HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 - Establish Marina Park Parking Lots Hours, Approve the Marina Park Daily Parking Permit, and Exempt Master and Annual Permit Parking from Marina Park Parking Lots - CorrespondenceReceived After Agenda Printed
October 27, 2015
Item No. 6
Rieft Kim
From: Denys Oberman <dho@obermanassociates.com>
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2015 11:23 AM
To: Dixon, Diane; Petros, Tony; keithcurryl@yahoo.com; Dept - City Council; Kiff, Dave; City
Clerk's Office; dho@obermanassociates.com
Subject: Letter to City Council re. Marina Park Plan -REVISED
Attachments: Marina Park- Letter to City Council for record 10-27-15 session.docx
Importance: High
Sensitivity: Confidential
Please discard the prior letter, and distribute and enter into record the attached Letter ,which includes edit to
reflect the Correct number of planned Parking spaces on the Marina Park site of 177.
Thank you,
Denys Oberman
.......................
Note -please
Regards,
Denys H. Oberman, CEO
MOBERMAN
OBERMAN Strategy and Financial Advisors
2600 Michelson Drive, Suite 1700
Irvine, CA 92612
Tel (949) 476-0790
Cell (949) 230-5868
Fax (949) 752-8935
Email: dho(a)obermanassociates.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The documents accompanying this transmission contain confidential information belonging to the sender which is
legally privileged. The information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this telecopied information is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify us immediately at 9491476-0790 or the electronic address above, to arrange
for the return of the document(s) to us.
Marina Park- Letter to City Council 10-25-15
PLEASE DISTRIBUTE TO COUNCIL MEMBERS AND ENTER INTO THE PUBLIC
RECORD IN CONNECTION WITH CITY COUNCIL SESSION 10-27-15
Mayor and Members of the City Council:
We have had the opportunity to visit the Balboa Penninsula Marina Park site, and
discuss the staff's proposed operational plans with the City.
When initially proposed, the Balboa Penninsula residential community was
enthusiastic about having a Community Center close by which could be used for
recreation and learning, with some special events. The project started as a center
budgeted in the $25 mil. range. It was subsequently expanded in footprint and expense
to several times that amount, with building and facility footprint over twice what was
anticipated by the public.
The Center's luxurious expanded capacity and financial expenditure well beyond the
initial plan are clear indications that the City's vision and intent was to create a
Commercial —like major Event Venue , generating significant revenue streams to the
City . This was not the intent conveyed to, or initially supported by, the public.
We accept that this is now the case, and are willing to welcome a facility that can be
used by the residents and visitors alike and provides revenue streams to the City -----
However, NOT at the expense of the quality of life of the Balboa Penninsula and
surrounding coastal community.
The Center has many nice features which the Community appreciates. The expanded
capacity and programming for the facility and proposed operational approach presents a
number of concerns. We are focused here on two related areas of key concern: The
proposed parking schemes and hours of operation. As recommended by staff, Parking
and Hours of Operation present serious problems to the Community--- noise and
nuisance, traffic and ----most importantly, significantly limit the members of the
community's ability to get to and out of, and park in, the area in which they live.
Areas of particular concern in the City staff's plan recommendations to Council are as
follow:
1) Center Capacity and proposed Parking Scheme -
a. The Staff report states that there are a "total of 392 parking
spaces"... INCLUDING the 3 parking lots on the facility site, AND"the North
side of W. Balboa Blvd., W. Balboa median, 18th Street and W. Bay Ave".
The count of 392 is a misleading statement, as it suggests that: a) there is
sufficient parking for the events and capacity of the Park venue to
accommodate this level of visitors, and b) it sets forth a space count that
includes parking necessary for residents to park near where they live, not to
mention beach going visitors who may frequent the area.
The ACTUAL parking capacity currently on the Site plans of 177 spaces will not
even accommodate the Non -community events planned including staff and
concessioners, much less ANY actual members of the community who may wish
to use any part of the facility at the same time. One simple event on the second
story of the main building could house approximately 150 plus people, which,
with event and facility staff, would use up 100% of the parking capacity at the
site.
Where would other Visitors to the Center( residents and others) park?
Where can Residents of the community expect to park within reasonable
distance of their residences? And some measure of other Beach visitors?
b. The Staff report proposes to except those with Annual and Master Permits
from using them at the Community Center site parking- many of these people
are residents with Physical disabilities or seniors. This is unacceptable.
In short, with the capacity of the facility and the many Events and Venues already
planned and programmed, it is highly unlikely that Residents of the Community
will be able to park at and potentially make regular use of the Marina Park
"Community Center".
This is unfair at best.
2) Hours of Operation -
Staff has proposed plans for parking and operations hours of 6:30 am -12:00 midnight.
This is as transparent measure that is NOT consistent with the needs or character of the
residential community in the surrounding area. We surveyed other city Community
centers, and note that other City Community Centers have hours of operation from 8:00
am to 7:00 or 8:00 pm( earlier closes at some on Saturdays ) and closed on Sundays,
with Hours for Special events NOT extending later than a maximum of 10:00 pm.
Statements were made by the management of the other various Community Centers
that, 10:00 pm is curfew, and we need to not create impact on the residents in the
nearby Community".
We understand that the coastal activities may make it sense to have opening hours a
bit earlier, and also full days on Saturdays and Sundays given recreational patterns.
However, where is the Equity in 12:00 midnight hours for the Residents of Central
Balboa Penninsula community, and those on the Islands subject to across -water
impacts of late night noise and nuisance?
With the numerous events and alcohol serving establishment on premises, we are
setting up the community for "another Woody's" set of impacts.This is undesirable and
inequitable for the Community.
PROPOSED SOLUTIONS PLAN AND REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
We have carefuilly evaluated the situation, and believe that there are solutions
to addressing the parking challenge in a manner that is not adverse to the community:
provides residents and other visitors fair access to and ability to use the center without
denying residents' reasonable access to their homes, and supports a reasonable level
of revenue -generating commercial activity desired by the City.
1) Designate a certain number of spaces at the facility for Resident/community use,
on a first come first serve basis. A reasonable number would be in the range of
100. Permits and meters can be available for such purpose.
2) Honor/recognize Annual and Master Permits for facility use, with time limits.
3) Convert the unnecessariy large( drought intolerant) grass area to add an
additional 250 spaces, to be allocated as a combination of Open and permitted
parking. The Penninsula has both beach and grass parks, and does not need
another one.
4) Roll back Park Operating hours to be consistent with benchmark for Community
center facilities near residential neighborhoods. Hours of 7:00 am- 8:00 pm Mon-
Thurs and Sunday, and up to 10:00 pm on Fridays and Saturdays is more than
adequate to accommodate all types of use and provide significant containment of
parking and nuisance, drunk and disorderly —related problems.
5) Establish a Residents permit program for residential streets subject to Park
overflow and daily beach use.lmpacted areas would likely be streets of west
12- 14th, and 16th -18th . ( may require additional study to determine most
appropriate schedule).
We respectfully request that the Council move to Deny staff's recommendations
pertaining to Parking scheme other than the meter cost and daily rate, and also Hours
of parking and operations, and move to Approve the recommendations listed 1-4,
above.
Thank you.
Denys H. Oberman
and Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach