HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS2 - Bonita Canyon Sports ParkCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Study Session Item No. 2
February 11, 2003
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department General Services Department Recreation & Sr. Serv.
Steve Badum, Director David E. Niederhaus, Director Marie Knight, Director
949- 644 - 3311 949- 644 -3055 949-6" -3157
SUBJECT: BONITA CANYON SPORTS PARK UPDATE
To provide the background and history of the Bonita Canyon Sports Park as well as an
update on the current project status
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
On May 9, 2000, the City Council awarded the $6,276,000 Bonita Canyon Sports Park
Improvements contract to Castello, Inc., of Escondido, California. The Park has three
distinct use areas - East Park, Mid Park, and West Park. The contract included the
following basic park components:
East Park
• Three 200 -foot youth baseball fields
• One multi - purpose baseball /soccer field
• Restroom and equipment storage facilities
• Tot Lot
• Picnic areas
• Green open spaces with earth berms, pedestrian walking trails, and lights
• On site parking lot for 240 vehicles
Mid Park
• Three mid -park youth soccer fields
• Green open spaces with earth berms, pedestrian walking trails, and lights
• Restroom Facility
West Park
• Tot lot
• Youth soccer fields
• Green open spaces with earth berms, pedestrian walking trails, and lights
• On site parking lot for 115 vehicles
• Restroom Facility
SUBJECT: Bonita Canyon Sports Park Update
February 11, 2003
Page 2
In addition to the original contract, a change order was processed to add the tennis and
basketball courts in West Park for an additional cost of $113,000.
On August 14, 2001, City Council approved a change order in the amount of
$336,603.70, adding the landscaping of the "Freeway Reservation" open space parcel
along Macarthur Boulevard as a part of West Park construction.
In November 2001, work on the project stopped due to financial difficulties of the
general contractor, Castello, Inc. (Castello). The Park was approximately 88 percent
Complete and the Construction was scheduled for completion in February 2002, with five
months of plant establishment and maintenance to follow. The anticipated Park
opening was July 2002.
On January 22, 2002, the City Council approved the St. Paul Surety Takeover
Agreement to permit the Surety to complete the Park. This Agreement retained all the
covenants and requirements of the original contract. From that point forward all
payments, including retention were to be made to the Surety, who in turn would pay
their completion contractor. The performance and payment bonds of the Surety also
remained in effect.
The Takeover Agreement required the completion contractor be retained within thirty
days of the signing of this Agreement, and the construction work be Completed within
90 days of their start of work. Erreca's, Inc., of Lakeside, California was selected by the
Surety to complete the project. Construction restarted on February 25, 2002 and it
quickly became apparent 90 days was not a reasonable amount of time in which to
complete the Park based upon the new contractor's assessment of the quality and
amount of work actually completed. Additionally, from the November 2001 work
stoppage to the time Erreca's mobilized in late February 2002, several problems arose
due to the inactive status of the construction project such as weed control,
irrigation /erosion problems, and plant maintenance issues. The Surety's estimated 90
days was based on the original contract time and not based on the new contractor's
review of what time was realistically needed to complete the project. City staff asked
the Surety and Erreca's to provide an updated schedule. In addition, the turf grass
hydroseeding did not occur until August 2002
Erreca's initial revised schedule showed construction completion in October 2002. As
the new General Contractor, Erreca's re -hired most of the original sub - contractors.
The original landscape sub - contractor, Flintridge, had performance problems during the
first three months of the new effort to complete the project. Despite efforts to improve
their performance they were ultimately removed by the Surety and a new landscape
subcontractor, American Landscape, was hired as their replacement. Since American
Landscape has been hired, progress with the completion of the West Park has been
acceptable. Maintenance and upkeep of the Mid and East Park areas however, has
been unacceptable.
SUBJECT: Bonita Canyon Sports Park Update
February 11, 2003
Page 3
CURRENT STATUS:
Plant Establishment
The 90-day plant establishment period has been temporarily suspended on several
occasions due to above noted contract difficulties as well as recent technical problems
with both the irrigation system and the condition of the plants. The plant establishment
period of this project Is the time allotted for the grass, shrubs, trees and groundcover to
grow to an acceptable height and establish roots strong system. In addition, the plant
materials need to be healthy and free of insects and weeds. It is hoped that these
problems will be resolved shortly and the.plant establishment period for both East Park
and Mid Park could be completed in May. Once the plant establishment period is
successfully completed to the satisfaction of City Staff, the City may assume
possession of these portions of the Park and release the Surety from further
maintenance obligations. Turf establishment and seed mixture issues are addressed
separately in the "Playing Surface" portion of this report.
Irrigation
Reclaimed water provided by the Irvine Ranch Water District is utilized throughout the
Park's irrigation system. There are three main issues related to the irrigation system:
1. We believe the IRWD source water is clogging our points of connection basket
strainers to the point that no water can pass to the irrigation system. Each time
the strainers clog, a day of maintenance is required to rectify the situation. This
is occurring about once every two weeks. However, recently it has been
reduced to about once a month. We are working with IRWD and outside experts
to study the material that is clogging the strainers. Outside water quality
laboratories have also been introduced to study the problem. IRWD serves
reclaimed water to the site via the Michelson Treatment plant. However, there
are times when water is supplied from two open body reservoirs; Sand Canyon
and Rattlesnake. Because of the above - mentioned problems, the automated
mode in the irrigation design cannot be executed properly, is not dependable
and does not meet contractual compliance.
2. The mainline valves that operate the irrigation system are not functioning
properly. The rubber diaphragm components of the valves are deteriorating
causing failure. When the valves fail, they stick in the open position causing
flooding to the park. As of today, the manufacturer of the valves has not given a
definite solution to the problem. They are now testing new state-0f- -the art rubber
diaphragms for possible replacement on hundreds of valves. However, delivery of
the new diaphragms has not been realized at the writing of this report. The City
has used the same manufacturer of sprinkler valves that were installed in this Park
for the past 25 years without any problems.
SUBJECT: Bonita Canyon Sports Park Update
February 11, 2003
Page 4
Regulations on the use of reclaimed water require the City to have no
ponding of the reclaimed water being used. We have had situations where the
valves have been stuck open for hours causing extreme saturation and ponding.
These wet areas would make the fields temporarily un- playable, aside for the
perceived health risk associated with the public's contact with reclaimed water.
3. The irrigation system has been designed with pressure control valves throughout
the entire system to maintain a uniform pressure to the individual sprinkler heads.
Though the basket strainers at the point of connections are suppose to prevent
material from entering the irrigation system, very fine material is getting by these
strainers and causing blockages in the controls for the pressure reducing valves.
When a blockage has occurred, the pressure control valves are bypassed allowing
higher pressure to the sprinkler heads. Since the pressure is no longer being
controlled the heads are producing too much spray, causing overlapping spray
situations, which produces staturation. The irrigation system designer is looking
into options and Staff is also working with IRWD and the water quality laboratories
to determine where the material is being generated with the hope of eliminating it
at the source.
Playing Surface
The Park's designers, EPT Design, and outside turf experts recommend no formal use
of the turf until September to enable the turf root systems to be further established in
the warm summer months. Staff believes this is the prudent course of action and
supports this recommendation. This plan would ensure the establishment of safe and
durable fields for the soccer season. The turf grass species that was selected for the
Park took into consideration the multi -uses of this facility, maintenance budgets,
recovery of turf grass after each season, soil, and irrigation applications. Prior to
selecting the Turf grass species, staff conducted extensive research and soil tests in
order to arrive at the optimal blend for this multi -use Park. In addition, as it was
unknown what time of year the hydro seeding would take place, the seed blend
selected needed to be able to perform in either cold or warm weather. The turf grass
species that was selected has been used successfully in various blends at other City
parks that have multi - athletic use, i.e. Peninsula, Bob Henry, and Arroyo Parks.
Projected Use Schedule
Recreation and Senior Services Department staff is currently working with the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission (PB &R) to establish a Use Schedule for both
Bonita Canyon Sports Park (BCSP) as well as all of our sports field facilities. There are
four factors to be considered here: (1) based on information recently received from the
Youth Spots Organizations, all are experiencing increased registration this year for their
programs; (2) every organization has requested use of the fields at BCSP once it is
open; (3) the current allocation of fields to the sports organizations is unbalanced and
inequitable.
SUBJECT: Bonita Canyon Sports Park Update
February 11, 2003
Page 5
Over the years there are a few organizations who have been given the lion's share of
available fields, and with increased demand, it is time to create an equitable formula
that takes into consideration participant numbers, residency vs. non - residency, and
hours actually needed vs. hours desired. (4) With the opening of BCSP the City will be
utilizing one field for a maintenance rotation in order to give General Services
Department staff the ability to perform proper maintenance on other sports fields. This
field will not be assigned to any one group, rather used to transfer a group to BCSP
when their 'home field" is in a maintenance period.
Staff is gathering both current and past usage information from the various youth sports
organizations as well as their projected registration information and anticipates that the
proposed Field Use Allocation Schedule will be presented to the PB &R Commission at
the March 4, 2003 meeting.
Projected Opening
Final construction of the West Park facilities would not be completed until May of 2003.
The West Park portion of the project is on a different schedule due to the addition of the
landscaping work along MacArthur (Freeway Reservation open space). Like the East
and Mid -Park portions of the project, a 5 -month plant establishment and maintenance
period will follow. Upon successful completion of the plant establishment period, the
City would accept the entire Park project as completed and open the remaining portions
of the park for public use. The tentative completion date for the West Park is September
2003. However, the tot -lot, tennis, and basketball facilities in West Park may be
available for public use as early as May 2003 depending on the logistics of opening
these facilities within uncompleted portions of the park. This area of the park is also
experiencing problems with irrigation valves and filters and not functioning to design
criteria.
PROJECT COST SUMMARY
The costs to date are summarized as follows:
Construction Costs to Date
Total Original Contract Amount
Change Orders to Contract (approved as of this date)
Total Project Cost with Approved Change Orders
Current Payments
Payments to Castello /St. Paul Surety
Retention (escrow)
'The project is 94 percent eompiete.
T
$6,276,000.00
$581,369.36
$6,857369.36
$6,124,042.54
$ 325.544.93
$6,449,587.47
SUBJECT: Bonita Canyon Sports Park Update
February 11, 2003
Page 6
The funds for this project have been budgeted in the following accounts:
Account No.
Account Name
Amount
7441- C41220434
Bonita Canyon Development
$6,167,500.00
7532- C4120434
Sewer Pump Station Improvements
100,000.00
7021- C4120434
Park Improvements
48,000.00
7531- C5600292
Sewer Main Improvements
34,808.30
7432- C5100657
CIOSA Improvements
399,996.00
7015- C5100599
Park Improvements
33,607.70
7021- C4120616
Bonita Canyon Sports Park
120,000.00
7031- C4120431
Park &Field Renovation
13,482.00
Grand Total
$6,917,394.00
Also attached for your information is the Bonita Canyon Public Facilities Financing
Authority Summary that provided for construction of the sports park.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A negative Declaration was prepared forthis project.
SUMMARY
There are currently three obstacles to the final acceptance of the BCSP.
1. Plant establishment
2. Irrigation system problems
3. Legal difficulties and liability issues that would occur if the Park were to be
accepted in stages rather than as an entire project.
Submitted by:
in G. Badum, Director
Works Department
1
David E. Niederhaus, Director
General Services Department
Marie/<night, Dir+ct&
Recreeation and enior Services Department
Attachment: Bonita Canyon Public Facilities Financing Authority Summary
February 11, 2003
Study Session Item No. SS2
Attachment for Study Session Item No. 2 - Bonita Canyon Sports Park Update
Bonita Canyon Public Facilities Financing Authority
Community Facilities District 98 -1
Special Tax Bonds, Series 1998
Member Agencies
City of Newport Beach
City of Irvine (Dropped out upon Annexation)
Newport Mesa Unified School District
Term 31 Yrs
All in Total Interest Cost 5.66%
Par Value of Bonds 45,000,000
Less: Original Discount (747,997)
Less: Underwriter's Discount (618,750)
Net Proceeds due to Authority 43,633,253
Capitalized Interest
1,652,725
Reserve Fund
4,114,091
Cost of Issuance
420,000
Administrative Expense
28,302
City of Newport Beach Improvements
30,577,712
Newport Mesa USD Improvements
6,840,423
Total Uses of Authority
43,633,253
City Of Newport Beach Uses:
Principal
Banana Belt Parcel
14,000,000
Other Land
1,100,000
Freeway Reservation
7,000,000
Infrastructure Reimbursements
2,600,000
Real Estate Closing Costs:
100,000
Park Improvements
5,777,712
30,577,712
Park Improvement Interest
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
Interest Total
1,541,715 7,319,427
1,541,715 (6,715,353)
Construction
Interest
Exp
263,268
(3,600)
460,519
(1,139,141)
594,609
(4,084,834)
223,319
(1,342,743)
(145,035)
1,541,715 (6,715,353)
Work Stopped November 2001
• Contractor, Castello, has financial issues
unrelated to our project that limits their
ability to pay sub - contractors and suppliers
• Several sub - contractors and suppliers file
stop payment notices
• December 2001, City bans Castello from
proceeding due to non - performance.
• St. Paul Surety was notified
Fall 2002
• Project completion is falling behind
schedule due to the contractors inability to
properly staff project
• October 31, 2002 - Errecas terminates
Flintridge's sub - contract and hires
American Landscaping
55�_
Contract Award May 9, 2000
• Contract awarded to Castello, Inc. $6,276,000
• Scheduled for completion in Summer 2001
• After completion:
- 2 months of landscape establishment
- 3 months of maintenance
• Original park opening date, December 2001
• August 2001, Council approved addition of West
Park Open Space Landscaping
Surety Takeover of Project
• Takeover Agreement with St. Paul Surety,
approved by Council on January 22, 2002
• Surety assigned project to Errecas
• Most sub - contractors were hired back
including Flintridge Landscaping
• Work resumes February 2002
• Completion schedule revised to October
2002
Current Status
1. Continuing Irrigation Problems
• Basket strainers are clogging at connection
with IRWD
• Hundreds of control valves have faulty
rubber diaphragms
• Problems with pressure control valves
'7A -t t -o3
1
Current Status
2. Incomplete Work
• Turf is spotty from poor fertilization
• Sprinkler heads need to be raised
• Brick dust areas need replacements, weed
control, and edging
• Time to complete estimated at 4 weeks,
providing Contractor properly staffs
workcrews and good weather
The Good News
• Valve manufacturer, Griswold Controls,
will replace all rubber diaphragms
• Griswold will also flush irrigation system
• No cost to City or Contractor
— Bad News
• 4 -6 week process
• Until repairs are finished. system cannot be tested
,:',�:`
Ly
.. .. „'Y; i� y
�•.
�`�
�'
i
i
t
�: ., - �. �'.., r .
f V
,�.t�
�.,� i.
fir. _ � Y d �/ c
a, a t� � —.
Costs to Date
Original Contract
$6,276,000
Change Orders
$581,369
Total Project Cost
To Date
$6,857,369
Project is 94% Complete
Ta Dam PaMmts to
Contractor
S6.114.042
Rd..
$325.544
Current Status
3. Park Establishment
• 60 day period has been suspended until
irrigation problems are resolved
• While the park appears "green ", our turf
experts tell us the turf grasses have not yet
developed a strong root system to enable
use of the fields.
Current Schedule
East & Mid Park Compldioa
Mar6 2003
East & Mid Park Mawteoance & Plant
Establishment
Juae 2003
Went Pak Completat
Aptil 2003
Went Pack Maiatmance & Platt Eatbiishmmt
September 2003
E t Park Tot Lot & Restrooms Open for Public
Uae
Octoba 2002
West Pak Tot Lot, Tmais & easket,91 Coats,
Rearooms Opeo f Public Use
May 2003
Assmnptioos:
1. All oasatrding issues for imptim resolved in
the estimated time frame.
2. No delays due to weaha
rd
• Issues to be resolved
— Irrigation System Problems
— Completion of contract items
— Plant establishment
— Legal and liability issues if Park is accepted in
stages instead of entire project