HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - Banning Ranch Staff ReportCITT • - --
NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Staff Report t
July 231,
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Community Development Department
Brenda Wisneski, AICP. Deputy Director
949 -644 -3297. bwisneski(o)newoortbeachca.gov
PREPARED BY: Patrick J. Alford, Planning Manager
APPROVED: (� --
TITLE: Newport Banning Ranch - A proposed 401 -acre planned community
generally located north of West Coast Highway, south of 19th
Street, and east of the Santa Ana River (PA2008 -114)
ABSTRACT:
City Council consideration is requested on an application filed by Newport Banning Ranch, LLC,
seeking approval of a Development Agreement; General Plan Amendment to the Circulation
Element; Code Amendment; a Pre- annexation Zone Change; Planned Community
Development Plan; Master Development Plan; Tentative Tract Map; Affordable Housing
Implementation Plan; and Traffic Phasing Ordinance Traffic Study for a proposed planned
community on a 401.1 gross -acre project site for development of 1,375 residential dwelling
units, a 75 -room resort inn and ancillary resort uses, 75,000 square feet of commercial uses,
approximately 51.4 gross acres of parklands, and approximately 252.3 gross acres of
permanent open space.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Conduct public hearing; and
2) Adopt Resolution No. 2012 -58 (Attachment CC 1) certifying Environmental Impact
Report No. ER2009 -002 (S(:H No. 2009031061) and adopting Findings and Facts in
Support of Findings; and
3) Adopt Resolution No. 2012- 59 (Attachment CC 2) approving General Plan Amendment
No. GP2008 -008 and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and
4) Introduce Ordinance No. 2012 -16 (Attachment No. CC 3) approving Code Amendment
No. CA2008 -004 and Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PC2008-
002 and pass to second reading for adoption on August 14, 2012; and
Rd
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 2
5) Adopt Resolution No. 2012- 60 (Attachment CC 4) approving Master Development Plan
No. MP2008 -001, Tentative Tract Map No. NT2008 -003, Affordable Housing
Implementation Plan No. AH2O08 -001, Traffic Study No. TS2008 -002, and the Newport
Banning Ranch Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and
6) Introduce Ordinance No. 2012- 17 (Attachment No. CC 5) approving Development
Agreement No.2008 -003 and pass.to second reading for adoption on August 14, 2012.
VICINITY MAP
Atlanta Avenue
g e N615on Street
o y
a
q D
N z
m P J* urcrona street
m �
HamOlon Avenue 1
city of City of
Huntington Beach �, Z _ _ _ 7 Costa Mesa
D r gXc;ry Of.
f t
m $N
I ewp9'f
r C a Butch .
t
Banning Avenue �r q - -- — � te(n Shea!
c
3¢ tarn S
" o ( e
b CounCounty o! `� s .2 heet
`c
7 9°� Orange
•� •CFQ � s
\ 171h Street
NEKPORTB4NNAvGI
\ RANCH
.__ .... ___, 161h Street ^Q.w
City of Maducrien , \•
Newport �.` Place Q,xP \
ell •t Beach I `� 151h Street ' 1 •�
C
°e I
sly9iiy� Ciry of
Newport
Beach
O C E A A" e1ven Bay
1e�
g �
°m
6
2
ON -SITE
NORTH
SOUTH
EAST
WEST
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 3
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN II EXISTING ZONING
q,
\Q2 ..
Eel :I �1:1[L1q, +_1:1
Open Space /Residential
Village (OS (RV))
Multi -unit Residential
(RM), Parks and
Recreation (PR); Costa
Mesa General Plan
Public /Institutional
Single -Unit Residential
Detached (RS -D)
Parks and Recreation
(PR), Multi -Unit
Residential (RM),
General Industrial (IG),
Private Institutions (PI),
and Public Facilities (PF);
Costa Mesa General Plan
Light Industry and
Medium Density
Residential
Open Space (OS) and
Single -Unit Residential
Detached (RS -D)
Planned Community (PC-
25); County Zoning
Suburban Multi- family
Residential (R -4), Local
Business Commercial (C-
1), Light Industrial (M -1)
with Oil Production (0),
Sign Restriction (SR),
and Floodplain Zone (FP-
Planned Community (PC-
16), Costa Mesa Zoning
Institutional and
Recreational
Single -Unit Residential
(R -1)
Parks and Recreation
(PR), Planned
Community (PC -14),
Multi -Unit Residential
(RM), Industrial (IG),
Private Institutions (PI)
Public Facilities (PF);
Costa Mesa Zoning
General Industrial and
Multiple Family
Open Space (OS) and
Single -Unit Residential
(R -1)
Open space, oil production
Open space, multi -unit
residential
Single -unit residential detached
Single -unit detached residential,
light industrial, educational
facilities, multi -unit residential
and vacant
Open space and single -unit
residential detached
S
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 4
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
There is no budgetary impact related to this item. However, approval would lead to the future
payment of a public benefit fee in the amount of $30,909 per residential dwelling unit
developed (see Development Agreement section of this report for additional details). Also, a
fiscal impact analysis concluded that based on the revenue and cost projections, the
proposed project would have a net fiscal benefit of nearly $2.0 million per year at full build -out
(see Fiscal Impact section of this report for additional details).
DISCUSSION:
Project Setting
The project site consists of approximately 401.1 acres. Approximately 40 acres are located
within the incorporated boundary of the City and the remainder is located within
unincorporated Orange County, in the City's adopted Sphere of Influence, as approved by the
Local Agency Formation Commission of Orange County (LAFCO). The project site is
currently a producing oilfield with approximately 489 oil well sites and buildings and oil facility
infrastructure, including oil processing facilities, pipelines, storage tanks, utility poles, and
machinery.
Project Description
The project is a proposed planned community to include 1,375 residential dwelling units, a 75-
room resort inn and ancillary resort uses, 75,000 square feet of commercial uses, approximately
51.4 gross acres of parklands, and approximately 252.3 gross acres of permanent open space.
Background
General Plan Basis for the Project
The General Plan was adopted by the City Council on July 25, 2006, and the land use plan
was approved by the voters on November 6, 2006. Land Use Element Policy LU 6.3.1
establishes the primary use of the Banning Ranch property as open space, including
significant active community parklands that serve adjoining residential neighborhoods, if the
site is acquired through public funding. Policy LU 6.3.2 calls for the City to "support active
pursuit of the acquisition of Banning Ranch as permanent open space."
Policy LU 6.4.1 states that if the Banning Ranch property is not acquired for open space
within a time period and pursuant to terms agreed to by the City and property owner, the site
may be developed as a residential village. Policy LU 6.4.1 also provides that the property
owner may pursue entitlement and permits for a residential village during the time allowed for
acquisition as open space.
On January 12, 2008, the City Council adopted as a priority to `conduct an appraisal of the
Banning Ranch property and assess funding available for the purchase of the property for
open space." On February 12, 2008, the Banning Ranch Appraisal and Acquisition Ad Hoc
Committee was appointed. On December 23, 2008, an appraisal report was completed that
4
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 5
estimated the acquisition costs for the property to be between $138,000,000 and
$158,000,000. The report also concluded that State or private funding was unlikely at that
time; although, some funding from Measure M may be possible.
On January 27, 2009, the Council authorized the City to request Measure M funding and the
request was submitted to the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) on April 15,
2009. On June 15, 2009, OCTA responded that a "prioritization process" was under
preparation.
On August 11, 2009, the Council acted to continue the exploration of open space acquisition
possibilities and monitor funding opportunities. The Council also directed staff to move
forward with review of the Newport Banning Ranch application.
On March 30, 2010, OCTA Environmental Oversight Committee removed Banning Ranch
from list of potential acquisitions for the first round of funding.
Environmental Review
On March 16, 2009, the Notice of Preparation ( "NOP ") of the environmental impact report (EIR)
was mailed to public agencies, organizations and persons likely to be interested in the potential
impacts of the project.
On April 2, 2009, the City held two public scoping meetings, one for government agencies and
one for the general public, to present the project and to solicit input from interested individuals
regarding environmental issues that should be addressed in the EIR.
On September 9, 2011, the Draft EIR was circulated for public and agency review and
comments. The 60 -day public review and comment period closed on November 8, 2011.
On September 19, 2011 and October 17, 2011, the Environmental Quality Affairs Committee of
the City of Newport Beach held meetings to review and comment on the Draft EIR.
Planning Commission Review
On November 3, 2011, the Planning Commission of the City of Newport Beach held a study
session on the Draft EIR process.
The Planning Commission conducted a total of four study sessions on the environmental
impact report (EIR) and the project between January 19, 2012 and March 8, 2012:
• 01/19/12 Subdivision Design & Circulation
• 02/09/12 Open Space, Parks, & Trails
• 02/23/12 Land Use, Development Regulations & Architectural Guidelines
• 03/08/12 Draft Environmental Impact Report
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, devoted to the EIR on March 22, 2012
and public hearings on the project on April 19, 2012 and June 21, 2012. The Planning
0
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 6
Commission voted (6 -0) to recommend that the City Council certify the Final EIR and approve
the project with a Statement of Overriding Considerations.
Analysis
This report will provide an analysis of the Final EIR and the various components of the project
and will focus of the issues raised and addressed during the Planning Commission study
sessions and public hearings.
Final Environmental Impact Report
As the lead agency, the City is required to review and consider the Final EIR prior to any
decision to approve, revise, or deny the proposed project. The EIR provides an impact
analysis for those environmental impact categories where it was determined that the
proposed project could result in "potentially significant impacts." Most of the potentially
significant environmental impacts were determined to have either "no impact' or "No
Significant Impact' through the implementation of the Mitigation Program comprised of
Project Design Features (PDFs), Standard Conditions (SCs), and Mitigation Measures
(MMs). However, the impact analysis did identify significant and unavoidable impacts;
impacts that remain significant after including all feasible mitigation measures are considered:
• Land Use and Related Planning Programs. There would be land use incompatibility
with respect to long -term noise and night illumination predominately from North
Community Park on those Newport Crest residences immediately contiguous to the
project site.
• Aesthetic and Visual Resources. The proposed project would introduce nighttime
lighting into a currently unlit area.
• Transportation and Traffic. The proposed project would have impacts on intersections
in the City of Costa Mesa.
• Air Quality. Without mitigation, regional (mass) emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOx)
are forecasted to exceed applicable thresholds in some construction years. Long -term
operational emissions of criteria pollutants would not exceed the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) mass emissions thresholds from initial
occupancy through 2020. However, as project development continues beyond 2020,
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and carbon monoxide (CO) would
exceed the significance thresholds, principally due to vehicle operations. Therefore,
the impacts remain significant and unavoidable.
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions. The proposed project would emit quantities of green
house gases (GHGs) that would exceed the City's 6,000 million metric tons of carbon
dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year significance threshold. The proposed project
would make a cumulatively considerable contribution to the global GHG inventory
affecting global climate change.
0
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 7
• Noise. The increased traffic volumes on 17th Street west of Monrovia Avenue in
Costa Mesa would expose sensitive receptors (i.e., residential dwellings, hotels,
hospitals, day care centers, and educational facilities) to noise levels that would
exceed City of Costa Mesa significance thresholds.
Because the Final EIR identified significant environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to
a less than significant level through the adoption of mitigation measures or project
alternatives, the Council will need to decide if there are overriding considerations, including
project benefits, that outweigh the unavoidable impacts and adopt a Statement of Overriding
Considerations stating the reasons that support this action. The proposed Statement of
Overriding Considerations is discussed later in this report.
The Commission received a considerable amount of oral and written public testimony on the
adequacy of the EIR. Although not required by law to respond to comments received after
the public review period, responses to environmental issues raised in written comments and
public hearing testimony have been provided as Attachment CC 7. The thoroughness of the
responses will also ensure the public record is complete and assist the Council in evaluating
the multiple issues claimed.
Following receipt of all written and verbal testimony, the Commission concluded that no new
information was presented that changed the original conclusions of the EIR and determined
that the CEQA threshold for the need to re- circulate the EIR had not been met.
General Plan Amendment
An amendment to the Circulation Element of the General Plan is required as a part of the
proposed project to delete the segment of 15th Street west of Bluff Road, which would
provide a second arterial through the project site connecting to West Coast Highway. This
amendment would involve revising Figure CE1 (The Master Plan of Streets and Highways)
and Figure CE3 (Recommended Intersection Improvements) to remove depictions of this
roadway segment.
The Final EIR traffic analysis indicates that a second roadway connection through the project
site, as shown on the City's Circulation Element, is not needed to accommodate the projected
traffic demand accessing West Coast Highway. Furthermore, the development of the second
roadway connection to West Coast Highway would likely result in significant impacts to the
landform and biological resources, located on the Southern Bluffs. Elimination of this
roadway segment would be consistent with the landform and biological resource protection
policies of the General Plan.
Circulation Element CE Policy 3.1.3 requires that the City's Master Plan of Streets and
Highways to be consistent with the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH).
An amendment to the Orange County MPAH is proposed to ensure consistency between the
two plans.
PEI
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 8
Code Amendment and Planned Community Development Plan
The proposed code amendment would rezone the portion of the project site currently within
the incorporated boundary of the City from Planned Community (PC -25) to Planned
Community (PC -57) and prezone those portions of the project site located within the City's
Sphere of Influence from County zoning to PC -57. The Planned Community Development
Plan would establish the allowable land uses, general development regulations, and
implementation and administrative procedures, which would serve as zoning for the project
site.
The proposed Newport Banning Ranch Planned Development Plan (NBR -PC) will serve as
the zoning for PC -57. The NBR -PC (Exhibit A of Attachment CC 3) would establish the
allowable land uses, general development regulations, and implementation and
administrative procedures.
Discussion at the Planning Commission regarding the NBR -PC focused on clarifying the
proposed land use regulations, particularly those relating to bars, Resort Inn accessory uses,
and oil facility consolidation. The Commission also tightened provisions relating to the
transfer of residential units between land use districts.
The Commission also concluded that the 5 -acre South Community Park was not suitable as a
public park due to its location, sensitive habitat, topography, and lot configuration. The
Commission recommended that it not be dedicated to the City as part of the Community
Park.
The Commission also recommended establishing a time period to develop the Resort Inn that
would have to elapse before residential units could be proposed on the Resort Inn site. The
Commission included a provision in the NBR -PC requiring that no Site Development Review
be submitted for a residential development on Lot 228 in the Resort Colony earlier than three
years from the effective date the Development Agreement.
Master Development Plan
The proposed Master Development Plan (NBR -MDP) provides plans and preliminary layouts
for streets and lots, pedestrian and vehicular access ways, open space, parks, and other site
features proposed for the project site. The NBR -MDP (Exhibit D of Attachment CC 4)
includes detailed design criteria for each land use component to guide the review of
subsequent development approvals, such as architectural guidelines and plans for
landscaping, landform alteration, trails, roadways and infrastructure, and water management.
The Commission recommended that the NBR -MDP allow for a potential trail connecting the
Newport Crest Community with the project's park and trail system. A conceptual plan was
prepared showing this connection in the form of a path that would begin at the terminus of
Ticonderoga Street, pass through Central Community Park, and connect with the trail system
at Bluff Road. The Commission included this plan in the NBR -MDP with a statement that the
connection would require the approval of the Newport Crest Homeowner's Association.
N
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 9
Tentative Tract Map
The proposed Tentative Tract Map (Exhibit E of Attachment CC 4) is the implementing
subdivision map for the project. The Tentative Tract Map describes the subdivision of the
project site into lots for public dedication or conveyance, fee and condominium lots for
residential development and conveyance to home - buyers, and /or for financing and
conveyance to builders which may also be further subdivided for the development of
conventional fee lots, planned developments, and /or condominiums. The Tentative Tract Map
also describes the plan for grading and bluff restoration, roadways, infrastructure, and other
public improvements to serve the subdivision.
The Commission discussion of the Tentative Tract Map focused on the conditions of approval
relating to the timing of public improvements. The Commission wanted to make sure that the
system of roads, parks, and trails would be properly timed with each phase of the
development.
TPO Traffic Study
The Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) requires that a traffic study be prepared and findings be
made prior to issuance of building permits if a proposed project will generate in excess of 300
average daily trips (ADT). The TPO traffic study found that one intersection in the City and
eight intersections in the City of Costa Mesa would exceed the Level of Service (LOS) "D"
standard. The traffic study also identified improvements that would mitigate the impacts to
these intersections.
Affordable Housing Implementation Plan
The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires residential subdivision projects with 51 or more
units to prepare an Affordable Housing Implementation Plan (AHIP). An AHIP specifies how
the development would meet the City's affordable housing goal of an average of 15 percent
of all new housing units developed over the five -year Housing Element planning period be
affordable to very low, low, or moderate income households.
The Newport Banning Ranch AHIP (Exhibit G of Attachment CC 4) proposes the construction
of a minimum of 50 percent of the required affordable housing on the project site. The
remaining affordable housing obligation would be met through the payment of in -lieu fees; the
construction of off -site affordable housing including the rehabilitation of existing off -site
housing that would contribute to meeting the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA) requirements; land dedication; or a combination thereof.
The Commission expressed concern that an AHIP provision that requires the applicant to
post a bond as security for the provision of the required affordable housing amounted to a de
facto in -lieu fee that could be paid to avoid the project's affordable housing obligation.
Therefore, the Commission recommended that the security bond provision be removed from
the AHIP.
I
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 10
Development Agreement
A development agreement is required because the proposed project requires a Zoning Code
amendment that includes the development of more than fifty (50) residential units. The
proposed development agreement (Exhibit A of Attachment CC 5) between the applicant and
the City describes the development rights and public benefits to be provided by the applicant.
The agreement would vest the proposed project's development approvals to allow build -out
of the project site under the development standards and requirements in place at the time of
project approval. The term of the agreement would be 25 years.
The agreement includes two key public benefits. The first is payment of a public benefit fee
in the amount of $30,909 per residential dwelling unit developed on site as part of the
proposed project. The second public benefit is the dedication and full- improvement of the
North Community Park and the Central Community Park. These parks total 18 net acres,
which is in excess of the Quimby Act requirement.
The agreement also contains provisions regarding construction of North Bluff Road between
17th Street and 19th Street. The applicant would offer to dedicate the right -of -way for that
segment with first final tract map(s) for that area of the project and deliver it to the City in a
rough - graded condition prior to the issuance of the 800th residential dwelling certificate of
occupancy. Furthermore, the improvements for that segment would be constructed with the
final phase of the project, which the City may choose to construct or have them constructed
by the applicant. Should the City choose to construct that segment, the applicant would be
required to pay a fair share traffic fee based on the estimated cost of the work.
Statement of Overriding Considerations
The Commission considered the public benefits of the project and recommended that the
Council adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations. These public benefits are
summarized below and described in detail in the Statement of Overriding Considerations
(Exhibit A of Attachment CC 2):
• Open Space. The long -term protection of over 50 percent of the project site as natural
open space and habitat consistent with the City's General Plan.
• New Public and Coastal access. A site, privately -owned and closed to public use
currently, will provide new public and coastal access through new roadways, open
space and trails, public parkland, and 475 new public parking spaces in the coastal
zone.
• Comprehensive Oilfield Abandonment. The comprehensive oilfield abandonment and
remediation of the site would be conducted at no cost to the public and would allow for
habitat restoration activities.
• Area -wide Water Quality Benefits. The project includes water quality basins that are
proposed to be sized to treat off -site urban run -on from areas of the cities of Costa
Mesa and Newport Beach developed with commercial, industrial, and residential uses.
10
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 11
• Public Benefit Fee. In addition to any other fee or charge to which the project would
be required to pay, the project would pay to the City a public benefit fee of
approximately $30,909 for each residential unit constructed on the property.
• Net Positive Fiscal Impact. It is estimated that the project would have a net fiscal
benefit of nearly $2 million per year if all of the proposed land uses are fully developed.
• Housing. The project would provide a variety of housing opportunities within the City
consistent with the City's General Plan.
• Fire Station Improvements. The project would contribute up to $700,000 towards the
redevelopment of Newport Beach Fire Station No. 2.
• Sustainable Design. The project is designed to be a sustainable and green community
that provides energy efficiency and resource conservation to reduce the project's
greenhouse gas emissions.
• Circulation Improvements. The project, through an agreement with the City of Costa
Mesa, will fund intersection improvements for intersections in that City. Although
outside of the City of Newport Beach, these traffic improvements will provide benefits
to City of Newport Beach residents who use these streets.
Fiscal Impacts
Pursuant to City Council Policy D -2, a fiscal impact analysis (Attachment CC 6) of the
proposed annexation on City finances and related City services and facilities was prepared.
The fiscal analysis uses the Newport Beach Fiscal Impact Model to help calculate revenue
and cost impacts of the proposed project. The fiscal impact model calculates public service
impacts for specific land uses that support the residential population, the employment base
and the visitor population in the City. It also calculates the public revenues that each type of
land use typically generates for the City, including property taxes, sales taxes and other taxes
as well as a variety of user charges and fees.
The fiscal impact analysis concludes that based on the revenue and cost projections, the
proposed project would have a net fiscal benefit of nearly $2.0 million per year at full build -
out. Although, the City would have a somewhat lower benefit overall due to increased
maintenance costs for the community park and for Bluff Road. Thus, the regular tax and fee
income generated by the project for the City would be sufficient to cover the operations and
maintenance costs associated with providing the full range of City services to the project.
The Commission questioned the likelihood that the Resort Inn and the entire 75,000 square
feet of commercial uses would be developed. However, the model used in the analysis
indicates that even if no lodging, retail commercial, or service commercial uses were
developed, the project would still have a net fiscal benefit of nearly $1.4 million.
11
Newport Banning Ranch
Page 12
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) SCH No. 2009031061 was prepared to evaluate the
environmental impacts resulting from the proposed project. The Final EIR has been prepared in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA), as amended (Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.), and the State CEQA Guidelines for Implementation of
CEQA (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.), and City Council Policy
K -3.
NOTICING:
Notice of this hearing was published in the Daily Pilot, mailed to property owners within 1000
feet of the property (300 feet is required by the Zoning Code) and posted at the site a
minimum of 10 days in advance of the hearing consistent with the Municipal Code.
Additionally, the item appeared upon the agenda for this meeting, which was posted at City
Hall and on the City website.
Submitted by:
, Deputy Director
Attachments: CC 1
Resolution for certification of the Final EIR
Exhibits A -1 to A -6 - Final EIR (under separate cover)
Exhibit B - Findings and Facts in Support of Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations.
CC 2
Resolution for the approval of the General Plan Amendment
CC 3
Ordinance approving the Code Amendment and Planned Community
Development Plan
Exhibit A— Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Development
Plan (under separate cover) and Revisions and Errata
Exhibit B — Amended Zoning Map
Exhibit C — Legal Description
CC 4
Resolution approving the Master Development Plan, Tentative Tract Map,
Affordable Housing Implementation Plan, and Traffic Study
Exhibit A — Tentative Tract Map Findings
Exhibit B — Traffic Study Findings
Exhibit C — Affordable Housing Implementation Plan Findings
Exhibit D - Newport Banning Ranch Master Development Plan (under
separate cover) and Revisions and Errata
Exhibit E — Tentative Tract Map
Exhibit F — Tentative Tract Map Conditions of Approval
Exhibit G — Affordable Housing Implementation Plan
CC 5
Ordinance approving the Development Agreement
Exhibit A — Development Agreement
CC 6
Fiscal Impact Analysis
CC 7
Responses to Public Comments Received After EIR Comment Period
CC 8
Correspondence received as of July 17, 2012
12