HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - 4.11 - Greenhouse Gas EmissionsSection 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
4.11 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
4.11.1 INTRODUCTION
This section addresses the potential global climate change impacts that would occur from
construction and operation of the proposed Newport Banning Ranch Project (Project). At the
direction of the State Legislature in Senate Bill (SB) 97, the California Natural Resources
Agency adopted amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
that require analysis of climate change and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in CEQA
documents; these amendments were effective March 18, 2010. The model data used for the
quantitative analysis contained in this section are included in this EIR as Appendix H.
Greenhouse Gases
GHGs are atmospheric gases and clouds within the atmosphere that influence the Earth's
temperature by absorbing most of the infrared radiation that rises from the sun - warmed surface
and that would otherwise escape into space. This process is commonly known as the
"Greenhouse Effect ". GHGs, as defined under California Assembly Bill (AB) 32, include
carbon dioxide (COA methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).' General
discussions on climate change often include water vapor, ozone, and aerosols in the GHG
category. Water vapor and atmospheric ozone are not gases that are formed directly in the
construction or operation of development projects, nor can they be controlled in these projects.
Aerosols are not gases. While these elements have a role in climate change, they are not
considered by either regulatory bodies (such as the California Air Resources Board [CARB]) or
climate change groups (such as the California Climate Action Registry [CCAR]) as gases to be
reported or analyzed for control. Therefore, no further discussion of water vapor, atmospheric
ozone, or aerosols is provided in this EIR section.
4.11.2 REGULATORY SETTING
Federal
USEPA Findings
On December 7, 2009, the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ( USEPA)
signed two distinct findings regarding GHGs under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act:
• Endangerment Finding: The Administrator finds that the current and projected
concentrations of the six key well -mixed greenhouse gases— carbon dioxide
(COA methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs),
perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) —in the atmosphere
threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.
• Cause or Contribute Finding: The Administrator finds that the combined
emissions of these well -mixed greenhouse gases from new motor vehicles and
new motor vehicle engines contribute to the greenhouse gas pollution which
threatens public health and welfare.
' The addition of NF3 to the AB 32 list of GHGs was effective January 1, 2010.
RAProjmtswewponuol silo raft eiRW11 GHG- 090211.doc 4.11 -1 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
These findings do not themselves impose any requirements on industry or other entities.
However, this action is a prerequisite to finalizing the USEPA's proposed GHG emission
standards for light -duty vehicles (USEPA 2009b).
Light -Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Corporate Average Fuel
Economy Standards
On April 1, 2010, the USEPA and the Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration ( NHTSA) announced a joint final rule to reduce GHG emissions and to
improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in the United States. The rule applies to
passenger cars, light -duty trucks, and medium -duty passenger vehicles, covering model years
2012 through 2016. The rule requires these vehicles to meet an estimated combined average
emissions level of 295 grams of CO2 per mile by 2012, decreasing to 250 grams per mile by
2016; the latter figure is equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon (MPG) if the automobile industry
were to meet this CO2 level solely through fuel economy improvements. The combined USEPA
GHG standards and NHTSA Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards resolve
previously conflicting requirements under both federal programs and the standards of the State
of California and other states that have adopted the California standards (USEPA 2010).
State
CARIB, a part of the State of California Environmental Protection Agency, is responsible for the
coordination and administration of both federal and State air pollution control programs in
California. In this capacity, CARIB conducts research, sets the California Ambient Air Quality
Standards (CAAQS), compiles emission inventories, develops suggested control measures, and
oversees local programs, including those relative to climate change and global warming.
There are numerous State plans, policies, regulations, and laws related to GHGs and global
climate change. Following is a brief discussion of some of these plans, policies, and regulations.
Assembly Bill 1493 — Clean Car Standards
In 2002, AB 1493 (Pavley) (2002 Cal. Stats Ch. 200, amending California Heath an Safety
Code, Section 42823 and adding California Health and Safety Code, Section 43018.5) required
CARIB to develop and adopt, by January 1, 2005, regulations that achieve "the maximum
feasible reduction of GHGs emitted by passenger vehicles and light -duty truck and other
vehicles determined by CARIB to be vehicles whose primary use is noncommercial personal
transportation in the state ". Implementation of AB 1493 was delayed for many years by
prolonged litigation and USEPA actions. On May 19, 2009, challenging parties, automakers, the
State of California, and the federal government reached an agreement on a series of actions
that would resolve these current and potential future disputes over the standards through model
year 2016. On September 24, 2009, CARIB adopted amendments to the AB 1493 regulations
that reduce GHG emissions in new passenger vehicles from 2009 through 2016. The
amendments, approved by the Board, are part of California's commitment toward a nation -wide
program to reduce new passenger vehicle GHGs from 2012 through 2016. The amendments
bind California's enforcement of AB 1493 starting in 2009 while providing vehicle manufacturers
with new compliance flexibility. The amendments will also prepare California to harmonize its
rules with the federal rules for passenger vehicles (CARIB 2010). As described above, the
USEPAINHTSA rule to implement the GHG reduction standards was issued on April 1, 2010.
R9ProjmtswewponiJ015\!oraft E!RW.ii GHG -090211.doo 4.11 -2 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Executive Order 5 -3 -05
On June 1, 2005, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed Executive Order S -3 -05, which
proclaims that California is vulnerable to climate change impacts. It declares that increased
temperatures could reduce snowpack in the Sierra Nevadas, further exacerbate California's air
quality problems, and potentially cause a rise in sea levels. In an effort to avoid or reduce
climate change impacts, Executive Order S -3 -05 calls for a reduction in GHG emissions to the
year 2000 level by 2010, to year 1990 levels by 2020, and to 80 percent below 1990 levels by
2050.
Assembly Bill 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
The California Legislature adopted the public policy position that global warming is "a serious
threat to the economic well- being, public health, natural resources, and the environment of
California" (California Health and Safety Code §38501). Further, the State Legislature has
determined that:
the potential adverse impacts of global warming include the exacerbation of air
quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from the
Sierra Nevada snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of
thousands of coastal businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and
the natural environment, and an increase in the incidences of infectious disease,
asthma, and other human health - related problems.
These public policy statements became law with the enactment of AB 32, the California Global
Warming Solutions Act of 2006, signed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger in
September 2006. AB 32 is now codified as California Health and Safety Code Sections 38500-
38599. AB 32 requires that statewide GHG emissions be reduced to 1990 levels by 2020.
Senate Bill 97 and Amendments to State CEQA Guidelines
SB 97 directed the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) to adopt amendments to the
State CEQA Guidelines that require evaluation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG
emissions. The amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines, published December 31, 2009 in a
new Section 15064.4, titled Determining the Significance of Impacts from Greenhouse Gas
Emissions, provide that (CNRA 2009a):
(a) The determination of the significance of greenhouse gas emissions calls for a
careful judgment by the lead agency consistent with the provisions in
Section 15064. A lead agency should make a good -faith effort, based to the
extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate, or estimate
the amount of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project. A lead agency
shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether
to:
(1) Use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions
resulting from a project, and which model or methodology to use. The lead
agency has discretion to select the model or methodology it considers most
appropriate provided it supports its decision with substantial evidence. The
lead agency should explain the limitations of the particular model or
methodology selected for use; and /or
R9ProjmtslNewpaMJ01SMraft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -3 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance based standards.
(b) A lead agency should consider the following factors, among others, when
assessing the significance of impacts from greenhouse gas emissions on the
environment:
(1) The extent to which the project may increase or reduce greenhouse gas
emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting;
(2) Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the
lead agency determines applies to the project;
(3) The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements
adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction
or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. Such requirements must be
adopted by the relevant public agency through a public review process and
must reduce or mitigate the project's incremental contribution of
greenhouse gas emissions. If there is substantial evidence that the possible
effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable
notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements,
an EIR must be prepared for the project.
The amendments add a new Section 15126.4(c), Mitigation Measures Related to Greenhouse
Gas Emissions. This new State CEQA Guidelines section includes the following:
Lead agencies shall consider feasible means, supported by substantial evidence
and subject to monitoring or reporting, of mitigating the significant effects of
greenhouse gas emissions. Measures to mitigate the significant effects of
greenhouse gas emissions may include, among others:
(1) Measures in an existing plan or mitigation program for the reduction of
emissions that are required as part of the lead agency's decision;
(2) Reductions in emissions resulting from a project through implementation of
project features, project design, or other measures, such as those
described in Appendix F;
(3) Off -site measures, including offsets that are not otherwise required, to
mitigate a project's emissions;
(4) Measures that sequester greenhouse gases;
(5) In the case of the adoption of a plan, such as a general plan, long range
development plan, or plans for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,
mitigation may include the identification of specific measures that may be
implemented on a project -by- project basis. Mitigation may also include the
incorporation of specific measures or policies found in an adopted
ordinance or regulation that reduces the cumulative effect of emissions.
R9projmtswewponiJ015\!oraft E!RW.ii GHG -090211.doo 4.114 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The State CEQA Guidelines, Appendix F, Energy Conservation, in Section II, EIR Contents,
includes the following:
D. Mitigation Measures may include:
Potential measures to reduce wasteful, inefficient and unnecessary
consumption of energy during construction, operation, maintenance and /or
removal. The discussion should explain why certain measures were
incorporated in the Project and why other measures were dismissed.
2. The potential of siting, orientation, and design to minimize energy
consumption, including transportation energy, increase water conservation
and reduce solid- waste.
3. The potential for reducing peak energy demand.
4. Alternate fuels (particularly renewable ones) or energy systems.
5. Energy conservation which could result from recycling efforts.
CARB Scoping Plan
In December 2007, CARB published California's GHG inventory, which compiled statewide
anthropogenic GHG emissions and sinks for the years 1990 through 2004. The total statewide
GHG 1990 emissions level, and therefore the year 2020 emissions target, is 427 million metric
tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e).2 Achieving this target requires a reduction of
169 MMTCO2e (approximately 30 percent) from the State's projected 2020 emissions of
596 MMTCO2e (business -as- usual), and a reduction of 42 MMTCO2e (almost 10 percent) of the
2002 -2004 average emissions.
AB 32 requires CARB to develop a Scoping Plan to lower the State's GHG emissions to meet
the 2020 limit. The Scoping Plan was approved at the December 2008 board meeting and the
measures in the Scoping Plan, listed in Table 4.11 -1, will be developed and in place by 2012.
As shown in the table, statewide measures addressing vehicle emissions, energy efficiency,
vehicle fuel, and power generation are planned to achieve the greater amounts of emissions
reductions. However, reductions at all levels will be needed to reach the 2020 targets.
CO2e emissions are commonly expressed in metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e). Larger
quantities of emissions, such as on the State or world scale, are expressed in million metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e). Metric tons may also be stated as "tonnes ". The CO2e for a gas is
derived by multiplying the tons of the gas by the associated global warming potential (GWP) such that
MMTCO2e = (million metric tons of a GHG) x (GWP of the GHG). For example, the GWP for CH4 is 21. This
means that emissions of 1 million metric tons of CH4 are equivalent to the emissions of 21 million metric tons of
CO2.
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Graft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -5 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -1
AB 32 SCOPING PLAN RECOMMENDED GREENHOUSE GAS
REDUCTION MEASURES
Recommended Reduction Measures
Reductions
Counted Toward
2020 Target of 169
MMTCO2e
Percentage of
Statewide Year
2020 Target
Cap and Trade Program and Associated Measures
California Light -Duty Vehicle GHG Standards
31.7
18.2%
Energy Efficiency
26.3
15.1%
Renewable Portfolio Standard (33% by 2020)
21.3
12.2%
Low Carbon Fuel Standard
15
8.6%
Regional Transportation - Related GHG Targetsa
5
2.9%
Vehicle Efficiency Measures
4.5
2.6%
Goods Movement
3.7
2.1%
Million Solar Roofs
2.1
1.2%
Medium /Heavy Duty Vehicles
1.4
0.8%
High Speed Rail
1.0
0.6%
Industrial Measures
0.3
0.2%
Additional Reduction Necessary to Achieve Cap
34.4
19.8%
Total Estimated Reductions from Cap and Trade Program and
Associated Measures
146.7
84.3%
Uncapped Sources /Sectors Measures
High Global Warming Potential Gas Measures
20.2
11.6%
Sustainable Forests
5.0
2.9%
Industrial Measures (for sources not covered under cap and trade
program)
1.1
0.6%
Recycling and Waste (landfill methane capture)
1.0
0.6%
Total Estimated Reductions from Uncapped Sources/Sectors
27.3
15.7%
Total Reductions Counted Towards 2020 Target
1740
100%
Other Recommended Measures - Not Counted Towards 2020
Target
Estimated Reductions MMTCO2e
State Government Operations
1 to 2
Local Government Operations
To Be Determined
Green Buildings
26
Recycling and Waste
9
Water Sector Measures
4.8
Methane Capture at Large Dairies
1.0
MMTCO2e: million metric tons of COze; GHG: greenhouse gas(es)
Reductions represent an estimate of what may be achieved from local land use changes. It is not the SB 375 Regional target.
The total reduction for the recommended measures slightly exceeds the 169 MMTCO2e of reductions estimated in the Draft
Scoping Plan. This is the net effect of adding several measures and adjusting the emission reduction estimates for some other
measures.
Source. CARB 2008b.
Key elements of the Scoping Plan include (1) expanding and strengthening existing energy
efficiency programs and building and appliance standards; (2) achieving a statewide renewable
energy mix of 33 percent; (3) developing a California cap and trade program linked with other
similar programs; (4) establishing targets for transportation- related GHG emissions for regions
throughout California and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets;
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Draft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -6 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(5) implementing existing laws and standards such as California's clean car standards identified
in Table 4.11 -1 as Light Duty Vehicle GHG Standards and described above under the AB 1493
heading, goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS); and
(6) issuing targeted fees to fund the State's long -term commitment to AB 32 administration
(GARB 2008b).
The estimated 2020 greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions for measures described in the
2008 Scoping Plan, and above, were based on the best available information as of December
2008. CARB staff has since revised the expected 2020 emission reductions in consideration of
the economic recession and the availability of updated information from development of
measure - specific regulations. In addition, CARB moved the Light Duty Vehicle and renewable
portfolio standards into the baseline calculation. Based on these revisions, the AB 32 2020
baseline is now forecasted to be 507 MMTCO2e. Reduction of an estimated 80 MMTCO2e are
necessary to reduce statewide emissions to the AB 32 Target of 427 MMTCO2e by 2020. The
forecasted reductions for the individual scoping plan measures shown in Table 4.11 -1 have
been or are being reevaluated. For example, the estimated reductions from energy efficiency
and conservation have been revised from 19.5 to 11.9 MMTCO2e and reductions from regional
transportation related GHG targets, discussed in the next section, have been revised from 5.0 to
3.0 MMTCO2e.
Senate Bill 375
Signed September 30, 2008, SB 375 provides for a new planning process to coordinate land
use planning, regional transportation plans, and funding priorities in order to help California
meet the GHG reduction goals established in AB 32. Its goal is to promote land use growth
patterns that will help reduce GHG emissions by reducing driving. SB 375 requires Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (MPOs), including the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG), to incorporate a "Sustainable Communities Strategy' (SCS) in their regional
transportation plans that will demonstrate an ability to attain GHG emission reduction targets set
by CARB. There are two mutually important facets to SB 375: reducing vehicle miles traveled
(VMT) and encouraging more compact, complete, and efficient communities for the future.
SCAG's SCS is currently scheduled for adoption in April 2012. SB 375 also includes provisions
for streamlined CEQA review for some infill projects such as transit oriented development.
SB 375 will be implemented over the next several years.
SB 375 requires CARB to set GHG emission reduction targets for the 18 MPOs throughout
California. Prior to setting targets for a region, CARB is required to exchange technical
information with each MPO and the affected air districts. SB 375 also required CARB to appoint
a Regional Targets Advisory Committee (RTAC) by January 31, 2009, to recommend factors for
CARB to consider and methodologies for it to use in setting GHG emission reduction targets for
each region. The RTAC was required to include representation from the League of California
Cities, the California State Association of Counties, MPOs, developers, planning organizations,
and other stakeholders. In January 2009, CARB appointed 21 members to the RTAC, from a
variety of constituencies. On September 29, 2009, the RTAC released its recommendations to
CARB, representing a key step in the establishment of regional targets for inclusion in
sustainable community strategies (RTAC 2009). The RTAC recommendations focus largely on
the manner in which CARB staff should interact with various stakeholders during the target -
setting process, and how staff should use empirical studies and modeling in establishing
regional GHG targets.
Following the release of RTAC's recommendations, CARB began the process of developing
regional GHG reduction targets (Regional Targets) for the State's MPOs. In establishing the
R: \ProjmtslNewponiJ015 \!Graft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -7 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
targets, CARS must take into account GHG reductions to be achieved by improved vehicle
emission standards, changes in the carbon - intensity of fuels and other measures it has
approved that will reduce GHG emissions in affected regions. As these factors change, CARS
may revise the targets every four years, and at a minimum, must update them every eight years.
Additionally, each MPO may recommend a target for its region.
On September 23, 2010, CARB adopted Regional Targets applying to the years 2020 and 2035.
For the area under SCAG's jurisdiction — including the Project site —CARB adopted Regional
Targets of 8 percent for 2020 and 13 percent for 2035; these reductions are on a per capita
basis relative to a 2005 baseline. On February 15, 2011, the CARS's Executive Officer
approved the final targets. CARB filed a Notice of Decision two days later on February 17, 2011.
Now that CARB has adopted these Regional Targets, the MPOs must begin the process of
developing SCSs that meet these Regional Targets for inclusion in their Regional
Transportation Plans (RTPs) or, if it is not possible to meet the Regional Targets, MPOs must
develop Alternative Planning Strategies (APS). The APS is meant to bridge the gap between
GHG emission reductions an SCS can achieve and a region's target, set by CARB.
SB 375 is similar to the Regional Blueprint Planning Program, established by Caltrans, which
made $5 million in discretionary grants to fund available for regional transportation and land use
plans voluntarily developed by MPOs working in cooperation with Council of Governments.
SCAG adopted Amendment #4 to the 2008 RTP in November 2010. The Amendment was
developed as a response to changes to projects in the 2008 RTP. Five projects are being
modified or added in these Amendments, with a majority of the changes being minor in nature,
including changes to completion years, as well as minor modifications to project scopes, costs,
and funding. The 2013 RTP will be the first SCAG RTP subject to SB 375. The Scoping Plan
adopted by CARB in December of 2008 relies on the requirements of SB 375 to implement the
carbon emission reductions anticipated from land use decisions.
For the SCAG region, a subregional SCS may be prepared by a subregional Council Of
Government and the County Transportation Commission. The Orange County Council of
Governments (OCCOG) /Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) assumed this
responsibility and prepared a SCS that was approved by the OCCOG and OCTA boards of
directors in June 2011. During the last half of 2011, OCCOG /OCTA is working with SCAG to
integrate the subregional SCS into the SCAG regional SCS.
After assigning targets, CARS's role is to assure the accuracy of the methodology selected by
each MPO and then to determine whether the SCS, or the APS, would achieve the target if
implemented. Thus, the policy choices relating to how the MPO will achieve the target are left to
the region.
Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards
The Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6 of
the California Code of Regulations [CCR]) were established in 1978 in response to a legislative
mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. Since that time, the energy efficiency
standards have undergone several revisions. Effective January 1, 2010, the adopted 2008
Title 24 standards replaced the 2005 Title 24 standards. The California Energy Commission
(CEC) adopted the 2008 standards in order to (1) "Provide California with an adequate,
reasonably - priced, and environmentally -sound supply of energy" and (2) "Respond to Assembly
Bill 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, which mandates that California must reduce
its greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020" (CEC 2009).
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Draft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -E Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
An impact analysis of the 2008 Energy Efficiency Standards estimates that, compared to the
2005 Standards, for new multi - family residential construction, electricity use will be reduced by
19.7 percent; peak demand will be reduced by 7.4 percent; and gas consumption will be
reduced by 7.0 percent. For new single - family residential construction, electricity use will be
reduced by 22.7 percent; peak demand will be reduced by 8.2 percent; and gas consumption
will be reduced by 10.0 percent. These percent savings are relative to heating, cooling, lighting,
and water heating only and do not include other appliances, outdoor lighting that is not attached
to buildings, plug loads, or other energy uses (CEC 2007).
The California Energy Commission is in the process of developing the 2013 Title 24 Building
Energy Efficiency Standards; the proposed amended standards will be adopted in 2014
(CEC 2011).
Attorney General
The California Attorney General (AG) has filed numerous comment letters with agencies
discussing their analysis of climate change in CEQA documents. As part of the AG's efforts to
work with agencies on addressing climate change in their CEQA documents, the AG publishes
and updates The California Environmental Quality Act, Addressing Global Warming Impacts at
the Local Agency Level, which is a document with "information that may be helpful to local
agencies in carrying out their duties under CEQA as they relate to global warming. Included in
this document are various measures that may reduce the global warming related impacts of a
project" " (DOJ 2008). The AG's measures are addressed later in this EIR section.
Regional and Local
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Air quality in Orange County is regulated by the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD). The SCAQMD is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution
control in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). To that end, the SCAQMD, a regional agency,
works directly with SCAG, County transportation commissions, and local governments and
cooperates actively with all federal and State government agencies. The SCAQMD develops
rules and regulations; establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources; inspects
emissions sources; and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when
necessary.
Beginning in April 2008, the SCAQMD convened a working group to provide guidance to local
lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. The
Working Group meets approximately once per month. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD
Governing Board adopted its staff proposal for an interim CEQA GHG significance threshold for
industrial projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency (SCAQMD 2008). The interim
screening threshold for industrial projects is 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per
year (MTCO2e /yr).
In September 2010, the Working Group presented a tiered approach to determining GHG
significance (SCAQMD 2010). At Tier 1, GHG emissions impact would be less than significant if
the project qualifies under a categorical or statutory CEQA exemption. At Tier 2, the GHG
emissions impact would be less than significant if the project is consistent with a previously
adopted GHG reduction plan that meets specific requirements .3 At Tier 3, the Working Group
3 The plan must (A) Quantify greenhouse gas emissions, both existing and projected over a specified time period,
resulting from activities within a defined geographic area; (B) Establish a level, based on substantial evidence,
R9projmtswewponlJ015\!Draft E!Rw.ii GHG- 090211.doc 4.11 -9 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
proposes extending the 10,000 MTCO2e /yr screening threshold applicable to industrial projects
where SCAQMD is the lead agency, described above, to other lead agency industrial projects.
For residential and commercial projects the Working Group proposes the following Tier 3
screening values: either (1) a single 3,000 MTCO2e /yr threshold for all land use types or
(2) separate thresholds of 3,500 MTCO2e /yr for residential projects, 1,400 MTCO2e /yr for
commercial projects, and 3,000 MTCO2e /yr for mixed use projects. A project with emissions less
than the applicable screening value would have less than significant GHG emissions. As of
June 2011, these proposals have not been considered by the SCAQMD Board.
Projects with emissions greater than the Tier 3 screening values would be analyzed at Tier 4 by
one of three methods:
A percent emission reduction target. This method is used by the Sacramento
Metropolitan and San Joaquin Valley Air Districts and the City of San Diego. The
SCAQMD Working Group made no recommendation relative to this method.
2. Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan Measures. The Working
Group assumes implementation of AB 32 measures would be incorporated in method 3
below.
3. Efficiency Targets. On the project level, 2020 GHG emissions should not exceed 4.8
MTCO2e /year per service population (SP) where SP is project residents plus employees.
Further, 2035 GHG emissions should not exceed 3.0 MTCO2e /year per SP. This
efficiency methodology is used by the Bay Area Air District.
Projects with GHG emissions not meeting the Tier 4 targets would be required to provide
mitigation in the form of real, quantifiable, and verifiable offsets to achieve the target thresholds.
The offsets may be achieved through project design features, other on -site methods, or by off-
site actions, such as energy efficiency upgrade of existing buildings.
City of Newport Beach
General Plan
The General Plan for the City of Newport Beach was adopted in 2006. As Newport Beach is
almost fully built out, the General Plan focuses on conserving the existing pattern of land uses
and establishes policies for their protection and long -term maintenance. While the General Plan
contains no policies specifically pertaining to GHG emissions, the Natural Resources Element of
the General Plan provides direction regarding the conservation, development, and utilization of
natural resources. This element addresses water supply (as a resource) and water quality
(including bay and ocean quality and potable drinking water); air quality; terrestrial and marine
biological resources; open space; mineral resources; visual resources; and energy. The
Circulation Element includes policies to achieve reduced automobile travel. Specific policies that
below which the contribution to greenhouse gas emissions from activities covered by the plan would not be
cumulatively considerable; (C) Identify and analyze the greenhouse gas emissions resulting from specific actions
or categories of actions anticipated within the geographic area; (D) Specify measures or a group of measures,
including performance standards, that substantial evidence demonstrates, if implemented on a project -by- project
basis, would collectively achieve the specified emissions level; (E) Establish a mechanism to monitor the plan's
progress toward achieving the level and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving specified levels; (F) Be
adopted in a public process following environmental review (CEQA Guidelines §15183.5).
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Graft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -10 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
could result in GHG emissions reductions and that could relate to the proposed Project are
addressed later in this EIR section .4
Interim CEQA Significance Thresholds
The City of Newport Beach has used the following approach and standards in complying with
CEQA with respect to the assessment of global climate change impacts:
While State agencies and local air pollution control districts are currently working
to develop CEQA thresholds of significance that would guide classification of
impacts associated with global climate change in CEQA documents, to date, the
City lacks sufficient information to establish formal, permanent thresholds by
which to classify projects with relatively small, incremental contributions to the
State's total GHG emissions as cumulatively considerable or not. Until
appropriate regulatory entities develop CEQA thresholds for GHGs, for projects
emitting more than 1,600 metric tons of CO2e per year, the City will apply interim
standards. For residential and commercial projects, the City will evaluate a
project's consistency with performance standards set out in City policies, which
promote sustainability and reduce emissions, as well as State policies and
strategies designed to meet the State's emission reduction objectives in AB 32;5
the City will also evaluate project emissions numerically. Until further guidance is
provided by the State or other appropriate expert agencies, the City will
conservatively apply a standard that falls somewhat below the State's proposed
threshold for industrial projects, which is 7,000 metric tons of CO2e per year
(GARB 2008).
To restate, until more guidance is provided from the expert agencies, the City will
consider projects emitting 1,600 metric tons of CO2e per year or less to be less
than significant and no further analysis is required. For projects exceeding the
screening threshold of 1,600 metric tons of CO2e per year, the City will consider
projects to have significant impacts under this threshold if they either (1) are not
substantially consistent with policies and standards set out in federal, State, and
local plans designed to reduce greenhouse gas emission or (2) would emit more
than 6,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Projects that are not substantially
consistent with policies and standards set out in federal, State, and local plans
designed to reduce greenhouse gas emission or would emit more than
6,000 metric tons of CO2e per year would be considered to have significant
impacts under this threshold, and thus could be expected to impede the State's
mandatory requirement under AB 32 to reduce statewide GHG emissions to
1990 levels by 2020. The City recognizes that this is an interim standard and will
likely change over time as further guidance is provided by the expert regulatory
agencies.
For ease of reading, the policy tables are located at the end of this section.
The City adopted the interim standard on November 24, 2009, via Resolution No. 2009 -87, which certified the
City Hall and Park Development Project's Final EIR. These interim standards are consistent with the general
guidance on cumulative impacts analysis. For instance, Section 15064(h)(3) of the adopted amendments to the
CEQA Guidelines states that a. Lead Agency may determine that a project's incremental contribution to a
cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a plan or
regulation that apply to the project that is specified in law or adopted by the public agency and has specific
requirements to reduce GHG emissions.
RAProJmtswewpoelJ01 SM raft EiRWA1 GHG- 090211.doc 4.11 -11 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
4.11.3 METHODOLOGY
Calculation of GHG Emissions
Construction and Operational GHG Emissions
Long -term GHG emissions from mobile sources and area sources and short-term emissions
from construction equipment were calculated by using California Emissions Estimator Model
(CaIEEMod) version 2011.1.1 (SCAQMD 2011a). CaIEEMod was also used to calculate
construction GHG emissions. CaIEEMod is a computer program accepted by the SCAQMD that
can be used to estimate anticipated emissions associated with land development projects.
CaIEEMod has separate databases for specific counties and air districts. The Orange County
database was used for the proposed Project.
The limitations of the CaIEEMod model should be noted. The vehicle emission factors of
EMFAC 2007 have been updated to include standards required for vehicles through year 2016.
Emissions standards for the years 2017 -2025 (known as Pavley II or LEV III GHG) have not
been included; therefore, GHG emissions for the years 2017 -2025 may be overstated. Solid
waste emissions are not addressed in this analysis because of corrections in process to the
model. Solid waste GHG emissions are relatively a very small part of overall emissions and
omission of these data is considered to be acceptable.
Specific inputs to CaIEEMod for both construction and operations include Project land uses and
acreages. Operational inputs for mobile sources include year of operations and vehicle trip
generation rates. Mobile sources are the vehicles used by residents and by patrons, staff, and
vendors for commercial and hotel businesses. Model default values for trip distances, fleet
composition, and other factors may be adjusted for project- specific conditions. Default values
were used for the proposed Project. Inputs for long -term GHG emissions analysis include the
electrical energy supplier, fireplace types and quantities, changes in vegetated land use,
estimated number of new trees, land use features that contribute to reductions in vehicle miles
traveled, and Project criteria for energy use and water conservation.
In August 2010, the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association ( CAPCOA) published
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, A Resource for Local Government to Assess
Emission Reductions from Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures. This document provides
guidance on the quantification of project -level mitigation of GHGs associated with land use,
transportation, energy use, and other related project areas. The guidance includes detailed
procedures on the definition of "business as usual' emissions and the approaches to assessing
and calculating the GHG emission reductions associated with project design features and
mitigation measures. The concepts in the CAPCOA document were incorporated into
CaIEEMod.
Construction input data to CaIEEMod include but are not limited to the start and finish dates of
Project construction phases; inventories of construction equipment to be used during each
phase; volumes of materials to be imported to and exported from the site; areas to be paved;
and areas to be painted. Because impacts from construction activities occur over a relatively
short time period, they contribute a relatively small portion of the overall GHG emissions for the
lifetime of the Project. GHG emission reduction measures for construction equipment are
relatively limited. Therefore, in its Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA GHG Significance
Thresholds, the SCAQMD recommends that construction emissions be amortized over a
30 -year project lifetime so that GHG reduction measures will address construction GHG
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Draft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -12 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies (SCAQMD 2008). That
methodology is used in this analysis.
Oilfield Operations
GHG emissions for present and future oilfield operations are reported in Draft Air Toxic Health
Risk Assessment in Support of CEQA Documentation, Newport Banning Ranch (CDM 2010).
4.11.4 EXISTING CONDITIONS
Global Climate Chanae and Greenhouse Gases
Climate change is a recorded change in the average weather of the earth measured by
variables such as wind patterns, storms, precipitation, and temperature. Historical records show
that global temperature changes have occurred naturally in the past, such as during previous
ice ages. Since 1850, eleven of the 12 years from 1995 to 2006 rank among the warmest years
in the instrumental record of global surface temperature. An increase of 0.74 degree Celsius
( °C) (or 1.33 degrees Fahrenheit [ °F]) in the global surface temperature occurred during the
100 -year period from 1906 to 2005, and the linear warming trend over the 50 years from 1956 to
2005 is nearly twice that for the 100 years from 1906 to 2005 (IPCC 2007).
Increasing GHG emissions have led to an anthropogenic6 warming trend of the earth's average
temperature, which is causing changes in the earth's climate. GHG emissions are primarily
associated with (1) the burning of fossil fuels during motorized transport, electricity generation,
consumption of natural gas, industrial activity, manufacturing, and other activities;
(2) deforestation; (3) agricultural activity; and (4) solid waste decomposition. This increasing
temperature phenomenon is known as "global warming ", and the climatic effect is known as
.'climate change" or "global climate change ".
Recent scientific research indicates very high confidence (i.e., at least 90 percent) that the rate
and magnitude of current global temperature changes are anthropogenic and that global
warming will lead to adverse climate change effects around the globe (IPCC 2007).
Greenhouse Gases
GHGs are global pollutants and are therefore unlike air pollutants such as ozone, particulate
matter and toxic air contaminants (TACs), which are pollutants of regional and local concern
(see Section 4.10, Air Quality, of this EIR). While pollutants with localized air quality effects have
relatively short atmospheric lifetimes (generally on the order of a few days), GHGs have
relatively long atmospheric lifetimes, ranging from one year to several thousand years. Long
atmospheric lifetimes allow for GHGs to disperse around the globe. Therefore, GHG impacts
are global, as opposed to the localized air quality effects of criteria air pollutants and TACs.
GHGs vary widely in the power of their climatic effects; therefore, climate scientists have
established a unit called global warming potential (GWP). The GWP of a gas is a measure of
both potency and lifespan in the atmosphere as compared to CO2. For example, since CH4 and
N2O are approximately 21 and 310 times (respectively) more powerful than CO2 in their ability to
trap heat in the atmosphere, they have GWPs of 21 and 310, respectively (CO2 has a
GWP of 1). Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is a quantity that enables all GHG emissions to be
6 Anthropogenic effects, processes, objects, or materials are those that are derived from human activities, as
opposed to those occurring in natural environments without human influence.
R: \Projects \NewponlJ015\!Oraft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -13 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
considered as a group despite their varying GWP. The GWP of each GHG is multiplied by the
prevalence of that gas to produce COZe.
General Environmental Effects of Global Climate Change
Executive Order S -3 -05 mandates the preparation of biennial science assessment reports on
climate change impacts and adaptation options for California. Executive Order S -13 -08 directs
the California Natural Resources Agency (CNRA) to develop a State Climate Adaptation
Strategy and provide state land use planning guidance related to sea level rise and other
climate change impacts. Current reports resulting from these directed actions are the Climate
Action Team Biennial Report to the Governor and Legislature (CCCC 2009a) and the California
Climate Adaptation Strategy (CNRA 2009b). These studies report that global warming in
California is anticipated to impact resources including, but not limited to, the following:
• Public Health. Many Californians currently experience the worst air quality in the nation,
and climate change would likely make matters worse. Higher temperatures would
increase the frequency, duration, and intensity of conditions conducive to air pollution
formation. If global background ozone (03) levels increase as predicted under some
scenarios, it may become impossible to meet local air quality standards. Air quality could
be further compromised by more frequent wildfires, which emit fine particulate matter
that can travel long distances. Rising temperatures and more frequent heat waves would
increase the risk of death from dehydration, heat stroke /exhaustion, heart attack, stroke,
and respiratory distress. Climate change may also increase asthma rates and the spread
of infectious diseases and their vectors, as well as challenge food and water supplies.
Children, the elderly, people with chronic heart or lung disease, outdoor workers, people
who exercise outdoors, and the economically disadvantaged would be particularly
vulnerable to these changes. In addition, more frequent extreme weather events could
also result in increased injuries and deaths.
• Energy. Increasing mean temperature and more frequent heat waves will drive up
demand for cooling in summer; this new energy demand will only be partially offset by
decreased demand for heating in winter. Hydropower, which currently provides
15 percent of in -state generation, would be threatened by declining snowpack, which
serves as a natural reservoir for hydropower generation in the spring and summer.
Winter storms, earlier snowmelt, and greater runoff may combine to cause flooding,
which could, in turn, damage transmission lines and cause power outages.
• Water Resources. Rising temperatures, less precipitation, and more precipitation falling
as rain instead of snow could severely diminish snowpack. Because the Sierra Nevada
snowpack provides most of California's available water, this potential loss would
increase the risk of summer water shortages and would hamper water distribution and
hydropower generation. The diminished snowpack would also nearly eliminate all skiing
and other snow - related recreation. Rising sea levels would push saltwater into
California's estuaries, wetlands, and groundwater aquifers, threatening the water quality
and reliability within the Sacramento /San Joaquin River Delta —a major California fresh
water supply. Extreme precipitation and flooding could also damage water quality by
creating sudden increases in runoff. Moreover, warming would increase
evapotranspiration rates from plants, soil, and open water surfaces, which would result
in greater demand for irrigation. Overall, climate change would reduce California's water
supplies even as its growing population requires additional resources.
• Sea Level and Flooding. Sea level at California's coasts is expected to rise by 11 to
18 inches above 2000 levels by 2050, and by 23 to 55 inches by 2100. If realized, these
RAProjmtswewponW1610raft EiRW11 GHG- 090211.aoc 4.11 -14 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
increases would create more frequent and higher storm surges, would erode some
coastal areas, and would increase pressure on existing levees, creating greater risk of
flooding in previously untouched inland areas. Consequently, continued development in
vulnerable coastal areas would put more people and infrastructure at risk.
Agriculture. Although higher CO2 levels can stimulate plant production and increase
plant water -use efficiency, in the long -term, climate change would reduce the quantity
and quality of agricultural products statewide. As temperatures rise, farmers will face
greater water demand for crops and a less reliable water supply, as well as increased
competition from urban water users. Sea level rise may cause saltwater intrusion in the
Delta region, making it difficult to raise certain crops. Rising temperatures will likely
aggravate 03 pollution, interfering with plant growth and making plants more susceptible
to disease and pests. In addition, warming would reduce the number of colder hours
needed for fruit and nut production; would shift pest and weed ranges; alter
crop - pollinator timing; and increase the frequency of droughts, heat waves, and floods.
Higher average temperatures would also increase mortality and decrease productivity in
livestock.
Forestry. California timber production has declined over the past few decades due, in
part, to warming and increased wildfires. While further warming may increase production
for some species in some locations, climate change is expected to reduce overall forest
growth. Increasing average temperature and drought frequency would result in more
wildfires and greater burned areas, while less frequent and more intense rainfall would
increase soil erosion and landslides. Higher temperatures and less water would force
many tree species to shift their ranges; those that run out of livable habitat may die out.
Pests, diseases, and invasive species may also colonize new areas, further challenging
forest health and biodiversity.
Ecosystems. Rising average temperature would subject plants and animals to greater
thermal stress, causing some species to adapt or shift their ranges, while others may
face extinction. Invasive species may also shift their ranges, threatening native species.
Changing temperatures would also alter the timing of plant flowering and insect
emergence, damaging species' ability to reproduce. Changing precipitation patterns
would impact aquatic and riparian ecosystems by reducing snow pack, stream flow, and
groundwater, while increasing the frequency of droughts, floods, and wildfires. As sea
levels rise, some coastal habitats may be permanently flooded or eroded, and salt water
intrusion into fresh water resources may threaten terrestrial species. Changes in ocean
circulation and temperature, ocean acidification, and increased runoff and sedimentation
would threaten pelagic species. In sum, continued global warming would alter natural
ecosystems and threaten California's biological diversity.
Global, National, State, and Regional Contributions to Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Table 4.11 -2 shows the magnitude of GHG emissions on the global, national, State, and
regional scale. Worldwide, China is the world's largest GHG emitter, contributing approximately
19 percent, just ahead of the U.S., with approximately 18 percent. Approximately half of global
emissions come from developed countries and half from developing countries; note that China
and India are developing countries (WRI 2009). The most common GHG is CO2, which
constitutes approximately 84 to 85 percent of all GHG emissions in the United States and
California. The primary contributors to California GHG emissions are transportation; electric
power production from both in -state and out -of -state sources; and industrial uses.
R: \Projmts\NewponiJ015\!G2ft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -15 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -2
COMPARISON OF WORLDWIDE GHG EMISSIONS
Area and Data Year
Annual GHG Emissions
(MMTCO2e)
World (2006)
29,000
United States (2007)
7,150
California (2006)
480
Orange County (2008)
30
TCO2e: million metric tons of CO2e; GHG: greenhouse gas(es)
rce: Source: WRI 2009, USEPA 2009c, CARB 2007, SCAG 2008a.
So.Tree'
Existing Development and GHG Emissions on the Project Site
The Project site is currently operated as a crude oil and gas production facility.
Horizontal Drilling, LLC, and its operating affiliate, West Newport Oil Company (WNOC),
manage oil and gas production operations on most of the site. WNOC has approximately
85 active /idle wells spread across most of the approximate 401.1 -acre property. In addition, the
City of Newport Beach (City) operates 16 oil wells, 1 water injection well, and an oil processing
facility located at the West Coast Highway entrance area. The existing level of emissions from
the vehicles used in oilfield operations is estimated at 492 MTCO2e per year (CDM 2010).
GHG emissions from stationary oilfield sources were not included in the annual emissions
reports to the SCAQMD. Although this data and data relative to electrical energy used to power
the oilfield equipment are not reported, these data are not forecasted to change substantially for
the proposed Project. Although there would be physical consolidation of operations, the total
amount of active stationary operations may not be reduced markedly in the initial years. Thus,
an assumption of unchanged emissions is conservative. Therefore, the exclusion of these data
does not affect the impact analysis.
4.11.5 PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES AND STANDARD CONDITIONS
Project Design Features
The following project design features (PDFs) are identified as specifically addressing GHG
emissions.
PDF 4.11 -1 The Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Development Plan and the
Master Development Plan require that the Project be consistent with a
recognized green building programs that exist at the time of final Project approval
such as, but not limited to, Build It Green, the U.S. Green Building Council's
(USGBC's) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design— Neighborhood
Development (LEED- ND TM), California Green Builder, or National Association of
Home Builders' National Green Building Standard T11
PDF 4.11 -2 The Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Development Plan and the
Master Development Plan require the Project to exceed adopted 2008 Title 24
energy requirements by a minimum of five percent.
PDF 4.11 -3 The Master Development Plan and the Newport Banning Ranch Planned
Community Development Plan require the Project to be coordinated with Orange
County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to allow for a transit routing through the
R \ProjetswewponiJms \!Draft E!RW.ii GHG- 090211.doc 4.11 -16 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
community, and will provide bus stops and /or shelters as needed in the
community to accommodate the bus routing needed by OCTA.
PDF 4.11 -4 The Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Development Plan and the
Master Development Plan require that all residential development incorporate the
following measures, which will be reflected on and incorporated into every
application for a final subdivision map that creates residential lots:
a. Builder - installed indoor appliances, including dishwashers, showers, and
toilets, will be low water -use. Homeowners Association (HOA) owned and
operated public and /or common area men's restrooms will be required to
feature waterless urinals.
b. Smart Controller irrigation systems will be installed in all public and common
area landscaping. Community landscape areas will be designed on a
"hydrozone" basis to group plants according to their water requirements and
sun exposure.
c. Air conditioning units will be Freon -free.
d. Concrete for paving in public infrastructure and Project common areas will not
be acid - washed unless mandated by agency requirements.
e. The future homeowners association for Newport Banning Ranch will be
required to provide educational information on recycling to all homeowners
prior to individual purchase of property and again annually.
f. Multimetering "dashboards" will be provided in each dwelling unit to visualize
real -time energy use.
g. Single- family detached residential roofs, commercial building roofs, and HOA
owned public building roofs, which have adequate solar orientation shall be
designed to be compatible with the installation of photovoltaic panels or other
current solar power technology.
PDF 4.11 -5 The Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Development Plan and the
Master Development Plan require that the following measures be implemented
during initial project grading activities and will be incorporated into all grading
permit applications submitted to the City:
a. Construction waste diversion will be increased by 50 percent from 2010
requirements.
b. To the extent practical, during the oilfield clean -up and remediation process,
the Landowner /Master Developer will be required to recycle and reuse
materials on site to minimize off -site hauling and disposal of materials and
associated off -site traffic.
Additionally, the following PDFs, which are specifically identified for reducing criteria air pollutant
emissions, would also reduce GHG emissions.
PDF 4.8 -3 If permitted by all applicable agencies, a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over West
Coast Highway will be provided, as set forth in the Master Development Plan,
R9ProjmtslNewpaMJ015Rnraft EIRW 11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -17 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
from the Project site to a location south of West Coast Highway to encourage
walking and bicycling to and from the beach.
PDF 4.10 -1 The Master Development Plan provides for commercial uses, in the Mixed -
Use /Residential and Visitor - Serving Resort/Residential Land Use Districts, within
walking distance of the proposed residential neighborhoods and nearby
residential areas to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled.
PDF 4.10 -2 The Master Development Plan provides a network of public pedestrian and
bicycle trails to reduce auto - dependency by connecting proposed residential
neighborhoods to parks and open space within the Project site and to off -site
recreational amenities, such as the beach and regional parks and trails.
Standard Conditions and Requirements
SC 4.11 -1 Energy Efficiency Standards. The Project shall be built in accordance with the
California 2008 Building Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings, commonly identified as the "2008 Title 24 Energy
Efficiency Standards' or the version of these standards current at the time of the
issuance of each building permit.'
4.11.6 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The following significance criteria are derived from the State CEQA Guidelines. A project would
result in a significant adverse impact related to GHG emissions if it would:
Threshold 4.11 -1 Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may
have a significant impact on the environment.
In accordance with the interim policy of the City of Newport Beach, Threshold 4.11 -1 is
evaluated as follows. The Project would create a significant cumulative contribution to GHG
emissions if it would:
• Emit more than 6,000 MTCO2e /yr of GHGs.
Threshold 4.11 -2 Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
As described above, the State CEQA Guidelines allow lead agencies to select specific
significance criteria in a similar manner as occurs for air pollutants. The City of Newport Beach
has done so, as described in Section 4.11.2.
Because of the global nature of the climate change problem, most projects will not result in
GHG emissions that are individually significant (CAPCOA 2009). This concept is supported in
the various AG, CPR, and SCAQMD publications (as described above) that almost exclusively
address cumulative impacts. Therefore, it is accepted as very unlikely that any individual
development project or General Plan would have GHG emissions of a magnitude to directly
impact global climate change and the impact of the proposed Project is considered on a
cumulative basis.
2 Note that PDF 4.11 -2 requires the Project to exceed the energy requirements of these standards by at least five
percent.
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Draft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -18 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
4.11.7 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Threshold 4.11 -1 Would the project emit more than 6,000 MTCO2e/yr of GHGs?
Construction Emissions
Temporary impacts would result from Project construction activities. GHGs would be emitted by
off -road and on -road construction equipment and worker vehicles. Construction emissions were
calculated using CalEEMod, as described in the Methodology Section. The proposed Project
would be constructed over a period of approximately 13 years. Construction would include the
consolidation of the existing oilfields and soil remediation. Remediation is anticipated to occur
from approximately February 2014 until February 2017. Site development is scheduled to begin
in August 2014 with construction of residences and other Project elements expected to begin in
early 2015. Completion and full occupancy is expected at the end of 2023. The schedule of
construction activities used for calculating construction emissions was developed from the
Proposed Implementation Plan (see Table 3 -3 of Section 3.0, Project Description). The oilfield
remediation work would overlap with site development and construction of the first two building
phases. The details of development sequencing, selection of construction equipment, and other
input parameters are included in Appendix H. The results of the CalEEMod calculations for
GHGs from Project construction are shown in Table 4.11 -3. The total construction GHG
emissions are estimated at 16,851 MTCO2e.
TABLE 4.11 -3
ESTIMATED GREENOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM CONSTRUCTION
Year
Emissions
(MTCO2e)
2014
1,529
2015
2,165
2016
2,016
2017
2,214
2018
1,582
2019
2,645
2020
1,277
2021
1,165
2022
1,154
2023
1,103
Total
16,851
Annual Construction Emissions
Amortized over 30 Years'
562
MTCO¢e: metric tons of COz equivalent
Total does not add due to rounding.
See Section 4.11.3
Operational Emissions
Operational GHG emissions for the proposed Project were calculated in accordance with the
methodologies described above. Mobile source input for trip generation was taken from the
Project's traffic impact analysis (Kimley -Horn 2011). The results of the calculations are shown in
Table 4.11 -4; CalEEMod data sheets are included in Appendix H. Table 4.11 -4 shows both
R:\Projmts\NewponlJ015NDraftEIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -19 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
unmitigated and mitigated GHG emissions. The "mitigated" scenario demonstrates the GHG
reductions that occur with Project features that contribute to the reduction of GHG emissions
when compared with typical residential and commercial developments. These include VMT
reductions that would result from the mixed use, neighborhood walkability, and increased
density designs; energy design that would exceed Title 24 requirements; and water
conservation design for indoor and outdoor use. These measures would result in an estimated
reduction in forecasted buildout annual operational GHG emissions of approximately
25 percent: from 25,359 to 18,949 MTCO2e /yr.
TABLE 4.11 -4
ESTIMATED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
FROM OPERATIONS
Source
Unmitigated Emissions
Mitigated Emissions
MTCO2elyr
Percent of
Total
MTCO2e /yr
Percent of
Total
Project at Buildout
Mobile Sources
18,542
71.7%
12,368
63.6%
Electricity
2,581
10.0%
2,565
13.2%
Natural Gas
2,487
9.6%
2,380
12.2%
Area Sources - Fireplaces & Landscape
Maintenance
962
3.7%
962
4.9%
Water Supply and Disposal
794
3.1%
681
3.5%
Oilfield Operations'
485
1.9%
485
2.5%
Total— Proposed Project
25,851
100
19,441
100%
Existing Land Uses
Oilfield Operations'
1 4921
100
4921
100%
Total — Existing Land Uses
1 4921
100
4921
100%
Net Increase in Annual GHG Emissions
1 25,3591
18,949
MTCO2e /yr: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year.
Vehicle emissions only. GHG emissions from stationary sources, electrical energy use, and water
consumption are assumed to be the same for both Existing and Project Buildout conditions and are not
quantified.
Vegetation and Sequestration
Terrestrial carbon sequestration is the process through which CO2 from the atmosphere is
absorbed by trees, plants and crops through photosynthesis, and stored as carbon in biomass
(tree trunks, branches, foliage, and roots) and soils. The term "sinks" is also used to refer to
forests, croplands, and grazing lands, and their ability to sequester carbon. Vegetation existing
on the site is a GHG sink. The removal of existing vegetation to develop the project land uses
would result in a loss of sequestration capacity that would be equivalent to increasing GHG
emissions. The proposed Project is anticipated to include the planting of approximately 9,000
trees inclusive of private residential areas, parks, parkways, and medians. The trees would
become new GHG sinks.
The GHG emissions impact of the loss of vegetated area was calculated by CalEEMod to be
2,198 MTCO2e. The GHG emissions impact of the planting of new trees was calculated by
CalEEMod to be 5,762 MTCO2e. Thus, the proposed Project would improve the sequestration
capacity of the project site by approximately 3,564 MTCO2e. These emissions, similar to
construction emissions, are single -event emissions to be amortized over the Project lifetime.
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Draft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -20 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Combined Emissions
Construction, operational, and vegetation GHG emissions are combined by amortizing the
construction and vegetation emissions over a conservative, assumed 30 -year Project lifetime.
This combination is shown in Table 4.11 -5. The total annual estimated GHG emissions for the
proposed Project are 19,392 MTCOze /yr.
TABLE 4.11 -5
ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT ANNUAL GHG EMISSIONS
Source
Emissions
MTCO2e /yr
Construction amortized (from Table 4.11 -3)
562
Operations (Table 4.11 -4)
18,949
Vegetation
-119
Total
19,392
MTCOse /yr: metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year
The Total is the sum of amortized construction and operational
emissions less the amortized increase in sequestration.
SC 4.11 -1 requires the Project to be built in accordance with the Title 24 Building Efficiency
Standards and PDF 4.11 -2 actually requires the Project to exceed the Title 24 energy
requirements by five percent. Building energy efficiency is also required through PDF 4.11 -1,
requiring green building. PDF 4.11 -3, requiring coordination with OCTA for transit routing; PDF
4.8 -3, requiring a bridge over West Coast Highway; PDF 4.10 -1, requiring commercial uses
near residential uses; PDF 4.10 -2 requiring a network of pedestrian and bicycle trails; MM4.11-
5, requiring facilities for electric vehicle recharging; and MM4.11 -6 requiring bicycle parking
facilities would result in reduced GHG emissions resulting from reduced VMT. Additionally, PDF
4.11 -4 requires low water use appliances and plumbing fixtures and water - efficient landscape
and irrigation practices. PDF 4.11 -4 requires building roof orientation to be compatible for the
installation of solar power systems and MM 4.11 -2 requires solar heating for resort inn and
multi - family complex swimming pools. PDF 4.11 -4 and MM 4.11 -1 require homeowner
education programs in practices that will improve energy efficiencies and reduce GHG
emissions. PDF 4.11 -4 also requires in -home energy monitoring to improve energy use. PDF
4.11 -5 requires construction recycling practices to reduce VMT and GHG emissions. MM 4.11 -3
requires the use of energy efficient outdoor and street lighting. MM 4.11 -4 requires the
installation of recycling facilities for multi - family buildings and public spaces.
Impact Summary. Cumulatively Significant Impact. The total annual estimated GHG
emissions for the proposed Project are 19,392 MTCO2e /yr. The Project
would emit quantities of GHGs that would exceed the City's 6,000
MTCOze /yr significance threshold. Thus, the Project would make a
cumulatively considerable contribution to the global GHG inventory and
would have a cumulatively significant impact on global climate change.
Threshold 4.11 -2
Would the project
regulation adopted
greenhouse gases?
conflict with an applicable plan, policy or
for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
As discussed above under Section 4.11.2, Regulatory Setting, there are numerous State plans,
policies, and regulations that have been adopted to reduce GHG emissions. The principal
overall State plan and policy is AB 32. The quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG
R:�ProjmtswewponlJOls \!Draft E!aw.ii GHG -090211.doo 4.11 -21 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. This goal has been calculated by various methods, including
the reduction of 2020 GHG emissions by 28 to 30 percent compared to "business as usual ". To
state that a project quantitatively achieves this reduction would require speculation about
implementation timing, effectiveness of statewide policies, and characterization of "business as
usual ". However, as described in the PDFs and demonstrated above, the proposed Project
incorporates many characteristics and features that would reduce GHG emissions compared
with development of similar land uses in other locations or without commitments to sustainable
design. Table 4.11 -4 shows a 25 percent reduction with measures quantifiable in CaIEEMod.
Additional reductions would occur if developers or homeowners choose to install solar electricity
generation or hot water heating. The proposed Green and Sustainable Program (see
Section 3.6.8 of Section 3.0, Project Description) describes the minimum requirements for
.'green" building, required site design features, and compliance with the Newport Banning Ranch
Master Development Plan and Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Development Plan
(NBR -PC). Further, the proposed Project incorporates additional mitigation measures to reduce
GHG emissions. Thus, the proposed Project is consistent with AB 32 and the associated
Scoping Plan.
Statewide plans and regulations (such as GHG emissions standards for vehicles [AB 1493] and
the LCFS) are being implemented at the statewide level so compliance at the project level is not
appropriate. Therefore, the proposed Project does not conflict with those plans and regulations.
SB 375 is being addressed at the State and regional level, and application at the specific
plan /project level is not anticipated until 2012 or later. The goal of SB 375 is to promote land use
growth patterns that will help reduce GHG emissions by reducing VMT. It is intended to foster
the implementation of infill and transit oriented development projects to reduce GHG emissions
and meet the statewide goals of AB 32. Notwithstanding future date of applicability of SB 375,
the proposed Project has been planned in the compact, complete, and efficient land use
development manner envisioned by SB 375. Further, the Newport Banning Ranch Project,
because it is an infill project, when compared with a similar development not immediately
adjacent to commercial and public transportation facilities, would make a positive contribution to
reducing regional VMT, another goal of SB 375. The proposed Project would not conflict with
SB 375.
The regulations, plans, and polices adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are
directly applicable to the proposed Specific Plan include:
• Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and
• Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code.
By implementing SC 4.11 -1, the proposed Project would comply with both of these regulations.
Tables 4.11 -6, 4.11 -7, and 4.11 -88 evaluate the consistency of the proposed Project with the
applicable goals and policies of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),
the City's General Plan, and the California Coastal Act, respectively. For each applicable goal or
policy, the right -hand column of the table shows standard conditions and requirements (SCs),
PDFs, and strategies and commitments from the Green and Sustainable Program that respond
to the measure. As shown in Table 4.11 -7,9 the proposed Project is consistent with the City of
Newport Beach's policies regarding GHG emissions. Compliance with these policies would
further reduce the Project's GHG emissions.
" For ease of reading, the policy tables are located at the end of this section.
9 Table 4.11 -7 is not an exhaustive list of relevant City policies.
R: \ProjmtslNewponlJ015 \!Draft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -22 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
In accordance with Section 15126.4(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines, "Lead agencies shall
consider feasible means, supported by substantial evidence and subject to monitoring or
reporting, of mitigating the significant effects of greenhouse gas emissions ". Suggested
mitigation measures to reduce GHGs have been published by various agencies including the
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality
Management District, and the San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District. One of the more
comprehensive lists of project -level measures is published by the California AG. Therefore, that
list was selected for use in this impact analysis.
In addition to the Mitigation Program identified in this EIR section, the City has evaluated other
possible means of reducing GHG emissions as set forth in Table 4.11 -9; the table contains the
AG's list of project -level measures that reflect the AG's guidance on project compliance with
State policies. To the extent feasible and applicable, these measures have been incorporated
into the Project. For each applicable measure, the table's right -hand column shows SCs, PDFs,
or commitments from the Green and Sustainable Program that respond to the measure.
Table 4.11 -9 demonstrates that the proposed Project incorporates extensive feasible measures
to reduce GHG emissions.
As previously indicated, SC 4.11 -1 requires the Project to be built in accordance with the Title
24 Building Efficiency Standards and PDF 4.11 -2 actually requires the Project to exceed the
Title 24 energy requirements by five percent. Building energy efficiency is also required through
PDF 4.11 -1, requiring green building. PDF 4.11 -3, requiring coordination with OCTA for transit
routing; PDF 4.8 -3, requiring a bridge over West Coast Highway; PDF 4.10 -1, requiring
commercial uses near residential uses; PDF 4.10 -2 requiring a network of pedestrian and
bicycle trails; MM4.11 -5, requiring facilities for electric vehicle recharging; and MM4.11 -6
requiring bicycle parking facilities would result in reduced GHG emissions resulting from
reduced VMT. PDF 4.11 -4 requires low water use appliances and plumbing fixtures and water -
efficient landscape and irrigation practices. PDF 4.11 -4 requires building roof orientation to be
compatible for the installation of solar power systems and MM 4.11 -2 requires solar heating for
resort inn and multi - family complex swimming pools. PDF 4.11 -4 and MM 4.11 -1 require
homeowner education programs in practices that will improve energy efficiencies and reduce
GHG emissions. PDF 4.11 -4 also requires in -home energy monitoring to improve energy use.
Additionally, PDF 4.11 -5 requires construction recycling practices to reduce VMT and GHG
emissions. MM 4.11 -3 requires the use of energy efficient outdoor and street lighting.
MM 4.11 -4 requires the installation of recycling facilities for multi - family buildings and public
spaces.
Impact Summary. No Impact. As shown in Tables 4.11 -6, 4.11 -7, and 4.11 -8, the proposed
Project would be consistent with applicable SCAG, City of Newport Beach
General Plan, and Coastal Act policies that would result in minimization of
GHG emissions. Table 4.11 -9 shows consistency with measures
recommended by the California AG to reduce GHG emissions. Therefore,
the proposed Project would not conflict with applicable plans, policies or
regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of
greenhouse gases.
R: \Projmts\NewponiJ015\!G2ft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -23 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
4.11.8 MITIGATION PROGRAM
Project Design Features
The following Project Design Features (PDFs) are applicable to addressing GHG emissions:
PDF 4.11 -1, PDF 4.11 -2, PDF 4.11 -3, PDF 4.11 -4, PDF 4.11 -5, PDF 4.8 -3, PDF 4.10 -1, and
PDF 4.10 -2.
Standard Conditions and Requirements
Standard Condition SC 4.11 -1 is applicable to GHG.
Mitigation Measures
MM 4.11 -1 Prior to the issuance of each occupancy permit, the Applicant shall submit for
approval to the Community Development Director the plan for the applicable
future homeowners association to provide educational information on (1) water
conservation; (2) energy conservation, including the use of energy- efficient
lighting and the limiting of outdoor lighting; (3) mobile source emission reduction
techniques, such as use of alternative modes of transportation and zero- or low -
emission vehicles; and (4) the use of solar heating, automatic covers, and
efficient pumps and motors for pools and spas to all homeowners prior to
individual purchase of property and again annually.10
MM 4.11 -2 Prior to the issuance of the building permit for the resort inn and each building
permit for a multi - family complex with a swimming pool or spa, the Applicant shall
submit for approval to the Community Development Director that the plans
incorporate energy efficient heating, pumps and motors.
MM 4.11 -3 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the Applicant shall submit for
approval to the Public Works Director that light emitting diode (LED) lights shall
be used for traffic lights and LED or similar energy- efficient lighting will be used
for street lights and other outdoor lighting.
MM 4.11 -4 Prior to the issuance of each building permit for multi - family buildings, parks, and
other public spaces, the Applicant shall submit for approval to the Community
Development Director that the plans include the installation of facilities for the
collection of recyclable materials consistent with the recycle requirements of the
City and the local waste collection contractor.
MM 4.11 -5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit for multi - family buildings and the
resort inn, the Applicant shall submit for approval to the Community Development
Director that the plans include the installation of facilities for electric vehicle
recharging, unless it is demonstrated that the technology for these facilities or
availability of the equipment current at the time makes this installation infeasible.
MM 4.11 -6 Prior to the issuance of each building permit for multi - family buildings,
commercial building, park, and other public space, the Applicant shall submit for
approval to the Community Development Director that the plans include the
° The requirements in this MM are in addition to those of PDF 4.11 -4f, but may be distributed and/or grouped
together by the homeowners associations. The mobile source emissions component of this MM is the same as
MM 4.10 -7 from Section 4.10, Air Quality, of this EIR.
R: \Projects \NewponlJ015\!Oraft EIRW.11 GHG -099211.doc 4.11 -24 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
installation of bicycle parking spaces at each facility. Bicycle spaces for residents
and employees shall be easily accessible and secure. Bicycle spaces for visitors
and customers, in parks, and in public spaces shall be visible from the primary
entrance, illuminated at night, and protected from damage from moving and
parked vehicles.
4.11.9 LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE AFTER MITIGATION
The proposed Project would be consistent with applicable City of Newport Beach General Plan
policies that would result in minimization of GHG emissions and with measures recommended
by the California Attorney General to reduce GHG emissions. Notwithstanding, the Project
would emit quantities of GHGs that would substantially exceed the City's 6,000 MTCO2e /yr
significance threshold. GHG emission reductions resulting from implementation of the SC,
PDFs, and the Green and Sustainable Program cannot be reasonably estimated. These
reductions would not reduce emissions to less than 6,000 MTCOZe /yr. Mitigation Measures
4.11 -1 through 4.11 -6 would provide both GHG reductions and additional consistency with
applicable State and local policies. However, GHG emissions would continue to exceed the
6,000 MTCO2e /yr significance threshold. Despite application of all feasible mitigation, the
Project would make a cumulatively considerable contribution to the global GHG inventory and
would have a significant and unavoidable GHG emissions impact.
R:�ProjmtswewponiJOls\!oraft E!RW.11 GHG -090211.aoo 4.11 -25 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -6
SCAG REGIONAL POLICY CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Relevant Policies and Principles
Consistency Analysis
Regional Comprehensive Plan Policies (Voluntary)'
Land Use and Housing
The Project is consistent with this policy. PDF 4.11 -1
LU -6.2 Developers and local governments should
requires the Project to be consistent with green building
integrate green building measures into project
programs.
design and zoning such as those identified in the
U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in
Energy and Environmental Design, Energy Star
Homes, Green Point Rated Homes, and the
California Green Builder Program.
Open Space and Habitat
The Project is consistent with this policy. The Project is
OSC -11 Developers should incorporate and local
consistent with this principle. The Project site is an infill
governments should include land use principles,
site predominately surrounded by existing development.
such as green building, that use resources
The Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community
efficiently, eliminate pollution and significantly
Development Plan (NBR -PC) and the Master
reduce waste into their projects, zoning codes
Development Plan require that the Project be consistent
and other implementation mechanisms.
with recognized green building programs that exist at
the time of final Project approval such as, but not limited
to, Build It Green, the U.S. Green Building Council's
(USGBC's) Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design- Neighborhood Development (LEED- ND TM),
California Green Builder, or National Association of
Home Builders' National Green Building Standard TM
(see PDF 4.11 -1). Achieving this certification would
require the incorporation of many energy efficiency
measures.
Energy
The Project is consistent with this policy. The proposed
EN -8 Developers should incorporate and local
Project would allow for the development of a mix of
governments should include the following land
residential, retail, visitor - serving resort inn, active and
use principles that use resources efficiently,
passive recreation, and open space uses on the Project
eliminate pollution and significantly reduce waste
site. Included in the Project is up to 75,000 square feet
into their projects, zoning codes and other
(sf) of community retail uses integrated into the Urban
implementation mechanisms:
Colony (mix of retail and residential) area of the site,
• Mixed -use residential and commercial
which is intended to provide local convenient goods and
development that is connected with public
services to the residents of and visitors to the Project
transportation and utilizes existing
site and nearby residential areas.
infrastructure.
The Project would provide a network of public
• Land use and planning strategies to increase
pedestrian and bicycle trails that connect residential
biking and walking trips.
areas and visitor - serving areas to parks, commercial
uses, and open space within the Project site and to
recreational amenities including the beach and regional
bike trails located adjacent to the Project site to reduce
vehicle trips and miles traveled (PDF 4.10 -2).
Energy
The Project is consistent with this policy. The Project is
EN -10 Developers and local governments should
committed to LEED or National Green Building
integrate green building measures into project
certification, meeting or exceeding 2008 Title 24 energy
design and zoning such as those identified in the
requirements, and installing visual energy metering in
U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in
residential units. These strategies would reduce
Energy and Environmental Design, Energy Star
emissions from stationary sources consistent with NR
Homes, Green Point Rated Homes, and the
policies 7.1 and 7.2. (See SC 4.11 -1, PDF 4.11 -1, PDF
California Green Builder Program. Energy saving
4.11 -2 and Commitment 3.1.1 -a.)
measures that should be explored for new and
remodeled buildings include:
• Using energy efficient materials in building
design, construction, rehabilitation, and retrofit
• Encouraging new development to exceed Title
24 energy efficiency requirements.
R9ProjmtswewponiJ015\!oraft E!Ra.ii GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -26 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -6 (Continued)
SCAG REGIONAL POLICY CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Relevant Policies and Principles
Consistency Analysis
• Developing Cool Communities measures
including tree planting and light- colored roofs.
These measures focus on reducing ambient
heat, which reduces energy consumption
related to air conditioning and other cooling
equipment.
• Utilizing efficient commercial/ residential
space and water heaters: This could include
the advertisement of existing and /or
development of additional incentives for
energy efficient appliance purchases to
reduce excess energy use and save money.
Federal tax incentives are provided online at
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=Produ
cts.pr_tax_ credits.
• Encouraging landscaping that requires no
additional irrigation: utilizing native, drought
tolerant plants can reduce water usage up to
60 percent compared to traditional lawns.
• Encouraging combined heating and cooling
(CHP), also known as cogeneration, in all
buildings.
• Encouraging neighborhood energy systems,
which allow communities to generate their
own electricity
• Orienting streets and buildings for best solar
access.
• Encouraging buildings to obtain at least 20%
of their electric load from renewable energy.
Energy
The Project is consistent with this policy. MM 4.11 -1
EN -12 Developers and local governments should
expands the homeowner education program to include
encourage that new buildings are able to
the advantages of using solar heating, automatic
incorporate solar panels in roofing and tap other
covers, and efficient pumps and motors for pools and
renewable energy sources to offset new demand
spas. MM 4.11 -2 requires that pools and spas in the
on conventional power sources.
resort inn and multi - family complexes incorporate solar
heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and
motors as feasible.
Compass Blueprint Principles and Goals
Principle 4: Promote sustainability for future
The Project is consistent with this principle. The Project
generations.
site is an infill site surrounded by existing development.
GV P4.1 Preserve rural, agricultural, recreational, and
The NBR -PC and the Master Development Plan require
environmentally sensitive areas.
that the Project be consistent with recognized green
building programs that exist at the time of final Project
GV P4.2 Focus development in urban centers and existing
approval such as, but not limited to, Build It Green, the
cities.
USGBC's LEED-NDTM, California Green Builder, or
GV P4.3 Develop strategies to accommodate growth that
National Association of Home Builders' National Green
uses resources efficiently, eliminates pollution and
Building Standard TM (see PDF 4.11 -1). Consistency with
significantly reduces waste.
these programs would require the incorporation of many
GV P4.4 Utilize "green" development techniques.
I energy efficiency measures.
All SCAG Regional Comprehensive Plan policies listed are voluntary local government and developer practices.
R9ProjmtswewponiJ015\!oraft E!RW.ii GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -27 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -7
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Applicable General Plan Goals and Policies
Consistency Analysis'
Land Use Element
LU Policy 2.2: Sustainable and Complete
The Project is consistent with this policy. The proposed Project
Community
would allow for the development of a mix of residential, retail,
Emphasize the development of uses that enable
visitor - serving resort inn, active and passive recreation, and
Newport Beach to continue as a self- sustaining
open space uses on the Project site. Included in the Project is
community and minimize the need for residents to
up to 75,000 sf of community retail uses integrated into the
travel outside of the community for retail, goods
Urban Colony (mix of retail and residential) area of the site,
and services, and employment.
which is intended to provide local convenient goods and
services to the residents of and visitors to the Project site and
nearby residential areas. While parking would be provided for
the retail uses, the Project includes pedestrian and bicycle trails
throughout the Project site with access to the retail area.
LU Policy 6.4.10: Sustainable Development
The Project is consistent with this policy. PDFs 4.11 -1 through
Practices
4.11 -5 and PDFs 4.10 -1 and 4.10 -2 would reduce GHG
Require that any development of Banning Ranch
emissions, energy consumption, and vehicle miles traveled.
achieve high levels of environmental sustainability
The Green and Sustainable Program contains additional
that reduce pollution and consumption of energy,
strategies and commitments that would conserve resources
water, and natural resources to be accomplished
and reduce GHG emissions.
through land use patterns and densities, site
planning, building location and design,
transportation and utility infrastructure design, and
other techniques. Among the strategies that
should be considered are the concentration of
development, reduction of vehicle trips, use of
alternative transportation modes, maximized
walkability, use of recycled materials, capture and
re -use of storm water on -site, water conserving
fixtures and landscapes, architectural elements
that reduce heat gain and loss, and preservation
of wetlands and other habitats.
Natural Resources Element
Natural Resources General Plan Goal NR 1
Minimized water consumption through
The Project is consistent with this goal. The City of Newport
conservation methods and other techniques.
Beach Water Conservation Ordinance (Section 14.16 of the
Municipal Code) is applicable to the Project. The Ordinance
includes but is not limited to Low - impact Development (LID)
and requires an approved water use plan.
Builder - installed indoor appliances, including dishwashers,
showers, and toilets, would be low water -use. Public and /or
common area men's restrooms would be required to feature
waterless urinals. (PDF 4.11 -4a)
Smart Controller irrigation systems would be installed in all
public and common area landscaping. Community landscaped
areas would be designed on a "hydrozone" basis to group
plants according to their water requirements and sun exposure
(See PDF 4.11 -4b). 100% of plant materials in Upland and
Lowland Open Space Areas (excluding public park and
recreation areas), in Oil Facilities Areas, and common Fuel
Management Areas maintained by the HOA are required to be
California natives (Green and Sustainable Program; 3.3.1 -a).
Drought - tolerant, native landscaping would be used in public
and common areas to reduce water consumption (Green and
Sustainable Program; 3.3.1 -1b).
R9ProjmtswewponiJ015\!Dmft E!RW.ii GHG -000211.doc 4.11 -28 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -7 (Continued)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Applicable General Plan Goals and Policies
Consistency Analysise
Policies
NR Policy 1.1: Water Conservation in New
The Project is consistent with this policy. Please refer to the
Development
response to Goal NR 1.
Enforce water conservation measures that limit
water usage, prohibit activities that waste water or
cause runoff, and require the use of
water - efficient landscaping and irrigation in
conjunction with new construction projects.
NR Policy 1.2: Use of Water Conserving
The Project is consistent with this policy. Please refer to the
Devices
response to Goal NR 1.
Establish and actively promote use of water
conserving devices and practices in both new
construction and major alterations and additions
to existing buildings. This can include the use of
rainwater capture, storage, and reuse facilities.
NR Policy 1.4: Alternative Conservation
The Project is consistent with this policy. The NBR -PC and the
Measures
Master Development Plan require that the Project be consistent
Explore implementation of alternative
with recognized green building programs that exist at the time
conservation measures and technology as they
of final Project approval such as, but not limited to, Build It
become available.
Green, the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC's)
Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design —
Neighborhood Development (LEED -NDTM), California Green
Builder, or National Association of Home Builders' National
Green Building Standard TM (See PDF 4.11 -1). Consistency with
these programs would require the incorporation of many energy
efficiency measures identified in the Master Development Plan.
NR Policy 1.5: Education
The Project is consistent with this policy. MM 4.11 -1 would
Establish educational programs on water
expand the homeowner education program to include water
conservation.
conservation.
Natural Resources Element Goal NR 6
Reduced mobile source emissions.
The Project is consistent with the goal. To the degree feasible,
the Project would reduce mobile emissions during construction
as well as mobile emission sources. The Project would provide
a network of public pedestrian and bicycle trails that connect
residential areas and visitor - serving areas to parks, commercial
uses, and open space within the Project site and to recreational
amenities including the beach and regional bike trails located
adjacent to the Project site to reduce vehicle trips and miles
traveled (PDF 4.10 -2).
NR Policy 6.1: Walkable Neighborhoods
The Project is consistent with this policy. The Project would
Provide for walkable neighborhoods to reduce
design streets and intersections to encourage walking and
vehicle trips by siting amenities such as services,
bicycling with a pedestrian- oriented street design (Green and
parks, and schools in close proximity to
Sustainable Program; 5.1.1 -1).
residential areas.
NR Policy 6.2: Mixed -Use Development
The Project is consistent with this policy. In order to reduce
Support mixed -use development consisting of
vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, the Project would
commercial or office with residential uses in
include commercial uses in the Mixed - Use /Residential and
accordance with the Land Use Element that
Visitor - Serving Resort/Residential Land Use Districts within
increases the opportunity for residents to live in
walking distance of the proposed residential neighborhoods
proximity to jobs, services, and entertainment.
and nearby residential areas (PDF 4.10 -1).
R9ProjmtswewponiJ015\!oraft E!RW.ii GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -29 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -7 (Continued)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Applicable General Plan Goals and Policies
Consistency Analysise
NR Policy 6.3: Vehicle -Trip Reduction
The Project is consistent with this policy. The measures
Measures
described for policies NR 6.1, NR 6.2, NR 6.5, NR 6.9, and CE
Support measures to reduce vehicle -trip
6.2.1 all contribute to vehicle trip reduction. In addition,
generation such as at -work day care facilities, and
Fiber -optic lines (FIGS), including wireless technology or similar
on -site automated banking machines.
technology available at the time of construction, shall be
connected to all homes to provide opportunities for
telecommuting (Green and Sustainable Program; 5.1.3 -a).
NR Policy 6.4: Transportation Demand
The Project is consistent with the policy. The Project would be
Management Ordinance
coordinated with the Orange County Transportation Authority
Implement the Transportation Demand
(OCTA) to allow for a transit routing through the community,
Management (TDM) Ordinance, which promotes
and would provide bus stops and/or shelters as needed in the
and encourages the use of alternative
community to accommodate the bus routing needed by the
transportation modes, and provides those
OCTA (PDF 4.11 -3). The Project would design streets and
facilities such as bicycle lanes that support such
intersections to encourage walking and bicycling with a
alternate modes.
pedestrian- oriented street design (Green and Sustainable
Program; 5.1.1 -a).
NR Policy 6.5: Local Transit Agency
The Project is consistent with the policy. Please refer to the
Collaboration
response to NR Policy 6.4, which describes coordination with
Collaborate with local transit agencies to: develop
OCTA that would promote mass transit ridership.
programs and educate employers about
employee rideshare and transit; establish mass
transit mechanisms for the reduction of work -
related and non - work - related vehicle trips;
promote mass transit ridership through careful
planning of routes, headways, origins and
destinations, and types of vehicles; and develop
bus shelters, bicycle lanes, and other bicycle
facilities.
NR Policy 6.9: Education on Mobile Source
The Project is consistent with the policy. FIOS, including
Emission Reduction Techniques
wireless technology or similar technology available at the time
Provide education to the public on mobile source
of construction, would be connected to all homes to provide
emission reduction techniques such as using
opportunities for telecommuting (Green and Sustainable
alternative modes of transportation.
Program; 5.a.3 -a). MM 4.11 -1 would have a homeowner
education program to include mobile source emission reduction
techniques.
Natural Resources Element Goal NR 7
Reduced air pollutant emissions from stationary
The Project is committed to LEED or National Green Building
sources.
certification, meeting or exceeding 2008 Title 24 energy
requirements, and installing visual energy metering in
residential units. These strategies would reduce emissions from
stationary sources consistent with NR policies 7.1 and 7.2.
(See SC 4.11 -1, PDF 4.11 -1, PDF 4.11 -2 and Commitment
3.1.1 -a.)
NR Policy 7.1: Fuel Efficient Equipment
The Project is consistent with these policies. The NBR -PC and
Support the use of fuel efficient heating
the Master Development Plan require that the Project be
equipment and other appliances.
consistent with recognized green building programs that exist at
the time of final Project approval (PDF 4.11 -1). The Project
would be required to exceed adopted 2008 Title 24 energy
requirements by a minimum of five percent (PDF 4.11 -2).
R: \Projmts\NewponiJ015\!G2ft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -30 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -7 (Continued)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Applicable General Plan Goals and Policies
Consistency Analysise
NR Policy 7.3: Incentives for Air Pollution
The Project is consistent with this policy. MM 4.11 -1 would
Reduction
expand the homeowner education program to include the
Provide incentives to promote siting or to use
advantages of using solar heating, automatic covers, and
Glean air technologies and building materials
efficient pumps and motors for pools and spas. MM 4.11 -2
(e.g., fuel cell technologies, renewable energy
would require that pools and spas in the resort inn and
sources, UV coatings, hydrogen fuel)
multi - family complexes incorporate solar heating, automatic
covers, and efficient pumps and motors as feasible.
Natural Resources Element Goal NR 8
Reduced air pollutant emissions from construction
The Project is consistent with this goal. Construction waste
activities.
diversion would be increased by 50% from 2010 requirements
(PDF 4.11 -5a). To the extent practical, during the oilfield
clean -up and remediation process, the Applicant would be
required to recycle and reuse materials on site to minimize off -
site hauling and disposal of materials and associated off -site
traffic (PDF 4.11 -5b).
Natural Resources Element Goal NR 24
Increased energy efficiency in City facilities and
The Project is consistent with this goal. The NBR -PC and the
operations and in private developments.
Master Development Plan require that the Project be consistent
with recognized green building programs that exist at the time
of final Project approval. The Project would exceed adopted
2008 Title 24 energy requirements by a minimum of 5% (PDF
4.11 -2). The Project would install visual energy metering in
residential units. These strategies would result in energy
efficient design of Project facilities (PDF 4.11 -4g).
NR Policy 24.1: Incentives for Energy
The Project is consistent with this policy. Multi- metering
Conservation
"dashboards" would be provided in each residence to visualize
Develop incentives that encourage the use of
real -time energy use (PDF 4.11 -4g).
energy conservation strategies by private and
public developments.
NR Policy 24.2: Energy- Efficient Design
The Project is consistent with this policy. The NBR -PC and the
Features
Master Development Plan require that the Project be consistent
Promote energy - efficient design features.
with recognized green building programs that exist at the time
of final Project approval (PDF 4.11 -1). The Project would
exceed adopted 2008 Title 24 energy requirements by a
minimum of 5 percent (PDF 4.11 -2).
NR Policy 24.3: Incentives for Green Building
The Project is consistent with this policy. Please refer to the
Program Implementation
response to NB Policy 24.2.
Promote or provide incentives for
"Green Building" programs that go beyond the
requirements of Title 24 of the California
Administrative Code and encourage energy
efficient design elements as appropriate to
achieve "green building" status.
NR Policy 24.4: Incentives for Provision of
The Project is consistent with this policy. Please refer to the
LEED Certified Buildings
response to NB Policy 24.2.
Provide incentives for implementing Leadership in
Environmental and Energy Design (LEED)
certified building such as fee waivers, bonus
densities, and /or awards recognition programs.
R: \Projmts\NewponiJ015\!G2ft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -31 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -7 (Continued)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Applicable General Plan Goals and Policies
Consistency Analysise
Circulation Element
Policies
Policy CE 6.2.1 Alternative Transportation
The Project is consistent with this policy. The Project would
Modes
include commercial uses, in the Mixed - Use /Residential and
Promote and encourage the use of alternative
Visitor - Serving Resort/Residential Land Use Districts, within
transportation modes, such as ridesharing,
walking distance of the proposed residential neighborhoods
carpools, vanpools, public transit, bicycles, and
and nearby residential areas to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle
walking; and provide facilities that support such
miles traveled. (PDF 4.10 -1). The Project would provide public
alternate modes.
pedestrian and bicycle trails to reduce auto - dependency by
connecting proposed residential neighborhoods to parks and
open space within the Project site and to off -site recreational
amenities, such as the beach and regional parks and trails
(PDF 4.10 -2). A pedestrian and bicycle bridge is proposed over
West Coast Highway from the Project site to encourage walking
and bicycling to and from the beach (PDF 4.8 -3). The Project
would design streets and intersections to encourage walking
and bicycling with a pedestrian- oriented street design (Green
and Sustainable Program; 5.1.1 -a).
Policy CE 6.2.2 Support Facilities for
The Project is consistent with this policy. Please refer to the
Alternative Modes
response to Policy CE 6.2.1.
Require new development projects to provide
facilities commensurate with development type
and intensity to support alternative modes, such
as preferential parking for carpools, bicycle
lockers, showers, commuter information areas,
rideshare vehicle loading areas, water
transportation docks, and bus stop improvements.
Policy CE 6.2.3 Project Site Design Supporting
The Project is consistent with this policy. Please refer to the
Alternative Modes
response to Policy CE 6.2.1.
Encourage increased use of public transportation
by requiring project site designs that facilitate the
use of public transportation and walking.
SCs and PDFs are in Section 4.11 -5
R: \Projmts\NewponiJ015\!G2ft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -32 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4. 11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -8
CALIFORNIA COASTAL ACT CONSISTENCY ANALYSIS
Relevant California Coastal Act Policies
Consistency Analysis
Development
Section 30253 Minimization of adverse
The Project is consistent with this policy. The NBR -PC and the
impacts
Master Development Plan require that the Project be consistent
New development shall do all of the following:
with recognized green building programs that exist at the time of
final Project approval (PDF 4.11 -1). The Project would be required
(d) Minimize energy consumption and
to exceed adopted 2008 Title 24 energy requirements by a
vehicle miles traveled.
minimum of 5% (PDF 4.11 -2). Multi- metering "dashboards' would
be provided in each dwelling unit to visualize real -time energy use
(PDF 4.11 -4g).
In order to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, the
Project would include commercial uses in the
Mixed - Use /Residential and Visitor - Serving Resort/Residential Land
Use Districts within walking distance of the proposed residential
neighborhoods and nearby residential areas (PDF 4.10 -1). The
Project would provide public pedestrian and bicycle trails to reduce
auto - dependency by connecting proposed residential
neighborhoods to parks and open space within the Project site and
to off -site recreational amenities, such as the beach and regional
parks and trails (PDF 4.10 -2). A pedestrian and bicycle bridge is
proposed over West Coast Highway to encourage walking and
bicycling to and from the beach (PDF 4.8 -3). The Project would
design streets and intersections to encourage walking and bicycling
with a pedestrian- oriented street design (Green and Sustainable
Program; 5.1.1 -a).
R: \Projmts\NewponiJ015\!Greft EIRW.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -33 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
I Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measuresa
Energy Efficiency
The project is consistent with this measure. The NBR -PC and the Master
Development Plan require that the Project be consistent with recognized green
building programs that exist at the time of final Project approval such as, but not
AG -1
Design buildings to be energy efficient.
limited to, Build It Green, the U.S. Green Building Council's (USGBC's) Leadership
in Energy and Environmental Design — Neighborhood Development (LEED -ND TM ),
California Green Builder, or National Association of Home Builders' National
Green Building Standard TM (PDF 4.11 -1). The Project would exceed adopted 2008
Title 24 energy requirements by a minimum of 5 percent (PDF 4.11 -2).
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -3 would require that light -
AG-2
Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Site and
emitting diode (LED) or similar energy efficient lights be used for street lights and
design building to take advantage of daylight.
other outdoor lighting. Multi- metering "dashboards" would be provided in each
dwelling unit to visualize real -time energy use (PDF 4.11 -4g).
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Green and Sustainable Program
incorporates landscaping as a tool to reduce energy consumption and thereby
AG -3
Use trees, landscaping, and sun screens on west and south
reduce GHG emissions. Although the layout of individual residences has not been
exterior building walls to reduce energy use.
planned at this level of entitlement, where possible the Master Site Plan design
standards would encourage the placement of trees on residential lots to reduce
energy use.
AG -4
Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements.
The Project is consistent with this measure. Cool roofs are required by 2008 Title
24 standards.
AG -5
Provide information on energy management services for large
Not applicable.
energy users.
AG -6
Install energy efficient heating and cooling systems, appliances
The Project is consistent with this measure. Refer to AGA and AG -2 above.
and equipment, and control systems.
The Project is consistent with this measure. Street lights would be used only in
AG -7
Install light emitting diodes (LEDs) for traffic, street and other
key intersections and safety areas (Green and Sustainable Program; 8.1.4 -a).
outdoor lighting.
MM 4.11 -3 would require that LED or similar energy efficient lights be used for
street lights and other outdoor lighting.
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -1 expands upon the
AG -8
F
Limit the hours of operation of outdoor lighting.
homeowner education program to include energy conservation, including the
limiting of hours for operation of outdoor lighting.
R:\ Projects \Newportl015 \!Draft EIR\4.11 GHG -090211.d.c 4.11 -34 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9 (Continued)
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measures'
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -1 would expand the
homeowner education program to include the advantages of using solar heating,
AG -9
Use solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and
automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors for pools and spas. MM 4.11 -2
motors for pools and spas.
would require that pools and spas in the resort inn and multi - family complexes
incorporate solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors as
feasible.
The Project is consistent with this measure. Multi- metering "dashboards" would be
provided in each dwelling unit to visualize real -time energy use (PDF 4.11 -4g).
AG -10
Provide education on energy efficiency.
MM 4.11 -1 expands upon the homeowner education program to include the
advantages of using solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and
motors for pools and spas.
Renewable Energy
AG -11
Install solar, wind, and geothermal power systems and solar hot
Please refer to the response to Measure AG -9.
water heaters. Educate consumers about existing incentives.
AG -12
Install solar panels on carports and over parking areas.
No specific requirement, but may be used by builders to meet LEED - equivalent
and Title 24 energy efficiency requirements.
AG -13
Use on -site generated biogas, including methane, in
Not applicable for the proposed Project.
appropriate applications.
AG -14
Use combined heat and power in appropriate applications.
Not applicable. The USEPA suggests that combined heat and power would not be
a good ft for hotels with less than 100 rooms.
Water Conservation and Efficiency
The Project is consistent with this measure. 100% of the plant materials in Upland
and Lowland Open Space Areas (excluding public park and recreation areas), in
Oil Facilities Areas, and in common Fuel Management Areas maintained by the
AG -15
Create water - efficient landscapes.
Homeowners Association (HOA) are required to be California natives (Green and
Sustainable Program; 3.3.1 -a). Drought - tolerant, native landscaping would be
used in public common areas to reduce water consumption (Green and
Sustainable Program; 3.3.1 -b).
The Project is consistent with this measure. Smart Controller irrigation systems
AG -16
Install water - efficient irrigation systems and devices, such as
would be installed in all public and common area landscaping. Community
soil moisture -based irrigation controls.
landscape areas would be designed on a "hydrozone" basis to group plants
according to their water requirements and sun exposure (PDF 4.11 -4b).
Use reclaimed water for landscape irrigation in new
At present, this is not feasible, because the City does not have or plan to provide
AG -17
developments and on public property. Install the infrastructure
recycled water in the vicinity of the Project site.
to deliver and use reclaimed water.
R:\ Projects \Newportl015 \!Draft EIR\4.11 GHG -090211.d.c 4.11 -35 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9 (Continued)
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measuresa
The Project is consistent with this measure. Builder - installed indoor appliances,
AG -18
Design buildings to be water - efficient. Install water - efficient
including dishwashers, showers, and toilets, would be low water -use. Public
fixtures and appliances.
and /or common area men's restrooms would be required to feature waterless
urinals (PDF 4.11 -4a).
Use gray water. (Gray water is untreated household waste
This is not planned and is pending further development of regulations governing
water from bathtubs, showers, bathroom wash basins, and
the use of gray water and subsequent development of appropriate hardware that
AG -19
water from clothes washing machines.) For example, install
complies with the regulations.
dual plumbing in all new development allowing gray water to be
used for landscape irrigation.
The Project is consistent with this measure. Section 14.16.045 of the
AG -20
Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit systems that apply
Newport Beach Municipal Code states that "No person or customer shall use
water to non - vegetated surfaces) and control runoff.
water to wash any sidewalk, walkway, driveway, parking area or any other hard
surface'.
AG -21
Restrict the use of water for cleaning outdoor surfaces and
The Project is consistent with this measure. Please refer to the response to
vehicles.
Measure AG -20.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project would incorporate a
combination of best management practices (BMPs) for erosion control, sediment
control, wind erosion, tracking control, storm water and non -storm water
management, and waste management/pollution control (Green and Sustainable
Implement low- impact development (LID) practices that
Program; 2.3.6 -a). The larger streets and arterials throughout the Project site
maintain the existing hydrologic character of the site to manage
would be designed with "green street" and other Low Impact Development (LID)
AG -22
storm water and protect the environment. (Retaining storm
features, such as bioswales and bio- cells. Green streets are carefully designed
water runoff on -site can drastically reduce the need for energy-
roadways that incorporate sustainable design elements that may include narrower
intensive imported water at the site.)
pavement widths, canopy street trees, traffic - calming features, and alternative
lighting systems. In addition, landscaping along the street edges and within the
medians would provide opportunities for treatment of storm water runoff from the
streets and adjacent development areas where feasible (Green and Sustainable
Program; 2.3.3 -a, 3.4.1 -a).
Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy
The Project is consistent with this measure. See measures above.
AG -23
appropriate for the project and location. The strategy may
include many of the specific items listed above, plus other
innovative measures that are appropriate to the specific project.
AG -24
Provide education about water conservation and available
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -1 expands upon the
programs and incentives.
homeowner education program to include water conservation.
R:\ Projects \Newportl015 \!Draft EIR\4.11 GHG -090211.d.c 4.11 -36 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9 (Continued)
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
I Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measurese
Solid Waste Measures
The Project is consistent with this measure. Construction waste diversion would
Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste
be increased by 50 percent from 2010 requirements (PDF 4.11 -5b). To the extent
AG -25
(including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber,
practical, during the oilfield clean -up and remediation process, the Applicant would
metal, and cardboard).
be required to recycle and reuse materials on site to minimize off -site hauling and
disposal of materials and associated off -site traffic (PDF 4.11 -5c).
Provide interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -4 provides for recycling
AG -26
green waste and adequate recycling containers located in
facilities in multi - family buildings, commercial areas, parks, and public spaces.
public areas.
AG -27
Recover by- product methane to generate electricity.
Not applicable.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The future homeowners associations
AG 26
Provide education and publicity about reducing waste and
for Newport Banning Ranch would be required to provide educational information
available recycling services.
on recycling to all homeowners prior to individual purchase of property and again
annually (PDF 4.11 -4f).
Land Use Measures
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project site is an infll location that
would include the following mix of uses: up to 1,375 du, 75,000 sf of commercial
Include mixed -use, infill, and higher density in development
uses, and a 75 -room resort inn. Approximately 51.4 gross (42.1 net) acres are
projects to support the reduction of vehicle trips, promote
proposed for active and passive park uses. The Urban Colony area would have
AG -29
alternatives individual vehicle travel, and promote efficient
density exceeding 30 dwelling units /acre. In order to reduce vehicle trips and
delivery of services and goods.
vehicle miles traveled, the Project proposes commercial uses in the Mixed -
Use /Residential and Visitor- Serving Resort/Residential Land Use Districts within
walking distance of the proposed residential neighborhoods and nearby residential
areas (PDF 4.10 -1).
The Project is consistent with this measure. This EIR analyzes the Project and the
AG -30
Educate the public about the benefits of well- designed, higher
potential environmental effects associated with Project implementation. The
density development.
"benefits of well- designed, higher density development" can be addressed by the
City and the Applicant during the City's public hearing process.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project would coordinate with the
AG -31
Incorporate public transit into project design.
Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to provide a transit routing
through the community, and would provide bus stops and /or shelters as needed in
the community to accommodate the bus routing. (PDF 4.11 -3.)
R:\ Projects \Newportl015 \!Draft EIR\4.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -37 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9 (Continued)
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measuresa
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project would preserve and
enhance approximately 236 acres of open space and provide approximately 51.4
Preserve and create open space and parks. Preserve existing
gross (42.1 net) acres for public parks. Community landscaping improvements for
AG -32
trees, and plant replacement trees at a set ratio.
streets, parks, common areas, open space areas, and habitat areas would be
enhanced, restored, and improved to increase the biomass of the Project site,
providing for on -site carbon sequestration. This would be a beneficial impact for
GHG emissions.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project would allow for the
cleanup, remediation, and consolidation of an industrial site ( "brownfield "). The
AG -33
Develop "brownfields" and other underused or defunct
Project would allow for ongoing oil operations while providing for the reuse of the
properties near existing public transportation and jobs.
property with urban land uses and recreational opportunities. The infill location
places the site adjacent to existing residential and commercial areas and public
transportation.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project would include commercial
uses within walking distance of the proposed residential neighborhoods and
nearby residential areas to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (PDF
Include pedestrian and bicycle -only streets and plazas within
4.10 -1). The Project would provide public pedestrian and bicycle trails connecting
developments. Create travel routes that ensure that
residential areas and visitor - serving areas to parks, commercial uses, and open
AG -34
destinations may be reached conveniently by public
space within the Project site and to recreational amenities including the beach and
transportation, bicycling or walking.
regional bike trails (PDF 4.10 -2). A pedestrian and bicycle bridge is proposed
spanning West Coast Highway to encourage walking and bicycling to and from the
beach (PDF 4.8 -3). The Project would coordinate with the OCTA to provide a
transit routing through the community, and bus stops and /or shelters as needed in
the community to accommodate the bus routing (PDF 4.11 -3).
Transportation and Motor Vehicles
AG -35
Limit idling time for commercial vehicles, including delivery and
The Project is consistent with this measure. Vehicle idling time limits would
construction vehicles.
conform to State requirements.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project would use clean- burning
Use low or zero - emission vehicles, including construction
fuel, bio- diesel fuel, and /or other alternative fuels for heavy construction
'business
AG -36
vehicles.
equipment to reduce construction emissions by 25% over 2010 as
usual" construction equipment emissions (PDF 4.11 -5). The Project would not
have an operational vehicle fleet.
Promote ride sharing programs e.g., by designating a certain
Not applicable; this measure is applicable to large commercial, institutional, or
percentage of parking spaces for ride sharing vehicles,
industrial projects with a substantial commuting population.
AG -37
designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and
waiting areas for ride sharing vehicles, and providing a web site
or message board for coordinating rides.
R: \Projects \NewportW015 \!Draft E!R\4.11 GHG -090211.d.c 4.11 -38 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9 (Continued)
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measures'
Create car sharing programs. Accommodations for such
Not applicable; this measure is applicable to large commercial, institutional, or
AG -38
programs include providing parking spaces for the car share
industrial projects with a substantial commuting population.
vehicles at convenient locations accessible by public
transportation.
Create local "light vehicle" networks, such as neighborhood
A light vehicle network is not necessary because of the infill nature of the
AG -39
electric vehicle (NEV) systems.
development and the proposed pedestrian and bicycle trails described in PDF
4.10 -2.
Provide the necessary facilities and infrastructure to encourage
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -5 would require the
the use of low or zero - emission vehicles (e.g., electric vehicle
installation of electric vehicle charging facilities in multi - family buildings and the
AG -40
charging facilities and conveniently located alternative fueling
resort inn unless the necessary technology and equipment is not available. The
stations.
development of a common fueling station for alternative fuels is not appropriate for
the location and character of the development.
AG -41
Increase the cost of driving and parking private vehicles by,
Not applicable; this measure is applicable to large commercial, institutional, or
e.g., imposing tolls and parking fees.
industrial projects with a substantial commuting population.
AG -42
Institute a low- carbon fuel vehicle incentive program.
Not applicable; this measure is applicable to local, regional, or State agencies.
AG -43
Build or fund a transportation center where various public
Not applicable; this measure is applicable to local, regional, or State agencies.
transportation modes intersect.
A shuttle service is not necessary because of the compact nature of the
development and the proposed pedestrian and bicycle trails described in PDF
AG -44
Provide shuttle service to public transit.
4.10 -2 and the proximity to transit facilities. However, the Project would be
coordinated with OCTA to allow for a transit routing through the community, and
provide bus stops and /or shelters as needed in the community to accommodate
the bus routing needed by the OCTA (PDF 4.11 -3).
This measure is applicable to large commercial, institutional, or industrial projects
AG -45
Provide public transit incentives such as free or low -cost
or suburban residential developments with a substantial commuting population.
monthly transit passes.
The proposed Project's convenient access to public transit makes incentives
unnecessary.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project proposes commercial
uses within walking distance of proposed residential neighborhoods and nearby
residential areas to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled (PDF 4.10 -1).
Promote "least polluting' ways to connect people and goods to
The Project proposes public pedestrian and bicycle trails connecting residential
AG -46
their destinations.
areas and visitor- serving areas to parks, commercial uses, and open space within
the Project site and to recreational amenities including the beach and regional
bike trails (PDF 4.10 -2). A pedestrian and bicycle bridge is proposed over West
Coast Highway to encourage walking and bicycling to and from the beach
(PDF 4.8 -3).
R:\ Projects \Newportl015\!nraff EIR\4.11 GHG -090211.d.c 4.11 -39 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report
Section 4.11
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
TABLE 4.11 -9 (Continued)
APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY GENERAL'S RECOMMENDED
GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION MEASURES TO THE NEWPORT BANNING RANCH PROJECT
ID
Suggested Mitigation Measures
Newport Banning Ranch Project Consistency with Measures'
AG-47
Incorporate bicycle lanes and routes into street systems, new
The Project is consistent with this measure. Public pedestrian and bicycle trails
subdivisions, and large developments.
are proposed to reduce automobile dependency (see PDF 4.10 -2).
The Project is consistent with this measure. Streets and intersections would be
AG -48
Incorporate bicycle - friendly intersections into street design.
designed to create a safe, pleasant pedestrian experience that encourages
walking and bicycling in place of automobile use (Green and Sustainable
Program; 5.1.1 -a).
For commercial projects, provide adequate bicycle parking near
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -6 requires secure bicycle
building entrances to promote cyclist safety, security, and
parking.
AG -49
convenience. For large employers, provide facilities that
encourage bicycle commuting, including, e.g., locked bicycle
storage or covered or indoor bicycle parking.
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Project proposes public
pedestrian and bicycle trails connecting residential areas and visitor - serving areas
AG -50
Create bicycle lanes and walking paths directed to the location
to parks, commercial uses, and open space within the Project site and to
of schools, parks and other destination points.
recreational amenities including the beach and regional bike trails (PDF 4.10 -2). A
pedestrian and bicycle bridge is proposed over West Coast Highway to encourage
walking and bicycling to and from the beach (PDF 4.8 -3).
Work with the school district to restore or expand school bus
The Project is consistent with this measure. The Newport-Mesa Unified School
AG -51
District offers home -to- school bus transportation. Free or reduced bus passes are
services.
available for qualifying low- income families.
Institute a telecommute and /or flexible work hours program.
The Project is consistent with this measure. Fiber -optic lines (FIGS), including
AG -52
Provide information, training, and incentives to encourage
wireless technology, or similar technology available at the time of construction
participation. Provide incentives for equipment purchases to
would be installed to all homes to provide opportunities for telecommuting and
allow high - quality teleconferences.
other communications technology (Green and Sustainable Program; 5.1.3 -a).
Provide information on all options for individuals and
The Project is consistent with this measure. MM 4.11 -1 expands the homeowner
AG -53
businesses to reduce transportation - related emissions. Provide
education program to include mobile source emission reduction techniques.
education and information about public transportation.
a SCs and PDFs are in Section 4.11 -5.
R:\ Projects \Newportl015 \!Draft EIR\4.11 GHG -090211.doc 4.11 -40 Newport Banning Ranch
Draft Environmental Impact Report