Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-102 - Adopting the West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan (PA2015-138)RESOLUTION NO. 2016-102
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE WEST
NEWPORT MESA STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN (PA2015-
138)
WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach (City)
adopted Ordinance No. 2015-12 creating a height overlay district to allow increased
residential building height along with an increased setback for properties located in the
Multiple Residential District in Statistical Area A2 in West Newport Mesa;
WHEREAS, the height overlay district provides an opportunity to better improve the
aesthetic environment in the West Newport Mesa area;
WHEREAS, West Newport Mesa Land Use Policy LU 6.6.4 in the General Plan directs
the City to work with property owners and encourages the preparation of a master plan for
the residential neighborhood that defines park and streetscape improvements that provide
amenities for local residents and enhances the area's identity;
WHEREAS, stakeholder meetings were conducted on January 26, 2016, to identify
some of the primary concerns and desires for improving the area;
WHEREAS, public workshops with local residents, business owners, and property
owners occurred at the West Newport Community Center Gymnasium on February 17, 2016,
March 16, 2016, and June 22, 2016, to help guide the Master Plan's development;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the progress of the draft Master Plan
during study sessions on February 18, 2016, and June 9, 2016, and provided further
guidance to staff on potential improvements to the Master Plan at each of these study
sessions;
WHEREAS, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission reviewed the draft
Master Plan during its meeting on July 5, 2016, and expressed its support in implementing
the concepts provided in the Master Plan;
WHEREAS, on July 21, 2016, the Planning Commission reviewed the final draft of the
Master Plan at its regular meeting held in City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center
Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and
considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting. After some discussion and further
direction, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the West Newport
Mesa Streetscape Master Plan, with minor amendments; and
WHEREAS, on August 9, 2016, the City Council considered the final draft of the
Master Plan at its regular meeting held in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic
Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting
was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and
oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council at this meeting.
Resolution No. 2016-102
Page 2 of 2
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows:
Section 1: The recitals provided above are true and correct and are incorporated
into the operative part of this resolution.
Section 2: The City Council does hereby adopt the West Newport Mesa Streetscape
Master Plan, which is attached as Exhibit 'A," and incorporated herein by reference. The
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan shall apply to all property within the project
area, as depicted on page 1 of Exhibit "A."
Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is,
for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 4: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity
will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the
CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no
potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly.
Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City
Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 9tn day of August, 2016.
ATTEST:
Leilani I. E
City Clerk
Fp
6iane B. ixo
Mayor
Attachment: Exhibit A - West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
ANOMR-d
West Newport Mesa
STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN
Prepared for the C
This page intentionally left blank.
WEST NEWPORT MESA
STREETSCAPE
MASTER PLAN
Prepared for the
City of Newport Beach.
O�
1 Y
n
C'141 �P
FO V -
Document prepared by
RRM Design Group.
rrm
1'f design
group
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
100 Civic Center Drive,
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(949) 644-3309
CITY COUNCIL
Diane B. Dixon, Mayor - District I
Tony Petros - District 2
Duffy Duffield - District 3
Kevin Muldoon, Mayor Pro Tem - District 4
Edward D. Selich - District 5
Scott Peotter - District 6
Keith D. Curry - District 7
PLANNING COMMISSION
Kory Kramer, Chair
Peter Koetting,Vice Chair
Peter Zak, Secretary
Bradley Hillgren
Ray Lawler
Bill Dunlap
Erik Weigand
Tim Brown
CITY STAFF
Kimberly Brandt,AICP Community Development Director
BrendaWisneski,A1CP Deputy Community Development Director
Benjamin Zdeba,AICP Associate Planner
Tony Brine, PETE City Traffic Engineer
This page intentionally left blank.
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECTAREA.........................................................................I
1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW...............................................................I
1.3 PUBLIC OUTREACH...............................................................2
1.4 GENERAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ...... 3
1.5 IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES................................................4
2 PLACENTIA AVENUE
2.1
EXISTING CONDITIONS......................................................7
2.2
PUBUC INPUT...........................................................................7
2.3
OPPORTUNITIES......................................................................8
2.4
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.............................................10
2.5
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE......................................15
3 SUPERIOR AVENUE
3.1
EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................17
3.2
OPPORTUNITIES....................................................................17
3.3
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.............................................17
3.4
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE......................................21
4
MONROVIA AVENUE • 15TH STREET
• PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH
STREET
4.1
INTRODUCTION...................................................................23
4.2
EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................23
4.3
OPPORTUNITIES....................................................................25
4.4
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.............................................27
4.5
CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE......................................33
5
LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE
AMENITIES
5.1
PLANT PALETTE .............................. ........................... ............
35
5.2
SITE FURNISHINGS...............................................................39
5.3
WAYFINDING SIGNAGE.....................................................41
5.4
LIGHTING................................................................................42
5.5
PUBLICART..............................................................................42
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6 IMPLEMENTATION PHASING
6.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................45
6.2 PROJECT PHASING AND COST ESTIMATES................45
6.2 FUNDING SOURCES............................................................46
A APPENDIX A
A.I LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES CONCEPT LEVEL
ESTIMATE.................................................................................A
This page intentionally left blank.
1 INTRODUCTIC
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Maste
INTRODUCTION
VIF
I
West Newport Mesa Study Area Map
1.1 PROJECT AREA
The West Newport Mesa neighborhood is roughly bound by 16th
Street, MonroviaAvenue, Hospital Road, and Newport Boulevard.
The site for the proposed Newport Banning Ranch Development
abuts the study area to the west and Hospital Road abuts the
study area to the south. The study area covers approximately 149
acres of land within the City of Newport Beach and is comprised
of residential, commercial, industrial, and medical office uses with
several housing complexes, numerous medical uses, industrial
offices and buildings, and Carden Hall, Pacifica Christian High
School, and Coastline Community College.
1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan (Plan)
is a document designed to establish a vision and foster
implementation of an action plan to beautify and improve the
public right-of-way within West Newport Mesa. It provides a
framework to discuss future development requirements in the
private and public realms and address relationships between the
building edge and the roadway. The ultimate goal is to create
a lively and safe multimodal area that serves the needs of the
community.
In developing the Plan, the team reviewed several pertinent
planning documents, including the Newport Beach General Plan,
Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan, and the proposed Newport
Banning Ranch Planned Community Master Development Plan.
Several public outreach events were conducted to encourage
public involvement, to better understand the needs and concerns
West NewtportMesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach �'
of the community area, and to prioritize projects within West
Newport Mesa.
The Plan identifies challenges with the study area and provides
recommended improvements and phasing as well as cost
estimates to assist with implementation. The following primary
goals were identified to guide the design and development of the
study area:
• Develop a vision for West Newport Mesa.
• Implement complete street principles to better serve
pedestrians, transit riders, bicyclists, and automobiles.
• Encourage bicyclist and pedestrian activity.
• Create a more walkable environment.
• Improve safety.
• Improve landscape areas to be more aesthetically pleasing.
• Utilize sustainability measures such as low -water -use
planting and LED lighting.
• Implement traffic calming measures.
1.3 PUBLIC OUTREACH
In an effort to involve all those interested and affected by the Plan,
public outreach events were conducted to better understand
the needs and concerns of the community, residents, employees,
and visitors of the area. Stakeholder interviews and community
workshops were held to provide a variety of opportunities for
the community to become engaged in the planning process and
help develop strategies to best serve their needs.
1.3.1 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS
Interviews were conducted on January 26, 2016, with various
stakeholders interested in the improvements to West Newport
Mesa. The following stakeholders were interviewed:
• Representatives from the Newport Knolls, Newport
Terrace, and One Nautical Mile communities as well as
Seaside Catering & Cafe, a local business
• Tony Petros, City of Newport Beach Councilmember
• MBK Homes and Studio PAD Landscape Architects on Ebb
Tide Development
During these interviews, opportunity and constraint maps and
existing conditions photos were shared to support the discussion
for the vision of the study area.
Placentia Avenue existing condition
15th 'feet existing condition
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 2
_ _---- — City of Newpo coach
INTRODUCTION
Dot exercise at March 16th workshop
Nna� tlo ow i�k�t
Top ten community desires deternnned from public outreach
3 I West Newport M_esa_Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
1.3.2 PUBLIC WORKSHOPS
Several public workshops were conducted in early 2016, to assist
the project team in identifying and prioritizing issues and ideas to
create a vision for the study area:
• Workshop #I: February 17, 2016
• Workshop #2: March 16, 2016
• Planning Commission Meeting:June 9,2016
• Public Open House:June 22, 2016
• Planning Commission Final Review: July 11, 2016
Community members shared their comments and concerns in
response to the opportunities and constraints maps, proposed
improvement concepts, planting, site furnishings, lighting, and
graphics presented by RRM Design Group. The main topics of the
workshop included improving walkability and pedestrian safety,
bicycle safety, addressing high speeds on roadways, streetscape
beautification, low -water -use planting, increasing street amenities,
increasing visibility and lighting, improving parking availability, and
addressing drainage issues. This feedback was the foundation used
to develop the concepts outlined later in the Plan.
1.4 GENERAL OPPORTUNITIES AND
CONSTRAINTS
Information gathered from field observations, City staff input, and
public comments were utilized in the analysis and integrated into
an exhibit (Figure 1. 1).
Key topics that were identified by the community include:
• Increase lighting to improve visibility and safety, and to help
reduce vandalism
• Widen sidewalks
• Increase parking availability and capacity
• Remove sidewalk obstacles such as utilities and signage
• Add traffic calming measures
• Improve overall safety for vehicles, bicyclists, and
pedestrians
• Improve visibility to promote a safe feeling
• Add more bicycle facilities
• Address vandalism, graffiti, and homelessness
• Implement 15 foot setbacks in entire study area
• Provide opportunities for nodes, benches, wider parkways
and sidewalks
• Utilize complete streets concepts
• Create more walkable streets
• Consider bike share program
• Foster neighborhood feeling on smaller streets
• Provide safer crossings for pedestrians
LfOYfitslexLuteo
NRtlfClgx lq
\AMNYIG fLNCM
MYfIINIIfMI
�Dtx ILN mttn rOf
nccu LIO
r.%
IIY NG qN'a
PlA i0 t45l IN
EMER MEj
W, [OAS T
G1hx..G UF':n .. lN3t
NDOIrLOLM000
wucm fNLf
r smpNG L
xLULLu lNNf
cornet sIL®t
<NNY-r<w *e
'AccutNALns
AI [ND OI
16TH STREET ! -
a
C
HM.lION1IIiYE A}AP4Nfit1
4(MQYS
rznAcr
MI4PN1! 1rUt.Y r4W
Surm.+ mv»or
aN
Np:xA: wa
6tWron
MptI
t�l12A5:X M4D!1Y
.YAYrWiR
LEGEND
li IC T I" .A C 0liIA11N W.. IGX
QJ' p
P.C
.....
("v M.N.tYGEMit)
EY -1 3rL' F
PH( ,)5 ` f f ...
iAFS
17
lap
Figure I.1: Communy car.- iems an. i.'ers
1.5 IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES
1.5.1 COMPLETE STREETS
Implementation of the complete streets design philosophy is a
large part of the improvements that are desired for the study
area. This movement pushes to plan for balanced, multimodal
transportation network that meets the needs of all users
(motorists, pedestrians, people bicycling, children, persons with
disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods, and users
of public transportation) of streets, roads, and highways. The
California Department ofTransportation (Caltrans) adopted
Mrtl NOi4
.-A-1:'
MIMEO USES
19LSA1.3 U n' 11 YW11
AT WL 0vi
INTRODUCTION
VISLFlYCL IARIA 0!V!{OlMINI
N tNx¢ 1 MfA
AUDrOC6 C,OSSNG
MOULD Lrl NrUtt
UNDFIGbYNDNC.,O•
Fxlrf AUm LLtA
WOM SttfM nUS
CONflLNMID LSA
C1ctKi1 RL[SIVA.
fU6SnALAttL
LEI,WMTt ftx ALLAN t
xA,VW
unu vaswn
IlrxLrG ono
9YRYDL
.Cpli[Llfl •
LDNMNO L[0
.ulwceo
v1ylAm 11
NR6lONN
101 VfNKI! LIrDlNxx! Id
MfiLIG NnY11! Wp[AI
.COACLIxf Iq OL M[pCAt
WISIrANL SE9VNG
cl LlSIDlNIIM
C,OSbSG
G
NANOVf4
complete street policies in 2008, and has been working to
implement complete streets throughout the State transportation
system. These policies are also supported by Federal law
requiring safe accommodations for all transportation users.
West NewportMesa Streetscanpe Master Plan A
City of Newport Beach I 4
INTRODUCTION
1.5.2 GREEN STREETS AND SUSTAINABILITY
The study area provides opportunities to enhance environmental
resources and create sustainable site improvements to reduce
stormwater pollution and runoff, minimize solar heat gain, and
encourage walking and biking.
A large percentage of the surfaces within the street corridors
right-of-way are impervious and absorb summer heat. Impervious
surfaces prevent the percolation of water, creating stormwater
runoff that washes motor vehicle pollutants and other surface
contaminants into storm drains and eventually to reservoirs and
oceans. "Green Streets" principles should be applied to streets,
where appropriate, within the study area in an effort to reduce
water pollution and replenish local groundwater storage. Green
streets strategies include managing stormwater through small
scale drainage features to slow, filter, and capture urban runoff and
precipitation. Several ways to accomplish this are to increase the
permeable areas through parkway strips, medians, bioswales, and
storm drains with pervious bottoms to allow infiltration.
Solar heat gain is created when dark elements absorb heat from
the sun and emit excess heat throughout the day and night. A way
to minimize this is to use lighter colored materials to reflect the
sun's heat and to create shade over the exposed areas. Street
trees planted in parkways and medians are an effective way to
create shade and absorb greenhouse gases (GHGs) and other
airborne pollutants.
GHGs can also be reduced by providing more opportunities
for non -motorized transportation. The Plan aims to improve
neighborhood walkability by increasing sidewalk connectivity,
accessibility, sidewalk improvements, increased lighting,
enhanced Class II bike lanes, and sharrows. Providing alternate
transportation choices also creates opportunities for a healthier
lifestyle within the community.
reduce impact on traditional drainage systems
Jr I West New Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of I-iowrnrt Beach ----_ _ .
Law -water -use planing, current irrgabon techniques, mukh, and increased permeable
area are all ways to create a r )re sustainable environment
a
PLACENTIA AVEN
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
PLACENTIA AVENUE
2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Placentia Avenue, from just north of Production Place south to
Hospital Road, is lined with medical, commercial, office, industrial,
and dense residential uses, and is urban in nature. The right-
of-way is fairly wide, varying from 60 to 80 feet and designated
for bicycle, vehicular and bus travel. Parking is prohibited along
Placentia Avenue. The following elements describe the existing
conditions:
• High vehicular travel speed
EBB TIDE
• Uninviting pedestrian and bicycle environment due to
PROJECT
exposure to traffic
SEASIDE CAFE &
CATERING
• Lack of seating and trash receptacles
• Four bus stops provided by OCTA for bus route
• Reduced visibility at intersections for vehicles and
pedestrian activity, especially I Sth Street intersection
• Lack of street trees and planted medians north of Superior
\
Avenue intersection
DPOINT COVE APARTMENTS
• Variety of plant species on privately and publicly owned
JQ
landscapes
NEWPORT c�
• Varying building setback distances
SUPERIOR
NEWPORT MEDICAL Q
Powerlines alongboth sides of the street
TERRACE PLAZA •f
The northern border of Placentia Avenue, just south of 16th
;. �...... �. *. f.;
Street, is the City boundary between Costa Mesa and Newport
r r r r r
Beach, yet there is no signage, gatewayelement, or change in
identity signifying the transition between the two cities.
'PORT BROOKVIEW
-
REST NEWPORT
2.2 PUBLIC INPUT
Comments collected from community members about Placentia
Avenue at the various public outreach events include:
• Pedestrians and bicyclists feel constrained due to high
vehicle speeds
-
• Reduced visibility turning right on 15th Street from
UNION
Placentia Avenue heading south
t BANK
• Pedestrian and bicycle crossing I Sth Street from Placentia
Avenue concerns
-
• Barrier shrub planting outside Newport Terrace
LEGIU, u
encroaches onto sidewalk on Placentia Avenue and gives
CITY LIMIT HOA G NEWPORT LIDO MEDP
-- PROJECT STUDYAREA LIMIT HEALTH CENTER
little room to walk
©PHOTO LOCATIONS CENTER
Possible mid -block crossing opportunity
AND DIRECTION
EF61.WG CLASS " €' P LANE
PROPOS€D '.'KE LA I— ��■
_EKISTNGCLASi K:LANE .f
PROPOSED GLASS ii'rCE LANE, -
OCTA SE CLAS
Ex6T.4G POWERUNES
STREET LIGHT OPPORWM'
�..UDEWALY. GPPORTMTY
cTRAFFIC SIGNAL
13 So STOP N
P!acentio Avenue opportunities and coostIo nts map wtth existing photo locations
7
I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan_
City OFNew B, a& h
P
2.3 OPPORTUNITIES
With consideration to existing conditions and public input, several opportunities for improvement were identified:
• Enhanced bike lanes
• Landscaped medians and parkways with low -water -use plants with unified plant theme
• Additional site furnishings
• Enhanced crosswalks
• Standard setback policies for new development
• Improved identity for people entering Newport Beach from Costa Mesa
• Gateway opportunity at north PlacentiaAvenue when entering the City of Newport Beach
East side of Placentia Avenue looking north adjacent to Ebb Tide Development with
bike lane improvements and 15'setback improvement opportunities
ID 1. ■li
Intersection at Placentia Avenue and 15th Street looking scuth w"h
enV it cc—ent and bike Ione improvements
Intersection at Placentia Avenue and 15th Street looking north with aosswolk
Bike Ione and sidewalk improvement opportunities ?om P,acen-s Avenue looking south
West Newport -Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I Q
City of Ne•�, port ", 7ch
ENTIA AVENUE
LEGEND
# J� SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
to STRIPED BIKE LANES
mjjjw LANDSCAPE MEDIANS
Y LOW-WATER-USETREES
i
LOW -WATER -USE SHRUBS AND
GROUNDCOVER
SITE FURNISHINGS
STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
Existing ccndimns on In icenna Avenue beeveen 15th Street
9 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
2.4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Placentia Avenue is a four -lane undivided, highly traveled road in
the study area. The existing conditions perspective (Figure 2. 1),
shows the Placentia Avenue right-of-way between I Sth Street and
Production Place, and exhibits current conditions including varying
sidewalk widths, building locations, and overhead powerline
heights. Vehicular speeds consistent with an arterial road cause
safety concerns for exposed pedestrians and bicyclists.
Several proposed improvements focus on streetscape
beautification and pedestrian and bicycle safety are shown in the
perspective in Figure 2.2. Recommended improvements designed
to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and experience include
meandering sidewalks, striped bike lanes, and additional site
furnishings. A modified sidewalk configuration will allow space
for planted parkways as well as provide opportunities to locate
bus stops, site furnishings, signage, and utilities in a way that allows
increased accessible movement along the corridor.
Additional site furnishings, as identified in Section 5.2 of this
document, should be installed at approximately one location per
block. Additional furnishings may be located on private property,
Proposed improvements along Placentia Avenue looking north
should property owners choose to add to the theme and
walkability of the area. An opportunity for an accessible bus stop
also exists in front of the residential development across from
Production Place.
Landscape medians are proposed for PlacentiaAvenue in locations
which do not block or limit access to existing residences and
businesses. Canopy trees with low shrub and groundcover are
— West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of ! o; t+ewpBeacn I 10
aLACENTIA AVENUE _
rmAffuNoscerf, r f
s' II' m
m
Il'
1GYFl GNf
Ar s' P
iGVEL GNE fI1:F fgfW/3R
As
W111EE"ON
SIOfWAIS
COX01110N WAY
WA1
flCf iRAtle WiF RIVFI UNI
YNL
MfONX
11NF
CONMION
M
'
CUA410{ML
"
r
.
improvements
EDGECONDMON
VARIES
FUWRE TS'PRIVATE SETBACK i
W TH NEW DEVELOPMENT
TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY
WIDTH AND POWERUNES.
MURUAUMA'PARKWAY
p, WITH TREES.
Typek Existing Condition======IM1•MIWIWII• Typek Proposed Improvements=IMlWIMIWI1•=lM==
1 I West N_ewwport Mesa Streetscc a Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
"
r
Ali
EDGECONDMON
VARIES
FUWRE TS'PRIVATE SETBACK i
W TH NEW DEVELOPMENT
TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY
WIDTH AND POWERUNES.
MURUAUMA'PARKWAY
p, WITH TREES.
Typek Existing Condition======IM1•MIWIWII• Typek Proposed Improvements=IMlWIMIWI1•=lM==
1 I West N_ewwport Mesa Streetscc a Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
recommended for median plantings to provide shade, while
maintaining visibility along the corridor. Street trees should
be planted in parkways with a width of four feet or greater. In
areas where powerlines occur and will not be undergrounded
at the time of improvements, trees with a smaller canopy height
should be considered in order to avoid tree topping under the
powerlines.
Low -water -use plant species for parkways, medians, and
private landscape improvements have been selected and are
included in Chapter 5: Landscape and Streetscape Amenities. A
maintenance program tailored to the West Newport Mesa area is
recommended as a future implementation item to ensure the area
is well kept
Future development should include a I S -foot setback from the
street frontage to allow for street beautification, widened and
meandered sidewalks with planted parkways, and increased space
for pedestrian nodes and site furnishings (Figure 2.3). At the time
of future development, the City may obtain an easement for these
improvements.
2.4.1 PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS
Four improvement types were identified for improvements
along Placentia Avenue within the public realm. Recommended
improvements are located based on existing conditions, available
public right-of-way, and enhancement opportunities. Areas where
no proposed changes occur are located where existing conditions
are restrictive.
Type A: Existing Conditions:
Currently, areas in the right-of-way have narrow sidewalks and
missing trees, which make it hot and uncomfortable for walking.
Many existing parkways include grass with a high need for water.
Type A: Proposed Improvements:
The sidewalk will be widened to make a more walkable pedestrian
experience. Existing mature trees will be supplemented with
lower story plants and groundcovers. New street trees will be
added to provide additional shade for pedestrians and to beautify
the street. Water -intensive lawn will be replaced with drought -
tolerant, visually appealing shrubs that will preserve resources and
add character to the street
PLACENTIA AVENUE
NEWPORT
TERRACE
�l
BROOKVIEW '
NEWPORT '
UNION
BANK
NEWPORT JQ�
SItPFRInR
HOSFIIA
Plocentia Avenue Strectscope Imorovemen: Cor_ tons
AMEAME
—West NMesa Streetscape Master Plan I 12
_.__ewport _- City i f He,+port Bea -;_.h
LEGEND
� amu CITY LIMBS
�•� PROJECT BOUNDARY
.
TYPE A CONDITION
E
=ME TYPE C CONDITION
R61�
MMA TYPE D CONDITION
A
CHANGE
SEASIDE CAFE
CATERING ,
PROPOSED
Z;
i W
1 >,
NEWPORT
TERRACE
�l
BROOKVIEW '
NEWPORT '
UNION
BANK
NEWPORT JQ�
SItPFRInR
HOSFIIA
Plocentia Avenue Strectscope Imorovemen: Cor_ tons
AMEAME
—West NMesa Streetscape Master Plan I 12
_.__ewport _- City i f He,+port Bea -;_.h
PLACENTIA AVENUE
EDGE CONDITION
VARIES
TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY
WIDTH AND POWER NINES.
MINIMUM A' PARKWAY
WIIHITEES.
PRIVATE SETBACK VARIES
fUNRE IRIVA71
WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT �'---.,
�}'-
I
t
Y`
Type C: Existing Condition -- M
Type C:Proposed Improvements=_��������
Type C: Existing Conditions:
Type C: Proposed Improvements:
Lawn cover requires significant watering in order to maintain
Buffering the sidewalk from the street with planters provides
vitality. Long stretches of sidewalks have sparse tree spacing,
a pleasant pedestrian experience while adding character to
offering little shade to pedestrians.
the public realm. Augmenting mature trees with similar, shade -
providing trees increases comfort for pedestrians and makes the
street more attractive as a whole. Native and drought -tolerant
planting will reduce water needs and soften the roadway edges
along the street.
1 I West Newport Mesa Streetscapee MasterPlan
City of Newport Bead I — -- - -
PLACENTIA AVENUE
Type D: Existing Condition============ Type D: Proposed Improvements==========
Type D: Existing Conditions:
; r` ,,
Lack of a sidewalk for pedestrians decreases connectivity, accessibility and discourages
CSE SIOt CAFE 6l�! --
alternative transportation. Existing vegetation lacks cohesion to other community landscaping
`A'eRs c 1z1
and decreases visibility, thereby decreasing pedestrian comfort.>I
Ia!
Type D: Proposed Improvements:
1¢!
1�!
The addition of a sidewalk creates a more walkable community by increasing connectivity.
1 WI
Parkway planters include attractive, drought -tolerant landscaping and buffer the pedestrian
Ie� NLwEOEi SJ
1¢I wrEmoK
from the street. The addition of vines over the fence increases comfort for the pedestrian
Without compromising the visual buffer between the public and private realm.
!
RRWKYIEM ! !
NEWI09t 1 1
!
N'34G ', � NENtfOai VD(%
NEA4iM. Mfa1CAl CnafE
CEMER , l
NA HOSPITAL ROAD
Placentia Avenue Streetscope Irnprovernent
Conditions
West Newport Mesa Streetsc_ape Master Plan I A
-- — -- Cify Of Newport m 4 Bea
PLACENTIA AVENUE
2.5 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
This section presents the estimated cost of public improvements
identified within the PlacentiaAvenue corridor. These
improvements include new sidewalks with additional landscaping, a
new landscaped median, striped bike lanes, and street furnishings.
Additional costs for area -wide improvements and implementation
prioritization are identified within Chapter 6 and the original
detailed cost estimate and background is provided within
AppendixA of this document. While the overall cost of the public
right-of-way improvements have been provided, it is possible
that some of the financial burden will be met as part of private
redevelopment within the study area. Cost estimates are shown
as lump sum, rounded to the nearest thousand, include hard and
soft costs, and assume prorates for general conditions, design
contingency, and escalation. All cost estimates for construction
are based on current 2016 rates. At the time of project bidding,
it is important to ensure that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are
received.
Conceptual Cost Estimate
Project Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping,
bicycle facilities, landscaped medians, and street furnishings):
$764,000
General Conditions: 10%
$ 77,000
Design Contingency: 30%
$229,000
Escalation to 2019: 14.76%
$113,000
Subtotal:
$1,183,000
Bonds: 02%
$ 24,000
Overhead and Profit: 08%
$ 95,000
Placentia Avenue Total Estimated Cost:
$1,302,000
I 15West Newport Mesa Stre_et_scape Master Plan
1
City of Newport Beach J ,
K
SUPERIOR M
West Newport Mesa Streetsc
SUPERIOR AVENUE
East side of SuperorAvenue looking south with turf removal and replacement with
low -water -use plant species opportunity
Superior Aven :e or Plarenuo Avenue Intersection
enkcrcement rppartunity
3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Superior Avenue between 16th Street and Hospital Road has a
wide open street character lined with medical, commercial, office,
and residential development. The right-of-way is fairly wide along
Superior Avenue, ranging from 80 to 100 feet. The following
elements describe the existing conditions:
• Traffic speeds consistent with arterial road
• Multiple driveways and curb -cuts provide opportunities for
pedestrian/bicycle/vehicular conflicts. Bicyclists have been
observed riding on the sidewalk
• Class 11 bike lane south of the Placentia Avenue intersection
• Class III bike lane north of the Placentia Avenue
intersection
• Lack of seating and trash receptacles
• Lack of buffer between the sidewalk and the street
• Power poles, utilities, and signage are located within
sidewalks, creating accessibility issues
• Inconsistent landscape theme
3.2 OPPORTUNITIES
Several opportunities for improvement were identified with
consideration to existing conditions and public input including:
• Driveway consolidation
• Landscape parkways
• Unified low -water -use plant theme
• Site furnishings
• Enhanced crosswalks
• City of Newport Beach gateway opportunity on north
Superior Avenue when entering the City from Costa Mesa
3.3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
Superior Avenue is a four -lane divided, highly traveled road
characterized by distinctive planted medians and adjacent to a
variety of land uses. Landscaping located within parkways on
and privately owned land varies in plant species and style. Turf
parkways along the Superior Avenue corridor should be replaced
with low -water -use shrubs and groundcover. Additional areas
should be evaluated and replaced if excessive water use exists.
Street trees should be planted in existing and proposed
parkways with a width of four feet or greater. In areas where
powerlines occur, and will not be undergrounded at the time
of improvements, trees with a smaller canopy height should be
considered in order to avoid tree topping under powerlines.
I
7 West Newport Mesa Stre_etsca a Master Plan _
City of Newport Beach
COAST
WINERY
tOSSFIT SEASIDE CAFE &
9RT BEACH CATERING
SANDPOINT COVE APARTMENTS
:LIEF
NEWPORT
TERRACE
NEWPORT BROOKVIEW
SEACREST NEWPORT
ONE
NAUTICAL MILE _
EWPORT
(NOLLS
THE BEACH HOUSE
APARTMENTS
UNfON
BANK
Z17 VERSAILLES ON THE BLUFFS
SuperiorAvenue opportunities and constraints map nth exiv.ng photo lac tion;
SUPERIOR AVENUE
CITY OF
COSTA MESA
EBB TIDE
PROJECT
NEWPORT
SUPERIOR
MEDICAL
PLAZA
HOAG
HEALTH
CENTER
'PO
�qO
P�
40
Q
4z,
CI'
A
FLAGSHIP
HEALTHCAR
CENTER
11 I
.EGET,''
HOAG
NEWPORT LIDO MEDICAL an LIMIT
HEALTH CENTER ^-- PROJECT STUDY AREA UNIT
CENTER PHOTO LOCATIONS
AND DIRECTION
girt.:: ai C'.A' .NIKE '•N
_• Pk.:Ju.:LA.S I1 elAi tA•:.
EY a>G Cay'_.. E C L, ._
FRC'::'. -..D C' A:'_ :... tA' ;
_ C.LiA3H-
NA T4/•c:- 3N'l
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I l O
City of 17 e,;Purt -z . I O
PERIOR AVENUE
Recommended plant species are provided in Chapter 5:
Landscape and Streetscape Amenities. A unified landscape along
Superior Avenue would help create a cohesive character for the
corridor. Site furnishings, also identified in Chapter 5, should be
installed once per block to improve walkability and the pedestrian
environment.
Future development should include a 15 -foot setback from the
street frontage to allow for street beautification, widened and
meandered sidewalks with planted parkways, and increased space
for pedestrian nodes and site furnishings (Figure 2.3). At the time
of future development, the City may obtain an easement for these
improvements.
3.3.1 PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS
Two public realm improvement types were identified for
improvements along SuperiorAvenue. Recommended
improvements are located based on existing conditions, available
public right-of-way, and enhancement opportunities. Areas where
no proposed changes occur are located where existing conditions
are restrictive.
Type A: Existing Conditions:
Currently, areas in the right-of-way have narrow sidewalks and
missing trees which make it hot and uncomfortable for walking.
Many existing parkways include grass with a high need for water.
Type A: Proposed Improvements:
The sidewalk will be widened to make a more walkable pedestrian
experience. Existing mature trees will be supplemented with
lower story plants and groundcovers. New street trees will be
added to provide additional shade for pedestrians and to beautify
the street Water -intensive lawn will be replaced with drought -
tolerant, visually appealing shrubs that will preserve resources and
add character to the street.
- - TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY
WIDTH AND POWERUNES.
i MINIMUM' PARKWAY
-�� WITH TREES.
EDGECONOMON
VARIES
FMRE IS' PRIVATE SETBACK
WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT
Type A: Existing Condition=====Type A:Proposed Improvements==========
l A I West Newport Mesa Streets_cape Master Plan_ _
17 City of Newport Beoch
SANDPOINT COVE APARTMENTS Q
THE BEACH HOUSE
APARTMENTS
I—
Z
LL
NEWPORT V
TERRACE Q
J
CL
VERSAILLES ON THE BLUFFS
AT NEWPORT
Superior Avenue Streetscope Improvement Condivons
SUPERIOR AVENUE
10
CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH PARK
MAINTENANCE
LEGEND
111mmu CITY LIMITS
•—•- PROJECT BOUNDARY
Mm■ TYPE A CONDITION
ENM■ TYPE C CONDITION
NAMEEN I:O CHANGE
7/�' PROPOSED
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 20
— - - - —
Cit, c.fls:p�rt Beach
EDGECONDDION
VARIES
PRIVARESEERACU
EDGECONUTION
VARIES
EUNIRE IS' PRIVATE SMACK / -
WNN NEW DEVELOPMENT
WIDTH AND POWERUNES.
Type C: Existing Condition============ Type C: Proposed Improvements======== MM
Type C: Existing Conditions:
Lawn cover requires significant watering in order to maintain
vitality. Long stretches of sidewalks have sparse tree spacing,
offering little shade to pedestrians.
Type C: Proposed Improvements:
Buffering the sidewalk from the street with planters provides
a pleasant pedestrian experience while adding character to
the public realm. Augmenting mature trees with similar, shade -
providing trees increases comfort for pedestrians and makes the
street more attractive as a whole. Native and drought -tolerant
planting will reduce water needs and soften the roadway edges
along the street
3.4 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
This section presents the estimated cost of public improvements
identified within the Superior Avenue corridor. These
improvements include new sidewalks with additional landscaping,
striped bike lanes, and street furnishings.Additional costs for
area -wide improvements and implementation prioritization are
identified within Chapter 6 and the original detailed cost estimate
and background is provided within AppendixA of this document.
While the overall cost of the public right-of-way improvements
have been provided, it is possible that some of the financial
I
21 West Newport Mesa Str_eetscape Master Plan
City of Nc-wport Beach
burden will be met as part of private redevelopment within the
study area. Cost estimates are shown as lump sum, rounded to
the nearest thousand, include hard and soft costs, and assume
prorates for general conditions, design contingency, and escalation.
All cost estimates for construction are based on current 2016
rates. At the time of project bidding, it is important to ensure
that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received.
Conceptual Cost Estimate
Project Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping,
bicycle facilities, and street furnishings):
$737,000
General Conditions: 100/0
$ 74,000
Design Contingency: 30%
$221,000
Escalation to 2019: 14.76%
$ 109,000
Subtotal:
$1,141,000
Bonds: 02%
$ 23,000
Overhead and Profit 08%
$ 91,000
Superior Avenue Total Estimated Cost:
$1,255,000
4 1 MONROVIA
AVENUE • 15TH STREET •
PRODUCTION PLACE •
16TH STREET
West Newport Mesa Streetscope Master Plan
AVENUE • 1STH STREET •
CITY OF
COSTA MESA
6TH STREET•
���-llllll'''"'
` 0 ORANGE
COAST
WINERY
A
.LN,� �I
GARDEN HALL &rrrrrr�Eii`N
r. ' L���III �K
741f
(Lyy)
ir7l�I�i�i��r
•Q CROSSFIT
Irr rr rr
iTi1 SEASIDE CAFE &
NEWPORT BEACH
CATERING
9z
Z
COC
COASTLINE 4
COMMUNITY
I, COLLEGE
E
N A��V
TH
SANDPOINT COVE APARTMENTS
SEACLIFf
NEWPORT
TERRACE
• tr*rrr�rjr ylr*Ir•pr�rrrr�r�Lrr r•r>rr *Err•
r� r� /r r•r rII. �JL�L�;��J r� rr1 rrl ��
F NEWPORT • BROOKVIEW
SEACREST NEWPORT
Its :up with exisoag photo Ixafws for hloaror;a Avenue, 16th Street, Pt ha, i Place, Mrd 15th Street
4.1 INTRODUCTION
MonroviaAvenue, 16th Street, Production Place, and 15th Street
share similar characteristics and opportunities for improvements.
Chapter 4 describes the existing conditions and cost estimates, as
well as proposed improvements for each of the corridors.
4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS
4.2.1 MONROVIA AVENUE
MonroviaAvenue, from just north of 16th Street at the
City boundary to the south ending of the cul-de-sac, has a
23 I West Newport Mesa Vreetsc_ape Master Plan_
City. of Newwt Beach
LEGEND
CITY LIMIT
�— PROJECT STUDYAREA LIMIT
PHOTO LOCATIONS
AND DIRECTION
FK"'e:G CLASS II MIKE LANE
-- PRJPL:S> CLASS Y BIKE LANE
—Ex., G CLASS tlI BIKE LANE
F<'J:- 1 CLASS M EIKE LANE
CGTF F.. RC _'L'
. Ex..' 3:0WEF':'NES
-IR%ET, a.. GE oar.¢nY
--SINEW .Lr G^PC rut n
or, aNA:
© :._sT<
neighborhood feel in comparison to Superior Avenue and
Placentia Avenue. The 60 -foot -wide right-of-way has two travel
lanes, one in each direction, and there is parallel parking on either
side of the street. MonroviaAvenue is flanked by industrial and
residential uses. Coastline Community College and Carden Hall,
a private school, are also located on the west side of the street.
Several existing conditions include:
• Peak traffic patterns for Coastline Community College,
drop off and pick up times for Carden Hall, and work hours
for businesses and Production Avenue
• Pedestrian and bicycle travel is perceived as constrained
MONROVIA AVENUE •
On -street parking is often fully utilized
Lack of bicycle facilities
Lack of street furnishings and pedestrian lighting
Overhead powerlines are located along segments of the
street frontage
• Landscape parkways on both sides of the street
• Varying landscape palette including turf, low -water -use
planting, and trees
crosswalk o,,d bul.out op;nrt rn�l
East side of Monrovia Avenue looking north with turf removal and replacement with
low -water -use plant species opportunity
enhancement and bulbout opportunity
_ West Newport Mesa Streeh ope Master Plan I �l A
City of Newport 3each L'i
NROVIA A
4.2.2 16TH STREET
16th Street, from Placentia Avenue west to Monrovia Avenue,
includes a light industrial use neighborhood, half of which is
located within the City of Costa Mesa on the north side of
the street At the far west end of 16th Street is the Newport
Beach City Utilities Yard, and a possible future location for the
West Newport Beach Community Center. The right-of-way for
16th Street is 60 feet wide and has two travel lanes with parallel
parking on both sides of the south side of the street. A few
existing conditions include:
• Lack of bicycle facilities
• Turf parkway and sidewalks on the north and south side
• Powerlines line most of the north side.
• Lighting is limited to street lights attached to power poles
• Varying plant palette
• Lack of site furnishings
4.2.3 PRODUCTION PLACE
Production Place, from Monrovia Avenue to Placentia Avenue,
is bordered by industrial buildings. The right-of-way is 60 feet
wide and includes two travel lanes, parallel parking and sidewalk
flanking either side of the street, and some landscape areas. A few
existing conditions include:
• Narrow sidewalks without landscaped parkways to buffer
the street edge
• Utilities and signage located in the sidewalk
• Inconsistent street lighting
• Turf dominant planting with a few street trees on the south
side of the street
• Varying traffic patterns due to Coastline Community
College, drop off and pick up times for Carden Hall, and
work hours for businesses
I
2 C West Newport Mesa Streetsc_ ape Master Plan
J City of Newport Beach
PLACE • 16TH STREET
4.2.4 15TH STREET
I Sth Street, from Superior Avenue west, is a predominantly
residential street with dense housing. Pacifica Christian High
School is located at the old West Newport Community Center
building. Coastline Community College and the future Kobe
Inc. Headquarters bookend the west end of 15th Street, while
commercial, medical, and office buildings bookend the east end.
The right-of-way varies from 60 to 72 feet wide, containing two
travel lanes and parallel parking on both sides. Several existing
conditions are listed below:
• Lack of on -street parking
• Varying sidewalk width and parkway
• Utilities, signs, and power poles on the south side of the
street located in the sidewalk
• Powerlines on north side of the street
• Decomposed granite path on north side parkway
• Lack of bicycle facilities
• Inconsistent lighting on the south side.
• Visibility concerns at the Placentia Avenue and Superior
Avenue intersections
4.3 OPPORTUNITIES
With consideration to existing conditions and public input, several
opportunities for improvement were identified:
• Pedestrian lighting for increased visibility and walkability.
• Sharrows for bicycle safety and awareness
• Enhanced crosswalks and curb extensions at intersections
to increase visibility and safety
• Turf removal and replacement with low -water -use planting
• Shared parking program with Coastline Community
College
• Wayfinding directional signage for major destinations
• Additional street trees
• Consistent plant palette to unify the street
• Site furnishings
• Sidewalk improvements
NROVIA AVENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH
and bike facilities
South side of 16th Street looking east with landscape improvements and bike facility
opportunities
and replacement, and increased lighting opportunities
and replacement, and increased lighting opportunities
15th Street looking east from the south side of the street with parkway, sharrow, and
lighting opportunities
15th Street looking west from the north side of the s --eat with sharrow opportunities
est Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I n L
- -- -- -- - - - — W
City of 14ewDort Beach LCJ
MONROVIA Al
W
Q
FUTURE
BANNING
RANCH
'ENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH STREET
*'&MM..Frr"
COSTA +"
MESA
16TH! STREET Q
,1Z
r0ASORANi
-L
IFFY
y{::vE4V
ll.l
I
TU
CONNECTION TO
BANNING RANCH air
Pro fssed imprweme= (. • Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street Production %ace, and 15th Street
4.4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
ON P
$,AS JE
G CATE
NS•fYOR Jv
TI tRAC^ NEWP::•,'
iJPERiUi J
AE,)iCAI P
P.A[A Q
1STH STREET 0
Q
Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Production Place, and I Sth Street are considered the
neighborhood streets of the study area. They are all characterized by varying sidewalk
and parkway widths, but are generally similar in needs including pedestrian and bicycle
improvements, low -water -use planting, additional site furnishings, and increased parking.
Pedestrian and bicycle improvements for this area include new meandering and wider
sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulbouts, and sharrows. Enhanced crosswalks and
bulbouts are envisioned at the 16th Street, Production Place, and 15th Street intersections
at Monrovia Avenue, reducing the crossing distances and increasing the visibility for
pedestrians. Bike sharrows are proposed in the area to elevate the importance of
bicyclists in the area. A sharrow is a street marking which is placed in a travel lane to
notify drivers that bicyclists can legally ride In the roadway.
Turf is present on the four streets in parkway and privately owned landscape areas. Low-
water -use planting should replace turf in all parkway and City controlled right-of-ways.
Opportunities for street trees should be considered to provide more shade along the
streets. Street trees should be planted in existing and proposed parkways with a width of
27 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
LEGEND
CITY LIMIT
.�..�... PROJECT STUDY AREA LIMIT
- STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION
w= PARKING
LOW WATER USE NATIVE
PLANTING
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
1 IE ENHANCED CROSSWALKS AND
BULBOUTS
SHARROWS AND STRIPED LANES
�s NEW STREET LANDSCAPE
MEDIANS
Z STREET TREES AND DROUGHT
TOLERANT PLANTING
*'tfr
SITE FURNISHINGS
PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING
PARKING PROGRAMS
IMPROVE STREET DRAINAGE
EXISTING BUS STOP
• 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE •
four feet or greater. In areas where powerlines occur, and will not be undergrounded at the time LEGEND
of improvements, trees with a smaller canopy height should be considered in order to avoid tree SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS,
BULBOtopping under powerlines.A cohesive plant palette will help create a more unified character for �' � ENHANCEANDMENTS CROSSWALK
the neighborhood streets and the study area as a whole. Site furnishings should be considered ENHANCEMENTS
to provide seating nodes with trash receptacles and appropriate lighting. Site furnishings and SHARROWS
lighting recommendations can be found in Chapter 5: Landscape and Streetscape Amenities.
Evistirng conditions for Mcdrovv- AverL
166 Street, Prcductian F. ice,
.,d 15th Street
LOW -WATER -USE SHRUBS AND
GROUNDCOVER
SITE FURNISHINGS
Various proposed conditions (er Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Production Mace, and 15th Street
U
'�''}•
S7�{.
LOW -WATER -USE TREES
LOW -WATER -USE SHRUBS AND
GROUNDCOVER
SITE FURNISHINGS
LIGHTING
STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS
AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
OPARKING
SHARE PROGRAMS
DRAINAGE
.111L -.— _ —
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 2Q
City of Newport Beoch vU
AVENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH STREET
Monrovia Avenue, Production Place, and 15th Street all have a
shortage of available on -street parking. Parking share programs
With Coastline Community College and Pacifica Christian High
School should be explored, in an effort to alleviate the parking
shortage.
4.4.1 PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS
Four public realm improvement types were identified for
improvements along MonroviaAvenue, 16th Street, Production
Place, and 15th Street. Recommended improvements are located
based on existing conditions, available public right-of-way, and
Future development should include a 15 -foot setback from the enhancement opportunities. Areas where no proposed changes
street frontage to allow for street beautification, widened and occur are located where existing conditions are restrictive.
meandered sidewalks with planted parkways, and increased space Type A: Existing Conditions:
for pedestrian nodes and site furnishings (Figure 2.3). At the time
of future development, the City may obtain an easement for these Currently, areas in the right-of-way have narrow sidewalks and
improvements. missing trees which make it hot and uncomfortable for walking.
Many existing parkways include grass with a high need for water.
S
I
Type A: Proposed Improvements:
-
The sidewalk will be widened to make a more walkable pedestrian
experience. Existing mature trees will be supplemented with
lower story plants and groundcovers. New street trees will be
added to provide additional shade for pedestrians and to beautify
the street. Water -intensive lawn will be replaced with drought -
tolerant, visually appealing shrubs that will preserve resources and
add character to the street.
EDGE CONDITION
VARIES
FUNRE T5 PRIVATE SETBACK
WITH NEW DEVEIOPMENT
TREES WNW PARKWAY
MOTHAND POWERUNES.
MINIMUM d' PARKWAY
Type A: Existing Condition============ Type A: Proposed Improvements MMMMMMMMMM
29 I West NewwwwSort Mesa Streets_cape Master Plan
7 City of Newport Brach
Type B: Existing
Conditions:
The current sidewalk in place
provides no buffer to the
street, resulting in a barren and
exposed space. The lawn in
the adjacent landscape require
Intense water needs and
frequent maintenance.
Type B: Proposed
Improvements:
Proposed improvements
include adding parkway
planters to buffer the street,
improving pedestrian comfort,
and allowing the sidewalk to
meander in wider right-of-
ways. Additional trees will
shade pedestrians and grow
to add character to the street.
Replacing water -intensive
lawn with drought -resistant,
native landscaping preserves
resources and adds visual
appeal.
AVENUE • 15TH STREET •
NEWPORT
REACH CITY
UTILITIES
41
LEGEND
null CITY LIMITS
•-- PROJECT BOUNDARY
=ME TYPE A CONDITION
MMM TYPE B CONDITION
u —=ME TYPE C CONDITION
Z.M= MEMO TYPE D CONDITION
=== MMN NO CHANGE
d��RR�kkh PROPOSED
COAST P
WNIERY N
'Y L._
IALL ; Jtm� m woomm_m== =tri
w
■ CROSSFIT SEASIDE CAFES
NEWPORT BEACH CATERING
Z
SANI)FONTCOVE 4PARINIEN'I5
I—
ry
EH—
Z
W
SEA,CUFF
Q
NEWPORT
TERRACE
CL
NEWPORT
SEACRESt
Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Prrduc.n Place, a—' 15t S'-eet Sr P• --ape lm( r,ement C. l t, n-
PRIVATE SETBACK VARIES
EDOECONDMON
VARIES
ENURE 15' PRIVATE SETBACK
WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT_,
BROOKVIEW
NEWPORT
TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY
WIDTH AND POWERUNES.
MINIMUM < PARKWAY
111P. WITH TREES.
Type B: Existing Condition============ Type B: Proposed Improvements==========
West Newport Mesa_Stre_etscape Master _Pla_n I '?O
— — -- – – — --- -- --- J
Cc; Cf I- E; ✓PO f Be0,
AVENUE • 15TH STREET • P
Type C: Existing Conditions:
Lawn cover requires significant watering in order to maintain
vitality. Long stretches of sidewalks have sparse tree spacing,
offering little shade to pedestrians.
Type C: Proposed Improvements:
Buffering the sidewalk from the street with planters provides
a pleasant pedestrian experience while adding character to
the public realm. Augmenting mature trees with similar, shade -
providing trees increases comfort for pedestrians and makes the
street more attractive as a whole. Native and drought -tolerant
planting will reduce water needs and soften the roadway edges
along the street.
n
J _
1.,
lit
EDGE CONDMON
VARIES
P=RE 15' PRIVAIESEMACK
WNN NEW DEVELOPMEW
I
1REES VARY WM PARKWAY
WIDM AND POWERNNES.
Type C: Existing Condition============ Type C: Proposed Improvements==========
Type D: Existing Condition============
Type D: Proposed Improvements = = I• 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
31
I West Newport Mesa Streetsc pe Master Plan
City of Newrxyt Beach --11
—
• 16TH STREET
West Newport Mesa Streetscaape Master Plan I 32
Ci'y cf i:ewport Beach
AVENUE • 15TH STREET •
4.5 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE
This section presents the estimated cost of public improvements
identified within the Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Production
Place, and 15th Street corridors. These improvements include
bulbouts with bioswales, new sidewalks with additional
landscaping, bicycle sharrows, pedestrian oriented street
lighting, and street furnishings. Additional costs for area -wide
improvements and implementation prioritization are identified
within Chapter 6 and the original detailed cost estimate and
background is provided withinAppendixA of this document.
While the overall cost of the public right-of-way improvements
have been provided, it is possible that some of the financial
burden will be met as part of private redevelopment within the
study area. Cost estimates are shown as lump sum, rounded to
the nearest thousand, include hard and soft costs, and assume
prorates for general conditions, design contingency, and escalation.
All cost estimates for construction are based on current 2016
rates. At the time of project bidding, it is important to ensure
that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received.
MonroviaAvenue
Project Improvements (new bulbouts/bioswales, sidewalks with
additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, pedestrian oriented
lighting, and street furnishings): $678,000
General Conditions: 10% $ 68,000
Design Contingency:
30%
$203,000
Escalation to 2019:
14.76%
$100,000
Subtotal:
$1,049,000
Bonds:
02%
$ 21,000
Overhead and Profit
08%
$ 84,000
Monrovia Avenue Total Estimated Cost:
$1,154,000
33 I West Newport Mesa_S_tre_etscaQe Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
16th Street
Project Improvements (new bulbouts/bioswales, sidewalks with
additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, pedestrian oriented
lighting, and street furnishings): $393,000
General Conditions: 10% $ 94,000
Design Contingency: 30% $282,000
Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $ 139,000
Subtotal: $1,454,000
Bonds: 02% $ 29,000
Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 116,000
16th Street Total Estimated Cost: $1,599,000
Production Place
Project Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping,
pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $390,000
General Conditions: 10% $ 39,000
Design Contingency: 30% $117,000
Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $ 58,000
Subtotal: $604,000
Bonds: 02% $ 12,000
Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 48,000
Production Place Total Estimated Cost: $ 664,000
15th Street
Project Improvements (new bulbouts/bioswales, sidewalks with
additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, pedestrian oriented
lighting, and street furnishings): $793,000
General Conditions: 10% $ 79,000
Design Contingency: 30% $238;000
Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $117,000
Subtotal: $1,227,000
Bonds: 02% $ 25,000
Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 98,000
ISth Street Total Estimated Cost: $1,350,000
5 1 LANDSCAPE AND
STREETSCAP_E_ AMENITIES
west Newport Masa Streetscape Master Plan
LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES
Recent Dover Drive Streetscape Improvements
Landscape Palette Areas
LEGEND
CITY LIMIT
PROJECT STUDY AREA
STREETS
- SUPERIORAVENUE
PLACENTIAAVENUE
MONROVIAAVENUE
16TH STREET
PRODUCTION PLACE
- ISTH STREET
'Note: Street colors are keyed to p!mrc palette matrix.
35 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
5.1 PLANT PALETTE
The plant palette for the West Newport Mesa streetscape
incorporates several complementary tree, shrub, and groundcover
palettes that will help to create a distinctive character and unified
theme for each corridor. The majority of the streets in the study
area currently have inconsistent plantings, preventing these streets
from possessing a true sense of identity,
Canopy trees with a high, broad branching structure are
recommended for plan area streetscapes for several reasons.
Canopy trees create shade for roadway and sidewalk surfaces,
thereby reducing the heat island effect and creating a more
comfortable environment. In addition, trees improve air quality
by absorbing vehicle air pollution and enhance water quality by
capturing and filtering stormwater runoff. Lastly, canopy trees
provide a passive traffic calming influence by visually narrowing
the feel of a corridor, which leads a driver to instinctively reduce
speed.
A few of the challenges within the study area include the
overhead powerlines and narrow parkways within the street
right-of-way. Trees with lower heights that can handle small root
zones are recommended for most of the streets adjacent to
powerlines. In addition, many of the streets have more right-of-
way on one side of the street than the other. In these areas, trees
an be planted on the City -owned right-of-way and private land
owners are encouraged to plant similarly.
Planting should be low -water -use to comply with the State of
California's drought -tolerant laws and to reduce water use. A
variety of plants and colors should be used within the medians
and the parkways to create a unified, yet diverse and aesthetically
pleasing corridor. Boulders and mulch should be used as accents
in the landscape area. Mulch should also be used as a tool to
retain moisture and lessen the need for additional water.
On the following pages, a list can be found with recommended
trees, shrubs and groundcover and corresponding height,
spread, spacing, and location. Many of the species listed in the
plant palette matrix are existing species, which are currently
present within the study area. Plant species should be selected
appropriately for height, spread, and intended use and placed
where optimal growing conditions will ensure health and longevity.
Certain existing tree, shrub, and groundcover species in the study
area should be replaced at the time of landscape improvements
if they have destructive roots, weak branching structure, and high
water use or are poisonous or combustible or leave heavy debris.
LANDSCAPE AND
— — -- --
_ _ West N"Roort Mesa Streetscae Master Plan I 36
City of IJewpxI Sewn
Z'
G
s1S.
tom.
t
Agonis (lexuosa
Arbutus unedo
Agave americana
Agave parryi
Baugainvilleo spp.
PeppermintTree
Strawberry Tree
Blue Agave
Parry's Agave
Bougainvillea
r
�
S
w.
Metrosideros ex-elso
Platanus racemosa
Carex praegracilis
Carissa macrocarpa
Gstus purpureus
New7ealand ChristmasTree
California Sycamore
California Field Sedge
Natal Plum
Purple Rockrose
Quercus agrTolio
Tipuana tipu
Keckiella con#blia
Muhlenbergia rigens
Myoporum parvi";m
Coast Live Oak
Tipu Tree
Heartleaf Kecldella
Deer Grass
Creeping Myoporum
a
r
t
i r r, �
Tristaniopsis lounna
Ulmus parv(joba
SoMa clevelandii
Senecio serpens
Yucca pfomentow'Golden Sword'
Water Gum
Chinese Elm
Cleveland Sage
Blue Chalk Sticks
Golden Sword Yucca
— — -- --
_ _ West N"Roort Mesa Streetscae Master Plan I 36
City of IJewpxI Sewn
AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES
Legend: P = Primary Trees O = Secondary Trees
*Known to be attacked by the Polyphagus Shot Hole Borer Beetle. Assess the severity of the beetle before planting this species.
37 I west Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan _
City of Newpo,t Beach
i
I
Agonis (lexucsa
•
•
•
• •
•
•
PeppermintTree
-
Arhutus'Manna
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Arbutus
Arbutus unedo
•
•
•
•
•
O
O
P
P
P
P
Strawberry Tree
•
•
•
•
•
Baubmla vanegoto
•
•
•
•
•
® •
Purple Orchid Tree
•
•
•
Brachych¢un acerfc us
•
•
•
•
0
•
Flame -Free
Lagerstroeno indica
'Natchez'
•
•
•
O
®
•
•
O
P
•
•
•
White Crape Myrtle
Laurus noaihs'Saratogo'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
O
Saratoga Laurel
©
Lophostemon confertus
•
•
•
O
O
O
O
•
•
Brisbane Box
Magnolia grondif lona
'Little Gem'
•
•
•
•
O
e
•
•
P
O
P
O
Little Gem Magnolia
Metrosideros excelso
New Zealand
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
P
•
•
O
Christmas Tree
Phoenix doctyM1fero
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Date Palm
Platonus racemosa*
•
•
•
•
•
•
P
California Sycamore
Quercus agn(olra
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Coast Live Oak
Syogr us romanzuffona
•
•
•
•
•
P
Queen Palm
Lpuano apu
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O
O
Tipu Tree
Trlstonlopsls lounna
•
•
•
•
•
O
•
•
•
•
Water Gum
Ulmus parnfolio
•
•
•
••
•
•
O
Chinese Elm
Legend: P = Primary Trees O = Secondary Trees
*Known to be attacked by the Polyphagus Shot Hole Borer Beetle. Assess the severity of the beetle before planting this species.
37 I west Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan _
City of Newpo,t Beach
Aeonmm spp.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• P
•
•
Canary Island Rose
California Field
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Agave omencono
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• P
•
•
•
•
Blue Agave
•
Bush Anenome
Agave attenuota
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• O
O P
•
Agave
•
Purple Rockrose
Agave desmettiono
Festuca idohoensis
'Variegate'
Variegated Dwarf
•
'Sislayou Blue'
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O P
P
P
P
P
Agave
P
Idaho Fescue
Agave parryi
Parry's Agave
•
Hardenbergia vio!acea
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• •
O
•
•
O
Agave victorm-reginae
P
Purple Lilac Vine
Queen Victoria
•
Legend: P = Primary Shrubs and Groundcover, O = Secondary Shrubs and Groundcover
•
City of Newport B3och
•
•
•
•
•
O P
P
P
P
P
Agave
Aloe spb
Aloe
•
®
••
•
• O
Amgozanthos flavrdw
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Kangaroo Paw
Bougainvillea spp
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
O O
P
O
O
P
Bougainvillea
Callistemon vnmmafa'bude
John'
Little John
•
•
•
•
•
O P
Bottlebtush
Carex drvulsa
European Gray
•
•
•
•
•
• •
TPP
P
P
Sedge
Carex proegracrlis
•
•
•
•
•
• P
•
•
California Field
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Sedge
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
Conssa macrocarpa
•
•
•
•
•
• P
•
•
Natal Plum
Corpmtena cah(omica
•
•
•
•
•
• •
•
•
•
•
Bush Anenome
Cetus purpureus
•
•
•
•
•
O P
•
•
Purple Rockrose
Festuca idohoensis
'Sislayou Blue'
•
•
•
•
•
P O
P
P
P
P
Idaho Fescue
Hardenbergia vio!acea
•
•
•
•
P
P
Purple Lilac Vine
Legend: P = Primary Shrubs and Groundcover, O = Secondary Shrubs and Groundcover
West New port Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I %a4
City of Newport B3och
LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES
,.
i;
Keckiello cordifoho •
•
•
•
•
• • • • • • •
Heartleaf Keckiella
Muhlenbergia Imdne.men
'Leri
•
•
•
•
• •
Autumn Glow Muhly
I
Muhlenbergia rigens
•
•
•
•
•
P P
P
P
P P
Deer Grass
Myoporum pornfolmm
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Creeping Myoporum
Penstemon heterophyllus •
•
•
•
•
•
0
0 •
•
•
• •
Beard Tongue
Rosmnnus offianalis
•
•
•
•
•
P P
P
P
P P
Rosemary
SOMG develandn
•
•
0
0
0
0
m
O •
•
•
• •
Cleveland Sage
Salvia meff fern
0
•
•
0
0
• •
•
•
• •
Black Sage
Salvia leucontho
•
•
8
0
•
•
•
P P
P
P
P P
Mexican Sage Bush
Seneac serpens •
•
®
0
•
P P
P
P
P P
Blue Chalk Sticks
Yucca filamentoso'Golden
Sword' •
•
•
•
•
•
•
e O
Golden Sword Yucca
Legend:P = Primary Shrubs and Groundcover,O = Secondary Shrubs and Groundcover
5.2 SITE FURNISHINGS
Street furnishings such as benches, trash and recycling receptacles,
bike racks, and bus shelters can create a sense of character and
unify a place. Furnishings in the study area should be clustered
together to create gathering spaces and nodes for members of
the community to enjoy. Recommended street furnishings are
provided below.
BENCHES
Benches should be placed every 300 feet to improve the
pedestrian experience. Benches may be placed with other
furnishing elements to create a node. Benches should be
designed to deter homeless activity, whether using a center
armrest, installing a shorter bench or installing individual chairs.
Skateboard deterrents can also be added to the benches to help
reduce damage.
Manufacturer. Maglin or similar
Model.• MLBS 10 Series
Color. Graphite Gloss or RAL Custom Gray
39 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan____
City of Newport Beach
LANDSCAPE AND
CHAIRS
Chair locations should be determined on the same criteria as
bench locations. Chairs should be placed in groups of two or
more or accompany a bench.
Manufacturer. Victor Stanley or similar
Model.PRSCA-8 Production Collection
Color. Gray or RAL Custom Gray
TRASH AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLES
Trash and recycling receptacles should be placed in multiple
places along each corridor to provide multiple convenient waste
disposal locations. Receptacles should also be placed with other
furnishings such as benches and bus shelters.
Manufacturer. Maglin or similar
Model. MLWR250-32 Series
Color: Graphite Gloss or RAL Custom Gray
BIKE RACKS
Bike racks should be located near transit stops, schools, the
community college, medical areas, commercial areas, parking lou,
and various places throughout the study area. They should also
be considered within new development and open space areas.
Bike racks encourage bike ridership and prevent bikes from being
locked to high posts or trees. Bike racks should accommodate a
minimum of two bicycles and their capacity should be determined
by the location and the number of bicyclists who frequent the
destination.
Manufacturer: Dero or similar
Model. Round Rack
Color: Silver or Gray
BUS SHELTERS
Bus stop shelters shall be added to all current and future bus stop
locations within the study area. Bus shelters should be combined
with benches and trash receptacles. Safety lighting should also be
considered for bus shelters.
Manufacturer: Landscape Forms or similar
Model. Kaleidoscope OS
Color: Silver
All furnishings should be coated with a protective sealant against
rust to combat local coastal conditions.
2- the 5- If r cora
_West kewport Mesa StreetscapeMaster Plan 1
40
LANDSCAPE AND
""IP
16TH STREET
z
a PRODUCTION PLACE
O
z
O
15TH STREET
9
Wcypn.:,ng signage map lacaws
5.3 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE
A wayfinding signage program should be established for the
study area to enhance mobility, physically accommodating various
modes of transportation.The City should coordinate with
community organizations to develop key points of interest for
signage locations and content.
Vehicular directional signs will establish an identity for West
Newport Mesa as a special district within the City of Newport
Beach. They incorporate distinctive forms and colors inspired
by the local area. Common, easy to understand symbols and
fonts identify and guide travelers to the district's destinations
and attractions. Durability and economic implementation and
maintenance were planned for in the design of the signage.
41 I West Neww�ort Mn
esa Streetscape Master Pla
City of Newport Beach — —_ .^__._
SIGN TYPES
Q Vehicular Directional Sign
A.8
U
tiH
H ITAL
NA
Typical destinations may include:
• Coastline Community College
Community Center
• Medical Center
• Trails
Parks
Relevant public destinations outside the district, creating
better connectivity
Wayfinding signs for bikes will follow the guidelines of the City's
Bicycle Master Plan. Pedestrian wayfinding signs (directional and
directories) may be developed in the future as the area evolves,
following the design aesthetic established by the vehicular signs,
only on a much smaller scale.
Wayfnding signage should be uniform
with site furnishings. Deigned by Graphu:
Solutions
Pedestrian lighting should be uniform
within the study Grea
DSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE
Monument signage should also be considered at higher profile
locations such as City boundaries and heavily traveled areas.
Monument signs should follow the current City monument sign
program, should be located in planted medians, and should be lit
at night.
5.4 LIGHTING
Pedestrian lights are typically located along pathways and
sidewalks to provide a smaller, more focused illuminated area.
Pedestrian lights should be placed evenly along sidewalks where
lighting is needed. Globes should be dark sky compliant and
should have LED light bulbs.
Man*aurer: Ameron (City Standard Type V) or similar
Model: 22 -CT -10
Color: Standard Concrete
5.5 PUBLIC ART
The use of public art within a community is an effective way
of expressing the unique personality and character of the area.
Public art should serve as an aesthetic improvement to enhance
the pedestrian environment Stand-alone installations or design
integrated installations should both be considered with future
improvements in the study area, such as building murals, paving,
benches, sculpture, mosaics, and water features. A public art
program should be developed for the West Newport Mesa
community that is consistent with public art programs that are
currently on-going with the City of Newport Beach.
SIGN FACE '.AL •.. _C <',„ ,T
GRAPHICS PANEL: C•'n.T D ".:.'A -i, aE%t-TWE V'NY.W(T
F`Pk:' a3Nt: .r;3C
IS I, "',.nil L":'IrA-:VFRLAY
COLOR MATCH REFERENCE: 1, r.AY.':'_"-qF "PNt.•.;T
RACK OF SIGN: PA STBRAYf -0 G
SIGN POST:44 A'_ '.i. i,'/ -
'F0UONSELOWGRA0ETPEATV,'
C_FAOSwu%1
FOOTING: CORCRETE FGPTINS FERC_
PAINT FINISHES: ALL PAINT FIX VS -S' GEL-G'3P
'.3KH WITH ANL -GRAFFITI CPA' 1v"
West Neww�Tort Mesa Streetsc_ape Master Plan I 42
-- —" City of Newport Bcoch
o
Community
kst hinope f1w
4
College
Community
4
Center
Trails
Pedestrian lighting should be uniform
within the study Grea
DSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE
Monument signage should also be considered at higher profile
locations such as City boundaries and heavily traveled areas.
Monument signs should follow the current City monument sign
program, should be located in planted medians, and should be lit
at night.
5.4 LIGHTING
Pedestrian lights are typically located along pathways and
sidewalks to provide a smaller, more focused illuminated area.
Pedestrian lights should be placed evenly along sidewalks where
lighting is needed. Globes should be dark sky compliant and
should have LED light bulbs.
Man*aurer: Ameron (City Standard Type V) or similar
Model: 22 -CT -10
Color: Standard Concrete
5.5 PUBLIC ART
The use of public art within a community is an effective way
of expressing the unique personality and character of the area.
Public art should serve as an aesthetic improvement to enhance
the pedestrian environment Stand-alone installations or design
integrated installations should both be considered with future
improvements in the study area, such as building murals, paving,
benches, sculpture, mosaics, and water features. A public art
program should be developed for the West Newport Mesa
community that is consistent with public art programs that are
currently on-going with the City of Newport Beach.
SIGN FACE '.AL •.. _C <',„ ,T
GRAPHICS PANEL: C•'n.T D ".:.'A -i, aE%t-TWE V'NY.W(T
F`Pk:' a3Nt: .r;3C
IS I, "',.nil L":'IrA-:VFRLAY
COLOR MATCH REFERENCE: 1, r.AY.':'_"-qF "PNt.•.;T
RACK OF SIGN: PA STBRAYf -0 G
SIGN POST:44 A'_ '.i. i,'/ -
'F0UONSELOWGRA0ETPEATV,'
C_FAOSwu%1
FOOTING: CORCRETE FGPTINS FERC_
PAINT FINISHES: ALL PAINT FIX VS -S' GEL-G'3P
'.3KH WITH ANL -GRAFFITI CPA' 1v"
West Neww�Tort Mesa Streetsc_ape Master Plan I 42
-- —" City of Newport Bcoch
This page intentionally left blank.
IMPLEMENTATION
PHASI
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
ENTATION
6.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides direction for implementing the public
improvements proposed within the West Newport Mesa study
area. Individual street improvements and area -wide wayfinding,
bicycle facilities, and walkability have been considered in
prioritizing and phasing recommendations. Associated cost
estimates for each street (provided in previous chapters) have
been organized within proposed near (2.4 years), mid (4-6 years),
and long (6-8 year) term phasing plans. In addition, potential future
funding sources are identified within the chapter.
6.2 PROJECT PHASING AND COST
ESTIMATES
NEAR TERM PHASE (2 TO 4 YEARS)
A number of near-term improvements have been prioritized,
balancing community input and desire with the City's ability to
create change with capital improvement projects that will beautify
the area and improve walkability and bicycle access within the
existing public right-of-way. Priority projects within the next few
years include:
• MonroviaAvenue (new bulboutslbioswales at Production
Place, sidewalks with additional landscaping, pedestrian
oriented lighting, wayfinding signage, and street furnishings):
$1,154,000
• Placentia Avenue medians: $50,000
MID-TERM PHASE (4 TO 6 YEARS)
Mid to long-term projects will likely be realized as private
development transitions over time and incremental improvements
are implemented. The following matrix provides a summary of
improvements necessary to carry out the vision for the West
Newport Mesa area. In addition, prioritylphasing and preliminary
cost estimates are provided.
PlacentiaAvenue Remaining Improvements (new sidewalks
With additional landscaping, bicycle striping, crosswalk
striping, wayfinding signage, and street furnishings):
$908,000
Production Place Improvements (new sidewalks with
additional landscaping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding
signage, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings):
$664,000
I Sth Street Improvements (new bulboutslbioswales at
Monrovia Avenue, sidewalks with additional landscaping,
bicycle sharrow striping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding
signage, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings):
$1,350,000
Improvements within private property expanded required
setback and undergrounding of utilities, where feasible (on-
going)
Total Estimated Conceptual Cost of Mid -Term Phase
(with General Conditions, Contingencies, Overhead, and
Escalation): $2,922,000
• Placentia Avenue Type D Improvements to 15th Street LONG TERM PHASE (6 TO 8 YEARS)
intersection (new sidewalk, wall, and additional landscaping):
- S A I 'd
$346,000
• Crosswalk striping throughout the study area: $14,000
• Bicycle facility striping and signage throughout the study
area: $41,000
• Improvements within private property expanded required
setback and undergrounding of utilities, where feasible (on-
going)
• Coordination with Coastline Community College and
Pacifica Christian High School to explore shared parking
agreements
upertor venue mprovements (new si ewalks with
additional landscaping, bicycle striping, crosswalk striping,
wayfinding signage, and street furnishings): $1,255,000
16th Street Improvements (coincide with construction
of the Community Center) (new bulboutslbioswales at
Monrovia Avenue, sidewalks with additional landscaping,
bicycle sharrow striping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding
signage, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings):
$1,599,000
Improvements within private property expanded required
setback and undergrounding of utilities, where feasible (on -
Total Estimated Conceptual Cost of Near Term Phase going)
(with General Conditions, Contingencies, Overhead, and
Escalation): $1,605,000 Total Estimated Conceptual Cost of LongTerm Phase
(with General Conditions, Contingencies, Overhead, and
Escalation): $2,854,000
45 I
West Newport Me_sa_Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
6.3 FUNDING SOURCES
A summary of potential funding sources, as identified in the 2014
City of Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan, are listed below.
FEDERAL PROGRAMS
• Bus and Bus Facilities Program: State of Good Repair
• Bus Livability Initiative
• Federal Transit Act
• MAP -21 - Surface Transportation Program
• MAP -21 - Pilot Transit -Oriented Development Planning
Program
• National Center for Environmental Health - Health Impact
Assessment for Improved Community Design
• Transportation Investments Generating Economic
Recovery (TIGER) Program
STATE PROGRAMS
• CalTrans Active Transportation Program (ATP)
• Community Based Transportation Planning Grants
• Environmental justice: Context -Sensitive Planning
• Safe Routes to School (SRTS)
• Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentives
Program
• Watershed Protection Program (Proposition 13)
REGIONAL PROGRAMS
• Clean Air Fund (AB 434/2766 -Vehicle Registration Fee
Surcharge)
• Orange County Measure M2 Local Return
• OCTA Bike Corridor Improvement Program (BCIP) Call
for Projects
PRIVATE PROGRAMS
• Health Foundations
• PeopleForBikes
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 46
Ci!y of fie•A ort -each
This page intentionally left blank.
i "lahkl.
A I APPENDIX A
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
-0APPENDIXA
Leland Saylor
Assoc i ates
A Certified DVBE
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
WEST NEWPORT MESA
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
LSA JOB NUMBER:
16-078AR3
July 25, 2016
PREPARED FOR
RRM DESIGN
BY LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
101 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 1 San Francisco I California 1 94104
415-291-3200 1 415-291-3201 (f) I www.lelandsaylor.com
7/2512016 1 of 17
A l I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newpod Beach
Leland Saylor
Associates
PROJECT:
WESTNEWPORTMESA
LOCATION:
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
CLIENT:
RRM DESIGN
DESCRIPTION:
STREETSCAPES
PENDIX
JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3
PREPARED BY: JS
BID DATE:
ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
CONTENTS
SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE
I PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE 3
II SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE 9
III ESTIMATE it
7/25/2016
2 of 17
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A
-City of I dewport Beach !1
APPENDIX A
Leland Saylor
Associates
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA
JOBNUMBER:
16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA
PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN
CHECKED BY:
IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES
ESTIMATE DATE:
7/25/2016
SECTION I
PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE
7/25/2016
A3I West Newport Mesa Streetscapee MasterPlan
J City of Newport BR ach - —� –
3 of 17
_- - APPENDIX A 0
Leland Saylor
Ass9ciates
1.1 TYPE OF STUDY:
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA
JOBNUMBER:
16.078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORTBEACH,CA
PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN
BID DATE:
EARLY 2019
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES
ESTIMATE DATE:
7/2S/2016
PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE
N/A
Sitework:
1.0 1 PROJECT SYNOPSIS
1.1 TYPE OF STUDY:
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Construction Type:
SITEWORK
Foundation Type:
RETAINING WALL
Exterior Wall Type:
RETAINING WALL
Roof Type:
N/A
Stories Below Grade:
N/A
Stories Above Grade:
N/A
Sitework:
PAVING, MEDIANS, LANDSCAPE, STRIPING, LIGHTING
Plumbing System:
N/A
Mechanical System:
N/A
Fire Protection System:
N/A
Electrical Service: LIGHTING
1.3 GENERAL NOTES REGARDING PROJECT:
REFURBISHMENT OF SEVERAL AREAS OF STREETSCAPES. WORK TO INCLUDE PAVING, MEDIANS, LANDSCAPE STRIPING,
UGHTING AND DRAINAGE.
7/2512016
4 o 17
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A A
City of Newport Beach
d%APPENDIX A
Leland Saylor
Astiociates
of Bids
Differential
I ...... _.....
_............ +25 to 100%
2 - 3 ....................
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA
JOB NUMBER:
I6-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORTBEACH,CA
PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN
BID DATE:
EARLY 2019
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES
ESTIMATE DATE:
7/25/2016
PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE
2,0 IDEFINITIONS
2.1 ESTIMATE OF COST:
An Estimate of Cost Is prepared from a survey of the quantities of work - items prepared from written or drawn
Information provided at the design -development, working drawing or bid -documents stage of the design. Historical
costs, information provided by contractors and suppliers, plus judgmental evaluation by the Estimator are used as
appropriate as the basis for pricing. Allowances as appropriate will be Included for Items of work which are not
indicated on the design documents provided that the Estimator is made aware of them, or which, in the judgment
of the Estimator, are required for completion of the work. We cannot, however, be responsible for items or work of
on unusual nature of which we have not been Informed.
2.2 BID:
An offer to enter contract to perform work fora fixed sum, to be completed within a limited period of time.
3.0 jBIDS&CONTRACTS
3.1 MARKET CONDITIONS:
In the current market conditions for construction, our experience shows the following results on competitive bids, as
a differential from Leland Saylor Associates final estimates:
Number Percentage
of Bids
Differential
I ...... _.....
_............ +25 to 100%
2 - 3 ....................
...... +10 to 25%
4- 5 ......... _I ..........
_... 0 to +107.
6 - 7 ......... _............
... 0 to .10%
B or more ... .... _.......
.......... -10 to -20%
Accordingly, it is extremely important to ensure that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received. Since LSA has no
control over the bid process, there is no guarantee that proposals, bids or construction cost will not vary from our
opinions or our estimates. Please see Competitive Bidding Statement in the estimate detail section for more
information.
7/25/2016
A5 I West Newport Mesa Stree_t_sc_a Jae Master Plan
City of Np%,port Beach
5 of 17
APPENDIX A A
Leland Saylor
Assoclatrs
Mechanical
Landscaping
REPORT ONLY
None
None
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA
JOB NUMBER:
16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA
PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT: RIM DESIGN
BID DATE:
EARLY 2019
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES
ESTIMATE DATE:
7/25/2016
PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE
4.0 IESTIMATE DOCUMENTS 1
4.1 This Estimate has been compiled from the following documents and information supplied
DRAWINGS:
Architectural
Mechanical
Landscaping
REPORT ONLY
None
None
Structural
Plumbing
Accessibility Standards
None
None
None
Civil
Electrical
Other
None
None
None
SPECIFICATIONS / PROJECT MANUAL:
Describe: Complete, or Technical Only or Bid & Conditions of the Work. MM, LBE.
COSTS PROVIDED BY OTHERS:
Describe: None, or list.
4.2 The user is cautioned that significant changes in the scope of the project, or alterations to the project documents
after completion of the concept level estimate can cause major cost changes. In these circumstances, Leland
Saylor Associates should be notified and an appropriate adjustment made to the concept level estimate.
5.0 1 GROSS SQUARE FEET
BUILDING GSF
STREETSCAPES 334,160
TOTAL Gross Flow Area 334,160
6.0 IWAGE RATES
6.1 This Estimate is based on prevailing wage -rates and conditions currently applicable in NEWPORT BEACH, CA.
7.0 1 PRORATE ADDITIONS TO THE ESTIMATE
7.1 GENERAL CONDITIONS: 10.007.
An allowance based on 10.00% of the construction costs subtotal has been included for Contractors General
Conditions.
7.2 CONTINGENCY: 30.007.
7/25/2016 6 of 17
_West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A6
. — __.. __ _ . -- City of Newpe)rt Beach
APPENDIX A
Leland Saylor
ASsocintas
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES
PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE
JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3
PREPARED BY: JS
BID DATE: EARLY 2019
ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
An allowance based on 30.00% of the construction costs subtotal has been included for Design/Estimating
Contingency.
NOTE: This allowance is intended to provide a Design Contingency sum only, for use during the design process. It is
not intended to provide for a Construction Contingency sum.
7.3 ESCALATION:
14.76%
An allowance of 14.76% has been included in this estimate for construction material & labor cost escalation up to
the anticipated mid -point of construction, based on the following ossumpfions:
Construction start date:
EARLY 2019
Construction period:
9 MONTHS
Mid -pant of construction:
MID 2019
Annual escalation rate:
5.00%
Allowance for escalation:
14.76%
No allowance has been made for Code Escalation or Technological Escolation.
7.4 GEOGRAPHIC FACTOR - REMOTE SITE
0.00%
This estimate is based on current market prices for work of a similar character, done in NEWPORT BEACH, CA. No
adjustment is required for geographical location factor.
7.5 PHASINGALLOWANCE
No Phasing Allowance is needed for this job.
7/25/2016
0.00%
A7 I west Newwport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan _
City of Newport Beach
7 of 17
APPENDIX A 0
Leland Saylor
AeSocla[es
PROJECT:
WESTNEWPORTMESA
JOBNUMBER:
16-078AR3
LOCATION:
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT:
RRM DESIGN
BID DATE:
EARLY 2019
DESCRIPTION:
STREETSCAPES
ESTIMATEDATE:
7/25/2016
PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE
7.6 BONDS:
2.00%
An allowance of 2.00% of the construction cost subtotal is included to provide for the cost of Payment and
Performance Bonds, if required.
7.7 CONTRACTOR'S FEE: 8.00%
An allowance based on 8.00% of the construction cost subtotal is included for Contractors office Overhead and
Profit. Office overhead of the contractor is always included with the fee.
All field overhead of the contractor is included in the General Conditions section of the estimate.
8.0 ISPECIAL NOTES PERTAINING TO THIS ESTIMATE
8.1 SPECIFIC INCLUSIONS,
The following Items are specifically included in this estimate:
NONE
8.2 SPECIFIC EXCLUSIONS:
The following items are specifically excluded from this estimate:
HAZMAT
SOIL REMEDIATION
7/252016
8 of 17
West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A8
City of Ne>, port Beach
ftAPPENDIX A
Leland Saylor
Associlntos
PROJECT:
WESTNEWPORTMESA
LOCATION:
NEWPORT BEACH, CA
CLIENT:
RRM DESIGN
DESCRIPTION:
STREETSCAPES
SECTION II
JOB NUMBER:
16-078AR3
PREPARED BY:
JS
CHECKED BY:
IS
ESTIMATE DATE:
7/25/2016
SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE
7/2 512 01 6
9 o117
AO I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
7 --
C:,.,. cf : dewpOrl Beach 11 ,y :leo I."r,� «•
-- - --------- ---- -- — — - APPENDIX A�
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT:
WEST NEWPORT MESA JOB NO:
16.078AR3
LOCATION:
NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT:
RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY:
IS
DESCRIPTION:
STREETSCAPES DATE:
7/25/2016
SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE GSF:
334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
DIV If
DESCRIPTION
QTY
UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTALS
SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE
1.00
ESTIMATE
334,160
GSF
21.90
$ 7,318,486
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
1 334,1601
GSF
21.90
7,318,486
PRORATES INCLUDED IN ABOVE COSTS
General Conditions
10.00%
Design Contingency
30.00%
Escalation
14.76%
Phasing Allowance
City Procurement / LEE Requirements
SUB -TOTAL
334,1601
GSF
j21.90
$ 7,318,486
Bonds / Insurance
2.00%
Contractors Fee
8.00%
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
1 334,1601
GSF
21.90
$ 7,318,486
Competitive Bidding
The prices in this Estimate are based on Competitive Bidding. Competitive Bidding is
receiving responsive bids from at least five (5) or more General Contractors and three
(3) or more responsive bids from Major Subcontractors or Trades. Major Subcontractors
are Structural Steel, Plaster / EIFS Contractors, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical
Subcontractors.
Without Competitive Bidding, Contractor bids can and have ranged from 25% -to 100%
over the prices in this Estimate, depending on the sae of the job.
We urge you to notify your client of the existing bidding climate, and work with them to
ensure that the project is adequately publicized so that they can get the minimum
number of bids for competitive bidding. Please contact LSA if you need ideas about
how to publicize your project.
712512016
10 of 17
_ West Newport Mesa Streetsca Jae Master PlanwI A 1 O
City o` Neport "r A I:
APPENDIX A _
Leland Saylor
Associates
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA
JOB NUMBER:
16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA
PREPARED BY:
JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN
CHECKED BY:
IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES
ESTIMATE DATE:
7/25/2016
SECTION 111
STREETSCAPES
7/25/2016
A 1 1 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City o.' wFG' Beach — -- - ---
11 of 17
APPENDIX A*
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
GSF: 334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
ITEM #
I DESCRIPTION
UANTITY
UNIT
COST
TOTAL
PLACENTIA AVENUE
23.37
763,872
SUPERIOR AVENUE
19.66
736,272
MONROVIA AVENUE
30.01
677,827
16TH ST
21.63
938,367
PRODUCTION PLACE
26.00
389,659
15TH ST
39.89
793,027
TOTAL SITE
1 4,299,024
4 299 024
PRORATES
General Conditions
10.00%
429,902
Design Contingency
30.00%
1,289,707
Escalation to 2019
14.76%
634,536
Geographic Factor- Remote Site
0.00%
-
Phasing Allowance
0.007.
SUBTOTAL
6,653,1691
Bonds
2.00%
133,063
Overhead and Profit
8.00%
532,254
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS
7 318 486
7/25/2016 12 of 17
West Newport Mesa Streetsca Jae Master Plan I A 1 2
----- -- — -----
City of Ncwport Beach
APPENDIX A
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
GSF: 334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
ITEM#
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY I
UNIT I
COST
TOTAL
PLACENTIA AVENUE
TYPEAIMPROVEMENT-
1,557
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
12,456
SF
4.00
49,824
SIDEWALK
12,456
SF
16.00
199,296
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
6,228
SF
0.25
1,557
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
6,228
SF
3.50
21,798
IRRIGATION
6,228
SF
3.00
18,684
ADJUST DRAINAGE
6,228
SF
1.00
6,228
TYPE C IMPROVEMENT
765
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
6,120
SF
4.00
24,480
SIDEWALK
6,120
SF
16.00
97,920
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
3,060
SF
0.25
765
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
3,060
SF
3.50
10,710
IRRIGATION
3,060
SF
3.00
9,180
ADJUST DRAINAGE
3,060
SF
1.00
3,060
TYPE D IMPROVEMENT
300
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
2,400
SF
4.00
9,600
RETAINING WALL, 3' AVE. HEIGHT
900
SF
55.00
49,500
RETAINING WALL FOOTING
150
CY
550.00
82,500
RETAINING WALL EXCAVATION 6 BACKFILL
300
CY
35.00
10,500
SIDEWALK
2,400
SF
16.00
38,400
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
1,200
SF
3.50
4,200
IRRIGATION
1,200
SF
3.00
3,600
ADJUST DRAINAGE
1,200
SF
4.00
4,800
7/25/2018 13 of 17
I West Newport Mesa Streetscap--_Master Plan
A13 _ _ _ _ _
C:-; of Newport Beach
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
GSF: 334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
I COST
TOTAL
STREET TREES & GRATES
18
EA
1,900.00
34,200
STRIPED CROSSWALKS
10
EA
500.00
5,000
BIKE LANE STRIPING
1,259
LF
10.00
12,590
WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION
2
EA
1,900.00
3,800
DEMO ROADWAY FOR MEDIAN
1,220
SF
4.00
4,880
MEDIANS, LANDSCAPED
1,220
SF
20.00
24,400
TRAFFIC CONTROL
30
DAYS
720.00
21,600
SITE FURNISHINGS
3
SET
3,600.00
10,800
SUBTOTAL
I
I
I763872
SUPERIOR AVENUE
TYPE A IMPROVEMENT -
760
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
6,080
SF
4.00
24,320
SIDEWALK
6,080
SF
16.00
97,280
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
3,040
SF
0.25
760
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
3,040
SF
3.50
10,640
IRRIGATION
3,040
SF
3.00
9,120
ADJUST DRAINAGE
3,040
SF
1.00
3,040
TYPE C IMPROVEMENT
3,035
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
24,280
SF
4.00
97,120
SIDEWALK
24,280
SF
16.00
388,480
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
4,047
SF
0.25
1,012
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
4,047
SF
3.50
14,163
IRRIGATION
4,047
SF
3.00
12,140
ADJUST DRAINAGE
4,047
SF
1.00
4,047
STREET TREES & GRATES
26
EA
1,900.00
49,400
STRIPED CROSSWALKS
2
EA
500.00
1,000
BIKE LANE STRIPING
915
LF
10.00
9,150
WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION
2
EA
1,900.00
3,800
SITE FURNISHINGS
3
SET
3,600.00
10,800
SUBTOTAL
-----73-6-,2-72-1
7/25/2016 14 of 17
West NewQort Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A 1 1
__ --- -- -
West �F
Cr, e`Newperte7ch
APPENDIX A _
UT
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
GSF: 334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION I
QUANTITY I
UNIT I
COST
TOTAL
MONROVIA AVENUE
TYPEAIMPROVEMENT-
1,260
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
10,080
SF
4.00
40,320
SIDEWALK
10,080
SF
16.00
161,280
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
5,040
SF
0.25
1,260
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
5,040
SF
3.50
17,640
IRRIGATION
5,040
SF
3.00
15,120
ADJUST DRAINAGE
5,040
SF
1.00
5,040
TYPE C IMPROVEMENT
800
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
6,400
SF
4.00
25,600
SIDEWALK
6,400
SF
16.00
102,400
CLEAR AND GRUB (EI LANDSCAPING
1,067
SF
0.25
267
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
1,067
SF
3.50
3,733
IRRIGATION
1,067
SF
3.00
3,200
ADJUST DRAINAGE
1,067
SF
1.00
1,067
STREET TREES & GRATES
15
EA
1,900.00
28,500
BULBOUTS - 2 CORNERS
4
EA
10,000.00
40,000
LIGHTING
2,193
LF
100.00
219,300
STRIPED CROSSWALKS
3
EA
500.00
1,500
SHARROW STRIPING
320
SF
2.50
800
SITE FURNISHINGS
3
SET
3,600.00
10,800
SUBTOTAL
677,827
16TH ST
TYPEAIMPROVEMENT-
3,182
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
25,456
SF
4.00
101,824
SIDEWALK
25,456
SF
16.00
407,296
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
12,728
SF
0.25
3,182
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
12,728
SF
3.50
44,548
IRRIGATION
12,728
SF
3.00
38,184
ADJUST DRAINAGE
12,728
SF
1.00
12,728
7/25/2016 15 Df 17
A15G I West Newport Mesa Stre_etscape Master Plan
I J City of New;-; t Beach
APPENDIX AG
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
GSF: 334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
I COST
TOTAL
TYPE C IMPROVEMENT
556
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
4,448
SF
4.00
17,792
SIDEWALK
4,448
SF
16.00
71,168
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
741
SF
0.25
185
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
741
SF
3.50
2,595
IRRIGATION
741
SF
3.00
2,224
ADJUST DRAINAGE
741
SF
1.00
741
STREET TREES & GRATES
19
EA
1,900.00
36,100
BULBOUTS - 4 CORNERS
I
EA
20,000.00
20,000
LIGHTING
1,660
LF
100.00
166,000
STRIPED CROSSWALKS
4
EA
500.00
2,000
SHARROW STRIPING
320
SF
2.50
800
WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION
2
EA
1,900.00
3,800
SITE FURNISHINGS
2
SET
3,600.00
7,200
SUBTOTAL
938.3671
PRODUCTION PLACE
TYPE B IMPROVEMENT
1,249
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
9,992
SF
4.00
39,968
SIDEWALK
9,992
SF
16.00
159,872
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
4,996
SF
0.25
1,249
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
4,996
SF
3.50
17,486
IRRIGATION
4,996
SF
3.00
14,988
ADJUST DRAINAGE
4,996
SF
1.00
4,996
STREET TREES & GRATES
10
EA
1,900.00
19,000
LIGHTING
1,249
LF
100.00
124,900
SITE FURNISHINGS
2
SET
3,600.00
7,200
SUBTOTAL
389 659
15TH ST
TYPEAIMPROVEMENT-
293
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
2,344
SF
4.00
9,376
SIDEWALK
2,344
SF
16.00
37,504
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
1,172
SF
0.25
293
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
1,172
SF
3.50
41102
IRRIGATION
1,172
SF
3.00
3,516
ADJUST DRAINAGE
1,172
SF
1.00
1,172
7/25/2016 16 of 17
- - --
West Newport Mesa Sireetsca Jae Master Plan I q 1 6
C'tyc N�r,r ,}E9C1Ch
APPENDIX A
LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES
PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16.078AR3
LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS
CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS
DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016
GSF: 334,160
CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE
ITEM If
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT I
COST
TOTAL
TYPE C IMPROVEMENT
956
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
2,294
SF
4.00
9,178
SIDEWALK
7,648
SF
16.00
122,368
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
1,275
SF
0.25
319
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
1,275
SF
3.50
4,461
IRRIGATION
1,275
SF
3.00
3,824
ADJUST DRAINAGE
1,275
SF
1.00
1,275
TYPE D IMPROVEMENT
620
LF
DEMO (E) SIDEWALK
2,480
SF
4.00
9,920
RETAINING WALL
1,860
SF
55.00
102,300
RETAINING WALL FOOTING
310
CY
550.00
170,500
RETAINING WALL EXCAVATION & BACKFILL
620
CY
35.00
21,700
SIDEWALK
4,960
SF
16.00
79,360
CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING
2,480
SF
0.25
620
LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS
2,480
SF
3.50
8,680
IRRIGATION
2,480
SF
3.00
7,440
ADJUST DRAINAGE
2,480
SF
4.00
9,920
STREET TREES & GRATES
16
EA
1,900.00
30,400
BULBOUTS - 2 CORNERS
2
EA
10,000.00
20,000
SHARROW STRIPING
320
SF
2.50
800
WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION
1
EA
1,900.00
1,900
SITE FURNISHINGS
2
SET
3,600.00
7,200
SUBTOTAL
793027
7/25/2016 17 of 17
A 7 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan
City of Newport Beach
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH }
I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council is seven; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution
No. 2016-102 was duly and regularly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a
regular meeting of said Council, duly and regularly held on the gth day of August, 2016, and that the same
was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Member Peotter, Council Member Duffield, Council Member Selich,
Council Member Curry, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tem Muldoon,
Mayor Dixon
NAYS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of
said City this 10th day of August, 2016.
Leilani I. Brown, MMC
City Clerk
Newport Beach, California
(Seal)