environmental Checklist. The environmental analysis in this section is patterned
after the questions in the Environmental Checklist. Under each issue area, a
general discussion of the existing conditions is provided according to the
environmental analysis of the proposed Project's impacts. To each question,
there are four possible responses:
No Impact. The proposed project will not have any measurable environmental
impact on the environment.
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project will have the potential for
impacting the environment, although this impact will be below thresholds that
may be considered significant.
Mod
Less -Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project
will have potentially significant adverse impacts which may exceed established
thresholds; however, mitigation measures or changes to the proposed project's
physical or operational characteristics will reduce these impacts to levels that are
less than significant. Those mitigation measures are specified in the following
sections. Each recommended mitigation measure has been agreed to by the
applicant.
Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project will have impacts that are
considered potentially significant and additional analysis is required to identify
mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to insignificant levels.
When an impact is determined to be potentially significant in the preliminary
analysis, the environmental issue will be subject to detailed analysis in an
environmental impact report (EIR).
�9
I. AESTHETICS.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. The proposed project would not affect a scenic vista. The project
site is not identified as a public view point by the City of Newport Beach General
Plan. The project site is located within a business park developed with a mixture
of low -, medium -, and high -rise offices, retail, restaurant, hotel uses, and surface
parking and parking structures. The proposed demolition of an existing 7,996
square -foot restaurant and construction of the single -story, 13,525 square -foot
commercial buildings would not obstruct views from any public viewpoint.
Therefore, as there are no scenic vistas in the general proximity of the project
site, no impacts would occur.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic
highway?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The project site contains a number of mature,
ornamental trees in landscaped medians and parkways. Some of the trees will
be removed by the development. However, this will not significantly reduce the
number of trees in the project area and the Newport Place Planned Community
Development Standards require trees to be planted in setback and parking
areas. Trees in parking areas are to be planted at a ratio of one (1) tree per each
five (5) parking stalls.
The project site and the surrounding project area does not contain of any rock
outcroppings or historic buildings. Furthermore, there are no designated scenic
highways in the vicinity of the proposed project (California Department of
Transportation 2009). Therefore, the proposed project would not damage a
scenic resource along a scenic highway, and no impacts would occur.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the
site and its surroundings?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not adversely
affect the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings
because the project site is located within a business park developed with a
mixture of low -, medium -, and high -rise offices, retail, restaurant, hotel uses, and
surface parking and parking structures. The proposed construction of two,
single -story commercial buildings totaling 13,525 square feet would blend in with
the existing character of the area and surrounding land uses. The proposed
materials for the project are smooth troweled integral tan color plaster, simulated
wood composite siding, glass and metal, which are compatible with the
contemporary materials and architectural styles of the surrounding development.
3D
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is located in an area that
is developed with a mixture of low -, medium -, and high -rise offices, retail,
restaurant, hotel uses, and surface parking and parking structures. The existing
parking lot is lighted for nighttime parking for safety purposes. Any lighting
associated with the proposed project would be similar to the existing lighting in
the area, and would not add substantial amounts of lighting to the area. Impacts
would be less than significant.
IL AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES.
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of
Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture
and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including
timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to
information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire
Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and
Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and
forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted
by the California Air Resources Board.
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources
Agency, to non - agricultural use?
No Impact. The proposed project would not convert any farmland to a non-
agricultural use. The project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland
of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance
(California Department of Conservation 2009). The project site and the
surrounding land are identified as "urban and built -up land" by the California
Department of Conservation's Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. The
project site is located within an existing fully developed commercial setting with
no agricultural uses on or surrounding the site. Therefore, no impacts would
occur.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
No Impact. The Williamson Act applies to parcels consisting of at least 20 acres
of Prime Farmland or at least 40 acres of farmland not designated as Prime
Farmland. The project site is approximately 1.11 acres in area and is not
designated as Prime Farmland. It is located within a fully developed commercial
area and is currently zoned for Restaurant Use within the Newport Place Planned
31
Community. Additionally, upon approval of the proposed amendment to change
the Zoning designation of the subject site from Restaurant Site 1 to General
Commercial Site 8, Agricultural uses are and will not be allowed within these
zoning designations. Because the site is not eligible to be placed under a
Williamson Act contract, no impacts would occur.
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as
defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined
by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland
Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?
No Impact. The proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning or cause
rezoning of forest land. The project site is located within a fully developed
commercial area, which is not near any forested lands. Therefore, no impacts
would occur.
d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -
forest use?
No Impact. The project site is located within a fully developed commercial area,
which is not near any forested lands. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their
location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-
agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use?
No Impact. The proposed project would not result in the conversion of farmland
to non - agricultural use, nor result in the conversion of forest land to non - forest
use. The project site is not currently used for agriculture and is not located within
any forested lands. It is not located near or adjacent to any areas that are
actively farmed or used for forest land. Therefore, the proposed project would not
disrupt or damage the operation or productivity of any areas designated as
farmland or forest land, and no farmland or forest land would be affected by the
proposed project. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
III. AIR QUALITY.
The proposed project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (Basin). The air
quality assessment includes estimating emissions associated with short -term
construction and long -term operation of the proposed project. Long -term impacts
include impacts from pollutants with regional effects and pollutants with localized
impacts. The impact analysis contained in this section was prepared in
accordance with the methodologies provided by the SCAQMD in its CEQA Air
Quality Handbook. Air quality model data are provided in Appendix G (South
Coast AQMD Air District, CalEEMod Emissions Data (Summer, Winter & Annual
Emissions) June 15, 2011).
32
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality
plan?
No Impact. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is
required, pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions of criteria
pollutants for which the Basin is in nonattainment (i.e., ozone [03], and
particulate matter equal to or less than 10 and less than 2.5 microns in diameter
[PM10 and PM2.e, respectively]). As such, the project would be subject to the
SCAQMD's 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The AQMP contains a
comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducing emissions
and achieving ambient air quality standards. These strategies are developed, in
part, based on regional population, housing, and employment projections
prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG).
SCAG is the regional planning agency for Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura,
Riverside, San Bernardino, and Imperial Counties and addresses regional issues
relating to transportation, economy, community development, and the
environment. With regard to air quality planning, SCAG has prepared the
Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP), which includes Growth Management and
Regional Mobility chapters that form the basis for the land use and transportation
control portions of the AQMP. These documents are used in the preparation of
the air quality forecasts and consistency analysis included in the AQMP. Both the
RCP and AQMP are based, in part, on projections originating with County and
City General Plans.
The proposed project is redevelopment of an approximately 48,221 square -foot
site. Approximately 13,525 square feet of new retail and food uses will replace an
existing single -story 7,996 square -foot vacant restaurant. Site grading for the
subject property will include the importation of 407 cubic yards of soil to prepare
the project site for construction.
The SCAQMD has established methods to quantify air emissions associated with
construction activities such as air pollutant emissions generated by operation of
on -site construction equipment; fugitive dust emissions related to grading and
site work activities; and mobile (tailpipe) emissions from construction worker
vehicles and haul /delivery truck trips. Emissions would vary from day to day,
depending on the level of activity, the specific type of construction activity
occurring, and, for fugitive dust, prevailing weather conditions.
Projects, such as this one, that are consistent with the local general plan are
considered consistent with the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The
proposed project would not emit either short- or long -term quantities of criteria
pollutants which exceed the SCAQMD's air quality significance thresholds (See
Appendix H, SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, Revised March,
2011). The thresholds in III(b) and (c) are based on the AQMP and are designed
to bring the Basin into attainment for the criteria pollutants for which it is in
nonattainment. The SCAQMD does not consider projects which result in
33
emissions below the SCAQMD significance thresholds to interfere with the goals
established in the AQMP.
Emissions generated by construction and operation would not exceed SCAQMD
thresholds as demonstrated in Table 3.1, Table 3.2, and the analysis in III (b).
Therefore, because the proposed project does not exceed any of the thresholds
it will not conflict with SCAQMD's goal of bringing the Basin into attainment for all
criteria pollutants and, as such, is consistent with the AQMP. Therefore, no
significant impact to the AQMP will occur as a result of the proposed project. No
mitigation measures are necessary.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
Less -Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response III (a), the proposed
project site is located in the Basin. State and federal air quality standards often
are exceeded in many parts of the Basin. The proposed project involves
amendments to the planned community text and a transfer of development rights
which would not in themselves result in any construction or operational impacts.
However, the proposed project would result in the construction of two commercial
retail buildings totaling 13,525 square feet in area. For the purposes of estimating
construction and operational emissions, the project plans as described in the
project description are used to determine potential impacts on air quality.
A mass emissions inventory for the construction period was compiled based on
an estimate of construction equipment as well as scheduling and phasing
assumptions. More specifically, the mass emissions analysis takes into account:
❑ combustion emissions from operating on -site construction equipment,
❑ fugitive dust emissions from moving soil on site, and
❑ mobile- source combustion emissions from worker commute travel.
For the purpose of estimating emissions associated with the construction
activities, a project time frame of January 2012 through July 2012 was assumed.
The quantity, duration, and the intensity of construction activity have an effect on
the amount of construction emissions, and related pollutant concentrations,
occurring at any one time. As such, the emission forecasts provided herein
reflect a specific set of conservative assumptions based on the expected
construction scenario wherein a relatively large amount of construction is
occurring in a relatively intensive manner. Because of this conservative
assumption, actual emissions could be less than those forecasted. If construction
is delayed or occurs over a longer time period, emissions could be reduced
because of (1) a more modern and cleaner- burning construction equipment fleet
mix, and /or (2) a less intensive build -out schedule (i.e., fewer daily emissions
occurring over a longer time interval).
Air pollutant emissions associated with the project could occur over the short-
term for site preparation and construction activities. In addition, emissions would
3-¢
result from the long -term operation of the completed project from facility - related
energy consumption and automobile traffic traveling to and from the project site.
A discussion of the project's potential short-term construction - period and long-
term operational - period air quality impacts is provided below.
Short-Term Air Quality Impacts
With respect to the proposed project, construction activities are expected to
begin in January of 2012, and extend over a period of approximately seven
months. Construction activities during this period would be completed in five
main phases. The first phase would consist of the demolition of the existing
restaurant building over a period of two weeks. The second phase would consist
of general grading and site preparation over a period of approximately three
weeks. The third phase would consist of the construction of the two new retail
and restaurant, and bank buildings over a 16 -week duration. The fourth phase
would consist of asphalting of the project site and the fifth and final phase would
consist of architectural finishing including stucco and paint for the newly
constructed buildings. Phase four and five would take two weeks and five weeks,
respectively.
These construction emissions were estimated using the SCAQMD's
CaIEEMod.2011.1.1 and are included in Table 3.1; the model run is included in
Appendix G.
Table 3.1
Maximum Daily Construction Emissions
Source Pollutants (Ibs /day)
(Construction Phase) CO NOX VOC S02 PM10 PM2.5
Demolition 19 34 5 <0.1 3 2
Grading & Site Preparation
Building Construction
Asphalting
Architectural Finishing
SCAQMD Regional Emissions
Threshold (Ibs /day)
Exceed Threshold?
26
42
6
<0.1
8
6
19
28
6
<0.1
2
2
13
20
4
<0.1
2
2
2
4
47
<0.1
1
1
550
100
75
150
150
55
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
CO = carbon monoxide.
NOX = oxides of nitrogen.
VOC = volitile organic compounds (ref: CalEEMod ROG: Reactive Organic Gases)
S02 = sulfer oxides.
PM10 = particulate matter equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter.
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter.
• Source: CalEEMod 2011 Version 1.1.
• N /A: Not Applicable
• Construction equipment mix provided by the applicant in the Construction Phasing Table.
S5
. Fugitive dust emissions assumes application of Rule 403, which includes replacing ground
cover as quickly as possible, watering exposed surfaces two times daily, equipment
loading /unloading measures, and reducing vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to less than 15
miles per hour.
As shown in the table above, all emissions are less than their respective
SCAQMD threshold values. Short-term impacts due to daily construction impacts
are less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary.
Long -Term Operational - Related Impacts
Long -term air pollutant emissions generated by the project would be associated
with project - related vehicle trips and stationary- source emissions generated on-
site by sources such as fireplaces, paint, gas stoves, and fuel consumed for
landscaping activities. Long -term air quality impacts are typically associated with
the emissions produced by project - generated vehicle trips which are estimated
by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). The proposed development
will not exceed the threshold for SCAQMD air quality significance as pointed out
in Table 3.2 for operational emissions.
Table 3.2
Maximum Daily Operational Emissions
Source Pollutants (Ibs /day)
PM2.
(Construction Phase) CO NOX VOC S02 PM10 5
Vehicle Emissions 100 27 11 1 16 2
SCAQMD Regional Emissions
Threshold (Ibs /day) 550 55 55 150 150 55
Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No
CO = carbon monoxide.
NOx = oxides of nitrogen.
VOC = volitile organic compounds (ref: CalEEMod ROG: Reactive Organic Gases)
S02 = sulfer oxides.
PMto = particulate matter equal to or less than 10 microns in diameter.
PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter.
. Source: CalEEMod 2011 Version 1.1.
. N /A: Not Applicable
• VOC: Volatile Organic Compounds (ref: CalEEMOd ROG: Reactive Organic Gases)
• Construction equipment mix provided by the applicant in the Construction Phasing Table.
• Fugitive dust emissions assumes application of Rule 403, which includes replacing ground
cover as quickly as possible, watering exposed surfaces two times daily, equipment
loading /unloading measures, and reducing vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to less than 15
miles per hour.
so
Long -term impacts due to daily operational emissions are less than significant
and no mitigation measures are necessary.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions
which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
Less -Than Significant Impact. SCAQMD's approach for assessing cumulative
impacts is based on the AQMP forecasts of attainment of ambient air quality
standards in accordance with the requirements of the Federal and State Clean
Air Acts. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not
exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values does not add
significantly to a cumulative impact. The South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) is
designated as a non - attainment area for ozone and particulates (PM10 and
PM2.5) under the state and federal Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Air
pollutant modeling for construction emissions demonstrates that the project
implementation would not exceed the SCAQMD's construction phase pollutant
thresholds.
As discussed earlier in Response III(a), the proposed project would be consistent
with the AQMP, which is intended to bring the Basin into attainment for all criteria
pollutants. The operational emissions, which include vehicular trips, will not
exceed the SCAQMD thresholds as pointed out in the Operational Emissions in
Table 3.2. No mitigation measures are necessary.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The subject site is located in a planned
community surrounded by commercial office and retail buildings. Although
sensitive receptors are located in the vicinity of the site, the greatest amount of
pollutants generated by the proposed project will occur during the construction
phase. The emissions will be comprised of mostly dirt and dust particles as the
subject site is graded and the new building are constructed. However, such
emissions will be controlled through the implementation of standard conditions,
best management practices, and rules prescribed by the South Coast Air Quality
Management District and will be short-term.
As described in Response III(b) above, construction and operation of the
proposed project would not result in any substantial localized or regional air
pollution impacts; and therefore, would not expose any nearby sensitive
receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The emissions released from
operations after the construction phase is completed will predominantly be
comprised by vehicle trips which will not be a significant impact as pointed out in
the Maximum Daily Operational Emissions, Table 3.2, above. Therefore, project
implementation will not adversely affect sensitive receptors and no mitigation
measures are necessary.
37
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Project construction would involve the use of
heavy equipment creating exhaust pollutants from on -site earth movement and
from equipment bringing materials to the site. With regard to nuisance odors, any
air quality impacts would be confined to the immediate vicinity of the equipment
itself.
According to the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated
with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, wastewater treatment
plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills,
dairies, and fiberglass molding. The proposed project includes the construction of
13,525 square feet of retail, restaurant, and bank development within two single -
story freestanding buildings. Therefore, the proposed project does not include
any uses listed above and identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with
odors.
The proposed project would not produce objectionable odors per the SCAQMD
Handbook. Potential sources of odors during construction activities include
equipment exhaust and the use of architectural coatings and solvents. Odors
from these sources would be localized and generally confined to the proposed
project site. The proposed project would utilize typical construction techniques,
and the odors would be typical of most construction sites. Additionally, the odors
would be temporary, occurring when equipment is operating and during painting
activities. Construction activities associated with the proposed project would be
required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 on nuisances. Additionally,
SCAQMD Rule 1113 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds in
architectural coatings and solvents. Through mandatory compliance with
SCAQMD rules, no construction activities or materials are proposed that would
create a significant level of objectionable odors. As such, potential impacts during
short-term construction would be less than significant.
By the time such emissions or odors reach any sensitive receptor sites away
from the project site, they are typically diluted to well below any level of air quality
concern. Such emissions and odors are an adverse, but not significant impact.
Mitigation measures are not necessary as the impacts of emissions and odors
are less than significant.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or
by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
ON
No Impact. Although the proposed project would remove some of the existing
ornamental trees and hedges existing on the site, it would not have a substantial
adverse effect on any candidate, sensitive, or special- status species. The project
site is adjacent to MacArthur Boulevard and consists of a surface parking area
with landscaped medians and a vacant 7,996 square foot building. It is located
within a fully developed commercial and office park development with a mixture
of low -, medium -, and high -rise offices, retail, restaurant, hotel uses, and surface
parking and parking structures. According to Figure NR2 of the City of Newport
Beach General Plan Natural Resources Element, the project site is not located
within an Environmental Study Area (City of Newport Beach 2006). A visit to the
site confirmed that the project site is void of any native vegetation or wildlife
habitat. Therefore, the proposed project would not modify habitat or adversely
affect sensitive biological resources, and no impacts would occur.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies,
regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The proposed project would not have an adverse effect on any
riparian habitat. Per Figure NR2 of the City of Newport Beach General Plan
Natural Resources Element, the project site is not located within an
Environmental Study Area (City of Newport Beach 2006). The project site is a
fully developed site consisting of a surface parking area, narrow strips of
landscaped areas, and an existing building. It is void of any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community and no impacts would occur.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling,
hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. The project site is fully developed and consists of a surface parking
area, narrow strips of landscaped areas, and an existing building. There are no
federal wetlands or jurisdictional waters present on site or in the general vicinity.
Therefore, no impacts would occur.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impeded the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
No Impact. The proposed project would not interfere with the movement of fish
or wildlife. The project site is located within a fully developed commercial and
office park area and is not connected to other undeveloped lands. According to
Figures NR1 and NR2 of the City of Newport Beach General Plan Natural
Resources Element, the project site is not identified as a biological resources
area, nor is it located in an Environmental Study Area (City of Newport Beach
3J°
2006) and the site is not connected to any wildlife corridors. Therefore the project
site is not considered a part of a regional wildlife corridor that would facilitate
movement of wildlife species from one area to another. Therefore, no impacts
would occur.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact. The project site does not contain any biological resources that are
protected by local policies. According to the City off Newport Beach General Plan
Natural Resources Element, the project site is not located in an area where
sensitive and rare terrestrial and marine resources occur (City of Newport
General Plan 2006). Furthermore, according to the County of Orange General
Plan Resources Element, the project site is not located within the boundaries of
the Orange County Natural Communities Conservation Plan or Habitat
Conservation Plan (NCCP /HCP), (County of Orange 2005). The proposed project
would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources; therefore, no impacts would occur.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or
state habitat conservation plan?
No Impact. The City of Newport Beach is a signatory to a Natural Resource
Community Conservation Plan agreement. However, according to Figure VI -5 of
the Resources Element of the Orange County General Plan, the project site is
not located within a designated Natural Communities Conservation Plan area or
Habitat Conservation Plan (NCCP /HCP), (City of Newport Beach General Plan
2006, County of Orange 2005). Therefore, the proposed project would not be
subject to the provisions of any local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan
or Natural Communities Conservation Plan or Habitat Conservation Plan area,
and no impacts would occur.
VR01111k i11:L10 N *ie111:Zd N"
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in §15064.5?
No Impact. The 1.11 -acre project site is developed with a single -story, 7,996 -
square -foot restaurant, surface parking, and landscaped areas. Aerial
photographs depict the project site and surrounding area as vacant grassland in
1952; rough - graded for the existing development in 1972; and as currently
developed in 1980. These changes correlate in time with the approval of the
Newport Place Planned Community in December 1970 by the City, which
includes the project site. Building permits were issued in 1972 for the
construction of the existing restaurant building according to the City's building
records and was completed in 1973 per County Tax Assessor records. Thus, the
existing building and surrounding buildings are at most 40 years old. Built
LUP
environment resources constructed after 1960, unless extraordinarily important,
are not considered of sufficient age to warrant listing in the California Register of
Historic Resources.
There are no historical structures on the project site listed on any local, state, or
national historical registers, nor any determined to be eligible for listing as a
significant historical resource, according to the Historical Resources Element of
the Newport Beach General Plan (City of Newport Beach 2006). Because there
are no historical structures on the project parcel, no impacts would occur.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5?
Less -Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Because there is
no surface exposure in the project site, no archaeological resources survey was
performed for this project. The project site has undergone grading for
construction of the existing restaurant building and surface parking lot, as well as
for the other, adjacent buildings and surface parking lots. A geotechnical
engineering investigation (Appendix B) conducted for the project indicated
artificial fill over native soils on the existing pads varying from 0.5 feet to 1.5 feet.
Ground disturbances from these previous developments likely would have
inadvertently destroyed any unknown archeological resources present. The
proposed project would involve limited surface soil disturbance and grading to an
approximate depth of 3 feet to prepare for the building foundations. Therefore, it
is highly unlikely the proposed project would disturb any unknown archaeological
resources, and impacts would be less than significant. However, adhering to the
following mitigation measure would ensure compliance with state historical
guidelines. Impacts would be less than significant with incorporation of mitigation.
Mitigation Measure
5.1. The project applicant shall have a qualified professional archaeologist on
site to monitor for any potential impacts to archaeological or historic
resources throughout the duration of any demolition and ground disturbing
activities. The professional archeologist shall have the authority to halt any
activities adversely impacting potentially significant cultural resources until
the resources can be formally evaluated. The archaeologist must have
knowledge of both prehistoric and historical archaeology. Additionally, the
archaeological monitoring program shall include the presence of a local
Native American representative (Gabrielino and /or Juaneno). Resources
must be recovered, analyzed in accordance with CEQA guidelines, and
curated. Suspension of ground disturbance in the vicinity of the
discoveries shall not be lifted until the archaeologist has evaluated
discoveries to assess whether they are classified as historical resources
or unique archaeological sites, pursuant to CEQA.
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
41
Less -Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is
situated on late to middle Pleistocene marine deposits, which can be highly
fossiliferous, containing vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant fossil specimens. The
project site has undergone grading for construction of the existing restaurant
building and surface parking lot, as well as for the other, adjacent buildings and
surface parking lots. A geotechnical engineering investigation (Appendix B)
conducted for the project indicated artificial fill over native soils on the existing
pads varying from 0.5 feet to 1.5 feet. Therefore, it is highly unlikely the proposed
project would disturb any paleontological resources. With adherence to the
mitigation measure below, impacts would be less than significant and impacts
would be less than significant.
Mitigation Measure
5.2. The project applicant shall retain a qualified professional paleontologist for
periodic monitoring for any potential impacts to paleontological resources
throughout the duration of ground disturbing activities. In the event
paleontological resources are uncovered, the professional paleontologist
shall have the authority to halt any activities adversely impacting
potentially significant fossil resources until the resources can be formally
evaluated. If potentially significant fossils are uncovered they must be
recovered, analyzed in accordance with CEQA guidelines, and curated at
facilities at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, or other
scientific institution accredited for curation and collection of fossil
specimens. Suspension of ground disturbances in the vicinity of the
discoveries shall not be lifted until the paleontologist has evaluated the
significance of the resources pursuant to CEQA.
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
Less - Than - Significant Impact. The project site is not a formal cemetery and is
not adjacent to a formal cemetery. The project site is not known to contain
human remains interred outside formal cemeteries, nor is it known to be located
on a burial ground. The proposed project would involve limited surface soil
disturbance and grading to an approximate depth of 3 feet to prepare for the
building foundations. A geotechnical engineering investigation (Appendix B)
conducted for the project indicated artificial fill over native soils on the existing
pads varying from 0.5 feet to 1.5 feet. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that
construction of the proposed project would disturb any human remains. Should
human remains be uncovered during construction, as specified by State Health
and Safety Code Section 7050.5, no further disturbance will occur until the
County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin and disposition
pursuant to Public Resources Code 5097.98. If such a discovery occurs,
excavation or construction will halt in the area of the discovery, the area will be
protected, and consultation and treatment will occur as prescribed by law. If the
Coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she will contact the
4
Native American Heritage Commission, who will appoint the Most Likely
Descendent. Additionally, if the bones are determined to be Native American, a
plan will be developed regarding the treatment of human remains and associated
burial objects, and the plan will be implemented under the direction of the Most
Likely Descendent. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence
of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
No Impact. The project site is not included in any earthquake fault zones as
delineated by the Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Act. The principal
seismic hazard to the subject property and proposed project is strong ground
shaking from earthquakes produced by local faults. Secondary effects such as
surface rupture, lurching, or flooding are not considered probable (Appendix B).
Therefore, no impacts on the project would result from fault rupture.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Southern California is located in an active
seismic region. Moderate to strong earthquakes can occur on numerous faults.
The United States Geological Survey, California Division of Mines and Geology,
private consultants, and universities have been studying earthquakes in Southern
California for several decades. The purpose of the code seismic design
parameters is to prevent collapse during strong ground shaking. Cosmetic
damage should be expected. The principal seismic hazard to the subject
property and proposed project is strong ground shaking from earthquakes
produced by local faults. Secondary effects such as surface rupture, lurching, or
flooding are not considered probable (Appendix B).
An approximately 13,525 gross square feet of new commercial retail and food
uses are proposed to replace the existing single -story 7,996 square -foot vacant
restaurant. The new development will consist of two, free - standing, single -story
buildings. Each has a maximum building height of 29 feet. All demolition and
construction would occur in accordance with building and safety standards as
specified by the City. The proposed buildings would be constructed in
compliance with the latest earthquake- resistant design available and relevant
codes. All proposed project components would be in compliance with the most
up -to -date building codes. Plans would be reviewed and approved by the City
prior to issuance of grading and building permits and construction activities.
Furthermore, the proposed buildings would be evaluated prior to occupation to
2M
ensure that the construction has been completed in accordance with the
approved plans and applicable codes. Therefore, impacts would be less than
significant.
iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is a geologic process that causes
ground failure and typically occurs in loose, saturated sediments primarily of
sandy composition (City of Newport Beach 2006a). Figure S -2 of the Newport
Beach General Plan (Seismic Hazards) identifies areas of potential liquefaction in
the City of Newport Beach. The project site is not located in an area identified as
having a potential for soil liquefaction when subject to a seismic event (City of
Newport Beach 2006). Native soils consisted of a silty residual clayey soil to a
maximum depth explored of 13.5 feet in test pit 1. Groundwater was not
encountered in any of the geotechnical pits during the field investigation on
December 29, 2010 (Appendix B). Therefore, impacts on people or structures as
a result of seismic - related ground failure, including liquefaction, would be less
than significant.
iv) Landslides?
No Impact. The proposed project would have no impact related to landslides.
Figure S -2 of the Newport Beach General Plan 2006 (Seismic Hazards) identifies
areas with landslide potential. The project site is not located in any area with
landslide potential (City of Newport Beach 2006). The project site is generally
flat and implementation of the proposed project would not require slope cuts that
could result in landslides. Therefore, no impacts associated with landslides
would occur.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The project site is currently developed with a
single -story, 7,996- square -foot restaurant, surface parking, and landscaped
areas. As required by the City's Municipal Code, the project applicant would
obtain a grading permit from the City's Building Official. Chapter 15.10 contains
grading, fill, drainage, and erosion control standards that would be applied to the
corresponding construction activity. The project applicant would implement
standard erosion control measures and construction best management practices
(BMPs) that would minimize impacts. Therefore, impacts would be less than
significant.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or
off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The project site has been developed and is not
located in an area identified by the City of Newport Beach General Plan as
having a potential for soil liquefaction or landslides. Subsidence over the site
during grading is anticipated to be on the order of 0.5 feet. Shrinkage of reworked
materials should be in the range of 10 to 15 percent (Appendix B). All proposed
project components would occur in accordance with building and safety
standards. Impacts on people or structures as a result of seismic - related ground
failure, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse would be less than
significant.
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18- 1 -B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property?
Less -Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the
geotechnical engineering investigation, results of expansion tests indicate that
the near surface soils exhibit a medium expansion potential. The surface soils
are non - plastic with a medium expansion potential (Appendix B). Therefore,
impacts associated with expansive soils would be less than significant with
mitigation incorporated.
Mitigation Measures:
6.1 Prior to issuance of grading permits, a detailed design- engineering -level
geotechnical investigation report shall be prepared and submitted with
engineered grading plans to further evaluate expansive soils, soil
corrosivity, settlement, foundations, grading constraints, and other soil
engineering design conditions, and to provide site - specific
recommendations to address these conditions, if determined necessary.
The engineering -level report shall include and address each of the
recommendations included in the geotechnical reports prepared by Strata -
Tech, Inc. (Appendix B). The geotechnical reports shall be prepared and
signed /stamped by a Registered Civil Engineer specializing in
geotechnical engineering and a Certified Engineering Geologist.
Geotechnical rough grading plan review reports shall be prepared in
accordance with the City of Newport Beach Grading Ordinance.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of waste water?
No Impact. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are
included as part of the proposed project. The project site would tie into the
existing sewer line. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that
may have a significant impact on the environment?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Greenhouse gases emitted by human activity
are implicated in global climate change or global warming. The principal
45
greenhouse gases (GHGs) are carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, ozone,
and water vapor. Fossil fuel consumption in the transportation sector (on -road
motor vehicles, off- highway mobile sources, and aircraft) is the single largest
source of GHG emissions, accounting for approximately one -half of GHG
emissions globally.
Industrial and commercial sources are the second largest contributors of GHG
emissions with about one -fourth of total emissions. Some greenhouse gases
such as carbon dioxide occur naturally and are emitted to the atmosphere
through natural processes and human activities. Other greenhouse gases (e.g.,
fluorinated gases) are created and emitted solely through human activities. The
principal greenhouse gases that enter the atmosphere as a result of human
activities are Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), Nitrous Oxide (N2O), and
Fluorinated Gases. For purposes of analysis the global warming potential of each
gas is equated to Carbon Dioxide (CO2e) and the Carbon Dioxide equivalent is
identified in metric tons for each GHG.
SCQAMD's Significance Thresholds: On December 5, 2008, the South Coast
Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopted a GHG significance
threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans where the SCAQMD is the
lead agency. The threshold utilizes a tiered approach, with a screening
significance threshold of 10,000 MTCO2EQ, if the project was not part of a
general plan's GHG reduction plan. The SCAQMD has also developed draft
thresholds for commercial and residential projects, where it is not the lead. The
draft recommends a 3,000 MTCO2EQ per year screening threshold. The
SCAQMD's working group has not set a date for finalizing the recommendations.
Until more guidance is provided from the expert agencies (GARB and /or
SCAQMD), the City of Newport Beach intends to consider projects emitting 3,000
metric tons of CO2e per year or less to be a less- than - significant contribution to
greenhouse gasses, thereby not requiring further analysis.
For projects exceeding the screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per
year, the City will consider projects to have significant impacts if they either 1)
are not substantially consistent with policies and standards set out in federal,
state, and local plans designed to reduce GHGs; or 2) would emit more than
3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Projects that do not meet these thresholds
would be considered to have significant impacts, and thus could be expected to
exceed the State's mandatory requirement under Assembly Bill 32 to reduce
statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
A conservative estimate of the project's CO2e emissions during construction and
operation is presented in Table 7 -1. As shown, emissions would remain well
below the City's screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year;
therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
40
Table 7.1. Estimate of Proiect - Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions (DOunds Der dav)
a Value includes total annual operational emissions plus total construction emissions amortized
over 30 years.
Source: City of Newport Beach 2011. CalEEMod 2011.1.1 outputs provided in Appendix G.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less -Than Significant Impact. California has passed several bills and the
Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding greenhouse
gases. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research recently published
suggested changes to the CEQA Guidelines that would require that greenhouse
gases be evaluated in environmental documents.
The recommended approach for GHG analysis included in the Governor's Office
of Planning and Research (OPR) June 2008 Technical Advisory (TA) is to: 1)
identify and quantify GHG emissions, 2) assess the significance of the impact on
climate change, and 3) if significant, identify alternatives and /or mitigation
measures to reduce the impact below significance. Neither the CEQA Statute nor
Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for
performing an impact analysis.
Presently, there are no adopted federal plans, policies regulations or laws setting
a mandatory limit on GHG emissions. CARB (California Air Resources Board)
has published draft preliminary guidance to agencies on how to establish interim
significance thresholds for analyzing GHG emissions (California Air Resources
Board 2008). That guidance, while still in draft form, does provide some
assistance to the City in evaluating whether the project would impede the State's
47
Carbon Dioxide
Equivalent
California Statewide Average Daily Emissions (year
2006)
479,800,000
Project Emissions
Construction- Period Emissions
2012
182
Operations - period Emissions
Area Sources
0
Energy
86
Mobile
1,948
Waste
31
Water
11
Total Operations - Period
Emissions
2,076
Total Project Emissions a
2,258
City of Newport Beach Screening Level Threshold
3,000
Exceed Threshold?
I No
a Value includes total annual operational emissions plus total construction emissions amortized
over 30 years.
Source: City of Newport Beach 2011. CalEEMod 2011.1.1 outputs provided in Appendix G.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
Less -Than Significant Impact. California has passed several bills and the
Governor has signed at least three executive orders regarding greenhouse
gases. The Governor's Office of Planning and Research recently published
suggested changes to the CEQA Guidelines that would require that greenhouse
gases be evaluated in environmental documents.
The recommended approach for GHG analysis included in the Governor's Office
of Planning and Research (OPR) June 2008 Technical Advisory (TA) is to: 1)
identify and quantify GHG emissions, 2) assess the significance of the impact on
climate change, and 3) if significant, identify alternatives and /or mitigation
measures to reduce the impact below significance. Neither the CEQA Statute nor
Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for
performing an impact analysis.
Presently, there are no adopted federal plans, policies regulations or laws setting
a mandatory limit on GHG emissions. CARB (California Air Resources Board)
has published draft preliminary guidance to agencies on how to establish interim
significance thresholds for analyzing GHG emissions (California Air Resources
Board 2008). That guidance, while still in draft form, does provide some
assistance to the City in evaluating whether the project would impede the State's
47
mandatory requirements under AB 32 to reduce statewide GHG emissions to
1990 levels by 2020. The City of Newport Beach does not have any plans,
policies, regulations, significance thresholds, or laws addressing climate change
at this time.
As discussed in Response VII(a) above, the estimated CO2 greenhouse gas
emissions by the project will be below and not exceed the preliminary SCAQMD
screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2EQ /year. As such, the proposed project
would be consistent with the state's goals of reducing GHG emissions to 1990
levels by 2020; therefore, the proposed project's contribution to cumulative
climate change GHG emissions would be less than significant. The project will
not conflict with any adopted greenhouse gas plan, policy, or regulation. As a
result, the project will not have any significant impacts to greenhouse gas plans
or policies that are applicable to the project.
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The construction and operation of the proposed
project would not result in the reasonably foreseeable upset or release of any
hazardous materials. Construction equipment that would be used to build the
proposed project has the potential to release oils, greases, solvents, and other
finishing materials through accidental spills. Spill or upset of these materials
would have the potential to affect surrounding land uses. However, the
consequences of construction - related spills are generally reduced in comparison
to other accidental spills and releases because the amount of hazardous material
released during a construction - related spill is small as the volume in any single
piece of construction equipment is generally less than 50 gallons. Construction -
related spills of hazardous materials are not uncommon, but the enforcement of
construction and demolition standards, including BMPs by appropriate local and
state agencies, would minimize the potential for an accidental release of
petroleum products and /or hazardous materials or explosions during
construction. Federal, state, and local controls have been enacted to reduce the
effects of potential hazardous materials spills.
The Newport Beach Fire Department is an all -risk fire department and enforces
city, state, and federal hazardous materials regulations for Newport Beach. It
has the resources to respond and provide services to all types of emergencies,
including fires, medical emergencies, hazardous materials problems, beach
rescues, traffic accidents, high rise incidents, wildland fires, major flooding, and
disaster (City of Newport Beach 2009b. City regulations include Unified
Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials Management Regulatory Program,
Chapter 9.04 of the City's Municipal Code, and implementation of the California
Accidental Release Prevention Program (City of Newport Beach 2006b).
Elements of these programs include spill mitigation, and containment and
no
securing of hazardous materials containers to prevent spills. Compliance with
these requirements is mandatory as standard permitting conditions, and would
minimize the potential for the accidental release or upset of hazardous materials,
helping to ensure public safety.
The occupancies of restaurants and retail uses are not associated with the use or
storage of large amounts of hazardous substances. The proposed project would
not use or store large amounts of hazardous substances and an upset of those
types of materials would not be reasonably foreseeable. The construction and
operation of the proposed project would not create significant hazard to the
public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment.
Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the environment?
No Impact. Development of the project includes the demolition of a 7,996
square -foot restaurant building and construction of two, new single -story
buildings of 13,525 gross square feet with uses allocated to food uses and
general commercial uses. The age of the building to be demolished (pre -1980)
suggests the possibility of asbestos - containing building materials; however, a
major remodel in 1995 had a permit indicating that either there was no asbestos
in the building or that it had been removed and disposed of appropriately. A
Phase I Environmental Assessment (Appendix C) for the Evaluation of
Hazardous Materials was performed by Centec Engineering (Phase I EA Centec,
2003) for the subject property. During the on -site inspection, no damaged
suspect friable materials were noted and all materials appeared to be in good
condition. No samples were contained for analysis. Asbestos does not appear to
be a significant issue relative to a perceived asset value. No stored lead -based
paints were noted during inspection of the building and no use of lead -based
paint is suspected. No sampling or laboratory analyses were completed during
this investigation to verify the presence or absence of lead in any building
materials.
No hazardous materials other than what would be contained in "household"
cleaning supplies were noted at the existing restaurant and there is an in- ground
grease trap. The grease is removed by Baker Commodities. No significant stains
or signs of hazardous material spills were noted and the landscaping at the
property appeared healthy with no evidence of toxic materials dumping or
abandonment. No stains or signs of leakage were noted on the ground near pad -
mounted Southern California Edison (SCE) transformers which serve the subject
property and its neighbors. Federal law has prohibited the manufacture of
transformers utilizing PCB since 1977 and SCE maintains that it is "highly
unlikely" that the transformers contain polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) at
49
concentration levels requiring special management under the Environmental
Protection Agency's (EPA) rules (Phase I EA Centec, 2003).
There was no documentary or physical evidence of former or current
underground or aboveground storage tanks on the subject property. No evidence
of ponds, pits, lagoons, clarifiers, groundwater monitoring wells, or other possible
conduits for contamination was found. There was no evidence of sensitive
environmental receptors such as wetlands, marshes, endangered species, etc.,
in the immediate vicinity although the Newport Back Bay is located one mile
southwest of the property. No high -power electricity transmission towers were
noted in the immediate vicinity. Radon is not considered a significant area of
concern for Southern California and has not been tested for. Although site -
specific information regarding radon levels can only be obtained through direct
testing, the potential for elevated radon levels at the subject property is low
(Phase I EA Centec, 2003).
The proposed project would operate as take -out restaurant food uses and
general office and retail uses. A common grease interceptor will be built to
accommodate the restaurant uses. These uses would not routinely transport,
use, or dispose of hazardous materials. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
No Impact. There are several adult training schools, and a couple of music and
dance schools within one - quarter mile. However, the proposed project would not
emit hazardous emissions or require handling hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste. Therefore, the proposed project would not emit
hazardous emissions within one - quarter mile of a school. No impacts would
occur.
d) Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials
sites that complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as
a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
No Impact. The project site is not included on any list of hazardous materials
sites pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (Phase I EA Centec, 2003).
An environmental records database search report was completed on April 14,
2003, by Vista Information Solutions, Inc. (Vista) in San Diego, California. The
Vista database searched pertinent federal, state, and local lists of public
information, according to appropriate ASTM standards, to identify and
geographically locate sites of concern within a maximum radius of one mile of the
subject property. The subject property is not identified on the database for any
reason (Phase I EA Centec, 2003).
50
There are three different locations of contamination within the critical 1/4 —mile
radius. Koll Center and Koll Co /Sanwa Bank, both of which are on the east side
of MacArthur Blvd. and beyond 1,000 feet away from the subject property, had
leaking underground storage tanks (USTs) that affected "soil only" (Phase I EA
Centec, 2003). They have both been remediated and have a "case closed" status
and are therefore of no realistic concern to the subject property. Beacon Bay
Auto Wash, located 1,200 feet to the northwest, had a UST leak that affected
groundwater, but it is currently undergoing remediation, is hydrologically cross
gradient to the subject property, and is unlikely to have any impact on the subject
property (Phase I EA Centec, 2003).
Of the remaining 21 listed locations of contamination, seven have a "case closed"
status, six are currently either under remediation or post - remedial monitoring,
and the remainder are currently under investigation. All of these sites are too
distant and lack adequate significance to likely have an adverse environmental
impact on the subject property. There are no NPL of State "Superfund" sites or
other significant sources of contamination in the study (Phase I EA Centec,
2003).
Since the project site is not located on a list of hazardous materials sites, the
proposed project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment and no impact would occur.
e) For a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan
has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The closest airport is John Wayne Airport, which
is approximately within 0.38 miles northwest of the project site. The project site is
located within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for
John Wayne Airport. The proposed project is within the height restriction zone
for the John Wayne Airport and the notification area of the Federal Aviation
Regulation (FAR) Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces aeronautical obstruction area.
Section 77.13 of the FAR requires the notification of the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) for any construction or alteration which are identified as
follows: 1) exceeds 200 feet in height about the ground level at its site; 2)
exceeds a height greater than an imaginary surface extending outward and
upward at specific slope characteristics at 20,000 feet, 10,000 feet, and 5,000
feet from the nearest point of the airport runway; or 3) is a highway with specific
characteristics, and /or ,is occurring at an airport.
The proposed project includes the construction of two, free - standing single -story
buildings with a maximum height of 29 feet. The project site is approximately 50
feet above mean sea level (Phase I EA Centec, 2003). The proposed project
does not require notification to the FAA in accordance with Section 77.13 of the
51
FAR because the proposed project would not be more than 200 feet above
ground level and not more than 206 feet above mean sea level; the proposed
project would not exceed a height greater than the imaginary surface planes
identified within Section 77.13; the proposed project is not a highway; and the
proposed project is not a modification to an existing airport. Therefore, the filing
of Form 7460 -1 with the FAA is not required.
Although the proposed project is exempt from filing the Form 7460 -1 notice, a
referral by the City to the Airport Land Use Commission for Consistency Review
is required due to the location of the proposal within the AELUP Planning Area
and due to the nature of the required City approvals (i.e. planned community
development amendment) under PUC Section 21676(b).
The subject property is within Noise Impact Zone "2" as identified in the AELUP
which considers land uses including commercial as normally consistent meaning
conventional construction methods can be used and there are no special noise
reduction requirements. The subject property is not within the Runway Protection
Zone.
The proposed project would comply and be compatible with the land use
standards established in the City's Municipal Code and the AELUP (Airport Land
Use Commission 2008). The AELUP vicinity height guidelines would protect
public safety, health, and welfare by ensuring that aircraft could fly safely in the
airspace around the airport. Although the proposed project is located within an
airport land use plan, it would comply with all established standards,
requirements, and plans. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
No Impact. As described above in (e), the John Wayne Airport is located
approximately 0.38 miles northwest of the project site. There is no private airstrip
in the vicinity of the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed project would not
result in a safety hazard for people working in the project area from operations of
a private airstrip. No impacts would occur.
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
No Impact. The proposed project would not impair or physically affect any
adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan. The proposed project
would not interfere with the implementation of the City's Emergency Response
Plan. The City's Emergency Management Plan also establishes safety
procedures with respect to aviation hazards to promote the safety of persons on
the ground while reducing risks of serious harm to aircraft crews and passengers
that may need to make emergency landings in the immediate airport vicinity. The
proposed project would not require the closure of any public or private streets or
roadways, and would not impede access of emergency vehicles to the project
rl"
site, or any surrounding areas in the event of an aviation emergency or other
emergency. Finally, the proposed project would provide all required emergency
access in accordance with the requirements of the Newport Beach Fire
Department during plan review by the Fire Department. No impacts on
emergency response would occur.
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact. The project site is not located in an area adjacent to or intermixed
with wildlands, and is surrounded by office buildings. Furthermore, the City of
Newport Beach General Plan Safety Element Figure S4 (City of Newport Beach
2006a) identifies the project site as Low /None Fire Susceptibility. Therefore,
people or structures would not be exposed to a significant risk of loss, injury, or
death involving wildland fires as a result of the proposed project. No impacts
would occur.
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Land within the City of Newport Beach is
included in three watersheds: Newport Bay, Newport Coastal Streams, and
Santa Ana (County of Orange 2011). Each of these watersheds is under the
jurisdiction of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB)
and subject to the objectives, water quality standards, and BMP requirements
established in the Santa Ana River Basin Plan and Orange County Drainage
Area Management Plan (DAMP). The project site is located in the Newport Bay
Watershed, within the San Diego Creek Subwatershed. The EPA and Santa Ana
Regional Water Control Board have identified San Diego Creek as an impaired
water body. The main tributary of the San Diego Creek Watershed, San Diego
Creek, drains directly into Upper Newport Bay (City of Newport Beach 2006b).
Under the provisions of Chapter 14.36 (Water Quality) of the City of Newport
Beach Municipal Code, any discharge that would result in or contribute to
degradation of water quality via stormwater runoff is prohibited. New
development or redevelopment projects are required to comply with provisions
set forth in the DAMP, including the implementation of appropriate BMPs
identified in the DAMP to control stormwater runoff so as to prevent any
deterioration of water quality that would impair subsequent or competing
beneficial uses of water. Furthermore, a municipal separate storm sewer system
(MS4) permit is provided to the City by SARWQCB under the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to regulate the amount of stormwater
contaminants that are delivered into the City's waterways. MS4 permits require
53
an aggressive water quality ordinance, specific municipal practices to maintain
City facilities like the MS4, and use of BMPs in many residential, commercial,
and development - related activities to further reduce the amount of contaminants
in urban runoff (City of Newport Beach 2006b). The proposed project will comply
with the required water quality standards; therefore, impacts would be less than
significant.
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the
production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The project site is currently developed and is
not considered a location for groundwater recharge (City of Newport Beach
2006b). The proposed project would not substantially increase impervious
surfaces on the site, thereby interfering substantially with groundwater recharge.
Furthermore, the proposed project would not directly withdraw groundwater from
beneath the site, thereby substantially depleting groundwater supplies. Impacts
would be less than significant.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -
site?
Less -Than Significant Impact. No streams or rivers are located on the project
site; therefore, construction and operation of the proposed project would not
directly affect the flow of a stream or river. The project would involve some minor
grading for construction. These activities would minimally alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site. The proposed project would not increase the
impervious area on the site as the existing site is currently developed with
surface parking and a 7,996 square -foot building. During construction, an Erosion
Control Plan will be implemented. Therefore, impacts from erosion or siltation,
either on site or off site would be less than significant.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of a course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on or off -site?
Less -Than Significant Impact. No streams or rivers are located on site, and
therefore, construction and operation of the proposed project would not directly
affect the flow of a river or stream. Substantial amounts of stormwater are not
readily absorbed into the soil because of the urban character of the area and the
existing use of the project site for surface parking and a restaurant building. The
proposed project would minimally alter the existing drainage pattern of the site,
154
but would not increase the impervious area. During construction, runoff from the
proposed project site would be managed by the Erosion Control Plan and Water
Quality Management Plan. The BMPs from the preliminary landscape plan
include retention of significant amounts of water on -site. Storm runoff generated
through the project operations would be diverted into the existing stormwater
drainage system. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Overall, urban street flooding is rarely
considered a problem in the City of Newport Beach (City of Newport Beach
2003). The urban character of the area and the existing use of the project site
would not allow stormwater to be readily absorbed into the soil. The proposed
project would minimally alter the existing drainage pattern of the site but would
not substantially increase the impervious area; therefore, the proposed project
would not substantially increase the amount of stormwater runoff generated.
Finally, the proposed project would comply with the policies outlined in the
General Plan to minimize runoff - related flooding impacts. These policies include
NR 3.11, NR 3.20 and NR 4.4 and implementation would reduce the volume of
runoff generated and potential for flooding. As discussed in Section IX (d), runoff
from the proposed project site would be managed by the Erosion Control Plan
and Water Quality Management Plan. Therefore, impacts on stormwater would
be less than significant.
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not substantially
degrade water quality. The proposed project would comply with all General Plan
policies minimizing flooding impacts. The proposed food service uses will require
the installation of grease interceptors. As discussed in Sections IX (a -d), the
project site would be managed by the Erosion Control Plan and Water Quality
Management Plan and the proposed project will comply with required water
quality standards. Impacts on water quality would be less than significant.
g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood
hazard delineation map?
No Impact. Based on Figure S3 (Flood Hazards) of the City of Newport Beach
General Plan, the project site is not located in a flood hazard area. The proposed
project does not include the construction of housing; therefore, the proposed
project would not place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area, and no
impacts would occur.
h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would
impede or redirect flood flows?
515
No Impact. The project site is not located in a flood hazard area (City of
Newport Beach 2006a). Therefore, the proposed project would not impede or
redirect 100 -year flood flow, and no impacts would occur.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
No Impact. The proposed project is not located in a flood hazard area (City of
Newport Beach 2006a). The project site is not located near a levee or dam.
Various flood control measures have helped mitigate flood damage in the City.
Administered by the Orange County Resources & Development Management
Department, the Orange County Flood Control District ( OCFCD) provides,
operates, and maintains public facilities and regional resources for the residents
of Orange County. OCFCD operates and maintains flood control channels, dams,
retarding basins, pump stations, and other flood control infrastructure that the
OCFCD designs and constructs. Specifically, OCFCD is responsible for
maintaining the regional drainage facilities such as the Santa Ana River, San
Diego Creek, and Buck Gully. These structures help regulate flow in the Santa
Ana River, San Diego Creek, and smaller streams, and hold back some of the
flow during intense rainfall periods that could otherwise overwhelm the storm
drain system in Newport Beach. Therefore, no impacts would occur.
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
No Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not increase
exposure to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Due to the elevation of
the site (approximately 50 feet) and absence of nearby waterfront, impacts from
a tsunami would be negligible. Seiches result from the rhythmic movement of
water within a lake or other enclosed or semi - enclosed body of water, generally
caused by earthquakes. A small body of water, approximately 1.3 acres in area,
is located over 300 feet from the project site between MacArthur Boulevard and
Von Karman Avenue. Because no large lakes or other bodies of water lie on or
near the project site, the potential hazard from seiches is very low at the project
site. Based on Figure S1 (Coastal Hazards) of the City of Newport Beach
General Plan, the project site is not located in a 100- or 500 -year zone for
tsunami inundation at extreme high tide (City of Newport Beach 2006a). The site
is relatively flat and is not subject to a high risk of mudflow. The project site is
not in an area with landslide potential (City of Newport Beach 2006a), per Figure
S2 (Seismic Hazards) of the City of Newport Beach General Plan. Therefore, no
impacts would occur.
150
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING.
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The project sites are located in a planned community district. The
proposed change in use from restaurant to general commercial use, transfer of
hotel room entitlement to the project site location, and reduction in the hotel room
allocation of the off -site location will not create a physical division of or between
the established general office uses, hotel site, and the existing restaurant uses in
the vicinity; and will increase the types of commercial uses permitted to include
those that provide service or convenience for the benefit of persons visiting or
working in the vicinity. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to
the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning
ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an
environmental effect?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project involves two sites designated as
Mixed Use — Horizontal Land Use (MU -H2) per the Land Use Element of the
General Plan, which provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may
include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -use
buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses.
The development limits for the project sites are identified in Table LU2 of the
General Plan Land Use Element as a portion of Anomaly Number 12 with a
development limit of 457,880 square feet; and a portion of Anomaly Number 17
with a development limit of 33,392 square feet and 304 hotel rooms. Both sites
involved in the project are currently zoned PC -11, Newport Place Planned
Community District as Restaurant Site 1 (Project Site) and Hotel Site 2 -B (Donor
Site). The project as proposed includes a code amendment to change the
designation of a portion of Restaurant Site 1 to General Commercial Site 8
designation. Also included in the project is a request to transfer 54 hotel rooms
from Hotel Site 2 -B (donor site) to the project site.
The transfer of 54 hotel rooms will be converted to a comparable amount of
commercial floor area (8,000 square feet) to establish the total amount of the
project site, designated as General Commercial Site 8, to 13,525 square feet,
and change the entitlement of Anomaly No. 12 from 457,880 square feet to
463,409 square feet to accommodate the proposed construction of a new
commercial shopping center. Conversely, the hotel room entitlement of the donor
site within Statistical Area L-4, Anomaly Number 17 will be reduced from 304 to
250 hotel rooms.
The proposed activities will amend the zoning to allow for general commercial
uses and will not conflict with land use plans, policies, or zoning of the City of
Newport Beach, since the commercial square footage increase is offset by the
57
transfer and reallocation of hotel rooms located within the same Statistical Area
L4. Land use policy consistency analysis (Appendix 1) has been conducted and is
on file and available for review at the Planning Division at City Hall. Therefore, no
mitigation measures are required by CEQA.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
No Impact. As referenced in Section IV (Biological Resources), the project site
and the donor site are not within a habitat conservation area that supports any
specific species of flora or fauna on the property. Furthermore, the project site is
currently developed with a restaurant use and related surface parking that will be
demolished prior to construction of the new development; and the donor site is
occupied by an interim use, rental vehicle storage facility, with hotel room
entitlement that will be reduced in total number. The project will not conflict with any
applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan.
Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA.
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES.
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
No Impact. Per Section 4.5.6: Mineral Resources of the Draft EIR of the Newport
Beach General Plan 2006 Update, other than known active oil and gas resources
generally concentrated within the western portions of Newport Beach, there is no
active mining within the Newport Beach area. Based on guidelines adopted by
the CGS (California Geological Survey) areas known as Mineral Resource Zones
(MRZ) are classified according to the presence or absence of significant
deposits. The City is required to respond to mineral resource recovery areas that
have been designated by the State as MRZ -2 (significant existing or likely
mineral deposits). All areas within the City are either classified as containing no
significant mineral deposits (MRZ -1), or the significance of mineral deposits has
not been determined (MRZ -3). The proposed project site lies within an MRZ -3
zone (Figure 4.5 -4 Mineral Resource Zones, Draft EIR of the Newport Beach
General Plan 2006 Update). Therefore, the proposed project would not result in
the loss of the availability of known mineral resources that would be of value to
the region and the residents of the State, and no impact would occur.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or
other land use plan?
No Impact. The subject site is not delineated in the City of Newport Beach
General Plan as containing a locally important mineral resource (City of Newport
Beach 2006a). Therefore, no impacts would occur.
W
XII. NOISE.
Existina Conditions
Noise - sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project site include the Tutor Time
daycare center approximately 2,100 feet to the southwest at 1550 Bristol Street
North, the University of California Irvine Child Development Center located
approximately 2,100 feet to the east at 19262 Jamboree Road in the City of
Irvine, and high- density residences approximately 3,000 feet to the northeast at
the intersection of Campus Drive and Jamboree Road (Alford, pers. comm.).
The project site is also located within an area planned for future mixed
residential /commercial uses. However, no residential uses currently exist in this
area nor are they have any mixed residential /commercial development projects
been approved in this area (City of Newport Beach 2006).
Regulatory Background: Noise Standards and Thresholds of Significance
The proposed project is subject to the policies and standards contained in the
Noise Element of the Newport Beach General Plan and the Community Noise
Control Ordinance and the Loud and Unreasonable Noise Ordinance, Chapters
10.26 and Chapter 10.28, respectively, of the Newport Beach Municipal Code
(NBMC).
The Noise Element establishes standards for exterior sound levels based on land
use categories. The City also has established policies and regulations
concerning the generation and control of noise that could adversely affect its
citizens and noise - sensitive land uses. The Noise Element states that an outdoor
noise exposure level of 60 to 65 dBA community noise equivalent level (CNEL) is
considered "normally compatible" for single -unit and multi -unit residential
development.
The Noise Element also sets interior and exterior noise standards, based on land
use:
59
Land Use Categories
Allowable Noise Levels (dBA)
Interior "b
Exterior"b
Interior
Interior
Exterior
Exterior
Noise
Noise
Noise
Noise
Categories
Uses
Level
Level
Level
Level
(Leg)
(Leq) 10
(Leq)
(Leq)
7am to
pm to 7
7am to
10 pm
10pm
am
10pm
to 7 am
Single Family,
Two Family,
45
40
55
50
Multiple Family
(Zone 1)
Residential
Residential
Portions of
Mixed
45
40
60
50
Use
Developments
(Zone III)
Commercial
N/A
N/A
65
60
(Zone 11)
Commercial
Industrial or
Industrial
Manufacturing
N/A
N/A
70
70
(Zone
IV)
Schools, Day
Care Centers,
Churches,
Institutional
Libraries,
45
40
55
50
Museums,
Health Care
Institutions
(Zone 1)
a. If the ambient
noise level exceeds
the resulting standard, the
ambient shall
be the
standard.
b. It shall be unlawful for any person at any location within the incorporated area of the
City to create any noise or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned,
leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such a person which causes the noise level
when measured on any other property, to exceed either of the following:
• The noise standard for the applicable zone for any fifteen - minute period;
• A maximum instantaneous noise level equal to the value of the noise standard
plus twenty dBA for any period of time (measured using A- weighted slow
response).
• In the event the ambient noise level exceeds the noise standard, the noise
standard applicable to said category shall be increased to reflect the maximum
ambient noise level.
• The noise standard for the residential portions of the residential property falling
within one hundred feet of a commercial property, if the intruding noise
originates from that commercial property.
.I
• If the measurement location is on a boundary between two different noise
zones, the lower noise level standard applicable to the noise zone shall apply.
The City of Newport Beach General Plan's Noise Element (General Plan Policy N
1.8) identifies a significant impact as follows:
A significant noise impact occurs when there is an increase in the ambient CNEL
produced by new development impacting existing sensitive uses. The CNEL
increase is shown in the table below:
CNEL dBA Increase
55 3
60 2
65 1
70 1
Over 75 Any increase is significant
Noise Policy N 1.1 requires that all proposed developments be compatible with
the noise environment through the use of a land use noise compatibility matrix
contained in Table N2 of the Noise Element.
Section 10.26.025 NBMC specifies the following exterior noise standards:
NOISE
ALLOWABLE NOISE LEVEL (Equivalent
ZONE TYPE OF LAND USE
Noise Level Leq)
7 a.m. to 10 p.m. 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.
I Single -, two -or multiple-
55 dBA 50 dBA
family residential
II Commercial
65 dBA 60 dBA
Residential portions of
III
60 dBA 50 dBA
mixed -use properties
IV Industrial or
70 dBA 70 dBA
manufacturing
Construction noise is exempt from the above noise standards, pursuant to
Section 10.26.035 NBMC. However, Section 10.28.040 NBMC specifies
permitted hours for construction activities. Construction or other noise - generating
activity that would disturb a person of normal sensitivity who works or resides in
the vicinity may occur only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturdays. No construction
that would disturb a person of normal sensitivity may occur on Sundays or
federal holidays.
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
Less -Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Although
sensitive receptors in the area would be exposed to temporary increases in noise
01
from construction activities, City noise standards would not be exceeded. The
construction and operational noise impacts and required mitigation measures are
discussed below.
Construction Noise
Construction of the proposed project is anticipated to last for approximately
seven months, beginning in January 2012 and continue through June, 2012.
Noise from construction activity is generated by a broad array of powered
mechanical equipment. In order to assess the potential noise effects of
construction, this noise analysis used a list of construction equipment provided
for the proposed project to assess noise levels during construction phases.
During the demolition phase of construction, noise levels are estimated to be
approximately 92 dBA Leq at the project site. Construction noise levels of this
magnitude would attenuate at the closest sensitive receptor (UCI Child
Development Center) to approximately 55 dBA Leq (Noise attenuates at a rate of
6 dB per doubling distance). Because existing noise levels at the closest
sensitive receptor were measured at approximately 63 dBA Leq, the noise levels
would be marginally higher at this location during the loudest phase of
construction. Therefore, construction noise would likely be perceptible, but would
not dominate the noise environment at the sensitive receptor (Alford pers.
comm.).
The City's Municipal Code exempts construction from the noise restrictions
discussed above as long as it occurs between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30
p.m., Monday through Friday; and between 8:00 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Saturdays
and does not occur at any time on federal holidays or on Sundays. In addition to
the City's construction restrictions, the following mitigation measures would
ensure construction noise results in a less- than - significant impact:
Mitigation Measures:
12.1. All noise - producing project equipment and vehicles using internal
combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, air -inlet silencers
where appropriate, and any other shrouds, shields, or other noise -
reducing features in good operating condition that meet or exceed original
factory specification. Mobile or fixed "package' equipment (e.g., arc
welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise
control features that are readily available for that type of equipment.
12.2. All mobile and fixed noise - producing equipment used on the proposed
project that is regulated for noise output by a local, state, or federal
agency shall comply with such regulation while in the course of project
activity.
12.3. Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or
internal combustion- powered equipment, where feasible.
02
12.4. Mobile noise - generating equipment and machinery shall be shut off when
not in use.
12.5. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and
maintenance areas shall be located as far as practical from noise -
sensitive receptors.
12.6. Construction site and access road speed limits shall be established and
enforced during the construction period.
12.7. The use of noise - producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and
bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only.
12.8. No project - related public address or music system shall be audible at any
adjacent receptor.
12.9. The on -site construction supervisor shall have the responsibility and
authority to receive and resolve noise complaints. A clear appeal process
to the project proponent shall be established prior to construction
commencement that shall allow for resolution of noise problems that
cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor.
Operational Noise
The proposed project would generate some operational noise through stationary
noise sources such as HVAC units. However, the project would be required to
comply with Chapter 10.26 of the NBMC, which addresses Community Noise
Control, and these units would be properly enclosed or shielded to minimize
noise impacts. Furthermore, commercial uses surround the project site and
these uses are not considered sensitive noise receptors. Therefore, any slight
increase in operational noise associated with the HVAC units would not
represent a significant impact.
Traffic Noise
Figure N2 of the City of Newport Beach General Plan shows that the project site
is located within the Existing 60 -65 dBA CNEL Roadway Noise Contours and
within the 60 -65 dBA CNEL Roadway Noise Contours projected for 2025. The
Noise Element establishes that commercial land uses located with 60 -65 dBA
CNEL are "Clearly Compatible" based upon the assumption that any buildings
involved are of normal conventional construction without any special noise
insulation requirements.
The proposed project would generate vehicle trips on the surrounding roadways.
Based on generation rates for specific land use types, the project is proposed to
generate 942 more daily vehicle trips, 67 more of which would occur during the
morning peak hour and 55 more of which would occur during the evening peak
hour.
X03
Peak hour traffic volumes are considered to have the highest noise levels due to
the largest traffic volume. The PM peak hour trips were used for the analysis of
the surrounding roadways because traffic volume is highest during these hours.
Therefore, to be consistent, the PM peak hour trips generated by the proposed
project were also used in the analysis. The proposed project is anticipated to add
approximately 55 PM peak hour trips to the surrounding roadway network. Noise
is not additive in a linear sense; doubling the noise energy of a source (for
example, doubling the traffic volume on a roadway) does not result in a perceived
doubling of the noise level, nor does it result in a doubling of the noise level as
expressed in decibels. All other factors being held constant, a doubling of the
power from a noise source results in an increase of 3 dBA in the noise level.
The City of Newport Beach General Plan Policy N 1.8 states that an increase of 2
dBA would be considered significant in an area with where existing land uses are
exposed to noise levels between 60 and 65 dBA CNEL. In the case of this
proposed project, the addition of approximately 55 additional vehicle trips to the
surrounding roadways would result in a very small increase in the traffic noise.
Such a change in the noise level would be imperceptible. The proposed project's
traffic would not significantly increase noise from the existing roadway network.
Therefore, noise impacts would be less than significant.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne
vibration or ground borne noise levels?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Construction activities associated with grading
and excavation may result in minor levels of ground vibration. Construction of
the proposed project would not involve special construction methods such as pile
driving or blasting. Vibration from conventional construction activity is typically
below a level of human perception and well under levels that would cause
damage to existing buildings when the activity is more than approximately 50 feet
from the receiver. For this proposed project, construction activities would take
place at distances greater than 50 feet from sensitive receptors. Based on data
from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), small bulldozers (which are
representative of the size of construction equipment that would be on site)
produce vibration levels of 0.003 inch per second (IPS) peak particle velocity
(PPV) at a distance of 25 feet. This level is well below widely accepted levels of
perception thresholds (for example, California Department of Transportation
[Caltrans] has identified a PPV of between 0.0059 and 0.019 IPS PPV as the
threshold of human perception.) The FTA maintains a 0.12 IPS PPV threshold
for potential damage to "extremely fragile historic buildings" (U.S. Department of
Transportation 2006). Additionally, vibration from these activities would be short-
term and would end when construction is completed. Therefore, this impact is
considered less than significant.
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
04
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would generate some
operational noise through stationary equipment such as HVAC units. However,
the project would be required to comply with Chapter 10.26 of the NBMC, which
addresses Community Noise Control, and these units would be properly
enclosed or shielded to minimize noise impacts. Furthermore, office and
commercial uses surround the project site and these uses are not considered
sensitive noise receptors, therefore, any slight increase in operational noise
associated with the project would not represent a significant impact. Noise
associated with the operation of the proposed project would be generated
primarily by traffic. The proposed project would increase traffic volumes
marginally by adding 55 trips during the PM peak hour. As discussed above, the
increase in noise from the proposed project would not be perceptible. Therefore,
noise from traffic associated with the proposed project would be less than
significant.
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Construction of the proposed project would
result in a temporary increase in noise levels. These levels could be perceptible
but would not dominate the noise environment. The City exempts noise from
construction provided that it occurs only between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m, on Saturdays and at
no time on federal holidays or Sundays. Therefore, impacts from construction
would be less than significant.
e) For a project located within an airport land use land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The project site is located approximately 0.38 -
mile from John Wayne Airport. Figure N2 of the City of Newport Beach General
Plan shows the existing 65 dBA CNEL noise contour for John Wayne Airport.
Figure N2 shows that the project site is located approximately 970 feet outside
the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour for John Wayne Airport. The Noise Element
establishes that commercial land uses located with 60 -65 dBA CNEL are "Clearly
Compatible" based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of
normal conventional construction without any special noise insulation
requirements. Therefore, noise impacts related to air traffic would be less than
significant.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
No Impact. The project site is not located in the vicinity of an airstrip, private or
public. No impacts would occur (Alford, per. comm..).
W
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING.
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not induce
substantial population growth in the area, either directly or indirectly. The project
does not propose the development of any residences. The project involves the
development of approximately 13,525 square feet of restaurant and retail uses
which will replace the existing 7,996 square -foot restaurant. The proposed
project will provide new employment opportunities; however, the size and scope
of the development would not be of a regional scale that would directly induce
substantial population growth within the City of Newport Beach. Therefore, no
significant impacts to population growth are anticipated and no mitigation
measures are necessary.
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. No housing is currently on -site. Therefore, the project would not
displace any existing housing and no impacts would occur.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact. No housing is currently located on -site. Therefore, the project would
not displace any people and would not necessitate construction of replacement
housing elsewhere.
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts
associated with the provision of new or physically altered government
facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Other public facilities?
00
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is replacing a 7,996
square -foot vacant restaurant with a new 13,525 square -foot development
consisting of new multi- tenant commercial retail and food uses (5,000 square feet
for a food use and 8,525 square feet for general commercial). The public
services that could be required by the project upon construction include
emergency medical and /or fire protection or police calls. The proposed
development is designated for a retail and food service use and is not anticipated
to significantly impact the current levels of service provided by the fire and police
departments. Because many other public services (i.e., schools, libraries and
senior centers) cater to the population and no increase in the surrounding
population is anticipated due to the proposed project, the impacts will be less
than significant.
XV. RECREATION
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
No Impact. The proposed project would not affect neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities. An increase in the use of parks is generally
associated with an increase of housing or population in an area. As discussed in
Section XIII (a), Population and Housing, the proposed project is not expected to
substantially induce population growth. The short-term construction jobs and
retail and office - related jobs generated by the project are expected to be fulfilled
by the local population and it is unlikely that a substantial number of employees
would need to be relocated from outside the region. Furthermore, according to
Figure R1 of the City of Newport Beach General Plan, there are no existing
recreational facilities in the project vicinity (City of Newport Beach 2006a).
Therefore, the proposed project would not increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the facilities would occur. No impacts would
occur.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction of or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
No Impact. As discussed in Section XIII (a), Population and Housing, the
proposed project is not expected to substantially induce population growth. The
proposed project would not include recreational facilities or require the
construction of or expansion of recreation facilities that might have an adverse
physical effect on the environment. No impacts would occur.
XVI. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC
a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system,
07
taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and
non - motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system,
including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?
Less -Than Significant Impact. A traffic impact analysis was prepared by
Kunzman Associates, Inc., (dated May 31, 2011) to evaluate the potential traffic
impacts resulting from implementation of the project. The traffic impact analysis
is presented in full in Appendix E (this appendix is on file and available for review
at the Planning Division at City Hall), and summarized below.
The traffic generated by the project is determined by multiplying an appropriate
trip generation rate by the quantity of land use. Trip generation rates are derived
from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 8`h Edition
(2008). Pursuant to the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO), trips that would
be generated by the existing 7,996 square -foot restaurant building are credited
against the total trips that would be generated by the proposed project. As shown
in Table 16 -1, the resulting net trips of 942 average daily vehicle trips would be
utilized only for the TPO traffic analysis (forecast year 2013 with project
conditions). However, in order to analyze a conservative scenario in terms of trip
generation and assignment of traffic, the CEQA analysis does not provide trip
credit for the existing 7,996 square -foot restaurant building. Without the credit,
the project (up to 13,525 sq. ft. of commercial retail and food uses) is forecast to
generate 70 morning peak -hour trips, 89 evening peak -hour trips, and 1,352
average daily vehicle trips (see Table 16 -1).
N:
TABLE 16 -1:
PROJECT TRIP GENERATION
Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO)
Peak Hour
Morning
Evening
Inbound
Outbound
Total
Inbound
Outbound
Total
Land Use
Quantity
Units'
Dail
Existing Use
Quality
Restaurant
7.996
TSF
5
1
6
40
20
60
719
Pass -By
43%
-2
-1
-3
-17
-9
-26
1 -309
Total
3
0
3
23
11
34
410
Proposed
Uses
Retail
4.325
TSF
NOM2
NOM
NOM
5
7
12
192
Fast Food
Restaurant
1.000
TSF
26
18
44
13
13
26
716
High Turnover
(Sit -Down)
Restaurant
4.000
TSF
24
22
46
26
18
44
509
Bank
4.000
TSF
17
7
24
19
29
48
600
Subtotal
13.325
TSF
67
47
114
63
67
130
2,017
Pass -B Y3
-25
-19
-44
-21
-20
-41
-665
Total 1
42
28
70
42
47
89
1,352
Difference
t
39
28
67
19
36
55
942
California Environmental Quality Act CEQA
AMRW
IV
Peak Hour
Morning
Evening
Inbound
Outbound
Total
Inbound
Outbound
Total
Land Use
Quantity
Units'
Daily
Proposed Uses
4.325
TSF
NOM2
NOM
NOM
5
7
12
192
Retail
Fast Food
Restaurant
1.000
TSF
26
18
44
13
13
26
716
High Turnover
(Sit -Down)
Restaurant
4.000
TSF
24
22
46
26
18
44
509
Bank
4.000
TSF
17
7
24
19
29
48
600
Subtotal
13.325
TSF
67
47
114
63
67
130
2,017
Pass -B Y3
-25
-19
-44
-21
-20
-41
-665
Total
42
1 28
1 70
1 42
47
1 89
1,352
1 TSF= Thousand Square Feet
2 NOW Nominal. It is anticipated the retail commercial uses would have hours of operation from 9:00 AM to 7:00
PM, daily.
3 The traffic volumes from the fast -food and high turn -over sit down restaurants have been reduced by 43% as a
result of pass -by -trips obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers and the bank has been reduced by
23% as a result of pass -by trips obtained from the San Diego Association of Governments.
The intersection impacts analysis is based on the Intersection Capacity
Utilization (ICU) methodology as utilized by the City of Newport Beach. To
calculate an ICU value, the volume of traffic using the intersection is compared
with the capacity of the intersection. An ICU value is usually expressed as a
decimal. The decimal represents that portion of the hour required to provide
sufficient capacity to accommodate all intersection traffic if all approaches
operate at capacity. The traffic impact analysis measures intersection
performance by using levels of service (LOS), a qualitative measure describing
the efficiency of traffic flow on a roadway or at an intersection. LOS range from A,
indicating free flow with minimal delays, to F, indicating severely congested
conditions. The City of Newport Beach target for peak hour intersection operation
is LOS D or better.
To determine whether the addition of project - generated trips at a signalized study
intersection results in a significant impact, the City of Newport Beach has
established the following threshold of significance:
• A significant impact occurs when the addition of project - generated trips
causes the level of service at a study intersection to deteriorate from an
acceptable LOS (LOS D or better in most cases) to a deficient LOS (LOS E or
F); or
• For intersections operating at LOS E or F under existing conditions, a
significant impact occurs when the addition of project - generated trips
increases the ICU value by one percent (0.01) or more.
Existing Conditions (Year 2011) and Existing + Project
Currently (2011), all study intersections operate at Level of Service (LOS) C or
better during both morning and evening peak hours. The addition of project traffic
would not result in a significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of
one - percent or more at a study area intersection operating at worse than LOS D
during the morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no mitigation is required (see
Table 16 -2).
70
TABLE 16 -2:
EXISTING AND EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND
LOS
71
Peak Hour ICU -LOS'
Existing (Year
2011)
Existing (Year
Traffic
2011)
+Project
ICU Increase
MoEatL
Evening
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Intersection
Contro12
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.435 -A
0.635 -13
0.437 -A
0.635 -13
+0.002
+0.000
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.380 -A
0.457 -A
0.380 -A
0.458 -A
+0.000
+0.001
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
TS
0.552 -A
0.558 -A
0.558 -A
0:564 -A
+0.006
+0.006
Jamboree Road EW
TS
0.601 -13
0.678 -13
0.604 -13
0.680 -13
+0.003
+0.002
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue
(NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.488 -A
0.742 -C
0.490 -A
0.744 -C
+0.002
+0.002
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.634 -B
I 0.465 -A
0.635 -13
0.466 -A
+0.001
+0.001
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.532 -A
0.527 -A
0.533 -A
0.527 -A
+0.001
+0.000
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.391 -A
0.436 -A
0.391 -A
0.437 -A
+0.000
+0.001
Von Kerman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.462 -A
0.563 -A
0.463 -A
0.564 -A
+0.001
+0.001
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.285 -A
0.351 -A
0.287 -A
0.352 -A
+0.002
+0.001
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.417 -A
0.540 -A
0.417 -A
0.540 -A
+0.000
+0.000
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.615 -13
0.583 -A
0.618 -13
0.584 -A
+0.003
+0.001
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.514 -A
0.421 -A
0.516 -A
0.423 -A
+0.002
+0.002
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.426 -A
0.489 -A
0.427 -A
0.490 -A
+0.001
+0.001
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.611 -13
0.661 -13
0.612 -B
0.662 -13
+0.001
+0.001
1 ICU - LOS = Intersection Capacity Utilization - Level of Service
2 TS= Traffic Signal
71
Existing + Ambient Growth (Year 2013) + Approved Projects'. With and Without
Project (Traffic Phasing Ordinance -- TPO Scenario)
One - percent of the projected peak hour volumes of each approach of each study
area intersection were compared with the peak hour distributed volumes from the
proposed project. If one - percent of the existing + growth (Year 2013) + approved
projects traffic peak hour volumes of each approach is greater than the peak
hour project generated approach volumes, no further analysis is required. If
project generated peak hour approach volumes are higher than one - percent of
the projected peak hour volumes on any approach of an intersection, the
intersection would require analysis utilizing the Intersection Capacity Utilization
methodology. Comparison of the one - percent of the existing + growth (Year
2013) + approved projects traffic peak hour approach volumes with the project
generated peak hour approach volumes resulted in the following study area
intersections exceeding the one - percent threshold and requiring additional
analysis:
MacArthur Boulevard (NS):
Campus Drive (EW) — Morning Peak Hour
Von Karman Avenue (EW) _ Morning Peak Hour & Evening Peak Hour
Jamboree Road (EW) — Morning Peak Hour & Evening Peak Hour
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW) — Morning Peak Hour
In the future (2013), with the addition of ambient growth and approved projects to
existing conditions, all intersections would continue to operate as in 2010 -- at
LOS C or better during the morning and evening peak hours. The addition of
project traffic would not result in a significant impact at the study area
intersections (increase of one - percent or more at a study area intersection
operating at worse than LOS D during the morning /evening peak hours);
therefore, no mitigation is required (see Table 16 -3).
' Approved Project- An approved project is one that has been approved, requires no further
discretionary approval, and has received, or is entitled to receive, a building permit or grading
permit for construction of the project or one or more phases of the project. See Table 5 of
Appendix E (Traffic Impact Analysis) for Approved Projects List.
72
TABLE 16 -3:
TPO INTESECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND LOS
+ Aooroved Pmiects +
In 2013, with approved projects, ambient growth and cumulative projects added
to existing conditions, all intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or
2 Cumulative Projects- Cumulative projects are known, but not yet approved developments that
are reasonably expected to be completed or nearly completed at the same time as the proposed
project. See Appendix J for Cumulative Projects List.
73
Peak Hour
ICU -LOS'
Existing + Growth
Existing + Growth
(Year 2013) +
(Year 2013) +
Approved Projects
Traffic
Approved Projects
+ Project
ICU Increase
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Intersection
Contro12
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.45 -A
0.65 -B
0.45 -A
0.65 -B
+0.00
+0.00
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.39 -A
0.48 -A
0.39 -A
0.48 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
TS
0.56 -A
0.57 -A
0.57 -A
0.57 -A
+0.01
+0.00
Jamboree Road EW
TS
0.62 -B
0.71 -C
0.63 -B
0.71 -C
+0.01
+0.00
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue
(NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.50 -A
0.76 -C
0.50 -A
0.76 -C
+0.00
+0.00
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.64 -B
0.47 -A
0.64 -B
0.47 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.53 -A
0.54 -A
0.54 -A
0.54 -A
+0.01
+0.00
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.40 -A
0.46 -A
0.40 -A
0.46 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Von Kerman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.47 -A
0.57 -A
0.47 -A
0.57 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Birch Street EW
TS
0.29 -A
0.35 -A
0.29 -A
0.35 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.43 -A
0.55 -A
0.43 -A
0.55 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.64 -B
0.61 -13
0.64 -B
0.61 -B
+0.00
+0.00
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.54 -A
0.44 -A
0.54 -A
0.44 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.46 -A
0.52 -A
0.46 -A
0.52 -A
+0.00
+0.00
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.65 -B
0.70 -C
0.65 -13
0.70 -C
+0.00
+0.00
1 ICU-LOS= Intersection Capacity Utilization - Level of Service
2 TS= Traffic Signal
+ Aooroved Pmiects +
In 2013, with approved projects, ambient growth and cumulative projects added
to existing conditions, all intersections would continue to operate at LOS C or
2 Cumulative Projects- Cumulative projects are known, but not yet approved developments that
are reasonably expected to be completed or nearly completed at the same time as the proposed
project. See Appendix J for Cumulative Projects List.
73
better during the morning and evening peak hours. The addition of project traffic
would not result in a significant impact at the study area intersections (increase of
one - percent or more at a study area intersection operating at worse than LOS D
during the morning /evening peak hours); therefore, no mitigation is required.
Table 16 -4 shows with and without capacity utilization and LOS for the
Cumulative Analysis scenario.
TABLE 16 -4:
CEQA INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION AND LOS
Peak Hour
ICU -LOS'
Existing + Growth
Existing + Growth
(Year 2013) +
Approved Projects
(Year 2013) +
+
Approved Projects
Cumulative
+
Projects
Cumulative
Traffic
Projects
+ Project
ICU Increase
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Morning
Evening
Intersection
Contro12
MacArthur Boulevard (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.470 -A
0.659 -13
0.471 -A
0.659 -B
+0.001
+0.000
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.413 -A
0.495 -A
0.413 -A
0.496 -A
+0.000
+0.001
Von Karman Avenue (EW)
TS
0.569 -A
0.601 -B
0.575 -A
0.606 -B
+0.006
+0.005
Jamboree Road EW
TS
0.682 -B
0.763 -C
0.686 -B
0.765 -C
+0.004
+0.002
Campus Drive /Irvine Avenue
(NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.515 -A
0.773 -C
0.516 -A
0.774 -C
+0.001
+0.001
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.647 -B
0.486 -A
0.648 -B
0.487 -A
+0.001
+0.001
Birch Street (NS) at:
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.555 -A
0.549 -A
0.556 -A
0.549 -A
+0.001
+0.000
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.401 -A
0.467 -A
0.401 -A
0.467 -A
+0.000
+0.000
Von Karman Avenue (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.482 -A
0.578 -A
0.483 -A
0.580 -A
+0.001
+0.002
Birch Street EW
TS
0.295 -A
0.354 -A
0.296 -A
0.354 -A
+0.001
+0.000
Bayview Place (NS) at:
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.430 -A
0.568 -A
0.430 -A
0.568 -A
+0.000
+0.000
Jamboree Road (NS) at:
Campus Drive (EW)
TS
0.665 -B
0.638 -B
0.667 -B
0.639 -B
+0.002
+0.001
Birch Street (EW)
TS
0.557 -A
0.480 -A
0.558 -A
0.481 -A
+0.001
+0.001
Bristol Street North (EW)
TS
0.484 -A
0.539 -A
0.485 -A
0.540 -A
+0.001
+0.001
Bristol Street South EW
TS
0.663 -B
0.735 -C
0.664 -B
0.736 -C
+0.001
+0.001
1 ICU-LOS= Intersection Capacity Utilization - Level of Service
2 TS= Traffic Signal
b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of service standard and travel demand
measures, or other standards established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The Congestion Management Plan (CMP) is the
program by which agencies in Orange County have agreed to monitor and report
on the status of regional roadways. In the County, the CMP uses ICU intersection
analysis methodology to analyze its operations. According to the Orange County
CMP, the addition of project generated trips results in a significant impact at the
study intersections if traffic demand is increased by more than three percent of
capacity (V /C >0.03), causing or worsening LOS F. Based upon the CMP
significance threshold, the project - generated traffic did not result in a significant
impact at the study area intersections. No significant impact would occur and no
mitigation measures are necessary.
d) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase
in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety
risks?
No Impact. The commercial nature of the project would not result in a population
increase in the City of Newport Beach. Thus, the project is not expected to result
in a substantial increase in air traffic levels.
The proposed project is located approximately 0.38 miles from John Wayne
Airport (JWA) and is located within the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP)
for JWA. The AELUP contains policies governing the land uses within the JWA
area. Specifically, these policies establish development criteria that protect
sensitive receptors from airport noise, persons from risk of operations, and height
guidelines to ensure aircraft safety. The proposed project would be required to
implement the guidelines contained in the AELUP. The airspace over the project
site could be used by commercial aircraft and helicopters; however, both would
be at sufficient altitude so as not to be affected by the proposed project. In
addition, the proposed project site is outside the noise contours and safety zones
for JWA. Therefore, there would be no impacts from implementation of the
proposed project and no mitigation measures are necessary.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
Less -Than Significant Impact. Although no significant impacts or hazards were
identified in the traffic study as a result of project implementation, several
improvements were recommended to avoid conflicts related to on -site circulation
and site access. To assure smooth traffic operations for vehicles entering and
exiting the site, the northbound left turn pocket on MacArthur Boulevard is
recommended to accommodate a minimum pocket length of 120 feet. Vehicular
signage is recommended to be installed to ensure U -turns and eastbound left
75
turns are prohibited at the MacArthur Boulevard /Project Driveway. Also, a STOP
sign is recommended to be installed to control outbound traffic on all site access
roadways. To maintain sight distance, the landscape plantings and signs should
be limited to 36 inches in height within 25 feet of project driveways to assure
good visibility. In order to ensure no circulation hazards occur, sight distance will
be established at the time final grading, landscaping, and street improvement
plans are submitted. Sight distance will comply with the City of Newport Beach
standards. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated and no mitigation
measures are required.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
Less -Than Significant Impact. California Fire Code, Section 503 requires
approved fire access roads within 150 feet of the exterior walls of the first story of
each building. Such roads must be at least 20 feet wide, have a minimum of 13.5
feet of vertical clearance, and must provide all- weather driving capabilities for
firefighting vehicles. The project site plans have been designed in coordination
with the NBFD to ensure that the project would provide adequate access for
firefighting and emergency vehicles and to meet the requirements of CFC
Section 503. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation
measures are necessary.
f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public
transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not conflict with
adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. The project is located
within walking distance of several high and moderate intensity commercial office
buildings, and the proposed restaurant uses would provide a convenient location
for dining. Public transportation is readily available in and around the project
area. Also, the proposed project would not impact the existing Class I Bikeway
located on the northbound side of MacArthur Boulevard. Therefore, no significant
impacts are anticipated and no mitigation measures are required.
70
XVII. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
Less - than - Significant Impact. The City of Newport Beach is the wastewater
service provider for the project site. Wastewater from the City's sewer system is
treated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). Wastewater treatment
at the OCSD facility is required to meet applicable Santa Ana Regional Water
Quality Control Board standards. The project would not exceed wastewater
treatment requirements and impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation
measures are necessary.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
Less - than - Significant Impact. Wastewater from the City's sewer system is
treated by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). The two sewage water
treatment plans operated by the OCSD include Treatment Plant No. 2 in
Huntington Beach and the Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The
proposed project is located north of State Route 73; therefore, wastewater would
be treated by Plant No. 1. The OCSD Reclamation Plant No.1 currently maintains
a design capacity of 174 million gallons per day and treats an average of 90
million gallons per day. Therefore, it operates at 52 percent of its capacity (City of
Newport Beach 2006b).
The existing use generates 2,581,909 gallons of wastewater per year as shown
in Table 17 -1 below. This accumulates to about 7,074 gallons per day. The
proposed project would generate the following amounts of wastewater as shown
in Table 17 -2 below.
Table 17 -1
Existing Project's Wastewater Generation
Wastewater
Wastewater
Generation Rate
Generated (gal/year)
all earls
Land Use
Square
Indoor
Outdoor
Indoor
Outdoor
Total (gal/year)
Feet
Restaurant
7,996
303.53
19.37
2,427,026
154,883
2,581,909
Total
2,581,909
Notes: Calculated from wastewater generation rates used in CaIEEMOD
77
Table 17 -2
Pro osed Project's Estimated Wastewater Generation
Wastewater
Wastewater
Generation Rate
Generated (gal /year)
(gal /year /sf)
Land Use
Square
Indoor
Outdoor
Indoor
Outdoor
Total (gal /year)
Feet
Restaurant
5,000
303.53
19.37
1,517,650
96,850
1,614,500
Commercial-
8,525
74.07
45.40
631,446
387.035
1,018,481
Retail
Total
2,632,981
Notes: Calculated from wastewater generation rates used in CalEEMOD
As shown in Table 17 -2, the project would generate 2,632,981 gallons of
wastewater per year or about 7,213 per day. This is 140 gallons per day more
than the existing use which is about .004 percent of the design capacity of Plant
No. 1. There is adequate treatment capacity in the region for the amount of
wastewater the project would generate. Project development would not require
building new or expanding existing wastewater treatment facility and impacts
would be less than significant.
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
Less - than - Significant Impact. The project site consists mostly of impervious
surfaces. The proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site and would not increase the pervious area as described in
Section IX, Hydrology and Water Quality. Currently, a small portion of the site
drains to Dolphin Striker Way. Approximately two - thirds of the remainder of the
site drains to a grate inlet located north of the existing building and then
southeasterly to a catch basin located on the westerly side of MacArthur
Boulevard. The proposed project would continue to be directed to the existing
storm drain connecting to the catch basin. However, a portion of the drainage
from Parcel 3 and a small portion of Parcel 1 will be diverted into MacArthur
Boulevard 180 feet north of the existing catch basin then drain southerly into
subject catch basin. During construction, runoff from the project site would be
managed by BMPs and as directed in the City's stormwater protection
requirements. BMPs would be incorporated into the proposed project as part of a
SWPPP to prevent discharges of polluted stormwater from construction sites
from entering the storm drains. Therefore, the proposed project would not require
or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of
existing facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
M
Less - than - Significant Impact. Water services for the project site are provided
by the City of Newport Beach. Domestic water for the project site is supplied by
both groundwater and imported surface water. Currently, a majority of water
supplied to the City, including the project site, is supplied by groundwater from
the Lower Santa Ana Basin (Basin). Specifically, approximately 75 percent of the
water supplied by the City's service area, including the project site, is supplied by
groundwater from the Basin, and the remaining 25 percent of water is imported
and purchased from the Municipal Water District (MWD). According to the City of
Newport Beach, there are sufficient existing water supplies in the City to meet the
project's estimated water demand, and project development would not require
new or expanded water supplies (Parks 2011)3. Impacts would be less than
significant and no mitigation measures are necessary.
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider,
which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to
serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Less -Than Significant Impact. See Response XVII(b).
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The City of Newport Beach is under contract
with Waste Management of Orange County for solid waste hauling and disposal.
The Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, located at 11002 Bee Canyon Access
Road in Irvine, is the closest facility for solid waste disposal. The Frank R.
Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, which is owned and operated by the Orange County
Integrated Waste Management Department (IWMD), opened in 1990 and is
scheduled to operate until approximately 2053. The current average disposal rate
at the landfill is roughly 4,660 tons per day, and the maximum permitted disposal
rate is 11,500 tons per day. The landfill's remaining capacity is approximately
118.5 million tons of solid waste (Hull 2011)4. Table 17 -3 shows the estimated
solid waste generation by the proposed project, using solid waste generation
rates from CALRecycle.
' Parks, Casey (Utilities Supervisor). 2011, July 12. Personal communication with City of Newport Beach
Utilities Department.
4 Hull, Ray (Administrative Manager). 2011, July 12. Personal communication with OC Waste & Recycling.
7�
Notes: *Calculated from solid waste generation rates used in CaIEEMOD and obtained from
CalRecycle:
Quality Restaurant: 11.65 tons /1,000 square feetlyear
Specialty Retail: 7.6 tons /1,000 square feet/year
1 ton /1,000 square feet = .00548 pounds /square foot/day
As shown in Table 17 -3, development of the proposed project would result in
.339 tons per day of solid waste to be disposed of at the Frank R. Bowerman
Sanitary Landfill, representing approximately .003 percent of the amount of solid
waste the landfill is allowed to accept daily. With the remaining capacity of 118.5
million tons, as well as a 42 -year lifespan at the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary
Landfill, the increase in solid waste generated by the proposed development
would not exceed the capacity of the landfill. No deficiencies currently exist at the
Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, as there is adequate daily surplus capacity
to accept the additional solid waste generated from the proposed project.
Therefore, as the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill would have sufficient
capacity to service the proposed project, impacts associated with solid waste
disposal would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are
necessary.
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation related
to solid waste?
No Impact. The proposed project would comply with all regulations related to
solid waste, such as the California Integrated Waste Management Act and City
recycling programs; therefore, no impacts would occur.
:I
Table 17 -3
Estimated Project
Solid Waste Generation
Solid Waste Generation, pounds/day
Generation Rate
Total (Ibs /day)
Land Use
Square Feet
Ibs /s *
Restaurant
5,000
.064
320
Commercial - Retail
8,525
.042
358
Total
678 Ibs /day
339 tons /day)
Notes: *Calculated from solid waste generation rates used in CaIEEMOD and obtained from
CalRecycle:
Quality Restaurant: 11.65 tons /1,000 square feetlyear
Specialty Retail: 7.6 tons /1,000 square feet/year
1 ton /1,000 square feet = .00548 pounds /square foot/day
As shown in Table 17 -3, development of the proposed project would result in
.339 tons per day of solid waste to be disposed of at the Frank R. Bowerman
Sanitary Landfill, representing approximately .003 percent of the amount of solid
waste the landfill is allowed to accept daily. With the remaining capacity of 118.5
million tons, as well as a 42 -year lifespan at the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary
Landfill, the increase in solid waste generated by the proposed development
would not exceed the capacity of the landfill. No deficiencies currently exist at the
Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill, as there is adequate daily surplus capacity
to accept the additional solid waste generated from the proposed project.
Therefore, as the Frank R. Bowerman Sanitary Landfill would have sufficient
capacity to service the proposed project, impacts associated with solid waste
disposal would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are
necessary.
g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulation related
to solid waste?
No Impact. The proposed project would comply with all regulations related to
solid waste, such as the California Integrated Waste Management Act and City
recycling programs; therefore, no impacts would occur.
:I
SOURCE LIST
The following enumerated documents are available at the offices of the City of
Newport Beach, Planning Division, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach,
California 92660.
1. Final Program EIR — City of Newport Beach General Plan 2006
2. California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
3. California Department of Conservation (2009)
4. California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program
5. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest and Range
Assessment Project, Forest Legacy Assessment project
6. City of Newport Beach General Plan, City of Newport Beach, adopted July
25, 2006.
7. County of Orange (2005), General Plan Natural Resources Element
8. PC -11 Newport Place Planned Community.
9. Title 20, 2010 Zoning Code of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
10. City Excavation and Grading Code, Newport Beach Municipal Code.
11. Chapters 10.26 & 10.28, Community Noise Ordinance of the Newport
Beach Municipal Code.
12. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Management
Plan 1997.
13. South Coast Air Quality Management District, Air Quality Management
Plan EIR, 1997.
14. Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne Airport
15. California Air Resources Board. 2008. Preliminary Draft Staff Proposal:
Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Thresholds for
Greenhouse Gases Under the California Environmental Quality Act.
October 24, 2008.
16. Santa Ana River Basin Plan and Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan.
21
17. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration
Impact Assessment. Prepared for the Federal Transit Authority.
18. California Department of Transportation. 2009. Officially Designated State
Scenic Highways and Historic Parkways.
The following appendices contained documents that have been prepared
specially for this project, and are incorporated by reference within this initial
study. These documents are available at the Planning Division, City of Newport
Beach.
A. Environmental Information Form, Ridgeway Development, November 1,
2010.
B. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Stata -Tech, Inc., January 18,
2011.
C. Phase 1 Environmental Assessment, CENTEC Engineering, April 24,
2003.
D. Construction Phasing, Ridgeway Development, April 5, 2011.
E. Traffic Impact Analysis (Revised), Kunzman Associates, Inc. May 31,
2011
F. Parking Management Plan, Kunzman Associates, Inc. June 16, 2011.
G. The South Coast AQMD Air District, CaIEEMod Emissions Data (Summer,
Winter & Annual Emissions) June 15, 2011.
H. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds, Revised March, 2011.
I. Land Use Consistency Analysis
J. Cumulative Projects List
K. Approved Projects List
Personal Communications
1. Alford, Patrick. Planning Manager. City of Newport Beach. Newport
Beach, CA. July 7, 2011.
22
List of Preparers
Environmental Sections
Planner
Aesthetics
P.
Alford
Agriculture and Forest Resources
K.
Sims
Air Quality
M.
Nova
Biological Resources
K.
Sims
Cultural Resources
P.
Alford
Geology and Soils
F.
Nueno
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
M.
Nova
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
M.
Whelan
Hydrology and Water Quality
F.
Nueno
Land Use and Planning
J.
Garcia
Mineral Resources
K.
Sims
Noise
P.
Alford
Population and Housing
G.
Ramirez
Public Services
B.
Zdeba
Recreation
E.
Steffen
Transportation/Traffic
J.
Murillo
Utilities and Services Systems
E.
Steffen
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Management
& Project
R.
Ung
Errata to the Draft IS /MND
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker
(PA2010 -135)
Introduction
This document addresses modifications to the draft IS /MND for the proposed MacArthur
at Dolphin- Striker project. It presents all revisions related to public comments and
added transfer of development rights location, as determined necessary by the City of
Newport Beach. Only sections that had revisions are included, and sections that had no
revisions are not included. Readers are referred to the IS /MND to view complete
sections.
The changes to the draft IS /MND in revision -mode text (i.e., deletions are shown with
stFik�c,,.cethreugh, and additions are shown with underline). These notations are meant to
provide clarification, corrections, or minor revisions as needed as a result of public
comments or because of changes in the project since the publication and distribution of
the draft IS /MND.
Changes to the Draft IS /MND
The following changes to the text as presented below are incorporated into the final
IS /MNS.
8. Description of Project (Page 3)
The project would introduce new general commercial uses to the subject site which
results in the requirement of an amendment to the Newport Place Planned Community
Development Plan. The amendment would create new statistical analysis standards,
permitted uses and development standards by changing the subject site (Parcel 1) from
"Restaurant 1" to "General Commercial Site 8 ". The proposed project also requires a
transfer of development intensity to allow the transfer of 54 48 un -built hotel units from
Hotel Site 2 -13 located at 1301 Quail Street and 1,620 square feet from General
Commercial Site 7 located at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard (donor sites) to the subject site
to accommodate a net increase of approximately 5,529 square feet of new
development.
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS (Page 51 -52)
e) For a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not
been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project
area?
Less -Than Significant Impact. The closest airport is John Wayne Airport, which is
approximately within 0.38 miles northwest of the project site. The project site is located
within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP) for John Wayne
Airport. The proposed project is within the height restriction zone for the John Wayne
Airport and the notification area of the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 77
Imaginary Surfaces aeronautical obstruction area.
Section 77.13 of the FAR requires the notification of the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) for any construction or alteration which are identified as follows: 1) exceeds 200
feet in height about the ground level at its site; 2) exceeds a height greater than an
imaginary surface extending outward and upward at specific slope characteristics at
20,000 feet, 10,000 feet, and 5,000 feet from the nearest point of the airport runway; or
3) is a highway with specific characteristics, and /or ,is occurring at an airport.
The proposed project includes the construction of two, free - standing single -story
buildings with a maximum height of 29 feet. The project site is approximately 50 feet
above mean sea level (Phase I EA Centec, 2003). The proposed project does not
require notification to the FAA in accordance with Section 77.13 of the FAR because the
proposed project would not be more than 200 feet above ground level and not more
than 286 86 feet above mean sea level at which the Notification Surface Height at the
subject property is determined. The proposed building height is an approximately 79
feet above mean sea level and is therefore, below the Notification Surface Height by 7
proposed building and is therefore, below the Obstruction Imaginary Surface height. -,
the proposed prejeGt would not exGeed a height greateF than the am _i I I se
panes identified ,.; +hin Semi,. :7 ��,. tThe proposed project is not a highway; and the
proposed project is not a modification to an existing airport. Therefore, the filing of Form
7460 -1 with the FAA is not required.
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING (Page 57)
Less Than Significant Impact. The project involves We three sites (the donor sites
and receiver site) designated as Mixed Use — Horizontal Land Use (MU -H2) per the
Land Use Element of the General Plan, which provides for a horizontal intermixing of
uses that may include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed -
use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses. The
development limits for the project sites are identified in Table LU2 of the General Plan
Land Use Element as a portion of Anomaly Number 12 with a development limit of
457,880 square feet (Receiver Site which is the subject property); and a portion of
Anomaly Number 17 with a development limit of 33,392 square feet and 304 hotel
rooms (donor site at 1301 Quail Street) and Anomaly Number 19 with a development
limit 228,530 square feet (donor site at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard). 4eth These sites
;,,. G'Ved OR the pF eet are currently zoned PC -11, Newport Place Planned Community
District as Restaurant Site 1 (Project Site), and Hotel Site 2 -13 (Donor Site at 1301 Quail
Street) and General Commercial Site 7 (Donor Site at 3901 MacArthur Boulevard). The
2
project as proposed includes a code amendment to change the designation of a portion
of Restaurant Site 1 to General Commercial Site 8 designation. Also included in the
project is a request to transfer 54 48 un -built hotel rooms from Hotel Site 2 -B (Donor
Site) and 1,620 square feet from General Commercial Site 7 (Donor Site) to the project
site.
The transfer of 54 48 un -built hotel rooms and 1,620 square feet will be converted to a
comparable amount of commercial floor area (8 088 5,529 square feet) to establish the
total amount of the project site, designated as General Commercial Site 8, to 13,525
square feet, and change the entitlement of Anomaly No. 12 from 457,880 square feet to
463,409 square feet to accommodate the proposed construction of a new commercial
shopping center. Conversely, the hotel room entitlement of the donor site within
Statistical Area L -4, Anomaly Number 17 will be reduced from 304 to 250 256 hotel
rooms and Anomaly Number 19 will be reduced from 228,530 to 256,910 square feet.
The proposed activities will amend the zoning to allow for general commercial uses and
will not conflict with land use plans, policies, or zoning of the City of Newport Beach,
since the commercial square footage increase is offset by the transfer and reallocation
of hotel rooms located within the same Statistical Area L4. Land use policy consistency
analysis (Appendix 1) has been conducted and is on file and available for review at the
Planning Division at City Hall. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA.
Appendix I — Land Use Consistency Analysis (Pages 1 -5, 8 & 9)
See attachment
3
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
Page 1 of 18
POLICY
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
General Plan -Land Use Element
Policy LU 1.4 Growth Management
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Implement a conservative growth strategy that enhances the quality of
The proposed project does not increase the development entitlement of the
fife of resident and balances the needs of all constituencies with the
statistical area but only converts and moves portions (converts hotel rooms
preservation of open space and natural resources.
to commercial floor are) from one anomaly area to another within the same
Statistical Area.
Policy LU 1.5 Economic Health
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Encourage a local economy that provides adequate commercial, office,
The proposed project would allow for the construction and operation of
industrial, and marine - oriented opportunities that provide employment
two, free - standing, single -story commercial buildings. Each has a
and revenue to support high - quality community services.
maximum building height of 29 feet. As discussed in Section XIII,
Population and Housing, of the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, it
would provide additional temporary construction worker jobs, as well as
projected retail, and service jobs (27 jobs projected). Therefore, the
proposed project would support the provision of adequate retail and
service opportunities that would provide construction and operation
employment and stimulate the local economy.
Policy LU 2.2 Sustainable and Complete Community
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Emphasize the development of uses that enable Newport Beach to
The proposed project would allow for the construction and operation of
continue as a self- sustaining community and minimize the need for
two commercial buildings that would provide short-term and long -term
residents to travel outside of the community for retail, goods and
employment opportunities for area residents. The construction and
services, and employment.
operation jobs provided by the proposed project could potentially be
fulfilled by the local workforce residing in the City of Newport Beach.
Therefore, the proposed project would enable Newport Beach to
continue as a self- sustaining community and minimize the need for
residents to travel outside of the community for employment in the retail
and service fields.
Policy LU 3.1 Neighborhoods, Districts, Corridors, and Open
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Spaces
The proposed project would amend the General -Plan -and Newport i
Maintain Newport Beach's pattern of residential neighborhoods,
Planned Community text to increase the allowable development s
business and employment districts, commercial centers, corridors, and
footage of the subject roe through a transfer of develo ment
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAS - 2010\PA2010 -135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MND - Land Use - GP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
11.dOCx 201011 Onan Stpike^ nnvn Land Use Go Analysis A....endix 09 09
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
POLICY
harbor and ocean districts.
Policy LU 3.2 Growth and Change
Enhance existing neighborhoods, districts, and corridors, allowing for
re -use and infill with uses that are complementary in type, form, scale,
and character. Changes in use and /or density/intensity should be
considered only in those areas that are economically underperforming,
are necessary to accommodate Newport Beach's share of projected
regional population growth, improve the relationship and reduce
commuting distance between home and jobs, or enhance the values
that distinguish Newport Beach as a special place to live for its
residents. The scale of growth and new development shall be
coordinated with the provision of adequate infrastructure and public
services, including standards for acceptable traffic level of service.
Commission
Refer the adoption or amendment of the General Plan, Zoning Code,
specific plans, and Planned Community development plans for land
Page 2 of 18
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
re guest. Howevecr-,-- itt- wil l- rapt- +ncreas� the- developmewt- of- tAe- SiatisiieaF
Area - The proposed project would be for the construction and operation of
two, free - standing, single -story commercial buildings within the existing
developed Newport Place Planned Community, which encompasses a
large portion of the Citys business and employment district. Furthermore, it
would blend in with the existing architectural characteristics. Therefore, it
would maintain Newport Beach's pattern of business and employment
districts in that area.
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
The proposed project would amend the General-- Plafl-a{ad- Newport
Place Planned Community text to increase the allowable development
square footage, and would allow for the new development of two, free-
standing, single -story commercial buildings on a site that is currently
occupied by a 7,996 square -foot vacant restaurant and related surface
parking. The proposed amendments will not change the
density/intensity in the Newport Place Planned Community, but would
be largely consistent with surrounding land use designations and
existing zoning, and would be consistent with the density of the
proposed land use designations and the surrounding business district.
As discussed in Section XIV, Public Services, and Section XVII, Utilities
and Service Systems, of the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, the
proposed project would have adequate infrastructure and public
services and would not exceed existing service levels for public
services or utilities. Furthermore, as discussed In Section XVI,
Transportation and Traffic, of the Initial Study Environmental Checklist,
the slight increase in trips that would result during the construction and
operation of the proposed project would not result in a significant
deterioration of surrounding intersections or the roadway network.
Therefore, the proposed project would result in complementary type,
form, and scale of the existing neighborhood, and would be adequately
served by the existing infrastructure and public services.
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
As discussed in Section VIII (e) and (f), Hazards and Hazardous
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAS - 2010 \PA2010 -135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MND - Land Use - GP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
1LdOG% : c....:........,..,...n n,.�.,6:.. c +.o.,.. nnnvn iAind iqe ro Analy.:. A..nendix 09 08
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
POLICY
wltnin the John Wayne Airport planning area, as established In the JWA
Airport Environs Land Use Plan ( AELUP), to the Airport Land Use
Commission (ALUC) for Orange County for review, as required by
Section 21676 of the California Public Utilities Code. In addition, refer
all development projects that include buildings with a height greater
than 200 feet above ground level to the ALUC for review.
Page 3 of 18
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
( AELUP) jurisdiction of John Wayne Airport. Furthermore, the proposed
project is within the height restriction zone for the John Wayne Airport
and the notification area of the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part
77 Imaginary Surfaces aeronautical obstruction area. The proposed
project includes construction of a two, freestanding single -story.
buildings with a maximum height of 29 feet, on a site that is
approximately 50 feet above mean sea level (AES Due Diligence 2004)
for an overall height of 79 feet above Mean Sea Level. The proposed
project does not require notification to the FAA in accordance with
Section 77.13 of the FAR because the proposed project would not be
more than 200 feet above ground level and not more than the
calculated Notification Surface Height requirement of 86 feet above
mean Sea Level ; the Project's calculated
surface height of 50 feet plus the building height of 29 feet for a total of
79 feet above Mean Sea Level does not exceed the applicable
Obstruction Imaginary Surface Height of 116 feet above Mean Sea
Level at the subject property, the project would not create any
imaginary surfaces with any of the specific slope characteristics
identified within Section 77.13; the proposed project is not a highway;
and the proposed project is not a modification to an existing airport.
As discussed in Section VIII, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the
proposed project is exempt from fling the Form 7460 -1 notice, however,
a referral by the City to the Airport Land Use Commission for
Consistency Review is required because of the location of the project
site within the AELUP Planning Area and because of the nature of the
required City approvals (i.e,. Newport Place Planned Community Text
GeRerai -Ran Amendment) under PUC Section 21676(b).
The proposed project would comply and be compatible with the land
use standards established in the City's Municipal Code and the Airport
Land Use Commission's John Wayne AELUP. The Citys Emergency
Management Plan also establishes safety procedures with respect to
aviation hazards to promote the safety of persons on the ground while
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAS - 2010 \PA2010 -135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MIND - Land Use - GP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
11.docX ._. __- D9Iohin ctFikeF n4NQ i.nd'-se GP Analysis e......mEk 09 08
IzandUse GP Analysis Appendix.deex
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
POLICY
Accommodate land use development consistent with the Land Use
Plan, Figure LU1 depicts the general distribution of uses throughout the
City and Figure LU2 through Figure LU15 depicts specific use
categories for each parcel within defined Statistical Areas. Table LU1
(Land Use Plan Categories) specifies the primary land use categories,
types of uses, and, for certain categories, the densities/ntensities to be
permitted. The permitted densities/intensities or amount of
development for land use categories for which this is not included in
Table LU1, are specified on the Land Use Plan, Figure LU4 through
Figure LU15. These are intended to convey maximum and, in some
cases, minimums that may be permitted on any parcel within the
designation or as otherwise specified by Table LU2 (Anomaly
Locations). The density /intensity ranges are calculated based on actual
land area, actual number of dwelling units in fully developed residential
areas, and development potential in areas where the General Plan
allows additional development. To determine the permissible
development, the user should:
a. Identify the parcel and the applicable land use designation on the
Land Use Plan, Figure LU4 through Figure LU15
b. Refer to Figure LU4 through Figure LU15 and Table LU1 to
identify the permitted uses and permitted density or intensity or
amount of development for the land use classification. Where
densities /intensities are applicable, the maximum amount of
development shall be determined by multiplying the area of the
parcel by the density/intensity.
c. For anomalies identified on the Land Use Map by a symbol, refer
to Table LU2 to determine the precise development limits.
d. For residential development in the Airport Area., refer to the
policies prescribed by the Land Use Element that define how
development may occur.
Page 4 of 18
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
may need to make emergency landings in the immediate airport vicinity.
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
The project site is located in the Airport Area (Statistical Area 1-4) in the
northern portion of the City of Newport Beach. The project site is
designated as Mixed Use Horizontal -2 (MU -1-12) per the General Plan
Land Use Element. The development limit for the project site is
identified in Table LU2 of the General Plan Land Use Element as
Anomaly Number 12. The development limit for Anomaly Number 12 is
457,880 gross square feet, as identified in Table LU2. The project site is
currently zoned PC Newport Place Planned Community. The project
site is located within a development site identified as Restaurant Site 1
in the Newport Place Planned Community. The allowable Building Area
for Restaurant Site 1 is 15,000 square feet as defined by the Newport
Place Planned Community Text. the new zoning designation (General
Commercial Site 8) would limit the Property to 13,525 square feet.
The proposed project involves ^ "^ncrc. °cn ^mendme cnd a
Newport Place Planned Community text amendment to increase the
allowable development square footage on the project site. The General
^ 29- grass- °.� -,mot; -- d -the General
Newport
Place Planned Community text amendment would establish the
allowable building area of General Commercial Site 8 at 13,525 gross
square feet. The Genpial Plan n^'^^^'^^ -^' "^ Newport Place
Planned Community text amendment would accommodate the land use
development of the proposed commercial shopping center that is
consistent with the land use designation and zoning.
"Require that adequate parking be provided and is conveniently The total parking requirement for the proposed development would be
located to serve tenants and customers. Set open parking lots 104 spaces (70 spaces for food uses and 34 for general commercial
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAs - 2010\ PA2010 -135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MIND - Land Use - SP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
11.dOCx
20104A2010 StFik,.. N404D Land Use r_nn.,a'ysis n....endix QA 02
hand'-se GPAnalysisAppendix.deex
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
POLICY
back from public streets and pedestrian ways and screen with
buildings, architectural walls, or dense landscaping. (Imp 2.1)"
Require that new and renovated office and retail development projects
be planned to exhibit a high - quality and cohesive "campus
environment," characterized by the following:
• Location of buildings around common plazas, courtyards,
walkways, and open spaces
• Incorporation of extensive on -site landscaping that emphasizes
special features such as entryways
• Use of landscape and open spaces to break the visual continuity
of surface parking lots
• Common signage program for tenant identification and way
finding
• Common streetscapes and lighting to promote pedestrian activity
• Readily observable site access, entrance drives and building
entries and minimized conflict between service vehicles, private
Require that new development of business park, office, and supporting
buildings be designed to convey a unified and high - quality character in
consideration of the following principles:
s Modulation of building mass, heights, and elevations and
Page 5 of 18
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
uses). The project provides a total of 9188 spaces (5967 on -site and 32
off - site), resulting in a parking deficit of 15 spaces. A use permit is
requested for the use of 134-6 -space off -site parking spaces to satisfy a
portion of the requirement (a total of 32 spaces) and a request for
reduction of the required off - street parking In accordance with Sections
20.40.100 and 20.40.110 of the Municipal Code, for all three parcels
that share reciprocal rights for parking, ingress and egress.
A waiver of a portion of the overall required parking (three spaces)
based on a parking study that takes into consideration the shared
reciprocal /common use parking of the neighboring Restaurant Site
(Parcels 2 and 3) and the hours of operation of Parcel 1 uses, including
restaurants. A parking management plan per Section 20.40.110.C. of
the municipal code is also proposed as a part of the project
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
The proposed project would be located within an existing "commercial
environment" in the Newport Place Planned Community and will convert
a portion of the Restaurant Site 1 to General Commercial Site 8. The
site will provide the code required landscaping in and around the
buildings and parking lot. Furthermore, the 30 -foot street side setback
will be landscaped. The proposed project would use the new site
access off of MacArthur Boulevard, which would be appropriately
signed with the proposed project addresses. Therefore, the proposed
commercial complex would complement the restaurant site
environment.
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
The proposed project would be designed to blend in with the existing
character of the area and surrounding land uses. As described in
Section I, Aesthetics in the Initial Study Environmental Checklist, the
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAS - 2010 \PA2010 - 135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MND - Land Use - GP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
11.docx: nna monnna n crikei : NOW _ nd Use GP Anal,,sisAppendix nn no
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
Page 8 of 18
POLICY
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
65 dBA CNEL noise contour specified by the 1985 JWA Master Plan.
Administration, Federal Aviation Regulations, and Caltrans Division of
Aeronautics. The proposed project does not include residential
development and therefore would not be subject to the 65 dBA CNEL
noise contour specified by the 1985 JWA Master Plan.
GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT
Policy CE 2.1.1 Level of Service Standards
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Plan the arterial roadway system to accommodate projected traffic at
As discussed in Section XVI (a), Traffic and Transportation, in the Initial
the following level of service standards:
"D"
Study Environmental Checklist, construction and operation of the
A. Level of Service (LOS) throughout the City, unless otherwise
proposed project would generally represent an increase of less than 2%
noted
B. LOS "E" at any intersection in the Airport Area shared with Irvine
of the existing AM and PM trips on the roadway network. It would not
create substantial traffic that would downgrade the level of service at
any of the intersections analyzed within the Initial Study Environmental
Checklist. Surrounding intersections currently operate at acceptable
levels of service, and the minimal traffic generated from the proposed
project would not downgrade the LOS at any intersections in the vicinity
of the project site. Therefore, the proposed project would continue to
accommodate projected traffic at the designated LOS.
Policy CE 6.2.1 Alternative Transportation Modes
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Promote and encourage the use of alternative transportation modes,
The proposed project would encourage the use of alternative modes of
such as ridesharing, carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles, and
transportation, bicycle racks will be provided on site. The project site is
walking; and provide facilities that support such alternate modes.
located near bus transit routes along MacArthur Boulevard.
Policy CE 7.1.1 Required Parking
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Require that new development provide adequate, convenient parking
The total parking requirement for the proposed development would be
for residents, guests, business patrons, and visitors.
104 spaces (70 spaces for food uses and 34 for retail and service
uses). The project provides a total of 9189 spaces (5932 on -site and 32
off - site), resulting in a parking shortage of 13-15 spaces based on the
Municipal Code Reauirements� a shortage of 8 spaces based on peak
demand under a shared parking scenario within the overall project site•
and a shortage of 1 space based on a shared parking scenario that
includes the adjacent restaurant sites. A use permit is being requested
for the additional of 16 -space off -site parking provision (a total of 32
spaces) and reduction of the required off - street parking in accordance
with Sections 20.40.100 and 20.40.110 of the Municipal Code. A waiver
of a portion of the required parking for threes aces is included in the
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAS - 2010 \PA2010 -135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MND - Land Use - GP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
11.dOCX SRVi.........eAtann..i. A1-44k.. NIND land;,.,, cn 0 ...1- 4; n,....... a:.. nn no
Appendix I - Land Use Consistency Analysis
Page 9 of 18
POLICY
CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
project and is based on shared use of the on -site parking lot and the
neighboring parcels.
A parking study shall be required and take into consideration the
common parking of the Restaurant Site and the hours of operation of
Parcel 1 uses, including restaurants to justify the waiver of a portion of
the required parking. Also included is the proposed parking
management plan per Section 20.40.110.C.
Based on the requirements, the proposed project would provide
adequate, convenient parking for guests, employees, and business
patrons with the 595 spaces on site and the shared use of the parking
spaces on the neighboring restaurant properties.
Policy CE 7.1.8 Parking Configuration
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Site and design new development to avoid use of parking configurations
The proposed project includes the shared ingress, egress and use of
or management programs that are difficult to maintain and enforce.
the on -site parking of the three parcels that make up the existing
restaurant site and the proposed commercial site and does not include
a parking management program. The proposed project would include
sufficient parking spaces, as discussed above in CE 7.1.1. Therefore,
site design would provide an adequate and safe parking configuration.
Policy CE 7.1.9 Parking Configuration
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Consider revised parking requirements for small scale neighborhood
The commercial shopping center will serve neighboring commercial
serving commercial uses in areas that derive most of their trade from
properties that are generally within walking distance and there is limited
walk -in business, especially where on- street or other public parking is
on street parking in the vicinity, therefore it is anticipated that a large
available.
number of patrons will walk to the site from the neighboring commercial
properties. The parking lot will be striped in accordance with City
Requirements.
GENERAL PLAN NATURAL RESOURCES ELEMENT
Policy NR 1.1 Water Conservation in New Development
The proposed project is consistent with this policy.
Enforce water conservation measures that limit water usage, prohibit
The proposed project would include design features for water
activities that waste water or cause runoff, and re uire the use of
conservation. Efficient landscaping features would be incorporated,
F: \USERS \PLN \Shared \PA's \PAS - 2010 \PA2010 - 135 \Environmental \Dolphin Striker MIND - Land Use - GP Analysis Appendix 09-08 -
11dOCX ' P0410 StFik.. RAND i and i se cn eAaly.:. A...,...,a:., nn no
CCRPACalifornia Cultural Resource Preservation Alliance, inc.
P.O. Box 54132 An alliance of American Indian and scientific communities working for
Irvine, CA 92619 -4132 the preservation of archaeological sites and other cultural resources.
August 3, 2011
Rosalinh Ung
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard, P.O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
Re: MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way (PA2010 -135) Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative
Declaration (July 15, 2011)
Thank you for the opportunity to review this document. It was unclear to me whether the Checklist Form
was meant to include both the MacArthur- Striker Way Site and the Quail Street "Donor Site." If the
Donor Site is to provide fill or be otherwise disturbed, it should be included in the environmental analysis
and mitigation plans.
Please note that though it was not possible to do an archaeological survey of the project areas, a literature
search should have been done to determine whether there are any recorded archaeological sites located
there or nearby. If the literature search was not done in connection with the environmental check list, it
should be completed before the negative declaration is granted to determine whether the project is in an
archaeologically sensitive area.
It appears that whereas it is possible that culturally significant remains may exist, the proposed project
includes adequate monitoring and a provision for cessation of work should cultural remains be
encountered. The planned mitigation and protection provisions are consistent with standard practice.
They should be appropriate for routine measures as well as unanticipated occurrences.
The CCRPA is pleased to work with the City of Newport Beach on cultural resource issues. Please let us
know if we can be of further help. You may contact me at (562) 493 5169 or by email at
vbickfl23 @aol.com.
Sincerely,
Virginia Bickford
Secretary, CCRPA on behalf of the Board of Directors
Sent on August 10, 2011 by email.
Ung, Rosalinh
From:
vbickf123 (vbickf123 @aol.com]
Sent:
Wednesday, August 10, 2011 1:02 PM
To:
Ung, Rosalinh
Subject:
MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way
Attachments:
CCRPA MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way NOI Neg Dec review.doc
Dear Ms Ung,
I apologize for being so late in sending the attached letter in response to the NOI concerning PA2010 -135. I hope it will .
still be of use and the comments taken into consideration. CCRPA would appreciate the opportunity to review future
documents.
Virginia Bickford
GRANGE I COUNTY
wren's
August 2, 2011
AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION
FOR ORANGE COUNTY
3160 Airway Avenue • Costa Mesa, California 92626 - 949.2523170 fax: 949.252.6012
COMMUNrrY
AUG 0 2 2011
Rosalinh Ung, Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach DEVELOPMENT GZ
3300 Newport Boulevard of N&�WOIXI or
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
Subject: NOI to Adopt a MND for MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way (Commercial
Retail and Food Uses)
Dear Ms. Ung:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Initial Study for the proposed Dolphin -
Striker Way ProjeePin the context of the Airport Land Use Commission's Airport
Environs Land Use Plan for John Wayne Airport (JWA AELUP). The proposed project is
redevelopment of an approximately 1. 11 acres site. New general commercial and food
uses are being;proposed,to replace an existing single- story,vacant restaurant. The new
development will consist of two,'free standing single -story buildings: Baoh building has
a maximum building height of 29 feet. We wish to offer the following comments and
respectfully request consideration of these.coriments as you proceed with preparation of
your Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)
y h
As discussed;in.the initial study, the pioposed project is-'located within the Federal
gut _r { ) _ al study states
Aviation Re anon FAR Part 77 Notification Area for JWA. The inch
that the proposed project does, notiequtre the - filing ±of For1:1480-1; wrth'the FAA. We
suggest that the,MND discuss the height-at which the notification surface,_would be
penetrated compared-.to ,the ..proposed'building heights. We also.recommend that the
MND include a discussion of the proposed project's location "thin the.F 4R Part 77
Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces foi.UWA ,tThe imtial`s2udy,discusses that the project
does not surpass 206 feet above mean sea level and that height is related to the
Obstruction Imaginary Surfaces for JWA and not the notification surface.
In addition, we recommend the MND discuss whether the development of heliports will
be pail of the proposed project. Should the development of heliports occur within your
jurisdiction, proposals to develop new heliports must be submitted through the City to the
ALUC for review and action pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 21661.5.
Proposed heliport projects must comply fully with the State permit procedure provided by
law and with all conditions of approval imposed or recommended by the FAA, by the
ALUC for Orange County, and by Caltrans/Division of Aeronautics,
ALUC Comments -City of Newport Beach
Dolphin - Striker Way Commercial Project
August 2, 2011
Page 2
A referral by the City to the ALUC may be required for this project due to the location of
the proposal within an AELUP Planning Area and due to the nature of the required City
approvals (i.e. Planned Community Amendment) under PUC Section 21676(b). In this
regard, please note that the Commission suggests such referrals to be submitted to the
ALUC for a determination, between the Local Agency's expected Planning Connnission
and City Council hearings. Since the ALUC meets on the third Thursday afternoon of
each month, submittals must be received in the ALUC office by the first of the month to
ensure sufficient time for review, analysis, and agendizing.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this initial study, Please contact Lea
Choum at (949) 252 -5123 or via email at IchoumOocair.coin if you need any additional
details or information regarding the future referral of your project.
Sincerely,
Kari A. Rigom
Executive Officer
August 16, 2011
Community Development
City of Irvine, One Civic Center Plaza, PO. Box 19575, Irvine, California 92623 -9575
Ms. Rosalinh Ung
Associate Planner
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Irvine, CA 92618
wvvvv.cityofirvine.org
A,e ybodAA91V _YO
1N3W61013A3e�0
1101 f t d3S
AlINnWWOo
"7 03A13oS't'
Subject: First Screencheck Review of the Notice of Intent to Adopt a
Negative Declaration — MacArthur at Dolphin- Striker Way Project
Dear Ms. Ung:
The City of Irvine staff has received and reviewed the information on the above -
referenced project, and offers the following comment:
The traffic analysis for the project analyzes an "Existing Plus Project" scenario
and an interim year "2013 Plus Project' scenario to determine potential traffic
impacts and mitigation. However, it is unclear why a build -out scenario is not
analyzed to determine whether traffic impacts are identified and resulting
mitigation necessary in the build -out condition; especially considering that land
use intensity is being transferred from an off -site location in order to implement
the proposed project. The City of Irvine staff recommends that a build -out
analysis be prepared that analyzes the four intersections listed below that lie
Naiiidi`� y "aui° 1. vino city in is to d_term+r;e i i mHart_ f Imi tir,in _. ..inns result from the
project:
• MacArthur /Campus
• Jamboree /MacArthur
• Von Karman /Campus
• Jamboree /Campus.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed project.
Staff would appreciate the opportunity to review any further information regarding
this project as the planning process proceeds. If you have any questions, I can be
(949) 724 -6000
Ms. Rosalinh Ung
August 16, 2011
Page 2
reached at (949) 724 -6521, or by email at biacobs cDcityofirvine.org. For
assistance, you may also contact Sun -Sun Murillo at (949) 724- 6262, or by email
at smurillo .ci.irvine.cams.
erely
BILL JACOBS, AICP
Principal Planner
cc: Sun -Sun Murillo, Supervising Transportation Analyst