HomeMy WebLinkAbout13 - Phase II Lower Bay Dredging FundingaEWPaRr CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
City CouncH Staff Report
Agenda Item No. 13
July 24, 2012
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Stephen G Badum, Public Works Director
949- 644 -3311, sbadum a( newportbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: Chris Miller, Harbor Resources Manager
APPROVED:
TITLE: Phase II Lower Bay Dredging — Funding
ABSTRACT:
The City is considering dredging additional areas as Phase II of the Lower Bay
Dredging Project ( "Project "). The US Army Corps of Engineers ( "Corps ") requires an
Amendment to the existing Memorandum of Agreement ( "MOX) if the City desires to
contribute funds to the Project.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Authorize the Mayor to execute an amendment to the existing Corps
Memorandum of Agreement relating to City financial participation in the
Project; and
2. Adopt Budget Amendment 13BA- 004 that appropriates $3,875,000 to
Account No. 7241- C4402003 to dredge additional areas in the Project
($2,337,000 to be considered a loan from the General Fund to be reimbursed
over time from Tidelands revenues and $1,538,000 in revenues from the
County of Orange); and recognizing $1,538,000 in revenue from the County
of Orange for its share of costs for the Lower Bay dredging project.
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Phase I of the Project is currently funded at $6,387,640 with $2,500,000 paid by the
City, and the remaining balance paid by the Corps. This evening, the Council will
Phase 11 Lower Bay Dredging — Funding
July 24, 2012
Page 2
consider contributing an additional $3,875,000 (loan from the General fund) to fund
additional dredging in the harbor as part of Phase 11. This amount includes a 10%
contingency of $345,262. The General Fund will be reimbursed over time from
Tidelands revenues (up to $2,337,000) and revenues from the County of Orange (up to
$1,538,000) for its share of the work pursuant to the terms of the Cooperative
Agreement between the County and the City.
The County has expressed an interest in contributing funds to dredge the County
Tidelands areas within Phases I & II. The County Board will consider reimbursing the
City for these expenses at their Board meeting on July 31. They are relying on the City
to initially cover these expenses because the County does not have an MOA with the
Corps that allows direct financial contribution to the project. The total County expense
including all ancillary costs (eelgrass mitigation, permitting, water quality monitoring,
Corps overhead and 10% contingency) is approximately $1,538,000 to be reimbursed to
the City.
DISCUSSION:
Lower Bay dredging has long been a Council goal, and Phase I of the current project
makes a significant impact toward achieving navigable channels in the harbor. Thanks
to an unexpected infusion of an additional $2.0 M from the federal government last
Spring, staff was able to formulate a plan for Phase II dredging which would address
most of the high spots in the harbor as noted on Attachment B (red areas). Combined,
Phases I and II represent approximately $10.4 M in dredging when accounting for other
ancillary costs associated with the project — the largest capital project the harbor has
seen in nearly 80 years. Coupled with the recently completed Rhine Channel project
($4.0 M), the Lower Bay will have received approximately $15.0 M of dredging, with the
City contributing nearly $10.0 M towards the effort (including all ramp up costs, i.e.
sediment testing, feasibility studies etc..).
Phase II
As previously stated, the City is considering dredging additional areas of Lower Newport
Bay as part of Phase II, The areas in the Table 1 below are depicted on the aerial
diagram in Attachment A. "LA -3" is the designation for the open disposal site, and
"POLB" designates Port of Long Beach disposal. All areas are within City Tidelands
unless otherwise noted,
Table 1: Proiect Cost— Phase II
Description — Phase II
Quantity
Unit Price
Price
Contractor Overhead
1
Lump Sum
$150,000
Yacht Anchorage 3 (LA -3 )
47,000 c
$12.55/cy
$589,850
West Lido Area B IA -3
50,000 c
$12.55/cy
$627,500
12_
Phase II Lower Bay Dredging — Funding
July 24, 2012
Page 3
Lido Isle Reach South LA -3
34,000 c
$12.55/cy
$426,700
Bay Island East Anchorage LA -3
15,000 c
$12.55/cy
$188,250
Upper Newport Channel (County Tidelands, LA -3
26,000 c
$12.95/cy
$336,700
Harbor Island Reach LA -3
13,000 c
$12.95/cy
$168,350
Small North Anchorage POLB
1,000 c
$34.50/cV
$34,500
Small South Anchorage POLB
600 c
$34.50/cy
$20,700
Total Phase 11 Federal Channel Dredging
$2,542,550
County Channel Non - Federal, LA -3)
14,000 c
$15.87/cy
$222,180
City Channel — Mobilization of Smaller Dredge Bare
1
$48,360 each
$48,360
City Channel Non - Federal, LA -3
8,600 c
$35.90
$308,740
City Channel Non - Federal, POLB
1,250 c
$49.79/cy
$62,238
Total Phase II Non - Federal Dredging
$641,518
Total Phase II Dredging
$3,184,068
Other Corps Costs
Corps Overhead Costs
$150,000
Eel grass Mitigation Costs, Non - Federal Channels
$118,556
Phase II Contribution to Corps
$3,452,624
10% Contingency
$345,262
Total Phase II City Contribution to Corps
$3,797,886
Future Phase II City & County Cost
Water Quality Monitoring, Estimated (Current contract
with Anchor QEA to be amended at a later date.
$75,000
Total
$3,872,886
3
Phase II Lower Bay Dredging — Funding
July 24, 2012
Page 4
Table 2: Citv / County Cost Sharing — Phase II
Phase II Dredge Costs
Ci
County
Total
Contractor Overhead
$121,490 81%
$28,510 19%
$150,000
Federal Dredging
$2,055,850 86%
$336,700 14%
$2,392,550
Non - Federal Dredging
$419,338 65%
$222,180 35%
$641,518
Phase II Dredge Subtotal
$2,596,678 (82% )
$587,390 18 %)
$3,184,068
Phase II Other Incidental Project Costs
City
County
Total
Corps Overhead
$121,490 81%
$28,510 19%
$150,000
Eel grass Mitigation
$15,168 13%
$103,388 (87%
$118,556
Project Contingency
$279,662 81%
$65,600 19%
$345,262
Water Quality Monitoring TBD
$60,745 81%
$14,255 (19% )
$75,000
Phase II Other Incidental Project Costs
Subtotal
$477,065 (69 %)
$211,753 (31 %)
$688,818
Total Phase II Dredging + Incidental Costs
$3,073,743 79 %)
$799,143 21%
$3,872,886
Both Corps and City staff feel the prices per cubic yard for the federal channels in
Phase II are reasonable when compared to the average price per cubic yard for Phase I
which was $13.89. For the non - federal channel in the County Tidelands (between
Linda Isle and Harbor Island), the price per cubic yard is also reasonable because the
dredger, R.E. Staite, will use their current equipment in this larger channel. However,
the much smaller channel on the backside of Linda Isle (City Tidelands) is expensive to
dredge because it requires a smaller dredge unit from San Diego to complete the work
(mobilization cost). In addition, because of the confined channel, the dredging will
proceed at a much slower pace, hence the increased price.
Another component of the City Tidelands area on the backside of Linda Isle is the 1,250
cy of unsuitable ocean disposal material. The City's previous sediment testing revealed
a small section of material that could not be disposed in the open ocean; hence, this
material will be delivered to the POLB for disposal. This extremely small quantity,
coupled with the delivery time to the POLB with the small, less efficient disposal scows,
account for the inflated per cubic yard cost.
Also note that the Small North Anchorage and the Small South Anchorage in the federal
channel have higher prices than the other federal channels. This is due to the scattered
Phase II Lower Bay Dredging — Funding
July 24, 2012
Page 5
nature of the high spots — the dredger must pick his way through these small areas and
dig very shallow cuts. However small this area is, the City has received complaints
about boats running aground near the Small North Anchorage area.
The areas that are identified in this Phase II of the dredging program were chosen
based on the most current bathymetry (depths) in the harbor as shown on Attachment
B. In this figure, the red areas denote the shallow areas (shoaling in the harbor). The
proposed dredge areas attempt to clear the harbor of a majority of these high spots
which will immediately improve navigation. Council may, however, individually chose
which areas are the highest priority and therefore only fund those areas as they see fit.
As a point of reference, the total cubic yards for the Phase I and proposed Phase II are:
LA -3
Phase 1 243,000 cy
Phase II 207,600 cy
Total 450,600 cy
POLB
105,400 cy
2,850 cV
108,250 cy
Tota 1
348,400 cy
210,450 cV
558,850 cy
Once Council decides which areas to dredge, Anchor QEA, the City's consultant
assisting with the required water quality monitoring, will develop a proposal for the
additional areas to monitor. A preliminary estimate based on a complete Phase II
dredging project is an additional $75,000 to be split proportionally with the County.
Memorandum of Agreement
In order for the City to contribute funds to Phase II dredging, an Amendment to the
existing City /Corps MOA (Attachment C) must be executed. As of the time of this
writing, the Corps has not released a draft Amendment for the City to review. However,
staff does not expect the terms of the original agreement to change, with the exception
of a "Work For Others" clause that will be added. This mechanism allows the Corps to
manage the non - federal channels near Linda Isle on behalf of the City and County. It is
important for the Corps to maintain management responsibility of the overall project in
order for Phase II to proceed seamlessly without the need for the City to individually
negotiate with RES directly, and therefore prolong the process.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
For the tidelands that are within the federal channels, the execution of this agreement
for this activity is a 'project' for California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") purposes.
In this case, the Army Corps of Engineers ( "Corps ") has prepared an Environmental
Assessment ( "EA ") under the National Environmental Policy Act ( "NEPA "). CEQA
authorizes the City to rely upon a NEPA document for purposes of CEQA compliance.
(CEQA Guidelines, sec 15221.) The Corps concluded through the EA that there will not
be a significant adverse impact upon the existing environment or the quality of the
M
Phase II Lower Bay Dredging — Funding
July 24, 2012
Page 6
human environment. City staff has reviewed the EA prepared by the Corps, and has
determined that this document meets the requirements of CEQA.
For the tidelands that are outside of the federal channels, staff recommends the City
Council find this action exempt from the CEQA pursuant to Section 15304, Class 4.g
(Minor Alterations to Land, Maintenance Dredging) of the CEQA Guidelines, California
Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential to have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOTICING:
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of
the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
Submitted by:
Director
A. Potential Phase II Areas to Dredge
B. 2012 Lower Bay Bathymetry
C. Existing Corps Memorandum of Agreement
D. Budget Amendment
t il
q � 1 r . ®1I � t _ F/ � � � �.. � r�j
0
y f, III
I �ViIIII
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE
ARMY AND THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FOR ACCEPTANCE AND
RETURN OF CONTRIBUTED FUNDS
FOR MAIN'T'ENANCE DREDGING OF NEWPORT BEACH HARBOR, CALIFORNIA
This MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "MOA "), entered
into this Sy-- day of Mhec w 2012, by and between the DEPARTMENT OF THE
ARMY (hereinafter referred to as the "Government "), represented by the U.S. Army Engineer, Los
Angeles District (hereinafter the "District Engineer "), and the City of Newport Beach (hereinafter
referred to as the "Contributor "), represented by its Mayor.
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, the River and Harbor Act of 1945, Public Law 79 -14, authorized construction
of the Federal Navigation Channel at Newport Bay Harbor, California (hereinafter referred to as
the "Project') in accordance with the recommendations contained in the report of the Chief of
Engineers published in Senate Document No. I38, 78rd Congress, 1st Session; and
WHEREAS the Corps is authorized to perform maintenance of the Project using funds
appropriated for dredging and disposal of materials from areas located within the Authorized
Federal Navigation Channel; and
WHEREAS the City of Newport Beach conducted investigations in 2009 that
identified sediment located within some areas of the Channel to be not suitable for open ocean
disposal or for beach disposal; and
WHEREAS the City of Newport Beach has obtained approval to place up to 130,000 cubic
yards of unsuitable sediment in Slipl of the Middle Harbor of the Port of Long Beach; and
WHEREAS sediment that is deemed suitable for open ocean disposal will be disposed of
at the LA -3 Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site; and
WHEREAS, the Contributor considers it to be in its own interest to expedite the maintenance
of the Project by voluntarily contributing funds (hereinafter referred to as "Contributed Funds ") to be
used by the Government for that purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Government is authorized pursuant to 33 U.S.C. Section 701h, to accept
Contributed Funds, to be expended in connection with Federally appropriated funds, for an
authorized work of public improvement of rivers and harbors whenever such work and expenditure
may be considered by the Chief of Engineers to be advantageous to the interests of navigation;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Government and Contributor agree as follows:
1. Subject to any necessary appropriation, the Contributor shall contribute to the Government
the following sums, in cash: $2,500,000.00.
tL
2. The contribution specified in paragraph 1 above shall be made as follows: provide the
Government with the full amount of the required funds by Electronic Funds Transfer no later than
March 15, 2012, directed to the USACE Finance Center, 5722 Integrity Drive, Millington, TN
38054.
3. In the event that the Contributor contributes more or less than the amount listed in paragraph
I above, or makes its contributions earlier or later than the date listed in paragraph 2 above, this
MOA shall apply to whatever funds are contributed by the Contributor to the Government pursuant
to this MOA; however, the Government shall not obligate any Contributed Funds before they are
received and available.
4. The Government shall use all Contributed Funds to perform maintenance dredging of the
Project, except with regard to excess Contributed Funds, which are addressed in paragraph 8 of this
MOA. The Contributor shall bear all additional costs of the work for which funds are accepted
including any additional environmental compliance costs.
5. The Government shall provide the Contributor with quarterly accountings of its expenditures
of Contributed Funds for maintenance. The first such accounting shall be provided within 30 days
after the final day of the first complete Government fiscal year quarter following receipt of the
Contributed Funds, and subsequent accountings shall be provided within 30 days after the final day
of each succeeding quarter until the Contributed Funds are completely expended or the Government
concludes maintenance on the Project.
6. Unless directed in law, the Government shall not reimburse the Contributor for Contributed
Funds expended by the Government.
7. The Government shall not credit the Contributor for the Contributed Funds so as to reduce
any obligation for which the Contributor is otherwise responsible or would be required of the
Contributor.
8. The Government, subject to the availability of funds and subject to the approval by the
Secretary of the Army, shall return to the Contributor, Contributed Funds not expended by the
Government no later than 2 years from the date of execution of this agreement by the Government. Any
Contributed Funds the Government considers necessary to complete and close out any contract awarded
in reliance on the Contributor's Contributed Funds prior to the applicable 2 year anniversary date,
including, but not limited to, funds necessary to resolve any outstanding claims, shall not be returned until
the contract has been completed, and all claims have been resolved.
9. No credit or repayment is authorized, nor shall be provided, for the Contributed Funds
provided by the Contributor.
10. Nothing herein shall constitute, represent, or imply any commitment to budget or appropriate
funding for this Project in the future; and nothing herein shall represent, or give rise to, obligations of
the United States.
11. Before any party to this MOA may bring suit in any court concerning an issue relating to this
I J
MOA, such party must first seek in good faith to resolve the issue through negotiation or other forms
of nonbinding alternative dispute resolution mutually acceptable to the parties.
12. The Contributor shall hold and save the Government free from all damages arising from the
design, construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the Project
and any Project - related betterments, except for damages due to the fault or negligence of the
Government or its contractors.
13. Federal and State Laws. In the exercise of their respective rights and obligations under this
MOA, the Contributor and the Government agree to comply with all applicable Federal and State
laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, Section 601 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
Public Law 88 -352 (42 U.S.C. 2000d), and Department of Defense Directive 5500.11 issued
pursuant thereto, as well as Army Regulation 600 -7, entitled "Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Handicap in Programs and Activities Assisted or Conducted by the Department of the Army ".
14. Relationship of Parties. In the exercise of their respective rights and obligations under this
MOA, the Govemment and the Contributor each act in an independent capacity, and neither is to be
considered the officer, agent, or employee of the other.
15. Officials Not to Benefit. No member of or delegate to the Congress, nor any resident
commissioner, shall be admitted to any share or part of this MOA, or to any benefit that may arise
therefrom.
16. Notices.
a. Any notice, request, demand, or other communication required or permitted to be given
under this MOA shall be deemed to have been duly given if in writing and either delivered personally
or by telegram or mailed by first- class, registered, or certified mail, as follows:
If to the Contributor:
City of Newport Beach
Post Office Box 1768
Newport Beach, California 92658 -8915
If to the Government:
Army Corps of Engineers
ATTN: CESPL -PM -N
915 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90017
b. A party may change the address to which such communications are to be directed by giving
written notice to the other party in the manner provided in this paragraph.
c. Any notice, request, demand, or other communication made pursuant to this paragraph shall
be deemed to have been received by the addressee at the earlier of such time as it is actually received
I
or seven days after it is mailed.
17. Confidentiality. To the extent permitted by the laws governing each party, the parties agree
to maintain the confidentiality of exchanged information when requested to do so by the providing
phi'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this MOA as of the day, month, and
year first above written.
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
1
BY:
R. N ark Toy, P. .
Colonel, Corps o sneers
Commander and District Engineer
4
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
l
BY:
Nancy G ner
Mayor
City of Newport Beach
Approved as to Form
C
Aaron Harp
City Attorney
City of Newport Beach
Leilani brown
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
I, Aaron Ham, do hereby certify that I am the principal legal officer of the CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH that the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH is a legally constituted public body
with full authority and legal capability to perform the terms of the Agreement between the
Department of the Army and the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH in connection with the Authorized
Federal Navigation Channel at Newport Beach, California, and to pay damages in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement, if necessary, in the event of the failure to perform, as required by
Section 221 of Public Law 91 -611 (42 U.S.C. Section 1962d -5b), and that the persons who have
executed this Agreement on behalf of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH have acted within their
statutory authority.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have made and executed this certification V day of March, 2012.
/ , C L—,--
Aaron Harp
City Attorney
City of Newport Beach
i('
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief that
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the
undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any
agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant,
the making of any Federal Ioan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension,
continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any
person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of
Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance
with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award
documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under
grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose
accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when
this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for
making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person
who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000
and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
Nancy G rte
Mayor
City of Newport Beach
DATE:
+7
BUDGET AMENDMENT
1
'aECT ON
BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE:
Amount
Increase Revenue Estimates
rq
Description
Increase Expenditure Appropriations AND
010
3605
Transfer Budget Appropriations
SOURCE:
rENUE ESTIMATES (3601)
Number 9900 Transfer Out
$2,337,000.00
from existing budget appropriations
X
Account
from additional estimated revenues
X
240/9240
from unappropriated fund balance
EXPLANATION:
NO. BA- 13BA -004
AMOUNT: $3,875,000.00
Increase in Budgetary Fund Balance
X Decrease in Budgetary Fund Balance
No effect on Budgetary Fund Balance
This budget amendment is requested to provide for the following:
To increase expenditure appropriations related to the Lower Newport Bay Dredging Project. A portion of the appropriations,
$2.3 million, will be transferred from the General Fund while $1.5 million will be from County of Orange private donations.
ACCOUNTING ENTRY:
BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE
Description
Amount
Fund
Account
Description
Debit Credit
010
3605
General Fund - Fund Balance
$2,337,000.00 '
rENUE ESTIMATES (3601)
Number 9900 Transfer Out
$2,337,000.00
Fund /Division
Account
Description
240/9240
6000
Lower Newport Bay Dredging - Transfer In
$2,337,000.00
240
4913
County of Orange Contributions
$1,538,000.00
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS (3603)
Description
Division
Number 7241 Tidelands - Capital
Account
Number C4402003 Lower Harbor Dredging
$3,875,000.00
Division
Number 9010 General Fund - Non Departmental
Account
Number 9900 Transfer Out
$2,337,000.00
` Automatic System Entry.
Signed: /
7—/4-12,
F ncla Ap oval: Finance ctor
Date
Signed:
L
Adminis ve Approval: City Manager
Date
Signed:
City Council Approval: City Clerk
Date
McDonald, Cristal
From: Craig M [craigmorissette @hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:42 PM
To: City Clerk's Office; mhenn527 @hotmail.com; Curry, Keith; Selich, Edward;
gardnerncy @aol.com; Brown, Leilani; Daigle, Leslie; parandigm @aol.com; Hill, Rush
Cc: Kiff, Dave
Subject: My thoughts on 7/24/2012 City Council agenda items C _R
Dear Newport Beach Councilmembers
Hello everyone. Thank you for considering my thoughts when you vote on several 7 /24/2012 agenda items.
Item 3 — Removal of parking restrictions on Balboa Blvd. The signs should have been removed several decades ago.
They serve no purpose. They restrict parking before 6:OOPM, yet allow parking during the summer weekend mass
exodus from the peninsula -- generally sometime between 6:30PM and 8:OOPM (depending on weather and sunset
time).
Item 16 — Marina Park Coastal Land Use Plan Amendment. It would be a missed opportunity to not to include an
iconic design element in the Marina Park project. I've attended nearly every Marina Park related meeting in the past
many years and I can't recall a better "iconic" idea than the lighthouse. A 35ft lighthouse is a ridiculous notion. It simply
doesn't fit the scale of the buildings. So, I'm either for a properly scaled lighthouse (71' sounds good to me), or no
lighthouse.
Item 13 — Phase II Lower Bay Dredging. All I can say is DREDGE, DREDGE, DREDGE —if the funds are available. I was
out in the main channel the other day and watched some kids "turtle" a Lido 14. The funny thing was that the head of
the sails were scooping mud long before the boat was upside down. It's not that deep out there —as you all well know!
As for Banning Ranch, I still haven't a clue. But, I'll let you know after wading through the staff report this weekend.
Oh, and I really liked the policy of not supporting private political fundraisers with public funds. As much as we would all
like any presidential candidate to come visit us, if it's private then the folks giving the party should pay for city services.
As always, thank you for your dedicated hard work.
Craig Morissette
Newport Beach resident and homeowner
At-
Tidelands Survey
< Newport Harbor
i City of Newport Beach
W
�1 NEWPORT <
;SHORES
T
15TH 6T W TSp
i
ORT 4 0 N
eR ! p� p
ANA Pp .
JETTY Q L ST
15 yJQ HOSPITAL RD C(i
\2� County Tidelands
to be Dredged
\\ Q
hlG F11NAY
P
1
Boundaries �.5
a ;�Ta,i _F • . -,
G 14 ,'TURA
9
191BLm1Ctl,B BeuM.ry Fn ✓mn:vnuv .�:5196oi
BA'
` 1'4; �t <1BA,
,`
�'� 1919 GdnIklM9 Bdunbry m�nm�..um oo:e.a,.0 .m a.
1 ` `",
1N
-. - Gra.b.Y Hi(H rib lib
b,
ICI G,ery Him The Lon,
e�L I/
�\ County Term eeumNy
-
�
T \I RbayMwnbrllns,rdai
V,%. a `,
while P,enne sooWAN
,`
Buahftdllmo
Redwool41 +n Duce +..0 1-1
Managing Agency
City of Newport Beach
NEWPOR
PIER
ndH.nbaS..,gWLmb in ILWBO191
.o
TW.len,h. Bubnsr9.a Lanai & FiMtl LNbObaNryupm, Y, Ymunabm. P.cIhO Wn VIaYm• al 1e�9 CnB�I n9 �'!W
ml.d nbbnc.
_ Tee Tftn. upend Po H,
N.b—n. peGCaled a Rnened teem.
19W Tmn,bOe.ns ti. fi'. •np
County of Orange
To"anb 6 SWme,g.d Lnds In Newpal BW
Rted TlaeleMi
J Pn rift to upend Rdpwty
State of California
Sub PN Baa.hn
Sbb HI9Nwy.
Federally Owned
=Pq cen.y.abyceybus G--nA
Conflicting Title/Designation
- pl bea.naan es. dtunpwr tet9 Bantlry 64i4on
❑I tbme Hb.d naAanb
IM 9.. W.Mthimm-
;TR
z�
Y• i -,
ISULA
tw_- NEWppNT
UV BAY
ISLE ISLA
`- --
Ii �
w
6
• Y�
MA "INERS 0Rp " I
6T \
\ 1
IJ
OP
0
NORTH
P STAR
Q BEACIp
A; Ay
x to
F AY
i� p�y0 a
�0 0
J j
PW
• O PARK AVE
m
-- B- AT.HOA - -75
BqC
CHANNEL
F��� � •tea e� EAST
BA BOA `.
PILR
PACIFIC /� OCEAN
N
0 0.5 1
Miles
Op
9SP
THE
WEDGE
Lido Isle
Reach South
$426,700
Current Contract Awarded to
R.E. Staite Engineering
cw.. .. ma c.ld
Upper Newport
Channel (County)
$336,700
West Lido
Area B
$627,500
f
Yacht
Anchorage 3
$589,850
County Channel
(Non - Federal)
$222,180
Bay Island East
Anchorage
$188,250
City Channel
(Non - Federal)
$419,338
($48,360 mob +
$308,740 LA -3 +
$62,238 POLB)
Harbor
Island Reach
$168,350
Small South
Anchorage
$20,700
Small North
Anchorage
$34,500