Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17 - Community Develpment Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2011-2012 CAPER� e�6W PORT O O U S CqC /F00.H�P TO: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 17 September 25, 2012 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Community Development Department Kimberly Brandt, AICP, Director 949 - 644 -3226, kbrandt @newportbeachca.gov PREPARED BY: James Campbell, Principal Planner APPROVED: TITLE: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2011 -2012, Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) ABSTRACT: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires the City of Newport Beach to prepare and submit a CAPER to describe the City and its subrecipients' progress in meeting the goals established in the Program Year 2011- 2012 Action Plan that was approved by the City Council on April 26, 2011. This report must be submitted to HUD on or before September 28, 2012, to comply with HUD regulations found at 24 Code of Federal Regulations 91.520. The Program Year 2011- 2012 CAPER was prepared and made available for the HUD - required 15 -day public review and comment period, which began on September 10, 2012, and concludes with the public hearing before the City Council on September 25, 2012. For the recently completed fiscal year that began on July 1, 2011, and concluded on June 30, 2012, the City received $323,777 of CDBG funds that were allocated in the Action Plan to activities designed to meet the City's five -year Consolidated Plan — Strategic Plan goals that were adopted April 26, 2011. This was the second year of the five -year Consolidated Plan cycle for CDBG program. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Hold a public hearing to receive comments on the Program Year 2011- 2012 CAPER; and 2. Approve the Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER; and 1 Community Development Block Grant Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER September 25, 2012 Page 2 3. Direct the City Manager or his designee to submit the Program Year 2011- 2012 CAPER to HUD. FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund related to this item. DISCUSSION: On September 8, 2012, the City published a notice in the Daily Pilot informing the general public that the City of Newport Beach had prepared the Draft 2011 -2012 CAPER and it would be available for review and comment until September 25, 2012. The public was informed of the opportunity to provide oral and /or written comments on the CAPER. To date, no public comments have been received. Additionally, the Citizen Participation Plan requires that a public hearing be held to receive comments from interested residents or parties regarding the CAPER. This public hearing fulfills the requirements for the public hearing. The CDBG allocation for Program Year 2011 -2012 was $323,777. Unallocated CDBG funds from previous allocations were available for this program year in the amount of $1,890. Additionally, prior -year CDBG funds carried overfrom 2010 -2011 in the amount of $65,922. The total Program Year 2011 -2012 budget was $391,589. The actual amount spent during the fiscal year is as follows: Category FY 2011 -2012 Expenditures Public Service Activities $ 48,468 Capital Improvement Projects $ 201,653 Program Administration & Fair Housing 64,164 Total $ 314,285 The accomplishments for this year include, but are not limited to, implementation of a senior /disabled mobile meals program, homeless prevention programs, fair housing services, and repayment of the Section 108 loan. A more detailed explanation of accomplishments can be found in the attached Draft Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Staff recommends the City Council find that the Draft Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. 2 Community Development Block Grant Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER September 25, 2012 Page 3 NOTICING: In accordance with HUD requirements for a 15 -day public review and comment period, notice of the public hearing was published in the Daily Pilot on September 8, 2012. Further, the agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the City Council considers the item). Submitted by: Kimberly Brand , AICP Director Attachment: Draft Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER 3 11 City Council Attachment 1 Draft Program Year 2011 -2012 CAPER 5 NO f 4 4,t OVL City of Newport Beach Program Year 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) DRAFT Prepared by: LLDM Assoc! a les•Inc. 7 City of Newport Beach 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 I. GENERAL NARRATIVE ................................................................................................... ..............................4 GeneralQuestions ......................................................................................................... ..............................4 Managingthe Process ................................................................................................. .............................17 CitizenParticipation ..................................................................................................... .............................18 InstitutionalStructure .................................................................................................... .............................19 Monitoring.................................................................................................................... .............................20 Lead -Based Paint ........................................................................................................ .............................26 II. HOUSING ...................................................................................................................... .............................27 HousingNeeds ............................................................................................................ .............................27 SpecificHousing Objectives ........................................................................................ .............................28 PublicHousing Strategy ............................................................................................ ............................... 30 Barriers to Affordable Housing .................................................................................. ............................... 30 HOME /American Dream Down Payment Initiative (ADDI) .......................................... .............................30 III. HOMELESS NEEDS ..................................................................................................... .............................31 HomelessNeeds ......................................................................................................... .............................31 Specific Homeless Prevention Elements ..................................................................... .............................35 Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) ............................................................................... .............................36 IV. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... .............................37 CommunityDevelopment ............................................................................................ .............................37 AntipovertyStrategy .................................................................................................... .............................42 V. NON - HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS ............................................................................. .............................43 Non - Homeless Special Needs ..................................................................................... .............................43 SpecificHOPWA Objectives ........................................................................................ .............................45 APPENDICES: A. Summary of Annual Objectives (CPMP Excel Tables) B. Project Summaries (CPMP Excel Tables) C. Proof of Public Notice D. Map (Newport Beach Eligible CDBG Areas) E. IDIS Reports 1. HUD Grants and Program Income Report (PR01) 2. CDBG Activity Summary Report for PY 2011 -2012 (PR03) 3. Summary of Consolidated Plan Projects for PY 2011 -2012 (PR06) 4. Summary of Accomplishments for PY 2011 -2012 (PR23) 5. CDBG Financial Summary for PY 2011 -2012 (PR26) F. CAPER Checklist PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report City of Newport Beach 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I Second Program Year CAPER The Consolidated Plan Management Process (CPMP) Second Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report includes narrative responses to CAPER questions that CDBG, HOME, HOPWA, and ESG grantees must respond to each year in order to be compliant with the Consolidated Planning Regulations. The Executive Summary narratives are optional. This report is the Second Year Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) which outlines the City of Newport Beach achievements in meeting the goals and objectives outlined in the City's 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan. The strategic plan objectives and goals for the fiscal year 2011 -2012 are summarized below including the achievements. 2011 -2012 Program Year Goals vs. Accomplishments Activity Accomplishment 2011 -2012 2011 -2012 Units Goals Accomplishments Housing: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Housing Units 400 497 Rent - Restricted Units Housing: Housing Units 7 0 Rehabilitation - Utility Connection Program Fair Housing Activities: Fair Housing & Counseling Services People Served 200 161 Senior Services: People Served 100 145 Home Delivered Meals Program Special Needs/Non- Homeless: People Served 7 14 Battered and Abused Spousal Program Special Needs/Non- Homeless: People Served 8 7 Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program Home less and HIV /AIDS: Transitional Housing Program People Served 100 147 Public Services: People Served 100 404 Health Services Public Facilities: Section 108 Loan Repayment - Balboa Village Public Facilities 1 1 Upgrade Public Facilities with ADA Improvements Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements -ADA Public Facilities 1 0 General Program Administration N/A N/A N/A A detailed breakdown of the five -year accomplishments by the City of Newport Beach using CDBG funds can be found in the Summary of Annual Objectives in Appendix "A ". 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 1 10 City of Newport Beach Development of the 2011 -2012 CAPER As required by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the City of Newport Beach has prepared the CAPER for public review and comment prior to its submittal to HUD. This document contains an assessment of the City's performance relative to the One -Year Action Plan. To the greatest extent feasible, the data collection efforts required by the CAPER reflect information for housing and community development projects that occurred within the City's jurisdiction, even if the City was not the lead agency. Citizen Participation As a prerequisite to submitting its CAPER, the City's Citizen Participation Plan and the CDBG implementing regulation require that a public hearing is held to provide citizens with an opportunity to express their views concerning the use of said funds. The public hearing was held on September 25, 2012 before the City Council. In addition, the draft 2011 -2012 CAPER was made available to the general public for a period of 15 days in order to provide them with an opportunity to review the document. In compliance with the City's approved Citizen Participation Plan and CDBG implementing regulation 24 CFR 92 -105, a Public Notice was published to solicit public comments from interested citizens regarding the City's 2011 -2012 CAPER. A copy of the published Public Hearing Notice can be found in Appendix «C„ Consultation The City obtained information from local agencies in the preparation of the 2011- 2012 CAPER. These included Community Based Organizations, various departments at the City of Newport Beach, the Fair Housing Foundation, and the Fair Housing Council of Orange County. City Council Review and Public Hearing On September 25, 2012, the City Council reviewed the 2011 -2012 CAPER, allowed citizens an opportunity to comment on the draft CAPER and approved the 2011- 2012 Newport Beach Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report. Activities Undertaken The following page indicates the source of funds used to implement projects undertaken with CDBG funds under the Program Year (PY) 2011 -2012. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 2 11 City of Newport Beach 2011 -2012 Program Year Sources of Funds Source _ Amount 2011 -2012 CDBG Entitlement $323,777 Unallocated CDBG Funds (Prior Year) $1,890 CDBG Program Income $0 Prior Year CDBG Funds $65,922 All other forms of CDBG $0 TOTAL $391,589 2011 -2012 Program Year Uses of Funds Public Services Age Well Senior Services — Home Delivered Meals Program $ 18,492 Families Forward — Transitional Housing Program $ 8,406 Human Options — Community Resource Center $ 3,867 Serving People in Need — Substance Abuse Rehab Program $ 9,246 Share Our Selves — SOS Free Medical and Dental Clinics $ 8,555 Capital Improvements City of Newport Beach — Utility Assessment District Grant Program $ 65,922' City of Newport Beach — Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements -ADA $ 8,802 City of Newport Beach — 108 Loan Repayment $ 201,654 Program Administration City of Newport Beach — Program Administration $ 52,755 Fair Housing Services $ 12,000 TOTAL $389,699 'PY 2010 -2011 Project budget was carried over to PY 11/12. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 3 12 I. GENERAL NARRATIVE 13 City of Newport Beach General Questions 1. Assessment of the one -year goals and objectives: a. Describe the accomplishments in attaining the goals and objectives for the reporting period. b. Provide a breakdown of the CPD formula grant funds spent on grant activities for each goal and objective. c. If applicable, explain why progress was not made towards meeting the goals and objectives. The City consulted with several local agencies concerning their accomplishments for the program year, including the Community Based Organizations, City of Newport Beach Public Works Department, and Fair Housing Foundation. Overall, the City has been successful in implementing most of the proposed projects for this Program Year and meeting most of the Five -Year Consolidated Plan goals (See Executive Summary 2011 -2012 Program Year Goals vs. Accomplishments Table). The City uses its allocation of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to address the Strategic Plan goals for Affordable Housing, Special Needs Populations, Homeless Objectives, Community Development Objectives, and some Housing Objectives. The majority of the Housing objectives, however, are funded locally using the City's in -lieu fee proceeds. The specific accomplishments for the 2011 -2012 program year concerning housing goals and objectives are discussed in Section VII, Housing. The City successfully utilized its allocation of CDBG funds to exceed the annual goals established for the 2011 -2012 program year as illustrated in the table below: 2011 -2012 Program Year Goals vs. Accomplishments Activity Accomplishment 2011 -2012 2011 -2012 Units Goals Accomplishments Housing: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Housing Units 400 497 Rent - Restricted Units Housing: Housing Units 7 0 Rehabilitation - Utility Connection Program Fair Housing Activities: People Served 200 161 Fair Housing & Counseling Services Senior Services: Home Delivered Meals Program People Served 100 145 Special Needs/Non- Homeless: People Served 7 14 Battered and Abused Spousal Program Special Needs/Non- Homeless: People Served 8 7 Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program Homeless and HIV /AIDS: People Served 100 147 Transitional Housing Program PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 4 -14 City of Newport Beach Activity Accomplishment 2011 -2012 2011 -2012 Sustainability Units Goals Accomplishments Public Services: Create Suitable Living Environments 35% - 62% People Served 100 404 Health Services 2.6% Public Facilities /Infrastructure $ 210,456 Public Facilities: Administration $ 52,755 16.3% Public Facilities 1 1 Section 108 Loan Repayment - Balboa Village Public Facilities with ADA Improv.: Public Facilities 1 0 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements General Program Administration N/A N/A N/A The following table reflects the percentage of CDBG expended to accomplish the various Strategic Plan objectives. HUD Objectives HUD Outcomes Availability/ Accessibility Affordability Sustainability Provide Decent Affordable Housing 3% - - Create Suitable Living Environments 35% - 62% Create Economic Opportunities - - - The table below illustrates how the City used the 2011 -2012 CDBG allocation to meet the HUD - mandated priority need categories: 1 HUD Priority Need Categories 2011 -2012 Funding 2011 -2012 Percentage Housing $ 12,000 3.7% Senior Services $ 18,492 5.7% Special Needs /Non- Homeless $ 13,113 4.1% Homeless and HIV/AIDS $ 8,406 2.6% Public Services $ 8,555 2.6% Public Facilities /Infrastructure $ 210,456 65% Administration $ 52,755 16.3% 2. Describe the manner in which the recipient would change its program as a result of its experiences. The City would not change its program at this time. This is a worthy program that increases accessibility for the purpose of creating a suitable living environment and access to decent housing for the residents of Newport Beach. 3. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing: a. Provide a summary of impediments to fair housing choice. b. Identify actions taken to overcome effects of impediments identified. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 5 1 15 City of Newport Beach In addition to developing a Consolidated Plan that addresses a broad range of housing and community development needs, the City also participated in the development of a regional plan with other Orange County cities called the "Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice ", or Al, to specifically address overcoming the barriers to fair housing found in the community. This study identifies impediments to fair housing and also recommends actions to overcome the effects of these impediments. During the most recent Al update, the City of Newport Beach monitored and reviewed its land use and other policies to ensure compliance with fair housing laws. The jurisdiction will work to ensure all potential recipients of government funds for housing related programs assist the jurisdiction in affirmatively furthering fair housing choice. The following impediments were identified in the 2010 -2015 Orange County Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (Regional Al). HOUSING DISCRIMINATION Impediment The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) compiled data on housing discrimination complaints for this Regional Al. In the five -year period since the prior Al, about 300 housing discrimination complaints have been filed with DFEH. Annually, the number of housing discrimination complaints averaged 60 per year. The number of cases ranged from a low of 46 in 2005 to a high of 78 in 2006. The vast majority — 244 of 302 housing discrimination complaints — have been filed in the Entitlement Cities. Irvine (58) and Anaheim (40) accounted for the highest number of complaints. Housing discrimination, especially in the rental housing market, is an impediment to fair housing choice because 60 complaints annually are filed by residents of the participating entitlement cities and Urban County. A housing discrimination complaint can have more than one basis. The bases include: • Physical Disability • Mental Disability • Race /Color • National Origin • Familial Status • Sex • Marital Status • Other - Retaliation; Religion; Source of Income; Association and Age About 35% of the housing discrimination complaints were based on a physical or mental disability. Since the prior Regional Al was completed, disability has been PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 6 10 City of Newport Beach increasing as a basis for a housing discrimination complaint. Race and color (20 %) and national origin (14 %) rank second and third as a basis for making a housing discrimination complaint. Although Individual cities vary in terms of the basis for a housing discrimination complaint, disability, race /color and national origin comprise the basis for the highest number of complaints. The DFEH compiles data on number of housing discrimination cases according to nine types of alleged acts: • Refusal to Rent • Eviction • Refusal to Show • Loan Withheld • Unequal Terms • Harassment • Unequal Access to Facilities • Denied Reasonable Modification /Accommodation A summary of the highest number and percentage of alleged acts is presented below: ■ About 22% (101) of the housing discrimination complaints occurred during the eviction process. • About 19% each of the alleged acts pertained to unequal terms (88) and to denial of a reasonable modification and /or accommodation (87). • About 15% each of the housing cases were filed because of harassment (72) and the refusal to rent (68). It appears that most of the alleged acts affect renters or persons seeking rental housing. This mirrors HUD's national study which found that about 70% of the persons who thought they were victims of discrimination were looking to rent at the time. Actions Taken During the 2010 -2015 period, the FHCOC is implementing the following actions: 1. FHCOC committed to continue to process housing discrimination complaints filed by city and county residents. 2. FHCOC committed to conduct testing of housing provider practices to determine whether there are differences in treatment based on a protected class. The 2005 -2009 housing discrimination complaint data and the fair housing community profile used to identify the protected classes and locations of housing providers that should be tested. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 7 27 City of Newport Beach 3. FHCOC committed to revise its website to provide direct access to a housing discrimination complaint form and provide a diagram or brief explanation of the process for investigating and resolving a complaint. 4. FHCOC committed to revise its website to add more information on how residents can detect whether they have been victims of unlawful housing discrimination. 5. FHCOC committed to publish a quarterly report on the FHCOC website summarizing the remedies pertaining to filed housing discrimination complaints. 6. FHCOC committed to compile an Annual Report on housing discrimination complaints filed with the FHCOC, the State Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) and HUD. The report will include housing discrimination complaints unique to each participating jurisdiction as well as those of the entire County. The Annual Report will describe emerging trends within the City and County. 7. FHCOC committed to transmit the Annual Report to the participating jurisdictions by August of each calendar year to allow jurisdictions to include a summary of the report findings in the CAPER. To date, the City of Newport Beach has not received this report. DISCRIMINATORY ADVERTISING Impediment Rental housing ads that state "no pets" or indicate rental discounts for seniors are impediments to fair housing choice because they make housing unavailable to disabled persons and the non - elderly. "No Section 8" ads may become an impediment to fair housing choice because they could make housing unavailable disproportionately to a protected class such as persons with disabilities. Actions Taken During the five -year period of the Consolidated Plan, the FHCOC is implementing the following actions: 1. FHCOC is encourage the Orange County Register to publish a Fair Housing Notice in the for rent classified ad section and to identify the FHCOC as an agency that can respond to fair housing questions. FHCOC is encouraging apartment rental websites to display more prominently their Fair Housing Notice. 2. FHCOC is encouraging the Los Angeles Times and Orange County Register to publish a "no pets" disclaimer that indicates rental housing PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 6 z2 City of Newport Beach owners must provide reasonable accommodations, including "service animals" and "companion animals" for disabled persons. 3. FHCOC Supports an amendment to the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to state no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider, except for notices, statements, or advertisements with respect to the sale, rental, financing or insuring, or any other service of a dwelling that violate the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. 4. FHCOC committed to periodically review for rent and for sale ads published in the print media. 5. FHCOC committed to prepare a summary of the accomplishments each year and transmit to the Entitlement Cities and Urban County in August of each year to allow the Entitlement Cities and Urban County to include a summary of the accomplishments in the CAPER. To date, the City of Newport Beach has not received the report. BLOCKBUSTING Impediment Blockbusting is unlawful; however, it does not appear to be a significant impediment to fair housing choice. For profit, to induce or attempt to induce any person to sell or rent any dwelling by representations regarding the entry or prospective entry into the neighborhood of a person or persons of a particular race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. With respect to blockbusting, the California law has more protected classes than the Federal Fair Housing Act. There is no local or county agency that maintains records on actual or potential blockbusting incidents. Such incidents would take place primarily as real estate agents attempt to solicit or induce homeowners to sell their homes. The California Real Estate Commissioner is authorized to take disciplinary action against licensees who have committed the prohibited discriminatory practice of blockbusting and panic selling. The Department of Real Estate stated in June 2010 that no Orange County licensee has had their license suspended or revoked because of the illegal practice of blockbusting. Actions Taken During the five -year period of the Fair Housing Action Plan, the FHCOC is implementing the following actions: PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 9 1 City of Newport Beach 1. FHCOC provides information on their website about the unlawful practice of blockbusting and includes examples of this illegal practice. 2. FHCOC committed to work with the California Department of Real Estate to determine if any Orange County licensees have had their licenses suspended or revoked because of the illegal practice of blockbusting. 3. In the event, a licensee has been found to have committed blockbusting, FHCOC committed to provide education and information on this practice to the responsible broker and all related salespersons. DENIAL OF REASONABLE MODIFICATION /REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION Impediment Denial of a reasonable modification or reasonable accommodation is an impediment to fair housing choice because they account for almost one -fifth of all alleged discriminatory acts. It is unlawful to refuse to make reasonable accommodations for disabled persons. The DFEH compiles data on the number of housing discrimination cases according to nine types of alleged acts. During the 2005 -2009 period, 461 alleged discriminatory acts were committed in the cases processed by the DFEH. Of this total, 87 or 18.9% involved denial of a reasonable modification /reasonable accommodation. About 17 -18 denials of reasonable modification /reasonable accommodation occurred per year during the five -year period. Actions Taken During the five -year period of the Fair Housing Action Plan, the FHCOC is implementing the following actions: 1. FHCOC committed to provide education and information on why this practice is unlawful to the owners and managers of apartment complexes and homeowner associations. 2. FHCOC committed to provide information on the unlawful practice of denying reasonable modifications /reasonable accommodations at fair housing seminars conducted by the Apartment Association of Orange County. HATE CRIMES Impediment Hate crimes committed at a residence are an impediment to fair housing choice because they impact the lives of 20 -30 households per year. Almost one -half of all hate crime events in Orange County had an anti -Black or anti - Latino bias motivation. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 10 20 City of Newport Beach Hate crime events were reviewed for the 5 -year period from 2004 to 2008 as reported by Criminal Justice Statistics Center of the California Department of Justice (DOJ). The annual average of events was 73 and, during the five -years there was a narrow low (69) to high (79) range. Except for the City of Huntington Beach, on a city -by -city basis, the number of hate crime events is low. In 2008, according to the Orange County Human Rights Commission (OCHRC), there were 79 cases of hate crimes in Orange County, essentially unchanged from the 80 cases in 2007. Despite the fact that the African American population makes up less than 2% of Orange County's population, this group continues to be the most frequent target for hate crimes. Hate crimes against Latinos continues to increase. In fact, since 2006 there has been almost a 100% increase in the number of cases reported. After a four -year downward trend, hate crimes against Jews increased. Additionally, while there was a slight decrease in hate crimes reported against Gays and Lesbian, this group frequently underreports. In 2008, 29% and 19% of the hate crimes in Orange County had an anti - African American and anti - Latino bias motivation. The California DOJ reports the location of hate crime events for the entire state by 25 categories (e.g., church, park, college, etc). During the past five years two locations are predominant, accounting for about 60% of all hate crime locations: Highway /Road /Alley /Street (29.1 %) and Residence /Home /Driveway (29.7 %). The application of the statewide housing location average of 29.7% to the annual Orange County average of hate crime events of 73 yields at estimate of 22 annual events occurring at a residence, home or driveway. The application of the 40% factor cited by the OCHRC yields an estimate of 29 events occurring at a housing location. On an individual city basis, the number of hate crime events occurring at a housing location is small. However, the number at the countywide level is significant and, as a result, the resources to monitor and alleviate this impediment are best handled at the regional level. Actions Taken During the five -year of the Fair Housing Action Plan, FHCOC is implementing the following actions: 1. FHCOC committed to coordinate with the Orange County Human Relations Commission, Center OC and the Orange County Victim Assistance Partnership. 2. FHCOC committed to provide affected residents — when needed - with referrals to hate crime victim resources. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 11 21- City of Newport Beach UNFAIR LENDING Impediment Disparities in the loan denial rates experienced by Hispanic and Black/African applicants create an impediment to fair housing choice as they have loans denied at rates 1.5 to 2.0 times greater than White applicants. The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) 15 U.S.C. 1691 et seq. prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, because an applicant receives income from a public assistance program, or because an applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. To supplement federal legislation, state laws have been enacted to forbid the discriminatory practice known as "redlining;" a practice results in blanket refusals by some lenders to make loans in whole neighborhoods or geographic areas. Redlining is illegal in California pursuant to the Housing Financial Discrimination Act of 1977 (Holden Act). (Health & Safety Code Section 35800 - 35833) The Holden Act prohibits the consideration of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry in lending for the purchase, construction, improvement, or rehabilitation of housing. Further, lenders cannot deny loan applications because of ethnic composition, conditions, characteristics, or expected trends in the neighborhood or geographic area surrounding the property. An analysis of the 2008 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data was completed in order to determine loan denial rates by census tract, race /ethnicity and income. HMDA requires lenders to report on the action taken on each loan application, as follows: • Loan Originated • Application Approved, Not Accepted • Application Denied • Application Withdrawn • Filed Closed for Incompleteness Many determinants of a loan decision — such as borrower credit history, debt -to- income -ratio and loan -to -value ratio - are not included in the HMDA data. Although the loan denial rates do not support definitive conclusions regarding discrimination on the bases of race or ethnicity, they are a useful screen to identify disparities in loan approval rates by the race and ethnicity of applicants and geographic markets where differences in denial rates warrant further investigation. Additionally, identifying census tracts /neighborhoods with high loan denial rates helps to target credit counseling and homebuyer education programs. Evidence from the 2008 Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data reveals the loan denial disparities between White applicants and Black and Hispanic applicants. Moderate income Blacks have an FHA loan denial rate almost two times greater PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 12 22 City of Newport Beach than moderate income White applicants. Above moderate income Blacks have an FHA loan denial rate about 1.4 times greater than White applicants with identical incomes. The conventional loan disparities are lower for moderate and above moderate income applicants than for FHA loans. However, low income Blacks have a conventional loan denial rate 2.55 times greater than White applicants. Moderate - income Hispanics have a loan denial rate for FHA and conventional loans that is two times greater than White applicants. The very low, low and above moderate income Hispanics have loan denial rates 1.46 to 1.93 higher than White applicants. Unfair lending is manifested more in the loan denial disparities experienced by different racial /ethnic borrowers than by the denial rate disparities experienced in neighborhoods with 20 % -79% minority populations, regardless of income. Additionally, a regression analysis was completed to determine if race /ethnicity is associated with the denial of loan applications. Two types of loans applications were considered in the analysis: (1) home purchases with conventional loans and (2) home purchases with FHA loan. A logit regression was used to "predict' if a loan was denied based on the minority population and income ratio of the census tract, as well as the loan amount. These variables were chosen because the results of a preliminary analysis utilizing census tract level data suggested each of these variables were influencing denials. Each of the three variables was significant predictors of loan denials for conventional loan applications, while the percent minority and the income ratio of a census tract were significant predictors of denials for FHA loan applications. For conventional loans, the probability of a loan being denied increased as the percentage minority population in the census tract increased, as the income increased the probability of a denial decreased, and as the amount of the loan increased the probability of a loan denial increased. Actions Taken 1. FHCOC committed to monitor the HMDA data annually using the 2008 HMDA analysis as a benchmark. 2. FHCOC committed to complete a HMDA analysis of the top 10 lenders in Orange County to compare and contrast loan denial rates. 3. FHCOC committed to conduct a follow -up analysis of loan denial rates at the neighborhood level to determine to what extent, if any, redlining may exist in Orange County. This follow -up will be completed when Census 2010 data are available on minority populations at the census tract level. The Census 2010 data will enable an analysis of loan activity and minority population characteristics for the same time period. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 13 23 City of Newport Beach 4. FHCOC committed to conduct outreach to cultural, ethnic and minority organizations to potentially increase interest and readiness in home purchases. 5. FHCOC committed to provide homebuyer education programs in neighborhoods with high denial rates, high minority population concentrations and limited English speaking proficiency to help increase loan approval rates. Public Sector Impediments Common to Most Participating Jurisdictions As part of the preparation of an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice participating cities responded to a 24- question survey regarding local governmental codes or policies and practices that may result in the creation or perpetuation of one or more impediments to fair housing choice. The survey has a particular focus on land use and zoning regulations, practices and procedures that can act as barriers to the situating, development, or use of housing for individuals with disabilities. In identifying impediments to fair housing choice, the survey looks to distinguish between regulatory impediments based on specific code provisions and practice impediments, which arise from practices or implementing policies used by the jurisdiction. • The most common public sector impediments are: • The zoning regulations do not define "disability'. • The zoning regulations do not define "supportive" and "transitional housing" as required by Government Code Section 65583(a)(5). • Some cities have not adopted a reasonable accommodation procedure. • The zoning regulations do not discuss housing for "special needs" populations. • The zoning regulations do not discuss fair housing. The population to be served by supportive and transitional housing is people with different kinds of disabilities. Actions by the entitlement cities and Urban County to provide zoning regulations will eliminate a potential impediment to the development of such housing. City Identified Public Sector Impediments Based on an evaluation of City Zoning and Planning Codes as well as policies and practices that may pose an impediment to Fair Housing Choice, the City of Newport Beach did not identify any public sector impediments. Actions to be Taken by the City Based on an evaluation of City Zoning and Planning Codes as well as policies and practices that may pose an impediment to Fair Housing Choice, the City of Newport PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 14 24 City of Newport Beach Beach did not identify any public sector impediments. Therefore, there are no actions to be taken at this time by the City with respect to public sector impediments. Actions To Affirmatively Further Fair Housing Choice Through the Location of Affordable Housing During the 2010 -2015 period, the FHCOC committed to take the following actions: ■ As needed, provide technical assistance to participating jurisdictions on how the location of affordable housing contributes to AFFH. • Aggregate - for each census tract - the number of voucher holders assisted by all four housing authorities. FHCOC committed to accomplish this in calendar year 2011, but has not provided the City with its findings to date. • Conduct an analysis of the location of affordable housing in census tracts with a low concentration of minority and low income populations for purposes of determining whether they offer sufficient affordable housing opportunities. FHCOC committed to accomplish this in calendar year 2011 or as soon as Census 2010 and American Community Survey data are available, but has not provided the City with its findings to date. • Extend the analysis to include census tracts with minority populations in the range of 60 to 80 %. FHCOC committed to accomplish this in calendar year 2011 or as soon as Census 2010 and American Community Survey data are available, but has not provided the City with its findings to date. • Suggest policies that the Housing Authorities and /or entitlement cities and the Urban County Program can implement to promote affordable housing opportunities outside of census tracts with high percentages of poverty and minority populations. FHCOC committed to review the housing authority annual plans and to provide input to the entitlement cities and Urban County Program as needed. 4. Describe Other Actions in Strategic Plan or Action Plan taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs. According to the Consolidated Plan, one of the most underserved needs in the City is affordable housing for families of extremely low, very low and low income. The City has identified the lack of developable sites, high land costs and limited funding as obstacles to affordable housing. Other obstacles in non - housing community development include NIMBY -ism (Not in My Backyard), lack of organizational capacity, and lack of available funding. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 15 25 City of Newport Beach The City has previously adopted policies to overcome these obstacles and to encourage affordable housing production by providing density bonuses and fee waivers. In addition, the City encourages affordable housing production by providing density bonuses to interested developers and through the inclusionary zoning requirements. The City will work closely with affordable housing developers to expedite the permitting process in order to cut costs. In regard to non - housing obstacles, the City will facilitate community involvement to increase understanding of community needs and the possible solutions to meet those needs. The City will maintain close partnerships with service providers and other community development professionals to identify and correct issues such as lack of capacity and resources. Toward the end of the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan cycle, additional affordable units will be created. The City continues to monitor and enforce affordability covenants on affordable housing projects throughout the City. This includes not only housing units developed with federal funds, but also all units with an affordability covenant in place. 5. Leveraging Resources a. Identify progress in obtaining "other" public and private resources to address needs. b. How Federal resources from HUD leveraged other public and private resources. c. How matching requirements were satisfied. The City used its CDBG allocations as collateral to secure a $2.4 million Section 108 loan in the 2001 -2002 program year. These additional funds were used to complete a portion of the Balboa Village Improvement Project. The 108 loan is being repaid over a twenty year - period. Ten payments remain on a principal balance. The Orange County Partnership's Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Grant application resulted in an award of $13.7 Million for 44 ongoing programs. The Orange County Housing and Community also received $1,506,678 million of CDBG and HOME Investment Partnership funds for affordable housing in Orange County during the program year 2011 -2012. There are no matching requirements for CDBG. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 16 20 City of Newport Beach MANAGING THE PROCESS 1. Describe actions taken during the last year to ensure compliance with program and comprehensive planning requirements. The City has made all efforts to ensure compliance with the 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan and the 2011 -2012 Action Plan. The City has utilized data from the HUD Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) for preparation of the Consolidated Plan and Action Plans. The City has included all necessary HUD reports as part of its CAPER submittal and has utilized the CPMP Tool to monitor the progress of the Strategic Plan (also see Appendix "A "). In addition, the City continues to consult with HUD for technical assistance of projects when necessary. 2011 -2012 Program Year Goals vs. Accomplishments Activity Accomplishment 2011 -2012 2011 -2012 Units Goals Achievements Housing: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Housing Units 400 497 Rent - Restricted Units Housing: Housing Units 7 01 *Rehabilitation - Utility Connection Program Fair Housing Activities: Fair Housing & Counseling Services People Served 200 161 Senior Services: People Served 100 145 Home Delivered Meals Program Special Needs/Non- Homeless: Battered and Abused Spousal Program People Served 7 14 Special Needs/Non- Homeless: People Served 8 7 Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program Homeless and HIV/AIDS: Transitional Housing Program People Served 100 147 Public Services: People Served 100 404 Health Services Public Facilities: Section 108 Loan Repayment - Balboa Village Public Facilities 1 1 Upgrade Public Facilities with ADA Improv.: Public Facilities 1 02 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements -ADA General Program Administration N/A N/A N/A 'The Utility Connection Program activity was cancelled as a result of the City's Substantial Amendment to the Action Plan 2010 -2011. The amendment re- allocated these funds to the new 2012 -2013 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Improvements activity. 2This activity was cancelled as a result of the City's Substantial Amendment to the Action Plan 2011 -2012. The amendment re- allocated these funds to the new 2012 -2013 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Improvements activity. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 17 27 City of Newport Beach CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 1. Provide a summary of citizen comments. The City encourages input and feedback on its performance in meeting the objectives of the Strategic Plan from concerned residents and local advocacy groups. The City provides a public review and comment period for the draft version of the CAPER, and also holds a public hearing to solicit input. A draft copy of the CAPER covering PY 2011 -2012 was made available from September 10, 2012 to September 25, 2012. No public comments were received. The public hearing to solicit public input and comment on the CAPER and the City's performance during PY 2011 -2012 was held at the Newport Beach City Council Chambers at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. No public comments were made. Notice of both the public comment/review period and the public hearing was published on September 8, 2012 in the Daily Pilot, a newspaper of local circulation. A copy of the Notice appears in Appendix "C ". 2. In addition, the performance report provided to citizens must identify the Federal funds made available for furthering the objectives of the Consolidated Plan. For each formula grant program, the grantee shall identify the total amount of funds available (including estimated program income), the total amount of funds committed during the reporting period, the total amount expended during the reporting period, and the geographic distribution and location of expenditures. Jurisdictions are encouraged to include maps in describing the geographic distribution and location of investment (including areas of minority concentration). The geographic distribution and expenditure requirement may also be satisfied by specifying the census tracts where expenditures were concentrated. 2011 -2012 Program Year Sources of Funds Source Amount 2011 -2012 CDBG Entitlement $323,777 Unallocated CDBG Funds (Prior Year) $1,890 CDBG Program Income $0 Prior Year CDBG Funds $65,922 All other forms of CDBG $0 TOTAL $391,589 PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 18 22 City of Newport Beach 2011 -2012 Program Year Fund Sources and Uses Activities Budget Expenditures Program Administration City of Newport Beach - Program Administration $ 52,755 $ 52,164 Fair Housing Services $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Subtotal Administration: $ 64,755 $ 64,164 Public Services 65% Age Well Senior Services- Home Delivered Meals Program $ 18,492 $ 18,492 Families Forward - Transitional Housing Program $ 8,406 $ 8,406 Human Options - Community Resource Center $ 3,867 $ 3,769 Serving People in Need - Substance Abuse Rehab Program $ 9,246 $ 9,246 Share Our Selves - SOS Free Medical and Dental Clinics $ 8,555 $ 8,555 Subtotal Public Services: $ 48,566 $ 48,468 Capital Improvements *City of Newport Beach - Utility Assessment District Grant Program $ 65,922' $ 0 City of Newport Beach -108 Loan Repayment $ 201,654 $ 201,653 *City of Newport Beach - Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements $ 8,802' $ 0 Subtotal Capital Improvements: $ 276,378 $ 201,653 TOTALS $ 389,699 $314,285 'These activities were cancelled as a result of the Substantial Amendment to the Action Plan FY 2010 -2011 and 2011 -2012. The funds of both activities will be allocated to the new 2012 -2013 Sidewalk, Curb, and Gutter Improvements Activity. Summary of Uses Activities Budget % of Budget Expenditures Program Administration $ 64,755 20% $ 64,164 Public Services $ 48,566 15% $ 48,468 *Capital Improvements $ 276,378* 65% $ 201,653 TOTALS $389,699 100% $ 314,285 *Utility Assessment District Grant Program activity funds were carried over to PY 2011 -2012 ($65,922). INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE 1. Describe actions taken during the last year to overcome gaps in institutional structures and enhance coordination. The City of Newport Beach continued to work with Orange County, the Orange County Housing Authority and various non - profit organizations to provide services to PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 19 29 City of Newport Beach the City's residents. Through the cooperative efforts of these organizations, a variety of housing and community development programs were implemented throughout the community. The City maintained close contact with social service organizations funded by the City as well as other local service providers to coordinate efforts and to avoid the duplication of services. MONITORING 1. Describe how and the frequency with which you monitored your activities. Each program year, the City develops a custom monitoring schedule including each contractor / subrecipient. The monitoring plan includes the following tools: Annual Subrecipient Conference / Onsite Technical Assistance Visit • Desk monitoring • Performance reports through our Grants Management System (GMS) • Onsite program and financial reviews An appropriate combination of these four items provides a clear and timely picture of each contractor /subrecipient's progress and level of compliance with program regulations. Annual Subrecipient Workshop / Onsite Technical Assistance Visits An annual workshop is provided for new subrecipients. At this workshop, City staff review the program reporting requirements and documentation /record keeping standards to foster compliance. For high risk agencies, an onsite technical assistance meeting may also be necessary to assess the subrecipient's capacity related to recordkeeping, service delivery, and /or accounting systems. These visits are conducted in August and February of each year. Desk Monitoring Annually, the City reviews copies of case files to ensure complete and accurate documentation regarding the following items: • Client eligibility (if applicable) • Property eligibility (if applicable) ■ Appropriate funding levels for the activity Compliance with all program requirements (i.e. environmental review) Performance Reports The City requires that performance reports from all subrecipients be submitted through the GMS in order to facilitate the examination of a project's progress throughout the program year. For capital projects and public service grants, reports are required on a quarterly basis. The performance reports alert staff to any PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 20 30 City of Newport Beach problems in subrecipient performance, need for technical assistance, and ensure data collection requirements are met. Annual Onsite Program and Financial Reviews The Department provides annual on -site reviews of all high -risk subrecipients in order to conduct a complete programmatic and financial monitoring. The Department will conduct on -site monitoring of low and moderate -risk subrecipients on a bi- annual basis. Monitoring Staff The City has the following monitoring duties: Oversee the planning and budgeting process to ensure that projects and programs are consistent with the Consolidated Plan's identified high- and in some cases medium - priority strategic objectives and grant requirements. Staff also provides technical guidance regarding Affirmative Marketing and Fair Housing practices. • Provide technical guidance with each subrecipient partner regarding: program structure, income requirements, and document compliance. Staff reviews the City's monthly expenditure reports. At a minimum, staff performs quarterly draw downs in HUD's Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS) against the appropriate grant. For IDIS, Staff gathers quarterly program statistical reports from the subrecipient partners and updates all necessary fields from setup to completion of each project and activity. Regular updating and draws ensures the City meets the CDBG timeliness deadline. As needed, staff performs environmental reviews and Davis -Bacon monitoring. • Review the invoices from each subrecipient and ensure timeliness with expenditures. • Provide technical guidance regarding all housing construction, demolition, and rehabilitation projects ensuring the correct number of units, timeliness in build -out, and approval of payments. For new construction, ensure compliance with all applicable local codes, ordinances, and zoning ordinances at the time of project completion. Provide monitoring orientation with all subrecipient partners and establish monitoring visits. The monitoring orientation includes the timing for monitoring visits. Subrecipient partners without problems or significant findings receive annual or semi - annual monitoring visits, while new subrecipients and subrecipients with significant problems or complex projects receive quarterly visits. 2. Describe the results of your monitoring including any improvements. The Department achieved monitoring success through: PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 21 31 City of Newport Beach • Pre -award screening, risk assessment, and orientation; • Strong written agreements; • Performance standards and program objectives; and • Defined monitoring of each subrecipient partner on quarterly, semi - annual, and annual basis. The City will continually refine its monitoring procedures to ensure that each monitoring has a meaningfully positive impact on the overall program and that projects have measurable outcomes. 3. Self Evaluation a. Describe the effect programs have in solving neighborhood and community problems. b. Describe progress in meeting priority needs and specific objectives and help make community's vision of the future a reality. c. Describe how you provided decent housing and a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunity principally for low and moderate - income persons. d. Indicate any activities falling behind schedule. e. Describe how activities and strategies made an impact on identified needs. f. Identify indicators that would best describe the results. g. Identify barriers that had a negative impact on fulfilling the strategies and overall vision. h. Identify whether major goals are on target and discuss reasons for those that are not on target. i. Identify any adjustments or improvements to strategies and activities that might meet your needs more effectively. Program Year 2011 -2012 was the eighteenth year that Newport Beach administered its own CDBG program since becoming a CDBG Entitlement Jurisdiction in 1994. The City completed all the planning requirements of the CDBG program and began program implementation on July 1, 2011. To facilitate the administration of the CDBG program, the City has retained a consultant to provide technical support and to oversee the City of Newport Beach CDBG activities and expenditures. CDBG grants were awarded to five (5) social service and fair housing agencies to address the supportive service needs of Newport Beach residents. Overall, the City has been successful in implementing the proposed projects during the seventeenth year of its CDBG program and first under the 2010 -2014 Five -Year Consolidated Plan. The City utilizes its CDBG funds to address homeless issues, special needs and community development objectives. Housing objectives are primarily met with the use of local in -lieu fee proceeds. As a result, for this Report, the majority of the achievements in this report address the strategic plan objectives in which CDBG PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 22 S2 City of Newport Beach funds are utilized (homeless, special needs and community development objectives). The City has met the majority of the annual goals for the aforementioned objectives. The City met the following objectives for the program year: 2011 -2012 Program Year Goals vs. Accomplishments Activity Accomplishment 2011 -2012 2011.2012 Units Goals Achievements Housing: Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher and Housing Units 400 497 Rent - Restricted Units Housing: Rehabilitation - Utility Connection Program Housing Units 7 0 Fair Housing Activities: Fair Housing & Counseling Services People Served 200 161 Senior Services: People Served 100 145 Home Delivered Meals Program Special NeedslNon- Homeless: Battered and Abused Spousal Program People Served 7 14 Special Needs/Non- Homeless: Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program People Served 8 7 Homeless and HIV /AIDS: Transitional Housing Program People Served 100 147 Public Services: People Served 100 404 Health Services Public Facilities: Public Facilities 1 1 Section 108 Loan Repayment - Balboa Village Upgrade Public Facilities with ADA Improv.: Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements -ADA Public Facilities 1 0 General Program Administration NIA NIA NIA The table in the Executive Summary and Managing the Process clearly demonstrate that the City met a majority of the quantifiable goals it proposed in the Five -Year Consolidated Plan and the One -Year Action Plan, and exceeded most goals. However, many of the City's programs have indirect benefits that are difficult to measure. For example, the full benefits of the Balboa Village Public Facility Improvements will not be realized until private businesses capitalize on the public investment, expand their operations and hire new staff. In establishing five -year priorities, the City of Newport Beach has taken two (2) concerns into consideration: 1) those categories of lower- and moderate - income households most in need of housing and community development assistance; and 2) which activities will best meet the needs of those identified households. The homeless, persons with special needs, and those at risk of homelessness are most in need of housing and community assistance. The City developed the following strategies to address the needs of such persons: PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 23 33 City of Newport Beach • Provide supportive services and housing for the homeless and near homeless through support of social agencies and regional programs; • Provide supportive services for special needs populations; • Provide for the access needs of the physically challenged; and • Provide needed community services to those of lower- and moderate - income. The activities funded in program year 2011 -2012 not only addressed the above strategies, but improved the quality of life for those identified as the most in need of housing and community development assistance. To illustrate, the City awarded the Fair Housing Foundation CDBG funds to help low and moderate - income and persons with special needs to remain in their homes. The Fair Housing Foundation assisted 161 persons with various fair housing services. The most noted example of how activities and strategies made an impact on identified needs during the 2011 -2012 program year is Age Well Senior Services Mobile Meals Program. This organization provides home - delivered nutritious meals to homebound, disabled, low and moderate - income seniors and disabled persons in southern Orange County, including Newport Beach. Age Well Senior Services delivered nutritional meals to 145 seniors and disabled persons in the City during the program year. In an effort to increase supportive services to elderly residents and disabled persons, Age Well Senior Services has worked with HOAG Hospital to ensure that discharged low- income seniors and disabled persons can receive home delivered nutritionally appropriate meals. Such coordination has improved the access of seniors and disabled persons to services. Serving People In Need (SPIN) assisted 7 low- and moderate - income residents suffering from substance abuse. Families Forward provided emergency /transitional shelter to 147 people providing meals, shelter, clothing, case management and referral services to homeless families. Human Options provided services to 14 clients who are homeless because of domestic violence. This agency provides to battered women with children shelter, food, clothing, and counseling and legal advocacy. Share Our Selves (SOS) served 404 low- and moderate - income residents providing primary/urgent care on a daily walk -in basis, chronic care, and specialty care by appointment to uninsured Orange County residents and patients in the County MSI Program. This activity provided a service to persons in need of medical and dental care. The Substantial Amendment to the Annual Action Plan 2010 -2011 cancelled the Utility Assessment District Grant Program activity. Eight (8) applications were received in FY 2010 -2011. The status and disposition of those applicants includes: PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 2/4' ST City of Newport Beach Four (4) were determined eligible and provided with information on how to solicit bids and to contract for the work in conformance with the Program Guidelines. None of those four (4) applicants provided the documentation necessary to actually provide grant assistance. Two (2) were determined ineligible based on household income exceeding the 50% of AMI threshold. Two (2) applications were determined to be incomplete. Neither applicant provided the necessary documentation to complete their applications. Subsequent to cancellation, the entire $65,922 budget was re- allocated to the new 2012 -2013 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements activity. The City continues to look for ways to provide affordable housing to low- and moderate - income households by using resources such as City's in -lieu fee associated with market -rate development, as well as local regulations such as density bonuses, waiver of processing and permitting fees, and the relaxation of development standards. The City continues to look for potential developers of affordable housing for seniors and families to use these available funds. In program year 2011 -2012, the City used in -lieu fee proceeds for plumbing repairs needed to preserve affordable housing units. The City continues to preserve affordable housing by monitoring existing affordable housing units and enforcing affordability covenants. Additionally, the City is working with developers to create over 100 new affordable housing units (see Affordable Housing Table in Section VII). The current projects expected to lead to the creation of new affordable housing units include: • Uptown Newport: This project will provide 102 very low- income, 185 low - income or 369 moderate - income units on or off -site. The project is currently under review and the entitlement process is expected to be completed during FY 2012 -2013. 50% of the affordable units are expected to be completed by 2018. Completion of the balance of the affordable units is anticipated between 2021 and 2027. • Santa Barbara Condos: This project will develop 79 ownership units. The project applicant had the option of converting 12 market -rate apartments into affordable units; however, the applicant has elected to pay in -lieu housing fees of $1,622,976. Payment of this fee is expected in FY 2012 -2013 and a specific use for these additional in -lieu funds has not been identified, but could lead to the acquisition of affordability covenants on existing rental units. • North Newport Center Planned Community: This project consists of 524 new residential units. In order to construct this project, the project applicant will convert existing market -rate apartment units at The Bays Apartments to create affordable housing. The applicant has the option of providing either 52 PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 25 35 City of Newport Beach very low- income, 79 low- income, or 105 moderate - income units for a 30 -year period. Project completion is expected in 2015. The Substantial Amendment to the Annual Action Plan 2011 -2012 cancelled the Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements activity. The activity was not implemented during 2011 -2012 due to insufficient CDBG funds. Subsequent to cancellation, the entire $8,802 budget is to be allocated to the new 2012 -2013 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements activity as part of the 2012 -2013 Action Plan. The City will continue to provide funding for ADA Sidewalk Improvements to public facilities throughout the City to ensure accessibility to residents with disabilities during the 2012 -2013 program year. The City set a goal of improving ADA access to two public facilities in the consolidated plan. The City cannot identify any barriers to strategies and activities at this time. As previously stated, the City is on target with major Strategic Plan goals and objectives. The City has no other adjustments to strategies and activities other than those previously mentioned in this report. LEAD -BASED PAINT 1. Describe actions taken during the last year to evaluate and reduce lead -based paint hazards. The City does not administer a general housing rehabilitation program that includes lead abatement and therefore has no method of directly reducing the threat of lead paint in the community. The City supports the efforts of the Orange County Department of Health Services, an organization that educates residents on the health hazards of lead -based paint through the dissemination of brochures to residents. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 26 so II. HOUSING 37 City of Newport Beach Housing Needs 1. Describe Actions taken during the last year to foster and maintain affordable housing. The City fosters and maintains affordable housing with local resources such as the in -lieu fee associated with market -rate development and local regulations such as density bonuses, waiver of processing and permitting fees, and the relaxation of development standards. The City continues to look for potential developers of affordable housing for seniors and families to use these available funds. In program year 2011 -2012, the City used in -lieu fee proceeds for plumbing repairs needed to preserve affordable housing. In addition, City staff continued to monitor the number of affordable housing units and enforce the affordability covenants of units in Newport Beach. The table below provides a list of units that currently have affordability covenants and are located within the City of Newport Beach. The City is responsible for monitoring 377 of the 538 affordable units. City of Newport Beach - Affordable Housing Units Project Name Project Address Termination No. Units Unit Breakdown Date Newport Sea Crest 843 15" Street 11/1/16 65 45 -2 Bedroom Apts. 20 -1 Bedroom Newport Seaside Apts. 1544 Placentia Avenue 8/1/19 P5 23 -2 bedroom 2 -3 bedroom Newport Seashore 849 West 15'" Street 7/1/18 15 2 bedrooms Apts. Newport Harbor 1 1538 Placentia Avenue 5/7/20 26 21 -2 bedroom 5 -3 bedroom Pacific Heights 881 -887 W 15" Street 9/12/18 7 2 bedrooms -Apartments Newport Harbor II 1530 Placentia Ave 7/16/23 14 10 -2 Bedroom 4 -SRO Style Kirkwood (Villa del 401 Seaward Road 4/19/25 2 2 bedrooms Este Proprietorship Villa Sienna 2102 East 15 Street 07/02122 3 2 bedrooms Condominiums Pro rietorshi 851 Domingo Drive 851 Domingo Drive (County Perm. 28 Not monitored by Apts. Project City Seaview Lutheran 2900 Pacific View Dr.(Federal 03/26/21 100 1 bedroom Plaza Project) Newport North 2 Milano Drive (County Perm. 133 Not monitored by Project City Lower Bayview 1121 Back Bay Drive Perm. 120 96 -1 bedroom Housing 24 -2 bedroom TOTAL 538 TOTAL RENTAL UNITS MONITORED BY THE CITY: 377 PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 27 38 City of Newport Beach Specific Housing Objectives 1. Evaluate progress in meeting specific objective of providing affordable housing, including the number of extremely low- income, low- income, and moderate - income renter and owner households comparing actual accomplishments with proposed goals during the reporting period. The City divided its efforts to foster and maintain affordable housing into three specific objectives that are described more fully below. The three objectives are: • Add and maintain 34 affordable housing units • Maintain current level of Section 8 Vouchers • Ensure universal access to fair housing Maintain current level of Section 8 Vouchers The Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) administers the Section 8 rental certificate and rental voucher program for the City. The Section 8 rental program provides rental assistance to very low- income families. In PY 2011 -2012, 120 households received Section 8 rental assistance. Ensure universal access to fair housing The Fair Housing Foundation was allocated $12,000 to provide landlord tenant mediation, eviction prevention and fair housing counseling. Fair Housing Foundation made contacts with individuals in Newport Beach regarding fair housing issues, 161 persons received services. A comprehensive education and outreach program was implemented to ensure that residents, potential residents, landlords, real estate brokers and agents all have access to critical information needed to ensure fair housing choice throughout Newport Beach. HOUSING 5 -Year Strategy: Expand the supply of affordable rental and homeownership housing opportunities Outcome /Objective Planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements Acquisition of Affordability Covenants on Rental Properties Housing Units 0 0 (North Newport Center & Santa Affordability /Decent Barbara Condominiums) Affordable Housing Construction of Multi- Family Affordable Housing Units 0 0 Housing Units (Uptown Newport) PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 28 39 City of Newport Beach HOUSING 5 -Year Strategy: Preserve and improve the existing housing stock and ensure equal access Outcome /Objective planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Housing Units 400 497 and Rent - Restricted Units Housing Rehabilitation Programs Housing Units 7 0 Accessibility/ Decent Affordable Housing Utility Connection Programs Fair Housing Program People 200 161 2. Evaluate progress in providing affordable housing that meets the Section 215 definition of affordable housing for rental and owner households comparing actual accomplishments with proposed goals during the reporting period. The City's goal is to preserve and increase housing affordability. The City expects to add at least 102 affordable housing units through the Uptown Newport project (formerly referred to as Airport Area Conexant in the Consolidated Plan with a goal of 68 units). Completion of half of these units is expected by 2018. The City established a Consolidated Plan goal of acquiring at least 34 affordable housing covenants by June 30, 2015. Currently, the City plans to acquire these covenants through the conversion of existing market rate apartments at The Bays Apartments into affordable units as a condition of the approval of the Newport North Center Planned Community. The completion of the project and the provision of the affordable units is not anticipated until 2015. The in -lieu fee paid as part of the Santa Barbara Condominiums project Affordable Housing Implementation Plan may also be used to create additional affordable units during the Consolidated Plan cycle. 3. Describe efforts to address "worst- case" housing needs and housing needs of persons with disabilities. In addition to the activities mentioned in questions number 1 and 2 of the Specific Housing Objectives Section above, the City addressed the needs of "worst- case" households through the funding of non - profit public service agencies. "Worst- case" households are defined as households that do not receive on -going rental assistance and pay more than one -half of their income for rent or live in severely inadequate housing. These households face the greatest risk of becoming homeless. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 29 40 City of Newport Beach Public Housing Strategy 1. Describe actions taken during the last year to improve public housing and resident initiatives. The City supported the Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) efforts to maximize the use of Section 8 funds and other resources within Newport Beach. There are currently thirty -one (31) OCHA participating jurisdictions, including Newport Beach. Representatives from the participating jurisdictions meet at a minimum quarterly, often times monthly, to form the Cities Advisory Committee to assist the Orange County Board of Supervisors and the OCHA staff in accomplishing public housing goals. Newport Beach attends the meetings regularly and provides input on the OCHA Five -Year Strategic Plan, Annual Plan and Administrative Plans. Although there are currently no public housing units in Newport Beach, the City continued to participate on the Advisory Committee and support OCHA's efforts (1) in expanding affordable housing opportunities for Section 8 Voucher recipients, and (2) ensuring OCHA goals are consistent with the City's Consolidated Plan and Housing Element. Barriers to Affordable Housing 1. Describe actions taken during the last year to eliminate barriers to affordable housing. The City implemented the following actions to reduce barriers to affordable housing: • Continued to monitor all regulations, ordinances, departmental processing procedures, and residential development fees to ensure these requirements do not excessively constrain affordable residential development. • Continued to enforce the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance that requires market -rate developers to allocate between 10 and 20 percent of new units for low and moderate - income households. Developers can also opt for the in- lieu fee. The City currently has $2,128,289 million of in -lieu fees. In -lieu fees are reserved for the development or preservation of affordable housing. ■ Continued to offer density bonus incentives for the development of affordable housing pursuant to state density bonus requirements and Newport Beach Housing Element. ■ Offered fee waivers to developers of affordable housing. HOME /American Dream Down Payment Initiative (ADDI) The City of Newport Beach does not receive HOME funds. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 30 42 III. HOMELESS NEEDS 42 City of Newport Beach Homeless Needs 1. Identify actions taken to address needs of homeless persons. The Strategic Plan addresses the needs of persons who are homeless and are at risk of homelessness. 1. Preserve the supply of emergency and transitional units available 2. Assist homeless and those at risk of homelessness 3. Assist homeless battered women and children Preserve the supply of emergency and transitional units available Three (3) of the five (5) public service agencies receiving CDBG funds from the City provided emergency or transitional housing for homeless persons in Orange County. These funded programs were: • Human Options —Emergency Shelter for Battered Women; • Families Forward - Transitional Housing Programs; and • Serving People in Need (SPIN) - Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program. Assist homeless and those at risk of homelessness The City of Newport Beach provided financial assistance to Serving People In Need (SPIN), Families Forward, and Age Well Senior Services to provide access to recovery programs to homeless and low income individuals who otherwise could not afford such services. The program includes one month of room and board, counseling, and supplemental services focused on employment, medical assistance, and legal assistance. Home delivery meals twice daily to homebound persons to age, illness or disability. Please also see the services provided by the Fair Housing Council of Orange County in the General Narrative, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. Assist homeless battered women and children The City of Newport Beach provided financial assistance to Human Options under the Domestic Violence Intervention /Prevention Program to provide temporary emergency shelter to battered and abused women and their children. This program also receives referrals through the Courthouse Family violence Outreach Center, Interval House Project, and Transitional Housing Project. 2. Identify actions to help homeless persons make the transition to permanent housing and independent living. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 31 -43 City of Newport Beach In order to address homelessness in an effective, comprehensive manner, HUD asks cities to form Continuums of Care. A Continuum of care refers to an overall plan to coordinate the efforts of all involved parties to meet the needs of homeless persons and persons at risk of homelessness. The components of a continuum include homeless prevention, emergency shelter, transitional shelter, permanent supportive housing, and supportive services. The overall objective is to move homeless persons and families outside the service delivery system into emergency housing, then to transitional housing, and finally to self- sufficiency or permanent supportive housing. The City of Newport Beach actively participates in the Orange County Continuum of Care, a collaboration of other city jurisdictions, non - profit organizations, and local groups and charities. The City is involved with the Steering Committee and has assisted in the development of strategies to meet homeless needs. The City also funded several non - profits involved at different stages of the Continuum: Prevention: Emergency Shelter: Transitional Housing Permanent Supportive Housing Supportive Services: HOMELESS AND HIV/AIDS Fair Housing Foundation and Human Options Human Options & Families Forward Serving People In Need (SPIN), Human Options; and Families Forward None Families Forward, Human Options, and SPIN 5 -Year Strategy: Support a continuum of services in support of the City's and County's effort to end homeless and improve the quality of life for persons living with HIVIAIDS Outcome /Objective planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements Homeless Prevention Programs Transitional Housing Emergency Shelter to Victims of Accessibility / Suitable Domestic Violence Living Environments People 100 147 Transitional Housing and Support Services for Victims of Domestic Violence Case Management and Other Services PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 32 44 City of Newport Beach 3. Identify new Federal resources obtained from Homeless SuperNOFA. The City of Newport Beach supports the County of Orange Housing and Community Services Department and the Orange County Partnership in their efforts to secure funds to end homelessness. In 2011 (most recent available), OC partnership secured $13.7 million for the region through the Competitive Homeless SuperNOFA. While none of the funded projects are located in the City of Newport Beach, the region as a whole will benefit from the following new programs that were awarded funding in the Homeless SuperNOFA: • American Family Housing: $419,662 for 36 beds, supportive services, and operations to provide transitional housing to homeless • Orange County Housing Authority: $3,233,916 for 174 Housing Certificates for tenant -based rental assistance for disabled homeless • Orange County Housing Authority: $571,176 for 30 Housing Certificates for tenant -based rental assistance for disabled homeless • Orange County Housing Authority: $524,424 for 30 Housing Certificates for tenant -based rental assistance for disabled homeless • Mercy House: $118,000 for 27 beds, supportive services, operations and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Anaheim Supportive Housing Senior Adults: $139,020 for 12 beds, supportive services, operations and HMIS to provide permanent housing to homeless • Mercy House: $90,240 for 21 beds, supportive services and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Collette's Children's Home: $157,278 for 24 beds, supportive services, operations, leasing and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Human Options: $111,122 for 50 beds, supportive services and operations to provide transitional housing to homeless • John Henry Foundation: $146,369 for 6 units, supportive services and operations to provide permanent housing to homeless • OC Partnership: $57,043 for HMIS implementation • OC Partnership: $433,263 for HMIS to provide support services to providers who serve homeless subpopulations • Collette's Children's Home: $127,309 for 24 beds, supportive services, operations, leasing, and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 33 45 City of Newport Beach • South County Outreach: $50,191 for 18 beds, supportive services and operations to provide transitional housing to homeless • South County Outreach: $175,959 for 50 beds, supportive services and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • So. Cal. Alcohol & Drug: $382,345 for 20 beds, supportive services, operations, leasing and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless ■ Thomas House: $87,833 for supportive services, operations and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Human Options: $30,793 for supportive services to homeless • YWCA Central OC: $93,880 for 11 beds, supportive services, operations and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Orange Coast Interfaith Shelter: $283,129 for 24 beds, supportive services, operations, leasing and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Veterans First: $159,700 for 24 beds, supportive services, operations and leasing to provide transitional housing to homeless • Families Forward: $73,819 for 35 beds, supportive services and operations to provide transitional housing to homeless • Veterans First: $254,804 for 28 beds, supportive services, operations, leasing and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Families Forward: $132,941 for 36 beds, supportive services and operations to provide transitional housing to homeless • Interval House: $73,268 for case management and supportive services to victims of domestic violence ■ Eli Home: $524,275 for 28 beds, supportive services, operations, leasing and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless • Fullerton Interfaith Emergency Shelter: $252,000 for low cost child care services to homeless families • Toby's House: $119,545 for supportive services for homeless individuals • Orange County Housing Authority: $1,050,864 for 58 Housing Certificates for tenant -based rental assistance for disabled homeless PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 34 40 City of Newport Beach ■ Orange County Housing Authority: $727,608 for 40 Housing Certificates for tenant -based rental assistance for disabled homeless • Orange County Housing Authority: $426,648 for 29 Housing Certificates for project -based rental assistance for disabled homeless • Friendship Shelter: $68,136 to provide supportive services to the chronic homeless • Veteran's First: $211,664 for 22 permanent housing beds to serve disabled and chronic homeless veterans • WISE Place: $100,593 for 5 beds, supportive services, and operations to provide transitional housing to homeless • Colette's Children's Home: $163,898 for 24 beds, supportive services, operations, and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless (Anaheim) • Colette's Children's Home: $137,882 for 24 beds, supportive services, operations, and HMIS to provide transitional housing to homeless (Placentia) Specific Homeless Prevention Elements 1. Identify actions taken to prevent homelessness. Fair Housing Foundation — Fair Housing The City of Newport Beach provided financial assistance to continue to provide fair housing and landlord /tenant mediation to ensure universal access to fair housing to low and moderate income residents. Serving People in Need (SPIN) — Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program This program provided access to recovery programs to homeless and low income individuals who otherwise could not afford such services. The program includes one month of room and board, counseling, and supplemental services focused on employment, medical assistance, and legal assistance. Human Options — Emergency Shelter for Battered Women The City of Newport Beach provided financial assistance to provide for emergency shelter, food, clothing, counseling, and legal advocacy to battered women and their children to ensure availability /accessibility of suitable living environment. Families Forward — Emergency Shelter and Transitional Housing The City of Newport Beach provided financial assistance. This program transits struggling families from crisis to stability and self- sufficiency. Please also see the services provided by the Fair Housing Council of Orange PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 35 47 City of Newport Beach County in the General Narrative, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG) The City of Newport Beach does not receive ESG funds. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 36 42 IV. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �-9 City of Newport Beach Community Development 1. Assessment of Relationship of CDBG Funds to Goals and Objectives a. Assess use of CDBG funds in relation to the priorities, needs, goals, and specific objectives in the Consolidated Plan, particularly the highest priority activities. b. Evaluate progress made toward meeting goals for providing affordable housing using CDBG funds, including the number and types of households served. c. Indicate the extent to which CDBG funds were used for activities that benefited extremely low- income, low- income, and moderate - income persons. The primary objective of CDBG Program is the development of viable urban communities, including decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate - income. Accordingly, the City of Newport Beach developed a Consolidated Plan — One -Year Action Plan that gave priority to meeting community housing, public service, fair housing, public facilities and improvements, ADA Accessibility programs. Through public meetings, and public hearings, the City provided residents and service providers an opportunity to help identify the City's major needs and thereby assist in the establishment of long and short term community development objectives. During the 2011 -2012 fiscal year, the City expended CDBG funds in a manner consistent with meeting the National Objectives of the program. 100% of the CDBG funds expended were for activities that benefit low to moderate income persons. The percentage includes Administration and Planning activities. The following is a list of CDBG public service programs that were implemented Fair Housing and Landlord /Tenant Mediation • Community Resource Center • Emergency/Transitional Housing Shelter Senior Services • Substance Abuse Rehab • Share Our Selves — Free Medical and Dental Services PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 37 50 City of Newport Beach PUBLIC SERVICES 5 -Year Strategy: Contribute to the well -being of individuals, families, and neighborhoods Outcome /Objective planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements Sustainabilityl General Public Service Programs Suitable Living Employment and Other Training Public Facilities 1 1 Environments Programs Accessibility/ Suitable Food and Essential Services People 100 404 Living Environments Family Services Health Services Youth Services The following is a list of CDBG housing and capital improvement projects that were implemented: • Section 108 Loan Repayment (Balboa Village Improvements) PUBLIC FACILITIES 5 -Year Strategy: Provide access to local public facilities that contribute to community and neighborhood development Outcome /Objective Planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements Sustainabilityl Section 108 Loan Repayment — Suitable Living Balboa Village Improvements Public Facilities 1 1 Environments 2. Changes in Program Objectives a. Identify the nature of and the reasons for any changes in program objectives and how the jurisdiction would change its program as a result of its experiences. The City did not make any changes to its program objectives. 3. Assessment of Efforts in Carrying Out Planned Actions a. Indicate how grantee pursued all resources indicated in the Consolidated Plan. b. Indicate how grantee provided certifications of consistency in a fair and impartial manner. c. Indicate how grantee did not hinder Consolidated Plan implementation by action or willful inaction. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 38 51 City of Newport Beach The City pursued all resources described in the PY 2011 -2012 One -Year Action Plan. The City provided certifications of consistency upon request to non - profits that were pursuing activities and projects that worked toward meeting the strategic objectives and national objectives found in the Consolidated Plan and the Orange County Housing Authority (OCHA) for its Annual Plan. The City did not hinder the implementation of any portion of the Consolidated Plan through any action or willful inaction. 4. For Funds Not Used for National Objectives a. Indicate how use of CDBG funds did not meet national objectives. b. Indicate how did not comply with overall benefit certification. According to the CDBG Grantee Performance Report generated by HUD's Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS), all CDBG funded activities, with the exception of administration, fair housing, and Section 108 repayments, satisfied the Low /Moderate Income National Objective. In the 2011 -2012 One -Year Action Plan, the City certified that at least 70 percent of all CDBG funded activities would primarily benefit low and moderate - income persons. According to the CDBG Financial Summary Report (PR26) generated by HUD's Integrated Disbursement and Information System (IDIS), 100% of the City's CDBG expenditures went toward satisfying the national objective of serving persons of low- and moderate - income. 5. Anti - displacement and Relocation - for activities that involve acquisition, rehabilitation or demolition of occupied real property a. Describe steps actually taken to minimize the amount of displacement resulting from the CDBG- assisted activities. b. Describe steps taken to identify households, businesses, farms or nonprofit organizations who occupied properties subject to the Uniform Relocation Act or Section 104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and whether or not they were displaced, and the nature of their needs and preferences. c. Describe steps taken to ensure the timely issuance of information notices to displaced households, businesses, farms, or nonprofit organizations. The City did not undertake any CDBG- funded activities that involved acquisition, displacement or relocation. 6. Low /Mod Job Activities - for economic development activities undertaken where jobs were made available but not taken by low- or moderate - income persons a. Describe actions taken by grantee and businesses to ensure first consideration was or will be given to low /mod persons. b. List by job title of all the permanent jobs created /retained and those that were made available to low /mod persons. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 39 152 City of Newport Beach c. If any of jobs claimed as being available to low /mod persons require special skill, work experience, or education, provide a description of steps being taken or that will be taken to provide such skills, experience, or education. The City did not undertake any CDBG- funded activities using the economic development or job creation national objective. 7. Low /Mod Limited Clientele Activities - for activities not falling within one of the categories of presumed limited clientele low and moderate income benefit a. Describe how the nature, location, or other information demonstrates the activities benefit a limited clientele at least 51% of whom are low- and moderate - income. The City funded several activities on the basis that at least 51 percent of the beneficiaries of the service would be of low- or moderate - income. All funded services that qualified as a Low /Mod Clientele activity either served homeless persons, who qualify as a presumed benefit sub - population, or verified the income of the beneficiary upon intake. At least 51 percent of beneficiaries for each CDBG- funded activity were documented or presumed to be of low- and moderate - income. 8. Program income received a. Detail the amount of program income reported that was returned to each individual revolving fund, e.g., housing rehabilitation, economic development, or other type of revolving fund. b. Detail the amount repaid on each float- funded activity. c. Detail all other loan repayments broken down by the categories of housing rehabilitation, economic development, or other. d. Detail the amount of income received from the sale of property by parcel. The City did not receive any CDBG program income in PY 2011 -2012. 9. Prior period adjustments - where reimbursement was made this reporting period for expenditures (made in previous reporting periods) that have been disallowed, provide the following information: a. The activity name and number as shown in IDIS; b. The program year(s) in which the expenditure(s) for the disallowed activity(ies) was reported; c. The amount returned to line -of- credit or program account; and d. Total amount to be reimbursed and the time period over which the reimbursement is to be made, if the reimbursement is made with multi -year payments. There were no prior period adjustments. 10. Loans and other receivables a. List the principal balance for each float- funded activity outstanding as of the end of the reporting period and the date(s) by which the funds are expected to be received. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 40 53 City of Newport Beach b. List the total number of other loans outstanding and the principal balance owed as of the end of the reporting period. c. List separately the total number of outstanding loans that are deferred or forgivable, the principal balance owed as of the end of the reporting period, and the terms of the deferral or forgiveness. d. Detail the total number and amount of loans made with CDBG funds that have gone into default and for which the balance was forgiven or written off during the reporting period. e. Provide a List of the parcels of property owned by the grantee or its subrecipients that have been acquired or improved using CDBG funds and that are available for sale as of the end of the reporting period. The City did not used CDBG funds for any float- funded activities. 11. Lump sum agreements a. Provide the name of the financial institution. b. Provide the date the funds were deposited. c. Provide the date the use of funds commenced. d. Provide the percentage of funds disbursed within 180 days of deposit in the institution. The City has no lump sum agreements. 12. Housing Rehabilitation — for each type of rehabilitation program for which projects /units were reported as completed during the program year a. Identify the type of program and number of projects /units completed for each program. b. Provide the total CDBG funds involved in the program. c. Detail other public and private funds involved in the project. The Substantial Amendment to the Annual Action Plan 2010 -2011 cancelled the Utility Assessment District Grant Program activity. The following is a brief narrative of the reason for cancellation: Eight (8) applications were received in FY 2010 -2011. However, the status and disposition of those applicants includes: Four (4) were determined eligible and provided with information on how to solicit bids and to contract for the work in conformance with the Program Guidelines. None of those four (4) applicants provided the documentation necessary to actually provide grant assistance. Two (2) were determined ineligible based on household income exceeding the 50% of AM[ threshold. Two (2) applications were determined to be incomplete. Neither applicant provided the necessary documentation to complete their applications. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 41 5-+ City of Newport Beach Subsequent to cancellation, the entire $65,922 budget is to be allocated to the new 2012 -2013 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements activity. 13. Neighborhood Revitalization Strategies — for grantees that have HUD - approved neighborhood revitalization strategies a. Describe progress against benchmarks for the program year. For grantees with Federally- designated EZs or ECs that received HUD approval for a neighborhood revitalization strategy, reports that are required as part of the EZ /EC process shall suffice for purposes of reporting progress. The City did not have a Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Area in PY 2011 -2012. Antipoverty Strategy 1. Describe actions taken during the last year to reduce the number of persons living below the poverty level. In Program Year 2011 -2012, the City provided CDBG funding to support several programs to maintain or increase the client's level of self- sufficiency and ability to escape poverty. The following programs directly assisted low- and moderate - income persons: 1. Senior Services Home - Delivered Meal Program 2. Human Option /Emergency Shelter for Battered Women 3. Families Forward /Emergency /Transitional Shelter 4. SPIN /Substance Abuse Rehabilitation PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 42 515 V. NON - HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS S0 City of Newport Beach Non - homeless Special Needs 1. Identify actions taken to address special needs of persons that are not homeless but require supportive housing, (including persons with HIV /AIDS and their families). The City funded a number of programs that address the special needs of persons that are not homeless but require supportive housing. These programs include: Age Well Senior Services Home - Delivered Meal Program Provided home delivered meals to seniors and disabled persons to reduce the possibility of institutionalization. Share Our Selves (SOS) — Free Medical and Dental Clinics Provided primary /urgent care on a daily walk -in basis, chronic care, and specialty care by appointment to uninsured Orange County residents and patients in the County MSI Program. This activity provided a service to persons in need of medical and dental care. SPIN Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program Administered a substance abuse recovery program to help persons regain their self - sufficiency. SENIOR SERVICES 5 -Year Strategy: Provide quality supportive services so elderly residents can live as independently as possible Outcome /Objective Planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements General Senior Programs Accessibility /Suitable Information and Referral Programs Living Environments People 100 145 Food and Essential Services Senior Transportation Services PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 43 57 City of Newport Beach SPECIAL NEEDS /NON- HOMELESS 5 -Year Strategy: Help persons with special needs live as independently as possible Outcome /Objective Planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Indicator Goals Achievements General Public Service Programs Battered and Abused Spousal Employment and Other Training Programs Programs Food & Essential Services Accessibility / Suitable Food and Essential Services Referral and Case Management People 7 14 Services Family Services Employment Training and placement Accessibility/ Suitable for persons with Disabilities Living Environments Upgrade Public Facilities with ADA Public Facilities 1 0 Improvements Substance Abuse Rehabilitation People 8 7 Services PUBLIC SERVICES 5 -Year Strategy: Contribute to the well -being of individuals, families, and neighborhoods Outcome /Objective Planned Activities Performance 2011 2011 Statements Indicator Goals Achievements General Public Service Programs Employment and Other Training Programs Accessibility / Suitable Food and Essential Services People 100 404 Living Environments Family Services Health Services Youth Services PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 44 158 City of Newport Beach Specific HOPWA Objectives The City of Newport Beach does not receive HOPWA funds. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 45 JT V1. OTHER NARRATIVE 00 City of Newport Beach 1. Include any CAPER information that was not covered by narratives in any other section. Minority Business Enterprise / Women -Owned Business Enterprise (MBE - WBE) As an Entitlement recipient of CDBG funds, the City of Newport Beach is required to provide business opportunities to minority and women -owned businesses in connection with the activities funded through the CDBG grant. This requirement is applicable to contracting and subcontracting opportunities funded in whole or in part with the federal housing and community development assistance provided to the City as a grantee. OMB Circular A -102 states that "It is national policy to award a fair share of contracts to small and minority business firms. Grantees shall take similar appropriate affirmative action to support of women's enterprises and are encouraged to procure goods and services from labor surplus areas." The Uniform Administrative Requirements of 24 CFR 85.36(e) require the City to "take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority firms, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible." Further, the City is required under §570.507(b) - Reports (24 CFR Part 570, CDBG Final Rule) to submit a report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on the City's MBE -WBE contracting and subcontracting activity generated through the expenditure of HUD funds. To comply with these requirements, the City includes MBE -WBE firms on its bid solicitation lists and encourages MBE -WBE firms to compete for CDBG- funded construction contracts. The City's Economic Development Coordinator ensures that the Contract - Subcontract Activity Report and the MBE -WBE Summary Report are submitted to the Los Angeles Field Office of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development as required. PY 2011 -2012 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report Page 46 01 APPENDICES 02 APPENDIX "A" SUMMARY OF ANNUAL OBJECTIVES 03 City of Newport Beach HOUSING 5 -Year Strategy: Preserve and improve the existing housing stock and ensure equal access Summary of Specific Annual Objectives CPMP Version 2.0 Specific Obj. Outcome /Objective # Specific Annual Objectives —7 Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Percent Number Completed DHA Availability/Accessibility Availability/Accessibility of Decent Housin Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher - Maintain existing level of Section 8 housing vouchers and rent - restricted units within the City at risk of conversion to market rate housing through refinancing. Section 8 Housing Units 2010 400 409 102% 2011 400 497 124% In -Lieu Fee 2012 400 0% 2013 400 0% 2014 400 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 2000 906 45% DH -1 (1) Housing Rehabilitation Programs & Utility Connection Programs - Prevent deterioration of property and provide financial assistance for repair, rehabilitation, and utility underground hook -ups to low- and moderate - income households. CDBG Housing Units 2010 7 0% 2011 5 0% 2012 3 0% 2013 3 ° 0 /° 2014 3 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 21 0 0% Fair Housing Program - Ensure universal access to fair housing choice within the City. CDBG People 2010 200 160 80% 2011 200 161 81% 2012 200 0% 2013 200 0% 2014 200 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 1000 321 32% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objetives 04 City of Newport Beach CPMP version 2.0 HOUSING 5 -Year Strategy: Expand the supply of affordable rental and homeownership housing opportunities Summary of Specific Annual Objectives Specific Obj. Outcome /Objective # Specific Annual Objectives Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Number Percent Completed DH -2 Affordability of Decent Housing Acquisition of Affordability Covenants on 2010 0 0% Rental Properties - Expand the supply of In -Lieu Fee 2011 0 0% housing units affordable to low- and moderate - income within the City. Housing Units 2012 0 0% 2013 22 0% 2014 12 0% DH MULTI -YEAR GOAL 34 0 0% -2 (1) Construction of Multi - Family Affordable 2010 0 0% Housing Units - Increase supply of housing Density Bonus 2011 0 0% units affordable to low- and moderate- income households through new construction. Housing Units Tax Credits 2012 0 0% 2013 0 o 0 /o 2014 68 0% State HOME MULTI -YEAR GOAL 68 0 0% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objectives Appendix "B" 015 City of Newport Beach CPMP Version 2.0 5 -Year Strategy: Provide quality supportive services so elderly residents can live as independently as possible Summary of Specific Annual Objectives Specific Obj. Outcome /Objective # 7 Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Percent Number Completed Specific Annual Objectives SL -1 Availability /Accessibility of Suitable Living Environment Improve supportive services for elderly 2010 100 144 144% residents through: CDBG 2011 100 145 145% SL -1 (1) - General Senior Programs - Information and Referral Services - Food and Essential Services People 2012 100 0% 2013 100 0% 2014 100 0% - Senior Transportation Services MULTI -YEAR GOAL 500 289 57.8% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objectives Appendix "B" 00 City of Newport Beach 6yllx0 ]MI0i•IAA9141kgW04aIIQAIAMV 5 -Year Strategy: Help persons with special needs live as independently as possible Summary of Specific Annual Objectives CPMP Version 2.0 Specific Obj. Outcome /Objective # Specific Annual Objectives Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Percent Number Completed SLA Availability/Accessibility Availability/Accessibility of Suitable Living Environment Increase services to low- and moderate - income persons with special needs through: - Battered and Abused Spousal Programs - Food and Essential Services - Referral and Case Management Services - Employment Training and Placement of Persons with Disabilities CDBG People 2010 7 13 186% 2011 7 14 200% 2012 7 0% 2013 7 0% 2014 7 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 35 27 77.1% SLA (2) Upgrade Public Facilities with ADA Improvements - Increase accessibility of persons with disabilities to public facilities. CDBG Public Facilities 2010 0% 2011 0% 2012 0% 2013 1 0% 2014 1 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 2 0 0.0% Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Services - Increase supportive services for persons suffering from substance abuse. CDBG People 2010 8 8 100% 2011 8 7 88% 2012 8 0% 2013 8 0% 2014 8 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 1 401 151 37.5% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objectives Appendix "B" 07 City of Newport Beach CPMP Version 2.0 HOMELESS AND HIV /AIDS 5 -Year Strategy: Support a continuum of services in support of the City's and County's effort to end homeless and assist in improving the quality of life for persons with HIV /AIDS Summary of Specific Annual Objectives Specific Obj. Outcome /Objective Specific Annual Objectives Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Percent Number Completed SLA Availability/Accessibility Availability/Accessibility of Suitable Living Environment Preserve the supply of emergency and transitional housing, increase supportive services for persons 2010 100 144 144% living with HIV /AIDS, and improve services for CDBG homeless persons and prevent those at -risk of 2011 100 147 147% homelessness through: - Homeless Prevention Programs People 2012 100 0% SLA (3) - Transitional Housing Emergency Shelter to Victims of Domestic Violence 2013 100 0% - Transitional Housing and Support Services for Victims of Domestic Violence 2014 100 0% Case Management and Other Services MULTI -YEAR GOAL 500 291 58.2% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objectives Appendix "B" 02 City of Newport Beach PUBLIC SERVICES 5 -Year Strategy: Contribute to the well -being of individuals, families, and neighborhoods Summary of Specific Annual Objectives CPMP Version 2.0 Specific Obj. Outcome /Objective # -7 Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Number Percent Completed Specific Annual Objectives SL -1 Availability/Accessibility Availability/Accessibility of Suitable Living Environment Provide and improve public services to low- 2010 100 369 369% and moderate - income persons through: - General Public Services CDBG 2011 100 404 404% 2012 100 0% Employment and Other Training Programs People SL -1 (4) - Food and Essential Services - Family Services 2013 100 0% 2014 100 0% - Health Services MULTI -YEAR GOAL 500 773 154.6% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objectives Appendix "B" 09 City of Newport Beach CPMP Version 2.0 PUBLIC FACILITIES 5 -Year Strategy: Provide access to local public facilities that contribute to community and neighborhood development Summary of Specific Annual Objectives Specific Outcome /Objective Obj.# Specific Annual Objectives Sources of Funds Performance Indicators Year Expected Number Actual Percent Number Completed SL -3 Sustainability of Suitable Living Environment SL -3 1 ) � Repayment Section 108 Loan / Balboa Village Improvements - Preserve community infrastructure in order to eliminate blight, blighting influences, and prevent deterioration of property. The improvements will stimulate future economic investments and create a suitable living environment. CDBG Public Facility 2010 1 1 100% 2011 1 1 100% 2012 1 0% 2013 1 0% 2014 1 0% MULTI -YEAR GOAL 5 2 40.0% 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan Strategies and Specific Annual Objectives Appendix "B" 7 L-) APPENDIX "B" CPMP PROJECT SUMMARIES 71 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach P'ect Name: CDBG Administration DM tiers: I 11DISProjectir: 2011 -01 UOGCede: ICA62454 NEWPORT BEACH This project will provide for the overall administration of the CDBG Program, to include: preparation and submission of the Annual Action Plan and the CAPER, IDIS data input, provision of technical assistance, monitoring of all projects, and overall fiscal management. Location: Priority Need Cate p City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Select one: Flansng /AAmes9ra0on V Newport Beach, CA 92658 Explanation: Expected Completion Date: The goal of the City's CDBG program Is to provide decent housing, housing choice, suitable living environment and economic opportunity for all re dents, businesses and visitors. Staff responsible for CDBG 6/30/2012 lectrve tegory 0 Decent Housing administratian work towards these endeavors. S SuRable Wing Envtronment Q Bmawmlcopportunty Specific objectives Outcome Categories El AvailablllN /Accessibility ❑AHwdabde, 1 Arpve are sOMOSN byitvtl 1. Penes 2 ❑Sucadrabillty 3 is C is Acoi Type Proposed N/A Accoi Type I , Proposed Pro ram Year 1 Underway Program Year 4 Underway complete complete pE i m AMmgd Tips pro posed N/A Ao.'ngd Type v Proposed Underway Underway u _ p o E E Pro ram Year 2 Program Year 5 Complete Complete 6 u A®rpL Typo Proposed ®r ApL Type v Proposed Underwav Underway U d Complete Complete Program Year 3 Con Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Access to decent housing and National Objective: N/A individual CDBG Project sultable living envlronmen[ 2MGevtl RpgrariMdu@adm 570.205 V Nam, Cots r/ Nenix Codes , Nana, Cotla Nmbc Codie , Namc Cetlx CDBG Proposed Amt. $60,285 Dndsource v I Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $60,285 Actual Amount d AA®ad.lyan Ratla� Proposed Amt. Dnd gum v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount I v Prep osetl Units N/A Amrpl. Tyye - Proposetl Units QActual 1 Units N/A Actual Units AAO..V.lW. v Proposed Units A®ryt.lypc v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units N Coat Proposed Amt. $52,755 Ondanum - Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $52,164 Actual Amount N AAmrpL raid gum Proposed Amt BelEgum 'Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Type 1 Pro used units N/A AmrpL Type Proposed units 00 G Actual Units N/A Actual Units !rbt r a v 11 Pro aced Un its Anoint Type - Proposed units Actual Units Actual Units m Coat , Proposed Amt. and gum � Proposetl Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount ypnd �yxm , Proposed Amt pnd ausm Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Type: Pont, osed Units Amrp,lype: Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units P 1 Amepl. Typo Proposed Units Amrpl.lyxa Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units O CoBG Proposed Amt. Fund some , Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount d Y IEp atl gum Proposed Amt Ntl gum Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Ammpl. Type: Pro osed Units Amvrpl. Type: v Proposed Units Oi O y Attual Units Actual Units Amopl. Type: I . Pro exact Units Amryt lype: . Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units in CDBG Proposed Amt. Fndgum v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount E I Other l V Proposed Amt Fndgem 1 � Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount ADLtrY. Typee V PrOPOSed Units A®rtY. TYPE: Proposed LtM V Actual Units Actual Units OI O D. Amatid.Type iV Proposed Units Apntpi,Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units L. 72 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Prof. xame: Fair Housin Services Description, 1Drs Pmjettn: 2011 -02 jUOGCodeo ICA62454 NEWPORT BEACH The project will provide fair housing education, counseling, and enforcement services to current or potential Newport Beach residents, Coupled with landlord /tenant counseling services. These services impact and benefit target COBG areas and the e#remely -low to moderate income population. Lacaticam Pmm xaad Category :air MOYSing Pounda[ion 3605 Long Beach give, Long Beach, CA 90807 Select one: _ Manr9fl�:y��, Explanatian: E %petted Completion Data: Low- Income and special needs persons often have limited resources to address any landlord /tenant concerns, or other issues that affect their housing. Providing access to fair housing services improves housing choice, ensures decent housing and a more suitable living environment. 5/30/2012 n OO Decent Intones O suitable Lived eov:mnment O sconce ie "community Specific objectless Outcome Categories AvalladlM1y /Aceena p.W Atonabllity surenadiaty 1 alto sessions la ho us V 2 3 9 d M Ped 1 Proposed M1 ie Proposed Pro ram Year l underwa Program Year 4 Underway Complete complete d L Y u F E 011hpe V Pro ram Year 2 Proposed 200 Moppose Program Year 5 Proposed Underway Underway <om lete 161 <om lete a` a anPeTle V Program Year 3 pop, osed an Piston V Con Plan Period P.o oseE Underway Underway complete complete Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Acceseibllity rarthe pumose of providing decent affordable housing National Objective: N/A pH -1 Availablllty /Accessibility 31D Far14Ve;,9Afiuron ( abjattE Yp/,ghm, y)STAa� W _ Vide DSks IV- Mi Cod s _M4ufc6s .rN iV Marm. I!� M qRanm� E Y g d Fan Stem Proposed Amt Fund Stem IV Fan4am . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Proposetl Amt. Proposetl Amt. Actual gmount Actual gmount Aremrl. Tyre: V Ancem LP e: I Pro asetlllnits A m. Tdac I hm,rs. Ty¢: Pro osetl Units gttual Units Attual Units Prep oseE Units its Actual Units N Q4 V Pro osed Amt. 12000 Ran Swm W t. Actual Amount 12 000 nt tAmount N Y � E N Is 4 a6a W Pro osetl Amt. 581 359 nand v .m V mt. Actual Amount $581,359 Actual nt .pays, V Pro osetl Units Actual Uni6 A�ttY. Tyre: V Proposed Units Actual Uni6 20D 161 Amip. Ty{C: V Pro oseE Uni6 Adppri T yr4: 1 Pro oseE Uni6 Actual Units Actual Units M q Y E Y m 0 d WHi I pop osed Amt. Fad 9a:%m Pro osetl Amt. Actual Amount ActualAmount Other V Pro osed Amt. V Pro osetl Am[. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 MTie W Proposed Units A:mnY. Tyre: W Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Andedi Tyre . Proposed units Amp. Tyre . Pra mad Units Actual Units Actual Units V q E Y q D 4 WBG %r other Proposed Amt Fund b I. Rand gum Proposed Amt. Acual Amount Actual Amount ose Proptl Amt Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount o1 Ry1[ An Ty¢: A:mryl. Type: V ,l n]. Ty¢: V Pro osetl Units Pro osetl Units Actual Units Attual Units Pro oseE Units Prep oseE Units Actual Units I Actual Units N qDav Y E 4 Q'B W Proposed Amt Rand SUm Pro osetl Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount V Proposed Amt. n:M Sava W I Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual gmoun[ pl Pads ar Proposed Units Actual Units !t_1 mare � Pro Os[tl Units Actual Units Ymlph'son I, prop osetl Units H01rY. Typed 11 IP­p oseE Units Actual Units I Actual Units 73 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Project Name: I Human O tians: Community Resource Center Description: Ibis Project #: 2011 -03 UOG Cade: ICA62454 NEWPORT BEACH This project will provide a wide variety of counseling and educational programs to help victims and their family members deal with the effects of domestic violence. CDBG funds will be used to pay for a portion of the salaries of staff who provide counseling and case management services. Location: Priority Need Category Community Resource Center 5540 TrabuccO Read Select one: _ Irvine, CA 92620 Explanation: Expected Completion Date: Victims of domestic violence who flee their abuser often need confidential support services and housing. Many victims flee an abusive situation without the resources (food, clothing, etc.) necessary to support themselves. This can often lead to homelessness. 6/30/2012 e ve dry O Decent Housing * soluble ul Environment National Objective Citation: LMC 570.208(a)(2)(i)(A) Q Economic opportunity specific Objectives 1 grpoeycmMtafor lowhntl inure pears Outcome Categories 0 Availadlity/kDoulanity ❑Aflordabllity 2 V 3 ❑shatinabllity u alnyple V Proposed 7 of People Proposed Program Year 1 Underway Program Year 4 Underway complete Complete 13 a a Y u o E 01 People Program Year 2 Proposed 7 Ol Pepe Program Year 5 Proposed Underway Underway com lets Cc m lets 14 a Y 01 People Undersea 0®rb. Typo Proposed Underway underway a - - Complete Complete Program Year 3 Con Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure I Actual Outcome Accessolllty for the purpose M People SL -1 Availabllity /Accessibility creating suitable living environment DSSi 6'iteetl ad Att�$wrca SAIDS(ej a Means Dallas �Ci atl Olx 9oM6(e) L� t4tb&— rAsb[lbtl® ' Mapsmtla .i Cae6 Prep ds.E Am[. $4,600 Nsd cases L, Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $2,179 Actual Amount V q oye Proposed Amt. $408,69B Rstl same v Proposed A. Ac[ualAmounk Actual Amount 01 Rage Proposed Units 7 Armory. Type er Proposed Units P O 6 Actual Units 13 Actual Units Am. Trya i, Proposed Units hmNi Type, v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units y,l f1EG er I Proposed Amt $3,867 Nntl$t•IB , Prep osetl Amt. Actual Amount $3,769 Actual Amount W E ry other PrOPOSad Amt $426,931 Fsdsasm V Proposed Amt. Actus mount 5426,931 Actual Amount 01 RYx#e er I Proposed Units 7 peep, Type er Proposed Units Actual Units 14 Actual Units 0 O 1 Armtpl. Types v I Proposed Units ABry 1. Type er Pro osetl Units Actual Units Actual Units m Calls - proposed Amt nsd �sre er Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount N 7 Iq Dye V Proposed Amt Wtl9arts Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 Pape V Proposed Units Amrgy. TgE Proposetl Units Actual Units Units O 4 A®rpl. Type v Proposed Units _Actual Aoa,fy, Type . Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units a ®G Proposetl Amt nerd SNr2 Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount at E oMha Proposetl Am[. Rsdsyso: Proposed Pmt. Actual Amount Actual Amount 01 People W Proposed Units Abori Type s, Proposed Units A Actual Units Actual Units 0 O AtmrPL Type , Pro osetl Units Ammi Type si� Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units gt Cases , Proposed Amt Fsd its V 1 Proposetl Amt. is Actual Amount A[tualAmount y E ryfe v Proposed Am[. FrdScsm, V I Proposed Amt. Actual Amount lActual Amount Ol People w Proposed Units 0[¢trry. Types � Proposetl Units A Actual Units Actual Units P O d Omnpl. Typx 1 Pro osetl Units Armory. Type � Proposetl Units Actual Units A<[ual Units Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Project Name: !Families Forward: Transitional Housin Pro ram Description: IDIS Project x: 2011 -04 UOO COae: CA62454 NEWPORT BEACH The Transitional Housing program assists homeless families to regain stability and self sufficiency. The target population Is homeless families with children. The program provides case management and supportive services to households residing in Families Forward transitional housing units. CDBG funds will be use to pay for a portion of the salary of a rase manager. Location: Priority Need Latepory Families Forward 9221 Irvine Blvd. Select one: P�c� V Irvine, CA 92618 Explanation: Expected Completion Date: Provide needed services for low /mod income persons by preserving the supply of emergency and transitional units and those at risk of homeleness. National Objective Citation: LMC 570.208(e)(2)(i)(A) 6/30/2012 ve egory O Decant Houses * suitable Living Envlronment 00 EmnomlC Oni artunity speeific objectives Outcome Categories 1 LaeactM ranLaafhmdea pe5prp npdrq irdypmmvtfppeng O Avelabillty /ACCgsihllity ❑Affordability 2 N�eae zayi�forb Mvditmre pass V 3 ❑sustalmbillty a C EProgram mpw* L. Year 1 Proposed 100 MRecall v Program Year 4 Proposed underway Unw deray Complete 144 Complete i y mPeople V Proposed loo mpeople V. Proposed Underway Underway D E Vear 2 Program Year 5 Complete 147 Complete mtO _Program Aoanpl. Type, I. Proposed Acconpl. Type V Proposed Underway QUnderway complete complete Program Year 3 Con Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Accessibility for the purpose of People SL -1 Availability /Accessibility creating suitable living environment �Nac Sayia Mall _VJ sebh� r4ltNloda fffiik piles ataacot� �' Mahufads � ,y mar Proposed Amt. $10,000 pDd scum - Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $10,000 Actual Amount s. al - 2 other, .1 Proposed Amt. $1,104,907 Rrtlgum V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $1,104,907 Actual Amount Mregie Proposed Units 100 p®qy, Tyt¢ V Proposed Units Actual Units 144 Actual Units OI 6 Amspl, type I V Proposed Units Aosnpl. Type v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units N tTH' Proposed Amt. $8,406 Fyrigxao= - Proposed Amt. is Actual Amount $8,406 Actual Amount d NM Otls V Proposed Amt $1,093,610 FW gum Proposed Am[. Actual Amount $1,043,610 Actual Amount PaT1e Proposed Units 100 AssionnFY. Type V Pro osed Units Actual Units 147 Actual Units 0 6 /®npl, Typo Proposed Units Aparpl. type V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units M COM V.I Proposed Amt fwgum - Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount y 4 gndgxso= Proposed Amt. pssd ---TV Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount at Aryl+ v Proposed Units Atmtpl. Type , Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units OI LLAmIpL Type: Proposetl Units Aocopl. Type Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units p' pgr V Proposed Amt. Magum V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount q y - N other .I Proposed Amt. Ford gam LV Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount at ggle , Proposed Units A ®qY. 7Wa V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units DI 6 hens AVe, V Proposed Units Acal Type V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units N moo Proposed Amt. Fvri SNrm V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount yDean, >- NMpeople Proposed Amt. Nrtlgum Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount V Proposed Units A®rp. Type V , Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 0 LLAmryl. typo Proposetl Units AccompL Type v. Proposed Units Actual UnW Actual Units Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Project Name: Agee Well Senior Services: Home Delivered Meals Description: I I IDIS Project a: 2011-05 UOGCOde: ICA62454 NEWPORT BEACH Age Well Senior Services will provide home - delivered meals to homebound senior citizens (62 years or older) who are uanble to prepare meals for themselves due to age, illness, or disability. COBG funds will be used to pay for a portion of the salary of home- deliverd meal staff. Location: Priority Need Category Age Well Senior S.,,up, I.T. 24300 El Toro Road, Suite 2000 Select one: _ Laguna Woods, CA 92637 Explanation: Expected completion Date: Homebound seniors often have difficulty preparing nutritiously appropriate meals for themselves. Home delivered nutritious meals enables homebound seniors to remain in their homes, avoid being institutionalized, and creates 6/30/2012 ve Category 0 Count Imsmg a more SU Oable living environment. Suitable Uvig Environment National Objective Otal LMC 570.208(a)(2)(1)(A) Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome Categories 1 Inposetlleseviosfor bvFrotl i�tmnepe�s Q+ Availablliry/Aaesslbility ❑WOMabiliry 2 3 ❑SUDaInabllM _ EProgram Di gnple V Year 1 Proposed 100 Ol Pape 'Underway Program Year 4 Propasetl Underway complete 142 complete dL y N N a 'F E of People . Pro ram Year 2 Pro ozed loo Di rBgie Pro ram Year 5 Pro ozed Underway Underway Complete 145 Complete 6 u olpowas Proposed p®rip, Type v Proposed jUndemay QUnderway iv complete complete Program Year 3 Con Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual as Outcome Accessibility forthe purpose of People SL -1 Availability/Accessibility creating sultable living environment M4vSerei ®5RA1(e) F4Eiz CndS I- Codes MONCOEe V 14AT.Cal ,y coop w Proposed Amt. $20,000 Fadsands _ Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $20,000 Actual Amount M E E Other, V - Proposed Amt. $1,552,940 Fud Savo: _ Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $1,552,940 Actual Amount UPape , Proposed Units 100 A®rp, Typa Proposed Units Actual Units 142 Actual Units Ot a lmryi. Type , Pro osed Units Arnaud Type w I Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units N coos IV Proposed Amt. $18,492 Fund Save V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $18,492 Actual Amount To E M Ov,e I, Proposed Amt. $1,559,440 Fud Saar V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $1,559,440 Actual Amount M Pads Proposed Units 100 Addi Types - Pro ozetl Units Actual Units 145 ARUaI Units P a lmryi. Type v Proposed Units Atmgl. Type , I Prep osetl Units Actual Units Actual Units m cops V Proposed Amt. Fund Source: V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount T E over V Proposed AmG Fund SUaa: V Proposed At. m Actual Amount Actual Amount at pecde v Proposed Units Atmgi Type -1 ni[z Actual Units s G7 O G - lml Type Proposed Units alp.. Type V nits Actual Wks s RA...pt call . Proposetl Amt. Nod Sa vo= V mt. Actual Amount unt d 2 Utle , Proposed Amt. Md5'oso3 roposemt. Actual Amount Actual Amount moral , Proposed Units Amgi Type I Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units M O LL Amrp.ly➢e v Proposed Units Amrp. Type V I Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 0 else , Proposed Amt. rud5ouo= V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount yOver T Amost Proposed Amt Fund Sass v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount e � Proposed Units A.".Type � Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units on LLAmrp. Type , Proposed Units A.W. Type V I Proposetl Units Actual Units Actual Units 70 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Project Name: 1 Serving People In Need (SPIN): Substance Abuse Treatment Program (SARP) Description: I JIDIS Project A: 2011 -06 1 UOG Code: CA62454 NEWPORT BEACH SARP provides access to substance abuse recovery to those least able to afford it - the homeless and low income. These individuals cannot otherwise afford treatment. Case management includes: counseling, supplemental employment services, medical assistance, and legal assistance. CDBG funds will be used to pay for personnel costs to implement this program. Location: Priority Need Category Serving People In Need (SPIN) 151 Kelart , H -2 5 Select one: - Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Explanation: Expected completion Date: Homeless and low -income people often do not have sufficient income to participate In substance abuse treatment programs to help In their recovery. SARP increases the access to such programs for homeless and low- income 6/30/2012 rve egpry 0 Demnt Hcuvng persons suffering from substance abuse. 0 suitable Ul Emiranment National Objective Citation: LMC 570.208(a)(2)(1)(A)ll Emmmlc opppiwniry Specific objectives Outcome Categories 1 Ahis. the services for baytrW irmne pose Q AVallablliry /ACmssihpiry ❑Affokablliry End drvchmod��'.� 2 3 V ❑Sotsirebllity w EProgram In. People Year 1 Proposed 8 01 People Program Year 4 Proposed Underway Untlerway complete s complete d M U D a E mPaple Pro ram Yea 2 Proposed a 01 FeXie V Pro ram Year 5 v.... sed Underway Untlerway com lace Complete 6 E D1 MOe Proposed Aoarol. Type V Proposed Untlerway QUnderway complete complete Program Year 3 Can Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Accessibility for the purpose of People 5L -1 Availability /Accessibility creating suitable Irving environment of 91�re/8 ®SV1[®SAmm(e7 . sWeCatlas pg 91ffirm Ala�SaU®SAmm(e7 V Mhbh cAtlw -, 6tl[bercd Wil orcmdes ,y rose Proposed Amt. nstlsusd V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Dtla V Proposed Amt. M- head Suao: Proposed Amt. n y E Acal Amount Actual Amount m Moe w Proposed Units Acopl. Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units OI 2 EL Amaral Tyler' , Proposed Units poz". Types V Pro osed Units Actual Units P$1291;1412 Actual Units ly meG v Proposed Amt. rub Sp �. V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Otllo- Proposed Amt. rand Souce: " 1 Proposed Amt. n y Y h Actual Amount $425,4921 Actual Amount D1 Mime Proposed Units 8 q�rlpl. Tyt¢: Proposed Units Actual Units J Actual Units 0 a A®qy, Tp3 Pro osed Units Aozrrpl. Type Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units m mM13 VI Proposed Amt. rum Scare V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount y otg VI Proposed Amt. q.,a Sum . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount NIn. people I. Proposed Units A®rpL Type I Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units N a AmXgl. Tyxx V Proposed Units Amami. Typo V Proposed Lull Actual Units Actual Units 1Der V Proposed Amt Bad Spud: t Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount M >- AMP.,* rudscume V ods V Proposed Amt. Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount IV Proposed Units A ®rpL Type: Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units o a Aoarp, Type: IV Proposed Units Ao nVL Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units in mg' , Propose tl Amt Feld Scapa . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount doDS Y Nmpopse Proposed Am[. . Proposetl Ami. _ Fund SdaB " Actual Amount Actual Amount Pro osetl Units AmamLTypo V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Ol 4 Apalrp, Pipe: Propose Units Acropl. Type: V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units 77 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Pro'ect Name: Share Our Selves 505: 505 Free Medical and Dental Clinics oescripnon: 1DIS Protect A: 2611 -07 U. rode: CA62454 NEWPORT BEACH Share Our Selves will provide primary /urgent are on a daily walk -in bask, chronic rare, and specialty care by appointment to unlsured Orange County residents and patients In me County MIC Program. In addition, 505 provides bridge medical are to patients who qualify for medical insurance programs and are waiting to be placed in an appropriate medical home or who will not qualify but who reside far from SOS and therefore need to establish a medical home closer to home. Full scope primary care /urgent care cllnics is a commitment to true open access for those lacking a more traditional medical home, Location: Indigrit, Need Costagodir Share our Selves 1550 Superior Avenue Costa Mass, CA 92627 Select one: _ Explanation: Expected completion Date: Provide free medical and octal care to unisured low /mod income persons. National Objective Citation: LMC 570.208(a)(2)(I)(B) 6/3042012 ve eggry cecen[ Hpusng Suitable W, Environment Economic upnortunity Specific OD ecitive , Outcome Categories Q AVailadility/Accessibility ❑affordability ❑ Suoaimbility 1 Lrpoegra 9es�fvloipfiyxl inmepavc - -_ 2 B g _ Is u mPape !I,I Program Year 1 Proposed 100 Attempt Typx v Program Year 4 Proposed Underway Underway complete 369 complete d L ' e V u ° mR1pe s, Program Year 2 Proposed 100 Agerml T" s, Program Year 5 Proposed Untlerwe U -down. complete 404 complete M? aUnderway ups,µ Type Program Year 3 Proposed A®rp Type Proposed Con Plan Period Underway complete complete Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environment People SL -1 Avallabllity/Accessibility Pa BOlc Services (general) eAad(e) Mattreses Mmdx btb rnmarraa® yet COtla 16t &r�s N M NmPmp@ I. A. mg' Proposed Amt $g,OOO gatl gym hir l Proposed Ann Actual Amount $9,000 Actual Amount me Proposed Amt. $3701 276 Fund murages V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $3,701,276 Actual Amount Proposed Units 100 pvvrpL Typo Proposed Units Actual Units 369 Actual Units Ammpk1,,e sp Pro osetl Units A�pl hipe v Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units N al E O N O d tai Proposed Amt. 8 555 Ford! sosm Proposed Amt. Actual Amount 8555 Actual Amount Ode s, Proposed Amt. $4,150,919 Mad Senate i Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $4,150,419 Actual Amount mPaga sr Proposed Units 100 AmryLTi s !� Proposed Units Actual Units 404 Actual Units hmrpl Ty¢ Proposed Units A®dpL T}pe V Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units he yolder E OI GAman Does s, Proposed Amt Mad Asm , Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Proposed Amt Msd 5usm v Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount mlRpk+ '♦ Proposed Units AmrFL Tyfg Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Ore. LType ss ed Units Aoarp Type Proposed Units Units Actual Units be Ol Does etl Amt. Mrdes, Proposed A mt. Amount Actual Amount other etl Amt MsdSmm Pro osetl Amt. Amount MUnits Actual Amount etl Units A®rpLT}pe sr Pro osed Units Units Actual Units A®lpLPrye ed Units Auggd LTyo � Prop osea Units Units Actual Units I. q e E p-g' etl Amt Msd SUSm Prime setl Am[. Actual Amount Actual Amount gtla Propose Ain nn nd 5 V Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount mPevpl Proposed Units Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Pro osetl Units Pro osetl Units Actual Units Actual Wits Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Pro ea rvame: Section 108 Loan Re a ment oescripfim: IDIS Project x: 2011 -08 uoo code: JEA62454 NEWPORT BEACH Funds will be used to repay the City's Section 108 Loan. The loan was used to partially fund public improvements to the Balboa Target Area totaling $8 million. The scope of work includes the Balboa Village Pedestrian and Streetscape Plan, Street Improvements to Balboa Blvd., Pier Parking Lot, Pier Plaza, and Lot A connecting access to Main Street. Location: Priority Need Category LMA - Census Tract 62800.1 Select one: pubi`BaOrides � Explanation: expected Completion Date: Targeted areas within Balboa Village were detonating. To eliminate the blight, blighting influences and prevent further detonation, the City used CDBG funds to make necessary Improvements to the target areas. The Improvements will stimulate future economic Investment and provide a more suitable living environment. National Objective Citation: LMC 520.208(a)(1) 6/30/2012 1 nx Cansi C) parent Housing Q soluble Living Environment 0 Economic OpppNnity Specific Objections Outcome Categories El Motisbi6ry /ACreisiblllty ❑AiFortlablldY [1sustainabiliry 11rrA :M4PttY /i,n®a:le::adYOrpJir. i:rtsvena6Rr Yxaiwre penis .I 2 imp °' esideft/ I : Aer4ty &nektbodm:lfmlYrsfmbwilmnep . 3 0 C vE nPublereaEa .I Program Year 1 Proposed 1 11 Bbip Palm i. -. .Proposed Pro arm Year 4 Underway Underway complete 1 complete NllNic f raifh"s as Pro ram Year 2 Pro osed I llW:ic facHies . — Pro ram Year 5 ones osetl U nderway underway Complete 1 ca m let" o it $ QUnderway ssnnip r as Program Year 3 Proposed AmipL TPe .. 'Proposed Con Plan Period Underway complete complete Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Accessibility for the purpose of creating suitable living environments Public Fad llty SL -3 Sustainability [SF P4sea R�Aratcf 9xllm 1161mn1tix181 . LYbb:rn0a 19FPiinetl WyAtratrt4saxl MIlan lltlGDet . Mbb "a Clips Edda . Ma monsdat s W ryllRlec OI a mBf . Proposed Amt $199,346 pnd-, .I Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $199,345 Actual Amount Fmd Slam: . I Proposed Amt Z::;7 -,so Proposed Amt. Abuse Amount Actual Amount Proposetl Units PoOSd . Proposed Units 1 Actual Units 1 Actual Units Pmnp. Type . Proposed Units pose . Proposed units Actual Units Actual Units VPmp.sed N N y A OI a Cost I. Proposed Amt $201,654 Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $201,653 Actual Amount qM SOSe . Proposed AmL Proposetl Aml. Actual AmOunf Actual Amount llplse rmilli Proposed Units 1 . Prpppsed Units Actual Units 1 Actual Units A®np -n a: . Proposetl Units Api Type . I Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units m as E n OI a Cli . Proposetl Arm. Nand Spve . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount gatl Aae I. Proposed Amt pond Sasm . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount nPublef9dY' . Proposed Units =777- Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units A�pl. Tog . Proposed Units goanp. Toe . Proposed Unitr Actual Units Actual Units Q N W NllRBCFmfaa. tp O 6 L19r I. Proposetl A.I. Nnd soya . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount qnd gaare; . Proposed Amt Fund loops: . Proposed Am[. Actual Amount Actual Amount Proposed Units / pL Tqs . Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Aposrp, Type . Proposed Units A®rpL Tpe L Proposed Units Actual Uni[z Actual Units pl yFa:tl E 01 LLA®np. calle aa Proposed Amt pandlipass . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount Acmal Amount Spam; . Proposed Amt Fmtl Seam . (Proposed Arm Actual Amount Actual Amount llnb4p Fa,,o. Prop osed Units µ CPL Top; .,Proposetl Units Actual Units Actual Units Type . Proposed Units Amerµ TOe . Proposetl Units Actual Units Aetual Units �9 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Project Name: Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements Description: 111DIS Project #: 2011 -09 June Code: CA62454 NEWPORT BEACH PROJECT WAS CANCELLED AS A RESULT OF THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO AP 11 -12. 'This project will provide Improvements in the following order: 1) Update a Citywide Transition Plan for accessible public improvements for ADA impacted persons; and 2) reconstruct curb access ramps citywide. Both functions help to provide accessibility to public improvements throughout the Gty of Newport Beach. CDBG funds will be used for the construction of curb access ramps citywide." Locatlom Priority Need Category City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Select one: arAasoumre V Newport Beach, CA 92658 Explanation: LMC Provide updated plan for access improvements citiwide for ADA Impacted perspns. National Objective Citation: LMC 570.208(a)(2)(ii)(A) Expected Completion Date: 6/3012012 ary ng 7�� g En vironment Specific Objectives portunity Outcome Categories 1 avms rerlgectboar9 apaysal9aEMgbpasev/�®I pis Availability/Attadel lily 2 Affordability Su3ainability 3 V Anni p. Ifni ♦ Pro .sea . Pro oaetl H _ Underway underway Complete complete p Program Year 1 Pro ram Year 4 Public F Proposed 10 . Proposed N t11 '—" underway V Pro ramYear 2 Pro ram Year 5 complete AmR1. Type: . Proposed . 2Unde�ay underway c.m late Pro ram Year 3 Con Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Accessibility M ADA Imparted persons by Persons provided improved or new spot. SL -1 Avallablllty /A[[es ihllity providmg'mfusemacture Improvements a4h[tC� . afla ratles ni Sitle.ticSA c . =--coney ._ MarroCda . NahtcCada ... '1 Re d �u� ♦ Proposed Amt I-- L. ProposedA Actual Amount And Actual W Proposed Amt . pm oaetl Actual Amount Ann E Actual a A.-apLTypa . Pro oaetl Units . Pm osed U Actual Units Unit 0 Actual y A®rpLTytc . Proposed Units .1 Proposed U Actual Units Unit Actual tg Coal . Proposed Amt. $8,802 . Proposed A Actual Amount $0 Am R Actual N Red Snxos ter o oaetl Amt. ♦ Pro osed A - Actual Actual Amount Amo E E ll Wtic ra9i�. proposed Units 10 . Proposed U Actual Units O Unit OI Actual If . Proposed A®rpL Type Proposed Units U LL Actual Actual Units Unit: m rind axed . I Pro opal AmL . Pro osetl Actual Amount Am Actual yRaw Seeds . I Proposed Amt. lProeosed Actual Amount lActual Amo E A®qy, Ty)x: ♦ proposed Units . Proposed U Actual Units Unit OI Actual 1 . Proposed AfmhtA. Type Proposed Units U Actual Units Unit Actual O Redilaene 1, Proposed Amt Proposetl Actual Amount Am Actual Wd9aea . Proposed Amt . Pmpasetl Actual Actual Amount Amo NAAmrpl Type . Proposed Units . Proposed U Actual Units Unit C ' Actual AmrpL Type . Proposed Units osetl U i- . Prop Actual Units Uni[ Actual m Nd9ae� . Prop. ed Amt ♦ Pra setl Actual Amount ActualAm aRed . Proposed aue� I. Proposer) Amt A pc[ual Actual Amount pmo a Oam�, Type . Proposed Units . Pfposed U Actual Units Unit O I _ Actual A. A®rpL Type . Pro oaea Units . Pin osetl U Actual Units Unit Actual 20 Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Project Name: Utility Assessment District Grant Pro ram Description: I JIDIS Project u: 2010 -09 I UOG Code: ICA62454 NEWPORT BEACH PR0= WAS CANCELLED AS A RESULT TO THE SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT TO AP 10 -11. "This project will help [p provide financial assistance to the impacted low- and moderate -Income owner - occupants located within proposed utility undergrounding Assessment Districts in the City of Newport Beach. In order to reduce the financial burden of an Assessment District, the City proposes a grant program to cover a portion of the cost of utility hook -ups to owner - occupants within the District(s). Households that cannot afford to make the necessary hook -ups after utilities have been undergrounded will be left without electricity, thereby creating a health and safety concern for the City. " Location: Priority Need Category City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Select one: F_ omnm HOarg �' , Newport Beach, CA 92658 Explanation: Provide financial assistance to low /moderate income households for utility hook -ups which will improve the basic utility services of their homes. National Objective Citation: LMC 570.208(.)(3) Expected Completion Date: 6/30 2012 w ory Uecmt Housing Q Suitable Living Envlmnnent 0 Economic Opportunity Specific Objectives Outcome Categories i APmedegeayofwsekomg IV Availability /ArcessibillN 2 �+ ARardability S abilnabfcq 3 10 Hoeing UMs V Propose. 7 V Proposed Underna Underway y C cpm le[e Complete ram Year I Program Year 4 WPro ]O the;g lEid Proposed D IV Proposed =L Udeay Underway y n o E PrD ramYear Program Year 5 complete Complete Proposes Proposed ya ` C U Q Underway Underway Complete complete Program Year 3 Con Plan Period Proposed Outcome Performance Measure Actual Outcome Accessibility for the purpose of Housing Units DH -1 Availability /Accessibility providing decent housing Mehl Mom �. p4trkm0a tYhh V MaOhfAtlm plYi¢r� peatc, Pro... d Amt. $65,922 Pro osetl Actual Amount Am R Actual 7 nnd,auine; V Proposed Amt. V Proposed Actual Actual Amount Am E lolYrBlry tMib� Proposed Units 7 Prop osed 0 Actual Units 0 Actual Uni[ y A®rpl. type; V Proposed Units V Proposed Actual Units Unl[ Actual p Fund-, V Proposed Amt. $0 , Proposed Actual Amount Am Actual q Ped4uce; , Proposed Amt V Proposed Y Actual Actual Amount Am AA op p. Tye: I V Proposed Units 5 V Proposed Actual Units 0 Unl[ UI Actual GAoarpl. Type; V Proposed Units V Proposetl Actual Units Unit Actual ro ry;d Sns� Prop. ad Amt. v Proposed Al I Actual Amount Am Actual y nxtl 9JUre' Proposed Amt V Proposed Actual Amount Actual Amid dl Amryl. Type; Proposed Units V Proposed Actual Units Unit 0 Actual Pro osed Units V Proposed Actual Units Unit Actual O hntl gdxro: V Proposed Amt. v Proposed Actual Amount Am Actual M nsd Sasrn; , Proposed Amt Proposed Y Actual Actual Amount Am N Asamat Tye; I- Proposed Units Pro osed Actual Units Uni[ W Actual yAoarpl. Proposetl Units Type; Proposed Actual Units Ual[ Actual pi naldsyR; V Proposed Amt. v Proposed Actual Amount Am Actual M FudBou.; V Proposed Amt. V Proposed Y Actual Actual Amount Am NAompl. Type; Proposed Units V Proposed Actual Units Unit W Actual GA®rpt Proposed Units Proposed Type v Actual Unit. Uni[ Actual M Me Grantee Name: City of Newport Beach Pro eot Name: Fair Housina Council O.C.: Fair H n ServiClq Description: I JUDISProleetto 2010 -02 UOG code: ICA62454 NEWPORT BEACH The project will provide fair housing education, counseling, and enforcement services to current or potential Newport Beach residents, coupled with landlord /tenant counseling services. These services Impact and benefit target COBG areas and the extremelydow to moderate Income Population. mcanon: Pnori Nem care e rain nouemg Ceendl of Orange 20i S.Ah amadway Santa Ana, CA 92M Select one: Explanation: Low - income and special needs persons often have limited resources t0 address any landlord /tenant Concerns, Or Other issues that affect their housing. Providing access to fair housing services improves housing choice, ensures decent housing and a more suitable living environment. e. . Complain— Date: 5/30/2011 ry O ant MOUSIig O SuRade LIWy EnWmmilen[ O Emnomso unl Outcome Categories AvulibllltAA¢avbil'6y AROrdablity Sictembilly Specific on]ectivea i Npoca�mdrwdaE nstl lnaq . 2 3 'A m v mPo le . Pro osed 200 mNigk . Pm Pro ram Year I Undema Pro ram Year 4 Com Nte 160 complete m L a n opE mlBtiO • pre ram Year 2 Pro osetl mPicau • Pro ram Year 5 UntleNai complete Co. ° ti Q mnandu . Pro ram Year 3 Pro osed Anal rues . Con Plan Period Unaerwa Com lete Proposed Outcome Performance Measure I Actual Outcome Aaess1011lty for the pni of pmviding decent affoNable housing National capEarve: N/A OH -1 Availability /Attessibillty vDrdrfaa,gamw®(P�mm 2meam:, �1 smgq _ vebnmae, Mabad$ . MAO,die, MabmmAS . Mbdmtla q E q an Q ° COEG . Proposed Amt $11,185 5N aums . Proposed Amt. Actual Amount $11185 Actual Amount door . Proposed Amt. $6,115 _ FNSavcc . a ®�d. 1, . Proposed Amt Actual Amount $6115 Actual Amount units mPax,e, . Aaa d h in .vro vro o:ea Units zoo Actual Units 160 Actual Units osed Units vro osm Unin actual Units Actual Units N W 0 7 E q rn 0 ° QBr . die V Prn oue Amt gad5u� . P.n osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Proposed Amt. Pro osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount mPSxle . P.o osed units rm,p. typo . vro osed units Actual Unas Actual Una. Anti Tit¢ . Pro osed Units pmrn.Tpe . Wa osed Units Actual Unas Actual Units Lit QBr . Proposed Amt. Sna FUce . P opened Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount q E q mmrexse 4 ° paper . Pro osed Amt rW S uce . Pro used Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount . naaryi. tv- . Proposed units am.p..ypa . Proposed Units Actual Units Actual Units Pro used Unas pmrrl.Tyyc . Proposed Units Actual Unce Actual Units V at L y E 4 ° ®s . Other . Proposed Amt. RaNSUSm . Rad9um. . Pro osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount Pro Osee Amt. Pr0 osed Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount m Pai te A..VLType I.. A cep, Twe . Aoemi e . P.o o.ea Unit. P.o ots sed Uni Actual Units Actual Unas Pro osed Units Pro osed Units Actual Units Actual Units N q d ii- Cons . Pro OSea Amt. rsrd3 ate. . Pro Oaetl Amt. Actual Amount Actual Amount die . Pr .... Ad Am[. rsrd4iae . Prupoaea Amt. Actual Amount Actual Pmoun[ E q mmimPe a . . P.O Deco units Pro osed units Actual Uni[9 Actual Units ° Amgi Twa . Proposed Units A®r[l Ty¢ . PrapOSea Units Actual Unite Actual Unit. 2010 -2011 Action Plan Adopted 04 -22 -10 22 APPENDIX "C" PROOF OF PUBLIC NOTICE m PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DRAFT CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2011 -2012 Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach, California has prepared the draft Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the Fiscal Year, beginning July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012, as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. A copy of the CAPER will be available for public review from September 10, 2012 to September 25, 2012. PUBLIC HEARING: In addition, the Newport Beach City Council will hold a public hearing to review comments received on the draft CAPER at the following date, time, and location: Date: September 25, 2012 Time: 7:00 PM Location: City Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DESCRIPTION: The draft CAPER provides a detailed account of how the City of Newport Beach utilized its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other funds in Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 to pursue the strategies, goals, and objectives proposed in the City's 2011 -2012 One Year Action Plan and how well the City addressed the housing and community development needs identified in the City's 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Public Hearing for the CAPER is to allow the public the opportunity to comment on the manner in which the City utilized federal and non - federal funds for the one -year period that ended on June 30, 2012. REVIEW OF THE CAPER DOCUMENT: Copies of the draft CAPER will be available for public review and comment from September 10, 2012, to September 25, 2012 at the following locations: City Clerk's Office: City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, CA Community Development Dept: City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, CA Central Library: 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA Questions and written comments regarding the draft CAPER may be addressed to James Campbell, Principal Planner, at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92663. You may also call (949) 644- 3210 with any questions concerning the above documents. ACCESSIBILITY TO MEETINGS AND DOCUMENTS: It is the objective of the City to comply with, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and the ADA Amendment Act of 2008, the Fair Housing Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act in all respects. If you require public documents in an accessible format, the City will make reasonable efforts to accommodate your request. If you require a disability - related accommodation to attend or participate in a hearing or meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the City Clerk's Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting at (949) 644 -3005. Publish: Daily Pilot, September 8, 2012 Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk City of Newport Beach r APPENDIX "D" MAP 25 t; City of Newport Beach b1 r f e... �F 6nienR p w.eum xa _ J { aoci 6 G G cup 2 T e oc t tPoo Gm,p I ! ! F FF Yy.. ses� 6 G. . 1:8]OGB — & & ..11 .2 .Gmup 1 •• B 5( �m I ry t 2T 13 5 mcmm • Bock 2 aydar i PACIFIC OCEAN ,----_ N1 20 APPENDIX "E" IDIS REPORTS 1. HUD GRANTS AND PROGRAM INCOME REPORT (PRO 1) 2. CDBG ACTIVITY SUMMARY REPORT (PR03) 3. SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED PLAN PROJECTS (PR06) 4. SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS (PR23) 5. CDBG FINANCIAL SUMMARY (PR26) m IRIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 8/30/2012 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PR01 - HUD Grants and Program Income TIME 15032 PM NEWPORT BEACH Subtotal: $10,589,505.00 $0.00 $10,162,221.62 Amount $427,283.38 $427,973.14 EN Subtotal: $10,589,505.00 $0.00 Program Fund Type Grantee Name Grant Number Authorized Suballocated Committed to Net Drawn Available to Available to $0.00 Amount Amount Activities Amount Commit Draw CDBG EN NEWPORT BEACH B89MC060546 $423,000.00 $0.00 $423,000.00 $423,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 GRANTEE TOTALS 510.686.108.00 B90MC060546 $406,000.00 $0.00 $406,000.00 $406,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B91 MC060546 $453,000.00 $0.00 $453,000.00 $453,000.00 $0.00 $0.D0 B92MC060546 $469,000.00 $0.00 $469,000.00 $469,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B93MC060546 $472,000.00 $0.00 $472,000.00 $472,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B94MC060546 $513,000.00 $0.00 $513,000.00 $513,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B95MC060546 $534,000.00 $0.00 $534,000.00 $534,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B96MC060546 $520,000.00 $0.00 $520,000.00 $520,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B97MG060546 $515,000.00 $0.00 $515,000.00 $515,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B98MC060546 $492,000.00 $0.00 $492,000.00 $492,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B99MC060546 $495,000.00 $0.00 $495,000.00 $495,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 BOOMC060546 $498,000.00 $0.00 $498,000.00 $498,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B01MC060546 $518,000.00 $0.00 $518,000.00 $518,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B02MC060546 $490,000.00 $0.00 $490,000.00 $490,000.00 $0.00 $0.D0 B03MC060546 $426,000.00 $0.00 $426,000.00 $426,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B04MC060546 $437,000.00 $0.00 $437,000.00 $437,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 B05MC060546 $412,233.00 $0.00 $412,233.00 $412,233.00 $0.00 $0.00 B06MC060546 $373,292.00 $0.00 $373,292.00 $373,292.00 $0.00 $0.00 B07MC060546 $370,332.00 $0.00 $370,332.00 $370,332.00 $0.00 $0.00 B08MC060546 $355,659.00 $0.00 $355,659.00 $355,659.00 $0.00 $0.00 B09MC060546 $357,354.00 $0.00 $357,354.00 $357,354.00 $0.00 $0.00 BIOMC060546 $385,189.00 $0.00 $385,189.DO $385,189.00 $0.00 $0.00 B11MC060546 $323,777.00 $0.00 $247,162.62 $246,472.86 $76,614.38 $77,304.14 B12MG060546 $350.669.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $350.669.00 $350.669.00 NEWPORT BEACH Subtotal: $10,589,505.00 $0.00 $10,162,221.62 $10,161,531.86 $427,283.38 $427,973.14 EN Subtotal: $10,589,505.00 $0.00 $10,162,221.62 $10,161,531.86 $427,263.38 $427,973.14 CDBG -R EN NEWPORT BEACH B09MY060546 $96,603.00 $0.00 $96,603.00 $96,603.00 $0.00 $0.00 NEWPORT BEACH Subtotal: $96,603.00 $0.00 $96,603.00 $96,603.00 $0.00 $0.00 EN Subtotal: $96,603.00 $0.00 $96,603.00 $96,603.00 $0.00 $0.00 GRANTEE TOTALS 510.686.108.00 $0.00 $10.258.824.62 510.258134.86 5427.283.38 $427.973.14 1/1 PAGE: 1/1 yT 7 01,%ENT0R. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development �Q" yo c Office of Community Planning and Development II I I'll Integrated Disbursement and Information System * * yo IIIIIIII CDBG Activity Summary Report (GPR) for Program Year 2011 e� 98'gl NEWPORT BEACH DEV6V0 PGM Year: 2010 Project: 0010 - UTILITY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT GRANT PROGRAM IDIS Activity: 205 - UTILITY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT GRANT PROGRAM Status: Canceled 7/25/2012 8:12:05 PM Objective: Provide decent affordable housing Location: 3300 Newport Blvd Newport Beach, CA 92663 -3816 Outcome: Availability /accessibility Matrix Code: Rehab; Single -Unit Residential Initial Funding 10/09/2010 Financing Funded Amount: 0.00 Drawn Thru Program Year: 0.00 Drawn In Program Year: 0.00 Proposed Accomplishments Housing Units: 7 Actual Accomplishments Date: 29- Aug -2012 Time: 15:29 Page: 1 National Objective: LMH Description: This program provides financial assistance to the impacted low- and moderate - income owner - occupants located within proposed utility undergounding Assessment Districts in the City of Newport Beach by providing grants to cover a portion of the cost of utility hook -ups to owner - occupants within the District(s). Program benefits low- and moderate - income residents. 29 Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted: Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic c c White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Hispanic: Total: Female- headed Households: Income Category: Percent Low /Mod Annual Accomplishments Year # Benefitting Accomplishment Narrative 0 0 Owner Renter Total Extremely Low 0 0 0 Low Mod 0 0 0 Moderate 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 Percent Low /Mod Annual Accomplishments Year # Benefitting Accomplishment Narrative 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Person 0 0 0 0 0 90 PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0001 - CDBG Administration IDIS Activity: 206 - CDBG Administration Status: Open Location: Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Financing Funded Amount: 52,755.00 Drawn Thru Program Year: 52,163.75 Drawn In Program Year: 52,163.75 Proposed Accomplishments Actual Accomplishments Number assisted White: Black /African American: Asian: American Indian /Alaskan Native: Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: Asian White: Black /African American & White: American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American Other multi - racial: Asian /Pacific Islander: Hispanic: Total: Female- headed Households: Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: General Program Administration National Objective: Description: This project will provide for the overall administration of the CDBG Program. Owner Renter Total Person Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic c c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Income Category: 91 Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 Low Mod 0 Moderate 0 Non Low Moderate 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low /Mod Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 92 PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0002 - Fair Housing Services IDIS Activity: 207 - Fair Housing Services Status: Open Location: Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Financing Funded Amount: 12,000.00 Drawn Thru Program Year: 12,000.00 Drawn In Program Year: 12,000.00 Proposed Accomplishments Actual Accomplishments Number assisted White: Black /African American: Asian: American Indian /Alaskan Native: Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: Asian White: Black /African American & White: American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American Other multi - racial: Asian /Pacific Islander: Hispanic: Total: Female- headed Households: Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: Fair Housing Activities (subject to National Objective: 20% Admin Cap) (21 D) Description: This project will provide fair housing education, counseling, and enforcement services to current Newport Beach residents, coupled with landlordtenat counseling services. Owner Renter Total Person Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic C c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 Income Category: Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 Low Mod 0 Moderate 0 Non Low Moderate 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low /Mod Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 94 PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0003 - Community Resource Center IDIS Activity: 208 - Community Resource Center Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments Location: 1920 E Warner Ave Ste A Santa Ana, CA 92705 -5547 Outcome: Availability /accessibility Matrix Code: Battered and Abused Spouses National Objective: LMC Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Description: Financing This project will provide a wide variety of counseling and educational programs to help victims Funded Amount: 3,867.00 and their family members deal with the effects of domestic violence. Drawn Thru Program Year: 3,769.19 Drawn In Program Year: 3,769.19 Proposed Accomplishments People (General) : 7 Actual Accomplishments Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted: Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic C C White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 2 Black /African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 4 Female- headed Households: Income Category: no G] 95 Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 14 1st Qtr. the organization provided counseling and legal advocacy to 5 unduplicated clients. 2nd Qtr. provided assistance to 2 unduplicated clients, totaling 10 client contacts. 3rd Qtr. provided assistance to 4 unduplicated clients, totaling 30 client contacts. 4th Qtr. provided assistance to 3 unduplicated clients, totaling 48 client contacts. A total of 14 unduplicated persons were assisted during this FY and a total of 115 client contacts. Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 11 Low Mod 0 0 0 2 Moderate 0 0 0 1 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 14 Percent Low /Mod 100.0% Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 14 1st Qtr. the organization provided counseling and legal advocacy to 5 unduplicated clients. 2nd Qtr. provided assistance to 2 unduplicated clients, totaling 10 client contacts. 3rd Qtr. provided assistance to 4 unduplicated clients, totaling 30 client contacts. 4th Qtr. provided assistance to 3 unduplicated clients, totaling 48 client contacts. A total of 14 unduplicated persons were assisted during this FY and a total of 115 client contacts. PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0004 - Families Forward: Transitional Housing IDIS Activity: 209 - Families Forward: Transitional Housing Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments Location: 9221 Irvine Blvd Irvine, CA 92618 -1645 Outcome: Availability /accessibility Matrix Code: Public Services (General) (05) National Objective: LMC Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Description: Financing This program will provide assistance to homeless families to regain stability and self sufficiency. Funded Amount: 8,406.00 The target population is homeless families with children. The program also provides case management and supportive services. Funds will be used to pay a portion of the salary of a case Drawn Thru Program Year: 8,406.00 manager. Drawn In Program Year: 8,406.00 Proposed Accomplishments People (General) : 100 Actual Accomplishments Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted: Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic G C White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 36 Black /African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 4 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 46 Female- headed Households: Income Category: no G] 97 Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 101 Low Mod 0 0 0 44 Moderate 0 0 0 2 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 147 Percent Low /Mod 100.0% Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 147 1st Qtr. Families Forward provided transitional housing services to 103 unduplicated individuals which comprise 32 families moving them from crisis towards stability. 2nd Qtr. the Organization assisted 6 unduplicated persons. 3rd Qtr. the organization assisted 9 unduplicated persons. 4th Qtr. the Organization assisted 29 unduplicated persons which comprise 7 families assisted. A total of 147 unduplicated persons were assisted during this fiscal year. PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0005 - Age Well Senior Services:Home Delivered Meals IDIS Activity: 210 - Age Well Senior Services:Home Delivered Meals Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments Location: 24300 El Toro Rd Ste 2000 Laguna Woods, CA 92637- Outcome: Availability /accessibility 2777 Matrix Code: Senior Services (05A) National Objective: LMC Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Description: Financing This project provides home - delivered meals to homebound senior citizens (62 years or older) Funded Amount: 18,492.00 who are unable to prepare meals for themselves due to age, illness, or disability. The funds will be used to pay a portion of the salary of the meal staff. Drawn Thru Program Year: 18,492.00 Drawn In Program Year: 18,492.00 Proposed Accomplishments People (General) : 100 Actual Accomplishments Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted., Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic c c White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 2 Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black/African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 145 2 Female- headed Households: Income Category: 0 0 99 Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 145 1st Qtr. Age Well Seniors provided to 88 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 13,092 meals delivered. 2nd Qtr. the organization provided to 21 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 11,199 meals delivered. 3rd Qtr. the organization provided to 21 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 12,705 meals delivered. 4th Qtr. the organization provided to 15 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 8,466 meals delivered. A total of 145 unduplicated residents were provided home - delivered meals totaling 45,465 meals delivered during this fiscal year. 100 Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 68 Low Mod 0 0 0 27 Moderate 0 0 0 38 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 12 Total 0 0 0 145 Percent Low /Mod 91.7% Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 145 1st Qtr. Age Well Seniors provided to 88 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 13,092 meals delivered. 2nd Qtr. the organization provided to 21 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 11,199 meals delivered. 3rd Qtr. the organization provided to 21 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 12,705 meals delivered. 4th Qtr. the organization provided to 15 unduplicated residents home - delivered meals totaling 8,466 meals delivered. A total of 145 unduplicated residents were provided home - delivered meals totaling 45,465 meals delivered during this fiscal year. 100 PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0006 - Serving People In Need: Substance Abuse Treatment IDIS Activity: 211 - Serving People In Need: Substance Abuse Treatment Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments Location: 151 Kalmus Dr Ste H2 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 -5969 Outcome: Availability /accessibility Matrix Code: Substance Abuse Services (05F) National Objective: LMC Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Description: Financing This project provides access to substance abuse recovery to those least able to afford it - the Funded Amount: 9,246.00 homeless and low income. Case management will be provided, counseling, medical assistance, and legal assistance. Funds will be used to pay for personnel costs to implement this program. Drawn Thru Program Year: 9,246.00 Drawn In Program Year: 9,246.00 Proposed Accomplishments People (General) : 7 Actual Accomplishments Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted., Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic c c White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 Black /African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 2 Female- headed Households: U [1] X Income Category: 2O2 Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 7 1st Qtr. there were no new persons assisted. 2nd Qtr. SPIN provided assistance to 3 unduplicated clients. 3rd Qtr. SPIN provided assistance to 4 unduplicated clients. 4th Qtr. there were no new persons assisted. A total of 7 unduplicated persons were assisted, totaling 85 client contacts during this fiscal year. 102 Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 7 Low Mod 0 0 0 0 Moderate 0 0 0 0 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 7 Percent Low /Mod 100.0% Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 7 1st Qtr. there were no new persons assisted. 2nd Qtr. SPIN provided assistance to 3 unduplicated clients. 3rd Qtr. SPIN provided assistance to 4 unduplicated clients. 4th Qtr. there were no new persons assisted. A total of 7 unduplicated persons were assisted, totaling 85 client contacts during this fiscal year. 102 PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0007 - Share Our Selves (SOS): Free Medical and Dental Clinics IDIS Activity: 212 - SOS Free Medical and Dental Clinics Status: Open Objective: Create suitable living environments Location: 1550 Superior Ave Costa Mesa, CA 92627 -3653 Outcome: Availability /accessibility Matrix Code: Public Services (General) (05) National Objective: LMC Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Description: Financing This program will provide primaryurgent care on a daily walk -in basis, chronic care, and specialty Funded Amount: 8,555.00 care by appointment to unisured Orange County residents and patients in the County MSI Program. This program will assist lowmod income persons. Drawn Thru Program Year: 8,555.00 Drawn In Program Year: 8,555.00 Proposed Accomplishments People (General) : 100 Actual Accomplishments Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted., Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic c c White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 318 122 Black /African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 62 34 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 404 156 Female- headed Households: I$] Ll X Income Category: low W /M Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 0 0 292 Low Mod 0 0 0 96 Moderate 0 0 0 11 Non Low Moderate 0 0 0 5 Total 0 0 0 404 Percent Low /Mod 98.8% Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 2011 404 1st Qtr SOS provided medical clinic services to 98 unduplicated persons. 33 were Female Head of Households. 2nd Qtr. SOS provided services to 97 unduplicated persons. 33 were Female Head of Households. 3rd Qtr. SOS provided services to 113 unduplicated persons. 40 were Female Head of Households. 4th Qtr. SOS provided services to 96 unduplicated persons. 38 were Female Head of Households. A total of 404 unduplicated persons were provided with medical clinic services during this fiscal year. W /M PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0008 - Section 108 Loan Repayment IDIS Activity: 213 - Section 108 Loan Repayment Status: Open Location: , Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Financing Funded Amount: 201,654.00 Drawn Thru Program Year: 201,653.30 Drawn In Program Year: 201,653.30 Proposed Accomplishments Actual Accomplishments Number assisted: White: Black /African American: Asian: American Indian /Alaskan Native: Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: Asian White: Black /African American & White: American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American Other multi - racial: Asian /Pacific Islander: Hispanic: Total: Female- headed Households: Objective: Outcome: Matrix Code: Planned Repayment of Section National Objective: 108 Loan Principal (19F) Description: Funds will be used to repay the City's Section 108 Loan. The loan was used to partially fund public improvements to the Balboa Target Area. Owner Renter Total Person Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic C c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 105 Income Category: Owner Renter Total Person Extremely Low 0 Low Mod 0 Moderate 0 Non Low Moderate 0 Total 0 0 0 0 Percent Low /Mod Annual Accomplishments Accomplishment Narrative Year # Benefitting 100 PGM Year: 2011 Project: 0009 - Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements IDIS Activity: 214 - Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements Status: Canceled 7/25/2012 8:15:05 PM Objective: Create suitable living environments Location: 3300 Newport Blvd Newport Beach, CA 92663 -3816 Outcome: Availability /accessibility Matrix Code: Sidewalks (03L) National Objective: LMC Initial Funding 11/17/2011 Description: Financing This project will provide funds for public improvements such as construction of curb access Funded Amount: 0.00 ramps citywide. Funds will provide a portion of the construction cost. Drawn Thru Program Year: 0.00 Drawn In Program Year: 0.00 Proposed Accomplishments Public Facilities : 10 Actual Accomplishments Owner Renter Total Person Number assisted: Total Hispani Total Hispani Total Hispanic Total Hispanic c c White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Black /African American & White: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native & Black/African American: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other multi - racial: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Asian /Pacific Islander: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hispanic: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Female- headed Households: Income Category: no G] 107 Extremely Low Low Mod Moderate Non Low Moderate Total Percent Low /Mod Annual Accomplishments Year # Benefitting Owner Renter Total Person 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Accomplishment Narrative s02 Total Funded Amount: $3,474,852.80 Total Drawn Thru Program Year: $3,474,163.04 Total Drawn In Program Year: $314,285.24 PR03 - NEWPORT BEACH Page: 1 of 1 109 IDIS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DATE: 8/29/2012 OFFICE OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PRO6 - Summary of Consolidated Plan Projects for Report Year Plan IDIS Amount Drawn Amount Amount Year Prajed Project Title and Description Program Project Commited Thru Report Available to Drawn in Estimate Amount Year Draw Report Year 2011 1 CDBG Administration This project will provide for the overall CDBG $52,755.00 $52,755.00 $52,163.75 $591.25 $52,163.75 administration of the CDBG Program. 2 Fair Housing Services This project will provide fair housing education, CDBG $12,000.00 $12,000.OD $12,000.00 $0.00 $12,000.00 counseling and enforcement services to Newport Beach residents, coupled with landlord /tenat counseling services. 3 Community Resource Center This project will provide a wide variety of CDBG $3,867.00 $3,867.00 $3,769.19 $97.81 $3,769.19 counseling and educational programs to help victims and their family members deal with the effects of domestic violence. 4 Families Forward: Transitional Housing This project assists homeless families to regain CDBG $8,406.00 $8,406.00 $8,406.00 $0.00 $8,406.00 stability and self sufficiency. The target population is homeless families with children. 5 Age Well Senior Services:Home Delivered Meals This project provides home delivered meals to CDBG $18,492.00 $18,492.00 $18,492.00 $0.00 $18,492.00 homebound senior citizens (62 years or older) who are unable to prepare meals for themselves due to age. 6 Serving People In Need: Substance Abuse This program provides access to substance CDBG $9,246.00 $9,246.00 $9,246.00 $0.00 $9,246.00 Treatment abuse recovery to those least able to afford it, the homeless and low income people. 7 Share Our Selves (SOS): Free Medical and This project will provide primary/urgent care on CDBG $8,555.00 $8,555.00 $8,555.00 $0.00 $8,555.00 Dental Clinics a daily walk -on basis, chronic care, and specialty care by appointment to unisured Orange County residents and patients in the County MSI Program. 8 Section 108 Loan Repayment Funds will be used to repay the City's Section CDBG $201,654.00 $201,654.00 $201,653.30 $0.70 $201,653.30 108 loan. The loan was used to partially fund public improvements to the Balboa Target Area. 9 Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Improvements This project will provide partial funds to public CDBG $8,802.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 improvements. 1/1 TIME 3:10:52 PM PAGE: 1/1 110 p�.�ME NT OFy U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development DATE: 08 -29 -12 v e* IIhIII y°N� Office of Community Planning and Development TIME: 15:15 Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 1 Zo IIIIIIII CDBG Summary of Accomplishments c9 oe� Program Year: 2011 B'9N DEVEv NEWPORT BEACH Count of CDBG Activities with Disbursements by Activity Group & Matrix Code Grand Total 9 $314,285.24 2 $0.00 11 $314,285.24 222 Underway Completed Activity Group Activity Category Underway Activities Completed Activities Program Year Total Activities Count Disbursed Count Disbursed Count Disbursed Housing Rehab; Single -Unit Residential (14A) 0 $0.00 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 Total Housing 0 $0.00 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 Public Facilities and Improvements Public Facilities and Improvement 1 $0.00 0 $0.00 1 $0.00 (General) (03) Sidewalks (03L) 0 $0.00 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 Total Public Facilities and 1 $0.00 1 $0.00 2 $0.00 Improvements Public Services Public Services (General) (05) 2 $16,961.00 0 $0.00 2 $16,961.00 Senior Services (05A) 1 $18,492.00 0 $0.00 1 $18,492.00 Substance Abuse Services (05F) 1 $9,246.00 0 $0.00 1 $9,246.00 Battered and Abused Spouses (05G) 1 $3,769.19 0 $0.00 1 $3,769.19 Total Public Services 5 $48,468.19 0 $0.00 5 $48,468.19 General Administration and General Program Administration (21A) 1 $52,163.75 0 $0.00 1 $52,163.75 Planning Fair Housing Activities (subject to 20% 1 $12,000.00 0 $0.00 1 $12,000.00 Admin Cap) (21D) Total General Administration and 2 $64,163.75 0 $0.00 2 $64,163.75 Planning Repayment of Section 108 Loans Planned Repayment of Section 108 1 $201,653.30 0 $0.00 1 $201,653.30 Loan Principal (19F) Total Repayment of Section 108 1 $201,653.30 0 $0.00 1 $201,653.30 Loans Grand Total 9 $314,285.24 2 $0.00 11 $314,285.24 222 1.00eNTO, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development DATE: 08 -29 -12 j e* IIhIII ° Office of Community Planning and Development TIME: 15:15 Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 2 Zo IIIIIIII CDBG Summary of Accomplishments �9 oe� Program Year: 2011 AN DENEo NEWPORT BEACH CDBG Sum of Actual Accomplishments by Activity Group and Accomplishment Type Activity Group Matrix Code Accomplishment Type Program Year Open Count Completed Count Totals Public Services Public Services (General) (05) Persons 551 0 551 Senior Services (05A) Persons 145 0 145 Substance Abuse Services (05F) Persons 7 0 7 Battered and Abused Spouses (05G) Persons 14 0 14 Total Public Services 717 0 717 Grand Total 717 0 717 112 p�.�Me NT 0, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development DATE: 08 -29 -12 v e* IIhIII �°N� Office of Community Planning and Development TIME: 15:15 Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 3 Zo IIIIIIII CDBG Summary of Accomplishments c9 oe� Program Year: 2011 B'9N DEVEv NEWPORT BEACH CDBG Beneficiaries by Racial / Ethnic Category Housing -Non Housing Race Total Hispanic Total Hispanic Total Persons Persons Total Households Households Non Housing White 578 164 0 0 Black /African American 47 4 0 0 Asian 20 1 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native 4 4 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander 3 0 0 0 Other multi - racial 65 37 0 0 Total Non Housing 717 210 0 0 Grand Total White 578 164 0 0 Black /African American 47 4 0 0 Asian 20 1 0 0 American Indian /Alaskan Native 4 4 0 0 Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander 3 0 0 0 Other multi - racial 65 37 0 0 Total Grand Total 717 210 0 0 113 1.00eNTDF U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development DATE: 08 -29 -12 j e* IIhIII ° Office of Community Planning and Development TIME: 15:15 Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 4 Zo IIIIIIII CDBG Summary of Accomplishments �9 o9 Program Year: 2011 AN DENEo NEWPORT BEACH CDBG Beneficiaries by Income Category Income Levels Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Persons Non Housing Extremely Low ( < =30 %) 0 0 479 Low ( >30% and < =50 %) 0 0 169 Mod (>50% and < =80 %) 0 0 52 Total Low -Mod 0 0 700 Non Low -Mod ( >80 %) Total Beneficiaries 114 17 717 P'tV NT,, ��e *1111111 IIM�II e 9e+N DEVE�-O Office of Community Planning and Development U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Integrated Disbursement and Information System PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report Program Year 2011 NEWPORT BEACH, CA PART I: SUMMARY OF CDBG RESOURCES 01 UNEXPENDED CDBG FUNDS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 02 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 03 SURPLUS URBAN RENEWAL 04 SECTION 108 GUARANTEED LOAN FUNDS 05 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 06 RETURNS 07 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AVAILABLE 08 TOTAL AVAILABLE (SUM, LINES 01 -07) PART II: SUMMARY OF CDBG EXPENDITURES 09 DISBURSEMENTS OTHER THAN SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS AND PLANNING /ADMINISTRATION 10 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW /MOD BENEFIT 11 AMOUNT SUBJECT TO LOW /MOD BENEFIT (LINE 09 + LINE 10) 12 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING /ADMINISTRATION 13 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR SECTION 108 REPAYMENTS 14 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15 TOTAL EXPENDITURES (SUM, LINES I1 -14) 16 UNEXPENDED BALANCE (LINE 08 - LINE 15) PART III: LOWMOD BENEFIT THIS REPORTING PERIOD 17 EXPENDED FOR LOW /MOD HOUSING IN SPECIAL AREAS 18 EXPENDED FOR LOW /MOD MULTI -UNIT HOUSING 19 DISBURSED FOR OTHER LOW /MOD ACTIVITIES 20 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL LOW /MOD CREDIT 21 TOTAL LOW /MOD CREDIT (SUM, LINES 17 -20) 22 PERCENT LOW /MOD CREDIT (LINE 21 /1-INE 11) LOW /MOD BENEFIT FOR MULTI -YEAR CERTIFICATIONS 23 PROGRAM YEARS(PY) COVERED IN CERTIFICATION 24 CUMULATIVE NET EXPENDITURES SUBJECT TO LOW /MOD BENEFIT CALCULATION 25 CUMULATIVE EXPENDITURES BENEFITING LOW /MOD PERSONS 26 PERCENT BENEFIT TO LOW /MOD PERSONS (LINE 25 /1-INE 24) PART IV: PUBLIC SERVICE (PS) CAP CALCULATIONS 27 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PUBLIC SERVICES 28 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 29 PS UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 30 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS 31 TOTAL PS OBLIGATIONS (LINE 27 + LINE 28 - LINE 29 + LINE 30) 32 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 33 PRIOR YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 34 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP 35 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PS CAP (SUM, LINES 32 -34) 36 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PS ACTIVITIES (LINE 31 /LINE 35) PART V: PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATION (PA) CAP 37 DISBURSED IN IDIS FOR PLANNING /ADMINISTRATION 38 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF CURRENT PROGRAM YEAR 39 PA UNLIQUIDATED OBLIGATIONS AT END OF PREVIOUS PROGRAM YEAR 40 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS 41 TOTAL PA OBLIGATIONS (LINE 37 + LINE 38 - LINE 39 +LINE 40) 42 ENTITLEMENT GRANT 43 CURRENT YEAR PROGRAM INCOME 44 ADJUSTMENT TO COMPUTE TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP 45 TOTAL SUBJECT TO PA CAP (SUM, LINES 42 -44) 46 PERCENT FUNDS OBLIGATED FOR PA ACTIVITIES (LINE 41 /LINE 45) DATE: 08 -29 -12 TIME: 15:32 PAGE: 1 215 0.00 323,777.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 323,777.00 48,468.19 0.00 48,468.19 64,163.75 201,653.30 0.00 314,285.24 9,491.76 0.00 0.00 48,468.19 0.00 48,468.19 100.00% PY: PY: PY: 0.00 0.00 0.00% 48,468.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,468.19 323,777.00 0.00 0.00 323,777.00 14.97% 64,163.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 64,163.75 323,777.00 0.00 0.00 323,777.00 19.82% Pt>AEN;roc Office of Community Planning and Development DATE: 08 -29 -12 .,, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development TIME: 15:32 a* * Integrated Disbursement and Information System PAGE: 2 ZQ IIh�IIIIIIIII I PR26 - CDBG Financial Summary Report Q Program Year 2011 9egN oev e NEWPORT BEACH, CA LINE 17 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 17 Report returned no data. LINE 18 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING THE AMOUNT TO ENTER ON LINE 18 Report returned no data. LINE 19 DETAIL: ACTIVITIES INCLUDED IN THE COMPUTATION OF LINE 19 Plan Year IDIS Project IDIS Activity Voucher Activity Name Matrix National Number Code Objective Drawn Amount 2011 3 208 5405265 Community Resource Center 05G LMC $1,465.13 2011 3 208 5443075 Community Resource Center 05G LMC $836.39 2011 3 208 5468863 Community Resource Center 05G LMC $1,467.67 2011 4 209 5405265 Families Forward: Transitional Housing 05 LMC $8,406.00 2011 5 210 5443075 Age Well Senior Services:Home Delivered Meals 05A LMC $13,869.00 2011 5 210 5468863 Age Well Senior Services:Home Delivered Meals 05A LMC $4,623.00 2011 6 211 5405265 Serving People In Need: Substance Abuse Treatment 05F LMC $840.90 2011 6 211 5443075 Serving People In Need: Substance Abuse Treatment 05F LMC $6,950.10 2011 6 211 5468863 Serving People In Need: Substance Abuse Treatment 05F LMC $1,455.00 2011 7 212 5468863 SOS Free Medical and Dental Clinics 05 LMC $8,555.00 Total $48,468.19 110 APPENDIX "F" CHECKLIST 1-z7 APPENDIX "F ": COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST The City's Consolidated Annual Performance Evaluation Report (CAPER) must comply with several federal regulations. This appendix is designed to aid the City's representative document that the report is in full compliance with the regulations. THE SUBMISSION Was the statutory submission deadline met? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Was the Financial Summary (IDIS Report number C04PR26) provided? Yes ❑ No ❑ - grantee notified, summary received Did the report cover the appropriate program year? Yes ❑ No ❑ - grantee notified, correct report received Does the report identify CPD entitlement funds? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Does the report identify all known Federal /HUD resources available to the grantee (including SNAPS)? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Correct information noted and/or requested in PYR letter. NARRATIVES - GENERAL Does the Three /Five Year Goals and Obiectives assessment relate back to Strategic Consolidated Plan objectives? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Does the report address High Priority Needs? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Does the Affordable Housing Evaluation include the number of extremely low, low, and moderate - income renter and owner households assisted during the reporting period? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Does the Affordable Housing Evaluation include the number of households assisted with housing that meets the Section 215 definition of affordable housing for rental and home ownership? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Section 215 Affordable Housing. 1. Rental Housing: A rental housing unit is considered to be an affordable housing unit if it is occupied by a low - income household or individual and bears a rent that is the lesser of a) the existing section 8 fair market rent for comparable units in the area or b) 30 percent of the adjusted income of a household whose income equals 65 percent of the median income for the area, except that HUD may establish CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPENDIX "F" 118 income ceilings higher or lower than 65 percent of the median because of prevailing level of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. 2. Homeownership: a) housing that is for purchase, with or without rehab., qualifies as affordable housing if it 1) is purchased by a low income first time homebuyer who will make the housing his or her principal residence and 2) has a sale price which does not exceed the mortgage limit for the type of single family housing for the area under HUD's single family insuring authority under the National Housing Act. b) housing thefts to be rehabilitated, but is already awned by a household when assistance is provided, qualifies as affordable if the housing 1) is occupied by a low - income household which uses the housing as its principal residence, and 2) has a value, after rehabilitation, that does not exceed the mortgage limit for the type of single family housing for the area as described in 2a) above. Note: these definitions apply for the purposes of enumerating the number of households assisted with housing meeting the 215 affordable housing definition regardless of the Federal funding source used in support of that housing. Was there a comparison of actual accomplishments with proposed goals for the reporting period? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Were there efforts to address worse case needs? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Were there efforts to address the needs of persons with disabilities? Yes ❑ *No ❑ CONTINUUM OF CARE STRATEGY Does the CAPER identify actions taken at all points along the continuum from prevention and outreach through emergency, transitional, and permanent housing? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Other Actions addressed, include: Actions taken to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs; Yes ❑ *No ❑ Fostering and maintaining affordable housing; Yes ❑ *No ❑ Eliminating barriers to affordable housing; Yes ❑ *No ❑ Overcoming gaps in institutional structures and enhancing coordination; Yes ❑ *No ❑ Improving public housing and resident initiatives; Yes ❑ *No ❑ N/A ❑ Evaluating and reducing lead based paint hazards; Yes ❑ *No ❑ Ensuring compliance with program and comprehensive planning requirements; and Yes ❑ *No ❑ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPENDIX "F" 119 Reducing the number of persons living below the poverty level. Yes ❑ *No ❑ Did the submission include a description of the Leveraging of other public and private resources as indicated in the Plan, including how any matching requirements were satisfied? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Was a Summary of Citizen Comments included in the submission? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Did the report include a Self - evaluation? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing evaluated by FHEO Division, all grantees. No review undertaken. `Correct information noted and /or requested in PYR letter. CDBG ENTITLEMENT NARRATIVES Did the submission include an Assessment of the Relationship of CDBG Funds to the high priority needs/objectives in the plan, including an evaluation of the extent to which CDBG funds were used to benefit LMI persons? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Did Narratives also include: An explanation of the nature of and reasons for any changes in program objectives, and an indication of how the jurisdiction would change its program as a result of its experience? Yes ❑ *No ❑ An evaluation of the extent to which CDBG funds were used to benefit LMI persons? Yes ❑ *No ❑ Assessment of Efforts Made in Carrying Out Planned Actions described in the Consolidated Plan includes a narrative or other information which indicates that: The grantee pursued all resources indicated in the Consolidated Plan. Yes ❑ *No ❑ Certifications for consistency were provided for other HUD programs. Yes ❑ *No ❑ N/A ❑ The grantee did not hinder plan implementation by action or willful inaction. Yes ❑ *No ❑ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPEN0IX "F" 120 Did the grantee indicate that it has carried out activities that involved acquisition, rehabilitation or demolition of occupied property triggering the Uniform Relocation Act? *Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A (no activities) ❑ *Yes: The grantee submitted narratives which identify: The steps taken to minimize the amount of displacement resulting from the CDBG- assisted activities. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A (no activities) ❑ Steps taken to identify households, businesses, farms or nonprofit organizations who occupied properties subject to the relocation Act; whether or not they were displaced, and; the nature of their needs and preferences. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A (no activities) ❑ Steps taken to endure the timely issuance of information notices. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A (no activities) ❑ Did the grantee carry out Economic Development Activities during the reporting period? *Yes ❑ No ❑ *Yes: Job Creation /Retention Economic development jobs as applicable were made available to low- or moderate- income persons. Yes ❑ *No ❑ N/A Qob creation /retention objective not employed) ❑ A narrative of actions taken by the grantees and the businesses to ensure first consideration was or will be given to low /mod persons has been provided. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A Qob creation /retention objective not employed) ❑ A listing by job title of all permanent jobs created /retained and those that were made available to low /mod persons has been provided. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A Qob creation /retention objective not employed) ❑ Were jobs claimed as being available to low /mod persons that require special skills, work experience, or education? *Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Did the grantee include a description of the steps being taken or that will be taken to meet this requirement? Yes ❑ * *No ❑ N/A ❑ Did the grantee undertake activities that serve Limited Clientele not falling within one of the categories of presumed limited clientele low /mod benefit? CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPENDIX "F" 121 *Yes ❑ * *No ❑ ** *Can't Tell ❑ *Yes: the grantee provided a narrative description explaining how the nature, location, or other information demonstrates the activities benefit a limited clientele at least 51% of who are low- and moderate - income. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ Did the grantee undertake activities during the program year which generated Program Income to revolving funds; from Float funded activities; from the sale of real property; other loan repayments; prior period adjustments; loans outstanding or written off, parcels of CDBG- acquired property available for sale; or lump sum drawdown payments? *Yes ❑ No ❑ * *Can't Tell ❑ *Yes: narrative information provided: a) the amount of program income which was returned to each revolving fund; b) the amount repaid on each float funded activity; c) all other loan repayments broken down by the categories of housing rehabilitation, economic development, or other; and d) the amount of income received from the sale of property by parcel. Yes (A ❑B ❑C ❑D❑) "No (A ❑B ❑C ❑D❑) Prior Period Adjustments: were reimbursements made this reporting period for expenditures that have been disallowed? *Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ *Yes: the grantee included narrative information that includes: a) the activity name and number as shown in IDIS; b) the amount returned to the line of credit or program account; and c) if the reimbursement is to be made over multi -year payments, the total amount to be reimbursed and the time period over which the reimbursement is to be made. Yes (A ❑B ❑C❑) * *No(A ❑B ❑C ❑) Loans and Other Receivables *Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ Yes: The narrative for Loans and Other Receivables identified: a) Float Funded activities outstanding as of the end of the reporting period; b) the total amount of loans outstanding and the principal balance owed as of the end of the reporting period, c) parcels acquired or improved with CDBG funds that are available for sale as of the end of the reporting period; and d) the number and amount of loans in default for which the balance was forgiven or written off during the reporting period. Yes (A ❑B ❑C ❑D❑) * *No(A ❑B ❑C ❑D❑) Lump Sum Agreements *Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A ❑ *Yes: Information regarding a) the name of the financial institution; b) date the funds were deposited; c) date the use of funds commenced; and d) the percentage of funds disbursed within 180 days of deposit in the institution was provided. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPEN0IX "F" 122 Yes (AD B ❑ C ❑ D ❑) * *No (A ❑ B ❑ C ❑ D ❑) Does the grantee have CDBG funded Rehabilitation Programs with completed projects or units? *Yes ❑ No (no CDBG funded Rehab. Program ❑ N/A (no completed projects or units ❑ *Yes: the submission includes: a) a narrative description that identifies the type of program and the number of properties/units completed for each; and b) the total CDBG and other public and private funds involved in the project. Yes (A❑ B❑) * *No(A ❑B❑) NRSA Does the grantee have an approved neighborhood revitalization strategy? *Yes ❑ No ❑ *Yes: A report of progress against benchmarks was included in the CAPER. Yes ❑ * *No ❑ " Correct information noted and /or requested in PYR letter. Eligibility /national objective, primary objective, planning and administration, and public service worksheets are completed and attached. HOME PJ Worksheet Attached: Yes ❑ No - not a HOME PJ ESG Worksheet Attached: Yes ❑ No - not a recipient of ESG funds HOPWA Worksheet: Yes ❑ No - not a HOPWA grantee CPD Representative / date CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPEN0IX "F" 12S ELIGIBILITY / NATIONAL OBJECTIVE WORKSHEET Review each activity listed on the Activity Summary and CAPER Report to determine if the activities are eligible and meet the national objective. Determine if appropriate matrix codes have been utilized and if all criteria for funding have been met. Use this review sheet to list questionable activities for follow -up. After consulting with the grantee, enter the result here. Reclassify any misclassified activities, identify any ineligible activities, and take appropriate corrective or remedial action. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPEN0IX "F" W01 PRIMARY OBJECTIVE - OVERALL BENEFIT CALCULATION If national objective codes are incorrect on IDIS reports, please utilize this form to confirm overall benefit. Do the calculation shown below to determine whether the grantee met its certification that at least 70 percent of all CDBG funds expended during one, two, or three consecutive program years, as specified, were for activities benefiting :/M persons. Where the certification is not met, ask for further information and, when necessary, take corrective or remedial action. To calculate the level of overall benefit this year: 1. Figure the amount subject to program benefit: a. Enter the activity expenditures (on line 15 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) b. Subtract P&A expenditures (line 12 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) c. Equals expenditures subject to overall benefit calculation $ 2. Figure the percentage of expenditures benefiting UM Persons: a. Enter amount of expenditures benefiting UM Persons (line 19 IDIS Report number C04PR26) b. Divide by amount subject to program benefit (enter line 1.c). $ c. Equal the percentage of expenditures benefiting :/M Persons. $ 3. Compare the percentage with the overall benefit standard: The percentage should be greater than or equal to 79 %, if the grantee chose a one year certification period. Yes ❑ No ❑ For two or three year certification periods Total the cumulative expenditures subject to program benefit and divide by the cumulative expenditures directly benefiting LIM persons (low mod area, limited clientele, housing, andjobs). Ensure that progress is being made towards meeting the requirement within the certification period. Certification period 12 3 years; and program years as identified in the Certifications: , CAPER Certification period 1 years; Program Year Cumulative Program Expenditures Direct Benefit Expenditures Cumulative totals: / Percentage: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPENDIX "F" 125 PLANNING AND ADMINISTRATIVE COST CAP WORKSHEET If IDIS matrix codes are incorrect on any planning and administrative activity, you must verify planning and administrative costs utilizing this form. Calculate the level of planning and administrative cost expenditures according to the steps below. The grantee is required to be within the 20 percent cap. If the grantee has exceeded the cap, ask for further information and, when necessary, take corrective or remedial action. 1. Figure the expenditures cap; a. Enter the grant and program income amount (line 2, plus line 5 in IDIS Report number C04PR26) $ b. Multiply by 20 percent _ c. Equals the cap $ 2. Figure this year's P&A expenditures: a. Enter total of expenditures for planning & administration (Part 11 line 12 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) $ b. Enter total of planning and administrative current year unliquidated obligations (Par V, line 38 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) $0 c. Add lines 2.a. and 2.b. d. Enter total of planning and administrative prior year unliquidated obligations (Part V, line 39 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) $0 e. Subtract line 2.d. from 2.c. 3. Compare cap (on line I. c.) with P&A expenditures (on line 2.e.): a. Cap exceeded? Yes ❑ No ❑ if Yes, amount (line 2.e. minus 1.c.) $_ b. Divide line 2.e. byline 1.a. P&A expenditures are less than the cap or equal to it 20 P&A expenditures exceed the cap CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPENDIX "F" 120 PUBLIC SERVICE COST CAP WORKSHEET If matrix codes for public service activities are incorrect on IDIS activity reports, please utilize this form to verify the public service cap calculation. Calculate the level of public service obligations according to the steps below. The grantee is required to be within the 15 percent cap. If the grantee has exceeded the cap, ask for further information and, when necessary, take corrective or remedial action. 1. Figure the obligations cap: a. Enter the grant amount (line 2 of IDIS Report number C04PR26)$ b. Multiply by 15 percent (or by the alternative percentages, if applicable, as described in the note below) X .15 c. Amount d. Enter the amount of program income received in the preceding program year (line 33 of IDIS Report number CO2PR26) $0 e. Multiply by 15 percent f. Amount $0 g. Total of lines 1.c. and 1.f. equals the cap 2. Figure this year's public service obligations: a. Enter total of public service expenditures (Part IV, line 27 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) b. Enter total of public service unliquidated obligations (Part IV, line 28 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) $0 c. Add lines 2.a. and 2.b. d. Enter last year's public service unliquidated obligations (Part IV, line 29 of IDIS Report number C04PR26) $0 e. Subtract line 2.d. from line 2.c. 3. Compare cap (on line 1.g.) with obligations (on line 2.e.): a. Cap exceeded? Yes ❑ No ❑ If Yes, amount (2.e. minus 1.g.): $ b. Add lines 1.a. and 1.d. Divide line 2.e. by sum of line 1.a. and 1.d. Obligations are less than the cap or equal to it Obligations exceed the cap CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CAPER FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2011 -2012 APPEN0IX "F" 127 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DRAFT CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2011 -2012 Notice is hereby given that the City of Newport Beach, California has prepared the draft Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) for the Fiscal Year, beginning July 1, 2011, and ending June 30, 2012, as required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. A copy of the CAPER will be available for public review from September 10, 2012 to September 25, 2012. PUBLIC HEARING: In addition, the Newport Beach City Council will hold a public hearing to review comments received on the draft CAPER at the following date, time, and location: Date: September 25, 2012 Time: 7:00 PM Location: City Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA DESCRIPTION: The draft CAPER provides a detailed account of how the City of Newport Beach utilized its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and other funds in Fiscal Year 2011 -2012 to pursue the strategies, goals, and objectives proposed in the City's 2011 -2012 One Year Action Plan and how well the City addressed the housing and community development needs identified in the City's 2010 -2014 Consolidated Plan. PURPOSE: The purpose of the Public Hearing for the CAPER is to allow the public the opportunity to comment on the manner in which the City utilized federal and non - federal funds for the one -year period that ended on June 30, 2012. REVIEW OF THE CAPER DOCUMENT: Copies of the draft CAPER will be available for public review and comment from September 10, 2012, to September 25, 2012 at the following locations: City Clerk's Office: City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, CA Community Development Dept: City of Newport Beach, 3300 Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, CA Central Library: 1000 Avocado Avenue, Newport Beach, CA Questions and written comments regarding the draft CAPER may be addressed to James Campbell, Principal Planner, at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA 92663. You may also call (949) 644 -3210 with any questions concerning the above documents. ACCESSIBILITY TO MEETINGS AND DOCUMENTS: It is the objective of the City to comply with, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and the ADA Amendment Act of 2008, the Fair Housing Act, and the Architectural Barriers Act in all respects. If you require public documents in an accessible format, the City will make reasonable efforts to accommodate your request. If you require a disability - related accommodation to attend or participate in a hearing or meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the City Clerk's Office at least 48 hours prior to the meeting at (949) 644 -3005. q old" Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk City of Newport Beach STAVE OF CALIFORNIA) ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County of Los Angeles; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the notice published. I am a principal clerk of the NEWPORT BEACH /COSTA MESA DAILY PILOT, which was adjudged a newspaper of general circulation on September 29, 1961, case A6214, and June 11, 1963, case A24831, for the City of Costa Mesa, County of Orange, and the State of California: Attached to this Affidavit is a true and complete copy as was printed and published on the following date(s): Saturday, September 8, 2012 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on September 12, 2012 at Los Angeles, California llU,vbfr +,�VX (,f�t✓lyf H :Wh , 4 Signature %R0 ),', J0 D 9Z:0IWV Z CEA1301d 0 J